<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_30_120233</id>
	<title>First Collisions At the LHC</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269952740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"At 1:06 p.m. Central European Summer Time (CEST) today, the <a href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/30/lhc-research-program-launched-with-7-tev-collisions/">first protons collided</a> at 7 TeV in the Large Hadron Collider. These first collisions, recorded by the LHC experiments, mark the start of the LHC's research program."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " At 1 : 06 p.m. Central European Summer Time ( CEST ) today , the first protons collided at 7 TeV in the Large Hadron Collider .
These first collisions , recorded by the LHC experiments , mark the start of the LHC 's research program .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "At 1:06 p.m. Central European Summer Time (CEST) today, the first protons collided at 7 TeV in the Large Hadron Collider.
These first collisions, recorded by the LHC experiments, mark the start of the LHC's research program.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674562</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Salsaman</author>
	<datestamp>1269976080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can they be so sure that anti-matter was anihilated ? Maybe it just ended up on the other side of the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can they be so sure that anti-matter was anihilated ?
Maybe it just ended up on the other side of the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can they be so sure that anti-matter was anihilated ?
Maybe it just ended up on the other side of the universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668996</id>
	<title>1st post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>im being sucked by a black hole<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. does that mean the experiment is a success?</htmltext>
<tokenext>im being sucked by a black hole .. does that mean the experiment is a success ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>im being sucked by a black hole .. does that mean the experiment is a success?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669734</id>
	<title>Not yet!</title>
	<author>Vectormatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269960720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At 7 TeV it is still running at only half power, the original design is for 14 TeV (two 7 TeV beams colliding). From today on it will run a while, and go down for extended maintenance, at which point they will modify the LHC so it can be cranked up to full spec power.</p><p>Still bloody amazing though, AFAIK the tevatron over in the states, now the second most powerfull collider, tops at around 1 TeV</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At 7 TeV it is still running at only half power , the original design is for 14 TeV ( two 7 TeV beams colliding ) .
From today on it will run a while , and go down for extended maintenance , at which point they will modify the LHC so it can be cranked up to full spec power.Still bloody amazing though , AFAIK the tevatron over in the states , now the second most powerfull collider , tops at around 1 TeV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At 7 TeV it is still running at only half power, the original design is for 14 TeV (two 7 TeV beams colliding).
From today on it will run a while, and go down for extended maintenance, at which point they will modify the LHC so it can be cranked up to full spec power.Still bloody amazing though, AFAIK the tevatron over in the states, now the second most powerfull collider, tops at around 1 TeV</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31676934</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1269941520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Yeah, a pigeon with a piece of bread just doesn't seem to measure up to Old Testament standards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity .
Yeah , a pigeon with a piece of bread just does n't seem to measure up to Old Testament standards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity.
Yeah, a pigeon with a piece of bread just doesn't seem to measure up to Old Testament standards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669344</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*checks*  Nope, still alive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* checks * Nope , still alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*checks*  Nope, still alive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673856</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>gumbi west</author>
	<datestamp>1269973620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes. There would be (a) massive emissions of x-rays and (b) physical dilation that would tear you apart. There would be other problems too like you could not see or communicate with those further our from you and those further in than you would not be able to see or communicate with you. If you could contact someone, they could not respond--so there are no working servers in a black hole.</p><p>But you have to remember the theory that said we might get eaten by a black hole didn't predict that it would happen right away. It could take years or millions of years for the black hole to get big enough to start to eat atoms. From there... it would all happen really really fast.</p><p>I guess that if we did get eaten by a black hole, we might understand the Fermi paradox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes .
There would be ( a ) massive emissions of x-rays and ( b ) physical dilation that would tear you apart .
There would be other problems too like you could not see or communicate with those further our from you and those further in than you would not be able to see or communicate with you .
If you could contact someone , they could not respond--so there are no working servers in a black hole.But you have to remember the theory that said we might get eaten by a black hole did n't predict that it would happen right away .
It could take years or millions of years for the black hole to get big enough to start to eat atoms .
From there... it would all happen really really fast.I guess that if we did get eaten by a black hole , we might understand the Fermi paradox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes.
There would be (a) massive emissions of x-rays and (b) physical dilation that would tear you apart.
There would be other problems too like you could not see or communicate with those further our from you and those further in than you would not be able to see or communicate with you.
If you could contact someone, they could not respond--so there are no working servers in a black hole.But you have to remember the theory that said we might get eaten by a black hole didn't predict that it would happen right away.
It could take years or millions of years for the black hole to get big enough to start to eat atoms.
From there... it would all happen really really fast.I guess that if we did get eaten by a black hole, we might understand the Fermi paradox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672530</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dewey B Larson.  Now there's a name I've not heard in, oh, ages.</p><p>My high school physics teacher was a Dewey B Larson fan, lent me a couple of his books.  Weird stuff.  This was over thirty years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dewey B Larson .
Now there 's a name I 've not heard in , oh , ages.My high school physics teacher was a Dewey B Larson fan , lent me a couple of his books .
Weird stuff .
This was over thirty years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dewey B Larson.
Now there's a name I've not heard in, oh, ages.My high school physics teacher was a Dewey B Larson fan, lent me a couple of his books.
Weird stuff.
This was over thirty years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669974</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Caraig</author>
	<datestamp>1269961740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that means LHC was a triumph.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that means LHC was a triumph .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that means LHC was a triumph.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31677314</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1269942600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Old people", in such sense, usually means a state into which people put themselves in; not age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Old people " , in such sense , usually means a state into which people put themselves in ; not age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Old people", in such sense, usually means a state into which people put themselves in; not age.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671976</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.</p></div><p>Okay, this is not an instant destruction but the process has already kicked in. micro/nano blackhole have been created. it will be done swallowing the earth by december 21, 2012 just as the maya's have said.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot 's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Okay , this is not an instant destruction but the process has already kicked in .
micro/nano blackhole have been created .
it will be done swallowing the earth by december 21 , 2012 just as the maya 's have said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Okay, this is not an instant destruction but the process has already kicked in.
micro/nano blackhole have been created.
it will be done swallowing the earth by december 21, 2012 just as the maya's have said.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669692</id>
	<title>Re:Excellent news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269960420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LHC = Let's Have Chardonnay</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LHC = Let 's Have Chardonnay</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LHC = Let's Have Chardonnay</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672566</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>20 minutes? But I want my hydrogen NOW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>20 minutes ?
But I want my hydrogen NOW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>20 minutes?
But I want my hydrogen NOW!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669600</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269959880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/~mcgrew/journal/241840" title="slashdot.org">No.</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670900</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269964800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never understood how scientists can outline the time evolution of the big bang, because isn't it spacetime itself that's evolving?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood how scientists can outline the time evolution of the big bang , because is n't it spacetime itself that 's evolving ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood how scientists can outline the time evolution of the big bang, because isn't it spacetime itself that's evolving?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669438</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269959040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, but they did find Waldo so this wasn't a complete waste of space and time</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , but they did find Waldo so this was n't a complete waste of space and time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, but they did find Waldo so this wasn't a complete waste of space and time</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674050</id>
	<title>a word of advice</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1269974280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>go read Dewey B. Larson's approach to the unifield field theory problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>go read Dewey B. Larson 's approach to the unifield field theory problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>go read Dewey B. Larson's approach to the unifield field theory problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31688494</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1270053360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think, only a lay-mans guess here, that you might need all energy ever created, or could ever be created to simulate a big bang.</p><p>It's unlikely that one tiny rock in the universe is capable or generating the necessary energy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think , only a lay-mans guess here , that you might need all energy ever created , or could ever be created to simulate a big bang.It 's unlikely that one tiny rock in the universe is capable or generating the necessary energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think, only a lay-mans guess here, that you might need all energy ever created, or could ever be created to simulate a big bang.It's unlikely that one tiny rock in the universe is capable or generating the necessary energy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669730</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>rufey</author>
	<datestamp>1269960600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Various webcams also caught the moments after the collisions.  I also cannot understand why Slashdot, or CERN for that matter, are still available on the Internet after this.

