<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_26_138221</id>
	<title>White House To Appoint "Internet Czar"</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243344960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The Washington Post reports that President Obama is set to appoint <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/25/AR2009052502104.html">a 'Cybersecurity czar with a broad mandate'</a>: 'The adviser will have the most comprehensive mandate granted to such an official to date and will probably be a member of the National Security Council but will report to the national security adviser as well as the senior White House economic adviser, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations are not final.

The announcement will coincide with the long-anticipated release of a 40-page report that evaluates the government's cybersecurity initiatives and policies. The report is intended to outline a "strategic vision" and the range of issues the new adviser must handle, but it will not delve into details, administration officials told reporters last month.' Cynics are expecting the appointee to be <a href="//politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/06/2342251&amp;tid=266">a lawyer for the RIAA</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The Washington Post reports that President Obama is set to appoint a 'Cybersecurity czar with a broad mandate ' : 'The adviser will have the most comprehensive mandate granted to such an official to date and will probably be a member of the National Security Council but will report to the national security adviser as well as the senior White House economic adviser , said the sources , who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations are not final .
The announcement will coincide with the long-anticipated release of a 40-page report that evaluates the government 's cybersecurity initiatives and policies .
The report is intended to outline a " strategic vision " and the range of issues the new adviser must handle , but it will not delve into details , administration officials told reporters last month .
' Cynics are expecting the appointee to be a lawyer for the RIAA .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The Washington Post reports that President Obama is set to appoint a 'Cybersecurity czar with a broad mandate': 'The adviser will have the most comprehensive mandate granted to such an official to date and will probably be a member of the National Security Council but will report to the national security adviser as well as the senior White House economic adviser, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations are not final.
The announcement will coincide with the long-anticipated release of a 40-page report that evaluates the government's cybersecurity initiatives and policies.
The report is intended to outline a "strategic vision" and the range of issues the new adviser must handle, but it will not delve into details, administration officials told reporters last month.
' Cynics are expecting the appointee to be a lawyer for the RIAA.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094459</id>
	<title>Czars</title>
	<author>slowgreenturtle</author>
	<datestamp>1243349760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did we start offering offices to czars? I don't see any emperors or kings in charge of this country. And doesn't our constitution say something about not allowing titles of nobility? The government is like a child who constantly tests it boundaries and so far nobody's doing anything about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did we start offering offices to czars ?
I do n't see any emperors or kings in charge of this country .
And does n't our constitution say something about not allowing titles of nobility ?
The government is like a child who constantly tests it boundaries and so far nobody 's doing anything about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did we start offering offices to czars?
I don't see any emperors or kings in charge of this country.
And doesn't our constitution say something about not allowing titles of nobility?
The government is like a child who constantly tests it boundaries and so far nobody's doing anything about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095181</id>
	<title>G-d bless and keep the Czar...</title>
	<author>Mark Gordon</author>
	<datestamp>1243353120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...far away from us!</p><p>- "Fiddler on the Roof"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...far away from us ! - " Fiddler on the Roof "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...far away from us!- "Fiddler on the Roof"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094399</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243349520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it is necessary. It gives somebody power and a 'mandate' while avoiding that pesky requirement of actually asking the Senate for "advice and consent".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it is necessary .
It gives somebody power and a 'mandate ' while avoiding that pesky requirement of actually asking the Senate for " advice and consent " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it is necessary.
It gives somebody power and a 'mandate' while avoiding that pesky requirement of actually asking the Senate for "advice and consent".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097621</id>
	<title>Re:!!democracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243362900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not democracy.</p><p>A capitalistic democracy where votes go to whoever has the best media campaign is a form of plutocracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not democracy.A capitalistic democracy where votes go to whoever has the best media campaign is a form of plutocracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not democracy.A capitalistic democracy where votes go to whoever has the best media campaign is a form of plutocracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099219</id>
	<title>Re:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>value\_added</author>
	<datestamp>1243368840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The term 'Czar' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder.</i></p><p>No, the term has much broader connotations.  I appreciate the general sentiments of your post, but the fact that you associate 'Czar' with Nicholas II, a period in history that is exceedingly narrow in its historical, cultural and political scope, suggests a general ignorance.  The same could be said about anyone who has a similarly narrow interpretation of kings, queens, ministers, secretaries, and presidents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The term 'Czar ' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder.No , the term has much broader connotations .
I appreciate the general sentiments of your post , but the fact that you associate 'Czar ' with Nicholas II , a period in history that is exceedingly narrow in its historical , cultural and political scope , suggests a general ignorance .
The same could be said about anyone who has a similarly narrow interpretation of kings , queens , ministers , secretaries , and presidents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The term 'Czar' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder.No, the term has much broader connotations.
I appreciate the general sentiments of your post, but the fact that you associate 'Czar' with Nicholas II, a period in history that is exceedingly narrow in its historical, cultural and political scope, suggests a general ignorance.
The same could be said about anyone who has a similarly narrow interpretation of kings, queens, ministers, secretaries, and presidents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101429</id>
	<title>Re:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1243335240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's an anecdote for ya.</p><p>After the Soviet revolution of 1917, Bolsheviks purged most of those who were in power - ministers, high-ranking clerks, army officers. The very titles, the words themselves - "minister", "officer" etc - were banned. Workers were given full control over factories, and on the front (as WWI was still ongoing), soldiers were supposed to self-organized.</p><p>Well, that didn't work. You can imagine why. Any sufficiently complex organized activity needs a good manager, no matter how you call him.</p><p>So Bolsheviks had some creative renaming done. There were no bourgeoisie "ministers" in Soviet Russia, no-no - there were "people's commissars" - as in, experienced individuals commissioned by the people (through the Party, of course) to manage a particular area. So there was People's Commissariat for Military Affairs, People's Commissariat of Education, People's Commissariat of Finance, etc. And their heads, the people's commissars, met in a Council of the People's Commissars, headed by a chairman. But, look, no cabinet of ministers!</p><p>Similar thing happened in the army. Turns out you can't really fight well without specific people dedicated to leading and giving orders, and so such were introduced. No pesky reactionary "officers", of course: the people in charge were called using proper, proletarian words such as "squad commander", "battalion commander",  "division commander" etc.</p><p>~30 years later, Stalin had enough of that, and restored the original words with their meanings. And it turned out that, apart from being easier to spell, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn't actually work any better or worse than the People's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs. Surprising, that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's an anecdote for ya.After the Soviet revolution of 1917 , Bolsheviks purged most of those who were in power - ministers , high-ranking clerks , army officers .
The very titles , the words themselves - " minister " , " officer " etc - were banned .
Workers were given full control over factories , and on the front ( as WWI was still ongoing ) , soldiers were supposed to self-organized.Well , that did n't work .
You can imagine why .
Any sufficiently complex organized activity needs a good manager , no matter how you call him.So Bolsheviks had some creative renaming done .
There were no bourgeoisie " ministers " in Soviet Russia , no-no - there were " people 's commissars " - as in , experienced individuals commissioned by the people ( through the Party , of course ) to manage a particular area .
So there was People 's Commissariat for Military Affairs , People 's Commissariat of Education , People 's Commissariat of Finance , etc .
And their heads , the people 's commissars , met in a Council of the People 's Commissars , headed by a chairman .
But , look , no cabinet of ministers ! Similar thing happened in the army .
Turns out you ca n't really fight well without specific people dedicated to leading and giving orders , and so such were introduced .
No pesky reactionary " officers " , of course : the people in charge were called using proper , proletarian words such as " squad commander " , " battalion commander " , " division commander " etc. ~ 30 years later , Stalin had enough of that , and restored the original words with their meanings .
And it turned out that , apart from being easier to spell , the Ministry of Foreign Affairs did n't actually work any better or worse than the People 's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs .
Surprising , that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's an anecdote for ya.After the Soviet revolution of 1917, Bolsheviks purged most of those who were in power - ministers, high-ranking clerks, army officers.
The very titles, the words themselves - "minister", "officer" etc - were banned.
Workers were given full control over factories, and on the front (as WWI was still ongoing), soldiers were supposed to self-organized.Well, that didn't work.
You can imagine why.
Any sufficiently complex organized activity needs a good manager, no matter how you call him.So Bolsheviks had some creative renaming done.
There were no bourgeoisie "ministers" in Soviet Russia, no-no - there were "people's commissars" - as in, experienced individuals commissioned by the people (through the Party, of course) to manage a particular area.
So there was People's Commissariat for Military Affairs, People's Commissariat of Education, People's Commissariat of Finance, etc.
And their heads, the people's commissars, met in a Council of the People's Commissars, headed by a chairman.
But, look, no cabinet of ministers!Similar thing happened in the army.
Turns out you can't really fight well without specific people dedicated to leading and giving orders, and so such were introduced.
No pesky reactionary "officers", of course: the people in charge were called using proper, proletarian words such as "squad commander", "battalion commander",  "division commander" etc.~30 years later, Stalin had enough of that, and restored the original words with their meanings.
And it turned out that, apart from being easier to spell, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn't actually work any better or worse than the People's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs.
Surprising, that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095553</id>
	<title>Has any President been so "Czarist"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243354620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama has appointed more czars than any other President that I can remember.  And I think this is a bad thing, as czars end up with the same (or more) power as a constitutional cabinet official and don't have to go through the scrutiny of confirmation.</p><p>This makes it easy to slip in cronies and lobbyists.  And yes, I expect the person to have MAFIAA ties.</p><p>The Obama administration runs like it has two cabinets, the one that had to be confirmed by Congress, and the "shadow" one made up of czars and all these "focus groups" he's been running.</p><p>This definitely doesn't lead to transparency in government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama has appointed more czars than any other President that I can remember .
And I think this is a bad thing , as czars end up with the same ( or more ) power as a constitutional cabinet official and do n't have to go through the scrutiny of confirmation.This makes it easy to slip in cronies and lobbyists .
And yes , I expect the person to have MAFIAA ties.The Obama administration runs like it has two cabinets , the one that had to be confirmed by Congress , and the " shadow " one made up of czars and all these " focus groups " he 's been running.This definitely does n't lead to transparency in government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama has appointed more czars than any other President that I can remember.
And I think this is a bad thing, as czars end up with the same (or more) power as a constitutional cabinet official and don't have to go through the scrutiny of confirmation.This makes it easy to slip in cronies and lobbyists.
