<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_30_1257222</id>
	<title>Next iPhone &mdash; Front-Facing Camera, A4 Processor</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269957600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>As a quarter million pre-orderers wait for their iPad on Saturday, the millions of iPhone users can start <a href="http://www.edibleapple.com/iphone-hd-rumored-to-include-double-resolution-display-front-facing-camera-and-a4-processor/">speculating in earnest about the next gen iPhone</a>.  The rumors start by saying  <i>"It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a quarter million pre-orderers wait for their iPad on Saturday , the millions of iPhone users can start speculating in earnest about the next gen iPhone .
The rumors start by saying " It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD ' and will include a double resolution display , a front facing camera , multitasking support , and the blazing A4 processor .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a quarter million pre-orderers wait for their iPad on Saturday, the millions of iPhone users can start speculating in earnest about the next gen iPhone.
The rumors start by saying  "It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672110</id>
	<title>Packing</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1269968100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard that it will have a 12 inch screen that rolls up into a 3" diameter so you can stick it in your pants.  Nerds finally get a toy that impresses the ladies.  Did I mention that when the phone is set to vibrate . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that it will have a 12 inch screen that rolls up into a 3 " diameter so you can stick it in your pants .
Nerds finally get a toy that impresses the ladies .
Did I mention that when the phone is set to vibrate .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that it will have a 12 inch screen that rolls up into a 3" diameter so you can stick it in your pants.
Nerds finally get a toy that impresses the ladies.
Did I mention that when the phone is set to vibrate .
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</id>
	<title>Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>dazedNconfuzed</author>
	<datestamp>1269961920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products, it's that <b>nobody talking knows anything</b>. If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.</p><p>Remember how the iPad was supposed to have a front-facing camera, an awesome chess game, full 1080p HD video, solar charging, biometric security, etc. - and wasn't going to just be a fat iPod Touch? Yeah.</p><p>Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement. Duh. Anything more than that is pure rampant rabid speculation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products , it 's that nobody talking knows anything .
If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it 's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.Remember how the iPad was supposed to have a front-facing camera , an awesome chess game , full 1080p HD video , solar charging , biometric security , etc .
- and was n't going to just be a fat iPod Touch ?
Yeah.Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement .
Duh. Anything more than that is pure rampant rabid speculation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products, it's that nobody talking knows anything.
If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.Remember how the iPad was supposed to have a front-facing camera, an awesome chess game, full 1080p HD video, solar charging, biometric security, etc.
- and wasn't going to just be a fat iPod Touch?
Yeah.Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement.
Duh. Anything more than that is pure rampant rabid speculation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669994</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>qoncept</author>
	<datestamp>1269961860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://gear.ign.com/articles/106/1065534p1.html" title="ign.com">http://gear.ign.com/articles/106/1065534p1.html</a> [ign.com]

<br> <br>I don't think Apple devices will ever support flash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gear.ign.com/articles/106/1065534p1.html [ ign.com ] I do n't think Apple devices will ever support flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gear.ign.com/articles/106/1065534p1.html [ign.com]

 I don't think Apple devices will ever support flash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670058</id>
	<title>Re:Not so HD ?</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1269962100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Internally, 420p is completely plausible.  however, that's not the idea...  With NFC, and an appropriate receiver (or a simple dock and cable) 1080p connection to a TV is completely within reason.  Further, a tiny adjustment to the mini displayport on upcoming mac notebooks (and PCs as well, since it's part of the standard), and video in to a notebook through playback on an iPod/iPhone is completely plausible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Internally , 420p is completely plausible .
however , that 's not the idea... With NFC , and an appropriate receiver ( or a simple dock and cable ) 1080p connection to a TV is completely within reason .
Further , a tiny adjustment to the mini displayport on upcoming mac notebooks ( and PCs as well , since it 's part of the standard ) , and video in to a notebook through playback on an iPod/iPhone is completely plausible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Internally, 420p is completely plausible.
however, that's not the idea...  With NFC, and an appropriate receiver (or a simple dock and cable) 1080p connection to a TV is completely within reason.
Further, a tiny adjustment to the mini displayport on upcoming mac notebooks (and PCs as well, since it's part of the standard), and video in to a notebook through playback on an iPod/iPhone is completely plausible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671542</id>
	<title>Slate rumors</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269966600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone was absolutely convinced the iPad was going to be called the Slate or iSlate. And most of the rumors ($999 pricetag) were wrong. In fact, most Apple speculation proves to be wrong.</p><p>The 3G S was definately going to have a higher-resolution OLED screen and front-facing camera, remember?</p><p>I certainly hope these new rumors are true, but I'm content to wait for a press release and focus on facts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone was absolutely convinced the iPad was going to be called the Slate or iSlate .
And most of the rumors ( $ 999 pricetag ) were wrong .
In fact , most Apple speculation proves to be wrong.The 3G S was definately going to have a higher-resolution OLED screen and front-facing camera , remember ? I certainly hope these new rumors are true , but I 'm content to wait for a press release and focus on facts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone was absolutely convinced the iPad was going to be called the Slate or iSlate.
And most of the rumors ($999 pricetag) were wrong.
In fact, most Apple speculation proves to be wrong.The 3G S was definately going to have a higher-resolution OLED screen and front-facing camera, remember?I certainly hope these new rumors are true, but I'm content to wait for a press release and focus on facts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908</id>
	<title>Remarkable, though...</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269961440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>.... how Apple always manages to thrive upon rumors instead of upon "classical" ads. You may call such rumors "hypes", and they prolly are. Still, they do constitute remarkable publicity feats.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.... how Apple always manages to thrive upon rumors instead of upon " classical " ads .
You may call such rumors " hypes " , and they prolly are .
Still , they do constitute remarkable publicity feats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... how Apple always manages to thrive upon rumors instead of upon "classical" ads.
You may call such rumors "hypes", and they prolly are.
Still, they do constitute remarkable publicity feats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673124</id>
	<title>Unannounced Firefox bug?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1269971220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There must be some sort of DNS spoofing exploit that's currently being used to attack Firefox - my browser's address bar says slashdot.com but I'm obviously on macrumors.com.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There must be some sort of DNS spoofing exploit that 's currently being used to attack Firefox - my browser 's address bar says slashdot.com but I 'm obviously on macrumors.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There must be some sort of DNS spoofing exploit that's currently being used to attack Firefox - my browser's address bar says slashdot.com but I'm obviously on macrumors.com.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100</id>
	<title>front facing, rear facing</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269962220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is there some reason why a camera cannot be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants?</p><p>A rotating camera inside a transparent sphere or maybe a system of mirrors and a software switch between directions?</p><p>Not that I care about an iphone or a camera on a mobile, it's just a strange 'improvement'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is there some reason why a camera can not be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants ? A rotating camera inside a transparent sphere or maybe a system of mirrors and a software switch between directions ? Not that I care about an iphone or a camera on a mobile , it 's just a strange 'improvement' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is there some reason why a camera cannot be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants?A rotating camera inside a transparent sphere or maybe a system of mirrors and a software switch between directions?Not that I care about an iphone or a camera on a mobile, it's just a strange 'improvement'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670324</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1269962940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement.</p></div><p>It will run Android.<br> <br> <b>Zzzzzzing!</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement.It will run Android .
Zzzzzzing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure the next iPhone will be an improvement.It will run Android.
Zzzzzzing!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674140</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269974580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I sacrifice a little convenience for my freedom.</p></div></blockquote><p>If only people took this stance towards government.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sacrifice a little convenience for my freedom.If only people took this stance towards government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sacrifice a little convenience for my freedom.If only people took this stance towards government.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670288</id>
	<title>A4 processor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what an A4 processor is...</p><p>In the rest of the world, A4 is the standard size of a sheet of paper for printing<br>In chess A4 is the square that white would move his Kings Rooks Pawn to if he moved it two squres forward.<br>THe A4 Skyhawk was a small fighter bomger designed for the navy in the 1950's.It was still in service during the Vietnam war.<br>The A4 is a highway in the UK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what an A4 processor is...In the rest of the world , A4 is the standard size of a sheet of paper for printingIn chess A4 is the square that white would move his Kings Rooks Pawn to if he moved it two squres forward.THe A4 Skyhawk was a small fighter bomger designed for the navy in the 1950 's.It was still in service during the Vietnam war.The A4 is a highway in the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what an A4 processor is...In the rest of the world, A4 is the standard size of a sheet of paper for printingIn chess A4 is the square that white would move his Kings Rooks Pawn to if he moved it two squres forward.THe A4 Skyhawk was a small fighter bomger designed for the navy in the 1950's.It was still in service during the Vietnam war.The A4 is a highway in the UK.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920</id>
	<title>Re:And this is different from the 10000 other rumo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269961500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, the other 10000 rumors will all get their own Slashdot articles too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , the other 10000 rumors will all get their own Slashdot articles too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, the other 10000 rumors will all get their own Slashdot articles too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670300</id>
	<title>Apple Media Fans In Panic Mode Over Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Android selling at a rate of 22 million phones a year and doubling its marketshare every quarter the Apple fans in the media and blog world are in full scale panic mode that Apple will come up something that can compete with the entire cellphone industry putting out incredible after incredible new Android phone.</p><p>They should be scared. My old iPhone looks like a cheap tacky piece of junk next to my incredible Nexus One.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Android selling at a rate of 22 million phones a year and doubling its marketshare every quarter the Apple fans in the media and blog world are in full scale panic mode that Apple will come up something that can compete with the entire cellphone industry putting out incredible after incredible new Android phone.They should be scared .
My old iPhone looks like a cheap tacky piece of junk next to my incredible Nexus One .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Android selling at a rate of 22 million phones a year and doubling its marketshare every quarter the Apple fans in the media and blog world are in full scale panic mode that Apple will come up something that can compete with the entire cellphone industry putting out incredible after incredible new Android phone.They should be scared.
My old iPhone looks like a cheap tacky piece of junk next to my incredible Nexus One.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675180</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1269978780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare."</p><p>Yes, but who wants to volunteer to be one of the monkeys who read through the results looking for Shakespeare's works?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare .
" Yes , but who wants to volunteer to be one of the monkeys who read through the results looking for Shakespeare 's works ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.
"Yes, but who wants to volunteer to be one of the monkeys who read through the results looking for Shakespeare's works?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672474</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1269969240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm more and more attracted to the HTC Desire, which should give me the best of both worlds, with the freedom of Android (and they're not too shabby App store) but with the slick Sense UI interface. My fianc&#233; has the iPhone and she loves it, and while I was and still am a little tempted to get one for convenience sake, I do get the impression it won't satisfy my tech cravings as much as the HTC, not to mention I'd have to wait until summer while the HTC is all kinds of awesome right now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more and more attracted to the HTC Desire , which should give me the best of both worlds , with the freedom of Android ( and they 're not too shabby App store ) but with the slick Sense UI interface .
My fianc   has the iPhone and she loves it , and while I was and still am a little tempted to get one for convenience sake , I do get the impression it wo n't satisfy my tech cravings as much as the HTC , not to mention I 'd have to wait until summer while the HTC is all kinds of awesome right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more and more attracted to the HTC Desire, which should give me the best of both worlds, with the freedom of Android (and they're not too shabby App store) but with the slick Sense UI interface.
My fiancé has the iPhone and she loves it, and while I was and still am a little tempted to get one for convenience sake, I do get the impression it won't satisfy my tech cravings as much as the HTC, not to mention I'd have to wait until summer while the HTC is all kinds of awesome right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671364</id>
	<title>Re:Not so HD ?</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1269966180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps for mirroring video out?  I have a JB phone and video out cables and the look of the screen blown up to projector size just isn't very clear or pretty.  Having more resolution for presentations and teaching and whatnot would be welcomed.  Apple could make inroads into numerous organizations, including schools, if their presentation package was beefed up some with dedicated ppt type programs and a more robust video out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps for mirroring video out ?
