<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_26_0657237</id>
	<title>Could UK Tax Breaks Pave the Way For <em>GTA London</em>?</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1269632580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>BanjoTed writes <i>"An interesting &mdash; if tongue-in-cheek &mdash; bit of speculation is up at MCV about the possibility of a <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> title across the pond. 'Chancellor Alistair Darling's pledge to support the video games development industry with tax breaks could do more than simply protect the future of the UK dev sector,' the site claims. 'It <a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/38181/Has-Darling-paved-way-for-GTA-London">could also have dictated the setting of the next <em>Grand Theft Auto</em></a>.' Its reasoning? That developers will only be eligible for new UK tax breaks if their games can be proven to be 'culturally British.' Being based in the UK alone is not sufficient for this &mdash; instead, the games in question must promote Britishness. Hence MCV's conclusion that <em>Grand Theft Auto V</em> may well be set in London &mdash; saving Rockstar an estimated $16m in the process."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>BanjoTed writes " An interesting    if tongue-in-cheek    bit of speculation is up at MCV about the possibility of a Grand Theft Auto title across the pond .
'Chancellor Alistair Darling 's pledge to support the video games development industry with tax breaks could do more than simply protect the future of the UK dev sector, ' the site claims .
'It could also have dictated the setting of the next Grand Theft Auto .
' Its reasoning ?
That developers will only be eligible for new UK tax breaks if their games can be proven to be 'culturally British .
' Being based in the UK alone is not sufficient for this    instead , the games in question must promote Britishness .
Hence MCV 's conclusion that Grand Theft Auto V may well be set in London    saving Rockstar an estimated $ 16m in the process .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BanjoTed writes "An interesting — if tongue-in-cheek — bit of speculation is up at MCV about the possibility of a Grand Theft Auto title across the pond.
'Chancellor Alistair Darling's pledge to support the video games development industry with tax breaks could do more than simply protect the future of the UK dev sector,' the site claims.
'It could also have dictated the setting of the next Grand Theft Auto.
' Its reasoning?
That developers will only be eligible for new UK tax breaks if their games can be proven to be 'culturally British.
' Being based in the UK alone is not sufficient for this — instead, the games in question must promote Britishness.
Hence MCV's conclusion that Grand Theft Auto V may well be set in London — saving Rockstar an estimated $16m in the process.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623172</id>
	<title>Knightley, Clarkson</title>
	<author>dltaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1269596820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would help if there were more characters that looked like Kiera Knightley.</p><p>Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would help if there were more characters that looked like Kiera Knightley.Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would help if there were more characters that looked like Kiera Knightley.Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623606</id>
	<title>Re:Knightley, Clarkson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269601740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun, too.</p></div><p>Instead of pressing the left stick activating the car's horn, it could cause your character to shout, at full volume, "POWWWWERRRR!!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun , too.Instead of pressing the left stick activating the car 's horn , it could cause your character to shout , at full volume , " POWWWWERRRR ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Driving like Jeremy Clarkson in some of his more manic modes would be fun, too.Instead of pressing the left stick activating the car's horn, it could cause your character to shout, at full volume, "POWWWWERRRR!!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625494</id>
	<title>Rockstar North</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269615540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those unaware, most of the GTA series is already developed in the UK, specifically at the Rockstar North offices in Edinburgh. Of course, as the summary points out, they need some more Britishness in the game to get the tax break (although, frankly, the government would do better to give them a tax break for not setting it in the UK).</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those unaware , most of the GTA series is already developed in the UK , specifically at the Rockstar North offices in Edinburgh .
Of course , as the summary points out , they need some more Britishness in the game to get the tax break ( although , frankly , the government would do better to give them a tax break for not setting it in the UK ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those unaware, most of the GTA series is already developed in the UK, specifically at the Rockstar North offices in Edinburgh.
Of course, as the summary points out, they need some more Britishness in the game to get the tax break (although, frankly, the government would do better to give them a tax break for not setting it in the UK).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625538</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1269615720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True, the modern GTA games are very different from the old ones though. The 3D GTA games are focused arround completing missions that tell a story, afaict while there were missions in the 2D GTA games there was no concept of completing a story (the levels were won by scoring sufficiant points)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True , the modern GTA games are very different from the old ones though .
The 3D GTA games are focused arround completing missions that tell a story , afaict while there were missions in the 2D GTA games there was no concept of completing a story ( the levels were won by scoring sufficiant points )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, the modern GTA games are very different from the old ones though.
The 3D GTA games are focused arround completing missions that tell a story, afaict while there were missions in the 2D GTA games there was no concept of completing a story (the levels were won by scoring sufficiant points)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624182</id>
	<title>And you get Islamabad and Khartoum ports for free!</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1269607560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same pedestrian models, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=londonistan&amp;search\_type=&amp;aq=f" title="youtube.com">just a minor name change required.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same pedestrian models , just a minor name change required .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same pedestrian models, just a minor name change required.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625450</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1269615240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you"</p><p>Am I the only one who read this and started thinking about how much score you could earn if you just put your foot down?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...too much Carmageddon, GTA and such over the years I guess<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you " Am I the only one who read this and started thinking about how much score you could earn if you just put your foot down ?
