<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_1334238</id>
	<title>How Comic Fans & Shops Are Stereotyped</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1243521780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:simon\_brew@dennis.co.uk" rel="nofollow">brumgrunt</a> writes <i>"Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes, and Everybody Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores? Den of Geek has  <a href="http://denofgeek.com/television/258102/8\_ways\_that\_comic\_book\_fans\_and\_shops\_are\_stereotyped\_in\_tv\_shows.html">pulled together eight examples</a>, with video evidence to back them up ..."</i>  Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle.  Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced, which I hope you all have seen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>brumgrunt writes " Why do TV shows , such as 30 Rock , The Simpsons , Heroes , and Everybody Loves Raymond , persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores ?
Den of Geek has pulled together eight examples , with video evidence to back them up ... " Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle .
Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced , which I hope you all have seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brumgrunt writes "Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes, and Everybody Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores?
Den of Geek has  pulled together eight examples, with video evidence to back them up ..."  Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle.
Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced, which I hope you all have seen.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129513</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1243502520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are more hot chicks that like comics than there used to be, but any "hot chick" causes consternation for a socially awkward nerd. Your fiancee will almost certainly have an easier time finding someone who will stammer and be unable to interact with her because of her appearance in a comic book store than elsewhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are more hot chicks that like comics than there used to be , but any " hot chick " causes consternation for a socially awkward nerd .
Your fiancee will almost certainly have an easier time finding someone who will stammer and be unable to interact with her because of her appearance in a comic book store than elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are more hot chicks that like comics than there used to be, but any "hot chick" causes consternation for a socially awkward nerd.
Your fiancee will almost certainly have an easier time finding someone who will stammer and be unable to interact with her because of her appearance in a comic book store than elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130065</id>
	<title>Simpsons comic book guy</title>
	<author>Skuld-Chan</author>
	<datestamp>1243504800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the home town I grew up on - the local comic book shop had a guy just like the one from the Simpsons (was very sarcastic, and always projected a feeling of "why are you even in my store"). I suspect Matt Groening's inspiration for him wasn't necessarily based on a stereotype.</p><p>Interestingly enough the shop was gone last time I was around there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the home town I grew up on - the local comic book shop had a guy just like the one from the Simpsons ( was very sarcastic , and always projected a feeling of " why are you even in my store " ) .
I suspect Matt Groening 's inspiration for him was n't necessarily based on a stereotype.Interestingly enough the shop was gone last time I was around there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the home town I grew up on - the local comic book shop had a guy just like the one from the Simpsons (was very sarcastic, and always projected a feeling of "why are you even in my store").
I suspect Matt Groening's inspiration for him wasn't necessarily based on a stereotype.Interestingly enough the shop was gone last time I was around there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Banned? Just banned? You should have been hung, drawn and quartered. Each step lasting 100 30 minute episodes with lots of screaming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Banned ?
Just banned ?
You should have been hung , drawn and quartered .
Each step lasting 100 30 minute episodes with lots of screaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Banned?
Just banned?
You should have been hung, drawn and quartered.
Each step lasting 100 30 minute episodes with lots of screaming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125061</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Oh yeah, there's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single, right?</p></div></blockquote><p>

Well they certainly don't have hot chicks as girlfriends.  Liar.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , there 's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single , right ?
Well they certainly do n't have hot chicks as girlfriends .
Liar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, there's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single, right?
Well they certainly don't have hot chicks as girlfriends.
Liar.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124627</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243529400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love those guys. I usually leave them red faced and with a throbbing vein stinking out of their forehead.</p><p>Toss me out? oh noes! where will I get my comic books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love those guys .
I usually leave them red faced and with a throbbing vein stinking out of their forehead.Toss me out ?
oh noes !
where will I get my comic books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love those guys.
I usually leave them red faced and with a throbbing vein stinking out of their forehead.Toss me out?
oh noes!
where will I get my comic books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124163</id>
	<title>Because it's true!</title>
	<author>Amiralul</author>
	<datestamp>1243527720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I walked into to different comic book stores, in two different states while being for the first time in the US, in February. There were exactly I imagined them! Huge piles of old comics, new comics, action figures, maniacal comic books guys (the one from Colorado told me he had 500.000 comic books at his home but he was nice, giving me a free '60 Action Comics incomplete issue as a bonus plus a 20\% discount to a nice DC Comics Cover Girls huge album, since I've spent some bucks there).
So, anything I I saw in cartoons and movies about comic book guys and stores is perfectly true. I'm not being sarcastic or mean here, I like comic book shops!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I walked into to different comic book stores , in two different states while being for the first time in the US , in February .
There were exactly I imagined them !
Huge piles of old comics , new comics , action figures , maniacal comic books guys ( the one from Colorado told me he had 500.000 comic books at his home but he was nice , giving me a free '60 Action Comics incomplete issue as a bonus plus a 20 \ % discount to a nice DC Comics Cover Girls huge album , since I 've spent some bucks there ) .
So , anything I I saw in cartoons and movies about comic book guys and stores is perfectly true .
I 'm not being sarcastic or mean here , I like comic book shops !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I walked into to different comic book stores, in two different states while being for the first time in the US, in February.
There were exactly I imagined them!
Huge piles of old comics, new comics, action figures, maniacal comic books guys (the one from Colorado told me he had 500.000 comic books at his home but he was nice, giving me a free '60 Action Comics incomplete issue as a bonus plus a 20\% discount to a nice DC Comics Cover Girls huge album, since I've spent some bucks there).
So, anything I I saw in cartoons and movies about comic book guys and stores is perfectly true.
I'm not being sarcastic or mean here, I like comic book shops!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28157655</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1243779360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using a comparison operator without assigning a Boolean value to the evaluation in a declarative context is effectively a NO OP. Did you mean "=", and not "=="?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using a comparison operator without assigning a Boolean value to the evaluation in a declarative context is effectively a NO OP .
Did you mean " = " , and not " = = " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using a comparison operator without assigning a Boolean value to the evaluation in a declarative context is effectively a NO OP.
Did you mean "=", and not "=="?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128919</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take it you have a non-parented 5-year old as a test sample to prove this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take it you have a non-parented 5-year old as a test sample to prove this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take it you have a non-parented 5-year old as a test sample to prove this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123725</id>
	<title>Same reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same reason all sitcom dads are morons and their wives + wife's sister gets upset at them, it's an easy stereotype that the writers can use so they don't have to put any thought into their characters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same reason all sitcom dads are morons and their wives + wife 's sister gets upset at them , it 's an easy stereotype that the writers can use so they do n't have to put any thought into their characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same reason all sitcom dads are morons and their wives + wife's sister gets upset at them, it's an easy stereotype that the writers can use so they don't have to put any thought into their characters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123781</id>
	<title>More like sterotypical Slashdot reader...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Rob Malda, I need You. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord. Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life. Take control of the throne of my life. Make me the kind of person You want me to be."</p><p>Does this prayer express the desire of your heart? If it does, I invite you to pray this prayer right now and Christ will come into your life, as He promised. Did you pray this prayer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Rob Malda , I need You .
Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins .
I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord .
Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life .
Take control of the throne of my life .
Make me the kind of person You want me to be .
" Does this prayer express the desire of your heart ?
If it does , I invite you to pray this prayer right now and Christ will come into your life , as He promised .
Did you pray this prayer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Rob Malda, I need You.
Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins.
I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord.
Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life.
Take control of the throne of my life.
Make me the kind of person You want me to be.
"Does this prayer express the desire of your heart?
If it does, I invite you to pray this prayer right now and Christ will come into your life, as He promised.
Did you pray this prayer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28162261</id>
	<title>Movie that puts comic fans in a Good light</title>
	<author>MamaGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1243774140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You all seem to be forgetting one popular movie, Mallrats, that puts comic book fans in a very good light.  The main character is a comic fan, is very cool, and gets the girl in the end.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You all seem to be forgetting one popular movie , Mallrats , that puts comic book fans in a very good light .
The main character is a comic fan , is very cool , and gets the girl in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You all seem to be forgetting one popular movie, Mallrats, that puts comic book fans in a very good light.
The main character is a comic fan, is very cool, and gets the girl in the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125251</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>jabithew</author>
	<datestamp>1243532220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the other hand, levels in DBZ are a fantastic way to explain the concept of hyperinflation to someone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , levels in DBZ are a fantastic way to explain the concept of hyperinflation to someone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, levels in DBZ are a fantastic way to explain the concept of hyperinflation to someone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124355</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1243528440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yup, the one near me looks like the one in Heroes
<p>
I've only seen it through it's window, which needs a good cleaning, as I can't think of any reasdon why I'd ever want to go inside - unless there was a large poster offering money to the 1000th person through the door, and the counter stood at 999.
However, I digress. It did look like it was rows and rows of comics, with posters on the walls and a few spotty-faced children inside. So from that I wouldn't say it was a stereotype - I'd say it was an accurate depiction.
</p><p>
If you don't like the image they have, you're free to start one of your own in whatever style you like. Drop me an email from your yacht if it works out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , the one near me looks like the one in Heroes I 've only seen it through it 's window , which needs a good cleaning , as I ca n't think of any reasdon why I 'd ever want to go inside - unless there was a large poster offering money to the 1000th person through the door , and the counter stood at 999 .
However , I digress .
It did look like it was rows and rows of comics , with posters on the walls and a few spotty-faced children inside .
So from that I would n't say it was a stereotype - I 'd say it was an accurate depiction .
If you do n't like the image they have , you 're free to start one of your own in whatever style you like .
Drop me an email from your yacht if it works out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, the one near me looks like the one in Heroes

I've only seen it through it's window, which needs a good cleaning, as I can't think of any reasdon why I'd ever want to go inside - unless there was a large poster offering money to the 1000th person through the door, and the counter stood at 999.
However, I digress.
It did look like it was rows and rows of comics, with posters on the walls and a few spotty-faced children inside.
So from that I wouldn't say it was a stereotype - I'd say it was an accurate depiction.
If you don't like the image they have, you're free to start one of your own in whatever style you like.
Drop me an email from your yacht if it works out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126675</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>AkiraRoberts</author>
	<datestamp>1243537260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll second that low user number appreciation, and add in a touch of appreciation for the user name. You don't see enough of Jerry Cornelius these days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll second that low user number appreciation , and add in a touch of appreciation for the user name .
You do n't see enough of Jerry Cornelius these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll second that low user number appreciation, and add in a touch of appreciation for the user name.
You don't see enough of Jerry Cornelius these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127227</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>jenn\_13</author>
	<datestamp>1243538940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're doing our share, the geekling should grace us with his/her presence in about 5 1/2 months...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're doing our share , the geekling should grace us with his/her presence in about 5 1/2 months... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're doing our share, the geekling should grace us with his/her presence in about 5 1/2 months... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123875</id>
	<title>malcolm in the middle?</title>
	<author>wjh31</author>
	<datestamp>1243526580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is it just me that thought it was a shame this ended, it managed to remain funny to the end</htmltext>
<tokenext>is it just me that thought it was a shame this ended , it managed to remain funny to the end</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is it just me that thought it was a shame this ended, it managed to remain funny to the end</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125377</id>
	<title>Very simple -- it's true in a lot of cases</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1243532760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>American comic shops are fairly embarrassing places to be. I personally love the comic medium, think it's fabu, but there's a lot of crap out there. Because comics are expensive and are no longer casual purchases for kids, the publishers have to cater to the disposable income market. That's teens and young adults. Sex and violence are to entertainment what salt, sugar and fat is to food. The fanboys are the ones who want big-titted heroines in fighting crime in lingerie. They want the edgier and darker crap with violence and 'slosions.</p><p>It's like what we're seeing with the Republican party. The GOP isn't all that popular right now and so the party leaders are trying to play to their base, drum up support. But the very act of playing to that base alienates people who only have a weak inclination to the party. So you end up having loyalty tests, demanding candidates meet ridiculous standards, purges to ensure ideological purity. Specter is as loyal a Republican as you could possibly hope for and disagrees with the Dems on virtually everything. No Dem in the world would want him in the party. But one vote in favor of Obama on an economics bill and boom, he's effectively booted from the party. It was seen as a great victory.</p><p>Web comics have been fairly popular and we've seen some breakouts get picked up in the big bookstores. Manga has exploded among teen girls, a segment no American comic company would have even dreamed breaking into. Why, that's as ridiculous as girl gamers, right? No American comic book writer would want to be involved in turning out bishonen and yaoi comics but it turns out that's what the girls are into. Nobody wanted to make the Sims and it took arm-twisting to get it published and now it's the biggest girl game series ever.</p><p>Of course, the stereotypes also come from trendy writers who try to live the vapid, trendy lives of the characters they write about and hold in disdain social groups they perceive as lower on the totem pole than themselves. That's classic high school clique behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>American comic shops are fairly embarrassing places to be .
I personally love the comic medium , think it 's fabu , but there 's a lot of crap out there .
Because comics are expensive and are no longer casual purchases for kids , the publishers have to cater to the disposable income market .
That 's teens and young adults .
Sex and violence are to entertainment what salt , sugar and fat is to food .
The fanboys are the ones who want big-titted heroines in fighting crime in lingerie .
They want the edgier and darker crap with violence and 'slosions.It 's like what we 're seeing with the Republican party .
The GOP is n't all that popular right now and so the party leaders are trying to play to their base , drum up support .
But the very act of playing to that base alienates people who only have a weak inclination to the party .
So you end up having loyalty tests , demanding candidates meet ridiculous standards , purges to ensure ideological purity .
Specter is as loyal a Republican as you could possibly hope for and disagrees with the Dems on virtually everything .
No Dem in the world would want him in the party .
But one vote in favor of Obama on an economics bill and boom , he 's effectively booted from the party .
It was seen as a great victory.Web comics have been fairly popular and we 've seen some breakouts get picked up in the big bookstores .
Manga has exploded among teen girls , a segment no American comic company would have even dreamed breaking into .
Why , that 's as ridiculous as girl gamers , right ?
No American comic book writer would want to be involved in turning out bishonen and yaoi comics but it turns out that 's what the girls are into .
Nobody wanted to make the Sims and it took arm-twisting to get it published and now it 's the biggest girl game series ever.Of course , the stereotypes also come from trendy writers who try to live the vapid , trendy lives of the characters they write about and hold in disdain social groups they perceive as lower on the totem pole than themselves .
That 's classic high school clique behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>American comic shops are fairly embarrassing places to be.
I personally love the comic medium, think it's fabu, but there's a lot of crap out there.
Because comics are expensive and are no longer casual purchases for kids, the publishers have to cater to the disposable income market.
That's teens and young adults.
Sex and violence are to entertainment what salt, sugar and fat is to food.
The fanboys are the ones who want big-titted heroines in fighting crime in lingerie.
They want the edgier and darker crap with violence and 'slosions.It's like what we're seeing with the Republican party.
The GOP isn't all that popular right now and so the party leaders are trying to play to their base, drum up support.
But the very act of playing to that base alienates people who only have a weak inclination to the party.
So you end up having loyalty tests, demanding candidates meet ridiculous standards, purges to ensure ideological purity.
Specter is as loyal a Republican as you could possibly hope for and disagrees with the Dems on virtually everything.
No Dem in the world would want him in the party.
But one vote in favor of Obama on an economics bill and boom, he's effectively booted from the party.
It was seen as a great victory.Web comics have been fairly popular and we've seen some breakouts get picked up in the big bookstores.
Manga has exploded among teen girls, a segment no American comic company would have even dreamed breaking into.
Why, that's as ridiculous as girl gamers, right?
No American comic book writer would want to be involved in turning out bishonen and yaoi comics but it turns out that's what the girls are into.
Nobody wanted to make the Sims and it took arm-twisting to get it published and now it's the biggest girl game series ever.Of course, the stereotypes also come from trendy writers who try to live the vapid, trendy lives of the characters they write about and hold in disdain social groups they perceive as lower on the totem pole than themselves.
That's classic high school clique behavior.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124829</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243530360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If an attractive woman walks into a room, all the guys will take notice. Men in a comic book shops are not immune. Of coutrse thate xample complelty overlooks the fact that the comic shop owner was a pretty regular guy.</p><p>The real problem with that episode is that the COMIC SHOP GUY gets super powers and never thinks about using them, not even as a thought exercise? come on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If an attractive woman walks into a room , all the guys will take notice .
Men in a comic book shops are not immune .
Of coutrse thate xample complelty overlooks the fact that the comic shop owner was a pretty regular guy.The real problem with that episode is that the COMIC SHOP GUY gets super powers and never thinks about using them , not even as a thought exercise ?
come on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If an attractive woman walks into a room, all the guys will take notice.
Men in a comic book shops are not immune.
Of coutrse thate xample complelty overlooks the fact that the comic shop owner was a pretty regular guy.The real problem with that episode is that the COMIC SHOP GUY gets super powers and never thinks about using them, not even as a thought exercise?
come on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128613</id>
	<title>Pul-eeze</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why take this so personally? Move out of your parents' basement and get over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why take this so personally ?
Move out of your parents ' basement and get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why take this so personally?
Move out of your parents' basement and get over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123675</id>
	<title>Worst Article Ever</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1243525500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(had to be said)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( had to be said )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(had to be said)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124733</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243529940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Graphic Novels is a type of format, not a way to 'legitimize them". You know why? becasue they don't need to be legitimized.</p><p>Care to name me a reason why the comic book format can't be used to tell epic stories? Retelling of ancient morality plays?</p><p>Comic books is just a medium to tell a story. That. is. all.</p><p>Like any medium some of it is crap, some of it is excellent, and most of it is mediocre.</p><p>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Graphic Novels is a type of format , not a way to 'legitimize them " .
You know why ?
becasue they do n't need to be legitimized.Care to name me a reason why the comic book format ca n't be used to tell epic stories ?
Retelling of ancient morality plays ? Comic books is just a medium to tell a story .
That. is .
all.Like any medium some of it is crap , some of it is excellent , and most of it is mediocre. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Graphic Novels is a type of format, not a way to 'legitimize them".
You know why?
becasue they don't need to be legitimized.Care to name me a reason why the comic book format can't be used to tell epic stories?
Retelling of ancient morality plays?Comic books is just a medium to tell a story.
That. is.
all.Like any medium some of it is crap, some of it is excellent, and most of it is mediocre..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124067</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Dr\_Ken</author>
	<datestamp>1243527360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep. I work in such a place part time and your observations sum it up nicely. People see what they expect to see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
I work in such a place part time and your observations sum it up nicely .
People see what they expect to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
I work in such a place part time and your observations sum it up nicely.
People see what they expect to see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123885</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1243526580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thing is, most of the Simpsons writers <i>are</i> geeks and nerds. That's why the show's so full of pop-culture and science in-jokes. The League of Extraordinary Freelancers, for crying out loud. It's not "us versus them", it's self-denigrating humour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thing is , most of the Simpsons writers are geeks and nerds .
That 's why the show 's so full of pop-culture and science in-jokes .
The League of Extraordinary Freelancers , for crying out loud .
It 's not " us versus them " , it 's self-denigrating humour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thing is, most of the Simpsons writers are geeks and nerds.
That's why the show's so full of pop-culture and science in-jokes.
The League of Extraordinary Freelancers, for crying out loud.
It's not "us versus them", it's self-denigrating humour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134167</id>
	<title>Re:a word about stereotypes</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1243526820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow!  Frotz!  An openly racist troll, modded +5 Insightful on Slashdot!  You, sir, have my admiration.  Let <b>pak9rabid</b> be enshrined in this year's top 10 eye-popping comments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
Frotz ! An openly racist troll , modded + 5 Insightful on Slashdot !
You , sir , have my admiration .
Let pak9rabid be enshrined in this year 's top 10 eye-popping comments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
Frotz!  An openly racist troll, modded +5 Insightful on Slashdot!
You, sir, have my admiration.
Let pak9rabid be enshrined in this year's top 10 eye-popping comments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125899</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Thundarr Trollgrim</author>
	<datestamp>1243534620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, you are just plain wrong. Marriage has nothing to do with it.
<br> <br>
From the OED:
<br> <br>
6 not involved in an established romantic or sexual relationship</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , you are just plain wrong .
Marriage has nothing to do with it .
From the OED : 6 not involved in an established romantic or sexual relationship</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, you are just plain wrong.
Marriage has nothing to do with it.
From the OED:
 
