<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_27_1612244</id>
	<title>Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fall Release</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1243444380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Several readers have written to mention that Microsoft has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/zune-hd-is-official-heading-your-way-this-fall/">confirmed and unveiled the Zune HD</a>. It has a "3.3-inch, 480 x 272 OLED capacitive touchscreen display, built-in HD Radio receiver, HD output," and it makes use of multi-touch input. More details will be forthcoming at E3, including how the device interacts with Xbox Live. Reader johnjaydk notes a PCWorld article that asks whether the Zune HD will be <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/165562/can\_the\_zune\_hd\_trump\_the\_ipod\_touch.html">capable of competing with the iPod Touch</a>. Quoting: "... the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software. The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Several readers have written to mention that Microsoft has confirmed and unveiled the Zune HD .
It has a " 3.3-inch , 480 x 272 OLED capacitive touchscreen display , built-in HD Radio receiver , HD output , " and it makes use of multi-touch input .
More details will be forthcoming at E3 , including how the device interacts with Xbox Live .
Reader johnjaydk notes a PCWorld article that asks whether the Zune HD will be capable of competing with the iPod Touch .
Quoting : " ... the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software .
The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE , while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform , for which thousands of applications are available .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several readers have written to mention that Microsoft has confirmed and unveiled the Zune HD.
It has a "3.3-inch, 480 x 272 OLED capacitive touchscreen display, built-in HD Radio receiver, HD output," and it makes use of multi-touch input.
More details will be forthcoming at E3, including how the device interacts with Xbox Live.
Reader johnjaydk notes a PCWorld article that asks whether the Zune HD will be capable of competing with the iPod Touch.
Quoting: "... the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software.
The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118423</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1243437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations, you have found the tool for you. You do realise that people like other things than you, or will this be news to you?</p><p>There are reasons to prefer your device, just as there are reasons to prefer iPhone. I had an ipaq, albeit with a smaller screen resolution. The browser was so shit, it was actually painful to use. It was also hard develop for, compared to the iPhone.</p><p>I see nothing wrong with your post, except the tone that you take, that the Ipaq is good for everybody. You realise it is not the developers who made the iPhone popular, it is everyone else, who enjoyed a device that is easy to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you have found the tool for you .
You do realise that people like other things than you , or will this be news to you ? There are reasons to prefer your device , just as there are reasons to prefer iPhone .
I had an ipaq , albeit with a smaller screen resolution .
The browser was so shit , it was actually painful to use .
It was also hard develop for , compared to the iPhone.I see nothing wrong with your post , except the tone that you take , that the Ipaq is good for everybody .
You realise it is not the developers who made the iPhone popular , it is everyone else , who enjoyed a device that is easy to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you have found the tool for you.
You do realise that people like other things than you, or will this be news to you?There are reasons to prefer your device, just as there are reasons to prefer iPhone.
I had an ipaq, albeit with a smaller screen resolution.
The browser was so shit, it was actually painful to use.
It was also hard develop for, compared to the iPhone.I see nothing wrong with your post, except the tone that you take, that the Ipaq is good for everybody.
You realise it is not the developers who made the iPhone popular, it is everyone else, who enjoyed a device that is easy to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114447</id>
	<title>Wow, You Are Utterly Clueless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243416480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Xbox is complete and utter failure in Asia.<br>The Xbox is only alive in the UK and dead across all of mainland Europe.<br>And in the US, Sony's PS2 and PS3 sold more than 1.5 times as many consoles as Microsoft.</p><p>That is before the long awaited PS3 price cut - the PS3 hasn't had a price cut for over a year and a half. Even worse for Microsoft is the fact that massive numbers of Xbox 360 owners are buying their second, third, fourth Xbox 360 due to the RRoD disaster, noise, disc scratching, and and the new E74 hardware failures hoping they will finally get a console that actually works.</p><p>Hell, every major publisher is making more money on PS3 sales than Xbox 360 sales. All one needs to know to grasp the extent of Xbox owners buying multiple 360 units.</p><p>Even going with generously low estimates for the massive number of duplicate Xbox 360s out there, Microsoft isn't even keeping pace with the first Xbox fiasco.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Xbox is complete and utter failure in Asia.The Xbox is only alive in the UK and dead across all of mainland Europe.And in the US , Sony 's PS2 and PS3 sold more than 1.5 times as many consoles as Microsoft.That is before the long awaited PS3 price cut - the PS3 has n't had a price cut for over a year and a half .
Even worse for Microsoft is the fact that massive numbers of Xbox 360 owners are buying their second , third , fourth Xbox 360 due to the RRoD disaster , noise , disc scratching , and and the new E74 hardware failures hoping they will finally get a console that actually works.Hell , every major publisher is making more money on PS3 sales than Xbox 360 sales .
All one needs to know to grasp the extent of Xbox owners buying multiple 360 units.Even going with generously low estimates for the massive number of duplicate Xbox 360s out there , Microsoft is n't even keeping pace with the first Xbox fiasco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Xbox is complete and utter failure in Asia.The Xbox is only alive in the UK and dead across all of mainland Europe.And in the US, Sony's PS2 and PS3 sold more than 1.5 times as many consoles as Microsoft.That is before the long awaited PS3 price cut - the PS3 hasn't had a price cut for over a year and a half.
Even worse for Microsoft is the fact that massive numbers of Xbox 360 owners are buying their second, third, fourth Xbox 360 due to the RRoD disaster, noise, disc scratching, and and the new E74 hardware failures hoping they will finally get a console that actually works.Hell, every major publisher is making more money on PS3 sales than Xbox 360 sales.
All one needs to know to grasp the extent of Xbox owners buying multiple 360 units.Even going with generously low estimates for the massive number of duplicate Xbox 360s out there, Microsoft isn't even keeping pace with the first Xbox fiasco.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113911</id>
	<title>Pinch me with your giant lobster claws</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1243456500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software. The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available"</p><p>So the main weakness of the Microsoft platform is that very little popular software appears to be available for it, whereas the Apple equivalent is where all the apps are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  If anybody fell asleep a few years ago and woke up to this they are going to be very confused!</p><p>I'd say this is simultaneously an example of:<br>a) how if MS produce a platform that many users prefer - like Apple originally did with the iPhone - that the application builders Will Come.<br>b) just what an incredible job Apple's simultaneous technical and marketing pushes have done for their entry into the phone market.</p><p>It'll be interesting to see what trends emerge for MS and Apple in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software .
The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE , while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform , for which thousands of applications are available " So the main weakness of the Microsoft platform is that very little popular software appears to be available for it , whereas the Apple equivalent is where all the apps are ... If anybody fell asleep a few years ago and woke up to this they are going to be very confused ! I 'd say this is simultaneously an example of : a ) how if MS produce a platform that many users prefer - like Apple originally did with the iPhone - that the application builders Will Come.b ) just what an incredible job Apple 's simultaneous technical and marketing pushes have done for their entry into the phone market.It 'll be interesting to see what trends emerge for MS and Apple in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the real competition between the Zune HD and the iPod Touch will come down to software.
The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available"So the main weakness of the Microsoft platform is that very little popular software appears to be available for it, whereas the Apple equivalent is where all the apps are ...  If anybody fell asleep a few years ago and woke up to this they are going to be very confused!I'd say this is simultaneously an example of:a) how if MS produce a platform that many users prefer - like Apple originally did with the iPhone - that the application builders Will Come.b) just what an incredible job Apple's simultaneous technical and marketing pushes have done for their entry into the phone market.It'll be interesting to see what trends emerge for MS and Apple in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113301</id>
	<title>Beveled Backside</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1243453680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes the device look thiner than it is.  It is actually pretty thick.  I guess they couldn't get everything into a slim package.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes the device look thiner than it is .
It is actually pretty thick .
I guess they could n't get everything into a slim package .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes the device look thiner than it is.
It is actually pretty thick.
I guess they couldn't get everything into a slim package.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114013</id>
	<title>Don't knock the hardware</title>
	<author>dj245</author>
	<datestamp>1243456980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Zune hardware is actually pretty solid, and for a while they were really, really cheap.  At one point the 30gb version was getting dumped on various internet sites for $80-$99.  That's a terrific value, even now.  So good, in fact, that I bought one myself.  The hardware is solid; I've dropped mine more than once and it still keeps going.  The battery life is good, and the interface, while not perfect, isn't bad.<br> <br>
The atrocious part about the Zune is the windows software.  It was an abomination 2 years ago, and is still terrible.  For a long period of time it wasn't available on Vista, Windows 64, or any version of Windows Media Center.  Various hacks to the installer program proved it could be done- the limitation was an entirely unnecessary OS-check.  The software is still a pig, but the hardware is good, and was cheap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Zune hardware is actually pretty solid , and for a while they were really , really cheap .
At one point the 30gb version was getting dumped on various internet sites for $ 80- $ 99 .
That 's a terrific value , even now .
So good , in fact , that I bought one myself .
The hardware is solid ; I 've dropped mine more than once and it still keeps going .
The battery life is good , and the interface , while not perfect , is n't bad .
The atrocious part about the Zune is the windows software .
It was an abomination 2 years ago , and is still terrible .
For a long period of time it was n't available on Vista , Windows 64 , or any version of Windows Media Center .
Various hacks to the installer program proved it could be done- the limitation was an entirely unnecessary OS-check .
The software is still a pig , but the hardware is good , and was cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Zune hardware is actually pretty solid, and for a while they were really, really cheap.
At one point the 30gb version was getting dumped on various internet sites for $80-$99.
That's a terrific value, even now.
So good, in fact, that I bought one myself.
The hardware is solid; I've dropped mine more than once and it still keeps going.
The battery life is good, and the interface, while not perfect, isn't bad.
The atrocious part about the Zune is the windows software.
It was an abomination 2 years ago, and is still terrible.
For a long period of time it wasn't available on Vista, Windows 64, or any version of Windows Media Center.
Various hacks to the installer program proved it could be done- the limitation was an entirely unnecessary OS-check.
The software is still a pig, but the hardware is good, and was cheap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112267</id>
	<title>Re:OLED screen?</title>
	<author>Hijacked Public</author>
	<datestamp>1243449480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.amazon.com/80001-1-5-Inch-Digital-Keychain-Brushed/dp/B000NVVG7M" title="amazon.com">Small ones</a> [amazon.com] are all over the place. Most of the desktop sized digital photo frames I saw last I was in Japan are OLED.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Small ones [ amazon.com ] are all over the place .
Most of the desktop sized digital photo frames I saw last I was in Japan are OLED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Small ones [amazon.com] are all over the place.
Most of the desktop sized digital photo frames I saw last I was in Japan are OLED.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113451</id>
	<title>I really hate defending Microsoft but...</title>
	<author>Povno</author>
	<datestamp>1243454340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a Zune120.  Despite the given fact that it is proprietary as hell, it is a fairly stable device.  The firmware is extremely intuitive and runs really smoothly.  The audio quality is clear.  And I really enjoy the social that is built around it.  My only issue is with it being so damn proprietary that I have to either dual boot XP or have it inside my Ubuntu Studio on a VM to even use it.  It is the only reason I still even use windows.<br> <br>
I think part of the reason why the Zune fails is that it's one of those devices that a lot of people don't give a chance to.  Those of us that use them, really enjoy them.  I also happen to think iPods are nice as well and I have really considered Archos devices (though I had enough trouble affording my 120); but the truth is I like my Zune too much.  And for players with large storage capabilities the options are limited.  If we could only get it working in <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3482/" title="ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">Linux</a> [ubuntu.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Zune120 .
Despite the given fact that it is proprietary as hell , it is a fairly stable device .
The firmware is extremely intuitive and runs really smoothly .
The audio quality is clear .
And I really enjoy the social that is built around it .
My only issue is with it being so damn proprietary that I have to either dual boot XP or have it inside my Ubuntu Studio on a VM to even use it .
It is the only reason I still even use windows .
I think part of the reason why the Zune fails is that it 's one of those devices that a lot of people do n't give a chance to .
Those of us that use them , really enjoy them .
I also happen to think iPods are nice as well and I have really considered Archos devices ( though I had enough trouble affording my 120 ) ; but the truth is I like my Zune too much .
And for players with large storage capabilities the options are limited .
If we could only get it working in Linux [ ubuntu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Zune120.
Despite the given fact that it is proprietary as hell, it is a fairly stable device.
The firmware is extremely intuitive and runs really smoothly.
The audio quality is clear.
And I really enjoy the social that is built around it.
My only issue is with it being so damn proprietary that I have to either dual boot XP or have it inside my Ubuntu Studio on a VM to even use it.
It is the only reason I still even use windows.
I think part of the reason why the Zune fails is that it's one of those devices that a lot of people don't give a chance to.
Those of us that use them, really enjoy them.
I also happen to think iPods are nice as well and I have really considered Archos devices (though I had enough trouble affording my 120); but the truth is I like my Zune too much.
And for players with large storage capabilities the options are limited.
If we could only get it working in Linux [ubuntu.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113179</id>
	<title>120 not so bad</title>
	<author>snooz\_crash</author>
	<datestamp>1243453200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The current 4/8 gig units cannot hold a candle to the equivalent ipods.  However, the 80/120 gig units in screen size and dpi, format handling, DRM issues, fm signal, etc. blows away the ipod "classic." Now, if MS can only do something to improve Zune Marketplace.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The current 4/8 gig units can not hold a candle to the equivalent ipods .
However , the 80/120 gig units in screen size and dpi , format handling , DRM issues , fm signal , etc .
blows away the ipod " classic .
" Now , if MS can only do something to improve Zune Marketplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The current 4/8 gig units cannot hold a candle to the equivalent ipods.
However, the 80/120 gig units in screen size and dpi, format handling, DRM issues, fm signal, etc.
blows away the ipod "classic.
" Now, if MS can only do something to improve Zune Marketplace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111907</id>
	<title>headline misreading. . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else read the headline as "set for FAIL release"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else read the headline as " set for FAIL release " ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else read the headline as "set for FAIL release"?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113519</id>
	<title>Perfection?</title>
	<author>ephraimX</author>
	<datestamp>1243454760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else flabbergasted by the cropped "e" on the Marketplace menu item? This is their official promo imagery (captioned with the word "Perfection," no less) on all their press pages! Really? They couldn't have sized that to fit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else flabbergasted by the cropped " e " on the Marketplace menu item ?
This is their official promo imagery ( captioned with the word " Perfection , " no less ) on all their press pages !
Really ? They could n't have sized that to fit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else flabbergasted by the cropped "e" on the Marketplace menu item?
This is their official promo imagery (captioned with the word "Perfection," no less) on all their press pages!
Really? They couldn't have sized that to fit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112895</id>
	<title>What a relief</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243452060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this nightmare, in which we experienced a severe shortage of irrelevant proprietary boxes designed for trivial purposes.  THANK MICROSOFT!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this nightmare , in which we experienced a severe shortage of irrelevant proprietary boxes designed for trivial purposes .
THANK MICROSOFT ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this nightmare, in which we experienced a severe shortage of irrelevant proprietary boxes designed for trivial purposes.
THANK MICROSOFT!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117183</id>
	<title>Re:It's coming to Europe</title>
	<author>earnest murderer</author>
	<datestamp>1243428360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know the technicals regarding DAB, but I do know that the current generation of HD receiver/decoders get really hot and pull a lot of current. Even if Microsoft has significantly improved the technology it's probably still going to be awfully hard on a little battery. I don't believe a 20x improvement in efficiency is likely in any case.<br>I suspect they've made compromises to reduce power usage (and antenna size), which when paired with a technology that is problematic to begin with is probably going to mean that it has a much more limited range than typical HD radios, or they'll play games with the availability of the feature (only when plugged in or some such).</p><p>In any case it's a very nice device. It's a real shame HD radio sounds like 90's era Napster downloads. It's an interesting solution to an ongoing problem, but there's only so much you can do with 48kpbs regardless of how good your codec is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know the technicals regarding DAB , but I do know that the current generation of HD receiver/decoders get really hot and pull a lot of current .
Even if Microsoft has significantly improved the technology it 's probably still going to be awfully hard on a little battery .
