<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_27_1550204</id>
	<title>Facebook's Plan To Automatically Share Your Data</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1269707040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Giosuele sends in this excerpt from TechCrunch:
<i>"In anticipation of a slew of new features that will be launching at f8, today Facebook announced that it was once again <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=376904492130">making changes to its privacy policy</a>. One of the biggest changes that Facebook is making involves applications and third-party websites. We've been hearing whispers from multiple sources about these changes, and the announcement all but confirms what Facebook is planning to do. In short, it sounds like Facebook is going to be automatically <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/26/facebooks-plan-to-automatically-share-your-data-with-sites-you-never-signed-up-for/">opting users into a reduced form of Facebook Connect</a> on certain third party sites &mdash; a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Giosuele sends in this excerpt from TechCrunch : " In anticipation of a slew of new features that will be launching at f8 , today Facebook announced that it was once again making changes to its privacy policy .
One of the biggest changes that Facebook is making involves applications and third-party websites .
We 've been hearing whispers from multiple sources about these changes , and the announcement all but confirms what Facebook is planning to do .
In short , it sounds like Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into a reduced form of Facebook Connect on certain third party sites    a bold change that may well unnerve users , at least at first .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giosuele sends in this excerpt from TechCrunch:
"In anticipation of a slew of new features that will be launching at f8, today Facebook announced that it was once again making changes to its privacy policy.
One of the biggest changes that Facebook is making involves applications and third-party websites.
We've been hearing whispers from multiple sources about these changes, and the announcement all but confirms what Facebook is planning to do.
In short, it sounds like Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into a reduced form of Facebook Connect on certain third party sites — a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646180</id>
	<title>what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269773520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>declare your freedom from shallowness </i>and miss out on slashdot comments, too ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>declare your freedom from shallowness and miss out on slashdot comments , too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>declare your freedom from shallowness and miss out on slashdot comments, too ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641234</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>quickgold192</author>
	<datestamp>1269716760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I honestly do not like Facebook, although I have an account that I'll use about once a month. The problem with not having a Facebook account is the same problem with not eating out: Eating out every meal is expensive and, if you're a decent cook, you usually find the food pretty awful. However, if you work in an environment where everyone eats out every meal, you're pretty much forced to eat out as well unless you want to alienate yourself. Get new friends? In a job where you move every 6 months and your coworkers all just graduated college with you, you're pretty much stuck with what fate gave you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly do not like Facebook , although I have an account that I 'll use about once a month .
The problem with not having a Facebook account is the same problem with not eating out : Eating out every meal is expensive and , if you 're a decent cook , you usually find the food pretty awful .
However , if you work in an environment where everyone eats out every meal , you 're pretty much forced to eat out as well unless you want to alienate yourself .
Get new friends ?
In a job where you move every 6 months and your coworkers all just graduated college with you , you 're pretty much stuck with what fate gave you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly do not like Facebook, although I have an account that I'll use about once a month.
The problem with not having a Facebook account is the same problem with not eating out: Eating out every meal is expensive and, if you're a decent cook, you usually find the food pretty awful.
However, if you work in an environment where everyone eats out every meal, you're pretty much forced to eat out as well unless you want to alienate yourself.
Get new friends?
In a job where you move every 6 months and your coworkers all just graduated college with you, you're pretty much stuck with what fate gave you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640880</id>
	<title>You'll get used to it</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1269714540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first.</p></div><p>Now give me a moment while I slowly turn up the burner under my stew pot full of live frogs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a bold change that may well unnerve users , at least at first.Now give me a moment while I slowly turn up the burner under my stew pot full of live frogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first.Now give me a moment while I slowly turn up the burner under my stew pot full of live frogs.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640370</id>
	<title>Re:Nooooo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269711480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's ok, you don't have any friends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's ok , you do n't have any friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's ok, you don't have any friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642722</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>mazarin5</author>
	<datestamp>1269685080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.</p></div><p>I absolutely disagree with this, but I don't have time to discuss it now. If you want to discuss this further, you can reach me here:</p><p>Dan Cruz<br>656 Maple Ave.<br>San Diego, CA<br>Home: (901) 271-5342<br>Work: (901) 887-4040 x523<br>Cell: (901) 279-8601</p><p>You can reach me at my $65k/yr job from 8 to 2, and then I go to the gym for an hour. If you have to reach me next week, I'll be on vacation with my wife Julia for six days, so call my cell. Also, this reuben sandwich is dee-licious!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet .
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.I absolutely disagree with this , but I do n't have time to discuss it now .
If you want to discuss this further , you can reach me here : Dan Cruz656 Maple Ave.San Diego , CAHome : ( 901 ) 271-5342Work : ( 901 ) 887-4040 x523Cell : ( 901 ) 279-8601You can reach me at my $ 65k/yr job from 8 to 2 , and then I go to the gym for an hour .
If you have to reach me next week , I 'll be on vacation with my wife Julia for six days , so call my cell .
Also , this reuben sandwich is dee-licious !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet.
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.I absolutely disagree with this, but I don't have time to discuss it now.
If you want to discuss this further, you can reach me here:Dan Cruz656 Maple Ave.San Diego, CAHome: (901) 271-5342Work: (901) 887-4040 x523Cell: (901) 279-8601You can reach me at my $65k/yr job from 8 to 2, and then I go to the gym for an hour.
If you have to reach me next week, I'll be on vacation with my wife Julia for six days, so call my cell.
Also, this reuben sandwich is dee-licious!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640638</id>
	<title>UK Data protection rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269712800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure just giving peoples data out to third parties without their consent breaks the UK data protection rules...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure just giving peoples data out to third parties without their consent breaks the UK data protection rules.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure just giving peoples data out to third parties without their consent breaks the UK data protection rules...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</id>
	<title>facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269711120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites. Each and every one of these social networking websites exists for one purpose and that's to sell your information, your demographics to advertisers and generate revenue.</p><p>None of these sites are altruistic establishments who seek to serve the public good guarding one's privacy. At the end of the day you're engaging in opt-in Big Brother and it's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America.</p><p>Doesn't matter if you're using a throwaway freemail account because even then it's ridiculously easy to find one's real-life information. Just stop going there, delete your information and send their company a strongly-worded letter demanding they remove your information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet .
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites .
Each and every one of these social networking websites exists for one purpose and that 's to sell your information , your demographics to advertisers and generate revenue.None of these sites are altruistic establishments who seek to serve the public good guarding one 's privacy .
At the end of the day you 're engaging in opt-in Big Brother and it 's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America.Does n't matter if you 're using a throwaway freemail account because even then it 's ridiculously easy to find one 's real-life information .
Just stop going there , delete your information and send their company a strongly-worded letter demanding they remove your information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet.
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.
Each and every one of these social networking websites exists for one purpose and that's to sell your information, your demographics to advertisers and generate revenue.None of these sites are altruistic establishments who seek to serve the public good guarding one's privacy.
At the end of the day you're engaging in opt-in Big Brother and it's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America.Doesn't matter if you're using a throwaway freemail account because even then it's ridiculously easy to find one's real-life information.
Just stop going there, delete your information and send their company a strongly-worded letter demanding they remove your information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640832</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>DogDude</author>
	<datestamp>1269714120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what?  Everybody who gave all of their personal information to a new company willy-nilly technically agreed that they could change their policies at will.Sure, nobody reads all of the legal-ese, but you're voluntarily giving VALUABLE personal information to a FOR PROFIT company.  What did people THINK would happen?  Did people think that Facebook would, as a corporate entity say, "We don't really want the revenue from selling our users' information?"  I don't understand how people can be so naive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what ?
Everybody who gave all of their personal information to a new company willy-nilly technically agreed that they could change their policies at will.Sure , nobody reads all of the legal-ese , but you 're voluntarily giving VALUABLE personal information to a FOR PROFIT company .
What did people THINK would happen ?
Did people think that Facebook would , as a corporate entity say , " We do n't really want the revenue from selling our users ' information ?
" I do n't understand how people can be so naive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what?
Everybody who gave all of their personal information to a new company willy-nilly technically agreed that they could change their policies at will.Sure, nobody reads all of the legal-ese, but you're voluntarily giving VALUABLE personal information to a FOR PROFIT company.
What did people THINK would happen?
Did people think that Facebook would, as a corporate entity say, "We don't really want the revenue from selling our users' information?
"  I don't understand how people can be so naive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31647604</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269794220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I use Facebook to share with my coworkers... Coworkers are acquaintances who - if you are mildly involved in their lives - will improve your work environment and generally be much more friendly. Sure I don't have the time to hang out with them 24/7, but maybe I want to know what they've done (similar they want to know what I've done) so we can *gasp* socialize at work the following day! No fake masks, its called socializing. Its ok to do this with people who aren't your friends, I reject your ridiculously introverted world view, but I would never lecture you for not buying into mine.</p><p>How pompous are you cannot understand someone else's rather valid use case for a technology... and to deride them for using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I use Facebook to share with my coworkers... Coworkers are acquaintances who - if you are mildly involved in their lives - will improve your work environment and generally be much more friendly .
Sure I do n't have the time to hang out with them 24/7 , but maybe I want to know what they 've done ( similar they want to know what I 've done ) so we can * gasp * socialize at work the following day !
No fake masks , its called socializing .
Its ok to do this with people who are n't your friends , I reject your ridiculously introverted world view , but I would never lecture you for not buying into mine.How pompous are you can not understand someone else 's rather valid use case for a technology... and to deride them for using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I use Facebook to share with my coworkers... Coworkers are acquaintances who - if you are mildly involved in their lives - will improve your work environment and generally be much more friendly.