I have a JB phone and video out cables and the look of the screen blown up to projector size just is n't very clear or pretty .
Having more resolution for presentations and teaching and whatnot would be welcomed .
Apple could make inroads into numerous organizations , including schools , if their presentation package was beefed up some with dedicated ppt type programs and a more robust video out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps for mirroring video out?
I have a JB phone and video out cables and the look of the screen blown up to projector size just isn't very clear or pretty.
Having more resolution for presentations and teaching and whatnot would be welcomed.
Apple could make inroads into numerous organizations, including schools, if their presentation package was beefed up some with dedicated ppt type programs and a more robust video out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670660</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1269964020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Adobe can't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it's x86 Windows. So honest to $deity I hope not.</p></div><p>What? Adobe can't code on Windows, either. There was a time when they could do it on the Mac, but that ended about the time System 7 came out.</p><p>If you look at what flash does, and compare it to some other similar system, you'll find it doesn't do much and it's horribly inefficient at what it does. There are loads of game engines which have been melded with a scripting engine which do the same kind of stuff at much higher levels of performance, probably mostly because they're not reinventing wheels. They're using standard libraries for drawing and they're using existing scripting engines like Lua and Python, meaning they don't have to try to make an efficient, optimized scripting engine either. If Adobe had gone with one of these languages instead of inventing their own, the world would be a better place today. Or at least, the web would.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adobe ca n't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it 's x86 Windows .
So honest to $ deity I hope not.What ?
Adobe ca n't code on Windows , either .
There was a time when they could do it on the Mac , but that ended about the time System 7 came out.If you look at what flash does , and compare it to some other similar system , you 'll find it does n't do much and it 's horribly inefficient at what it does .
There are loads of game engines which have been melded with a scripting engine which do the same kind of stuff at much higher levels of performance , probably mostly because they 're not reinventing wheels .
They 're using standard libraries for drawing and they 're using existing scripting engines like Lua and Python , meaning they do n't have to try to make an efficient , optimized scripting engine either .
If Adobe had gone with one of these languages instead of inventing their own , the world would be a better place today .
Or at least , the web would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adobe can't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it's x86 Windows.
So honest to $deity I hope not.What?
Adobe can't code on Windows, either.
There was a time when they could do it on the Mac, but that ended about the time System 7 came out.If you look at what flash does, and compare it to some other similar system, you'll find it doesn't do much and it's horribly inefficient at what it does.
There are loads of game engines which have been melded with a scripting engine which do the same kind of stuff at much higher levels of performance, probably mostly because they're not reinventing wheels.
They're using standard libraries for drawing and they're using existing scripting engines like Lua and Python, meaning they don't have to try to make an efficient, optimized scripting engine either.
If Adobe had gone with one of these languages instead of inventing their own, the world would be a better place today.
Or at least, the web would.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670478</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269963480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on the source of the rumor.  Some sites got the iPad right when they predicted a large iPod Touch with 3G capabilities.  But generally the rule is to wait til Apple makes an announcement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on the source of the rumor .
Some sites got the iPad right when they predicted a large iPod Touch with 3G capabilities .
But generally the rule is to wait til Apple makes an announcement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on the source of the rumor.
Some sites got the iPad right when they predicted a large iPod Touch with 3G capabilities.
But generally the rule is to wait til Apple makes an announcement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670440</id>
	<title>Does no-one remember the past?</title>
	<author>Mr\_Silver</author>
	<datestamp>1269963360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that they've barely changed the hardware in the last couple of iterations, I see no reason to suspect that they'll do anything different.</p><p>Before the 3GS came out, everyone went mad imagining what kind of new stuff it had and ended up being disappointed. Yet, if they'd looked at past performance, they should have realised they were being hopelessly optimistic.</p><p>My prediction is that there will obviously be new software but the hardware will remain largely unchanged with the exception being that they'll change to HSDPA (or maybe even HSUPA).</p><p>And nothing else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that they 've barely changed the hardware in the last couple of iterations , I see no reason to suspect that they 'll do anything different.Before the 3GS came out , everyone went mad imagining what kind of new stuff it had and ended up being disappointed .
Yet , if they 'd looked at past performance , they should have realised they were being hopelessly optimistic.My prediction is that there will obviously be new software but the hardware will remain largely unchanged with the exception being that they 'll change to HSDPA ( or maybe even HSUPA ) .And nothing else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that they've barely changed the hardware in the last couple of iterations, I see no reason to suspect that they'll do anything different.Before the 3GS came out, everyone went mad imagining what kind of new stuff it had and ended up being disappointed.
Yet, if they'd looked at past performance, they should have realised they were being hopelessly optimistic.My prediction is that there will obviously be new software but the hardware will remain largely unchanged with the exception being that they'll change to HSDPA (or maybe even HSUPA).And nothing else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674458</id>
	<title>A4 seem quite big for a phone</title>
	<author>davrob60</author>
	<datestamp>1269975660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4\_paper#A\_series" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4\_paper#A\_series</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4 \ _paper # A \ _series [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4\_paper#A\_series [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670008</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>rsmith-mac</author>
	<datestamp>1269961920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>or a bloody Flash plugin</p></div></blockquote><p>Adobe can't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it's x86 Windows. So honest to $deity I hope not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or a bloody Flash pluginAdobe ca n't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it 's x86 Windows .
So honest to $ deity I hope not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or a bloody Flash pluginAdobe can't code their way out of a wet paper bag unless it's x86 Windows.
So honest to $deity I hope not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034</id>
	<title>A new, innovative product!</title>
	<author>Computer\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1269962040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I present to you, the iPad Nano!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I present to you , the iPad Nano !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I present to you, the iPad Nano!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677726</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking : do not want</title>
	<author>dfghjk</author>
	<datestamp>1269944160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's why Apple doesn't support it in OS X, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why Apple does n't support it in OS X , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why Apple doesn't support it in OS X, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269962640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.</p></div></blockquote><p>If someone could finally give the monkeys modern computers with word processors, the error and typo rate would go down and they could write Shakespeare a lot faster.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it 's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.If someone could finally give the monkeys modern computers with word processors , the error and typo rate would go down and they could write Shakespeare a lot faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone gets any Apple-product prediction right it's because enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.If someone could finally give the monkeys modern computers with word processors, the error and typo rate would go down and they could write Shakespeare a lot faster.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674002</id>
	<title>The title should mention this is a rumor</title>
	<author>mcguyver</author>
	<datestamp>1269974100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note to sensationalist Slashdot mods.  This is a rumor, that's significant info, note that in the title.  Please say that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. hasn't degraded to the point of disguising apple rumors as legit stories on the homepage.  Feel free to mod this down but some long time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers have got to be thinking the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to sensationalist Slashdot mods .
This is a rumor , that 's significant info , note that in the title .
Please say that / .
has n't degraded to the point of disguising apple rumors as legit stories on the homepage .
Feel free to mod this down but some long time / .
readers have got to be thinking the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to sensationalist Slashdot mods.
This is a rumor, that's significant info, note that in the title.
Please say that /.
hasn't degraded to the point of disguising apple rumors as legit stories on the homepage.
Feel free to mod this down but some long time /.
readers have got to be thinking the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670090</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1269962220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers, or a bloody Flash plugin?  Fix those before you add gadgets.</p></div><p>I've seen <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/03/29/wsj-verizon-iphone-hitting-this-summer/" title="mobilecrunch.com">rumors</a> [mobilecrunch.com] that a Verizon iPhone is on the way...</p><p>But, as far as Flash goes, I'd rather they didn't support it.</p><p>Sure, Flash has its place...  But it's been horribly abused and overused for years.  Platforms like the iPhone, and the advent of HTML5, have the opportunity to push Flash back where it belongs.  I'd love to see that happen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers , or a bloody Flash plugin ?
Fix those before you add gadgets.I 've seen rumors [ mobilecrunch.com ] that a Verizon iPhone is on the way...But , as far as Flash goes , I 'd rather they did n't support it.Sure , Flash has its place... But it 's been horribly abused and overused for years .
Platforms like the iPhone , and the advent of HTML5 , have the opportunity to push Flash back where it belongs .
I 'd love to see that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers, or a bloody Flash plugin?
Fix those before you add gadgets.I've seen rumors [mobilecrunch.com] that a Verizon iPhone is on the way...But, as far as Flash goes, I'd rather they didn't support it.Sure, Flash has its place...  But it's been horribly abused and overused for years.
Platforms like the iPhone, and the advent of HTML5, have the opportunity to push Flash back where it belongs.
I'd love to see that happen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674628</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269976380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4G same for everyone? I'm sorry to say this but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP\_Long\_Term\_Evolution vs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4G same for everyone ?
I 'm sorry to say this but http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP \ _Long \ _Term \ _Evolution vs http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4G same for everyone?
I'm sorry to say this but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP\_Long\_Term\_Evolution vs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673738</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>cshbell</author>
	<datestamp>1269973260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>If there's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products, it's that nobody talking knows anything.</i> </p><p>That's not always the case; sometimes, far from it. The source for <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/03/29/wsj" title="daringfireball.net" rel="nofollow">this information</a> [daringfireball.net] comes from John Gruber over at <a href="http://daringfireball.net/" title="daringfireball.net" rel="nofollow">Daring Fireball</a> [daringfireball.net]. It's well known, and John says as much, that he has sources inside Apple. As a reliable critic ('critic' as in Ebert, not hostility) of Apple, it seems his sources are either known to the company and the leaks are green-lighted, or else Apple simply doesn't care enough about smaller announcements to ferret out the mole. I'd bet heavily on the former.</p><p>John doesn't always make predictions of a declarative nature, but when he does, you can more or less take them as stated fact; for example, his "<a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/06/wwdc\_2009\_predictions" title="daringfireball.net" rel="nofollow">predictions</a> [daringfireball.net]" for last year's WWDC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products , it 's that nobody talking knows anything .
That 's not always the case ; sometimes , far from it .
The source for this information [ daringfireball.net ] comes from John Gruber over at Daring Fireball [ daringfireball.net ] .
It 's well known , and John says as much , that he has sources inside Apple .
As a reliable critic ( 'critic ' as in Ebert , not hostility ) of Apple , it seems his sources are either known to the company and the leaks are green-lighted , or else Apple simply does n't care enough about smaller announcements to ferret out the mole .
I 'd bet heavily on the former.John does n't always make predictions of a declarative nature , but when he does , you can more or less take them as stated fact ; for example , his " predictions [ daringfireball.net ] " for last year 's WWDC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If there's one thing history teaches about rumors regarding upcoming Apple products, it's that nobody talking knows anything.
That's not always the case; sometimes, far from it.
The source for this information [daringfireball.net] comes from John Gruber over at Daring Fireball [daringfireball.net].
It's well known, and John says as much, that he has sources inside Apple.
As a reliable critic ('critic' as in Ebert, not hostility) of Apple, it seems his sources are either known to the company and the leaks are green-lighted, or else Apple simply doesn't care enough about smaller announcements to ferret out the mole.
I'd bet heavily on the former.John doesn't always make predictions of a declarative nature, but when he does, you can more or less take them as stated fact; for example, his "predictions [daringfireball.net]" for last year's WWDC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670084</id>
	<title>Re:Not so HD ?</title>
	<author>Graham J - XVI</author>
	<datestamp>1269962220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to TFA, 960x640.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA , 960x640 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA, 960x640.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672034</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>CompressedAir</author>
	<datestamp>1269967860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno, I'm a pretty big nerd and I love my iPhone. There's plenty of fun to be had with it with the serial tx/rx on the dock connector. I'm getting close to getting it to work with a Picaxe, and once that works the sky is the limit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , I 'm a pretty big nerd and I love my iPhone .
There 's plenty of fun to be had with it with the serial tx/rx on the dock connector .