<a href="http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html" title="cyriak.co.uk">http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</a> [cyriak.co.uk]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Various webcams also caught the moments after the collisions .
I also can not understand why Slashdot , or CERN for that matter , are still available on the Internet after this .
http : //www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html [ cyriak.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Various webcams also caught the moments after the collisions.
I also cannot understand why Slashdot, or CERN for that matter, are still available on the Internet after this.
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html [cyriak.co.uk]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</id>
	<title>Surprised</title>
	<author>impaledsunset</author>
	<datestamp>1269956460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot 's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670344</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269963000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Perhaps it's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary (apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo), and accept that science is all we need now.</p><p>Good luck with that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Perhaps it 's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary ( apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo ) , and accept that science is all we need now.Good luck with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Perhaps it's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary (apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo), and accept that science is all we need now.Good luck with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669672</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1269960300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once, would we even notice it?</p></div><p>Yes. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal\_force" title="wikipedia.org">Tidal forces</a> [wikipedia.org] would stretch everything like spaghetti and tear it apart.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once , would we even notice it ? Yes .
Tidal forces [ wikipedia.org ] would stretch everything like spaghetti and tear it apart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once, would we even notice it?Yes.
Tidal forces [wikipedia.org] would stretch everything like spaghetti and tear it apart.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684224</id>
	<title>Re:First events</title>
	<author>BananaBender</author>
	<datestamp>1270026360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't help it but those pictures look like straight out of a Hollywood science fiction movie...this is just awesome! We are living in the future<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't help it but those pictures look like straight out of a Hollywood science fiction movie...this is just awesome !
We are living in the future : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't help it but those pictures look like straight out of a Hollywood science fiction movie...this is just awesome!
We are living in the future :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669156</id>
	<title>Coincidence</title>
	<author>hallucinogen</author>
	<datestamp>1269957420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>While watching the webcast, just seconds away from the first collisions, the stream went down. I was like w000t! You have no idea how disappointed I was as I realized that it was just my shitty wifi..</htmltext>
<tokenext>While watching the webcast , just seconds away from the first collisions , the stream went down .
I was like w000t !
You have no idea how disappointed I was as I realized that it was just my shitty wifi. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While watching the webcast, just seconds away from the first collisions, the stream went down.
I was like w000t!
You have no idea how disappointed I was as I realized that it was just my shitty wifi..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668994</id>
	<title>and the greatest thing about this?</title>
	<author>bmecoli</author>
	<datestamp>1269956460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're still here.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're still here .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're still here.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669556</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1269959640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's only at half energy now. Wait til 2012 when it launches a collision at 14TeV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only at half energy now .
Wait til 2012 when it launches a collision at 14TeV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only at half energy now.
Wait til 2012 when it launches a collision at 14TeV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669332</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm living nearby in France and I can testify nothing has been destroeth0: carrier lost</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm living nearby in France and I can testify nothing has been destroeth0 : carrier lost</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm living nearby in France and I can testify nothing has been destroeth0: carrier lost</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669268</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1269958200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.</p></div><p>Welcome to Cachedot.org, impaledsunset. Your new user ID is '6'. May all your sunsets be impaled.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot 's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Welcome to Cachedot.org , impaledsunset .
Your new user ID is '6' .
May all your sunsets be impaled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Welcome to Cachedot.org, impaledsunset.
Your new user ID is '6'.
May all your sunsets be impaled.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>JohnFluxx</author>
	<datestamp>1269959340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There isn't really a limit.  You just get closer and closer to t=0.<br>The big bang timeline goes roughly (listing the time when the mentioned period \_ends\_):</p><p>10^-43 seconds   - Planck epoch  - this is where we need string theory etc. The universe is expanding really really really fast.  Frigging fast.  This is called 'inflation'<br>10^-36 seconds   - Grand unification epoch - this is where gravity starts to become seperate from the other forces<br>10^-12 seconds   - The really-really-really-frigging-fast inflation is now over. We've now just got the normal expansion.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; --- WE ARE HERE WITH THE LHC ---<br>10^-6 seconds     - Higgs particles are now able to give particles mass.  But too hot for quarks to combine into protons etc.<br>1 second             - Quarks have now formed into protons etc<br>10 seconds          - anti-matter is now annihalted somehow.  All the protons etc have been created.<br>20 minutes           - Hydrogen etc is formed.  We now have real atoms! (Nucleosynthesis)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is n't really a limit .
You just get closer and closer to t = 0.The big bang timeline goes roughly ( listing the time when the mentioned period \ _ends \ _ ) : 10 ^ -43 seconds - Planck epoch - this is where we need string theory etc .
The universe is expanding really really really fast .
Frigging fast .
This is called 'inflation'10 ^ -36 seconds - Grand unification epoch - this is where gravity starts to become seperate from the other forces10 ^ -12 seconds - The really-really-really-frigging-fast inflation is now over .
We 've now just got the normal expansion .
    --- WE ARE HERE WITH THE LHC ---10 ^ -6 seconds - Higgs particles are now able to give particles mass .
But too hot for quarks to combine into protons etc.1 second - Quarks have now formed into protons etc10 seconds - anti-matter is now annihalted somehow .
All the protons etc have been created.20 minutes - Hydrogen etc is formed .
We now have real atoms !
( Nucleosynthesis )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There isn't really a limit.
You just get closer and closer to t=0.The big bang timeline goes roughly (listing the time when the mentioned period \_ends\_):10^-43 seconds   - Planck epoch  - this is where we need string theory etc.
The universe is expanding really really really fast.
Frigging fast.
This is called 'inflation'10^-36 seconds   - Grand unification epoch - this is where gravity starts to become seperate from the other forces10^-12 seconds   - The really-really-really-frigging-fast inflation is now over.
We've now just got the normal expansion.
    --- WE ARE HERE WITH THE LHC ---10^-6 seconds     - Higgs particles are now able to give particles mass.
But too hot for quarks to combine into protons etc.1 second             - Quarks have now formed into protons etc10 seconds          - anti-matter is now annihalted somehow.
All the protons etc have been created.20 minutes           - Hydrogen etc is formed.
We now have real atoms!
(Nucleosynthesis)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670066</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>IICV</author>
	<datestamp>1269962160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to know more about the timeline of the Big Bang, the Starts with a Bang blog has a series of articles on it named "The Greatest Story Ever Told"; it starts <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/01/the\_greatest\_story\_ever\_told\_-.php" title="scienceblogs.com">here</a> [scienceblogs.com] and continues in these.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to know more about the timeline of the Big Bang , the Starts with a Bang blog has a series of articles on it named " The Greatest Story Ever Told " ; it starts here [ scienceblogs.com ] and continues in these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to know more about the timeline of the Big Bang, the Starts with a Bang blog has a series of articles on it named "The Greatest Story Ever Told"; it starts here [scienceblogs.com] and continues in these.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669326</id>
	<title>Re:Resources</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can also see the current status here<br>http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also see the current status herehttp : //hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also see the current status herehttp://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670342</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Tyler Durden</author>
	<datestamp>1269963000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just curious, but what source are you using for this timeline?  I've heard the same thing described with small variations between them here and there, and I'm trying to figure out which is believed to be the most accurate of them so far.  In the one I remember the most, all of the initial hydrogen and helium nuclei (with tiny amounts of heavier atomic nuclei) were formed within the first three minutes of the initial bang.  Things didn't cool off enough for the electrons to join them to form atoms until around 380,000 years after t0.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just curious , but what source are you using for this timeline ?
