<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_26_1643259</id>
	<title>Beijing Sweetens Rubbish With Giant Deodorant Guns</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269592080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Beijing plans to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/26/beijing-rubbish-deodorant">install 100 deodorant guns at a landfill site</a> on the edge of the city in the hopes that it will dampen complaints about the capital's rubbish crisis.The giant fragrance sprayers will be put in place by May at the Asuwei dump site. From the article: 'Municipal authorities say they will also apply more plastic layers to cover the site in response to furious protests by local residents who have to put up with the stench when the wind blows in their direction. The high-pressure guns, which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m, are produced by several Chinese firms and based on German and Italian technology. They are already in use at several landfill sites, but they are merely a temporary fix.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Beijing plans to install 100 deodorant guns at a landfill site on the edge of the city in the hopes that it will dampen complaints about the capital 's rubbish crisis.The giant fragrance sprayers will be put in place by May at the Asuwei dump site .
From the article : 'Municipal authorities say they will also apply more plastic layers to cover the site in response to furious protests by local residents who have to put up with the stench when the wind blows in their direction .
The high-pressure guns , which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m , are produced by several Chinese firms and based on German and Italian technology .
They are already in use at several landfill sites , but they are merely a temporary fix .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Beijing plans to install 100 deodorant guns at a landfill site on the edge of the city in the hopes that it will dampen complaints about the capital's rubbish crisis.The giant fragrance sprayers will be put in place by May at the Asuwei dump site.
From the article: 'Municipal authorities say they will also apply more plastic layers to cover the site in response to furious protests by local residents who have to put up with the stench when the wind blows in their direction.
The high-pressure guns, which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m, are produced by several Chinese firms and based on German and Italian technology.
They are already in use at several landfill sites, but they are merely a temporary fix.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632080</id>
	<title>Matter that stuffs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/.'s stuff that matters is also about the matter that stuffs.</p><p>This matter we produce, stuffs us, we don't know what to do with it.  Futurama of-course tackled this problem, all that is needed is a giant rocket to take every piece of garbage off this rock and dump it into the space.  Later, when more garbage is created, all we do is throw the second pile at the first.  One of them will fly into the Sun.</p><p>On the other hand it looks like soon enough there will be a huge opportunity for new ways of recycling this shit by turning it into energy by applying various types of bacteria that eat it and burp or poop up carbons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
's stuff that matters is also about the matter that stuffs.This matter we produce , stuffs us , we do n't know what to do with it .
Futurama of-course tackled this problem , all that is needed is a giant rocket to take every piece of garbage off this rock and dump it into the space .
Later , when more garbage is created , all we do is throw the second pile at the first .
One of them will fly into the Sun.On the other hand it looks like soon enough there will be a huge opportunity for new ways of recycling this shit by turning it into energy by applying various types of bacteria that eat it and burp or poop up carbons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
's stuff that matters is also about the matter that stuffs.This matter we produce, stuffs us, we don't know what to do with it.
Futurama of-course tackled this problem, all that is needed is a giant rocket to take every piece of garbage off this rock and dump it into the space.
Later, when more garbage is created, all we do is throw the second pile at the first.
One of them will fly into the Sun.On the other hand it looks like soon enough there will be a huge opportunity for new ways of recycling this shit by turning it into energy by applying various types of bacteria that eat it and burp or poop up carbons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633902</id>
	<title>Now if only...</title>
	<author>fiendy</author>
	<datestamp>1269605160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now if only I can convince the Chinese government to install one in my boss' office.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if only I can convince the Chinese government to install one in my boss ' office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if only I can convince the Chinese government to install one in my boss' office.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635934</id>
	<title>Re:News at 11!</title>
	<author>gemada</author>
	<datestamp>1269617820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>soon we will be overrun by a giant mutated bug called Deodor-ant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>soon we will be overrun by a giant mutated bug called Deodor-ant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>soon we will be overrun by a giant mutated bug called Deodor-ant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631944</id>
	<title>Like Smelly Kids Do</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1269595920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is like when people smell horrid after they come out of the gym full of other horrid smelling people, have somewhere to be and just take a cologne bath.

<br> <br>

When you do that it just smells like the bathroom after someone comes out waving their spray can.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is like when people smell horrid after they come out of the gym full of other horrid smelling people , have somewhere to be and just take a cologne bath .
