<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_31_1233210</id>
	<title>Sex.com is Going Down</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1270039860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>nathanielinbrazil writes <i>"A motion to <a href="http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5509808-sex-maybe-going-bankrupt">dismiss the involuntary bankruptcy of Sex.com</a> has been filed  in a California court. Operational turmoil has put its owner in the doghouse with its creditors, who want to take over. 'It's the best domain in the world by far,' said Mike Mann, who has tried to keep the creditors at bay. Sex.com is estimated to be worth $100m. Let the games begin!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nathanielinbrazil writes " A motion to dismiss the involuntary bankruptcy of Sex.com has been filed in a California court .
Operational turmoil has put its owner in the doghouse with its creditors , who want to take over .
'It 's the best domain in the world by far, ' said Mike Mann , who has tried to keep the creditors at bay .
Sex.com is estimated to be worth $ 100m .
Let the games begin !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nathanielinbrazil writes "A motion to dismiss the involuntary bankruptcy of Sex.com has been filed  in a California court.
Operational turmoil has put its owner in the doghouse with its creditors, who want to take over.
'It's the best domain in the world by far,' said Mike Mann, who has tried to keep the creditors at bay.
Sex.com is estimated to be worth $100m.
Let the games begin!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686536</id>
	<title>Re:I don't go there</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1270045620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a Marketing class, and find out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a Marketing class , and find out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a Marketing class, and find out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31689472</id>
	<title>Just $100m ?</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1270057740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Are they insane?
</p><p>
Sex.com is worth billions A bid for $100 million would be sort of a joke, an insult.</p><p>
When you consider the number of visitors who will go there just due to the name, now, and the exponentially growing number of people who will visit the domain at times in the future (due to the increasing internet population)...
</p><p>
Not to mention the branding opportunities.
</p><p>
Although, I suppose at the end of the day, it can only be sold for as much as someone is actually willing to pay for it, regardless of its actual intrinsic value.
</p><p>
Its owner must've done something pretty bad if they went bankrupt while holding such a prized jewel though....
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they insane ?
Sex.com is worth billions A bid for $ 100 million would be sort of a joke , an insult .
When you consider the number of visitors who will go there just due to the name , now , and the exponentially growing number of people who will visit the domain at times in the future ( due to the increasing internet population ) .. . Not to mention the branding opportunities .
Although , I suppose at the end of the day , it can only be sold for as much as someone is actually willing to pay for it , regardless of its actual intrinsic value .
Its owner must 've done something pretty bad if they went bankrupt while holding such a prized jewel though... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Are they insane?
Sex.com is worth billions A bid for $100 million would be sort of a joke, an insult.
When you consider the number of visitors who will go there just due to the name, now, and the exponentially growing number of people who will visit the domain at times in the future (due to the increasing internet population)...

Not to mention the branding opportunities.
Although, I suppose at the end of the day, it can only be sold for as much as someone is actually willing to pay for it, regardless of its actual intrinsic value.
Its owner must've done something pretty bad if they went bankrupt while holding such a prized jewel though....
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687414</id>
	<title>Glen Quagmire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Giggity...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Giggity.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giggity...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690442</id>
	<title>Re:Thought that domain name hype was over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270061880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>.... 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!)</p></div><p>you dont say</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.... 'pornhub.com ' ( NSFW !
) you dont say</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!
)you dont say
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686942</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, I think they haven't been going down enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , I think they have n't been going down enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, I think they haven't been going down enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687046</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with sex.com: About 10 years ago, the domain name got transfered owner under "suspicious circumstances", which resulted in a lawsuit, which resulted in an injunction from the name from being used. The legal battle has raged on since (which is why if you go to sex.com you see it pretty much parked).</p><p>It's not that the name is worthless - it's that there's pretty much no content at the site, the legal battle is not over, and the owner has run out of money, which is why creditors want to take it over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with sex.com : About 10 years ago , the domain name got transfered owner under " suspicious circumstances " , which resulted in a lawsuit , which resulted in an injunction from the name from being used .
