<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_29_1412243</id>
	<title>Will Your Next Touchscreen Be Touchless?</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269873660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>forgot\_my\_username writes <i>"The MIT Media Lab is developing a  <a href="http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5498898-possibility-of-touchless-computers">motion screen computer</a>.  It looks back at you.  It measures light and gestures, and uses those to control the interface.  'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,' said Ramesh Rakar, an Associate Professor at the Media Lab. They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>forgot \ _my \ _username writes " The MIT Media Lab is developing a motion screen computer .
It looks back at you .
It measures light and gestures , and uses those to control the interface .
'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light, ' said Ramesh Rakar , an Associate Professor at the Media Lab .
They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>forgot\_my\_username writes "The MIT Media Lab is developing a  motion screen computer.
It looks back at you.
It measures light and gestures, and uses those to control the interface.
'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,' said Ramesh Rakar, an Associate Professor at the Media Lab.
They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657632</id>
	<title>Nietzche Monitor</title>
	<author>NitroWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269879480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is the first Nietzsche 30" Hi-Color Monitor?</p><p>It would be a great ad campaign... just a black and white screen and the words slowly fade in: "When you stare into the monitor the monitor stares back at you."</p><p>Then a picture of the monitor and in the background the crushed carcasses of all the other monitors competing with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is the first Nietzsche 30 " Hi-Color Monitor ? It would be a great ad campaign... just a black and white screen and the words slowly fade in : " When you stare into the monitor the monitor stares back at you .
" Then a picture of the monitor and in the background the crushed carcasses of all the other monitors competing with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is the first Nietzsche 30" Hi-Color Monitor?It would be a great ad campaign... just a black and white screen and the words slowly fade in: "When you stare into the monitor the monitor stares back at you.
"Then a picture of the monitor and in the background the crushed carcasses of all the other monitors competing with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657484</id>
	<title>This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1269878820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get the public used to the idea of computer vision input for everyday tasks, and suddenly adware starts including drivers for the cameras (just in case you forgot to install the drivers yourself).<br>  "People seem to keep looking at the upper right hand corner of the ad window.  Move most of the content there, and the subliminal content to the bottom.  Horizontal mirror image for Mac OS X and Ubuntu 10.4"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get the public used to the idea of computer vision input for everyday tasks , and suddenly adware starts including drivers for the cameras ( just in case you forgot to install the drivers yourself ) .
" People seem to keep looking at the upper right hand corner of the ad window .
Move most of the content there , and the subliminal content to the bottom .
Horizontal mirror image for Mac OS X and Ubuntu 10.4 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get the public used to the idea of computer vision input for everyday tasks, and suddenly adware starts including drivers for the cameras (just in case you forgot to install the drivers yourself).
"People seem to keep looking at the upper right hand corner of the ad window.
Move most of the content there, and the subliminal content to the bottom.
Horizontal mirror image for Mac OS X and Ubuntu 10.4"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658300</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269882120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see six.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see six .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see six.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658814</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>MpVpRb</author>
	<datestamp>1269884640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A touchscreen leads to smudging your screen, while picking the wrong menu choice and getting your arm tired.

</p><p>Wonder why anybody likes them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A touchscreen leads to smudging your screen , while picking the wrong menu choice and getting your arm tired .
Wonder why anybody likes them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A touchscreen leads to smudging your screen, while picking the wrong menu choice and getting your arm tired.
Wonder why anybody likes them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658412</id>
	<title>Software solution</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1269882600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A webcam (or maybe 2 for 3d gesture recognition) is the only hardware device needed, no special hardware that senses with not very fine resolution where are your fingers and usually not with how much intensity are pressing. Think in Microsoft Surface, or better yet, in Sixth Sense technology. Moving the game to mostly software land gives a good potential for features, at least if cpu is enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A webcam ( or maybe 2 for 3d gesture recognition ) is the only hardware device needed , no special hardware that senses with not very fine resolution where are your fingers and usually not with how much intensity are pressing .
Think in Microsoft Surface , or better yet , in Sixth Sense technology .
Moving the game to mostly software land gives a good potential for features , at least if cpu is enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A webcam (or maybe 2 for 3d gesture recognition) is the only hardware device needed, no special hardware that senses with not very fine resolution where are your fingers and usually not with how much intensity are pressing.
Think in Microsoft Surface, or better yet, in Sixth Sense technology.
Moving the game to mostly software land gives a good potential for features, at least if cpu is enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658370</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269882420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah sure, everything i want from my devices is even less tactile feedback.<br>give me back my keys and get off my lawn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah sure , everything i want from my devices is even less tactile feedback.give me back my keys and get off my lawn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah sure, everything i want from my devices is even less tactile feedback.give me back my keys and get off my lawn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31666650</id>
	<title>Yo dawg, we herd u liek gorillas.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269885780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So we made your touchscreen touchless, so you can have a gorilla finger, while having a gorilla arm!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we made your touchscreen touchless , so you can have a gorilla finger , while having a gorilla arm !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we made your touchscreen touchless, so you can have a gorilla finger, while having a gorilla arm!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657162</id>
	<title>First health benefit:</title>
	<author>Nov Voc</author>
	<datestamp>1269877680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No more Cheetos-fingers when a friend asks for computer help and you don't insist on using your own mouse/keyboard... *shudders* Though orange cheddar powder is always one of the better "mystery coatings".</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more Cheetos-fingers when a friend asks for computer help and you do n't insist on using your own mouse/keyboard... * shudders * Though orange cheddar powder is always one of the better " mystery coatings " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more Cheetos-fingers when a friend asks for computer help and you don't insist on using your own mouse/keyboard... *shudders* Though orange cheddar powder is always one of the better "mystery coatings".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657176</id>
	<title>Pah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269877740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The MIT media lab. is developing a motion screen computer. It looks back at you."</p></div><p>They had such babies twenty six years ago...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The MIT media lab .
is developing a motion screen computer .