When you do that it just smells like the bathroom after someone comes out waving their spray can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is like when people smell horrid after they come out of the gym full of other horrid smelling people, have somewhere to be and just take a cologne bath.
When you do that it just smells like the bathroom after someone comes out waving their spray can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632254</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>badran</author>
	<datestamp>1269597060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You would have to look at what people throw away, in poorer countries people tend not to throw away reusable items like plastic bags and glass containers. And also less food is thrown away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You would have to look at what people throw away , in poorer countries people tend not to throw away reusable items like plastic bags and glass containers .
And also less food is thrown away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would have to look at what people throw away, in poorer countries people tend not to throw away reusable items like plastic bags and glass containers.
And also less food is thrown away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633330</id>
	<title>Respiratory disease?  Yes please!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269601920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what kind of substandard shit will China be spraying all over Beijing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what kind of substandard shit will China be spraying all over Beijing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what kind of substandard shit will China be spraying all over Beijing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31637356</id>
	<title>Gack the fragrance might be more toxic.</title>
	<author>niftymitch</author>
	<datestamp>1269631740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many fragrances are toxic.
<br>
Thus this is adding insult to injury.
<br>
Worse fragrances in "everything" are
implicated in the epidemic of childhood
asthma.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many fragrances are toxic .
Thus this is adding insult to injury .
Worse fragrances in " everything " are implicated in the epidemic of childhood asthma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many fragrances are toxic.
Thus this is adding insult to injury.
Worse fragrances in "everything" are
implicated in the epidemic of childhood
asthma.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632786</id>
	<title>Re:News at 11!</title>
	<author>Bugamn</author>
	<datestamp>1269599220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DAMN!
It's World War Z becoming true!</htmltext>
<tokenext>DAMN !
It 's World War Z becoming true !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DAMN!
It's World War Z becoming true!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31654582</id>
	<title>Re:Spray on reactants instead</title>
	<author>grh\_angelone</author>
	<datestamp>1269857100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process.</p></div><p>biodegradation of what?
plastic bags?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process.biodegradation of what ?
plastic bags ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process.biodegradation of what?
plastic bags?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092</id>
	<title>Environmental impact</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they'll end up putting in these sprayers?  It doesn't help much if it's something loaded with CFCs or something.  Also, is covered the thing in plastic a good idea?  If they starve the landfill of air wouldn't everything decompose more slowly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they 'll end up putting in these sprayers ?
It does n't help much if it 's something loaded with CFCs or something .
Also , is covered the thing in plastic a good idea ?
If they starve the landfill of air would n't everything decompose more slowly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they'll end up putting in these sprayers?
It doesn't help much if it's something loaded with CFCs or something.
Also, is covered the thing in plastic a good idea?
If they starve the landfill of air wouldn't everything decompose more slowly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31638510</id>
	<title>Another source of migraine ...</title>
	<author>Misagon</author>
	<datestamp>1269694380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can get a migraine attack if I am subjected to too much perfume, and there are a lot of other people with the same problem.</p><p>I (we) already have to avoid perfumed people at work, when travelling and standing in line for something. Now, all of us with the same sensitivity are being locked out of that chinese neighbourhood completely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can get a migraine attack if I am subjected to too much perfume , and there are a lot of other people with the same problem.I ( we ) already have to avoid perfumed people at work , when travelling and standing in line for something .
Now , all of us with the same sensitivity are being locked out of that chinese neighbourhood completely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can get a migraine attack if I am subjected to too much perfume, and there are a lot of other people with the same problem.I (we) already have to avoid perfumed people at work, when travelling and standing in line for something.
Now, all of us with the same sensitivity are being locked out of that chinese neighbourhood completely.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631988</id>
	<title>Damn.</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1269596040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i> The high-pressure guns, which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m</i> </p><p>I'm just counting the days until department store cosmetics departments get this. In the arms race between perfume demonstration ladies and shoppers passing through the department, I think someone has just gone nuclear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The high-pressure guns , which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m I 'm just counting the days until department store cosmetics departments get this .
In the arms race between perfume demonstration ladies and shoppers passing through the department , I think someone has just gone nuclear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  The high-pressure guns, which can spray dozens of litres of fragrance per minute over a distance of up to 50m I'm just counting the days until department store cosmetics departments get this.
