<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_27_1656214</id>
	<title>Is Playing a DVD Harder Than Rocket Science?</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1243441260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>dacut writes <i>"After successfully repairing the Hubble Space Telescope, astronauts aboard the shuttle Atlantis found themselves with a free day due to thunderstorms which delayed their return.  They attempted to pass the time by watching movies, only to find that <a href="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090522/D98BF91G0.html">their laptops did not have the proper software</a>, and Houston was unable to help.  No word, alas, on what software was involved, though we can assume that software/codec updates are a tad difficult when you're orbiting the planet at 17,200MPH."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>dacut writes " After successfully repairing the Hubble Space Telescope , astronauts aboard the shuttle Atlantis found themselves with a free day due to thunderstorms which delayed their return .
They attempted to pass the time by watching movies , only to find that their laptops did not have the proper software , and Houston was unable to help .
No word , alas , on what software was involved , though we can assume that software/codec updates are a tad difficult when you 're orbiting the planet at 17,200MPH .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dacut writes "After successfully repairing the Hubble Space Telescope, astronauts aboard the shuttle Atlantis found themselves with a free day due to thunderstorms which delayed their return.
They attempted to pass the time by watching movies, only to find that their laptops did not have the proper software, and Houston was unable to help.
No word, alas, on what software was involved, though we can assume that software/codec updates are a tad difficult when you're orbiting the planet at 17,200MPH.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119139</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243444920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>frost pist

James</htmltext>
<tokenext>frost pist James</tokentext>
<sentencetext>frost pist

James</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120587</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure most OEM builds of Windows do ship with some sort of DVD player for exactly this reason, so the average person would never know that Windows can't play DVDs out of the box.</p><p>I'm equally sure, however, that NASA almost certainly use their own customised Windows install which very likely does not include DVD playback software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure most OEM builds of Windows do ship with some sort of DVD player for exactly this reason , so the average person would never know that Windows ca n't play DVDs out of the box.I 'm equally sure , however , that NASA almost certainly use their own customised Windows install which very likely does not include DVD playback software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure most OEM builds of Windows do ship with some sort of DVD player for exactly this reason, so the average person would never know that Windows can't play DVDs out of the box.I'm equally sure, however, that NASA almost certainly use their own customised Windows install which very likely does not include DVD playback software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28132229</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>zuperduperman</author>
	<datestamp>1243514820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep.  I like Vista quite a lot, use windows as my main desktop, I'm no Windows hater (also use plenty of linux for all kinds of servers).</p><p>But I was dumbfounded to find after installing Vista Business that it wouldn't play a simple DVD out of the box.  This is a pretty freakin expensive operating system - off the shelf, hundreds of dollars.  How can it not play a simple DVD!!?!  Do business people not work with DVDs?  How is it that a Home version of windows has this capability and a business version doesn't?</p><p>I absolutely detest what MS has done with the fragmentation of the different versions of windows.  It's one of their worst decisions IMHO and has a lot more to do with the failure of Vista than people realize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
I like Vista quite a lot , use windows as my main desktop , I 'm no Windows hater ( also use plenty of linux for all kinds of servers ) .But I was dumbfounded to find after installing Vista Business that it would n't play a simple DVD out of the box .
This is a pretty freakin expensive operating system - off the shelf , hundreds of dollars .
How can it not play a simple DVD ! ! ? !
Do business people not work with DVDs ?
How is it that a Home version of windows has this capability and a business version does n't ? I absolutely detest what MS has done with the fragmentation of the different versions of windows .
It 's one of their worst decisions IMHO and has a lot more to do with the failure of Vista than people realize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
I like Vista quite a lot, use windows as my main desktop, I'm no Windows hater (also use plenty of linux for all kinds of servers).But I was dumbfounded to find after installing Vista Business that it wouldn't play a simple DVD out of the box.
This is a pretty freakin expensive operating system - off the shelf, hundreds of dollars.
How can it not play a simple DVD!!?!
Do business people not work with DVDs?
How is it that a Home version of windows has this capability and a business version doesn't?I absolutely detest what MS has done with the fragmentation of the different versions of windows.
It's one of their worst decisions IMHO and has a lot more to do with the failure of Vista than people realize.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122511</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>neomunk</author>
	<datestamp>1243520100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?  Because DVDs are a recreational activity or because the DVD format is suboptimal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Because DVDs are a recreational activity or because the DVD format is suboptimal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Because DVDs are a recreational activity or because the DVD format is suboptimal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122661</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243520820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a bug that some distros of Windows can't play DVDs. Every time MS tries to include a feature like an antivirus or a DVD decoder, somebody sues them for being anti-competitive. Your OS is actually part of the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a bug that some distros of Windows ca n't play DVDs .
Every time MS tries to include a feature like an antivirus or a DVD decoder , somebody sues them for being anti-competitive .
Your OS is actually part of the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a bug that some distros of Windows can't play DVDs.
Every time MS tries to include a feature like an antivirus or a DVD decoder, somebody sues them for being anti-competitive.
Your OS is actually part of the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119629</id>
	<title>If you're going to ship humans to Mars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then on a long trip decent porn is pretty much a mission requirement.  They had better figure this out or human spaceflight is doomed to low earth orbit.  0G sex is good for the folks who need to check that box, but novelty wears off after a while.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then on a long trip decent porn is pretty much a mission requirement .
They had better figure this out or human spaceflight is doomed to low earth orbit .
0G sex is good for the folks who need to check that box , but novelty wears off after a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then on a long trip decent porn is pretty much a mission requirement.
They had better figure this out or human spaceflight is doomed to low earth orbit.
0G sex is good for the folks who need to check that box, but novelty wears off after a while.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125509</id>
	<title>Re:Modems</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1243533300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If NASA can get internet, and NASA communicates with the space station... What era is NASA living in, if the space station can't get an internet connection. The internet solves all problems, especially missing codec problems.</p></div><p>The Space Station can get Internet access.  They're not on the Space Station.  They're on a shuttle, next to the Hubble Telescope.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If NASA can get internet , and NASA communicates with the space station... What era is NASA living in , if the space station ca n't get an internet connection .
The internet solves all problems , especially missing codec problems.The Space Station can get Internet access .
They 're not on the Space Station .
They 're on a shuttle , next to the Hubble Telescope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If NASA can get internet, and NASA communicates with the space station... What era is NASA living in, if the space station can't get an internet connection.
The internet solves all problems, especially missing codec problems.The Space Station can get Internet access.
They're not on the Space Station.
They're on a shuttle, next to the Hubble Telescope.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120307</id>
	<title>What basement dwellers, those astronauts!</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1243544220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ultimate, extreme geek. There you are, with the most scenic view of all times. For many it would be a once in a lifetime opportunity, to see the earth in its whole glory, from above the clouds...</p><p>And what do you want to do? Watch a DVD movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ultimate , extreme geek .
There you are , with the most scenic view of all times .
For many it would be a once in a lifetime opportunity , to see the earth in its whole glory , from above the clouds...And what do you want to do ?
Watch a DVD movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ultimate, extreme geek.
There you are, with the most scenic view of all times.
For many it would be a once in a lifetime opportunity, to see the earth in its whole glory, from above the clouds...And what do you want to do?
Watch a DVD movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123381</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds odd....</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1243524120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm also surprised they would bring DVD's. Why bring several clunky physical media, when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives (ripped, that is). I rip movies from legal DVD's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip; one would think when you're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter...</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...because they're a US government agency and the DMCA makes DVD ripping illegal?</p><p>(See Also: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal\_v.\_Reimerdes" title="wikipedia.org">Universal v. Reimerdes</a> [wikipedia.org])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm also surprised they would bring DVD 's .
Why bring several clunky physical media , when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives ( ripped , that is ) .
I rip movies from legal DVD 's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip ; one would think when you 're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter... ...because they 're a US government agency and the DMCA makes DVD ripping illegal ?
( See Also : Universal v. Reimerdes [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm also surprised they would bring DVD's.
Why bring several clunky physical media, when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives (ripped, that is).
I rip movies from legal DVD's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip; one would think when you're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter... ...because they're a US government agency and the DMCA makes DVD ripping illegal?
(See Also: Universal v. Reimerdes [wikipedia.org])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120489</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...<i>in space</i>...and they're going to <i>watch a movie</i>?  Really?</p></div><p>Well, i read from somewhere, that it's hard to have sex in zero G. So yeah, what else could they do? Watch some pr0n and masturbate. What would you do? Moon the moon?</p><p>As a side note, someone should extrude a pun out of "having sex in/with zero G" (muawhahwa).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , am I the only one who read that and thought , " They 're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they 're going to watch a movie ?
Really ? Well , i read from somewhere , that it 's hard to have sex in zero G. So yeah , what else could they do ?
Watch some pr0n and masturbate .
What would you do ?
Moon the moon ? As a side note , someone should extrude a pun out of " having sex in/with zero G " ( muawhahwa ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they're going to watch a movie?
Really?Well, i read from somewhere, that it's hard to have sex in zero G. So yeah, what else could they do?
Watch some pr0n and masturbate.
What would you do?
Moon the moon?As a side note, someone should extrude a pun out of "having sex in/with zero G" (muawhahwa).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120919</id>
	<title>I bet it was region-coded</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1243507260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and the player would play only DVDs certified for Low Earth Orbit area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and the player would play only DVDs certified for Low Earth Orbit area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the player would play only DVDs certified for Low Earth Orbit area.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121331</id>
	<title>waste of time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243511400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would they have brought movie dvd's with them in the first place? That's really sad if they couldn't find anything better to do. I mean they could at least play around with some video or still cameras and take interesting photos in 0G. Particularly since this is one of the last space shuttle flights ever, you think they would make better use of the time. Pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would they have brought movie dvd 's with them in the first place ?
That 's really sad if they could n't find anything better to do .
I mean they could at least play around with some video or still cameras and take interesting photos in 0G .
Particularly since this is one of the last space shuttle flights ever , you think they would make better use of the time .
Pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would they have brought movie dvd's with them in the first place?
That's really sad if they couldn't find anything better to do.
I mean they could at least play around with some video or still cameras and take interesting photos in 0G.
Particularly since this is one of the last space shuttle flights ever, you think they would make better use of the time.
Pathetic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119963</id>
	<title>I have no idea why..</title>
	<author>Cheney</author>
	<datestamp>1243453620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I absolutely <i>shudder</i> to understand why but this whole movie just made me think of the God forsaken movie about ol' Mark Twain and his beloved comet.

<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088678/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088678/</a> [imdb.com]

Hold me, please?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I absolutely shudder to understand why but this whole movie just made me think of the God forsaken movie about ol ' Mark Twain and his beloved comet .
http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0088678/ [ imdb.com ] Hold me , please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I absolutely shudder to understand why but this whole movie just made me think of the God forsaken movie about ol' Mark Twain and his beloved comet.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088678/ [imdb.com]

Hold me, please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119745</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243450680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect each crewmember has a certain allowance for personal items, and I'm sure whatever DVD's they have were part of someone's personal items. I highly doubt they were part of official mission planning.</p><p>And I'm sure the computers were both *not* part of anyone's personal allowance, and I'm sure they did work for whatever they were intended to do as part of the mission, which probably didn't include playing DVD's.</p><p>Basically, it probably didn't occur to whoever did bring the DVD's to check to make sure the computers they had would be able to play them. Perhaps they didn't have an opportunity to do so, perhaps they assumed any computer could play DVD's. Possibly even if they had thought about it and wanted to burn a disc with some playing software on it, if these were mission-critical computers they aren't allowed to install additional software on them.</p><p>In any case, I see two things coming of this. One, it will raise awareness of how DRM and software patents/licenses interfere with reasonable legitimate use of media, and two, someone at NASA will probably get software that can play DVD's and include it for future space missions, wether on the shuttle or whatever else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect each crewmember has a certain allowance for personal items , and I 'm sure whatever DVD 's they have were part of someone 's personal items .