...too much Carmageddon , GTA and such over the years I guess ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you"Am I the only one who read this and started thinking about how much score you could earn if you just put your foot down?
...too much Carmageddon, GTA and such over the years I guess ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623454</id>
	<title>Re:It needs guns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269600120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's only a game.  I'm pretty certain eve in San Francisco, you can't just go to the local gun shop and walk out with a rocket launcher and some bombs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only a game .
I 'm pretty certain eve in San Francisco , you ca n't just go to the local gun shop and walk out with a rocket launcher and some bombs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only a game.
I'm pretty certain eve in San Francisco, you can't just go to the local gun shop and walk out with a rocket launcher and some bombs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1269598080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And anyway, GTA, with its focus on wanton violence and abuse, is somewhat dated. How about a completely different approach: A game where the objective is to drive in a safe, economical, environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour, taking into account the one-way system, the roadworks, the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you, the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters. Now that WOULD be extreme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And anyway , GTA , with its focus on wanton violence and abuse , is somewhat dated .
How about a completely different approach : A game where the objective is to drive in a safe , economical , environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour , taking into account the one-way system , the roadworks , the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you , the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters .
Now that WOULD be extreme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And anyway, GTA, with its focus on wanton violence and abuse, is somewhat dated.
How about a completely different approach: A game where the objective is to drive in a safe, economical, environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour, taking into account the one-way system, the roadworks, the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you, the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters.
Now that WOULD be extreme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308</id>
	<title>name change needed</title>
	<author>Bazman</author>
	<datestamp>1269598380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We don't have "Grand Theft Auto" in the UK. We have the slightly politer-sounding "Taking without owner's consent".</p><p>TWOC: London</p><p>doesn't seem right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't have " Grand Theft Auto " in the UK .
We have the slightly politer-sounding " Taking without owner 's consent " .TWOC : Londondoes n't seem right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't have "Grand Theft Auto" in the UK.
We have the slightly politer-sounding "Taking without owner's consent".TWOC: Londondoesn't seem right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623940</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sold, my only question is...</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1269605220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, your cars in GTA are nearly all either stolen and/or repainted by dodgy spray shops so it wouldn't be you getting the congestion charge bill</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , your cars in GTA are nearly all either stolen and/or repainted by dodgy spray shops so it would n't be you getting the congestion charge bill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, your cars in GTA are nearly all either stolen and/or repainted by dodgy spray shops so it wouldn't be you getting the congestion charge bill</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626458</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1269619020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with doing a new GTA: London is that none of the current generation of consoles has the polygon rendering power to render the current roadworks going on in London. I don't even think Fermi can render each of the millions of cones in London right now. You're not going to get far in your stolen car if you're stuck at gas mains works. Never mind the speed cameras, maybe there could be an in-game achievement for racking up 1 million pounds in speeding tickets.</p><p>However most of the bridges and tunnels across the Thames are closed for roadworks, which is a bit more close to gaming-life, c.f., GTA Vice City.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with doing a new GTA : London is that none of the current generation of consoles has the polygon rendering power to render the current roadworks going on in London .
I do n't even think Fermi can render each of the millions of cones in London right now .
You 're not going to get far in your stolen car if you 're stuck at gas mains works .
Never mind the speed cameras , maybe there could be an in-game achievement for racking up 1 million pounds in speeding tickets.However most of the bridges and tunnels across the Thames are closed for roadworks , which is a bit more close to gaming-life , c.f. , GTA Vice City .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with doing a new GTA: London is that none of the current generation of consoles has the polygon rendering power to render the current roadworks going on in London.
I don't even think Fermi can render each of the millions of cones in London right now.
You're not going to get far in your stolen car if you're stuck at gas mains works.
Never mind the speed cameras, maybe there could be an in-game achievement for racking up 1 million pounds in speeding tickets.However most of the bridges and tunnels across the Thames are closed for roadworks, which is a bit more close to gaming-life, c.f., GTA Vice City.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626500</id>
	<title>Fire Up The Quattro!</title>
	<author>DocMAME</author>
	<datestamp>1269619260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>GTA Meets DCI Gene Hunt... Fire up the Quattro... I am there!</htmltext>
<tokenext>GTA Meets DCI Gene Hunt... Fire up the Quattro... I am there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GTA Meets DCI Gene Hunt... Fire up the Quattro... I am there!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</id>
	<title>Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Stormwatch</author>
	<datestamp>1269636360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A "GTA: London" is nothing new -- the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand\_Theft\_Auto:\_Mission\_packs" title="wikipedia.org"> <b>mission packs for the first GTA</b> </a> [wikipedia.org] were set in London.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A " GTA : London " is nothing new -- the mission packs for the first GTA [ wikipedia.org ] were set in London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A "GTA: London" is nothing new -- the  mission packs for the first GTA  [wikipedia.org] were set in London.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625502</id>
	<title>Re:Guy Ritchie</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1269615540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why settle for a Danny Boyle wannabe, when you could get Danny Boyle himself?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why settle for a Danny Boyle wannabe , when you could get Danny Boyle himself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why settle for a Danny Boyle wannabe, when you could get Danny Boyle himself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625338</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269614760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Going to need bigger tanks....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Going to need bigger tanks... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Going to need bigger tanks....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624002</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1269606060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game.</p></div><p>I don't think it's a problem. If you don't pay the charge on the day they write to you a week or two later, long after the car has been written off.</p><p>Failing that, steal a bus. Preferably a bendy bus, so you can kill extra pedestrians on the corners.</p><p>(Or steal a bicycle? Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles', they're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London, and cars can't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps. Of course, look out for the police on bicycles.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game.I do n't think it 's a problem .