I 've heard the same thing described with small variations between them here and there , and I 'm trying to figure out which is believed to be the most accurate of them so far .
In the one I remember the most , all of the initial hydrogen and helium nuclei ( with tiny amounts of heavier atomic nuclei ) were formed within the first three minutes of the initial bang .
Things did n't cool off enough for the electrons to join them to form atoms until around 380,000 years after t0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just curious, but what source are you using for this timeline?
I've heard the same thing described with small variations between them here and there, and I'm trying to figure out which is believed to be the most accurate of them so far.
In the one I remember the most, all of the initial hydrogen and helium nuclei (with tiny amounts of heavier atomic nuclei) were formed within the first three minutes of the initial bang.
Things didn't cool off enough for the electrons to join them to form atoms until around 380,000 years after t0.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046</id>
	<title>Higgs</title>
	<author>Subm</author>
	<datestamp>1269956760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, did they find the Higgs yet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , did they find the Higgs yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, did they find the Higgs yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671754</id>
	<title>1 and half year late and half power</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1269967140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good luck to the physicists at CERN, delays have certainly hurt them,
but I hope these collisions make for a solid physics run.
<p>
---
</p><p>
The blogosphere has plenty on the LHC as you can see at:<br>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/LHC/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">LHC</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck to the physicists at CERN , delays have certainly hurt them , but I hope these collisions make for a solid physics run .
--- The blogosphere has plenty on the LHC as you can see at : LHC [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck to the physicists at CERN, delays have certainly hurt them,
but I hope these collisions make for a solid physics run.
---

The blogosphere has plenty on the LHC as you can see at:
LHC [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675046</id>
	<title>Re:Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269978060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what Wilson said when Pastore questioned him in front of a Congressional Joint Committee as to whether particle physics provided any value to the country (and what Pastore meant was, did it give us any advantage over the Russians):</p><p> <i>Only from a long-range point of view, of a developing technology. Otherwise, it has to do with: Are we good painters, good sculptors, great poets? I mean all the things that we really venerate and honor in our country and are patriotic about. In that sense, this new knowledge has all to do with honor and country but <b>it has nothing to do directly with defending our country, except to make it worth defending.</b> </i> </p><p>So yeah, if you want your culture to basically be an animal culture, where your prime concerns are eating, sleeping, and shitting, where ignorance is held as a standard to aspire to, and everyone is essentially a moron and proud of it, sure. Go ahead and stop doing science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what Wilson said when Pastore questioned him in front of a Congressional Joint Committee as to whether particle physics provided any value to the country ( and what Pastore meant was , did it give us any advantage over the Russians ) : Only from a long-range point of view , of a developing technology .
Otherwise , it has to do with : Are we good painters , good sculptors , great poets ?
I mean all the things that we really venerate and honor in our country and are patriotic about .
In that sense , this new knowledge has all to do with honor and country but it has nothing to do directly with defending our country , except to make it worth defending .
So yeah , if you want your culture to basically be an animal culture , where your prime concerns are eating , sleeping , and shitting , where ignorance is held as a standard to aspire to , and everyone is essentially a moron and proud of it , sure .
Go ahead and stop doing science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what Wilson said when Pastore questioned him in front of a Congressional Joint Committee as to whether particle physics provided any value to the country (and what Pastore meant was, did it give us any advantage over the Russians): Only from a long-range point of view, of a developing technology.
Otherwise, it has to do with: Are we good painters, good sculptors, great poets?
I mean all the things that we really venerate and honor in our country and are patriotic about.
In that sense, this new knowledge has all to do with honor and country but it has nothing to do directly with defending our country, except to make it worth defending.
So yeah, if you want your culture to basically be an animal culture, where your prime concerns are eating, sleeping, and shitting, where ignorance is held as a standard to aspire to, and everyone is essentially a moron and proud of it, sure.
Go ahead and stop doing science.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669082</id>
	<title>Armageddon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where are the (microscopic) Black Holes and why hasn't our Planet imploded yet? I'm disappointed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are the ( microscopic ) Black Holes and why has n't our Planet imploded yet ?
I 'm disappointed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are the (microscopic) Black Holes and why hasn't our Planet imploded yet?
I'm disappointed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674038</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>alex67500</author>
	<datestamp>1269974220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What did *you* see in your flash forward ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What did * you * see in your flash forward ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What did *you* see in your flash forward ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670208</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1269962580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>in  the history of mankind. this may be the real deal. its possible that we may find the first 'entity' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson's physics approach.</p></div><p>+4, Insightful?</p><p>If we find the Higgs (or not), there are <i>zero</i> implications for the existence of a higher power.  We call it the "God particle" primarily because it's proven damned near impossible to prove or disprove the existence of.</p><p>There are plenty of phenomena observed in quantum mechanics that exhibit "otherworldly" behavior.  The Higgs is not one of them -- our interest in it is almost purely mathematical -- if we find it, it will simply help to confirm a set of assumptions we've been using about particle physics that have (thus far) conformed to existing experimental data.  The LHC is intended to either provide additional data to back up the standard model, or observe some new phenomenon that forces us to rethink our understanding of particle physics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>in the history of mankind .
this may be the real deal .
its possible that we may find the first 'entity ' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson 's physics approach. + 4 , Insightful ? If we find the Higgs ( or not ) , there are zero implications for the existence of a higher power .
We call it the " God particle " primarily because it 's proven damned near impossible to prove or disprove the existence of.There are plenty of phenomena observed in quantum mechanics that exhibit " otherworldly " behavior .
The Higgs is not one of them -- our interest in it is almost purely mathematical -- if we find it , it will simply help to confirm a set of assumptions we 've been using about particle physics that have ( thus far ) conformed to existing experimental data .
The LHC is intended to either provide additional data to back up the standard model , or observe some new phenomenon that forces us to rethink our understanding of particle physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in  the history of mankind.
this may be the real deal.
its possible that we may find the first 'entity' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson's physics approach.+4, Insightful?If we find the Higgs (or not), there are zero implications for the existence of a higher power.
We call it the "God particle" primarily because it's proven damned near impossible to prove or disprove the existence of.There are plenty of phenomena observed in quantum mechanics that exhibit "otherworldly" behavior.
The Higgs is not one of them -- our interest in it is almost purely mathematical -- if we find it, it will simply help to confirm a set of assumptions we've been using about particle physics that have (thus far) conformed to existing experimental data.
The LHC is intended to either provide additional data to back up the standard model, or observe some new phenomenon that forces us to rethink our understanding of particle physics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669388</id>
	<title>First collisions...not involving a baguette</title>
	<author>ruark</author>
	<datestamp>1269958740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The title could be a little more precise. This is not technically the first collision at the LHC.