6 not involved in an established romantic or sexual relationship</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124839</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243530420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are you sure?  have you checked?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are you sure ?
have you checked ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are you sure?
have you checked?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123719</id>
	<title>Oh, I dunno...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could be that it's accurate?  Comic Book Guy, for example, has been employed in at least half of the comic book shops I've ever visited.  Pus there's something to be said about "comic book store odor", and it ain't coming from the books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be that it 's accurate ?
Comic Book Guy , for example , has been employed in at least half of the comic book shops I 've ever visited .
Pus there 's something to be said about " comic book store odor " , and it ai n't coming from the books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be that it's accurate?
Comic Book Guy, for example, has been employed in at least half of the comic book shops I've ever visited.
Pus there's something to be said about "comic book store odor", and it ain't coming from the books.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243530060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</p><p>No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals, then geekery will seem normal.</p><p>c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it.No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals , then geekery will seem normal.c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals, then geekery will seem normal.c.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124881</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243530600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's human nature to want to feel better than someone else.  It's the "us versus them" mentality that pervades our culture.  Geeks/nerds versus "normal" people is only one facet of the problem.  It's seen everywhere, from Republicans versus Democrats, urban versus suburban versus rural, and black versus white.</p><p>Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</p></div><p>Apparently a <a href="http://www.thebigsort.com/home.php" title="thebigsort.com" rel="nofollow">very good book</a> [thebigsort.com] on that very subject is available, according to my stepfather. I need to read it when I get a chance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's human nature to want to feel better than someone else .
It 's the " us versus them " mentality that pervades our culture .
Geeks/nerds versus " normal " people is only one facet of the problem .
It 's seen everywhere , from Republicans versus Democrats , urban versus suburban versus rural , and black versus white.Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it.Apparently a very good book [ thebigsort.com ] on that very subject is available , according to my stepfather .
I need to read it when I get a chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's human nature to want to feel better than someone else.
It's the "us versus them" mentality that pervades our culture.
Geeks/nerds versus "normal" people is only one facet of the problem.
It's seen everywhere, from Republicans versus Democrats, urban versus suburban versus rural, and black versus white.Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.Apparently a very good book [thebigsort.com] on that very subject is available, according to my stepfather.
I need to read it when I get a chance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131091</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>zaivala</author>
	<datestamp>1243509000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wost?  What means wost?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wost ?
What means wost ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wost?
What means wost?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124651</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</i></p><p>Worst. Stereotype. Ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them , the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Worst .
Stereotype. Ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Worst.
Stereotype. Ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124169</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>colfer</author>
	<datestamp>1243527780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Correction, it's a continuing struggle. Forty-five years after Selma, the U.S. elected Obama.  It didn't happen by magic, or by some inevitable trend in human nature.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it .
Correction , it 's a continuing struggle .
Forty-five years after Selma , the U.S. elected Obama .
It did n't happen by magic , or by some inevitable trend in human nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.
Correction, it's a continuing struggle.
Forty-five years after Selma, the U.S. elected Obama.
It didn't happen by magic, or by some inevitable trend in human nature.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130999</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>meringuoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243508640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>That said, I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone.</i>

<p>At the end of the Sandman plot arc <i>A Game of You</i>, there's a scene where a woman - not just any woman, a literal Barbie - goes into a comic store. She's buying a Bizarro back-issue for a friend who recently died who'd been a huge fan. Well, 'Weirdzo', from 'Hyperman', but in this continuity Superman actually exists, so, you know... Anyway, as she lays it on the grave, she comments: "In order to buy it I had to go into this bizarre little store. I mean, I don't think they'd swept the floor in a decade, and I bet the staff <b>had</b> to have taken unhelpfulness lessons. And there was a big <b>greasy guy</b> behind the counter who seemed <b>really</b> amused that I was like, female, and asking for this comic. He said it <b>wasn't</b> very collectable. Then he said they didn't normally see breasts as <b>small</b> as mine in his store, and all these guys laughed."

</p><p>After publication of those issues, Neil Gaiman got a lot of letters from readers. Mostly male fans insisting that there exist no comics stores like that in all the world. And yet ever since, women have been asking him... "How did you know?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That said , I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT 'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone .
At the end of the Sandman plot arc A Game of You , there 's a scene where a woman - not just any woman , a literal Barbie - goes into a comic store .
She 's buying a Bizarro back-issue for a friend who recently died who 'd been a huge fan .
Well , 'Weirdzo ' , from 'Hyperman ' , but in this continuity Superman actually exists , so , you know... Anyway , as she lays it on the grave , she comments : " In order to buy it I had to go into this bizarre little store .
I mean , I do n't think they 'd swept the floor in a decade , and I bet the staff had to have taken unhelpfulness lessons .
And there was a big greasy guy behind the counter who seemed really amused that I was like , female , and asking for this comic .
He said it was n't very collectable .
Then he said they did n't normally see breasts as small as mine in his store , and all these guys laughed .
" After publication of those issues , Neil Gaiman got a lot of letters from readers .
Mostly male fans insisting that there exist no comics stores like that in all the world .
And yet ever since , women have been asking him... " How did you know ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That said, I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone.
At the end of the Sandman plot arc A Game of You, there's a scene where a woman - not just any woman, a literal Barbie - goes into a comic store.
She's buying a Bizarro back-issue for a friend who recently died who'd been a huge fan.
Well, 'Weirdzo', from 'Hyperman', but in this continuity Superman actually exists, so, you know... Anyway, as she lays it on the grave, she comments: "In order to buy it I had to go into this bizarre little store.
I mean, I don't think they'd swept the floor in a decade, and I bet the staff had to have taken unhelpfulness lessons.
And there was a big greasy guy behind the counter who seemed really amused that I was like, female, and asking for this comic.
He said it wasn't very collectable.
Then he said they didn't normally see breasts as small as mine in his store, and all these guys laughed.
"

After publication of those issues, Neil Gaiman got a lot of letters from readers.
Mostly male fans insisting that there exist no comics stores like that in all the world.
And yet ever since, women have been asking him... "How did you know?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126945</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1243538160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this the worst article ever?<br>Some of the clips were very funny indeed, making good fun of comic book stereotypes.<br>To top it off, I found a new TV show I liked.<br>Mind you, I didn't read any of the text.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this the worst article ever ? Some of the clips were very funny indeed , making good fun of comic book stereotypes.To top it off , I found a new TV show I liked.Mind you , I did n't read any of the text .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this the worst article ever?Some of the clips were very funny indeed, making good fun of comic book stereotypes.To top it off, I found a new TV show I liked.Mind you, I didn't read any of the text.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126255</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1243536000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the republicratic party is really one party with two heads, so it's more like "us vs. us".</p><p>-Viz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the republicratic party is really one party with two heads , so it 's more like " us vs. us " .-Viz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the republicratic party is really one party with two heads, so it's more like "us vs. us".-Viz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134095</id>
	<title>Re:Who isn't stereotyped</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1243526400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Because most people are simplistic, and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning.</i> <p>I'd go with an alternative conclusion: you're not nearly the clever writer you think you are, and nobody but you and your little friends intuitively grasp your little layers of meaning.  Thus, you give up because it's "too hard" and write crap instead.  Been there, done that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because most people are simplistic , and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning .
I 'd go with an alternative conclusion : you 're not nearly the clever writer you think you are , and nobody but you and your little friends intuitively grasp your little layers of meaning .
Thus , you give up because it 's " too hard " and write crap instead .
Been there , done that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because most people are simplistic, and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning.
I'd go with an alternative conclusion: you're not nearly the clever writer you think you are, and nobody but you and your little friends intuitively grasp your little layers of meaning.
Thus, you give up because it's "too hard" and write crap instead.
Been there, done that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124323</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>story645</author>
	<datestamp>1243528320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You insensitive clod!</p><p>Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous.</p></div><p>Although I agree with you 'cause the "graphic novel" label gets thrown at every comic under the sun, technically a graphic novel is a subset of all comic books; a graphic novel has the whole plot structure (rising action, climax, falling action) wrapped up in one book (or over the course of the series), whereas many other types of comics  stretch the plot out over the course of an arc, and a few collective arcs can be combined into an overarching arc, and a comic series often has many overarching arcs. Basically "graphic novels" have one big climax. A good rule of thumb is: do all the chapters/books in this series tie into one big event (usually at the end)? if yes: graphic novel</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You insensitive clod ! Seriously though , attempting to legitimize them as " Graphic Novels " is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous.Although I agree with you 'cause the " graphic novel " label gets thrown at every comic under the sun , technically a graphic novel is a subset of all comic books ; a graphic novel has the whole plot structure ( rising action , climax , falling action ) wrapped up in one book ( or over the course of the series ) , whereas many other types of comics stretch the plot out over the course of an arc , and a few collective arcs can be combined into an overarching arc , and a comic series often has many overarching arcs .
Basically " graphic novels " have one big climax .
A good rule of thumb is : do all the chapters/books in this series tie into one big event ( usually at the end ) ?
if yes : graphic novel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You insensitive clod!Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous.Although I agree with you 'cause the "graphic novel" label gets thrown at every comic under the sun, technically a graphic novel is a subset of all comic books; a graphic novel has the whole plot structure (rising action, climax, falling action) wrapped up in one book (or over the course of the series), whereas many other types of comics  stretch the plot out over the course of an arc, and a few collective arcs can be combined into an overarching arc, and a comic series often has many overarching arcs.
Basically "graphic novels" have one big climax.
A good rule of thumb is: do all the chapters/books in this series tie into one big event (usually at the end)?
if yes: graphic novel
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124241</id>
	<title>Re:The Answer</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243528020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Those are the people running a lot of stuff today."</p><p>Yeah, for some other person who was popular in School.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Those are the people running a lot of stuff today .
" Yeah , for some other person who was popular in School .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.
"Yeah, for some other person who was popular in School.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124005</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</p></div><p>Soooooo, why were YOU there?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them , the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Soooooo , why were YOU there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Soooooo, why were YOU there?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125473</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>AbyssWyrm</author>
	<datestamp>1243533120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, do you watch TV?  "Good looking women stereotyped as airheads" was in the first example in the article, and is prevalent throughout Friends.  Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash is virtually the premise of King of the Hill.