I do n't believe a 20x improvement in efficiency is likely in any case.I suspect they 've made compromises to reduce power usage ( and antenna size ) , which when paired with a technology that is problematic to begin with is probably going to mean that it has a much more limited range than typical HD radios , or they 'll play games with the availability of the feature ( only when plugged in or some such ) .In any case it 's a very nice device .
It 's a real shame HD radio sounds like 90 's era Napster downloads .
It 's an interesting solution to an ongoing problem , but there 's only so much you can do with 48kpbs regardless of how good your codec is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know the technicals regarding DAB, but I do know that the current generation of HD receiver/decoders get really hot and pull a lot of current.
Even if Microsoft has significantly improved the technology it's probably still going to be awfully hard on a little battery.
I don't believe a 20x improvement in efficiency is likely in any case.I suspect they've made compromises to reduce power usage (and antenna size), which when paired with a technology that is problematic to begin with is probably going to mean that it has a much more limited range than typical HD radios, or they'll play games with the availability of the feature (only when plugged in or some such).In any case it's a very nice device.
It's a real shame HD radio sounds like 90's era Napster downloads.
It's an interesting solution to an ongoing problem, but there's only so much you can do with 48kpbs regardless of how good your codec is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28126207</id>
	<title>Actually...</title>
	<author>sean.peters</author>
	<datestamp>1243535820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a Mac, iTunes, iPhone, etc, at home too... and I buy all my music from Amazon.com. Their music downloader makes the process absolutely as easy as buying from iTMS. The process is almost exactly the same.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Mac , iTunes , iPhone , etc , at home too... and I buy all my music from Amazon.com .
Their music downloader makes the process absolutely as easy as buying from iTMS .
The process is almost exactly the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Mac, iTunes, iPhone, etc, at home too... and I buy all my music from Amazon.com.
Their music downloader makes the process absolutely as easy as buying from iTMS.
The process is almost exactly the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112959</id>
	<title>I'm Excited.</title>
	<author>Drone69</author>
	<datestamp>1243452300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. Really. I prefer my Zune 80 over my all of my iPods. Better sounding, better software, better features. And Microsoft's philosophy on hardware firmware/updates is miles above Apple's <i>if-you-want-the-new-features-you-need-to-buy-the-new-iPod</i> attitude.<br>
<br>
The only thing MS need to work on is battery life and 3rd party ability for line-out (LOD) cables to use with DAC/Amps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
Really. I prefer my Zune 80 over my all of my iPods .
Better sounding , better software , better features .
And Microsoft 's philosophy on hardware firmware/updates is miles above Apple 's if-you-want-the-new-features-you-need-to-buy-the-new-iPod attitude .
The only thing MS need to work on is battery life and 3rd party ability for line-out ( LOD ) cables to use with DAC/Amps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
Really. I prefer my Zune 80 over my all of my iPods.
Better sounding, better software, better features.
And Microsoft's philosophy on hardware firmware/updates is miles above Apple's if-you-want-the-new-features-you-need-to-buy-the-new-iPod attitude.
The only thing MS need to work on is battery life and 3rd party ability for line-out (LOD) cables to use with DAC/Amps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113727</id>
	<title>Set for Fail Release</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1243455660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was I the only one to read this as "fail release" and not "fall release"? I guess the topic helped to add to my misread confusion.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnSoEJ7taio" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnSoEJ7taio</a> [youtube.com] (Oh wait, I have an iPod like the rest of the world)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was I the only one to read this as " fail release " and not " fall release " ?
I guess the topic helped to add to my misread confusion .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = XnSoEJ7taio [ youtube.com ] ( Oh wait , I have an iPod like the rest of the world )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was I the only one to read this as "fail release" and not "fall release"?
I guess the topic helped to add to my misread confusion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnSoEJ7taio [youtube.com] (Oh wait, I have an iPod like the rest of the world)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112695</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>geminidomino</author>
	<datestamp>1243451280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But now it will fail in advanced 480 x 272 resolution!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But now it will fail in advanced 480 x 272 resolution !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But now it will fail in advanced 480 x 272 resolution!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115269</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1243419420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But isn't that just grumpy featurism?</p><p>Sure, it may look better <i>on paper</i>, but you have to take into account that his phone just does it better, and that doesn't show up in a simple feature list.</p><p>[Actually, I'm teasing - my point is that this is <i>exactly</i> the response people give when someone points out another phone does more than the Iphone, and they'd get modded up to +5 for saying this.]</p><p><i>no phone (you might not weant one but the rest of the world does)</i></p><p>The topic is Zune/Ipods, so comparing non-phone devices is relevant. And if we include phones, then there are far bigger players than the Iphone there too (e.g., Nokia).</p><p><i>no App Store (see phone comment)</i></p><p>Didn't you see his Wifi comment? Not only can he download apps, he isn't restricted to one single site. True, he can't download apps without a Wifi connection, but the same is true of the Ipod (and you could always use a phone as a modem, if say you wanted a separate PDA with a cheap 3G phone).</p><p><i>no SMS</i></p><p>But <i>surely</i> you'd just send an email rather than use such outdated technology? [Again, I'm joking, but that's the standard Iphone response for MMS.]</p><p><i>no iTunes</i></p><p>Hurray! (I'm afraid I find Itunes on Windows has one of the poorest UIs around - second only to Quicktime.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But is n't that just grumpy featurism ? Sure , it may look better on paper , but you have to take into account that his phone just does it better , and that does n't show up in a simple feature list .
[ Actually , I 'm teasing - my point is that this is exactly the response people give when someone points out another phone does more than the Iphone , and they 'd get modded up to + 5 for saying this .
] no phone ( you might not weant one but the rest of the world does ) The topic is Zune/Ipods , so comparing non-phone devices is relevant .
And if we include phones , then there are far bigger players than the Iphone there too ( e.g. , Nokia ) .no App Store ( see phone comment ) Did n't you see his Wifi comment ?
Not only can he download apps , he is n't restricted to one single site .
True , he ca n't download apps without a Wifi connection , but the same is true of the Ipod ( and you could always use a phone as a modem , if say you wanted a separate PDA with a cheap 3G phone ) .no SMSBut surely you 'd just send an email rather than use such outdated technology ?
[ Again , I 'm joking , but that 's the standard Iphone response for MMS .
] no iTunesHurray !
( I 'm afraid I find Itunes on Windows has one of the poorest UIs around - second only to Quicktime .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But isn't that just grumpy featurism?Sure, it may look better on paper, but you have to take into account that his phone just does it better, and that doesn't show up in a simple feature list.
[Actually, I'm teasing - my point is that this is exactly the response people give when someone points out another phone does more than the Iphone, and they'd get modded up to +5 for saying this.
]no phone (you might not weant one but the rest of the world does)The topic is Zune/Ipods, so comparing non-phone devices is relevant.
And if we include phones, then there are far bigger players than the Iphone there too (e.g., Nokia).no App Store (see phone comment)Didn't you see his Wifi comment?
Not only can he download apps, he isn't restricted to one single site.
True, he can't download apps without a Wifi connection, but the same is true of the Ipod (and you could always use a phone as a modem, if say you wanted a separate PDA with a cheap 3G phone).no SMSBut surely you'd just send an email rather than use such outdated technology?
[Again, I'm joking, but that's the standard Iphone response for MMS.
]no iTunesHurray!
(I'm afraid I find Itunes on Windows has one of the poorest UIs around - second only to Quicktime.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851</id>
	<title>Re:People said the same thing about Xbox failing..</title>
	<author>AnalPerfume</author>
	<datestamp>1243451880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn that was funny, cheers. If I had mod points I'd use them.<br><br>While the XBOX and the XBOX 360 are decent, the Sony equivalents are much the same. The Wii spanked BOTH those in terms of sales and popularity. Is the Wii making or losing money for Nintendo? What about the XBOX 360 part of Microsoft, how is that affecting the bottom line? We still have potential lawsuits over faulty hardware to take into account.<br><br>Microsoft do have a habit of not seeing a potential money making sector as it grows, until it's big enough to catch their attention and by that time there are other entrenched players to unseat. Usually at that point Microsoft try to do their own thing, vendor locked and half baked, which tends to fail. The next point is to buy someone already successful in that sector, buying the market share they can't get on merit. If they can't buy market share it's the old smear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/legal threats campaign to destroy the competition. The only area they did actually offer a good product comparable with the competition was the XBOX &amp; it's successor the XBOX 360.<br><br>As the credit crunch continues and people still have to watch their spending Microsoft will continue to have a hard time. They relied on the usual hype with Windows to have Vista being sung from the rooftops as the savior to their IT woes, and it bombed. Perhaps some of the criticism was unjustified but plenty was very much on the mark, and the people rebelled. When you have a multi-billion-doller sure thing you can afford to count on the money rolling in, so when it doesn't you find you've spent a LOT in other areas that you're in even more shit. So you send out the PR drones / proxies / astorturfers to try and brainwash the people and eventually have to give up, give the pig a make over and a new name....and charge more for it to make up the losses.<br><br>The Zune is just another example of a boat they missed and have been desperately running alongside it trying to catch up, all the while being ignored by almost everyone except the die hard fanboys. How many projects to Microsoft keep pumping money into without making it back before they get canceled. Sure each part of Microsoft plays into the whole, some are losing money, some are making it while their two cash cows Windows and Office keep many afloat. The Windows cash cow went on a severe diet over the last couple of years, and shows no real signs of putting on the weight it's been accustomed to.<br><br>Microsoft's PR may give you the idea that they're playing for keeps but in a market like personal mp3/4 players the iPod is king. PR people ALWAYS talk up their products, it's their jobs. There are plenty of great mp3/4 players but the iPod is still king (as much as I wouldn't be seen dead with one personally). Personal gadgets are often used as street cred, where people use them as trophies to be accepted into a crowd. Microsoft will NEVER be trendy, unless you're attending a corporate Christmas office party where the average age of the party attendees is in their 50's and the common thread is "mid life crisis".<br><br>They tried with the Zune before and failed. Even if they have learned some lessons and redesigned the Zune into something reasonably cool, the name Zune has as much cool cred as Windows ME. Microsoft are often keen to rebrand a failed project, apply a new skin and launch it as a new product hoping it will work the second time. It's yet to work for them, this time they didn't waste the money on rebranding, which could be a sign of a budget cut.<br><br>Every other week Microsoft are laying people off, or cutting back on budgets for some projects or plans. The Zune will be a drain for Microsoft to pour some money down, while trying in vain to capture some market share and income from an entrenched leader. This time next year the Zune will be one of the growing list of failures that finally got the axe from the accounts department at Microsoft trying to cut away the dead weight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn that was funny , cheers .
If I had mod points I 'd use them.While the XBOX and the XBOX 360 are decent , the Sony equivalents are much the same .
The Wii spanked BOTH those in terms of sales and popularity .
Is the Wii making or losing money for Nintendo ?
What about the XBOX 360 part of Microsoft , how is that affecting the bottom line ?
We still have potential lawsuits over faulty hardware to take into account.Microsoft do have a habit of not seeing a potential money making sector as it grows , until it 's big enough to catch their attention and by that time there are other entrenched players to unseat .
Usually at that point Microsoft try to do their own thing , vendor locked and half baked , which tends to fail .
The next point is to buy someone already successful in that sector , buying the market share they ca n't get on merit .
If they ca n't buy market share it 's the old smear /legal threats campaign to destroy the competition .
The only area they did actually offer a good product comparable with the competition was the XBOX &amp; it 's successor the XBOX 360.As the credit crunch continues and people still have to watch their spending Microsoft will continue to have a hard time .
They relied on the usual hype with Windows to have Vista being sung from the rooftops as the savior to their IT woes , and it bombed .
Perhaps some of the criticism was unjustified but plenty was very much on the mark , and the people rebelled .
When you have a multi-billion-doller sure thing you can afford to count on the money rolling in , so when it does n't you find you 've spent a LOT in other areas that you 're in even more shit .
So you send out the PR drones / proxies / astorturfers to try and brainwash the people and eventually have to give up , give the pig a make over and a new name....and charge more for it to make up the losses.The Zune is just another example of a boat they missed and have been desperately running alongside it trying to catch up , all the while being ignored by almost everyone except the die hard fanboys .
How many projects to Microsoft keep pumping money into without making it back before they get canceled .
Sure each part of Microsoft plays into the whole , some are losing money , some are making it while their two cash cows Windows and Office keep many afloat .
The Windows cash cow went on a severe diet over the last couple of years , and shows no real signs of putting on the weight it 's been accustomed to.Microsoft 's PR may give you the idea that they 're playing for keeps but in a market like personal mp3/4 players the iPod is king .
PR people ALWAYS talk up their products , it 's their jobs .
There are plenty of great mp3/4 players but the iPod is still king ( as much as I would n't be seen dead with one personally ) .
Personal gadgets are often used as street cred , where people use them as trophies to be accepted into a crowd .
Microsoft will NEVER be trendy , unless you 're attending a corporate Christmas office party where the average age of the party attendees is in their 50 's and the common thread is " mid life crisis " .They tried with the Zune before and failed .
Even if they have learned some lessons and redesigned the Zune into something reasonably cool , the name Zune has as much cool cred as Windows ME .
Microsoft are often keen to rebrand a failed project , apply a new skin and launch it as a new product hoping it will work the second time .
It 's yet to work for them , this time they did n't waste the money on rebranding , which could be a sign of a budget cut.Every other week Microsoft are laying people off , or cutting back on budgets for some projects or plans .
The Zune will be a drain for Microsoft to pour some money down , while trying in vain to capture some market share and income from an entrenched leader .
This time next year the Zune will be one of the growing list of failures that finally got the axe from the accounts department at Microsoft trying to cut away the dead weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn that was funny, cheers.
If I had mod points I'd use them.While the XBOX and the XBOX 360 are decent, the Sony equivalents are much the same.
The Wii spanked BOTH those in terms of sales and popularity.
Is the Wii making or losing money for Nintendo?
What about the XBOX 360 part of Microsoft, how is that affecting the bottom line?
We still have potential lawsuits over faulty hardware to take into account.Microsoft do have a habit of not seeing a potential money making sector as it grows, until it's big enough to catch their attention and by that time there are other entrenched players to unseat.
Usually at that point Microsoft try to do their own thing, vendor locked and half baked, which tends to fail.
The next point is to buy someone already successful in that sector, buying the market share they can't get on merit.
If they can't buy market share it's the old smear /legal threats campaign to destroy the competition.
The only area they did actually offer a good product comparable with the competition was the XBOX &amp; it's successor the XBOX 360.As the credit crunch continues and people still have to watch their spending Microsoft will continue to have a hard time.
They relied on the usual hype with Windows to have Vista being sung from the rooftops as the savior to their IT woes, and it bombed.
Perhaps some of the criticism was unjustified but plenty was very much on the mark, and the people rebelled.
When you have a multi-billion-doller sure thing you can afford to count on the money rolling in, so when it doesn't you find you've spent a LOT in other areas that you're in even more shit.
So you send out the PR drones / proxies / astorturfers to try and brainwash the people and eventually have to give up, give the pig a make over and a new name....and charge more for it to make up the losses.The Zune is just another example of a boat they missed and have been desperately running alongside it trying to catch up, all the while being ignored by almost everyone except the die hard fanboys.
How many projects to Microsoft keep pumping money into without making it back before they get canceled.
Sure each part of Microsoft plays into the whole, some are losing money, some are making it while their two cash cows Windows and Office keep many afloat.
The Windows cash cow went on a severe diet over the last couple of years, and shows no real signs of putting on the weight it's been accustomed to.Microsoft's PR may give you the idea that they're playing for keeps but in a market like personal mp3/4 players the iPod is king.
PR people ALWAYS talk up their products, it's their jobs.
There are plenty of great mp3/4 players but the iPod is still king (as much as I wouldn't be seen dead with one personally).
Personal gadgets are often used as street cred, where people use them as trophies to be accepted into a crowd.
Microsoft will NEVER be trendy, unless you're attending a corporate Christmas office party where the average age of the party attendees is in their 50's and the common thread is "mid life crisis".They tried with the Zune before and failed.
