<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_30_1951242</id>
	<title>Novell Wins vs. SCO</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269937200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Aim Here writes <i>"<a href="http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=2153">According to Novell's website</a>, and the Salt Lake Tribune, the jury in the SCO v. Novell trial has <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci\_14786202">returned a verdict</a>: Novell owns the Unix copyrights. This also means that SCO's case against IBM must surely collapse too, and likely the now bankrupt SCO group itself. It's taken 7 years, but the US court system has eventually done the right thing ..."</i>  No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aim Here writes " According to Novell 's website , and the Salt Lake Tribune , the jury in the SCO v. Novell trial has returned a verdict : Novell owns the Unix copyrights .
This also means that SCO 's case against IBM must surely collapse too , and likely the now bankrupt SCO group itself .
It 's taken 7 years , but the US court system has eventually done the right thing ... " No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aim Here writes "According to Novell's website, and the Salt Lake Tribune, the jury in the SCO v. Novell trial has returned a verdict: Novell owns the Unix copyrights.
This also means that SCO's case against IBM must surely collapse too, and likely the now bankrupt SCO group itself.
It's taken 7 years, but the US court system has eventually done the right thing ..."  No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678654</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>drdrgivemethenews</author>
	<datestamp>1269948120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I disagree; the amounts are almost beneath notice. These big companies know that while legal actions are important, you make all your real money by SELLING PRODUCTS. The factor is going on 1000 to 1--a trillion dollar industry will have around a billion dollars available for attack by lawyers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree ; the amounts are almost beneath notice .
These big companies know that while legal actions are important , you make all your real money by SELLING PRODUCTS .
The factor is going on 1000 to 1--a trillion dollar industry will have around a billion dollars available for attack by lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree; the amounts are almost beneath notice.
These big companies know that while legal actions are important, you make all your real money by SELLING PRODUCTS.
The factor is going on 1000 to 1--a trillion dollar industry will have around a billion dollars available for attack by lawyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677778</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1269944340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Novell has a couple billion in cash, so a suit like this is nothing to it.  SCO, on the other hand, is beyond bankrupt at this point so a bill for $10 isn't going to be paid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Novell has a couple billion in cash , so a suit like this is nothing to it .
SCO , on the other hand , is beyond bankrupt at this point so a bill for $ 10 is n't going to be paid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Novell has a couple billion in cash, so a suit like this is nothing to it.
SCO, on the other hand, is beyond bankrupt at this point so a bill for $10 isn't going to be paid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690116</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>TemporalBeing</author>
	<datestamp>1270060380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While my money is on IBM too, you have to wonder if going after IBM is still possible since Novell directed (per contract per APA) that they are to drop everything against IBM, and SCO does not have (AFAIK) a contract directly with IBM outside of Project Montgomery - which long ago proved to be a dead-end road for going after IBM on. So what contracts exactly are they going after? It can't be UNIX related, or related to copyright infringement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While my money is on IBM too , you have to wonder if going after IBM is still possible since Novell directed ( per contract per APA ) that they are to drop everything against IBM , and SCO does not have ( AFAIK ) a contract directly with IBM outside of Project Montgomery - which long ago proved to be a dead-end road for going after IBM on .
So what contracts exactly are they going after ?
It ca n't be UNIX related , or related to copyright infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While my money is on IBM too, you have to wonder if going after IBM is still possible since Novell directed (per contract per APA) that they are to drop everything against IBM, and SCO does not have (AFAIK) a contract directly with IBM outside of Project Montgomery - which long ago proved to be a dead-end road for going after IBM on.
So what contracts exactly are they going after?
It can't be UNIX related, or related to copyright infringement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679930</id>
	<title>watch what you say</title>
	<author>Nekomusume</author>
	<datestamp>1269954000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this."</p><p>You fool! You've doomed us all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this .
" You fool !
You 've doomed us all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.
"You fool!
You've doomed us all!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680202</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>Rod Beauvex</author>
	<datestamp>1269955140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I call dibs on the hearts. Been wanting a blacker, more evil model for awhile.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I call dibs on the hearts .
Been wanting a blacker , more evil model for awhile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call dibs on the hearts.
Been wanting a blacker, more evil model for awhile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683920</id>
	<title>Not the end...</title>
	<author>maheshc</author>
	<datestamp>1270066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As Churchill said: Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Churchill said : Now this is not the end .
It is not even the beginning of the end .
But it is , perhaps , the end of the beginning</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Churchill said: Now this is not the end.
It is not even the beginning of the end.
But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677844</id>
	<title>Re:Novel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269944640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, if Novel now owns Unix, Microsoft can't buy out Novel - because this would mean that Microsoft not only has control over Unix, but everything that can be branded as Unix, such as OSX. Wouldn't this create a monopolistic entity? Just thinking out loud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , if Novel now owns Unix , Microsoft ca n't buy out Novel - because this would mean that Microsoft not only has control over Unix , but everything that can be branded as Unix , such as OSX .
Would n't this create a monopolistic entity ?
Just thinking out loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, if Novel now owns Unix, Microsoft can't buy out Novel - because this would mean that Microsoft not only has control over Unix, but everything that can be branded as Unix, such as OSX.
Wouldn't this create a monopolistic entity?
Just thinking out loud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678090</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1269945780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or if they can spring for a cup of Starbucks a few times a year.</p><p>With all seriousness, their marginal cost from this trial is probably $0. IBM surely has a bunch of lawyers on staff - they're paying them a salary, why not put them in a courtroom and make them tear the balls off SCO?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or if they can spring for a cup of Starbucks a few times a year.With all seriousness , their marginal cost from this trial is probably $ 0 .
IBM surely has a bunch of lawyers on staff - they 're paying them a salary , why not put them in a courtroom and make them tear the balls off SCO ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or if they can spring for a cup of Starbucks a few times a year.With all seriousness, their marginal cost from this trial is probably $0.
IBM surely has a bunch of lawyers on staff - they're paying them a salary, why not put them in a courtroom and make them tear the balls off SCO?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676862</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>seanellis</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be very difficult for SCO to spin this one in a positive direction. Darl McBride isn't at SCO any more, which is a shame. It would have been good to see him go down with the ship.</p><p>Roll on the IBM case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be very difficult for SCO to spin this one in a positive direction .
Darl McBride is n't at SCO any more , which is a shame .
It would have been good to see him go down with the ship.Roll on the IBM case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be very difficult for SCO to spin this one in a positive direction.
Darl McBride isn't at SCO any more, which is a shame.
It would have been good to see him go down with the ship.Roll on the IBM case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678576</id>
	<title>It's Not Over!</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1269947700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>              Turn on the Fox channel and watch O'Reilly whine on and on about Obama winning the election. Now picture SCO. The wailing and gnashing of teeth has just begun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Turn on the Fox channel and watch O'Reilly whine on and on about Obama winning the election .
Now picture SCO .
The wailing and gnashing of teeth has just begun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>              Turn on the Fox channel and watch O'Reilly whine on and on about Obama winning the election.
Now picture SCO.
The wailing and gnashing of teeth has just begun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677998</id>
	<title>Re:Not completely over</title>
	<author>ImprovOmega</author>
	<datestamp>1269945360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The interesting part about that is that Darl himself stated that they didn't need the copyrights.  It's quoted in the Groklaw report on his testimony.  Basically, they got all the same rights as HP (HP-UX), IBM (AIX), and others who rolled their own Unix.  They didn't need the copyrights and proving that should be trivial at this point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The interesting part about that is that Darl himself stated that they did n't need the copyrights .
It 's quoted in the Groklaw report on his testimony .
Basically , they got all the same rights as HP ( HP-UX ) , IBM ( AIX ) , and others who rolled their own Unix .
They did n't need the copyrights and proving that should be trivial at this point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The interesting part about that is that Darl himself stated that they didn't need the copyrights.
It's quoted in the Groklaw report on his testimony.
Basically, they got all the same rights as HP (HP-UX), IBM (AIX), and others who rolled their own Unix.
They didn't need the copyrights and proving that should be trivial at this point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677534</id>
	<title>Too early for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269943380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>April Fools' Day</p><p>(Posting twice isn't)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>April Fools ' Day ( Posting twice is n't )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>April Fools' Day(Posting twice isn't)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31684754</id>
	<title>simply amazing...</title>
	<author>sdnoob</author>
	<datestamp>1270031040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that this case actually reached a verdict before the contested copyrights expired!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that this case actually reached a verdict before the contested copyrights expired !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that this case actually reached a verdict before the contested copyrights expired!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680706</id>
	<title>Don't forget...</title>
	<author>kemapa</author>
	<datestamp>1269957420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget to pay your $699 licensing fee, you cock-smoking teabaggers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget to pay your $ 699 licensing fee , you cock-smoking teabaggers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget to pay your $699 licensing fee, you cock-smoking teabaggers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682954</id>
	<title>Happy Birthday to Me !</title>
	<author>BlindBear</author>
	<datestamp>1269971220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a great present! Now I have to get drunk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a great present !
Now I have to get drunk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a great present!
