<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_29_1327246</id>
	<title>A User's Guide To the Universe</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269885780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:alf@freealf.com" rel="nofollow">alfredw</a> writes <i>"Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party?  Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics' questions about time travel and black holes?  Do you want to know more about modern physics, but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics?  If you answered 'yes' to any of those questions, then you're in the target audience for <em>A User's Guide to the Universe: Surviving the Perils of Black Holes, Time Paradoxes, and Quantum Uncertainty</em>."</i> Keep reading for the rest of alfredw's review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>alfredw writes " Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party ?
Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics ' questions about time travel and black holes ?
Do you want to know more about modern physics , but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics ?
If you answered 'yes ' to any of those questions , then you 're in the target audience for A User 's Guide to the Universe : Surviving the Perils of Black Holes , Time Paradoxes , and Quantum Uncertainty .
" Keep reading for the rest of alfredw 's review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alfredw writes "Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party?
Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics' questions about time travel and black holes?
Do you want to know more about modern physics, but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics?
If you answered 'yes' to any of those questions, then you're in the target audience for A User's Guide to the Universe: Surviving the Perils of Black Holes, Time Paradoxes, and Quantum Uncertainty.
" Keep reading for the rest of alfredw's review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660074</id>
	<title>Does it come with a towel?</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1269890040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd sure like to get out of here before the Vogons demolish the planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd sure like to get out of here before the Vogons demolish the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd sure like to get out of here before the Vogons demolish the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661974</id>
	<title>Re:Physicists at cocktail party?</title>
	<author>styrotech</author>
	<datestamp>1269855780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You better watch out in case they realize that the one thing they really can't stand is a smartass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You better watch out in case they realize that the one thing they really ca n't stand is a smartass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You better watch out in case they realize that the one thing they really can't stand is a smartass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662276</id>
	<title>dumbing it down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269857160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Physics without math is like cooking without food...kind of misses the whole point</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Physics without math is like cooking without food...kind of misses the whole point</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Physics without math is like cooking without food...kind of misses the whole point</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660340</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1269891300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every book review on Slashdot has such a link; it's been like this for at least as long as Amazon has had an affiliate policy (though I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; Noble, though I could be mistaken).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every book review on Slashdot has such a link ; it 's been like this for at least as long as Amazon has had an affiliate policy ( though I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; Noble , though I could be mistaken ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every book review on Slashdot has such a link; it's been like this for at least as long as Amazon has had an affiliate policy (though I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; Noble, though I could be mistaken).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660990</id>
	<title>Butthole-ing a physicist?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269894060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like an odd thing to do, but if she's cute i'll be a gentleman and offer to push in her stool.</p><p>Are there any cute female phycisists?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like an odd thing to do , but if she 's cute i 'll be a gentleman and offer to push in her stool.Are there any cute female phycisists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like an odd thing to do, but if she's cute i'll be a gentleman and offer to push in her stool.Are there any cute female phycisists?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662552</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1269858240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Damn kids, read a fucking book!</p></div></blockquote><p>I think fucking is one of those things you figure out without reading a book.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn kids , read a fucking book ! I think fucking is one of those things you figure out without reading a book .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn kids, read a fucking book!I think fucking is one of those things you figure out without reading a book.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660708</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>AndersOSU</author>
	<datestamp>1269893040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Judging by the comments, this review serves as an excellent Rorschach test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the comments , this review serves as an excellent Rorschach test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the comments, this review serves as an excellent Rorschach test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661610</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Hartree</author>
	<datestamp>1269854280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to BE a physicist you ignorant clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to BE a physicist you ignorant clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to BE a physicist you ignorant clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663264</id>
	<title>AstronomyCast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269862020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A great podcast on most of the same topics.</p><p><a href="http://astronomycast.com/" title="astronomycast.com" rel="nofollow">Astronomy Cast</a> [astronomycast.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A great podcast on most of the same topics.Astronomy Cast [ astronomycast.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A great podcast on most of the same topics.Astronomy Cast [astronomycast.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660824</id>
	<title>Dave Goldberg Rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269893460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About a dozen times during the astro observing class he taught at Yale he pointed skyward and said, "Behold: Jove, king of the planets!"  He also wrote a nifty image stacking applet for students.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About a dozen times during the astro observing class he taught at Yale he pointed skyward and said , " Behold : Jove , king of the planets !
" He also wrote a nifty image stacking applet for students .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About a dozen times during the astro observing class he taught at Yale he pointed skyward and said, "Behold: Jove, king of the planets!
"  He also wrote a nifty image stacking applet for students.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663086</id>
	<title>read it..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269860880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.scribd.com/doc/26358649/A-User-s-Guide-to-the-Universe-Surviving-the-Perils-of-Black-Holes-Time-Paradoxes-and-Quantum-Uncertainty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.scribd.com/doc/26358649/A-User-s-Guide-to-the-Universe-Surviving-the-Perils-of-Black-Holes-Time-Paradoxes-and-Quantum-Uncertainty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.scribd.com/doc/26358649/A-User-s-Guide-to-the-Universe-Surviving-the-Perils-of-Black-Holes-Time-Paradoxes-and-Quantum-Uncertainty</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660186</id>
	<title>its interesting they need to write books like this</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1269890520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cosmology is is changing rapidly and made several sharp turns during my lifetime. And the vast amount of new astronomical data pouring in thanks to Moore's Law suggests we'll see a few more sharp turns before its over.
<br> <br>
On the other hand particle physics appears to have stagnated the past couple decades after verifying the last couple quarks and the Standard Theory.  Its now wallowing in untestable theories like Strings and Quantum Gravity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cosmology is is changing rapidly and made several sharp turns during my lifetime .
And the vast amount of new astronomical data pouring in thanks to Moore 's Law suggests we 'll see a few more sharp turns before its over .
On the other hand particle physics appears to have stagnated the past couple decades after verifying the last couple quarks and the Standard Theory .
Its now wallowing in untestable theories like Strings and Quantum Gravity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cosmology is is changing rapidly and made several sharp turns during my lifetime.
And the vast amount of new astronomical data pouring in thanks to Moore's Law suggests we'll see a few more sharp turns before its over.
On the other hand particle physics appears to have stagnated the past couple decades after verifying the last couple quarks and the Standard Theory.
