<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_30_1727236</id>
	<title>Computer Vision Tech Grabs Humans In Real-Time 3D</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269972900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Tinkle writes <i>"Toshiba's R&amp;D Labs in Cambridge, UK have developed a system capable of real-time 3D modeling of the human face and body &mdash; using a simple set of three different colored lights. Simple it may be, but the <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/software/2010/03/30/photos-3d-replicas-to-help-sell-your-home-thats-computer-vision-39745647/4/#story">results are impressive</a>. Commercial <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/software/2010/03/30/photos-3d-replicas-to-help-sell-your-home-thats-computer-vision-39745647/">applications for computer vision technology</a> look set to be huge &mdash; according professor Roberto Cipolla. On the horizon: cheap and easy digitized everyday objects for ecommerce, plus gesture-based interfaces &mdash; a la Natal &mdash; and in-car safety systems. Ultimately even driver-less cars. 'This is going to be the decade of computer vision,' predicts Cipolla."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tinkle writes " Toshiba 's R&amp;D Labs in Cambridge , UK have developed a system capable of real-time 3D modeling of the human face and body    using a simple set of three different colored lights .
Simple it may be , but the results are impressive .
Commercial applications for computer vision technology look set to be huge    according professor Roberto Cipolla .
On the horizon : cheap and easy digitized everyday objects for ecommerce , plus gesture-based interfaces    a la Natal    and in-car safety systems .
Ultimately even driver-less cars .
'This is going to be the decade of computer vision, ' predicts Cipolla .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tinkle writes "Toshiba's R&amp;D Labs in Cambridge, UK have developed a system capable of real-time 3D modeling of the human face and body — using a simple set of three different colored lights.
Simple it may be, but the results are impressive.
Commercial applications for computer vision technology look set to be huge — according professor Roberto Cipolla.
On the horizon: cheap and easy digitized everyday objects for ecommerce, plus gesture-based interfaces — a la Natal — and in-car safety systems.
Ultimately even driver-less cars.
'This is going to be the decade of computer vision,' predicts Cipolla.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906</id>
	<title>Implications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269977400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to be a downer, as I'm often fascinated by computer vision technology, but aren't there some very negative potential applications here?  The UK is basically coated in CCTV cameras at this point, and our phones can broadcast GPS data to telcos (whom we KNOW are happy to hand over data to the NSA if they ask kindly).  Isn't fully-automated human tracking the third element of the surveillance state trifecta?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to be a downer , as I 'm often fascinated by computer vision technology , but are n't there some very negative potential applications here ?
The UK is basically coated in CCTV cameras at this point , and our phones can broadcast GPS data to telcos ( whom we KNOW are happy to hand over data to the NSA if they ask kindly ) .
Is n't fully-automated human tracking the third element of the surveillance state trifecta ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to be a downer, as I'm often fascinated by computer vision technology, but aren't there some very negative potential applications here?
The UK is basically coated in CCTV cameras at this point, and our phones can broadcast GPS data to telcos (whom we KNOW are happy to hand over data to the NSA if they ask kindly).
Isn't fully-automated human tracking the third element of the surveillance state trifecta?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675434</id>
	<title>And...</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1269979800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In further news 20 million CAPTCHA drones in 3rd world countries rioted at the prospect of being replaced by advances in computer vision which will render captcha technology useless...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In further news 20 million CAPTCHA drones in 3rd world countries rioted at the prospect of being replaced by advances in computer vision which will render captcha technology useless.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In further news 20 million CAPTCHA drones in 3rd world countries rioted at the prospect of being replaced by advances in computer vision which will render captcha technology useless...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676648</id>
	<title>The article started Face, how hard are guestures?</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1269940680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have thought gesture recognition would be relatively easy
just moment the position of hands, which should be the nearest object.
But its taking some time. Certainly having a computer recognise basic
hand movements and running scripts accordingly would be get timesaver.