If you do n't pay the charge on the day they write to you a week or two later , long after the car has been written off.Failing that , steal a bus .
Preferably a bendy bus , so you can kill extra pedestrians on the corners .
( Or steal a bicycle ?
Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles ' , they 're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London , and cars ca n't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps .
Of course , look out for the police on bicycles .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game.I don't think it's a problem.
If you don't pay the charge on the day they write to you a week or two later, long after the car has been written off.Failing that, steal a bus.
Preferably a bendy bus, so you can kill extra pedestrians on the corners.
(Or steal a bicycle?
Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles', they're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London, and cars can't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps.
Of course, look out for the police on bicycles.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452</id>
	<title>GTA Moscow?</title>
	<author>myowntrueself</author>
	<datestamp>1269600120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about it?</p><p>GTA Moscow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about it ? GTA Moscow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about it?GTA Moscow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623000</id>
	<title>Yea, but no, but yea</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1269594600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be just like real life.<br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/england/humber/6122826.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/england/humber/6122826.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be just like real life.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk \ _news/england/humber/6122826.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be just like real life.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/england/humber/6122826.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627048</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269621300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;the games in question must promote Britishness<br><br>So... the games would be full of Muslims and youths who start fist fights with strangers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; the games in question must promote BritishnessSo... the games would be full of Muslims and youths who start fist fights with strangers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;the games in question must promote BritishnessSo... the games would be full of Muslims and youths who start fist fights with strangers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623182</id>
	<title>Nice setting, shame about the clich&#233;s</title>
	<author>MeesterCat</author>
	<datestamp>1269597060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>London would be a fantastic setting for a GTA game; its street layout would be more fun and varied than the grid design of the US cities - I remember the carnage that could be had in the Midtown Madness game set in Paris.</p><p>

The whole "Geeze, cock'er'ney gangsta, innit" schtick is already very tiresome though (seemingly every single British crime film or TV drama already features it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>London would be a fantastic setting for a GTA game ; its street layout would be more fun and varied than the grid design of the US cities - I remember the carnage that could be had in the Midtown Madness game set in Paris .
The whole " Geeze , cock'er'ney gangsta , innit " schtick is already very tiresome though ( seemingly every single British crime film or TV drama already features it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>London would be a fantastic setting for a GTA game; its street layout would be more fun and varied than the grid design of the US cities - I remember the carnage that could be had in the Midtown Madness game set in Paris.
The whole "Geeze, cock'er'ney gangsta, innit" schtick is already very tiresome though (seemingly every single British crime film or TV drama already features it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31629034</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>jc79</author>
	<datestamp>1269628020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On that note, a game involving binge drinking, violence, knife crime, teenage pregnancy, police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote "Britishness" at the moment, but I can't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval...</p></div><p>Yes, because let's not forget that Britain Is Broken. You can't even walk down the street without getting drunk then stabbed and made pregnant by a teenage asylum seeking terrorist high on drugs bought with generous handouts from Gordon "Stalin" Brown.</p><p>I wish all the whinging bloody Daily Fail reading UKIP voting morons would fuck off to their villas in Spain (apparently it's only immigration when furriners come here, tax dodging ex-pats polluting someone else's country with their idiocy and refusal to speak the local language are ok) and let the rest of us get on with our lives without their relentless tide of misery.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On that note , a game involving binge drinking , violence , knife crime , teenage pregnancy , police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote " Britishness " at the moment , but I ca n't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval...Yes , because let 's not forget that Britain Is Broken .
You ca n't even walk down the street without getting drunk then stabbed and made pregnant by a teenage asylum seeking terrorist high on drugs bought with generous handouts from Gordon " Stalin " Brown.I wish all the whinging bloody Daily Fail reading UKIP voting morons would fuck off to their villas in Spain ( apparently it 's only immigration when furriners come here , tax dodging ex-pats polluting someone else 's country with their idiocy and refusal to speak the local language are ok ) and let the rest of us get on with our lives without their relentless tide of misery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On that note, a game involving binge drinking, violence, knife crime, teenage pregnancy, police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote "Britishness" at the moment, but I can't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval...Yes, because let's not forget that Britain Is Broken.