I highly doubt they were part of official mission planning.And I 'm sure the computers were both * not * part of anyone 's personal allowance , and I 'm sure they did work for whatever they were intended to do as part of the mission , which probably did n't include playing DVD 's.Basically , it probably did n't occur to whoever did bring the DVD 's to check to make sure the computers they had would be able to play them .
Perhaps they did n't have an opportunity to do so , perhaps they assumed any computer could play DVD 's .
Possibly even if they had thought about it and wanted to burn a disc with some playing software on it , if these were mission-critical computers they are n't allowed to install additional software on them.In any case , I see two things coming of this .
One , it will raise awareness of how DRM and software patents/licenses interfere with reasonable legitimate use of media , and two , someone at NASA will probably get software that can play DVD 's and include it for future space missions , wether on the shuttle or whatever else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect each crewmember has a certain allowance for personal items, and I'm sure whatever DVD's they have were part of someone's personal items.
I highly doubt they were part of official mission planning.And I'm sure the computers were both *not* part of anyone's personal allowance, and I'm sure they did work for whatever they were intended to do as part of the mission, which probably didn't include playing DVD's.Basically, it probably didn't occur to whoever did bring the DVD's to check to make sure the computers they had would be able to play them.
Perhaps they didn't have an opportunity to do so, perhaps they assumed any computer could play DVD's.
Possibly even if they had thought about it and wanted to burn a disc with some playing software on it, if these were mission-critical computers they aren't allowed to install additional software on them.In any case, I see two things coming of this.
One, it will raise awareness of how DRM and software patents/licenses interfere with reasonable legitimate use of media, and two, someone at NASA will probably get software that can play DVD's and include it for future space missions, wether on the shuttle or whatever else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121377</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>[HooL]</author>
	<datestamp>1243512060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching planet earth from outer space will be fascinating for an hour and the fascination will be renewed whenever lighting chances or any other circumstances lead to a new view. However, staring 8 hours at a blue ball will not be fascinating enough.<br>Maybe for a Zen buddhist, yes, but not for scientists/astronaut hybrids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching planet earth from outer space will be fascinating for an hour and the fascination will be renewed whenever lighting chances or any other circumstances lead to a new view .
However , staring 8 hours at a blue ball will not be fascinating enough.Maybe for a Zen buddhist , yes , but not for scientists/astronaut hybrids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching planet earth from outer space will be fascinating for an hour and the fascination will be renewed whenever lighting chances or any other circumstances lead to a new view.
However, staring 8 hours at a blue ball will not be fascinating enough.Maybe for a Zen buddhist, yes, but not for scientists/astronaut hybrids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119903</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243452300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NOTE: Any and all MS boxes I have seen in the last few years have media center hiding in it. Also many of my dvd's have BASIC codecs or software to play it lurking on the disc.  They may not play the sound right though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NOTE : Any and all MS boxes I have seen in the last few years have media center hiding in it .
Also many of my dvd 's have BASIC codecs or software to play it lurking on the disc .
They may not play the sound right though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NOTE: Any and all MS boxes I have seen in the last few years have media center hiding in it.
Also many of my dvd's have BASIC codecs or software to play it lurking on the disc.
They may not play the sound right though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119393</id>
	<title>Doh!!</title>
	<author>XB-70</author>
	<datestamp>1243447320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much is the weight allowance for a Knoppix DVD?<p>
What about dual booting? A backup OS such as Linux would be smart at best and prudent at worst. I mean, isn't NASA about redundancy?
</p><p>I still agree with the comment about looking out the window rather than watching movies on their day off. Come on!! I'm sure a few kids on earth would have loved to ask for pics to be taken etc. etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much is the weight allowance for a Knoppix DVD ?
What about dual booting ?
A backup OS such as Linux would be smart at best and prudent at worst .
I mean , is n't NASA about redundancy ?
I still agree with the comment about looking out the window rather than watching movies on their day off .
Come on ! !
I 'm sure a few kids on earth would have loved to ask for pics to be taken etc .
etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much is the weight allowance for a Knoppix DVD?
What about dual booting?
A backup OS such as Linux would be smart at best and prudent at worst.
I mean, isn't NASA about redundancy?
I still agree with the comment about looking out the window rather than watching movies on their day off.
Come on!!
I'm sure a few kids on earth would have loved to ask for pics to be taken etc.
etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119547</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people planning missions for NASA shouldn't be spending even a single second making sure the astronauts can watch DVDs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people planning missions for NASA should n't be spending even a single second making sure the astronauts can watch DVDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people planning missions for NASA shouldn't be spending even a single second making sure the astronauts can watch DVDs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120271</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1243543860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For one thing, the novelty of it all wears off rather quickly, I assume. Then it's just pretty difficult living conditions. The other reason is that the ISS doesn't have an observation deck, so aside from the absence of gravity, you're simply in a bunch of big steel tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For one thing , the novelty of it all wears off rather quickly , I assume .
Then it 's just pretty difficult living conditions .
The other reason is that the ISS does n't have an observation deck , so aside from the absence of gravity , you 're simply in a bunch of big steel tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For one thing, the novelty of it all wears off rather quickly, I assume.
Then it's just pretty difficult living conditions.
The other reason is that the ISS doesn't have an observation deck, so aside from the absence of gravity, you're simply in a bunch of big steel tubes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28132091</id>
	<title>Don't send DVDs to the aliens, then</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243514040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say this to the aliens when eventually they spot the Pioneer disc, the Voyager gold record, the Active SETI or METI messages, or other interstellar messages we have sent using technological tools and obscure codes that even here on Terra only a few specialist scientists can decipher and understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Say this to the aliens when eventually they spot the Pioneer disc , the Voyager gold record , the Active SETI or METI messages , or other interstellar messages we have sent using technological tools and obscure codes that even here on Terra only a few specialist scientists can decipher and understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say this to the aliens when eventually they spot the Pioneer disc, the Voyager gold record, the Active SETI or METI messages, or other interstellar messages we have sent using technological tools and obscure codes that even here on Terra only a few specialist scientists can decipher and understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125349</id>
	<title>Priorities People!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have no idea how much it pisses me off that these folks are IN SPACE and they need to pass the time!  I mean come on!  I feel bad enough watching a movie if it's nice outside.  This is kind of like parents zoned out on their ipods as they 'play' with their kids in the park.  Priorities people!  No one ever said on their death bed, "I wish I had watched a few more episodes of Friends."  Kurtsweil not withstanding, we only get one chance at this life.  Squeeze the most out of it!  Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have no idea how much it pisses me off that these folks are IN SPACE and they need to pass the time !
I mean come on !
I feel bad enough watching a movie if it 's nice outside .
This is kind of like parents zoned out on their ipods as they 'play ' with their kids in the park .
Priorities people !
No one ever said on their death bed , " I wish I had watched a few more episodes of Friends .
" Kurtsweil not withstanding , we only get one chance at this life .
Squeeze the most out of it !
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have no idea how much it pisses me off that these folks are IN SPACE and they need to pass the time!
I mean come on!
I feel bad enough watching a movie if it's nice outside.
This is kind of like parents zoned out on their ipods as they 'play' with their kids in the park.
Priorities people!
No one ever said on their death bed, "I wish I had watched a few more episodes of Friends.
"  Kurtsweil not withstanding, we only get one chance at this life.
Squeeze the most out of it!
Thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121147</id>
	<title>Re:Chatty Tech Support..</title>
	<author>Rocketship Underpant</author>
	<datestamp>1243509480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because "Bob from Houston" is actually Assim from Bangalore who just reads through a long list of unrelated technical questions in an unintelligible accent before putting the astronaut on hold and accidentally disconnecting him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because " Bob from Houston " is actually Assim from Bangalore who just reads through a long list of unrelated technical questions in an unintelligible accent before putting the astronaut on hold and accidentally disconnecting him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because "Bob from Houston" is actually Assim from Bangalore who just reads through a long list of unrelated technical questions in an unintelligible accent before putting the astronaut on hold and accidentally disconnecting him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120599</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine the novelty of staring at the Earth from space and bouncing around in zero gravity wears off after the first 10 or 15 hours of having nothing else to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine the novelty of staring at the Earth from space and bouncing around in zero gravity wears off after the first 10 or 15 hours of having nothing else to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine the novelty of staring at the Earth from space and bouncing around in zero gravity wears off after the first 10 or 15 hours of having nothing else to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125911</id>
	<title>No Russians To Help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure that on the ISS there's some russian gear with this capability.  RIAA would not touch this for the same reason they don't touch the military-a place where new soldiers are asked to dump their music and movies on the communal hard drive when they come "in country".  Bad Politics.</p><p>I guess the DVD player would have to cycle regions as it orbited<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that on the ISS there 's some russian gear with this capability .
RIAA would not touch this for the same reason they do n't touch the military-a place where new soldiers are asked to dump their music and movies on the communal hard drive when they come " in country " .
Bad Politics.I guess the DVD player would have to cycle regions as it orbited : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that on the ISS there's some russian gear with this capability.
RIAA would not touch this for the same reason they don't touch the military-a place where new soldiers are asked to dump their music and movies on the communal hard drive when they come "in country".
Bad Politics.I guess the DVD player would have to cycle regions as it orbited :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125489</id>
	<title>Expensive film</title>
	<author>Fifth Earth</author>
	<datestamp>1243533240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some back of the napkin calculations say that to lift a 1-oz. DVD (that they can't play) into orbit on the shuttle costs about $500.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some back of the napkin calculations say that to lift a 1-oz .
DVD ( that they ca n't play ) into orbit on the shuttle costs about $ 500 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some back of the napkin calculations say that to lift a 1-oz.
DVD (that they can't play) into orbit on the shuttle costs about $500.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120823</id>
	<title>A DVD player in earth orbit</title>
	<author>Markee</author>
	<datestamp>1243506360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey astronauts, maybe you should not have set a new country code every 15 minutes while passing over the next continent....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey astronauts , maybe you should not have set a new country code every 15 minutes while passing over the next continent... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey astronauts, maybe you should not have set a new country code every 15 minutes while passing over the next continent....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123207</id>
	<title>DVD vs. rocket science</title>
	<author>OhHellWithIt</author>
	<datestamp>1243523340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is Playing a DVD Harder Than Rocket Science?</p></div><p>Hmmm, let's think about this. The Germans were playing with V2s in the 1940s, and the Soviets put a satellite into orbit in 1957; in 1969, NASA was still doing some calculations with slide rules. The DVD was introduced in the mid-1990s and requires some fairly serious computer technology plus a technology called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation</a> [wikipedia.org] (LASER) which wasn't available until the 1960s.
</p><p>I think playing a DVD is harder.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Playing a DVD Harder Than Rocket Science ? Hmmm , let 's think about this .
The Germans were playing with V2s in the 1940s , and the Soviets put a satellite into orbit in 1957 ; in 1969 , NASA was still doing some calculations with slide rules .