I 'm getting close to getting it to work with a Picaxe , and once that works the sky is the limit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, I'm a pretty big nerd and I love my iPhone.
There's plenty of fun to be had with it with the serial tx/rx on the dock connector.
I'm getting close to getting it to work with a Picaxe, and once that works the sky is the limit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678214</id>
	<title>Re:How will affect old stuff</title>
	<author>konohitowa</author>
	<datestamp>1269946320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm still using my first gen iPhone (EDGE). Perhaps I'll update when the next one comes out, but so far the only compelling reason I've had is hardware voice recognition. Just because you're unhappy with the speed doesn't make it unusable for everyone. Plus, I like the savings of not having to pay AT&amp;T's 3G surcharge.</p><p>Frankly, had I not wanted to update the OS I could have just refused the update, and I could always rollback if I changed my mind. But having to remember to click "No" might be asking too much of some people. Although, there may be some AT&amp;T forced updates buried in their somewhere -- I somewhat lost track because I run developer beta's frequently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still using my first gen iPhone ( EDGE ) .
Perhaps I 'll update when the next one comes out , but so far the only compelling reason I 've had is hardware voice recognition .
Just because you 're unhappy with the speed does n't make it unusable for everyone .
Plus , I like the savings of not having to pay AT&amp;T 's 3G surcharge.Frankly , had I not wanted to update the OS I could have just refused the update , and I could always rollback if I changed my mind .
But having to remember to click " No " might be asking too much of some people .
Although , there may be some AT&amp;T forced updates buried in their somewhere -- I somewhat lost track because I run developer beta 's frequently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still using my first gen iPhone (EDGE).
Perhaps I'll update when the next one comes out, but so far the only compelling reason I've had is hardware voice recognition.
Just because you're unhappy with the speed doesn't make it unusable for everyone.
Plus, I like the savings of not having to pay AT&amp;T's 3G surcharge.Frankly, had I not wanted to update the OS I could have just refused the update, and I could always rollback if I changed my mind.
But having to remember to click "No" might be asking too much of some people.
Although, there may be some AT&amp;T forced updates buried in their somewhere -- I somewhat lost track because I run developer beta's frequently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674940</id>
	<title>What will the gimmick be this time?</title>
	<author>viamptor</author>
	<datestamp>1269977580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How will Apple deem this evolution of the iphone "revolutionary" with these specs?? What will make it different than phones like the HTC EVO4G? which seems have better specs or the HTC scorpion which is rumored to have a dual core 1.3 or 1.5 ghz processor?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How will Apple deem this evolution of the iphone " revolutionary " with these specs ? ?
What will make it different than phones like the HTC EVO4G ?
which seems have better specs or the HTC scorpion which is rumored to have a dual core 1.3 or 1.5 ghz processor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will Apple deem this evolution of the iphone "revolutionary" with these specs??
What will make it different than phones like the HTC EVO4G?
which seems have better specs or the HTC scorpion which is rumored to have a dual core 1.3 or 1.5 ghz processor?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671198</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>briggsl</author>
	<datestamp>1269965640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It still won't be as good as the HTC Desire</p><p>**prepares to be modded down by Apple fanboys**</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It still wo n't be as good as the HTC Desire * * prepares to be modded down by Apple fanboys * *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It still won't be as good as the HTC Desire**prepares to be modded down by Apple fanboys**</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670978</id>
	<title>Re:Not so HD ?</title>
	<author>jschen</author>
	<datestamp>1269965040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And what for? A 960x640 screen at that size would have an absurdly high pixel density, adding a lot to cost for no good reason. The iPhone screen resolution is already 163 dpi (per Apple's specs)! I think it's safe to say that we will never see a 960x460 screen on a consumer product the size of modern day cell phones. There's simply no point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And what for ?
A 960x640 screen at that size would have an absurdly high pixel density , adding a lot to cost for no good reason .
The iPhone screen resolution is already 163 dpi ( per Apple 's specs ) !
I think it 's safe to say that we will never see a 960x460 screen on a consumer product the size of modern day cell phones .
There 's simply no point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what for?
A 960x640 screen at that size would have an absurdly high pixel density, adding a lot to cost for no good reason.
The iPhone screen resolution is already 163 dpi (per Apple's specs)!
I think it's safe to say that we will never see a 960x460 screen on a consumer product the size of modern day cell phones.
There's simply no point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868</id>
	<title>And this is different from the 10000 other rumors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269961380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671096</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1269965340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the rest of the world (ie, not the USA), you can take your iPhone to whatever carrier you want.</p><p>Some nerds might want the iPhone if it does what they need. If not, then there's Android or some other option. I have a 3G and am perfectly happy with it. I don't need to add my own video and audio codecs, I can't get Hulu in the UK (but iPlayer in the UK, which uses flash on the web, works on the iPhone anyway), don't really need multitasking - the apps save state and it's relatively quick to hop between them, but would be nice to have.</p><p>Not all nerds need all those things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the rest of the world ( ie , not the USA ) , you can take your iPhone to whatever carrier you want.Some nerds might want the iPhone if it does what they need .
If not , then there 's Android or some other option .
I have a 3G and am perfectly happy with it .
I do n't need to add my own video and audio codecs , I ca n't get Hulu in the UK ( but iPlayer in the UK , which uses flash on the web , works on the iPhone anyway ) , do n't really need multitasking - the apps save state and it 's relatively quick to hop between them , but would be nice to have.Not all nerds need all those things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the rest of the world (ie, not the USA), you can take your iPhone to whatever carrier you want.Some nerds might want the iPhone if it does what they need.
If not, then there's Android or some other option.
I have a 3G and am perfectly happy with it.
I don't need to add my own video and audio codecs, I can't get Hulu in the UK (but iPlayer in the UK, which uses flash on the web, works on the iPhone anyway), don't really need multitasking - the apps save state and it's relatively quick to hop between them, but would be nice to have.Not all nerds need all those things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964</id>
	<title>Multi-tasking : do not want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269961680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Multi-tasking is a bad idea.  Most users are not computer professionals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Multi-tasking is a bad idea .
Most users are not computer professionals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Multi-tasking is a bad idea.
Most users are not computer professionals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671058</id>
	<title>And it will run on Verizon's network..</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1269965220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and it will have unicorns and ponies and...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and it will have unicorns and ponies and.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and it will have unicorns and ponies and...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670144</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash needs to die, and Apple is pushing web standards as the alternative (as opposed to Microsoft who would also like to see Flash die but only to replace it with Silverlight).</p><p>No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin. It forces people to stop using Flash where there's no reason to use it, such as navigation and video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash needs to die , and Apple is pushing web standards as the alternative ( as opposed to Microsoft who would also like to see Flash die but only to replace it with Silverlight ) .No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin .
It forces people to stop using Flash where there 's no reason to use it , such as navigation and video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash needs to die, and Apple is pushing web standards as the alternative (as opposed to Microsoft who would also like to see Flash die but only to replace it with Silverlight).No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin.
It forces people to stop using Flash where there's no reason to use it, such as navigation and video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670636</id>
	<title>Re:front facing, rear facing</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1269964020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is there some reason why a camera cannot be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants?</p></div><p>I had a camera flip phone in the mid 00s that mounted the cam on the "flip".  So close the phone and the cam faces you, for self portraits, and open the phone and the cam faces outward, for taking pictures of other people.  Camera "shutter" button on side, using "trigger finger".</p><p>I found the whole concept of a cam phone useless, and the blurry fuzzy low res pix to be worthless, but it was a good design.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is there some reason why a camera can not be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants ? I had a camera flip phone in the mid 00s that mounted the cam on the " flip " .
So close the phone and the cam faces you , for self portraits , and open the phone and the cam faces outward , for taking pictures of other people .
Camera " shutter " button on side , using " trigger finger " .I found the whole concept of a cam phone useless , and the blurry fuzzy low res pix to be worthless , but it was a good design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is there some reason why a camera cannot be flexible to face whatever direction the user wants?I had a camera flip phone in the mid 00s that mounted the cam on the "flip".
So close the phone and the cam faces you, for self portraits, and open the phone and the cam faces outward, for taking pictures of other people.
Camera "shutter" button on side, using "trigger finger".I found the whole concept of a cam phone useless, and the blurry fuzzy low res pix to be worthless, but it was a good design.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670320</id>
	<title>4x not 2x</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not double resolution it is quadruple resolution. Double the pixels in each direction is 4x the number of pixels total.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not double resolution it is quadruple resolution .
Double the pixels in each direction is 4x the number of pixels total .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not double resolution it is quadruple resolution.
Double the pixels in each direction is 4x the number of pixels total.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672402</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable, though...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't believe Apple does any real product development. They just pick the best rumors and merge them into their existing product line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe Apple does any real product development .
They just pick the best rumors and merge them into their existing product line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe Apple does any real product development.
They just pick the best rumors and merge them into their existing product line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31695754</id>
	<title>A4 Processor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270042140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So let me get this right, the processor is 210mmx197mm, how big is the phone going to be??  You're gonna need bigger pockets...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this right , the processor is 210mmx197mm , how big is the phone going to be ? ?
You 're gon na need bigger pockets.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this right, the processor is 210mmx197mm, how big is the phone going to be??
You're gonna need bigger pockets...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673800</id>
	<title>Bluetooth Keyboard drivers</title>
	<author>tekrat</author>
	<datestamp>1269973440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add to your list "Can I use a keyboard with it?" For those of us that think of the iPhone as a computing platform rather than a toy and we might actually want to use it to take notes in a meeting, or compose an email.</p><p>The iPhone is capable of email, and yet, their software keyboard only lets you type messages that say "Tbrn  tgnsje jwe sdfb".</p><p>The killer is Apple themselves sell a bluetooth keyboard. But they don't let you pair it with an iPhone. They will let you pair with a Mac or an iPad. Apple killed Macally's product which was to be a folding keyboard specifically designed for the iPhone.</p><p>WTF? I'm not buying an iPhone until I can use a keyboard because I cannot type on that cruddy software keyboard. And I will buy the first smartphone that does let you hook up a REAL keyboard and has a notes application (like the older Palm Treos). Why is it that older tech works better than newer (like older VCRs weren't affected by macrovision) ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add to your list " Can I use a keyboard with it ?
" For those of us that think of the iPhone as a computing platform rather than a toy and we might actually want to use it to take notes in a meeting , or compose an email.The iPhone is capable of email , and yet , their software keyboard only lets you type messages that say " Tbrn tgnsje jwe sdfb " .The killer is Apple themselves sell a bluetooth keyboard .
But they do n't let you pair it with an iPhone .
They will let you pair with a Mac or an iPad .
Apple killed Macally 's product which was to be a folding keyboard specifically designed for the iPhone.WTF ?
I 'm not buying an iPhone until I can use a keyboard because I can not type on that cruddy software keyboard .
And I will buy the first smartphone that does let you hook up a REAL keyboard and has a notes application ( like the older Palm Treos ) .
Why is it that older tech works better than newer ( like older VCRs were n't affected by macrovision ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add to your list "Can I use a keyboard with it?
" For those of us that think of the iPhone as a computing platform rather than a toy and we might actually want to use it to take notes in a meeting, or compose an email.The iPhone is capable of email, and yet, their software keyboard only lets you type messages that say "Tbrn  tgnsje jwe sdfb".The killer is Apple themselves sell a bluetooth keyboard.
But they don't let you pair it with an iPhone.
They will let you pair with a Mac or an iPad.
Apple killed Macally's product which was to be a folding keyboard specifically designed for the iPhone.WTF?
I'm not buying an iPhone until I can use a keyboard because I cannot type on that cruddy software keyboard.
And I will buy the first smartphone that does let you hook up a REAL keyboard and has a notes application (like the older Palm Treos).