In the arms race between perfume demonstration ladies and shoppers passing through the department, I think someone has just gone nuclear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632164</id>
	<title>Car analogy?</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1269596700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Car analogy? Maybe!</p><p>When I was a mechanic we used Brake Cleaner for all sorts of things. It left no residue, removed most nasty crud that needed to be removed and worked wonders removing moisture from electrical circuits. The problem was that it was pretty nasty smelling stuff. It completely evaporates leaving most of the chemicals floating around the shop for awhile.</p><p>Then one day I open a new case of the stuff and start using it on a brake job. Whoa! New smell! Apparently, the manufacturer thought it would be a good idea to add fragrance to the cans to make it more acceptable.</p><p>The problem was that the FRAGRANCE did NOT evaporate. It hung on to whatever it was sprayed on. We actually had several customers return their cars because of the smell (especially once the brakes got hot from use).</p><p>I returned the rest of the case, and the vendor took it back without question as they had been getting numerous complaints...the fragrance ended up being worse then the original problem.</p><p>On another note, I don't even go to the local mall anymore because all the vendors pump fragrances out the front doors of the individual shops. I usually have a doozy of a headache after being in there for more then 10-15 minutes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Car analogy ?
Maybe ! When I was a mechanic we used Brake Cleaner for all sorts of things .
It left no residue , removed most nasty crud that needed to be removed and worked wonders removing moisture from electrical circuits .
The problem was that it was pretty nasty smelling stuff .
It completely evaporates leaving most of the chemicals floating around the shop for awhile.Then one day I open a new case of the stuff and start using it on a brake job .
Whoa ! New smell !
Apparently , the manufacturer thought it would be a good idea to add fragrance to the cans to make it more acceptable.The problem was that the FRAGRANCE did NOT evaporate .
It hung on to whatever it was sprayed on .
We actually had several customers return their cars because of the smell ( especially once the brakes got hot from use ) .I returned the rest of the case , and the vendor took it back without question as they had been getting numerous complaints...the fragrance ended up being worse then the original problem.On another note , I do n't even go to the local mall anymore because all the vendors pump fragrances out the front doors of the individual shops .
I usually have a doozy of a headache after being in there for more then 10-15 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Car analogy?
Maybe!When I was a mechanic we used Brake Cleaner for all sorts of things.
It left no residue, removed most nasty crud that needed to be removed and worked wonders removing moisture from electrical circuits.
The problem was that it was pretty nasty smelling stuff.
It completely evaporates leaving most of the chemicals floating around the shop for awhile.Then one day I open a new case of the stuff and start using it on a brake job.
Whoa! New smell!
Apparently, the manufacturer thought it would be a good idea to add fragrance to the cans to make it more acceptable.The problem was that the FRAGRANCE did NOT evaporate.
It hung on to whatever it was sprayed on.
We actually had several customers return their cars because of the smell (especially once the brakes got hot from use).I returned the rest of the case, and the vendor took it back without question as they had been getting numerous complaints...the fragrance ended up being worse then the original problem.On another note, I don't even go to the local mall anymore because all the vendors pump fragrances out the front doors of the individual shops.
I usually have a doozy of a headache after being in there for more then 10-15 minutes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632088</id>
	<title>modQ up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>over a 4ua7ity</htmltext>
<tokenext>over a 4ua7ity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over a 4ua7ity</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634372</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269608100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Febreeze ftw!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Febreeze ftw !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Febreeze ftw!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632078</id>
	<title>Re:News for Nerds</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269596400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This IS news for nerds... at my workplace, we're strongly considering using this technology on nerds that "forget" to shower!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This IS news for nerds... at my workplace , we 're strongly considering using this technology on nerds that " forget " to shower !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This IS news for nerds... at my workplace, we're strongly considering using this technology on nerds that "forget" to shower!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632882</id>
	<title>If they would bury the garbage deeper ...</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1269599700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be our problem!  At least that's what I remember from one of my childhood bedtime stories.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be our problem !
At least that 's what I remember from one of my childhood bedtime stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be our problem!
At least that's what I remember from one of my childhood bedtime stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632090</id>
	<title>pyrolysis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You end up with char, oils, combustible gases, energy and more space.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You end up with char , oils , combustible gases , energy and more space .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>You end up with char, oils, combustible gases, energy and more space.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632116</id>
	<title>Re:News for Nerds</title>
	<author>twidarkling</author>
	<datestamp>1269596580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't even news. They're using a piss-poor solution for a problem that they created. That's not news, that's what 90\% of the world does. What's the news part? That they're using perfume guns? Those aren't news-worthy. The basic tech is known as a fire hose. That Beijing has a trash problem? So do a lot of other places.</p><p>This is idle-fodder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't even news .