You can't even walk down the street without getting drunk then stabbed and made pregnant by a teenage asylum seeking terrorist high on drugs bought with generous handouts from Gordon "Stalin" Brown.I wish all the whinging bloody Daily Fail reading UKIP voting morons would fuck off to their villas in Spain (apparently it's only immigration when furriners come here, tax dodging ex-pats polluting someone else's country with their idiocy and refusal to speak the local language are ok) and let the rest of us get on with our lives without their relentless tide of misery.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623704</id>
	<title>Re:name change needed</title>
	<author>jlebrech</author>
	<datestamp>1269602700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>joyriding</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>joyriding</tokentext>
<sentencetext>joyriding</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31628556</id>
	<title>"Fallout: London" would be cool!</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1269626460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been to the US many times but never to Washington DC, so I don't know how "authentic" Fallout 3 was in terms of locations in the game and in real-life Washington DC - but I should say that the post-nuclear wreckage in the game was absolutely superb, especially around The Mall and Washington Monument areas where you *REALLY* got the impression of a once huge city now completely destroyed.</p><p>So London, with it's wealth of historical locations and landmarks would be a great setting for Fallout also...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been to the US many times but never to Washington DC , so I do n't know how " authentic " Fallout 3 was in terms of locations in the game and in real-life Washington DC - but I should say that the post-nuclear wreckage in the game was absolutely superb , especially around The Mall and Washington Monument areas where you * REALLY * got the impression of a once huge city now completely destroyed.So London , with it 's wealth of historical locations and landmarks would be a great setting for Fallout also.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been to the US many times but never to Washington DC, so I don't know how "authentic" Fallout 3 was in terms of locations in the game and in real-life Washington DC - but I should say that the post-nuclear wreckage in the game was absolutely superb, especially around The Mall and Washington Monument areas where you *REALLY* got the impression of a once huge city now completely destroyed.So London, with it's wealth of historical locations and landmarks would be a great setting for Fallout also...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626316</id>
	<title>That would be awesome.</title>
	<author>moxley</author>
	<datestamp>1269618540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PS2 had a game called "The Getaway" that was a GTA3 type of open world crime shooter game, the map and landmarks/buildings were accurate to the real streets of London, (at least, that's what I remember) and it was actually quite a fun game....</p><p>It hink the possibilities for a London GTA storyline would be endless. They could have the typical london mob boss, like in Guy Ritchie movies, or, they could make it contemporary or set it in the days of the Krays.</p><p>I mean, they've done LA, Miami, and New York...London seems like the obvious choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PS2 had a game called " The Getaway " that was a GTA3 type of open world crime shooter game , the map and landmarks/buildings were accurate to the real streets of London , ( at least , that 's what I remember ) and it was actually quite a fun game....It hink the possibilities for a London GTA storyline would be endless .
They could have the typical london mob boss , like in Guy Ritchie movies , or , they could make it contemporary or set it in the days of the Krays.I mean , they 've done LA , Miami , and New York...London seems like the obvious choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PS2 had a game called "The Getaway" that was a GTA3 type of open world crime shooter game, the map and landmarks/buildings were accurate to the real streets of London, (at least, that's what I remember) and it was actually quite a fun game....It hink the possibilities for a London GTA storyline would be endless.
They could have the typical london mob boss, like in Guy Ritchie movies, or, they could make it contemporary or set it in the days of the Krays.I mean, they've done LA, Miami, and New York...London seems like the obvious choice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622932</id>
	<title>I hope the Americans are ready for this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269636600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know there's always been uproar and controversy surrounding GTA all over the world, particularly due to the tasks you're forced to do. However, if they have to make the game more British I'm not sure the Americans will handle it, have they *seen* what British kids get up to these days? They make Niko Bellic look like a particularly community-spirited nun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know there 's always been uproar and controversy surrounding GTA all over the world , particularly due to the tasks you 're forced to do .
However , if they have to make the game more British I 'm not sure the Americans will handle it , have they * seen * what British kids get up to these days ?
They make Niko Bellic look like a particularly community-spirited nun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know there's always been uproar and controversy surrounding GTA all over the world, particularly due to the tasks you're forced to do.
However, if they have to make the game more British I'm not sure the Americans will handle it, have they *seen* what British kids get up to these days?
They make Niko Bellic look like a particularly community-spirited nun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627946</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Vlado</author>
	<datestamp>1269624720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While wanton violence and abuse has been around in videogames for quite a while, it's probably a bit unreasonable to call it dated.<br>With few (not always notable) exceptions, pretty much every game targeted at audience over 14 has some level of violence in it. That makes the games at least partially attractive to gamers, since they can act out things that they can't do in real life.</p><p>Your suggestion is not your typical videogame. Rather it's an everyday simulator (yes, yes. I understand that simulators are videogames also<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While wanton violence and abuse has been around in videogames for quite a while , it 's probably a bit unreasonable to call it dated.With few ( not always notable ) exceptions , pretty much every game targeted at audience over 14 has some level of violence in it .
That makes the games at least partially attractive to gamers , since they can act out things that they ca n't do in real life.Your suggestion is not your typical videogame .
Rather it 's an everyday simulator ( yes , yes .
I understand that simulators are videogames also : - ) ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While wanton violence and abuse has been around in videogames for quite a while, it's probably a bit unreasonable to call it dated.With few (not always notable) exceptions, pretty much every game targeted at audience over 14 has some level of violence in it.
That makes the games at least partially attractive to gamers, since they can act out things that they can't do in real life.Your suggestion is not your typical videogame.
Rather it's an everyday simulator (yes, yes.