On the subject, when will windows get a proper scripting language, like
Rexx was on OS2 and amiga?
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Computer\%20Vision/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Computer Vision</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have thought gesture recognition would be relatively easy just moment the position of hands , which should be the nearest object .
But its taking some time .
Certainly having a computer recognise basic hand movements and running scripts accordingly would be get timesaver .
On the subject , when will windows get a proper scripting language , like Rexx was on OS2 and amiga ?
--- Computer Vision [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have thought gesture recognition would be relatively easy
just moment the position of hands, which should be the nearest object.
But its taking some time.
Certainly having a computer recognise basic
hand movements and running scripts accordingly would be get timesaver.
On the subject, when will windows get a proper scripting language, like
Rexx was on OS2 and amiga?
---

Computer Vision [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674788</id>
	<title>The obligatory response:</title>
	<author>internic</author>
	<datestamp>1269976920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are <em>four</em> lights!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are four lights !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are four lights!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31679388</id>
	<title>Re:Obvious applications in rapid prototyping.</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269951660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd need different sets of colors for each camera or you'll get cross-contamination between cameras.  It would be better to just spin the object.  The other option is to use specific wavelengths and filter out the light profiles for each camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd need different sets of colors for each camera or you 'll get cross-contamination between cameras .
It would be better to just spin the object .
The other option is to use specific wavelengths and filter out the light profiles for each camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd need different sets of colors for each camera or you'll get cross-contamination between cameras.
It would be better to just spin the object.
The other option is to use specific wavelengths and filter out the light profiles for each camera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31677196</id>
	<title>One step closer to...</title>
	<author>D3</author>
	<datestamp>1269942240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Running Man!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Running Man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Running Man!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674950</id>
	<title>Colors</title>
	<author>Conspiracy\_Of\_Doves</author>
	<datestamp>1269977580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of red green and blue, could they use three different frequencies in the infrared range? Then they could also take photographs in normal visible light and wrap then around the model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of red green and blue , could they use three different frequencies in the infrared range ?
Then they could also take photographs in normal visible light and wrap then around the model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of red green and blue, could they use three different frequencies in the infrared range?
Then they could also take photographs in normal visible light and wrap then around the model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674996</id>
	<title>Re:Skip to the chase</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269977820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until they can construct 3D models AND animate them convincingly I don't think there are any implications. Having viewers download a 3D model to admire on their 2D display doesn't seem to offer much advantage over photos or video. Loading the model in an editor and applying different clothing or performing a virtual boob-job maybe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until they can construct 3D models AND animate them convincingly I do n't think there are any implications .
Having viewers download a 3D model to admire on their 2D display does n't seem to offer much advantage over photos or video .
Loading the model in an editor and applying different clothing or performing a virtual boob-job maybe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until they can construct 3D models AND animate them convincingly I don't think there are any implications.
Having viewers download a 3D model to admire on their 2D display doesn't seem to offer much advantage over photos or video.
Loading the model in an editor and applying different clothing or performing a virtual boob-job maybe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31680644</id>
	<title>Re:Sculpting / Rapid Prototyping solutions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269957000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am well aware of what the current technologies are, and how expensive they are.</p><p>ALL of them involve a laser light that gets incrementally dragged across the surface of the object, and the output is a set of points in a cloud, and yes, there ARE specialist firms that deal with it.</p><p>The point I was trying to make was that this technology would make a more simplified technology available, and would greatly reduce the cost of entry into the digital prototyping market.  It might not get the same resolution as a traditional scanner, but most everyone can afford a high-end digital camera, and some LEDs.</p><p>This whole technology looks like a simple ray-trace algorithm (Single bounce), coupled with selective output from a CCD, and some preprogrammed static variables. (Angles of the LED cones of exposure, distance between LEDs, Distances of LEDs to surface of object, and distance of camera from object, for instance.) All of that could be incorporated into a digital camera firmware.</p><p>The most expensive part of the setup would be the software licensing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am well aware of what the current technologies are , and how expensive they are.ALL of them involve a laser light that gets incrementally dragged across the surface of the object , and the output is a set of points in a cloud , and yes , there ARE specialist firms that deal with it.The point I was trying to make was that this technology would make a more simplified technology available , and would greatly reduce the cost of entry into the digital prototyping market .