They 're using a piss-poor solution for a problem that they created .
That 's not news , that 's what 90 \ % of the world does .
What 's the news part ?
That they 're using perfume guns ?
Those are n't news-worthy .
The basic tech is known as a fire hose .
That Beijing has a trash problem ?
So do a lot of other places.This is idle-fodder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't even news.
They're using a piss-poor solution for a problem that they created.
That's not news, that's what 90\% of the world does.
What's the news part?
That they're using perfume guns?
Those aren't news-worthy.
The basic tech is known as a fire hose.
That Beijing has a trash problem?
So do a lot of other places.This is idle-fodder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631954</id>
	<title>Spray on reactants instead</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1269595920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should instead spray on biological reactants to absorb odors and/or biodegradation accelerators to speed up the process.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632406</id>
	<title>Sucks for Allergic people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269597780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have friends that are allergic to fragrances.  That would suck to live close to these land fills and go from a horrible smell to constant congestion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have friends that are allergic to fragrances .
That would suck to live close to these land fills and go from a horrible smell to constant congestion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have friends that are allergic to fragrances.
That would suck to live close to these land fills and go from a horrible smell to constant congestion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634036</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269605940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume!</p></div><p>Sounds like my ex gf.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume ! Sounds like my ex gf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume!Sounds like my ex gf.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632040</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>Gruff1002</author>
	<datestamp>1269596280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA said less than 4\% of their rubbish is recycled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA said less than 4 \ % of their rubbish is recycled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA said less than 4\% of their rubbish is recycled.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632674</id>
	<title>Yeesss</title>
	<author>the\_hellspawn</author>
	<datestamp>1269598680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>mixed with the rancid scent of garbage is a pleasing scent of lilacs. From that point forward lilacs will have the scent of garbage and lilacs in the minds of everyone whom smells it. yummy yummy so good for my tummy</htmltext>
<tokenext>mixed with the rancid scent of garbage is a pleasing scent of lilacs .
From that point forward lilacs will have the scent of garbage and lilacs in the minds of everyone whom smells it .
yummy yummy so good for my tummy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mixed with the rancid scent of garbage is a pleasing scent of lilacs.
From that point forward lilacs will have the scent of garbage and lilacs in the minds of everyone whom smells it.
yummy yummy so good for my tummy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632580</id>
	<title>Stop throwing out so much trash?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269598440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my entire life, okay maybe not but it's up there. Maybe they need to learn to stop throwing out so much trash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the dumbest thing I 've ever heard in my entire life , okay maybe not but it 's up there .
Maybe they need to learn to stop throwing out so much trash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my entire life, okay maybe not but it's up there.
Maybe they need to learn to stop throwing out so much trash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632192</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1269596820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume! Two great scents that go great together!</p><p>It'll mix nicely from the open-vent sewers they have in Beijing.</p><p>Seriously.</p><p>I thought I was going to puke when my taxi, windows open, got parked on top of one of those things in traffic for a few minutes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume !
Two great scents that go great together ! It 'll mix nicely from the open-vent sewers they have in Beijing.Seriously.I thought I was going to puke when my taxi , windows open , got parked on top of one of those things in traffic for a few minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume!
Two great scents that go great together!It'll mix nicely from the open-vent sewers they have in Beijing.Seriously.I thought I was going to puke when my taxi, windows open, got parked on top of one of those things in traffic for a few minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632124</id>
	<title>IIRC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't there a company that built a $400 million trash factory that burned trash into a tiny, inert substance, generating enough energy in the process to generate income and pay for the factory?  Whatever happened to them?  I would think China would love to use their tech.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there a company that built a $ 400 million trash factory that burned trash into a tiny , inert substance , generating enough energy in the process to generate income and pay for the factory ?
Whatever happened to them ?
I would think China would love to use their tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there a company that built a $400 million trash factory that burned trash into a tiny, inert substance, generating enough energy in the process to generate income and pay for the factory?
Whatever happened to them?