Even if they have learned some lessons and redesigned the Zune into something reasonably cool, the name Zune has as much cool cred as Windows ME.
Microsoft are often keen to rebrand a failed project, apply a new skin and launch it as a new product hoping it will work the second time.
It's yet to work for them, this time they didn't waste the money on rebranding, which could be a sign of a budget cut.Every other week Microsoft are laying people off, or cutting back on budgets for some projects or plans.
The Zune will be a drain for Microsoft to pour some money down, while trying in vain to capture some market share and income from an entrenched leader.
This time next year the Zune will be one of the growing list of failures that finally got the axe from the accounts department at Microsoft trying to cut away the dead weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118353</id>
	<title>Re:Open up MTPZ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243437120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Songbird on linux has zune support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Songbird on linux has zune support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Songbird on linux has zune support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114555</id>
	<title>Get over yourselves...</title>
	<author>LoudNoiseElitist</author>
	<datestamp>1243416960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm having a hard time determining who here has really tried the Zune, or who is just bashing for the sake of bashing.

I've had 3 iPods and 2 Zunes.  The Zunes rock.  The Zune pass rocks.  It's a solid player that works great, feels great, and hasn't given me any real problems.  Yeah, the Zune software is a little bloated, but anyone with a decent system shouldn't notice any problems (I routinely play games with it running with no issues).

I've had a Zune30 and a Zune80, and they've both been great.  I was really excited to see the news today that there's another one coming out.  My only real concern is the loss of the Zune pad.  That thing works great (4 directions plus click?  Yep, good idea.)  Also, I'm one of the ones who hates fingerprints.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm having a hard time determining who here has really tried the Zune , or who is just bashing for the sake of bashing .
I 've had 3 iPods and 2 Zunes .
The Zunes rock .
The Zune pass rocks .
It 's a solid player that works great , feels great , and has n't given me any real problems .
Yeah , the Zune software is a little bloated , but anyone with a decent system should n't notice any problems ( I routinely play games with it running with no issues ) .
I 've had a Zune30 and a Zune80 , and they 've both been great .
I was really excited to see the news today that there 's another one coming out .
My only real concern is the loss of the Zune pad .
That thing works great ( 4 directions plus click ?
Yep , good idea .
) Also , I 'm one of the ones who hates fingerprints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm having a hard time determining who here has really tried the Zune, or who is just bashing for the sake of bashing.
I've had 3 iPods and 2 Zunes.
The Zunes rock.
The Zune pass rocks.
It's a solid player that works great, feels great, and hasn't given me any real problems.
Yeah, the Zune software is a little bloated, but anyone with a decent system shouldn't notice any problems (I routinely play games with it running with no issues).
I've had a Zune30 and a Zune80, and they've both been great.
I was really excited to see the news today that there's another one coming out.
My only real concern is the loss of the Zune pad.
That thing works great (4 directions plus click?
Yep, good idea.
)  Also, I'm one of the ones who hates fingerprints.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112813</id>
	<title>Re:HD Output?</title>
	<author>haystor</author>
	<datestamp>1243451700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While that may not be HDTV, 480x272 is pretty good and a very high resolution for such a small device.  It can be HD just not a big screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While that may not be HDTV , 480x272 is pretty good and a very high resolution for such a small device .
It can be HD just not a big screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While that may not be HDTV, 480x272 is pretty good and a very high resolution for such a small device.
It can be HD just not a big screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113079</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243452780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true, yet again?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Maybe you should have waited for the Xbox 720, then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true , yet again ?
Maybe you should have waited for the Xbox 720 , then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true, yet again?
Maybe you should have waited for the Xbox 720, then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112045</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ditto, you took the words right out of my mouth.  Or fingers.  Whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ditto , you took the words right out of my mouth .
Or fingers .
Whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ditto, you took the words right out of my mouth.
Or fingers.
Whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112531</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1243450680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fall, release, drop, give-up, fail... all much the same really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fall , release , drop , give-up , fail... all much the same really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fall, release, drop, give-up, fail... all much the same really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</id>
	<title>Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1243448340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With specs like that, I'm curious as to what their target demographic is?  Apple already tied up the young, hip and ignorant.  iRiver owns the cheap and techy.  All that's left is the old and confused.</p><p>The Zune is like the Go-Bots of digital media players.  It's what your grandmother will buy you for your birthday, knowing you like that "music thing"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With specs like that , I 'm curious as to what their target demographic is ?
Apple already tied up the young , hip and ignorant .
iRiver owns the cheap and techy .
All that 's left is the old and confused.The Zune is like the Go-Bots of digital media players .
It 's what your grandmother will buy you for your birthday , knowing you like that " music thing "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With specs like that, I'm curious as to what their target demographic is?
Apple already tied up the young, hip and ignorant.
iRiver owns the cheap and techy.
All that's left is the old and confused.The Zune is like the Go-Bots of digital media players.
It's what your grandmother will buy you for your birthday, knowing you like that "music thing"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112725</id>
	<title>What next HD reading glasses?</title>
	<author>WebmasterNeal</author>
	<datestamp>1243451400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh wait too late!
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=hd+glasses" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=hd+glasses</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait too late !
http : //www.google.com/search ? q = hd + glasses [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait too late!
http://www.google.com/search?q=hd+glasses [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</id>
	<title>Title</title>
	<author>Anonymous Custard</author>
	<datestamp>1243448040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I first read that title as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fail Release"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I first read that title as " Zune HD Unveiled , Set For Fail Release "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first read that title as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fail Release"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112739</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243451460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just squirted after hearing this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just squirted after hearing this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just squirted after hearing this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113089</id>
	<title>Oh...but....</title>
	<author>Drone69</author>
	<datestamp>1243452840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I'm still asking for an iPhone (32GB) for Christmas this year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I 'm still asking for an iPhone ( 32GB ) for Christmas this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I'm still asking for an iPhone (32GB) for Christmas this year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113219</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243453380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome anti-Microsoft bias here, as we can see with the totaly random 'troll' mod on parent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome anti-Microsoft bias here , as we can see with the totaly random 'troll ' mod on parent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome anti-Microsoft bias here, as we can see with the totaly random 'troll' mod on parent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114319</id>
	<title>LOL! Xbox...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243415940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell us you know how idiotic you just made yourself look to everyone?</p><p>Right...right...right???</p><p>The PS3 just sold 10 million units in 2008 at double the price of the Xbox 360.</p><p>The PS3 has kicked the Xbox 360 into last place in both Japan and Europe even with the Xbox 360 being out for a year earlier in Japan and and a year and a half earlier in Europe.</p><p>Even more humiliating is the fact that the Xbox 360 almost got outsold by Sony's 9 year old PS2 last month in the one country, the US, that it is still a viable product.</p><p>And in the ultimate humiliation for Microsoft and the failed Xbox, the Net has been filled with Xbox fans screaming and hoping for a port of year old PS3 game, Metal Gear Solid 4, thinking that was going to be Microsoft' BIG NEWS at E3 this year. LOL!</p><p>You could hear the Xbox fanboys scream out in pain when it was, surprise, the next Metal Gear is a PS3 exclusive and no downgraded 360 port is being made.</p><p>Xbox 360<br>Worst console hardware in history with the RRoD fiasco, disc scratching<br>Smaller than last gen 7 gigabyte DVD format compared to the next gen standard BluRay 25/50 gigabyte discs<br>Worst online service with 50 dollar a year online fees, stupid 50 dollar a year fees, Nintendo Mii ripoffs<br>Worst first party developers, Sony has 20 first part studios, Nintendo has 10, Microsoft only has 3(LOL! Guess that's why Xbox fanboys are constantly begging for PS3 exclusives like MGS4. Losers...)<br>Dead last in 2/3 major console regions around the world</p><p>And now another fucking Zune, the laughing stock of music market, and the Xbox, the laughing stock of the gaming market, are joining forces!</p><p>LOL!</p><p>FAIL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell us you know how idiotic you just made yourself look to everyone ? Right...right...right ? ?
? The PS3 just sold 10 million units in 2008 at double the price of the Xbox 360.The PS3 has kicked the Xbox 360 into last place in both Japan and Europe even with the Xbox 360 being out for a year earlier in Japan and and a year and a half earlier in Europe.Even more humiliating is the fact that the Xbox 360 almost got outsold by Sony 's 9 year old PS2 last month in the one country , the US , that it is still a viable product.And in the ultimate humiliation for Microsoft and the failed Xbox , the Net has been filled with Xbox fans screaming and hoping for a port of year old PS3 game , Metal Gear Solid 4 , thinking that was going to be Microsoft ' BIG NEWS at E3 this year .
LOL ! You could hear the Xbox fanboys scream out in pain when it was , surprise , the next Metal Gear is a PS3 exclusive and no downgraded 360 port is being made.Xbox 360Worst console hardware in history with the RRoD fiasco , disc scratchingSmaller than last gen 7 gigabyte DVD format compared to the next gen standard BluRay 25/50 gigabyte discsWorst online service with 50 dollar a year online fees , stupid 50 dollar a year fees , Nintendo Mii ripoffsWorst first party developers , Sony has 20 first part studios , Nintendo has 10 , Microsoft only has 3 ( LOL !
Guess that 's why Xbox fanboys are constantly begging for PS3 exclusives like MGS4 .
Losers... ) Dead last in 2/3 major console regions around the worldAnd now another fucking Zune , the laughing stock of music market , and the Xbox , the laughing stock of the gaming market , are joining forces ! LOL ! FAIL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell us you know how idiotic you just made yourself look to everyone?Right...right...right??
?The PS3 just sold 10 million units in 2008 at double the price of the Xbox 360.The PS3 has kicked the Xbox 360 into last place in both Japan and Europe even with the Xbox 360 being out for a year earlier in Japan and and a year and a half earlier in Europe.Even more humiliating is the fact that the Xbox 360 almost got outsold by Sony's 9 year old PS2 last month in the one country, the US, that it is still a viable product.And in the ultimate humiliation for Microsoft and the failed Xbox, the Net has been filled with Xbox fans screaming and hoping for a port of year old PS3 game, Metal Gear Solid 4, thinking that was going to be Microsoft' BIG NEWS at E3 this year.
LOL!You could hear the Xbox fanboys scream out in pain when it was, surprise, the next Metal Gear is a PS3 exclusive and no downgraded 360 port is being made.Xbox 360Worst console hardware in history with the RRoD fiasco, disc scratchingSmaller than last gen 7 gigabyte DVD format compared to the next gen standard BluRay 25/50 gigabyte discsWorst online service with 50 dollar a year online fees, stupid 50 dollar a year fees, Nintendo Mii ripoffsWorst first party developers, Sony has 20 first part studios, Nintendo has 10, Microsoft only has 3(LOL!
Guess that's why Xbox fanboys are constantly begging for PS3 exclusives like MGS4.
Losers...)Dead last in 2/3 major console regions around the worldAnd now another fucking Zune, the laughing stock of music market, and the Xbox, the laughing stock of the gaming market, are joining forces!LOL!FAIL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117489</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243430280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet again? When has it been true in the past?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet again ?
When has it been true in the past ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet again?
When has it been true in the past?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937</id>
	<title>It's coming to Europe</title>
	<author>CNETNate</author>
	<datestamp>1243448280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zunes are also finally coming to Europe as well, which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped. Understandably, the US press has perhaps overlooked this fact, but if you live here in Europe, it's possibly bigger news than the Zune HD being announced.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zunes are also finally coming to Europe as well , which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped .
Understandably , the US press has perhaps overlooked this fact , but if you live here in Europe , it 's possibly bigger news than the Zune HD being announced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zunes are also finally coming to Europe as well, which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped.
Understandably, the US press has perhaps overlooked this fact, but if you live here in Europe, it's possibly bigger news than the Zune HD being announced.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112683</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>superdana</author>
	<datestamp>1243451220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn, I clicked through just to say that very thing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , I clicked through just to say that very thing : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, I clicked through just to say that very thing :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113495</id>
	<title>Failboat HD</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1243454580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MS needs to realise no one likes the Zune and they're happy with their iPods. They may not be perfect but people know MS makes rubbish and will only stick with their OS because they have to but they don't have to buy a Zune.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS needs to realise no one likes the Zune and they 're happy with their iPods .
They may not be perfect but people know MS makes rubbish and will only stick with their OS because they have to but they do n't have to buy a Zune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS needs to realise no one likes the Zune and they're happy with their iPods.
They may not be perfect but people know MS makes rubbish and will only stick with their OS because they have to but they don't have to buy a Zune.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113077</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>flameproof</author>
	<datestamp>1243452780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Me too.  How "Zune" and "Fail" cannot exist in the same sentence is beyond my comprehension, yet, there it is.  Chalk one up to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.  Hooked In!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Me too .
How " Zune " and " Fail " can not exist in the same sentence is beyond my comprehension , yet , there it is .
Chalk one up to / .
Hooked In ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me too.
How "Zune" and "Fail" cannot exist in the same sentence is beyond my comprehension, yet, there it is.
Chalk one up to /.
Hooked In!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28124893</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>DougInKY</author>
	<datestamp>1243530660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I carry a Touch and am wondering where you are finding these many free hotspots. Not Nashville, TN or Louisville, KY or even in Kansas City, MO or Saint Louis, MO. Yes there are free hotspots in all of these places but they are far from ubiquitous. You pretty much have to know where they are beforehand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I carry a Touch and am wondering where you are finding these many free hotspots .
Not Nashville , TN or Louisville , KY or even in Kansas City , MO or Saint Louis , MO .
Yes there are free hotspots in all of these places but they are far from ubiquitous .
You pretty much have to know where they are beforehand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I carry a Touch and am wondering where you are finding these many free hotspots.
Not Nashville, TN or Louisville, KY or even in Kansas City, MO or Saint Louis, MO.
Yes there are free hotspots in all of these places but they are far from ubiquitous.
You pretty much have to know where they are beforehand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113053</id>
	<title>480 x 272  ...... Lame</title>
	<author>Spy Handler</author>
	<datestamp>1243452660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iphone/ipods already have 480 x 320 screen resolution.  How is this thing "HD" when it has lower resolution than the 1st generation iphone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iphone/ipods already have 480 x 320 screen resolution .
How is this thing " HD " when it has lower resolution than the 1st generation iphone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iphone/ipods already have 480 x 320 screen resolution.
How is this thing "HD" when it has lower resolution than the 1st generation iphone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113029</id>
	<title>Re:It's coming to Europe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243452600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will they replace the HD Radio with DAB radio for Britain and the other parts of Europe that use DAB?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will they replace the HD Radio with DAB radio for Britain and the other parts of Europe that use DAB ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will they replace the HD Radio with DAB radio for Britain and the other parts of Europe that use DAB?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089</id>
	<title>People said the same thing about Xbox failing...</title>
	<author>HerculesMO</author>
	<datestamp>1243448760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at how the Xbox 360 unceremoniously unseated Playstation as the console of choice.</p><p>MS is playing for keeps -- if they keep at it, they will do well. I actually think their Zune Pass is one of the best things out there, even though I don't have a Zune. If they got a few 3rd parties to do a car integration kit (ala Dice) I'd be on board and buy one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at how the Xbox 360 unceremoniously unseated Playstation as the console of choice.MS is playing for keeps -- if they keep at it , they will do well .
I actually think their Zune Pass is one of the best things out there , even though I do n't have a Zune .
If they got a few 3rd parties to do a car integration kit ( ala Dice ) I 'd be on board and buy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at how the Xbox 360 unceremoniously unseated Playstation as the console of choice.MS is playing for keeps -- if they keep at it, they will do well.
I actually think their Zune Pass is one of the best things out there, even though I don't have a Zune.
