<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_28_2259243</id>
	<title><em>Battlefield Earth</em> Screenwriter Accepts Razzie</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269774420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The New York Post has a story about J.D. Shapiro, and his <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/penned\_the\_suckiest\_movie\_ever\_sorry\_MdXedZpTMWJmfpw80Xc7aO/0">gracious acceptance of a Razzie</a> award for writing <em>Battlefield Earth</em>.  He first offers an apology to anyone who has seen it, then he offers a funny, outsider's perspective of dealing with Scientologists, and the subsequent mangling of his script for what was once allegedly referred to by John Travolta as 'The <em>Schindler's List</em> of Sci-Fi.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The New York Post has a story about J.D .
Shapiro , and his gracious acceptance of a Razzie award for writing Battlefield Earth .
He first offers an apology to anyone who has seen it , then he offers a funny , outsider 's perspective of dealing with Scientologists , and the subsequent mangling of his script for what was once allegedly referred to by John Travolta as 'The Schindler 's List of Sci-Fi .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The New York Post has a story about J.D.
Shapiro, and his gracious acceptance of a Razzie award for writing Battlefield Earth.
He first offers an apology to anyone who has seen it, then he offers a funny, outsider's perspective of dealing with Scientologists, and the subsequent mangling of his script for what was once allegedly referred to by John Travolta as 'The Schindler's List of Sci-Fi.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657000</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1269877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a fun and entertaining read.</p><p>, "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item"<br>So? You acts as if those two things can't coexist int he same person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a fun and entertaining read. , " OMG , this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut " until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected , erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item " So ?
You acts as if those two things ca n't coexist int he same person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a fun and entertaining read., "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item"So?
You acts as if those two things can't coexist int he same person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651790</id>
	<title>Battlefield Earth was so bad...</title>
	<author>preaction</author>
	<datestamp>1269781860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... my VCR spit out the tape about 5 minutes in, thus saving me from ever seeing any substantial part of the movie and wanting to claw my own eyes out.

That VCR no longer works at all, but I keep him around, just to stop by and say "Thanks" every once in a while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... my VCR spit out the tape about 5 minutes in , thus saving me from ever seeing any substantial part of the movie and wanting to claw my own eyes out .
That VCR no longer works at all , but I keep him around , just to stop by and say " Thanks " every once in a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... my VCR spit out the tape about 5 minutes in, thus saving me from ever seeing any substantial part of the movie and wanting to claw my own eyes out.
That VCR no longer works at all, but I keep him around, just to stop by and say "Thanks" every once in a while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657204</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Fujisawa Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1269877920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Normally I like pulp; but I never made it far enough into that doorstop to get interested or care. I think I made it through about the first 5 chapters before getting bored and chucking it. It was highly unmemorable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Normally I like pulp ; but I never made it far enough into that doorstop to get interested or care .
I think I made it through about the first 5 chapters before getting bored and chucking it .
It was highly unmemorable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Normally I like pulp; but I never made it far enough into that doorstop to get interested or care.
I think I made it through about the first 5 chapters before getting bored and chucking it.
It was highly unmemorable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653144</id>
	<title>Re:This guy rocks</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1269795900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Read the whole interview. It's totally worth it. A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs.</p></div><p>I sense a Hollywood pitch...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the whole interview .
It 's totally worth it .
A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs.I sense a Hollywood pitch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the whole interview.
It's totally worth it.
A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs.I sense a Hollywood pitch...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651500</id>
	<title>ROMFL!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269779100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you hated the movie, just read the speech linked in the summary.  That, is, absolutely, hilarious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you hated the movie , just read the speech linked in the summary .
That , is , absolutely , hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you hated the movie, just read the speech linked in the summary.
That, is, absolutely, hilarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653172</id>
	<title>Re:No way it was the worst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269796140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These guys solicit money from these "interested investors", they put together a really bad film crew, some really bad actors and they make a movie.  Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons, they put together a lame party for the "investors" with the has beens as main course.</p></div><p>But enough about Uwe Boll's career...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These guys solicit money from these " interested investors " , they put together a really bad film crew , some really bad actors and they make a movie .
Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons , they put together a lame party for the " investors " with the has beens as main course.But enough about Uwe Boll 's career.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These guys solicit money from these "interested investors", they put together a really bad film crew, some really bad actors and they make a movie.
Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons, they put together a lame party for the "investors" with the has beens as main course.But enough about Uwe Boll's career...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31659056</id>
	<title>Great Movie!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269885660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>one of my favorites!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>one of my favorites !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one of my favorites!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652984</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269794460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you all getting Battlefield Earth mixed up with his "Mission Earth" series of books?</p><p>While not the best piece of fiction, it actually does make sense and offers some social commentary on how little minds put into big roles can end up ruining the company (or species as it were).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you all getting Battlefield Earth mixed up with his " Mission Earth " series of books ? While not the best piece of fiction , it actually does make sense and offers some social commentary on how little minds put into big roles can end up ruining the company ( or species as it were ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you all getting Battlefield Earth mixed up with his "Mission Earth" series of books?While not the best piece of fiction, it actually does make sense and offers some social commentary on how little minds put into big roles can end up ruining the company (or species as it were).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31663234</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269861840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not Dune or LotR, but it's an entertaining read.  I very much enjoyed the book.</p><p>The movie... is the only movie I've ever considered actually walking out of.  (Yes, to my great shame, I saw it in the theater.)  I always like to stay for the entire movie, even if it's bad, just to see if it somehow redeems itself later on in the film.  But at some point very early on in BE, it occurred to me that no matter how well it ended, it couldn't possibly make up for the travesty it had been so far.  But still I stayed... and I've regretted it ever since.  lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Dune or LotR , but it 's an entertaining read .
I very much enjoyed the book.The movie... is the only movie I 've ever considered actually walking out of .
( Yes , to my great shame , I saw it in the theater .
) I always like to stay for the entire movie , even if it 's bad , just to see if it somehow redeems itself later on in the film .
But at some point very early on in BE , it occurred to me that no matter how well it ended , it could n't possibly make up for the travesty it had been so far .