I would think China would love to use their tech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632870</id>
	<title>Is there nothing they won't censor?</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1269599580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're even censoring the smell of rubbish!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're even censoring the smell of rubbish !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're even censoring the smell of rubbish!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632114</id>
	<title>the answer is higher concentrations of chemicals?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>reeeally? so they'll dump thousands of liters of chemical spray (hello febreeze knock off) and this is somehow better than either making or enforcing a few basic rules on landfill usage?</p><p>china just gets more interesting by the minute as a benchmark for human tolerances to just about everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>reeeally ?
so they 'll dump thousands of liters of chemical spray ( hello febreeze knock off ) and this is somehow better than either making or enforcing a few basic rules on landfill usage ? china just gets more interesting by the minute as a benchmark for human tolerances to just about everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>reeeally?
so they'll dump thousands of liters of chemical spray (hello febreeze knock off) and this is somehow better than either making or enforcing a few basic rules on landfill usage?china just gets more interesting by the minute as a benchmark for human tolerances to just about everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631998</id>
	<title>Questions:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am not deluded (or I should probably say 'optimistic') enough to be one of the "Let's save the planet!!" types, but seriously, with our modern technology shouldn't there be a way to break down various forms of 'garbage' into its rawest state for productive use in something else? If not, what about just breaking it down to where it doesn't take up so much space so that we can postpone the inevitable for a few more decades so that our posterity can languish in it for slightly longer?<br> <br>And no. I am not talking about recycling. That is one of those voluntary things that so few people participate in. I am talking about the tried proven method of paying some poor sap to clean the crap up so that we don't have to be bothered with finding a specially colored wastebin (which itself will probably end up in a landfill as opposed to being 'recycled').</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not deluded ( or I should probably say 'optimistic ' ) enough to be one of the " Let 's save the planet ! !
" types , but seriously , with our modern technology should n't there be a way to break down various forms of 'garbage ' into its rawest state for productive use in something else ?
If not , what about just breaking it down to where it does n't take up so much space so that we can postpone the inevitable for a few more decades so that our posterity can languish in it for slightly longer ?
And no .
I am not talking about recycling .
That is one of those voluntary things that so few people participate in .
I am talking about the tried proven method of paying some poor sap to clean the crap up so that we do n't have to be bothered with finding a specially colored wastebin ( which itself will probably end up in a landfill as opposed to being 'recycled ' ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not deluded (or I should probably say 'optimistic') enough to be one of the "Let's save the planet!!
" types, but seriously, with our modern technology shouldn't there be a way to break down various forms of 'garbage' into its rawest state for productive use in something else?
If not, what about just breaking it down to where it doesn't take up so much space so that we can postpone the inevitable for a few more decades so that our posterity can languish in it for slightly longer?
And no.
I am not talking about recycling.
That is one of those voluntary things that so few people participate in.
I am talking about the tried proven method of paying some poor sap to clean the crap up so that we don't have to be bothered with finding a specially colored wastebin (which itself will probably end up in a landfill as opposed to being 'recycled').</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928</id>
	<title>News for Nerds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269595860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get it.. what is the point of this story on the front page?</p><p>There's no tech angle to it, nothing remotely nerd worthy to discuss.</p><p>Can we focus on something real here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it.. what is the point of this story on the front page ? There 's no tech angle to it , nothing remotely nerd worthy to discuss.Can we focus on something real here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it.. what is the point of this story on the front page?There's no tech angle to it, nothing remotely nerd worthy to discuss.Can we focus on something real here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632272</id>
	<title>Re:Environmental impact</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1269597120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compressed air?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compressed air ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compressed air?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269595800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume!  Two great scents that go great together!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume !
Two great scents that go great together !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it will smell like rubbish and perfume!
Two great scents that go great together!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632104</id>
	<title>China has a surplus of deodorant...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because they don't use it themselves!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because they do n't use it themselves !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because they don't use it themselves!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31661060</id>
	<title>Oh no the deodorant causes cancer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269894480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure...setting up high power machines that can spray dozens of liters of "fragrance" per minute over a distance of 50m sounds safe. I totally trust that it is safe to breath that stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure...setting up high power machines that can spray dozens of liters of " fragrance " per minute over a distance of 50m sounds safe .
I totally trust that it is safe to breath that stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure...setting up high power machines that can spray dozens of liters of "fragrance" per minute over a distance of 50m sounds safe.