Sure I don't have the time to hang out with them 24/7, but maybe I want to know what they've done (similar they want to know what I've done) so we can *gasp* socialize at work the following day!
No fake masks, its called socializing.
Its ok to do this with people who aren't your friends, I reject your ridiculously introverted world view, but I would never lecture you for not buying into mine.How pompous are you cannot understand someone else's rather valid use case for a technology... and to deride them for using it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640682</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269712980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.</p></div><p>"We" (I'm not part of the "we") willingly give it away, because that's what their TOS say: if you use false information, you don't exist, therefore your account will be deleted, because it doesn't belong to anyone (or you are impersonating someone, which is against the law in any country on Earth).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet .
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites .
" We " ( I 'm not part of the " we " ) willingly give it away , because that 's what their TOS say : if you use false information , you do n't exist , therefore your account will be deleted , because it does n't belong to anyone ( or you are impersonating someone , which is against the law in any country on Earth ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet.
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.
"We" (I'm not part of the "we") willingly give it away, because that's what their TOS say: if you use false information, you don't exist, therefore your account will be deleted, because it doesn't belong to anyone (or you are impersonating someone, which is against the law in any country on Earth).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641606</id>
	<title>Re:Nooooo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269719580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, do you really want all the GNAA and Goatse trolls to have access to your wife?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , do you really want all the GNAA and Goatse trolls to have access to your wife ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, do you really want all the GNAA and Goatse trolls to have access to your wife?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641508</id>
	<title>hah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269718920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dislike!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dislike !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dislike!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640926</id>
	<title>so what</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269714960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get it when people say privacy is dead because of facebook. Facebook only has access to data IF YOU PUT IN ON FACEBOOK. You put sensitive data on facebook, and complain when facebook shares that with others. If you don't put something on facebook, facebook does not have that info (except for possible tracking cookies that I'll explain how to fix). If you don't want something public, don't put it on facebook, it's very simple, and also clear private data in firefox+use BetterPrivacy to kill flash cookies, and then any issues with cookies are gone. If you are concerned about privacy of data, SIMPLY DO NOT PUT THAT DATA ON FACEBOOK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it when people say privacy is dead because of facebook .
Facebook only has access to data IF YOU PUT IN ON FACEBOOK .
You put sensitive data on facebook , and complain when facebook shares that with others .
If you do n't put something on facebook , facebook does not have that info ( except for possible tracking cookies that I 'll explain how to fix ) .
If you do n't want something public , do n't put it on facebook , it 's very simple , and also clear private data in firefox + use BetterPrivacy to kill flash cookies , and then any issues with cookies are gone .
If you are concerned about privacy of data , SIMPLY DO NOT PUT THAT DATA ON FACEBOOK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it when people say privacy is dead because of facebook.
Facebook only has access to data IF YOU PUT IN ON FACEBOOK.
You put sensitive data on facebook, and complain when facebook shares that with others.
If you don't put something on facebook, facebook does not have that info (except for possible tracking cookies that I'll explain how to fix).
If you don't want something public, don't put it on facebook, it's very simple, and also clear private data in firefox+use BetterPrivacy to kill flash cookies, and then any issues with cookies are gone.
If you are concerned about privacy of data, SIMPLY DO NOT PUT THAT DATA ON FACEBOOK.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644290</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>tommut</author>
	<datestamp>1269701220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the rest of us are patiently waiting for The Onion to write up an Area Man Constantly Mentioning He's Not on Facebook article that we can link to....</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the rest of us are patiently waiting for The Onion to write up an Area Man Constantly Mentioning He 's Not on Facebook article that we can link to... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the rest of us are patiently waiting for The Onion to write up an Area Man Constantly Mentioning He's Not on Facebook article that we can link to....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644628</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1269705540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>..but willingly give out your real-life information..</p></div><p>I, for one, don't. I know other people who also do not. I do have many friends who say "I have nothing to hide so why should I care?", and I don't bother trying to explain it to them because they just don't get the basic concept. Some of them may one day have a rude awakening when they discover that there <i>is</i> something about their lives they don't want the whole wide world knowing, but most will not. I will continue to use pseudonyms online, and carefully screen my own postings to such sites so as to maintain an air gap between my online life and my "real" life, and laugh at everyone else who gets caught with their pants down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>..but willingly give out your real-life information..I , for one , do n't .
I know other people who also do not .
I do have many friends who say " I have nothing to hide so why should I care ?
" , and I do n't bother trying to explain it to them because they just do n't get the basic concept .
Some of them may one day have a rude awakening when they discover that there is something about their lives they do n't want the whole wide world knowing , but most will not .
I will continue to use pseudonyms online , and carefully screen my own postings to such sites so as to maintain an air gap between my online life and my " real " life , and laugh at everyone else who gets caught with their pants down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..but willingly give out your real-life information..I, for one, don't.
I know other people who also do not.
I do have many friends who say "I have nothing to hide so why should I care?
", and I don't bother trying to explain it to them because they just don't get the basic concept.
Some of them may one day have a rude awakening when they discover that there is something about their lives they don't want the whole wide world knowing, but most will not.
I will continue to use pseudonyms online, and carefully screen my own postings to such sites so as to maintain an air gap between my online life and my "real" life, and laugh at everyone else who gets caught with their pants down.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640592</id>
	<title>Adult sites</title>
	<author>Rik Sweeney</author>
	<datestamp>1269712620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully they won't partner with adult sites...</p><p><i>Richard is watching Porn Movie of the Day on SexSexSex.com, the dirty dirty bastard.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully they wo n't partner with adult sites...Richard is watching Porn Movie of the Day on SexSexSex.com , the dirty dirty bastard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully they won't partner with adult sites...Richard is watching Porn Movie of the Day on SexSexSex.com, the dirty dirty bastard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642954</id>
	<title>Re:Nooooo!</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1269687120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friends</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't think my Mom will mind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friendsI do n't think my Mom will mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friendsI don't think my Mom will mind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641254</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269716880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep feeling smug.  However you still have an account at Experion, Transunion and Equifax.  They sell your information and <b>don't</b> tell you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep feeling smug .
However you still have an account at Experion , Transunion and Equifax .
They sell your information and do n't tell you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep feeling smug.
However you still have an account at Experion, Transunion and Equifax.
They sell your information and don't tell you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644942</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>pitchaxistheory</author>
	<datestamp>1269709500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+5 Insightful!</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 5 Insightful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+5 Insightful!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640996</id>
	<title>Re:UK Data protection rules</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269715380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The UK and EU data protection laws do not apply to US companies.  A few UK companies use this to work around them by requiring you to give explicit permission for them to share your data with a single US company, which is then free to share your data with everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK and EU data protection laws do not apply to US companies .
A few UK companies use this to work around them by requiring you to give explicit permission for them to share your data with a single US company , which is then free to share your data with everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK and EU data protection laws do not apply to US companies.
A few UK companies use this to work around them by requiring you to give explicit permission for them to share your data with a single US company, which is then free to share your data with everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644734</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>ydrol</author>
	<datestamp>1269706980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; advanced police state that exists in the UK</p><p>Please explain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; advanced police state that exists in the UKPlease explain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; advanced police state that exists in the UKPlease explain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640402</id>
	<title>New law of physics?</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1269711600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>One thing faster than the speed of light is the frequency with which Facebook changes its privacy policy to suck in the unwary. (Units deliberately left undefined.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing faster than the speed of light is the frequency with which Facebook changes its privacy policy to suck in the unwary .
( Units deliberately left undefined .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing faster than the speed of light is the frequency with which Facebook changes its privacy policy to suck in the unwary.
(Units deliberately left undefined.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502</id>
	<title>Only a fool would publish personal info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269718920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use Facebook because a number of my friends do, but I did not use real information when signing up.  My birthday, address, etc are not correct.  My birthday is close, the city is different as is the zip code.  Birth date and zip code are 2 of the primary ways credit card companies use to verify you when calling in (plus your SSN, which I give to no one).  FB does not need this information and I do not provide it to anyone I don't have to.  It's not paranoia, it's prudence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Facebook because a number of my friends do , but I did not use real information when signing up .
My birthday , address , etc are not correct .
My birthday is close , the city is different as is the zip code .
Birth date and zip code are 2 of the primary ways credit card companies use to verify you when calling in ( plus your SSN , which I give to no one ) .
FB does not need this information and I do not provide it to anyone I do n't have to .
It 's not paranoia , it 's prudence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Facebook because a number of my friends do, but I did not use real information when signing up.
My birthday, address, etc are not correct.
My birthday is close, the city is different as is the zip code.
Birth date and zip code are 2 of the primary ways credit card companies use to verify you when calling in (plus your SSN, which I give to no one).
FB does not need this information and I do not provide it to anyone I don't have to.