Why is it that older tech works better than newer (like older VCRs weren't affected by macrovision) ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670400</id>
	<title>Re:front facing, rear facing</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1269963240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sony did that, it's horribly delicate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony did that , it 's horribly delicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony did that, it's horribly delicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670028</id>
	<title>I so wish I'd bought stock</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1269962040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back just before the iPhone launch. Unfortunately my friend in 'the city' informed me that the analysts at his place didn't think it would take off and I didn't invest.</p><p>Dumbass!</p><p>I hope they were fired.</p><p>The way things are going the holy steve could wipe his butt on each iPad and still they'd sell like holy relics and the stock would rocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back just before the iPhone launch .
Unfortunately my friend in 'the city ' informed me that the analysts at his place did n't think it would take off and I did n't invest.Dumbass ! I hope they were fired.The way things are going the holy steve could wipe his butt on each iPad and still they 'd sell like holy relics and the stock would rocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back just before the iPhone launch.
Unfortunately my friend in 'the city' informed me that the analysts at his place didn't think it would take off and I didn't invest.Dumbass!I hope they were fired.The way things are going the holy steve could wipe his butt on each iPad and still they'd sell like holy relics and the stock would rocket.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670182</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>alobar72</author>
	<datestamp>1269962520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>totally agree - I am still bored because of the many "prediction" regarding the iPad.<br>I really dont want to start this all over with the next iPhone - flodding every techforum there is.<br>I am not that into hardware-"facts" anyway - since the magic will be in the software - or nowhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>totally agree - I am still bored because of the many " prediction " regarding the iPad.I really dont want to start this all over with the next iPhone - flodding every techforum there is.I am not that into hardware- " facts " anyway - since the magic will be in the software - or nowhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>totally agree - I am still bored because of the many "prediction" regarding the iPad.I really dont want to start this all over with the next iPhone - flodding every techforum there is.I am not that into hardware-"facts" anyway - since the magic will be in the software - or nowhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670372</id>
	<title>Ponies</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1269963120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it have little kittens and ponies too?!  Oh yeah, ponies!  I want ponies!  Black ones and polka-dotted ones, and pink ones too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it have little kittens and ponies too ? !
Oh yeah , ponies !
I want ponies !
Black ones and polka-dotted ones , and pink ones too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it have little kittens and ponies too?!
Oh yeah, ponies!
I want ponies!
Black ones and polka-dotted ones, and pink ones too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670194</id>
	<title>I have heard this many times before</title>
	<author>Montezumaa</author>
	<datestamp>1269962580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have had an iphone for some time and it was one of the worst purchases I ever made.  Regardless, I am sure most of us have heard great rumors surrounding new iPhone generations in the past.  The reality is that Apple is too consumed with the "Sony Process"(i.e. small incremental improvements).  Really, anyone with an iPhone 3G or 3G S should wait another generation or two before they upgrade.  Chances are we might see a better camera, with an extremely low chance of a flash for said camera, along with a slightly faster processor and a slightly better display.</p><p>As with any of us Technophiles, I really enjoy being on the "bleeding edge"(which the iPhone is not on), but I also like to tinker with any currently used technology.  After playing with the iPhone for a while, I am ready to run back to the edge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have had an iphone for some time and it was one of the worst purchases I ever made .
Regardless , I am sure most of us have heard great rumors surrounding new iPhone generations in the past .
The reality is that Apple is too consumed with the " Sony Process " ( i.e .
small incremental improvements ) .
Really , anyone with an iPhone 3G or 3G S should wait another generation or two before they upgrade .
Chances are we might see a better camera , with an extremely low chance of a flash for said camera , along with a slightly faster processor and a slightly better display.As with any of us Technophiles , I really enjoy being on the " bleeding edge " ( which the iPhone is not on ) , but I also like to tinker with any currently used technology .
After playing with the iPhone for a while , I am ready to run back to the edge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have had an iphone for some time and it was one of the worst purchases I ever made.
Regardless, I am sure most of us have heard great rumors surrounding new iPhone generations in the past.
The reality is that Apple is too consumed with the "Sony Process"(i.e.
small incremental improvements).
Really, anyone with an iPhone 3G or 3G S should wait another generation or two before they upgrade.
Chances are we might see a better camera, with an extremely low chance of a flash for said camera, along with a slightly faster processor and a slightly better display.As with any of us Technophiles, I really enjoy being on the "bleeding edge"(which the iPhone is not on), but I also like to tinker with any currently used technology.
After playing with the iPhone for a while, I am ready to run back to the edge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152</id>
	<title>How will affect old stuff</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1269962460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps it is because the phones are changing so much, but Apple does not seem to be keeping to their traditional 3 years of useful life policy.  I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software, released only two years after the iPhone, ran like a dog.  Unlike a general purpose computer, the new OS get pushed through the synch process so there is little hope of keeping it off.
<p>
With the iPad and probably a new iPhone leveraging much more computing power, I can imagine an iPhone 4.0 software that will also make the current iPhones run like dogs, and I would not be surprised to see such an OS by the end of this year.  This would not be so much of an issue but most of us sign two year contracts, but the OS seems to make hardware obsolete in 18 months.  I sure wish that Apple would let us pay 50 dollars for to reduce the contract terms to one year.  That is what I used to with phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it is because the phones are changing so much , but Apple does not seem to be keeping to their traditional 3 years of useful life policy .
I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software , released only two years after the iPhone , ran like a dog .
Unlike a general purpose computer , the new OS get pushed through the synch process so there is little hope of keeping it off .
With the iPad and probably a new iPhone leveraging much more computing power , I can imagine an iPhone 4.0 software that will also make the current iPhones run like dogs , and I would not be surprised to see such an OS by the end of this year .
This would not be so much of an issue but most of us sign two year contracts , but the OS seems to make hardware obsolete in 18 months .
I sure wish that Apple would let us pay 50 dollars for to reduce the contract terms to one year .
That is what I used to with phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it is because the phones are changing so much, but Apple does not seem to be keeping to their traditional 3 years of useful life policy.
I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software, released only two years after the iPhone, ran like a dog.
Unlike a general purpose computer, the new OS get pushed through the synch process so there is little hope of keeping it off.
With the iPad and probably a new iPhone leveraging much more computing power, I can imagine an iPhone 4.0 software that will also make the current iPhones run like dogs, and I would not be surprised to see such an OS by the end of this year.
This would not be so much of an issue but most of us sign two year contracts, but the OS seems to make hardware obsolete in 18 months.
I sure wish that Apple would let us pay 50 dollars for to reduce the contract terms to one year.
That is what I used to with phones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31683252</id>
	<title>Re:Screen resolution</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1269973680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be quite surprised if Apple changes the screen res of the iPhone this soon. The current screen res is good enough and that's not something that's going to change unless people start holding their phones closer to their faces. A higher res screen would have to offer enough of a benefit to overcome the extra production cost, increased GPU consumption, and extra mucking about for developers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be quite surprised if Apple changes the screen res of the iPhone this soon .
The current screen res is good enough and that 's not something that 's going to change unless people start holding their phones closer to their faces .
A higher res screen would have to offer enough of a benefit to overcome the extra production cost , increased GPU consumption , and extra mucking about for developers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be quite surprised if Apple changes the screen res of the iPhone this soon.
The current screen res is good enough and that's not something that's going to change unless people start holding their phones closer to their faces.
A higher res screen would have to offer enough of a benefit to overcome the extra production cost, increased GPU consumption, and extra mucking about for developers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670184</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>teg</author>
	<datestamp>1269962520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers,</i> </p><p>
It does have a choice in carriers outside the US. The US is special, with much more carrier lock-in - a big reason being that the carriers use different standards. So I wouldn't be surprised if the ability to choose Verizon is far off - the mobile phone market just doesn't work as well in the US as elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers , It does have a choice in carriers outside the US .
The US is special , with much more carrier lock-in - a big reason being that the carriers use different standards .
So I would n't be surprised if the ability to choose Verizon is far off - the mobile phone market just does n't work as well in the US as elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers, 
It does have a choice in carriers outside the US.
The US is special, with much more carrier lock-in - a big reason being that the carriers use different standards.
So I wouldn't be surprised if the ability to choose Verizon is far off - the mobile phone market just doesn't work as well in the US as elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188</id>
	<title>Screen resolution</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1269962580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is true then it's really no suprise, particularly regarding the screen resolution.</p><p>Many pointed out the issue of having to cater to different screen sizes with Android and touted the iPhone as a superior platform for development because it's hardware is static.</p><p>I've long said that it's not realistically going to stay that way, with the iPhone you already have differences between existing models that you must cater too in terms of performance and certain features. It's not suprising that resolution is now something you will also have to deal with, because the iPhone was already running at half the resolution of the likes of the Nexus One.</p><p>Of course, you might say that Apple will automatically scale apps, which is an option, but that just means the apps wont be making any use of the higher resolution.</p><p>It'll be interesting to see how Apple handles this, and with the iPad coming too, developers for Apple's platform are going to have to cater to differences just as with Android, and just as developers of desktop apps have always had to.</p><p>Realistically it could only ever be a pipe dream to keep the hardware static, else the phone would simply get dated and no other platforms based on the technology (i.e. the iPad) could ever be released. If this is true it's really a vindication of the fact that if you want your platform to advance, and stay relevant, there's no hiding behind the supposed advantage of having a static hardware platform for the sake of easier development. Developers are going to have to work and deal with differences over time regardless whether they're developing for Windows, Android or the iPhone.</p><p>Do any iPhone developers here know whether this means existing applications might have to be updated to support different resolutions? It'll be a massive job if so, so I'm guessing by default the new iPhone will indeed just scale graphics or something to start with unless an application specifically handles differing resolutions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is true then it 's really no suprise , particularly regarding the screen resolution.Many pointed out the issue of having to cater to different screen sizes with Android and touted the iPhone as a superior platform for development because it 's hardware is static.I 've long said that it 's not realistically going to stay that way , with the iPhone you already have differences between existing models that you must cater too in terms of performance and certain features .
It 's not suprising that resolution is now something you will also have to deal with , because the iPhone was already running at half the resolution of the likes of the Nexus One.Of course , you might say that Apple will automatically scale apps , which is an option , but that just means the apps wont be making any use of the higher resolution.It 'll be interesting to see how Apple handles this , and with the iPad coming too , developers for Apple 's platform are going to have to cater to differences just as with Android , and just as developers of desktop apps have always had to.Realistically it could only ever be a pipe dream to keep the hardware static , else the phone would simply get dated and no other platforms based on the technology ( i.e .
the iPad ) could ever be released .
If this is true it 's really a vindication of the fact that if you want your platform to advance , and stay relevant , there 's no hiding behind the supposed advantage of having a static hardware platform for the sake of easier development .
Developers are going to have to work and deal with differences over time regardless whether they 're developing for Windows , Android or the iPhone.Do any iPhone developers here know whether this means existing applications might have to be updated to support different resolutions ?
It 'll be a massive job if so , so I 'm guessing by default the new iPhone will indeed just scale graphics or something to start with unless an application specifically handles differing resolutions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is true then it's really no suprise, particularly regarding the screen resolution.Many pointed out the issue of having to cater to different screen sizes with Android and touted the iPhone as a superior platform for development because it's hardware is static.I've long said that it's not realistically going to stay that way, with the iPhone you already have differences between existing models that you must cater too in terms of performance and certain features.
It's not suprising that resolution is now something you will also have to deal with, because the iPhone was already running at half the resolution of the likes of the Nexus One.Of course, you might say that Apple will automatically scale apps, which is an option, but that just means the apps wont be making any use of the higher resolution.It'll be interesting to see how Apple handles this, and with the iPad coming too, developers for Apple's platform are going to have to cater to differences just as with Android, and just as developers of desktop apps have always had to.Realistically it could only ever be a pipe dream to keep the hardware static, else the phone would simply get dated and no other platforms based on the technology (i.e.
the iPad) could ever be released.