I totally trust that it is safe to breath that stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31636890</id>
	<title>idiocracy</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1269625560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, a correct use of the tag for once!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , a correct use of the tag for once !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, a correct use of the tag for once!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269595800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how much of that landfill is recyclables?  Dunno if that's a stock photo of a landfill or something, but I see a lot of plastics there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much of that landfill is recyclables ?
Dunno if that 's a stock photo of a landfill or something , but I see a lot of plastics there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much of that landfill is recyclables?
Dunno if that's a stock photo of a landfill or something, but I see a lot of plastics there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632098</id>
	<title>They hired the Axe people to do the fragrance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are actually spraying a relabeled version of Axe: New Jersey Breeze. With Jersey's fiscal crisis, they could no longer afford it. Jersey's loss is China's gain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are actually spraying a relabeled version of Axe : New Jersey Breeze .
With Jersey 's fiscal crisis , they could no longer afford it .
Jersey 's loss is China 's gain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are actually spraying a relabeled version of Axe: New Jersey Breeze.
With Jersey's fiscal crisis, they could no longer afford it.
Jersey's loss is China's gain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633970</id>
	<title>Tragically lazy, backwards solution</title>
	<author>toby</author>
	<datestamp>1269605520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rather than address the problems at the source - Reduce, Re-use, Recycle would be a start - the complaints and proposal is about covering up the problem at the end of the chain. This "cure" is if anything worse than the disease.</p><p>China's enthusiastically converted their country to one big foul toxic wasteland, but this is our shared fate, if such backwards responses to the problem are the best we can do.</p><p>Start with Use Less. Don't buy overpackaged goods or small packages. Re-use packaging and bags. Do recycle. Humans were resourceful enough to make (and keep on making) the mess; now we have to be smart enough to change our ways.</p><p>There is no Planet B.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than address the problems at the source - Reduce , Re-use , Recycle would be a start - the complaints and proposal is about covering up the problem at the end of the chain .
This " cure " is if anything worse than the disease.China 's enthusiastically converted their country to one big foul toxic wasteland , but this is our shared fate , if such backwards responses to the problem are the best we can do.Start with Use Less .
Do n't buy overpackaged goods or small packages .
Re-use packaging and bags .
Do recycle .
Humans were resourceful enough to make ( and keep on making ) the mess ; now we have to be smart enough to change our ways.There is no Planet B .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than address the problems at the source - Reduce, Re-use, Recycle would be a start - the complaints and proposal is about covering up the problem at the end of the chain.
This "cure" is if anything worse than the disease.China's enthusiastically converted their country to one big foul toxic wasteland, but this is our shared fate, if such backwards responses to the problem are the best we can do.Start with Use Less.
Don't buy overpackaged goods or small packages.
Re-use packaging and bags.
Do recycle.
Humans were resourceful enough to make (and keep on making) the mess; now we have to be smart enough to change our ways.There is no Planet B.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633240</id>
	<title>Re:Environmental impact</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1269601320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they'll end up putting in these sprayers?</p></div><p>With the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution\_in\_China" title="wikipedia.org">insane</a> [wikipedia.org] amount of pollution that China is already producing, you're worried about CFCs in the garbage deodorant?! "A drop in the ocean" doesn't even begin to capture your lack of perspective.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they 'll end up putting in these sprayers ? With the insane [ wikipedia.org ] amount of pollution that China is already producing , you 're worried about CFCs in the garbage deodorant ? !
" A drop in the ocean " does n't even begin to capture your lack of perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is anybody else worried about what they'll end up putting in these sprayers?With the insane [wikipedia.org] amount of pollution that China is already producing, you're worried about CFCs in the garbage deodorant?!
"A drop in the ocean" doesn't even begin to capture your lack of perspective.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633286</id>
	<title>I don't get, why people don't get...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269601680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that trash is a mix of valuable resources, already digged out of the ground and preprocessed. You only have to filter what you want to take out, and recycle it. A good machine that can sort the pulverized stuff by mass and perhaps other chemical properties, might be able to recycle nearly all of that stuff. Biodegradables become mineral-rich earth. Glass is obviously useful. Metals even more so, and often very valuable. Plastics can also be recycled nowadays. I bet with all the electronics, that landfill contains more gold than a normal gold mine.<br>All that is an opportunity to make money from it. As long as it&rsquo;s not transformed to something less useful than what&rsquo;s digged out of the ground, there&rsquo;s money in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that trash is a mix of valuable resources , already digged out of the ground and preprocessed .