But still I stayed... and I 've regretted it ever since .
lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Dune or LotR, but it's an entertaining read.
I very much enjoyed the book.The movie... is the only movie I've ever considered actually walking out of.
(Yes, to my great shame, I saw it in the theater.
)  I always like to stay for the entire movie, even if it's bad, just to see if it somehow redeems itself later on in the film.
But at some point very early on in BE, it occurred to me that no matter how well it ended, it couldn't possibly make up for the travesty it had been so far.
But still I stayed... and I've regretted it ever since.
lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657180</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269877800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft. You read it and think, "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, you've actually verified that his sources are themselves reliable and that his citations actually say what he says they do?  There's nothing about being being extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent that intrinsically rules out also being a whacked out conspiracy nut.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda , entitled Sinister Forces , a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft .
You read it and think , " OMG , this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut " until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected , erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.So , you 've actually verified that his sources are themselves reliable and that his citations actually say what he says they do ?
There 's nothing about being being extremely well-respected , erudite and diligent that intrinsically rules out also being a whacked out conspiracy nut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft.
You read it and think, "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.So, you've actually verified that his sources are themselves reliable and that his citations actually say what he says they do?
There's nothing about being being extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent that intrinsically rules out also being a whacked out conspiracy nut.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654608</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1269857580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Moderators! You mark this informative when it describes an orangutan's ass as purple?! Honestly, what is Slashdot coming to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moderators !
You mark this informative when it describes an orangutan 's ass as purple ? !
Honestly , what is Slashdot coming to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moderators!
You mark this informative when it describes an orangutan's ass as purple?!
Honestly, what is Slashdot coming to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653568</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269800520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft. [. .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.] It's a pretty hard book to find, but it's worth the effort for the wild ride.</i></p><p>Yeah man, that was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sinister-Forces-Nine-Political-Witchcraft/dp/0975290622" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">TOUGH.</a> [amazon.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda , entitled Sinister Forces , a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft .
[ . .
. ] It 's a pretty hard book to find , but it 's worth the effort for the wild ride.Yeah man , that was TOUGH .
[ amazon.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft.
[. .
.] It's a pretty hard book to find, but it's worth the effort for the wild ride.Yeah man, that was TOUGH.
[amazon.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651522</id>
	<title>Didn't think it through....</title>
	<author>drjuggler</author>
	<datestamp>1269779340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFA: "In the end, did Scientology get me laid? What do you think?"

That's why I became Unitarian! Not much screenplay material here oddly enough...</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : " In the end , did Scientology get me laid ?
What do you think ?
" That 's why I became Unitarian !
Not much screenplay material here oddly enough.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: "In the end, did Scientology get me laid?
What do you think?
"

That's why I became Unitarian!
Not much screenplay material here oddly enough...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1269783000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I've not actually read the novel, but apparently it's pretty good.</p></div></blockquote><p>Unh-uh.  Not good at all.  It's barely even good as pulp sci-fi.</p><p>There were some great science fiction writers working at the same time as Hubbard, and Battlefield Earth is little more than a weak echo of them.  The ideas are mostly retreads and the prose as purple as an orangutan's ass.</p><p>The only Hubbard story that's really interesting is the real one about his involvement with Jack Parsons, military intelligence mind control experiments, and Alistair Crowley's Church of Thelema.  It's got everything:  twisted sex, drugs, madness, Nazis, spies, violence and more real-life science fiction than a shelf full of novels.  There's even an indirect Charlie Manson connection, but I'll leave that easter egg for the more curious and determined among you to discover for yourselves.</p><p>A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled <b>Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft</b>.  You read it and think, "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.</p><p>It's a pretty hard book to find, but it's worth the effort for the wild ride.</p><p>Oh, and not to make it sound too much like something from a Neal Stephenson novel, but it's rumored that Peter Levenda, who first became known for his books about the history of Chinese-American trade (which are still taught in business schools), is also one of the "translators" of <b>The Necronomicon</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've not actually read the novel , but apparently it 's pretty good.Unh-uh .
Not good at all .
It 's barely even good as pulp sci-fi.There were some great science fiction writers working at the same time as Hubbard , and Battlefield Earth is little more than a weak echo of them .
The ideas are mostly retreads and the prose as purple as an orangutan 's ass.The only Hubbard story that 's really interesting is the real one about his involvement with Jack Parsons , military intelligence mind control experiments , and Alistair Crowley 's Church of Thelema .
It 's got everything : twisted sex , drugs , madness , Nazis , spies , violence and more real-life science fiction than a shelf full of novels .
There 's even an indirect Charlie Manson connection , but I 'll leave that easter egg for the more curious and determined among you to discover for yourselves.A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda , entitled Sinister Forces , a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft .
You read it and think , " OMG , this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut " until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected , erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.It 's a pretty hard book to find , but it 's worth the effort for the wild ride.Oh , and not to make it sound too much like something from a Neal Stephenson novel , but it 's rumored that Peter Levenda , who first became known for his books about the history of Chinese-American trade ( which are still taught in business schools ) , is also one of the " translators " of The Necronomicon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've not actually read the novel, but apparently it's pretty good.Unh-uh.
Not good at all.
It's barely even good as pulp sci-fi.There were some great science fiction writers working at the same time as Hubbard, and Battlefield Earth is little more than a weak echo of them.
The ideas are mostly retreads and the prose as purple as an orangutan's ass.The only Hubbard story that's really interesting is the real one about his involvement with Jack Parsons, military intelligence mind control experiments, and Alistair Crowley's Church of Thelema.
It's got everything:  twisted sex, drugs, madness, Nazis, spies, violence and more real-life science fiction than a shelf full of novels.
There's even an indirect Charlie Manson connection, but I'll leave that easter egg for the more curious and determined among you to discover for yourselves.A lot of it is laid out in the most excellent trilogy by the historian Peter Levenda, entitled Sinister Forces, a Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft.