The legal battle has raged on since ( which is why if you go to sex.com you see it pretty much parked ) .It 's not that the name is worthless - it 's that there 's pretty much no content at the site , the legal battle is not over , and the owner has run out of money , which is why creditors want to take it over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with sex.com: About 10 years ago, the domain name got transfered owner under "suspicious circumstances", which resulted in a lawsuit, which resulted in an injunction from the name from being used.
The legal battle has raged on since (which is why if you go to sex.com you see it pretty much parked).It's not that the name is worthless - it's that there's pretty much no content at the site, the legal battle is not over, and the owner has run out of money, which is why creditors want to take it over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182</id>
	<title>Um</title>
	<author>jav1231</author>
	<datestamp>1270043640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy ?
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy?
:p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686512</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270045500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better question is why can't he get debtor in possession financing.  What is needed in a situation like this is a pool of outside investors and a manager to "fix" the business issues and buy out the unsecured creditors at a discount, and move forward.  porn is not going away any time soon, although the revenue model is changing and may be too difficult for anyone to manage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better question is why ca n't he get debtor in possession financing .
What is needed in a situation like this is a pool of outside investors and a manager to " fix " the business issues and buy out the unsecured creditors at a discount , and move forward .
porn is not going away any time soon , although the revenue model is changing and may be too difficult for anyone to manage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better question is why can't he get debtor in possession financing.
What is needed in a situation like this is a pool of outside investors and a manager to "fix" the business issues and buy out the unsecured creditors at a discount, and move forward.
porn is not going away any time soon, although the revenue model is changing and may be too difficult for anyone to manage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31691052</id>
	<title>If the domain was worth 100m</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1270064100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He wouldn't be having financial troubles.</p><p>The day of overpriced domain names is over.  The good names are known, the ones that could have been good but were fucked up by douchebags squatting on them are long gone as they've already been ruined, people know to go elsewhere.</p><p>When you can go to Google, search for 'free porn' and get back www.pornhub.com as the first link, sex.com doesn't have a chance nor does it have any value, people looking for things it might have know its worthless to them and go elsewhere.</p><p>It'd take years to rebuild the brand with that domain.</p><p>Its value is nil, which is exactly why his business has failed.  He ruined the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He would n't be having financial troubles.The day of overpriced domain names is over .
The good names are known , the ones that could have been good but were fucked up by douchebags squatting on them are long gone as they 've already been ruined , people know to go elsewhere.When you can go to Google , search for 'free porn ' and get back www.pornhub.com as the first link , sex.com does n't have a chance nor does it have any value , people looking for things it might have know its worthless to them and go elsewhere.It 'd take years to rebuild the brand with that domain.Its value is nil , which is exactly why his business has failed .
He ruined the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wouldn't be having financial troubles.The day of overpriced domain names is over.
The good names are known, the ones that could have been good but were fucked up by douchebags squatting on them are long gone as they've already been ruined, people know to go elsewhere.When you can go to Google, search for 'free porn' and get back www.pornhub.com as the first link, sex.com doesn't have a chance nor does it have any value, people looking for things it might have know its worthless to them and go elsewhere.It'd take years to rebuild the brand with that domain.Its value is nil, which is exactly why his business has failed.
He ruined the name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686334</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>AndGodSed</author>
	<datestamp>1270044480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess they're screwed then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they 're screwed then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they're screwed then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690228</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>Lando</author>
	<datestamp>1270060860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Website outlook gives a value of around 62k USD <a href="http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.sex.com" title="websiteoutlook.com">http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.sex.com</a> [websiteoutlook.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Website outlook gives a value of around 62k USD http : //www.websiteoutlook.com/www.sex.com [ websiteoutlook.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Website outlook gives a value of around 62k USD http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.sex.com [websiteoutlook.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686200</id>
	<title>$100,000,000 ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270043820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmm, well - to my N-th generation offspring ( N &gt; 3 ), "terraformation.com" is going to be worth a lot more than that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , well - to my N-th generation offspring ( N &gt; 3 ) , " terraformation.com " is going to be worth a lot more than that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, well - to my N-th generation offspring ( N &gt; 3 ), "terraformation.com" is going to be worth a lot more than that...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686218</id>
	<title>Let it begin! Let it begin!</title>
	<author>Moryath</author>
	<datestamp>1270043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Let the games begin!</i></p><p>Let the jokes begin - starting with the article's <i>double entendre</i> headline! This should be more fun than the naming of Nintendo's Weewee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let the games begin ! Let the jokes begin - starting with the article 's double entendre headline !