Its now wallowing in untestable theories like Strings and Quantum Gravity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660582</id>
	<title>Re:Err I don't think that's correct</title>
	<author>Dorkmaster Flek</author>
	<datestamp>1269892500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A quick visit to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] shows that you are correct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A quick visit to Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] shows that you are correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A quick visit to Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] shows that you are correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660764</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1269893220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How does light travel at the speed of light?</p></div></blockquote><p>That one is easy: Because it is light, whatever speed it goes is the speed of light.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><blockquote><div><p>We know that photons have a small amount of mass,</p></div></blockquote><p>No, photons have exactly zero mass (well, actually all we can say for sure is that their mass is far below anything we can measure, but if they had any mass, they would not travel at the invariant speed (c), but slightly below (but still so fast that any light we have yet measured is so close to c that we can't see the difference). The big question is: If we found a photon mass, would we still call the invariant speed the speed of light?<br>Anyway, out theories say the photon doesn't have any mass, and the experiments don't contradict this assumption.</p><blockquote><div><p>and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's not a problem for light, because it doesn't get accelerated to that speed, but as massless particle, it goes at speed of light right from its creation up to its destruction.</p><blockquote><div><p>Sooo.. WTF?<br>Photons have mass but not inertia?</p></div></blockquote><p>Photons have no mass, but inertia. Indeed, in the direction it goes it has infinite inertia: You cannot slow it down, nor speed it up (you might object to this claim because of the lower speed of light in media, but that's the group velocity, which isn't the speed of photons). In the direction orthogonal to its direction of flight it has inertia proportional to its energy (you <em>can</em> change the direction in which the light flies, as every mirror proves; the light pressure shows that there's a force involved).</p><blockquote><div><p>How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a (tiny) mass that moves at the speed of light?</p></div></blockquote><p>It can't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does light travel at the speed of light ? That one is easy : Because it is light , whatever speed it goes is the speed of light .
: - ) We know that photons have a small amount of mass,No , photons have exactly zero mass ( well , actually all we can say for sure is that their mass is far below anything we can measure , but if they had any mass , they would not travel at the invariant speed ( c ) , but slightly below ( but still so fast that any light we have yet measured is so close to c that we ca n't see the difference ) .
The big question is : If we found a photon mass , would we still call the invariant speed the speed of light ? Anyway , out theories say the photon does n't have any mass , and the experiments do n't contradict this assumption.and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.That 's not a problem for light , because it does n't get accelerated to that speed , but as massless particle , it goes at speed of light right from its creation up to its destruction.Sooo.. WTF ? Photons have mass but not inertia ? Photons have no mass , but inertia .
Indeed , in the direction it goes it has infinite inertia : You can not slow it down , nor speed it up ( you might object to this claim because of the lower speed of light in media , but that 's the group velocity , which is n't the speed of photons ) .
In the direction orthogonal to its direction of flight it has inertia proportional to its energy ( you can change the direction in which the light flies , as every mirror proves ; the light pressure shows that there 's a force involved ) .How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a ( tiny ) mass that moves at the speed of light ? It ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does light travel at the speed of light?That one is easy: Because it is light, whatever speed it goes is the speed of light.
:-)We know that photons have a small amount of mass,No, photons have exactly zero mass (well, actually all we can say for sure is that their mass is far below anything we can measure, but if they had any mass, they would not travel at the invariant speed (c), but slightly below (but still so fast that any light we have yet measured is so close to c that we can't see the difference).
The big question is: If we found a photon mass, would we still call the invariant speed the speed of light?Anyway, out theories say the photon doesn't have any mass, and the experiments don't contradict this assumption.and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.That's not a problem for light, because it doesn't get accelerated to that speed, but as massless particle, it goes at speed of light right from its creation up to its destruction.Sooo.. WTF?Photons have mass but not inertia?Photons have no mass, but inertia.
Indeed, in the direction it goes it has infinite inertia: You cannot slow it down, nor speed it up (you might object to this claim because of the lower speed of light in media, but that's the group velocity, which isn't the speed of photons).
In the direction orthogonal to its direction of flight it has inertia proportional to its energy (you can change the direction in which the light flies, as every mirror proves; the light pressure shows that there's a force involved).How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a (tiny) mass that moves at the speed of light?It can't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661822</id>
	<title>Re:Things I want to do...</title>
	<author>styrotech</author>
	<datestamp>1269855060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? Talking about physicists not being invited to parties on a Slashdot article titled "A Users Guide to the Universe" and (so far) there are no references to the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain?</p><p>I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
Talking about physicists not being invited to parties on a Slashdot article titled " A Users Guide to the Universe " and ( so far ) there are no references to the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain ? I 'm shocked I tell you , shocked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
Talking about physicists not being invited to parties on a Slashdot article titled "A Users Guide to the Universe" and (so far) there are no references to the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain?I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660240</id>
	<title>Frankly?</title>
	<author>Bearhouse</author>
	<datestamp>1269890820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party?"</p><p>Only if she was hot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party ?
" Only if she was hot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party?
"Only if she was hot...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086</id>
	<title>Yeah, right</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269890100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As if anybody really understands this stuff. Get back to me when you have a Grand Unified Theory that isn't as full of holes as a brick of Swiss cheese.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As if anybody really understands this stuff .
Get back to me when you have a Grand Unified Theory that is n't as full of holes as a brick of Swiss cheese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As if anybody really understands this stuff.
Get back to me when you have a Grand Unified Theory that isn't as full of holes as a brick of Swiss cheese.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663692</id>
	<title>Re:not an american...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269864300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read "Have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist at a cocktail party?"</p><p>As a physicist, I thought, please no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " Have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist at a cocktail party ?
" As a physicist , I thought , please no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read "Have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist at a cocktail party?
"As a physicist, I thought, please no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176</id>
	<title>Things I want to do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the top of my list - buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party!</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the top of my list - buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the top of my list - buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662574</id>
	<title>What's on page 42 of book?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1269858360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm hoping page 42 is something like "This page intentionally left blank" or something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping page 42 is something like " This page intentionally left blank " or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping page 42 is something like "This page intentionally left blank" or something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660292</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269891120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cosmos was an amazing attempt at pop physics by an amazing guy.</p><p>It was up to date in the 1980s.  It's REALLY REALLY out of date now.  Especially the cosmology.  In the ensuing 30 years, there has been a several-orders-of-magnitude increase in the amount of data.  Cosmology isn't data starved, as it was in the early 80s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cosmos was an amazing attempt at pop physics by an amazing guy.It was up to date in the 1980s .
It 's REALLY REALLY out of date now .
Especially the cosmology .
In the ensuing 30 years , there has been a several-orders-of-magnitude increase in the amount of data .
Cosmology is n't data starved , as it was in the early 80s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cosmos was an amazing attempt at pop physics by an amazing guy.It was up to date in the 1980s.
It's REALLY REALLY out of date now.
Especially the cosmology.
In the ensuing 30 years, there has been a several-orders-of-magnitude increase in the amount of data.
Cosmology isn't data starved, as it was in the early 80s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660534</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269892320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cosmos is awesome, we watched some of it in physics in high school.</p><p>He has the uncanny ability to explain very complicated and abstract ideas in a way that most anybody can understand.  His explanation of why it's so hard to conceptualize in the 4th dimension (and beyond) was an eye opener.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cosmos is awesome , we watched some of it in physics in high school.He has the uncanny ability to explain very complicated and abstract ideas in a way that most anybody can understand .
His explanation of why it 's so hard to conceptualize in the 4th dimension ( and beyond ) was an eye opener .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cosmos is awesome, we watched some of it in physics in high school.He has the uncanny ability to explain very complicated and abstract ideas in a way that most anybody can understand.
