<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_26_1539204</id>
	<title>Boy Left Stranded In Tree Because of Health and Safety Policy<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">73</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269620700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>School employees <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1260253/Teachers-leave-boy-5-tree-health-safety.html">left a 5-year-old boy stranded in a tree</a> because it is against health and safety policies in the UK to help him down. Instead they went inside to "observe from a distance" so the boy would not get "distracted and fall." The incident reached an even more ridiculous level when passer-by Kim Barrett had the audacity to actually help the child down. Officials promptly called the police and tried to have her charged with trespassing. From the article: "Mrs Martin confirmed that the school's policy prevents staff going to the aid of children who have climbed trees. She said: 'The safety of our pupils is our priority and we would like to make it clear that this child was being observed at all times during this very short incident. Like other schools whose premises include wooded areas, our policy when a child climbs a tree, is for staff to observe the situation from a distance so the child does not get distracted and fall. We would strongly urge members of the public not to climb over a padlocked gate to approach children as their motives are not clear to staff.'"</htmltext>
<tokenext>School employees left a 5-year-old boy stranded in a tree because it is against health and safety policies in the UK to help him down .
Instead they went inside to " observe from a distance " so the boy would not get " distracted and fall .
" The incident reached an even more ridiculous level when passer-by Kim Barrett had the audacity to actually help the child down .
Officials promptly called the police and tried to have her charged with trespassing .
From the article : " Mrs Martin confirmed that the school 's policy prevents staff going to the aid of children who have climbed trees .
She said : 'The safety of our pupils is our priority and we would like to make it clear that this child was being observed at all times during this very short incident .
Like other schools whose premises include wooded areas , our policy when a child climbs a tree , is for staff to observe the situation from a distance so the child does not get distracted and fall .
We would strongly urge members of the public not to climb over a padlocked gate to approach children as their motives are not clear to staff .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>School employees left a 5-year-old boy stranded in a tree because it is against health and safety policies in the UK to help him down.
Instead they went inside to "observe from a distance" so the boy would not get "distracted and fall.
" The incident reached an even more ridiculous level when passer-by Kim Barrett had the audacity to actually help the child down.
Officials promptly called the police and tried to have her charged with trespassing.
From the article: "Mrs Martin confirmed that the school's policy prevents staff going to the aid of children who have climbed trees.
She said: 'The safety of our pupils is our priority and we would like to make it clear that this child was being observed at all times during this very short incident.
Like other schools whose premises include wooded areas, our policy when a child climbs a tree, is for staff to observe the situation from a distance so the child does not get distracted and fall.
We would strongly urge members of the public not to climb over a padlocked gate to approach children as their motives are not clear to staff.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31682318</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269966240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy. It's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers, yet so many waste it. GOTO 10</p></div></blockquote><p>1) I agree. It sucks when people blindly follow rules.</p><p>2) NO SUCH LINE</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy .
It 's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers , yet so many waste it .
GOTO 101 ) I agree .
It sucks when people blindly follow rules.2 ) NO SUCH LINE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy.
It's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers, yet so many waste it.
GOTO 101) I agree.
It sucks when people blindly follow rules.2) NO SUCH LINE
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31746706</id>
	<title>Makes perfect sense....</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1270560840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if the child was to fall while you were rescuing him? Who knows what sort of trouble you could get into.</p><p>Knowing this, would you volunteer to help him down? Would you feel comfortable telling somebody else to get him down...?</p><p>The days of "loco parentis" are long dead. Long live the lawyers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the child was to fall while you were rescuing him ?
Who knows what sort of trouble you could get into.Knowing this , would you volunteer to help him down ?
Would you feel comfortable telling somebody else to get him down... ? The days of " loco parentis " are long dead .
Long live the lawyers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the child was to fall while you were rescuing him?
Who knows what sort of trouble you could get into.Knowing this, would you volunteer to help him down?
Would you feel comfortable telling somebody else to get him down...?The days of "loco parentis" are long dead.
Long live the lawyers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31678244</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>Securityemo</author>
	<datestamp>1269946440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not even slanting, that's pure fabrication? And people actually read this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not even slanting , that 's pure fabrication ?
And people actually read this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not even slanting, that's pure fabrication?