If they got a few 3rd parties to do a car integration kit (ala Dice) I'd be on board and buy one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120525</id>
	<title>Re:People said the same thing about Xbox failing..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The funny thing is, that Zune actually was the reason why the xbox 360 was such a quality fuckup. In the middle of designing the console, Ballmer decided that Zune was more important and dragged half the xbox team away. Needless to say that the time schedule for the xbox was not altered because it had to be released one year before Sony and that the console was released with significant hardware flaws upfront.<br>In the end the console was sold in a shady breaking condition to customers despite internal warnings, the rest is history!<br>If Sony havent made such a major fuckup in two important areas, first the price, secondly, alienating 100 mio potential customers by dropping ps2 compatibilities, Microsoft would be with the xbox 360 where it was with the original xbox!<br>It is less the fault of Microsoft they did what they always do, release products with questionable quality and then let marketing fix the situation, but more the fault of Sony alienating almost their entire customerbase with 2-3 endlessly stupid decisions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The funny thing is , that Zune actually was the reason why the xbox 360 was such a quality fuckup .
In the middle of designing the console , Ballmer decided that Zune was more important and dragged half the xbox team away .
Needless to say that the time schedule for the xbox was not altered because it had to be released one year before Sony and that the console was released with significant hardware flaws upfront.In the end the console was sold in a shady breaking condition to customers despite internal warnings , the rest is history ! If Sony havent made such a major fuckup in two important areas , first the price , secondly , alienating 100 mio potential customers by dropping ps2 compatibilities , Microsoft would be with the xbox 360 where it was with the original xbox ! It is less the fault of Microsoft they did what they always do , release products with questionable quality and then let marketing fix the situation , but more the fault of Sony alienating almost their entire customerbase with 2-3 endlessly stupid decisions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funny thing is, that Zune actually was the reason why the xbox 360 was such a quality fuckup.
In the middle of designing the console, Ballmer decided that Zune was more important and dragged half the xbox team away.
Needless to say that the time schedule for the xbox was not altered because it had to be released one year before Sony and that the console was released with significant hardware flaws upfront.In the end the console was sold in a shady breaking condition to customers despite internal warnings, the rest is history!If Sony havent made such a major fuckup in two important areas, first the price, secondly, alienating 100 mio potential customers by dropping ps2 compatibilities, Microsoft would be with the xbox 360 where it was with the original xbox!It is less the fault of Microsoft they did what they always do, release products with questionable quality and then let marketing fix the situation, but more the fault of Sony alienating almost their entire customerbase with 2-3 endlessly stupid decisions!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112905</id>
	<title>set for fall release...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243452120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Saw that yesterday on macrumours along with their comments, and when i saw the headline here, at first i thought it read "..set for FAIL release". But i guess that says more about my view of microsoft products, rather than the products themselves... or is it the other way around?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Saw that yesterday on macrumours along with their comments , and when i saw the headline here , at first i thought it read " ..set for FAIL release " .
But i guess that says more about my view of microsoft products , rather than the products themselves... or is it the other way around ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saw that yesterday on macrumours along with their comments, and when i saw the headline here, at first i thought it read "..set for FAIL release".
But i guess that says more about my view of microsoft products, rather than the products themselves... or is it the other way around?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112179</id>
	<title>can't wait ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's patently obvious that the Zune is the better and most innovative product ever to come out of Redmond, despite Apple launching the iPod in 2001, a full five years before the Zune. And Apple stealing the '<strong>Zune Marketplace</strong>' and rebranding it as the <strong>iTunes Store</strong><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br> <br>

Seriously: if they don't tie the Zune to the Windows desktop, and make using the other players a jolting experience, then the 'innovation' magic isn't going to work this time. The constant mud slinging at Apple being a reminder as to who they are a worry to.<br> <br>

'<i>dirty Hobbitses, trying to steal my precious! kill Hosbitses</i>'</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's patently obvious that the Zune is the better and most innovative product ever to come out of Redmond , despite Apple launching the iPod in 2001 , a full five years before the Zune .
And Apple stealing the 'Zune Marketplace ' and rebranding it as the iTunes Store .. : ) Seriously : if they do n't tie the Zune to the Windows desktop , and make using the other players a jolting experience , then the 'innovation ' magic is n't going to work this time .
The constant mud slinging at Apple being a reminder as to who they are a worry to .
'dirty Hobbitses , trying to steal my precious !
kill Hosbitses'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's patently obvious that the Zune is the better and most innovative product ever to come out of Redmond, despite Apple launching the iPod in 2001, a full five years before the Zune.
And Apple stealing the 'Zune Marketplace' and rebranding it as the iTunes Store .. :) 

Seriously: if they don't tie the Zune to the Windows desktop, and make using the other players a jolting experience, then the 'innovation' magic isn't going to work this time.
The constant mud slinging at Apple being a reminder as to who they are a worry to.
'dirty Hobbitses, trying to steal my precious!
kill Hosbitses'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112141</id>
	<title>Necessary Response</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1243448940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apple already tied up the young, hip and ignorant.</i></p><p>Glad you're enjoying your iPod.</p><p>They also tied up the people interested in the platform with the widest capability...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple already tied up the young , hip and ignorant.Glad you 're enjoying your iPod.They also tied up the people interested in the platform with the widest capability.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple already tied up the young, hip and ignorant.Glad you're enjoying your iPod.They also tied up the people interested in the platform with the widest capability...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116989</id>
	<title>Who else</title>
	<author>BronsCon</author>
	<datestamp>1243427160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>read that as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Failed Release"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>read that as " Zune HD Unveiled , Set For Failed Release " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>read that as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Failed Release"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>rzekson</author>
	<datestamp>1243450740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>From this never-ending iphon/ipod/zune buzz, one could get the impression that the world has only two cutting edge devices, ipod/iphone and zune. it just so happens that the fantastic features they promise to come have all been around for some time now. I just find it genuinely hard to understand why the free software community drools over the iphones, and fails to notice the availability of platforms that are superior and basically made for developers (not to mention there are a number of better devices out there). FYI, for well over a year I have owned a Windows Mobile device (IPAQ 210) with a fantastic 640x480 touch screen that beats all the ipods, zunes and other such iphones by a large margin in terms of resolution and comfort. it cost me $400, about as much as any of the other toys. It eats 32 GB memory in flash cards (allegedly even more, have not checked). Compact flash and SD, replaceable at anytime, including while the device is on. It has good-quality 802.11 radio (no flakey operation), wiht no restrictions, I can open sockets, send multicast, consume web services. It has bluetooth. It lasts for days without charging. And most importantly, it takes the latest compact editions of the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET framework, allowing me to deploy any code I feel like to deploy on it at a press of a button in Visual Studio, bypassing the need to unlock it, use app stores or other such bizarre nonsense. I like the idea of being able to program my devices, and I use that feature constantly. And yes, it does play hd mp4 videos from youtube very smoothly. Doesn't come with a phone. And what would I need a phone for?! To pay the $100+ in monthly charges for a data plan? I pass by wifi access points so often, I don't need to think about it much. Most of the time, I get my email while carrying the device in my pocket. It boots in about a second. It does not come with GPS. Frankly, I wouldn't have noticed. Most of the time, I know where I am, and when I travel, I prefer to use a professional device such as tom tom that was made for thus purpose and has been developed and improved for a long time. And no, I don't work for hewlett-packard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From this never-ending iphon/ipod/zune buzz , one could get the impression that the world has only two cutting edge devices , ipod/iphone and zune .
it just so happens that the fantastic features they promise to come have all been around for some time now .
I just find it genuinely hard to understand why the free software community drools over the iphones , and fails to notice the availability of platforms that are superior and basically made for developers ( not to mention there are a number of better devices out there ) .
FYI , for well over a year I have owned a Windows Mobile device ( IPAQ 210 ) with a fantastic 640x480 touch screen that beats all the ipods , zunes and other such iphones by a large margin in terms of resolution and comfort .
it cost me $ 400 , about as much as any of the other toys .
It eats 32 GB memory in flash cards ( allegedly even more , have not checked ) .
Compact flash and SD , replaceable at anytime , including while the device is on .
It has good-quality 802.11 radio ( no flakey operation ) , wiht no restrictions , I can open sockets , send multicast , consume web services .
It has bluetooth .
It lasts for days without charging .
And most importantly , it takes the latest compact editions of the .NET framework , allowing me to deploy any code I feel like to deploy on it at a press of a button in Visual Studio , bypassing the need to unlock it , use app stores or other such bizarre nonsense .
I like the idea of being able to program my devices , and I use that feature constantly .
And yes , it does play hd mp4 videos from youtube very smoothly .
Does n't come with a phone .
And what would I need a phone for ? !
To pay the $ 100 + in monthly charges for a data plan ?
I pass by wifi access points so often , I do n't need to think about it much .
Most of the time , I get my email while carrying the device in my pocket .
It boots in about a second .
It does not come with GPS .
Frankly , I would n't have noticed .
Most of the time , I know where I am , and when I travel , I prefer to use a professional device such as tom tom that was made for thus purpose and has been developed and improved for a long time .
And no , I do n't work for hewlett-packard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From this never-ending iphon/ipod/zune buzz, one could get the impression that the world has only two cutting edge devices, ipod/iphone and zune.
it just so happens that the fantastic features they promise to come have all been around for some time now.
I just find it genuinely hard to understand why the free software community drools over the iphones, and fails to notice the availability of platforms that are superior and basically made for developers (not to mention there are a number of better devices out there).
FYI, for well over a year I have owned a Windows Mobile device (IPAQ 210) with a fantastic 640x480 touch screen that beats all the ipods, zunes and other such iphones by a large margin in terms of resolution and comfort.
it cost me $400, about as much as any of the other toys.
It eats 32 GB memory in flash cards (allegedly even more, have not checked).
Compact flash and SD, replaceable at anytime, including while the device is on.
It has good-quality 802.11 radio (no flakey operation), wiht no restrictions, I can open sockets, send multicast, consume web services.
It has bluetooth.
It lasts for days without charging.
And most importantly, it takes the latest compact editions of the .NET framework, allowing me to deploy any code I feel like to deploy on it at a press of a button in Visual Studio, bypassing the need to unlock it, use app stores or other such bizarre nonsense.
I like the idea of being able to program my devices, and I use that feature constantly.
And yes, it does play hd mp4 videos from youtube very smoothly.
Doesn't come with a phone.
And what would I need a phone for?!
To pay the $100+ in monthly charges for a data plan?
I pass by wifi access points so often, I don't need to think about it much.
Most of the time, I get my email while carrying the device in my pocket.
It boots in about a second.
It does not come with GPS.
Frankly, I wouldn't have noticed.
Most of the time, I know where I am, and when I travel, I prefer to use a professional device such as tom tom that was made for thus purpose and has been developed and improved for a long time.
And no, I don't work for hewlett-packard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113273</id>
	<title>Re:I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1243453620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so, you basically want to say that apple makes products for the stupid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so , you basically want to say that apple makes products for the stupid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so, you basically want to say that apple makes products for the stupid?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113403</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1243454100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With specs like that, I'm curious as to what their target demographic is?</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/melinda-gates-secretly-pines-for-iphone-actually-doesnt-even-l/" title="engadget.com">Bill Gates' wife.</a> [engadget.com]  Although I guess they decided not to make it into a phone... yet...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With specs like that , I 'm curious as to what their target demographic is ?
Bill Gates ' wife .
[ engadget.com ] Although I guess they decided not to make it into a phone... yet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With specs like that, I'm curious as to what their target demographic is?
Bill Gates' wife.
[engadget.com]  Although I guess they decided not to make it into a phone... yet...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115059</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243418760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a simple answer as to why your favorite device isn't popular.
<br> <br>
iPAQ 210
Dimensions (w x d x h)
2.97 x<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.69 x 5.27 in (75.4 x 17.5 x 133.9 mm)
Weight
6.6 oz (190 g)
<br> <br>
iPod Touch:
Width:
2.4 inches (61.8 mm)
Height:
4.1 inches (110 mm)
Depth:
0.33 inch (8.5 mm)
Weight:
4.05 ounces (115 grams)
<br> <br>
It doesn't seem like that big of a difference at first, but it really adds up: The iPaq is 176681 mm^2 versus the iPod Touch's 57783 mm^2. That's three times more voluminous, which both explains how they get extra functionality in there and why it's not very popular.
<br> <br>It's essentially the same problem Creative had back when the iPod first came out; your product isn't bad, but it's noticeably more awkward in size compared with Apple's. I can't say how the user interface compares with the iPhone, but there may be issues there too.
<br> <br>(I compared it with the iPod Touch because the Touch has four times more units sold than the iPhone, and it also eliminates the phone functionality and contract from the picture. The iPhone is 88222 mm^2 -- still only half the volume of the iPAQ 210.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a simple answer as to why your favorite device is n't popular .
iPAQ 210 Dimensions ( w x d x h ) 2.97 x .69 x 5.27 in ( 75.4 x 17.5 x 133.9 mm ) Weight 6.6 oz ( 190 g ) iPod Touch : Width : 2.4 inches ( 61.8 mm ) Height : 4.1 inches ( 110 mm ) Depth : 0.33 inch ( 8.5 mm ) Weight : 4.05 ounces ( 115 grams ) It does n't seem like that big of a difference at first , but it really adds up : The iPaq is 176681 mm ^ 2 versus the iPod Touch 's 57783 mm ^ 2 .
That 's three times more voluminous , which both explains how they get extra functionality in there and why it 's not very popular .
It 's essentially the same problem Creative had back when the iPod first came out ; your product is n't bad , but it 's noticeably more awkward in size compared with Apple 's .
I ca n't say how the user interface compares with the iPhone , but there may be issues there too .
( I compared it with the iPod Touch because the Touch has four times more units sold than the iPhone , and it also eliminates the phone functionality and contract from the picture .
The iPhone is 88222 mm ^ 2 -- still only half the volume of the iPAQ 210 .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a simple answer as to why your favorite device isn't popular.
iPAQ 210
Dimensions (w x d x h)
2.97 x .69 x 5.27 in (75.4 x 17.5 x 133.9 mm)
Weight
6.6 oz (190 g)
 
iPod Touch:
Width:
2.4 inches (61.8 mm)
Height:
4.1 inches (110 mm)
Depth:
0.33 inch (8.5 mm)
Weight:
4.05 ounces (115 grams)
 
It doesn't seem like that big of a difference at first, but it really adds up: The iPaq is 176681 mm^2 versus the iPod Touch's 57783 mm^2.
That's three times more voluminous, which both explains how they get extra functionality in there and why it's not very popular.
It's essentially the same problem Creative had back when the iPod first came out; your product isn't bad, but it's noticeably more awkward in size compared with Apple's.
I can't say how the user interface compares with the iPhone, but there may be issues there too.
(I compared it with the iPod Touch because the Touch has four times more units sold than the iPhone, and it also eliminates the phone functionality and contract from the picture.
The iPhone is 88222 mm^2 -- still only half the volume of the iPAQ 210.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113087</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>MMInterface</author>
	<datestamp>1243452780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging by the Zune store integration, I would say people who bought an X-box. Not just the old and confused ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the Zune store integration , I would say people who bought an X-box .
Not just the old and confused ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the Zune store integration, I would say people who bought an X-box.
Not just the old and confused ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114317</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>UnknownSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1243415880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, more like, <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=36099539665548298" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">If Microsoft designed the iPod Package</a> [google.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , more like , If Microsoft designed the iPod Package [ google.com ] : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, more like, If Microsoft designed the iPod Package [google.com] :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355</id>
	<title>Open up MTPZ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish I could get my Zune to work in Ubuntu. Microsoft, please open up MTPZ!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I could get my Zune to work in Ubuntu .
Microsoft , please open up MTPZ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I could get my Zune to work in Ubuntu.
Microsoft, please open up MTPZ!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117323</id>
	<title>Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fall</title>
	<author>CyranoDeBergerac</author>
	<datestamp>1243429260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There, FTFY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There , FTFY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There, FTFY.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113407</id>
	<title>Re:Over-engineered iPods</title>
	<author>RoFLKOPTr</author>
	<datestamp>1243454100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Part of "insanely great" is "don't go cool too early". Short of any real competition, Apple doesn't want to release functionality until they've got usability nailed.</p></div><p>Actually, they don't want to release any functionality until the marketing department says it's alright. I hate Apple, but I have to hand it to them... they have a fantastic marketing strategy, and if you haven't noticed all the tricks they pull with their products then you are exactly the person they're after.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Part of " insanely great " is " do n't go cool too early " .