The DVD was introduced in the mid-1990s and requires some fairly serious computer technology plus a technology called light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation [ wikipedia.org ] ( LASER ) which was n't available until the 1960s .
I think playing a DVD is harder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Playing a DVD Harder Than Rocket Science?Hmmm, let's think about this.
The Germans were playing with V2s in the 1940s, and the Soviets put a satellite into orbit in 1957; in 1969, NASA was still doing some calculations with slide rules.
The DVD was introduced in the mid-1990s and requires some fairly serious computer technology plus a technology called light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation [wikipedia.org] (LASER) which wasn't available until the 1960s.
I think playing a DVD is harder.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123813</id>
	<title>They dodged a bullet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They dodged a bullet.  I hear they were going to watch Armageddon...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They dodged a bullet .
I hear they were going to watch Armageddon.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They dodged a bullet.
I hear they were going to watch Armageddon...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565</id>
	<title>MPC Home Cinema  VLC</title>
	<author>Aereus</author>
	<datestamp>1243449060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC isn't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.</p><p>Media Player Classic Home Cinema is a much superior player that also has built-in playback codecs.<br><a href="http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC is n't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.Media Player Classic Home Cinema is a much superior player that also has built-in playback codecs.http : //mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC isn't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.Media Player Classic Home Cinema is a much superior player that also has built-in playback codecs.http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122217</id>
	<title>Why are we launching DVDs into orbit?</title>
	<author>Simulant</author>
	<datestamp>1243518540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Nobody thought to rip 'em to the hd?  I was under the impression that every ounce counted when launching a shuttle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Nobody thought to rip 'em to the hd ?
I was under the impression that every ounce counted when launching a shuttle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Nobody thought to rip 'em to the hd?
I was under the impression that every ounce counted when launching a shuttle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122181</id>
	<title>Re:When you're in space ...</title>
	<author>PhxBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1243518360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But they <b>can</b> hear you scream "KHHAAAAAAAAAANNN!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>But they can hear you scream " KHHAAAAAAAAAANNN !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they can hear you scream "KHHAAAAAAAAAANNN!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119387</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119365</id>
	<title>Windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243446960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing they were using windows<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing they were using windows : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing they were using windows :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120163</id>
	<title>Thinking out of the box</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why didn't NASA just arrange to play movie requests on a string of large format stadium screens and the guys from the shuttle then point Hubble at them as they orbit? I'm sure they could have found a composite video output somewhere and watched on a shuttle monitor.</p><p>See, there's often a simple solution to these kind of problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't NASA just arrange to play movie requests on a string of large format stadium screens and the guys from the shuttle then point Hubble at them as they orbit ?
I 'm sure they could have found a composite video output somewhere and watched on a shuttle monitor.See , there 's often a simple solution to these kind of problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't NASA just arrange to play movie requests on a string of large format stadium screens and the guys from the shuttle then point Hubble at them as they orbit?
I'm sure they could have found a composite video output somewhere and watched on a shuttle monitor.See, there's often a simple solution to these kind of problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120185</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...<i>in space</i>...and they're going to <i>watch a movie</i>?</p></div><p>Ummm yes.... What else would you have them do? Space isn't a magical place that suddenly because exciting because you get a funny feeling watching Star Trek. I can't imagine a more boring place. It's nothing but a vast empty abyss. Plus it's not like they can go off exploring neighbouring planets at warp speed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , am I the only one who read that and thought , " They 're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they 're going to watch a movie ? Ummm yes.... What else would you have them do ?
Space is n't a magical place that suddenly because exciting because you get a funny feeling watching Star Trek .
I ca n't imagine a more boring place .
It 's nothing but a vast empty abyss .
Plus it 's not like they can go off exploring neighbouring planets at warp speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they're going to watch a movie?Ummm yes.... What else would you have them do?
Space isn't a magical place that suddenly because exciting because you get a funny feeling watching Star Trek.
I can't imagine a more boring place.
It's nothing but a vast empty abyss.
Plus it's not like they can go off exploring neighbouring planets at warp speed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</id>
	<title>NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1243447440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll be the first to offer up that I am not the most organized planner or manager.  But I have known plenty who were and they could plan anything down to the last detail.  I know these people cannot be THAT rare.</p><p>NASA's history is filled with incidents where they forgot tiny details and some pretty major ones as well.  While the inability to play a movie isn't a show-stopper, it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing.  But we can also thank the greed of the motion picture industry that insisted on controlling the what and the where of the DVDs you own can be played.  And of course, if the users of the computer(s) in question knew about it, VLC would have been a good option regardless of the OS run.  But all-in-all, this incident highlights exactly what is wrong with NASA.</p><p>I know NASA wants everyone to believe they are the most careful and meticulous planners on the planet.  Nothing could be further from the truth, I think.  I have no solutions to offer, so this commentary won't be particularly helpful, but one notion comes to mind that I think should be pretty obvious -- fire the beureaucrats who muck up the works with their self-important nonsense and put people in charge who are selfless and actually care about the mission.</p><p>There shouldn't be a single piece of gear going up into space that doesn't work and there should always be a complete inventory of every item that goes up there complete with weight, density and other details such as whether or not it works.  And I could go on and on about space craft design, repair and maintenance policies and procedures, but suffice to say that NASA is supposed to be an extremely idealistic program that is above politics and power games though presently, it is not only made up of politics and power games, it is "that" intensified beyond that which one typically encounters.</p><p>It's a huge mess and it sickens me to see it.  NASA was once looked upon as an amazing program well above the pettiness of other daily things, but now it is well below the idealism that it started from and is, at every turn, the poster child of waste and corruption thanks to the influence of the aerospace industry and the military industrial complex that owns it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be the first to offer up that I am not the most organized planner or manager .
But I have known plenty who were and they could plan anything down to the last detail .
I know these people can not be THAT rare.NASA 's history is filled with incidents where they forgot tiny details and some pretty major ones as well .
While the inability to play a movie is n't a show-stopper , it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing .
But we can also thank the greed of the motion picture industry that insisted on controlling the what and the where of the DVDs you own can be played .
And of course , if the users of the computer ( s ) in question knew about it , VLC would have been a good option regardless of the OS run .
But all-in-all , this incident highlights exactly what is wrong with NASA.I know NASA wants everyone to believe they are the most careful and meticulous planners on the planet .
Nothing could be further from the truth , I think .
I have no solutions to offer , so this commentary wo n't be particularly helpful , but one notion comes to mind that I think should be pretty obvious -- fire the beureaucrats who muck up the works with their self-important nonsense and put people in charge who are selfless and actually care about the mission.There should n't be a single piece of gear going up into space that does n't work and there should always be a complete inventory of every item that goes up there complete with weight , density and other details such as whether or not it works .
And I could go on and on about space craft design , repair and maintenance policies and procedures , but suffice to say that NASA is supposed to be an extremely idealistic program that is above politics and power games though presently , it is not only made up of politics and power games , it is " that " intensified beyond that which one typically encounters.It 's a huge mess and it sickens me to see it .
NASA was once looked upon as an amazing program well above the pettiness of other daily things , but now it is well below the idealism that it started from and is , at every turn , the poster child of waste and corruption thanks to the influence of the aerospace industry and the military industrial complex that owns it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be the first to offer up that I am not the most organized planner or manager.
But I have known plenty who were and they could plan anything down to the last detail.
I know these people cannot be THAT rare.NASA's history is filled with incidents where they forgot tiny details and some pretty major ones as well.
While the inability to play a movie isn't a show-stopper, it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing.
But we can also thank the greed of the motion picture industry that insisted on controlling the what and the where of the DVDs you own can be played.
And of course, if the users of the computer(s) in question knew about it, VLC would have been a good option regardless of the OS run.
But all-in-all, this incident highlights exactly what is wrong with NASA.I know NASA wants everyone to believe they are the most careful and meticulous planners on the planet.
Nothing could be further from the truth, I think.
I have no solutions to offer, so this commentary won't be particularly helpful, but one notion comes to mind that I think should be pretty obvious -- fire the beureaucrats who muck up the works with their self-important nonsense and put people in charge who are selfless and actually care about the mission.There shouldn't be a single piece of gear going up into space that doesn't work and there should always be a complete inventory of every item that goes up there complete with weight, density and other details such as whether or not it works.
And I could go on and on about space craft design, repair and maintenance policies and procedures, but suffice to say that NASA is supposed to be an extremely idealistic program that is above politics and power games though presently, it is not only made up of politics and power games, it is "that" intensified beyond that which one typically encounters.It's a huge mess and it sickens me to see it.
NASA was once looked upon as an amazing program well above the pettiness of other daily things, but now it is well below the idealism that it started from and is, at every turn, the poster child of waste and corruption thanks to the influence of the aerospace industry and the military industrial complex that owns it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121061</id>
	<title>Re:Lifting dvds into space, why?</title>
	<author>fwarren</author>
	<datestamp>1243508640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone like "Amazon" or "Apple" should provide Movies for the space missions. It is great PR. Each astronaut picks 5 movies or so, which get loaded onto the laptop. It saves NASA and the taxpayers money, because you don't have to pay for the fuel to lift the DVDs. Someone has made sure the software to view the movies is on the Laptop in whatever OS they are using. And who ever pulls off this PR stunt pays 1 or 2 bucks in royalties to the studios. </p><p>It sounds like a win-win to everyone involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone like " Amazon " or " Apple " should provide Movies for the space missions .
It is great PR .
Each astronaut picks 5 movies or so , which get loaded onto the laptop .
It saves NASA and the taxpayers money , because you do n't have to pay for the fuel to lift the DVDs .
Someone has made sure the software to view the movies is on the Laptop in whatever OS they are using .
And who ever pulls off this PR stunt pays 1 or 2 bucks in royalties to the studios .
It sounds like a win-win to everyone involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone like "Amazon" or "Apple" should provide Movies for the space missions.
It is great PR.
Each astronaut picks 5 movies or so, which get loaded onto the laptop.
It saves NASA and the taxpayers money, because you don't have to pay for the fuel to lift the DVDs.
Someone has made sure the software to view the movies is on the Laptop in whatever OS they are using.
And who ever pulls off this PR stunt pays 1 or 2 bucks in royalties to the studios.
It sounds like a win-win to everyone involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121179</id>
	<title>Re:VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243509780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it isn't. Firstly, VLC and MPC have different design goals - VLC is designed to be a standalone media streaming platform, whereas MPC is designed to be a simple, kitchen-sink-included media player. It just happens to be that VLC is a fairly decent (if not daunting and ugly) local media player. Secondly, MPC does not have a non-windows port, whereas VLC works on nearly everything - something that makes MPC <b>extremely</b> inferior for cross-platform users (eg, Apple users who may find themselves trapped on a windows PCs, ultra-portable platforms, homebrew linux-based media servers, etc). Next you'll be telling us that a Prius is "better" than a Big Rig. Please keep your ill-informed nonsense to yourself, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it is n't .
Firstly , VLC and MPC have different design goals - VLC is designed to be a standalone media streaming platform , whereas MPC is designed to be a simple , kitchen-sink-included media player .
It just happens to be that VLC is a fairly decent ( if not daunting and ugly ) local media player .
Secondly , MPC does not have a non-windows port , whereas VLC works on nearly everything - something that makes MPC extremely inferior for cross-platform users ( eg , Apple users who may find themselves trapped on a windows PCs , ultra-portable platforms , homebrew linux-based media servers , etc ) .