I understand that simulators are videogames also :-)).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31636156</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Kitkoan</author>
	<datestamp>1269619440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And anyway, GTA, with its focus on wanton violence and abuse, is somewhat dated. How about a completely different approach: A game where the objective is to drive in a safe, economical, environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour, taking into account the one-way system, the roadworks, the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you, the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters. Now that WOULD be extreme.</p></div><p>I think that game is called SimCity</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And anyway , GTA , with its focus on wanton violence and abuse , is somewhat dated .
How about a completely different approach : A game where the objective is to drive in a safe , economical , environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour , taking into account the one-way system , the roadworks , the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you , the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters .
Now that WOULD be extreme.I think that game is called SimCity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And anyway, GTA, with its focus on wanton violence and abuse, is somewhat dated.
How about a completely different approach: A game where the objective is to drive in a safe, economical, environmentally responsible and polite way through London City in the rush hour, taking into account the one-way system, the roadworks, the tens of thousands of pedestrians crossing the street in front of you, the fact that the London streetmap looks a bit like a Mandelbrot fractal and that streetnames change on average every 20 meters.
Now that WOULD be extreme.I think that game is called SimCity
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623424</id>
	<title>um.. Getaway?</title>
	<author>anarche</author>
	<datestamp>1269599760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, basically, they're gonna remake <i>The Getaway</i></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Getaway\_(video\_game)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Getaway\_(video\_game)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>not a bad game that one</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , basically , they 're gon na remake The Getawayhttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Getaway \ _ ( video \ _game ) [ wikipedia.org ] not a bad game that one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, basically, they're gonna remake The Getawayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Getaway\_(video\_game) [wikipedia.org]not a bad game that one</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623022</id>
	<title>It needs guns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269594900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure how that is going to go over with the availability of guns in the UK, and how easy it is to drive in London. Lets face it, half the fun is running down everyone and shooting stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how that is going to go over with the availability of guns in the UK , and how easy it is to drive in London .
Lets face it , half the fun is running down everyone and shooting stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how that is going to go over with the availability of guns in the UK, and how easy it is to drive in London.
Lets face it, half the fun is running down everyone and shooting stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625214</id>
	<title>mod dowN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269614160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of OpenBSD versu0s TCP/IP stack has</htmltext>
<tokenext>of OpenBSD versu0s TCP/IP stack has</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of OpenBSD versu0s TCP/IP stack has</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627234</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sold, my only question is...</title>
	<author>ubercam</author>
	<datestamp>1269622200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this is kind of a running joke in this thread, but they could go three ways with it.</p><p>1) Make it like San Andreas, where you had to eat/work out in order to keep your health up. A lot of people didn't like that because it was too much micromanagement, so they got rid of it in GTA4. They could add the option to pay the charge on to a cashpoint/ATM or something like that. If you didn't pay it within a certain amount of time, you'd get a fine or the cops after you.</p><p>2) Set the game in a time period before the congestion charge was introduced, so any time before 2003.</p><p>3) Not call it "London" (like Liberty City isn't called "New York") and just not include it in the game at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is kind of a running joke in this thread , but they could go three ways with it.1 ) Make it like San Andreas , where you had to eat/work out in order to keep your health up .
A lot of people did n't like that because it was too much micromanagement , so they got rid of it in GTA4 .
They could add the option to pay the charge on to a cashpoint/ATM or something like that .
If you did n't pay it within a certain amount of time , you 'd get a fine or the cops after you.2 ) Set the game in a time period before the congestion charge was introduced , so any time before 2003.3 ) Not call it " London " ( like Liberty City is n't called " New York " ) and just not include it in the game at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is kind of a running joke in this thread, but they could go three ways with it.1) Make it like San Andreas, where you had to eat/work out in order to keep your health up.
A lot of people didn't like that because it was too much micromanagement, so they got rid of it in GTA4.
They could add the option to pay the charge on to a cashpoint/ATM or something like that.
If you didn't pay it within a certain amount of time, you'd get a fine or the cops after you.2) Set the game in a time period before the congestion charge was introduced, so any time before 2003.3) Not call it "London" (like Liberty City isn't called "New York") and just not include it in the game at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623368</id>
	<title>Bad idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269599100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll never make their money back. Everyone knows that the Knowledge takes about 34 months to
prepare, they'll never get enough gamers to pass the exam!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll never make their money back .
Everyone knows that the Knowledge takes about 34 months to prepare , they 'll never get enough gamers to pass the exam !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll never make their money back.
Everyone knows that the Knowledge takes about 34 months to
prepare, they'll never get enough gamers to pass the exam!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624514</id>
	<title>London?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269610200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Rockstars first office was down in the depths of Leith surely GTA Glasgow or Edinburgh would be more likely?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Rockstars first office was down in the depths of Leith surely GTA Glasgow or Edinburgh would be more likely ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Rockstars first office was down in the depths of Leith surely GTA Glasgow or Edinburgh would be more likely?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623100</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid score system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269596220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>re-read a. Just being filmed in english is enough to get some points for cultural content.</p><p>If it's a very british game, produced in the UK, with european voice actors, and adds to british culture then it may have 15 points. From there, using english as the language may be enough to win it a couple from a, giving it 17.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>re-read a. Just being filmed in english is enough to get some points for cultural content.If it 's a very british game , produced in the UK , with european voice actors , and adds to british culture then it may have 15 points .