Now I have to get drunk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677130</id>
	<title>Celebrate victory!</title>
	<author>xmorg</author>
	<datestamp>1269942060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a great day for open sourcE!  Get the beer and python, and lets play roguelikes deep into the night....</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a great day for open sourcE !
Get the beer and python , and lets play roguelikes deep into the night... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a great day for open sourcE!
Get the beer and python, and lets play roguelikes deep into the night....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678430</id>
	<title>So when do the lawsuits start?</title>
	<author>PhilipPeake</author>
	<datestamp>1269947100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I expect that those people who were dumb enough to buy Linux "licenses" from SCO and Microsoft must be feeling like complete idiots about now (possibly because they are).</p><p>Just wonder when the first lawsuits against SCO and Microsoft will begin? Actually, suing SCO is a waste of time, they are effectively bankrupt, but Microsoft has a nice stash of cash available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect that those people who were dumb enough to buy Linux " licenses " from SCO and Microsoft must be feeling like complete idiots about now ( possibly because they are ) .Just wonder when the first lawsuits against SCO and Microsoft will begin ?
Actually , suing SCO is a waste of time , they are effectively bankrupt , but Microsoft has a nice stash of cash available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect that those people who were dumb enough to buy Linux "licenses" from SCO and Microsoft must be feeling like complete idiots about now (possibly because they are).Just wonder when the first lawsuits against SCO and Microsoft will begin?
Actually, suing SCO is a waste of time, they are effectively bankrupt, but Microsoft has a nice stash of cash available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31829262</id>
	<title>NatalieGlebova</title>
	<author>natalieglebova</author>
	<datestamp>1271157960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is absolutely absurd

<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/womensera" title="squidoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.squidoo.com/womensera</a> [squidoo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is absolutely absurd http : //www.squidoo.com/womensera [ squidoo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is absolutely absurd

http://www.squidoo.com/womensera [squidoo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31686114</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1270043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?"</p><p>Possible version:</p><p>I'm trying to teach myself to set idiots on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here ?
" Possible version : I 'm trying to teach myself to set idiots on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
"Possible version:I'm trying to teach myself to set idiots on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677120</id>
	<title>wait a minute</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFS: "No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this."</p><p>ORLY?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFS : " No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this .
" ORLY ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFS: "No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.
"ORLY?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677284</id>
	<title>Re:Not completely over</title>
	<author>mapsjanhere</author>
	<datestamp>1269942480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All appeals are paid for, SCO can sue until the SCOTUS tells them to get lost.  Even if the bankruptcy court now moves them to chapter 7, some mystery buyer can still pay $1 for the rights to the lawsuit, and pursue it as successor in interest.  The fat lady is hoarse from all the singing she's done in this case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All appeals are paid for , SCO can sue until the SCOTUS tells them to get lost .
Even if the bankruptcy court now moves them to chapter 7 , some mystery buyer can still pay $ 1 for the rights to the lawsuit , and pursue it as successor in interest .
The fat lady is hoarse from all the singing she 's done in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All appeals are paid for, SCO can sue until the SCOTUS tells them to get lost.
Even if the bankruptcy court now moves them to chapter 7, some mystery buyer can still pay $1 for the rights to the lawsuit, and pursue it as successor in interest.
The fat lady is hoarse from all the singing she's done in this case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681694</id>
	<title>Re:Novel</title>
	<author>belmolis</author>
	<datestamp>1269962460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
No, the "brand" is the Unix trademark, which is owned by <a href="http://www.unix.org/trademark.html" title="unix.org">The Open Group</a> [unix.org], not by Novel or SCO. What Novel owns are the copyrights to the original Unix code.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the " brand " is the Unix trademark , which is owned by The Open Group [ unix.org ] , not by Novel or SCO .
What Novel owns are the copyrights to the original Unix code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
No, the "brand" is the Unix trademark, which is owned by The Open Group [unix.org], not by Novel or SCO.
What Novel owns are the copyrights to the original Unix code.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860</id>
	<title>Not completely over</title>
	<author>awkScooby</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The jury part of the trial is over, but there are still some issues that are to be decided by the judge.  The big one is SCO's claim of "specific performance."  Their argument is that if the copyrights didn't transfer (which the jury just said they didnt), that APA2 is a promise to transfer them, so Novell should be forced to transfer them now.  If the judge rules against SCO, it's over, barring an appeal that SCO can't afford.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The jury part of the trial is over , but there are still some issues that are to be decided by the judge .
The big one is SCO 's claim of " specific performance .
" Their argument is that if the copyrights did n't transfer ( which the jury just said they didnt ) , that APA2 is a promise to transfer them , so Novell should be forced to transfer them now .
If the judge rules against SCO , it 's over , barring an appeal that SCO ca n't afford .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The jury part of the trial is over, but there are still some issues that are to be decided by the judge.
The big one is SCO's claim of "specific performance.
"  Their argument is that if the copyrights didn't transfer (which the jury just said they didnt), that APA2 is a promise to transfer them, so Novell should be forced to transfer them now.
If the judge rules against SCO, it's over, barring an appeal that SCO can't afford.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31684594</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>Scrab</author>
	<datestamp>1270029660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please tell me that Cahn's name is pronounced the way I think it is....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me that Cahn 's name is pronounced the way I think it is... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me that Cahn's name is pronounced the way I think it is....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678078</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269945720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash. How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $$'s? With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs?</i></p><p>Novell's win against SCO ends that lawsuit but it doesn't end the SCO v IBM suit.  The "<a href="http://www.sltrib.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print\_article.jsp?articleId=14786202&amp;siteId=297" title="sltrib.com">Salt Lake Tribune</a> [sltrib.com]" article has this little tidbit:</p><p>"Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.</p><p>"But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues."</p><p>Exactly what claim SCO can make I have no idea, but it took Novell more than 6 years to prevail over SCO and I have no illusion SCO will die a quick death.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is like declaring victory because you 're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash .
How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $ $ 's ?
With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs ? Novell 's win against SCO ends that lawsuit but it does n't end the SCO v IBM suit .
The " Salt Lake Tribune [ sltrib.com ] " article has this little tidbit : " Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn , the trustee for SCO 's bankruptcy filed in Delaware , said the company is " deeply disappointed " in the jury 's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix , which is widely used in business computing .
" But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM , in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor , causing a decline in SCO 's revenues .
" Exactly what claim SCO can make I have no idea , but it took Novell more than 6 years to prevail over SCO and I have no illusion SCO will die a quick death .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash.
How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $$'s?
With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs?Novell's win against SCO ends that lawsuit but it doesn't end the SCO v IBM suit.
The "Salt Lake Tribune [sltrib.com]" article has this little tidbit:"Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.
"But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues.
"Exactly what claim SCO can make I have no idea, but it took Novell more than 6 years to prevail over SCO and I have no illusion SCO will die a quick death.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</id>
	<title>Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269941040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash.  How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $$'s?  With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is like declaring victory because you 're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash .
How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $ $ 's ?
With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash.
How much has this cost Novell and IBM in real $$'s?
With SCO bankrupt how can either expect to recoup any of the 7 years of court costs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677062</id>
	<title>Re:Novel</title>
	<author>Abalamahalamatandra</author>
	<datestamp>1269941820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not bloody likely, unless all the interest in Unix goes to someone else they don't own...  And what other reason is there to do anything with Novell other than grind them in the dust?</p><p>What part of "convicted monopolist" is hard to understand?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not bloody likely , unless all the interest in Unix goes to someone else they do n't own... And what other reason is there to do anything with Novell other than grind them in the dust ? What part of " convicted monopolist " is hard to understand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not bloody likely, unless all the interest in Unix goes to someone else they don't own...  And what other reason is there to do anything with Novell other than grind them in the dust?What part of "convicted monopolist" is hard to understand?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679480</id>
	<title>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269951960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?  Are you kidding?  Zombies don't die unless you reboot the system.  They had a chance at a proper death, but they got past init(cleanup) and now they will remain in the system process stack holding onto enough memory to hold the return code (and possibly a whole stack frame --enough to hold a complete context switch including all registers including the program counter).    SCO can't die now.  Its a zombie.  Chainsaws can chop it into little pieces. but unless all the pieces get stuck into concrete or something, they will keep coming after you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
Are you kidding ?
Zombies do n't die unless you reboot the system .
They had a chance at a proper death , but they got past init ( cleanup ) and now they will remain in the system process stack holding onto enough memory to hold the return code ( and possibly a whole stack frame --enough to hold a complete context switch including all registers including the program counter ) .
SCO ca n't die now .
Its a zombie .
Chainsaws can chop it into little pieces .
but unless all the pieces get stuck into concrete or something , they will keep coming after you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
Are you kidding?
Zombies don't die unless you reboot the system.
They had a chance at a proper death, but they got past init(cleanup) and now they will remain in the system process stack holding onto enough memory to hold the return code (and possibly a whole stack frame --enough to hold a complete context switch including all registers including the program counter).
SCO can't die now.
Its a zombie.