You read it and think, "OMG, this is some crazy bat-shit from a whacked-out conspiracy nut" until you learn that Levenda is an extremely well-respected, erudite and diligent historian who carefully sources every single item.It's a pretty hard book to find, but it's worth the effort for the wild ride.Oh, and not to make it sound too much like something from a Neal Stephenson novel, but it's rumored that Peter Levenda, who first became known for his books about the history of Chinese-American trade (which are still taught in business schools), is also one of the "translators" of The Necronomicon.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651462</id>
	<title>YouTube Link...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269778860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D. Shapiro:<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D .
Shapiro : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = DKlEE18R5d8 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D.
Shapiro: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652916</id>
	<title>Re:The lesson here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269793920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Braveheart</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Braveheart</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Braveheart</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652860</id>
	<title>I won't begrudge anyone a paycheck, but . . .</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1269793020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did this guy really not think the involvement of the Church of Scientology was gonna cause the whole endeavor to get a tiny bit weird?</p><p>Also, there were major red flags.  For example, he says that he pretty much repeatedly insulted them to their faces and they just kept on with the offer.  It's pretty clear they were using him to get L Ron's unsellable script through the door far enough that the studios would accept there was no going back.  They used him to front a sellable, perhaps even awesome, script to the studio when they knew all along the were filming their version of the movie.</p><p>They didn't bat an eyelash at his misbehavior because he was their frontman.</p><p>It's pretty psychopathic behavior when you get right down to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did this guy really not think the involvement of the Church of Scientology was gon na cause the whole endeavor to get a tiny bit weird ? Also , there were major red flags .
For example , he says that he pretty much repeatedly insulted them to their faces and they just kept on with the offer .
It 's pretty clear they were using him to get L Ron 's unsellable script through the door far enough that the studios would accept there was no going back .
They used him to front a sellable , perhaps even awesome , script to the studio when they knew all along the were filming their version of the movie.They did n't bat an eyelash at his misbehavior because he was their frontman.It 's pretty psychopathic behavior when you get right down to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did this guy really not think the involvement of the Church of Scientology was gonna cause the whole endeavor to get a tiny bit weird?Also, there were major red flags.
For example, he says that he pretty much repeatedly insulted them to their faces and they just kept on with the offer.
It's pretty clear they were using him to get L Ron's unsellable script through the door far enough that the studios would accept there was no going back.
They used him to front a sellable, perhaps even awesome, script to the studio when they knew all along the were filming their version of the movie.They didn't bat an eyelash at his misbehavior because he was their frontman.It's pretty psychopathic behavior when you get right down to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651708</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1269780960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The novel isn't good.  It is however a page turner.  Hubbard was a good pulp writer, and Battlefield Earth is pretty much a pulp cliffhanger series, 1000 pages long.  Lots of short chapters, in which our intrepid hero is always about to be killed or captured.  The story never makes a lot of sense, but its fun watching it go along.  It would make a great half hour summer filler series.  Each chapter feels about like The Venture Brothers level of dramatization.  As a movie, you have to cut out way too much to get the right campy feel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The novel is n't good .
It is however a page turner .
Hubbard was a good pulp writer , and Battlefield Earth is pretty much a pulp cliffhanger series , 1000 pages long .
Lots of short chapters , in which our intrepid hero is always about to be killed or captured .
The story never makes a lot of sense , but its fun watching it go along .
It would make a great half hour summer filler series .
Each chapter feels about like The Venture Brothers level of dramatization .
As a movie , you have to cut out way too much to get the right campy feel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The novel isn't good.
It is however a page turner.
Hubbard was a good pulp writer, and Battlefield Earth is pretty much a pulp cliffhanger series, 1000 pages long.
Lots of short chapters, in which our intrepid hero is always about to be killed or captured.
The story never makes a lot of sense, but its fun watching it go along.
It would make a great half hour summer filler series.
Each chapter feels about like The Venture Brothers level of dramatization.
As a movie, you have to cut out way too much to get the right campy feel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652660</id>
	<title>Re:No way it was the worst</title>
	<author>stockard</author>
	<datestamp>1269790260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like they took a page straight from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063462/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">The Producers</a> [imdb.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they took a page straight from The Producers [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they took a page straight from The Producers [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652090</id>
	<title>Isn't that the award that's....</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1269784740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that the award that's both a candy and gum?<br>
Lucky guy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that the award that 's both a candy and gum ?
Lucky guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that the award that's both a candy and gum?
Lucky guy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653964</id>
	<title>Re:This guy rocks</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1269805140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes definitely, one of the best pieces of articles written ever... perfect material for a sitcom!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes definitely , one of the best pieces of articles written ever... perfect material for a sitcom !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes definitely, one of the best pieces of articles written ever... perfect material for a sitcom!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652920</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>stor</author>
	<datestamp>1269793980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't vouch for the validity of this, but this is a fun read if your appetite was piqued by PopeRazto's post:</p><p><a href="http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/aleister-crowley/" title="rotten.com">http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/aleister-crowley/</a> [rotten.com]</p><p>You should find the Charlie Manson easter egg there, and a lot of the other twisted stuff mentioned in PopeRazto's post.</p><p>I'd recommend taking it all with a grain of salt, and reading this stuff at home, not at work<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>-Stor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't vouch for the validity of this , but this is a fun read if your appetite was piqued by PopeRazto 's post : http : //www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/aleister-crowley/ [ rotten.com ] You should find the Charlie Manson easter egg there , and a lot of the other twisted stuff mentioned in PopeRazto 's post.I 'd recommend taking it all with a grain of salt , and reading this stuff at home , not at work : ) -Stor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't vouch for the validity of this, but this is a fun read if your appetite was piqued by PopeRazto's post:http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/aleister-crowley/ [rotten.com]You should find the Charlie Manson easter egg there, and a lot of the other twisted stuff mentioned in PopeRazto's post.I'd recommend taking it all with a grain of salt, and reading this stuff at home, not at work :)-Stor</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651544</id>
	<title>I think its great</title>
	<author>interval1066</author>
	<datestamp>1269779520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have the RiffTrax version of it and its hilarious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have the RiffTrax version of it and its hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have the RiffTrax version of it and its hilarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652080</id>
	<title>unacceptable</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1269784680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't take his apology seriously until he takes it seriously. The Japanese have a ceremony that helps to convey complete sincerity. I suggest he uses it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't take his apology seriously until he takes it seriously .