It's not paranoia, it's prudence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642436</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Colz Grigor</author>
	<datestamp>1269683040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>lose facebook. you're life will improve</p></div><p>I made the decision to drop off Facebook on February 17th (nothing special about the date, my brain just remembers little details like that).  I had in excess of 200 family, friends, and acquaintances, about 125 of which updated semi-regularly.  Facebook's "push" mechanism and its critical mass of people was a very convenient way to keep up with the people I care about.  For me, it wasn't a bonfire of vanities or shallow, like you suggest, because keeping up on the lives of friends <i>is</i> interesting and valuable.  I can see it being a "garbage in, garbage out" kind of system, though: if you only update shallowness then perhaps you only keep shallow friends, and so for you Facebook relationships lack any sort of depth.  My "real" friends are scattered around the world on five continents, and it would be a major time drain to have to have one-on-one conversations with each of them to keep up on their lives.</p><p>"Losing" Facebook was painful, socially, and I'm not entirely certain that my life has yet improved.  Kind of like Google "leaving" China; sometimes we have to make hard choices based on our ethics.  But I do agree with you that every time I read about Facebook privacy issues, I snicker just a little bit.  Still, I hope that someday a company that convinces me that they are trustworthy develops a social networking tool that has a critical mass of people while simultaneously allowing me to access the information in the manner of my choosing.  I haven't seen it yet, and my hopes aren't high.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>lose facebook .
you 're life will improveI made the decision to drop off Facebook on February 17th ( nothing special about the date , my brain just remembers little details like that ) .
I had in excess of 200 family , friends , and acquaintances , about 125 of which updated semi-regularly .
Facebook 's " push " mechanism and its critical mass of people was a very convenient way to keep up with the people I care about .
For me , it was n't a bonfire of vanities or shallow , like you suggest , because keeping up on the lives of friends is interesting and valuable .
I can see it being a " garbage in , garbage out " kind of system , though : if you only update shallowness then perhaps you only keep shallow friends , and so for you Facebook relationships lack any sort of depth .
My " real " friends are scattered around the world on five continents , and it would be a major time drain to have to have one-on-one conversations with each of them to keep up on their lives .
" Losing " Facebook was painful , socially , and I 'm not entirely certain that my life has yet improved .
Kind of like Google " leaving " China ; sometimes we have to make hard choices based on our ethics .
But I do agree with you that every time I read about Facebook privacy issues , I snicker just a little bit .
Still , I hope that someday a company that convinces me that they are trustworthy develops a social networking tool that has a critical mass of people while simultaneously allowing me to access the information in the manner of my choosing .
I have n't seen it yet , and my hopes are n't high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lose facebook.
you're life will improveI made the decision to drop off Facebook on February 17th (nothing special about the date, my brain just remembers little details like that).
I had in excess of 200 family, friends, and acquaintances, about 125 of which updated semi-regularly.
Facebook's "push" mechanism and its critical mass of people was a very convenient way to keep up with the people I care about.
For me, it wasn't a bonfire of vanities or shallow, like you suggest, because keeping up on the lives of friends is interesting and valuable.
I can see it being a "garbage in, garbage out" kind of system, though: if you only update shallowness then perhaps you only keep shallow friends, and so for you Facebook relationships lack any sort of depth.
My "real" friends are scattered around the world on five continents, and it would be a major time drain to have to have one-on-one conversations with each of them to keep up on their lives.
"Losing" Facebook was painful, socially, and I'm not entirely certain that my life has yet improved.
Kind of like Google "leaving" China; sometimes we have to make hard choices based on our ethics.
But I do agree with you that every time I read about Facebook privacy issues, I snicker just a little bit.
Still, I hope that someday a company that convinces me that they are trustworthy develops a social networking tool that has a critical mass of people while simultaneously allowing me to access the information in the manner of my choosing.
I haven't seen it yet, and my hopes aren't high.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640424</id>
	<title>I can see it now...</title>
	<author>mace9984</author>
	<datestamp>1269711720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sexy Girl: FB Update - Just got out of the shower... LOCATION: 123 Main St.
Creepy Man: FB Update - Just zipped up pants. 123 Main St.
Broadview Security: Targeted Ad - Hey! Sexy Girl, Now is the time to think about home security!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sexy Girl : FB Update - Just got out of the shower... LOCATION : 123 Main St . Creepy Man : FB Update - Just zipped up pants .
123 Main St . Broadview Security : Targeted Ad - Hey !
Sexy Girl , Now is the time to think about home security !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sexy Girl: FB Update - Just got out of the shower... LOCATION: 123 Main St.
Creepy Man: FB Update - Just zipped up pants.
123 Main St.
Broadview Security: Targeted Ad - Hey!
Sexy Girl, Now is the time to think about home security!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646852</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>barzok</author>
	<datestamp>1269787260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happened to a friend of mine with his local Big Brothers/Big Sisters chapter. They told his Little that they were going to terminate their match of 6 years because my friend hadn't turned over his ID &amp; password for any social networking sites he has an account on. They want access to it to make sure that Bigs aren't doing "bad" things and especially not posting information about/pictures of their Littles. Here's what he quoted from his chapter's policy (which he wasn't aware of previously):</p><blockquote><div><p>q. Internet Usage</p><p>Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that applicants and current Big Brothers/Sisters inform agency staff if they have an active social networking site (i.e. Facebook, Myspace...) or personal website. It is the responsibility of the volunteer to:</p><ul> <li>Provide full access to his/her social networking site to Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region; and</li><li>Provide Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region the location of any personal websites; and</li><li>Ensure that content on any social networking site or website is appropriate for his/her Little to be exposed to and/or not share the content of or expose the site to his/her Little; and</li><li>Understand that Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to conduct random audits of social networking sites and personal websites.</li></ul><p>Additionally, Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that volunteers do not post any photographs, videos, drawings, or other visual representations of his/her Little in any way on the Internet.</p><p>Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to terminate any match based on the content of a volunteer's social networking site and/or website or a volunteer's failure to abide by this policy.</p></div></blockquote><p>I told him that his response should be along the lines of "the terms of usage for those sites prohibits me from sharing my credentials. If I did so, I wouldn't be setting a very good example, would I?</p><p>In addition to the usual social networking sites, my friend has a few websites he runs on the side (as a business), might have a personal one as well, where do you draw the line?</p><p>Perhaps we'll all have to fall back to <a href="http://theinfosphere.org/Ipgee" title="theinfosphere.org">Ipgee</a> [theinfosphere.org]'s position.</p><blockquote><div><p>Ipgee: So I said, "Your request for a date is most flattering Leela, but I'm afraid I must decline. These office romances never work out. After all, that is how I met my horrible wife."<br>Leela: But you never wore a ring, I didn't know you had a wife.<br>Ipgee: And my wife doesn't know I have a job, I keep my personal and professional life separate.</p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Happened to a friend of mine with his local Big Brothers/Big Sisters chapter .
They told his Little that they were going to terminate their match of 6 years because my friend had n't turned over his ID &amp; password for any social networking sites he has an account on .
They want access to it to make sure that Bigs are n't doing " bad " things and especially not posting information about/pictures of their Littles .
Here 's what he quoted from his chapter 's policy ( which he was n't aware of previously ) : q. Internet UsageBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that applicants and current Big Brothers/Sisters inform agency staff if they have an active social networking site ( i.e .
Facebook , Myspace... ) or personal website .
It is the responsibility of the volunteer to : Provide full access to his/her social networking site to Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region ; andProvide Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region the location of any personal websites ; andEnsure that content on any social networking site or website is appropriate for his/her Little to be exposed to and/or not share the content of or expose the site to his/her Little ; andUnderstand that Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to conduct random audits of social networking sites and personal websites.Additionally , Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that volunteers do not post any photographs , videos , drawings , or other visual representations of his/her Little in any way on the Internet.Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to terminate any match based on the content of a volunteer 's social networking site and/or website or a volunteer 's failure to abide by this policy.I told him that his response should be along the lines of " the terms of usage for those sites prohibits me from sharing my credentials .
If I did so , I would n't be setting a very good example , would I ? In addition to the usual social networking sites , my friend has a few websites he runs on the side ( as a business ) , might have a personal one as well , where do you draw the line ? Perhaps we 'll all have to fall back to Ipgee [ theinfosphere.org ] 's position.Ipgee : So I said , " Your request for a date is most flattering Leela , but I 'm afraid I must decline .
These office romances never work out .
After all , that is how I met my horrible wife .
" Leela : But you never wore a ring , I did n't know you had a wife.Ipgee : And my wife does n't know I have a job , I keep my personal and professional life separate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happened to a friend of mine with his local Big Brothers/Big Sisters chapter.
They told his Little that they were going to terminate their match of 6 years because my friend hadn't turned over his ID &amp; password for any social networking sites he has an account on.
They want access to it to make sure that Bigs aren't doing "bad" things and especially not posting information about/pictures of their Littles.
Here's what he quoted from his chapter's policy (which he wasn't aware of previously):q. Internet UsageBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that applicants and current Big Brothers/Sisters inform agency staff if they have an active social networking site (i.e.
Facebook, Myspace...) or personal website.
It is the responsibility of the volunteer to: Provide full access to his/her social networking site to Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region; andProvide Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region the location of any personal websites; andEnsure that content on any social networking site or website is appropriate for his/her Little to be exposed to and/or not share the content of or expose the site to his/her Little; andUnderstand that Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to conduct random audits of social networking sites and personal websites.Additionally, Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region requires that volunteers do not post any photographs, videos, drawings, or other visual representations of his/her Little in any way on the Internet.Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Capital Region reserves the right to terminate any match based on the content of a volunteer's social networking site and/or website or a volunteer's failure to abide by this policy.I told him that his response should be along the lines of "the terms of usage for those sites prohibits me from sharing my credentials.
If I did so, I wouldn't be setting a very good example, would I?In addition to the usual social networking sites, my friend has a few websites he runs on the side (as a business), might have a personal one as well, where do you draw the line?Perhaps we'll all have to fall back to Ipgee [theinfosphere.org]'s position.Ipgee: So I said, "Your request for a date is most flattering Leela, but I'm afraid I must decline.
These office romances never work out.