Chainsaws can chop it into little pieces.
but unless all the pieces get stuck into concrete or something, they will keep coming after you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108</id>
	<title>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269941940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>of any of this?
<p>
No! You must kill it! Kill It With FIRE!!!
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>of any of this ?
No ! You must kill it !
Kill It With FIRE ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of any of this?
No! You must kill it!
Kill It With FIRE!!
!
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690440</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1270061880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash.</p> </div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling\_(game)" title="wikipedia.org">Been there, done that.</a> [wikipedia.org]  And here, too, the players can re-shuffle the cards and deal them out again.  SCO may be bankrupt (chapter 11), but they're not yet liquidated (chapter 7).  The US Trustee has even stated that there is more litigation to follow.  Whether he just means the IBM case, the SUSE arbitration, the Red Hat counterclaims et al, or whether he means an appeal of the jury trial, was not said.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is like declaring victory because you 're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash .
Been there , done that .
[ wikipedia.org ] And here , too , the players can re-shuffle the cards and deal them out again .
SCO may be bankrupt ( chapter 11 ) , but they 're not yet liquidated ( chapter 7 ) .
The US Trustee has even stated that there is more litigation to follow .
Whether he just means the IBM case , the SUSE arbitration , the Red Hat counterclaims et al , or whether he means an appeal of the jury trial , was not said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...is like declaring victory because you're the last person to hit the ground in the plane crash.
Been there, done that.
[wikipedia.org]  And here, too, the players can re-shuffle the cards and deal them out again.
SCO may be bankrupt (chapter 11), but they're not yet liquidated (chapter 7).
The US Trustee has even stated that there is more litigation to follow.
Whether he just means the IBM case, the SUSE arbitration, the Red Hat counterclaims et al, or whether he means an appeal of the jury trial, was not said.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679798</id>
	<title>Re:No doubt this is the last we will ever hear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269953340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or nuke it from orbit , it 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682920</id>
	<title>Thank you</title>
	<author>watanabe</author>
	<datestamp>1269970920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Taco,</p><p>Thank you for your commentary. I laughed out loud. That was nice. Then I thought (probably Taco), and checked -- there you were. A part of slashdot will die forever when Darl ends his campaign.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Taco,Thank you for your commentary .
I laughed out loud .
That was nice .
Then I thought ( probably Taco ) , and checked -- there you were .
A part of slashdot will die forever when Darl ends his campaign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Taco,Thank you for your commentary.
I laughed out loud.
That was nice.
Then I thought (probably Taco), and checked -- there you were.
A part of slashdot will die forever when Darl ends his campaign.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677174</id>
	<title>SCO still wants to pursue the IBM case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci\_14786202" title="sltrib.com">http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci\_14786202</a> [sltrib.com]
<p>
"Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.sltrib.com/news/ci \ _14786202 [ sltrib.com ] " Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci\_14786202 [sltrib.com]

"Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677356</id>
	<title>Someone has to say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc., and not SCO, owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company's litigation against others.</p><p>Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.</p><p>But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues.</p><p>"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said. '</p><p>So, a victory, but not quite the end.  Still, my money's on IBM...</p></div><p>CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN!!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group 's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc. , and not SCO , owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company 's litigation against others.Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn , the trustee for SCO 's bankruptcy filed in Delaware , said the company is " deeply disappointed " in the jury 's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix , which is widely used in business computing.But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM , in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor , causing a decline in SCO 's revenues .
" The copyright claims are gone , but we have other claims based on contracts , " Cahn said .
'So , a victory , but not quite the end .
Still , my money 's on IBM...CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc., and not SCO, owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company's litigation against others.Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues.
"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said.
'So, a victory, but not quite the end.
Still, my money's on IBM...CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN!!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678976</id>
	<title>Where is the Birth Certificate???</title>
	<author>infonography</author>
	<datestamp>1269949560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Orly Tates will be suing Novell shortly demanding the birth certificate of UNIX</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Orly Tates will be suing Novell shortly demanding the birth certificate of UNIX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Orly Tates will be suing Novell shortly demanding the birth certificate of UNIX</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682966</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269971280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For IBM this isn't about winning a settlement. It's about making a public stand: you won't get Big Blue to back down by filing a flimsy lawsuit, and IBM will indemnify and defend their users against such claims even at great expense to themselves. Both IBM's customers and their would-be antagonists will remember this case for a long time to come.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For IBM this is n't about winning a settlement .
It 's about making a public stand : you wo n't get Big Blue to back down by filing a flimsy lawsuit , and IBM will indemnify and defend their users against such claims even at great expense to themselves .
Both IBM 's customers and their would-be antagonists will remember this case for a long time to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For IBM this isn't about winning a settlement.
It's about making a public stand: you won't get Big Blue to back down by filing a flimsy lawsuit, and IBM will indemnify and defend their users against such claims even at great expense to themselves.
Both IBM's customers and their would-be antagonists will remember this case for a long time to come.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676692</id>
	<title>Seven years for eight hours work</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1269940800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But at least that part is over.  There's still a little cleaning up to do but this one could be over and done with finally this summer.  If you like Groklaw, head over and give PJ a pat on the back for her long perseverence.
</p><p>Congrats to Novell's legal team.
</p><p>/SCO die,die,die!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But at least that part is over .
There 's still a little cleaning up to do but this one could be over and done with finally this summer .
If you like Groklaw , head over and give PJ a pat on the back for her long perseverence .
Congrats to Novell 's legal team .
/SCO die,die,die !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But at least that part is over.
There's still a little cleaning up to do but this one could be over and done with finally this summer.
If you like Groklaw, head over and give PJ a pat on the back for her long perseverence.
Congrats to Novell's legal team.
/SCO die,die,die!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682942</id>
	<title>Re:So, what?   Law of Agency - wikipedia etc</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269971100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Law of Agency - wikipedia etc and everywhere else since business law has existed in the modern world, says, that if you let someone appear to be your agent, and you do nothing at the time to "stop their acting as your agent" then, you as the principle, need sometimes (case by case, maybe judge or jury will decide, based on the state, and merits of the case)... you will sometimes have to live by the actions of an apparent agent (and so).    So, maybe Novell will have to live with the SCO and SUN deal.... as at least SCO did have the right to make deals (even if they needed to be approved by Novell).   In some cases, and maybe this one... it appears that Sun or rather Oracle will be able to keep OpenSolaris cooking like it is now.   The best thing to do if this were to go to court would be to have Novell and Oracle agree to GPLv3 OpenSolaris.... and one-up Linux on the FOSS scale.   Now that would be really interesting.  Of course, Microsoft would hate that with a passion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Law of Agency - wikipedia etc and everywhere else since business law has existed in the modern world , says , that if you let someone appear to be your agent , and you do nothing at the time to " stop their acting as your agent " then , you as the principle , need sometimes ( case by case , maybe judge or jury will decide , based on the state , and merits of the case ) ... you will sometimes have to live by the actions of an apparent agent ( and so ) .
So , maybe Novell will have to live with the SCO and SUN deal.... as at least SCO did have the right to make deals ( even if they needed to be approved by Novell ) .
In some cases , and maybe this one... it appears that Sun or rather Oracle will be able to keep OpenSolaris cooking like it is now .
The best thing to do if this were to go to court would be to have Novell and Oracle agree to GPLv3 OpenSolaris.... and one-up Linux on the FOSS scale .
Now that would be really interesting .
Of course , Microsoft would hate that with a passion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Law of Agency - wikipedia etc and everywhere else since business law has existed in the modern world, says, that if you let someone appear to be your agent, and you do nothing at the time to "stop their acting as your agent" then, you as the principle, need sometimes (case by case, maybe judge or jury will decide, based on the state, and merits of the case)... you will sometimes have to live by the actions of an apparent agent (and so).
So, maybe Novell will have to live with the SCO and SUN deal.... as at least SCO did have the right to make deals (even if they needed to be approved by Novell).
In some cases, and maybe this one... it appears that Sun or rather Oracle will be able to keep OpenSolaris cooking like it is now.
The best thing to do if this were to go to court would be to have Novell and Oracle agree to GPLv3 OpenSolaris.... and one-up Linux on the FOSS scale.
Now that would be really interesting.
Of course, Microsoft would hate that with a passion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269941280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It's taken 7 years, but the US court system has eventually done the right thing..."</p><p>This. Is a contradiction.  Justice delayed is justice denied.  Always.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's taken 7 years , but the US court system has eventually done the right thing... " This .
Is a contradiction .
Justice delayed is justice denied .
Always .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's taken 7 years, but the US court system has eventually done the right thing..."This.