As for the rich folk, I don't think I've ever seen a rich folk <i>not</i> stereotyped that way -- for instance Lois' dad in Family Guy, Mr. Burns in The Simpsons, the villain in any Adam Sandler movie.

et cetera.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , do you watch TV ?
" Good looking women stereotyped as airheads " was in the first example in the article , and is prevalent throughout Friends .
Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash is virtually the premise of King of the Hill .
As for the rich folk , I do n't think I 've ever seen a rich folk not stereotyped that way -- for instance Lois ' dad in Family Guy , Mr. Burns in The Simpsons , the villain in any Adam Sandler movie .
et cetera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, do you watch TV?
"Good looking women stereotyped as airheads" was in the first example in the article, and is prevalent throughout Friends.
Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash is virtually the premise of King of the Hill.
As for the rich folk, I don't think I've ever seen a rich folk not stereotyped that way -- for instance Lois' dad in Family Guy, Mr. Burns in The Simpsons, the villain in any Adam Sandler movie.
et cetera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125391</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Quirkz</author>
	<datestamp>1243532820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling, bowling addicted rubes.</p></div><p>

Hey, wait a minute! *I* guzzle beer and bowl weekly! I should be working in a factory! And all this time I've been pretending to be in IT and wondering why I didn't hang out in comic book shops like my friends. Apparently my hobbies have revealed what my true career should be. Thank goodness I discovered this while I have enough working years to get a good pension. They still do those, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling , bowling addicted rubes .
Hey , wait a minute !
* I * guzzle beer and bowl weekly !
I should be working in a factory !
And all this time I 've been pretending to be in IT and wondering why I did n't hang out in comic book shops like my friends .
Apparently my hobbies have revealed what my true career should be .
Thank goodness I discovered this while I have enough working years to get a good pension .
They still do those , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling, bowling addicted rubes.
Hey, wait a minute!
*I* guzzle beer and bowl weekly!
I should be working in a factory!
And all this time I've been pretending to be in IT and wondering why I didn't hang out in comic book shops like my friends.
Apparently my hobbies have revealed what my true career should be.
Thank goodness I discovered this while I have enough working years to get a good pension.
They still do those, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124695</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243529820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>kaaaaaaaa *commercial break* aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *commercial break* aaaaaaaaaa *end of episode*</p><p>*new episode* meeeeeeeeeeeee *commercial break* [something unrelated to the fight scene] *commercial break* eeeeeeeeeeeeeee *end of episode*</p><p>*new episode* haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *commercial break* [something related to the previous unrelated thing] *commercial break aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *end of season 'cliffhanger'*</p><p>*new season* [completely different story line]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>kaaaaaaaa * commercial break * aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa * commercial break * aaaaaaaaaa * end of episode * * new episode * meeeeeeeeeeeee * commercial break * [ something unrelated to the fight scene ] * commercial break * eeeeeeeeeeeeeee * end of episode * * new episode * haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa * commercial break * [ something related to the previous unrelated thing ] * commercial break aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa * end of season 'cliffhanger ' * * new season * [ completely different story line ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kaaaaaaaa *commercial break* aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *commercial break* aaaaaaaaaa *end of episode**new episode* meeeeeeeeeeeee *commercial break* [something unrelated to the fight scene] *commercial break* eeeeeeeeeeeeeee *end of episode**new episode* haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *commercial break* [something related to the previous unrelated thing] *commercial break aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *end of season 'cliffhanger'**new season* [completely different story line]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123843</id>
	<title>How is this news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're complaining that comic book owners are being portrayed accurately.  If you want to change the stereotype...stop visiting sites named "den of geek".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're complaining that comic book owners are being portrayed accurately .
If you want to change the stereotype...stop visiting sites named " den of geek " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're complaining that comic book owners are being portrayed accurately.
If you want to change the stereotype...stop visiting sites named "den of geek".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123959</id>
	<title>Why do TV shows stereotype..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. college football players?</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. politicians?</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. managers of large companies?</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. labour unions?</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. school children?</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. everyone there isn't a particular anti-stereotype group ready to beat them up for?</p><p>Answer: Because stereotypes are funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. college football players ?
.. politicians ?
.. managers of large companies ?
.. labour unions ?
.. school children ?
.. everyone there is n't a particular anti-stereotype group ready to beat them up for ? Answer : Because stereotypes are funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. college football players?
.. politicians?
.. managers of large companies?
.. labour unions?
.. school children?
.. everyone there isn't a particular anti-stereotype group ready to beat them up for?Answer: Because stereotypes are funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126127</id>
	<title>Because it is true!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean just look at the sick fucks defending child rape, bestiality, and other disgusting acts here. Christ, the scum really does float to the surface.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean just look at the sick fucks defending child rape , bestiality , and other disgusting acts here .
Christ , the scum really does float to the surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean just look at the sick fucks defending child rape, bestiality, and other disgusting acts here.
Christ, the scum really does float to the surface.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125427</id>
	<title>The World's Most Interesting Geek</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1243532940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He once impressed a girl... just to see how it feels.<br>He was created by a makefile... that he ran himself.<br>He once wrote some buggy code... for an entomologist.<br>He can sometimes make a fool of himself... dancing.<br>He has a best friend... because he likes to be unpredictable.<br>He is the World's Most Interesting Geek.</p><p>"I always use computers, and when I do, I prefer Linux."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He once impressed a girl... just to see how it feels.He was created by a makefile... that he ran himself.He once wrote some buggy code... for an entomologist.He can sometimes make a fool of himself... dancing.He has a best friend... because he likes to be unpredictable.He is the World 's Most Interesting Geek .
" I always use computers , and when I do , I prefer Linux .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He once impressed a girl... just to see how it feels.He was created by a makefile... that he ran himself.He once wrote some buggy code... for an entomologist.He can sometimes make a fool of himself... dancing.He has a best friend... because he likes to be unpredictable.He is the World's Most Interesting Geek.
"I always use computers, and when I do, I prefer Linux.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127605</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>DrSlinky</author>
	<datestamp>1243539960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</p></div><p>Must depend on the store, or area perhaps.
<br> <br>
My local comic shop happens to be a music store that started selling comics when digital downloads started crippling their sales.  As it is, the wall where the new comic books are displayed are next to the used CD racks.  You see a guy (or girl) go down that aisle, and you think you can predict what they're going to buy, by comparing them to these ingrained stereotypes.  And yet, I'm surprised (and sometimes shocked) almost every week, when someone I "just know" is going to the used CDs actually starts picking up the latest offerings from Marvel, DC, Image, etc.
<br> <br>
Do I see some of these stereotypes there?  Sure.  But not as often as I see someone you wouldn't assume is a "comic book nerd" if you saw them walking down the street.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them , the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Must depend on the store , or area perhaps .
My local comic shop happens to be a music store that started selling comics when digital downloads started crippling their sales .
As it is , the wall where the new comic books are displayed are next to the used CD racks .
You see a guy ( or girl ) go down that aisle , and you think you can predict what they 're going to buy , by comparing them to these ingrained stereotypes .
And yet , I 'm surprised ( and sometimes shocked ) almost every week , when someone I " just know " is going to the used CDs actually starts picking up the latest offerings from Marvel , DC , Image , etc .
Do I see some of these stereotypes there ?
Sure. But not as often as I see someone you would n't assume is a " comic book nerd " if you saw them walking down the street .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.Must depend on the store, or area perhaps.
My local comic shop happens to be a music store that started selling comics when digital downloads started crippling their sales.
As it is, the wall where the new comic books are displayed are next to the used CD racks.
You see a guy (or girl) go down that aisle, and you think you can predict what they're going to buy, by comparing them to these ingrained stereotypes.
And yet, I'm surprised (and sometimes shocked) almost every week, when someone I "just know" is going to the used CDs actually starts picking up the latest offerings from Marvel, DC, Image, etc.
Do I see some of these stereotypes there?
Sure.  But not as often as I see someone you wouldn't assume is a "comic book nerd" if you saw them walking down the street.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127343</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bwhaha.. the obligitory "i have a girlfriend" post.. has no merit to the rest of the post..</p><p>i have a girlfriend too.. just dont tell my wife</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bwhaha.. the obligitory " i have a girlfriend " post.. has no merit to the rest of the post..i have a girlfriend too.. just dont tell my wife</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bwhaha.. the obligitory "i have a girlfriend" post.. has no merit to the rest of the post..i have a girlfriend too.. just dont tell my wife</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124647</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my town the comic book store is actually named "My Parents Basement" And it has a wonderfully fragrant bouquet that requires you to hold your breath if you want to hold your lunch from entrance to exit.</p><p>I literally saw a 45 year old guy with a gut and a ponytail wearing a Gargoyles T-shirt with his belly button hanging out of it.</p><p>He spoke just like the comic book guy too. They were seriously having the mac vs windows debate, only this man hasn't updated his debating information since the early to mid nineties. So painful to hear.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//I'm a board game geek here, I just needed a game, in and out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my town the comic book store is actually named " My Parents Basement " And it has a wonderfully fragrant bouquet that requires you to hold your breath if you want to hold your lunch from entrance to exit.I literally saw a 45 year old guy with a gut and a ponytail wearing a Gargoyles T-shirt with his belly button hanging out of it.He spoke just like the comic book guy too .
They were seriously having the mac vs windows debate , only this man has n't updated his debating information since the early to mid nineties .
So painful to hear .
//I 'm a board game geek here , I just needed a game , in and out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my town the comic book store is actually named "My Parents Basement" And it has a wonderfully fragrant bouquet that requires you to hold your breath if you want to hold your lunch from entrance to exit.I literally saw a 45 year old guy with a gut and a ponytail wearing a Gargoyles T-shirt with his belly button hanging out of it.He spoke just like the comic book guy too.
They were seriously having the mac vs windows debate, only this man hasn't updated his debating information since the early to mid nineties.
So painful to hear.
//I'm a board game geek here, I just needed a game, in and out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</id>
	<title>Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wost... article... ever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wost... article... ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wost... article... ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123957</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Amazing Quantum Man</author>
	<datestamp>1243526880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*whoosh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* whoosh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*whoosh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124059</id>
	<title>relavent to this topic</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1243527300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/manga-porn/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/manga-porn/</a> [wired.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/manga-porn/ [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/manga-porn/ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124379</id>
	<title>EWWW!!!</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1243528500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nothing worse than sensitive nerds.  There goes my breakfast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing worse than sensitive nerds .
There goes my breakfast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing worse than sensitive nerds.
There goes my breakfast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124489</id>
	<title>Re:The Answer</title>
	<author>harryandthehenderson</author>
	<datestamp>1243528920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Those geeks you make fun of in high school? The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else? Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.</p></div><p>Outside of a few occasional people like with a Bill Gates, the vast majority of people running things aren't nerds. This is just more of the typical "we are better than those stupid jocks (or insert any other group that is more well socialized than you)" mantra that is in many cases just no true.  Being a nerd doesn't make you superior to anyone else.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those geeks you make fun of in high school ?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else ?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.Outside of a few occasional people like with a Bill Gates , the vast majority of people running things are n't nerds .
This is just more of the typical " we are better than those stupid jocks ( or insert any other group that is more well socialized than you ) " mantra that is in many cases just no true .
Being a nerd does n't make you superior to anyone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those geeks you make fun of in high school?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.Outside of a few occasional people like with a Bill Gates, the vast majority of people running things aren't nerds.
This is just more of the typical "we are better than those stupid jocks (or insert any other group that is more well socialized than you)" mantra that is in many cases just no true.
Being a nerd doesn't make you superior to anyone else.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124319</id>
	<title>Look around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243528260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is ALWAYS at least one total geek in the comic book store.  Go in, look around, if you don't see one then you're it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is ALWAYS at least one total geek in the comic book store .
Go in , look around , if you do n't see one then you 're it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is ALWAYS at least one total geek in the comic book store.
Go in, look around, if you don't see one then you're it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127545</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>destine</author>
	<datestamp>1243539840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a reasonably attractive woman and giant nerd that I am, I've gone into store where the leering is not only there, but supported and one upped by the staff. Blatantly. Now, I would say, given the amount of comic book/game stores I've been entered in my life about half of them have been either dismissive or creepy, NOT counting the general filthyness of a few of the stores. I remember the 90's specfically going into comic book stores and the guys in there looking from me to the Dawn posters. It really freaked me out and I almost never got into any comics at all because of that. Luckily, I've found wonderful game and comic book stores that I can go to and feel good about spending my money at. So when I see those places on television I think, oh, it's one of those places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a reasonably attractive woman and giant nerd that I am , I 've gone into store where the leering is not only there , but supported and one upped by the staff .
Blatantly. Now , I would say , given the amount of comic book/game stores I 've been entered in my life about half of them have been either dismissive or creepy , NOT counting the general filthyness of a few of the stores .
I remember the 90 's specfically going into comic book stores and the guys in there looking from me to the Dawn posters .
It really freaked me out and I almost never got into any comics at all because of that .
Luckily , I 've found wonderful game and comic book stores that I can go to and feel good about spending my money at .
So when I see those places on television I think , oh , it 's one of those places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a reasonably attractive woman and giant nerd that I am, I've gone into store where the leering is not only there, but supported and one upped by the staff.
Blatantly. Now, I would say, given the amount of comic book/game stores I've been entered in my life about half of them have been either dismissive or creepy, NOT counting the general filthyness of a few of the stores.
I remember the 90's specfically going into comic book stores and the guys in there looking from me to the Dawn posters.
It really freaked me out and I almost never got into any comics at all because of that.
Luckily, I've found wonderful game and comic book stores that I can go to and feel good about spending my money at.
So when I see those places on television I think, oh, it's one of those places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124213</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1243527960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's silly.<br> <br>Let's look at this first from the non-comic perspective.  Novels are a subset of books.  There is criteria to establish what is a novel, and what isn't.  I have a novel in my hand right now... is it a book?  Of course.  But if I tell you I have a book in my hand, can you say that it is definitely a novel? <br> <br>For comics, why would this not apply as well?  There can be comic novels, there can be comic books.  I think we can agree on this.<br> <br>The problem with calling them comic novels is that "comic novels" already exist, in non-graphical form.  Terry Pratchett, for example, writes comic novels, and these are not in a graphical format.  So we are left with using the term "graphical novels" for comics that are also novels.<br> <br>It's important to note that 'graphical novel' is <i>not</i> a term used to 'legitimize' comic books.  It's a term used to differentiate one kind of comic book from another.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's silly .
Let 's look at this first from the non-comic perspective .
Novels are a subset of books .
There is criteria to establish what is a novel , and what is n't .
I have a novel in my hand right now... is it a book ?
Of course .
But if I tell you I have a book in my hand , can you say that it is definitely a novel ?
For comics , why would this not apply as well ?
There can be comic novels , there can be comic books .
I think we can agree on this .
The problem with calling them comic novels is that " comic novels " already exist , in non-graphical form .
Terry Pratchett , for example , writes comic novels , and these are not in a graphical format .
So we are left with using the term " graphical novels " for comics that are also novels .
It 's important to note that 'graphical novel ' is not a term used to 'legitimize ' comic books .
It 's a term used to differentiate one kind of comic book from another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's silly.
Let's look at this first from the non-comic perspective.
Novels are a subset of books.
There is criteria to establish what is a novel, and what isn't.
I have a novel in my hand right now... is it a book?
Of course.
But if I tell you I have a book in my hand, can you say that it is definitely a novel?
For comics, why would this not apply as well?
There can be comic novels, there can be comic books.
I think we can agree on this.
The problem with calling them comic novels is that "comic novels" already exist, in non-graphical form.
Terry Pratchett, for example, writes comic novels, and these are not in a graphical format.
So we are left with using the term "graphical novels" for comics that are also novels.
It's important to note that 'graphical novel' is not a term used to 'legitimize' comic books.
It's a term used to differentiate one kind of comic book from another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124471</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Jeremiah Cornelius</author>
	<datestamp>1243528860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This received three replies.</p><p>All three - independently - quoted the same Simpsons character, with an identical one 'word' catchphrase.</p><p>There is SOMETHING that can be stereotyped!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This received three replies.All three - independently - quoted the same Simpsons character , with an identical one 'word ' catchphrase.There is SOMETHING that can be stereotyped !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This received three replies.All three - independently - quoted the same Simpsons character, with an identical one 'word' catchphrase.There is SOMETHING that can be stereotyped!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why worst ever?</p><p>Did it hit uncomfortably close to home?</p><p>Is home your parent's basement?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why worst ever ? Did it hit uncomfortably close to home ? Is home your parent 's basement ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why worst ever?Did it hit uncomfortably close to home?Is home your parent's basement?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125977</id>
	<title>Present!</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1243534920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have nothing to add. I just thought my sig belonged in this thread.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have nothing to add .
I just thought my sig belonged in this thread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have nothing to add.
I just thought my sig belonged in this thread.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125465</id>
	<title>Re:The Answer</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1243533120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stereotypes are natural, societal recognitions of patterns.  They are certainly not perfect, but they exist because they are more often right than wrong.</p><p>To see where the comic book fan/manager stereotypes came from, go to a comic book store.  To see where the D&amp;D stereotypes come from, go hang out with D&amp;D players for a while.  They fit.</p><p>The stereotypes go way beyond that, too.  Politicians use them, they call them "demographics".  That's your "soccer mom", or "Nascar dad".  You say those things, and an image imediately pops into your head of who they are talking about, because you know those types of people!</p><p>People can get too broad with stereotypes, but in those cases it's usually a protection mechanism.  For example, young black men who wear very baggy clothes.  Plenty are harmless, good people, but enough of them are hoodlums, thugs, or wannabe thugs that there is a strong stereotype against young black men who wear baggy clothes.  Combine that with the fact that a great many of those who fit the stereotype are racist, and white people especially tend to stear clear.</p><p>There are plenty of stereotypes on the flip side of that coin that are just as bad, but the fact is stereotypes exist because people who like or do certain things tend to group together, and people who group together tend to act the same.  Thus, a stereotype is born.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stereotypes are natural , societal recognitions of patterns .
They are certainly not perfect , but they exist because they are more often right than wrong.To see where the comic book fan/manager stereotypes came from , go to a comic book store .
To see where the D&amp;D stereotypes come from , go hang out with D&amp;D players for a while .
They fit.The stereotypes go way beyond that , too .
Politicians use them , they call them " demographics " .
That 's your " soccer mom " , or " Nascar dad " .
You say those things , and an image imediately pops into your head of who they are talking about , because you know those types of people ! People can get too broad with stereotypes , but in those cases it 's usually a protection mechanism .
For example , young black men who wear very baggy clothes .
Plenty are harmless , good people , but enough of them are hoodlums , thugs , or wannabe thugs that there is a strong stereotype against young black men who wear baggy clothes .
Combine that with the fact that a great many of those who fit the stereotype are racist , and white people especially tend to stear clear.There are plenty of stereotypes on the flip side of that coin that are just as bad , but the fact is stereotypes exist because people who like or do certain things tend to group together , and people who group together tend to act the same .
Thus , a stereotype is born .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stereotypes are natural, societal recognitions of patterns.
They are certainly not perfect, but they exist because they are more often right than wrong.To see where the comic book fan/manager stereotypes came from, go to a comic book store.
To see where the D&amp;D stereotypes come from, go hang out with D&amp;D players for a while.
They fit.The stereotypes go way beyond that, too.
Politicians use them, they call them "demographics".
That's your "soccer mom", or "Nascar dad".
You say those things, and an image imediately pops into your head of who they are talking about, because you know those types of people!People can get too broad with stereotypes, but in those cases it's usually a protection mechanism.
For example, young black men who wear very baggy clothes.
Plenty are harmless, good people, but enough of them are hoodlums, thugs, or wannabe thugs that there is a strong stereotype against young black men who wear baggy clothes.
Combine that with the fact that a great many of those who fit the stereotype are racist, and white people especially tend to stear clear.There are plenty of stereotypes on the flip side of that coin that are just as bad, but the fact is stereotypes exist because people who like or do certain things tend to group together, and people who group together tend to act the same.
Thus, a stereotype is born.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123671</id>
	<title>I know</title>
	<author>reidiq</author>
	<datestamp>1243525500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>By having Den of Geek defend our geekness? Not sure if that helps or not.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>By having Den of Geek defend our geekness ?
Not sure if that helps or not.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By having Den of Geek defend our geekness?
Not sure if that helps or not.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134851</id>
	<title>Big Bang Theory...</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1243533060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen most episodes, I typically find them hilarious - actual literal LOLing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>Sometimes, the gross social incompetence of the characters is frustrating to watch, but that's part due to painful-because-some-of-it-is-true.</p><p>I don't think their comic book habit makes them look like fools - other aspects of the characters seem to accomplish that, such as Sheldon's oft-manifested general OCD/asshole temperament</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen most episodes , I typically find them hilarious - actual literal LOLing .
: ) Sometimes , the gross social incompetence of the characters is frustrating to watch , but that 's part due to painful-because-some-of-it-is-true.I do n't think their comic book habit makes them look like fools - other aspects of the characters seem to accomplish that , such as Sheldon 's oft-manifested general OCD/asshole temperament</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen most episodes, I typically find them hilarious - actual literal LOLing.
:)Sometimes, the gross social incompetence of the characters is frustrating to watch, but that's part due to painful-because-some-of-it-is-true.I don't think their comic book habit makes them look like fools - other aspects of the characters seem to accomplish that, such as Sheldon's oft-manifested general OCD/asshole temperament</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123729</id>
	<title>Why do TV shows stereotype comic book people?</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1243525860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, is this the human concept you call "humor"?  It is so illogical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , is this the human concept you call " humor " ?
It is so illogical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, is this the human concept you call "humor"?
It is so illogical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123695</id>
	<title>Simpson's comic book guy is the worst stereotype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are always showing him with his gut hanging out of an XL t-shirt. When in reality many comic geeks guts hang out of an XXL t-shirt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are always showing him with his gut hanging out of an XL t-shirt .
When in reality many comic geeks guts hang out of an XXL t-shirt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are always showing him with his gut hanging out of an XL t-shirt.
When in reality many comic geeks guts hang out of an XXL t-shirt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129117</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1243544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, it's societies that creats that image.
Watch small children, they generally want to get along. It's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality.</p></div><p>One of my earliest memories is of a time when I had to have my natural US and THEM mentality removed from me.  I was watching TV with my father and brother, and a commercial came on.  I don't remember the entire commercial, but it was something about diversity and expectations during the backdrop of a chess game, where you only saw a black person's hand and a white person's hand moving the pieces.  At the end, the black person won and declared checkmate.  The reason I remember it so vividly is because my dad then asked me (as he often did) "What did that mean?"<br> <br>
I, being a little kid, overgeneralized into an US and THEM mentality: "Black people are better at chess"<br> <br>
Then, there was a long talk with my dad about how I had missed the \_real\_ point of the commercial, and I remember thinking I was in trouble, but my dad was trying to tell me that black or white didn't matter. etc.<br> <br>
US and THEM is also strong in kindergarten and elementary school.  There were "popular" kids in kindergarten, believe it or not.  US and THEM might be a useful survival trait when THEM is Neanderthal, other human tribes, or other predators.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's societies that creats that image .
Watch small children , they generally want to get along .
It 's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality.One of my earliest memories is of a time when I had to have my natural US and THEM mentality removed from me .
I was watching TV with my father and brother , and a commercial came on .
I do n't remember the entire commercial , but it was something about diversity and expectations during the backdrop of a chess game , where you only saw a black person 's hand and a white person 's hand moving the pieces .
At the end , the black person won and declared checkmate .
The reason I remember it so vividly is because my dad then asked me ( as he often did ) " What did that mean ?
" I , being a little kid , overgeneralized into an US and THEM mentality : " Black people are better at chess " Then , there was a long talk with my dad about how I had missed the \ _real \ _ point of the commercial , and I remember thinking I was in trouble , but my dad was trying to tell me that black or white did n't matter .
etc . US and THEM is also strong in kindergarten and elementary school .
There were " popular " kids in kindergarten , believe it or not .
US and THEM might be a useful survival trait when THEM is Neanderthal , other human tribes , or other predators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's societies that creats that image.
Watch small children, they generally want to get along.
It's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality.One of my earliest memories is of a time when I had to have my natural US and THEM mentality removed from me.
I was watching TV with my father and brother, and a commercial came on.
I don't remember the entire commercial, but it was something about diversity and expectations during the backdrop of a chess game, where you only saw a black person's hand and a white person's hand moving the pieces.
At the end, the black person won and declared checkmate.
The reason I remember it so vividly is because my dad then asked me (as he often did) "What did that mean?
" 
I, being a little kid, overgeneralized into an US and THEM mentality: "Black people are better at chess" 
Then, there was a long talk with my dad about how I had missed the \_real\_ point of the commercial, and I remember thinking I was in trouble, but my dad was trying to tell me that black or white didn't matter.
etc. 
US and THEM is also strong in kindergarten and elementary school.
There were "popular" kids in kindergarten, believe it or not.
US and THEM might be a useful survival trait when THEM is Neanderthal, other human tribes, or other predators.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129447</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1243502280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DBZ: 5 minutes of plot in 30 minutes of show. It's "&lt;insert soap opera title here&gt;" for the anime crowd. IT'S OVER 9000!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>DBZ : 5 minutes of plot in 30 minutes of show .
It 's " " for the anime crowd .
IT 'S OVER 9000 ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DBZ: 5 minutes of plot in 30 minutes of show.
It's "" for the anime crowd.
IT'S OVER 9000!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124777</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1243530120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll have you know, some people sleep during the day. How do you sleep at any time, making such blanket generalizations?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll have you know , some people sleep during the day .
How do you sleep at any time , making such blanket generalizations ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll have you know, some people sleep during the day.
How do you sleep at any time, making such blanket generalizations?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</id>
	<title>Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>jockeys</author>
	<datestamp>1243525860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (to name one) is not a caricature.  He's a real guy.  I've met him.  He lives in most comic book shops.  He will make fun of you for liking the wrong comics, he will make fun of you for buying the wrong set of dice.  He is the alpha nerd, and he's not going to let you forget it.
<br> <br>
AFAIK, I'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old, I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons ( to name one ) is not a caricature .
He 's a real guy .
I 've met him .
He lives in most comic book shops .
He will make fun of you for liking the wrong comics , he will make fun of you for buying the wrong set of dice .
He is the alpha nerd , and he 's not going to let you forget it .
AFAIK , I 'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old , I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (to name one) is not a caricature.
He's a real guy.
I've met him.
He lives in most comic book shops.
He will make fun of you for liking the wrong comics, he will make fun of you for buying the wrong set of dice.
He is the alpha nerd, and he's not going to let you forget it.
AFAIK, I'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old, I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124109</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>DaffyDuck101</author>
	<datestamp>1243527600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahem...<br><br>&lt;comic book store guy&gt; Whoosh &lt;/comic book store guy&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem... Whoosh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem... Whoosh </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123783</id>
	<title>Comic Book Store as the embodyment of Geekiness</title>
	<author>Publikwerks</author>
	<datestamp>1243526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While many other bastions of Geekiness has become more trendy as technology has been absorbed by society(ex: Radio Shack) or eaten up by box stores(ex Computer Stores), the comic book store remains as one single place that is universally recognized as "Geeky".
<br> <br>
But, this is TV, it's not like reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While many other bastions of Geekiness has become more trendy as technology has been absorbed by society ( ex : Radio Shack ) or eaten up by box stores ( ex Computer Stores ) , the comic book store remains as one single place that is universally recognized as " Geeky " .
But , this is TV , it 's not like reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While many other bastions of Geekiness has become more trendy as technology has been absorbed by society(ex: Radio Shack) or eaten up by box stores(ex Computer Stores), the comic book store remains as one single place that is universally recognized as "Geeky".
But, this is TV, it's not like reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124591</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1243529340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's funny that while Americans (at least) call comic books from Japan "manga" (because just calling them comics isn't esoteric enough), the Japanese also use the term "komikku" to refer to certain kinds of the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's funny that while Americans ( at least ) call comic books from Japan " manga " ( because just calling them comics is n't esoteric enough ) , the Japanese also use the term " komikku " to refer to certain kinds of the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's funny that while Americans (at least) call comic books from Japan "manga" (because just calling them comics isn't esoteric enough), the Japanese also use the term "komikku" to refer to certain kinds of the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126081</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>DJCouchyCouch</author>
	<datestamp>1243535340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh come on, it's not even fair! Kirk would need to be blindfolded to make it a challenge. Sheesh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , it 's not even fair !
Kirk would need to be blindfolded to make it a challenge .
Sheesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, it's not even fair!
Kirk would need to be blindfolded to make it a challenge.
Sheesh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124275</id>
	<title>Re:What about Captain Sweatpants ?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243528140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the show sucks the the 'intelligent nerds' often get the science wrong.<br>Also, the comic shop owner is just a normal guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the show sucks the the 'intelligent nerds ' often get the science wrong.Also , the comic shop owner is just a normal guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the show sucks the the 'intelligent nerds' often get the science wrong.Also, the comic shop owner is just a normal guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128997</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1243543920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt; Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</p><p>No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals, then geekery will seem normal.</p><p>c.</p></div><p>With part of being a geek not getting any. That could be a problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it.No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals , then geekery will seem normal.c.With part of being a geek not getting any .
That could be a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.No problem... the geeks just need to out-reproduce the normals, then geekery will seem normal.c.With part of being a geek not getting any.
That could be a problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28153669</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243686480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right.  We all know that the worst crime any socially weak group or individual can do on the Internet is actually attempt to stand up for themselves. This fascist stuff is all over the place, from 4chan/Encyclopedia Dramatica, to youtube, to Wikipedia, to the very comment section of this slashdot forum... are you queer? black? jewish? a furry? intelligent? shy? depressed? Abused? Female? anything other than a straight, white male jarhead "type a personality" and you are fodder for these Internet nazis who will always use worst-case examples to represent everyone in a group.