After all, that is how I met my horrible wife.
"Leela: But you never wore a ring, I didn't know you had a wife.Ipgee: And my wife doesn't know I have a job, I keep my personal and professional life separate. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31649540</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269808020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those of us who care don't sell our freedoms for some trinket at a website...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those of us who care do n't sell our freedoms for some trinket at a website.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those of us who care don't sell our freedoms for some trinket at a website...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641780</id>
	<title>Re:Adult sites</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269720780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not a real site!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I checked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a real site !
...I checked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a real site!
...I checked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640704</id>
	<title>What real life information really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269713280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They know my full name and the name of my wife; my birthday and home town and a google email address.  That's it.  What's the big deal about that?  It's not like they have access to any of my bank details, credit cards, NI number, passport number, or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.</p><p>Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill.   Sheesh !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They know my full name and the name of my wife ; my birthday and home town and a google email address .
That 's it .
What 's the big deal about that ?
It 's not like they have access to any of my bank details , credit cards , NI number , passport number , or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill .
Sheesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They know my full name and the name of my wife; my birthday and home town and a google email address.
That's it.
What's the big deal about that?
It's not like they have access to any of my bank details, credit cards, NI number, passport number, or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Sheesh !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641548</id>
	<title>Another one bites the dust.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269719160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just <a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Permanently-Delete-a-Facebook-Account" title="wikihow.com" rel="nofollow">closed and deleted</a> [wikihow.com] my Facebook account.  I'm sick of fussing over my profile and repeatedly having to reconfigure the site to NOT broadcast my information.  Screw 'em.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just closed and deleted [ wikihow.com ] my Facebook account .
I 'm sick of fussing over my profile and repeatedly having to reconfigure the site to NOT broadcast my information .
Screw 'em .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just closed and deleted [wikihow.com] my Facebook account.
I'm sick of fussing over my profile and repeatedly having to reconfigure the site to NOT broadcast my information.
Screw 'em.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644854</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>jsepeta</author>
	<datestamp>1269708420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as much as i have enjoyed touching base with people on facebook, i deleted all my other social networking accounts except for facebook and linked in tonight. and i am seriously considering dumping the other two. i dunno, i'm kind of tired of being humped by business and then told it's a good thing for me to have happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as much as i have enjoyed touching base with people on facebook , i deleted all my other social networking accounts except for facebook and linked in tonight .
and i am seriously considering dumping the other two .
i dunno , i 'm kind of tired of being humped by business and then told it 's a good thing for me to have happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as much as i have enjoyed touching base with people on facebook, i deleted all my other social networking accounts except for facebook and linked in tonight.
and i am seriously considering dumping the other two.
i dunno, i'm kind of tired of being humped by business and then told it's a good thing for me to have happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644452</id>
	<title>What's New?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269703380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About a year ago, a friend of mine sent me a facebook invite - which I politely declined.  However, the email that came with it knew my wife and anyone else who was in my email list who had a facebook account.  It was even kind enough to give me pictures of them (so much for my friends saying "they are careful about their privacy - they don't give out any details").</p><p>I don't use facebook and won't use facebook because I am highly concerned about the long term privacy concerns.  When you logon, how long you spend, topics you discuss, etc.  Do you really want people knowing THAT much about you?</p><p>AC<br>PS I'm wearing red underpants today.  I told you that because I wanted to know how it feels to be a facebook user - and sharing all sorts of personal data with the rest of the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About a year ago , a friend of mine sent me a facebook invite - which I politely declined .
However , the email that came with it knew my wife and anyone else who was in my email list who had a facebook account .
It was even kind enough to give me pictures of them ( so much for my friends saying " they are careful about their privacy - they do n't give out any details " ) .I do n't use facebook and wo n't use facebook because I am highly concerned about the long term privacy concerns .
When you logon , how long you spend , topics you discuss , etc .
Do you really want people knowing THAT much about you ? ACPS I 'm wearing red underpants today .
I told you that because I wanted to know how it feels to be a facebook user - and sharing all sorts of personal data with the rest of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About a year ago, a friend of mine sent me a facebook invite - which I politely declined.
However, the email that came with it knew my wife and anyone else who was in my email list who had a facebook account.
It was even kind enough to give me pictures of them (so much for my friends saying "they are careful about their privacy - they don't give out any details").I don't use facebook and won't use facebook because I am highly concerned about the long term privacy concerns.
When you logon, how long you spend, topics you discuss, etc.
Do you really want people knowing THAT much about you?ACPS I'm wearing red underpants today.
I told you that because I wanted to know how it feels to be a facebook user - and sharing all sorts of personal data with the rest of the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640946</id>
	<title>Oblig Colbert</title>
	<author>bacon volcano</author>
	<datestamp>1269715080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I value my privacy. I've been very consistent about that. I've said it on my TV show, my Twitter feed, my Facebook page, my live web Colonoscopy cam."
<br> 
<br> 
- Stephen Colbert
<br> 
<br> 


<a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/267560/march-17-2010/united-states-census-2010" title="colbertnation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/267560/march-17-2010/united-states-census-2010</a> [colbertnation.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I value my privacy .
I 've been very consistent about that .
I 've said it on my TV show , my Twitter feed , my Facebook page , my live web Colonoscopy cam .
" - Stephen Colbert http : //www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/267560/march-17-2010/united-states-census-2010 [ colbertnation.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I value my privacy.
I've been very consistent about that.
I've said it on my TV show, my Twitter feed, my Facebook page, my live web Colonoscopy cam.
"
 
 
- Stephen Colbert
 
 


http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/267560/march-17-2010/united-states-census-2010 [colbertnation.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645142</id>
	<title>Re:reductio ad absurdum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269711720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty certain most telephone conversations 1) aren't in a very easily searchable form (ie text) 2) stored indefinitely for future data mining 3) you get the idea. reductio ad strawman</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty certain most telephone conversations 1 ) are n't in a very easily searchable form ( ie text ) 2 ) stored indefinitely for future data mining 3 ) you get the idea .
reductio ad strawman</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty certain most telephone conversations 1) aren't in a very easily searchable form (ie text) 2) stored indefinitely for future data mining 3) you get the idea.
reductio ad strawman</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641842</id>
	<title>My 2p worth of rambling</title>
	<author>asdf7890</author>
	<datestamp>1269721500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be honest I don't care about the info I have on FB. All they have is my name, an incorrect birth date, a low resolution indication of my general location, and a list of people that I am linked with in some way. Nothing of much value to any third party that I can think of.</p><p>What does bother me though is the idea of someone passing on my information (whether I care about the information or not) for profit. I I'm to be hored out to the world I'll do the horing and have the profit thankyouverymuch. If someone else wants to try gain from my info maybe I'll let them, but it is only common curtsey to ask for permission rather than automatically opting me in.</p><p>From a technical point of view I assume this linking of you to your FB account (and from there to other information and linking information FB holds) is going to be done by the 3rd party web site making a client-side request to FB (this request, being client-side, would contain your FB session ID cookie value) which then redirects to a script on the 3rd party site with some sort of session ID that can be used to make further requests to FB server side. This would not be difficult to block if you run a cleaning proxy (strip out requests to FB pages from with pages that were not served from an FB server to start with) or simply by using a separate browser. By "separate" I mean really separate: not common add-ons for instance (flash cookies, if you aren't in the habit of blocking flash by default, are cross-browser and even survive through "private browsing" mods) - true separation might mean having to run it in a VM or some such construct (which may, in turn, mean I can't be bothered enough for the hassle).</p><p>If I were to ever see signs that a site had gone prying into what information there is about be out there I would never revisit that site or those relating to it, and would recommend that my contacts do the same. Unfortunately I'm in a minority - most people are not as bitter, anal, and vindictive enough to carry out threats of "never coming back" so in the long run my avoidance of such sites won't make much difference to them in the grand scheme of things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest I do n't care about the info I have on FB .
All they have is my name , an incorrect birth date , a low resolution indication of my general location , and a list of people that I am linked with in some way .
Nothing of much value to any third party that I can think of.What does bother me though is the idea of someone passing on my information ( whether I care about the information or not ) for profit .
I I 'm to be hored out to the world I 'll do the horing and have the profit thankyouverymuch .
If someone else wants to try gain from my info maybe I 'll let them , but it is only common curtsey to ask for permission rather than automatically opting me in.From a technical point of view I assume this linking of you to your FB account ( and from there to other information and linking information FB holds ) is going to be done by the 3rd party web site making a client-side request to FB ( this request , being client-side , would contain your FB session ID cookie value ) which then redirects to a script on the 3rd party site with some sort of session ID that can be used to make further requests to FB server side .
This would not be difficult to block if you run a cleaning proxy ( strip out requests to FB pages from with pages that were not served from an FB server to start with ) or simply by using a separate browser .
By " separate " I mean really separate : not common add-ons for instance ( flash cookies , if you are n't in the habit of blocking flash by default , are cross-browser and even survive through " private browsing " mods ) - true separation might mean having to run it in a VM or some such construct ( which may , in turn , mean I ca n't be bothered enough for the hassle ) .If I were to ever see signs that a site had gone prying into what information there is about be out there I would never revisit that site or those relating to it , and would recommend that my contacts do the same .
Unfortunately I 'm in a minority - most people are not as bitter , anal , and vindictive enough to carry out threats of " never coming back " so in the long run my avoidance of such sites wo n't make much difference to them in the grand scheme of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest I don't care about the info I have on FB.
All they have is my name, an incorrect birth date, a low resolution indication of my general location, and a list of people that I am linked with in some way.