Next you 'll be telling us that a Prius is " better " than a Big Rig .
Please keep your ill-informed nonsense to yourself , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it isn't.
Firstly, VLC and MPC have different design goals - VLC is designed to be a standalone media streaming platform, whereas MPC is designed to be a simple, kitchen-sink-included media player.
It just happens to be that VLC is a fairly decent (if not daunting and ugly) local media player.
Secondly, MPC does not have a non-windows port, whereas VLC works on nearly everything - something that makes MPC extremely inferior for cross-platform users (eg, Apple users who may find themselves trapped on a windows PCs, ultra-portable platforms, homebrew linux-based media servers, etc).
Next you'll be telling us that a Prius is "better" than a Big Rig.
Please keep your ill-informed nonsense to yourself, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119509</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123933</id>
	<title>Might be useful for the mission to Mars...</title>
	<author>kbaud</author>
	<datestamp>1243526820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This may be a minor annoyance in orbit but for a long trip to Mars it becomes more important to crew moral and reducing "cabin fever".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may be a minor annoyance in orbit but for a long trip to Mars it becomes more important to crew moral and reducing " cabin fever " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may be a minor annoyance in orbit but for a long trip to Mars it becomes more important to crew moral and reducing "cabin fever".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122569</id>
	<title>How should *I* prepare before takeoff then?</title>
	<author>judhaz</author>
	<datestamp>1243520340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean - what are the basic <tt>"yum install *list of codecs*", "apt-get install *list of codecs*", "opkg install *list of codecs*"</tt>, etc?
<br>
Seriously - this could be quite useful, even for a weekend trip down here at the surface...
<br>
(And yes, I do not live in the USA, not even Sweden. Damn, I'm a lucky boy.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean - what are the basic " yum install * list of codecs * " , " apt-get install * list of codecs * " , " opkg install * list of codecs * " , etc ?
Seriously - this could be quite useful , even for a weekend trip down here at the surface.. . ( And yes , I do not live in the USA , not even Sweden .
Damn , I 'm a lucky boy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean - what are the basic "yum install *list of codecs*", "apt-get install *list of codecs*", "opkg install *list of codecs*", etc?
Seriously - this could be quite useful, even for a weekend trip down here at the surface...

(And yes, I do not live in the USA, not even Sweden.
Damn, I'm a lucky boy.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123869</id>
	<title>Doesn't surprise me</title>
	<author>gravis777</author>
	<datestamp>1243526580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This does not surprise me, especially on a government / contractor issued laptop. My experience working in various it departments is that people are so paranoid about security, that they install just the apps needed, then lock the computer down so much that the user cannot even change the wallpaper, much less install stuff like flash, update adobe reader, or install video apps. NASA would probably either have to remote in, or do a package push, which I bet is difficult over a satelite uplink</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does not surprise me , especially on a government / contractor issued laptop .
My experience working in various it departments is that people are so paranoid about security , that they install just the apps needed , then lock the computer down so much that the user can not even change the wallpaper , much less install stuff like flash , update adobe reader , or install video apps .
NASA would probably either have to remote in , or do a package push , which I bet is difficult over a satelite uplink</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This does not surprise me, especially on a government / contractor issued laptop.
My experience working in various it departments is that people are so paranoid about security, that they install just the apps needed, then lock the computer down so much that the user cannot even change the wallpaper, much less install stuff like flash, update adobe reader, or install video apps.
NASA would probably either have to remote in, or do a package push, which I bet is difficult over a satelite uplink</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122691</id>
	<title>I can't be the only one wondering...</title>
	<author>ausekilis</author>
	<datestamp>1243520940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How the hell did they get DVD's up there to begin with? Aren't there some checks for 'contraband' before they even get on the shuttle?
<br> <br>
And please tell me one of the DVD's was Apollo 13. That would be hilarious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How the hell did they get DVD 's up there to begin with ?
Are n't there some checks for 'contraband ' before they even get on the shuttle ?
And please tell me one of the DVD 's was Apollo 13 .
That would be hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the hell did they get DVD's up there to begin with?
Aren't there some checks for 'contraband' before they even get on the shuttle?
And please tell me one of the DVD's was Apollo 13.
That would be hilarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123641</id>
	<title>Watch the Earth...not a movie?</title>
	<author>stonecutter2</author>
	<datestamp>1243525320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I orbiting in space, and had a free day, I wouldn't want to stare at a laptop screen to watch a movie - I'd spend hours staring at the Earth, because I could!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I orbiting in space , and had a free day , I would n't want to stare at a laptop screen to watch a movie - I 'd spend hours staring at the Earth , because I could !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I orbiting in space, and had a free day, I wouldn't want to stare at a laptop screen to watch a movie - I'd spend hours staring at the Earth, because I could!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120347</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>ILongForDarkness</author>
	<datestamp>1243501560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My thoughts exactly. What is it costing 1M per hour to keep them in space and they decide to watch a movie instead?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly .
What is it costing 1M per hour to keep them in space and they decide to watch a movie instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.
What is it costing 1M per hour to keep them in space and they decide to watch a movie instead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</id>
	<title>Watching movies?  Really?</title>
	<author>paulwye</author>
	<datestamp>1243448760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...<i>in space</i>...and they're going to <i>watch a movie</i>?  Really?  That's the first choice for how to spend a day in a circumstance that basically nobody else on the goddamn planet is going to have a shot at for a really, really long time?
<br> <br>
But perhaps more importantly: what were they going to watch?
<br> <br>
Actually, I just got an idea for a poll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , am I the only one who read that and thought , " They 're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they 're going to watch a movie ?
Really ? That 's the first choice for how to spend a day in a circumstance that basically nobody else on the goddamn planet is going to have a shot at for a really , really long time ?
But perhaps more importantly : what were they going to watch ?
Actually , I just got an idea for a poll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, am I the only one who read that and thought, "They're aboard the shuttle...in space...and they're going to watch a movie?
Really?  That's the first choice for how to spend a day in a circumstance that basically nobody else on the goddamn planet is going to have a shot at for a really, really long time?
But perhaps more importantly: what were they going to watch?
Actually, I just got an idea for a poll.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</id>
	<title>Oh come on!</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1243447620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are already people posting "well, they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs." Why? This is a reasonable expectation of what a computer should be able to do out of the box! My Mac certainly came with the ability to play DVDs, and nowadays most Linux installs do too - so we're almost certainly talking about a Windows box. Sure, you can download and install VLC - as a matter of fact, that's what I had to resort to with my wife's old Windows laptop before she (thankfully) switched to a Mac. But why the heck are all you Windows users so tolerant of the stupidity that leaves a stock operating system unable to do exactly the sort of thing the average user will expect to be able to do?</p><p>I was a DOS user and then a Windows user from way back. But silly little things like this always bugged me, and eventually I wised up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are already people posting " well , they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs .
" Why ?
This is a reasonable expectation of what a computer should be able to do out of the box !
My Mac certainly came with the ability to play DVDs , and nowadays most Linux installs do too - so we 're almost certainly talking about a Windows box .
Sure , you can download and install VLC - as a matter of fact , that 's what I had to resort to with my wife 's old Windows laptop before she ( thankfully ) switched to a Mac .
But why the heck are all you Windows users so tolerant of the stupidity that leaves a stock operating system unable to do exactly the sort of thing the average user will expect to be able to do ? I was a DOS user and then a Windows user from way back .
But silly little things like this always bugged me , and eventually I wised up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are already people posting "well, they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs.
" Why?
This is a reasonable expectation of what a computer should be able to do out of the box!
My Mac certainly came with the ability to play DVDs, and nowadays most Linux installs do too - so we're almost certainly talking about a Windows box.
Sure, you can download and install VLC - as a matter of fact, that's what I had to resort to with my wife's old Windows laptop before she (thankfully) switched to a Mac.
But why the heck are all you Windows users so tolerant of the stupidity that leaves a stock operating system unable to do exactly the sort of thing the average user will expect to be able to do?I was a DOS user and then a Windows user from way back.
But silly little things like this always bugged me, and eventually I wised up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121737</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243515780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching 2001: A Space Odyssey in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/space/ would be pretty cool, if somewhat time consuming</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching 2001 : A Space Odyssey in /space/ would be pretty cool , if somewhat time consuming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching 2001: A Space Odyssey in /space/ would be pretty cool, if somewhat time consuming</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119311</id>
	<title>Imagine this happening on a trip to Mars!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243446540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>18 months without being able to watch their favorite DVDs!</p><p>Seriously - Get a Mac!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>18 months without being able to watch their favorite DVDs ! Seriously - Get a Mac !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>18 months without being able to watch their favorite DVDs!Seriously - Get a Mac!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123299</id>
	<title>Water...water...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243523700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...not a <i>drop</i> to drink.</p><p>They were a adrift is a sea of data bits whizzing by to satellites in orbit, but with no network connection of their own.</p><p>Perhaps, they should've tuned into the galaxy newsgroups on the ultrawave instead. Oh, wait. We're still too far <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A\_Fire\_Upon\_the\_Deep" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">down</a> [wikipedia.org] to get any signal here. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...not a drop to drink.They were a adrift is a sea of data bits whizzing by to satellites in orbit , but with no network connection of their own.Perhaps , they should 've tuned into the galaxy newsgroups on the ultrawave instead .
Oh , wait .
We 're still too far down [ wikipedia.org ] to get any signal here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...not a drop to drink.They were a adrift is a sea of data bits whizzing by to satellites in orbit, but with no network connection of their own.Perhaps, they should've tuned into the galaxy newsgroups on the ultrawave instead.
Oh, wait.
We're still too far down [wikipedia.org] to get any signal here. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123835</id>
	<title>well</title>
	<author>rinoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243526340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously they were trying to play a DVD in the wrong fracking region!</p><p>Set your region codes to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... outer space?</p><p>On the other hand -- buy a mac doodz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously they were trying to play a DVD in the wrong fracking region ! Set your region codes to ... outer space ? On the other hand -- buy a mac doodz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously they were trying to play a DVD in the wrong fracking region!Set your region codes to ... outer space?On the other hand -- buy a mac doodz.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121517</id>
	<title>Re:MPC Home Cinema VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243513740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not supported very well?</p><p>VLC is in the debian repositories. MPC isn't.</p><p>Which one isn't supported very well?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not supported very well ? VLC is in the debian repositories .
MPC is n't.Which one is n't supported very well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not supported very well?VLC is in the debian repositories.
MPC isn't.Which one isn't supported very well?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120595</id>
	<title>Re:MPC Home Cinema VLC</title>
	<author>SlashWombat</author>
	<datestamp>1243504140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>VLC isn't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.</p></div><p>Wat planet do you come from? <br> <br>
Ever since I found that VLC plays virtually everything you can throw at it, it has become my primary media player. It is TINY compared to M$ offering, and you never get the bloody ridiculous "<b>looking for a suitable CODEC<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Could not download a suitable Codec</b>" thing that happens with the excretable media player software. I recommend VLC to everyone having problems with their media files, and these people generally make it their default media player as well!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC is n't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.Wat planet do you come from ?
Ever since I found that VLC plays virtually everything you can throw at it , it has become my primary media player .
It is TINY compared to M $ offering , and you never get the bloody ridiculous " looking for a suitable CODEC ... Could not download a suitable Codec " thing that happens with the excretable media player software .