And yes, I expect the person to have MAFIAA ties.The Obama administration runs like it has two cabinets, the one that had to be confirmed by Congress, and the "shadow" one made up of czars and all these "focus groups" he's been running.This definitely doesn't lead to transparency in government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094515</id>
	<title>Power to Change Things?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243350000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mandate != Power to Change</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mandate ! = Power to Change</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mandate != Power to Change</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094537</id>
	<title>what...</title>
	<author>night\_flyer</author>
	<datestamp>1243350120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... could possibly go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28102847</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243342320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hm. A Drug Czar on the throne. Serving him are his loyal vasals, the Drug Barons...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hm .
A Drug Czar on the throne .
Serving him are his loyal vasals , the Drug Barons.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hm.
A Drug Czar on the throne.
Serving him are his loyal vasals, the Drug Barons...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094623</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094645</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243350660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</p></div><p>So would this make pirate bay be the internet Bolsheviks? Or would that only be the case if they had real guns and actually killed people?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I suspect that this " czar " will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates , teenagers , and Youtube ? So would this make pirate bay be the internet Bolsheviks ?
Or would that only be the case if they had real guns and actually killed people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?So would this make pirate bay be the internet Bolsheviks?
Or would that only be the case if they had real guns and actually killed people?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28103705</id>
	<title>Re:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>MorePower</author>
	<datestamp>1243347360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You all do realize that "czar" is just the media's nickname for these positions, right? <br>
The real title of all the "czars" is usually something along the lines of "Deputy Assistant Undersecretary of [government department] and Adjunct Liaison to [some other government department] for Matters of [some issue currently in the headlines]"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You all do realize that " czar " is just the media 's nickname for these positions , right ?
The real title of all the " czars " is usually something along the lines of " Deputy Assistant Undersecretary of [ government department ] and Adjunct Liaison to [ some other government department ] for Matters of [ some issue currently in the headlines ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You all do realize that "czar" is just the media's nickname for these positions, right?
The real title of all the "czars" is usually something along the lines of "Deputy Assistant Undersecretary of [government department] and Adjunct Liaison to [some other government department] for Matters of [some issue currently in the headlines]"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096475</id>
	<title>Re:Black Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Ray</author>
	<datestamp>1243358160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rush, is that you? Oh, sorry Sean. Gee you're puttin' on weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rush , is that you ?
Oh , sorry Sean .
Gee you 're puttin ' on weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rush, is that you?
Oh, sorry Sean.
Gee you're puttin' on weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094611</id>
	<title>What do they call the Russia expert?</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1243350540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would he be the Russian czar? Condi Rice was an alleged expert on the topic, would that make her the Russian czarina?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would he be the Russian czar ?
Condi Rice was an alleged expert on the topic , would that make her the Russian czarina ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would he be the Russian czar?
Condi Rice was an alleged expert on the topic, would that make her the Russian czarina?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095403</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>coopaq</author>
	<datestamp>1243353960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo Dawg! I heard you like Czars. So we put a Czar in your Czar so you can be be censored while being censored!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo Dawg !
I heard you like Czars .
So we put a Czar in your Czar so you can be be censored while being censored !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo Dawg!
I heard you like Czars.
So we put a Czar in your Czar so you can be be censored while being censored!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095169</id>
	<title>Re:Power to Change Things?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243353060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And while we're at it...</p><p>Election != Mandate</p><p>Though I'm open to suggestions about which percentage would establish a "mandate" I certainly think it should be higher than ~52\%.  Especially considering the collected intelligence (read "clue") of the middle 40\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And while we 're at it...Election ! = MandateThough I 'm open to suggestions about which percentage would establish a " mandate " I certainly think it should be higher than ~ 52 \ % .
Especially considering the collected intelligence ( read " clue " ) of the middle 40 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And while we're at it...Election != MandateThough I'm open to suggestions about which percentage would establish a "mandate" I certainly think it should be higher than ~52\%.
Especially considering the collected intelligence (read "clue") of the middle 40\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101587</id>
	<title>Re:Freudian slip?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243335960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>except you forget that the czar was killed by the communists</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>except you forget that the czar was killed by the communists</tokentext>
<sentencetext>except you forget that the czar was killed by the communists</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28108101</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243431240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?  I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue ?
I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar , who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?
I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095501</id>
	<title>Where will he live?</title>
	<author>Ezrymyrh</author>
	<datestamp>1243354440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does he live in his parents basement? How about a funny hat, all Gov appointed Czars should get one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does he live in his parents basement ?
How about a funny hat , all Gov appointed Czars should get one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does he live in his parents basement?
How about a funny hat, all Gov appointed Czars should get one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094373</id>
	<title>Just the man</title>
	<author>Mathinker</author>
	<datestamp>1243349460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/05/16/1825244/Sony-Pictures-CEO-Thinks-the-Net-Wasnt-Worth-It?art\_pos=2" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Michael Lynton, CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment</a> [slashdot.org]....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Lynton , CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment [ slashdot.org ] ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Lynton, CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment [slashdot.org]....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098963</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243367880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope his last name is Binks, so we have Czar Czar Binks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope his last name is Binks , so we have Czar Czar Binks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope his last name is Binks, so we have Czar Czar Binks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096029</id>
	<title>What? No "In Soviet Russia" jokes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243356360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I know czars were there before the Soviets (councils), but hey, this is Slashdot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I know czars were there before the Soviets ( councils ) , but hey , this is Slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I know czars were there before the Soviets (councils), but hey, this is Slashdot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094733</id>
	<title>Re:Again?</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1243351140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How many slashdot "White House to Appoint Internet Czar" stories are we going to see?</p></div></blockquote><p>At least one more, when the kdawson cron job dupes it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many slashdot " White House to Appoint Internet Czar " stories are we going to see ? At least one more , when the kdawson cron job dupes it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many slashdot "White House to Appoint Internet Czar" stories are we going to see?At least one more, when the kdawson cron job dupes it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094569</id>
	<title>It's Corporate America, Baby!</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1243350300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need someone to scapegoat and fire today when fundamental errors made 20 years ago finally become manifest.</p><p>That's how we roll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need someone to scapegoat and fire today when fundamental errors made 20 years ago finally become manifest.That 's how we roll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need someone to scapegoat and fire today when fundamental errors made 20 years ago finally become manifest.That's how we roll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099807</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1243371240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Czar" title has a distinct advantage. Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot.</p></div><p>Not really - your mistaken assumption is that only Russia had tsars (I prefer this spelling as it reflects the actual pronounciation of the word). In practice, a few other Slavic countries have also used it, most notably Bulgaria - its last tsar was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon\_Saxe-Coburg-Gotha" title="wikipedia.org">Simeon II</a> [wikipedia.org], ruling until 1946 (when Commies took over). And he wasn't executed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Czar " title has a distinct advantage .
Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot.Not really - your mistaken assumption is that only Russia had tsars ( I prefer this spelling as it reflects the actual pronounciation of the word ) .
In practice , a few other Slavic countries have also used it , most notably Bulgaria - its last tsar was Simeon II [ wikipedia.org ] , ruling until 1946 ( when Commies took over ) .
And he was n't executed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Czar" title has a distinct advantage.
Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot.Not really - your mistaken assumption is that only Russia had tsars (I prefer this spelling as it reflects the actual pronounciation of the word).
In practice, a few other Slavic countries have also used it, most notably Bulgaria - its last tsar was Simeon II [wikipedia.org], ruling until 1946 (when Commies took over).
And he wasn't executed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097057</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243360560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</p></div><p>Actually, he will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time surfing on Youtube and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. Hey, it's field research!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I suspect that this " czar " will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates , teenagers , and Youtube ? Actually , he will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time surfing on Youtube and / .
Hey , it 's field research !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?Actually, he will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time surfing on Youtube and /.
Hey, it's field research!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101145</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243333740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The correct orientation is over-the-top release. The correct wiping direction for males is front to back. Females may optionally go front to back or back to front, provided the have filed the proper release forms. That is all.</p><p>-- TP Czar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The correct orientation is over-the-top release .
The correct wiping direction for males is front to back .
Females may optionally go front to back or back to front , provided the have filed the proper release forms .
That is all.-- TP Czar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The correct orientation is over-the-top release.
The correct wiping direction for males is front to back.
Females may optionally go front to back or back to front, provided the have filed the proper release forms.
That is all.-- TP Czar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096425</id>
	<title>Re:!!democracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243357980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One problem... we don't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One problem... we do n't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One problem... we don't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094799</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>hal2814</author>
	<datestamp>1243351440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry.  They'll be the first against the wall when the Revolution comes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry .
They 'll be the first against the wall when the Revolution comes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry.
They'll be the first against the wall when the Revolution comes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094489</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1243349940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</p></div><p>Why do I have a feeling that this "czar" will accomplish nothing on either of those fronts and will prove to be as effective as all the other "czars" that have come before him?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I suspect that this " czar " will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates , teenagers , and Youtube ? Why do I have a feeling that this " czar " will accomplish nothing on either of those fronts and will prove to be as effective as all the other " czars " that have come before him ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?Why do I have a feeling that this "czar" will accomplish nothing on either of those fronts and will prove to be as effective as all the other "czars" that have come before him?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095739</id>
	<title>"I'm from the government and I'm here to help you"</title>
	<author>Tokolosh</author>
	<datestamp>1243355220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We fought for freedom and all we got was democracy."</p><p>Pieter-Dirk Uys</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We fought for freedom and all we got was democracy .
" Pieter-Dirk Uys</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We fought for freedom and all we got was democracy.
"Pieter-Dirk Uys</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</id>
	<title>More Cynicism</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1243349100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and <b>economic concerns</b>, the sources said.</p></div><p>Economic concerns like what?  The fact that internet commerce explodes on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber\_Monday" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Cyber Monday</a> [wikipedia.org] as consumers and businesses enjoy a wealth of increased buying/spending?  Or would you so happen to be referring to economic concerns like the MPAA/RIAA are short one ivory back scratcher?  Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it <i>untaxed</i>?  Maybe concerns that used books, DVDs and games are being sold increasingly with a down-turned economy?  <br> <br>

I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in?  <br> <br>


You want to help the consumer, you should mandate that proprietary DRM violates anti-trust laws as it locks consumers into the software and hardware associated with their music service.  Or maybe you should look into <a href="http://news.cnet.com/New-move-to-ease-encryption-limits/2100-1023\_3-220245.html" title="cnet.com" rel="nofollow">allowing people to use whatever level of encryption they want to secure their financial transactions</a> [cnet.com]?  Nah, nobody's paying you for that. <br> <br>

Throw on top of that <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16814" title="p2pnet.net" rel="nofollow">the fact that Biden's good friends with the MPAA and RIAA</a> [p2pnet.net] (and I'm sure <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/11/mpaa-already-lo/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">Obama's not far behind</a> [wired.com]) there may be cause for concern.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns , the sources said.Economic concerns like what ?