His explanation of why it's so hard to conceptualize in the 4th dimension (and beyond) was an eye opener.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660706</id>
	<title>Good as long as they don't ask Michio Kaku</title>
	<author>NotSoHeavyD3</author>
	<datestamp>1269893040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess maybe it's just the Science and History channel but some of the answers he gives on those shows I just thought were useless. I mean first he prattles on about how weird gravity is in Newtonian mechanics because matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on objects at a distance directly. Nobody knows what that force is and this always bothered physicists. No that's not what happens we have to listen to Einstein and how he explained that really what happens is space is warped and objects are moving through this space in basically straight lines and it's so much better and doesn't have that spooky action at a distance stuff. I guess he didn't notice one thing, how does space get warped? Oh yeah, matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on space itself. Then by pulling on space objects at a distance are moved indirectly. (I get that relativity works better. My problem with Kaku's explaination was he had a bug up his ass over that mysterious force acting over a distance when talking about Newton. Yet when he talked about Einstein it didn't seem to bother him that some how matter still needs to "grab" over a distance. I was thinking to myself, "Wait why should matter warp space at all?")

Well that and when he tried to explain how we know E=MC^2 as pretty much "Well that's what Einstein said it was." (Ok, I looked that one up on Wikipedia. I actually understood their explaination and it made me understand relativity more. That was cool.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess maybe it 's just the Science and History channel but some of the answers he gives on those shows I just thought were useless .
I mean first he prattles on about how weird gravity is in Newtonian mechanics because matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on objects at a distance directly .
Nobody knows what that force is and this always bothered physicists .
No that 's not what happens we have to listen to Einstein and how he explained that really what happens is space is warped and objects are moving through this space in basically straight lines and it 's so much better and does n't have that spooky action at a distance stuff .
I guess he did n't notice one thing , how does space get warped ?
Oh yeah , matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on space itself .
Then by pulling on space objects at a distance are moved indirectly .
( I get that relativity works better .
My problem with Kaku 's explaination was he had a bug up his ass over that mysterious force acting over a distance when talking about Newton .
Yet when he talked about Einstein it did n't seem to bother him that some how matter still needs to " grab " over a distance .
I was thinking to myself , " Wait why should matter warp space at all ?
" ) Well that and when he tried to explain how we know E = MC ^ 2 as pretty much " Well that 's what Einstein said it was .
" ( Ok , I looked that one up on Wikipedia .
I actually understood their explaination and it made me understand relativity more .
That was cool .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess maybe it's just the Science and History channel but some of the answers he gives on those shows I just thought were useless.
I mean first he prattles on about how weird gravity is in Newtonian mechanics because matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on objects at a distance directly.
Nobody knows what that force is and this always bothered physicists.
No that's not what happens we have to listen to Einstein and how he explained that really what happens is space is warped and objects are moving through this space in basically straight lines and it's so much better and doesn't have that spooky action at a distance stuff.
I guess he didn't notice one thing, how does space get warped?
Oh yeah, matter magically reaches out with a mysterious force to pull on space itself.
Then by pulling on space objects at a distance are moved indirectly.
(I get that relativity works better.
My problem with Kaku's explaination was he had a bug up his ass over that mysterious force acting over a distance when talking about Newton.
Yet when he talked about Einstein it didn't seem to bother him that some how matter still needs to "grab" over a distance.
I was thinking to myself, "Wait why should matter warp space at all?
")

Well that and when he tried to explain how we know E=MC^2 as pretty much "Well that's what Einstein said it was.
" (Ok, I looked that one up on Wikipedia.
I actually understood their explaination and it made me understand relativity more.
That was cool.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668864</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1269955560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; Noble</i></p><p>They did, back when Slashdot cared about Amazon's one-click patent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; NobleThey did , back when Slashdot cared about Amazon 's one-click patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to recall the links used to go to Barnes &amp; NobleThey did, back when Slashdot cared about Amazon's one-click patent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659980</id>
	<title>goat goat goat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there any chapter aboot goat turds?!?!??!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any chapter aboot goat turds ? ! ? ! ? ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any chapter aboot goat turds?!?!??
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662434</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1269857820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>We know that photons have a small amount of mass, and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.</em> </p><p>Photons don't have any mass. Not sure where you get that idea. They have energy due to their frequency, and energy and mass are equivalent as far as general relativity is concerned, but the photon doesn't literally have a rest mass. This is because the photon <i>is never at rest.</i> </p><p>Your confusion arises because you aren't using the correct definitions of energy and momentum. When you use the proper relativistic definitions, there is nothing confusing about it.</p><p>To the issue of how a photon, which is massless, can possibly carry a momentum, you can explain this several ways. The simplest, but more opaque explanation is that photons always originate from charged matter. Because a photon carries energy (I don't see how you can dispute THAT fact), this means the energy of the charged particle which emits a photon must change somehow. Suppose this change is of the kinetic type (as opposed to a change purely in electronic state). This means the momentum of the charged particle changes, because its velocity changes. But the momentum cannot change without putting the extra momentum elsewhere -- basic conservation of momentum. Ergo, the momentum MUST be in the photon.</p><p>A more physically revelatory way of looking at it is to consider it from a wave perspective. An EM wave has an electric component and a magnetic component. When the electric component interacts with a charged particle, it causes this particle to oscillate. As the particle oscillates, it moves through the magnetic field from the very same light wave. This produces a Lorentz force which generally points in the same direction the light wave is propagating -- ergo, light carries momentum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We know that photons have a small amount of mass , and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity .
Photons do n't have any mass .
Not sure where you get that idea .
They have energy due to their frequency , and energy and mass are equivalent as far as general relativity is concerned , but the photon does n't literally have a rest mass .
This is because the photon is never at rest .
Your confusion arises because you are n't using the correct definitions of energy and momentum .
When you use the proper relativistic definitions , there is nothing confusing about it.To the issue of how a photon , which is massless , can possibly carry a momentum , you can explain this several ways .
The simplest , but more opaque explanation is that photons always originate from charged matter .
Because a photon carries energy ( I do n't see how you can dispute THAT fact ) , this means the energy of the charged particle which emits a photon must change somehow .
Suppose this change is of the kinetic type ( as opposed to a change purely in electronic state ) .
This means the momentum of the charged particle changes , because its velocity changes .
But the momentum can not change without putting the extra momentum elsewhere -- basic conservation of momentum .
Ergo , the momentum MUST be in the photon.A more physically revelatory way of looking at it is to consider it from a wave perspective .
An EM wave has an electric component and a magnetic component .
When the electric component interacts with a charged particle , it causes this particle to oscillate .
As the particle oscillates , it moves through the magnetic field from the very same light wave .
This produces a Lorentz force which generally points in the same direction the light wave is propagating -- ergo , light carries momentum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We know that photons have a small amount of mass, and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.
Photons don't have any mass.
Not sure where you get that idea.
They have energy due to their frequency, and energy and mass are equivalent as far as general relativity is concerned, but the photon doesn't literally have a rest mass.
This is because the photon is never at rest.
Your confusion arises because you aren't using the correct definitions of energy and momentum.
When you use the proper relativistic definitions, there is nothing confusing about it.To the issue of how a photon, which is massless, can possibly carry a momentum, you can explain this several ways.
The simplest, but more opaque explanation is that photons always originate from charged matter.