It looks back at you .
" They had such babies twenty six years ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The MIT media lab.
is developing a motion screen computer.
It looks back at you.
"They had such babies twenty six years ago...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659134</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh...</title>
	<author>KillShill</author>
	<datestamp>1269886080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And mirrors will become "Digital Circumvention Tools"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And mirrors will become " Digital Circumvention Tools " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And mirrors will become "Digital Circumvention Tools"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658182</id>
	<title>Re:Calibration</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1269881580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.</p></div><p>I can just see the next greasemonkey script for firefox. If fist is shaken, run getoffmylawn.js...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope there 's a sensitivity calibration - I would n't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.I can just see the next greasemonkey script for firefox .
If fist is shaken , run getoffmylawn.js.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.I can just see the next greasemonkey script for firefox.
If fist is shaken, run getoffmylawn.js...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124</id>
	<title>Calibration</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1269877560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope there 's a sensitivity calibration - I would n't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657690</id>
	<title>apple patented this a few years ago?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269879660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought apple had a patent like this back in around 2005~2006 where there were sensors for every pixel that acted like a camera.  I remember reading it on engadget but nobody knew what that patent was really about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought apple had a patent like this back in around 2005 ~ 2006 where there were sensors for every pixel that acted like a camera .
I remember reading it on engadget but nobody knew what that patent was really about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought apple had a patent like this back in around 2005~2006 where there were sensors for every pixel that acted like a camera.
I remember reading it on engadget but nobody knew what that patent was really about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658032</id>
	<title>touchscreens are to be avoided where possible</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1269881040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work in the avionics industry, some of our products use touchscreens. I find touchscreens are much slower/less productive in use compared to a keyboard/mouse setup. Also they get very icky very quickly. Sometimes its even hard to read the screen after a few people have used the system, apparently some people like to rub their hands in dirty sump oil before using touchscreens. Personally I choose just about any other form of input over touchscreen when possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in the avionics industry , some of our products use touchscreens .
I find touchscreens are much slower/less productive in use compared to a keyboard/mouse setup .
Also they get very icky very quickly .
Sometimes its even hard to read the screen after a few people have used the system , apparently some people like to rub their hands in dirty sump oil before using touchscreens .
Personally I choose just about any other form of input over touchscreen when possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in the avionics industry, some of our products use touchscreens.
I find touchscreens are much slower/less productive in use compared to a keyboard/mouse setup.
Also they get very icky very quickly.
Sometimes its even hard to read the screen after a few people have used the system, apparently some people like to rub their hands in dirty sump oil before using touchscreens.
Personally I choose just about any other form of input over touchscreen when possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658140</id>
	<title>Will your next article..</title>
	<author>eXFeLoN</author>
	<datestamp>1269881460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>be completely thoughtless? researchers believe it possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>be completely thoughtless ?
researchers believe it possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>be completely thoughtless?
researchers believe it possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068</id>
	<title>I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269877320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can use my computer without barely moving at all.  It's the perfect tool for my lazy self.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can use my computer without barely moving at all .
It 's the perfect tool for my lazy self .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can use my computer without barely moving at all.
It's the perfect tool for my lazy self.
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657798</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1269880020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given how shitty my Nexus One is, my next anything will have a real keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given how shitty my Nexus One is , my next anything will have a real keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given how shitty my Nexus One is, my next anything will have a real keyboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657960</id>
	<title>Re:Calibration</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269880680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or a scowl sends off a nasty email to an ex-girlfriend.  What am I kidding?  This is slashdot.  That will never happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or a scowl sends off a nasty email to an ex-girlfriend .
What am I kidding ?
This is slashdot .
That will never happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or a scowl sends off a nasty email to an ex-girlfriend.
What am I kidding?
This is slashdot.
That will never happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658006</id>
	<title>Why is this a good idea?</title>
	<author>Tangentc</author>
	<datestamp>1269880980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think that this will die for security concerns, though it does have tremendous potential to cause them. I think this will die because it's unnecessary, impractical, and redundant. Because this requires gestures much larger than would be required with a mouse or traditional touchscreen; and it doesn't really provide much in the way of increased functionality for the cost of the experimental technology. Lastly, it's because we can already make webcams small enough to fit right above laptop LCD screens which could realistically be used in the same way for a lot less money. Think of it like Sony's Eyetoy, both in how it will be innovative and how it will completely flop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that this will die for security concerns , though it does have tremendous potential to cause them .
I think this will die because it 's unnecessary , impractical , and redundant .
Because this requires gestures much larger than would be required with a mouse or traditional touchscreen ; and it does n't really provide much in the way of increased functionality for the cost of the experimental technology .
Lastly , it 's because we can already make webcams small enough to fit right above laptop LCD screens which could realistically be used in the same way for a lot less money .
Think of it like Sony 's Eyetoy , both in how it will be innovative and how it will completely flop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that this will die for security concerns, though it does have tremendous potential to cause them.
I think this will die because it's unnecessary, impractical, and redundant.
Because this requires gestures much larger than would be required with a mouse or traditional touchscreen; and it doesn't really provide much in the way of increased functionality for the cost of the experimental technology.
Lastly, it's because we can already make webcams small enough to fit right above laptop LCD screens which could realistically be used in the same way for a lot less money.