The Japanese have a ceremony that helps to convey complete sincerity .
I suggest he uses it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't take his apology seriously until he takes it seriously.
The Japanese have a ceremony that helps to convey complete sincerity.
I suggest he uses it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651930</id>
	<title>Strange comparison.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1269783180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would've thought Travolta would've compared it to <i>Passion of the Christ</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would 've thought Travolta would 've compared it to Passion of the Christ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would've thought Travolta would've compared it to Passion of the Christ</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31655760</id>
	<title>I actually saw it at the theaters!</title>
	<author>Aaron32</author>
	<datestamp>1269870780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember this movie vividly as it's my single most biggest disappointing movie, EVER!</p><p>Seeing the previews I just KNEW it would be a fantastic show and on the same level as The Matrix.  Boy was I ever wrong.  My friends still to this day rub it in my face that I saw it at the theaters.</p><p>I was so let down, it's not even funny.  I think what really clenched it was when the cavemen taught themselves how to "break in" a harrier jet the same way they would break in broncos.</p><p>However, the good side of it is I'll never forget this lesson, and IMDB is my friend when questioning whether I'm about to see another Battlefield Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember this movie vividly as it 's my single most biggest disappointing movie , EVER ! Seeing the previews I just KNEW it would be a fantastic show and on the same level as The Matrix .
Boy was I ever wrong .
My friends still to this day rub it in my face that I saw it at the theaters.I was so let down , it 's not even funny .
I think what really clenched it was when the cavemen taught themselves how to " break in " a harrier jet the same way they would break in broncos.However , the good side of it is I 'll never forget this lesson , and IMDB is my friend when questioning whether I 'm about to see another Battlefield Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember this movie vividly as it's my single most biggest disappointing movie, EVER!Seeing the previews I just KNEW it would be a fantastic show and on the same level as The Matrix.
Boy was I ever wrong.
My friends still to this day rub it in my face that I saw it at the theaters.I was so let down, it's not even funny.
I think what really clenched it was when the cavemen taught themselves how to "break in" a harrier jet the same way they would break in broncos.However, the good side of it is I'll never forget this lesson, and IMDB is my friend when questioning whether I'm about to see another Battlefield Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31660228</id>
	<title>Thanks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To all of you who enjoyed my article!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To all of you who enjoyed my article !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To all of you who enjoyed my article!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654274</id>
	<title>Re:The reason why Battlefield Earth Won the Razzie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269895680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The premise wasn't bad, the execution is what killed it.</p></div><p>Yes. Also, the premise was bad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The premise was n't bad , the execution is what killed it.Yes .
Also , the premise was bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The premise wasn't bad, the execution is what killed it.Yes.
Also, the premise was bad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31667194</id>
	<title>To those who actually watched/read BE...</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1269891720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations for at least giving it a chance.<br>I've obviously heard of its really-low critical opinion, but I wouldn't feel confident repeating that myself until I've actually tried it</p><p>To provide an audio example (as I hesitate to use the term 'music' here), Ke$ha sucks, but I'll only say that because I actually (tried to) listen to her album.</p><p>While critics are often right, and critical opinion does sometimes serve as an information-processing heuristic, I keep the following factors in mind:<br>* there's lots of stuff that's better than the critics think (or worse than the critics think)<br>* You're one of the sliver of people the thing appeals to and/or the critic(s) are one of the sliver of people the thing doesn't appeal to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations for at least giving it a chance.I 've obviously heard of its really-low critical opinion , but I would n't feel confident repeating that myself until I 've actually tried itTo provide an audio example ( as I hesitate to use the term 'music ' here ) , Ke $ ha sucks , but I 'll only say that because I actually ( tried to ) listen to her album.While critics are often right , and critical opinion does sometimes serve as an information-processing heuristic , I keep the following factors in mind : * there 's lots of stuff that 's better than the critics think ( or worse than the critics think ) * You 're one of the sliver of people the thing appeals to and/or the critic ( s ) are one of the sliver of people the thing does n't appeal to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations for at least giving it a chance.I've obviously heard of its really-low critical opinion, but I wouldn't feel confident repeating that myself until I've actually tried itTo provide an audio example (as I hesitate to use the term 'music' here), Ke$ha sucks, but I'll only say that because I actually (tried to) listen to her album.While critics are often right, and critical opinion does sometimes serve as an information-processing heuristic, I keep the following factors in mind:* there's lots of stuff that's better than the critics think (or worse than the critics think)* You're one of the sliver of people the thing appeals to and/or the critic(s) are one of the sliver of people the thing doesn't appeal to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656252</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>MrNiceguy\_KS</author>
	<datestamp>1269873720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An even better line from TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I took a few courses, including the Purification Rundown, or Purif. You go to CC every day, take vitamins and go in and out of a sauna so toxins are released from your body.  You're supposed to reach an "End Point." I never did, but I was bored so I told them I had a vision of L. Ron. They said, "What did he say?" "Pull my finger," was my response. They said I was done.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An even better line from TFA : I took a few courses , including the Purification Rundown , or Purif .
You go to CC every day , take vitamins and go in and out of a sauna so toxins are released from your body .
You 're supposed to reach an " End Point .
" I never did , but I was bored so I told them I had a vision of L. Ron. They said , " What did he say ?
" " Pull my finger , " was my response .
They said I was done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An even better line from TFA:I took a few courses, including the Purification Rundown, or Purif.
You go to CC every day, take vitamins and go in and out of a sauna so toxins are released from your body.
You're supposed to reach an "End Point.
" I never did, but I was bored so I told them I had a vision of L. Ron. They said, "What did he say?
" "Pull my finger," was my response.