Why don't people stand UP for themselves, dammit? Why don't you stop siding with these closed minded creeps? Fight back! Don't back down. Stop hiding. Stop trying to play both sides. Stand up for yourselves and fight, dammit. (and note: there is a difference between anonymity and Anonymous. Anonymity is the ability to obscure your identity. Anonymous is a fascistic control-based cult of abusive "law and order" prusish internet fascists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right .
We all know that the worst crime any socially weak group or individual can do on the Internet is actually attempt to stand up for themselves .
This fascist stuff is all over the place , from 4chan/Encyclopedia Dramatica , to youtube , to Wikipedia , to the very comment section of this slashdot forum... are you queer ?
black ? jewish ?
a furry ?
intelligent ? shy ?
depressed ? Abused ?
Female ? anything other than a straight , white male jarhead " type a personality " and you are fodder for these Internet nazis who will always use worst-case examples to represent everyone in a group .
Why do n't people stand UP for themselves , dammit ?
Why do n't you stop siding with these closed minded creeps ?
Fight back !
Do n't back down .
Stop hiding .
Stop trying to play both sides .
Stand up for yourselves and fight , dammit .
( and note : there is a difference between anonymity and Anonymous .
Anonymity is the ability to obscure your identity .
Anonymous is a fascistic control-based cult of abusive " law and order " prusish internet fascists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.
We all know that the worst crime any socially weak group or individual can do on the Internet is actually attempt to stand up for themselves.
This fascist stuff is all over the place, from 4chan/Encyclopedia Dramatica, to youtube, to Wikipedia, to the very comment section of this slashdot forum... are you queer?
black? jewish?
a furry?
intelligent? shy?
depressed? Abused?
Female? anything other than a straight, white male jarhead "type a personality" and you are fodder for these Internet nazis who will always use worst-case examples to represent everyone in a group.
Why don't people stand UP for themselves, dammit?
Why don't you stop siding with these closed minded creeps?
Fight back!
Don't back down.
Stop hiding.
Stop trying to play both sides.
Stand up for yourselves and fight, dammit.
(and note: there is a difference between anonymity and Anonymous.
Anonymity is the ability to obscure your identity.
Anonymous is a fascistic control-based cult of abusive "law and order" prusish internet fascists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125263</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1243532280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (to name one) is not a caricature. He's a real guy. I've met him. He lives in most comic book shops.</p></div><p>Exactly. He was partly inspired by a specific comic book guy in LA, but Matt Groening says: "I can't tell you how many times people have come up to me and said, 'I know who you based that comic book guy on. It's that comic-book guy right down the block.' And I have to tell them, 'No, it's every comic-bookstore guy in America.'"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons ( to name one ) is not a caricature .
He 's a real guy .
I 've met him .
He lives in most comic book shops.Exactly .
He was partly inspired by a specific comic book guy in LA , but Matt Groening says : " I ca n't tell you how many times people have come up to me and said , 'I know who you based that comic book guy on .
It 's that comic-book guy right down the block .
' And I have to tell them , 'No , it 's every comic-bookstore guy in America .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons (to name one) is not a caricature.
He's a real guy.
I've met him.
He lives in most comic book shops.Exactly.
He was partly inspired by a specific comic book guy in LA, but Matt Groening says: "I can't tell you how many times people have come up to me and said, 'I know who you based that comic book guy on.
It's that comic-book guy right down the block.
' And I have to tell them, 'No, it's every comic-bookstore guy in America.
'"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126123</id>
	<title>Re:The Answer</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1243535460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Being a nerd doesn't make you superior to anyone else</p></div><p>I don't know, aren't "nerdy" types are usually classified as nerds simply because they are more intelligent and prefer mental pursuits rather than physical ones? They of course are not superior in every way, but I suspect the average nerd will have a higher IQ than the average non-nerd.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being a nerd does n't make you superior to anyone elseI do n't know , are n't " nerdy " types are usually classified as nerds simply because they are more intelligent and prefer mental pursuits rather than physical ones ?
They of course are not superior in every way , but I suspect the average nerd will have a higher IQ than the average non-nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being a nerd doesn't make you superior to anyone elseI don't know, aren't "nerdy" types are usually classified as nerds simply because they are more intelligent and prefer mental pursuits rather than physical ones?
They of course are not superior in every way, but I suspect the average nerd will have a higher IQ than the average non-nerd.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124419</id>
	<title>Eat it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243528620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SHUT UP, NERD!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SHUT UP , NERD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SHUT UP, NERD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV. Call your congressman.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I'll have you know, some members of Congress are female.  How do you sleep at night, making such blanket generalizations?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV .
Call your congressman .
I 'll have you know , some members of Congress are female .
How do you sleep at night , making such blanket generalizations ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV.
Call your congressman.
I'll have you know, some members of Congress are female.
How do you sleep at night, making such blanket generalizations?
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123967</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duh. You have to roll a 20 to enter the store, and roll a 2nd 20 to make the CBG forget that he banned you.</p><p>Watch out though: If you roll a 1 inside the store, the CBG gets a crit hit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh .
You have to roll a 20 to enter the store , and roll a 2nd 20 to make the CBG forget that he banned you.Watch out though : If you roll a 1 inside the store , the CBG gets a crit hit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh.
You have to roll a 20 to enter the store, and roll a 2nd 20 to make the CBG forget that he banned you.Watch out though: If you roll a 1 inside the store, the CBG gets a crit hit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</id>
	<title>Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Folks get stereotyped on television? You don't say?</p><p>I've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.<br>I have never seen good looking women stereotyped as airheads.<br>I have never seen Christians stereotyped as clueless and out of touch.<br>I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling, bowling addicted rubes.<br>I have never seen Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash.<br>I have never seen rich folks stereotyped as constantly stepping on and using others.</p><p>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV. Call your congressman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks get stereotyped on television ?
You do n't say ? I 've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.I have never seen good looking women stereotyped as airheads.I have never seen Christians stereotyped as clueless and out of touch.I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling , bowling addicted rubes.I have never seen Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash.I have never seen rich folks stereotyped as constantly stepping on and using others.Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV .
Call your congressman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks get stereotyped on television?
You don't say?I've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.I have never seen good looking women stereotyped as airheads.I have never seen Christians stereotyped as clueless and out of touch.I have never seen factory workers stereotyped as beer guzzling, bowling addicted rubes.I have never seen Southerners stereotyped as trailer trash.I have never seen rich folks stereotyped as constantly stepping on and using others.Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV.
Call your congressman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123907</id>
	<title>i will always leave $$ at the comic shop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>comic shops are still one of the only places i can lose hours to *gasp* shopping</p><p>any other store i'm in and out as quickly as possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>comic shops are still one of the only places i can lose hours to * gasp * shoppingany other store i 'm in and out as quickly as possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>comic shops are still one of the only places i can lose hours to *gasp* shoppingany other store i'm in and out as quickly as possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123751</id>
	<title>In my expereince 50\%</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Roughly half of the people I know who are big comic book fans fall into the stereotype. But the half that don't are pretty normal successful people, they don't need anyone's pity for a stereotype they don't fit. I, myself, just think comic books suck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Roughly half of the people I know who are big comic book fans fall into the stereotype .
But the half that do n't are pretty normal successful people , they do n't need anyone 's pity for a stereotype they do n't fit .
I , myself , just think comic books suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roughly half of the people I know who are big comic book fans fall into the stereotype.
But the half that don't are pretty normal successful people, they don't need anyone's pity for a stereotype they don't fit.
I, myself, just think comic books suck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126377</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1243536360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;I've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.</p><p>You've obviously missed Charles Barkley's and Magic's appearances off the court on TV.</p><p>My personal favorite is the one where Barkley said he could do anything better than a woman except clean and cook. At which point a camerawoman proceeded to outdo him in a push-up contest.</p><p><a href="http://ballhype.com/story/video\_charles\_barkley\_loses\_to\_woman\_in\_push\_up/" title="ballhype.com">http://ballhype.com/story/video\_charles\_barkley\_loses\_to\_woman\_in\_push\_up/</a> [ballhype.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.You 've obviously missed Charles Barkley 's and Magic 's appearances off the court on TV.My personal favorite is the one where Barkley said he could do anything better than a woman except clean and cook .
At which point a camerawoman proceeded to outdo him in a push-up contest.http : //ballhype.com/story/video \ _charles \ _barkley \ _loses \ _to \ _woman \ _in \ _push \ _up/ [ ballhype.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I've never seen athletes stereotyped as bumbling morons.You've obviously missed Charles Barkley's and Magic's appearances off the court on TV.My personal favorite is the one where Barkley said he could do anything better than a woman except clean and cook.
At which point a camerawoman proceeded to outdo him in a push-up contest.http://ballhype.com/story/video\_charles\_barkley\_loses\_to\_woman\_in\_push\_up/ [ballhype.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124769</id>
	<title>Re:I dunno.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243530120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"..t, but they are cool kids so we forgive them."</p><p>*Looks around at the lack of record stores*</p><p>Apparently, we didn't forgive them so much as watch them go away.</p><p>Comic shop owners, beware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ..t , but they are cool kids so we forgive them .
" * Looks around at the lack of record stores * Apparently , we did n't forgive them so much as watch them go away.Comic shop owners , beware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"..t, but they are cool kids so we forgive them.
"*Looks around at the lack of record stores*Apparently, we didn't forgive them so much as watch them go away.Comic shop owners, beware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126691</id>
	<title>Positives, too</title>
	<author>ericlj</author>
	<datestamp>1243537380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a wife, I am sometimes forced to watch shows like Bravo's Millionaire Matchmaker. In one episode, she tells the eager young women that one of the best places to pick up wealthy, unattached men is at comics conventions. I was a little surprised to hear it, but her logic made sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a wife , I am sometimes forced to watch shows like Bravo 's Millionaire Matchmaker .
In one episode , she tells the eager young women that one of the best places to pick up wealthy , unattached men is at comics conventions .
I was a little surprised to hear it , but her logic made sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a wife, I am sometimes forced to watch shows like Bravo's Millionaire Matchmaker.
In one episode, she tells the eager young women that one of the best places to pick up wealthy, unattached men is at comics conventions.
I was a little surprised to hear it, but her logic made sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124971</id>
	<title>Off topic: The roll of the dice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243530960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can anyone explain why headers appear and disappear whenever I try to open a Slashdot page? I cannot think of a site of a site more inconsistent and capricious in its presentation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone explain why headers appear and disappear whenever I try to open a Slashdot page ?
I can not think of a site of a site more inconsistent and capricious in its presentation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone explain why headers appear and disappear whenever I try to open a Slashdot page?
I cannot think of a site of a site more inconsistent and capricious in its presentation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126073</id>
	<title>Why are comic book fans stereotyped?</title>
	<author>gnarlyhotep</author>
	<datestamp>1243535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle. Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced, which I hope you all have seen.</p></div><p>That's why, precisely.  Because comic book fans feed the stereotype, at least partly as self-deprecation.  The other part is just being oblivious to how we fit it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle .
Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced , which I hope you all have seen.That 's why , precisely .
Because comic book fans feed the stereotype , at least partly as self-deprecation .
The other part is just being oblivious to how we fit it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Minus one point for doubling up on Malcolm in the Middle.
Plus 10 points for referencing Spaced, which I hope you all have seen.That's why, precisely.
Because comic book fans feed the stereotype, at least partly as self-deprecation.
The other part is just being oblivious to how we fit it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126387</id>
	<title>Re:Jeremy from Lee's Comics</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1243536360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, I will never forget that day he spoke in class.  He seemed so... harmless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , I will never forget that day he spoke in class .
He seemed so... harmless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, I will never forget that day he spoke in class.
He seemed so... harmless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125927</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good luck with that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123983</id>
	<title>BBT</title>
	<author>mehrotra.akash</author>
	<datestamp>1243527000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>same happens in the big bang theory, you forgot to mention it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>same happens in the big bang theory , you forgot to mention it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>same happens in the big bang theory, you forgot to mention it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126027</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Creepy Crawler</author>
	<datestamp>1243535160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about guys who liked Sailor Moon?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Try watching the originals, not the mutilated crap shown here in the US... Those lesbians were hot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about guys who liked Sailor Moon ?
: ) Try watching the originals , not the mutilated crap shown here in the US... Those lesbians were hot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about guys who liked Sailor Moon?
:) Try watching the originals, not the mutilated crap shown here in the US... Those lesbians were hot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125419</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1243532940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>AFAIK, I'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old, I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira.</p></div><p>No, you were banned for liking DBZ. I assure you, the same thing happened to girls who were into Sailor Moon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK , I 'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old , I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira.No , you were banned for liking DBZ .
I assure you , the same thing happened to girls who were into Sailor Moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK, I'm still banned from the Laughing Dragon in Dallas because when I was 12 years old, I suggested that I liked DBZ better than Akira.No, you were banned for liking DBZ.
I assure you, the same thing happened to girls who were into Sailor Moon.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125141</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1243531800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</i></p><p>We could have a massive, all-out civil war, with everybody against everybody! Then we could finally determine who is better than whom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it.We could have a massive , all-out civil war , with everybody against everybody !
Then we could finally determine who is better than whom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.We could have a massive, all-out civil war, with everybody against everybody!
Then we could finally determine who is better than whom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123937</id>
	<title>a word about stereotypes</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1243526820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ya know, stereotypes exist for a reason; they're a fairly accurate portrayal of peoples' observations.  Am I saying it's right to use them to pre-judge people?  Absolutely not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know , stereotypes exist for a reason ; they 're a fairly accurate portrayal of peoples ' observations .
Am I saying it 's right to use them to pre-judge people ?
Absolutely not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know, stereotypes exist for a reason; they're a fairly accurate portrayal of peoples' observations.
Am I saying it's right to use them to pre-judge people?
Absolutely not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859</id>
	<title>I dunno.</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1243526460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Often times comic shops perpetuate their stereotype, but as far as service goes, I've never had an issues. They are manned by people who are genunnely interested in the product they are selling. Now walk down to the record store and you get something pretty different. They tend to have no interest in selling you anything, are disinterested and view your purchases with comtempt, but they are cool kids so we forgive them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Often times comic shops perpetuate their stereotype , but as far as service goes , I 've never had an issues .
They are manned by people who are genunnely interested in the product they are selling .
Now walk down to the record store and you get something pretty different .
They tend to have no interest in selling you anything , are disinterested and view your purchases with comtempt , but they are cool kids so we forgive them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Often times comic shops perpetuate their stereotype, but as far as service goes, I've never had an issues.
They are manned by people who are genunnely interested in the product they are selling.
Now walk down to the record store and you get something pretty different.
They tend to have no interest in selling you anything, are disinterested and view your purchases with comtempt, but they are cool kids so we forgive them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125553</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>DiscountBorg(TM)</author>
	<datestamp>1243533540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget to reuse the ~15 frames of animation of the disembowelment roughly about 2-3 times per episode along with the screaming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget to reuse the ~ 15 frames of animation of the disembowelment roughly about 2-3 times per episode along with the screaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget to reuse the ~15 frames of animation of the disembowelment roughly about 2-3 times per episode along with the screaming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</id>
	<title>Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Lendrick</author>
	<datestamp>1243526820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's say, hypothetically, that you walk into a comic book store.  There are five people in there browsing comics.  Four of those people are fairly normal looking folks who are just there to buy comics and leave.  The fifth one is a large guy with poor hygiene who corners you and talks to you incessantly about whether or not Captain Kirk could have single-handedly taken out the Death Star, and seems oblivious to the not-so-subtle signals you're giving off as you try to back away.</p><p>Who are you going to remember?  The four normal people, or the smelly dude who wouldn't leave you alone?  Hell, *I* stereotype comic book geeks, and I *am* one.  When I see them portrayed that way on TV, I usually get a laugh out of it, because I've met the exact sort of person they're portraying.</p><p>That said, I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone.  There are plenty of hot chicks, my fiancee included, who like comics.  (Oh yeah, there's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single, right?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's say , hypothetically , that you walk into a comic book store .
There are five people in there browsing comics .
Four of those people are fairly normal looking folks who are just there to buy comics and leave .
The fifth one is a large guy with poor hygiene who corners you and talks to you incessantly about whether or not Captain Kirk could have single-handedly taken out the Death Star , and seems oblivious to the not-so-subtle signals you 're giving off as you try to back away.Who are you going to remember ?
The four normal people , or the smelly dude who would n't leave you alone ?
Hell , * I * stereotype comic book geeks , and I * am * one .
When I see them portrayed that way on TV , I usually get a laugh out of it , because I 've met the exact sort of person they 're portraying.That said , I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT 'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone .
There are plenty of hot chicks , my fiancee included , who like comics .
( Oh yeah , there 's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single , right ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's say, hypothetically, that you walk into a comic book store.
There are five people in there browsing comics.
Four of those people are fairly normal looking folks who are just there to buy comics and leave.
The fifth one is a large guy with poor hygiene who corners you and talks to you incessantly about whether or not Captain Kirk could have single-handedly taken out the Death Star, and seems oblivious to the not-so-subtle signals you're giving off as you try to back away.Who are you going to remember?
The four normal people, or the smelly dude who wouldn't leave you alone?
Hell, *I* stereotype comic book geeks, and I *am* one.
When I see them portrayed that way on TV, I usually get a laugh out of it, because I've met the exact sort of person they're portraying.That said, I think the classic HOLY CRAP IT'S A HOT CHICK IN MY COMIC BOOK STORE thing is a bit overdone.
There are plenty of hot chicks, my fiancee included, who like comics.
(Oh yeah, there's another stereotype -- Slashdot readers are all single, right?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130089</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>DLWormwood</author>
	<datestamp>1243504860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin
<br>
Actually, this <i>was</i> invented as a form of spin.  In Scott McCloud's <i>Understanding Comics</i>, he illustrates how Will Eisner's early attempts to make serious fare (like <i>A Contract With God</i>) would be marginalized, despite being one of the first comics long enough to <b>be</b> a book, rather than a magazine, which most comics were up until then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Seriously though , attempting to legitimize them as " Graphic Novels " is just spin Actually , this was invented as a form of spin .
In Scott McCloud 's Understanding Comics , he illustrates how Will Eisner 's early attempts to make serious fare ( like A Contract With God ) would be marginalized , despite being one of the first comics long enough to be a book , rather than a magazine , which most comics were up until then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin

Actually, this was invented as a form of spin.
In Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics, he illustrates how Will Eisner's early attempts to make serious fare (like A Contract With God) would be marginalized, despite being one of the first comics long enough to be a book, rather than a magazine, which most comics were up until then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127955</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Single == Available</p><p>I am not married, but in a long-term relationship and definitely not available. I am not single.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Single = = AvailableI am not married , but in a long-term relationship and definitely not available .
I am not single .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Single == AvailableI am not married, but in a long-term relationship and definitely not available.
I am not single.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</id>
	<title>Human Nature</title>
	<author>Akido37</author>
	<datestamp>1243525560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's human nature to want to feel better than someone else.  It's the "us versus them" mentality that pervades our culture.  Geeks/nerds versus "normal" people is only one facet of the problem.  It's seen everywhere, from Republicans versus Democrats, urban versus suburban versus rural, and black versus white.<br> <br>
Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's human nature to want to feel better than someone else .
It 's the " us versus them " mentality that pervades our culture .
Geeks/nerds versus " normal " people is only one facet of the problem .
It 's seen everywhere , from Republicans versus Democrats , urban versus suburban versus rural , and black versus white .
Sadly , I do n't think there 's a whole lot we can do about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's human nature to want to feel better than someone else.
It's the "us versus them" mentality that pervades our culture.
Geeks/nerds versus "normal" people is only one facet of the problem.
It's seen everywhere, from Republicans versus Democrats, urban versus suburban versus rural, and black versus white.
Sadly, I don't think there's a whole lot we can do about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123911</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>ZenDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1243526760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>QFT</htmltext>
<tokenext>QFT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>QFT</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123993</id>
	<title>"Comic book"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, I think you might mean "graphic novel" there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , I think you might mean " graphic novel " there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, I think you might mean "graphic novel" there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125151</id>
	<title>Damned if you do, damned if you don't</title>
	<author>Dracil</author>
	<datestamp>1243531800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They actually got slammed twice for Heroes.  First people complained that no comic book geek would look like that swimmer store employee.  So then they did the stereotypical comic book geek and the people complained again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They actually got slammed twice for Heroes .
First people complained that no comic book geek would look like that swimmer store employee .
So then they did the stereotypical comic book geek and the people complained again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They actually got slammed twice for Heroes.
First people complained that no comic book geek would look like that swimmer store employee.
So then they did the stereotypical comic book geek and the people complained again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037</id>
	<title>Jeremy from Lee's Comics</title>
	<author>Snap E Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1243527240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes, "Stereotypes are a real time saver," as The Onion put it.  Growing up, Lee's Comics in Palo Alto, CA was my neighborhood comic book store.  Working there from the early 90's, there was a guy named Jeremy.  I remember vividly the day Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons was introduced (or shall I say, First Appearance).  When I watched that episode, me and every other kid within a ten mile radius said, "Jeremy!"</p><p>After school the next day, me and my friends went in, ran to Jeremy and said, "Hey Jeremy, did you watch the Simpsons last night?"  "Yes," he said groaning, and obviously tired of the question.  Why was he tired?  Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard, receding hairline, big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts.  Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.</p><p>Jeremy, Real Life Comic Book Guy, wherever you are now, I salute you.  You were a huge impact on the lives of many kids in the 94306 zip code.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes , " Stereotypes are a real time saver , " as The Onion put it .
Growing up , Lee 's Comics in Palo Alto , CA was my neighborhood comic book store .
Working there from the early 90 's , there was a guy named Jeremy .
I remember vividly the day Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons was introduced ( or shall I say , First Appearance ) .
When I watched that episode , me and every other kid within a ten mile radius said , " Jeremy !
" After school the next day , me and my friends went in , ran to Jeremy and said , " Hey Jeremy , did you watch the Simpsons last night ?
" " Yes , " he said groaning , and obviously tired of the question .
Why was he tired ?
Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard , receding hairline , big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts .
Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.Jeremy , Real Life Comic Book Guy , wherever you are now , I salute you .
You were a huge impact on the lives of many kids in the 94306 zip code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes, "Stereotypes are a real time saver," as The Onion put it.
Growing up, Lee's Comics in Palo Alto, CA was my neighborhood comic book store.
Working there from the early 90's, there was a guy named Jeremy.
I remember vividly the day Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons was introduced (or shall I say, First Appearance).
When I watched that episode, me and every other kid within a ten mile radius said, "Jeremy!
"After school the next day, me and my friends went in, ran to Jeremy and said, "Hey Jeremy, did you watch the Simpsons last night?
"  "Yes," he said groaning, and obviously tired of the question.
Why was he tired?
Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard, receding hairline, big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts.
Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.Jeremy, Real Life Comic Book Guy, wherever you are now, I salute you.
You were a huge impact on the lives of many kids in the 94306 zip code.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723</id>
	<title>What about Captain Sweatpants ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was shocked that The Big Bang Theory was not mentionned. When it comes to stereotypes, geeks and comics, it should be the reference show.