Think of it like Sony's Eyetoy, both in how it will be innovative and how it will completely flop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657624</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1269879480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I prefer the keyboard. It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands)</p></div><p>That entirely depends what you're doing. If you're drawing a picture, the keyboard is usually a terrible interface</p><p>Even when there are exceptional cases -- for example, I've not found a better way to produce sequence diagrams than the text-driven <a href="http://www.websequencediagrams.com/" title="websequencediagrams.com">http://www.websequencediagrams.com/</a> [websequencediagrams.com] -- you can hypothesise a nicer interface based on touching/clicking and dragging.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the keyboard .
It 's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone ( provided you learned the hotkeys and commands ) That entirely depends what you 're doing .
If you 're drawing a picture , the keyboard is usually a terrible interfaceEven when there are exceptional cases -- for example , I 've not found a better way to produce sequence diagrams than the text-driven http : //www.websequencediagrams.com/ [ websequencediagrams.com ] -- you can hypothesise a nicer interface based on touching/clicking and dragging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the keyboard.
It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands)That entirely depends what you're doing.
If you're drawing a picture, the keyboard is usually a terrible interfaceEven when there are exceptional cases -- for example, I've not found a better way to produce sequence diagrams than the text-driven http://www.websequencediagrams.com/ [websequencediagrams.com] -- you can hypothesise a nicer interface based on touching/clicking and dragging.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202</id>
	<title>what ever happended to "vocie recognition"?</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1269877860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That seems like the obvious way to interact verbally with the computer.  At least for parts of applications where you are selecting or entering text.
<br>
Touch and gesture has its niches for visual information, where pointing is more succinct than talking or typing about the action.
<br> <br>
APIs for both systems are necessary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That seems like the obvious way to interact verbally with the computer .
At least for parts of applications where you are selecting or entering text .
Touch and gesture has its niches for visual information , where pointing is more succinct than talking or typing about the action .
APIs for both systems are necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That seems like the obvious way to interact verbally with the computer.
At least for parts of applications where you are selecting or entering text.
Touch and gesture has its niches for visual information, where pointing is more succinct than talking or typing about the action.
APIs for both systems are necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1269877620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse with just one pointer and a few buttons. You can potentially transmit a lot more instructions in a lot less time using your hands, if only we figured out a proper way to make it work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse with just one pointer and a few buttons .
You can potentially transmit a lot more instructions in a lot less time using your hands , if only we figured out a proper way to make it work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse with just one pointer and a few buttons.
You can potentially transmit a lot more instructions in a lot less time using your hands, if only we figured out a proper way to make it work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659546</id>
	<title>Re:Good for the hearing-impaired</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1269887640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was a concept that my writer friend had in the books I helped with.  It continued through the fan fiction and now he is using it in his new series.</p><p>In the first books, people walked around typing in the air, not paying any attention to others while looking through the transparent displays in their glasses (gogs) and listening to their earbuds.</p><p>I moved the displays to contacts in a story I wrote, then John made the contact displays interactive with the virtual keyboards or with eye movements.</p><p>Did not really think of the hearing-impaired angle, we were all looking at it like the way people talk into their earbuds now and look strange, but even stranger in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was a concept that my writer friend had in the books I helped with .
It continued through the fan fiction and now he is using it in his new series.In the first books , people walked around typing in the air , not paying any attention to others while looking through the transparent displays in their glasses ( gogs ) and listening to their earbuds.I moved the displays to contacts in a story I wrote , then John made the contact displays interactive with the virtual keyboards or with eye movements.Did not really think of the hearing-impaired angle , we were all looking at it like the way people talk into their earbuds now and look strange , but even stranger in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was a concept that my writer friend had in the books I helped with.
It continued through the fan fiction and now he is using it in his new series.In the first books, people walked around typing in the air, not paying any attention to others while looking through the transparent displays in their glasses (gogs) and listening to their earbuds.I moved the displays to contacts in a story I wrote, then John made the contact displays interactive with the virtual keyboards or with eye movements.Did not really think of the hearing-impaired angle, we were all looking at it like the way people talk into their earbuds now and look strange, but even stranger in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657974</id>
	<title>Imagine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269880800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> "Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,"</i></p><p>Imagine turning off your computer and going outside and seeing the world for a change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light , " Imagine turning off your computer and going outside and seeing the world for a change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,"Imagine turning off your computer and going outside and seeing the world for a change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31667008</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB.</p></div></blockquote><p>
My company has performed computer vision installtions in public spaces, and I can confirm that Intel specifically has been looking into placing "a camera in your living room" for the purposes of gathering audience demographics including how many people (and ideally what age) watch which programs and saw which advertisements.
</p><p>
We were approached just over a year ago by a representative at a conference. When the issue of privacy was immediately raised by our team the response was to ignore that for the purposes of the conversation as they had reseason to believe a significant portion of the population would not be concerned.
</p><p>
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons and feel free to take that into consideration.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI : " Secure audience reporting protocol " an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB .
My company has performed computer vision installtions in public spaces , and I can confirm that Intel specifically has been looking into placing " a camera in your living room " for the purposes of gathering audience demographics including how many people ( and ideally what age ) watch which programs and saw which advertisements .
We were approached just over a year ago by a representative at a conference .
When the issue of privacy was immediately raised by our team the response was to ignore that for the purposes of the conversation as they had reseason to believe a significant portion of the population would not be concerned .
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons and feel free to take that into consideration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB.
My company has performed computer vision installtions in public spaces, and I can confirm that Intel specifically has been looking into placing "a camera in your living room" for the purposes of gathering audience demographics including how many people (and ideally what age) watch which programs and saw which advertisements.
We were approached just over a year ago by a representative at a conference.