They said I was done.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31655058</id>
	<title>Very, very funny film, unintentionally or not.</title>
	<author>BC\_Man</author>
	<datestamp>1269863700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean come on, from the writer of Robin Hood, men in tights ?!? This is the film I laughed hardest at. Is it because I'm a human rights activist and I've seen some extremely peculiar ways of "fighting tyranny"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... definitely. Memorable scenes: 1. The freedom fighters steal Harrier Jump Jets that miraculously work and have plenty of fuel. 2, The Travolta character shows off his genius for working out the humans by tracking one to find out their favourite food and witnesses him<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... eating a rat ?!?

Believe me if you've witnessed idiots trying to organise themselves trying to fight any kind of oppression then this film is for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean come on , from the writer of Robin Hood , men in tights ? ! ?
This is the film I laughed hardest at .
Is it because I 'm a human rights activist and I 've seen some extremely peculiar ways of " fighting tyranny " ... ? .... definitely. Memorable scenes : 1 .
The freedom fighters steal Harrier Jump Jets that miraculously work and have plenty of fuel .
2 , The Travolta character shows off his genius for working out the humans by tracking one to find out their favourite food and witnesses him ... eating a rat ? ! ?
Believe me if you 've witnessed idiots trying to organise themselves trying to fight any kind of oppression then this film is for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean come on, from the writer of Robin Hood, men in tights ?!?
This is the film I laughed hardest at.
Is it because I'm a human rights activist and I've seen some extremely peculiar ways of "fighting tyranny" ... ? .... definitely. Memorable scenes: 1.
The freedom fighters steal Harrier Jump Jets that miraculously work and have plenty of fuel.
2, The Travolta character shows off his genius for working out the humans by tracking one to find out their favourite food and witnesses him ... eating a rat ?!?
Believe me if you've witnessed idiots trying to organise themselves trying to fight any kind of oppression then this film is for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652378</id>
	<title>Good read</title>
	<author>yoshi\_mon</author>
	<datestamp>1269787620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA is written by someone who actually knows how to write.  If your reading this instead of it, 'your doing it wrong'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA is written by someone who actually knows how to write .
If your reading this instead of it , 'your doing it wrong' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA is written by someone who actually knows how to write.
If your reading this instead of it, 'your doing it wrong'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504</id>
	<title>The reason why Battlefield Earth Won the Razzie</title>
	<author>djdevon3</author>
	<datestamp>1269779100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason why Battlefield Earth deserved worst film of the decade was because it tried to be a serious film and fail Fail FAIL FIALED epiccccc fail.  The premise wasn't bad, the execution is what killed it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason why Battlefield Earth deserved worst film of the decade was because it tried to be a serious film and fail Fail FAIL FIALED epiccccc fail .
The premise was n't bad , the execution is what killed it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason why Battlefield Earth deserved worst film of the decade was because it tried to be a serious film and fail Fail FAIL FIALED epiccccc fail.
The premise wasn't bad, the execution is what killed it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656242</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1269873660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sci-fi? I thought it was based on a true story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sci-fi ?
I thought it was based on a true story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sci-fi?
I thought it was based on a true story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651566</id>
	<title>Using a pseudonym when it sucks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269779700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Robert Towne replaced his name with that of his dog, Pannonia's Haramia Vezer, a komondor, for Greystoke, Legend of Tarzan.   So either he wasn't paid much (doubtful) or his lawyer was better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Robert Towne replaced his name with that of his dog , Pannonia 's Haramia Vezer , a komondor , for Greystoke , Legend of Tarzan .
So either he was n't paid much ( doubtful ) or his lawyer was better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Robert Towne replaced his name with that of his dog, Pannonia's Haramia Vezer, a komondor, for Greystoke, Legend of Tarzan.
So either he wasn't paid much (doubtful) or his lawyer was better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653102</id>
	<title>Re:The lesson here?</title>
	<author>H0D\_G</author>
	<datestamp>1269795540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, all the best bands are affiliated with Satan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , all the best bands are affiliated with Satan : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, all the best bands are affiliated with Satan :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652032</id>
	<title>Book was FANTASTIC - movie was not so much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269784200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read the book - experience a fantastic mental image.<br>See the video - reach for the eye bleach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the book - experience a fantastic mental image.See the video - reach for the eye bleach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the book - experience a fantastic mental image.See the video - reach for the eye bleach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652890</id>
	<title>Re:The lesson here?</title>
	<author>Xiroth</author>
	<datestamp>1269793560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is related to why anything of the form [religion] [normal thing] generally just means [sucky] [normal thing].</p></div></blockquote><p>While I'm not in favour of religion myself, Bach's body of work (amoung many, many others) might just disagree with you...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is related to why anything of the form [ religion ] [ normal thing ] generally just means [ sucky ] [ normal thing ] .While I 'm not in favour of religion myself , Bach 's body of work ( amoung many , many others ) might just disagree with you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is related to why anything of the form [religion] [normal thing] generally just means [sucky] [normal thing].While I'm not in favour of religion myself, Bach's body of work (amoung many, many others) might just disagree with you...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496</id>
	<title>This guy rocks</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1269779100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, looking back at the movie with fresh eyes, I can't help but be strangely proud of it. Because out of all the sucky movies, mine is the suckiest.<br>In the end, did Scientology get me laid? What do you think? No way do you get any action by boldly going up to a woman and proclaiming, "I wrote Battlefield Earth!" If anything, I'm trying to figure out a way to bottle it and use it as birth control. I'll make a mint!</p></div><p>Read the whole interview. It's totally worth it. A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , looking back at the movie with fresh eyes , I ca n't help but be strangely proud of it .
Because out of all the sucky movies , mine is the suckiest.In the end , did Scientology get me laid ?
What do you think ?
No way do you get any action by boldly going up to a woman and proclaiming , " I wrote Battlefield Earth !
" If anything , I 'm trying to figure out a way to bottle it and use it as birth control .
I 'll make a mint ! Read the whole interview .
It 's totally worth it .
A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, looking back at the movie with fresh eyes, I can't help but be strangely proud of it.
Because out of all the sucky movies, mine is the suckiest.In the end, did Scientology get me laid?