And people actually read this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646124</id>
	<title>what can I say...</title>
	<author>thephydes</author>
	<datestamp>1269771960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>JESUS FUCKING CHRIST !!!!!!  WTF is going on?  Has everyone gone stark raving looney or something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>JESUS FUCKING CHRIST ! ! ! ! ! !
WTF is going on ?
Has everyone gone stark raving looney or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JESUS FUCKING CHRIST !!!!!!
WTF is going on?
Has everyone gone stark raving looney or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646170</id>
	<title>Not letting the facts get in the way...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269773280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article does not say the boy was stuck up the tree.</p><p>It says he was refusing to come down. That changes the interpretation entirely.</p><p>An air rifle would have done the job, but apparently that is not allowed any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article does not say the boy was stuck up the tree.It says he was refusing to come down .
That changes the interpretation entirely.An air rifle would have done the job , but apparently that is not allowed any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article does not say the boy was stuck up the tree.It says he was refusing to come down.
That changes the interpretation entirely.An air rifle would have done the job, but apparently that is not allowed any more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31727708</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1270381980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're an idiot. Just because kids bounce doesn't mean you leave them to their own means. We do not need laws to protect adults from themselves. Down that road lies Big Brother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're an idiot .
Just because kids bounce does n't mean you leave them to their own means .
We do not need laws to protect adults from themselves .
Down that road lies Big Brother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're an idiot.
Just because kids bounce doesn't mean you leave them to their own means.
We do not need laws to protect adults from themselves.
Down that road lies Big Brother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31748422</id>
	<title>I've seen it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270570380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a child, a classmate of mine climbed a tree and got stuck. As soon as she was noticed, a teacher called the fire department's non-emergency number, and they showed up with a ladder truck to help her out. Aside from an embarrassment that wore off quickly, she escaped with no injuries.</p><p>I'm not sure if there was any policy, but the teacher probably realized this was the best way to go. The girl in the tree was in good health, in no danger of dehydration, and had no problem waiting for the fire department to show up. From a safety standpoint, it was probably a lot safer than getting the building supervisor to show up with an extension ladder.</p><p>So, um, couldn't the teacher in this case have called for help?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a child , a classmate of mine climbed a tree and got stuck .
As soon as she was noticed , a teacher called the fire department 's non-emergency number , and they showed up with a ladder truck to help her out .
Aside from an embarrassment that wore off quickly , she escaped with no injuries.I 'm not sure if there was any policy , but the teacher probably realized this was the best way to go .
The girl in the tree was in good health , in no danger of dehydration , and had no problem waiting for the fire department to show up .
From a safety standpoint , it was probably a lot safer than getting the building supervisor to show up with an extension ladder.So , um , could n't the teacher in this case have called for help ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a child, a classmate of mine climbed a tree and got stuck.
As soon as she was noticed, a teacher called the fire department's non-emergency number, and they showed up with a ladder truck to help her out.
Aside from an embarrassment that wore off quickly, she escaped with no injuries.I'm not sure if there was any policy, but the teacher probably realized this was the best way to go.
The girl in the tree was in good health, in no danger of dehydration, and had no problem waiting for the fire department to show up.
From a safety standpoint, it was probably a lot safer than getting the building supervisor to show up with an extension ladder.So, um, couldn't the teacher in this case have called for help?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31637108</id>
	<title>So the staff can safely observe when...</title>
	<author>cmdrwhitewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269627600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The student promptly falls out of the tree - there's nobody around to blame *or* get fallen on! (The win-win scenario)<br>"Remember the safety of our staff... um, students is paramount!" (the OSHA style scenario)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The student promptly falls out of the tree - there 's nobody around to blame * or * get fallen on !
( The win-win scenario ) " Remember the safety of our staff... um , students is paramount !
" ( the OSHA style scenario )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The student promptly falls out of the tree - there's nobody around to blame *or* get fallen on!
(The win-win scenario)"Remember the safety of our staff... um, students is paramount!
" (the OSHA style scenario)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31654316</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269896340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason for this is overly strict laws involving children and overly strict law enforcement officers relating to those laws. You are looking at the country where adults will ignore a crying child in public if it isn't theirs for fear of prosecution. The teachers refuse to touch the children because they don't want to risk being accused of attempting to molest them.</p><p>Society has reached a point where paranoia has outweighed our common sense, its tragic. In the name of protecting our children we've come to the point where we are afraid to actually help the children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason for this is overly strict laws involving children and overly strict law enforcement officers relating to those laws .