In particular "Captain Sweatpants" who so much looks like the typical comics reader<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was shocked that The Big Bang Theory was not mentionned .
When it comes to stereotypes , geeks and comics , it should be the reference show .
In particular " Captain Sweatpants " who so much looks like the typical comics reader ... : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was shocked that The Big Bang Theory was not mentionned.
When it comes to stereotypes, geeks and comics, it should be the reference show.
In particular "Captain Sweatpants" who so much looks like the typical comics reader ... :p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124649</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My understanding of the difference between a comic and a graphic novel is that a comic is a single issue while a graphic novel is a collection of issues.<br>A graphic novel will often cover a story arc (or a good deal of one if the arc is really long).</p><p>I prefer to buy graphic novels rather than individual comic books a the length is closer to that of a normal book if i grab 2 or 3 rather than 30 or 40 comics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding of the difference between a comic and a graphic novel is that a comic is a single issue while a graphic novel is a collection of issues.A graphic novel will often cover a story arc ( or a good deal of one if the arc is really long ) .I prefer to buy graphic novels rather than individual comic books a the length is closer to that of a normal book if i grab 2 or 3 rather than 30 or 40 comics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding of the difference between a comic and a graphic novel is that a comic is a single issue while a graphic novel is a collection of issues.A graphic novel will often cover a story arc (or a good deal of one if the arc is really long).I prefer to buy graphic novels rather than individual comic books a the length is closer to that of a normal book if i grab 2 or 3 rather than 30 or 40 comics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124635</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243529460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what's a record store?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's a record store ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's a record store?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</id>
	<title>They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"!</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1243525860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You insensitive clod!</p><p>Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous. I will confess privately that I liked the original Hellboy comic (Note: notice no attempt to spin it as a "Graphic Novel"!) Its a comic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You insensitive clod ! Seriously though , attempting to legitimize them as " Graphic Novels " is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous .
I will confess privately that I liked the original Hellboy comic ( Note : notice no attempt to spin it as a " Graphic Novel " !
) Its a comic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You insensitive clod!Seriously though, attempting to legitimize them as "Graphic Novels" is just spin and makes you look more ridiculous.
I will confess privately that I liked the original Hellboy comic (Note: notice no attempt to spin it as a "Graphic Novel"!
) Its a comic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124477</id>
	<title>The big bang theory.</title>
	<author>Chatsubo</author>
	<datestamp>1243528860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That show completely makes the point that this guy misses. The male leads on this show are all completely stereotyped. They're completely nerdy and totally bonkers about comic books. And who cares? I don't. I think the show is funny. It does throw some of the stereotypes to the wind (some of the characters do get laid), but otherwise I like it for the fact that it makes fun of nerdy/geeky/whatever-your-favourite-label-is people, in a way that doesn't degrade them.</p><p>What a bunch of whiny idiosyncratic losers we are if we fail to laugh at ourselves once in a while... Go watch a Chris Rock standup or something, realize that sometimes laughing at your own stereotypes can be a good thing. Maybe if you stop bitching about it, people would like you more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That show completely makes the point that this guy misses .
The male leads on this show are all completely stereotyped .
They 're completely nerdy and totally bonkers about comic books .
And who cares ?
I do n't .
I think the show is funny .
It does throw some of the stereotypes to the wind ( some of the characters do get laid ) , but otherwise I like it for the fact that it makes fun of nerdy/geeky/whatever-your-favourite-label-is people , in a way that does n't degrade them.What a bunch of whiny idiosyncratic losers we are if we fail to laugh at ourselves once in a while... Go watch a Chris Rock standup or something , realize that sometimes laughing at your own stereotypes can be a good thing .
Maybe if you stop bitching about it , people would like you more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That show completely makes the point that this guy misses.
The male leads on this show are all completely stereotyped.
They're completely nerdy and totally bonkers about comic books.
And who cares?
I don't.
I think the show is funny.
It does throw some of the stereotypes to the wind (some of the characters do get laid), but otherwise I like it for the fact that it makes fun of nerdy/geeky/whatever-your-favourite-label-is people, in a way that doesn't degrade them.What a bunch of whiny idiosyncratic losers we are if we fail to laugh at ourselves once in a while... Go watch a Chris Rock standup or something, realize that sometimes laughing at your own stereotypes can be a good thing.
Maybe if you stop bitching about it, people would like you more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124307</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1243528260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's not complaining that they're stereotyped.  He's complaining that they're not stereotyped as suave, confident chick magnets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not complaining that they 're stereotyped .
He 's complaining that they 're not stereotyped as suave , confident chick magnets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not complaining that they're stereotyped.
He's complaining that they're not stereotyped as suave, confident chick magnets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124507</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>evilkasper</author>
	<datestamp>1243528980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stereotypes exist for a reason. That aside my local Comic store owner looks and acts just like the one from the Simpsons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stereotypes exist for a reason .
That aside my local Comic store owner looks and acts just like the one from the Simpsons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stereotypes exist for a reason.
That aside my local Comic store owner looks and acts just like the one from the Simpsons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123989</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</p></div><p>And if you go to the ghetto part of any major US city and look at the black people there, the vast majority will match up to the "thug nigger" stereotype.  Still doesn't make it right.  So what's the difference, you may ask?  The black people have many political groups with lots of media clout who will very loudly scream RACISM at any opportunity.  Whether it's a valid complaint is worked out later, after all the screaming is done.  The comic fans and shops have no such political groups and thus are not seen as a "protected minority" even though bigotry is bigotry whether it's about color of skin, sexual preference, preferred forms of entertainment, whatever.
<br> <br>
This is indeed how it works, which is why the concept of "politically correct" is met with such contempt, even if it's not open contempt.  If it was about what you believed and not about who has the political clout then it wouldn't be so contemptible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them , the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.And if you go to the ghetto part of any major US city and look at the black people there , the vast majority will match up to the " thug nigger " stereotype .
Still does n't make it right .
So what 's the difference , you may ask ?
The black people have many political groups with lots of media clout who will very loudly scream RACISM at any opportunity .
Whether it 's a valid complaint is worked out later , after all the screaming is done .
The comic fans and shops have no such political groups and thus are not seen as a " protected minority " even though bigotry is bigotry whether it 's about color of skin , sexual preference , preferred forms of entertainment , whatever .
This is indeed how it works , which is why the concept of " politically correct " is met with such contempt , even if it 's not open contempt .
If it was about what you believed and not about who has the political clout then it would n't be so contemptible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.And if you go to the ghetto part of any major US city and look at the black people there, the vast majority will match up to the "thug nigger" stereotype.
Still doesn't make it right.
So what's the difference, you may ask?
The black people have many political groups with lots of media clout who will very loudly scream RACISM at any opportunity.
Whether it's a valid complaint is worked out later, after all the screaming is done.
The comic fans and shops have no such political groups and thus are not seen as a "protected minority" even though bigotry is bigotry whether it's about color of skin, sexual preference, preferred forms of entertainment, whatever.
This is indeed how it works, which is why the concept of "politically correct" is met with such contempt, even if it's not open contempt.
If it was about what you believed and not about who has the political clout then it wouldn't be so contemptible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</id>
	<title>Sad but true</title>
	<author>harryandthehenderson</author>
	<datestamp>1243525500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them , the vast majority will match up to the stereotype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be a stereotype but if you walk into most comic book/anime stores and look around at the people in them, the vast majority will match up to the stereotype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125055</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, he lives in Laughing Dragon in Dallas.  I've never met anyone like this in the 100 or more shops I've been in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , he lives in Laughing Dragon in Dallas .
I 've never met anyone like this in the 100 or more shops I 've been in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, he lives in Laughing Dragon in Dallas.
I've never met anyone like this in the 100 or more shops I've been in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128621</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1243542720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement. and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex.</i> <br> <br>Or going in to obsessive detail when none was actually required or desired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement .
and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex .
Or going in to obsessive detail when none was actually required or desired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement.
and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex.
Or going in to obsessive detail when none was actually required or desired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123883</id>
	<title>Re:What about Captain Sweatpants ?</title>
	<author>Silicon Jedi</author>
	<datestamp>1243526580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And is viewed as a subject of derision by the other customers and staff.  And the comic store guy is an artist, and not portrayed as slovenly or overweight,  BBT is quite mild and insightful when it comes to stereotyping and more closely shows the intra-community geek stereotypes than the external ones.  (Of course the ethnic and gender sterotyping is way worse, but still not so bad.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>And is viewed as a subject of derision by the other customers and staff .
And the comic store guy is an artist , and not portrayed as slovenly or overweight , BBT is quite mild and insightful when it comes to stereotyping and more closely shows the intra-community geek stereotypes than the external ones .
( Of course the ethnic and gender sterotyping is way worse , but still not so bad .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And is viewed as a subject of derision by the other customers and staff.
And the comic store guy is an artist, and not portrayed as slovenly or overweight,  BBT is quite mild and insightful when it comes to stereotyping and more closely shows the intra-community geek stereotypes than the external ones.
(Of course the ethnic and gender sterotyping is way worse, but still not so bad.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124573</id>
	<title>Re:What about Captain Sweatpants ?</title>
	<author>\_|()|\|</author>
	<datestamp>1243529220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Slashdot's <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/24/054241" title="slashdot.org">Fall Geek TV Lineup</a> [slashdot.org] was the first I heard about Big Bang Theory.  I remember thinking at the time that it was not remotely appealing to the presumably geek target audience.  I have to admit, though, that one of the comic book jokes was pretty funny.  Sheldon comes back from the store with the latest issue of Flash.  He asks his fictional hero, "Want to watch me read your comic?"  A second later he asks, "Want to watch me read it again?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Slashdot 's Fall Geek TV Lineup [ slashdot.org ] was the first I heard about Big Bang Theory .
I remember thinking at the time that it was not remotely appealing to the presumably geek target audience .
I have to admit , though , that one of the comic book jokes was pretty funny .
Sheldon comes back from the store with the latest issue of Flash .
He asks his fictional hero , " Want to watch me read your comic ?
" A second later he asks , " Want to watch me read it again ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Slashdot's Fall Geek TV Lineup [slashdot.org] was the first I heard about Big Bang Theory.
I remember thinking at the time that it was not remotely appealing to the presumably geek target audience.
I have to admit, though, that one of the comic book jokes was pretty funny.
Sheldon comes back from the store with the latest issue of Flash.
He asks his fictional hero, "Want to watch me read your comic?
"  A second later he asks, "Want to watch me read it again?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124995</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1243531140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I concur. I used to read comics, friends of mine still do... I've been in the shops back then and recently... the stereotypes are for the most part true. Like all other stereotypes, they are based on some fact, and you just broaden the test group to include all peoples in a particular grouping. I'm pretty sure the majority of Chinese people have trouble speaking English words with L in them, and I'm pretty sure the Irish and Irish descendants love them some booze... was in Boston for St. Patrick's day, so I saw it first hand, and I frequent many a Chinese restaurant and not once have I heard them pronounce Mongolian beef without saying Mongorian.

Shoot, go to a comics convention. A lot of the attendees are normal everyday joe looking people, there are even some fantastically hot women there... but a good majority of them are comic book guy from the Simpsons, and thus they/we all get lumped into that group. Face it. Besides, it's not as fun to make fun of ordinary people with hobbies, as it is to make fun of people who live their hobbies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I concur .
I used to read comics , friends of mine still do... I 've been in the shops back then and recently... the stereotypes are for the most part true .
Like all other stereotypes , they are based on some fact , and you just broaden the test group to include all peoples in a particular grouping .
I 'm pretty sure the majority of Chinese people have trouble speaking English words with L in them , and I 'm pretty sure the Irish and Irish descendants love them some booze... was in Boston for St. Patrick 's day , so I saw it first hand , and I frequent many a Chinese restaurant and not once have I heard them pronounce Mongolian beef without saying Mongorian .
Shoot , go to a comics convention .
A lot of the attendees are normal everyday joe looking people , there are even some fantastically hot women there... but a good majority of them are comic book guy from the Simpsons , and thus they/we all get lumped into that group .
Face it .
Besides , it 's not as fun to make fun of ordinary people with hobbies , as it is to make fun of people who live their hobbies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I concur.
I used to read comics, friends of mine still do... I've been in the shops back then and recently... the stereotypes are for the most part true.
Like all other stereotypes, they are based on some fact, and you just broaden the test group to include all peoples in a particular grouping.
I'm pretty sure the majority of Chinese people have trouble speaking English words with L in them, and I'm pretty sure the Irish and Irish descendants love them some booze... was in Boston for St. Patrick's day, so I saw it first hand, and I frequent many a Chinese restaurant and not once have I heard them pronounce Mongolian beef without saying Mongorian.
Shoot, go to a comics convention.
A lot of the attendees are normal everyday joe looking people, there are even some fantastically hot women there... but a good majority of them are comic book guy from the Simpsons, and thus they/we all get lumped into that group.
Face it.
Besides, it's not as fun to make fun of ordinary people with hobbies, as it is to make fun of people who live their hobbies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124311</id>
	<title>Re:The Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243528260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Those geeks you make fun of in high school?  The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else?  Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.  So I guess it's ok to make fun of them all you want<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even when they've become your boss.</p> </div><p>I disagree.  These are the people that end up doing the work for whoever is in charge.  Not that there is anything wrong with this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those geeks you make fun of in high school ?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else ?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today .
So I guess it 's ok to make fun of them all you want ... even when they 've become your boss .
I disagree .
These are the people that end up doing the work for whoever is in charge .
Not that there is anything wrong with this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Those geeks you make fun of in high school?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.
So I guess it's ok to make fun of them all you want ... even when they've become your boss.
I disagree.
These are the people that end up doing the work for whoever is in charge.
Not that there is anything wrong with this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125327</id>
	<title>The Simpsons is just that way</title>
	<author>slaad</author>
	<datestamp>1243532520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores?</i>
<br> <br>
Well, the Simpsons feverently persists in stereotyping <i>everything</i>.... that's kind of what they do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do TV shows , such as 30 Rock , The Simpsons , Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond , persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores ?
Well , the Simpsons feverently persists in stereotyping everything.... that 's kind of what they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently stereotyping comic book fans and stores?
Well, the Simpsons feverently persists in stereotyping everything.... that's kind of what they do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703</id>
	<title>The Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently [sic] stereotyping comic book fans and stores?</p></div><p>Well, the article didn't help me answering that question, it just illustrated the stereotype. <br> <br>