What do you think?
No way do you get any action by boldly going up to a woman and proclaiming, "I wrote Battlefield Earth!
" If anything, I'm trying to figure out a way to bottle it and use it as birth control.
I'll make a mint!Read the whole interview.
It's totally worth it.
A mans odyssey while trying to get laid at all costs.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657464</id>
	<title>Re:The lesson here?</title>
	<author>RyuuzakiTetsuya</author>
	<datestamp>1269878760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not true.</p><p>The Passion of the Christ was a well made movie.  The pacing was great, the scenes were shot very well, and the characterization was excellent.</p><p>I mean, it was still a snuff film hiding as a jesus freak film but still.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not true.The Passion of the Christ was a well made movie .
The pacing was great , the scenes were shot very well , and the characterization was excellent.I mean , it was still a snuff film hiding as a jesus freak film but still .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not true.The Passion of the Christ was a well made movie.
The pacing was great, the scenes were shot very well, and the characterization was excellent.I mean, it was still a snuff film hiding as a jesus freak film but still.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269778980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't normally RTFA, but it's worth it for lines like this:<p><div class="quote"><p>As far as I know, I am the only non-Scientologist to ever be on their cruise ship, the Freewind. I was a bit of an oddity, walking around in a robe, sandals, smoking Cuban cigars and drinking fine scotch (Scientologists are not allowed to drink while taking courses). I also got one of the best massages ever. My friends asked if I got a "happy ending." I said, "Yes, I got off the ship."</p></div><p>Could anyone have done it better?  I've not actually read the novel, but apparently it's pretty good.  I actually enjoyed the film - it's at that level of so bad it's hilariously funny, not so bad it's unwatchable.  I bought the DVD completely at random, knowing nothing about the story, for &pound;2 in a charity shop a few years back and I've watched it a couple of times.  It's great with a few friends and a few beers, although I probably wouldn't recommend watching it sober.</p><p>
The article makes me want to read the original script.  I wonder if it's online anywhere.  For those who haven't seen the film, I suggest that you read the <a href="http://www.the-editing-room.com/battlefield.html" title="the-editing-room.com">abridged script</a> [the-editing-room.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't normally RTFA , but it 's worth it for lines like this : As far as I know , I am the only non-Scientologist to ever be on their cruise ship , the Freewind .
I was a bit of an oddity , walking around in a robe , sandals , smoking Cuban cigars and drinking fine scotch ( Scientologists are not allowed to drink while taking courses ) .
I also got one of the best massages ever .
My friends asked if I got a " happy ending .
" I said , " Yes , I got off the ship .
" Could anyone have done it better ?
I 've not actually read the novel , but apparently it 's pretty good .
I actually enjoyed the film - it 's at that level of so bad it 's hilariously funny , not so bad it 's unwatchable .
I bought the DVD completely at random , knowing nothing about the story , for   2 in a charity shop a few years back and I 've watched it a couple of times .
It 's great with a few friends and a few beers , although I probably would n't recommend watching it sober .
The article makes me want to read the original script .
I wonder if it 's online anywhere .
For those who have n't seen the film , I suggest that you read the abridged script [ the-editing-room.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't normally RTFA, but it's worth it for lines like this:As far as I know, I am the only non-Scientologist to ever be on their cruise ship, the Freewind.
I was a bit of an oddity, walking around in a robe, sandals, smoking Cuban cigars and drinking fine scotch (Scientologists are not allowed to drink while taking courses).
I also got one of the best massages ever.
My friends asked if I got a "happy ending.
" I said, "Yes, I got off the ship.
"Could anyone have done it better?
I've not actually read the novel, but apparently it's pretty good.
I actually enjoyed the film - it's at that level of so bad it's hilariously funny, not so bad it's unwatchable.
I bought the DVD completely at random, knowing nothing about the story, for £2 in a charity shop a few years back and I've watched it a couple of times.
It's great with a few friends and a few beers, although I probably wouldn't recommend watching it sober.
The article makes me want to read the original script.
I wonder if it's online anywhere.
For those who haven't seen the film, I suggest that you read the abridged script [the-editing-room.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652758</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>rawg</author>
	<datestamp>1269791580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... I liked the movie.  I didn't realize that it was awful.  Strange.  Maybe I should watch it again.  I've certainly seen worse movies over the past few years.</p><p>I had no idea about the Scientologists part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... I liked the movie .
I did n't realize that it was awful .
Strange. Maybe I should watch it again .
I 've certainly seen worse movies over the past few years.I had no idea about the Scientologists part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... I liked the movie.
I didn't realize that it was awful.
Strange.  Maybe I should watch it again.
I've certainly seen worse movies over the past few years.I had no idea about the Scientologists part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651526</id>
	<title>hilarious article</title>
	<author>C0vardeAn0nim0</author>
	<datestamp>1269779400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if he wrote a movie based on his experience with The  CoS, it'll be one of the funniest comedies ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if he wrote a movie based on his experience with The CoS , it 'll be one of the funniest comedies ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if he wrote a movie based on his experience with The  CoS, it'll be one of the funniest comedies ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653266</id>
	<title>if it was such a bad movie</title>
	<author>jdc18</author>
	<datestamp>1269797100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if it was such a bad movie, why i have the feeling everyone here saw this crap</htmltext>
<tokenext>if it was such a bad movie , why i have the feeling everyone here saw this crap</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if it was such a bad movie, why i have the feeling everyone here saw this crap</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653970</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Dr Herbert West</author>
	<datestamp>1269805260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The book you're thinking of is:
Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons

Great read-- kinda like "everyone is Kevin Bacon" except with Satanists, physicists, and random movie and fine art scenesters from the 50s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The book you 're thinking of is : Sex and Rockets : The Occult World of Jack Parsons Great read-- kinda like " everyone is Kevin Bacon " except with Satanists , physicists , and random movie and fine art scenesters from the 50s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The book you're thinking of is:
Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons

Great read-- kinda like "everyone is Kevin Bacon" except with Satanists, physicists, and random movie and fine art scenesters from the 50s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269778260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, he did the best he could.  Do you really think someone else would have come up with a <em>better</em> screen play from the same source material?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , he did the best he could .