Because a photon carries energy (I don't see how you can dispute THAT fact), this means the energy of the charged particle which emits a photon must change somehow.
Suppose this change is of the kinetic type (as opposed to a change purely in electronic state).
This means the momentum of the charged particle changes, because its velocity changes.
But the momentum cannot change without putting the extra momentum elsewhere -- basic conservation of momentum.
Ergo, the momentum MUST be in the photon.A more physically revelatory way of looking at it is to consider it from a wave perspective.
An EM wave has an electric component and a magnetic component.
When the electric component interacts with a charged particle, it causes this particle to oscillate.
As the particle oscillates, it moves through the magnetic field from the very same light wave.
This produces a Lorentz force which generally points in the same direction the light wave is propagating -- ergo, light carries momentum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664240</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Fallingcow</author>
	<datestamp>1269867240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I second the recommendation of Asimov.  I've got most of his essay collections (from his Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction column), his guides to the Bible and Shakespeare, and recently I picked up the original version of his guide to science (that one's mostly good for the humor value; it's worth it for the chapter on the potential of atomic energy/weapons alone)</p><p>He's an amazing non-fic writer.  I don't even like his fiction--the ideas are often interesting, but the execution is usually on par with what a moderately talented high school freshman might produce--but I can't get enough of his non-fiction.</p><p>I'd love to find a collection of his non-fic online (I really, <i>really</i> want to have a searchable version) but I've not found much.  Bittorrent has failed me, certainly, though I haven't tried resorting to (*shudder*) IRC yet.  Looks like anyone who's interested will have to shell out for the real thing, but luckily most it isn't in very high demand so it's very cheap used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I second the recommendation of Asimov .
I 've got most of his essay collections ( from his Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction column ) , his guides to the Bible and Shakespeare , and recently I picked up the original version of his guide to science ( that one 's mostly good for the humor value ; it 's worth it for the chapter on the potential of atomic energy/weapons alone ) He 's an amazing non-fic writer .
I do n't even like his fiction--the ideas are often interesting , but the execution is usually on par with what a moderately talented high school freshman might produce--but I ca n't get enough of his non-fiction.I 'd love to find a collection of his non-fic online ( I really , really want to have a searchable version ) but I 've not found much .
Bittorrent has failed me , certainly , though I have n't tried resorting to ( * shudder * ) IRC yet .
Looks like anyone who 's interested will have to shell out for the real thing , but luckily most it is n't in very high demand so it 's very cheap used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I second the recommendation of Asimov.
I've got most of his essay collections (from his Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction column), his guides to the Bible and Shakespeare, and recently I picked up the original version of his guide to science (that one's mostly good for the humor value; it's worth it for the chapter on the potential of atomic energy/weapons alone)He's an amazing non-fic writer.
I don't even like his fiction--the ideas are often interesting, but the execution is usually on par with what a moderately talented high school freshman might produce--but I can't get enough of his non-fiction.I'd love to find a collection of his non-fic online (I really, really want to have a searchable version) but I've not found much.
Bittorrent has failed me, certainly, though I haven't tried resorting to (*shudder*) IRC yet.
Looks like anyone who's interested will have to shell out for the real thing, but luckily most it isn't in very high demand so it's very cheap used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269896040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years</i></p><p>Damn kids, <b>read a fucking book!</b> At least it doesn't seem to have made you illiterate, like so many I see on the internet who don't know there from they're or lose from loose, or when and when not to use an apostrophe. Books, unlike the internet, have editors and proofreaders.</p><p>Look into Isaac Asimov. He didn't just write science fiction, he was called "the great educator" because of all the nonfiction books he wrote. Dr. Asimov was a real scientist, researching and teaching biochemistry at (iirc) Boston University. His writing is very readable, his explanations unconfusing. One of my favorite Asimov volumes is <i>Asimov on Numbers</i>, which is about mathematics, always my worst subject.</p><p>You don't have to get off my lawn if you have a book in your hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't read an actual book for about 8 yearsDamn kids , read a fucking book !
At least it does n't seem to have made you illiterate , like so many I see on the internet who do n't know there from they 're or lose from loose , or when and when not to use an apostrophe .
Books , unlike the internet , have editors and proofreaders.Look into Isaac Asimov .
He did n't just write science fiction , he was called " the great educator " because of all the nonfiction books he wrote .
Dr. Asimov was a real scientist , researching and teaching biochemistry at ( iirc ) Boston University .
His writing is very readable , his explanations unconfusing .
One of my favorite Asimov volumes is Asimov on Numbers , which is about mathematics , always my worst subject.You do n't have to get off my lawn if you have a book in your hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't read an actual book for about 8 yearsDamn kids, read a fucking book!
At least it doesn't seem to have made you illiterate, like so many I see on the internet who don't know there from they're or lose from loose, or when and when not to use an apostrophe.
Books, unlike the internet, have editors and proofreaders.Look into Isaac Asimov.
He didn't just write science fiction, he was called "the great educator" because of all the nonfiction books he wrote.
Dr. Asimov was a real scientist, researching and teaching biochemistry at (iirc) Boston University.
His writing is very readable, his explanations unconfusing.
One of my favorite Asimov volumes is Asimov on Numbers, which is about mathematics, always my worst subject.You don't have to get off my lawn if you have a book in your hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660416</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, right</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269891840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure that will happen just as soon as you stop being so full of yourself.</p><p>Come on now, hurry up! The GUTOE (Grand Unified Theory Of Everything) is waiting!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that will happen just as soon as you stop being so full of yourself.Come on now , hurry up !
The GUTOE ( Grand Unified Theory Of Everything ) is waiting !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that will happen just as soon as you stop being so full of yourself.Come on now, hurry up!
The GUTOE (Grand Unified Theory Of Everything) is waiting!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661600</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>SparkleMotion88</author>
	<datestamp>1269854220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos! It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).</p></div></blockquote><p>

If you are not allowed to access Hulu, you can still see episodes of Cosmos on the view screen of your space ship of the imagination.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have any interest in this stuff , go watch Cosmos !
It 's all on Hulu and its free ( if your country is allowed access ) .
If you are not allowed to access Hulu , you can still see episodes of Cosmos on the view screen of your space ship of the imagination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos!
It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).
If you are not allowed to access Hulu, you can still see episodes of Cosmos on the view screen of your space ship of the imagination.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662272</id>
	<title>As Maggie Thatcher said</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1269857100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party? Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics' questions about time travel and black holes? Do you want to know more about modern physics, but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, no, and no.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party ?
Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics ' questions about time travel and black holes ?
Do you want to know more about modern physics , but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics ? No , no , and no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist at a cocktail party?
Do you have the burning desire to sit down with a professor and ask a laundry list of 'physics' questions about time travel and black holes?