It might not get the same resolution as a traditional scanner , but most everyone can afford a high-end digital camera , and some LEDs.This whole technology looks like a simple ray-trace algorithm ( Single bounce ) , coupled with selective output from a CCD , and some preprogrammed static variables .
( Angles of the LED cones of exposure , distance between LEDs , Distances of LEDs to surface of object , and distance of camera from object , for instance .
) All of that could be incorporated into a digital camera firmware.The most expensive part of the setup would be the software licensing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am well aware of what the current technologies are, and how expensive they are.ALL of them involve a laser light that gets incrementally dragged across the surface of the object, and the output is a set of points in a cloud, and yes, there ARE specialist firms that deal with it.The point I was trying to make was that this technology would make a more simplified technology available, and would greatly reduce the cost of entry into the digital prototyping market.
It might not get the same resolution as a traditional scanner, but most everyone can afford a high-end digital camera, and some LEDs.This whole technology looks like a simple ray-trace algorithm (Single bounce), coupled with selective output from a CCD, and some preprogrammed static variables.
(Angles of the LED cones of exposure, distance between LEDs, Distances of LEDs to surface of object, and distance of camera from object, for instance.
) All of that could be incorporated into a digital camera firmware.The most expensive part of the setup would be the software licensing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676874</id>
	<title>Sculpting / Rapid Prototyping solutions</title>
	<author>dj245</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest a <a href="http://faro.com/content.aspx?ct=di&amp;content=pro&amp;item=1&amp;subitem=0&amp;tab=1" title="faro.com">Faro Laser ScanArm</a> [faro.com] or possibly a Faro Laser Scanner.  Both can turn a hand-made model into a 3d drawing.  The equipment is fairly expensive (~$100k), but you can hire firms that have the equipment to scan your stuff.  The company we use charges about $200 an hour, but depending on what you're scanning, this might be really cheap.

The Faro technology is fantastic, but since the market is not so large, the prices are high. The equipment is also precision-made and durable enough to survive industrial environments, both of which probably increase the cost dramatically.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest a Faro Laser ScanArm [ faro.com ] or possibly a Faro Laser Scanner .
Both can turn a hand-made model into a 3d drawing .
The equipment is fairly expensive ( ~ $ 100k ) , but you can hire firms that have the equipment to scan your stuff .
The company we use charges about $ 200 an hour , but depending on what you 're scanning , this might be really cheap .
The Faro technology is fantastic , but since the market is not so large , the prices are high .
The equipment is also precision-made and durable enough to survive industrial environments , both of which probably increase the cost dramatically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest a Faro Laser ScanArm [faro.com] or possibly a Faro Laser Scanner.
Both can turn a hand-made model into a 3d drawing.
The equipment is fairly expensive (~$100k), but you can hire firms that have the equipment to scan your stuff.
The company we use charges about $200 an hour, but depending on what you're scanning, this might be really cheap.
The Faro technology is fantastic, but since the market is not so large, the prices are high.
The equipment is also precision-made and durable enough to survive industrial environments, both of which probably increase the cost dramatically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675092</id>
	<title>Interference</title>
	<author>acheron12</author>
	<datestamp>1269978300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since this requires shining lights on the object to be digitized from particular angles, two or more independent vision systems (e.g. in driverless cars) would probably interfere with each other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this requires shining lights on the object to be digitized from particular angles , two or more independent vision systems ( e.g .
in driverless cars ) would probably interfere with each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this requires shining lights on the object to be digitized from particular angles, two or more independent vision systems (e.g.
in driverless cars) would probably interfere with each other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675124</id>
	<title>All your face are belong to us</title>
	<author>moteyalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1269978540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is a fantastic leap in thinking!<br>
I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a fantastic leap in thinking !