You only have to filter what you want to take out , and recycle it .
A good machine that can sort the pulverized stuff by mass and perhaps other chemical properties , might be able to recycle nearly all of that stuff .
Biodegradables become mineral-rich earth .
Glass is obviously useful .
Metals even more so , and often very valuable .
Plastics can also be recycled nowadays .
I bet with all the electronics , that landfill contains more gold than a normal gold mine.All that is an opportunity to make money from it .
As long as it    s not transformed to something less useful than what    s digged out of the ground , there    s money in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that trash is a mix of valuable resources, already digged out of the ground and preprocessed.
You only have to filter what you want to take out, and recycle it.
A good machine that can sort the pulverized stuff by mass and perhaps other chemical properties, might be able to recycle nearly all of that stuff.
Biodegradables become mineral-rich earth.
Glass is obviously useful.
Metals even more so, and often very valuable.
Plastics can also be recycled nowadays.
I bet with all the electronics, that landfill contains more gold than a normal gold mine.All that is an opportunity to make money from it.
As long as it’s not transformed to something less useful than what’s digged out of the ground, there’s money in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634552</id>
	<title>Plasma gasification?</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1269609300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the trash over there is a big enough problem to require deodorant guns it sounds like it's also big enough to use those high-volume plasma incinerators.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the trash over there is a big enough problem to require deodorant guns it sounds like it 's also big enough to use those high-volume plasma incinerators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the trash over there is a big enough problem to require deodorant guns it sounds like it's also big enough to use those high-volume plasma incinerators.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632494</id>
	<title>Re:Great!</title>
	<author>mweather</author>
	<datestamp>1269598020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might make the perfume smell even better. Porpoise vomit does.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might make the perfume smell even better .
Porpoise vomit does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might make the perfume smell even better.
Porpoise vomit does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996</id>
	<title>News at 11!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>News at 11: Researchers discover the deodorant was actually a mutagen.  Half of Beijing is dead.  The other half have turned into mutant zombies...</htmltext>
<tokenext>News at 11 : Researchers discover the deodorant was actually a mutagen .
Half of Beijing is dead .
The other half have turned into mutant zombies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News at 11: Researchers discover the deodorant was actually a mutagen.
Half of Beijing is dead.
The other half have turned into mutant zombies...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631926</id>
	<title>in related news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269595860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slashdot goes dead while all geeks in world rush to be the next in line...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdot goes dead while all geeks in world rush to be the next in line.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdot goes dead while all geeks in world rush to be the next in line...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632270</id>
	<title>wont this slow the decomposition?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269597120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is this deodorant reducing stench by adding an odor, or does it kill the bacteria that is decomposing the waste? or both?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is this deodorant reducing stench by adding an odor , or does it kill the bacteria that is decomposing the waste ?
or both ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this deodorant reducing stench by adding an odor, or does it kill the bacteria that is decomposing the waste?
or both?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632000</id>
	<title>Re:News for Nerds</title>
	<author>drachenstern</author>
	<datestamp>1269596100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's news, it's just not a tech story.</p><p>Aw crap, am I feeding the trolls again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's news , it 's just not a tech story.Aw crap , am I feeding the trolls again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's news, it's just not a tech story.Aw crap, am I feeding the trolls again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633196</id>
	<title>Woah</title>
	<author>Zeromous</author>
	<datestamp>1269601140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could totally use this technology on slashdot readers!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/the missing step?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could totally use this technology on slashdot readers !
/the missing step ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could totally use this technology on slashdot readers!
/the missing step?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632742</id>
	<title>Polishing a turd...</title>
	<author>tokenshi</author>
	<datestamp>1269599040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems pretty appropriate for Chinese Society and Government at large.  I have to wonder if logic enters into the decision making process at all.</p><p>Take for example when I was living in an Apartment in Beijing where we were having issues with a light fixture in one of my roommates room.  After several weeks of prompting to repair guy to sort it out, he comes over at 7am, while I'm getting ready for work, enters the roommates room... Stands on his bed (with his dirty shoes on) WHILE my roommate is still sleeping, and begins dismantling the fixture, dropping paint flakes etc from the ceiling onto the bed... all while smoking.</p><p>Or a more direct comparison is the Chinese solution to pollution right before the Olympics: Turn off the factories for a few days...</p><p>Didn't think "Hey, maybe we should keep the factories from polluting so much ALL the time..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems pretty appropriate for Chinese Society and Government at large .