When the issue of privacy was immediately raised by our team the response was to ignore that for the purposes of the conversation as they had reseason to believe a significant portion of the population would not be concerned.
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons and feel free to take that into consideration.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657392</id>
	<title>This could be bad for pron</title>
	<author>forgot\_my\_username</author>
	<datestamp>1269878460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hypothetically, if I knew someone who may have at one point or another visited a site with risque adult material....<br>
well, I see potential interface issues<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
right, I am off to register touchlessporntube.com</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hypothetically , if I knew someone who may have at one point or another visited a site with risque adult material... . well , I see potential interface issues .. . right , I am off to register touchlessporntube.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hypothetically, if I knew someone who may have at one point or another visited a site with risque adult material....
well, I see potential interface issues ...
right, I am off to register touchlessporntube.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657286</id>
	<title>It looks back at you?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269878160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The MIT media lab. is developing a motion screen computer. It looks back at you.</p></div></blockquote><p>What are you doing, Dave?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The MIT media lab .
is developing a motion screen computer .
It looks back at you.What are you doing , Dave ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The MIT media lab.
is developing a motion screen computer.
It looks back at you.What are you doing, Dave?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098</id>
	<title>Good for the hearing-impaired</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269877440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This'll be great for the hearing-impaired. We're all gonna have to learn sign language to interact with our computers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This 'll be great for the hearing-impaired .
We 're all gon na have to learn sign language to interact with our computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This'll be great for the hearing-impaired.
We're all gonna have to learn sign language to interact with our computers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657364</id>
	<title>Obligitory H2G2</title>
	<author>Conspiracy\_Of\_Doves</author>
	<datestamp>1269878400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wavebands for news of himself. The machine was rather difficult to operate. For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive &mdash; you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same programme.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>Another voice broke in, presumably Halfrunt. He said: "Vell, Zaphod's jist zis guy you know?" but got no further because an electric pencil flew across the cabin and through the radio's on/off sensitive airspace. Zaphod turned and glared at Trillian &mdash; she had thrown the pencil.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wavebands for news of himself .
The machine was rather difficult to operate .
For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials ; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive    you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers ; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope .
It saved a lot of muscular expenditure of course , but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same programme .
....Another voice broke in , presumably Halfrunt .
He said : " Vell , Zaphod 's jist zis guy you know ?
" but got no further because an electric pencil flew across the cabin and through the radio 's on/off sensitive airspace .
Zaphod turned and glared at Trillian    she had thrown the pencil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wavebands for news of himself.
The machine was rather difficult to operate.
For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive — you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope.
It saved a lot of muscular expenditure of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same programme.
....Another voice broke in, presumably Halfrunt.
He said: "Vell, Zaphod's jist zis guy you know?
" but got no further because an electric pencil flew across the cabin and through the radio's on/off sensitive airspace.
Zaphod turned and glared at Trillian — she had thrown the pencil.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658246</id>
	<title>Re:Why do researchers</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269881880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Claiming buttons are good does not publish any papers; everyone knows this.  If you claim some kind of button substitute is good, you can publish two papers.  One making the claim and then another comparing it with buttons in a user study and showing that, actually, buttons are better.  If you're really clever, you can then publish a third paper on the methodology for evaluating button substitutes, and a fourth paper on potential problems with future button replacements.  Guess which route academics prefer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Claiming buttons are good does not publish any papers ; everyone knows this .
If you claim some kind of button substitute is good , you can publish two papers .
One making the claim and then another comparing it with buttons in a user study and showing that , actually , buttons are better .
If you 're really clever , you can then publish a third paper on the methodology for evaluating button substitutes , and a fourth paper on potential problems with future button replacements .
Guess which route academics prefer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Claiming buttons are good does not publish any papers; everyone knows this.
If you claim some kind of button substitute is good, you can publish two papers.
One making the claim and then another comparing it with buttons in a user study and showing that, actually, buttons are better.
If you're really clever, you can then publish a third paper on the methodology for evaluating button substitutes, and a fourth paper on potential problems with future button replacements.
Guess which route academics prefer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31660000</id>
	<title>Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1269889680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What happened to voice recognition?</p><p>It worked really well until an intern ran through the lab shouting "bash, Ar Em   dash Ar Ef   asterisk, SHUTDOWN NOW!"</p><p>That's when they switched to EEG-based typing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happened to voice recognition ? It worked really well until an intern ran through the lab shouting " bash , Ar Em dash Ar Ef asterisk , SHUTDOWN NOW !
" That 's when they switched to EEG-based typing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happened to voice recognition?It worked really well until an intern ran through the lab shouting "bash, Ar Em   dash Ar Ef   asterisk, SHUTDOWN NOW!
"That's when they switched to EEG-based typing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657304</id>
	<title>Sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1269878220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many fingers do you see, Winston?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many fingers do you see , Winston ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many fingers do you see, Winston?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658080</id>
	<title>Not new</title>
	<author>inKubus</author>
	<datestamp>1269881220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't anything new. We've been able to do this for <a href="http://www.bored.com/monitorcamera/" title="bored.com">years</a> [bored.com]!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't anything new .
We 've been able to do this for years [ bored.com ] !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't anything new.
We've been able to do this for years [bored.com]!