I recommend VLC to everyone having problems with their media files , and these people generally make it their default media player as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC isn't supported very well and should be your last-resort if all else fails.Wat planet do you come from?
Ever since I found that VLC plays virtually everything you can throw at it, it has become my primary media player.
It is TINY compared to M$ offering, and you never get the bloody ridiculous "looking for a suitable CODEC ... Could not download a suitable Codec" thing that happens with the excretable media player software.
I recommend VLC to everyone having problems with their media files, and these people generally make it their default media player as well!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119387</id>
	<title>When you're in space ...</title>
	<author>HW\_Hack</author>
	<datestamp>1243447200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no one can hear you scream "AAARRRGGGHHHHHHHHHH" !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no one can hear you scream " AAARRRGGGHHHHHHHHHH " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no one can hear you scream "AAARRRGGGHHHHHHHHHH" !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121397</id>
	<title>Sounds odd....</title>
	<author>PhotoGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1243512300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't there a story recently about how mission control managed to upload the whole freakin' Spiderman movie lately for the astronauts?  How would uploading a codec or VLC be harder than that?</p><p>I'm also surprised they would bring DVD's.  Why bring several clunky physical media, when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives (ripped, that is).  I rip movies from legal DVD's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip; one would think when you're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter...</p><p>Just seems very strange.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there a story recently about how mission control managed to upload the whole freakin ' Spiderman movie lately for the astronauts ?
How would uploading a codec or VLC be harder than that ? I 'm also surprised they would bring DVD 's .
Why bring several clunky physical media , when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives ( ripped , that is ) .
I rip movies from legal DVD 's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip ; one would think when you 're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter...Just seems very strange .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there a story recently about how mission control managed to upload the whole freakin' Spiderman movie lately for the astronauts?
How would uploading a codec or VLC be harder than that?I'm also surprised they would bring DVD's.
Why bring several clunky physical media, when the movies could have been pre-copied to the hard drives (ripped, that is).
I rip movies from legal DVD's to the hard drive when I go on a mere business trip; one would think when you're going on the damn shuttle you pack even lighter...Just seems very strange.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119563</id>
	<title>Airlocked in a spaceship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28126423</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>alexandre\_ganso</author>
	<datestamp>1243536540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you suppose that nasa supplied the guys with the dvds. Perhaps one of them just took it with him, aren't they allowed to carry some stuff of their own?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you suppose that nasa supplied the guys with the dvds .
Perhaps one of them just took it with him , are n't they allowed to carry some stuff of their own ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you suppose that nasa supplied the guys with the dvds.
Perhaps one of them just took it with him, aren't they allowed to carry some stuff of their own?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28129819</id>
	<title>Re:Lifting dvds into space, why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is Up with People capitalising Random words?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is Up with People capitalising Random words ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is Up with People capitalising Random words?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120415</id>
	<title>Wait, so does this mean...?</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1243502340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean Windows isn't ready for the Average Joe's desktop yet?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There are already people posting "well, they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs." Why?</p></div><p>Because they're sending it into space.  If you send stuff into space, and you want to expect it to work, you test it.</p><p>One good reason: it's really hard to service once it's up there.  <em>Should</em> it be the case that the testing of DVD playback is trying it once, saying "yep, it works", and then moving on?  Yeah, I'm coll with that.  But if you want it to work in space, you test it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean Windows is n't ready for the Average Joe 's desktop yet ?
; - ) There are already people posting " well , they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs .
" Why ? Because they 're sending it into space .
If you send stuff into space , and you want to expect it to work , you test it.One good reason : it 's really hard to service once it 's up there .
Should it be the case that the testing of DVD playback is trying it once , saying " yep , it works " , and then moving on ?
Yeah , I 'm coll with that .
But if you want it to work in space , you test it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean Windows isn't ready for the Average Joe's desktop yet?
;-)There are already people posting "well, they should have checked to make sure their computer could play DVDs.
" Why?Because they're sending it into space.
If you send stuff into space, and you want to expect it to work, you test it.One good reason: it's really hard to service once it's up there.
Should it be the case that the testing of DVD playback is trying it once, saying "yep, it works", and then moving on?
Yeah, I'm coll with that.
But if you want it to work in space, you test it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121341</id>
	<title>I guess you can't Stream it</title>
	<author>Onyma</author>
	<datestamp>1243511520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's suggest they stream the movie to them but you know what they say... In space, no one can hear your stream.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's suggest they stream the movie to them but you know what they say... In space , no one can hear your stream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's suggest they stream the movie to them but you know what they say... In space, no one can hear your stream.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403</id>
	<title>Bored in orbit ???</title>
	<author>Lexor</author>
	<datestamp>1243447380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll likely remain Earthbound for my entire life yet I usually find plenty to do before I'm tempted by mass media.  Spare time or not, I can't imagine being so bored during a relatively short Shuttle mission that I'd want to fire up a movie.  Instead, why not grab a camera and inspire other people who won't ever get the chance to orbit our planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll likely remain Earthbound for my entire life yet I usually find plenty to do before I 'm tempted by mass media .
Spare time or not , I ca n't imagine being so bored during a relatively short Shuttle mission that I 'd want to fire up a movie .
Instead , why not grab a camera and inspire other people who wo n't ever get the chance to orbit our planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll likely remain Earthbound for my entire life yet I usually find plenty to do before I'm tempted by mass media.
Spare time or not, I can't imagine being so bored during a relatively short Shuttle mission that I'd want to fire up a movie.
Instead, why not grab a camera and inspire other people who won't ever get the chance to orbit our planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119653</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't speak for other distribs since it's been too long since I've used them, but last I checked ubuntu throws up a message on the first attempt at playing a DVD using totem telling you that if you want to play the dvd you have to click ok and allow it to download codecs, which may or may not be legal depending on the laws of your country.</p><p>And yes, ubuntu is my main OS (although I haven't done a fresh install in a pretty long time).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't speak for other distribs since it 's been too long since I 've used them , but last I checked ubuntu throws up a message on the first attempt at playing a DVD using totem telling you that if you want to play the dvd you have to click ok and allow it to download codecs , which may or may not be legal depending on the laws of your country.And yes , ubuntu is my main OS ( although I have n't done a fresh install in a pretty long time ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't speak for other distribs since it's been too long since I've used them, but last I checked ubuntu throws up a message on the first attempt at playing a DVD using totem telling you that if you want to play the dvd you have to click ok and allow it to download codecs, which may or may not be legal depending on the laws of your country.And yes, ubuntu is my main OS (although I haven't done a fresh install in a pretty long time).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119343</id>
	<title>Next time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243446780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe they will plan on pre-ripping their porn videos to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.wmv?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe they will plan on pre-ripping their porn videos to .wmv ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe they will plan on pre-ripping their porn videos to .wmv?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731</id>
	<title>Chatty Tech Support..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243450560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA, they worked with tech support for "More than an hour".</p><p>Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with IT</p><p>

<i>Uhh...Did you try restarting the computer?</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA , they worked with tech support for " More than an hour " .Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with IT Uhh...Did you try restarting the computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA, they worked with tech support for "More than an hour".Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with IT

Uhh...Did you try restarting the computer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157</id>
	<title>VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243445160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/" title="videolan.org" rel="nofollow">vlc</a> [videolan.org] wasn't part of their default software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad vlc [ videolan.org ] was n't part of their default software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad vlc [videolan.org] wasn't part of their default software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122053</id>
	<title>At the risk of being called a Luddite...</title>
	<author>Dream492</author>
	<datestamp>1243517580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about a book?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a book ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a book?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119511</id>
	<title>There aren't Personal PC's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to realize that the DVD's were a just in case item and weren't planed on being used but regardless, the computers are Nasa computers. Not personal Pc's that most of you use. Most of the free software that you all know and love is free for personal use, but usually not corporate use. There needs to be a paid license and the computer IT guys need to take care of that but probably won't as they won't pay for software that isn't directly related to space missions. The thing is that I do get it, (if we are assuming windows) is actually pretty useless out of the box. The first thing most of us do is install a whole pile of software just so we can get out machines to do what we want them to do and I think that at this point it's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still doesn't do anything will out adding more software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to realize that the DVD 's were a just in case item and were n't planed on being used but regardless , the computers are Nasa computers .
Not personal Pc 's that most of you use .
Most of the free software that you all know and love is free for personal use , but usually not corporate use .
There needs to be a paid license and the computer IT guys need to take care of that but probably wo n't as they wo n't pay for software that is n't directly related to space missions .
The thing is that I do get it , ( if we are assuming windows ) is actually pretty useless out of the box .
The first thing most of us do is install a whole pile of software just so we can get out machines to do what we want them to do and I think that at this point it 's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still does n't do anything will out adding more software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to realize that the DVD's were a just in case item and weren't planed on being used but regardless, the computers are Nasa computers.
Not personal Pc's that most of you use.
Most of the free software that you all know and love is free for personal use, but usually not corporate use.
There needs to be a paid license and the computer IT guys need to take care of that but probably won't as they won't pay for software that isn't directly related to space missions.
The thing is that I do get it, (if we are assuming windows) is actually pretty useless out of the box.
The first thing most of us do is install a whole pile of software just so we can get out machines to do what we want them to do and I think that at this point it's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still doesn't do anything will out adding more software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119657</id>
	<title>Re:Bored in orbit ???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps *you* might not be bored in space, but these are astronauts whose *job* it is to be in space. One can only be awed by the beauty of the sight of earth from space for so long, then it becomes old news.  Ditto for the space shuttle itself - it might be awesome, interesting, and new to someone who *isn't* already an astronaut and had the inner workings of every piece of tech on it drilled into their head so many times they could do it all in their sleep, but I'm sure its all terribly 'the same old stuff' to those who are.</p><p>Also, there is an awful lot more room on the earth, things you haven't already seen, than there is on the shuttle for the astronauts. They are certainly intimately familiar with every square inch of space that they might go to 'find plenty to do' - pretty much all the gear and equipment they have is all there with the purpose of their mission - there isn't much in terms of 'things to do'. (Well, I heard somewhere they did bring some movies on DVD, presumably ones they haven't already seen)</p><p>And "grab a camera" ? - I'm sure so many pictures have been taken from orbit, and of the inside of the shuttle, that any more would just be a waste of storage/film. I'm sure that there were even cameras rolling (and/or snapping) for their entire set of spacewalks working on Hubble, as well. What on earth could now they take pictures of that would be new?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps * you * might not be bored in space , but these are astronauts whose * job * it is to be in space .
One can only be awed by the beauty of the sight of earth from space for so long , then it becomes old news .
Ditto for the space shuttle itself - it might be awesome , interesting , and new to someone who * is n't * already an astronaut and had the inner workings of every piece of tech on it drilled into their head so many times they could do it all in their sleep , but I 'm sure its all terribly 'the same old stuff ' to those who are.Also , there is an awful lot more room on the earth , things you have n't already seen , than there is on the shuttle for the astronauts .
They are certainly intimately familiar with every square inch of space that they might go to 'find plenty to do ' - pretty much all the gear and equipment they have is all there with the purpose of their mission - there is n't much in terms of 'things to do' .
( Well , I heard somewhere they did bring some movies on DVD , presumably ones they have n't already seen ) And " grab a camera " ?
- I 'm sure so many pictures have been taken from orbit , and of the inside of the shuttle , that any more would just be a waste of storage/film .