The fact that internet commerce explodes on Cyber Monday [ wikipedia.org ] as consumers and businesses enjoy a wealth of increased buying/spending ?
Or would you so happen to be referring to economic concerns like the MPAA/RIAA are short one ivory back scratcher ?
Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it untaxed ?
Maybe concerns that used books , DVDs and games are being sold increasingly with a down-turned economy ?
I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in ?
You want to help the consumer , you should mandate that proprietary DRM violates anti-trust laws as it locks consumers into the software and hardware associated with their music service .
Or maybe you should look into allowing people to use whatever level of encryption they want to secure their financial transactions [ cnet.com ] ?
Nah , nobody 's paying you for that .
Throw on top of that the fact that Biden 's good friends with the MPAA and RIAA [ p2pnet.net ] ( and I 'm sure Obama 's not far behind [ wired.com ] ) there may be cause for concern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns, the sources said.Economic concerns like what?
The fact that internet commerce explodes on Cyber Monday [wikipedia.org] as consumers and businesses enjoy a wealth of increased buying/spending?
Or would you so happen to be referring to economic concerns like the MPAA/RIAA are short one ivory back scratcher?
Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it untaxed?
Maybe concerns that used books, DVDs and games are being sold increasingly with a down-turned economy?
I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in?
You want to help the consumer, you should mandate that proprietary DRM violates anti-trust laws as it locks consumers into the software and hardware associated with their music service.
Or maybe you should look into allowing people to use whatever level of encryption they want to secure their financial transactions [cnet.com]?
Nah, nobody's paying you for that.
Throw on top of that the fact that Biden's good friends with the MPAA and RIAA [p2pnet.net] (and I'm sure Obama's not far behind [wired.com]) there may be cause for concern.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094493</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>jerep</author>
	<datestamp>1243349940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because 90\% of what the government already does is to help big corporations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because 90 \ % of what the government already does is to help big corporations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because 90\% of what the government already does is to help big corporations?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095243</id>
	<title>Hypocrisy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243353360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the 'democrats' tag? The appointment of Kings, or 'Czar' if you speak Russian, is typical of the Democrat party. Ask any Brit...it'll be recorded and reviewed by his Government. And yours, soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the 'democrats ' tag ?
The appointment of Kings , or 'Czar ' if you speak Russian , is typical of the Democrat party .
Ask any Brit...it 'll be recorded and reviewed by his Government .
And yours , soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the 'democrats' tag?
The appointment of Kings, or 'Czar' if you speak Russian, is typical of the Democrat party.
Ask any Brit...it'll be recorded and reviewed by his Government.
And yours, soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094751</id>
	<title>Hackers and pirates beware . . .</title>
	<author>spamking</author>
	<datestamp>1243351200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hackers and pirates beware . . . Bruce Willis won't be there to save you this time . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hackers and pirates beware .
. .
Bruce Willis wo n't be there to save you this time .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hackers and pirates beware .
. .
Bruce Willis won't be there to save you this time .
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097473</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1243362360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably just spend most of his time tracking down all the people that post child porn on 4chan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably just spend most of his time tracking down all the people that post child porn on 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably just spend most of his time tracking down all the people that post child porn on 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101469</id>
	<title>Re:ENOUGH WITH THE F---ING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>superyooser</author>
	<datestamp>1243335420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with you about the use of "czar" or "tsar." Freedom-loving countries should not use that as a title for a political position. The spelling, in particular, links it to terrible regimes that are anathema to the spirit of the U.S. Constitution.
</p><p>However, on a geeky note, the etymology of the word branches out to more than just "Caesar." There are many personal titles that are or may be related, and most are positive more often than negative: Sire, Sir, Sieur (Old French) leading to Monsieur (lit. my lord), Senior (Latin; disputed), Kaiser (German; the original pronunciation of "Caesar" in Classical Latin), etc. Most interesting to me is sar, which is a Hebrew word that appears hundreds of times in the Bible. To emphasize a positive use of the word, "Sar Shalom" is a prophetic title for the Messiah (Isaiah 9:6; 9:5 in Tanakh).
</p><p> <a href="http://www.world-destiny.org/isaac1.htm" title="world-destiny.org">This page</a> [world-destiny.org] just about covers it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with you about the use of " czar " or " tsar .
" Freedom-loving countries should not use that as a title for a political position .
The spelling , in particular , links it to terrible regimes that are anathema to the spirit of the U.S. Constitution . However , on a geeky note , the etymology of the word branches out to more than just " Caesar .
" There are many personal titles that are or may be related , and most are positive more often than negative : Sire , Sir , Sieur ( Old French ) leading to Monsieur ( lit .
my lord ) , Senior ( Latin ; disputed ) , Kaiser ( German ; the original pronunciation of " Caesar " in Classical Latin ) , etc .
Most interesting to me is sar , which is a Hebrew word that appears hundreds of times in the Bible .
To emphasize a positive use of the word , " Sar Shalom " is a prophetic title for the Messiah ( Isaiah 9 : 6 ; 9 : 5 in Tanakh ) .
This page [ world-destiny.org ] just about covers it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with you about the use of "czar" or "tsar.
" Freedom-loving countries should not use that as a title for a political position.
The spelling, in particular, links it to terrible regimes that are anathema to the spirit of the U.S. Constitution.
However, on a geeky note, the etymology of the word branches out to more than just "Caesar.
" There are many personal titles that are or may be related, and most are positive more often than negative: Sire, Sir, Sieur (Old French) leading to Monsieur (lit.
my lord), Senior (Latin; disputed), Kaiser (German; the original pronunciation of "Caesar" in Classical Latin), etc.
Most interesting to me is sar, which is a Hebrew word that appears hundreds of times in the Bible.
To emphasize a positive use of the word, "Sar Shalom" is a prophetic title for the Messiah (Isaiah 9:6; 9:5 in Tanakh).
This page [world-destiny.org] just about covers it all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096133</id>
	<title>Ron Paul</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243356660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder what Ron Paul has to say about all of this...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what Ron Paul has to say about all of this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what Ron Paul has to say about all of this...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094479</id>
	<title>Which member of ACORN</title>
	<author>thorkyl</author>
	<datestamp>1243349880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is he going to hire for this job.</p><p>more importantly what country is he going to borrow the money from to hire this ACORN/RIAA moron from?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is he going to hire for this job.more importantly what country is he going to borrow the money from to hire this ACORN/RIAA moron from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is he going to hire for this job.more importantly what country is he going to borrow the money from to hire this ACORN/RIAA moron from?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095265</id>
	<title>Re:Again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243353420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, let's flood slashdot with this story however many times it takes to get the message across. We must be ever vigilant with regards to humanities last bastion of freedom in the world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , let 's flood slashdot with this story however many times it takes to get the message across .
We must be ever vigilant with regards to humanities last bastion of freedom in the world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, let's flood slashdot with this story however many times it takes to get the message across.
We must be ever vigilant with regards to humanities last bastion of freedom in the world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094955</id>
	<title>What we will soon need is a czar czar...</title>
	<author>VennData</author>
	<datestamp>1243352280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... to oversee all the czars:  I propose Czar-Czar Gabor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... to oversee all the czars : I propose Czar-Czar Gabor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... to oversee all the czars:  I propose Czar-Czar Gabor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095945</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243356000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I nominate Cheryl Crow!<br>http://newsbusters.org/node/12226</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I nominate Cheryl Crow ! http : //newsbusters.org/node/12226</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I nominate Cheryl Crow!http://newsbusters.org/node/12226</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>Twillerror</author>
	<datestamp>1243351200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the *AAs, but I'm not their enemy either.</p><p>Yes I'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s, but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.</p><p>What pisses me off the most about my friends who still download crap illegally is that it is not forming the market we need. Instead form consumer protection groups and force...or maybe even just nicely ask...the companies to give us the content a little differently.</p><p>Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue. Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists? Really...what are we f'in stupid.</p><p>DRM is a result of our stupidity. Stop downloading and start organizing. but I guess we are the lazy get everything for free generation so I bet we will just pay piratebay for a VPN connection instead of supporting music. And the end result is I have to listen to "gotta get that boom boom boom" on the radio now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the * AAs , but I 'm not their enemy either.Yes I 'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s , but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.What pisses me off the most about my friends who still download crap illegally is that it is not forming the market we need .
Instead form consumer protection groups and force...or maybe even just nicely ask...the companies to give us the content a little differently.Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue .
Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists ?
Really...what are we f'in stupid.DRM is a result of our stupidity .
Stop downloading and start organizing .
but I guess we are the lazy get everything for free generation so I bet we will just pay piratebay for a VPN connection instead of supporting music .
And the end result is I have to listen to " got ta get that boom boom boom " on the radio now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the *AAs, but I'm not their enemy either.Yes I'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s, but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.What pisses me off the most about my friends who still download crap illegally is that it is not forming the market we need.
Instead form consumer protection groups and force...or maybe even just nicely ask...the companies to give us the content a little differently.Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue.
Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists?
Really...what are we f'in stupid.DRM is a result of our stupidity.
Stop downloading and start organizing.
but I guess we are the lazy get everything for free generation so I bet we will just pay piratebay for a VPN connection instead of supporting music.
And the end result is I have to listen to "gotta get that boom boom boom" on the radio now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095341</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Tanktalus</author>
	<datestamp>1243353720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just to avoid all the old arguments on the topic, or maybe, by reference, repeating them: <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1232109&amp;cid=27941947" title="slashdot.org">Czar Czar</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to avoid all the old arguments on the topic , or maybe , by reference , repeating them : Czar Czar [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to avoid all the old arguments on the topic, or maybe, by reference, repeating them: Czar Czar [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094731</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1243351080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He has a point, this is area where if dark clouds come over and rain falls from the sky you are called cynic for saying that someone is going to get wet, but anywhere else the positivist/naysayer/shill would be called insane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He has a point , this is area where if dark clouds come over and rain falls from the sky you are called cynic for saying that someone is going to get wet , but anywhere else the positivist/naysayer/shill would be called insane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He has a point, this is area where if dark clouds come over and rain falls from the sky you are called cynic for saying that someone is going to get wet, but anywhere else the positivist/naysayer/shill would be called insane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243350300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Czar" title has a distinct advantage. Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Czar " title has a distinct advantage .
Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Czar" title has a distinct advantage.
Czars were abolished when the last of them had been put against a wall and the shot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099597</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Chees0rz</author>
	<datestamp>1243370220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as these new regulations help me stop knocking a fresh roll off the spool each time I go for that first wipe.  Somehow I always put it in incorrectly.  Maybe I don't wait for the click...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as these new regulations help me stop knocking a fresh roll off the spool each time I go for that first wipe .
Somehow I always put it in incorrectly .
Maybe I do n't wait for the click.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as these new regulations help me stop knocking a fresh roll off the spool each time I go for that first wipe.
Somehow I always put it in incorrectly.
Maybe I don't wait for the click...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094543</id>
	<title>It might not be a lawyer...</title>
	<author>sesshomaru</author>
	<datestamp>1243350180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... it might be a CEO.  Why, I hear the CEO of Sony just wrote an article about Guardrails for the Internet.</p><p>I bet if the price were right, he could get the job!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... it might be a CEO .
Why , I hear the CEO of Sony just wrote an article about Guardrails for the Internet.I bet if the price were right , he could get the job !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it might be a CEO.
Why, I hear the CEO of Sony just wrote an article about Guardrails for the Internet.I bet if the price were right, he could get the job!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021</id>
	<title>Freudian slip?</title>
	<author>AnalPerfume</author>
	<datestamp>1243352460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone find it strange that a country steeped in an anti-communist / pro-capitalist past / present / future chooses to adopt a Russian term for an overseer? We've seen so many fuck ups by past US administrations because they got their panties in a twist about the fear of communism with Cuba, the McCarthy trials etc. The Republicans in particular have their supporters mind warped into seeing commies everywhere, yet it hasn't occurred to them that "Czar" is not a Western / US word.<br><br>They rail against state control over personal freedoms and here the government are trying to let people know where they stand and the people don't notice. Not only that, but many right wingers are thrilled that a Czar is taking charge to impose order, although presumably that only applies when the order being imposed is on an area they agree with and not with their rights to own guns etc.<br><br>It's like the story telling entertainment industries. They tell so many stories of corporate / political abuse of citizens which resonate with the audience and the audience never notices why. Stories resonate because they have enough basis in reality for the audience to relate to, yes they are fictional characters, fictional corporations, fictional laws etc but the base is real, and believable. It's believable because there is plenty of news about REAL people committing similar crimes and abuses and often getting away with it. The entertainment industry is showing us the world as it is through fictional rewrites and what do we do about it? Fuck all.<br><br>How many more times do we have to be shown reality before we decide that enough is enough?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone find it strange that a country steeped in an anti-communist / pro-capitalist past / present / future chooses to adopt a Russian term for an overseer ?
We 've seen so many fuck ups by past US administrations because they got their panties in a twist about the fear of communism with Cuba , the McCarthy trials etc .
The Republicans in particular have their supporters mind warped into seeing commies everywhere , yet it has n't occurred to them that " Czar " is not a Western / US word.They rail against state control over personal freedoms and here the government are trying to let people know where they stand and the people do n't notice .
Not only that , but many right wingers are thrilled that a Czar is taking charge to impose order , although presumably that only applies when the order being imposed is on an area they agree with and not with their rights to own guns etc.It 's like the story telling entertainment industries .
They tell so many stories of corporate / political abuse of citizens which resonate with the audience and the audience never notices why .
Stories resonate because they have enough basis in reality for the audience to relate to , yes they are fictional characters , fictional corporations , fictional laws etc but the base is real , and believable .
It 's believable because there is plenty of news about REAL people committing similar crimes and abuses and often getting away with it .
The entertainment industry is showing us the world as it is through fictional rewrites and what do we do about it ?
Fuck all.How many more times do we have to be shown reality before we decide that enough is enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone find it strange that a country steeped in an anti-communist / pro-capitalist past / present / future chooses to adopt a Russian term for an overseer?
We've seen so many fuck ups by past US administrations because they got their panties in a twist about the fear of communism with Cuba, the McCarthy trials etc.
The Republicans in particular have their supporters mind warped into seeing commies everywhere, yet it hasn't occurred to them that "Czar" is not a Western / US word.They rail against state control over personal freedoms and here the government are trying to let people know where they stand and the people don't notice.
Not only that, but many right wingers are thrilled that a Czar is taking charge to impose order, although presumably that only applies when the order being imposed is on an area they agree with and not with their rights to own guns etc.It's like the story telling entertainment industries.
They tell so many stories of corporate / political abuse of citizens which resonate with the audience and the audience never notices why.
Stories resonate because they have enough basis in reality for the audience to relate to, yes they are fictional characters, fictional corporations, fictional laws etc but the base is real, and believable.
It's believable because there is plenty of news about REAL people committing similar crimes and abuses and often getting away with it.
The entertainment industry is showing us the world as it is through fictional rewrites and what do we do about it?
Fuck all.How many more times do we have to be shown reality before we decide that enough is enough?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361</id>
	<title>Again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243349280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many slashdot "White House to Appoint Internet Czar" stories are we going to see? Let's just report it when it happens (if it ever does).</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many slashdot " White House to Appoint Internet Czar " stories are we going to see ?
Let 's just report it when it happens ( if it ever does ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many slashdot "White House to Appoint Internet Czar" stories are we going to see?
Let's just report it when it happens (if it ever does).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095901</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Whalou</author>
	<datestamp>1243355880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rumour has it the U.S. Government started negotiating with George Lucas for the right to use the term "Jedi" to replace "czar" once everyone is fed up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumour has it the U.S. Government started negotiating with George Lucas for the right to use the term " Jedi " to replace " czar " once everyone is fed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumour has it the U.S. Government started negotiating with George Lucas for the right to use the term "Jedi" to replace "czar" once everyone is fed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095851</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>maroonhat</author>
	<datestamp>1243355700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know a James Binks who needs work
<br> <br>
And I love the sound of Czar Czar Binks</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know a James Binks who needs work And I love the sound of Czar Czar Binks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know a James Binks who needs work
 
And I love the sound of Czar Czar Binks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271</id>
	<title>I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>$RANDOMLUSER</author>
	<datestamp>1243348980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something, please God, anything else for a change, plz?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something , please God , anything else for a change , plz ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something, please God, anything else for a change, plz?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095485</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1243354320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Czars have a mandate and little authority, they're not supposed to actually accomplish anything. They get appointed for two reasons:</p><p>1. To give the appearance of activity without actually doing anything. ("Of course we care about issue X! We appointed a czar to oversee it.")</p><p>2. To reward allies and contributors with plum patronage positions but few actual responsibilities to worry about.</p><p>The "best" part is everybody cynically expects them to fail, so there's no complaint or comment when the appointee accomplishes nothing. It's really quite brilliant... Bush's mistake was making patronage appointments to positions which actually hold responsibilities, like managing FEMA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Czars have a mandate and little authority , they 're not supposed to actually accomplish anything .
They get appointed for two reasons : 1 .
To give the appearance of activity without actually doing anything .
( " Of course we care about issue X !
We appointed a czar to oversee it. " ) 2 .
To reward allies and contributors with plum patronage positions but few actual responsibilities to worry about.The " best " part is everybody cynically expects them to fail , so there 's no complaint or comment when the appointee accomplishes nothing .
It 's really quite brilliant... Bush 's mistake was making patronage appointments to positions which actually hold responsibilities , like managing FEMA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Czars have a mandate and little authority, they're not supposed to actually accomplish anything.
They get appointed for two reasons:1.
To give the appearance of activity without actually doing anything.
("Of course we care about issue X!
We appointed a czar to oversee it.")2.
To reward allies and contributors with plum patronage positions but few actual responsibilities to worry about.The "best" part is everybody cynically expects them to fail, so there's no complaint or comment when the appointee accomplishes nothing.
It's really quite brilliant... Bush's mistake was making patronage appointments to positions which actually hold responsibilities, like managing FEMA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096151</id>
	<title>Well....</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1243356780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well all I have to say is that if you get this czar near any 4chan people you will soon hear headlines of "Internet Czar Rickrolled", or "Internet Czar Looking at Goatse"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well all I have to say is that if you get this czar near any 4chan people you will soon hear headlines of " Internet Czar Rickrolled " , or " Internet Czar Looking at Goatse "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well all I have to say is that if you get this czar near any 4chan people you will soon hear headlines of "Internet Czar Rickrolled", or "Internet Czar Looking at Goatse"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095241</id>
	<title>Internet Censorship...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243353300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Queue the internet censorship in 3...2...1...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue the internet censorship in 3...2...1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue the internet censorship in 3...2...1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096571</id>
	<title>I thought they were trying to stop w/ the Czars?</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1243358460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought this administration was trying to stop using the term?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this administration was trying to stop using the term ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this administration was trying to stop using the term?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098365</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>sgt\_doom</author>
	<datestamp>1243365840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because of such wondrous appointments as: Geithner, Summers, Shapiro, Altman, et al.........</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because of such wondrous appointments as : Geithner , Summers , Shapiro , Altman , et al........ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because of such wondrous appointments as: Geithner, Summers, Shapiro, Altman, et al.........</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</id>
	<title>ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>ScooterComputer</author>
	<datestamp>1243353420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dammit these people in power in America piss me off. STOP USING THE TERM 'CZAR', 'TSAR', whatever! STOP STOP STOP.</p><p>I can't wait until a President is ready to march to Congress and appoint Der Fuehrer of Alternative Energy, which would prove that they have no clue what these titles mean to people around the world as well as citizens in our own country. I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.</p><p>The term 'Czar' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder. The term itself comes from Caesar, not exactly a bright point in Europe's history. There are better terms, and we as a Democratic people are more creative than this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit these people in power in America piss me off .
STOP USING THE TERM 'CZAR ' , 'TSAR ' , whatever !
STOP STOP STOP.I ca n't wait until a President is ready to march to Congress and appoint Der Fuehrer of Alternative Energy , which would prove that they have no clue what these titles mean to people around the world as well as citizens in our own country .
I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.The term 'Czar ' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder .
The term itself comes from Caesar , not exactly a bright point in Europe 's history .
There are better terms , and we as a Democratic people are more creative than this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit these people in power in America piss me off.
STOP USING THE TERM 'CZAR', 'TSAR', whatever!
STOP STOP STOP.I can't wait until a President is ready to march to Congress and appoint Der Fuehrer of Alternative Energy, which would prove that they have no clue what these titles mean to people around the world as well as citizens in our own country.
I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.The term 'Czar' relates to a despicable history of oppression and murder.
The term itself comes from Caesar, not exactly a bright point in Europe's history.
There are better terms, and we as a Democratic people are more creative than this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095303</id>
	<title>Cynics are expecting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243353600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... a <i>lawyer</i> from the RIAA?<br>
No, I expect he'll hire someone with actual internet experience, like a "private investigator" from MediaSentry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... a lawyer from the RIAA ?
No , I expect he 'll hire someone with actual internet experience , like a " private investigator " from MediaSentry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a lawyer from the RIAA?
No, I expect he'll hire someone with actual internet experience, like a "private investigator" from MediaSentry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098991</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Myrimos</author>
	<datestamp>1243368000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?  I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</p></div><p>Damn skippy you're awaiting a TP czar.  Hanging-end in front, bottom to top all the way!</p><p>(Except when it's particularly messy and you need to mop up. Then top to bottom is acceptable with written permission from your physician.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue ?
I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar , who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.Damn skippy you 're awaiting a TP czar .
Hanging-end in front , bottom to top all the way !
( Except when it 's particularly messy and you need to mop up .
Then top to bottom is acceptable with written permission from your physician .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?
I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.Damn skippy you're awaiting a TP czar.
Hanging-end in front, bottom to top all the way!
(Except when it's particularly messy and you need to mop up.
Then top to bottom is acceptable with written permission from your physician.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101223</id>
	<title>Re:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING "CZAR" TITLE!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243334220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.</p></div><p>Maybe he should; Those sound <i>awesome</i>!  Well, the second one sounds like an enemy of America, but you know.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.Maybe he should ; Those sound awesome !
Well , the second one sounds like an enemy of America , but you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt Obama would appoint an Imperial Wizard of Credit Debt or Grand Dragon of Terrorism.Maybe he should; Those sound awesome!
Well, the second one sounds like an enemy of America, but you know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094943</id>
	<title>Another Czar, Big Whoopteedoo</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1243352160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL! The real irony here is that pre-election, the Democrats were busy pointing out what a moron Bush was.<br>I'll take bets in this thread over how long it takes till Obama to land in a pile of dog crap and end up just as popular or less than Bush.<br>Oh No! It's the gambling czar saying I cant do that. Oh crap! wait, I can't do that either the feces czar says " all your crap are belong to us"<br>Well I guess little Obamas solution is to turn a bunch of czars loose on the citizens in whats supposed to be a free country.<br>He won't be missed when he is finally shamed out of the whitehouse as an incompetent pretender.<br>Now don't get the idea that I hold any love for Republicans either, at least they're openly crooked.<br>Until we start electing outside of this imaginary two party bullshit, we get the government we deserve. Wait a minute, I didn't vote for these screwups! I guess anyone who offends themselves with what I say deserves that kind of government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL !
The real irony here is that pre-election , the Democrats were busy pointing out what a moron Bush was.I 'll take bets in this thread over how long it takes till Obama to land in a pile of dog crap and end up just as popular or less than Bush.Oh No !
It 's the gambling czar saying I cant do that .
Oh crap !
wait , I ca n't do that either the feces czar says " all your crap are belong to us " Well I guess little Obamas solution is to turn a bunch of czars loose on the citizens in whats supposed to be a free country.He wo n't be missed when he is finally shamed out of the whitehouse as an incompetent pretender.Now do n't get the idea that I hold any love for Republicans either , at least they 're openly crooked.Until we start electing outside of this imaginary two party bullshit , we get the government we deserve .
Wait a minute , I did n't vote for these screwups !
I guess anyone who offends themselves with what I say deserves that kind of government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!
The real irony here is that pre-election, the Democrats were busy pointing out what a moron Bush was.I'll take bets in this thread over how long it takes till Obama to land in a pile of dog crap and end up just as popular or less than Bush.Oh No!
It's the gambling czar saying I cant do that.
Oh crap!
wait, I can't do that either the feces czar says " all your crap are belong to us"Well I guess little Obamas solution is to turn a bunch of czars loose on the citizens in whats supposed to be a free country.He won't be missed when he is finally shamed out of the whitehouse as an incompetent pretender.Now don't get the idea that I hold any love for Republicans either, at least they're openly crooked.Until we start electing outside of this imaginary two party bullshit, we get the government we deserve.
Wait a minute, I didn't vote for these screwups!
I guess anyone who offends themselves with what I say deserves that kind of government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095723</id>
	<title>The Bureaucracy is Expanding</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1243355160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy...</htmltext>
<tokenext>To meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094257</id>
	<title>Hacker CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243348920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm find with this as long as the government doesn't start sizing up security companies for consolidation/acquisition.</p><p>If conficker blows a gasket will white hat hackers get drafted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm find with this as long as the government does n't start sizing up security companies for consolidation/acquisition.If conficker blows a gasket will white hat hackers get drafted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm find with this as long as the government doesn't start sizing up security companies for consolidation/acquisition.If conficker blows a gasket will white hat hackers get drafted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094847</id>
	<title>We deserve a truly Great Leader for this</title>
	<author>hoarier</author>
	<datestamp>1243351800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is one man, and <em>only</em> one man, with the decisiveness, ruthlessness, all-round leadership quality, and refined taste in footwear needed for this post. I refer of course to that great, great <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jp-agp6RIAqb0GRXPBRy69VrKWmw" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">expert in matters internet</a> [google.com] [no, <em>AFP</em>], <strong>Kim Jong-Il</strong>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is one man , and only one man , with the decisiveness , ruthlessness , all-round leadership quality , and refined taste in footwear needed for this post .
I refer of course to that great , great expert in matters internet [ google.com ] [ no , AFP ] , Kim Jong-Il .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is one man, and only one man, with the decisiveness, ruthlessness, all-round leadership quality, and refined taste in footwear needed for this post.
I refer of course to that great, great expert in matters internet [google.com] [no, AFP], Kim Jong-Il.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095433</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1243354080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar</p></div><p>They can have my three-ply, quilted softness when they pull it out of my unwashed, dead hands!<br>
Seriously, TP is one of the few things I don't cheap-out on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper CzarThey can have my three-ply , quilted softness when they pull it out of my unwashed , dead hands !
Seriously , TP is one of the few things I do n't cheap-out on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper CzarThey can have my three-ply, quilted softness when they pull it out of my unwashed, dead hands!
Seriously, TP is one of the few things I don't cheap-out on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095895</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>jshackney</author>
	<datestamp>1243355820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it <i>untaxed</i>?</p></div><p>BINGO!!!</p><p>This Czar's job is to figure out how the government is going to get their piece of the pie. Don't be fooled into thinking otherwise.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it untaxed ? BINGO ! !
! This Czar 's job is to figure out how the government is going to get their piece of the pie .
Do n't be fooled into thinking otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps the concerns that all that internet commerce is happening with most of it untaxed?BINGO!!
!This Czar's job is to figure out how the government is going to get their piece of the pie.
Don't be fooled into thinking otherwise.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627</id>
	<title>!!democracy</title>
	<author>Arthur B.</author>
	<datestamp>1243350540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This *is* democracy. Democracy isn't a synonym of "good" and it doesn't imply a just or free society, it's not a poney filled land. Democracy is a political system and this is the result of such a system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This * is * democracy .
Democracy is n't a synonym of " good " and it does n't imply a just or free society , it 's not a poney filled land .
Democracy is a political system and this is the result of such a system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This *is* democracy.
Democracy isn't a synonym of "good" and it doesn't imply a just or free society, it's not a poney filled land.
Democracy is a political system and this is the result of such a system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095863</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1243355700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> <i>Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something, please God, anything else for a change, plz?</i> </b> <p>

Sounds good to me! How about he appoints an "Internet Guru" to the Cabinet! The position should be filled by a 15-year-old kid, or Wesley Crusher Wil Wheaton. =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something , please God , anything else for a change , plz ?
Sounds good to me !
How about he appoints an " Internet Guru " to the Cabinet !
The position should be filled by a 15-year-old kid , or Wesley Crusher Wil Wheaton .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Could we have a poobah or a caliph or sultan or something, please God, anything else for a change, plz?
Sounds good to me!
How about he appoints an "Internet Guru" to the Cabinet!
The position should be filled by a 15-year-old kid, or Wesley Crusher Wil Wheaton.
=)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095227</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>AceofSpades19</author>
	<datestamp>1243353300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the *AAs, but I'm not their enemy either.</p><p>Yes I'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s, but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.</p></div><p>Yes, I'm physically depriving someone of physical property when I download a song from the thepiratebay. I think the term you mean to say is copyright infringement.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue. Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists? Really...what are we f'in stupid.</p></div><p>the RIAA/MPAA exists long before the internet. I really think you should do some research before you post on this topic again</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the * AAs , but I 'm not their enemy either.Yes I 'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s , but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.Yes , I 'm physically depriving someone of physical property when I download a song from the thepiratebay .
I think the term you mean to say is copyright infringement.Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue .
Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists ?
Really...what are we f'in stupid.the RIAA/MPAA exists long before the internet .
I really think you should do some research before you post on this topic again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no fan of DRM or good friedns with the *AAs, but I'm not their enemy either.Yes I'd like the songs I buy on Apple to be MP3s, but downloading songs for free from thepiratebay is not protesting anymore it is just stealing.Yes, I'm physically depriving someone of physical property when I download a song from the thepiratebay.
I think the term you mean to say is copyright infringement.Honestly I think the powers that be have no f'in clue.
Really they just need to be told what to do...but instead we all go off and download crap illegally...and then wonder why the RIAA and MPAA exists?
Really...what are we f'in stupid.the RIAA/MPAA exists long before the internet.
I really think you should do some research before you post on this topic again
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098373</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243365900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dollars are powerful vote with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dollars are powerful vote with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dollars are powerful vote with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096163</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1243356840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and <b>economic concerns</b>, the sources said.</p></div><p>I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in?