This should be more fun than the naming of Nintendo 's Weewee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let the games begin!Let the jokes begin - starting with the article's double entendre headline!
This should be more fun than the naming of Nintendo's Weewee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686294</id>
	<title>The most common strategy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270044300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just like pizza.com, I bet a lot more people search google for sex than try sex.com...  I mean, strictly hypothetically speaking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like pizza.com , I bet a lot more people search google for sex than try sex.com... I mean , strictly hypothetically speaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like pizza.com, I bet a lot more people search google for sex than try sex.com...  I mean, strictly hypothetically speaking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690394</id>
	<title>On who?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1270061640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And is there 3. $$$$ profit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And is there 3 .
$ $ $ $ profit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And is there 3.
$$$$ profit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688092</id>
	<title>Bungle</title>
	<author>Archon-X</author>
	<datestamp>1270051800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This domain has been bungled every single time someone has owned it.<br>Either<br>a) corporate types get hold of if, and having no clue about the adult industry, make it a banner farm, or<br>b) Shady types get it and use it to suck Capital Investors dry.</p><p>Meanwhile on the rest of the internet, the pornographers are making more money of standard domains than one could ever hope to off sex.com<br>How do you make bank off 100M in a 5 year plan?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This domain has been bungled every single time someone has owned it.Eithera ) corporate types get hold of if , and having no clue about the adult industry , make it a banner farm , orb ) Shady types get it and use it to suck Capital Investors dry.Meanwhile on the rest of the internet , the pornographers are making more money of standard domains than one could ever hope to off sex.comHow do you make bank off 100M in a 5 year plan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This domain has been bungled every single time someone has owned it.Eithera) corporate types get hold of if, and having no clue about the adult industry, make it a banner farm, orb) Shady types get it and use it to suck Capital Investors dry.Meanwhile on the rest of the internet, the pornographers are making more money of standard domains than one could ever hope to off sex.comHow do you make bank off 100M in a 5 year plan?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31692594</id>
	<title>Re:Thought that domain name hype was over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270026840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Surely we've moved on from this?<br>Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days?<br>For example, I just typed 'sex' into my browser address line, (Firefox and with Google default search), and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!)</p></div><p>Don't worry if you're at work, pornhub.com is currently being slashdotted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely we 've moved on from this ? Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days ? For example , I just typed 'sex ' into my browser address line , ( Firefox and with Google default search ) , and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com ' ( NSFW !
) Do n't worry if you 're at work , pornhub.com is currently being slashdotted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely we've moved on from this?Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days?For example, I just typed 'sex' into my browser address line, (Firefox and with Google default search), and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!
)Don't worry if you're at work, pornhub.com is currently being slashdotted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686412</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1270045020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd think you could make very good money by just selling advertising space on sex.com.  Or running just about any kind of business whose target market has a smutty sense of humor.  For example, start selling discounted college textbooks from a site called sex.com, throw in some gender-selectable eye candy, and students across North America will beat (off) a path to your door.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd think you could make very good money by just selling advertising space on sex.com .
Or running just about any kind of business whose target market has a smutty sense of humor .
For example , start selling discounted college textbooks from a site called sex.com , throw in some gender-selectable eye candy , and students across North America will beat ( off ) a path to your door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd think you could make very good money by just selling advertising space on sex.com.
Or running just about any kind of business whose target market has a smutty sense of humor.
For example, start selling discounted college textbooks from a site called sex.com, throw in some gender-selectable eye candy, and students across North America will beat (off) a path to your door.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31703096</id>
	<title>Why hasn't it been sold?</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1270117740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe it's so valuable and he rather just lose it and everything else he owns rather than sell it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe it 's so valuable and he rather just lose it and everything else he owns rather than sell it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe it's so valuable and he rather just lose it and everything else he owns rather than sell it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402</id>
	<title>I don't go there</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1270044960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone out there who actually makes it a habit to go to sex.com?  Frankly I've never heard of them since the big sale however many years ago that was.  And who goes to business.com?  Sure, they're generic keywords with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com behind them, but honestly where's the value in a name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone out there who actually makes it a habit to go to sex.com ?