<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/06/0824213/LHC-Shut-Down-Again-mdash-By-Baguette-Dropping-Bird" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/06/0824213/LHC-Shut-Down-Again-mdash-By-Baguette-Dropping-Bird</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The title could be a little more precise .
This is not technically the first collision at the LHC .
http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/06/0824213/LHC-Shut-Down-Again-mdash-By-Baguette-Dropping-Bird [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title could be a little more precise.
This is not technically the first collision at the LHC.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/06/0824213/LHC-Shut-Down-Again-mdash-By-Baguette-Dropping-Bird [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669550</id>
	<title>Re:Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269959580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>we're to the point that each euro burned is an euro saved from corruption and fraud</htmltext>
<tokenext>we 're to the point that each euro burned is an euro saved from corruption and fraud</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we're to the point that each euro burned is an euro saved from corruption and fraud</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</id>
	<title>This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1269956460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in  the history of mankind. this may be the real deal. its possible that we may find the first 'entity' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson's physics approach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the history of mankind .
this may be the real deal .
its possible that we may find the first 'entity ' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson 's physics approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in  the history of mankind.
this may be the real deal.
its possible that we may find the first 'entity' as described as the base of existence in Dewey B Larson's physics approach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669486</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1269959280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, now, to be fair, the LHC is only up to half power at this point.</p><p>Of course, the idea that we'll be swallowed up by a black hole is still utterly absurd.  But our current and ongoing existence is, unfortunately, not sufficient evidenced to completely disprove the cranks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , now , to be fair , the LHC is only up to half power at this point.Of course , the idea that we 'll be swallowed up by a black hole is still utterly absurd .
But our current and ongoing existence is , unfortunately , not sufficient evidenced to completely disprove the cranks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, now, to be fair, the LHC is only up to half power at this point.Of course, the idea that we'll be swallowed up by a black hole is still utterly absurd.
But our current and ongoing existence is, unfortunately, not sufficient evidenced to completely disprove the cranks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669018</id>
	<title>obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is all sfw. and you've probably seen them already. (but I wouldn't blame you for not trusting an AC seeing as how we are in a pathetically paranoid game theory induced society... anyways, i digress)<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.nulleando.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/freeman.jpg" title="nulleando.com.ar" rel="nofollow">http://www.nulleando.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/freeman.jpg</a> [nulleando.com.ar] <br> <br>
<a href="http://www.rodrigoflausino.com.br/wp-content/imagens/games/half\_life/half\_life\_lhc\_02.jpg" title="rodrigoflausino.com.br" rel="nofollow">http://www.rodrigoflausino.com.br/wp-content/imagens/games/half\_life/half\_life\_lhc\_02.jpg</a> [rodrigoflausino.com.br]</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is all sfw .
and you 've probably seen them already .
( but I would n't blame you for not trusting an AC seeing as how we are in a pathetically paranoid game theory induced society... anyways , i digress ) http : //www.nulleando.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/freeman.jpg [ nulleando.com.ar ] http : //www.rodrigoflausino.com.br/wp-content/imagens/games/half \ _life/half \ _life \ _lhc \ _02.jpg [ rodrigoflausino.com.br ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is all sfw.
and you've probably seen them already.
(but I wouldn't blame you for not trusting an AC seeing as how we are in a pathetically paranoid game theory induced society... anyways, i digress) 

http://www.nulleando.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/freeman.jpg [nulleando.com.ar]  
http://www.rodrigoflausino.com.br/wp-content/imagens/games/half\_life/half\_life\_lhc\_02.jpg [rodrigoflausino.com.br]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214</id>
	<title>We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269957780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/30/lhc-research-program-launched-with-7-tev-collisions/" title="symmetrymagazine.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/30/lhc-research-program-launched-with-7-tev-collisions/</a> [symmetrymagazine.org]

So according to that article, we did the colliding at 7 TeV and their next goal is 14 TeV in 2013, but it's not clear whether that level of 14 is equivilant to the "big bang".

Does anyone know what we need to hit in energy levels to reach that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/30/lhc-research-program-launched-with-7-tev-collisions/ [ symmetrymagazine.org ] So according to that article , we did the colliding at 7 TeV and their next goal is 14 TeV in 2013 , but it 's not clear whether that level of 14 is equivilant to the " big bang " .
Does anyone know what we need to hit in energy levels to reach that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/30/lhc-research-program-launched-with-7-tev-collisions/ [symmetrymagazine.org]

So according to that article, we did the colliding at 7 TeV and their next goal is 14 TeV in 2013, but it's not clear whether that level of 14 is equivilant to the "big bang".
Does anyone know what we need to hit in energy levels to reach that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</id>
	<title>Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics, this was a useful endeavor because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics , this was a useful endeavor because ... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics, this was a useful endeavor because ... ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673396</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269972120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What religion is that, where God creates earth for man to make it into a paradise? The semitic religions, as far as I'm informed, believe that mankind will destroy earth and at last realize that knowledge/conscience, derived from Adam and Eve, was not a good idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What religion is that , where God creates earth for man to make it into a paradise ?
The semitic religions , as far as I 'm informed , believe that mankind will destroy earth and at last realize that knowledge/conscience , derived from Adam and Eve , was not a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What religion is that, where God creates earth for man to make it into a paradise?
The semitic religions, as far as I'm informed, believe that mankind will destroy earth and at last realize that knowledge/conscience, derived from Adam and Eve, was not a good idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669848</id>
	<title>Re:Resources</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269961260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">and this explanation of the experiment.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>and this explanation of the experiment .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and this explanation of the experiment.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670260</id>
	<title>Hmmm</title>
	<author>jarbrewer</author>
	<datestamp>1269962760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My cellphone's gone missing...<br>Stupid blackholes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My cellphone 's gone missing...Stupid blackholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My cellphone's gone missing...Stupid blackholes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670538</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269963660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More important what does it look like?</p><p>I imagine it to be round, and orange.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More important what does it look like ? I imagine it to be round , and orange .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More important what does it look like?I imagine it to be round, and orange.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120</id>
	<title>Why not "strangelets"?</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1269957240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not "strangelets"?  Is it because of the kind of particles used in the collisions?  Or are strange flavoured particles currently not in favor these days?</p><p>Not that it makes much practical difference; if we were to be scrunched into a black hole (I know, I know it's not going to happen) or converted into strange matter we're just as dead.  (In fact won't the conversion to strange matter happen at the speed of light whereas it'll take a while for a black hole to grow large enough to shred us?).  Kinda sounds like the weapon used in "Ender's game" the "little doctor" (but it left over iron not strange matter).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not " strangelets " ?
Is it because of the kind of particles used in the collisions ?
Or are strange flavoured particles currently not in favor these days ? Not that it makes much practical difference ; if we were to be scrunched into a black hole ( I know , I know it 's not going to happen ) or converted into strange matter we 're just as dead .
( In fact wo n't the conversion to strange matter happen at the speed of light whereas it 'll take a while for a black hole to grow large enough to shred us ? ) .
Kinda sounds like the weapon used in " Ender 's game " the " little doctor " ( but it left over iron not strange matter ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not "strangelets"?
Is it because of the kind of particles used in the collisions?
Or are strange flavoured particles currently not in favor these days?Not that it makes much practical difference; if we were to be scrunched into a black hole (I know, I know it's not going to happen) or converted into strange matter we're just as dead.
(In fact won't the conversion to strange matter happen at the speed of light whereas it'll take a while for a black hole to grow large enough to shred us?).