Short of any real competition , Apple does n't want to release functionality until they 've got usability nailed.Actually , they do n't want to release any functionality until the marketing department says it 's alright .
I hate Apple , but I have to hand it to them... they have a fantastic marketing strategy , and if you have n't noticed all the tricks they pull with their products then you are exactly the person they 're after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Part of "insanely great" is "don't go cool too early".
Short of any real competition, Apple doesn't want to release functionality until they've got usability nailed.Actually, they don't want to release any functionality until the marketing department says it's alright.
I hate Apple, but I have to hand it to them... they have a fantastic marketing strategy, and if you haven't noticed all the tricks they pull with their products then you are exactly the person they're after.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Mike Buddha</author>
	<datestamp>1243449780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have to say that their target demographic is probably everyone who bought an Xbox 360. The one piece of MS's gaming strategy that's been noticably lacking is the handheld. Now, it appears they're getting serious about it. I had high hopes for Zune integration when the 360 came out, and it just never happened. Then, XNA came out and it looked like things were going to happen in that space again, and then nothing. Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true, yet again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have to say that their target demographic is probably everyone who bought an Xbox 360 .
The one piece of MS 's gaming strategy that 's been noticably lacking is the handheld .
Now , it appears they 're getting serious about it .
I had high hopes for Zune integration when the 360 came out , and it just never happened .
Then , XNA came out and it looked like things were going to happen in that space again , and then nothing .
Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true , yet again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have to say that their target demographic is probably everyone who bought an Xbox 360.
The one piece of MS's gaming strategy that's been noticably lacking is the handheld.
Now, it appears they're getting serious about it.
I had high hopes for Zune integration when the 360 came out, and it just never happened.
Then, XNA came out and it looked like things were going to happen in that space again, and then nothing.
Maybe the old axiom about MS getting it right on the third shot is going to hold true, yet again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111935</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1243448280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>World points.<br>World laughs.<br>World goes on with the business at hand, chuckling quietly and smirking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>World points.World laughs.World goes on with the business at hand , chuckling quietly and smirking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>World points.World laughs.World goes on with the business at hand, chuckling quietly and smirking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113533</id>
	<title>Re:Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243454760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companies</p><p>Microsoft have \_always\_ done that. MS-DOS 1 was a clone of CP/M, MS-SOS 5 and 6 followed the DR-DOS 5 and 6 a year or two later. Windows was a clone of what they saw while working on Word for Mac and they announcedWindows as vapourware when the saw GEM demonstrated at COMDEC and then started work on it. Windows 3 intyernals based on work on OS/2 that was designed by IBM.</p><p>MSSQL was bought from Sybase. IIS was bought from (?), MS bought Frontpage, SpyGlass wrote IE. C# is a clone of Java developed initially at Borland until MS bought the developer.</p><p>MS had optical mice first because they went to the company that developed the mechanism and bought the whole of the first 6 months production to stop anyone else using it.</p><p>MS watches which way the crowd is moving, runs to the front and yells 'follow me', has that ever been 'innovation' ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companiesMicrosoft have \ _always \ _ done that .
MS-DOS 1 was a clone of CP/M , MS-SOS 5 and 6 followed the DR-DOS 5 and 6 a year or two later .
Windows was a clone of what they saw while working on Word for Mac and they announcedWindows as vapourware when the saw GEM demonstrated at COMDEC and then started work on it .
Windows 3 intyernals based on work on OS/2 that was designed by IBM.MSSQL was bought from Sybase .
IIS was bought from ( ?
) , MS bought Frontpage , SpyGlass wrote IE .
C # is a clone of Java developed initially at Borland until MS bought the developer.MS had optical mice first because they went to the company that developed the mechanism and bought the whole of the first 6 months production to stop anyone else using it.MS watches which way the crowd is moving , runs to the front and yells 'follow me ' , has that ever been 'innovation ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companiesMicrosoft have \_always\_ done that.
MS-DOS 1 was a clone of CP/M, MS-SOS 5 and 6 followed the DR-DOS 5 and 6 a year or two later.
Windows was a clone of what they saw while working on Word for Mac and they announcedWindows as vapourware when the saw GEM demonstrated at COMDEC and then started work on it.
Windows 3 intyernals based on work on OS/2 that was designed by IBM.MSSQL was bought from Sybase.
IIS was bought from (?
), MS bought Frontpage, SpyGlass wrote IE.
C# is a clone of Java developed initially at Borland until MS bought the developer.MS had optical mice first because they went to the company that developed the mechanism and bought the whole of the first 6 months production to stop anyone else using it.MS watches which way the crowd is moving, runs to the front and yells 'follow me', has that ever been 'innovation' ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112471</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>Etrias</author>
	<datestamp>1243450380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Raise the failure flag!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raise the failure flag !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raise the failure flag!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116255</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>BearRanger</author>
	<datestamp>1243423020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone has great titles for this one.  <a href="http://arstechnica.com/" title="arstechnica.com">http://arstechnica.com/</a> [arstechnica.com] offers: "Zune HD: a new hope for Microsoft".  To which the only response can be no.  It's really just a Phantom Menace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone has great titles for this one .
http : //arstechnica.com/ [ arstechnica.com ] offers : " Zune HD : a new hope for Microsoft " .
To which the only response can be no .
It 's really just a Phantom Menace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone has great titles for this one.
http://arstechnica.com/ [arstechnica.com] offers: "Zune HD: a new hope for Microsoft".
To which the only response can be no.
It's really just a Phantom Menace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114023</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1243457040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, the Go-Bots were awesome!</p><p>If anyone moderates this funny I shall be offended<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , the Go-Bots were awesome ! If anyone moderates this funny I shall be offended : -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, the Go-Bots were awesome!If anyone moderates this funny I shall be offended :-p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051</id>
	<title>Release should be fine</title>
	<author>gcnaddict</author>
	<datestamp>1243448640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The device is sturdy (judging from past Zunes), the screen (while not HD by any means) will still be a decent screen to work with, and the hardware will be solid enough to output 1280x720.
<br> <br>It's a winner in my book, even though I still wish the screen itself was 720p.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The device is sturdy ( judging from past Zunes ) , the screen ( while not HD by any means ) will still be a decent screen to work with , and the hardware will be solid enough to output 1280x720 .
It 's a winner in my book , even though I still wish the screen itself was 720p .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The device is sturdy (judging from past Zunes), the screen (while not HD by any means) will still be a decent screen to work with, and the hardware will be solid enough to output 1280x720.
It's a winner in my book, even though I still wish the screen itself was 720p.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112847</id>
	<title>Re:HD Output?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243451880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You misread the article. Please read it again.</p><p>It *outputs* HD video at 720p; that's 1280x720.</p><p>It *displays* at 480x272.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You misread the article .
Please read it again.It * outputs * HD video at 720p ; that 's 1280x720.It * displays * at 480x272 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You misread the article.
Please read it again.It *outputs* HD video at 720p; that's 1280x720.It *displays* at 480x272.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112615</id>
	<title>Microsoft App Store - Lame.</title>
	<author>EMB Numbers</author>
	<datestamp>1243450980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smaller screen than an iPod Touch, Windows CE, Microsoft App Store - Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smaller screen than an iPod Touch , Windows CE , Microsoft App Store - Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smaller screen than an iPod Touch, Windows CE, Microsoft App Store - Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112163</id>
	<title>Still?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zune? They still have those?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zune ?
They still have those ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zune?
They still have those?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120023</id>
	<title>Re:Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>ericn32</author>
	<datestamp>1243540920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While Microsoft has never made anything "cool" on their first try, they have made some really nice stuff, especially for developers. While people say that Vista and Win7 are copied from OSX, it's kinda true- but there are things like jump lists and other new Win7 Aero things (which have a practical purpose) that no one's implemented before.</p><p>And at least they don't shove people into a DRM-locked walled garden of media and limited phones.</p><p>Microsoft products are infinitely more open and flexible than Apple's eye-candy-yet-in-all-honesty-not-very-useful devices. Sure Apple stuff looks nice and feels intuitive, but I love my Windows phone's functionality, even if the UI looks like puke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While Microsoft has never made anything " cool " on their first try , they have made some really nice stuff , especially for developers .
While people say that Vista and Win7 are copied from OSX , it 's kinda true- but there are things like jump lists and other new Win7 Aero things ( which have a practical purpose ) that no one 's implemented before.And at least they do n't shove people into a DRM-locked walled garden of media and limited phones.Microsoft products are infinitely more open and flexible than Apple 's eye-candy-yet-in-all-honesty-not-very-useful devices .
Sure Apple stuff looks nice and feels intuitive , but I love my Windows phone 's functionality , even if the UI looks like puke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While Microsoft has never made anything "cool" on their first try, they have made some really nice stuff, especially for developers.
While people say that Vista and Win7 are copied from OSX, it's kinda true- but there are things like jump lists and other new Win7 Aero things (which have a practical purpose) that no one's implemented before.And at least they don't shove people into a DRM-locked walled garden of media and limited phones.Microsoft products are infinitely more open and flexible than Apple's eye-candy-yet-in-all-honesty-not-very-useful devices.
Sure Apple stuff looks nice and feels intuitive, but I love my Windows phone's functionality, even if the UI looks like puke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112217</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would make the iPod the My Little Ponys?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would make the iPod the My Little Ponys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would make the iPod the My Little Ponys?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120201</id>
	<title>Re:Still feel MS just doesn't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>HD Radio is a nice gimmick, but if want a portable radio, why would I need to buy a 300+ dollar device? There are cheaper options. Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality? Got my doubts. For that matter, I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better.</p></div><p>The <b>HD</b> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD\_Radio#Criticisms" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">"HD Radio"</a> [wikipedia.org] actually <b>stands for <i>hybrid digital</i>, not <i>high definition</i> </b>.</p><p>It uses an ancient, hard-wired, proprietary, trade secret codec that can't ever be updated and bit rates of 48kbps or below (compared to iTunes 128, 192, or 256kbps AAC, made with modern encoders).  Plus the digital stream interferes with neighboring analog signals.</p><p>Your sound is pre-raped on "HD" radio.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>HD Radio is a nice gimmick , but if want a portable radio , why would I need to buy a 300 + dollar device ?
There are cheaper options .
Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality ?
Got my doubts .
For that matter , I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better.The HD in " HD Radio " [ wikipedia.org ] actually stands for hybrid digital , not high definition .It uses an ancient , hard-wired , proprietary , trade secret codec that ca n't ever be updated and bit rates of 48kbps or below ( compared to iTunes 128 , 192 , or 256kbps AAC , made with modern encoders ) .
Plus the digital stream interferes with neighboring analog signals.Your sound is pre-raped on " HD " radio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HD Radio is a nice gimmick, but if want a portable radio, why would I need to buy a 300+ dollar device?
There are cheaper options.
Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality?
Got my doubts.
For that matter, I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better.The HD in "HD Radio" [wikipedia.org] actually stands for hybrid digital, not high definition .It uses an ancient, hard-wired, proprietary, trade secret codec that can't ever be updated and bit rates of 48kbps or below (compared to iTunes 128, 192, or 256kbps AAC, made with modern encoders).
Plus the digital stream interferes with neighboring analog signals.Your sound is pre-raped on "HD" radio.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363</id>
	<title>HD Output?</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1243449900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>480x272 is 'HD Output'?  Surely they are joking.  Or maybe they've somehow made it so your speakers/headphones work better magically, and they mean HD audio output.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>480x272 is 'HD Output ' ?
Surely they are joking .
Or maybe they 've somehow made it so your speakers/headphones work better magically , and they mean HD audio output .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>480x272 is 'HD Output'?
Surely they are joking.
Or maybe they've somehow made it so your speakers/headphones work better magically, and they mean HD audio output.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114207</id>
	<title>Fall = Fail</title>
	<author>myspace-cn</author>
	<datestamp>1243415280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft need's to aim a little higher.  Or include a "FREE MAGNIFYING GLASS."</p><p><a href="http://www.mp4nation.net/catalog/" title="mp4nation.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.mp4nation.net/catalog/</a> [mp4nation.net]</p><p>ONDA VX545HD - 5" TFT Screen<br>Onda VX777LE 8GB Touch Screen - TV Out + FM Transmitter<br>Onda VX787 16GB Touch Screen + TV Out + FM Transmitter</p><p>I am not even saying buy Onda, hell just about any player on the website kicks Zune's ass.<br><a href="http://mp4nation.net/catalog/index.php?main\_page=index&amp;cPath=1" title="mp4nation.net" rel="nofollow">http://mp4nation.net/catalog/index.php?main\_page=index&amp;cPath=1</a> [mp4nation.net]</p><p>Want BIGGER? The 7" tft</p><p><a href="http://thegadgetsite.blogspot.com/2009/04/onda-vx797hd-with-7-inch-screen.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://thegadgetsite.blogspot.com/2009/04/onda-vx797hd-with-7-inch-screen.html</a> [blogspot.com]</p><p>None of these players have drm, or proprietary connectors, or other such nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft need 's to aim a little higher .
Or include a " FREE MAGNIFYING GLASS .
" http : //www.mp4nation.net/catalog/ [ mp4nation.net ] ONDA VX545HD - 5 " TFT ScreenOnda VX777LE 8GB Touch Screen - TV Out + FM TransmitterOnda VX787 16GB Touch Screen + TV Out + FM TransmitterI am not even saying buy Onda , hell just about any player on the website kicks Zune 's ass.http : //mp4nation.net/catalog/index.php ? main \ _page = index&amp;cPath = 1 [ mp4nation.net ] Want BIGGER ?
The 7 " tfthttp : //thegadgetsite.blogspot.com/2009/04/onda-vx797hd-with-7-inch-screen.html [ blogspot.com ] None of these players have drm , or proprietary connectors , or other such nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft need's to aim a little higher.
Or include a "FREE MAGNIFYING GLASS.
"http://www.mp4nation.net/catalog/ [mp4nation.net]ONDA VX545HD - 5" TFT ScreenOnda VX777LE 8GB Touch Screen - TV Out + FM TransmitterOnda VX787 16GB Touch Screen + TV Out + FM TransmitterI am not even saying buy Onda, hell just about any player on the website kicks Zune's ass.http://mp4nation.net/catalog/index.php?main\_page=index&amp;cPath=1 [mp4nation.net]Want BIGGER?
The 7" tfthttp://thegadgetsite.blogspot.com/2009/04/onda-vx797hd-with-7-inch-screen.html [blogspot.com]None of these players have drm, or proprietary connectors, or other such nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112417</id>
	<title>You can get it in any color you want...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243450080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... as long as it's brown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... as long as it 's brown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... as long as it's brown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112953</id>
	<title>Re:Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1243452300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft's corporate culture... I feel for them...</p></div><p>Actually, you're quite wrong about that.  Microsoft has some of the most talented people working for them in their research divisions that are free to do whatever they like for the most part.  Now seeing this result in cool, innovative products is quite another thing, thanks to Microsoft's corporate culture.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft 's corporate culture... I feel for them...Actually , you 're quite wrong about that .
Microsoft has some of the most talented people working for them in their research divisions that are free to do whatever they like for the most part .
Now seeing this result in cool , innovative products is quite another thing , thanks to Microsoft 's corporate culture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft's corporate culture... I feel for them...Actually, you're quite wrong about that.
Microsoft has some of the most talented people working for them in their research divisions that are free to do whatever they like for the most part.
Now seeing this result in cool, innovative products is quite another thing, thanks to Microsoft's corporate culture.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117145</id>
	<title>Zune must be Bill Gates' "hobby",,,</title>
	<author>woohootoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243428060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>like Apple TV is Steve Jobs'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>like Apple TV is Steve Jobs' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like Apple TV is Steve Jobs'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120799</id>
	<title>Re:Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>cyber-vandal</author>
	<datestamp>1243506060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They could work at Microsoft Research and have lots of great ideas that never see the light of day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could work at Microsoft Research and have lots of great ideas that never see the light of day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could work at Microsoft Research and have lots of great ideas that never see the light of day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793</id>
	<title>Windows CE has a few applications too</title>
	<author>syntap</author>
	<datestamp>1243451640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod me down for defending Microsoft, but the note</p><p><i>"The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available."</i></p><p>fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available.  Just sayin'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod me down for defending Microsoft , but the note " The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE , while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform , for which thousands of applications are available .
" fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available .
Just sayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod me down for defending Microsoft, but the note"The new Zune will be based on a custom version of Windows CE, while the iPod Touch runs on the already popular iPhone platform, for which thousands of applications are available.
"fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available.
Just sayin'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111899</id>
	<title>Zune</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Q: What do you call a bunch of Zunes?<br> <br>

A: <b>Shit bricks!</b> Haw haw haw haw HAAAAAWWW!!1!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : What do you call a bunch of Zunes ?
A : Shit bricks !
Haw haw haw haw HAAAAAWWW ! ! 1 ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: What do you call a bunch of Zunes?
A: Shit bricks!
Haw haw haw haw HAAAAAWWW!!1!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113967</id>
	<title>Re:Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>jmpeax</author>
	<datestamp>1243456800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should try using a Zune. Its interface is very innovative and very different from the iPod's.<br> <br>I know many iPod users who have seen and preferred my Zune, but because we're in the UK they haven't been able to get hold of one.<br> <br>I think there's a real chance that the Zune will catch on and gain significant market share, especially with modern, sexy features that people go crazy for (like a touch screen and HD output). I know I'll be buying one, despite having a Zune 2 that's only a year old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try using a Zune .
Its interface is very innovative and very different from the iPod 's .
I know many iPod users who have seen and preferred my Zune , but because we 're in the UK they have n't been able to get hold of one .
I think there 's a real chance that the Zune will catch on and gain significant market share , especially with modern , sexy features that people go crazy for ( like a touch screen and HD output ) .
I know I 'll be buying one , despite having a Zune 2 that 's only a year old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try using a Zune.
Its interface is very innovative and very different from the iPod's.
I know many iPod users who have seen and preferred my Zune, but because we're in the UK they haven't been able to get hold of one.
I think there's a real chance that the Zune will catch on and gain significant market share, especially with modern, sexy features that people go crazy for (like a touch screen and HD output).
I know I'll be buying one, despite having a Zune 2 that's only a year old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957</id>
	<title>OLED screen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will this be the first mass produced consumer product to use an OLED screen?  I know I've been reading about them for some time, but other than one digital camera (i think) I don't know that I've heard of any products that will actually contain one.  It will be interesting to see how it looks relative to other small media players.</p><p>If nothing else it's great that they're raising the bar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this be the first mass produced consumer product to use an OLED screen ?
I know I 've been reading about them for some time , but other than one digital camera ( i think ) I do n't know that I 've heard of any products that will actually contain one .
It will be interesting to see how it looks relative to other small media players.If nothing else it 's great that they 're raising the bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this be the first mass produced consumer product to use an OLED screen?
I know I've been reading about them for some time, but other than one digital camera (i think) I don't know that I've heard of any products that will actually contain one.
It will be interesting to see how it looks relative to other small media players.If nothing else it's great that they're raising the bar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118525</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>Divebus</author>
	<datestamp>1243438440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...lousy UI for a touch device, no camera, lousy tech support, no SMS, no iTunes, no decent MP3 player.</p></div><p>Should have finished that off with "Lame" to be complete.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...lousy UI for a touch device , no camera , lousy tech support , no SMS , no iTunes , no decent MP3 player.Should have finished that off with " Lame " to be complete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...lousy UI for a touch device, no camera, lousy tech support, no SMS, no iTunes, no decent MP3 player.Should have finished that off with "Lame" to be complete.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112525</id>
	<title>Really Microsoft?</title>
	<author>WalletBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1243450620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that the best you can do? Do you really have the word "More" and its associated icon <i>clipped</i> on your products' main screen as shown on your official home product page? You couldn't at least make it so the home screen isn't clipped in all of your publicity photos?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that the best you can do ?
Do you really have the word " More " and its associated icon clipped on your products ' main screen as shown on your official home product page ?
You could n't at least make it so the home screen is n't clipped in all of your publicity photos ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that the best you can do?
Do you really have the word "More" and its associated icon clipped on your products' main screen as shown on your official home product page?
You couldn't at least make it so the home screen isn't clipped in all of your publicity photos?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115375</id>
	<title>Re:Windows CE has a few applications too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243419660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available.  Just sayin'.</p></div><p>Go ahead name one CE app.  Not Windows Mobile App, or app for some other CE platform.  You can't.  CE apps need to target a platform, and if they target Windows Mobile in particular, generally there's a lot of shell code they're calling that make them difficult to port to other random CE platforms.  And all bets are off if you're doing something that your CE device's platform doesn't include.</p><p>It is possible to write one application that runs on multiple CE platforms, but it's generally not done.  I'm not saying moving a CE app from one platform to another is hard, but it's not a given either.  Just because your favorite Windows Mobile Tetris game is written for a CE platform, doesn't mean it'll be available for the Zune HD when MS releases it</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available .
Just sayin'.Go ahead name one CE app .
Not Windows Mobile App , or app for some other CE platform .
You ca n't .
CE apps need to target a platform , and if they target Windows Mobile in particular , generally there 's a lot of shell code they 're calling that make them difficult to port to other random CE platforms .
And all bets are off if you 're doing something that your CE device 's platform does n't include.It is possible to write one application that runs on multiple CE platforms , but it 's generally not done .
I 'm not saying moving a CE app from one platform to another is hard , but it 's not a given either .
Just because your favorite Windows Mobile Tetris game is written for a CE platform , does n't mean it 'll be available for the Zune HD when MS releases it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fails to acknowledge that Windows CE has been around a bit longer than the iPhone OS and has tons of applications available.
Just sayin'.Go ahead name one CE app.
Not Windows Mobile App, or app for some other CE platform.
You can't.
CE apps need to target a platform, and if they target Windows Mobile in particular, generally there's a lot of shell code they're calling that make them difficult to port to other random CE platforms.
And all bets are off if you're doing something that your CE device's platform doesn't include.It is possible to write one application that runs on multiple CE platforms, but it's generally not done.
I'm not saying moving a CE app from one platform to another is hard, but it's not a given either.
Just because your favorite Windows Mobile Tetris game is written for a CE platform, doesn't mean it'll be available for the Zune HD when MS releases it
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112137</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably the same demographic that has XBox 360s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the same demographic that has XBox 360s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the same demographic that has XBox 360s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113667</id>
	<title>Ah but...</title>
	<author>dudeeh</author>
	<datestamp>1243455360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will it run linux?</p><p>Seriously though, if the hardware is nice, i might consider buying it IF i can throw on an OS i actually...like</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will it run linux ? Seriously though , if the hardware is nice , i might consider buying it IF i can throw on an OS i actually...like</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will it run linux?Seriously though, if the hardware is nice, i might consider buying it IF i can throw on an OS i actually...like</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113421</id>
	<title>Re:Windows CE has a few applications too</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1243454160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it doesn't matter, because most people:  a) can't tell you what Windows CE is, b) name one Windows CE program, c) name a phone or product that runs CE.  The iPhone has Apps. The commercial told me so, and the iTunes store made it easy to check them out.  That's the formula of marketing success.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it does n't matter , because most people : a ) ca n't tell you what Windows CE is , b ) name one Windows CE program , c ) name a phone or product that runs CE .
The iPhone has Apps .
The commercial told me so , and the iTunes store made it easy to check them out .
That 's the formula of marketing success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it doesn't matter, because most people:  a) can't tell you what Windows CE is, b) name one Windows CE program, c) name a phone or product that runs CE.
The iPhone has Apps.
The commercial told me so, and the iTunes store made it easy to check them out.
That's the formula of marketing success.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112095</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Bruiser80</author>
	<datestamp>1243448820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll have an HD radio receiver. That's something that iPod doesn't do. Screen resolution does sound cruddy. It would be interesting to see what this thing could do, but most likely will be discarded, just like the original Zune (I believe the original Zune had a radio receiver too).
<br> <br>
Lol, GoBots<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll have an HD radio receiver .
That 's something that iPod does n't do .
Screen resolution does sound cruddy .
It would be interesting to see what this thing could do , but most likely will be discarded , just like the original Zune ( I believe the original Zune had a radio receiver too ) .
Lol , GoBots : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll have an HD radio receiver.
That's something that iPod doesn't do.
Screen resolution does sound cruddy.
It would be interesting to see what this thing could do, but most likely will be discarded, just like the original Zune (I believe the original Zune had a radio receiver too).
Lol, GoBots :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28123235</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243523400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your just mad because they finally came out with something way better then ipod stupid</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your just mad because they finally came out with something way better then ipod stupid</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your just mad because they finally came out with something way better then ipod stupid</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112435</id>
	<title>Re:I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1243450140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do *not* go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply. I download bittorents because the whole F'ing process is streamlined. I don't have to think. Plus, I'm a cheap-ass bastard!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do * not * go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply .
I download bittorents because the whole F'ing process is streamlined .
I do n't have to think .
Plus , I 'm a cheap-ass bastard !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do *not* go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply.
I download bittorents because the whole F'ing process is streamlined.
I don't have to think.
Plus, I'm a cheap-ass bastard!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116405</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1243423920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That platform is based on a Microsoft product.  I'm sure many don't like it just for that reason.  We need competition.  And, as far as the implementation goes it was never that elegant and was quite quirky.  There are also limits on the SD capacity due to the chipset used in the device.  So, no you can't just keep adding higher density SD cards.  It also appear that it is a windows solution and everyone should know we are talking cross platform here, even if it is just Windows and the Mac.</p><p>And, we aren't talking about competing hardware.  This is an evaluation of the current crop offered by Microsoft and how it stands up to the second most popular. So, even tho there are other choices they haven't stacked up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That platform is based on a Microsoft product .
I 'm sure many do n't like it just for that reason .
We need competition .
And , as far as the implementation goes it was never that elegant and was quite quirky .
There are also limits on the SD capacity due to the chipset used in the device .
So , no you ca n't just keep adding higher density SD cards .
It also appear that it is a windows solution and everyone should know we are talking cross platform here , even if it is just Windows and the Mac.And , we are n't talking about competing hardware .
This is an evaluation of the current crop offered by Microsoft and how it stands up to the second most popular .
So , even tho there are other choices they have n't stacked up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That platform is based on a Microsoft product.
I'm sure many don't like it just for that reason.
We need competition.
And, as far as the implementation goes it was never that elegant and was quite quirky.
There are also limits on the SD capacity due to the chipset used in the device.
So, no you can't just keep adding higher density SD cards.
It also appear that it is a windows solution and everyone should know we are talking cross platform here, even if it is just Windows and the Mac.And, we aren't talking about competing hardware.
This is an evaluation of the current crop offered by Microsoft and how it stands up to the second most popular.
So, even tho there are other choices they haven't stacked up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112603</id>
	<title>Re:Title</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1243450920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I first read that title as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fail Release"</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Maybe that's the date they will <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=mass+zune+failure" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">all fail simultaneously</a> [google.com]? But this time, it'll be in high-definition!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I first read that title as " Zune HD Unveiled , Set For Fail Release " Maybe that 's the date they will all fail simultaneously [ google.com ] ?
But this time , it 'll be in high-definition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first read that title as "Zune HD Unveiled, Set For Fail Release"
Maybe that's the date they will all fail simultaneously [google.com]?
But this time, it'll be in high-definition!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114077</id>
	<title>I'm sorry...</title>
	<author>Schnoogs</author>
	<datestamp>1243457460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but it's hard to get excited over this.  I had a first gen Zune and I liked it more than any of the iPods available at that time.  It had a larger screen, an FM radio and supported codecs that the iPod didn't.  Two years later though I have an iPhone and I'm seriously asking myself what possible advantage does this have that would make me want to carry TWO devices around.  Then when you tack on the app store and the many applications I use on a daily basis and the Zune seems hopeless to compete.  Unless MS can offer the same level of application support and the ability to play XBox Live Arcade games I think the platform needs to be taken out back and shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but it 's hard to get excited over this .
I had a first gen Zune and I liked it more than any of the iPods available at that time .
It had a larger screen , an FM radio and supported codecs that the iPod did n't .
Two years later though I have an iPhone and I 'm seriously asking myself what possible advantage does this have that would make me want to carry TWO devices around .
Then when you tack on the app store and the many applications I use on a daily basis and the Zune seems hopeless to compete .
Unless MS can offer the same level of application support and the ability to play XBox Live Arcade games I think the platform needs to be taken out back and shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it's hard to get excited over this.
I had a first gen Zune and I liked it more than any of the iPods available at that time.
It had a larger screen, an FM radio and supported codecs that the iPod didn't.
Two years later though I have an iPhone and I'm seriously asking myself what possible advantage does this have that would make me want to carry TWO devices around.
Then when you tack on the app store and the many applications I use on a daily basis and the Zune seems hopeless to compete.
Unless MS can offer the same level of application support and the ability to play XBox Live Arcade games I think the platform needs to be taken out back and shot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112733</id>
	<title>Still feel MS just doesn't get it</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1243451400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are NOT the cool company. Nobody wants the MS logo (what is it actually?) on their fashion accesory MP3 player. For me to pay the premium that both MS and Apple demand, there got to be something in it that makes the premium worth while. Else I can just buy a FAR more capable music player from say iRiver, that can actually play more then  just MP3/WMV/AAC.
</p><p>Furthermore, Apple has already won the war, the retake lost ground, MS would have to do something innovative. They haven't. HD video output can only be done via a docking station. They never heard of mini-hdmi (or whatever the exact name is)?
</p><p>HD Radio is a nice gimmick, but if want a portable radio, why would I need to buy a 300+ dollar device? There are cheaper options. Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality? Got my doubts. For that matter, I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better. The Apple devices are the same, terrible audio quality especially if you consider the high price. Silly me for expecting a device that costs 3x as much to sound 3x better<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P
</p><p>It uses a customer version of CE. Why? I can't think of any other reason then to limit cross spread of software. That it will have all kinds of build in limits that make building for it hard and impossible to share music. Exactly like MS has done countless times before including the previous Zunes.
</p><p>MS just doesn't get it, nobody will buy their device simply for the logo and it ain't going to win over anyone that just wants a good portable music player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are NOT the cool company .
Nobody wants the MS logo ( what is it actually ?
) on their fashion accesory MP3 player .
For me to pay the premium that both MS and Apple demand , there got to be something in it that makes the premium worth while .
Else I can just buy a FAR more capable music player from say iRiver , that can actually play more then just MP3/WMV/AAC .
Furthermore , Apple has already won the war , the retake lost ground , MS would have to do something innovative .
They have n't .
HD video output can only be done via a docking station .
They never heard of mini-hdmi ( or whatever the exact name is ) ?
HD Radio is a nice gimmick , but if want a portable radio , why would I need to buy a 300 + dollar device ?
There are cheaper options .
Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality ?
Got my doubts .
For that matter , I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better .
The Apple devices are the same , terrible audio quality especially if you consider the high price .
Silly me for expecting a device that costs 3x as much to sound 3x better : P It uses a customer version of CE .
Why ? I ca n't think of any other reason then to limit cross spread of software .
That it will have all kinds of build in limits that make building for it hard and impossible to share music .
Exactly like MS has done countless times before including the previous Zunes .
MS just does n't get it , nobody will buy their device simply for the logo and it ai n't going to win over anyone that just wants a good portable music player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are NOT the cool company.
Nobody wants the MS logo (what is it actually?
) on their fashion accesory MP3 player.
For me to pay the premium that both MS and Apple demand, there got to be something in it that makes the premium worth while.
Else I can just buy a FAR more capable music player from say iRiver, that can actually play more then  just MP3/WMV/AAC.
Furthermore, Apple has already won the war, the retake lost ground, MS would have to do something innovative.
They haven't.