</p></div><p>
I share a great deal of your cynicism.  I've seen the US Government make a fine mess of it's information security initiatives.  And I've witnesses beurocrats twist such initiatives and policy around until they do something entirely different than what they should be.  So I completely agree that the danger of this sort of thing is very real.  However, having said that, let's not get too carried away.  The full paragraph from the article reads:
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns, the sources said. It also indicates an effort to quell an internal political battle in which Lawrence H. Summers, the senior White House economic adviser, is pushing for the National Economic Council to have a key role in cybersecurity to ensure that efforts to protect private networks do not unduly threaten economic growth, the sources said.</p></div><p>
What we have is the standard inverse relationship between security and functionality; increase one, affect the other.  In this case, we're concerned with security policy vs. the cost of doing business / impacts on economic growth.  Any formal infosec requirement tends to induce a cost on businesses required to follow those requirements.  And believe me, the US Government does an excellent job at inducing costly requirements (second only to private industry's ability - which is impressive on it's own rights).
</p><p>
One of the most effective environments I've dealt with was a private enterprise that often pitted the security team against the business unit that wanted to do something.  Usually the two could come up with ways to handle most situations.  But there were times when the infosec group put forward their recommendations and the business unit wished to ignore them.  In those situations, both sides would make their case to upper management.  Infosec issues would be bounced against business concerns and if the business unit could demonstrate that there was sufficient business reasons to take on the risks the infosec team identified, they got their way.  It should be noted that this wasn't a common occurrence as most business unit managers weren't confident enough in their position to put their own reputation on the line to fight that fight.  But when it did occur, the risk and issues were well vetted.
</p><p>
What we have is the beginnings of a policy that makes sense and recognizes how things work in The Real World.  Whether it remains so or not is yet to be seen.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns , the sources said.I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in ?
I share a great deal of your cynicism .
I 've seen the US Government make a fine mess of it 's information security initiatives .
And I 've witnesses beurocrats twist such initiatives and policy around until they do something entirely different than what they should be .
So I completely agree that the danger of this sort of thing is very real .
However , having said that , let 's not get too carried away .
The full paragraph from the article reads : Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns , the sources said .
It also indicates an effort to quell an internal political battle in which Lawrence H. Summers , the senior White House economic adviser , is pushing for the National Economic Council to have a key role in cybersecurity to ensure that efforts to protect private networks do not unduly threaten economic growth , the sources said .
What we have is the standard inverse relationship between security and functionality ; increase one , affect the other .
In this case , we 're concerned with security policy vs. the cost of doing business / impacts on economic growth .
Any formal infosec requirement tends to induce a cost on businesses required to follow those requirements .
And believe me , the US Government does an excellent job at inducing costly requirements ( second only to private industry 's ability - which is impressive on it 's own rights ) .
One of the most effective environments I 've dealt with was a private enterprise that often pitted the security team against the business unit that wanted to do something .
Usually the two could come up with ways to handle most situations .
But there were times when the infosec group put forward their recommendations and the business unit wished to ignore them .
In those situations , both sides would make their case to upper management .
Infosec issues would be bounced against business concerns and if the business unit could demonstrate that there was sufficient business reasons to take on the risks the infosec team identified , they got their way .
It should be noted that this was n't a common occurrence as most business unit managers were n't confident enough in their position to put their own reputation on the line to fight that fight .
But when it did occur , the risk and issues were well vetted .
What we have is the beginnings of a policy that makes sense and recognizes how things work in The Real World .
Whether it remains so or not is yet to be seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns, the sources said.I am certain the economic concerns you speak of are only economic concerns of lobbyists when you should maybe be paying attention to what consumers are interested in?
I share a great deal of your cynicism.
I've seen the US Government make a fine mess of it's information security initiatives.
And I've witnesses beurocrats twist such initiatives and policy around until they do something entirely different than what they should be.
So I completely agree that the danger of this sort of thing is very real.
However, having said that, let's not get too carried away.
The full paragraph from the article reads:
Having the adviser report to both the national security and economic advisers suggests that the White House is seeking to ensure a balance between homeland security and economic concerns, the sources said.
It also indicates an effort to quell an internal political battle in which Lawrence H. Summers, the senior White House economic adviser, is pushing for the National Economic Council to have a key role in cybersecurity to ensure that efforts to protect private networks do not unduly threaten economic growth, the sources said.
What we have is the standard inverse relationship between security and functionality; increase one, affect the other.
In this case, we're concerned with security policy vs. the cost of doing business / impacts on economic growth.
Any formal infosec requirement tends to induce a cost on businesses required to follow those requirements.
And believe me, the US Government does an excellent job at inducing costly requirements (second only to private industry's ability - which is impressive on it's own rights).
One of the most effective environments I've dealt with was a private enterprise that often pitted the security team against the business unit that wanted to do something.
Usually the two could come up with ways to handle most situations.
But there were times when the infosec group put forward their recommendations and the business unit wished to ignore them.
In those situations, both sides would make their case to upper management.
Infosec issues would be bounced against business concerns and if the business unit could demonstrate that there was sufficient business reasons to take on the risks the infosec team identified, they got their way.
It should be noted that this wasn't a common occurrence as most business unit managers weren't confident enough in their position to put their own reputation on the line to fight that fight.
But when it did occur, the risk and issues were well vetted.
What we have is the beginnings of a policy that makes sense and recognizes how things work in The Real World.
Whether it remains so or not is yet to be seen.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095885</id>
	<title>Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>WheelDweller</author>
	<datestamp>1243355820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An economist and two other cabinet members who evaded paying taxes, a 'car czar' who knows nothing about cars, a 'banking czar' who knows nothing about banks, and the admission that "I don't know much about finance", and he appoints another guy who likely knows nothing to round us up here, on the net.</p><p>I would say he means "FieldMarschall" but those were the best-n-brightest Germany could offer.</p><p>Is anyone else aware that the "Bail Outs" are actually "Buy Outs" which permits the Federal Government to control things not in the Constitution?  We're in the midst of a coup.</p><p>But at least we'll have those sexy arms of Michelle's to watch as they crack the whip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An economist and two other cabinet members who evaded paying taxes , a 'car czar ' who knows nothing about cars , a 'banking czar ' who knows nothing about banks , and the admission that " I do n't know much about finance " , and he appoints another guy who likely knows nothing to round us up here , on the net.I would say he means " FieldMarschall " but those were the best-n-brightest Germany could offer.Is anyone else aware that the " Bail Outs " are actually " Buy Outs " which permits the Federal Government to control things not in the Constitution ?
We 're in the midst of a coup.But at least we 'll have those sexy arms of Michelle 's to watch as they crack the whip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An economist and two other cabinet members who evaded paying taxes, a 'car czar' who knows nothing about cars, a 'banking czar' who knows nothing about banks, and the admission that "I don't know much about finance", and he appoints another guy who likely knows nothing to round us up here, on the net.I would say he means "FieldMarschall" but those were the best-n-brightest Germany could offer.Is anyone else aware that the "Bail Outs" are actually "Buy Outs" which permits the Federal Government to control things not in the Constitution?
We're in the midst of a coup.But at least we'll have those sexy arms of Michelle's to watch as they crack the whip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094461</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1243349820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>10\% of his time you dealing with security issues? He will spend all of his time on security issues because everyone knows the biggest threat to America are the pirates of multimedia with their Limewire and BitTorrent. All of the people attempting to hack into the DoD, Bank of America and so forth come in a distant second so he will just ignore them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>10 \ % of his time you dealing with security issues ?
He will spend all of his time on security issues because everyone knows the biggest threat to America are the pirates of multimedia with their Limewire and BitTorrent .
All of the people attempting to hack into the DoD , Bank of America and so forth come in a distant second so he will just ignore them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10\% of his time you dealing with security issues?
He will spend all of his time on security issues because everyone knows the biggest threat to America are the pirates of multimedia with their Limewire and BitTorrent.
All of the people attempting to hack into the DoD, Bank of America and so forth come in a distant second so he will just ignore them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095929</id>
	<title>No more Czars!</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1243355940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously! The Czars PREDATE SOVIET RUSSIA! That's why they did the whole Bolshevik Revolution! So we can't even counteract this new rise in Czars with the whole "IN SOVIET RUSSIA" meme that's become so popular around here! What's a Slashdotter to do?!?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
The Czars PREDATE SOVIET RUSSIA !
That 's why they did the whole Bolshevik Revolution !
So we ca n't even counteract this new rise in Czars with the whole " IN SOVIET RUSSIA " meme that 's become so popular around here !
What 's a Slashdotter to do ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
The Czars PREDATE SOVIET RUSSIA!
That's why they did the whole Bolshevik Revolution!
So we can't even counteract this new rise in Czars with the whole "IN SOVIET RUSSIA" meme that's become so popular around here!
What's a Slashdotter to do?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101219</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1243334160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar for EVERY issue?"</p><p>Too much Czarist oppression gave rise to Bolshevism, giving the Czar and his parasite family exactly what they deserved...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar for EVERY issue ?
" Too much Czarist oppression gave rise to Bolshevism , giving the Czar and his parasite family exactly what they deserved.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar for EVERY issue?
"Too much Czarist oppression gave rise to Bolshevism, giving the Czar and his parasite family exactly what they deserved...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096591</id>
	<title>Re:Black Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243358580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excellent comment. One of my buddies, who was not black but was into the hip-hop culture, once told me that<p><div class="quote"><p>Niggas only believe in <b>one thing</b>, and that is <b>otha niggas</b>.</p> </div><p>I've never heard more true words. But you must admit that there is still plenty of mass-media race-baiting going on. For example, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pyW6w5B7Aw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">the Popeye's</a> [youtube.com] and <a href="http://eclipsemagazine.com/television/9445/" title="eclipsemagazine.com" rel="nofollow">KFC</a> [eclipsemagazine.com] chicken fiascoes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excellent comment .
One of my buddies , who was not black but was into the hip-hop culture , once told me thatNiggas only believe in one thing , and that is otha niggas .
I 've never heard more true words .
But you must admit that there is still plenty of mass-media race-baiting going on .
For example , the Popeye 's [ youtube.com ] and KFC [ eclipsemagazine.com ] chicken fiascoes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excellent comment.
One of my buddies, who was not black but was into the hip-hop culture, once told me thatNiggas only believe in one thing, and that is otha niggas.
I've never heard more true words.
But you must admit that there is still plenty of mass-media race-baiting going on.