Kinda sounds like the weapon used in "Ender's game" the "little doctor" (but it left over iron not strange matter).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670574</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269963840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Being omnipotent means you can see everything, even if your back is turned. No excuses, no cop-outs.</p></div><p>Just to be pedantic for a minute, the term you are looking for is omniscient...  And if you were, you'd know that...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being omnipotent means you can see everything , even if your back is turned .
No excuses , no cop-outs.Just to be pedantic for a minute , the term you are looking for is omniscient... And if you were , you 'd know that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being omnipotent means you can see everything, even if your back is turned.
No excuses, no cop-outs.Just to be pedantic for a minute, the term you are looking for is omniscient...  And if you were, you'd know that...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669396</id>
	<title>MIT Ph.D now out of work</title>
	<author>Nighttime</author>
	<datestamp>1269958800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hangs up his orange suit and crowbar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hangs up his orange suit and crowbar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hangs up his orange suit and crowbar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671548</id>
	<title>Re:First events</title>
	<author>nomorecwrd</author>
	<datestamp>1269966660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First link is very reminiscent of an old PC game. <br>
"Out of this world" aka "Another World"<br>
<a href="http://data1.blog.de/blog/f/fz1-3do/img/Image8\_05.jpg" title="data1.blog.de" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [data1.blog.de] is a capture of the game.<br>
<br>I think the first game I ever completed, extremely well written and an incredibly good graphic adventure, considering you played using only with about 6 keys in total.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First link is very reminiscent of an old PC game .
" Out of this world " aka " Another World " Here [ data1.blog.de ] is a capture of the game .
I think the first game I ever completed , extremely well written and an incredibly good graphic adventure , considering you played using only with about 6 keys in total .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First link is very reminiscent of an old PC game.
"Out of this world" aka "Another World"
Here [data1.blog.de] is a capture of the game.
I think the first game I ever completed, extremely well written and an incredibly good graphic adventure, considering you played using only with about 6 keys in total.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669786</id>
	<title>Re:Excellent news!</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1269960960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>P.S. The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>So that means free food for the PhDs??? sounds good enough. Fortunately I've passed that stage already!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>P.S .
The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight : ) So that means free food for the PhDs ? ? ?
sounds good enough .
Fortunately I 've passed that stage already !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>P.S.
The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight :)So that means free food for the PhDs???
sounds good enough.
Fortunately I've passed that stage already!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672674</id>
	<title>A bloody waste of money if you ask me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And also the bloody thing is already down... From their page I cannot see the beam anymore...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And also the bloody thing is already down... From their page I can not see the beam anymore.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And also the bloody thing is already down... From their page I cannot see the beam anymore...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669152</id>
	<title>Watched Live</title>
	<author>KClaisse</author>
	<datestamp>1269957420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watched this happen live and was really stunned with how relatively smooth it went (when you consider the LHC's track record in the past). Yes a couple problems, but the third ramp was the good one. I cannot wait until they start getting enough data to extrapolate any useful data. The potential for new discoveries is almost guaranteed at this point. Higgs boson, or maybe something that completely changes everything we know. Might not get anything though, who knows. They say they will be ramping up to 14TeV in 2012 (7 TeV per beam) with the LHC. So there is still chance for DOOOOOOMMMM!!! (jk ofc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watched this happen live and was really stunned with how relatively smooth it went ( when you consider the LHC 's track record in the past ) .
Yes a couple problems , but the third ramp was the good one .
I can not wait until they start getting enough data to extrapolate any useful data .
The potential for new discoveries is almost guaranteed at this point .
Higgs boson , or maybe something that completely changes everything we know .
Might not get anything though , who knows .
They say they will be ramping up to 14TeV in 2012 ( 7 TeV per beam ) with the LHC .
So there is still chance for DOOOOOOMMMM ! ! !
( jk ofc : p )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watched this happen live and was really stunned with how relatively smooth it went (when you consider the LHC's track record in the past).
Yes a couple problems, but the third ramp was the good one.
I cannot wait until they start getting enough data to extrapolate any useful data.
The potential for new discoveries is almost guaranteed at this point.
Higgs boson, or maybe something that completely changes everything we know.
Might not get anything though, who knows.
They say they will be ramping up to 14TeV in 2012 (7 TeV per beam) with the LHC.
So there is still chance for DOOOOOOMMMM!!!
(jk ofc :p)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670452</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269963420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that you mention "old people" as if they were a foreign being and not something you will become tells me you do not yet know enough about life to make a decision on religion for everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that you mention " old people " as if they were a foreign being and not something you will become tells me you do not yet know enough about life to make a decision on religion for everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that you mention "old people" as if they were a foreign being and not something you will become tells me you do not yet know enough about life to make a decision on religion for everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034</id>
	<title>Resources</title>
	<author>tist</author>
	<datestamp>1269956700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can see the beam status here: <a href="http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC1" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC1</a> [web.cern.ch] and follow the webcast here <a href="http://webcast.cern.ch/lhcfirstphysics/" title="webcast.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://webcast.cern.ch/lhcfirstphysics/</a> [webcast.cern.ch]. The webcast screen also has links to each of the experiments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can see the beam status here : http : //op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php ? usr = LHC1 [ web.cern.ch ] and follow the webcast here http : //webcast.cern.ch/lhcfirstphysics/ [ webcast.cern.ch ] .
The webcast screen also has links to each of the experiments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can see the beam status here: http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC1 [web.cern.ch] and follow the webcast here http://webcast.cern.ch/lhcfirstphysics/ [webcast.cern.ch].
The webcast screen also has links to each of the experiments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990</id>
	<title>First events</title>
	<author>mu22le</author>
	<datestamp>1269956460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the first events seen in Atlas:<br><a href="http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png</a> [imgur.com]</p><p>and in CMS:<br><a href="http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/events/snapshotA.png" title="cmsdoc.cern.ch">http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/events/snapshotA.png</a> [cmsdoc.cern.ch]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the first events seen in Atlas : http : //imgur.com/ugwnl.png [ imgur.com ] and in CMS : http : //cmsdoc.cern.ch/events/snapshotA.png [ cmsdoc.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the first events seen in Atlas:http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png [imgur.com]and in CMS:http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/events/snapshotA.png [cmsdoc.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672208</id>
	<title>Re:Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>Joe U</author>
	<datestamp>1269968340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it could lead to the ability to assemble highly complex items from simple particles?</p><p>If you know how matter is put together, you're on the path to turning lead into gold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it could lead to the ability to assemble highly complex items from simple particles ? If you know how matter is put together , you 're on the path to turning lead into gold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it could lead to the ability to assemble highly complex items from simple particles?If you know how matter is put together, you're on the path to turning lead into gold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070</id>
	<title>Excellent news!</title>
	<author>rumith</author>
	<datestamp>1269956940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>After all the years of delays and cost overruns, I'm extremely glad to see LHC entering normal operation mode. Congratulations to everybody who contributed and thank you very much for your commitment and hard work! <br>
P.S. The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all the years of delays and cost overruns , I 'm extremely glad to see LHC entering normal operation mode .
Congratulations to everybody who contributed and thank you very much for your commitment and hard work !
P.S. The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all the years of delays and cost overruns, I'm extremely glad to see LHC entering normal operation mode.
Congratulations to everybody who contributed and thank you very much for your commitment and hard work!