Is a contradiction.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
Always.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677854</id>
	<title>More to Come - SCO can still get the copyrights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269944640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The case is not yet over</p><p>There are a number of other parts of the SCO v Novell issue that were not part of the jury trial.</p><p>Among other things, this includes a bench (judge) trial on SCO's alternate claim for specific purpose (which asks the court to order Novell to transfer the copyrights).</p><p>In short - it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The case is not yet overThere are a number of other parts of the SCO v Novell issue that were not part of the jury trial.Among other things , this includes a bench ( judge ) trial on SCO 's alternate claim for specific purpose ( which asks the court to order Novell to transfer the copyrights ) .In short - it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The case is not yet overThere are a number of other parts of the SCO v Novell issue that were not part of the jury trial.Among other things, this includes a bench (judge) trial on SCO's alternate claim for specific purpose (which asks the court to order Novell to transfer the copyrights).In short - it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31685092</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? The Nazgul Comeith!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270034700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So we replaced one bad actor -- Darl -- with Cahn who is suppose to be a Trustee who now wants to pick up Darl's tired script  book, and seems to be just as brainless as Darl. SCO just got its butt kicked by Novell, and Cahn now wants to pick a fight with IBM and its Nazgul?!? SCO must have a Death Wish, though I suspect that the zombie that is SCO is clinging to life by a hidden transfusion of money from Microsoft: SCO  can't pay any of its creditors but somehow it can continue to pursue the litigation lottery. Now it wants to pick a fight with IBM, and IBM has an even better case against SCO than Novell had. I say "Release the Nazgul on SCO!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we replaced one bad actor -- Darl -- with Cahn who is suppose to be a Trustee who now wants to pick up Darl 's tired script book , and seems to be just as brainless as Darl .
SCO just got its butt kicked by Novell , and Cahn now wants to pick a fight with IBM and its Nazgul ? ! ?
SCO must have a Death Wish , though I suspect that the zombie that is SCO is clinging to life by a hidden transfusion of money from Microsoft : SCO ca n't pay any of its creditors but somehow it can continue to pursue the litigation lottery .
Now it wants to pick a fight with IBM , and IBM has an even better case against SCO than Novell had .
I say " Release the Nazgul on SCO ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we replaced one bad actor -- Darl -- with Cahn who is suppose to be a Trustee who now wants to pick up Darl's tired script  book, and seems to be just as brainless as Darl.
SCO just got its butt kicked by Novell, and Cahn now wants to pick a fight with IBM and its Nazgul?!?
SCO must have a Death Wish, though I suspect that the zombie that is SCO is clinging to life by a hidden transfusion of money from Microsoft: SCO  can't pay any of its creditors but somehow it can continue to pursue the litigation lottery.
Now it wants to pick a fight with IBM, and IBM has an even better case against SCO than Novell had.
I say "Release the Nazgul on SCO!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678340</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>dgr73</author>
	<datestamp>1269946740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the horror movie jokes aside. SCO is on the losing side of proving they even own the Unix rights, which *might* by some legal trickery and well placed campaign funds only allow them to sue IBM &amp; all for (c) violation. That trial would then have to prove the stealing of code, which has already been debated in court to SCOs detriment.

The court cases might go on one way or another, but any "linux liability scare factor" has long since disappeared from any reasonably savvy IT-Manager's mind.

But far be it from me to deny the jokes and gloating people derive from any SCO related lawreports, knock yourselves out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the horror movie jokes aside .
SCO is on the losing side of proving they even own the Unix rights , which * might * by some legal trickery and well placed campaign funds only allow them to sue IBM &amp; all for ( c ) violation .
That trial would then have to prove the stealing of code , which has already been debated in court to SCOs detriment .
The court cases might go on one way or another , but any " linux liability scare factor " has long since disappeared from any reasonably savvy IT-Manager 's mind .
But far be it from me to deny the jokes and gloating people derive from any SCO related lawreports , knock yourselves out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the horror movie jokes aside.
SCO is on the losing side of proving they even own the Unix rights, which *might* by some legal trickery and well placed campaign funds only allow them to sue IBM &amp; all for (c) violation.
That trial would then have to prove the stealing of code, which has already been debated in court to SCOs detriment.
The court cases might go on one way or another, but any "linux liability scare factor" has long since disappeared from any reasonably savvy IT-Manager's mind.
But far be it from me to deny the jokes and gloating people derive from any SCO related lawreports, knock yourselves out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680518</id>
	<title>Novell owns the Unix copyrights</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1269956400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah baby.. Now it's Microsoft's turn..</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this...</i></p><p>That's funny as hell!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah baby.. Now it 's Microsoft 's turn.. ...No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this...That 's funny as hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah baby.. Now it's Microsoft's turn.. ...No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this...That's funny as hell!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679992</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269954300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is Edward Cahn another Ken Starr?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Edward Cahn another Ken Starr ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Edward Cahn another Ken Starr?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678462</id>
	<title>8 hours of jury deliberations means...</title>
	<author>christian.einfeldt</author>
	<datestamp>1269947220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that even a lay-person jury could see that SCO's case was worthless.  I'm a lawyer, and I'm here to state the obvious: juries take longer than 8 hours to decide many petty theft cases.  Trustee Cahn, who is effectively running SCO, needs to wake up and smell SCO's dead feet.  SCO is dead, dead, dead I say!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that even a lay-person jury could see that SCO 's case was worthless .
I 'm a lawyer , and I 'm here to state the obvious : juries take longer than 8 hours to decide many petty theft cases .
Trustee Cahn , who is effectively running SCO , needs to wake up and smell SCO 's dead feet .
SCO is dead , dead , dead I say !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that even a lay-person jury could see that SCO's case was worthless.
I'm a lawyer, and I'm here to state the obvious: juries take longer than 8 hours to decide many petty theft cases.
Trustee Cahn, who is effectively running SCO, needs to wake up and smell SCO's dead feet.
SCO is dead, dead, dead I say!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>durdur</author>
	<datestamp>1269941520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM almost certainly doesn't care about the cost, which isn't even a day's worth of revenue for them. They have filed  counter-claims against SCO, and in theory could win damages, but since SCO has few assets and many creditors, they won't get paid. In a fairer world, SCO would have had to answer for its baseless campaign against Linux users much earlier. But they didn't - they got to put the victims of this campaign on the defensive, first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM almost certainly does n't care about the cost , which is n't even a day 's worth of revenue for them .
They have filed counter-claims against SCO , and in theory could win damages , but since SCO has few assets and many creditors , they wo n't get paid .
In a fairer world , SCO would have had to answer for its baseless campaign against Linux users much earlier .
But they did n't - they got to put the victims of this campaign on the defensive , first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM almost certainly doesn't care about the cost, which isn't even a day's worth of revenue for them.
They have filed  counter-claims against SCO, and in theory could win damages, but since SCO has few assets and many creditors, they won't get paid.
In a fairer world, SCO would have had to answer for its baseless campaign against Linux users much earlier.
But they didn't - they got to put the victims of this campaign on the defensive, first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678330</id>
	<title>Okay!  Everyone sing along with me!</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1269946680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!<br>HAPPY!<br>Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!<br>HAPPY!</p><p>*Finds a grave for SCO*<br>*Erects a dance floor*<br>*Breakdances to the point of passing out from the exertions*<br>*Returns every once in a while for a return engagement*</p><p>
&nbsp; HAAA-HAAA!</p><p>Hot?  Cold?  Revenge is a dish best SERVED!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy ! HAPPY ! Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy ! HAPPY !
* Finds a grave for SCO * * Erects a dance floor * * Breakdances to the point of passing out from the exertions * * Returns every once in a while for a return engagement *   HAAA-HAAA ! Hot ?
Cold ? Revenge is a dish best SERVED !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!HAPPY!Happy happy joy joy happy happy joy!HAPPY!
*Finds a grave for SCO**Erects a dance floor**Breakdances to the point of passing out from the exertions**Returns every once in a while for a return engagement*
  HAAA-HAAA!Hot?
Cold?  Revenge is a dish best SERVED!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</id>
	<title>The last we'll hear? Not according to the link...</title>
	<author>Bearhouse</author>
	<datestamp>1269941940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc., and not SCO, owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company's litigation against others.</p><p>Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.</p><p>But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues.</p><p>"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said. '</p><p>So, a victory, but not quite the end.  Still, my money's on IBM...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group 's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc. , and not SCO , owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company 's litigation against others.Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn , the trustee for SCO 's bankruptcy filed in Delaware , said the company is " deeply disappointed " in the jury 's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix , which is widely used in business computing.But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM , in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor , causing a decline in SCO 's revenues .
" The copyright claims are gone , but we have other claims based on contracts , " Cahn said .
'So , a victory , but not quite the end .
Still , my money 's on IBM.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>' The former federal judge overseeing The SCO Group's bankruptcy said a jury decision today that Novell Inc., and not SCO, owns the copyrights to the Unix computer operating system does not end the company's litigation against others.Former U.S. District Judge Edward Cahn, the trustee for SCO's bankruptcy filed in Delaware, said the company is "deeply disappointed" in the jury's verdict in the dispute over which company owned the copyrights to Unix, which is widely used in business computing.But Cahn said SCO intends to continue its lawsuit against IBM, in which the computer giant is accused of using Unix code to make the Linux operating system a viable competitor, causing a decline in SCO's revenues.
"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said.
'So, a victory, but not quite the end.
Still, my money's on IBM...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681074</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269959340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The point was never to win.  The point was to keep people from buying software and services from Novell, Red Hat and IBM.  That strategy worked very well for seven years...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point was never to win .