Do you want to know more about modern physics, but want to do it with pop culture experiments instead of mathematics?No, no, and no.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660278</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1269891060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen! Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel. I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years</p><p>No offense, but I think these two things might be correlated. Books are so much better than TV... I tried watching Cosmos on Netflix, and it's just not that good. Poor video quality, content is Sagan's trademarked breathy high level wankery, etc. There's a lot of better stuff out there these days. In books. I've been reading The Fabric of the Cosmos by Greene, Physics of the Impossible (by the same guy that does the show on Science, Kaiko), but I'd really recommend Physics for the Rest of Us by Jones. It sounds like a For Dummies book, but it actually digs pretty deep into the structure of reality and the philosophical implications of science.</p><p>Again, not meaning to be a dick - I just think that Sagan is vastly overrated, and couldn't imagine going 8 years without reading a book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; but damn if that is n't the * most * inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen !
Immediately after watching it I could n't stop thinking about space travel .
I have n't read an actual book for about 8 yearsNo offense , but I think these two things might be correlated .
Books are so much better than TV... I tried watching Cosmos on Netflix , and it 's just not that good .
Poor video quality , content is Sagan 's trademarked breathy high level wankery , etc .
There 's a lot of better stuff out there these days .
In books .
I 've been reading The Fabric of the Cosmos by Greene , Physics of the Impossible ( by the same guy that does the show on Science , Kaiko ) , but I 'd really recommend Physics for the Rest of Us by Jones .
It sounds like a For Dummies book , but it actually digs pretty deep into the structure of reality and the philosophical implications of science.Again , not meaning to be a dick - I just think that Sagan is vastly overrated , and could n't imagine going 8 years without reading a book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen!
Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel.
I haven't read an actual book for about 8 yearsNo offense, but I think these two things might be correlated.
Books are so much better than TV... I tried watching Cosmos on Netflix, and it's just not that good.
Poor video quality, content is Sagan's trademarked breathy high level wankery, etc.
There's a lot of better stuff out there these days.
In books.
I've been reading The Fabric of the Cosmos by Greene, Physics of the Impossible (by the same guy that does the show on Science, Kaiko), but I'd really recommend Physics for the Rest of Us by Jones.
It sounds like a For Dummies book, but it actually digs pretty deep into the structure of reality and the philosophical implications of science.Again, not meaning to be a dick - I just think that Sagan is vastly overrated, and couldn't imagine going 8 years without reading a book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662482</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1269858000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel.</p></div><p>I saw Cosmos when it first aired. Don't worry. You'll get over it.</p><p>It's the amounts of energy and the sheer scales required that always unravels all the lofty plans. You hear about all these wild ideas, but when you start to look at the actual numbers involved (like 1000 kilometer lenses focusing city sized lasers on light sails bigger than the Earth), the hopelessness begins to settle in. That's why I always say if something out there *did* create the universe, it was a total asshole, and I'd love to punch it in the closest thing it has for a crotch.</p><p>Oh, but I'm just being a big old curmudgeon many will say. That newfangled physics will be along any day now to upend our view of the cosmos, and we'll be tossing Alcubierre drive ships out into the galaxy left and right! You betcha!</p><p>Sure, kids. Sure you will.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Immediately after watching it I could n't stop thinking about space travel.I saw Cosmos when it first aired .
Do n't worry .
You 'll get over it.It 's the amounts of energy and the sheer scales required that always unravels all the lofty plans .
You hear about all these wild ideas , but when you start to look at the actual numbers involved ( like 1000 kilometer lenses focusing city sized lasers on light sails bigger than the Earth ) , the hopelessness begins to settle in .
That 's why I always say if something out there * did * create the universe , it was a total asshole , and I 'd love to punch it in the closest thing it has for a crotch.Oh , but I 'm just being a big old curmudgeon many will say .
That newfangled physics will be along any day now to upend our view of the cosmos , and we 'll be tossing Alcubierre drive ships out into the galaxy left and right !
You betcha ! Sure , kids .
Sure you will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel.I saw Cosmos when it first aired.
Don't worry.
You'll get over it.It's the amounts of energy and the sheer scales required that always unravels all the lofty plans.
You hear about all these wild ideas, but when you start to look at the actual numbers involved (like 1000 kilometer lenses focusing city sized lasers on light sails bigger than the Earth), the hopelessness begins to settle in.
That's why I always say if something out there *did* create the universe, it was a total asshole, and I'd love to punch it in the closest thing it has for a crotch.Oh, but I'm just being a big old curmudgeon many will say.
That newfangled physics will be along any day now to upend our view of the cosmos, and we'll be tossing Alcubierre drive ships out into the galaxy left and right!
You betcha!Sure, kids.
Sure you will.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661322</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1269896040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I don't know why I like this video as much as I do...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = zSgiXGELjbc [ youtube.com ] I do n't know why I like this video as much as I do.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc [youtube.com]I don't know why I like this video as much as I do...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660556</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>mrsquid0</author>
	<datestamp>1269892380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photons do not have mass.  You may be thinking of neutrinos, which were once thought to be massless, but have been found to have a very small mass.  Only massless particles can travel at the speed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photons do not have mass .
You may be thinking of neutrinos , which were once thought to be massless , but have been found to have a very small mass .
Only massless particles can travel at the speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photons do not have mass.
You may be thinking of neutrinos, which were once thought to be massless, but have been found to have a very small mass.
Only massless particles can travel at the speed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660454</id>
	<title>XKCD - My Hobby...</title>
	<author>SeNtM</author>
	<datestamp>1269892020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The author of this article must have used the insights on time-travel to build a time-machine, travel to Wednesday and return with the XKCD comic from that day...<br> <br>
To be entitled: "My Hobby: Buttonholing physicists at cocktail parties."</htmltext>
<tokenext>The author of this article must have used the insights on time-travel to build a time-machine , travel to Wednesday and return with the XKCD comic from that day.. . To be entitled : " My Hobby : Buttonholing physicists at cocktail parties .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The author of this article must have used the insights on time-travel to build a time-machine, travel to Wednesday and return with the XKCD comic from that day... 
To be entitled: "My Hobby: Buttonholing physicists at cocktail parties.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31801164</id>
	<title>Time travel</title>
	<author>Allan Kent Pedersen</author>
	<datestamp>1270932900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>its interesting with time travels. Maybe in the future a death sentence would be carried out by travelling back and make sure the convicted were never born</htmltext>
<tokenext>its interesting with time travels .
Maybe in the future a death sentence would be carried out by travelling back and make sure the convicted were never born</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its interesting with time travels.
Maybe in the future a death sentence would be carried out by travelling back and make sure the convicted were never born</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660658</id>
	<title>Re:not an american...</title>
	<author>OctaviusIII</author>
	<datestamp>1269892800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a saying that means, as was said above, "to detain someone in conversation against their wishes".  It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them, no butts required.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a saying that means , as was said above , " to detain someone in conversation against their wishes " .
It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them , no butts required .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a saying that means, as was said above, "to detain someone in conversation against their wishes".
It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them, no butts required.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660820</id>
	<title>Brian Greene</title>
	<author>Dthief</author>
	<datestamp>1269893400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm curious how much more one would get out of this versus reading Brian Greenes' books.

Or is it more like a newer version of this with a bit more time behind it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious how much more one would get out of this versus reading Brian Greenes ' books .
Or is it more like a newer version of this with a bit more time behind it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious how much more one would get out of this versus reading Brian Greenes' books.