I 'm sure that there were even cameras rolling ( and/or snapping ) for their entire set of spacewalks working on Hubble , as well .
What on earth could now they take pictures of that would be new ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps *you* might not be bored in space, but these are astronauts whose *job* it is to be in space.
One can only be awed by the beauty of the sight of earth from space for so long, then it becomes old news.
Ditto for the space shuttle itself - it might be awesome, interesting, and new to someone who *isn't* already an astronaut and had the inner workings of every piece of tech on it drilled into their head so many times they could do it all in their sleep, but I'm sure its all terribly 'the same old stuff' to those who are.Also, there is an awful lot more room on the earth, things you haven't already seen, than there is on the shuttle for the astronauts.
They are certainly intimately familiar with every square inch of space that they might go to 'find plenty to do' - pretty much all the gear and equipment they have is all there with the purpose of their mission - there isn't much in terms of 'things to do'.
(Well, I heard somewhere they did bring some movies on DVD, presumably ones they haven't already seen)And "grab a camera" ?
- I'm sure so many pictures have been taken from orbit, and of the inside of the shuttle, that any more would just be a waste of storage/film.
I'm sure that there were even cameras rolling (and/or snapping) for their entire set of spacewalks working on Hubble, as well.
What on earth could now they take pictures of that would be new?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28128863</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also a reasonable expectation (for many people) that a new computer will be capable of playing their Texas Hold'em or any of the computer games they have laying around the house.  Maybe if they buy a computer that costs more money, they'll be getting one that can do everything!</p><p>Hmm, let's peruse through the 'average consumer' games aisle....</p><p>"Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP compatible"</p><p>whoops, I just bought a $2,000 computer that has been manufactured for elitist snobs with the expectation that everyone who uses a Windows computer would be better off with a Mac.</p><p>Well at least it looks pretty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also a reasonable expectation ( for many people ) that a new computer will be capable of playing their Texas Hold'em or any of the computer games they have laying around the house .
Maybe if they buy a computer that costs more money , they 'll be getting one that can do everything ! Hmm , let 's peruse through the 'average consumer ' games aisle.... " Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP compatible " whoops , I just bought a $ 2,000 computer that has been manufactured for elitist snobs with the expectation that everyone who uses a Windows computer would be better off with a Mac.Well at least it looks pretty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also a reasonable expectation (for many people) that a new computer will be capable of playing their Texas Hold'em or any of the computer games they have laying around the house.
Maybe if they buy a computer that costs more money, they'll be getting one that can do everything!Hmm, let's peruse through the 'average consumer' games aisle...."Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP compatible"whoops, I just bought a $2,000 computer that has been manufactured for elitist snobs with the expectation that everyone who uses a Windows computer would be better off with a Mac.Well at least it looks pretty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28127345</id>
	<title>Knoppix and others</title>
	<author>polyomninym</author>
	<datestamp>1243539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why I take Knoppix and other live OS's with me everywhere.  Yeah, I know, I don't go into space much, but it's sure handy here on earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I take Knoppix and other live OS 's with me everywhere .
Yeah , I know , I do n't go into space much , but it 's sure handy here on earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I take Knoppix and other live OS's with me everywhere.
Yeah, I know, I don't go into space much, but it's sure handy here on earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119815</id>
	<title>Software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243451340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we sure that NASA actually bought laptops with DVD drives in them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we sure that NASA actually bought laptops with DVD drives in them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we sure that NASA actually bought laptops with DVD drives in them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122743</id>
	<title>Couldnt play DVDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243521180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, did they get them from 0bama?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , did they get them from 0bama ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, did they get them from 0bama?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119481</id>
	<title>Depends ...</title>
	<author>visible.frylock</author>
	<datestamp>1243448160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you using BSD?</p><p>I kid, really, please don't crack my xp box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you using BSD ? I kid , really , please do n't crack my xp box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you using BSD?I kid, really, please don't crack my xp box.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119623</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>slackingme</author>
	<datestamp>1243449660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trolling is alive and well on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.
You are trolling, right? If we give up on NASA we might as well throw in the towel.
I believe that anyone carrying a NASA badge knows exactly how important their organization is to our country, and species, and I am unanimous in that.

Don't let the AYBS reference diminish the seriousness of my response.
I wasn't even tempted to make a crack about Windows' inability to play DVDs out of the box. Really I wasn't.
NASA is above that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trolling is alive and well on / .
You are trolling , right ?
If we give up on NASA we might as well throw in the towel .
I believe that anyone carrying a NASA badge knows exactly how important their organization is to our country , and species , and I am unanimous in that .
Do n't let the AYBS reference diminish the seriousness of my response .
I was n't even tempted to make a crack about Windows ' inability to play DVDs out of the box .
Really I was n't .
NASA is above that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trolling is alive and well on /.
You are trolling, right?
If we give up on NASA we might as well throw in the towel.
I believe that anyone carrying a NASA badge knows exactly how important their organization is to our country, and species, and I am unanimous in that.
Don't let the AYBS reference diminish the seriousness of my response.
I wasn't even tempted to make a crack about Windows' inability to play DVDs out of the box.
Really I wasn't.
NASA is above that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121871</id>
	<title>Re:Lifting dvds into space, why?</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1243516440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Problem 1: Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.</p></div><p>They didn't bother testing the telescope if reports here (a couple of days ago) of the mirror being improperly ground are correct - that cost $2billion or so, why bother testing a laptop.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem 1 : Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.They did n't bother testing the telescope if reports here ( a couple of days ago ) of the mirror being improperly ground are correct - that cost $ 2billion or so , why bother testing a laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem 1: Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.They didn't bother testing the telescope if reports here (a couple of days ago) of the mirror being improperly ground are correct - that cost $2billion or so, why bother testing a laptop.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122791</id>
	<title>New MPAA trailer</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1243521420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You wouldn't steal a space shuttle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You would n't steal a space shuttle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wouldn't steal a space shuttle...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119585</id>
	<title>Region 8 (sideways)</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1243449240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't they know, outer space is region 8 (*laid down sideways). MPAA is still working on the technology to allow playback there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't they know , outer space is region 8 ( * laid down sideways ) .
MPAA is still working on the technology to allow playback there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't they know, outer space is region 8 (*laid down sideways).
MPAA is still working on the technology to allow playback there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119561</id>
	<title>Re:NASA is simply poorly run</title>
	<author>1053r</author>
	<datestamp>1243449000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

Seriously? There's maybe you and five other people that think that on the face of this planet. I'm fairly certain that ensuring that the astronauts had proper playback codecs was not on the list of priorities at NASA. I'd quite frankly be upset if it *was*, given that the only reason that they had an extra day was that the unforseen thunderstorm made landing impossible, and it's impossible to reliably predict *those* weeks in advance. To dedicate resources to seeing to petty details such as video playback software would be the epitome of waste and inefficiency that you are decrying. The astronauts should absolutely not be wasting time and money watching movies in space (of course, unless it's in a situation like this one where there is no more scheduled work left to be done).
<br> <br>
Granted, maybe NASA wasn't once the wonder it once was, but that was only because of the Cold War, after the Russians and Sputnik scared the crap out of everybody this side of the Pacific. The only reason the politicians were willing to allow NASA to spend the money to send a man to the moon was so we could beat the Soviets there. But NASA has still done some pretty amazing things since. I couldn't count on one hand the number of probes and rovers they've sent to places like Mars and Jupiter, and most of those have *way* outlived their expected useful lifespan. They've been way more successful than expected. Contrast this with the Beagle 2, which was completely lost before it even had the chance to do anything even remotely useful (It was British, by the way).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing Seriously ?
There 's maybe you and five other people that think that on the face of this planet .
I 'm fairly certain that ensuring that the astronauts had proper playback codecs was not on the list of priorities at NASA .
I 'd quite frankly be upset if it * was * , given that the only reason that they had an extra day was that the unforseen thunderstorm made landing impossible , and it 's impossible to reliably predict * those * weeks in advance .
To dedicate resources to seeing to petty details such as video playback software would be the epitome of waste and inefficiency that you are decrying .
The astronauts should absolutely not be wasting time and money watching movies in space ( of course , unless it 's in a situation like this one where there is no more scheduled work left to be done ) .
Granted , maybe NASA was n't once the wonder it once was , but that was only because of the Cold War , after the Russians and Sputnik scared the crap out of everybody this side of the Pacific .
The only reason the politicians were willing to allow NASA to spend the money to send a man to the moon was so we could beat the Soviets there .
But NASA has still done some pretty amazing things since .
I could n't count on one hand the number of probes and rovers they 've sent to places like Mars and Jupiter , and most of those have * way * outlived their expected useful lifespan .
They 've been way more successful than expected .
Contrast this with the Beagle 2 , which was completely lost before it even had the chance to do anything even remotely useful ( It was British , by the way ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is a pretty fundamentally stupid thing


Seriously?
There's maybe you and five other people that think that on the face of this planet.
I'm fairly certain that ensuring that the astronauts had proper playback codecs was not on the list of priorities at NASA.
I'd quite frankly be upset if it *was*, given that the only reason that they had an extra day was that the unforseen thunderstorm made landing impossible, and it's impossible to reliably predict *those* weeks in advance.
To dedicate resources to seeing to petty details such as video playback software would be the epitome of waste and inefficiency that you are decrying.
The astronauts should absolutely not be wasting time and money watching movies in space (of course, unless it's in a situation like this one where there is no more scheduled work left to be done).
Granted, maybe NASA wasn't once the wonder it once was, but that was only because of the Cold War, after the Russians and Sputnik scared the crap out of everybody this side of the Pacific.
The only reason the politicians were willing to allow NASA to spend the money to send a man to the moon was so we could beat the Soviets there.
But NASA has still done some pretty amazing things since.
I couldn't count on one hand the number of probes and rovers they've sent to places like Mars and Jupiter, and most of those have *way* outlived their expected useful lifespan.
They've been way more successful than expected.
Contrast this with the Beagle 2, which was completely lost before it even had the chance to do anything even remotely useful (It was British, by the way).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123311</id>
	<title>MPAA</title>
	<author>ossuary</author>
	<datestamp>1243523760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somewhere, far down below, there was an MPAA exec cackling menacingly.  Muuu-hah-hah-haaaaaaa!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere , far down below , there was an MPAA exec cackling menacingly .
Muuu-hah-hah-haaaaaaa !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere, far down below, there was an MPAA exec cackling menacingly.
Muuu-hah-hah-haaaaaaa!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120913</id>
	<title>Re:There aren't Personal PC's</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1243507200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I think that at this point it's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still doesn't do anything will out adding more software.</i></p><p>I know we're supposed to be used to ACs making dumb comments, but seriously.  There are plenty of <a href="http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/" title="damnsmalllinux.org">small</a> [damnsmalllinux.org] or <a href="http://www.netbsd.org/" title="netbsd.org">potentially</a> [netbsd.org] <a href="http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/" title="linuxfromscratch.org">bare</a> [linuxfromscratch.org] <a href="http://www.slackware.org/" title="slackware.org">bones</a> [slackware.org] FOSS operating systems available.</p><p>I can't comprehend why they'd be using anything other than NetBSD in space anywayz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that at this point it 's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still does n't do anything will out adding more software.I know we 're supposed to be used to ACs making dumb comments , but seriously .