Nothing of much value to any third party that I can think of.What does bother me though is the idea of someone passing on my information (whether I care about the information or not) for profit.
I I'm to be hored out to the world I'll do the horing and have the profit thankyouverymuch.
If someone else wants to try gain from my info maybe I'll let them, but it is only common curtsey to ask for permission rather than automatically opting me in.From a technical point of view I assume this linking of you to your FB account (and from there to other information and linking information FB holds) is going to be done by the 3rd party web site making a client-side request to FB (this request, being client-side, would contain your FB session ID cookie value) which then redirects to a script on the 3rd party site with some sort of session ID that can be used to make further requests to FB server side.
This would not be difficult to block if you run a cleaning proxy (strip out requests to FB pages from with pages that were not served from an FB server to start with) or simply by using a separate browser.
By "separate" I mean really separate: not common add-ons for instance (flash cookies, if you aren't in the habit of blocking flash by default, are cross-browser and even survive through "private browsing" mods) - true separation might mean having to run it in a VM or some such construct (which may, in turn, mean I can't be bothered enough for the hassle).If I were to ever see signs that a site had gone prying into what information there is about be out there I would never revisit that site or those relating to it, and would recommend that my contacts do the same.
Unfortunately I'm in a minority - most people are not as bitter, anal, and vindictive enough to carry out threats of "never coming back" so in the long run my avoidance of such sites won't make much difference to them in the grand scheme of things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641186</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>Talizorah</author>
	<datestamp>1269716520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that your post does a wonderful job of highlighting the hypocrisy and reality of this recurring issue. The reasons you outlined above are why I don't belong to MySpace, Facebook, or any other "social networking" websites, and probably never will in the future. Whenever you use anything freely, it is a privilege; so it is no wonder that many of these websites now feel an increasing sense of entitlement to user-contributed information.
<br> <br>
The naivete displayed in the replies to your comment are astounding. Others are quick to point out that they wouldn't cry about this issue if they had a say in the "when and what" of how their information was sold. If only the American right to privacy gave us such direct control over our information, and was transmutable to such an extent on social networking sites that it superseded the TOS! Ultimately, our privacy is our own burden. If we choose to give our information freely to these websites, then we should expect what they choose to do with it to change as often as their TOS and Privacy Policies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that your post does a wonderful job of highlighting the hypocrisy and reality of this recurring issue .
The reasons you outlined above are why I do n't belong to MySpace , Facebook , or any other " social networking " websites , and probably never will in the future .
Whenever you use anything freely , it is a privilege ; so it is no wonder that many of these websites now feel an increasing sense of entitlement to user-contributed information .
The naivete displayed in the replies to your comment are astounding .
Others are quick to point out that they would n't cry about this issue if they had a say in the " when and what " of how their information was sold .
If only the American right to privacy gave us such direct control over our information , and was transmutable to such an extent on social networking sites that it superseded the TOS !
Ultimately , our privacy is our own burden .
If we choose to give our information freely to these websites , then we should expect what they choose to do with it to change as often as their TOS and Privacy Policies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that your post does a wonderful job of highlighting the hypocrisy and reality of this recurring issue.
The reasons you outlined above are why I don't belong to MySpace, Facebook, or any other "social networking" websites, and probably never will in the future.
Whenever you use anything freely, it is a privilege; so it is no wonder that many of these websites now feel an increasing sense of entitlement to user-contributed information.
The naivete displayed in the replies to your comment are astounding.
Others are quick to point out that they wouldn't cry about this issue if they had a say in the "when and what" of how their information was sold.
If only the American right to privacy gave us such direct control over our information, and was transmutable to such an extent on social networking sites that it superseded the TOS!
Ultimately, our privacy is our own burden.
If we choose to give our information freely to these websites, then we should expect what they choose to do with it to change as often as their TOS and Privacy Policies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640562</id>
	<title>Spin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269712440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"After feedback from many of you"..

Apparently Facebook is confusing "many" for "most" or "all".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" After feedback from many of you " . . Apparently Facebook is confusing " many " for " most " or " all " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"After feedback from many of you"..

Apparently Facebook is confusing "many" for "most" or "all".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640498</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>blai</author>
	<datestamp>1269712200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet. You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.</p> </div><p>I am putting my information up on a widely used platform where I can easily exchange information with the people I want. The fact that the platform is a 3rd-party website is not at all voluntary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet .
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites .
I am putting my information up on a widely used platform where I can easily exchange information with the people I want .
The fact that the platform is a 3rd-party website is not at all voluntary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand what is wrong with everyone on the internet.
You cry about privacy but willingly give out your real-life information to these websites.
I am putting my information up on a widely used platform where I can easily exchange information with the people I want.
The fact that the platform is a 3rd-party website is not at all voluntary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>Chuq</author>
	<datestamp>1269723360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life. </i></p><p>We do?  Is that legal?  Easy answer: "I don't have a facebook account".  It's none of their damn business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker 's Facebook accounts in real life .
We do ?
Is that legal ?
Easy answer : " I do n't have a facebook account " .
It 's none of their damn business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life.
We do?
Is that legal?
Easy answer: "I don't have a facebook account".
It's none of their damn business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641416</id>
	<title>automatically opting users into</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269718140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into...</p></div><p>The phrase 'automatically opting users into' sounds like someone just picked three words at random to postfix to automatically.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into...The phrase 'automatically opting users into ' sounds like someone just picked three words at random to postfix to automatically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook is going to be automatically opting users into...The phrase 'automatically opting users into' sounds like someone just picked three words at random to postfix to automatically.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640688</id>
	<title>Think of Facebook as your press release</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269713100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter/Facebook are flooded with advertisers  so if you can't beat em join em. Use it as a press release page only.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter/Facebook are flooded with advertisers so if you ca n't beat em join em .
Use it as a press release page only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter/Facebook are flooded with advertisers  so if you can't beat em join em.
Use it as a press release page only.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642754</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1269685380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a nice diatribe, wrong, but nice.</p><p>Perhaps what you're describing is how many people use Facebook, and perhaps that's just how you envision all users using Facebook.</p><p>My family uses it somewhat differently. It's an excellent way to share pictures, stay involved with each others lives by sharing highlights (and lowlights) of what's happening, and just generally be social with each other. I also communicate with my brother who is stationed in Iraq. The soccer team my son plays on uses it much the same way. It's an ad-hoc way to share pictures, distribute information on when the next practice is, where everyone is staying for the next tournament, etc.</p><p>Just because you're angry at the kids on your lawn with bicycles doesn't mean us whippersnappers, I'm 38, haven't figured out a thing or two about convenient communications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a nice diatribe , wrong , but nice.Perhaps what you 're describing is how many people use Facebook , and perhaps that 's just how you envision all users using Facebook.My family uses it somewhat differently .
It 's an excellent way to share pictures , stay involved with each others lives by sharing highlights ( and lowlights ) of what 's happening , and just generally be social with each other .
I also communicate with my brother who is stationed in Iraq .
The soccer team my son plays on uses it much the same way .
It 's an ad-hoc way to share pictures , distribute information on when the next practice is , where everyone is staying for the next tournament , etc.Just because you 're angry at the kids on your lawn with bicycles does n't mean us whippersnappers , I 'm 38 , have n't figured out a thing or two about convenient communications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a nice diatribe, wrong, but nice.Perhaps what you're describing is how many people use Facebook, and perhaps that's just how you envision all users using Facebook.My family uses it somewhat differently.
It's an excellent way to share pictures, stay involved with each others lives by sharing highlights (and lowlights) of what's happening, and just generally be social with each other.
I also communicate with my brother who is stationed in Iraq.
The soccer team my son plays on uses it much the same way.
It's an ad-hoc way to share pictures, distribute information on when the next practice is, where everyone is staying for the next tournament, etc.Just because you're angry at the kids on your lawn with bicycles doesn't mean us whippersnappers, I'm 38, haven't figured out a thing or two about convenient communications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641390</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>schmidt349</author>
	<datestamp>1269717960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Facebook profile identifies my religious and political views, my intellectual interests, and past and present occupations. What part of any of that obtains in "shallowness?"</p><p>A computer isn't a trivial toy, even though you can use one to play video games and argue on Slashdot all day. By the same token, Facebook isn't "endless navel gazing" even though you can use it to trumpet your superiority to your fellow man, whether that comes from flashy clothes or smug overgeneralizations like yours. Facebook is a powerful tool for social organization of all kinds, from sex to business to international politics and everything in between.</p><p>If you don't like the tool, or you don't like its privacy policy, that's fine; don't use it, and feel free to criticize the shortcomings you have problems with. But get off your high horse. You aren't a better person than I am because you avoid "shallowness," or because you refuse to acknowledge the value of your individuality. We are all interesting in different ways to different people, and there's nothing wrong with making that available to the rest of the world. Maybe you aren't the kind of guy to care about what kind of clothing I wear, but if my friend or her sister does that doesn't make her "worse" than you are in some metaphysical sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Facebook profile identifies my religious and political views , my intellectual interests , and past and present occupations .
What part of any of that obtains in " shallowness ?
" A computer is n't a trivial toy , even though you can use one to play video games and argue on Slashdot all day .
By the same token , Facebook is n't " endless navel gazing " even though you can use it to trumpet your superiority to your fellow man , whether that comes from flashy clothes or smug overgeneralizations like yours .
Facebook is a powerful tool for social organization of all kinds , from sex to business to international politics and everything in between.If you do n't like the tool , or you do n't like its privacy policy , that 's fine ; do n't use it , and feel free to criticize the shortcomings you have problems with .