Frankly I 've never heard of them since the big sale however many years ago that was .
And who goes to business.com ?
Sure , they 're generic keywords with .com behind them , but honestly where 's the value in a name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone out there who actually makes it a habit to go to sex.com?
Frankly I've never heard of them since the big sale however many years ago that was.
And who goes to business.com?
Sure, they're generic keywords with .com behind them, but honestly where's the value in a name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686268</id>
	<title>the best domain in the world?</title>
	<author>Virtucon</author>
	<datestamp>1270044120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about google.com?  microsoft.com?</p><p>I'd point out that those sites have made substantially more money for their owners than sex.com.  Just reading the stories about this domain, the theft, the international intrigue it makes me think it's the most nefarious domain on the network, but hardly the best one.  It reminds me of the story of "the monkey's paw" and unfortunately that was fiction, this is reality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about google.com ?
microsoft.com ? I 'd point out that those sites have made substantially more money for their owners than sex.com .
Just reading the stories about this domain , the theft , the international intrigue it makes me think it 's the most nefarious domain on the network , but hardly the best one .
It reminds me of the story of " the monkey 's paw " and unfortunately that was fiction , this is reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about google.com?
microsoft.com?I'd point out that those sites have made substantially more money for their owners than sex.com.
Just reading the stories about this domain, the theft, the international intrigue it makes me think it's the most nefarious domain on the network, but hardly the best one.
It reminds me of the story of "the monkey's paw" and unfortunately that was fiction, this is reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686506</id>
	<title>Re:I don't go there</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1270045440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For that matter are there *any* generic keyword domains that have any use whatsoever?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For that matter are there * any * generic keyword domains that have any use whatsoever ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For that matter are there *any* generic keyword domains that have any use whatsoever?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688338</id>
	<title>Re:I don't go there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>weather.com is a decent weather site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>weather.com is a decent weather site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>weather.com is a decent weather site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686406</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>Nesman64</author>
	<datestamp>1270044960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing seems to be worth its value anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing seems to be worth its value anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing seems to be worth its value anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687080</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Untrue, now in the US, health insurance is no longer bound by that rule, since we have to buy it regardless of price.</p><p>I really hope that gets struck down in court, mandating liability insurance is one thing (I can simply not drive on public roads), but this is just a terrible law. Not saying that what we had worked, but forcing people to buy something is just wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Untrue , now in the US , health insurance is no longer bound by that rule , since we have to buy it regardless of price.I really hope that gets struck down in court , mandating liability insurance is one thing ( I can simply not drive on public roads ) , but this is just a terrible law .
Not saying that what we had worked , but forcing people to buy something is just wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Untrue, now in the US, health insurance is no longer bound by that rule, since we have to buy it regardless of price.I really hope that gets struck down in court, mandating liability insurance is one thing (I can simply not drive on public roads), but this is just a terrible law.
Not saying that what we had worked, but forcing people to buy something is just wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690028</id>
	<title>Ok, but what we want to know is...</title>
	<author>JockTroll</author>
	<datestamp>1270060140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... On whom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... On whom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... On whom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</id>
	<title>Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>thsoundman</author>
	<datestamp>1270043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the domain is "so valuble" then why can't he sell it?  Who the hell values these things?  Granted it's a much clamored for domain but seriously... somthing is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it.  If no one is willing to pay for the domain it's not worth 100 million.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the domain is " so valuble " then why ca n't he sell it ?
Who the hell values these things ?
Granted it 's a much clamored for domain but seriously... somthing is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it .
If no one is willing to pay for the domain it 's not worth 100 million .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the domain is "so valuble" then why can't he sell it?
Who the hell values these things?
Granted it's a much clamored for domain but seriously... somthing is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it.