You are looking at the country where adults will ignore a crying child in public if it is n't theirs for fear of prosecution .
The teachers refuse to touch the children because they do n't want to risk being accused of attempting to molest them.Society has reached a point where paranoia has outweighed our common sense , its tragic .
In the name of protecting our children we 've come to the point where we are afraid to actually help the children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason for this is overly strict laws involving children and overly strict law enforcement officers relating to those laws.
You are looking at the country where adults will ignore a crying child in public if it isn't theirs for fear of prosecution.
The teachers refuse to touch the children because they don't want to risk being accused of attempting to molest them.Society has reached a point where paranoia has outweighed our common sense, its tragic.
In the name of protecting our children we've come to the point where we are afraid to actually help the children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31687536</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Cato</author>
	<datestamp>1270049880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the rebuttal by the school also linked in comment here;   <a href="http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1032-really-bad-journalism" title="uponnothing.co.uk">http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1032-really-bad-journalism</a> [uponnothing.co.uk]  - this incident never happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the rebuttal by the school also linked in comment here ; http : //www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1032-really-bad-journalism [ uponnothing.co.uk ] - this incident never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the rebuttal by the school also linked in comment here;   http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1032-really-bad-journalism [uponnothing.co.uk]  - this incident never happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31744988</id>
	<title>just. wow</title>
	<author>merockstar</author>
	<datestamp>1270491420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anybody happen to know of a nerd oriented news website similar to this one that isn't terrible?

Between this story and the story about smokers having lower IQs, I think I officially just quit slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody happen to know of a nerd oriented news website similar to this one that is n't terrible ?
Between this story and the story about smokers having lower IQs , I think I officially just quit slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody happen to know of a nerd oriented news website similar to this one that isn't terrible?
Between this story and the story about smokers having lower IQs, I think I officially just quit slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31631076</id>
	<title>OK, what really happened...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269635640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>was that the boy climbed the tree right as the bell for afternoon tea was rung and the faculty had to meet the tea and crumpet guy in the faculty lounge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>was that the boy climbed the tree right as the bell for afternoon tea was rung and the faculty had to meet the tea and crumpet guy in the faculty lounge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was that the boy climbed the tree right as the bell for afternoon tea was rung and the faculty had to meet the tea and crumpet guy in the faculty lounge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31640708</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>Svartalfar</author>
	<datestamp>1269713340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is that anytime you step outside of the laws, you put yourself in danger of litigation. You're right, this is ridiculous. But it's mostly our fault as a people. Had they tried to help him and he fell anyways or someone was hurt, saying Well it was his fault he was in the tree wouldn't remove yourself from jeopardy. Sadly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that anytime you step outside of the laws , you put yourself in danger of litigation .
You 're right , this is ridiculous .
But it 's mostly our fault as a people .
Had they tried to help him and he fell anyways or someone was hurt , saying Well it was his fault he was in the tree would n't remove yourself from jeopardy .
Sadly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that anytime you step outside of the laws, you put yourself in danger of litigation.
You're right, this is ridiculous.
But it's mostly our fault as a people.
Had they tried to help him and he fell anyways or someone was hurt, saying Well it was his fault he was in the tree wouldn't remove yourself from jeopardy.
Sadly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31684884</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>cheezegeezer</author>
	<datestamp>1270032420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you had a GOOD read of that lot total drivel   more like a case of Oh shit we been caught with our knickers around our ankles lets see if we cant crap on this</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you had a GOOD read of that lot total drivel more like a case of Oh shit we been caught with our knickers around our ankles lets see if we cant crap on this</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you had a GOOD read of that lot total drivel   more like a case of Oh shit we been caught with our knickers around our ankles lets see if we cant crap on this</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</id>
	<title>Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy. It's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers, yet so many waste it.

GOTO 10</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy .
It 's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers , yet so many waste it .
GOTO 10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy.
It's one of the many gifts that humans have over computers, yet so many waste it.