There are plenty of small [ damnsmalllinux.org ] or potentially [ netbsd.org ] bare [ linuxfromscratch.org ] bones [ slackware.org ] FOSS operating systems available.I ca n't comprehend why they 'd be using anything other than NetBSD in space anywayz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that at this point it's getting unacceptable to have a gigabyte OS and it still doesn't do anything will out adding more software.I know we're supposed to be used to ACs making dumb comments, but seriously.
There are plenty of small [damnsmalllinux.org] or potentially [netbsd.org] bare [linuxfromscratch.org] bones [slackware.org] FOSS operating systems available.I can't comprehend why they'd be using anything other than NetBSD in space anywayz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119375</id>
	<title>Hi Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243447140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard you like to put usb ports in your usb ports so you can usb on your usb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard you like to put usb ports in your usb ports so you can usb on your usb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard you like to put usb ports in your usb ports so you can usb on your usb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120017</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same reason that linux doesn't playback MP3, DVDs and h.264 by default. US-only software patents covering the codecs. Without paying the fee, and getting the licences to use the patents, it's illegal to ship it in your US product.</p><p>XP added limited MP3 playback, Windows Vista added built in MPEG2 playback, and 7 adds h.264 playback. Yes, XP should have had MPEG2 playback built in, it came out three years after DVD became widely available.</p><p>Linux at least has the excuse that free distros can't pay the patent fees and thus can't ship them in the default package to US users (so usually have a 'download it now' option when you first need it, where you promise you don't live in the US, and download from a mirror elsewhere in the world). This is annoying when you do live outside the US, and have to put up with software patent bullshit in everything, even non-US software projects, because they don't want to get sued.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same reason that linux does n't playback MP3 , DVDs and h.264 by default .
US-only software patents covering the codecs .
Without paying the fee , and getting the licences to use the patents , it 's illegal to ship it in your US product.XP added limited MP3 playback , Windows Vista added built in MPEG2 playback , and 7 adds h.264 playback .
Yes , XP should have had MPEG2 playback built in , it came out three years after DVD became widely available.Linux at least has the excuse that free distros ca n't pay the patent fees and thus ca n't ship them in the default package to US users ( so usually have a 'download it now ' option when you first need it , where you promise you do n't live in the US , and download from a mirror elsewhere in the world ) .
This is annoying when you do live outside the US , and have to put up with software patent bullshit in everything , even non-US software projects , because they do n't want to get sued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same reason that linux doesn't playback MP3, DVDs and h.264 by default.
US-only software patents covering the codecs.
Without paying the fee, and getting the licences to use the patents, it's illegal to ship it in your US product.XP added limited MP3 playback, Windows Vista added built in MPEG2 playback, and 7 adds h.264 playback.
Yes, XP should have had MPEG2 playback built in, it came out three years after DVD became widely available.Linux at least has the excuse that free distros can't pay the patent fees and thus can't ship them in the default package to US users (so usually have a 'download it now' option when you first need it, where you promise you don't live in the US, and download from a mirror elsewhere in the world).
This is annoying when you do live outside the US, and have to put up with software patent bullshit in everything, even non-US software projects, because they don't want to get sued.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119889</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1243452120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's okay - the MPAA are shooting themselves in the foot. Every time a Windows user can't figure out how to play a DVD, a new pirate is born.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's okay - the MPAA are shooting themselves in the foot .
Every time a Windows user ca n't figure out how to play a DVD , a new pirate is born .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's okay - the MPAA are shooting themselves in the foot.
Every time a Windows user can't figure out how to play a DVD, a new pirate is born.
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119141</id>
	<title>the numba 1</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243444980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first first first yes i did it for once</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first first first yes i did it for once</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first first first yes i did it for once</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123829</id>
	<title>Is it that boring already?</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1243526280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christ, is outerspace that boring already?  I mean, even if I'd been up there a week, I expect I'd be grateful for a few hours to do nothing but stare out the porthole and play zero gee paper football.</p><p>Watch a DVD?  Christ, that can wait until I'm back home, suffering from microgravity withdrawal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christ , is outerspace that boring already ?
I mean , even if I 'd been up there a week , I expect I 'd be grateful for a few hours to do nothing but stare out the porthole and play zero gee paper football.Watch a DVD ?
Christ , that can wait until I 'm back home , suffering from microgravity withdrawal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christ, is outerspace that boring already?
I mean, even if I'd been up there a week, I expect I'd be grateful for a few hours to do nothing but stare out the porthole and play zero gee paper football.Watch a DVD?
Christ, that can wait until I'm back home, suffering from microgravity withdrawal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119509</id>
	<title>Re:VLC</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1243448520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mediaplayer classic is leagues beyond VLC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mediaplayer classic is leagues beyond VLC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mediaplayer classic is leagues beyond VLC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125231</id>
	<title>From TFA - 17,200mph</title>
	<author>SBrach</author>
	<datestamp>1243532100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does how fast the shuttle is orbiting the planet have to do with how hard it is to update the codec.  Its not like there on the top of a semi flying down the freeway at 80mph trying to get the dvd-rom drive open.  I think the bigger problem is that the ethernet cable so they could get to divx.com would be a little long at their current altitude.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does how fast the shuttle is orbiting the planet have to do with how hard it is to update the codec .
Its not like there on the top of a semi flying down the freeway at 80mph trying to get the dvd-rom drive open .
I think the bigger problem is that the ethernet cable so they could get to divx.com would be a little long at their current altitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does how fast the shuttle is orbiting the planet have to do with how hard it is to update the codec.
Its not like there on the top of a semi flying down the freeway at 80mph trying to get the dvd-rom drive open.
I think the bigger problem is that the ethernet cable so they could get to divx.com would be a little long at their current altitude.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28133513</id>
	<title>Hal? Is that you?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1243522200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were going to watch <i>2001: A Space Odyssey</i>, but the equipment wouldn't let them?</p><p>Let's pray this is a coincidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were going to watch 2001 : A Space Odyssey , but the equipment would n't let them ? Let 's pray this is a coincidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were going to watch 2001: A Space Odyssey, but the equipment wouldn't let them?Let's pray this is a coincidence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123773</id>
	<title>television or tunnel vision?</title>
	<author>kbaud</author>
	<datestamp>1243526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-kbaud</htmltext>
<tokenext>-kbaud</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-kbaud</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122065</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>mdsharpe</author>
	<datestamp>1243517640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know this isn't a popular approach on Slashdot, but, I'm guessing they were using Windows XP.

Vista can play DVDs out of the box.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is n't a popular approach on Slashdot , but , I 'm guessing they were using Windows XP .
Vista can play DVDs out of the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this isn't a popular approach on Slashdot, but, I'm guessing they were using Windows XP.
Vista can play DVDs out of the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120091</id>
	<title>Sarat says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weren't there any Jedi to help them out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Were n't there any Jedi to help them out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weren't there any Jedi to help them out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120909</id>
	<title>Re:Region 8 (sideways)</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1243507140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've never seen the crew of Serenity watch a movie. And those are pirates if I've ever seen them. Now you know who won the war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've never seen the crew of Serenity watch a movie .
And those are pirates if I 've ever seen them .
Now you know who won the war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've never seen the crew of Serenity watch a movie.
And those are pirates if I've ever seen them.
Now you know who won the war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120791</id>
	<title>What effect does low - zero gravity have on a DVD</title>
	<author>nibbles2004</author>
	<datestamp>1243505940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>would the low gravity have an effect on playing a DVD</htmltext>
<tokenext>would the low gravity have an effect on playing a DVD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would the low gravity have an effect on playing a DVD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122721</id>
	<title>They could just listen to some music instead</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1243521060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ground control to Major Tom...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ground control to Major Tom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ground control to Major Tom...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120223</id>
	<title>Re:MPC Home Cinema VLC</title>
	<author>Barny</author>
	<datestamp>1243543500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then, load both<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>When I pre-install computers for my customers, they get both pre-loaded (use CCCP for MPC, it loads the codecs needed, and configures it for it automagically).</p><p>I agree though, MPC is much nicer interface than VLC, but when you are troubleshooting VLC is the best thing on the planet, it "just works".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then , load both : ) When I pre-install computers for my customers , they get both pre-loaded ( use CCCP for MPC , it loads the codecs needed , and configures it for it automagically ) .I agree though , MPC is much nicer interface than VLC , but when you are troubleshooting VLC is the best thing on the planet , it " just works " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then, load both :)When I pre-install computers for my customers, they get both pre-loaded (use CCCP for MPC, it loads the codecs needed, and configures it for it automagically).I agree though, MPC is much nicer interface than VLC, but when you are troubleshooting VLC is the best thing on the planet, it "just works".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373</id>
	<title>Lifting dvds into space, why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243447020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem 1: Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.</p><p>Problem 2: Has space flight become so routine and, dare I say it, boring for astronauts that they would prefer to watch dvds?</p><p>Problem 3: They honsetly spent taxpayer money to lift the mass of some DVDs into low orbit, when they should have just ripped the movies to the laptop's hard drive?</p><p>In ripped format there would be no fragile disks floating around in freefall, likely playable even with video players lacking actual DVD support, and most importantly wouldn't add to the fuel cost of lifting the shuttle into low orbit.</p><p>Yet another common sense fail by NASA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem 1 : Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.Problem 2 : Has space flight become so routine and , dare I say it , boring for astronauts that they would prefer to watch dvds ? Problem 3 : They honsetly spent taxpayer money to lift the mass of some DVDs into low orbit , when they should have just ripped the movies to the laptop 's hard drive ? In ripped format there would be no fragile disks floating around in freefall , likely playable even with video players lacking actual DVD support , and most importantly would n't add to the fuel cost of lifting the shuttle into low orbit.Yet another common sense fail by NASA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem 1: Not testing that the laptops would be able to play the dvds before launching it all into space.Problem 2: Has space flight become so routine and, dare I say it, boring for astronauts that they would prefer to watch dvds?Problem 3: They honsetly spent taxpayer money to lift the mass of some DVDs into low orbit, when they should have just ripped the movies to the laptop's hard drive?In ripped format there would be no fragile disks floating around in freefall, likely playable even with video players lacking actual DVD support, and most importantly wouldn't add to the fuel cost of lifting the shuttle into low orbit.Yet another common sense fail by NASA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123915</id>
	<title>Next time, take your PSP</title>
	<author>WeeLad</author>
	<datestamp>1243526760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How boring are these short shuttle flights getting that they'd rather be sitting around watching DVDs.   An extended ISS tour I could understand, but these shuttle flights don't happen that often and I believe it's still pretty competitive to get on board.   If it were me, I'd probably spend that time floating around doing back-flips or other stuff I couldn't do on earth.  Hell, if they let me take someone's spot on the next trip, I'll buy them a copy of the DVD.  They can watch it all they want down here while I'm bouncing off the walls in orbit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How boring are these short shuttle flights getting that they 'd rather be sitting around watching DVDs .
An extended ISS tour I could understand , but these shuttle flights do n't happen that often and I believe it 's still pretty competitive to get on board .
If it were me , I 'd probably spend that time floating around doing back-flips or other stuff I could n't do on earth .
Hell , if they let me take someone 's spot on the next trip , I 'll buy them a copy of the DVD .
They can watch it all they want down here while I 'm bouncing off the walls in orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How boring are these short shuttle flights getting that they'd rather be sitting around watching DVDs.
An extended ISS tour I could understand, but these shuttle flights don't happen that often and I believe it's still pretty competitive to get on board.
If it were me, I'd probably spend that time floating around doing back-flips or other stuff I couldn't do on earth.