If no one is willing to pay for the domain it's not worth 100 million.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686626</id>
	<title>Re:It might have been valuable back in 1998 or so</title>
	<author>De Lemming</author>
	<datestamp>1270046100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And even typing "sex" in the url bar won't bring you to sex.com.  By default, IE will do a Bing search, Chrome will do a Google search, and Firefox will simply try to connect to the "sex" domain, which will fail (unless you have a web server named sex on your internal network).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And even typing " sex " in the url bar wo n't bring you to sex.com .
By default , IE will do a Bing search , Chrome will do a Google search , and Firefox will simply try to connect to the " sex " domain , which will fail ( unless you have a web server named sex on your internal network ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And even typing "sex" in the url bar won't bring you to sex.com.
By default, IE will do a Bing search, Chrome will do a Google search, and Firefox will simply try to connect to the "sex" domain, which will fail (unless you have a web server named sex on your internal network).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687138</id>
	<title>Re:Not worth that much i guess</title>
	<author>nathanielinbrazil</author>
	<datestamp>1270048380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand that the only way a bankruptcy court would be involved is because another court had entered the fray. I suspect that another court had granted one of the lenders the right to auction off the SITE, including the domain name. It was scheduled and DOM files the Motion to Dismiss claiming he had both domestic and international bidders on a date certain. Whether or not the price makes sense, he will be compelled to demonstrate to the court that he indeed did have those potential buyers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand that the only way a bankruptcy court would be involved is because another court had entered the fray .
I suspect that another court had granted one of the lenders the right to auction off the SITE , including the domain name .
It was scheduled and DOM files the Motion to Dismiss claiming he had both domestic and international bidders on a date certain .
Whether or not the price makes sense , he will be compelled to demonstrate to the court that he indeed did have those potential buyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand that the only way a bankruptcy court would be involved is because another court had entered the fray.
I suspect that another court had granted one of the lenders the right to auction off the SITE, including the domain name.
It was scheduled and DOM files the Motion to Dismiss claiming he had both domestic and international bidders on a date certain.
Whether or not the price makes sense, he will be compelled to demonstrate to the court that he indeed did have those potential buyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690260</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1270061040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pics or it didn't happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pics or it did n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pics or it didn't happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686214</id>
	<title>One owner survived an assassination attempt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or I vaguely remember reading that somewhere.</p><p>Sex kills.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or I vaguely remember reading that somewhere.Sex kills .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or I vaguely remember reading that somewhere.Sex kills.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688846</id>
	<title>Search.com</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1270055040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>search.com &gt; google.com<br>video.com &gt; hulu.com and youtube.com<br>shopping.com &gt; amazon.com</p><p>Honestly, having a common dictionary word as your domain name was assumed to be the key to internet success in the mid 90's, but haven't we moved on since then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>search.com &gt; google.comvideo.com &gt; hulu.com and youtube.comshopping.com &gt; amazon.comHonestly , having a common dictionary word as your domain name was assumed to be the key to internet success in the mid 90 's , but have n't we moved on since then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>search.com &gt; google.comvideo.com &gt; hulu.com and youtube.comshopping.com &gt; amazon.comHonestly, having a common dictionary word as your domain name was assumed to be the key to internet success in the mid 90's, but haven't we moved on since then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690554</id>
	<title>Re:It might have been valuable back in 1998 or so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270062240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who don't know the difference between the URL field and the search field.</p></div><p>The obvious answer to this is to do what Chrome did and just merge the two. Of course this further devalues domain names like the one in question because people actually have to type the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com part to avoid the browser interpreting it as a search.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who do n't know the difference between the URL field and the search field.The obvious answer to this is to do what Chrome did and just merge the two .
Of course this further devalues domain names like the one in question because people actually have to type the .com part to avoid the browser interpreting it as a search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who don't know the difference between the URL field and the search field.The obvious answer to this is to do what Chrome did and just merge the two.