I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a fantastic leap in thinking!
I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675706</id>
	<title>Artificial Intelligence is around the corner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269980760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Real World to 3d models is a core component on AI.  The AI needs to see its world before it can make decisions inside it.  Imagine quake, you can make a bot to play inside it because you have all the data in the game.  Now if you wanted to make a "Fetch me a beer bot", the thing would have to know what your house looked like to navigate the instruction path.<br> <br>
Obviously you'll need to write software that also "identifies" the 3d objects you're looking at, and that will take some work, but isn't impossible using pattern recognition.<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.goodnewsjim.com/js2/" title="goodnewsjim.com" rel="nofollow"> I have a small page on how I think AI will come about</a> [goodnewsjim.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Real World to 3d models is a core component on AI .
The AI needs to see its world before it can make decisions inside it .
Imagine quake , you can make a bot to play inside it because you have all the data in the game .
Now if you wanted to make a " Fetch me a beer bot " , the thing would have to know what your house looked like to navigate the instruction path .
Obviously you 'll need to write software that also " identifies " the 3d objects you 're looking at , and that will take some work , but is n't impossible using pattern recognition .
I have a small page on how I think AI will come about [ goodnewsjim.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real World to 3d models is a core component on AI.
The AI needs to see its world before it can make decisions inside it.
Imagine quake, you can make a bot to play inside it because you have all the data in the game.
Now if you wanted to make a "Fetch me a beer bot", the thing would have to know what your house looked like to navigate the instruction path.
Obviously you'll need to write software that also "identifies" the 3d objects you're looking at, and that will take some work, but isn't impossible using pattern recognition.
I have a small page on how I think AI will come about [goodnewsjim.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675366</id>
	<title>Real Avatars and computer gaming</title>
	<author>NonSenseAgency</author>
	<datestamp>1269979560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of the uses mentioned in the article was that this would enable gamers to upload realistic portrayals of themselves into computer games as their avatar. Unfortunately ( or perhaps fortunately for some of us), real virtual life isn't anything like Neal Stephenson's "Snowcrash" novel. Most gamers, unlike the hero Hiro Protagonist (pun intended) do not want to look like themselves at all. They are bigger, or meaner, or better looking or in the case of all too many, not even the same gender.


What would seem far more likely is a market springing up in avatars made from recordings of real people. So this begs a whole new question, who owns your avatar? Intellectual Property rights just took a huge twist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the uses mentioned in the article was that this would enable gamers to upload realistic portrayals of themselves into computer games as their avatar .
Unfortunately ( or perhaps fortunately for some of us ) , real virtual life is n't anything like Neal Stephenson 's " Snowcrash " novel .
Most gamers , unlike the hero Hiro Protagonist ( pun intended ) do not want to look like themselves at all .
They are bigger , or meaner , or better looking or in the case of all too many , not even the same gender .
What would seem far more likely is a market springing up in avatars made from recordings of real people .
So this begs a whole new question , who owns your avatar ?
Intellectual Property rights just took a huge twist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the uses mentioned in the article was that this would enable gamers to upload realistic portrayals of themselves into computer games as their avatar.
Unfortunately ( or perhaps fortunately for some of us), real virtual life isn't anything like Neal Stephenson's "Snowcrash" novel.
Most gamers, unlike the hero Hiro Protagonist (pun intended) do not want to look like themselves at all.
They are bigger, or meaner, or better looking or in the case of all too many, not even the same gender.
What would seem far more likely is a market springing up in avatars made from recordings of real people.
So this begs a whole new question, who owns your avatar?
Intellectual Property rights just took a huge twist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675034</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269978000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key is to not let them stop at a trifecta. We the people need to add a 4th element: renegade tracking and recording of "the watchers."</p><p>Once everybody is subjected to the same rules and consequences, the idea of a surveillance society seems a lot less scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key is to not let them stop at a trifecta .