I have to wonder if logic enters into the decision making process at all.Take for example when I was living in an Apartment in Beijing where we were having issues with a light fixture in one of my roommates room .
After several weeks of prompting to repair guy to sort it out , he comes over at 7am , while I 'm getting ready for work , enters the roommates room... Stands on his bed ( with his dirty shoes on ) WHILE my roommate is still sleeping , and begins dismantling the fixture , dropping paint flakes etc from the ceiling onto the bed... all while smoking.Or a more direct comparison is the Chinese solution to pollution right before the Olympics : Turn off the factories for a few days...Did n't think " Hey , maybe we should keep the factories from polluting so much ALL the time... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems pretty appropriate for Chinese Society and Government at large.
I have to wonder if logic enters into the decision making process at all.Take for example when I was living in an Apartment in Beijing where we were having issues with a light fixture in one of my roommates room.
After several weeks of prompting to repair guy to sort it out, he comes over at 7am, while I'm getting ready for work, enters the roommates room... Stands on his bed (with his dirty shoes on) WHILE my roommate is still sleeping, and begins dismantling the fixture, dropping paint flakes etc from the ceiling onto the bed... all while smoking.Or a more direct comparison is the Chinese solution to pollution right before the Olympics: Turn off the factories for a few days...Didn't think "Hey, maybe we should keep the factories from polluting so much ALL the time..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635834</id>
	<title>Re:News at 11!</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1269617100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe that's the planned next step in Chinese capitalism. Zombies don't complain about things like hours and wages and overtime pay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that 's the planned next step in Chinese capitalism .
Zombies do n't complain about things like hours and wages and overtime pay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that's the planned next step in Chinese capitalism.
Zombies don't complain about things like hours and wages and overtime pay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31639474</id>
	<title>Stealing the idea from EU</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269705240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next, they will have their citizens stand downwind so that they can also avoid taking showers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next , they will have their citizens stand downwind so that they can also avoid taking showers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next, they will have their citizens stand downwind so that they can also avoid taking showers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31636632</id>
	<title>I figured this was protestors...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269623280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't this be better used on protestors at any world summit???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this be better used on protestors at any world summit ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this be better used on protestors at any world summit??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634438</id>
	<title>That figures...</title>
	<author>Sandhog</author>
	<datestamp>1269608580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just cover up the problem and it will go away. Classic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just cover up the problem and it will go away .
Classic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just cover up the problem and it will go away.
Classic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632956</id>
	<title>Lemon ass</title>
	<author>Conditioner</author>
	<datestamp>1269600000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>great, instead of ass smell, now they get lemon ass...</htmltext>
<tokenext>great , instead of ass smell , now they get lemon ass.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>great, instead of ass smell, now they get lemon ass...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31646048</id>
	<title>Incinerators</title>
	<author>bradley13</author>
	<datestamp>1269770160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why oh why don't these countries use incinerators? Incinerators can generate energy out of garbage, and pollution is no longer an issue with modern filters. The metal bits - even nonmagnetic metals like copper and aluminum - can be easily recovered out of the ash and recycled. The remaining ash takes up a fraction of the landfill space otherwise required, and doesn't stink.

Landfills are primitive and wasteful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why oh why do n't these countries use incinerators ?
Incinerators can generate energy out of garbage , and pollution is no longer an issue with modern filters .
The metal bits - even nonmagnetic metals like copper and aluminum - can be easily recovered out of the ash and recycled .
The remaining ash takes up a fraction of the landfill space otherwise required , and does n't stink .
Landfills are primitive and wasteful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why oh why don't these countries use incinerators?
Incinerators can generate energy out of garbage, and pollution is no longer an issue with modern filters.
The metal bits - even nonmagnetic metals like copper and aluminum - can be easily recovered out of the ash and recycled.
The remaining ash takes up a fraction of the landfill space otherwise required, and doesn't stink.
Landfills are primitive and wasteful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31654582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1643259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31654582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31635934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31634036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31633970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1643259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31631928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1643259.31632116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