Of course this further devalues domain names like the one in question because people actually have to type the .com part to avoid the browser interpreting it as a search.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398</id>
	<title>Thought that domain name hype was over</title>
	<author>Bearhouse</author>
	<datestamp>1270044900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely we've moved on from this?<br>Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days?<br>For example, I just typed 'sex' into my browser address line, (Firefox and with Google default search), and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely we 've moved on from this ? Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days ? For example , I just typed 'sex ' into my browser address line , ( Firefox and with Google default search ) , and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com ' ( NSFW !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely we've moved on from this?Is not getting a high ranking in search engine responses more important these days?For example, I just typed 'sex' into my browser address line, (Firefox and with Google default search), and it took me straight to 'pornhub.com' (NSFW!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686360</id>
	<title>rubbing peters to pay paul</title>
	<author>forgot\_my\_username</author>
	<datestamp>1270044720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most interesting part of the article is where Mike Mann, the guy who runs sex.com, said that he wanted to give all the proceeds to charity!<br>
<br>
I know that there is a great joke there... but my brain is still in shock<br>
<br>
<br>
--------<br>
No one can do everything perfectly; mistakes happen. But we&rsquo;re assassins: when we make mistakes, people live</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most interesting part of the article is where Mike Mann , the guy who runs sex.com , said that he wanted to give all the proceeds to charity !
I know that there is a great joke there... but my brain is still in shock -------- No one can do everything perfectly ; mistakes happen .
But we    re assassins : when we make mistakes , people live</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most interesting part of the article is where Mike Mann, the guy who runs sex.com, said that he wanted to give all the proceeds to charity!
I know that there is a great joke there... but my brain is still in shock


--------
No one can do everything perfectly; mistakes happen.
But we’re assassins: when we make mistakes, people live</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686496</id>
	<title>Timing Is Everything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270045440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since this appears to be real, it's a darn good thing the article was posted today. Had it come out 1 day later, nobody would believe the story was anything but an excuse for the headline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this appears to be real , it 's a darn good thing the article was posted today .
Had it come out 1 day later , nobody would believe the story was anything but an excuse for the headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this appears to be real, it's a darn good thing the article was posted today.
Had it come out 1 day later, nobody would believe the story was anything but an excuse for the headline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686374</id>
	<title>Is it really worth 100 metres?</title>
	<author>celibate for life</author>
	<datestamp>1270044780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought worth should be measured in currency.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought worth should be measured in currency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought worth should be measured in currency.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686446</id>
	<title>Going down</title>
	<author>the\_hellspawn</author>
	<datestamp>1270045200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL! Oh, yeah that's right...yeah!</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL !
Oh , yeah that 's right...yeah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!
Oh, yeah that's right...yeah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396</id>
	<title>It might have been valuable back in 1998 or so</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1270044900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But aren't domain names pretty irrelevant now in the Brave Google World?

</p><p>The subset of people naive, dumb or drunk enough to just type "sex" in the url bar probably doesn't intersect in any meaningful way with people who own a credit card and are capable of typing in the number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But are n't domain names pretty irrelevant now in the Brave Google World ?
The subset of people naive , dumb or drunk enough to just type " sex " in the url bar probably does n't intersect in any meaningful way with people who own a credit card and are capable of typing in the number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But aren't domain names pretty irrelevant now in the Brave Google World?
The subset of people naive, dumb or drunk enough to just type "sex" in the url bar probably doesn't intersect in any meaningful way with people who own a credit card and are capable of typing in the number.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688914</id>
	<title>Branding, type in traffic, seo juice...</title>
	<author>canadian\_in\_beijing</author>
	<datestamp>1270055340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is it important?  First have a look at Coke... their brand is worth millions if not billions.  Same thing goes with domains and sex.com is on of the highest searched keywords ever on the intertet.

  Average Monthly Searches: 	513,360,000
  Average Cost Per Click: 	$0.51 USD.

I happen to have a few domains with type in traffic and it's usually 0.5-3\% type in traffic of the average searches.  So with sex.com you are looking at large monthly checks from just type in traffic.  Not everyone uses search engines to visit websites, and when returning to websites they will most likely type the domain in the address bar.

People like to develop sites that have memorable, easy to type in, and easy to say domains (word of mouth).  Sex.com is lots easier to remember compared to asianchicksgettingnailed.com.