We the people need to add a 4th element : renegade tracking and recording of " the watchers .
" Once everybody is subjected to the same rules and consequences , the idea of a surveillance society seems a lot less scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key is to not let them stop at a trifecta.
We the people need to add a 4th element: renegade tracking and recording of "the watchers.
"Once everybody is subjected to the same rules and consequences, the idea of a surveillance society seems a lot less scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675146</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>spleen\_blender</author>
	<datestamp>1269978600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>if it will be able to perceive black people.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>if it will be able to perceive black people .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = t4DT3tQqgRM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if it will be able to perceive black people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675122</id>
	<title>John Bell, err, Bill Joy was right!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269978540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just improve skynet's target acquisition algorithms, why don't you?!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just improve skynet 's target acquisition algorithms , why do n't you ? ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just improve skynet's target acquisition algorithms, why don't you?!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726</id>
	<title>Skip to the chase</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269976680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What implications does this development have for the pornography industry?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What implications does this development have for the pornography industry ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What implications does this development have for the pornography industry?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675934</id>
	<title>Re:oic</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1269981600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, in different areas of the U.S. I have driven (San Francisco, CA; Denver, CO;, Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA, Phoenix, AZ; Tampa, FL and others) I would say that driver-less cars would as safe (if not safer) than cars with drivers in some of those areas.</p><p>Of course, it kind of depends on the driving conditions (rush hour, driven rain storms, blizzards, thick fog, etc.).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , in different areas of the U.S. I have driven ( San Francisco , CA ; Denver , CO ; , Chicago , IL ; Los Angeles , CA , Phoenix , AZ ; Tampa , FL and others ) I would say that driver-less cars would as safe ( if not safer ) than cars with drivers in some of those areas.Of course , it kind of depends on the driving conditions ( rush hour , driven rain storms , blizzards , thick fog , etc .
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, in different areas of the U.S. I have driven (San Francisco, CA; Denver, CO;, Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA, Phoenix, AZ; Tampa, FL and others) I would say that driver-less cars would as safe (if not safer) than cars with drivers in some of those areas.Of course, it kind of depends on the driving conditions (rush hour, driven rain storms, blizzards, thick fog, etc.
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31684396</id>
	<title>how long...</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1270027860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>until hollywood use it to make actors obsolete?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>until hollywood use it to make actors obsolete ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>until hollywood use it to make actors obsolete?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675098</id>
	<title>Impressive</title>
	<author>wilcley</author>
	<datestamp>1269978360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like the Toshiba group accomplishes with one camera what <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/paul\_debevec\_animates\_a\_photo\_real\_digital\_face.html" title="ted.com" rel="nofollow">these guys</a> [ted.com] did with dozens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like the Toshiba group accomplishes with one camera what these guys [ ted.com ] did with dozens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like the Toshiba group accomplishes with one camera what these guys [ted.com] did with dozens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675006</id>
	<title>Re:Obvious applications in rapid prototyping.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269977880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, but they're a bit late. project natal was presented commercially last year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , but they 're a bit late .
project natal was presented commercially last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, but they're a bit late.
project natal was presented commercially last year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675758</id>
	<title>I like this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269980940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the possible use in making avatars for games.  That alone makes it a great technology.  You could have the computer record your facial expressions and apply them to ingame emotes too.  Would make for excellent MMORPG characters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the possible use in making avatars for games .
That alone makes it a great technology .
You could have the computer record your facial expressions and apply them to ingame emotes too .
Would make for excellent MMORPG characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the possible use in making avatars for games.
That alone makes it a great technology.
You could have the computer record your facial expressions and apply them to ingame emotes too.