Or is it more like a newer version of this with a bit more time behind it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663312</id>
	<title>You insensitive clod</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1269862200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a saying that means, as was said above, "to detain someone in conversation against their wishes".  It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them, no butts required.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a saying that means , as was said above , " to detain someone in conversation against their wishes " .
It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them , no butts required .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a saying that means, as was said above, "to detain someone in conversation against their wishes".
It carries the imagery of forcing someone into a space the size of a buttonhole so you can have your conversational way with them, no butts required.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660210</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a theory.</p><p>Take every variable possible, make sure you include them all, and put them on one side of the equation. Now, on the other side, put 42. I guarantee either you find me correct or I'll find something you are missing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a theory.Take every variable possible , make sure you include them all , and put them on one side of the equation .
Now , on the other side , put 42 .
I guarantee either you find me correct or I 'll find something you are missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a theory.Take every variable possible, make sure you include them all, and put them on one side of the equation.
Now, on the other side, put 42.
I guarantee either you find me correct or I'll find something you are missing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661242</id>
	<title>There are wmone physicists and they're pretty!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269895500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes they do. And one of them, <a href="http://img.timeinc.net/time/time100/2007/images/lisa\_randall.jpg" title="timeinc.net" rel="nofollow">Lisa Randall of Harvard</a> [timeinc.net], is one I'd like to buttonhole a few times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes they do .
And one of them , Lisa Randall of Harvard [ timeinc.net ] , is one I 'd like to buttonhole a few times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes they do.
And one of them, Lisa Randall of Harvard [timeinc.net], is one I'd like to buttonhole a few times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</id>
	<title>Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Facegarden</author>
	<datestamp>1269890280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just started watching Carl Sagan's Cosmos on Hulu. I'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80's, but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen! Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel. I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years, and this weekend i bought "A Brief History of Time" to learn even more. I'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.</p><p>If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos! It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).</p><p>Really, so inspiring its crazy!<br>-Taylor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just started watching Carl Sagan 's Cosmos on Hulu .
I 'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80 's , but damn if that is n't the * most * inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen !
Immediately after watching it I could n't stop thinking about space travel .
I have n't read an actual book for about 8 years , and this weekend i bought " A Brief History of Time " to learn even more .
I 'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.If you have any interest in this stuff , go watch Cosmos !
It 's all on Hulu and its free ( if your country is allowed access ) .Really , so inspiring its crazy ! -Taylor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just started watching Carl Sagan's Cosmos on Hulu.
I'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80's, but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen!
Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel.
I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years, and this weekend i bought "A Brief History of Time" to learn even more.
I'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos!
It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).Really, so inspiring its crazy!-Taylor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660674</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1269892860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here, this may help clear up your misunderstanding: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here , this may help clear up your misunderstanding : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here, this may help clear up your misunderstanding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661390</id>
	<title>Re:ewww</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269896340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What font are you using?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What font are you using ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What font are you using?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660424</id>
	<title>Jeff Goldblum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269891900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we sure this book wasn't written by Jeff Goldblum?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we sure this book was n't written by Jeff Goldblum ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we sure this book wasn't written by Jeff Goldblum?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660600</id>
	<title>Perils</title>
	<author>bluefoxlucid</author>
	<datestamp>1269892560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... in Italic, Perils looks more like 'Penis'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>... in Italic , Perils looks more like 'Penis ' : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... in Italic, Perils looks more like 'Penis' :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662824</id>
	<title>User's Guide?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269859560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when do user's read the guide anyway? Is there a quick start guide?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when do user 's read the guide anyway ?
Is there a quick start guide ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when do user's read the guide anyway?
Is there a quick start guide?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660404</id>
	<title>ewww</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269891720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>i really hate skinny italic fonts. i read <p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Surviving the Perils of Black Holes, Time Paradoxes, and Quantum Uncertainty"</i></p> </div><p> as Surviving the Penis of Black Holes...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i really hate skinny italic fonts .
i read Surviving the Perils of Black Holes , Time Paradoxes , and Quantum Uncertainty " as Surviving the Penis of Black Holes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i really hate skinny italic fonts.
i read  Surviving the Perils of Black Holes, Time Paradoxes, and Quantum Uncertainty"  as Surviving the Penis of Black Holes...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660508</id>
	<title>Ohhhh...it said "buttonhole"...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269892260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad I read that first sentence a second time...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad I read that first sentence a second time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad I read that first sentence a second time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659964</id>
	<title>I read that as...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..."have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist".</p><p>Well, brains ARE sexy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... " have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist " .Well , brains ARE sexy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..."have you ever wanted to butthole a physicist".Well, brains ARE sexy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31666124</id>
	<title>Pff, sissy stuff!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269880140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Real men start with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QED\_(book)" title="wikipedia.org">QED</a> [wikipedia.org] as a light bedside reading! And <em>then</em> switch to the real challenging stuff! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Real men start with QED [ wikipedia.org ] as a light bedside reading !
And then switch to the real challenging stuff !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real men start with QED [wikipedia.org] as a light bedside reading!
And then switch to the real challenging stuff!
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660998</id>
	<title>You insensitive clod</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1269894120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was <i>my</i> girlfriend, and she went off with him. He promised her that once she understood the Schroedinger equation, she would really get into big bangs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was my girlfriend , and she went off with him .
He promised her that once she understood the Schroedinger equation , she would really get into big bangs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was my girlfriend, and she went off with him.
He promised her that once she understood the Schroedinger equation, she would really get into big bangs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660466</id>
	<title>Err I don't think that's correct</title>
	<author>NotSoHeavyD3</author>
	<datestamp>1269892080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From what I remember photons are massless but carry momentum. (Admittedly I only took up to physics 102 so my understanding of modern physics is definitely limited.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I remember photons are massless but carry momentum .
( Admittedly I only took up to physics 102 so my understanding of modern physics is definitely limited .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I remember photons are massless but carry momentum.
(Admittedly I only took up to physics 102 so my understanding of modern physics is definitely limited.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662372</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269857580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just started watching Carl Sagan's Cosmos on Hulu. I'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80's, but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen! Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel. I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years, and this weekend i bought "A Brief History of Time" to learn even more. I'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.</p><p>If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos! It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).</p><p>Really, so inspiring its crazy!<br>-Taylor</p></div><p>Oh, sure.. now Hulu will be slash-dotted by billions and billions of users.</p><p>But seriously, Carl Sagan rocked hard with Cosmos.  And was a pothead to boot, so how can you go wrong?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just started watching Carl Sagan 's Cosmos on Hulu .
I 'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80 's , but damn if that is n't the * most * inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen !
Immediately after watching it I could n't stop thinking about space travel .
I have n't read an actual book for about 8 years , and this weekend i bought " A Brief History of Time " to learn even more .
I 'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.If you have any interest in this stuff , go watch Cosmos !
It 's all on Hulu and its free ( if your country is allowed access ) .Really , so inspiring its crazy ! -TaylorOh , sure.. now Hulu will be slash-dotted by billions and billions of users.But seriously , Carl Sagan rocked hard with Cosmos .
And was a pothead to boot , so how can you go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just started watching Carl Sagan's Cosmos on Hulu.