Website owners want customers to return and sex.com is one of the easiest and shortest sex names out there.  Also getting top search engine rankings with Google, Bing, etc is lots easier if you have the keyword in your domain (not all cases but in highly competitive markets it will help).  I don't think the domain is worth $100m but if properly developed it could be pulling in that amount of profit every year.  My guess is a sale around $10m.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it important ?
First have a look at Coke... their brand is worth millions if not billions .
Same thing goes with domains and sex.com is on of the highest searched keywords ever on the intertet .
Average Monthly Searches : 513,360,000 Average Cost Per Click : $ 0.51 USD .
I happen to have a few domains with type in traffic and it 's usually 0.5-3 \ % type in traffic of the average searches .
So with sex.com you are looking at large monthly checks from just type in traffic .
Not everyone uses search engines to visit websites , and when returning to websites they will most likely type the domain in the address bar .
People like to develop sites that have memorable , easy to type in , and easy to say domains ( word of mouth ) .
Sex.com is lots easier to remember compared to asianchicksgettingnailed.com .
Website owners want customers to return and sex.com is one of the easiest and shortest sex names out there .
Also getting top search engine rankings with Google , Bing , etc is lots easier if you have the keyword in your domain ( not all cases but in highly competitive markets it will help ) .
I do n't think the domain is worth $ 100m but if properly developed it could be pulling in that amount of profit every year .
My guess is a sale around $ 10m .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it important?
First have a look at Coke... their brand is worth millions if not billions.
Same thing goes with domains and sex.com is on of the highest searched keywords ever on the intertet.
Average Monthly Searches: 	513,360,000
  Average Cost Per Click: 	$0.51 USD.
I happen to have a few domains with type in traffic and it's usually 0.5-3\% type in traffic of the average searches.
So with sex.com you are looking at large monthly checks from just type in traffic.
Not everyone uses search engines to visit websites, and when returning to websites they will most likely type the domain in the address bar.
People like to develop sites that have memorable, easy to type in, and easy to say domains (word of mouth).
Sex.com is lots easier to remember compared to asianchicksgettingnailed.com.
Website owners want customers to return and sex.com is one of the easiest and shortest sex names out there.
Also getting top search engine rankings with Google, Bing, etc is lots easier if you have the keyword in your domain (not all cases but in highly competitive markets it will help).
I don't think the domain is worth $100m but if properly developed it could be pulling in that amount of profit every year.
My guess is a sale around $10m.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690434</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1270061880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></div></blockquote><p>*whoosh*</p><p>That's the sound of the joke going over your head.</p><p>*thump*</p><p>That's the sound of the joke hitting me in the lower abdomen</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy ?
: p * whoosh * That 's the sound of the joke going over your head .
* thump * That 's the sound of the joke hitting me in the lower abdomen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought going down had been a big part of their strategy?
:p*whoosh*That's the sound of the joke going over your head.
*thump*That's the sound of the joke hitting me in the lower abdomen
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686838</id>
	<title>Best domain how?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this is such a valuable domain, why is it that no one has been able to do anything profitable with it, other than trade it around? Even if he doesn't think he can get a fair price for it at auction right now, surely he could call someone up and say "For $X/month, we can point this domain at your site, and I can stay out of bankruptcy."</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is such a valuable domain , why is it that no one has been able to do anything profitable with it , other than trade it around ?
Even if he does n't think he can get a fair price for it at auction right now , surely he could call someone up and say " For $ X/month , we can point this domain at your site , and I can stay out of bankruptcy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is such a valuable domain, why is it that no one has been able to do anything profitable with it, other than trade it around?
Even if he doesn't think he can get a fair price for it at auction right now, surely he could call someone up and say "For $X/month, we can point this domain at your site, and I can stay out of bankruptcy.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686514</id>
	<title>Re:It might have been valuable back in 1998 or so</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1270045500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The intersection of those two sets is huge.  I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who don't know the difference between the URL field and the search field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The intersection of those two sets is huge .
I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who do n't know the difference between the URL field and the search field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The intersection of those two sets is huge.
I staff a corporate help desk and I talk to dozens of people a week who don't know the difference between the URL field and the search field.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31692594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1233210_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31689472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31692594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31688338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1233210.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31687046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31686512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1233210.31690228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