Would make for excellent MMORPG characters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796</id>
	<title>Obvious applications in rapid prototyping.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269976980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right now, 3D camera technology to scan a hand-made prototype into commercial CAD software revolves around a scanning laser, and special cameras, and a turn table.</p><p>Combining this technology with other image mapping software would allow you to use 3 or 4 fixed cameras with overlapping FOVs, you would be able to simply set your source model on a table, turn on the lights, take a picture, and you are done.</p><p>I would SOO love to have a FOSS implementation of this modeling software.</p><p>(I sculpt, and being able to make a large physical object, scan it, then send the digital model to a rapid prototype house and get a miniature size made from the digital version would be VERY handy.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now , 3D camera technology to scan a hand-made prototype into commercial CAD software revolves around a scanning laser , and special cameras , and a turn table.Combining this technology with other image mapping software would allow you to use 3 or 4 fixed cameras with overlapping FOVs , you would be able to simply set your source model on a table , turn on the lights , take a picture , and you are done.I would SOO love to have a FOSS implementation of this modeling software .
( I sculpt , and being able to make a large physical object , scan it , then send the digital model to a rapid prototype house and get a miniature size made from the digital version would be VERY handy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now, 3D camera technology to scan a hand-made prototype into commercial CAD software revolves around a scanning laser, and special cameras, and a turn table.Combining this technology with other image mapping software would allow you to use 3 or 4 fixed cameras with overlapping FOVs, you would be able to simply set your source model on a table, turn on the lights, take a picture, and you are done.I would SOO love to have a FOSS implementation of this modeling software.
(I sculpt, and being able to make a large physical object, scan it, then send the digital model to a rapid prototype house and get a miniature size made from the digital version would be VERY handy.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675612</id>
	<title>Mick</title>
	<author>michaelmalak</author>
	<datestamp>1269980400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone else, having read just the headline, think this was about Mick Jagger?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else , having read just the headline , think this was about Mick Jagger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else, having read just the headline, think this was about Mick Jagger?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31684254</id>
	<title>Avatars?</title>
	<author>KlausBreuer</author>
	<datestamp>1270026600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I quote: "One potential usage for the tech is to create avatars that are not just cartoonesque versions of the computer user but an exact copy. Gamers would then be able to upload their digital double into their favourite games."</p><p>Sooooo.... instead of your gaming appearance in the form of a muscular avatar with a shock full of hair, you'll show people that you're in reality a balding fatso?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I quote : " One potential usage for the tech is to create avatars that are not just cartoonesque versions of the computer user but an exact copy .
Gamers would then be able to upload their digital double into their favourite games. " Sooooo... .
instead of your gaming appearance in the form of a muscular avatar with a shock full of hair , you 'll show people that you 're in reality a balding fatso ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I quote: "One potential usage for the tech is to create avatars that are not just cartoonesque versions of the computer user but an exact copy.
Gamers would then be able to upload their digital double into their favourite games."Sooooo....
instead of your gaming appearance in the form of a muscular avatar with a shock full of hair, you'll show people that you're in reality a balding fatso?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31678012</id>
	<title>Uh Oh</title>
	<author>spaceman375</author>
	<datestamp>1269945420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks around...
<br>   Red Light source --check
<br>   Yellow light source -  check
<br>   Green light source -  check
<br>   Other colors from monitor<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......
<p>
I think I'll go polish my tinfoil hat.
</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/// Oooo, Shiny</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks around.. . Red Light source --check Yellow light source - check Green light source - check Other colors from monitor ..... . I think I 'll go polish my tinfoil hat .
/// Oooo , Shiny</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks around...
   Red Light source --check
   Yellow light source -  check
   Green light source -  check
   Other colors from monitor ......

I think I'll go polish my tinfoil hat.