The point was to keep people from buying software and services from Novell , Red Hat and IBM .
That strategy worked very well for seven years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point was never to win.
The point was to keep people from buying software and services from Novell, Red Hat and IBM.
That strategy worked very well for seven years...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681384</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Swampash</author>
	<datestamp>1269960780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"the US court system has eventually done the right thing..."

In the same way that someone brutally sodomizing you does the right thing. When they, you know, pull out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" the US court system has eventually done the right thing... " In the same way that someone brutally sodomizing you does the right thing .
When they , you know , pull out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the US court system has eventually done the right thing..."

In the same way that someone brutally sodomizing you does the right thing.
When they, you know, pull out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682718</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1269968940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a fairer world, this wouldn't have been SCO, a corporate entity run by untouchable, soulless trolls. No rather, IBM, Novell, etc would be able to go after Darl and the other hucksters for their frivolous bullshit.</p><p>Unfortunately, C*O's are treated like untouchable, OMG society would cease to exist w/o them Gods and protected from behaving like complete fuck ups and for this kind of behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a fairer world , this would n't have been SCO , a corporate entity run by untouchable , soulless trolls .
No rather , IBM , Novell , etc would be able to go after Darl and the other hucksters for their frivolous bullshit.Unfortunately , C * O 's are treated like untouchable , OMG society would cease to exist w/o them Gods and protected from behaving like complete fuck ups and for this kind of behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a fairer world, this wouldn't have been SCO, a corporate entity run by untouchable, soulless trolls.
No rather, IBM, Novell, etc would be able to go after Darl and the other hucksters for their frivolous bullshit.Unfortunately, C*O's are treated like untouchable, OMG society would cease to exist w/o them Gods and protected from behaving like complete fuck ups and for this kind of behavior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677378</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1269942780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darl no longer works for SCO from what I understand.  He was removed some time ago.  Though he doesn't, I believe he has (or tried to) purchase(d) some assets of SCO for a ridiculously low sum of money, like in the $30,000 range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darl no longer works for SCO from what I understand .
He was removed some time ago .
Though he does n't , I believe he has ( or tried to ) purchase ( d ) some assets of SCO for a ridiculously low sum of money , like in the $ 30,000 range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darl no longer works for SCO from what I understand.
He was removed some time ago.
Though he doesn't, I believe he has (or tried to) purchase(d) some assets of SCO for a ridiculously low sum of money, like in the $30,000 range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677324</id>
	<title>Re:SCO still wants to pursue the IBM case</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1269942600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And IBM says that sucks. There is nothing left for us to get when we bury you. What a waste of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And IBM says that sucks .
There is nothing left for us to get when we bury you .
What a waste of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And IBM says that sucks.
There is nothing left for us to get when we bury you.
What a waste of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683926</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>MidnightBrewer</author>
	<datestamp>1270066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too. Many periods. And truisms are always wrong. How soon does justice have to be served to make the deadline? Seven days? Seven months? Seven years is incredible for a case that was patently (har har) ridiculous, but it's over with and the bad guys lost. This is a Good Thing (tm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too .
Many periods .
And truisms are always wrong .
How soon does justice have to be served to make the deadline ?
Seven days ?
Seven months ?
Seven years is incredible for a case that was patently ( har har ) ridiculous , but it 's over with and the bad guys lost .
This is a Good Thing ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too.
Many periods.
And truisms are always wrong.
How soon does justice have to be served to make the deadline?
Seven days?
Seven months?
Seven years is incredible for a case that was patently (har har) ridiculous, but it's over with and the bad guys lost.
This is a Good Thing (tm).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677106</id>
	<title>Obligatory....</title>
	<author>RKThoadan</author>
	<datestamp>1269941940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there was much rejoicing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there was much rejoicing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there was much rejoicing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678500</id>
	<title>So, what does this mean for Solaris?</title>
	<author>SEE</author>
	<datestamp>1269947400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) The 1994 Sun-Novell license agreement prohibited Sun from disclosing SRVX code for a period of 20 years.  It's not 2014 yet.<br>2) The jury just said Novell retained copyright to Unix, so SCO had no title to SVRX, and so no power to license SVRX except as provided in the Novell-SCO APA.<br>3) Under the APA, SCO "shall not, and shall not have the authority to, amend, modify, or waive any right under or assign any SVRX License without the prior written consent" of Novell.</p><p>As a result, SCO neither had the contractual right (under the APA) nor right of title in SVRX necessary to license the release of any SVRX code by Sun prior to 2014.  If there is any SVRX in OpenSolaris, then, Oracle is in violation of its SVRX license agreement with Novell, and its right to distribute Solaris (assuming Solaris contains any SVRX) is, as a result, questionable.</p><p>Now, yes, the 2003 SCO-Sun agreement requires that SCO indemnify Sun against any claims arising under the agreement . . . but SCO is too bankrupt for that indemnity to have much value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) The 1994 Sun-Novell license agreement prohibited Sun from disclosing SRVX code for a period of 20 years .
It 's not 2014 yet.2 ) The jury just said Novell retained copyright to Unix , so SCO had no title to SVRX , and so no power to license SVRX except as provided in the Novell-SCO APA.3 ) Under the APA , SCO " shall not , and shall not have the authority to , amend , modify , or waive any right under or assign any SVRX License without the prior written consent " of Novell.As a result , SCO neither had the contractual right ( under the APA ) nor right of title in SVRX necessary to license the release of any SVRX code by Sun prior to 2014 .
If there is any SVRX in OpenSolaris , then , Oracle is in violation of its SVRX license agreement with Novell , and its right to distribute Solaris ( assuming Solaris contains any SVRX ) is , as a result , questionable.Now , yes , the 2003 SCO-Sun agreement requires that SCO indemnify Sun against any claims arising under the agreement .
. .
but SCO is too bankrupt for that indemnity to have much value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) The 1994 Sun-Novell license agreement prohibited Sun from disclosing SRVX code for a period of 20 years.
It's not 2014 yet.2) The jury just said Novell retained copyright to Unix, so SCO had no title to SVRX, and so no power to license SVRX except as provided in the Novell-SCO APA.3) Under the APA, SCO "shall not, and shall not have the authority to, amend, modify, or waive any right under or assign any SVRX License without the prior written consent" of Novell.As a result, SCO neither had the contractual right (under the APA) nor right of title in SVRX necessary to license the release of any SVRX code by Sun prior to 2014.
If there is any SVRX in OpenSolaris, then, Oracle is in violation of its SVRX license agreement with Novell, and its right to distribute Solaris (assuming Solaris contains any SVRX) is, as a result, questionable.Now, yes, the 2003 SCO-Sun agreement requires that SCO indemnify Sun against any claims arising under the agreement .
. .
but SCO is too bankrupt for that indemnity to have much value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679224</id>
	<title>in other news, Novell announces MSFT now owns UNIX</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1269951000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>now that there is little question as to who owns the copyrights to UNIX, will we now see another bid to purchase Novell and said copyrights?  Why not Nathan Myhrvold's Intellectual Vultures group which has Bill Gates on is investors list?<br><br>the judgment pretty much says that SCO had no leg to stand in claiming Linux infringed on their UNIX copyrights but only in that SCO didn't have the UNIX copyrights. It did not clear up any infringement questions. And you know that right now, Microsoft is out hunting down victims to hang on their Patent Licensing mantel as they start building their case against Linux. What a hammer owning UNIX copyrights would be.<br><br>and yes Jane, I do believe that Intellectual Vultures are tied back to MSFT.<br><br>LoB</htmltext>
<tokenext>now that there is little question as to who owns the copyrights to UNIX , will we now see another bid to purchase Novell and said copyrights ?
Why not Nathan Myhrvold 's Intellectual Vultures group which has Bill Gates on is investors list ? the judgment pretty much says that SCO had no leg to stand in claiming Linux infringed on their UNIX copyrights but only in that SCO did n't have the UNIX copyrights .
It did not clear up any infringement questions .
And you know that right now , Microsoft is out hunting down victims to hang on their Patent Licensing mantel as they start building their case against Linux .
What a hammer owning UNIX copyrights would be.and yes Jane , I do believe that Intellectual Vultures are tied back to MSFT.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now that there is little question as to who owns the copyrights to UNIX, will we now see another bid to purchase Novell and said copyrights?
Why not Nathan Myhrvold's Intellectual Vultures group which has Bill Gates on is investors list?the judgment pretty much says that SCO had no leg to stand in claiming Linux infringed on their UNIX copyrights but only in that SCO didn't have the UNIX copyrights.
It did not clear up any infringement questions.
And you know that right now, Microsoft is out hunting down victims to hang on their Patent Licensing mantel as they start building their case against Linux.
What a hammer owning UNIX copyrights would be.and yes Jane, I do believe that Intellectual Vultures are tied back to MSFT.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678680</id>
	<title>SCO = FAIL</title>
	<author>radicalrendell</author>
	<datestamp>1269948300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>cue keyboard cat!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>cue keyboard cat ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cue keyboard cat!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682424</id>
	<title>Yet they still claim to own Linux</title>
	<author>Deputy Doodah</author>
	<datestamp>1269966840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and they're still trying to sell "SCO Source".