HD video output can only be done via a docking station.
They never heard of mini-hdmi (or whatever the exact name is)?
HD Radio is a nice gimmick, but if want a portable radio, why would I need to buy a 300+ dollar device?
There are cheaper options.
Is the MP3/FLAC/ETC part of it also better quality?
Got my doubts.
For that matter, I am actually willing to bet that the HD radio is raped by the internal circuits till it sounds no better.
The Apple devices are the same, terrible audio quality especially if you consider the high price.
Silly me for expecting a device that costs 3x as much to sound 3x better :P
It uses a customer version of CE.
Why? I can't think of any other reason then to limit cross spread of software.
That it will have all kinds of build in limits that make building for it hard and impossible to share music.
Exactly like MS has done countless times before including the previous Zunes.
MS just doesn't get it, nobody will buy their device simply for the logo and it ain't going to win over anyone that just wants a good portable music player.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112791</id>
	<title>Re:OLED screen?</title>
	<author>crabbz</author>
	<datestamp>1243451580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sony's new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/05/sony-oled-walkman-impressions/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">walkman</a> [engadget.com]
has an OLED screen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony 's new walkman [ engadget.com ] has an OLED screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony's new walkman [engadget.com]
has an OLED screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118425</id>
	<title>Re:OLED screen?</title>
	<author>ninjamonkey26</author>
	<datestamp>1243437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh as far as I know it wont be the first, my sister has had a Samsung Impression for  2+ months and it has a f'n gorgeous AMOLED screen.

Samsung Impression

<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Samsung+Impression&amp;q\_sku=sku3680237/" title="att.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Samsung+Impression&amp;q\_sku=sku3680237/</a> [att.com]

(I am neither a samsung nor an at&amp;t shill)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh as far as I know it wont be the first , my sister has had a Samsung Impression for 2 + months and it has a f'n gorgeous AMOLED screen .
Samsung Impression http : //www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/ ? device = Samsung + Impression&amp;q \ _sku = sku3680237/ [ att.com ] ( I am neither a samsung nor an at&amp;t shill )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh as far as I know it wont be the first, my sister has had a Samsung Impression for  2+ months and it has a f'n gorgeous AMOLED screen.
Samsung Impression

http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Samsung+Impression&amp;q\_sku=sku3680237/ [att.com]

(I am neither a samsung nor an at&amp;t shill)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112379</id>
	<title>Throw away my iPod Touch and buy a Zune HD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can hardly wait.</p><p>Not!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can hardly wait.Not !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can hardly wait.Not!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115397</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1243419720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I couldn't agree more.</p><p>There's a wide range of devices out there, and given that one of the reasons to come to Slashdot is supposedly to learn about new tech news, it's frustrating that the coverage when it comes to mobile devices is so poor: covering every trivial news release or even rumour about the Iwhatever, and ignoring any news from other major companies (including ones that are far bigger players in the phone market).</p><p>I also love how TFS brags about having more apps for the Iphone than on Windows CE. I don't know if it's true, and it's less likely to be true when the lack of Java on the Iphone is taken into account. But the point being, surely Apple fans are always telling us that having fewer applications isn't a problem? Or do they now concede that Windows is better than MacOS due to the greater application support? Which is it, I wonder?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could n't agree more.There 's a wide range of devices out there , and given that one of the reasons to come to Slashdot is supposedly to learn about new tech news , it 's frustrating that the coverage when it comes to mobile devices is so poor : covering every trivial news release or even rumour about the Iwhatever , and ignoring any news from other major companies ( including ones that are far bigger players in the phone market ) .I also love how TFS brags about having more apps for the Iphone than on Windows CE .
I do n't know if it 's true , and it 's less likely to be true when the lack of Java on the Iphone is taken into account .
But the point being , surely Apple fans are always telling us that having fewer applications is n't a problem ?
Or do they now concede that Windows is better than MacOS due to the greater application support ?
Which is it , I wonder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I couldn't agree more.There's a wide range of devices out there, and given that one of the reasons to come to Slashdot is supposedly to learn about new tech news, it's frustrating that the coverage when it comes to mobile devices is so poor: covering every trivial news release or even rumour about the Iwhatever, and ignoring any news from other major companies (including ones that are far bigger players in the phone market).I also love how TFS brags about having more apps for the Iphone than on Windows CE.
I don't know if it's true, and it's less likely to be true when the lack of Java on the Iphone is taken into account.
But the point being, surely Apple fans are always telling us that having fewer applications isn't a problem?
Or do they now concede that Windows is better than MacOS due to the greater application support?
Which is it, I wonder?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112871</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1243452000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't recycle your gobots onto your grand kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't recycle your gobots onto your grand kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't recycle your gobots onto your grand kids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113453</id>
	<title>Re:Lousy screen, Low Storage</title>
	<author>Zader</author>
	<datestamp>1243454340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 360?  Oh you mean that white thing that sits on my shelf with the nice blinky red rings when you attempt to power it on.  So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... unless it is capable of resurrecting RROD Xboxes it's not going to integrate all that well...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 360 ?
Oh you mean that white thing that sits on my shelf with the nice blinky red rings when you attempt to power it on .
So ... unless it is capable of resurrecting RROD Xboxes it 's not going to integrate all that well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 360?
Oh you mean that white thing that sits on my shelf with the nice blinky red rings when you attempt to power it on.
So ... unless it is capable of resurrecting RROD Xboxes it's not going to integrate all that well...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117819</id>
	<title>Re:Open up MTPZ</title>
	<author>some\_guy\_88</author>
	<datestamp>1243432560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is, they arn't going to. They have no reason to.</p><p>We need to show these companies that we arn't going to put up with proprietary protocols by not buying the devices in the first place.</p><p>You need to speak with your wallet. It's the only thing capitalists understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is , they ar n't going to .
They have no reason to.We need to show these companies that we ar n't going to put up with proprietary protocols by not buying the devices in the first place.You need to speak with your wallet .
It 's the only thing capitalists understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is, they arn't going to.
They have no reason to.We need to show these companies that we arn't going to put up with proprietary protocols by not buying the devices in the first place.You need to speak with your wallet.
It's the only thing capitalists understand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114733</id>
	<title>Re:I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>jtn</author>
	<datestamp>1243417680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't that thinking is a burden, it's that thinking could be reserved for, I don't know, complex tasks that have more meaning than getting music onto your portable music player. Please explain to me the advantage of requiring "thinking" to listen to the music you want?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't that thinking is a burden , it 's that thinking could be reserved for , I do n't know , complex tasks that have more meaning than getting music onto your portable music player .
Please explain to me the advantage of requiring " thinking " to listen to the music you want ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't that thinking is a burden, it's that thinking could be reserved for, I don't know, complex tasks that have more meaning than getting music onto your portable music player.
Please explain to me the advantage of requiring "thinking" to listen to the music you want?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28243773</id>
	<title>Re:Why does MS have to compete in EVERY market?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244366700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they want to grow the company and increase profits.  There is not really any room for growth in the OS market, and very little room in the Office software market.  That means they need to enter new markets to increase their profits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they want to grow the company and increase profits .
There is not really any room for growth in the OS market , and very little room in the Office software market .
That means they need to enter new markets to increase their profits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they want to grow the company and increase profits.
There is not really any room for growth in the OS market, and very little room in the Office software market.
That means they need to enter new markets to increase their profits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</id>
	<title>I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>goffster</author>
	<datestamp>1243449180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have Mac at home.   I want to buy some music.<br>I do *not* go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply.  I buy from ITunes because the whole F'ing process is streamlined.   I don't have to think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Mac at home .
I want to buy some music.I do * not * go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply .
I buy from ITunes because the whole F'ing process is streamlined .
I do n't have to think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Mac at home.
I want to buy some music.I do *not* go to Amazon.com or Walmart to buy my music more cheaply.
I buy from ITunes because the whole F'ing process is streamlined.
I don't have to think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116219</id>
	<title>Re:HD Output?</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1243422840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The bright OLED touch screen interface allows users to flip through music, movies and other content with ease, and the 16:9 widescreen format display (480x272 resolution) offers a premium viewing experience on the go.</p></div><p>That's the OLED resolution they implemented.  You need a docking station to output 720p HD.  Meaning you need to pay for something that will likely be pretty pricey.  Most likely the device itself doesn't actually output HDMI instead it feeds the video through the docking station which outputs to the HDMI.  Will be pretty worthless overall as it doesn't actually implement it--the videos stored, even if they are 720p, probably won't play at that resolution on the Zune itself, instead they'll be downsized (hehe, good guess as I just noticed the footnote about downsizing --guess MS is just too predicatable.)</p><p>Notice the "premium viewing experience on the go"?  One has to wonder which wonderful marketing folk thought that up to "cover up" the fact that the resolution just sucks. Though, it will allegedly be bright and consume less power.</p><p>Also the HD radio is actually Hybrid Digital not High Definition.</p><p>WiFi is just a feature of most all devices like that so them tossing in the fact that it has WiFi is a sucker punch.  And, that they have 5 million tracks means nothing as I believe last.FM has between 10 and 30 million tracks, and you don't have to deal with DRM nor with a company like Microsoft violating your privacy by reporting information to the RIAA (legit or otherwise). And, Last.fm music is free to listen to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bright OLED touch screen interface allows users to flip through music , movies and other content with ease , and the 16 : 9 widescreen format display ( 480x272 resolution ) offers a premium viewing experience on the go.That 's the OLED resolution they implemented .
You need a docking station to output 720p HD .
Meaning you need to pay for something that will likely be pretty pricey .
Most likely the device itself does n't actually output HDMI instead it feeds the video through the docking station which outputs to the HDMI .
Will be pretty worthless overall as it does n't actually implement it--the videos stored , even if they are 720p , probably wo n't play at that resolution on the Zune itself , instead they 'll be downsized ( hehe , good guess as I just noticed the footnote about downsizing --guess MS is just too predicatable .
) Notice the " premium viewing experience on the go " ?
One has to wonder which wonderful marketing folk thought that up to " cover up " the fact that the resolution just sucks .
Though , it will allegedly be bright and consume less power.Also the HD radio is actually Hybrid Digital not High Definition.WiFi is just a feature of most all devices like that so them tossing in the fact that it has WiFi is a sucker punch .
And , that they have 5 million tracks means nothing as I believe last.FM has between 10 and 30 million tracks , and you do n't have to deal with DRM nor with a company like Microsoft violating your privacy by reporting information to the RIAA ( legit or otherwise ) .
And , Last.fm music is free to listen to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bright OLED touch screen interface allows users to flip through music, movies and other content with ease, and the 16:9 widescreen format display (480x272 resolution) offers a premium viewing experience on the go.That's the OLED resolution they implemented.
You need a docking station to output 720p HD.
Meaning you need to pay for something that will likely be pretty pricey.
Most likely the device itself doesn't actually output HDMI instead it feeds the video through the docking station which outputs to the HDMI.
Will be pretty worthless overall as it doesn't actually implement it--the videos stored, even if they are 720p, probably won't play at that resolution on the Zune itself, instead they'll be downsized (hehe, good guess as I just noticed the footnote about downsizing --guess MS is just too predicatable.
)Notice the "premium viewing experience on the go"?
One has to wonder which wonderful marketing folk thought that up to "cover up" the fact that the resolution just sucks.
Though, it will allegedly be bright and consume less power.Also the HD radio is actually Hybrid Digital not High Definition.WiFi is just a feature of most all devices like that so them tossing in the fact that it has WiFi is a sucker punch.
And, that they have 5 million tracks means nothing as I believe last.FM has between 10 and 30 million tracks, and you don't have to deal with DRM nor with a company like Microsoft violating your privacy by reporting information to the RIAA (legit or otherwise).
And, Last.fm music is free to listen to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113265</id>
	<title>Apps</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1243453560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does the custom version of Windows CE allow users to run the apps of their choice?  If so, this seems OBVIOUSLY better than any of Apple's products.  The 'thousands' of programs in the Apple App Store will be surpassed in six months, if the new Zune is not locked down like an Apple product.<br> <br>

The Zune always had really good hardware.  It had some silly restrictions (like on WiFi), and terrible marketing.  Compare that to the iPod/iPhone, which is good hardware, silly restrictions, and great marketing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the custom version of Windows CE allow users to run the apps of their choice ?
If so , this seems OBVIOUSLY better than any of Apple 's products .
The 'thousands ' of programs in the Apple App Store will be surpassed in six months , if the new Zune is not locked down like an Apple product .
The Zune always had really good hardware .
It had some silly restrictions ( like on WiFi ) , and terrible marketing .
Compare that to the iPod/iPhone , which is good hardware , silly restrictions , and great marketing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the custom version of Windows CE allow users to run the apps of their choice?
If so, this seems OBVIOUSLY better than any of Apple's products.
The 'thousands' of programs in the Apple App Store will be surpassed in six months, if the new Zune is not locked down like an Apple product.
The Zune always had really good hardware.
It had some silly restrictions (like on WiFi), and terrible marketing.
Compare that to the iPod/iPhone, which is good hardware, silly restrictions, and great marketing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115129</id>
	<title>OT: Monkeys</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1243419000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Life is a monkey, flinging feces and candy. The trick is figuring out when to dodge and when to catch.</p></div></blockquote><p>Unless monkeys have learnt to wash their hands, keep dodging.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Life is a monkey , flinging feces and candy .
The trick is figuring out when to dodge and when to catch.Unless monkeys have learnt to wash their hands , keep dodging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life is a monkey, flinging feces and candy.
The trick is figuring out when to dodge and when to catch.Unless monkeys have learnt to wash their hands, keep dodging.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114155</id>
	<title>Why does MS have to compete in EVERY market?</title>
	<author>wickerprints</author>
	<datestamp>1243414980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never understood this business strategy.  I don't see any intrinsic reason why Microsoft should seek to enter every possible technology market and leverage its enormous financial power and resources to do so.</p><p>They know Zune is a failed business venture.  As a product, the Zune is unable to compete with the iPod on any meaningful level.  And Microsoft management knows this.  Yet they persist, not out of some altruistic desire to encourage competition, but because the executives (read: Ballmer) have too much hubris to concede that Apple has done something remarkable.  They have succeeded in revolutionizing the portable media device.  And with the iPhone, Apple has created nothing less than an integrated portable computing/communications/multimedia solution that is as stylish as it is easy to use.  Is it perfect?  Hardly.  Was it the first to use each of its component technologies?  No.  But it is indisputable that it broke new ground by combining all these features into a single, easy-to-use device.  And the only ones who still refuse to admit this are those who are aligned with Ballmer's distorted view of reality.</p><p>I have a healthy appreciation for the competition--Google (Android), RIM (Blackberry), Palm (Pre), Nokia (N9x), and yes, even Microsoft (Zune/Windows Mobile).  It's important that these guys are around to keep Apple on its toes.  But let's not fool ourselves into believing that these are the good guys for fostering that competition.  If they were truly good, they would have recognized the importance of innovating beyond what they see in Apple's offerings, rather than simply trying to make a comparable product.  Where was their vision before Apple dominated the field?  No, they were too busy being complacent.  We saw tiny, incremental changes in the mobile device market for years until the iPhone blew everyone away.  The same was true of the pre-iPod MP3 market.  Apple lit a fire under their collective asses and now hardware manufacturers are going nuts trying to make the next "iPod/iPhone/iWhatever" killer.</p><p>The Zune will never be successful as long as it is deprived of a true vision.  It isn't enough to mimic another device or its success.  That's what Microsoft does not understand.  They never have understood what makes a product work.  The ubiquity of their bread-and-butter Windows has brought them enormous financial success and market share, but with that it has brought laziness and sloppy management.  They can afford to push out half-assed products.  Windows will still be there to keep the money coming in.  They don't have to be hungry, visionary, or risk-taking, like Apple has had to be for decades.  They've made some real blunders (G4 cube, 20th Anniversary Mac, the Lisa, Mac OS licensing, Centris/Quadra/Performa bloated product line,... I could go on but I think you get the point).  But they have had enormous successes as well.  Microsoft could make Zune amazing.  Any company could, given that much money and talent.  But that's not what they really want.  They don't want to make something better than an iPhone or an iPod.  They want to make something just good enough superficially, with as little attention to detail as possible, just so they can say they have some market penetration.</p><p>Microsoft has not wanted to make a better 'something' for DECADES.  When a company stops caring about providing the best possible user experience, I stop caring about that company's products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never understood this business strategy .