/// Oooo, Shiny</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31684472</id>
	<title>Re:Skip to the chase</title>
	<author>junjie\_1024</author>
	<datestamp>1270028580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here are good news for fashion <a href="http://www.mychanelmall.com/" title="mychanelmall.com" rel="nofollow">Chanel handbags</a> [mychanelmall.com]lovers! There are countless Chanel handbags

New arrivals, including Chanel leather handbags, Chanle flap handbags, Chanel Flap Bag, Chanel Shoulder Bag, Chanel Coco Cabas

Shoulder Handbags, Chanel Cambon Bag Black, Chanel Line Tote Handbags and Chanel Wallet, etc. Fashion
<a href="http://www.mychanelmall.com/chanel-wallet-c-8.html" title="mychanelmall.com" rel="nofollow">Chanle wallets</a> [mychanelmall.com], especially black Chanel wallet, can make you more

sexier. You can find
<a href="http://www.mychanelmall.com/" title="mychanelmall.com" rel="nofollow">Chanel bags</a> [mychanelmall.com] sale online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are good news for fashion Chanel handbags [ mychanelmall.com ] lovers !
There are countless Chanel handbags New arrivals , including Chanel leather handbags , Chanle flap handbags , Chanel Flap Bag , Chanel Shoulder Bag , Chanel Coco Cabas Shoulder Handbags , Chanel Cambon Bag Black , Chanel Line Tote Handbags and Chanel Wallet , etc .
Fashion Chanle wallets [ mychanelmall.com ] , especially black Chanel wallet , can make you more sexier .
You can find Chanel bags [ mychanelmall.com ] sale online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are good news for fashion Chanel handbags [mychanelmall.com]lovers!
There are countless Chanel handbags

New arrivals, including Chanel leather handbags, Chanle flap handbags, Chanel Flap Bag, Chanel Shoulder Bag, Chanel Coco Cabas

Shoulder Handbags, Chanel Cambon Bag Black, Chanel Line Tote Handbags and Chanel Wallet, etc.
Fashion
Chanle wallets [mychanelmall.com], especially black Chanel wallet, can make you more

sexier.
You can find
Chanel bags [mychanelmall.com] sale online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675668</id>
	<title>Re:All your face are belong to us</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1269980700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas?</p></div><p>Only with crude beings does this work, not luminous matter.</p><p>And you'll have too many stars with overlapping spectra to have effective chroma isolation for mapping non-stellar matter, let alone the problem of first mapping out all the light sources contributing to its illumination.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas ? Only with crude beings does this work , not luminous matter.And you 'll have too many stars with overlapping spectra to have effective chroma isolation for mapping non-stellar matter , let alone the problem of first mapping out all the light sources contributing to its illumination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am wondering if this technique could be used with the spectrum of stars to identify the 3 dimensional structure of distant galaxies and clouds of gas?Only with crude beings does this work, not luminous matter.And you'll have too many stars with overlapping spectra to have effective chroma isolation for mapping non-stellar matter, let alone the problem of first mapping out all the light sources contributing to its illumination.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674850</id>
	<title>Windows xp FTW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269977160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>n/t</htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31679356</id>
	<title>Martian eyes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269951600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and thats new technology? No, simply old martian tech</p><p>at last, they are filtering a bit of technology from Area 51s hijacked UFO</p><p>http://www.war-ofthe-worlds.co.uk/images/war\_worlds\_pal\_10\_x.jpg<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and thats new technology ?
No , simply old martian techat last , they are filtering a bit of technology from Area 51s hijacked UFOhttp : //www.war-ofthe-worlds.co.uk/images/war \ _worlds \ _pal \ _10 \ _x.jpg ; D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and thats new technology?
No, simply old martian techat last, they are filtering a bit of technology from Area 51s hijacked UFOhttp://www.war-ofthe-worlds.co.uk/images/war\_worlds\_pal\_10\_x.jpg ;D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714</id>
	<title>oic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269976680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Driverless cars huh? Not sure how safe I feel about that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Driverless cars huh ?
Not sure how safe I feel about that ; &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Driverless cars huh?