<a href="http://www.sco.com/scosource/license\_program.html" title="sco.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sco.com/scosource/license\_program.html</a> [sco.com] <br>
Anyone feel up to cutting them a check?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and they 're still trying to sell " SCO Source " .
http : //www.sco.com/scosource/license \ _program.html [ sco.com ] Anyone feel up to cutting them a check ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and they're still trying to sell "SCO Source".
http://www.sco.com/scosource/license\_program.html [sco.com] 
Anyone feel up to cutting them a check?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677490</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269943200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cahn has never heard of the Nazgul?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cahn has never heard of the Nazgul ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cahn has never heard of the Nazgul?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682020</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1269964380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As we've seen with all the work killing zombies, you've got to knock out the control nodes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As we 've seen with all the work killing zombies , you 've got to knock out the control nodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we've seen with all the work killing zombies, you've got to knock out the control nodes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679416</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>Drishmung</author>
	<datestamp>1269951780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said.</p></div><p>
"it's just a flesh wound!"</p><p>
"I'm invincible!"</p><p>
"Come back here and take what's coming to you! I'll bite your legs off!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The copyright claims are gone , but we have other claims based on contracts , " Cahn said .
" it 's just a flesh wound !
" " I 'm invincible !
" " Come back here and take what 's coming to you !
I 'll bite your legs off !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The copyright claims are gone, but we have other claims based on contracts," Cahn said.
"it's just a flesh wound!
"
"I'm invincible!
"
"Come back here and take what's coming to you!
I'll bite your legs off!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678102</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it</title>
	<author>celtic\_hackr</author>
	<datestamp>1269945840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unless someone finds a way to remove Yarro's vocal cords we'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...</p><p>We're doomed to hear SCO's moanings until DNF is released.</p></div><p>There fixed that for ya. Darl is out. He boguht a pice at firesale prices and laffed it up. Novell may have the last laugh though. With a little bit of law referred to as the Lanham Act.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless someone finds a way to remove Yarro 's vocal cords we 'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...We 're doomed to hear SCO 's moanings until DNF is released.There fixed that for ya .
Darl is out .
He boguht a pice at firesale prices and laffed it up .
Novell may have the last laugh though .
With a little bit of law referred to as the Lanham Act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless someone finds a way to remove Yarro's vocal cords we'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...We're doomed to hear SCO's moanings until DNF is released.There fixed that for ya.
Darl is out.
He boguht a pice at firesale prices and laffed it up.
Novell may have the last laugh though.
With a little bit of law referred to as the Lanham Act.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760</id>
	<title>Doubt it</title>
	<author>Arimus</author>
	<datestamp>1269940980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.</p></div></blockquote><p>Unless someone finds a way to remove Darl's vocal cords we'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...</p><p>We're doomed to hear SCO's moanings until DNF is released.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.Unless someone finds a way to remove Darl 's vocal cords we 'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...We 're doomed to hear SCO 's moanings until DNF is released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.Unless someone finds a way to remove Darl's vocal cords we'll have not heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination...We're doomed to hear SCO's moanings until DNF is released.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677292</id>
	<title>Does "SCO Group Likes Its Stock at These Levels"?</title>
	<author>lightspawn</author>
	<datestamp>1269942540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.linux.org/news/2004/03/12/0006.html" title="linux.org">http://www.linux.org/news/2004/03/12/0006.html</a> [linux.org]</p><p>I've only been waiting six years to post this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.linux.org/news/2004/03/12/0006.html [ linux.org ] I 've only been waiting six years to post this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.linux.org/news/2004/03/12/0006.html [linux.org]I've only been waiting six years to post this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679640</id>
	<title>The Last We Will Ever Hear Of This</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1269952740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what we thought the last twenty times the case has been in the headlines...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what we thought the last twenty times the case has been in the headlines.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what we thought the last twenty times the case has been in the headlines...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1269951840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NOW can we get on with harvesting SCO's management for organs? We get that with this deal, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>NOW can we get on with harvesting SCO 's management for organs ?
We get that with this deal , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NOW can we get on with harvesting SCO's management for organs?
We get that with this deal, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31685408</id>
	<title>Not the last we will ever hear of this...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1270037700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as there is a higher court to appeal to, SCO and its minions will not likely give up. After all, they have litigation investors to answer to. The sunk-cost fallacy is lost on these guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as there is a higher court to appeal to , SCO and its minions will not likely give up .
After all , they have litigation investors to answer to .
The sunk-cost fallacy is lost on these guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as there is a higher court to appeal to, SCO and its minions will not likely give up.
After all, they have litigation investors to answer to.
The sunk-cost fallacy is lost on these guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677898</id>
	<title>No doubt this is the last we ever hear of this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269944880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this."</p><p>You made coffee squirt out my nose!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this .
" You made coffee squirt out my nose !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No doubt this is the last we will ever hear of any of this.
"You made coffee squirt out my nose!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678094</id>
	<title>Thank you, Novell... and here's $35 for you</title>
	<author>MikePlacid</author>
	<datestamp>1269945840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've just bought OpenSUSE dvd from Novell's website - as a way to say "Thank you!"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've just bought OpenSUSE dvd from Novell 's website - as a way to say " Thank you !
" .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've just bought OpenSUSE dvd from Novell's website - as a way to say "Thank you!
"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676866</id>
	<title>Organ sale?</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, their livers are probably shot, but I have to believe that there are other organs worth harvesting from the board of directors and the legal firm representing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , their livers are probably shot , but I have to believe that there are other organs worth harvesting from the board of directors and the legal firm representing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, their livers are probably shot, but I have to believe that there are other organs worth harvesting from the board of directors and the legal firm representing them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677584</id>
	<title>Re:Novel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269943560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Novell just turned down a 2 billion dollar offer. Obviously they value the UNIX copyrights much higher. Now it just needs to find a buyer with more then 2 billion dollars in pocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Novell just turned down a 2 billion dollar offer .
Obviously they value the UNIX copyrights much higher .
Now it just needs to find a buyer with more then 2 billion dollars in pocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Novell just turned down a 2 billion dollar offer.
Obviously they value the UNIX copyrights much higher.
Now it just needs to find a buyer with more then 2 billion dollars in pocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31685920</id>
	<title>hahah</title>
	<author>Dekonega</author>
	<datestamp>1270042080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>hahaha, fags sure got told!</htmltext>
<tokenext>hahaha , fags sure got told !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hahaha, fags sure got told!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678124</id>
	<title>Novell all set for start of next legal case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269946020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Financed by Microsoft, with Miguel as chief witness.</p><p>All your Linux are belong to us!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Financed by Microsoft , with Miguel as chief witness.All your Linux are belong to us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Financed by Microsoft, with Miguel as chief witness.All your Linux are belong to us!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679036</id>
	<title>It's worse than that</title>
	<author>SpammersAreScum</author>
	<datestamp>1269949920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if the judge doesn't force a transfer, Cahn has said they'll still continue the IBM suit on contract grounds. SCO's arrangement with its lawyers can keep this going (as well as an appeal) even if they're broke. This definitely has a ways to go, alas...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if the judge does n't force a transfer , Cahn has said they 'll still continue the IBM suit on contract grounds .
SCO 's arrangement with its lawyers can keep this going ( as well as an appeal ) even if they 're broke .
This definitely has a ways to go , alas.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if the judge doesn't force a transfer, Cahn has said they'll still continue the IBM suit on contract grounds.
SCO's arrangement with its lawyers can keep this going (as well as an appeal) even if they're broke.
This definitely has a ways to go, alas...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678182</id>
	<title>A little thing called Lanham Act</title>
	<author>celtic\_hackr</author>
	<datestamp>1269946200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a bit of legal ground where one entity can strip away the veil of limited liability of a company and go after the officers. It's referred to as the Lanham Act. When officer's of a company do things that are heinous and or illegal under the veil of limited liability in the name of a corporation this act can strip away that protection and go after the people and all their possesions. Pushing them into bankruptcy and taking it almost all. It isn't over yet. you wait and see. They may be very old when it's all over. But a few of them might live to see jail time, and bankruptcy and the lose of their chalet in France.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a bit of legal ground where one entity can strip away the veil of limited liability of a company and go after the officers .
It 's referred to as the Lanham Act .
When officer 's of a company do things that are heinous and or illegal under the veil of limited liability in the name of a corporation this act can strip away that protection and go after the people and all their possesions .
Pushing them into bankruptcy and taking it almost all .
It is n't over yet .
you wait and see .
They may be very old when it 's all over .
But a few of them might live to see jail time , and bankruptcy and the lose of their chalet in France .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a bit of legal ground where one entity can strip away the veil of limited liability of a company and go after the officers.
It's referred to as the Lanham Act.
When officer's of a company do things that are heinous and or illegal under the veil of limited liability in the name of a corporation this act can strip away that protection and go after the people and all their possesions.