But get off your high horse .
You are n't a better person than I am because you avoid " shallowness , " or because you refuse to acknowledge the value of your individuality .
We are all interesting in different ways to different people , and there 's nothing wrong with making that available to the rest of the world .
Maybe you are n't the kind of guy to care about what kind of clothing I wear , but if my friend or her sister does that does n't make her " worse " than you are in some metaphysical sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Facebook profile identifies my religious and political views, my intellectual interests, and past and present occupations.
What part of any of that obtains in "shallowness?
"A computer isn't a trivial toy, even though you can use one to play video games and argue on Slashdot all day.
By the same token, Facebook isn't "endless navel gazing" even though you can use it to trumpet your superiority to your fellow man, whether that comes from flashy clothes or smug overgeneralizations like yours.
Facebook is a powerful tool for social organization of all kinds, from sex to business to international politics and everything in between.If you don't like the tool, or you don't like its privacy policy, that's fine; don't use it, and feel free to criticize the shortcomings you have problems with.
But get off your high horse.
You aren't a better person than I am because you avoid "shallowness," or because you refuse to acknowledge the value of your individuality.
We are all interesting in different ways to different people, and there's nothing wrong with making that available to the rest of the world.
Maybe you aren't the kind of guy to care about what kind of clothing I wear, but if my friend or her sister does that doesn't make her "worse" than you are in some metaphysical sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645640</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269719160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember seeing that when it was new. I also remember seeing an update about them getting a lot of flak over it from nation-wide news coverage. I think they stopped due to the pressure, which would imply the public will still stand up against that kind of insanity. (Too lazy to look for a citation, this post won't really be seen so it won't earn me mod points).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember seeing that when it was new .
I also remember seeing an update about them getting a lot of flak over it from nation-wide news coverage .
I think they stopped due to the pressure , which would imply the public will still stand up against that kind of insanity .
( Too lazy to look for a citation , this post wo n't really be seen so it wo n't earn me mod points ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember seeing that when it was new.
I also remember seeing an update about them getting a lot of flak over it from nation-wide news coverage.
I think they stopped due to the pressure, which would imply the public will still stand up against that kind of insanity.
(Too lazy to look for a citation, this post won't really be seen so it won't earn me mod points).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641798</id>
	<title>Re:But</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269721020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know the nitty gritty of the deal but I do know Facebook is working with Omniture beyond <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/03/facebook-omniture/" title="techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">providing tools for FB App marketers</a> [techcrunch.com].  -- Their soon going to start aggregating data between Facebook and <a href="http://www.omniture.com/en/privacy/2o7" title="omniture.com" rel="nofollow">Omniture's 2o7.net network</a> [omniture.com].</p><p>Not necessarily a surprise.  My CEO is buddies with the guys at Omniture.  He came in a few weeks ago talking about it.... and how we could make money with them too. =)  It's all about money folks.  Every, Single, Thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know the nitty gritty of the deal but I do know Facebook is working with Omniture beyond providing tools for FB App marketers [ techcrunch.com ] .
-- Their soon going to start aggregating data between Facebook and Omniture 's 2o7.net network [ omniture.com ] .Not necessarily a surprise .
My CEO is buddies with the guys at Omniture .
He came in a few weeks ago talking about it.... and how we could make money with them too .
= ) It 's all about money folks .
Every , Single , Thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know the nitty gritty of the deal but I do know Facebook is working with Omniture beyond providing tools for FB App marketers [techcrunch.com].
-- Their soon going to start aggregating data between Facebook and Omniture's 2o7.net network [omniture.com].Not necessarily a surprise.
My CEO is buddies with the guys at Omniture.
He came in a few weeks ago talking about it.... and how we could make money with them too.
=)  It's all about money folks.
Every, Single, Thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526</id>
	<title>But</title>
	<author>davidjgraph</author>
	<datestamp>1269712260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are third party sites any more capable of doing anything complex with this information than Facebook? The extent to which I noticed facebook profiled me is the ads on the side would say "free gifts if you're male, 67 years old and live in Sausageville". Let's face it (no pun intended), Facebook probably gives prospective advertisers and third-party sites looking to use profile information some complex sounding presentation about the way that break down demographics to the point that an individual can be uniquely identified 24 seconds before they even think about logging into Facebook. But really, 99\% of ads are based on sex, age and where they live, I'm sure a lot more companies than Facebook know this information, I think we're somewhat over-estimating technology companies' ability to mine data. OK, once I told a FB friend to not be such a baby and they got some ads about gifts for new parents. Maybe we should have a social experiment where we try to affect the ads by what we post. "Man, I wish I could get a cheap rate mobile, easy date in my area , cartoonize myself" should be a good starting point...</p><p>---<br>This user was referred to this thread via their Farmville syndication feed. Farmville automatically linked their fruit and vegetable interests to breaking world news and current affairs. Their response on Slashdot.org has been logged and helps us build up an in-depth profile of the deepest workings of their mind, thanks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are third party sites any more capable of doing anything complex with this information than Facebook ?
The extent to which I noticed facebook profiled me is the ads on the side would say " free gifts if you 're male , 67 years old and live in Sausageville " .
Let 's face it ( no pun intended ) , Facebook probably gives prospective advertisers and third-party sites looking to use profile information some complex sounding presentation about the way that break down demographics to the point that an individual can be uniquely identified 24 seconds before they even think about logging into Facebook .
But really , 99 \ % of ads are based on sex , age and where they live , I 'm sure a lot more companies than Facebook know this information , I think we 're somewhat over-estimating technology companies ' ability to mine data .
OK , once I told a FB friend to not be such a baby and they got some ads about gifts for new parents .
Maybe we should have a social experiment where we try to affect the ads by what we post .
" Man , I wish I could get a cheap rate mobile , easy date in my area , cartoonize myself " should be a good starting point...---This user was referred to this thread via their Farmville syndication feed .
Farmville automatically linked their fruit and vegetable interests to breaking world news and current affairs .
Their response on Slashdot.org has been logged and helps us build up an in-depth profile of the deepest workings of their mind , thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are third party sites any more capable of doing anything complex with this information than Facebook?
The extent to which I noticed facebook profiled me is the ads on the side would say "free gifts if you're male, 67 years old and live in Sausageville".
Let's face it (no pun intended), Facebook probably gives prospective advertisers and third-party sites looking to use profile information some complex sounding presentation about the way that break down demographics to the point that an individual can be uniquely identified 24 seconds before they even think about logging into Facebook.
But really, 99\% of ads are based on sex, age and where they live, I'm sure a lot more companies than Facebook know this information, I think we're somewhat over-estimating technology companies' ability to mine data.
OK, once I told a FB friend to not be such a baby and they got some ads about gifts for new parents.
Maybe we should have a social experiment where we try to affect the ads by what we post.
"Man, I wish I could get a cheap rate mobile, easy date in my area , cartoonize myself" should be a good starting point...---This user was referred to this thread via their Farmville syndication feed.
Farmville automatically linked their fruit and vegetable interests to breaking world news and current affairs.
Their response on Slashdot.org has been logged and helps us build up an in-depth profile of the deepest workings of their mind, thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642530</id>
	<title>reductio ad absurdum</title>
	<author>sweatyboatman</author>
	<datestamp>1269683700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know exactly what you mean!  I feel the same way about the telephone!</p><p>Sure you can use it to keep up with friends and family who live far away, but that's what letters are for.  If you have real friends, they wont need this contrivance to maintain their friendship with you.  And think about all the things you'll be able to talk about as if they were new if they come to visit.  Ah the joys of limited connectivity!</p><p>And I mean, talk about annoying!  I know that as soon as I install one in my house, it's gonna start ringing, interrupting work, interrupting dinner, interrupting sleep.  And nine times out of ten it's going to be someone I don't know trying to sell me something I don't need.  And what do you want to bet that the phone company isn't listening in?</p><p>That's why I say,</p><p>lose the telephone, you're (sic) life will improve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know exactly what you mean !
I feel the same way about the telephone ! Sure you can use it to keep up with friends and family who live far away , but that 's what letters are for .
If you have real friends , they wont need this contrivance to maintain their friendship with you .
And think about all the things you 'll be able to talk about as if they were new if they come to visit .
Ah the joys of limited connectivity ! And I mean , talk about annoying !
I know that as soon as I install one in my house , it 's gon na start ringing , interrupting work , interrupting dinner , interrupting sleep .
And nine times out of ten it 's going to be someone I do n't know trying to sell me something I do n't need .
And what do you want to bet that the phone company is n't listening in ? That 's why I say,lose the telephone , you 're ( sic ) life will improve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know exactly what you mean!
I feel the same way about the telephone!Sure you can use it to keep up with friends and family who live far away, but that's what letters are for.
If you have real friends, they wont need this contrivance to maintain their friendship with you.
And think about all the things you'll be able to talk about as if they were new if they come to visit.
Ah the joys of limited connectivity!And I mean, talk about annoying!
I know that as soon as I install one in my house, it's gonna start ringing, interrupting work, interrupting dinner, interrupting sleep.
And nine times out of ten it's going to be someone I don't know trying to sell me something I don't need.
And what do you want to bet that the phone company isn't listening in?That's why I say,lose the telephone, you're (sic) life will improve</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642066</id>
	<title>Re:But</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269723120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook has ads? Honestly I've never seen one. Someone I work with says they do too, but when I mentioned I'd never seen one she did say they were only in those applets or silly game things like Farmville and others. Since I block all those crappy games, quizzes, and "send a ", I never see any ads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has ads ?