GOTO 10</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764348</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1270667760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the article, but you missed an important point - it <i>did</i> happen.</p><p>Facts not in debate:</p><p>1) Child, in/around tree, avoiding class<br>2) Passer-by intervention<br>3) Police involvement</p><p>Facts in debate:</p><p>1) Necessity of intervention<br>2) Result of intervention</p><p>Notice this quote:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Mr Hester took the woman back on to the playground during Key Stage 2 playtime and asked her to identify the tree and then challenged her regarding her entrance to the school via a locked gateway.</p></div><p>There was a disagreement, in that moment, and at least Mr Hester wasn't certain what this woman observed.</p><p>Without all the facts, this is a basic he-said-she-said.</p><p>I will say, though, that the label of "completely untrue story" is <i>more false</i> than the story itself.  That's suspicious, I think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the article , but you missed an important point - it did happen.Facts not in debate : 1 ) Child , in/around tree , avoiding class2 ) Passer-by intervention3 ) Police involvementFacts in debate : 1 ) Necessity of intervention2 ) Result of interventionNotice this quote : Mr Hester took the woman back on to the playground during Key Stage 2 playtime and asked her to identify the tree and then challenged her regarding her entrance to the school via a locked gateway.There was a disagreement , in that moment , and at least Mr Hester was n't certain what this woman observed.Without all the facts , this is a basic he-said-she-said.I will say , though , that the label of " completely untrue story " is more false than the story itself .
That 's suspicious , I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the article, but you missed an important point - it did happen.Facts not in debate:1) Child, in/around tree, avoiding class2) Passer-by intervention3) Police involvementFacts in debate:1) Necessity of intervention2) Result of interventionNotice this quote:Mr Hester took the woman back on to the playground during Key Stage 2 playtime and asked her to identify the tree and then challenged her regarding her entrance to the school via a locked gateway.There was a disagreement, in that moment, and at least Mr Hester wasn't certain what this woman observed.Without all the facts, this is a basic he-said-she-said.I will say, though, that the label of "completely untrue story" is more false than the story itself.
That's suspicious, I think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31687536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647008</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269789000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've encountered this type of thinking before. I got onto a train that had arrived at the the last stop, and was about to head back in the opposite direction. I watched all the passengers get off, but there was still a young girl hunched over in her chair. Thinking she was asleep, I got on and tried to wake her up. She was unresponsive, so I tried to shake her awake. Still, no response, just a groan of some sort. Her eyes were fluttering between closed and open. Worried, thinking she could be a diabetic and had fallen into a coma, I went to alert the guard, who promptly told me that she had already been on the train going backwards and forwards on the route for over an hour. Amazed, I asked the guard why hadn't he called for an ambulance, or tried to see if he could wake her up. He just shrugged his shoulders and said, "Not allowed to touch  'em, health and safety." It was only when I pressed the issue that he agreed to get some police and/or health services to meet the train at the next stop to help her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've encountered this type of thinking before .
I got onto a train that had arrived at the the last stop , and was about to head back in the opposite direction .
I watched all the passengers get off , but there was still a young girl hunched over in her chair .
Thinking she was asleep , I got on and tried to wake her up .
She was unresponsive , so I tried to shake her awake .
Still , no response , just a groan of some sort .
Her eyes were fluttering between closed and open .
Worried , thinking she could be a diabetic and had fallen into a coma , I went to alert the guard , who promptly told me that she had already been on the train going backwards and forwards on the route for over an hour .
Amazed , I asked the guard why had n't he called for an ambulance , or tried to see if he could wake her up .
He just shrugged his shoulders and said , " Not allowed to touch 'em , health and safety .
" It was only when I pressed the issue that he agreed to get some police and/or health services to meet the train at the next stop to help her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've encountered this type of thinking before.
I got onto a train that had arrived at the the last stop, and was about to head back in the opposite direction.
I watched all the passengers get off, but there was still a young girl hunched over in her chair.
Thinking she was asleep, I got on and tried to wake her up.
She was unresponsive, so I tried to shake her awake.
Still, no response, just a groan of some sort.
Her eyes were fluttering between closed and open.
Worried, thinking she could be a diabetic and had fallen into a coma, I went to alert the guard, who promptly told me that she had already been on the train going backwards and forwards on the route for over an hour.