Pushing them into bankruptcy and taking it almost all.
It isn't over yet.
you wait and see.
They may be very old when it's all over.
But a few of them might live to see jail time, and bankruptcy and the lose of their chalet in France.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31741306</id>
	<title>No SCO</title>
	<author>SphericalCrusher</author>
	<datestamp>1270463400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My god... SCO. The anti-SCO t-shirt I bought years ago is falling apart... that's how old this shit is. An organized Project Mayhem needs to be set in motion to completely wipe these guys out seems like....</htmltext>
<tokenext>My god... SCO. The anti-SCO t-shirt I bought years ago is falling apart... that 's how old this shit is .
An organized Project Mayhem needs to be set in motion to completely wipe these guys out seems like... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My god... SCO. The anti-SCO t-shirt I bought years ago is falling apart... that's how old this shit is.
An organized Project Mayhem needs to be set in motion to completely wipe these guys out seems like....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678350</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1269946800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's easy to say when your justice has been delayed.  When your justice has actually been denied, a little delay looks really good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's easy to say when your justice has been delayed .
When your justice has actually been denied , a little delay looks really good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's easy to say when your justice has been delayed.
When your justice has actually been denied, a little delay looks really good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677686</id>
	<title>Re:The last we'll hear? Not according to the link.</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1269944040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While IBM has contributed considerably to Linux, this claim seems to be that without IBM, Linux wouldn't have been a competitor is absurd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While IBM has contributed considerably to Linux , this claim seems to be that without IBM , Linux would n't have been a competitor is absurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While IBM has contributed considerably to Linux, this claim seems to be that without IBM, Linux wouldn't have been a competitor is absurd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677234</id>
	<title>Novell ONLY got what USL vs BSDI settlment didn't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep in mind that USL vs BSDI settlement (secret and first published on GROKLAW), did not give the IP or copyrights for all of Unix to USL (USL was owned by Novell at the time of the settlement).   The settlement when made public showed us that indeed much of Unix was not proprietary at all.   So, it is no wonder that Novell didn't transfer to Santa Cruz Operations, as they didn't  have all the marbles to transfer, so they didn't want everyone to know this, so they didn't transfer any (otherwise, then they would have to let the world know about the USL vs BSDI settlement (and everyone then would stop paying any money to Novell or any UNIX tax collector)... when BSD was free !</p><p>So - saying that Novell has all the IP marbles in the Unix world, and that Novell OWNS the Unix copyrights (all of them),  is not exactly correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind that USL vs BSDI settlement ( secret and first published on GROKLAW ) , did not give the IP or copyrights for all of Unix to USL ( USL was owned by Novell at the time of the settlement ) .
The settlement when made public showed us that indeed much of Unix was not proprietary at all .
So , it is no wonder that Novell did n't transfer to Santa Cruz Operations , as they did n't have all the marbles to transfer , so they did n't want everyone to know this , so they did n't transfer any ( otherwise , then they would have to let the world know about the USL vs BSDI settlement ( and everyone then would stop paying any money to Novell or any UNIX tax collector ) ... when BSD was free ! So - saying that Novell has all the IP marbles in the Unix world , and that Novell OWNS the Unix copyrights ( all of them ) , is not exactly correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind that USL vs BSDI settlement (secret and first published on GROKLAW), did not give the IP or copyrights for all of Unix to USL (USL was owned by Novell at the time of the settlement).
The settlement when made public showed us that indeed much of Unix was not proprietary at all.
So, it is no wonder that Novell didn't transfer to Santa Cruz Operations, as they didn't  have all the marbles to transfer, so they didn't want everyone to know this, so they didn't transfer any (otherwise, then they would have to let the world know about the USL vs BSDI settlement (and everyone then would stop paying any money to Novell or any UNIX tax collector)... when BSD was free !So - saying that Novell has all the IP marbles in the Unix world, and that Novell OWNS the Unix copyrights (all of them),  is not exactly correct.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677224</id>
	<title>Not a Linux story</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1269942360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the Linux-related claims were dismissed years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the Linux-related claims were dismissed years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the Linux-related claims were dismissed years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677734</id>
	<title>bad day for investors</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1269944160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=scoxq.pk" title="yahoo.com">http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=scoxq.pk</a> [yahoo.com]</p><p>Ouch!  from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.46 down to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.10.  While 36 cents might not sound like much, it's an 80\% drop in value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //finance.yahoo.com/q ? s = scoxq.pk [ yahoo.com ] Ouch !
from .46 down to .10 .
While 36 cents might not sound like much , it 's an 80 \ % drop in value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=scoxq.pk [yahoo.com]Ouch!
from .46 down to .10.
While 36 cents might not sound like much, it's an 80\% drop in value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677238</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM and Novell may not win anything tangible from this, but in the future, any would-be SCOs now know something they didn't know before: even if it is technically cheaper to play ball with an extortionist, neither IBM nor Novell will do this.  They will take the time and effort to crush you, repeatedly, until you stop.</p><p>Then again, as far as I know, nobody responsible for this SCO fiasco was ever charged with fraud.  So the less for would-be SCOs might be that you can do whatever you like and you'll never face justice.</p><p>Unless that's the next step in this drama, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM and Novell may not win anything tangible from this , but in the future , any would-be SCOs now know something they did n't know before : even if it is technically cheaper to play ball with an extortionist , neither IBM nor Novell will do this .
They will take the time and effort to crush you , repeatedly , until you stop.Then again , as far as I know , nobody responsible for this SCO fiasco was ever charged with fraud .
So the less for would-be SCOs might be that you can do whatever you like and you 'll never face justice.Unless that 's the next step in this drama , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM and Novell may not win anything tangible from this, but in the future, any would-be SCOs now know something they didn't know before: even if it is technically cheaper to play ball with an extortionist, neither IBM nor Novell will do this.
They will take the time and effort to crush you, repeatedly, until you stop.Then again, as far as I know, nobody responsible for this SCO fiasco was ever charged with fraud.
So the less for would-be SCOs might be that you can do whatever you like and you'll never face justice.Unless that's the next step in this drama, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680116</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1269954840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have finally found my inner-peace.</p><p>I held back on paying SCO for licensing since I've been using a Linux desktop for a while on my personal desktop. I couldn't stand it anymore - sleepless nights, the shakes, sweating, and I took up smoking and booze. I was about to rip out the credit card today after work and pay them. Good thing I read Slashdot first!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have finally found my inner-peace.I held back on paying SCO for licensing since I 've been using a Linux desktop for a while on my personal desktop .
I could n't stand it anymore - sleepless nights , the shakes , sweating , and I took up smoking and booze .
I was about to rip out the credit card today after work and pay them .
Good thing I read Slashdot first !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have finally found my inner-peace.I held back on paying SCO for licensing since I've been using a Linux desktop for a while on my personal desktop.
I couldn't stand it anymore - sleepless nights, the shakes, sweating, and I took up smoking and booze.
I was about to rip out the credit card today after work and pay them.
Good thing I read Slashdot first!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677896</id>
	<title>Groklaw's input</title>
	<author>mrflash818</author>
	<datestamp>1269944880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Groklaw's input:<br>'It's over. The jury has found that the copyrights did not go to SCO under the APA or anything else. The verdict is in. Novell has the news up on their website already, but I heard it from Chris Brown also. Here's the brief Novell statement:</p><p>"Today, the jury in the District Court of Utah trial between SCO Group and Novell issued a verdict.<br>Novell is very pleased with the jury&rsquo;s decision confirming Novell&rsquo;s ownership of the Unix copyrights, which SCO had asserted to own in its attack on Linux. Novell remains committed to promoting Linux, including by defending Linux on the intellectual property front.</p><p>This decision is good news for Novell, for Linux, and for the open source community." '</p><p><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622" title="groklaw.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622</a> [groklaw.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Groklaw 's input : 'It 's over .
The jury has found that the copyrights did not go to SCO under the APA or anything else .
The verdict is in .
Novell has the news up on their website already , but I heard it from Chris Brown also .
Here 's the brief Novell statement : " Today , the jury in the District Court of Utah trial between SCO Group and Novell issued a verdict.Novell is very pleased with the jury    s decision confirming Novell    s ownership of the Unix copyrights , which SCO had asserted to own in its attack on Linux .
Novell remains committed to promoting Linux , including by defending Linux on the intellectual property front.This decision is good news for Novell , for Linux , and for the open source community .
" 'http : //www.groklaw.net/article.php ? story = 20100330152829622 [ groklaw.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Groklaw's input:'It's over.
The jury has found that the copyrights did not go to SCO under the APA or anything else.
The verdict is in.
Novell has the news up on their website already, but I heard it from Chris Brown also.
Here's the brief Novell statement:"Today, the jury in the District Court of Utah trial between SCO Group and Novell issued a verdict.Novell is very pleased with the jury’s decision confirming Novell’s ownership of the Unix copyrights, which SCO had asserted to own in its attack on Linux.