Honestly I 've never seen one .
Someone I work with says they do too , but when I mentioned I 'd never seen one she did say they were only in those applets or silly game things like Farmville and others .
Since I block all those crappy games , quizzes , and " send a " , I never see any ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook has ads?
Honestly I've never seen one.
Someone I work with says they do too, but when I mentioned I'd never seen one she did say they were only in those applets or silly game things like Farmville and others.
Since I block all those crappy games, quizzes, and "send a ", I never see any ads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641750</id>
	<title>Re:What real life information really?</title>
	<author>AndGodSed</author>
	<datestamp>1269720600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not like they have access to any of my bank details, credit cards, NI number, passport number, or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.</p></div><p>Yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like they have access to any of my bank details , credit cards , NI number , passport number , or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.Yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like they have access to any of my bank details, credit cards, NI number, passport number, or anything that would really cause me grief if it got into the wrong hands.Yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640398</id>
	<title>I see; tit for tat...</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1269711600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you reserve the right to burden Facebook with the truth about yourself and your most sensitive information, then they reserve the right to relieve themselves of that burden by revealing it to whomever they see fit.</p><p>The e-reward for e-trust.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you reserve the right to burden Facebook with the truth about yourself and your most sensitive information , then they reserve the right to relieve themselves of that burden by revealing it to whomever they see fit.The e-reward for e-trust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you reserve the right to burden Facebook with the truth about yourself and your most sensitive information, then they reserve the right to relieve themselves of that burden by revealing it to whomever they see fit.The e-reward for e-trust.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644622</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Alien1024</author>
	<datestamp>1269705480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree many people indeed use it as a display of vanity or to attract attention. And you don't need facebook to improve a "friendship" or to stay friends. Some of my best friends are not on facebook, or not connected.
<br>  <br> 
What I find really useful in facebook is its search function, as it allows you to e.g. reconnect with people who graduated in the same year at the same school/college as you.
<br>  <br> 
The photo sharing abilities are not all that great (poor resolution, cumbersome interface to restrict visibility).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree many people indeed use it as a display of vanity or to attract attention .
And you do n't need facebook to improve a " friendship " or to stay friends .
Some of my best friends are not on facebook , or not connected .
What I find really useful in facebook is its search function , as it allows you to e.g .
reconnect with people who graduated in the same year at the same school/college as you .
The photo sharing abilities are not all that great ( poor resolution , cumbersome interface to restrict visibility ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree many people indeed use it as a display of vanity or to attract attention.
And you don't need facebook to improve a "friendship" or to stay friends.
Some of my best friends are not on facebook, or not connected.
What I find really useful in facebook is its search function, as it allows you to e.g.
reconnect with people who graduated in the same year at the same school/college as you.
The photo sharing abilities are not all that great (poor resolution, cumbersome interface to restrict visibility).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644492</id>
	<title>Re:Only a fool would publish personal info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269703860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I say that you are a fool?</p><p>Who are your friends?  That is now known.<br>Topics?  Any you discuss are known.<br>How long do you spend on line on facebook?  Now known.<br>When are you on holidays?  Easy to extrapolate.  Calculate your average logon frequency.  When it changes noticeably, the system could predict you're away.  The system could then use your IP address and other information to calculate where you live.</p><p>For f*** sake.  Are people this stupid?  You think it's about birth dates?</p><p>AC<br>PS For those saying "yeah, but why would they do that?", just look at history.  Read Machiavelli's "the prince".  It won't talk about facebook, but it does talk about opportunity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I say that you are a fool ? Who are your friends ?
That is now known.Topics ?
Any you discuss are known.How long do you spend on line on facebook ?
Now known.When are you on holidays ?
Easy to extrapolate .
Calculate your average logon frequency .
When it changes noticeably , the system could predict you 're away .
The system could then use your IP address and other information to calculate where you live.For f * * * sake .
Are people this stupid ?
You think it 's about birth dates ? ACPS For those saying " yeah , but why would they do that ?
" , just look at history .
Read Machiavelli 's " the prince " .
It wo n't talk about facebook , but it does talk about opportunity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I say that you are a fool?Who are your friends?
That is now known.Topics?
Any you discuss are known.How long do you spend on line on facebook?
Now known.When are you on holidays?
Easy to extrapolate.
Calculate your average logon frequency.
When it changes noticeably, the system could predict you're away.
The system could then use your IP address and other information to calculate where you live.For f*** sake.
Are people this stupid?
You think it's about birth dates?ACPS For those saying "yeah, but why would they do that?
", just look at history.
Read Machiavelli's "the prince".
It won't talk about facebook, but it does talk about opportunity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269685140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, we do.</p><p>Here's one from last year.</p><p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html" title="cnet.com">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html</a> [cnet.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , we do.Here 's one from last year.http : //news.cnet.com/8301-13578 \ _3-10268282-38.html [ cnet.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, we do.Here's one from last year.http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html [cnet.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644042</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>geck4o</author>
	<datestamp>1269698580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-- it's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America --



How can the collection of overwhelmingly trivial personal information on the internet possibly be 'far more disturbing' than the inexorable loss of individual freedom and human rights that has occurred in the US and UK in the past decade or so?

Doesn't make sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>-- it 's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America -- How can the collection of overwhelmingly trivial personal information on the internet possibly be 'far more disturbing ' than the inexorable loss of individual freedom and human rights that has occurred in the US and UK in the past decade or so ?
Does n't make sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-- it's far more disturbing than the advanced police state that exists in the UK and is growing in the United States of America --



How can the collection of overwhelmingly trivial personal information on the internet possibly be 'far more disturbing' than the inexorable loss of individual freedom and human rights that has occurred in the US and UK in the past decade or so?
Doesn't make sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641572</id>
	<title>Re:But</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269719340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a computer scientist specializing in data mining, I'd like to say that you'd be surprised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a computer scientist specializing in data mining , I 'd like to say that you 'd be surprised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a computer scientist specializing in data mining, I'd like to say that you'd be surprised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643644</id>
	<title>Re:Only a fool would publish personal info</title>
	<author>thegrassyknowl</author>
	<datestamp>1269694260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What fucking pisses me off is I do that and yet I have one \_ex\_ friend who is dumb enough to go posting all over Facebook wherever that stuff comes up with "corrections". Fucking idiot. No matter how often I told her there was a reason I'd put incorrect information in there she kept doing it. Deleted that moron from the friends list and also from the phonebook, and my life.</p><p>You may think you're doing a good job of being private, but I bet everybody on here has at least one friend who has loaded up their Google address book with all of the private details you were hoping to keep from Google. It's annoying enough that these people consistently email out with a hundred names and addresses in the To: field, so people who I'd successfully avoided giving my details to suddenly have them.</p><p>You can't win. People are dumb fuckers who care only about shiny things and making their own lives "better". Putting everything online with no regard for privacy or security somehow makes their lives "better", particularly if it's a nice shiny website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What fucking pisses me off is I do that and yet I have one \ _ex \ _ friend who is dumb enough to go posting all over Facebook wherever that stuff comes up with " corrections " .
Fucking idiot .
No matter how often I told her there was a reason I 'd put incorrect information in there she kept doing it .
Deleted that moron from the friends list and also from the phonebook , and my life.You may think you 're doing a good job of being private , but I bet everybody on here has at least one friend who has loaded up their Google address book with all of the private details you were hoping to keep from Google .
It 's annoying enough that these people consistently email out with a hundred names and addresses in the To : field , so people who I 'd successfully avoided giving my details to suddenly have them.You ca n't win .
People are dumb fuckers who care only about shiny things and making their own lives " better " .
Putting everything online with no regard for privacy or security somehow makes their lives " better " , particularly if it 's a nice shiny website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What fucking pisses me off is I do that and yet I have one \_ex\_ friend who is dumb enough to go posting all over Facebook wherever that stuff comes up with "corrections".
Fucking idiot.
No matter how often I told her there was a reason I'd put incorrect information in there she kept doing it.
Deleted that moron from the friends list and also from the phonebook, and my life.You may think you're doing a good job of being private, but I bet everybody on here has at least one friend who has loaded up their Google address book with all of the private details you were hoping to keep from Google.
It's annoying enough that these people consistently email out with a hundred names and addresses in the To: field, so people who I'd successfully avoided giving my details to suddenly have them.You can't win.
People are dumb fuckers who care only about shiny things and making their own lives "better".
Putting everything online with no regard for privacy or security somehow makes their lives "better", particularly if it's a nice shiny website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31659500</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1269887400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll be wanting folks to follow <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/06/bozeman-apologizes-backs-down-over-facebook-login-request.ars" title="arstechnica.com">where they backed down</a> [arstechnica.com], too.  Or maybe the <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/20/0146252/Bozeman-MT-Drops-Password-Info-Requirement?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">slashdot</a> [slashdot.org] article...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll be wanting folks to follow where they backed down [ arstechnica.com ] , too .
Or maybe the slashdot [ slashdot.org ] article.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll be wanting folks to follow where they backed down [arstechnica.com], too.