Amazed, I asked the guard why hadn't he called for an ambulance, or tried to see if he could wake her up.
He just shrugged his shoulders and said, "Not allowed to touch  'em, health and safety.
" It was only when I pressed the issue that he agreed to get some police and/or health services to meet the train at the next stop to help her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764640</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1270669140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with common sense is that often it's exercised by idiots: <a href="http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=340a79d6-839a-470d-b662-944325cea23d" title="aero-news.net">http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=340a79d6-839a-470d-b662-944325cea23d</a> [aero-news.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with common sense is that often it 's exercised by idiots : http : //www.aero-news.net/index.cfm ? ContentBlockID = 340a79d6-839a-470d-b662-944325cea23d [ aero-news.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with common sense is that often it's exercised by idiots: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=340a79d6-839a-470d-b662-944325cea23d [aero-news.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31692804</id>
	<title>"Helping" him down</title>
	<author>cypherdtraitor</author>
	<datestamp>1270027560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it a purely southern phenomenon that, when a child is afraid to come down from a tree, you encourage them to come down by throwing things at them?
The passerby could have done worse...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it a purely southern phenomenon that , when a child is afraid to come down from a tree , you encourage them to come down by throwing things at them ?
The passerby could have done worse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it a purely southern phenomenon that, when a child is afraid to come down from a tree, you encourage them to come down by throwing things at them?
The passerby could have done worse...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646530</id>
	<title>Thats what happens when lawyers get involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269781800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recently ran into a situation where<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... having around a hundred chairs that would need to be moved around quickly during a function, I asked the hotel for a chair dolly. It was refused on 'safety' grounds... Lawyers had determined that, if they lent us the equipment they would be responsible if our volunteers hurt themselves with it.
<p>
So our volunteers were left slinging the chairs around by hand.
</p><p>
For our next function, we used a different hotel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently ran into a situation where ... having around a hundred chairs that would need to be moved around quickly during a function , I asked the hotel for a chair dolly .
It was refused on 'safety ' grounds... Lawyers had determined that , if they lent us the equipment they would be responsible if our volunteers hurt themselves with it .
So our volunteers were left slinging the chairs around by hand .
For our next function , we used a different hotel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently ran into a situation where ... having around a hundred chairs that would need to be moved around quickly during a function, I asked the hotel for a chair dolly.
It was refused on 'safety' grounds... Lawyers had determined that, if they lent us the equipment they would be responsible if our volunteers hurt themselves with it.
So our volunteers were left slinging the chairs around by hand.
For our next function, we used a different hotel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31712962</id>
	<title>The Vogons have won!</title>
	<author>zish</author>
	<datestamp>1270228500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet another example of how life imitates Douglas Adams.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another example of how life imitates Douglas Adams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another example of how life imitates Douglas Adams.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31642812</id>
	<title>That seems reasonable to me</title>
	<author>FoolishOwl</author>
	<datestamp>1269685860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my experience, the standard response for a child climbing up a tree and being scared to come down is to reassure the child, "If you can climb up, you can climb down." The child will eventually calm down and climb down. It's when someone else tries to climb up the tree and "help" that you get real problems. And if it's some random passerby, you can't just assume they're okay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my experience , the standard response for a child climbing up a tree and being scared to come down is to reassure the child , " If you can climb up , you can climb down .
" The child will eventually calm down and climb down .
It 's when someone else tries to climb up the tree and " help " that you get real problems .
And if it 's some random passerby , you ca n't just assume they 're okay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my experience, the standard response for a child climbing up a tree and being scared to come down is to reassure the child, "If you can climb up, you can climb down.
" The child will eventually calm down and climb down.
It's when someone else tries to climb up the tree and "help" that you get real problems.
And if it's some random passerby, you can't just assume they're okay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31681358</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>kylemonger</author>
	<datestamp>1269960600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's another side to the story, but why should we believe it?  There are still unanswered questions.  Is there a policy to leave kids stuck in a tree?  Are the school staff lying to cover up malfeasance?  Mindlessly believing a rebuttal is no better than mindlessly believing the original story.  The government involved cannot be trusted.  An international human rights tribunal is the only way we'll ever learn the truth about what happened to that distressed little boy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's another side to the story , but why should we believe it ?