I do n't see any intrinsic reason why Microsoft should seek to enter every possible technology market and leverage its enormous financial power and resources to do so.They know Zune is a failed business venture .
As a product , the Zune is unable to compete with the iPod on any meaningful level .
And Microsoft management knows this .
Yet they persist , not out of some altruistic desire to encourage competition , but because the executives ( read : Ballmer ) have too much hubris to concede that Apple has done something remarkable .
They have succeeded in revolutionizing the portable media device .
And with the iPhone , Apple has created nothing less than an integrated portable computing/communications/multimedia solution that is as stylish as it is easy to use .
Is it perfect ?
Hardly. Was it the first to use each of its component technologies ?
No. But it is indisputable that it broke new ground by combining all these features into a single , easy-to-use device .
And the only ones who still refuse to admit this are those who are aligned with Ballmer 's distorted view of reality.I have a healthy appreciation for the competition--Google ( Android ) , RIM ( Blackberry ) , Palm ( Pre ) , Nokia ( N9x ) , and yes , even Microsoft ( Zune/Windows Mobile ) .
It 's important that these guys are around to keep Apple on its toes .
But let 's not fool ourselves into believing that these are the good guys for fostering that competition .
If they were truly good , they would have recognized the importance of innovating beyond what they see in Apple 's offerings , rather than simply trying to make a comparable product .
Where was their vision before Apple dominated the field ?
No , they were too busy being complacent .
We saw tiny , incremental changes in the mobile device market for years until the iPhone blew everyone away .
The same was true of the pre-iPod MP3 market .
Apple lit a fire under their collective asses and now hardware manufacturers are going nuts trying to make the next " iPod/iPhone/iWhatever " killer.The Zune will never be successful as long as it is deprived of a true vision .
It is n't enough to mimic another device or its success .
That 's what Microsoft does not understand .
They never have understood what makes a product work .
The ubiquity of their bread-and-butter Windows has brought them enormous financial success and market share , but with that it has brought laziness and sloppy management .
They can afford to push out half-assed products .
Windows will still be there to keep the money coming in .
They do n't have to be hungry , visionary , or risk-taking , like Apple has had to be for decades .
They 've made some real blunders ( G4 cube , 20th Anniversary Mac , the Lisa , Mac OS licensing , Centris/Quadra/Performa bloated product line,... I could go on but I think you get the point ) .
But they have had enormous successes as well .
Microsoft could make Zune amazing .
Any company could , given that much money and talent .
But that 's not what they really want .
They do n't want to make something better than an iPhone or an iPod .
They want to make something just good enough superficially , with as little attention to detail as possible , just so they can say they have some market penetration.Microsoft has not wanted to make a better 'something ' for DECADES .
When a company stops caring about providing the best possible user experience , I stop caring about that company 's products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never understood this business strategy.
I don't see any intrinsic reason why Microsoft should seek to enter every possible technology market and leverage its enormous financial power and resources to do so.They know Zune is a failed business venture.
As a product, the Zune is unable to compete with the iPod on any meaningful level.
And Microsoft management knows this.
Yet they persist, not out of some altruistic desire to encourage competition, but because the executives (read: Ballmer) have too much hubris to concede that Apple has done something remarkable.
They have succeeded in revolutionizing the portable media device.
And with the iPhone, Apple has created nothing less than an integrated portable computing/communications/multimedia solution that is as stylish as it is easy to use.
Is it perfect?
Hardly.  Was it the first to use each of its component technologies?
No.  But it is indisputable that it broke new ground by combining all these features into a single, easy-to-use device.
And the only ones who still refuse to admit this are those who are aligned with Ballmer's distorted view of reality.I have a healthy appreciation for the competition--Google (Android), RIM (Blackberry), Palm (Pre), Nokia (N9x), and yes, even Microsoft (Zune/Windows Mobile).
It's important that these guys are around to keep Apple on its toes.
But let's not fool ourselves into believing that these are the good guys for fostering that competition.
If they were truly good, they would have recognized the importance of innovating beyond what they see in Apple's offerings, rather than simply trying to make a comparable product.
Where was their vision before Apple dominated the field?
No, they were too busy being complacent.
We saw tiny, incremental changes in the mobile device market for years until the iPhone blew everyone away.
The same was true of the pre-iPod MP3 market.
Apple lit a fire under their collective asses and now hardware manufacturers are going nuts trying to make the next "iPod/iPhone/iWhatever" killer.The Zune will never be successful as long as it is deprived of a true vision.
It isn't enough to mimic another device or its success.
That's what Microsoft does not understand.
They never have understood what makes a product work.
The ubiquity of their bread-and-butter Windows has brought them enormous financial success and market share, but with that it has brought laziness and sloppy management.
They can afford to push out half-assed products.
Windows will still be there to keep the money coming in.
They don't have to be hungry, visionary, or risk-taking, like Apple has had to be for decades.
They've made some real blunders (G4 cube, 20th Anniversary Mac, the Lisa, Mac OS licensing, Centris/Quadra/Performa bloated product line,... I could go on but I think you get the point).
But they have had enormous successes as well.
Microsoft could make Zune amazing.
Any company could, given that much money and talent.
But that's not what they really want.
They don't want to make something better than an iPhone or an iPod.
They want to make something just good enough superficially, with as little attention to detail as possible, just so they can say they have some market penetration.Microsoft has not wanted to make a better 'something' for DECADES.
When a company stops caring about providing the best possible user experience, I stop caring about that company's products.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112093</id>
	<title>fiRst po5t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243448820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">the gay 8iggers percent of the *BSD</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>the gay 8iggers percent of the * BSD [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the gay 8iggers percent of the *BSD [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112947</id>
	<title>Re:I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>I'mTheEvilTwin</author>
	<datestamp>1243452240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>what's not to get?  You can get music from the zune marketplace just like you can in iTunes. From the best I can tell (don't own a mac) you can connect the zune to the mac with little to no effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's not to get ?
You can get music from the zune marketplace just like you can in iTunes .
From the best I can tell ( do n't own a mac ) you can connect the zune to the mac with little to no effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's not to get?
You can get music from the zune marketplace just like you can in iTunes.
From the best I can tell (don't own a mac) you can connect the zune to the mac with little to no effort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112729</id>
	<title>480x272? Moar like Zunestation Portable, amirite?</title>
	<author>Iriscal</author>
	<datestamp>1243451400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, this will never be as good as the PSP.
Though, it might sell a little better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this will never be as good as the PSP .
Though , it might sell a little better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this will never be as good as the PSP.
Though, it might sell a little better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113011</id>
	<title>Fear the version #</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243452540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahem.</p><p>Consider yourself fortunate that this is an even-number release from Microsoft.</p><p>For the next version, which my calculator says should be odd-numbered, you would be wise to refrain from opening your mouth or flexing your finger-muscles, in any attempt at Microsoft bashing.</p><p>That famous potrait of Obama, is him looking forward to the long-awaited Zune odd-version release.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem.Consider yourself fortunate that this is an even-number release from Microsoft.For the next version , which my calculator says should be odd-numbered , you would be wise to refrain from opening your mouth or flexing your finger-muscles , in any attempt at Microsoft bashing.That famous potrait of Obama , is him looking forward to the long-awaited Zune odd-version release .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem.Consider yourself fortunate that this is an even-number release from Microsoft.For the next version, which my calculator says should be odd-numbered, you would be wise to refrain from opening your mouth or flexing your finger-muscles, in any attempt at Microsoft bashing.That famous potrait of Obama, is him looking forward to the long-awaited Zune odd-version release.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201</id>
	<title>Looks Like a Duck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243449120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it looks like an iPod Touch and acts like an iPod Touch but comes from Microsoft, it ain't an iPod Touch.<br> <br>
It must suck to be an engineer at Microsoft. Ignoring the phat paycheck, it must really suck to work for a company that has largely given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companies. I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft's corporate culture... I feel for them...<br> <br>
Actually, they get paid magnitudes more than I do so I don't feel too bad for them...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it looks like an iPod Touch and acts like an iPod Touch but comes from Microsoft , it ai n't an iPod Touch .
It must suck to be an engineer at Microsoft .
Ignoring the phat paycheck , it must really suck to work for a company that has largely given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companies .
I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft 's corporate culture... I feel for them.. . Actually , they get paid magnitudes more than I do so I do n't feel too bad for them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it looks like an iPod Touch and acts like an iPod Touch but comes from Microsoft, it ain't an iPod Touch.
It must suck to be an engineer at Microsoft.
Ignoring the phat paycheck, it must really suck to work for a company that has largely given up on any semblance of innovation and is simply following the lead of other companies.
I would imagine that many of their best and brightest are begging to explore some very cool ideas but are being held back by Microsoft's corporate culture... I feel for them... 
Actually, they get paid magnitudes more than I do so I don't feel too bad for them...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116209</id>
	<title>Re:People said the same thing about Xbox failing..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243422780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ipod pos tbh</htmltext>
<tokenext>ipod pos tbh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ipod pos tbh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112923</id>
	<title>Over-engineered iPods</title>
	<author>dazedNconfuzed</author>
	<datestamp>1243452180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They'll have an HD radio receiver. That's something that iPod doesn't do.</i></p><p>Don't bet on it. Word is there is a lot more hardware capability built into current iPods than is being utilized. Usage thereof may be delayed pending marketing &amp; engineering concerns, but push come to shove methinks Apple can easily release an update that will turn on the radio receiver (among other abilities) and undercut any serious competition in short order.</p><p>Part of "insanely great" is "don't go cool too early". Short of any real competition, Apple doesn't want to release functionality until they've got usability nailed. Many companies indeed are "already there" with assorted technologies, yet it fails to catch on precisely because the market isn't ready and engineering hasn't figured out how to do it <i>right</i> yet; Apple lets them make the mistakes first and stir up the market before jumping in with their "insanely great" version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll have an HD radio receiver .
That 's something that iPod does n't do.Do n't bet on it .
Word is there is a lot more hardware capability built into current iPods than is being utilized .
Usage thereof may be delayed pending marketing &amp; engineering concerns , but push come to shove methinks Apple can easily release an update that will turn on the radio receiver ( among other abilities ) and undercut any serious competition in short order.Part of " insanely great " is " do n't go cool too early " .
Short of any real competition , Apple does n't want to release functionality until they 've got usability nailed .
Many companies indeed are " already there " with assorted technologies , yet it fails to catch on precisely because the market is n't ready and engineering has n't figured out how to do it right yet ; Apple lets them make the mistakes first and stir up the market before jumping in with their " insanely great " version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll have an HD radio receiver.
That's something that iPod doesn't do.Don't bet on it.
Word is there is a lot more hardware capability built into current iPods than is being utilized.
Usage thereof may be delayed pending marketing &amp; engineering concerns, but push come to shove methinks Apple can easily release an update that will turn on the radio receiver (among other abilities) and undercut any serious competition in short order.Part of "insanely great" is "don't go cool too early".
Short of any real competition, Apple doesn't want to release functionality until they've got usability nailed.
Many companies indeed are "already there" with assorted technologies, yet it fails to catch on precisely because the market isn't ready and engineering hasn't figured out how to do it right yet; Apple lets them make the mistakes first and stir up the market before jumping in with their "insanely great" version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114099</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1243457700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why in the world would you want a handheld device with a built-in 720 display? <a href="http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution\_chart.html" title="carltonbale.com">Do you plan to rest your eyeballs directly on the screen?</a> [carltonbale.com] That's about what you'd need to do to be able to perceive HD detail on a screen that size.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would you want a handheld device with a built-in 720 display ?
Do you plan to rest your eyeballs directly on the screen ?
[ carltonbale.com ] That 's about what you 'd need to do to be able to perceive HD detail on a screen that size .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would you want a handheld device with a built-in 720 display?
Do you plan to rest your eyeballs directly on the screen?
[carltonbale.com] That's about what you'd need to do to be able to perceive HD detail on a screen that size.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112601</id>
	<title>Re:I think Microsoft does not get it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243450920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't have to think.</p></div><p>That's exactly what Apple is counting on.  Most people don't consider thinking to be a burden.  It's an amusing argument anyway, that choice of where to buy your music and the fact that music you buy from a variety of retailers works, is a bad thing.  If you're against consumer choice I guess that explains why you prefer Apple products though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have to think.That 's exactly what Apple is counting on .
Most people do n't consider thinking to be a burden .
It 's an amusing argument anyway , that choice of where to buy your music and the fact that music you buy from a variety of retailers works , is a bad thing .
If you 're against consumer choice I guess that explains why you prefer Apple products though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have to think.That's exactly what Apple is counting on.
Most people don't consider thinking to be a burden.
It's an amusing argument anyway, that choice of where to buy your music and the fact that music you buy from a variety of retailers works, is a bad thing.
If you're against consumer choice I guess that explains why you prefer Apple products though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112195</id>
	<title>Re:It's coming to Europe</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1243449120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped.</i> <br> <br>...which is exactly why I predict Microsoft is unlikely to sell a single unit. Microsoft has totally missed the boat. They might as well just pick up their bags and go home, maybe to try and sell some lame operating system riddled with bugs and bigger holes than Britney...<br> <br>Ahem. Sorry. <br> <br>In other words, Move along please, nothing to see here...</htmltext>
<tokenext>which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped .
...which is exactly why I predict Microsoft is unlikely to sell a single unit .
Microsoft has totally missed the boat .
They might as well just pick up their bags and go home , maybe to try and sell some lame operating system riddled with bugs and bigger holes than Britney... Ahem. Sorry .
In other words , Move along please , nothing to see here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which marks the first time Microsoft has announced the US exclusivity on the Zune is being dropped.
...which is exactly why I predict Microsoft is unlikely to sell a single unit.
Microsoft has totally missed the boat.
They might as well just pick up their bags and go home, maybe to try and sell some lame operating system riddled with bugs and bigger holes than Britney... Ahem. Sorry.
In other words, Move along please, nothing to see here...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111917</id>
	<title>Why a Zune</title>
	<author>LinuxOverWindows</author>
	<datestamp>1243448220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Why base a Media player on a PDA os, that doesn't make sense, why would you use a PDA level OS to run a media player.&nbsp; Why not just run a basic firmware.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why base a Media player on a PDA os , that does n't make sense , why would you use a PDA level OS to run a media player.   Why not just run a basic firmware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why base a Media player on a PDA os, that doesn't make sense, why would you use a PDA level OS to run a media player.  Why not just run a basic firmware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597</id>
	<title>Re:Release should be fine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243455000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bigger, heavier, no multi-touch, junk web browser, no phone (you might not weant one but the rest of the world does), GPS (see phone comment), no App Store (see phone comment), lousy UI for a touch device, no camera, lousy tech support, no SMS, no iTunes, no decent MP3 player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bigger , heavier , no multi-touch , junk web browser , no phone ( you might not weant one but the rest of the world does ) , GPS ( see phone comment ) , no App Store ( see phone comment ) , lousy UI for a touch device , no camera , lousy tech support , no SMS , no iTunes , no decent MP3 player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bigger, heavier, no multi-touch, junk web browser, no phone (you might not weant one but the rest of the world does), GPS (see phone comment), no App Store (see phone comment), lousy UI for a touch device, no camera, lousy tech support, no SMS, no iTunes, no decent MP3 player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28126207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28243773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28123235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28124893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_27_1612244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118353
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113029
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117183
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28123235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112551
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116405
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115059
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118423
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28124893
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115397
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113597
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118525
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115269
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114099
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112603
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116255
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113519
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120525
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28116209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111935
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115129
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28243773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28120201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112331
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28117489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112923
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28115375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28113273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28114733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28126207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_27_1612244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28111957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28118425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_27_1612244.28112267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