My guess would be (1) because it's funny and (2) even someone like myself who spent tons of time in a comic book store get a kick out of it.  A lot of other stereotypes like hair brained teenage cheerleader will catch you a lot of criticism in the media.  Those geeks you make fun of in high school?  The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else?  Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.  So I guess it's ok to make fun of them all you want<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even when they've become your boss.  Other stereotypes hurt: i.e. "Math is hard."  <br> <br>

I do wish this article had broken down the social stigma it has associated with it though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... although perhaps there's not much to break down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do TV shows , such as 30 Rock , The Simpsons , Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond , persist in so ferevently [ sic ] stereotyping comic book fans and stores ? Well , the article did n't help me answering that question , it just illustrated the stereotype .
My guess would be ( 1 ) because it 's funny and ( 2 ) even someone like myself who spent tons of time in a comic book store get a kick out of it .
A lot of other stereotypes like hair brained teenage cheerleader will catch you a lot of criticism in the media .
Those geeks you make fun of in high school ?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else ?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today .
So I guess it 's ok to make fun of them all you want ... even when they 've become your boss .
Other stereotypes hurt : i.e .
" Math is hard .
" I do wish this article had broken down the social stigma it has associated with it though ... although perhaps there 's not much to break down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do TV shows, such as 30 Rock, The Simpsons, Heroes and Everyone Loves Raymond, persist in so ferevently [sic] stereotyping comic book fans and stores?Well, the article didn't help me answering that question, it just illustrated the stereotype.
My guess would be (1) because it's funny and (2) even someone like myself who spent tons of time in a comic book store get a kick out of it.
A lot of other stereotypes like hair brained teenage cheerleader will catch you a lot of criticism in the media.
Those geeks you make fun of in high school?
The ones that are hyper obsessive with social disorders that spend more time in their room reading than anywhere else?
Those are the people running a lot of stuff today.
So I guess it's ok to make fun of them all you want ... even when they've become your boss.
Other stereotypes hurt: i.e.
"Math is hard.
"   

I do wish this article had broken down the social stigma it has associated with it though ... although perhaps there's not much to break down.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123785</id>
	<title>It's not a stereotype if it's true.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a scientific fact that all black people love fried chicken.  That's not even a bad stereotype to be associated with, so I don't understand why people get all up in arms over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a scientific fact that all black people love fried chicken .
That 's not even a bad stereotype to be associated with , so I do n't understand why people get all up in arms over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a scientific fact that all black people love fried chicken.
That's not even a bad stereotype to be associated with, so I don't understand why people get all up in arms over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124459</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1243528800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like "batsuit" is attempt to legitimize men wearing "tights"..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like " batsuit " is attempt to legitimize men wearing " tights " . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like "batsuit" is attempt to legitimize men wearing "tights"..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124935</id>
	<title>Sturgeon's law</title>
	<author>DiscountBorg(TM)</author>
	<datestamp>1243530780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with trying to get comics respected is the complete social naivity of the biggest demograph of those who read comics.

My GF loves graphic novels, especially works by Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, etc.. The other day she randomly walked into a comic store the other day and picked up a manga.  There's something genuinely creepy being a girl in a store full of guys looking at drawings of oversexualized underage females.  I had to explain to her that while there is some pretty incredible manga out there, Sturgeon's law aptly applies.  It's hard to sort through all the crap, even if you are genuinely open-minded.

Later, I introduced her to some classic Osamu Tezuka (the Buddha series) which she couldn't put down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with trying to get comics respected is the complete social naivity of the biggest demograph of those who read comics .
My GF loves graphic novels , especially works by Alan Moore , Neil Gaiman , etc.. The other day she randomly walked into a comic store the other day and picked up a manga .
There 's something genuinely creepy being a girl in a store full of guys looking at drawings of oversexualized underage females .
I had to explain to her that while there is some pretty incredible manga out there , Sturgeon 's law aptly applies .
It 's hard to sort through all the crap , even if you are genuinely open-minded .
Later , I introduced her to some classic Osamu Tezuka ( the Buddha series ) which she could n't put down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with trying to get comics respected is the complete social naivity of the biggest demograph of those who read comics.
My GF loves graphic novels, especially works by Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, etc.. The other day she randomly walked into a comic store the other day and picked up a manga.
There's something genuinely creepy being a girl in a store full of guys looking at drawings of oversexualized underage females.
I had to explain to her that while there is some pretty incredible manga out there, Sturgeon's law aptly applies.
It's hard to sort through all the crap, even if you are genuinely open-minded.
Later, I introduced her to some classic Osamu Tezuka (the Buddha series) which she couldn't put down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128133</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1243541460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Call your congressman.</i> </p><p>I would, but I bet he's just a corrupt, fat, balding jerk in the 3-piece suit with a pocket watch who made his fortune off of graft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call your congressman .
I would , but I bet he 's just a corrupt , fat , balding jerk in the 3-piece suit with a pocket watch who made his fortune off of graft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Call your congressman.
I would, but I bet he's just a corrupt, fat, balding jerk in the 3-piece suit with a pocket watch who made his fortune off of graft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129783</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>Japie\_H</author>
	<datestamp>1243503480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like this? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7O4izi1fQE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Hot Girl in the Comic Shop</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this ?
Hot Girl in the Comic Shop [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this?
Hot Girl in the Comic Shop [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124535</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>EMCEngineer</author>
	<datestamp>1243529040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anecdotes are obviously not data, but my most recent experience is why I do not want to return to my local comics shop.</p><p>I stopped by on a Saturday, and they were having an event - a game tournament or the like.  The one image I most easily recall is a very overweight, poorly groomed, 30-something guy playing Yu-gi-oh.  If that is not a stereotypical patron, I don't know what is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anecdotes are obviously not data , but my most recent experience is why I do not want to return to my local comics shop.I stopped by on a Saturday , and they were having an event - a game tournament or the like .
The one image I most easily recall is a very overweight , poorly groomed , 30-something guy playing Yu-gi-oh .
If that is not a stereotypical patron , I do n't know what is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anecdotes are obviously not data, but my most recent experience is why I do not want to return to my local comics shop.I stopped by on a Saturday, and they were having an event - a game tournament or the like.
The one image I most easily recall is a very overweight, poorly groomed, 30-something guy playing Yu-gi-oh.
If that is not a stereotypical patron, I don't know what is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125097</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>theelectron</author>
	<datestamp>1243531620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not like the us vs them mentality is <a href="http://xkcd.com/588/" title="xkcd.com">ingrained in us as children</a> [xkcd.com] is it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like the us vs them mentality is ingrained in us as children [ xkcd.com ] is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like the us vs them mentality is ingrained in us as children [xkcd.com] is it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129045</id>
	<title>Re:For those who don't know Spaced...</title>
	<author>Scannerman</author>
	<datestamp>1243544100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one seems to have posted the link</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUkCJDkG3fg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUkCJDkG3fg</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one seems to have posted the linkhttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = hUkCJDkG3fg [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one seems to have posted the linkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUkCJDkG3fg [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124521</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1243529040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the issue here isn't that there ARE people who match the stereotypes, it's just a question of if the 4 normal people in the comic book store ever get portrayed at all. It's fine to show that un-hygienic and obsessive stereotype inflicting himself upon (presumably) a regular character, but do they also show the 4 normal people in the background looking on with that "I'm glad he didn't talk to me" expression on their faces?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the issue here is n't that there ARE people who match the stereotypes , it 's just a question of if the 4 normal people in the comic book store ever get portrayed at all .
It 's fine to show that un-hygienic and obsessive stereotype inflicting himself upon ( presumably ) a regular character , but do they also show the 4 normal people in the background looking on with that " I 'm glad he did n't talk to me " expression on their faces ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the issue here isn't that there ARE people who match the stereotypes, it's just a question of if the 4 normal people in the comic book store ever get portrayed at all.
It's fine to show that un-hygienic and obsessive stereotype inflicting himself upon (presumably) a regular character, but do they also show the 4 normal people in the background looking on with that "I'm glad he didn't talk to me" expression on their faces?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125265</id>
	<title>Re:It's not a stereotype if it's true.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it is a scientific fact that EVERYONE loves fried chicken, why should it be only limited to black individuals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it is a scientific fact that EVERYONE loves fried chicken , why should it be only limited to black individuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it is a scientific fact that EVERYONE loves fried chicken, why should it be only limited to black individuals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124693</id>
	<title>Re:I dunno.</title>
	<author>east coast</author>
	<datestamp>1243529760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really? One of the things I can say about this is that it sounds like you're going to a chain record store. I don't know if many of them still exist at this point but go to a mom and pop shop that doesn't seem to have too much of an genre bias and you'll probably find someone who knows more about music than you know about everything else put together.<br> <br>One of the reasons that you have such a good experience at the comic store is that AFAIK there are no chain comic book stores. The people involved got involved because of an interest in the product more than just the interest in the paycheck.<br> <br>And you should understand that once you get past genre bias there is so much going on in music that it's near impossible to know everything. It's hard to as a 50-something cashier with a Grateful Dead shirt on if he's heard the latest Lesbians on Ecstasy album or to ask the 22 year old with a green mohawk what he thinks might be good to someone who's big into Area Code 615.<br> <br>Because of this I would say your analogy is pretty unfair. One that would be closer to the truth is like going to Sam Goody (or whatever it is today) and trying to find someone who's hip or going to a Borders and finding someone who knows about comic books.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
One of the things I can say about this is that it sounds like you 're going to a chain record store .
I do n't know if many of them still exist at this point but go to a mom and pop shop that does n't seem to have too much of an genre bias and you 'll probably find someone who knows more about music than you know about everything else put together .
One of the reasons that you have such a good experience at the comic store is that AFAIK there are no chain comic book stores .
The people involved got involved because of an interest in the product more than just the interest in the paycheck .
And you should understand that once you get past genre bias there is so much going on in music that it 's near impossible to know everything .
It 's hard to as a 50-something cashier with a Grateful Dead shirt on if he 's heard the latest Lesbians on Ecstasy album or to ask the 22 year old with a green mohawk what he thinks might be good to someone who 's big into Area Code 615 .
Because of this I would say your analogy is pretty unfair .
One that would be closer to the truth is like going to Sam Goody ( or whatever it is today ) and trying to find someone who 's hip or going to a Borders and finding someone who knows about comic books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
One of the things I can say about this is that it sounds like you're going to a chain record store.
I don't know if many of them still exist at this point but go to a mom and pop shop that doesn't seem to have too much of an genre bias and you'll probably find someone who knows more about music than you know about everything else put together.
One of the reasons that you have such a good experience at the comic store is that AFAIK there are no chain comic book stores.
The people involved got involved because of an interest in the product more than just the interest in the paycheck.
And you should understand that once you get past genre bias there is so much going on in music that it's near impossible to know everything.
It's hard to as a 50-something cashier with a Grateful Dead shirt on if he's heard the latest Lesbians on Ecstasy album or to ask the 22 year old with a green mohawk what he thinks might be good to someone who's big into Area Code 615.
Because of this I would say your analogy is pretty unfair.
One that would be closer to the truth is like going to Sam Goody (or whatever it is today) and trying to find someone who's hip or going to a Borders and finding someone who knows about comic books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130003</id>
	<title>Re:I dunno.</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1243504500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They tend to have no interest in selling you anything, are disinterested and view your purchases with comtempt</p></div><p>It is interesting to hear you say that because apparently the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic\_book\_guy" title="wikipedia.org">Comic Book Guy</a> [wikipedia.org] was at least partly inspired by a clerk at the Los Angeles Amok book shop who often: "[Sat] on the high stool, kind of lording over the store with that supercilious attitude and eating behind the counter a big Styrofoam container full of fried clams with a lot of tartar sauce."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They tend to have no interest in selling you anything , are disinterested and view your purchases with comtemptIt is interesting to hear you say that because apparently the Comic Book Guy [ wikipedia.org ] was at least partly inspired by a clerk at the Los Angeles Amok book shop who often : " [ Sat ] on the high stool , kind of lording over the store with that supercilious attitude and eating behind the counter a big Styrofoam container full of fried clams with a lot of tartar sauce .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They tend to have no interest in selling you anything, are disinterested and view your purchases with comtemptIt is interesting to hear you say that because apparently the Comic Book Guy [wikipedia.org] was at least partly inspired by a clerk at the Los Angeles Amok book shop who often: "[Sat] on the high stool, kind of lording over the store with that supercilious attitude and eating behind the counter a big Styrofoam container full of fried clams with a lot of tartar sauce.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125439</id>
	<title>Matt Groening's take</title>
	<author>olddotter</author>
	<datestamp>1243533000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Matt Groening has said that the Simpson's team uses the comic book guy specifically to spare with their hardcore fan base the inhabits the online forums. (Only he probably worded it much better than I just did.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Matt Groening has said that the Simpson 's team uses the comic book guy specifically to spare with their hardcore fan base the inhabits the online forums .
( Only he probably worded it much better than I just did .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Matt Groening has said that the Simpson's team uses the comic book guy specifically to spare with their hardcore fan base the inhabits the online forums.
(Only he probably worded it much better than I just did.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124365</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>PhrostyMcByte</author>
	<datestamp>1243528440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I hear "Comic book" I think of a 20-30 page X-Men.  When I hear "Graphic novel" I think of a ~150 page Scott Pilgrim book or a ~600 page Blankets.  Graphic novels also usually have a definitive ending.  I see that distinction.</p><p>I think the problem comes from people who are too worried about looking like a stereotype, too worried about looking childish -- so they sell graphic novels as a more mature, adult version of a comic.  Which is totally false -- smart, mature comics with well written story arcs do exist, just like some childish graphic novels exist.  These guys need to accept who they are and stop being so self conscious.</p><p>I also think this, like most other stereotypes, is just exacerbated by a small number of very loud people.  None of the comic readers I know feel the need to defend themselves in such a silly manor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I hear " Comic book " I think of a 20-30 page X-Men .
When I hear " Graphic novel " I think of a ~ 150 page Scott Pilgrim book or a ~ 600 page Blankets .
Graphic novels also usually have a definitive ending .
I see that distinction.I think the problem comes from people who are too worried about looking like a stereotype , too worried about looking childish -- so they sell graphic novels as a more mature , adult version of a comic .
Which is totally false -- smart , mature comics with well written story arcs do exist , just like some childish graphic novels exist .
These guys need to accept who they are and stop being so self conscious.I also think this , like most other stereotypes , is just exacerbated by a small number of very loud people .
None of the comic readers I know feel the need to defend themselves in such a silly manor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I hear "Comic book" I think of a 20-30 page X-Men.
When I hear "Graphic novel" I think of a ~150 page Scott Pilgrim book or a ~600 page Blankets.
Graphic novels also usually have a definitive ending.
I see that distinction.I think the problem comes from people who are too worried about looking like a stereotype, too worried about looking childish -- so they sell graphic novels as a more mature, adult version of a comic.
Which is totally false -- smart, mature comics with well written story arcs do exist, just like some childish graphic novels exist.
These guys need to accept who they are and stop being so self conscious.I also think this, like most other stereotypes, is just exacerbated by a small number of very loud people.
None of the comic readers I know feel the need to defend themselves in such a silly manor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124621</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>MegaMahr</author>
	<datestamp>1243529400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll withhold the Simpson's quote, and instead marvel at your rediculously low member number.  Good to see your still around<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll withhold the Simpson 's quote , and instead marvel at your rediculously low member number .
Good to see your still around : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll withhold the Simpson's quote, and instead marvel at your rediculously low member number.
Good to see your still around :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131325</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1243510260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who are the "US and THEM"?</p><p>I'm a parent, I have a strong recollection of socialising with others in my village as a child. I never recall think of any group as an enemy.</p><p>I'm curious to know who the group is that I have to instill as "THEM" in my child next year?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who are the " US and THEM " ? I 'm a parent , I have a strong recollection of socialising with others in my village as a child .
I never recall think of any group as an enemy.I 'm curious to know who the group is that I have to instill as " THEM " in my child next year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who are the "US and THEM"?I'm a parent, I have a strong recollection of socialising with others in my village as a child.
I never recall think of any group as an enemy.I'm curious to know who the group is that I have to instill as "THEM" in my child next year?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130851</id>
	<title>Re:Not all stereotypes are wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You got off easy.  In my city that's worth 6d20 lashings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got off easy .
In my city that 's worth 6d20 lashings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got off easy.
In my city that's worth 6d20 lashings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28138409</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>kehren77</author>
	<datestamp>1243609860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The last time I was at a comic shop there was a guy in a cloak in there. But I also saw normal everyday looking kids in the D &amp; D section. </p><p>What does this tell us, stereotypes are based in fact but aren't true for all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last time I was at a comic shop there was a guy in a cloak in there .
But I also saw normal everyday looking kids in the D &amp; D section .
What does this tell us , stereotypes are based in fact but are n't true for all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last time I was at a comic shop there was a guy in a cloak in there.
But I also saw normal everyday looking kids in the D &amp; D section.
What does this tell us, stereotypes are based in fact but aren't true for all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123955</id>
	<title>Who isn't stereotyped</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know that comic shops and the patrons and owners are stereotyped more than anyone else.  I think like most so many other categories, they are used because they are mysterious.  For example, most people do not read any significant number of books, and even fewer read significant number of comic books, so people who do are mysterious.  Even fewer people write, so people who do, especially the amateurs that tend to occupy the genre fan fiction category, are triply mysterious.  Whining about it just makes us look like losers.
<p>
The article makes us really look like losers.  The one thing that is more stereotyped than the comic book guy is the cheerleader.  Save the cheerleader is both a catchphrase and an irony, because why does a girl who cannot be killed need saving, a la Buffy.  Yet we continue to want her to be the damsel in distress.  Bringing these two archetypes together was brilliant.  It is the thing that Heros does that no one understands.  Why do shows use stereotypes.  Because most people are simplistic, and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning.
</p><p>
Rocko is equally brilliant in that it is a good depiction of early young adult hood, when one is forced to learn to live.  It is not a pretty sight.  It is full of lots of scared people who deal with their fears in different ways.  Some by hiding in books, some by finding a new playmate every night.  Either one of these is stereotyped and seen as reasonable when on is young.  Being offended by Filbert says more about one's own issue rather than the character.  I find the show hard to take sometimes, but it is because it is so real.
</p><p>
The rest of the most of these are simply too pop culture and too obvious to even give credence.  Suffice it to say that we need to be secure enough with ourselves to not freak out anytime we are ridiculed.  We do the same with people we do not understand, like cheerleaders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know that comic shops and the patrons and owners are stereotyped more than anyone else .
I think like most so many other categories , they are used because they are mysterious .
For example , most people do not read any significant number of books , and even fewer read significant number of comic books , so people who do are mysterious .
Even fewer people write , so people who do , especially the amateurs that tend to occupy the genre fan fiction category , are triply mysterious .
Whining about it just makes us look like losers .
The article makes us really look like losers .
The one thing that is more stereotyped than the comic book guy is the cheerleader .
Save the cheerleader is both a catchphrase and an irony , because why does a girl who can not be killed need saving , a la Buffy .
Yet we continue to want her to be the damsel in distress .
Bringing these two archetypes together was brilliant .
It is the thing that Heros does that no one understands .
Why do shows use stereotypes .
Because most people are simplistic , and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning .
Rocko is equally brilliant in that it is a good depiction of early young adult hood , when one is forced to learn to live .
It is not a pretty sight .
It is full of lots of scared people who deal with their fears in different ways .
Some by hiding in books , some by finding a new playmate every night .
Either one of these is stereotyped and seen as reasonable when on is young .
Being offended by Filbert says more about one 's own issue rather than the character .
I find the show hard to take sometimes , but it is because it is so real .
The rest of the most of these are simply too pop culture and too obvious to even give credence .
Suffice it to say that we need to be secure enough with ourselves to not freak out anytime we are ridiculed .
We do the same with people we do not understand , like cheerleaders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know that comic shops and the patrons and owners are stereotyped more than anyone else.
I think like most so many other categories, they are used because they are mysterious.
For example, most people do not read any significant number of books, and even fewer read significant number of comic books, so people who do are mysterious.
Even fewer people write, so people who do, especially the amateurs that tend to occupy the genre fan fiction category, are triply mysterious.
Whining about it just makes us look like losers.
The article makes us really look like losers.
The one thing that is more stereotyped than the comic book guy is the cheerleader.
Save the cheerleader is both a catchphrase and an irony, because why does a girl who cannot be killed need saving, a la Buffy.
Yet we continue to want her to be the damsel in distress.
Bringing these two archetypes together was brilliant.
It is the thing that Heros does that no one understands.
Why do shows use stereotypes.
Because most people are simplistic, and have trouble with multiple levels of meaning.
Rocko is equally brilliant in that it is a good depiction of early young adult hood, when one is forced to learn to live.
It is not a pretty sight.
It is full of lots of scared people who deal with their fears in different ways.
Some by hiding in books, some by finding a new playmate every night.
Either one of these is stereotyped and seen as reasonable when on is young.
Being offended by Filbert says more about one's own issue rather than the character.
I find the show hard to take sometimes, but it is because it is so real.
The rest of the most of these are simply too pop culture and too obvious to even give credence.
Suffice it to say that we need to be secure enough with ourselves to not freak out anytime we are ridiculed.
We do the same with people we do not understand, like cheerleaders.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28136289</id>
	<title>Comic Book Straw Guy</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1243593120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recall the Simpsons episode where CBG was the target of an anti-fan speech given to Bart, the gist of which was that we should be grateful to suck up any crap the networks give us because it's "free entertainment". As if broadcasters don't have to pay to screen the show, and as if advertisers don't have to pay to advertise with them, and as if they don't recoup that money from us through product prices.