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659926</id>
	<title>Re:Good for the hearing-impaired</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1269889380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That comment pushes me to the off topic thought that it is a travesty that more schools don't offer sign language as a foreign language.  Learning a second spoken language is basically only useful for talking to people who don't speak the same language as you.  On a day to day basis, this is only useful for a small percentage of the population.  Sign language on the other hand, would (just like a spoken second language) let you talk to other people who only spoke that language, but it would also be useful for people who spoke the same primary language.  How many times have you tried to talk to someone that is on the other side of a window, in a place so noisy that you cannot easily hear what the other person is saying, or were in a place where you wanted to say something, but didn't want to make sound?  It doesn't happen to me every day, but I run into cases where any speech is difficult more often than I run into cases where the language is the barrier.<br> <br>

Even if there was not a single deaf person on the planet, sign language would STILL be a more useful second language than French, yet every school I ever went to that offer foreign languages taught French, and not one taught Sign.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That comment pushes me to the off topic thought that it is a travesty that more schools do n't offer sign language as a foreign language .
Learning a second spoken language is basically only useful for talking to people who do n't speak the same language as you .
On a day to day basis , this is only useful for a small percentage of the population .
Sign language on the other hand , would ( just like a spoken second language ) let you talk to other people who only spoke that language , but it would also be useful for people who spoke the same primary language .
How many times have you tried to talk to someone that is on the other side of a window , in a place so noisy that you can not easily hear what the other person is saying , or were in a place where you wanted to say something , but did n't want to make sound ?
It does n't happen to me every day , but I run into cases where any speech is difficult more often than I run into cases where the language is the barrier .
Even if there was not a single deaf person on the planet , sign language would STILL be a more useful second language than French , yet every school I ever went to that offer foreign languages taught French , and not one taught Sign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That comment pushes me to the off topic thought that it is a travesty that more schools don't offer sign language as a foreign language.
Learning a second spoken language is basically only useful for talking to people who don't speak the same language as you.
On a day to day basis, this is only useful for a small percentage of the population.
Sign language on the other hand, would (just like a spoken second language) let you talk to other people who only spoke that language, but it would also be useful for people who spoke the same primary language.
How many times have you tried to talk to someone that is on the other side of a window, in a place so noisy that you cannot easily hear what the other person is saying, or were in a place where you wanted to say something, but didn't want to make sound?
It doesn't happen to me every day, but I run into cases where any speech is difficult more often than I run into cases where the language is the barrier.
Even if there was not a single deaf person on the planet, sign language would STILL be a more useful second language than French, yet every school I ever went to that offer foreign languages taught French, and not one taught Sign.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269879420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse</p><p>You mean like a keyboard?   Yeah they perfected that technology back in the 70s with TRS-80s (#1 computer at the time), Apple IIs, and Atari 400/800s which replaced previous toggle-switched computers with a 10-finger interface where you could type words directly on a CRT! (or TV).  It was a great advancement in personal computers.</p><p>The problem with that 10-finger interface was the high learning curve which made people have to memorize all kinds of esoteric commands and key strokes, or constantly refer to a manual  (Alt E == create text box in Word for DOS).   The simplicity of the mouse  was found to be better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouseYou mean like a keyboard ?
Yeah they perfected that technology back in the 70s with TRS-80s ( # 1 computer at the time ) , Apple IIs , and Atari 400/800s which replaced previous toggle-switched computers with a 10-finger interface where you could type words directly on a CRT !
( or TV ) .
It was a great advancement in personal computers.The problem with that 10-finger interface was the high learning curve which made people have to memorize all kinds of esoteric commands and key strokes , or constantly refer to a manual ( Alt E = = create text box in Word for DOS ) .
The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouseYou mean like a keyboard?
Yeah they perfected that technology back in the 70s with TRS-80s (#1 computer at the time), Apple IIs, and Atari 400/800s which replaced previous toggle-switched computers with a 10-finger interface where you could type words directly on a CRT!
(or TV).
It was a great advancement in personal computers.The problem with that 10-finger interface was the high learning curve which made people have to memorize all kinds of esoteric commands and key strokes, or constantly refer to a manual  (Alt E == create text box in Word for DOS).
The simplicity of the mouse  was found to be better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659994</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh...</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1269889680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody else suggested advertising that watches its watchers.  I said kill it with fire.</p><p>I should have the same reaction to this idea, and I do, but I'm not even going to say it.  Because this is inevitable.  This isn't funny at all.  It'll happen, as surely as the RIAA will sue somebody.  It will be delayed while Apple behaves as Apple usually does and radically overvalues their own patent, to the point that Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers refuse to license it, but it will still happen.  If Samsung pays up and starts manufacturing these, I foresee a MPAA stampede to exploit it.</p><p>Shit, they'll try to use it to plug the analog hole!  Detected something that looks like a camera in front of the screen?  Refuse to play back.  After that it'll take a camouflaged camera with a military-style anti-reflective treated lens on it to take a video of a movie.</p><p>And it's inevitable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody else suggested advertising that watches its watchers .
I said kill it with fire.I should have the same reaction to this idea , and I do , but I 'm not even going to say it .
Because this is inevitable .
This is n't funny at all .
It 'll happen , as surely as the RIAA will sue somebody .
It will be delayed while Apple behaves as Apple usually does and radically overvalues their own patent , to the point that Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers refuse to license it , but it will still happen .
If Samsung pays up and starts manufacturing these , I foresee a MPAA stampede to exploit it.Shit , they 'll try to use it to plug the analog hole !
Detected something that looks like a camera in front of the screen ?
Refuse to play back .
After that it 'll take a camouflaged camera with a military-style anti-reflective treated lens on it to take a video of a movie.And it 's inevitable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody else suggested advertising that watches its watchers.
I said kill it with fire.I should have the same reaction to this idea, and I do, but I'm not even going to say it.
Because this is inevitable.
This isn't funny at all.
It'll happen, as surely as the RIAA will sue somebody.