There are still unanswered questions .
Is there a policy to leave kids stuck in a tree ?
Are the school staff lying to cover up malfeasance ?
Mindlessly believing a rebuttal is no better than mindlessly believing the original story .
The government involved can not be trusted .
An international human rights tribunal is the only way we 'll ever learn the truth about what happened to that distressed little boy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's another side to the story, but why should we believe it?
There are still unanswered questions.
Is there a policy to leave kids stuck in a tree?
Are the school staff lying to cover up malfeasance?
Mindlessly believing a rebuttal is no better than mindlessly believing the original story.
The government involved cannot be trusted.
An international human rights tribunal is the only way we'll ever learn the truth about what happened to that distressed little boy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31706120</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1270221960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have no evidence the kid was 'stuck' at all.</p><p>
For all we know he simply didn't want to come in, and the school didn't force the issue (As attempting to pull someone out of a tree can, in fact, be dangerous.), but left him out there with someone keeping an eye on him out the window.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have no evidence the kid was 'stuck ' at all .
For all we know he simply did n't want to come in , and the school did n't force the issue ( As attempting to pull someone out of a tree can , in fact , be dangerous .
) , but left him out there with someone keeping an eye on him out the window .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have no evidence the kid was 'stuck' at all.
For all we know he simply didn't want to come in, and the school didn't force the issue (As attempting to pull someone out of a tree can, in fact, be dangerous.
), but left him out there with someone keeping an eye on him out the window.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31681358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566</id>
	<title>This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269598380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is it, the essential example. It should be plated with gold and kept in a requilary. <br> I had a teacher like this once. Later in life, when I was reading up on Asperger, I realized she was a textbook case; the world is unpredictable and besides the most shallow emotions people are inscrutable black boxes, so just follow the rules and no one will blame you. I also realized this was basically how I had functioned up to my mid-teens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is it , the essential example .
It should be plated with gold and kept in a requilary .
I had a teacher like this once .
Later in life , when I was reading up on Asperger , I realized she was a textbook case ; the world is unpredictable and besides the most shallow emotions people are inscrutable black boxes , so just follow the rules and no one will blame you .
I also realized this was basically how I had functioned up to my mid-teens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is it, the essential example.
It should be plated with gold and kept in a requilary.
I had a teacher like this once.
Later in life, when I was reading up on Asperger, I realized she was a textbook case; the world is unpredictable and besides the most shallow emotions people are inscrutable black boxes, so just follow the rules and no one will blame you.
I also realized this was basically how I had functioned up to my mid-teens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31639912</id>
	<title>Daily Mail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269708600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ho hum: an anti-Health and Safety story from the Daily Mail. I suppose immigrants, asylum seekers, gays, liberals ans women were also involved in this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ho hum : an anti-Health and Safety story from the Daily Mail .
I suppose immigrants , asylum seekers , gays , liberals ans women were also involved in this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ho hum: an anti-Health and Safety story from the Daily Mail.
I suppose immigrants, asylum seekers, gays, liberals ans women were also involved in this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31660368</id>
	<title>Mod parent up</title>
	<author>navyjeff</author>
	<datestamp>1269891420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My kingdom for a mod point. Somebody mod parent informative.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My kingdom for a mod point .
Somebody mod parent informative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My kingdom for a mod point.
Somebody mod parent informative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31719364</id>
	<title>Re:School has different story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270295100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll note, however, that at no point do they actually deny that their policy is to leave the child alone and not help them down.</p><p>They quibble about the facts, but they don't state what their actual policy is, regarding helping children who are hurt or stuck.</p><p>Therefore, it would seem that this is an actual policy, and they are just attempting to distract people from the fact.</p><p>(Even if it happened as they said, the statements about leaving children because of health and safety policy were almost certainly the statements given to the mother who attempted to intervene, when challenged by the teacher, Mr. Hester. They still haven't denied this).</p><p>You really need to read more politician's statements. They love weasel words and communications like this. If you don't stick to the actual point, you can be easily misled by them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll note , however , that at no point do they actually deny that their policy is to leave the child alone and not help them down.They quibble about the facts , but they do n't state what their actual policy is , regarding helping children who are hurt or stuck.Therefore , it would seem that this is an actual policy , and they are just attempting to distract people from the fact .