Oh, I've wasted my life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recall the Simpsons episode where CBG was the target of an anti-fan speech given to Bart , the gist of which was that we should be grateful to suck up any crap the networks give us because it 's " free entertainment " .
As if broadcasters do n't have to pay to screen the show , and as if advertisers do n't have to pay to advertise with them , and as if they do n't recoup that money from us through product prices .
Oh , I 've wasted my life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recall the Simpsons episode where CBG was the target of an anti-fan speech given to Bart, the gist of which was that we should be grateful to suck up any crap the networks give us because it's "free entertainment".
As if broadcasters don't have to pay to screen the show, and as if advertisers don't have to pay to advertise with them, and as if they don't recoup that money from us through product prices.
Oh, I've wasted my life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123689</id>
	<title>For those who don't know Spaced...</title>
	<author>andyh3930</author>
	<datestamp>1243525560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like... f*ckin'... Shaft.</p><p>The appropriate quote from the comic book shop scene</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tim : Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like... f * ckin'... Shaft.The appropriate quote from the comic book shop scene</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like... f*ckin'... Shaft.The appropriate quote from the comic book shop scene
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281</id>
	<title>Re:Where stereotypes come from</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1243528140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She is your girlfriend... You are single.<br>Single==not married.<br>I know that the world now has shades of grey but if so then they are this.<br>Single not married, not living with someone, not going to get married or live with some one soon.<br>In a relationship.. Dating the same person for a while and only that person.<br>In a long term relationship Living with someone.<br>Married.</p><p>The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement. and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She is your girlfriend... You are single.Single = = not married.I know that the world now has shades of grey but if so then they are this.Single not married , not living with someone , not going to get married or live with some one soon.In a relationship.. Dating the same person for a while and only that person.In a long term relationship Living with someone.Married.The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement .
and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She is your girlfriend... You are single.Single==not married.I know that the world now has shades of grey but if so then they are this.Single not married, not living with someone, not going to get married or live with some one soon.In a relationship.. Dating the same person for a while and only that person.In a long term relationship Living with someone.Married.The stereotype for Slashdot is living in your parents basement.
and scared of or tend to scare off members of the opposite sex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128591</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>TenBrothers</author>
	<datestamp>1243542660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with labeling such as "graphic novels" is that you force all objects with that structure to be novels, and all objects with the former structure (i.e. story-arc over multiple works) to be books.

Compare works of literature:  With this consideration, Harry Potter is no longer 7 works, it's one series of "word books."  The Lord of the Rings Series is a series of "word books."  And "Goodnight moon" becomes a "childrens' novel."

Claiming "graphic novel" as a difference you are necessarily taking umbrage at "comic book" as somehow being a lesser work.

Personally, I say they are all comic books.  More than one person works on them.  Novels are done by one person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with labeling such as " graphic novels " is that you force all objects with that structure to be novels , and all objects with the former structure ( i.e .
story-arc over multiple works ) to be books .
Compare works of literature : With this consideration , Harry Potter is no longer 7 works , it 's one series of " word books .
" The Lord of the Rings Series is a series of " word books .
" And " Goodnight moon " becomes a " childrens ' novel .
" Claiming " graphic novel " as a difference you are necessarily taking umbrage at " comic book " as somehow being a lesser work .
Personally , I say they are all comic books .
More than one person works on them .
Novels are done by one person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with labeling such as "graphic novels" is that you force all objects with that structure to be novels, and all objects with the former structure (i.e.
story-arc over multiple works) to be books.
Compare works of literature:  With this consideration, Harry Potter is no longer 7 works, it's one series of "word books.
"  The Lord of the Rings Series is a series of "word books.
"  And "Goodnight moon" becomes a "childrens' novel.
"

Claiming "graphic novel" as a difference you are necessarily taking umbrage at "comic book" as somehow being a lesser work.
Personally, I say they are all comic books.
More than one person works on them.
Novels are done by one person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125803</id>
	<title>Re:Jeremy from Lee's Comics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard, receding hairline, big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts. Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.</p></div><p>so he was "the collector" from powerpuff girls.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard , receding hairline , big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts .
Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.so he was " the collector " from powerpuff girls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Jeremy looked exactly like Comic Book Guy - Beard, receding hairline, big rotund body always wrapped in shorts and t-shirts.
Only difference was that Jeremy wore glasses.so he was "the collector" from powerpuff girls.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124483</id>
	<title>Re: How Comic Fans &amp; Shops Are Stereotyped</title>
	<author>Darth McBride</author>
	<datestamp>1243528920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Accurately?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Accurately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accurately?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123753</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>DarrenBaker</author>
	<datestamp>1243525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes it especially difficult in this case, since we *are* better than the funnybook cranks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes it especially difficult in this case , since we * are * better than the funnybook cranks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes it especially difficult in this case, since we *are* better than the funnybook cranks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243527960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it's societies that creats that image.<br>Watch small children, they generally want to get along. It's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's societies that creats that image.Watch small children , they generally want to get along .
It 's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's societies that creats that image.Watch small children, they generally want to get along.
It's around age 5 that parents start instilling an US and THEM mentality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124825</id>
	<title>Re:They are not "Comics" they are "Graphic Novels"</title>
	<author>highfidelitychris</author>
	<datestamp>1243530360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not a purse, it's European!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a purse , it 's European !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a purse, it's European!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125385</id>
	<title>Re:Ehemm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They forgot The Big Bang Theory and so many other great examples.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They forgot The Big Bang Theory and so many other great examples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They forgot The Big Bang Theory and so many other great examples.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124327</id>
	<title>Re:malcolm in the middle?</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1243528320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It had to end, it became too difficult to sustain the high level of humor while having their characters age normally and maintain a continual story arc through which the characters continue to evolve and get involved in new long-term situations.</p><p>In my opinion, it jumped the shark when Jamie was born.  Sure, it was still pretty funny, but it was clear that the road they were going down was not sustainable forever.  Add to that Frankie Muniz thinking he was a good enough actor to maintain a movie career, and you get a show that had to end before it got really bad.</p><p>Having said that, I do think it was a great show, and for a live-action show that has to deal with all the realities live action shows have to deal with (people growing up, etc), it managed to sustain the high quality much longer than most.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It had to end , it became too difficult to sustain the high level of humor while having their characters age normally and maintain a continual story arc through which the characters continue to evolve and get involved in new long-term situations.In my opinion , it jumped the shark when Jamie was born .
Sure , it was still pretty funny , but it was clear that the road they were going down was not sustainable forever .
Add to that Frankie Muniz thinking he was a good enough actor to maintain a movie career , and you get a show that had to end before it got really bad.Having said that , I do think it was a great show , and for a live-action show that has to deal with all the realities live action shows have to deal with ( people growing up , etc ) , it managed to sustain the high quality much longer than most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It had to end, it became too difficult to sustain the high level of humor while having their characters age normally and maintain a continual story arc through which the characters continue to evolve and get involved in new long-term situations.In my opinion, it jumped the shark when Jamie was born.
Sure, it was still pretty funny, but it was clear that the road they were going down was not sustainable forever.
Add to that Frankie Muniz thinking he was a good enough actor to maintain a movie career, and you get a show that had to end before it got really bad.Having said that, I do think it was a great show, and for a live-action show that has to deal with all the realities live action shows have to deal with (people growing up, etc), it managed to sustain the high quality much longer than most.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127005</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Avatar8</author>
	<datestamp>1243538340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think it's a stereotype if it's true.<p>
Every comic book store I've ever visited has some or all of the aspects depicted in those scenes. Comic book stores, the owners and the customers are geeky and to some extent creepy. I'm a sci-fi/fantasy/computer geek, but comic books go beyond any level of geekiness I could achieve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's a stereotype if it 's true .
Every comic book store I 've ever visited has some or all of the aspects depicted in those scenes .
Comic book stores , the owners and the customers are geeky and to some extent creepy .
I 'm a sci-fi/fantasy/computer geek , but comic books go beyond any level of geekiness I could achieve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's a stereotype if it's true.
Every comic book store I've ever visited has some or all of the aspects depicted in those scenes.
Comic book stores, the owners and the customers are geeky and to some extent creepy.
I'm a sci-fi/fantasy/computer geek, but comic books go beyond any level of geekiness I could achieve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126029</id>
	<title>Re:Human Nature</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1243535160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're going to need a cloning booth and a LOT of biomass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're going to need a cloning booth and a LOT of biomass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're going to need a cloning booth and a LOT of biomass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125143</id>
	<title>Re:Mod Article -1 Whiner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV. Call your congressman.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'll have you know, some members of Congress are female.  How do you sleep at night, making such blanket generalizations?!</p></div><p>Yes, the proper term is "Congresscritter."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV .
Call your congressman.I 'll have you know , some members of Congress are female .
How do you sleep at night , making such blanket generalizations ?
! Yes , the proper term is " Congresscritter .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comic book folks are the only ones stereotyped on TV.
Call your congressman.I'll have you know, some members of Congress are female.
How do you sleep at night, making such blanket generalizations?
!Yes, the proper term is "Congresscritter.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125407</id>
	<title>Re:Sad but true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly what I was going to say.  I love comics as much as the next person but every store I've been in thus far fits the stereo type.  Then again, maybe I just think they fit because I expect them to.  Maybe the stereotype has blinded me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly what I was going to say .
I love comics as much as the next person but every store I 've been in thus far fits the stereo type .
Then again , maybe I just think they fit because I expect them to .
Maybe the stereotype has blinded me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly what I was going to say.
I love comics as much as the next person but every store I've been in thus far fits the stereo type.
Then again, maybe I just think they fit because I expect them to.
Maybe the stereotype has blinded me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28153669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28138409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124651
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28157655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1334238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129117
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128919
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124757
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126029
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127227
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124031
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124777
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134095
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124477
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124281
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128621
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28157655
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124521
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28127605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28138409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123995
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125553
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125419
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125055
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28134167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28153669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28131091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123779
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124471
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124621
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126675
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28126945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28125327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28130089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28128591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28129045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123751
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28123875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1334238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1334238.28124971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