It will be delayed while Apple behaves as Apple usually does and radically overvalues their own patent, to the point that Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers refuse to license it, but it will still happen.
If Samsung pays up and starts manufacturing these, I foresee a MPAA stampede to exploit it.Shit, they'll try to use it to plug the analog hole!
Detected something that looks like a camera in front of the screen?
Refuse to play back.
After that it'll take a camouflaged camera with a military-style anti-reflective treated lens on it to take a video of a movie.And it's inevitable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658070</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1269881160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better.<br><br>Yeah?  Unplug your keyboard and use the computer with just a mouse for a week, then we'll talk.<br><br>Having *both* is better, but if you have to pick one, the keyboard is way more important than the mouse for almost all common computing tasks (image editing being a possible exception).</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better.Yeah ?
Unplug your keyboard and use the computer with just a mouse for a week , then we 'll talk.Having * both * is better , but if you have to pick one , the keyboard is way more important than the mouse for almost all common computing tasks ( image editing being a possible exception ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better.Yeah?
Unplug your keyboard and use the computer with just a mouse for a week, then we'll talk.Having *both* is better, but if you have to pick one, the keyboard is way more important than the mouse for almost all common computing tasks (image editing being a possible exception).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657672</id>
	<title>Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"?</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1269879600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Voice recognition isn't mature yet. Just look at Youtube videos, it has an error in every line. I prefer to simply write the stuff instead of having to correct it afterwords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Voice recognition is n't mature yet .
Just look at Youtube videos , it has an error in every line .
I prefer to simply write the stuff instead of having to correct it afterwords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Voice recognition isn't mature yet.
Just look at Youtube videos, it has an error in every line.
I prefer to simply write the stuff instead of having to correct it afterwords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657170</id>
	<title>Why do researchers</title>
	<author>Josh04</author>
	<datestamp>1269877680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hate tactile feedback?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate tactile feedback ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate tactile feedback?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659400</id>
	<title>Did you see the Vista speech recognition demo?</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1269887040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y\_Jp6PxsSQ" title="youtube.com">Video Link</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Aunt , let 's set so double the killer delete select all.Video Link [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.Video Link [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657254</id>
	<title>Health Benefits</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269878040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.</p></div></blockquote><p>Especially for my co-workers. The last one who touched my display got stabbed in the hand by a spork.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.Especially for my co-workers .
The last one who touched my display got stabbed in the hand by a spork .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.Especially for my co-workers.
The last one who touched my display got stabbed in the hand by a spork.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658730</id>
	<title>Great, now we've got a portable abyss...</title>
	<author>emag</author>
	<datestamp>1269884220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. <strong>Friedrich Nietzsche</strong></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Battle not with monsters , lest ye become a monster , and if you gaze into the abyss , the abyss gazes also into you .
Friedrich Nietzsche</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Friedrich Nietzsche 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657302</id>
	<title>Project website</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269878220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://web.media.mit.edu/~mhirsch/bidi/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //web.media.mit.edu/ ~ mhirsch/bidi/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://web.media.mit.edu/~mhirsch/bidi/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657522</id>
	<title>Really - I just was glancing at those Boobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269879060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need to auto-zoom in....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to auto-zoom in... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to auto-zoom in....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659540</id>
	<title>I really LIKE touchscreens</title>
	<author>MikeURL</author>
	<datestamp>1269887640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess i should say i like the concept of a touchscreen.  I have a blackberry storm and an Archos 9 because I'd like to be able to do without a keyboard and mouse.  The problem is fidelity.  Even after a LOT of practice it is impossible to get the speed or accuracy of a plain old KB and mouse/touchpad.
<br> <br>
So now they are talking about stabbing at the air with your fingers and it sounds so cool in a Minority Report kind of way.  I like to think that they can get this right but how can stabbing at the air ever be better than stabbing at a keyboard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess i should say i like the concept of a touchscreen .
I have a blackberry storm and an Archos 9 because I 'd like to be able to do without a keyboard and mouse .
The problem is fidelity .
Even after a LOT of practice it is impossible to get the speed or accuracy of a plain old KB and mouse/touchpad .
So now they are talking about stabbing at the air with your fingers and it sounds so cool in a Minority Report kind of way .
I like to think that they can get this right but how can stabbing at the air ever be better than stabbing at a keyboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess i should say i like the concept of a touchscreen.
I have a blackberry storm and an Archos 9 because I'd like to be able to do without a keyboard and mouse.
The problem is fidelity.
Even after a LOT of practice it is impossible to get the speed or accuracy of a plain old KB and mouse/touchpad.
So now they are talking about stabbing at the air with your fingers and it sounds so cool in a Minority Report kind of way.
I like to think that they can get this right but how can stabbing at the air ever be better than stabbing at a keyboard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658364</id>
	<title>Less accurate</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269882420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I keep saying all the time, I really wish I had a less accurate way to use my touchscreen, and have even less tactile feedback.</p><p>Extending my finger all the way to the screen is such work.</p><p>Please, sign me up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep saying all the time , I really wish I had a less accurate way to use my touchscreen , and have even less tactile feedback.Extending my finger all the way to the screen is such work.Please , sign me up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep saying all the time, I really wish I had a less accurate way to use my touchscreen, and have even less tactile feedback.Extending my finger all the way to the screen is such work.Please, sign me up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657142</id>
	<title>Apple has a better patent already</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1269877620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple already has a patent on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/26/apple-patent-embeds-thousands-of-cameras-among-lcd-pixels/" title="engadget.com">LCD screens with integrated image sensors</a> [engadget.com]. Pretty sure that works based on the reflection of light, too, and it would do more than just detect gestures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple already has a patent on LCD screens with integrated image sensors [ engadget.com ] .