P.S. The labs down the hall that participate in the collaboration will be partying tonight :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269959580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what makes me laugh about the whole religion thing.</p><p>If God [or-substitute-deity-of-your-choice] really is an omnipotent being, how could he let this happen ? He must have known by giving us free will, we were going to use it ?</p><p>Even the earliest cavemen probably took apart animals and other cavemen to see how they worked. You'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity.</p><p>"I turn my back for one bloody minute, and those damn apes discover the raw particles that make up the universe".</p><p>Being omnipotent means you can see everything, even if your back is turned. No excuses, no cop-outs.</p><p>Perhaps it's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary (apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo), and accept that science is all we need now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what makes me laugh about the whole religion thing.If God [ or-substitute-deity-of-your-choice ] really is an omnipotent being , how could he let this happen ?
He must have known by giving us free will , we were going to use it ? Even the earliest cavemen probably took apart animals and other cavemen to see how they worked .
You 'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity .
" I turn my back for one bloody minute , and those damn apes discover the raw particles that make up the universe " .Being omnipotent means you can see everything , even if your back is turned .
No excuses , no cop-outs.Perhaps it 's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary ( apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo ) , and accept that science is all we need now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what makes me laugh about the whole religion thing.If God [or-substitute-deity-of-your-choice] really is an omnipotent being, how could he let this happen ?
He must have known by giving us free will, we were going to use it ?Even the earliest cavemen probably took apart animals and other cavemen to see how they worked.
You'd think he might of had a bit of foresight and brought a rain of frogs or an earth shattering meteor down upon us before we got to the LHC elementary particle level of curiosity.
"I turn my back for one bloody minute, and those damn apes discover the raw particles that make up the universe".Being omnipotent means you can see everything, even if your back is turned.
No excuses, no cop-outs.Perhaps it's time we drop the whole religion thing as completely unnecessary (apart from an excuse for old people to have a get-together and a game of bingo), and accept that science is all we need now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670846</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>grumpyman</author>
	<datestamp>1269964560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you using the wayback machine?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you using the wayback machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you using the wayback machine?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669474</id>
	<title>Scientists at Fermilab are drinking something</title>
	<author>BrentRJones</author>
	<datestamp>1269959220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like Kool Aid but the flavor is very strangeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like Kool Aid but the flavor is very strangeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like Kool Aid but the flavor is very strangeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669406</id>
	<title>Re:First events</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here are the Atlas official plots:<br><a href="http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html" title="web.cern.ch">http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html</a> [web.cern.ch]</p><p>CMS:<br><a href="http://cms.web.cern.ch/cms/Media/Images/EventDisplays/7\_0TeVCollisions/index.html" title="web.cern.ch">http://cms.web.cern.ch/cms/Media/Images/EventDisplays/7\_0TeVCollisions/index.html</a> [web.cern.ch]</p><p>LHCb:<br><a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255400" title="cdsweb.cern.ch">http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255400</a> [cdsweb.cern.ch]</p><p>Alice:<br><a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255398?ln=en" title="cdsweb.cern.ch">http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255398?ln=en</a> [cdsweb.cern.ch]</p><p>and finally all the CERN public photos:<br><a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/LHC\%20First\%20Physics\%20Photos" title="cdsweb.cern.ch">http://cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/LHC\%20First\%20Physics\%20Photos</a> [cdsweb.cern.ch]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are the Atlas official plots : http : //atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html [ web.cern.ch ] CMS : http : //cms.web.cern.ch/cms/Media/Images/EventDisplays/7 \ _0TeVCollisions/index.html [ web.cern.ch ] LHCb : http : //cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255400 [ cdsweb.cern.ch ] Alice : http : //cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255398 ? ln = en [ cdsweb.cern.ch ] and finally all the CERN public photos : http : //cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/LHC \ % 20First \ % 20Physics \ % 20Photos [ cdsweb.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are the Atlas official plots:http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html [web.cern.ch]CMS:http://cms.web.cern.ch/cms/Media/Images/EventDisplays/7\_0TeVCollisions/index.html [web.cern.ch]LHCb:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255400 [cdsweb.cern.ch]Alice:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1255398?ln=en [cdsweb.cern.ch]and finally all the CERN public photos:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/LHC\%20First\%20Physics\%20Photos [cdsweb.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673028</id>
	<title>Where's the Kaboom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269970980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the Kaboom ?
There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the Kaboom?
There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1269958140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once, would we even notice it? I'm sure there would be quite a difference when viewed from outside of the black hole, but when you're inside, wouldn't everything be exactly the same, relatively speaking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once , would we even notice it ?
I 'm sure there would be quite a difference when viewed from outside of the black hole , but when you 're inside , would n't everything be exactly the same , relatively speaking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if the entire Earth would be swallowed by a black hole at once, would we even notice it?
I'm sure there would be quite a difference when viewed from outside of the black hole, but when you're inside, wouldn't everything be exactly the same, relatively speaking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675076</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>CptPicard</author>
	<datestamp>1269978180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The formula itself doesn't need to be proven correct except by having repeated experimentation confirming its validity as far as has been tested. However, incompleteness does raise the interesting question of whether all universal laws really would be derivable from some fundamental theory of everything, because, as we know, all theories are necessarily either incomplete or contradictory...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The formula itself does n't need to be proven correct except by having repeated experimentation confirming its validity as far as has been tested .
However , incompleteness does raise the interesting question of whether all universal laws really would be derivable from some fundamental theory of everything , because , as we know , all theories are necessarily either incomplete or contradictory.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The formula itself doesn't need to be proven correct except by having repeated experimentation confirming its validity as far as has been tested.
However, incompleteness does raise the interesting question of whether all universal laws really would be derivable from some fundamental theory of everything, because, as we know, all theories are necessarily either incomplete or contradictory...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672264</id>
	<title>Re:Why not "strangelets"?</title>
	<author>painandgreed</author>
	<datestamp>1269968580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not "strangelets"?</i> </p><p>The basic argument for anything like this is that the LHC isn't doing anything different than what cosmic rays are doing already and have been doing for billions of years. Cosmic rays are high energy particles from space that are constantly bombarding the earth and its atmosphere. Their energy is in the range of the LHC and some that have been detected are on insane levels much higher. Since, over the billions of years, cosmic rays have not caused any strange matter or any other exotic happening that destroyed the earth, there is no reason to believe that the LHC would do so. The LHC is just doing what happens every day in the upper atmosphere but in a controlled environment where we can study it.</p><p>Actually, they are expecting, or at least hoping, to see some micro black holes. Certain branches of theoretical physics predict we will and if we do, then we'll have experimental data for further study. However, it is expected that these black holes will evaporate about as quickly as they are formed and never pose a threat to the earth. Again, if they did pose a threat to the earth, then the earth would have been long destroyed already by those caused by cosmic rays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not " strangelets " ?
The basic argument for anything like this is that the LHC is n't doing anything different than what cosmic rays are doing already and have been doing for billions of years .
Cosmic rays are high energy particles from space that are constantly bombarding the earth and its atmosphere .
Their energy is in the range of the LHC and some that have been detected are on insane levels much higher .
Since , over the billions of years , cosmic rays have not caused any strange matter or any other exotic happening that destroyed the earth , there is no reason to believe that the LHC would do so .
The LHC is just doing what happens every day in the upper atmosphere but in a controlled environment where we can study it.Actually , they are expecting , or at least hoping , to see some micro black holes .
Certain branches of theoretical physics predict we will and if we do , then we 'll have experimental data for further study .
However , it is expected that these black holes will evaporate about as quickly as they are formed and never pose a threat to the earth .