If this is true it's really a vindication of the fact that if you want your platform to advance, and stay relevant, there's no hiding behind the supposed advantage of having a static hardware platform for the sake of easier development.
Developers are going to have to work and deal with differences over time regardless whether they're developing for Windows, Android or the iPhone.Do any iPhone developers here know whether this means existing applications might have to be updated to support different resolutions?
It'll be a massive job if so, so I'm guessing by default the new iPhone will indeed just scale graphics or something to start with unless an application specifically handles differing resolutions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672382</id>
	<title>WTF? WSF - reliable?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269968940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? Walt Mossberg is a known Apple fanboi (similar to Pogue from NYT). Just because they are from WSJ or NYT does not make them neutral or unbiased.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
Walt Mossberg is a known Apple fanboi ( similar to Pogue from NYT ) .
Just because they are from WSJ or NYT does not make them neutral or unbiased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
Walt Mossberg is a known Apple fanboi (similar to Pogue from NYT).
Just because they are from WSJ or NYT does not make them neutral or unbiased.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673132</id>
	<title>Re:A new, innovative product!</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1269971220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And now witness these amazing HUGE MIDGETS!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And now witness these amazing HUGE MIDGETS !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And now witness these amazing HUGE MIDGETS!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671644</id>
	<title>Oh, you mean it'll be a Nokia N900?</title>
	<author>Eunuchswear</author>
	<datestamp>1269966840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor"</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD ' and will include a double resolution display , a front facing camera , multitasking support , and the blazing A4 processor "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674264</id>
	<title>Blazing?!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269975000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is the A4 blazing? Isn't it just another ARM derivate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the A4 blazing ?
Is n't it just another ARM derivate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the A4 blazing?
Isn't it just another ARM derivate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673934</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269973860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Word processors would make writing Shakespeare impossible. Remember, you're trying to replicate the work of someone who couldnt remember how to spell his own name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Word processors would make writing Shakespeare impossible .
Remember , you 're trying to replicate the work of someone who couldnt remember how to spell his own name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Word processors would make writing Shakespeare impossible.
Remember, you're trying to replicate the work of someone who couldnt remember how to spell his own name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31682916</id>
	<title>Not be be forgotten...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269970860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... it will have a battery life all of five (5) minutes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... it will have a battery life all of five ( 5 ) minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it will have a battery life all of five (5) minutes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669888</id>
	<title>Still waiting</title>
	<author>actionbastard</author>
	<datestamp>1269961440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5284929/the-iphone-3g-asserrrs" title="gizmodo.com">iPhone 3GAss.</a> [gizmodo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the iPhone 3GAss .
[ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the iPhone 3GAss.
[gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672666</id>
	<title>Re:Does no-one remember the past?</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1269969840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can imagine the faster processor, but I suspect based on past performance that they won't give multi tasking until the iteration after the next, as these are both reasonable selling points in themselves. I also think the front-facing VGA camera is a good possibility, and it if works for them in the press expect the next iPad to have this as its next big selling point. This incremental process seems to be working for them so I agree they're unlikely to throw everything into the next version when they can space it out over two releases and still get the sales, it's infuriating to us geeks who just want the latest, fastest tech, but as a marketing tool it seems to be standing them in good stead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can imagine the faster processor , but I suspect based on past performance that they wo n't give multi tasking until the iteration after the next , as these are both reasonable selling points in themselves .
I also think the front-facing VGA camera is a good possibility , and it if works for them in the press expect the next iPad to have this as its next big selling point .
This incremental process seems to be working for them so I agree they 're unlikely to throw everything into the next version when they can space it out over two releases and still get the sales , it 's infuriating to us geeks who just want the latest , fastest tech , but as a marketing tool it seems to be standing them in good stead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can imagine the faster processor, but I suspect based on past performance that they won't give multi tasking until the iteration after the next, as these are both reasonable selling points in themselves.
I also think the front-facing VGA camera is a good possibility, and it if works for them in the press expect the next iPad to have this as its next big selling point.
This incremental process seems to be working for them so I agree they're unlikely to throw everything into the next version when they can space it out over two releases and still get the sales, it's infuriating to us geeks who just want the latest, fastest tech, but as a marketing tool it seems to be standing them in good stead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670876</id>
	<title>Re:A new, innovative product!</title>
	<author>Vectormatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269964680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i bought an ipod touch the week after the big ipad let-down ($500 is ok, but what i want is a mac-book tablet, not a big ipod), and i seriously considered using apple's free engraving service to have 'iPad nano' engraved on it</p><p>didn't do it though, i just would have felt stupid anyway, with all those maxiPad jokes..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i bought an ipod touch the week after the big ipad let-down ( $ 500 is ok , but what i want is a mac-book tablet , not a big ipod ) , and i seriously considered using apple 's free engraving service to have 'iPad nano ' engraved on itdid n't do it though , i just would have felt stupid anyway , with all those maxiPad jokes. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i bought an ipod touch the week after the big ipad let-down ($500 is ok, but what i want is a mac-book tablet, not a big ipod), and i seriously considered using apple's free engraving service to have 'iPad nano' engraved on itdidn't do it though, i just would have felt stupid anyway, with all those maxiPad jokes..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671114</id>
	<title>Re:A4 processor?</title>
	<author>Vectormatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269965400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The A4 is a highway in the UK.</p></div><p>Also a highway in the Netherlands, an audi saloon car, the actual model number of the V2 rocket etc...</p><p>enjoy: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The A4 is a highway in the UK.Also a highway in the Netherlands , an audi saloon car , the actual model number of the V2 rocket etc...enjoy : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The A4 is a highway in the UK.Also a highway in the Netherlands, an audi saloon car, the actual model number of the V2 rocket etc...enjoy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A4 [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31676642</id>
	<title>Re:A new, innovative product!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269940620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or the iPad Shuffle.</p><p>The first tablet without a screen...</p><p>Nor any physical input device for the matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or the iPad Shuffle.The first tablet without a screen...Nor any physical input device for the matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or the iPad Shuffle.The first tablet without a screen...Nor any physical input device for the matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671368</id>
	<title>Comparison of ARM chip performance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269966180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When people talk about smart phones, they throw around a lot of terms.  A4 is here.  The 3GS and the Nokia N900 have an A8.  I've heard people say a lot about Snapdragon from Qualcomm.</p><p>Does anybody have a table of how these perform against each other?  All I've seen is clock frequencies being posted, which might be a poor measurement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When people talk about smart phones , they throw around a lot of terms .
A4 is here .
The 3GS and the Nokia N900 have an A8 .
I 've heard people say a lot about Snapdragon from Qualcomm.Does anybody have a table of how these perform against each other ?
All I 've seen is clock frequencies being posted , which might be a poor measurement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When people talk about smart phones, they throw around a lot of terms.
A4 is here.
The 3GS and the Nokia N900 have an A8.
I've heard people say a lot about Snapdragon from Qualcomm.Does anybody have a table of how these perform against each other?
All I've seen is clock frequencies being posted, which might be a poor measurement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673766</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269973320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.</p></div><p>No they won't. Monkeys break typewriters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.No they wo n't .
Monkeys break typewriters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>enough monkeys pounding on typewriters will eventually write Shakespeare.No they won't.
Monkeys break typewriters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674092</id>
	<title>A4 processor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269974340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd prefer a letter or legal processor...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd prefer a letter or legal processor.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd prefer a letter or legal processor...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671588</id>
	<title>Re:front facing, rear facing</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1269966720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...user wants..."</p><p>Apple</p><p>See the problem there!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...user wants... " AppleSee the problem there !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...user wants..."AppleSee the problem there!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669884</id>
	<title>first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269961380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should be good for fags</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should be good for fags</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should be good for fags</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677428</id>
	<title>Re:Screen resolution</title>
	<author>rovolo</author>
	<datestamp>1269942960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming that the screen is the same physical size, would there be any reason to resize the GUI for existing apps? Your fingers haven't changed size.</p><p>It's much harder to translate a GUI between different aspect ratios than to just up the resolution. If Apple increased the resolution on the built in widgets, then existing applications would look the same as they do on current hardware but sharper.</p><p>Honestly, what changes would you make to the layout if the resolution was higher? Even though we can put books onto microfiche, we still print them onto paper. An increased resolution can make it easier to distinguish between widgets, but with hardware as small as a phone no radical changes to the <b> <i>layout</i> </b> are really necessary. The only major problem for current apps will be custom icons and widgets that haven't been scaled up to the higher resolution.</p><p>The problem with different Android devices are the different aspect ratios like 3:4 or 3:5 and different physical screen sizes like 2.8", 3.2" and 3.7". The iPhone will most likely always be 2:3 and 3.5"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming that the screen is the same physical size , would there be any reason to resize the GUI for existing apps ?
Your fingers have n't changed size.It 's much harder to translate a GUI between different aspect ratios than to just up the resolution .
If Apple increased the resolution on the built in widgets , then existing applications would look the same as they do on current hardware but sharper.Honestly , what changes would you make to the layout if the resolution was higher ?
Even though we can put books onto microfiche , we still print them onto paper .
An increased resolution can make it easier to distinguish between widgets , but with hardware as small as a phone no radical changes to the layout are really necessary .
The only major problem for current apps will be custom icons and widgets that have n't been scaled up to the higher resolution.The problem with different Android devices are the different aspect ratios like 3 : 4 or 3 : 5 and different physical screen sizes like 2.8 " , 3.2 " and 3.7 " .
The iPhone will most likely always be 2 : 3 and 3.5 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming that the screen is the same physical size, would there be any reason to resize the GUI for existing apps?
Your fingers haven't changed size.It's much harder to translate a GUI between different aspect ratios than to just up the resolution.
If Apple increased the resolution on the built in widgets, then existing applications would look the same as they do on current hardware but sharper.Honestly, what changes would you make to the layout if the resolution was higher?
Even though we can put books onto microfiche, we still print them onto paper.
An increased resolution can make it easier to distinguish between widgets, but with hardware as small as a phone no radical changes to the  layout  are really necessary.
The only major problem for current apps will be custom icons and widgets that haven't been scaled up to the higher resolution.The problem with different Android devices are the different aspect ratios like 3:4 or 3:5 and different physical screen sizes like 2.8", 3.2" and 3.7".
The iPhone will most likely always be 2:3 and 3.5"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670690</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1269964140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and you N900 is also dog slow., herky jerky and has phone problems.   I loved my N900, but I need a phone first and a pocket PC second.  I had cell tower hand-off problems,  Bluetooth connectivity with my car sucked (have to reboot N900 after EVERY call to make another call through the car's hands free bluetooth, Damn Ford and BMW and their non standard Bluetooth that works with all other phones INCLUDING older Nokias!)  The interface get's slow at times making you wait, AND I experienced lockups at times.</p><p>I had to have a phone that worked with my bluetooth and worked as a phone 100\% of the time.   the N900 is not useable for that.   Sadly my friends iPhone did not have problems with  using the car's bluetooth integration, and he does not have lockups or loss of cellphone reception in many places.  Yes I checked...  my kichen, N900 = no signal  his iphone 2 bars.  walk to living room 5 bars, N900 still no signal for 30-60 seconds..... OH there it is!  I get 3 bars!  WOOOO!</p><p>I'm seriously thinking of selling my N900 on ebay and getting an iPhone or a Nexus 1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and you N900 is also dog slow. , herky jerky and has phone problems .
I loved my N900 , but I need a phone first and a pocket PC second .
I had cell tower hand-off problems , Bluetooth connectivity with my car sucked ( have to reboot N900 after EVERY call to make another call through the car 's hands free bluetooth , Damn Ford and BMW and their non standard Bluetooth that works with all other phones INCLUDING older Nokias !
) The interface get 's slow at times making you wait , AND I experienced lockups at times.I had to have a phone that worked with my bluetooth and worked as a phone 100 \ % of the time .
the N900 is not useable for that .