For example, the Popeye's [youtube.com] and KFC [eclipsemagazine.com] chicken fiascoes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101265</id>
	<title>Re:!!democracy</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1243334460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One problem... we don't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic.</p></div><p>Actually, you live in both.</p><p>The United States of America is a federal <em>democratic</em> republic.</p><p>An example of another democratic republic is France.<br>An example of a non-democratic republic is Iran.<br>An example of a democratic non-republic is Canada.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One problem... we do n't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic.Actually , you live in both.The United States of America is a federal democratic republic.An example of another democratic republic is France.An example of a non-democratic republic is Iran.An example of a democratic non-republic is Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One problem... we don't live in a democracy... we live in a Constitutional Republic.Actually, you live in both.The United States of America is a federal democratic republic.An example of another democratic republic is France.An example of a non-democratic republic is Iran.An example of a democratic non-republic is Canada.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095051</id>
	<title>Oblig.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243352580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oi didn't vote for 'im!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oi did n't vote for 'im !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oi didn't vote for 'im!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100729</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>SlowMovingTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1243331820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I vote for "Cheese" to go with the French Idealist Socialism theme.</p><p>We would have a Big Drug Cheese, an Internet Cheese, the Auto Cheese...  Cue "giant melting pot" jokes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I vote for " Cheese " to go with the French Idealist Socialism theme.We would have a Big Drug Cheese , an Internet Cheese , the Auto Cheese... Cue " giant melting pot " jokes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I vote for "Cheese" to go with the French Idealist Socialism theme.We would have a Big Drug Cheese, an Internet Cheese, the Auto Cheese...  Cue "giant melting pot" jokes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941</id>
	<title>Black Racism Against Whites and Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243356000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.  See the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] by CNN.
<p>
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.  These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks.  Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority.  So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate.  Only about 65\% of them supported Obama.
</p><p>
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.  At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
</p><p>
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama due to the Democratic party (and its ideals) that he has supported.  That claim is an outright lie.  Look at the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#NCDEM" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.  Consider the case of North Carolina.  Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.  Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.  Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.  Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
</p><p>
Here is the bottom line.  Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.  He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
</p><p>
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.  Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.  Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.  Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.  You need not defend your actions in any way.  Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the election , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
See the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] by CNN .
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics , Asian-Americans , etc .
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks .
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority .
So , Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate .
Only about 65 \ % of them supported Obama .
If African-Americans were not racist , then at most 65 \ % of them would have supported Obama .
At that level of support , McCain would have won the presidential race .
At this point , African-American supremacists ( and apologists ) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama due to the Democratic party ( and its ideals ) that he has supported .
That claim is an outright lie .
Look at the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] for the Democratic primaries .
Consider the case of North Carolina .
Again , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton .
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats , and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical .
Yet , 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton .
Why ? African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
Here is the bottom line .
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America .
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans .
African-Americans have established that expressing " racial pride " by voting on the basis of skin color is 100 \ % acceptable .
Neither the " Wall Street Journal " nor the " New York Times " complained about this racist behavior .
Therefore , in future elections , please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color .
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American .
You need not defend your actions in any way .
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today 's moral values .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
See the exit-polling data [cnn.com] by CNN.
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks.
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority.
So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate.
Only about 65\% of them supported Obama.
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.
At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama due to the Democratic party (and its ideals) that he has supported.
That claim is an outright lie.
Look at the exit-polling data [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.
Consider the case of North Carolina.
Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.
Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.
Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
Here is the bottom line.
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.
Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.
Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.
You need not defend your actions in any way.
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096247</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243357140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, most definitely, it is necessary to have a czar!!  It gives politicians a warm fuzzy feeling to think that they are in control!!  What would this world be without warm fuzzies?  What would they have to brag about, without some nearly all-powerful talking head making up goals, benchmarks, and charts?  Oh PLEASE, allow us a few more czars!!  I think that the next czar should be "Schoolchildren's playground equipment czar".  This world is a nasty place for toddlers, and small children.  We really need a czar to make sure the children are safe on the playground!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , most definitely , it is necessary to have a czar ! !
It gives politicians a warm fuzzy feeling to think that they are in control ! !
What would this world be without warm fuzzies ?
What would they have to brag about , without some nearly all-powerful talking head making up goals , benchmarks , and charts ?
Oh PLEASE , allow us a few more czars ! !
I think that the next czar should be " Schoolchildren 's playground equipment czar " .
This world is a nasty place for toddlers , and small children .
We really need a czar to make sure the children are safe on the playground !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, most definitely, it is necessary to have a czar!!
It gives politicians a warm fuzzy feeling to think that they are in control!!
What would this world be without warm fuzzies?
What would they have to brag about, without some nearly all-powerful talking head making up goals, benchmarks, and charts?
Oh PLEASE, allow us a few more czars!!
I think that the next czar should be "Schoolchildren's playground equipment czar".
This world is a nasty place for toddlers, and small children.
We really need a czar to make sure the children are safe on the playground!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094587</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1243350420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone he nominates for that position would be in direct conflict of the directives of the locally-elected Czar of Toilet Paper, my wife.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone he nominates for that position would be in direct conflict of the directives of the locally-elected Czar of Toilet Paper , my wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone he nominates for that position would be in direct conflict of the directives of the locally-elected Czar of Toilet Paper, my wife.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098921</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Myrimos</author>
	<datestamp>1243367700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</p></div><p>Because you're a far seeing paradigm of statistical insight?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I suspect that this " czar " will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates , teenagers , and Youtube ? Because you 're a far seeing paradigm of statistical insight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?Because you're a far seeing paradigm of statistical insight?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095955</id>
	<title>New Idea!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1243356060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Make Lobbying illegal, punishable by death, and Create a "Czar" for the "People".<br>2) ???<br>3) Profit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Make Lobbying illegal , punishable by death , and Create a " Czar " for the " People " .2 ) ? ?
? 3 ) Profit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Make Lobbying illegal, punishable by death, and Create a "Czar" for the "People".2) ??
?3) Profit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097585</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243362720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can bet your bottom dollar that he will be a JEW, or at the very least, a shabbas-goy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can bet your bottom dollar that he will be a JEW , or at the very least , a shabbas-goy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can bet your bottom dollar that he will be a JEW, or at the very least, a shabbas-goy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</id>
	<title>WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243348860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?  I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue ?
I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar , who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really that necessary to appoint a czar fro EVERY issue?
I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094353</id>
	<title>Dick Cheney!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243349280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How 'bout Dick Cheney? Maybe he'll shut up again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 'bout Dick Cheney ?
Maybe he 'll shut up again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How 'bout Dick Cheney?
Maybe he'll shut up again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095491</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1243354380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dammit you beat me to it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit you beat me to it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit you beat me to it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096095</id>
	<title>I know it's political</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1243356600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But why would you appoint a lawyer to a position that clearly needs a person with a technical skillset, a technical background, in order to even <i>understand</i> the security issues and assess the implications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But why would you appoint a lawyer to a position that clearly needs a person with a technical skillset , a technical background , in order to even understand the security issues and assess the implications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But why would you appoint a lawyer to a position that clearly needs a person with a technical skillset, a technical background, in order to even understand the security issues and assess the implications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095235</id>
	<title>ah the internet czar</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1243353300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if i recall correctly, after the browser wars of the 1990s, the internet czar abdicated following the y2k debacle during which he and his family were imprisoned first in a cisco router at a server farm in virginia beach, then later in a backup tape at an ibm server facility in omaha, and finally at an iPod nano in spokane. The internet czar, his wife, his son, his four daughters, the family's medical doctor, the czar's valet, the empress' lady in waiting and the family's cook were all killed in the same disk partition by the internet bolsheviks on the night of the release of google's ajax mapping software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if i recall correctly , after the browser wars of the 1990s , the internet czar abdicated following the y2k debacle during which he and his family were imprisoned first in a cisco router at a server farm in virginia beach , then later in a backup tape at an ibm server facility in omaha , and finally at an iPod nano in spokane .
The internet czar , his wife , his son , his four daughters , the family 's medical doctor , the czar 's valet , the empress ' lady in waiting and the family 's cook were all killed in the same disk partition by the internet bolsheviks on the night of the release of google 's ajax mapping software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if i recall correctly, after the browser wars of the 1990s, the internet czar abdicated following the y2k debacle during which he and his family were imprisoned first in a cisco router at a server farm in virginia beach, then later in a backup tape at an ibm server facility in omaha, and finally at an iPod nano in spokane.
The internet czar, his wife, his son, his four daughters, the family's medical doctor, the czar's valet, the empress' lady in waiting and the family's cook were all killed in the same disk partition by the internet bolsheviks on the night of the release of google's ajax mapping software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094203</id>
	<title>AC appoints first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243348680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>eat my obama, you turd burglar!</htmltext>
<tokenext>eat my obama , you turd burglar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eat my obama, you turd burglar!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096071</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243356480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our new Internet czar overload.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new Internet czar overload .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new Internet czar overload.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097119</id>
	<title>Worse then cynicism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243360800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The purpose of appointing a Czar is to avoid all congressional oversight, both in the creation of the office and in the selection of the czar. Welcome to change<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Obama = Bush.2.0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The purpose of appointing a Czar is to avoid all congressional oversight , both in the creation of the office and in the selection of the czar .
Welcome to change ... Obama = Bush.2.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The purpose of appointing a Czar is to avoid all congressional oversight, both in the creation of the office and in the selection of the czar.
Welcome to change ... Obama = Bush.2.0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097155</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243360980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only we could say the same thing about the drug czar. I'm sure the thousands in jail on mandatory minimums would agree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only we could say the same thing about the drug czar .
I 'm sure the thousands in jail on mandatory minimums would agree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only we could say the same thing about the drug czar.
I'm sure the thousands in jail on mandatory minimums would agree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095815</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1243355520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> <i>I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</i> </b> <p>

Government already has this job. It's officially called, "Director of the Internal Revenue Service."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar , who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe .
Government already has this job .
It 's officially called , " Director of the Internal Revenue Service .
" ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.
Government already has this job.
It's officially called, "Director of the Internal Revenue Service.
" ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096479</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>thtrgremlin</author>
	<datestamp>1243358160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what you are saying is that a repeal of the 9th and 10th amendments to The Constitution wasn't such a great idea after all?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you are saying is that a repeal of the 9th and 10th amendments to The Constitution was n't such a great idea after all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you are saying is that a repeal of the 9th and 10th amendments to The Constitution wasn't such a great idea after all?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099171</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243368660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CZAR CZAR love Ani!! YAY!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CZAR CZAR love Ani ! !