I'm 25 and was just a bit too young to watch it when it aired in the 80's, but damn if that isn't the *most* inspiring show about the universe I have ever seen!
Immediately after watching it I couldn't stop thinking about space travel.
I haven't read an actual book for about 8 years, and this weekend i bought "A Brief History of Time" to learn even more.
I'm looking at getting a decent telescope too.If you have any interest in this stuff, go watch Cosmos!
It's all on Hulu and its free (if your country is allowed access).Really, so inspiring its crazy!-TaylorOh, sure.. now Hulu will be slash-dotted by billions and billions of users.But seriously, Carl Sagan rocked hard with Cosmos.
And was a pothead to boot, so how can you go wrong?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660046</id>
	<title>Re:Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can tell you are a narcissist, but just because females won't have sex with you does not mean they don't exist. Also, most men's penises will not fit in a buttonhole. If yours does, you might actually be a girl, and that might just be your clit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can tell you are a narcissist , but just because females wo n't have sex with you does not mean they do n't exist .
Also , most men 's penises will not fit in a buttonhole .
If yours does , you might actually be a girl , and that might just be your clit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can tell you are a narcissist, but just because females won't have sex with you does not mean they don't exist.
Also, most men's penises will not fit in a buttonhole.
If yours does, you might actually be a girl, and that might just be your clit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660922</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269893880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"so inspiring its crazy"</p><p>It has gotten even better since.<br>You'll run into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" so inspiring its crazy " It has gotten even better since.You 'll run into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"so inspiring its crazy"It has gotten even better since.You'll run into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660646</id>
	<title>Good thing we have you!</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1269892740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without your cogent and well referenced criticisms, we would all blindly trust whatever those stupid, stupid scientists tell us. Seriously, though, you DO know that our current theories are quite simply, the most accurate and comprehensive theories mankind has ever developed, right? Your knee-jerk dismissal illustrates nothing more than your own ignorance and prejudice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without your cogent and well referenced criticisms , we would all blindly trust whatever those stupid , stupid scientists tell us .
Seriously , though , you DO know that our current theories are quite simply , the most accurate and comprehensive theories mankind has ever developed , right ?
Your knee-jerk dismissal illustrates nothing more than your own ignorance and prejudice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without your cogent and well referenced criticisms, we would all blindly trust whatever those stupid, stupid scientists tell us.
Seriously, though, you DO know that our current theories are quite simply, the most accurate and comprehensive theories mankind has ever developed, right?
Your knee-jerk dismissal illustrates nothing more than your own ignorance and prejudice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694</id>
	<title>Re:Things I want to do...</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1269892980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are of course never going to achieve your goal, largely because physicists aren't invited to cocktail parties. At least, not since one of them tried to sit down with the hostess and show her how to derive the Schrodinger Equation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are of course never going to achieve your goal , largely because physicists are n't invited to cocktail parties .
At least , not since one of them tried to sit down with the hostess and show her how to derive the Schrodinger Equation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are of course never going to achieve your goal, largely because physicists aren't invited to cocktail parties.
At least, not since one of them tried to sit down with the hostess and show her how to derive the Schrodinger Equation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</id>
	<title>Random question about light:</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1269891480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does light travel at the speed of light?</p><p>We know that photons have a small amount of mass, and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.</p><p>Sooo.. WTF?<br>Photons have mass but not inertia?</p><p>How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a (tiny) mass that moves at the speed of light?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does light travel at the speed of light ? We know that photons have a small amount of mass , and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.Sooo.. WTF ? Photons have mass but not inertia ? How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a ( tiny ) mass that moves at the speed of light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does light travel at the speed of light?We know that photons have a small amount of mass, and we know that the force required to accelerate to the speed of light approaches infinity.Sooo.. WTF?Photons have mass but not inertia?How can a little AAA battery/LED combo produce a (tiny) mass that moves at the speed of light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660288</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269891120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You read the last page of a mystery novel first, don't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You read the last page of a mystery novel first , do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You read the last page of a mystery novel first, don't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661696</id>
	<title>Re:Cosmos!</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1269854580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of Sagan's books are quite inspiring too. Pale Blue Dot and Demon Haunted World are 2 of his best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of Sagan 's books are quite inspiring too .
Pale Blue Dot and Demon Haunted World are 2 of his best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of Sagan's books are quite inspiring too.
Pale Blue Dot and Demon Haunted World are 2 of his best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660474</id>
	<title>Surviving the WHAT?</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1269892080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In italics, it looks like it says "Surviving the Penis of Black Holes". <br> <br> <br>
Gives it a new twist...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In italics , it looks like it says " Surviving the Penis of Black Holes " .
Gives it a new twist.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In italics, it looks like it says "Surviving the Penis of Black Holes".
Gives it a new twist...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660264</id>
	<title>Physicists at cocktail party?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know that is highly improbable, otherwise someone would have invented the infinite improbability drive by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know that is highly improbable , otherwise someone would have invented the infinite improbability drive by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know that is highly improbable, otherwise someone would have invented the infinite improbability drive by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664138</id>
	<title>I think I've seen this before...</title>
	<author>drkoemans</author>
	<datestamp>1269866760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And it was Kip Thorne's book Black Holes and Time Warps. Fantastic book targeted at the layperson with many of the examples described in this review as well. Except it was written 1995. 5 star reviews on amazon. what more can i say? How about a forward from Hawking. It has that too.
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Black-Holes-Time-Warps-Commonwealth/dp/0393312763/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1269906159&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Black-Holes-Time-Warps-Commonwealth/dp/0393312763/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1269906159&amp;sr=8-1</a> [amazon.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it was Kip Thorne 's book Black Holes and Time Warps .
Fantastic book targeted at the layperson with many of the examples described in this review as well .
Except it was written 1995 .
5 star reviews on amazon .
what more can i say ?
How about a forward from Hawking .
It has that too .
http : //www.amazon.com/Black-Holes-Time-Warps-Commonwealth/dp/0393312763/ref = sr \ _1 \ _1 ? ie = UTF8&amp;s = books&amp;qid = 1269906159&amp;sr = 8-1 [ amazon.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it was Kip Thorne's book Black Holes and Time Warps.
Fantastic book targeted at the layperson with many of the examples described in this review as well.
Except it was written 1995.
5 star reviews on amazon.
what more can i say?
How about a forward from Hawking.
It has that too.
http://www.amazon.com/Black-Holes-Time-Warps-Commonwealth/dp/0393312763/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1269906159&amp;sr=8-1 [amazon.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660030</id>
	<title>I can't help it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else read this as 'Surviving the penis of black holes?'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else read this as 'Surviving the penis of black holes ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else read this as 'Surviving the penis of black holes?
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664660</id>
	<title>Re:Good thing we have you!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269869460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My dismissal was tongue-in-cheek. The point was, before one goes writing a "User's Guide to the Universe", perhaps one should wait until they actually figure out how the universe actually works. String theory is based on wild guesses and conjecture that just appears to make the math work out right. That could all change in a short time. Personally, I'm hoping <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony\_Garrett\_Lisi" title="wikipedia.org">Garrett Lisi</a> [wikipedia.org] has the right idea, but there remains a huge amount of work to be done to prove or disprove his theories... has he made any predictions that can actually be tested by the LHC? Have the String Theorists made any predictions that can be tested by the LHC?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My dismissal was tongue-in-cheek .