Sadly my friends iPhone did not have problems with using the car 's bluetooth integration , and he does not have lockups or loss of cellphone reception in many places .
Yes I checked... my kichen , N900 = no signal his iphone 2 bars .
walk to living room 5 bars , N900 still no signal for 30-60 seconds..... OH there it is !
I get 3 bars !
WOOOO ! I 'm seriously thinking of selling my N900 on ebay and getting an iPhone or a Nexus 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and you N900 is also dog slow., herky jerky and has phone problems.
I loved my N900, but I need a phone first and a pocket PC second.
I had cell tower hand-off problems,  Bluetooth connectivity with my car sucked (have to reboot N900 after EVERY call to make another call through the car's hands free bluetooth, Damn Ford and BMW and their non standard Bluetooth that works with all other phones INCLUDING older Nokias!
)  The interface get's slow at times making you wait, AND I experienced lockups at times.I had to have a phone that worked with my bluetooth and worked as a phone 100\% of the time.
the N900 is not useable for that.
Sadly my friends iPhone did not have problems with  using the car's bluetooth integration, and he does not have lockups or loss of cellphone reception in many places.
Yes I checked...  my kichen, N900 = no signal  his iphone 2 bars.
walk to living room 5 bars, N900 still no signal for 30-60 seconds..... OH there it is!
I get 3 bars!
WOOOO!I'm seriously thinking of selling my N900 on ebay and getting an iPhone or a Nexus 1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675350</id>
	<title>iPhoneHD Pro</title>
	<author>Monoman</author>
	<datestamp>1269979500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a 1st gen iPhone. Now with all of the options out there now I just can't see sticking Apple unless they surprise us all.  On top of the HD specs I would like to see a Pro model aimed at office professionals (I know that is so not Apple).  This Pro model needs a memory card slot, a physical keyboard, a replaceable battery or longer life, better camera, etc.</p><p>There is definitely a market for the device and would somewhat fit in with Apple's other Pro products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 1st gen iPhone .
Now with all of the options out there now I just ca n't see sticking Apple unless they surprise us all .
On top of the HD specs I would like to see a Pro model aimed at office professionals ( I know that is so not Apple ) .
This Pro model needs a memory card slot , a physical keyboard , a replaceable battery or longer life , better camera , etc.There is definitely a market for the device and would somewhat fit in with Apple 's other Pro products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 1st gen iPhone.
Now with all of the options out there now I just can't see sticking Apple unless they surprise us all.
On top of the HD specs I would like to see a Pro model aimed at office professionals (I know that is so not Apple).
This Pro model needs a memory card slot, a physical keyboard, a replaceable battery or longer life, better camera, etc.There is definitely a market for the device and would somewhat fit in with Apple's other Pro products.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670556</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable, though...</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1269963780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ads cost millions of dollars. Rumors cost nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ads cost millions of dollars .
Rumors cost nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ads cost millions of dollars.
Rumors cost nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672560</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269969540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can I install my software without Apple's permission yet?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, if you have a developer's license, you may install any software you want on your own phone.  Using Apple's iTunes App store will require their permission.</p><blockquote><div><p>Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet?</p></div> </blockquote><p>This is more of a carrier limitation if I remember.  I had a Verizon phone and it had the same issue.  I would have to pay to get song to be a ringtone even though the phone could be an MP3 player.</p><blockquote><div><p>Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet?</p></div> </blockquote><p>While technically you can do this, why?  It isn't very efficient if you use the mobile device CPU to process these codecs.  On a general computer, it's not a big deal.  On a mobile device, it's more of an issue with limited power and processing capability.  Generally mobile devices have dedicated hardware for codecs.</p><blockquote><div><p>Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet?</p></div> </blockquote><p>Way back in the day, Apple warned that jailbreaking an iPhone may cause problems because of the methods used.  You are forcing the device to work in ways not intended.  When they released a firmware update that bricked phones, they didn't shed a tear because they warned you.  Jailbreakers found a workaround.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I install my software without Apple 's permission yet ? Yes , if you have a developer 's license , you may install any software you want on your own phone .
Using Apple 's iTunes App store will require their permission.Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet ?
This is more of a carrier limitation if I remember .
I had a Verizon phone and it had the same issue .
I would have to pay to get song to be a ringtone even though the phone could be an MP3 player.Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet ?
While technically you can do this , why ?
It is n't very efficient if you use the mobile device CPU to process these codecs .
On a general computer , it 's not a big deal .
On a mobile device , it 's more of an issue with limited power and processing capability .
Generally mobile devices have dedicated hardware for codecs.Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet ?
Way back in the day , Apple warned that jailbreaking an iPhone may cause problems because of the methods used .
You are forcing the device to work in ways not intended .
When they released a firmware update that bricked phones , they did n't shed a tear because they warned you .
Jailbreakers found a workaround .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I install my software without Apple's permission yet?Yes, if you have a developer's license, you may install any software you want on your own phone.
Using Apple's iTunes App store will require their permission.Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet?
This is more of a carrier limitation if I remember.
I had a Verizon phone and it had the same issue.
I would have to pay to get song to be a ringtone even though the phone could be an MP3 player.Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet?
While technically you can do this, why?
It isn't very efficient if you use the mobile device CPU to process these codecs.
On a general computer, it's not a big deal.
On a mobile device, it's more of an issue with limited power and processing capability.
Generally mobile devices have dedicated hardware for codecs.Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet?
Way back in the day, Apple warned that jailbreaking an iPhone may cause problems because of the methods used.
You are forcing the device to work in ways not intended.
When they released a firmware update that bricked phones, they didn't shed a tear because they warned you.
Jailbreakers found a workaround.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671554</id>
	<title>Re:Recurring lesson about Apple</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1269966660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give an infinte number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters (or computers) and eventually you will have a large pile of mangled metal and plastic all covered in shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give an infinte number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters ( or computers ) and eventually you will have a large pile of mangled metal and plastic all covered in shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give an infinte number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters (or computers) and eventually you will have a large pile of mangled metal and plastic all covered in shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886</id>
	<title>Flash?  Unlocked?</title>
	<author>BVis</author>
	<datestamp>1269961380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers, or a bloody Flash plugin?  Fix those before you add gadgets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers , or a bloody Flash plugin ?
Fix those before you add gadgets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it include minor expectations like a choice in carriers, or a bloody Flash plugin?
Fix those before you add gadgets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670874</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269964680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quarter million suckers.  Geez.</p><p>I would argue that the n900 isn't a phone for nerds, but more that the iphone is more a sad indicator of the buyer and their (lack of) understanding of technology.  They're tech wannabes, someone who wants access to features but otherwise doesn't really understand what they are giving up, or care to.</p><p>While there are certainly interesting selling points to the iphone, it's more a product that proves Larry Lessig's comment that software dictates the options and limits to the users.  In this case, it also applies to hardware (such as the crappy screen resolution, compared to other available devices).  Apple has continued to release products that are substandard, and their fan base and branding, not the technological merits, have been carrying them.  We've seen this with the ipod, the iphone, and now the ipad.</p><p>Hell, the ipad isn't even widescreen.  I wonder how many buyers actually could define widescreen or realized they aren't buying a 720p display device.  Even from a technological standpoint, the iphone resolution blows compare to pda's that came out years before, like the Nokia N770 and its similar later models.  That's the sort of people buying this product and Apple's whole i* line.  They should be looked down on, they're crowd followers, not independent thinkers, the masses, not relished or admired for their tecnological merit choice, but brand choices.  They're buying a status symbol, not a technological one.</p><p>And that is something Apple does well and continues to.  Put out a substandard product, get people to buy it at what the competitors are selling their lineup for, and profiting from the suckers due to the price difference saved in the product's parts.</p><p>The other companies to blame though are also the lack of competition and advertising to compete with Apple.  There is a bit of a Sansa and Creative following in the player realm at least.  And Apple has gotten the crap beaten out of them in the movie/tv player market, thanks to Netflix; Apple TV is a pretty big dud comparably even though it still sells probably more singularly as a product compared to any individual product in the whole of all the product offerings out there.  The phone market, I blame Nokia and cell providers for continuing to drop the ball and carve the market up.  At least the HTC lineup is getting pretty neat (HTC HD 2 I think), but they've only now finally gotten a screen resolution to match what some handhelds had years ago (800x480).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quarter million suckers .
Geez.I would argue that the n900 is n't a phone for nerds , but more that the iphone is more a sad indicator of the buyer and their ( lack of ) understanding of technology .
They 're tech wannabes , someone who wants access to features but otherwise does n't really understand what they are giving up , or care to.While there are certainly interesting selling points to the iphone , it 's more a product that proves Larry Lessig 's comment that software dictates the options and limits to the users .
In this case , it also applies to hardware ( such as the crappy screen resolution , compared to other available devices ) .
Apple has continued to release products that are substandard , and their fan base and branding , not the technological merits , have been carrying them .
We 've seen this with the ipod , the iphone , and now the ipad.Hell , the ipad is n't even widescreen .
I wonder how many buyers actually could define widescreen or realized they are n't buying a 720p display device .
Even from a technological standpoint , the iphone resolution blows compare to pda 's that came out years before , like the Nokia N770 and its similar later models .
That 's the sort of people buying this product and Apple 's whole i * line .
They should be looked down on , they 're crowd followers , not independent thinkers , the masses , not relished or admired for their tecnological merit choice , but brand choices .
They 're buying a status symbol , not a technological one.And that is something Apple does well and continues to .
Put out a substandard product , get people to buy it at what the competitors are selling their lineup for , and profiting from the suckers due to the price difference saved in the product 's parts.The other companies to blame though are also the lack of competition and advertising to compete with Apple .
There is a bit of a Sansa and Creative following in the player realm at least .
And Apple has gotten the crap beaten out of them in the movie/tv player market , thanks to Netflix ; Apple TV is a pretty big dud comparably even though it still sells probably more singularly as a product compared to any individual product in the whole of all the product offerings out there .
The phone market , I blame Nokia and cell providers for continuing to drop the ball and carve the market up .
At least the HTC lineup is getting pretty neat ( HTC HD 2 I think ) , but they 've only now finally gotten a screen resolution to match what some handhelds had years ago ( 800x480 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quarter million suckers.
Geez.I would argue that the n900 isn't a phone for nerds, but more that the iphone is more a sad indicator of the buyer and their (lack of) understanding of technology.
They're tech wannabes, someone who wants access to features but otherwise doesn't really understand what they are giving up, or care to.While there are certainly interesting selling points to the iphone, it's more a product that proves Larry Lessig's comment that software dictates the options and limits to the users.
In this case, it also applies to hardware (such as the crappy screen resolution, compared to other available devices).
Apple has continued to release products that are substandard, and their fan base and branding, not the technological merits, have been carrying them.
We've seen this with the ipod, the iphone, and now the ipad.Hell, the ipad isn't even widescreen.
I wonder how many buyers actually could define widescreen or realized they aren't buying a 720p display device.
Even from a technological standpoint, the iphone resolution blows compare to pda's that came out years before, like the Nokia N770 and its similar later models.
That's the sort of people buying this product and Apple's whole i* line.
They should be looked down on, they're crowd followers, not independent thinkers, the masses, not relished or admired for their tecnological merit choice, but brand choices.
They're buying a status symbol, not a technological one.And that is something Apple does well and continues to.
Put out a substandard product, get people to buy it at what the competitors are selling their lineup for, and profiting from the suckers due to the price difference saved in the product's parts.The other companies to blame though are also the lack of competition and advertising to compete with Apple.
There is a bit of a Sansa and Creative following in the player realm at least.
And Apple has gotten the crap beaten out of them in the movie/tv player market, thanks to Netflix; Apple TV is a pretty big dud comparably even though it still sells probably more singularly as a product compared to any individual product in the whole of all the product offerings out there.