YAY ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CZAR CZAR love Ani!!
YAY!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095347</id>
	<title>"democracy is the worst form of government</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1243353720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>except for all the other forms of government which have been tried"</p><p>-winston churchill, badly paraphrased</p><p>it does no good to point out the flaws of democracy, simply because for every flaw democracy has, any other government system you can show me has those same flaws, but more and worse... or not the same flaws, but much more horrible flaws</p><p>so what is your point? the probative value of your criticism of democracy is zero without the ability to describe a superior system</p><p>democracy sucks. and yet it is still better than any other governmental system out there (including and especially the absence of a governmental system)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>except for all the other forms of government which have been tried " -winston churchill , badly paraphrasedit does no good to point out the flaws of democracy , simply because for every flaw democracy has , any other government system you can show me has those same flaws , but more and worse... or not the same flaws , but much more horrible flawsso what is your point ?
the probative value of your criticism of democracy is zero without the ability to describe a superior systemdemocracy sucks .
and yet it is still better than any other governmental system out there ( including and especially the absence of a governmental system )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>except for all the other forms of government which have been tried"-winston churchill, badly paraphrasedit does no good to point out the flaws of democracy, simply because for every flaw democracy has, any other government system you can show me has those same flaws, but more and worse... or not the same flaws, but much more horrible flawsso what is your point?
the probative value of your criticism of democracy is zero without the ability to describe a superior systemdemocracy sucks.
and yet it is still better than any other governmental system out there (including and especially the absence of a governmental system)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094473</id>
	<title>Already seen this!</title>
	<author>Alfius</author>
	<datestamp>1243349820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't there an XKCD about this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there an XKCD about this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there an XKCD about this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094427</id>
	<title>XKCD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243349640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://xkcd.com/494/<br>through<br>http://xkcd.com/498/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/494/throughhttp : //xkcd.com/498/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/494/throughhttp://xkcd.com/498/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1243350060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.</p></div><p>Nah, I like the idea I heard in another article.  We need a Czar Czar to coordinate the activities of all of the Czar's that we are appointing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar , who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.Nah , I like the idea I heard in another article .
We need a Czar Czar to coordinate the activities of all of the Czar 's that we are appointing ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the Toilet Paper Czar, who will coordinate government efforts to regulate both the orientation of the roll in the holder as well as the direction of wipe.Nah, I like the idea I heard in another article.
We need a Czar Czar to coordinate the activities of all of the Czar's that we are appointing ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096357</id>
	<title>Re:Freudian slip?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1243357620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one was more anti-communism than the Russian Royalty.  They weren't as successful as the U.S. in their dealings with communists, but I'll bet they hated them more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No one was more anti-communism than the Russian Royalty .
They were n't as successful as the U.S. in their dealings with communists , but I 'll bet they hated them more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one was more anti-communism than the Russian Royalty.
They weren't as successful as the U.S. in their dealings with communists, but I'll bet they hated them more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097029</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"  Keeping score!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243360440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So as I count them...</p><p>The Romanov Dynasty: 15 Czars (Peter I - Nicholas II)</p><p>The Obama Administration: 15 Czars (Border Czar, Climate Czar, Cyberspace Czar, Copyright Czar, Climate Czar, Car Czar, Drug Czar, Energy Czar, Education Czar, Economic Czar, Health Care Czar, Housing Czar, Mortgage Czar, Technology Czar, WMD Czar)</p><p>I may have missed some in either category, but I'm still betting Obama will wind up with more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So as I count them...The Romanov Dynasty : 15 Czars ( Peter I - Nicholas II ) The Obama Administration : 15 Czars ( Border Czar , Climate Czar , Cyberspace Czar , Copyright Czar , Climate Czar , Car Czar , Drug Czar , Energy Czar , Education Czar , Economic Czar , Health Care Czar , Housing Czar , Mortgage Czar , Technology Czar , WMD Czar ) I may have missed some in either category , but I 'm still betting Obama will wind up with more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So as I count them...The Romanov Dynasty: 15 Czars (Peter I - Nicholas II)The Obama Administration: 15 Czars (Border Czar, Climate Czar, Cyberspace Czar, Copyright Czar, Climate Czar, Car Czar, Drug Czar, Energy Czar, Education Czar, Economic Czar, Health Care Czar, Housing Czar, Mortgage Czar, Technology Czar, WMD Czar)I may have missed some in either category, but I'm still betting Obama will wind up with more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</id>
	<title>I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243348740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I suspect that this " czar " will spend about 10 \ % of his time dealing with security issues and 90 \ % of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates , teenagers , and Youtube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I suspect that this "czar" will spend about 10\% of his time dealing with security issues and 90\% of his time finding ways to help big media companies protect their IP from evil pirates, teenagers, and Youtube?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095751</id>
	<title>Re:WTF "Czars"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243355280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One Czar to rule them all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One Czar to rule them all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One Czar to rule them all!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094623</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243350540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The advantage of a Czar is that it's much more fun to overthrow them than a king. Just ask Lenin.<br> <br>

I think in this case the parallels with the excess and oppression of imperial Czars, and the ruling of the Internet, will be quite apt.<br> <br>

Of course it's just as likely that this new Czar will be just as effective as other previous government Czars. The Drugs Czar for example. Since being appointed in 1982 we can congratulate the holders of that office as having done a great job. There is now no drug problem whatsoever, as everyone knows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The advantage of a Czar is that it 's much more fun to overthrow them than a king .
Just ask Lenin .
I think in this case the parallels with the excess and oppression of imperial Czars , and the ruling of the Internet , will be quite apt .
Of course it 's just as likely that this new Czar will be just as effective as other previous government Czars .
The Drugs Czar for example .
Since being appointed in 1982 we can congratulate the holders of that office as having done a great job .
There is now no drug problem whatsoever , as everyone knows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The advantage of a Czar is that it's much more fun to overthrow them than a king.
Just ask Lenin.
I think in this case the parallels with the excess and oppression of imperial Czars, and the ruling of the Internet, will be quite apt.
Of course it's just as likely that this new Czar will be just as effective as other previous government Czars.
The Drugs Czar for example.
Since being appointed in 1982 we can congratulate the holders of that office as having done a great job.
There is now no drug problem whatsoever, as everyone knows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094669</id>
	<title>Re:More Cynicism</title>
	<author>sesshomaru</author>
	<datestamp>1243350720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, you know, the previous administration was one of the most corrupt in history, but someone should've told Obama it's not a <i>corruption contest</i> and he doesn't need to try to <i>win</i> it by being <i>more corrupt.</i></p><p>Oh well, I guess it's too late for that now... he's decided which side his bread is buttered on.</p><p>As to me, I have to decide in 4 years whether to vote 3rd party, write in Dr. Phineas Waldorf Steel, or stay home and catch up on my reality-TV watching (um... I mean book reading.... that's the ticket)?  Decisions, decisions...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , you know , the previous administration was one of the most corrupt in history , but someone should 've told Obama it 's not a corruption contest and he does n't need to try to win it by being more corrupt.Oh well , I guess it 's too late for that now... he 's decided which side his bread is buttered on.As to me , I have to decide in 4 years whether to vote 3rd party , write in Dr. Phineas Waldorf Steel , or stay home and catch up on my reality-TV watching ( um... I mean book reading.... that 's the ticket ) ?
Decisions , decisions.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, you know, the previous administration was one of the most corrupt in history, but someone should've told Obama it's not a corruption contest and he doesn't need to try to win it by being more corrupt.Oh well, I guess it's too late for that now... he's decided which side his bread is buttered on.As to me, I have to decide in 4 years whether to vote 3rd party, write in Dr. Phineas Waldorf Steel, or stay home and catch up on my reality-TV watching (um... I mean book reading.... that's the ticket)?
Decisions, decisions...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095579</id>
	<title>Maybe...</title>
	<author>afxgrin</author>
	<datestamp>1243354740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... we should become cyber Bolsheviks.</p><p>Hah - with Slashdot being the popular front, and our leader - the great Commander Taco.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... we should become cyber Bolsheviks.Hah - with Slashdot being the popular front , and our leader - the great Commander Taco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... we should become cyber Bolsheviks.Hah - with Slashdot being the popular front, and our leader - the great Commander Taco.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100487</id>
	<title>Re:I have a funny feeling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243330860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's in the best case scenario.  This move effectively removes freedom of speech.  He and Obama ALONE will directly control the integrity and uptime of the root zone DNS records.</p><p>http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdf</p><p>He will have the ability to shut down any site at any time.  I will assume that foxnews.com and rushlimbaugh.com would be first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's in the best case scenario .
This move effectively removes freedom of speech .
He and Obama ALONE will directly control the integrity and uptime of the root zone DNS records.http : //cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdfHe will have the ability to shut down any site at any time .
I will assume that foxnews.com and rushlimbaugh.com would be first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's in the best case scenario.
This move effectively removes freedom of speech.
He and Obama ALONE will directly control the integrity and uptime of the root zone DNS records.http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdfHe will have the ability to shut down any site at any time.
I will assume that foxnews.com and rushlimbaugh.com would be first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098975</id>
	<title>Re:I'm really sick to death of Czars</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1243367880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, they all worked in the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation?</p><p>In any case, I'm sure they had some cult of Genuine People Personality<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , they all worked in the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation ? In any case , I 'm sure they had some cult of Genuine People Personality ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, they all worked in the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation?In any case, I'm sure they had some cult of Genuine People Personality ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095995</id>
	<title>Because...</title>
	<author>Artifex33</author>
	<datestamp>1243356180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really need one more bureaucrat controlling my life. Rebranding them Czars must have played well in focus groups.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really need one more bureaucrat controlling my life .
Rebranding them Czars must have played well in focus groups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really need one more bureaucrat controlling my life.
Rebranding them Czars must have played well in focus groups.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096477</id>
	<title>mo3 up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243358160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Apple ttO. No,</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple ttO .
No , [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple ttO.
No, [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28103705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28108101
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28102847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_26_138221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094427
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095241
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28103705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101223
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095553
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095941
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096591
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096425
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095227
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094623
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28102847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099807
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28100729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094943
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28097029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095491
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095341
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28098963
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28099171
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095751
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28101219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28108101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28094515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28095929
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096095
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_26_138221.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_26_138221.28096133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