Do you really think someone else would have come up with a better screen play from the same source material ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, he did the best he could.
Do you really think someone else would have come up with a better screen play from the same source material?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652596</id>
	<title>Reason for a huge flop</title>
	<author>mestar</author>
	<datestamp>1269789600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need a bunch of very powerful people with no connection to reality.  Nobody can stop them, nobody can correct them.  Thus that movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need a bunch of very powerful people with no connection to reality .
Nobody can stop them , nobody can correct them .
Thus that movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need a bunch of very powerful people with no connection to reality.
Nobody can stop them, nobody can correct them.
Thus that movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651548</id>
	<title>ALERT-- Important Notice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269779580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This time, TFA really, really, is a good read!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This time , TFA really , really , is a good read ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This time, TFA really, really, is a good read!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652262</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1269786600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Actually, I rather enjoyed it. It's not a good film, it's really quite bad, but not unwatchably so. Certainly nowhere near as bad as the Internet will tell you.
If I had to watch a film, and could only choose from really bad ones, I would pick Battlefield Earth before Plan 9. Although maybe it's a close thing!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I rather enjoyed it .
It 's not a good film , it 's really quite bad , but not unwatchably so .
Certainly nowhere near as bad as the Internet will tell you .
If I had to watch a film , and could only choose from really bad ones , I would pick Battlefield Earth before Plan 9 .
Although maybe it 's a close thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I rather enjoyed it.
It's not a good film, it's really quite bad, but not unwatchably so.
Certainly nowhere near as bad as the Internet will tell you.
If I had to watch a film, and could only choose from really bad ones, I would pick Battlefield Earth before Plan 9.
Although maybe it's a close thing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657526</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Yamata no Orochi</author>
	<datestamp>1269879060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm...under the impression he was suggesting that the prose was, in fact <i>not</i> purple. Much like an orangutan's ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm...under the impression he was suggesting that the prose was , in fact not purple .
Much like an orangutan 's ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm...under the impression he was suggesting that the prose was, in fact not purple.
Much like an orangutan's ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31655462</id>
	<title>For once an award I agree with...</title>
	<author>js\_sebastian</author>
	<datestamp>1269868620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D. Shapiro:



<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8</a> [youtube.com]</p> </div><p>This movie has been sitting at the top of my personal top-10 of worst movies I have seen in a movie theater. I only went because Forest Whitaker was in it.
I don't resent a very bad movie on tv now and then, but when they manage to con me into going to a theater for one I hate them for ever... For me, that movie is reason enough to ban scientology and travolta and exile them to the frozen oceans of ganymede.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D .
Shapiro : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = DKlEE18R5d8 [ youtube.com ] This movie has been sitting at the top of my personal top-10 of worst movies I have seen in a movie theater .
I only went because Forest Whitaker was in it .
I do n't resent a very bad movie on tv now and then , but when they manage to con me into going to a theater for one I hate them for ever... For me , that movie is reason enough to ban scientology and travolta and exile them to the frozen oceans of ganymede .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst PICTURE of the Decade - Battlefield Earth accepted by J.D.
Shapiro:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKlEE18R5d8 [youtube.com] This movie has been sitting at the top of my personal top-10 of worst movies I have seen in a movie theater.
I only went because Forest Whitaker was in it.
I don't resent a very bad movie on tv now and then, but when they manage to con me into going to a theater for one I hate them for ever... For me, that movie is reason enough to ban scientology and travolta and exile them to the frozen oceans of ganymede.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651800</id>
	<title>What's his excuse for Robin Hood Men in Tights?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269781920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1950's era comedy with hammy acting to match. Even Dave Chappelle came across like a dork.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1950 's era comedy with hammy acting to match .
Even Dave Chappelle came across like a dork .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1950's era comedy with hammy acting to match.
Even Dave Chappelle came across like a dork.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964</id>
	<title>No way it was the worst</title>
	<author>jdayer</author>
	<datestamp>1269783600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't even begin to talk about how much worse other movies have been.  Every year a few hundred movies that are so bad DVDs are never made of them.  In a nut shell there are millions of people who are interested in being involved in movies.  Some of these people end up on lists of potential investors that production companies purchase.  When I say production companies I mean con artists, but, con artists just this side of legal.  These guys solicit money from these "interested investors", they put together a really bad film crew, some really bad actors and they make a movie.  Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons, they put together a lame party for the "investors" with the has beens as main course.  Typically the only distribution these movies get is a short run (sometimes the producers make the copies themselves) that is sent out to the investors.  The movie is submitted around to film festivals, distributors and is summarily rejected by everyone.  I have some internet friends in the production business that complain about these losers because it makes it harder for independents to raise money.  Not to hard though, there are always people who want to be in the movie business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't even begin to talk about how much worse other movies have been .
Every year a few hundred movies that are so bad DVDs are never made of them .
In a nut shell there are millions of people who are interested in being involved in movies .
Some of these people end up on lists of potential investors that production companies purchase .
When I say production companies I mean con artists , but , con artists just this side of legal .
These guys solicit money from these " interested investors " , they put together a really bad film crew , some really bad actors and they make a movie .
Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons , they put together a lame party for the " investors " with the has beens as main course .
Typically the only distribution these movies get is a short run ( sometimes the producers make the copies themselves ) that is sent out to the investors .
The movie is submitted around to film festivals , distributors and is summarily rejected by everyone .
I have some internet friends in the production business that complain about these losers because it makes it harder for independents to raise money .
Not to hard though , there are always people who want to be in the movie business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't even begin to talk about how much worse other movies have been.
Every year a few hundred movies that are so bad DVDs are never made of them.
In a nut shell there are millions of people who are interested in being involved in movies.
Some of these people end up on lists of potential investors that production companies purchase.
When I say production companies I mean con artists, but, con artists just this side of legal.
These guys solicit money from these "interested investors", they put together a really bad film crew, some really bad actors and they make a movie.