The point was , before one goes writing a " User 's Guide to the Universe " , perhaps one should wait until they actually figure out how the universe actually works .
String theory is based on wild guesses and conjecture that just appears to make the math work out right .
That could all change in a short time .
Personally , I 'm hoping Garrett Lisi [ wikipedia.org ] has the right idea , but there remains a huge amount of work to be done to prove or disprove his theories... has he made any predictions that can actually be tested by the LHC ?
Have the String Theorists made any predictions that can be tested by the LHC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My dismissal was tongue-in-cheek.
The point was, before one goes writing a "User's Guide to the Universe", perhaps one should wait until they actually figure out how the universe actually works.
String theory is based on wild guesses and conjecture that just appears to make the math work out right.
That could all change in a short time.
Personally, I'm hoping Garrett Lisi [wikipedia.org] has the right idea, but there remains a huge amount of work to be done to prove or disprove his theories... has he made any predictions that can actually be tested by the LHC?
Have the String Theorists made any predictions that can be tested by the LHC?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668074</id>
	<title>Re:Does it come with a towel?</title>
	<author>ClericofAneron</author>
	<datestamp>1269946320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll see your towel and raise you 42.

(my apologies if this double posts...buggy today)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll see your towel and raise you 42 .
( my apologies if this double posts...buggy today )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll see your towel and raise you 42.
(my apologies if this double posts...buggy today)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662442</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, right</title>
	<author>mr\_walrus</author>
	<datestamp>1269857820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will i find my pair of dice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will i find my pair of dice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will i find my pair of dice?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661228</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>sebaseba</author>
	<datestamp>1269895380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The battery can produce photons as a single photon doesn't have much of energy: around 1 eV which is 1.602*10^-19 J.
One battery has around 1.5 V and 1000 mAh, that would be 1,5 Wh or 5,4 kJ.
A single AAA battery can generate 3,37*10^22 photons with 1 eV (implying 100\% efficiency).

E = mc^2 = h.

 being frequency,
h being planck's constant,
c being the speed of light,
m being mass and E for energy.

Moving photons do have a (virtual?) mass as in they are affected by gravity and they do affect others with their own gravity, albeit very weak one.

They don't have any rest mass, which is mass at rest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The battery can produce photons as a single photon does n't have much of energy : around 1 eV which is 1.602 * 10 ^ -19 J . One battery has around 1.5 V and 1000 mAh , that would be 1,5 Wh or 5,4 kJ .
A single AAA battery can generate 3,37 * 10 ^ 22 photons with 1 eV ( implying 100 \ % efficiency ) .
E = mc ^ 2 = h . being frequency , h being planck 's constant , c being the speed of light , m being mass and E for energy .
Moving photons do have a ( virtual ?
) mass as in they are affected by gravity and they do affect others with their own gravity , albeit very weak one .
They do n't have any rest mass , which is mass at rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The battery can produce photons as a single photon doesn't have much of energy: around 1 eV which is 1.602*10^-19 J.
One battery has around 1.5 V and 1000 mAh, that would be 1,5 Wh or 5,4 kJ.
A single AAA battery can generate 3,37*10^22 photons with 1 eV (implying 100\% efficiency).
E = mc^2 = h.

 being frequency,
h being planck's constant,
c being the speed of light,
m being mass and E for energy.
Moving photons do have a (virtual?
) mass as in they are affected by gravity and they do affect others with their own gravity, albeit very weak one.
They don't have any rest mass, which is mass at rest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660132</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1269890340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds more like a publisher's sales pitch than a review, and it is accompanied by an affiliate link. How did editors allow something like this? Please don't buy this book through the link provided. If you must buy it, go to amazon.com and search for it. At least don't encourage spam on slashdot since editors obviously don't care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds more like a publisher 's sales pitch than a review , and it is accompanied by an affiliate link .
How did editors allow something like this ?
Please do n't buy this book through the link provided .
If you must buy it , go to amazon.com and search for it .
At least do n't encourage spam on slashdot since editors obviously do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds more like a publisher's sales pitch than a review, and it is accompanied by an affiliate link.
How did editors allow something like this?
Please don't buy this book through the link provided.
If you must buy it, go to amazon.com and search for it.
At least don't encourage spam on slashdot since editors obviously don't care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660692</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>mhamel</author>
	<datestamp>1269892920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photons have no mass. That's one of the things that define them. There is a nice article on wikipedia about it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photons have no mass .
That 's one of the things that define them .
There is a nice article on wikipedia about it : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photons have no mass.
That's one of the things that define them.
There is a nice article on wikipedia about it :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661204</id>
	<title>Understanding Physics by Isaac Asimov</title>
	<author>bug</author>
	<datestamp>1269895200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another great book on physics for the uninitiated is Isaac Asimov's non-fiction book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0880292512/" title="amazon.com">Understanding Physics</a> [amazon.com].  Even after all these decades, it's still a fantastic book, and a surprisingly easy read.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another great book on physics for the uninitiated is Isaac Asimov 's non-fiction book , Understanding Physics [ amazon.com ] .
Even after all these decades , it 's still a fantastic book , and a surprisingly easy read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another great book on physics for the uninitiated is Isaac Asimov's non-fiction book, Understanding Physics [amazon.com].
Even after all these decades, it's still a fantastic book, and a surprisingly easy read.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661758</id>
	<title>Re:Good as long as they don't ask Michio Kaku</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269854760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wait why should matter warp space at all</i></p><p>The universe is warped. The reason things pull together is that the universe sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait why should matter warp space at allThe universe is warped .
The reason things pull together is that the universe sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait why should matter warp space at allThe universe is warped.
The reason things pull together is that the universe sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662334</id>
	<title>Re:Things I want to do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269857400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well it sure sounds preferable to cock-holing a physicist at a butt-tail party.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it sure sounds preferable to cock-holing a physicist at a butt-tail party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it sure sounds preferable to cock-holing a physicist at a butt-tail party.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660302</id>
	<title>Advice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269891120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DON'T PANIC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DO N'T PANIC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DON'T PANIC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960</id>
	<title>Have you ever wanted to buttonhole a physicist?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, trick question. There are no female physicists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , trick question .
There are no female physicists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, trick question.
There are no female physicists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660966</id>
	<title>Re:Random question about light:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269894000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photons don't have mass, fucktard. GB2 physics class.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photons do n't have mass , fucktard .
GB2 physics class .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photons don't have mass, fucktard.
GB2 physics class.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098</id>
	<title>not an american...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does "buttonhole" mean what I think it means?  (eg: something to do with your butt hole?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does " buttonhole " mean what I think it means ?
( eg : something to do with your butt hole ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does "buttonhole" mean what I think it means?
(eg: something to do with your butt hole?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1327246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31663692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31659980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31664240
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31668074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1327246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31662334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31661822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1327246.31660998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