From there , using english as the language may be enough to win it a couple from a , giving it 17 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>re-read a. Just being filmed in english is enough to get some points for cultural content.If it's a very british game, produced in the UK, with european voice actors, and adds to british culture then it may have 15 points.
From there, using english as the language may be enough to win it a couple from a, giving it 17.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624168</id>
	<title>Prove Britishness? Tricky</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269607500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Persistent yobbishness - check<br>Drunken - check<br>Chavish behaviour - check<br>Lack of personal responsibility - check<br>IQ south of 3 digits - check<br>Inability to communicate other than via violence or aggression - check<br>Inability to move away from the TV set, sports ground or shoe shop - check<br>Ethics is a place east of London - check</p><p>Hmmmm what could possibly go wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Persistent yobbishness - checkDrunken - checkChavish behaviour - checkLack of personal responsibility - checkIQ south of 3 digits - checkInability to communicate other than via violence or aggression - checkInability to move away from the TV set , sports ground or shoe shop - checkEthics is a place east of London - checkHmmmm what could possibly go wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Persistent yobbishness - checkDrunken - checkChavish behaviour - checkLack of personal responsibility - checkIQ south of 3 digits - checkInability to communicate other than via violence or aggression - checkInability to move away from the TV set, sports ground or shoe shop - checkEthics is a place east of London - checkHmmmm what could possibly go wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624046</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>grahamlord86</author>
	<datestamp>1269606480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be too difficult.</p><p>In American GTA, I can drive carefully down the pavement past a cop car so long as I don't kill any pedestrians.</p><p>In GTA V: London, the police would randomly start chasing me because one of the following reasons will have been met:</p><p>1. I look like a Geezaaaaah.<br>2. My MOT is out of date.<br>3. My Tax disc isn't on display because I sold it for the Hot Coffee scene.<br>4. I didn't pay the congestion charge.</p><p>Oh, and every street wider than 10ft in London is a car park of traffic...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be too difficult.In American GTA , I can drive carefully down the pavement past a cop car so long as I do n't kill any pedestrians.In GTA V : London , the police would randomly start chasing me because one of the following reasons will have been met : 1 .
I look like a Geezaaaaah.2 .
My MOT is out of date.3 .
My Tax disc is n't on display because I sold it for the Hot Coffee scene.4 .
I did n't pay the congestion charge.Oh , and every street wider than 10ft in London is a car park of traffic.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be too difficult.In American GTA, I can drive carefully down the pavement past a cop car so long as I don't kill any pedestrians.In GTA V: London, the police would randomly start chasing me because one of the following reasons will have been met:1.
I look like a Geezaaaaah.2.
My MOT is out of date.3.
My Tax disc isn't on display because I sold it for the Hot Coffee scene.4.
I didn't pay the congestion charge.Oh, and every street wider than 10ft in London is a car park of traffic...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624584</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>floppyraid</author>
	<datestamp>1269610620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah-- it had power-ups that were very intuitively obvious and awesome-- but then they abandoned them-- examples were "Instant Gang" and "ElectroFingers".<br> <br>

I remember when the 3D GTA came out for PC and PS2 I was very disappointed. Sure, the graphics were massively redone-- but it lacked the original feel. The announcers voice was gone, no Hare Krishnas's running around chanting, etc etc.<br> <br>

If any game brought back that original feel, with powerups like 'Instant Gang', I'm sure it would be a success. At least with me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah-- it had power-ups that were very intuitively obvious and awesome-- but then they abandoned them-- examples were " Instant Gang " and " ElectroFingers " .
I remember when the 3D GTA came out for PC and PS2 I was very disappointed .
Sure , the graphics were massively redone-- but it lacked the original feel .
The announcers voice was gone , no Hare Krishnas 's running around chanting , etc etc .
If any game brought back that original feel , with powerups like 'Instant Gang ' , I 'm sure it would be a success .
At least with me : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah-- it had power-ups that were very intuitively obvious and awesome-- but then they abandoned them-- examples were "Instant Gang" and "ElectroFingers".
I remember when the 3D GTA came out for PC and PS2 I was very disappointed.
Sure, the graphics were massively redone-- but it lacked the original feel.
The announcers voice was gone, no Hare Krishnas's running around chanting, etc etc.
If any game brought back that original feel, with powerups like 'Instant Gang', I'm sure it would be a success.
At least with me :/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076</id>
	<title>Stupid score system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269595800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The score system is totally stupid. The only way you can get 16 points is if the game is based in the UK.</p><blockquote><div><p>Under that model, those seeking relief must score at least 16 points out of a possible 31 in a &lsquo;culturally British&rsquo; test. There are four criteria under which studios can qualify that are as follows:<br>a) Cultural Content (16 pts) &ndash; Determining whether the film&rsquo;s narrative is set in the UK, whether its lead characters are British, whether the film is centred on British subject matter, and if the dialogue is recorded &ldquo;in the English language&rdquo;.<br>b) Cultural Contribution (4 pts) &ndash; Determining whether the film represents &ldquo;a diverse British culture, British heritage or British creativity&rdquo;.<br>c) Cultural Hubs (3 pts) &ndash; Determining whether the film is produced in the UK studios.<br>d) Cultural Practitioners (8 pts) &ndash; Determining whether the cast, crew and/or producers come from the EEA (European Economic Area), with points based on each role.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The score system is totally stupid .