Sometimes they hire a has been or two for walk ons, they put together a lame party for the "investors" with the has beens as main course.
Typically the only distribution these movies get is a short run (sometimes the producers make the copies themselves) that is sent out to the investors.
The movie is submitted around to film festivals, distributors and is summarily rejected by everyone.
I have some internet friends in the production business that complain about these losers because it makes it harder for independents to raise money.
Not to hard though, there are always people who want to be in the movie business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258</id>
	<title>The lesson here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269786600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Movies (or for that matter any media) which is made by people with a specific religious or political agenda will almost inevitably suck. In this particular case, there's little to no Scientology in the film itself. But the overriding agenda of making a movie out of the founder's best (least suck?) novel still shown through. This is related to why anything of the form [religion] [normal thing] generally just means [sucky] [normal thing]. Thus, Christian rock is a subgenre of sucky rock. Christian rap? Let's not go there. Jewish rock- generally pretty sucky rock. Etc. Let's all be thankful that we don't yet have Scientology rap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Movies ( or for that matter any media ) which is made by people with a specific religious or political agenda will almost inevitably suck .
In this particular case , there 's little to no Scientology in the film itself .
But the overriding agenda of making a movie out of the founder 's best ( least suck ?
) novel still shown through .
This is related to why anything of the form [ religion ] [ normal thing ] generally just means [ sucky ] [ normal thing ] .
Thus , Christian rock is a subgenre of sucky rock .
Christian rap ?
Let 's not go there .
Jewish rock- generally pretty sucky rock .
Etc. Let 's all be thankful that we do n't yet have Scientology rap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Movies (or for that matter any media) which is made by people with a specific religious or political agenda will almost inevitably suck.
In this particular case, there's little to no Scientology in the film itself.
But the overriding agenda of making a movie out of the founder's best (least suck?
) novel still shown through.
This is related to why anything of the form [religion] [normal thing] generally just means [sucky] [normal thing].
Thus, Christian rock is a subgenre of sucky rock.
Christian rap?
Let's not go there.
Jewish rock- generally pretty sucky rock.
Etc. Let's all be thankful that we don't yet have Scientology rap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651866</id>
	<title>2042</title>
	<author>future assassin</author>
	<datestamp>1269782700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is when it all happens again <a href="http://churchofxenu.com/" title="churchofxenu.com">http://churchofxenu.com/</a> [churchofxenu.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>is when it all happens again http : //churchofxenu.com/ [ churchofxenu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is when it all happens again http://churchofxenu.com/ [churchofxenu.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654292</id>
	<title>Re:No way it was the worst</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1269895980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah like this one : <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1479847/" title="imdb.com">"2012: Supernova"</a> [imdb.com] from the "Let's make a movie whose title sounds like another movie so people will rent it by mistake" school of filmmaking, starring the guy from Charmed. I think they mean worst as in worst movie made by Hollywood insiders and intended as a serious project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah like this one : " 2012 : Supernova " [ imdb.com ] from the " Let 's make a movie whose title sounds like another movie so people will rent it by mistake " school of filmmaking , starring the guy from Charmed .
I think they mean worst as in worst movie made by Hollywood insiders and intended as a serious project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah like this one : "2012: Supernova" [imdb.com] from the "Let's make a movie whose title sounds like another movie so people will rent it by mistake" school of filmmaking, starring the guy from Charmed.
I think they mean worst as in worst movie made by Hollywood insiders and intended as a serious project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651692</id>
	<title>I liked it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269780780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I liked the movie. Surely I can't be the only one, haha.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked the movie .
Surely I ca n't be the only one , haha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked the movie.
Surely I can't be the only one, haha.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651668</id>
	<title>Re:The reason why Battlefield Earth Won the Razzie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269780600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>FIALED</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FIALED</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FIALED
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652314</id>
	<title>Well, I liked it</title>
	<author>roland\_mai</author>
	<datestamp>1269787020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I watched the movie while coding on a project and I remember liking it.
I have found out that bad movies are not as bad if you code while watching them.
This allows one to only allocate to the move a very small fraction of brain power.

You'll feel happy because you actually did something, and that you did two things at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched the movie while coding on a project and I remember liking it .
I have found out that bad movies are not as bad if you code while watching them .
This allows one to only allocate to the move a very small fraction of brain power .
You 'll feel happy because you actually did something , and that you did two things at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched the movie while coding on a project and I remember liking it.
I have found out that bad movies are not as bad if you code while watching them.
This allows one to only allocate to the move a very small fraction of brain power.
You'll feel happy because you actually did something, and that you did two things at the same time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657716</id>
	<title>Re:Battlefield Earth was so bad...</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1269879780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I once saw Battlefield Earth at a gas station for a dollar...but they had blank VHS tapes for $2. That means that, by copying Battlefield Earth onto a VHS tape, your are reducing its' value by one dollar."</p><p>Paraphrased from an old Conan O'Brien monologue</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I once saw Battlefield Earth at a gas station for a dollar...but they had blank VHS tapes for $ 2 .
That means that , by copying Battlefield Earth onto a VHS tape , your are reducing its ' value by one dollar .
" Paraphrased from an old Conan O'Brien monologue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I once saw Battlefield Earth at a gas station for a dollar...but they had blank VHS tapes for $2.
That means that, by copying Battlefield Earth onto a VHS tape, your are reducing its' value by one dollar.
"Paraphrased from an old Conan O'Brien monologue</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654184</id>
	<title>Schindler's List of Sci-Fi?</title>
	<author>matunos</author>
	<datestamp>1269894180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>More like the Auschwitz of Sci-Fi.<br><br>There, I said it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More like the Auschwitz of Sci-Fi.There , I said it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like the Auschwitz of Sci-Fi.There, I said it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31663234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31655462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_28_2259243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31660228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651708
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651886
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654608
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657526
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652920
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653970
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31656242
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657180
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652984
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31663234
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657000
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31657464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31655462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31653172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31652660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31654292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_28_2259243.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_28_2259243.31651566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