Hell, if they let me take someone's spot on the next trip, I'll buy them a copy of the DVD.
They can watch it all they want down here while I'm bouncing off the walls in orbit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121465</id>
	<title>I guess they should have....</title>
	<author>yabos</author>
	<datestamp>1243513080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>bought a Mac!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>bought a Mac !
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bought a Mac!
:p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119299</id>
	<title>Wow.  They're in space and want to watch movies?!</title>
	<author>deek</author>
	<datestamp>1243446480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess even the view from space becomes boring after a while.</p><p>Maybe they could kick off the first ever game of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red\_Dwarf#Hallmarks" title="wikipedia.org">Zero Gee Football</a> [wikipedia.org].  Surely they'd have a Red Dwarf fan amongst the crew who could suggest it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess even the view from space becomes boring after a while.Maybe they could kick off the first ever game of Zero Gee Football [ wikipedia.org ] .
Surely they 'd have a Red Dwarf fan amongst the crew who could suggest it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess even the view from space becomes boring after a while.Maybe they could kick off the first ever game of Zero Gee Football [wikipedia.org].
Surely they'd have a Red Dwarf fan amongst the crew who could suggest it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28139789</id>
	<title>Lawyers can wreck anything...</title>
	<author>twoHats</author>
	<datestamp>1243616940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lawyers go through a special course called Obfuscation and Obliteration (O&amp;O to those in the know) which teaches them to take even the simplest human task and insert so many hoops etc, that even the brightest human has no chance.<br> <br>

Isn't the law wonderful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lawyers go through a special course called Obfuscation and Obliteration ( O&amp;O to those in the know ) which teaches them to take even the simplest human task and insert so many hoops etc , that even the brightest human has no chance .
Is n't the law wonderful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lawyers go through a special course called Obfuscation and Obliteration (O&amp;O to those in the know) which teaches them to take even the simplest human task and insert so many hoops etc, that even the brightest human has no chance.
Isn't the law wonderful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121589</id>
	<title>Modems</title>
	<author>CobaltBlueDW</author>
	<datestamp>1243514400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If NASA can get internet, and NASA communicates with the space station...  What era is NASA living in, if the space station can't get an internet connection.  The internet solves all problems, especially missing codec problems.</p><p>I'm scratching "Be an Astronaut" off my life goals list.  Seriously, stuck in a room for months and months on end with OUT an internet connection?!</p><p>No pizza, and no internet make homer...  something, something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If NASA can get internet , and NASA communicates with the space station... What era is NASA living in , if the space station ca n't get an internet connection .
The internet solves all problems , especially missing codec problems.I 'm scratching " Be an Astronaut " off my life goals list .
Seriously , stuck in a room for months and months on end with OUT an internet connection ?
! No pizza , and no internet make homer... something , something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If NASA can get internet, and NASA communicates with the space station...  What era is NASA living in, if the space station can't get an internet connection.
The internet solves all problems, especially missing codec problems.I'm scratching "Be an Astronaut" off my life goals list.
Seriously, stuck in a room for months and months on end with OUT an internet connection?
!No pizza, and no internet make homer...  something, something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120529</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I normally use Apple's DVD player, except when I'm forced to watch previews with the skip and fast-forward disabled, then I'll switch to VLC just out of principle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I normally use Apple 's DVD player , except when I 'm forced to watch previews with the skip and fast-forward disabled , then I 'll switch to VLC just out of principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I normally use Apple's DVD player, except when I'm forced to watch previews with the skip and fast-forward disabled, then I'll switch to VLC just out of principle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120645</id>
	<title>In the ask slashdot submission queue:</title>
	<author>Fr05t</author>
	<datestamp>1243504620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm currently orbiting the Earth for an extra 24 hours because of weather delays and trying to watch a DVD..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm currently orbiting the Earth for an extra 24 hours because of weather delays and trying to watch a DVD... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm currently orbiting the Earth for an extra 24 hours because of weather delays and trying to watch a DVD..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123271</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243523580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XP came out in 2001.  DVDs were still fairly "new" and drives and burners were still expensive.  I can forgive them for not bundling DVD playback.</p><p>You're forgetting, however, that Vista <i>does</i> include DVD playback software - works out of the box in WMP or Media Center.  And that SP2 evidently added BluRay support - to my knowledge, not too many *nix include that by default.</p><p>(Yes, you can't really "license" it in a Free OS and cracking it looks like it's turning out to be difficultish.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XP came out in 2001 .
DVDs were still fairly " new " and drives and burners were still expensive .
I can forgive them for not bundling DVD playback.You 're forgetting , however , that Vista does include DVD playback software - works out of the box in WMP or Media Center .
And that SP2 evidently added BluRay support - to my knowledge , not too many * nix include that by default .
( Yes , you ca n't really " license " it in a Free OS and cracking it looks like it 's turning out to be difficultish .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XP came out in 2001.
DVDs were still fairly "new" and drives and burners were still expensive.
I can forgive them for not bundling DVD playback.You're forgetting, however, that Vista does include DVD playback software - works out of the box in WMP or Media Center.
And that SP2 evidently added BluRay support - to my knowledge, not too many *nix include that by default.
(Yes, you can't really "license" it in a Free OS and cracking it looks like it's turning out to be difficultish.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119465</id>
	<title>What about the mission?</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1243447980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, easy to hate on Win, love OS X and yadda yadda yadda.</p><p>The laptops must have been there for a reason.  Perhaps someone in configuration management said, "Gee, it's going into space, it might be mission-critical at some point, so let's not load it up with entertainment stuff and bloatware."</p><p>I don't know - I'm in a more than usual snarky mood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , easy to hate on Win , love OS X and yadda yadda yadda.The laptops must have been there for a reason .
Perhaps someone in configuration management said , " Gee , it 's going into space , it might be mission-critical at some point , so let 's not load it up with entertainment stuff and bloatware .
" I do n't know - I 'm in a more than usual snarky mood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, easy to hate on Win, love OS X and yadda yadda yadda.The laptops must have been there for a reason.
Perhaps someone in configuration management said, "Gee, it's going into space, it might be mission-critical at some point, so let's not load it up with entertainment stuff and bloatware.
"I don't know - I'm in a more than usual snarky mood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125669</id>
	<title>bandwidth</title>
	<author>GregNorc</author>
	<datestamp>1243533900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably a bandwidth issue... VLC is 16 megs for a windows install, which is pretty big when not on broadband.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably a bandwidth issue... VLC is 16 megs for a windows install , which is pretty big when not on broadband .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably a bandwidth issue... VLC is 16 megs for a windows install, which is pretty big when not on broadband.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120353</id>
	<title>Re:Watching movies? Really?</title>
	<author>TornCityVenz</author>
	<datestamp>1243501620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would think just about ANYTHING you could do in space would be a better use of your time that watching a stupid movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think just about ANYTHING you could do in space would be a better use of your time that watching a stupid movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think just about ANYTHING you could do in space would be a better use of your time that watching a stupid movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119381</id>
	<title>A minor nit...</title>
	<author>HotNeedleOfInquiry</author>
	<datestamp>1243447140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is not at all clear that they "repaired the Hubble successfully".  They performed their jobs well, but we won't know whether the Hubble has been successfully repaired until it is calibrated and producing images.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not at all clear that they " repaired the Hubble successfully " .
They performed their jobs well , but we wo n't know whether the Hubble has been successfully repaired until it is calibrated and producing images .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not at all clear that they "repaired the Hubble successfully".
They performed their jobs well, but we won't know whether the Hubble has been successfully repaired until it is calibrated and producing images.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123565</id>
	<title>region code</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1243524900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We're sorry you're not authorized to play DVDs from this region code.  Your region code is currently set to 'extraterrestrial' and cannot be changed again."</p><p>Too bad with the shuttle going up and down all the time they ran out of region code changes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We 're sorry you 're not authorized to play DVDs from this region code .
Your region code is currently set to 'extraterrestrial ' and can not be changed again .
" Too bad with the shuttle going up and down all the time they ran out of region code changes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We're sorry you're not authorized to play DVDs from this region code.
Your region code is currently set to 'extraterrestrial' and cannot be changed again.
"Too bad with the shuttle going up and down all the time they ran out of region code changes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125435</id>
	<title>Re:Chatty Tech Support..</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1243533000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with IT</p></div><p>Well, what else are they going to do, take a walk?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with ITWell , what else are they going to do , take a walk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronauts must go through some seriously painful training if they can spend that much time on the phone with ITWell, what else are they going to do, take a walk?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119395</id>
	<title>I hate DVDs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243447320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That'll teach em to use those newfangled dee-vee-dees and their crazy codecs. If they had half a brain they'd be hoarding laser discs like me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 'll teach em to use those newfangled dee-vee-dees and their crazy codecs .
If they had half a brain they 'd be hoarding laser discs like me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That'll teach em to use those newfangled dee-vee-dees and their crazy codecs.
If they had half a brain they'd be hoarding laser discs like me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123015</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1243522440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah...why distros (at least those non-US based) don't put out fully featured ISOs for download if your IP is from place with more sensible laws? Why do I have to be unconvienienced by some stupid laws that don't apply to me?</p><p>(and yes, it hit me few times - you need a working internet connection to have fully functional Linux install)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah...why distros ( at least those non-US based ) do n't put out fully featured ISOs for download if your IP is from place with more sensible laws ?
Why do I have to be unconvienienced by some stupid laws that do n't apply to me ?
( and yes , it hit me few times - you need a working internet connection to have fully functional Linux install )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...why distros (at least those non-US based) don't put out fully featured ISOs for download if your IP is from place with more sensible laws?
Why do I have to be unconvienienced by some stupid laws that don't apply to me?
(and yes, it hit me few times - you need a working internet connection to have fully functional Linux install)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119571</id>
	<title>when you're orbiting the planet at 17,200MPH</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you any idea how many "regions" you're going through in just 20 minutes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<p>
No wonder they didn't make it through the "Thy shall not copy this DVD" part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you any idea how many " regions " you 're going through in just 20 minutes . . No wonder they did n't make it through the " Thy shall not copy this DVD " part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you any idea how many "regions" you're going through in just 20 minutes ..
No wonder they didn't make it through the "Thy shall not copy this DVD" part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120447</id>
	<title>I have a guess</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1243502700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But perhaps more importantly: what were they going to watch?</p></div><p>See the young girls wearing skimpy little space suits, lying on the Andromeda beach, catching some sun and a mild gust of solar wind. [something about sex, short-term relationships and jealousy].  Tune in tomorrow, where we see who will have to leave... the Paradise Planet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But perhaps more importantly : what were they going to watch ? See the young girls wearing skimpy little space suits , lying on the Andromeda beach , catching some sun and a mild gust of solar wind .
[ something about sex , short-term relationships and jealousy ] .
Tune in tomorrow , where we see who will have to leave... the Paradise Planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But perhaps more importantly: what were they going to watch?See the young girls wearing skimpy little space suits, lying on the Andromeda beach, catching some sun and a mild gust of solar wind.
[something about sex, short-term relationships and jealousy].
Tune in tomorrow, where we see who will have to leave... the Paradise Planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28128863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28126423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28132229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28129819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1656214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125509
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119139
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121061
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28129819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121871
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120017
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28128863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28132229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119509
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119565
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120595
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123869
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119547
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28126423
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28125435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121147
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28120447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28122181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28121397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28123381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1656214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1656214.28119365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