Pretty sure that works based on the reflection of light , too , and it would do more than just detect gestures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple already has a patent on LCD screens with integrated image sensors [engadget.com].
Pretty sure that works based on the reflection of light, too, and it would do more than just detect gestures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657722</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269879840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and the hardware needs to be reasonably widespread before the hot-shot UI designers work out how best to use it.</p><p>I thought pinch zoom/rotate was inspired when I first saw it, but I think we've only scratched the surface (heh) of what intuitive interfaces can be achieved with multitouch. Add pressure sensitivity and the palette becomes so much richer.</p><p>I think if you could somehow make the 1cm in front of your screen something you can interact directly with would be great - giving you 'hover' semantics on top of touch and pressure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and the hardware needs to be reasonably widespread before the hot-shot UI designers work out how best to use it.I thought pinch zoom/rotate was inspired when I first saw it , but I think we 've only scratched the surface ( heh ) of what intuitive interfaces can be achieved with multitouch .
Add pressure sensitivity and the palette becomes so much richer.I think if you could somehow make the 1cm in front of your screen something you can interact directly with would be great - giving you 'hover ' semantics on top of touch and pressure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and the hardware needs to be reasonably widespread before the hot-shot UI designers work out how best to use it.I thought pinch zoom/rotate was inspired when I first saw it, but I think we've only scratched the surface (heh) of what intuitive interfaces can be achieved with multitouch.
Add pressure sensitivity and the palette becomes so much richer.I think if you could somehow make the 1cm in front of your screen something you can interact directly with would be great - giving you 'hover' semantics on top of touch and pressure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658658</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1269883860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, I prefer to use the best task for the job.  I launch programs with the run prompt, navigate websites with the mouse, enter data into forms with the keyboard, manage small numbers of files spatially, and manage large numbers of files using commands.<br> <br>

You could use a hammer for everything, and save yourself the trouble of learning how to use multiple tools efficiently.  It's certainly less work in the short term.  Plus you provide everyone else with schadenfreude when you try to select a large subset of files with the mouse, or try to type out excessively long filenames with the keyboard.<br> <br>

<i>For terminal lovers: I'm well aware of, and make much use of tab autocompletion.  It doesn't work in all situations, and, even when it does, the mouse is a more efficient approach for certain common tasks.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I prefer to use the best task for the job .
I launch programs with the run prompt , navigate websites with the mouse , enter data into forms with the keyboard , manage small numbers of files spatially , and manage large numbers of files using commands .
You could use a hammer for everything , and save yourself the trouble of learning how to use multiple tools efficiently .
It 's certainly less work in the short term .
Plus you provide everyone else with schadenfreude when you try to select a large subset of files with the mouse , or try to type out excessively long filenames with the keyboard .
For terminal lovers : I 'm well aware of , and make much use of tab autocompletion .
It does n't work in all situations , and , even when it does , the mouse is a more efficient approach for certain common tasks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I prefer to use the best task for the job.
I launch programs with the run prompt, navigate websites with the mouse, enter data into forms with the keyboard, manage small numbers of files spatially, and manage large numbers of files using commands.
You could use a hammer for everything, and save yourself the trouble of learning how to use multiple tools efficiently.
It's certainly less work in the short term.
Plus you provide everyone else with schadenfreude when you try to select a large subset of files with the mouse, or try to type out excessively long filenames with the keyboard.
For terminal lovers: I'm well aware of, and make much use of tab autocompletion.
It doesn't work in all situations, and, even when it does, the mouse is a more efficient approach for certain common tasks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31663856</id>
	<title>Re:This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269865200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the advertisements also notice the look of purest hate in my eyes as they try to foist their crap on me for the thousandth time? I hope so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the advertisements also notice the look of purest hate in my eyes as they try to foist their crap on me for the thousandth time ?
I hope so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the advertisements also notice the look of purest hate in my eyes as they try to foist their crap on me for the thousandth time?
I hope so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657884</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1269880320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obligatory Back to the Future II quote:<p><div class="quote"><p>Video Game Boy #1: You mean you have to use your hands?</p><p>Video Game Boy #2: That's like a baby's toy!</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory Back to the Future II quote : Video Game Boy # 1 : You mean you have to use your hands ? Video Game Boy # 2 : That 's like a baby 's toy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory Back to the Future II quote:Video Game Boy #1: You mean you have to use your hands?Video Game Boy #2: That's like a baby's toy!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658742</id>
	<title>Re:Sanitary...</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1269884280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you handle doorknobs?  People touch those too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you handle doorknobs ?
People touch those too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you handle doorknobs?
People touch those too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188</id>
	<title>Ooh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269877800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forget this "touchless touchscreen" nonsense. Combine this with the various clever stuff being done in lenseless digital imaging, and we will finally achieve the dream... A Telescreen in every house.<br> <br>

Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB. Pay-per view programs can now control the number of viewers, V-chip 2 can now detect child-size viewers and automatically halt display of R-rated content(sorry midgets, its for the good of the children)! Neilson will be completely obsolete!<br> <br>

What could possibly go wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget this " touchless touchscreen " nonsense .
Combine this with the various clever stuff being done in lenseless digital imaging , and we will finally achieve the dream... A Telescreen in every house .
Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI : " Secure audience reporting protocol " an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB .
Pay-per view programs can now control the number of viewers , V-chip 2 can now detect child-size viewers and automatically halt display of R-rated content ( sorry midgets , its for the good of the children ) !
Neilson will be completely obsolete !
What could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget this "touchless touchscreen" nonsense.