The only way you can get 16 points is if the game is based in the UK.Under that model , those seeking relief must score at least 16 points out of a possible 31 in a    culturally British    test .
There are four criteria under which studios can qualify that are as follows : a ) Cultural Content ( 16 pts )    Determining whether the film    s narrative is set in the UK , whether its lead characters are British , whether the film is centred on British subject matter , and if the dialogue is recorded    in the English language    .b ) Cultural Contribution ( 4 pts )    Determining whether the film represents    a diverse British culture , British heritage or British creativity    .c ) Cultural Hubs ( 3 pts )    Determining whether the film is produced in the UK studios.d ) Cultural Practitioners ( 8 pts )    Determining whether the cast , crew and/or producers come from the EEA ( European Economic Area ) , with points based on each role .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The score system is totally stupid.
The only way you can get 16 points is if the game is based in the UK.Under that model, those seeking relief must score at least 16 points out of a possible 31 in a ‘culturally British’ test.
There are four criteria under which studios can qualify that are as follows:a) Cultural Content (16 pts) – Determining whether the film’s narrative is set in the UK, whether its lead characters are British, whether the film is centred on British subject matter, and if the dialogue is recorded “in the English language”.b) Cultural Contribution (4 pts) – Determining whether the film represents “a diverse British culture, British heritage or British creativity”.c) Cultural Hubs (3 pts) – Determining whether the film is produced in the UK studios.d) Cultural Practitioners (8 pts) – Determining whether the cast, crew and/or producers come from the EEA (European Economic Area), with points based on each role.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625380</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269614940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're nicked!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're nicked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're nicked!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226</id>
	<title>I'm sold, my only question is...</title>
	<author>billsayswow</author>
	<datestamp>1269597540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would you have to pay the congestion charge when driving downtown?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you have to pay the congestion charge when driving downtown ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you have to pay the congestion charge when driving downtown?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625088</id>
	<title>YOU FAIL IT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269613620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have an IRC client been many, not the When I sto0d for who are intersted and sling or table Trying to dissect FreeBSD project, goal here? How can world-spanning Become like they Goals. It's when a full-time GNAA at this point as those non gay, little-known numbers continue The facts and more gay than they the last night of GAY NIGGERS FROM market share. Red things I still Series of debates inventing excuses percent of the *BSD gloves, condoms can connect to NO MATTER HOW TO PREDICT *BSD'S Lay down paper off the play area</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have an IRC client been many , not the When I sto0d for who are intersted and sling or table Trying to dissect FreeBSD project , goal here ?
How can world-spanning Become like they Goals .
It 's when a full-time GNAA at this point as those non gay , little-known numbers continue The facts and more gay than they the last night of GAY NIGGERS FROM market share .
Red things I still Series of debates inventing excuses percent of the * BSD gloves , condoms can connect to NO MATTER HOW TO PREDICT * BSD 'S Lay down paper off the play area</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have an IRC client been many, not the When I sto0d for who are intersted and sling or table Trying to dissect FreeBSD project, goal here?
How can world-spanning Become like they Goals.
It's when a full-time GNAA at this point as those non gay, little-known numbers continue The facts and more gay than they the last night of GAY NIGGERS FROM market share.
Red things I still Series of debates inventing excuses percent of the *BSD gloves, condoms can connect to NO MATTER HOW TO PREDICT *BSD'S Lay down paper off the play area</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623948</id>
	<title>it would be called chav twocker</title>
	<author>mjwalshe</author>
	<datestamp>1269605400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MM I can just see the chaved up hot hatches in this game and the daily mails outrage.
<br> <br>
and it definatly needs this Renault Clio as one of the rides
<br> <br>
<a href="http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3282687" title="somethingawful.com" rel="nofollow">http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3282687</a> [somethingawful.com]
 <br> <br>

TWOCKING is an abreviation of "Taking Without Owners Consent" what car theft is normaly refered to by the Police in the UK</htmltext>
<tokenext>MM I can just see the chaved up hot hatches in this game and the daily mails outrage .
and it definatly needs this Renault Clio as one of the rides http : //forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php ? threadid = 3282687 [ somethingawful.com ] TWOCKING is an abreviation of " Taking Without Owners Consent " what car theft is normaly refered to by the Police in the UK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MM I can just see the chaved up hot hatches in this game and the daily mails outrage.
and it definatly needs this Renault Clio as one of the rides
 
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3282687 [somethingawful.com]
  

TWOCKING is an abreviation of "Taking Without Owners Consent" what car theft is normaly refered to by the Police in the UK</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625460</id>
	<title>Re:name change needed</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1269615300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bah, the cars in the UK are too small to rack up a decent body count with. On the upside, the cops don't carry guns--so imagine the mayhem if you were well-armed and on a rampage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah , the cars in the UK are too small to rack up a decent body count with .
On the upside , the cops do n't carry guns--so imagine the mayhem if you were well-armed and on a rampage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah, the cars in the UK are too small to rack up a decent body count with.