Novell remains committed to promoting Linux, including by defending Linux on the intellectual property front.This decision is good news for Novell, for Linux, and for the open source community.
" 'http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622 [groklaw.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683454</id>
	<title>Re:No doubt this is the last we will ever hear...</title>
	<author>eeyore</author>
	<datestamp>1269975660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that a stake of ash through the heart was usual in these cases.<br>--<br>E</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that a stake of ash through the heart was usual in these cases.--E</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that a stake of ash through the heart was usual in these cases.--E</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676864</id>
	<title>In depth coverage on Groklaw</title>
	<author>Palestrina</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The coverage of record on this story, from the beginning, through the dark days and the brighter days, and on until the very end, has been <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622" title="groklaw.net">Groklaw</a> [groklaw.net].  I highly recommend taking a look there for more commentary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The coverage of record on this story , from the beginning , through the dark days and the brighter days , and on until the very end , has been Groklaw [ groklaw.net ] .
I highly recommend taking a look there for more commentary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The coverage of record on this story, from the beginning, through the dark days and the brighter days, and on until the very end, has been Groklaw [groklaw.net].
I highly recommend taking a look there for more commentary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678122</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>goffster</author>
	<datestamp>1269945960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is civil law.  There is no justice in civil law, only monetary redistribution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is civil law .
There is no justice in civil law , only monetary redistribution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is civil law.
There is no justice in civil law, only monetary redistribution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681586</id>
	<title>ahhh....</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1269961920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... I remember getting an email from SCO way back in 1998 or 1999 regarding a $700 "upgrade" to SCO something or other.  I ignored it back then and nothing came of it.  Have been following the 12-13 years of hilarity between then and now waiting for the inevitable.  Can't say I'm surprised and even if Novell failed, IBMs patent team will fuck SCO into the ground.
<p>
Its about time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... I remember getting an email from SCO way back in 1998 or 1999 regarding a $ 700 " upgrade " to SCO something or other .
I ignored it back then and nothing came of it .
Have been following the 12-13 years of hilarity between then and now waiting for the inevitable .
Ca n't say I 'm surprised and even if Novell failed , IBMs patent team will fuck SCO into the ground .
Its about time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I remember getting an email from SCO way back in 1998 or 1999 regarding a $700 "upgrade" to SCO something or other.
I ignored it back then and nothing came of it.
Have been following the 12-13 years of hilarity between then and now waiting for the inevitable.
Can't say I'm surprised and even if Novell failed, IBMs patent team will fuck SCO into the ground.
Its about time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683542</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Michael Woodhams</author>
	<datestamp>1269976680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can point to SCO and say 'Look what happened to the last company that tried to sue us on flimsy grounds in the hope we'd pay something to make them go away rather than fight it out in court.'</p><p>This mostly applies to IBM, who had options (early settlement or buying SCO) to avoid the case which Novell did not, and also more benefit to having SCO's head impaled on a spike on their battlements, as they're a bigger target to opportunistic lawsuits than Novell is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can point to SCO and say 'Look what happened to the last company that tried to sue us on flimsy grounds in the hope we 'd pay something to make them go away rather than fight it out in court .
'This mostly applies to IBM , who had options ( early settlement or buying SCO ) to avoid the case which Novell did not , and also more benefit to having SCO 's head impaled on a spike on their battlements , as they 're a bigger target to opportunistic lawsuits than Novell is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can point to SCO and say 'Look what happened to the last company that tried to sue us on flimsy grounds in the hope we'd pay something to make them go away rather than fight it out in court.
'This mostly applies to IBM, who had options (early settlement or buying SCO) to avoid the case which Novell did not, and also more benefit to having SCO's head impaled on a spike on their battlements, as they're a bigger target to opportunistic lawsuits than Novell is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680904</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Christoph</author>
	<datestamp>1269958440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's the court costs and disbursements (which are awarded as a matter of course), and the much larger expense, attorney fees, which are only awarded upon motion by a party. Attorney fees are not usually recoverable. But either way, if the other party is broke, you're right -- you can't recover.</p><p>One possible option is to bring a claim against SCO's attorneys for malicious prosecution. Such suits are difficult to win if they can argue any reasonable attorney would have considered the claim to have merit.</p><p>I'm 10 months into exactly such a suit (<a href="http://www.cgstock.com/malicious\_prosecution" title="cgstock.com">Gregerson v. Boris Parker, Bassford Remele, et. al.)</a> [cgstock.com] against two attorneys and three firms. It also involves copyright; after I produced a certificate of copyright registration (and abundant other proof) they continued to sue me for two years based on a denial of my copyright.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's the court costs and disbursements ( which are awarded as a matter of course ) , and the much larger expense , attorney fees , which are only awarded upon motion by a party .
Attorney fees are not usually recoverable .
But either way , if the other party is broke , you 're right -- you ca n't recover.One possible option is to bring a claim against SCO 's attorneys for malicious prosecution .
Such suits are difficult to win if they can argue any reasonable attorney would have considered the claim to have merit.I 'm 10 months into exactly such a suit ( Gregerson v. Boris Parker , Bassford Remele , et .
al. ) [ cgstock.com ] against two attorneys and three firms .
It also involves copyright ; after I produced a certificate of copyright registration ( and abundant other proof ) they continued to sue me for two years based on a denial of my copyright .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's the court costs and disbursements (which are awarded as a matter of course), and the much larger expense, attorney fees, which are only awarded upon motion by a party.
Attorney fees are not usually recoverable.
But either way, if the other party is broke, you're right -- you can't recover.One possible option is to bring a claim against SCO's attorneys for malicious prosecution.
Such suits are difficult to win if they can argue any reasonable attorney would have considered the claim to have merit.I'm 10 months into exactly such a suit (Gregerson v. Boris Parker, Bassford Remele, et.
al.) [cgstock.com] against two attorneys and three firms.
It also involves copyright; after I produced a certificate of copyright registration (and abundant other proof) they continued to sue me for two years based on a denial of my copyright.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683842</id>
	<title>No doubt this is the last we will ever hear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269979080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No doubt they will be back.<br>SCO is like the Daleks in Dr Who or Blowfeld in James Bond<br>like Freddy Kruger or Jason or the terminator.<br>you cant KILL true evil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt they will be back.SCO is like the Daleks in Dr Who or Blowfeld in James Bondlike Freddy Kruger or Jason or the terminator.you cant KILL true evil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt they will be back.SCO is like the Daleks in Dr Who or Blowfeld in James Bondlike Freddy Kruger or Jason or the terminator.you cant KILL true evil</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677466</id>
	<title>Re:Winning in this case...</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1269943080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a valid question with respect to Novell, but asking how IBM can afford seven years of court costs is a bit like asking whether Sauron can stay up all night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a valid question with respect to Novell , but asking how IBM can afford seven years of court costs is a bit like asking whether Sauron can stay up all night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a valid question with respect to Novell, but asking how IBM can afford seven years of court costs is a bit like asking whether Sauron can stay up all night.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677256</id>
	<title>This is not the last we will ever hear of any this</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269942420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot Slashdot dupes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot Slashdot dupes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot Slashdot dupes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770</id>
	<title>Novel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269941040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hurray!  Just in time for Novell to be bought out by Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hurray !
Just in time for Novell to be bought out by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hurray!
Just in time for Novell to be bought out by Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680606</id>
	<title>Nah, not Darl.  But there will be noise!</title>
	<author>dmforcier</author>
	<datestamp>1269956880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darl is no longer associated with SCO, and he has no axe to grind: his options are worthless and have been for a while.</p><p>OTOH, there is the invisible Ralph Yarro, majority stockholder and now priority creditor. And there is also Judge Cahn, the Trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court. Yarro has supplied cash, and Cahn seems to have drunk the kool-aid.</p><p>Immediately after the verdict, Cahn announced that SCO will go forward with the IBM case.  SCO may not have standing to sue for infringement, but they do have contract claims.</p><p>And then there's the UnitedLinux arbiration....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darl is no longer associated with SCO , and he has no axe to grind : his options are worthless and have been for a while.OTOH , there is the invisible Ralph Yarro , majority stockholder and now priority creditor .
And there is also Judge Cahn , the Trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court .
Yarro has supplied cash , and Cahn seems to have drunk the kool-aid.Immediately after the verdict , Cahn announced that SCO will go forward with the IBM case .
SCO may not have standing to sue for infringement , but they do have contract claims.And then there 's the UnitedLinux arbiration... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darl is no longer associated with SCO, and he has no axe to grind: his options are worthless and have been for a while.OTOH, there is the invisible Ralph Yarro, majority stockholder and now priority creditor.
And there is also Judge Cahn, the Trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court.
Yarro has supplied cash, and Cahn seems to have drunk the kool-aid.Immediately after the verdict, Cahn announced that SCO will go forward with the IBM case.
SCO may not have standing to sue for infringement, but they do have contract claims.And then there's the UnitedLinux arbiration....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31686114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31685092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31684594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1951242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31685092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31684594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31690440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31683454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31676770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31681694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31677324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31679440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31686114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31680202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1951242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31678500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1951242.31682942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