Combine this with the various clever stuff being done in lenseless digital imaging, and we will finally achieve the dream... A Telescreen in every house.
Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB.
Pay-per view programs can now control the number of viewers, V-chip 2 can now detect child-size viewers and automatically halt display of R-rated content(sorry midgets, its for the good of the children)!
Neilson will be completely obsolete!
What could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657164</id>
	<title>Yakov</title>
	<author>The\_Wilschon</author>
	<datestamp>1269877680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In America, you watch television.  In Soviet Russia, television watches YOU!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In America , you watch television .
In Soviet Russia , television watches YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In America, you watch television.
In Soviet Russia, television watches YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658530</id>
	<title>Apple already has this patented.</title>
	<author>Brian Recchia</author>
	<datestamp>1269883200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220060007222\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060007222&amp;RS=DN/20060007222" title="uspto.gov" rel="nofollow">http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220060007222\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060007222&amp;RS=DN/20060007222</a> [uspto.gov] They have a patent for cameras hidden in between pixels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser ? Sect1 = PTO1&amp;Sect2 = HITOFF&amp;d = PG01&amp;p = 1&amp;u = \ % 2Fnetahtml \ % 2FPTO \ % 2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r = 1&amp;f = G&amp;l = 50&amp;s1 = \ % 2220060007222 \ % 22.PGNR.&amp;OS = DN/20060007222&amp;RS = DN/20060007222 [ uspto.gov ] They have a patent for cameras hidden in between pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220060007222\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20060007222&amp;RS=DN/20060007222 [uspto.gov] They have a patent for cameras hidden in between pixels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>buruonbrails</author>
	<datestamp>1269877740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer the keyboard. It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the keyboard .
It 's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone ( provided you learned the hotkeys and commands ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the keyboard.
It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657720</id>
	<title>Sanitary...</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1269879840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is a IT oriented site, and this story makes a comment like </p><p><div class="quote"><p>"They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays."</p></div><p>I wouldn't mind a solution that solves the sanitary benefits of getting rid of hand scanners.  I'm sorry, but I work in a colo, and there's a hand scanner next to the badge reader (you scan you badge, then your hand and the first door from security to the datacenter opens up).  I carry a tube of hand sanitizer because I have no interest in following 500 people with whatever bacteria/viruses they are carrying since entering the facility, returning from lunch or the restroom.</p><p>Someone needs to invent a hand scanner that you don't need to put your hand on any type of surface.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since / .
is a IT oriented site , and this story makes a comment like " They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays .
" I would n't mind a solution that solves the sanitary benefits of getting rid of hand scanners .
I 'm sorry , but I work in a colo , and there 's a hand scanner next to the badge reader ( you scan you badge , then your hand and the first door from security to the datacenter opens up ) .
I carry a tube of hand sanitizer because I have no interest in following 500 people with whatever bacteria/viruses they are carrying since entering the facility , returning from lunch or the restroom.Someone needs to invent a hand scanner that you do n't need to put your hand on any type of surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since /.
is a IT oriented site, and this story makes a comment like "They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.
"I wouldn't mind a solution that solves the sanitary benefits of getting rid of hand scanners.
I'm sorry, but I work in a colo, and there's a hand scanner next to the badge reader (you scan you badge, then your hand and the first door from security to the datacenter opens up).
I carry a tube of hand sanitizer because I have no interest in following 500 people with whatever bacteria/viruses they are carrying since entering the facility, returning from lunch or the restroom.Someone needs to invent a hand scanner that you don't need to put your hand on any type of surface.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658152</id>
	<title>Re:I prefer my mouse.</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1269881460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would not have both "perfected that technology" and "Atari 400/800" in the same sentence when referring to keyboards unless there was some kind of negation involved.  That plastic membrane keyboard was, ummm, bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would not have both " perfected that technology " and " Atari 400/800 " in the same sentence when referring to keyboards unless there was some kind of negation involved .
That plastic membrane keyboard was , ummm , bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would not have both "perfected that technology" and "Atari 400/800" in the same sentence when referring to keyboards unless there was some kind of negation involved.
That plastic membrane keyboard was, ummm, bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659734</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269888480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was just thinking about that; "'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,'" sounds an awful lot like a telescreen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just thinking about that ; " 'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light, ' " sounds an awful lot like a telescreen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just thinking about that; "'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,'" sounds an awful lot like a telescreen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659038</id>
	<title>puttygen.exe ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269885540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is now creating your secure ssh key. Don't move the mouse to create random noise, just scoot around the office on your office-chair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is now creating your secure ssh key .
Do n't move the mouse to create random noise , just scoot around the office on your office-chair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is now creating your secure ssh key.
Don't move the mouse to create random noise, just scoot around the office on your office-chair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657470</id>
	<title>Need new gestures to be invented</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269878760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whole slew of new gestures to be invented and patented!</p><p>Wait a minute, I have one already.. (gestures) Fsck you! (c) [patent pending]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whole slew of new gestures to be invented and patented ! Wait a minute , I have one already.. ( gestures ) Fsck you !
( c ) [ patent pending ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whole slew of new gestures to be invented and patented!Wait a minute, I have one already.. (gestures) Fsck you!
(c) [patent pending]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657570</id>
	<title>Quotes</title>
	<author>globalsnake</author>
	<datestamp>1269879240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone know if the quotes are set up so that the individual sheep read them, or are they the torture of the day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know if the quotes are set up so that the individual sheep read them , or are they the torture of the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know if the quotes are set up so that the individual sheep read them, or are they the torture of the day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31667008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31660000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31663856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1412243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657624
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657620
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658070
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31658300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31660000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31663856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1412243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31657188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31667008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1412243.31659134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