The phone market, I blame Nokia and cell providers for continuing to drop the ball and carve the market up.
At least the HTC lineup is getting pretty neat (HTC HD 2 I think), but they've only now finally gotten a screen resolution to match what some handhelds had years ago (800x480).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671000</id>
	<title>Re:A new, innovative product!</title>
	<author>PixetaledPikachu</author>
	<datestamp>1269965100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I present to you, the iPad Nano!</p></div><p>I want my iPod Mono</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I present to you , the iPad Nano ! I want my iPod Mono</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I present to you, the iPad Nano!I want my iPod Mono
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670080</id>
	<title>Source Article</title>
	<author>necro81</author>
	<datestamp>1269962220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good Grief.  I have a first-gen iPhone, and will consider upgrading when the next version comes out.  So you can expect that I'm excited about the possible specs on.  But, really, the linked article is a ridiculous i-gasm.  If you are going to report this stuff, stick to the original sources, rather than linking to second-hand articles that lace their copy with unabashed fanboy-ism.  If you want color commentary along with your tech news, check out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/" title="engadget.com">the relevant post</a> [engadget.com] on Engadget.<br> <br>

What actually kicked off this latest wave of speculation was an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304370304575152242601774892.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_MIDDLETopStories" title="wsj.com">an article</a> [wsj.com] from the Wall Street Journal, stating that Apple is developing a CDMA version of the iphone for Verizon.  The WSJ is a fairly reputable source that wouldn't print unless they had some solid evidence, so this should be interpreted as a bit more than a typical rumor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good Grief .
I have a first-gen iPhone , and will consider upgrading when the next version comes out .
So you can expect that I 'm excited about the possible specs on .
But , really , the linked article is a ridiculous i-gasm .
If you are going to report this stuff , stick to the original sources , rather than linking to second-hand articles that lace their copy with unabashed fanboy-ism .
If you want color commentary along with your tech news , check out the relevant post [ engadget.com ] on Engadget .
What actually kicked off this latest wave of speculation was an an article [ wsj.com ] from the Wall Street Journal , stating that Apple is developing a CDMA version of the iphone for Verizon .
The WSJ is a fairly reputable source that would n't print unless they had some solid evidence , so this should be interpreted as a bit more than a typical rumor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good Grief.
I have a first-gen iPhone, and will consider upgrading when the next version comes out.
So you can expect that I'm excited about the possible specs on.
But, really, the linked article is a ridiculous i-gasm.
If you are going to report this stuff, stick to the original sources, rather than linking to second-hand articles that lace their copy with unabashed fanboy-ism.
If you want color commentary along with your tech news, check out the relevant post [engadget.com] on Engadget.
What actually kicked off this latest wave of speculation was an an article [wsj.com] from the Wall Street Journal, stating that Apple is developing a CDMA version of the iphone for Verizon.
The WSJ is a fairly reputable source that wouldn't print unless they had some solid evidence, so this should be interpreted as a bit more than a typical rumor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670094</id>
	<title>Re:And this is different from the 10000 other rumo</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269962220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then, 24 hours later, they will all get their dupe too. And then another 24 hours later half of those will get a second dupe because the posters don't even read Slashdot themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then , 24 hours later , they will all get their dupe too .
And then another 24 hours later half of those will get a second dupe because the posters do n't even read Slashdot themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then, 24 hours later, they will all get their dupe too.
And then another 24 hours later half of those will get a second dupe because the posters don't even read Slashdot themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675242</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-tasking : do not want</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269979080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What -- you have absolutely no desire to play Space Invaders on your phone while you're talking to someone? Even if it's someone really boring, like your mom?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What -- you have absolutely no desire to play Space Invaders on your phone while you 're talking to someone ?
Even if it 's someone really boring , like your mom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What -- you have absolutely no desire to play Space Invaders on your phone while you're talking to someone?
Even if it's someone really boring, like your mom?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675182</id>
	<title>The future is here!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269978780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor</i>... and a 20 minute battery life when using all these new features!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD ' and will include a double resolution display , a front facing camera , multitasking support , and the blazing A4 processor... and a 20 minute battery life when using all these new features !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be dubbed the 'iPhone HD' and will include a double resolution display, a front facing camera, multitasking support, and the blazing A4 processor... and a 20 minute battery life when using all these new features!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</id>
	<title>Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can I install my software without Apple's permission yet?<br>
<br>
Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet?
<br> <br>
Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet?
<br> <br>
Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet?
<br> <br>
Can I multitask yet?
<br> <br>
Can I use Flash (and watch Hulu) yet?
<br> <br>
<br>
<br>
Yep, I think my n900 is still the phone for nerds.  I have a philosophical issue with Apple telling me what i can and can't do with hardware I purchased, when there is no technical reason I cannot do it.  I sacrifice a little convenience (the huge app store, Apple's admittedly-slick interface) for my <i>freedom.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I install my software without Apple 's permission yet ?
Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet ?
Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet ?
Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet ?
Can I multitask yet ?
Can I use Flash ( and watch Hulu ) yet ?
Yep , I think my n900 is still the phone for nerds .
I have a philosophical issue with Apple telling me what i can and ca n't do with hardware I purchased , when there is no technical reason I can not do it .
I sacrifice a little convenience ( the huge app store , Apple 's admittedly-slick interface ) for my freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I install my software without Apple's permission yet?
Can I assign my songs directly as ringtones yet?
Can I add my own audio and video codecs yet?
Can I take my phone to another carrier without Apple trying to brick my phone with a firmware update yet?
Can I multitask yet?
Can I use Flash (and watch Hulu) yet?
Yep, I think my n900 is still the phone for nerds.
I have a philosophical issue with Apple telling me what i can and can't do with hardware I purchased, when there is no technical reason I cannot do it.
I sacrifice a little convenience (the huge app store, Apple's admittedly-slick interface) for my freedom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671728</id>
	<title>My prediction</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1269967080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better 3G chip to go with all the carriers that have rolled out various kinds of HSDPA<br>Same CPU as the iPad (or more likely a version that cuts back the speed and power consumption to account for the smaller battery on the iPhone)<br>No multitasking (regardless of battery life concerns, Apple would need to "ruin" its perfect UI with some kind of task switcher feature)<br>No front facing camera (video calling has not taken off in the way phone carriers would like, especially in the US. AFAIK its almost non-existent on AT&amp;T)<br>Rewritten bootloaders and security to make jailbreaking and unlocking harder<br>I suspect 802.11n will appear IF apple can find a low power chip that doesn't require devoting too much of the internal space of the iPhone to the antenna.</p><p>I predict that there will still be no support for:<br>Loading apps without going through the app store<br>Fast 2D drawing APIs (CoreSurface or whatever it is) being able to be used in official apps<br>External keyboards of any kind<br>Any peripheral where Apple doesn't get a cut from every unit sold.<br>Any kind of ability for apps to share data files with each other<br>Any kind of ability to load arbitrary files onto an iPhone (i.e. a generic "documents" folder)</p><p>I also predict that there will continue to be many reasons Apple will reject your app submission, all of which exist as official policy at Apple (and are known to the app store reviewers) and none of which Apple will ever disclose to developers. One of these "unwritten rules" is likely "no apps that mean less revenue for Apple carrier partners such as AT&amp;T"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better 3G chip to go with all the carriers that have rolled out various kinds of HSDPASame CPU as the iPad ( or more likely a version that cuts back the speed and power consumption to account for the smaller battery on the iPhone ) No multitasking ( regardless of battery life concerns , Apple would need to " ruin " its perfect UI with some kind of task switcher feature ) No front facing camera ( video calling has not taken off in the way phone carriers would like , especially in the US .
AFAIK its almost non-existent on AT&amp;T ) Rewritten bootloaders and security to make jailbreaking and unlocking harderI suspect 802.11n will appear IF apple can find a low power chip that does n't require devoting too much of the internal space of the iPhone to the antenna.I predict that there will still be no support for : Loading apps without going through the app storeFast 2D drawing APIs ( CoreSurface or whatever it is ) being able to be used in official appsExternal keyboards of any kindAny peripheral where Apple does n't get a cut from every unit sold.Any kind of ability for apps to share data files with each otherAny kind of ability to load arbitrary files onto an iPhone ( i.e .
a generic " documents " folder ) I also predict that there will continue to be many reasons Apple will reject your app submission , all of which exist as official policy at Apple ( and are known to the app store reviewers ) and none of which Apple will ever disclose to developers .
One of these " unwritten rules " is likely " no apps that mean less revenue for Apple carrier partners such as AT&amp;T "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better 3G chip to go with all the carriers that have rolled out various kinds of HSDPASame CPU as the iPad (or more likely a version that cuts back the speed and power consumption to account for the smaller battery on the iPhone)No multitasking (regardless of battery life concerns, Apple would need to "ruin" its perfect UI with some kind of task switcher feature)No front facing camera (video calling has not taken off in the way phone carriers would like, especially in the US.
AFAIK its almost non-existent on AT&amp;T)Rewritten bootloaders and security to make jailbreaking and unlocking harderI suspect 802.11n will appear IF apple can find a low power chip that doesn't require devoting too much of the internal space of the iPhone to the antenna.I predict that there will still be no support for:Loading apps without going through the app storeFast 2D drawing APIs (CoreSurface or whatever it is) being able to be used in official appsExternal keyboards of any kindAny peripheral where Apple doesn't get a cut from every unit sold.Any kind of ability for apps to share data files with each otherAny kind of ability to load arbitrary files onto an iPhone (i.e.
a generic "documents" folder)I also predict that there will continue to be many reasons Apple will reject your app submission, all of which exist as official policy at Apple (and are known to the app store reviewers) and none of which Apple will ever disclose to developers.
One of these "unwritten rules" is likely "no apps that mean less revenue for Apple carrier partners such as AT&amp;T"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678414</id>
	<title>Re:How will affect old stuff</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1269947040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software, released only two years after the iPhone, ran like a dog.</p></div><p>So, why didn't you just run the version 2 software instead? Your reasoning isn't very sound, because there was no reason you had to have new hardware.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software , released only two years after the iPhone , ran like a dog.So , why did n't you just run the version 2 software instead ?
Your reasoning is n't very sound , because there was no reason you had to have new hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I had to replace my first gen iPhone because the 3.0 software, released only two years after the iPhone, ran like a dog.So, why didn't you just run the version 2 software instead?
Your reasoning isn't very sound, because there was no reason you had to have new hardware.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671092</id>
	<title>Resolution</title>
	<author>sonicmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1269965340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm impressed by its resolution, which is purported to be 960 x 640, according to engadget: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/" title="engadget.com">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/</a> [engadget.com]

</p><p>That's a step-up from the rest of the pack, including the "super-phone" EVO 4G.  I'm wondering if this also means a step-up in overall screen size.

</p><p>Regardless of where you fall in the iPhone fan/hate camp, you have to admit competition breeds excellence.

</p><p>Now if only we could do something about the locked-in phones, 2 year contracts, "subsidized" loan plans, and uncompetitive wireless market in the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm impressed by its resolution , which is purported to be 960 x 640 , according to engadget : http : //www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/ [ engadget.com ] That 's a step-up from the rest of the pack , including the " super-phone " EVO 4G .
I 'm wondering if this also means a step-up in overall screen size .
Regardless of where you fall in the iPhone fan/hate camp , you have to admit competition breeds excellence .
Now if only we could do something about the locked-in phones , 2 year contracts , " subsidized " loan plans , and uncompetitive wireless market in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm impressed by its resolution, which is purported to be 960 x 640, according to engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/ [engadget.com]

That's a step-up from the rest of the pack, including the "super-phone" EVO 4G.
I'm wondering if this also means a step-up in overall screen size.
Regardless of where you fall in the iPhone fan/hate camp, you have to admit competition breeds excellence.