( Even if it happened as they said , the statements about leaving children because of health and safety policy were almost certainly the statements given to the mother who attempted to intervene , when challenged by the teacher , Mr. Hester. They still have n't denied this ) .You really need to read more politician 's statements .
They love weasel words and communications like this .
If you do n't stick to the actual point , you can be easily misled by them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll note, however, that at no point do they actually deny that their policy is to leave the child alone and not help them down.They quibble about the facts, but they don't state what their actual policy is, regarding helping children who are hurt or stuck.Therefore, it would seem that this is an actual policy, and they are just attempting to distract people from the fact.
(Even if it happened as they said, the statements about leaving children because of health and safety policy were almost certainly the statements given to the mother who attempted to intervene, when challenged by the teacher, Mr. Hester. They still haven't denied this).You really need to read more politician's statements.
They love weasel words and communications like this.
If you don't stick to the actual point, you can be easily misled by them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31664466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31704884</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>ktippetts</author>
	<datestamp>1270241340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...wow. I wasn't aware the press in the UK were as truth-challenged as they are here in the US....</htmltext>
<tokenext>...wow .
I was n't aware the press in the UK were as truth-challenged as they are here in the US... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...wow.
I wasn't aware the press in the UK were as truth-challenged as they are here in the US....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647572</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>SueAnnSueAnn</author>
	<datestamp>1269794040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Common sense is illegal in the UK</htmltext>
<tokenext>Common sense is illegal in the UK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Common sense is illegal in the UK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402</id>
	<title>Re:This is the essence of Lawful Stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269771540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah yes. Except that this is a Daily Fail story that combines "it's-health-and-safety-gone-mad" with "won't-somebody-think-of-the-children", two of their favourite topics.</p><p> <a href="http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/70-newspaper-lies/1032-really-bad-journalism" title="uponnothing.co.uk" rel="nofollow">Oh look,</a> [uponnothing.co.uk] there appears to be another side to this story. What a surprise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah yes .
Except that this is a Daily Fail story that combines " it 's-health-and-safety-gone-mad " with " wo n't-somebody-think-of-the-children " , two of their favourite topics .
Oh look , [ uponnothing.co.uk ] there appears to be another side to this story .
What a surprise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah yes.
Except that this is a Daily Fail story that combines "it's-health-and-safety-gone-mad" with "won't-somebody-think-of-the-children", two of their favourite topics.
Oh look, [uponnothing.co.uk] there appears to be another side to this story.
What a surprise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31709360</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>spatley</author>
	<datestamp>1270241460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look dumasses the proper moderation on this post is either "funny" or "flamebait" not "interesting.

Seriously, what turnip truck did you all fall off of? Were your irony genes mutated by cosmic rays or microwave ovens?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look dumasses the proper moderation on this post is either " funny " or " flamebait " not " interesting .
Seriously , what turnip truck did you all fall off of ?
Were your irony genes mutated by cosmic rays or microwave ovens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look dumasses the proper moderation on this post is either "funny" or "flamebait" not "interesting.
Seriously, what turnip truck did you all fall off of?
Were your irony genes mutated by cosmic rays or microwave ovens?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31629560</id>
	<title>Darwinism in action!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269629820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm all for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31664466</id>
	<title>School has different story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269868440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The school in question reports the incident <a href="http://www.learningtolovelearning.co.uk/folder.asp?id=35" title="learningto...ning.co.uk">rather differently</a> [learningto...ning.co.uk].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The school in question reports the incident rather differently [ learningto...ning.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The school in question reports the incident rather differently [learningto...ning.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31691018</id>
	<title>Rescued?</title>
	<author>residieu</author>
	<datestamp>1270064040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't say she rescued him. The boy didn't want to come down, there was no indication that he needed help getting down. Trying to forcibly get a child out of a tree when he doesn't want to leave is definitely dangerous, and instead deciding to observe and wait for him to come down himself isn't an outrageous way to handle it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't say she rescued him .
The boy did n't want to come down , there was no indication that he needed help getting down .
Trying to forcibly get a child out of a tree when he does n't want to leave is definitely dangerous , and instead deciding to observe and wait for him to come down himself is n't an outrageous way to handle it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't say she rescued him.