Again , if they did pose a threat to the earth , then the earth would have been long destroyed already by those caused by cosmic rays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Any particle physicists care to illuminate us on the reason why the LHC might make mini-blackholes but not "strangelets"?
The basic argument for anything like this is that the LHC isn't doing anything different than what cosmic rays are doing already and have been doing for billions of years.
Cosmic rays are high energy particles from space that are constantly bombarding the earth and its atmosphere.
Their energy is in the range of the LHC and some that have been detected are on insane levels much higher.
Since, over the billions of years, cosmic rays have not caused any strange matter or any other exotic happening that destroyed the earth, there is no reason to believe that the LHC would do so.
The LHC is just doing what happens every day in the upper atmosphere but in a controlled environment where we can study it.Actually, they are expecting, or at least hoping, to see some micro black holes.
Certain branches of theoretical physics predict we will and if we do, then we'll have experimental data for further study.
However, it is expected that these black holes will evaporate about as quickly as they are formed and never pose a threat to the earth.
Again, if they did pose a threat to the earth, then the earth would have been long destroyed already by those caused by cosmic rays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669278</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They found Higgs, but unfortunately he has a headcrab attached to his head.  Get the crowbar!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They found Higgs , but unfortunately he has a headcrab attached to his head .
Get the crowbar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They found Higgs, but unfortunately he has a headcrab attached to his head.
Get the crowbar!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672328</id>
	<title>Re:Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269968760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would God not bthis to happen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would God not bthis to happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would God not bthis to happen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669020</id>
	<title>Re:1st post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it means you've confirmed (M)ann Coulter's homosexuality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it means you 've confirmed ( M ) ann Coulter 's homosexuality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it means you've confirmed (M)ann Coulter's homosexuality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1269967200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as the case may be.  Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.</p><p>Let's say that in principle we learn something that allows us to calculate a formula to unify gravitation and electromagnetism.   We don't know whether that formula is decidable, whether its membership in the set of correct formulae can be computed. Even if it is decidable, it might belong to a complexity class like EXPTIME-COMPLETE.  Even if we built a quantum computer that could give us the formula, we might not be able to conform the correctness of that formula except by appealing to that same computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or not ... as the case may be .
Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.Let 's say that in principle we learn something that allows us to calculate a formula to unify gravitation and electromagnetism .
We do n't know whether that formula is decidable , whether its membership in the set of correct formulae can be computed .
Even if it is decidable , it might belong to a complexity class like EXPTIME-COMPLETE .
Even if we built a quantum computer that could give us the formula , we might not be able to conform the correctness of that formula except by appealing to that same computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or not ... as the case may be.
Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.Let's say that in principle we learn something that allows us to calculate a formula to unify gravitation and electromagnetism.
We don't know whether that formula is decidable, whether its membership in the set of correct formulae can be computed.
Even if it is decidable, it might belong to a complexity class like EXPTIME-COMPLETE.
Even if we built a quantum computer that could give us the formula, we might not be able to conform the correctness of that formula except by appealing to that same computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670162</id>
	<title>Re:Why not "strangelets"?</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1269962460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that will be later, when they ramp up to 14 TeV, we have a 90\% chance of perishing in a "stranglet conversion".  However, the legal department of the LHC has advised the directorate that this situation poses no risk, as dead people don't seek redress of grievances via litigation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that will be later , when they ramp up to 14 TeV , we have a 90 \ % chance of perishing in a " stranglet conversion " .
However , the legal department of the LHC has advised the directorate that this situation poses no risk , as dead people do n't seek redress of grievances via litigation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that will be later, when they ramp up to 14 TeV, we have a 90\% chance of perishing in a "stranglet conversion".
However, the legal department of the LHC has advised the directorate that this situation poses no risk, as dead people don't seek redress of grievances via litigation</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669394</id>
	<title>More than 1h of stable beam...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and no blackhole yet !</p><p>http://mediaarchive.cern.ch/MediaArchive/Photo/Public/2010/1003062/1003062\_07/1003062\_07-A4-at-144-dpi.jpg<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and no blackhole yet ! http : //mediaarchive.cern.ch/MediaArchive/Photo/Public/2010/1003062/1003062 \ _07/1003062 \ _07-A4-at-144-dpi.jpg : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and no blackhole yet !http://mediaarchive.cern.ch/MediaArchive/Photo/Public/2010/1003062/1003062\_07/1003062\_07-A4-at-144-dpi.jpg :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669092</id>
	<title>The latest webcam can be found here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269957060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669384</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269958740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surprised, eh ? CowboyNeal and CmdrTaco backed everything up with us here on CoroT 9b. Welcome your  new overlords, earthling !!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surprised , eh ?
CowboyNeal and CmdrTaco backed everything up with us here on CoroT 9b .
Welcome your new overlords , earthling !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surprised, eh ?
CowboyNeal and CmdrTaco backed everything up with us here on CoroT 9b.
Welcome your  new overlords, earthling !
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672416</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>jda104</author>
	<datestamp>1269969060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. I thought the black hole would envelop Earth much more quickly than this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I thought the black hole would envelop Earth much more quickly than this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I thought the black hole would envelop Earth much more quickly than this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669482</id>
	<title>Re:Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>Deus.1.01</author>
	<datestamp>1269959220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OH, but offcourse! We should have spent all that money on concentration camps instead.</p><p>(yes im being pretty polemic about but everytime someone complains about "bad demographics" as a problem it just sends chills through my spine)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OH , but offcourse !
We should have spent all that money on concentration camps instead .
( yes im being pretty polemic about but everytime someone complains about " bad demographics " as a problem it just sends chills through my spine )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OH, but offcourse!
We should have spent all that money on concentration camps instead.
(yes im being pretty polemic about but everytime someone complains about "bad demographics" as a problem it just sends chills through my spine)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669428</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1269958980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you need to find the Anti-God Particle. Which you can use them to create explosions that will destroy time, I will stop 9/11 by destroying time between 2000 and 2008</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you need to find the Anti-God Particle .
Which you can use them to create explosions that will destroy time , I will stop 9/11 by destroying time between 2000 and 2008</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you need to find the Anti-God Particle.
Which you can use them to create explosions that will destroy time, I will stop 9/11 by destroying time between 2000 and 2008</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669404</id>
	<title>Re:Black hole ... of money</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1269958860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics, this was a useful endeavor because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p></div><p>... its a more useful way to spend our remaining time and money, than the alternatives?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics , this was a useful endeavor because .. .
? ... its a more useful way to spend our remaining time and money , than the alternatives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So given that the west is slowly dying under a load of debt and bad demographics, this was a useful endeavor because ...
?... its a more useful way to spend our remaining time and money, than the alternatives?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671128</id>
	<title>Solar storms and the LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone tell me what might happen to the LHC in the event of a large solar storm along the order of the Carrington Event?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone tell me what might happen to the LHC in the event of a large solar storm along the order of the Carrington Event ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone tell me what might happen to the LHC in the event of a large solar storm along the order of the Carrington Event?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669162</id>
	<title>Live video of the aforementioned experiment</title>
	<author>hansraj</author>
	<datestamp>1269957420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html" title="cyriak.co.uk">http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</a> [cyriak.co.uk]</p><p>And before you ask: yes, you are dead.</p><p>And no, you are not in heaven. Your still being on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should have been clue enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html [ cyriak.co.uk ] And before you ask : yes , you are dead.And no , you are not in heaven .
Your still being on / .
should have been clue enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html [cyriak.co.uk]And before you ask: yes, you are dead.And no, you are not in heaven.