Now if only we could do something about the locked-in phones, 2 year contracts, "subsidized" loan plans, and uncompetitive wireless market in the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670766</id>
	<title>Re:Flash? Unlocked?</title>
	<author>Vectormatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269964320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin. It forces people to stop using Flash where there's no reason to use it, such as navigation and video.</p></div><p>you dont even need an iphone type device for that. A year and a half back i worked on a webshop, and the program manager had me make a jpg/javascript fall back for the flash menu because google analytics showed that 1\% of the visitors didnt have flash. When the main goal of your website is getting people in, and getting them to spend money, management will have programmers bending over backwards to support even IE 5.0 if they think they will make an extra buck.</p><p>Granted, the only reason the navigation on that site was simple, and flash was only used to make things flashy...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin .
It forces people to stop using Flash where there 's no reason to use it , such as navigation and video.you dont even need an iphone type device for that .
A year and a half back i worked on a webshop , and the program manager had me make a jpg/javascript fall back for the flash menu because google analytics showed that 1 \ % of the visitors didnt have flash .
When the main goal of your website is getting people in , and getting them to spend money , management will have programmers bending over backwards to support even IE 5.0 if they think they will make an extra buck.Granted , the only reason the navigation on that site was simple , and flash was only used to make things flashy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Flash on extremely popular devices is a good thin.
It forces people to stop using Flash where there's no reason to use it, such as navigation and video.you dont even need an iphone type device for that.
A year and a half back i worked on a webshop, and the program manager had me make a jpg/javascript fall back for the flash menu because google analytics showed that 1\% of the visitors didnt have flash.
When the main goal of your website is getting people in, and getting them to spend money, management will have programmers bending over backwards to support even IE 5.0 if they think they will make an extra buck.Granted, the only reason the navigation on that site was simple, and flash was only used to make things flashy...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882</id>
	<title>Not so HD ?</title>
	<author>Saint Gerbil</author>
	<datestamp>1269961380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How HD can you get on an iPhone ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How HD can you get on an iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How HD can you get on an iPhone ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670354</id>
	<title>Re:front facing, rear facing</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1269963060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's cheaper and easier to have a lower resolution front-facing camera as it removes the need for moving, easily breakable parts. Other camera have had this for about 3 years, the technology (and precedence) is well established. The question is are they going to allow Skype to be used over 3G?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's cheaper and easier to have a lower resolution front-facing camera as it removes the need for moving , easily breakable parts .
Other camera have had this for about 3 years , the technology ( and precedence ) is well established .
The question is are they going to allow Skype to be used over 3G ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's cheaper and easier to have a lower resolution front-facing camera as it removes the need for moving, easily breakable parts.
Other camera have had this for about 3 years, the technology (and precedence) is well established.
The question is are they going to allow Skype to be used over 3G?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671154</id>
	<title>Re:Why would nerds want this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, but one point you failed to realize: the iPhone is not nor ever was for nerds &amp; geeks.  It was for everyone else.  And there are a lot more everyone elses.  And I for one consider lack of flash to be a feature, not a bug. And as someone who worked in video production in the earlier part of the last decade, H.264 won and for very good reasons.  Primarily, it's the best Codec available.  We now have a standard to which all devices/software should be writing &amp; playing.  The last thing I want to see is a return to Codec Hell.</p><p>Regardless I have heard from several people inside ATT that they are loosing exclusively and we're likely to see a CDMA iPhone for Verizon or Sprint later this year.  Although if the wireless carriers in the US begin deploying 4G technology (which is supposed to be the same for everyone), then maybe we'll finally see a phone that will work on all carriers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , but one point you failed to realize : the iPhone is not nor ever was for nerds &amp; geeks .
It was for everyone else .
And there are a lot more everyone elses .
And I for one consider lack of flash to be a feature , not a bug .
And as someone who worked in video production in the earlier part of the last decade , H.264 won and for very good reasons .
Primarily , it 's the best Codec available .
We now have a standard to which all devices/software should be writing &amp; playing .
The last thing I want to see is a return to Codec Hell.Regardless I have heard from several people inside ATT that they are loosing exclusively and we 're likely to see a CDMA iPhone for Verizon or Sprint later this year .
Although if the wireless carriers in the US begin deploying 4G technology ( which is supposed to be the same for everyone ) , then maybe we 'll finally see a phone that will work on all carriers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, but one point you failed to realize: the iPhone is not nor ever was for nerds &amp; geeks.
It was for everyone else.
And there are a lot more everyone elses.
And I for one consider lack of flash to be a feature, not a bug.
And as someone who worked in video production in the earlier part of the last decade, H.264 won and for very good reasons.
Primarily, it's the best Codec available.
We now have a standard to which all devices/software should be writing &amp; playing.
The last thing I want to see is a return to Codec Hell.Regardless I have heard from several people inside ATT that they are loosing exclusively and we're likely to see a CDMA iPhone for Verizon or Sprint later this year.
Although if the wireless carriers in the US begin deploying 4G technology (which is supposed to be the same for everyone), then maybe we'll finally see a phone that will work on all carriers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671168</id>
	<title>1PS:  One Pixel at a time!!</title>
	<author>DTC-Bob</author>
	<datestamp>1269965580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>New Feature:  AT&amp;T will support 1PS:  1 Pixel Per Second!!  Who needs 4G?

Who cares:  Apple is the new BORG....  Time to move the borg from Bill to Steve...</htmltext>
<tokenext>New Feature : AT&amp;T will support 1PS : 1 Pixel Per Second ! !
Who needs 4G ?
Who cares : Apple is the new BORG.... Time to move the borg from Bill to Steve.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New Feature:  AT&amp;T will support 1PS:  1 Pixel Per Second!!
Who needs 4G?
Who cares:  Apple is the new BORG....  Time to move the borg from Bill to Steve...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670054</id>
	<title>Re:And this is different from the 10000 other rumo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To which, fanbois will have to menstruate as many times?</htmltext>
<tokenext>To which , fanbois will have to menstruate as many times ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To which, fanbois will have to menstruate as many times?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31682504</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T sucks</title>
	<author>chappel</author>
	<datestamp>1269967260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God I hope the new iPhone has a model that will run on Verizon. I don't care if it actually DOES, or if it is ever supported by VZW, I just want AT&amp;T to feel enough pressure to make an effort to suck less.</p><p>I bought a 3Gs iPhone last fall, anticipating spending much of my time in Dallas. My reality turned out a bit different, now I'm living in rural Minnesota. I'm still forced to pay full price for 'unlimited' data, even though haven't seen a 3G connection since October. I was promised tethering was 'just around the corner', too - not that it matters - it'd be faster to walk to a hotspot than use a tethered EDGE connection. Now I see AT&amp;T is budgeting major expansions in MN - all around the metro area, still 100 miles outside my stomping grounds. North and South Dakota aren't even on the AT&amp;T map. I was recently visiting Warroad, MN, on the Canadian border, and couldn't even make a voice call. Crookston doesn't even have EDGE service. AT&amp;T pisses and moans about folks who actually take them for their word about 'unlimited' data, but I'd sure like to have my bill cut back as compensation for not getting ANY 3G service. On the up side, I keep the 3G radio off and get GREAT battery life.</p><p>I know lots of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers will think I'm an idiot 'fanboy' for keeping the iPhone, but I really like the apps I've got on it - I use it for billing, task management, weather and flight planning and lots of other stuff - and the apps integrate nicely with my macbook. I'd have gone with a droid/google phone, but at the time it was only available on T-Mobile, and I KNEW that wouldn't work for me. In the future I'm worried that the droid platform will be so windows-centric that I'll get the short end of the cool app stick as a mac user.</p><p>For the moment I feel like I'm watching a race to see who wins - the Droid to provide apps I need on their vastly superior VZW coverage, or AT&amp;T to expand the coverage for their superior apps. Maybe I should just trade the iPhone in for a Touch in the mean time.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God I hope the new iPhone has a model that will run on Verizon .
I do n't care if it actually DOES , or if it is ever supported by VZW , I just want AT&amp;T to feel enough pressure to make an effort to suck less.I bought a 3Gs iPhone last fall , anticipating spending much of my time in Dallas .
My reality turned out a bit different , now I 'm living in rural Minnesota .
I 'm still forced to pay full price for 'unlimited ' data , even though have n't seen a 3G connection since October .
I was promised tethering was 'just around the corner ' , too - not that it matters - it 'd be faster to walk to a hotspot than use a tethered EDGE connection .
Now I see AT&amp;T is budgeting major expansions in MN - all around the metro area , still 100 miles outside my stomping grounds .
North and South Dakota are n't even on the AT&amp;T map .
I was recently visiting Warroad , MN , on the Canadian border , and could n't even make a voice call .
Crookston does n't even have EDGE service .
AT&amp;T pisses and moans about folks who actually take them for their word about 'unlimited ' data , but I 'd sure like to have my bill cut back as compensation for not getting ANY 3G service .
On the up side , I keep the 3G radio off and get GREAT battery life.I know lots of /.ers will think I 'm an idiot 'fanboy ' for keeping the iPhone , but I really like the apps I 've got on it - I use it for billing , task management , weather and flight planning and lots of other stuff - and the apps integrate nicely with my macbook .
I 'd have gone with a droid/google phone , but at the time it was only available on T-Mobile , and I KNEW that would n't work for me .
In the future I 'm worried that the droid platform will be so windows-centric that I 'll get the short end of the cool app stick as a mac user.For the moment I feel like I 'm watching a race to see who wins - the Droid to provide apps I need on their vastly superior VZW coverage , or AT&amp;T to expand the coverage for their superior apps .
Maybe I should just trade the iPhone in for a Touch in the mean time .
: - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God I hope the new iPhone has a model that will run on Verizon.
I don't care if it actually DOES, or if it is ever supported by VZW, I just want AT&amp;T to feel enough pressure to make an effort to suck less.I bought a 3Gs iPhone last fall, anticipating spending much of my time in Dallas.
My reality turned out a bit different, now I'm living in rural Minnesota.
I'm still forced to pay full price for 'unlimited' data, even though haven't seen a 3G connection since October.
I was promised tethering was 'just around the corner', too - not that it matters - it'd be faster to walk to a hotspot than use a tethered EDGE connection.
Now I see AT&amp;T is budgeting major expansions in MN - all around the metro area, still 100 miles outside my stomping grounds.
North and South Dakota aren't even on the AT&amp;T map.
I was recently visiting Warroad, MN, on the Canadian border, and couldn't even make a voice call.
Crookston doesn't even have EDGE service.
AT&amp;T pisses and moans about folks who actually take them for their word about 'unlimited' data, but I'd sure like to have my bill cut back as compensation for not getting ANY 3G service.
On the up side, I keep the 3G radio off and get GREAT battery life.I know lots of /.ers will think I'm an idiot 'fanboy' for keeping the iPhone, but I really like the apps I've got on it - I use it for billing, task management, weather and flight planning and lots of other stuff - and the apps integrate nicely with my macbook.
I'd have gone with a droid/google phone, but at the time it was only available on T-Mobile, and I KNEW that wouldn't work for me.
In the future I'm worried that the droid platform will be so windows-centric that I'll get the short end of the cool app stick as a mac user.For the moment I feel like I'm watching a race to see who wins - the Droid to provide apps I need on their vastly superior VZW coverage, or AT&amp;T to expand the coverage for their superior apps.
Maybe I should just trade the iPhone in for a Touch in the mean time.
:-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674584</id>
	<title>Blazing???</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1269976140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An A4 is blazing? Seriously? But can it multitask?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An A4 is blazing ?
Seriously ? But can it multitask ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An A4 is blazing?
Seriously? But can it multitask?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31683252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31676642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_1257222_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31678214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31674140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670194
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31676642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31683252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31677428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670978
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31675180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31673934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669920
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31669908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31672382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_1257222.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31670288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_1257222.31671114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