Not sure how safe I feel about that ;&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675250</id>
	<title>Re:Skip to the chase</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269979080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well since you don't have to hold the steering wheel anymore...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well since you do n't have to hold the steering wheel anymore.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well since you don't have to hold the steering wheel anymore...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675620</id>
	<title>Re:oic</title>
	<author>shadowrat</author>
	<datestamp>1269980460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's totally safe as long as they only drive in dark rooms illuminated only by red, green, and blue lights at fixed positions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's totally safe as long as they only drive in dark rooms illuminated only by red , green , and blue lights at fixed positions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's totally safe as long as they only drive in dark rooms illuminated only by red, green, and blue lights at fixed positions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31677230</id>
	<title>Old principle, but better!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269942360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like a photometric stereo using colored light technique. This has been done since at least early 90's.<br>Other applications:<br>http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/VideoNormals/</p><p>But their take seems to make it work very well on the entire head, including hair - so a wide range of reflectance behavior.<br>This has been the challenge to this technique. Good work and proof of concept on how far this technique can go though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like a photometric stereo using colored light technique .
This has been done since at least early 90 's.Other applications : http : //mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/VideoNormals/But their take seems to make it work very well on the entire head , including hair - so a wide range of reflectance behavior.This has been the challenge to this technique .
Good work and proof of concept on how far this technique can go though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like a photometric stereo using colored light technique.
This has been done since at least early 90's.Other applications:http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/VideoNormals/But their take seems to make it work very well on the entire head, including hair - so a wide range of reflectance behavior.This has been the challenge to this technique.
Good work and proof of concept on how far this technique can go though!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675052</id>
	<title>THIS is going to be the decade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269978120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> ( 'This is going to be the decade of computer vision,' predicts Cipolla. )</p><p>where Twitter creates democracy and freedom around <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9MUuL647GU&amp;feature=player\_embedded#at=32" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">the world</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Yours In Perm,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( 'This is going to be the decade of computer vision, ' predicts Cipolla .
) where Twitter creates democracy and freedom around the world [ youtube.com ] .Yours In Perm,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ( 'This is going to be the decade of computer vision,' predicts Cipolla.
)where Twitter creates democracy and freedom around the world [youtube.com].Yours In Perm,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675138</id>
	<title>Re:Implications</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1269978600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hate to be a downer, as I'm often fascinated by computer vision technology, but aren't there some very negative potential applications here?</p> </div><p>You mean like how this will affect a bunch of epileptic kids walking down the street on a school field trip?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to be a downer , as I 'm often fascinated by computer vision technology , but are n't there some very negative potential applications here ?
You mean like how this will affect a bunch of epileptic kids walking down the street on a school field trip ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to be a downer, as I'm often fascinated by computer vision technology, but aren't there some very negative potential applications here?
You mean like how this will affect a bunch of epileptic kids walking down the street on a school field trip?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675328</id>
	<title>Re:The obligatory response:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269979500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Err, it's only obligatory to Star Trek (specifically, TNG) fans.</p><p>(damn - I'm not really a Trek fan but I actually know that. double-damn!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Err , it 's only obligatory to Star Trek ( specifically , TNG ) fans .
( damn - I 'm not really a Trek fan but I actually know that .
double-damn ! )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Err, it's only obligatory to Star Trek (specifically, TNG) fans.
(damn - I'm not really a Trek fan but I actually know that.
double-damn!)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31680596</id>
	<title>Yeah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the year of the 3d vision enhanced Linux desktop!...... yep</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the year of the 3d vision enhanced Linux desktop ! ..... .
yep</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the year of the 3d vision enhanced Linux desktop!......
yep</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675268</id>
	<title>Promise</title>
	<author>sonicmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1269979200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This has such incredible promise for the low-cost development of modern day games.  Animation still presents a problem of course.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has such incredible promise for the low-cost development of modern day games .
Animation still presents a problem of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has such incredible promise for the low-cost development of modern day games.
Animation still presents a problem of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31679388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31684472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31680644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1727236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31684472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31677196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676874
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31680644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31679388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31676648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31674950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1727236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1727236.31675668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