The boy didn't want to come down, there was no indication that he needed help getting down.
Trying to forcibly get a child out of a tree when he doesn't want to leave is definitely dangerous, and instead deciding to observe and wait for him to come down himself isn't an outrageous way to handle it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269982380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy.</p></div><p>That is such an ignorant statement. A human infant's morphology is designed so that it can withstand an impact from a fall much better than an adult elementary school teacher can. If an uninvited intruder wouldn't have trespassed on school grounds to rescue the infant, then the toddler would have eventually just fallen out of the tree on its own accord. Problem solved.</p><p>With adults getting involved, things become much more complicated. Laws were broken, and school and taxpayer liability were at stake. Britains are already over-taxed, we don't want to have to pay yet more money if a teacher would have broken her neck falling off of a tree. Children, on the other hand are more dispensable. Lose a teacher and you not only lose an investment of years of education, but you have to deal with the teachers union and the Labour Party. People need to stop thinking about their own morals and start thinking more about keeping Britain sheltered from responsability of thought and action. We have laws to protect children. We also need laws to protect adults from themselves. Playing the part of a good Samaritan is such a self-centered egotistical role that flies in the face of the Nanny State. You sir, obviously have no idea of how our beloved bureaucracy works.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy.That is such an ignorant statement .
A human infant 's morphology is designed so that it can withstand an impact from a fall much better than an adult elementary school teacher can .
If an uninvited intruder would n't have trespassed on school grounds to rescue the infant , then the toddler would have eventually just fallen out of the tree on its own accord .
Problem solved.With adults getting involved , things become much more complicated .
Laws were broken , and school and taxpayer liability were at stake .
Britains are already over-taxed , we do n't want to have to pay yet more money if a teacher would have broken her neck falling off of a tree .
Children , on the other hand are more dispensable .
Lose a teacher and you not only lose an investment of years of education , but you have to deal with the teachers union and the Labour Party .
People need to stop thinking about their own morals and start thinking more about keeping Britain sheltered from responsability of thought and action .
We have laws to protect children .
We also need laws to protect adults from themselves .
Playing the part of a good Samaritan is such a self-centered egotistical role that flies in the face of the Nanny State .
You sir , obviously have no idea of how our beloved bureaucracy works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forbid that common sense would prevail over bureaucracy.That is such an ignorant statement.
A human infant's morphology is designed so that it can withstand an impact from a fall much better than an adult elementary school teacher can.
If an uninvited intruder wouldn't have trespassed on school grounds to rescue the infant, then the toddler would have eventually just fallen out of the tree on its own accord.
Problem solved.With adults getting involved, things become much more complicated.
Laws were broken, and school and taxpayer liability were at stake.
Britains are already over-taxed, we don't want to have to pay yet more money if a teacher would have broken her neck falling off of a tree.
Children, on the other hand are more dispensable.
Lose a teacher and you not only lose an investment of years of education, but you have to deal with the teachers union and the Labour Party.
People need to stop thinking about their own morals and start thinking more about keeping Britain sheltered from responsability of thought and action.
We have laws to protect children.
We also need laws to protect adults from themselves.
Playing the part of a good Samaritan is such a self-centered egotistical role that flies in the face of the Nanny State.
You sir, obviously have no idea of how our beloved bureaucracy works.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31633658</id>
	<title>Good morning, Worm, your honour</title>
	<author>headbone</author>
	<datestamp>1269603780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The crown will plainly show the prisoner who now stands before you was caught red-handed showing feelings of an almost human nature.  This will not do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The crown will plainly show the prisoner who now stands before you was caught red-handed showing feelings of an almost human nature .
This will not do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The crown will plainly show the prisoner who now stands before you was caught red-handed showing feelings of an almost human nature.
This will not do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31706120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31681358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31640708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31678244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31682318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31727708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31719364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31664466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31687536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31660368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31684884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31654316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1539204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31709360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31639912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31633658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31628878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31682318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31667526
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31727708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31709360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31687536
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31764348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31647008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31631076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31637108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31632566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31640708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31650402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31678244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31684884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31660368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31681358
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31706120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31654316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31664466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31719364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31646530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1539204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1539204.31642812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