Or maybe the slashdot [slashdot.org] article...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640582</id>
	<title>my name is fred f stone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269712500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i live at 69 rockit drive<br>my hobbies include</p><p>banging my neighbors wife betty<br>and of course my own wifey wilma</p><p>want to be my friend ( sing it mister rogers style of course )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i live at 69 rockit drivemy hobbies includebanging my neighbors wife bettyand of course my own wifey wilmawant to be my friend ( sing it mister rogers style of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i live at 69 rockit drivemy hobbies includebanging my neighbors wife bettyand of course my own wifey wilmawant to be my friend ( sing it mister rogers style of course )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644388</id>
	<title>at least at first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269702660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first."</p><p>i think i used a similar line to talk my gf into anal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" a bold change that may well unnerve users , at least at first .
" i think i used a similar line to talk my gf into anal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"a bold change that may well unnerve users, at least at first.
"i think i used a similar line to talk my gf into anal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640302</id>
	<title>I love being AC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269711060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Precisely for things like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Precisely for things like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Precisely for things like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31652948</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269794220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yup, we do.</p><p>Here's one from last year.</p><p> <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html" title="cnet.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html</a> [cnet.com] </p></div><p>Actually legally we don't and if they refuse to hire you because you refuse to give them your information it can become a very large headache for them if you have any motivation. They can ask to see your page but in no way shape or form do they have any right to ask you for your screen name and passwords!! It is flat out completely and totally against the law and when you "sign" your agreement with the site you joined part of the disclaimer is that you do not share your screen name and password with anyone nor are you to let anyone access your account.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , we do.Here 's one from last year .
http : //news.cnet.com/8301-13578 \ _3-10268282-38.html [ cnet.com ] Actually legally we do n't and if they refuse to hire you because you refuse to give them your information it can become a very large headache for them if you have any motivation .
They can ask to see your page but in no way shape or form do they have any right to ask you for your screen name and passwords ! !
It is flat out completely and totally against the law and when you " sign " your agreement with the site you joined part of the disclaimer is that you do not share your screen name and password with anyone nor are you to let anyone access your account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, we do.Here's one from last year.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10268282-38.html [cnet.com] Actually legally we don't and if they refuse to hire you because you refuse to give them your information it can become a very large headache for them if you have any motivation.
They can ask to see your page but in no way shape or form do they have any right to ask you for your screen name and passwords!!
It is flat out completely and totally against the law and when you "sign" your agreement with the site you joined part of the disclaimer is that you do not share your screen name and password with anyone nor are you to let anyone access your account.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643918</id>
	<title>Re:facebook, myspace, friendster, orkut</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1269697200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Social networks allow me to stay in contact with my friends in a better and easier way than by phone. If I would not have such sites, I would have to call them or send them mails. And because modern economy forces people to move often, you cannot visit your friends every weekend, because they live in another country or state or continent. And I have not given them my data under agreement A and then they change it and then they could sell it or give my data to people I do not want to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Social networks allow me to stay in contact with my friends in a better and easier way than by phone .
If I would not have such sites , I would have to call them or send them mails .
And because modern economy forces people to move often , you can not visit your friends every weekend , because they live in another country or state or continent .
And I have not given them my data under agreement A and then they change it and then they could sell it or give my data to people I do not want to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social networks allow me to stay in contact with my friends in a better and easier way than by phone.
If I would not have such sites, I would have to call them or send them mails.
And because modern economy forces people to move often, you cannot visit your friends every weekend, because they live in another country or state or continent.
And I have not given them my data under agreement A and then they change it and then they could sell it or give my data to people I do not want to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641306</id>
	<title>Re:i used to complain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269717240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got some news for you. Even though you're not on Facebook, you're still on Facebook.</p><p>I finally gave up on the idea of internet anonymity a few months ago, realizing that if I didn't take charge of my own PR, someone else would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got some news for you .
Even though you 're not on Facebook , you 're still on Facebook.I finally gave up on the idea of internet anonymity a few months ago , realizing that if I did n't take charge of my own PR , someone else would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got some news for you.
Even though you're not on Facebook, you're still on Facebook.I finally gave up on the idea of internet anonymity a few months ago, realizing that if I didn't take charge of my own PR, someone else would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642168</id>
	<title>Facebook making your browsing habits public</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269680820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed several Facebook apps that allow you to see who is reading your home page and how many times. In other words, your Facebook browsing habits are available to random apps which then publish it to the world. And there is no opt in or opt out for this.<br>This is like google letting every one see the keywords you typed in alongside your name and photo.<br>Facebook is evil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed several Facebook apps that allow you to see who is reading your home page and how many times .
In other words , your Facebook browsing habits are available to random apps which then publish it to the world .
And there is no opt in or opt out for this.This is like google letting every one see the keywords you typed in alongside your name and photo.Facebook is evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed several Facebook apps that allow you to see who is reading your home page and how many times.
In other words, your Facebook browsing habits are available to random apps which then publish it to the world.
And there is no opt in or opt out for this.This is like google letting every one see the keywords you typed in alongside your name and photo.Facebook is evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288</id>
	<title>Nooooo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269711000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friends<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I see trouble in future<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friends ... I see trouble in future : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting all the users of slashdot access my friends ... I see trouble in future :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742</id>
	<title>i used to complain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269713640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>about the cranky losers who constantly trumpet the fact they don't have a television, whenever the subject comes up</p><p>however, i am now that cranky loser, for facebook: every time facebook comes up as an issue, i will trumpet the fact i don't have an account, and never will, and feel smugly superior for that fact</p><p>it's nothing but a bonfire of vanities. you're just not that interesting, none of us are, sorry</p><p>free your time and free yourself from endless navel gazing and obviously, get some privacy: lose facerbook, permanently. declare your freedom from shallowness and corporate exploitation</p><p>if you have real friends, they won't need this stupid contrivance to maintain their friendship with you. the rest are just acquaintances, not really friends, and you work far too hard to maintain some ridiculous fake mask for their sake. they don't really matter to the quality of your life, unless you're shallow, in which case you don't have that much quality of life to begin with</p><p>lose facebook. you're life will improve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>about the cranky losers who constantly trumpet the fact they do n't have a television , whenever the subject comes uphowever , i am now that cranky loser , for facebook : every time facebook comes up as an issue , i will trumpet the fact i do n't have an account , and never will , and feel smugly superior for that factit 's nothing but a bonfire of vanities .
you 're just not that interesting , none of us are , sorryfree your time and free yourself from endless navel gazing and obviously , get some privacy : lose facerbook , permanently .
declare your freedom from shallowness and corporate exploitationif you have real friends , they wo n't need this stupid contrivance to maintain their friendship with you .
the rest are just acquaintances , not really friends , and you work far too hard to maintain some ridiculous fake mask for their sake .
they do n't really matter to the quality of your life , unless you 're shallow , in which case you do n't have that much quality of life to begin withlose facebook .
you 're life will improve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about the cranky losers who constantly trumpet the fact they don't have a television, whenever the subject comes uphowever, i am now that cranky loser, for facebook: every time facebook comes up as an issue, i will trumpet the fact i don't have an account, and never will, and feel smugly superior for that factit's nothing but a bonfire of vanities.
you're just not that interesting, none of us are, sorryfree your time and free yourself from endless navel gazing and obviously, get some privacy: lose facerbook, permanently.
declare your freedom from shallowness and corporate exploitationif you have real friends, they won't need this stupid contrivance to maintain their friendship with you.
the rest are just acquaintances, not really friends, and you work far too hard to maintain some ridiculous fake mask for their sake.
they don't really matter to the quality of your life, unless you're shallow, in which case you don't have that much quality of life to begin withlose facebook.
you're life will improve</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642550</id>
	<title>Re:Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>SpekkioMofW</author>
	<datestamp>1269683880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life."

Can you provide URLs or anything? It's not that I don't believe you (I absolutely do) but I want to see these for myself and to share with my library management class. I tried finding articles on my own, but my Google Fu must not be strong today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker 's Facebook accounts in real life .
" Can you provide URLs or anything ?
It 's not that I do n't believe you ( I absolutely do ) but I want to see these for myself and to share with my library management class .
I tried finding articles on my own , but my Google Fu must not be strong today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life.
"

Can you provide URLs or anything?
It's not that I don't believe you (I absolutely do) but I want to see these for myself and to share with my library management class.
I tried finding articles on my own, but my Google Fu must not be strong today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464</id>
	<title>Tracking and XSS for the masses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269712020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And this comes as a surprise to anyone? The real danger is the proliferation of these services into everyday life. We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life. How long before you are viewed as being 'suspicious' for not having an account and sharing all your intimate details with the rest of the world? Everyone is doing it, why not you? Do you have anything to hide?

I am also sure that Facebook themselves will in no way use the third-party data in order to track their users visits on other sites, would they?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And this comes as a surprise to anyone ?
The real danger is the proliferation of these services into everyday life .
We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker 's Facebook accounts in real life .
How long before you are viewed as being 'suspicious ' for not having an account and sharing all your intimate details with the rest of the world ?
Everyone is doing it , why not you ?
Do you have anything to hide ?
I am also sure that Facebook themselves will in no way use the third-party data in order to track their users visits on other sites , would they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this comes as a surprise to anyone?
The real danger is the proliferation of these services into everyday life.
We already have examples of employers that demands access to prospective worker's Facebook accounts in real life.
How long before you are viewed as being 'suspicious' for not having an account and sharing all your intimate details with the rest of the world?
Everyone is doing it, why not you?
Do you have anything to hide?
I am also sure that Facebook themselves will in no way use the third-party data in order to track their users visits on other sites, would they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31649540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31647604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31659500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31652948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_27_1550204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31649540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31643644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642530
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31647604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31644942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642726
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31659500
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31652948
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31645640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31646852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31642550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31641780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_27_1550204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_27_1550204.31640302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