Your still being on /.
should have been clue enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669276</id>
	<title>Re:Why not "strangelets"?</title>
	<author>impaledsunset</author>
	<datestamp>1269958200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strangelets are hypothetical, nobody has ever seen, so they might not exist at all.  LHC is less likely to produce strangelets than RHIC, but I can't read the paper to see why, but it has something to do with the different nature of the collisions. The energies are too low for production of micro black holes, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strangelets are hypothetical , nobody has ever seen , so they might not exist at all .
LHC is less likely to produce strangelets than RHIC , but I ca n't read the paper to see why , but it has something to do with the different nature of the collisions .
The energies are too low for production of micro black holes , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strangelets are hypothetical, nobody has ever seen, so they might not exist at all.
LHC is less likely to produce strangelets than RHIC, but I can't read the paper to see why, but it has something to do with the different nature of the collisions.
The energies are too low for production of micro black holes, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671190</id>
	<title>Aaaaand it's down!</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1269965640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Beams dumped 16.34<br> <br>Good while it lasted!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beams dumped 16.34 Good while it lasted !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beams dumped 16.34 Good while it lasted!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669252</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slashdot server and earth and you have gone to the same place..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdot server and earth and you have gone to the same place. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdot server and earth and you have gone to the same place..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670560</id>
	<title>Re:Surprised</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1269963780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't you know anything about black holes?! When you get sucked in to them your speed increases so much that it takes forever for you to actually get pulled in, so much so, that it ends up being business as usual on earth.. duh</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot 's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Do n't you know anything about black holes ? !
When you get sucked in to them your speed increases so much that it takes forever for you to actually get pulled in , so much so , that it ends up being business as usual on earth.. duh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm quite suprised that I can reach Slashdot's server now that Earth is destroyed and gone.Don't you know anything about black holes?!
When you get sucked in to them your speed increases so much that it takes forever for you to actually get pulled in, so much so, that it ends up being business as usual on earth.. duh
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040</id>
	<title>Antichrist!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we only manage to get Jesus to come back and stop this...now that the Antichrist is clearly manifested and alive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we only manage to get Jesus to come back and stop this...now that the Antichrist is clearly manifested and alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we only manage to get Jesus to come back and stop this...now that the Antichrist is clearly manifested and alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669382</id>
	<title>the lights are coming up all over now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269958680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no mistakes, no coincidences.</p><p>it not at all about the 'end' or not. it's about the changes taking place, &amp; our ability to adapt.</p><p>it says in the manual(s) that the fake 'weather' program ends due to causing more problems than it's worth, then we get warmer. noting the record seismic activity etc..., we'll likely be 'getting' other stuff too, including colder, at times.</p><p>never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, as there can be little/no help/hope offered by man'kind', even though most of us will benefit from the creators' newclear powered (talk about big bang(s)) planet/population rescue initiative/mandate without helping, or even knowing what happened. see you there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no mistakes , no coincidences.it not at all about the 'end ' or not .
it 's about the changes taking place , &amp; our ability to adapt.it says in the manual ( s ) that the fake 'weather ' program ends due to causing more problems than it 's worth , then we get warmer .
noting the record seismic activity etc... , we 'll likely be 'getting ' other stuff too , including colder , at times.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators , as there can be little/no help/hope offered by man'kind ' , even though most of us will benefit from the creators ' newclear powered ( talk about big bang ( s ) ) planet/population rescue initiative/mandate without helping , or even knowing what happened .
see you there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no mistakes, no coincidences.it not at all about the 'end' or not.
it's about the changes taking place, &amp; our ability to adapt.it says in the manual(s) that the fake 'weather' program ends due to causing more problems than it's worth, then we get warmer.
noting the record seismic activity etc..., we'll likely be 'getting' other stuff too, including colder, at times.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, as there can be little/no help/hope offered by man'kind', even though most of us will benefit from the creators' newclear powered (talk about big bang(s)) planet/population rescue initiative/mandate without helping, or even knowing what happened.
see you there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674626</id>
	<title>Black holes?</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1269976320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where are all the massive black holes generated by the LHC? Has anyone seen one yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are all the massive black holes generated by the LHC ?
Has anyone seen one yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are all the massive black holes generated by the LHC?
Has anyone seen one yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670216</id>
	<title>FlashForward</title>
	<author>Danathar</author>
	<datestamp>1269962640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just blacked out! I had a dream/vision where I saw myself eating a meatloaf sandwitch and chips..oh..sorry..that's a TV show. Or is it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just blacked out !
I had a dream/vision where I saw myself eating a meatloaf sandwitch and chips..oh..sorry..that 's a TV show .
Or is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just blacked out!
I had a dream/vision where I saw myself eating a meatloaf sandwitch and chips..oh..sorry..that's a TV show.
Or is it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670158</id>
	<title>Re:We hit 7 TeV, but how much more to go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269962460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>21 minutes - God realizes he forgot to carry a one. "Ah crap, this is going to create humans. Well, too late now. Might as well have some fun with this iteration."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>21 minutes - God realizes he forgot to carry a one .
" Ah crap , this is going to create humans .
Well , too late now .
Might as well have some fun with this iteration .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>21 minutes - God realizes he forgot to carry a one.
"Ah crap, this is going to create humans.
Well, too late now.
Might as well have some fun with this iteration.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672854</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1269970380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as the case may be.  Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.</p></div><p>Yes... that's why we have physicists doing the math</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or not ... as the case may be .
Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.Yes... that 's why we have physicists doing the math</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or not ... as the case may be.
Computer Science has convinced me that a theory of everything might not be a practical development even if we knew all the relevant fundamental laws.Yes... that's why we have physicists doing the math
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31683110</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269972600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If all particles would just stay to the right, we wouldn't have this problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If all particles would just stay to the right , we would n't have this problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If all particles would just stay to the right, we wouldn't have this problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669004</id>
	<title>First Post</title>
	<author>trancemission</author>
	<datestamp>1269956520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No problems repor</htmltext>
<tokenext>No problems repor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problems repor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669506</id>
	<title>Re:This may be the biggest experiment of all</title>
	<author>eugene2k</author>
	<datestamp>1269959340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or we could create a black hole that would kill us all. Personally, I think the black hole sounds cooler.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or we could create a black hole that would kill us all .
Personally , I think the black hole sounds cooler .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or we could create a black hole that would kill us all.
Personally, I think the black hole sounds cooler.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669674</id>
	<title>First Collisions at the LHC</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269960300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever it was, I hope they're insured.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever it was , I hope they 're insured .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever it was, I hope they're insured.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684468</id>
	<title>Re:First events</title>
	<author>hcdejong</author>
	<datestamp>1270028460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the first events seen in Atlas:<br><a href="http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png</a> [imgur.com]</p> </div><p>Bottom right of that picture: <i>Lego</i>Plot Projection? Is that what the LHC is made of?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the first events seen in Atlas : http : //imgur.com/ugwnl.png [ imgur.com ] Bottom right of that picture : LegoPlot Projection ?
Is that what the LHC is made of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the first events seen in Atlas:http://imgur.com/ugwnl.png [imgur.com] Bottom right of that picture: LegoPlot Projection?
Is that what the LHC is made of?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31677314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31688494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31676934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_120233_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31684224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669344
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670158
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672566
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31688494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31676934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670452
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31677314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670344
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31673396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31671774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31675076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31674050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31668994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_120233.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31669276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31672264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_120233.31670162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