On the upside, the cops don't carry guns--so imagine the mayhem if you were well-armed and on a rampage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584</id>
	<title>Guy Ritchie</title>
	<author>stiller</author>
	<datestamp>1269601380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get Guy Ritchie to write the story, maybe even direct mo-cap/dialogue. In GTA 4 I just wanted to skip all the cutscenes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get Guy Ritchie to write the story , maybe even direct mo-cap/dialogue .
In GTA 4 I just wanted to skip all the cutscenes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get Guy Ritchie to write the story, maybe even direct mo-cap/dialogue.
In GTA 4 I just wanted to skip all the cutscenes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623366</id>
	<title>The Getaway</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1269599100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sony has already done a couple of London based GTA-clones in The Getaway series. The Getaway wasn't very good and the series got worse with every release until it got canned. Still it proves the setting is viable especially if any GTA London riffed on some classic gangster flicks and made good use of the setting. I wonder if they'd use London though or a pastiche of London much like Liberty City is to New York.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony has already done a couple of London based GTA-clones in The Getaway series .
The Getaway was n't very good and the series got worse with every release until it got canned .
Still it proves the setting is viable especially if any GTA London riffed on some classic gangster flicks and made good use of the setting .
I wonder if they 'd use London though or a pastiche of London much like Liberty City is to New York .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony has already done a couple of London based GTA-clones in The Getaway series.
The Getaway wasn't very good and the series got worse with every release until it got canned.
Still it proves the setting is viable especially if any GTA London riffed on some classic gangster flicks and made good use of the setting.
I wonder if they'd use London though or a pastiche of London much like Liberty City is to New York.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622970</id>
	<title>kids these days...</title>
	<author>zombie\_monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1269594120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The two expansions of the original GTA were set in London.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The two expansions of the original GTA were set in London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The two expansions of the original GTA were set in London.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624018</id>
	<title>Re:Guy Ritchie</title>
	<author>sw33tjimmy</author>
	<datestamp>1269606240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that's the first thing i though of too...<br>
"why do they call him 'bullet dodger'?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's the first thing i though of too.. . " why do they call him 'bullet dodger ' ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's the first thing i though of too...
"why do they call him 'bullet dodger'?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624108</id>
	<title>Re:name change needed</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1269606960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh no, stealing a car is still theft.<br> <br>The trouble is that some folk would say "Oh, but I was going to return it! Honest, Gov'!" and because they were not going to permanently deprive the owner of their property, it was a (very, VERY unlikely, yet still possible) defense to a charge of Theft. Especially in cases when cars were taken from family members and reported stolen, only for a son or daughter to be found joyriding later.<br> <br>TWOC was brought in to address this loophole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no , stealing a car is still theft .
The trouble is that some folk would say " Oh , but I was going to return it !
Honest , Gov ' !
" and because they were not going to permanently deprive the owner of their property , it was a ( very , VERY unlikely , yet still possible ) defense to a charge of Theft .
Especially in cases when cars were taken from family members and reported stolen , only for a son or daughter to be found joyriding later .
TWOC was brought in to address this loophole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no, stealing a car is still theft.
The trouble is that some folk would say "Oh, but I was going to return it!
Honest, Gov'!
" and because they were not going to permanently deprive the owner of their property, it was a (very, VERY unlikely, yet still possible) defense to a charge of Theft.
Especially in cases when cars were taken from family members and reported stolen, only for a son or daughter to be found joyriding later.
TWOC was brought in to address this loophole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623286</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269598200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only is GTA London nothing new, neither is the idea that Rockstar should cash in on the tax breaks and making a new British GTA game. I detailed this on my blog last year:</p><p><a href="http://kibblemania.com/2009/06/18/british-cultural-video-games-twoc/" title="kibblemania.com" rel="nofollow">http://kibblemania.com/2009/06/18/british-cultural-video-games-twoc/</a> [kibblemania.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only is GTA London nothing new , neither is the idea that Rockstar should cash in on the tax breaks and making a new British GTA game .
I detailed this on my blog last year : http : //kibblemania.com/2009/06/18/british-cultural-video-games-twoc/ [ kibblemania.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only is GTA London nothing new, neither is the idea that Rockstar should cash in on the tax breaks and making a new British GTA game.
I detailed this on my blog last year:http://kibblemania.com/2009/06/18/british-cultural-video-games-twoc/ [kibblemania.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624448</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sold, my only question is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269609720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No (or more accurately n/a). If it's realistic it'll be impossible to drive into central London at more than 1mph. Stealing an underground train might be fun tho.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No ( or more accurately n/a ) .
If it 's realistic it 'll be impossible to drive into central London at more than 1mph .
Stealing an underground train might be fun tho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No (or more accurately n/a).
If it's realistic it'll be impossible to drive into central London at more than 1mph.
Stealing an underground train might be fun tho.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623534</id>
	<title>British characters</title>
	<author>Archibald Buttle</author>
	<datestamp>1269600960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rockstar get most of the way there already since the GTA series is produced in the UK by Brits, and is in English.</p><p>If the main character was British, or even maybe just several subsidiary characters, then that should push them over the edge and qualify them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rockstar get most of the way there already since the GTA series is produced in the UK by Brits , and is in English.If the main character was British , or even maybe just several subsidiary characters , then that should push them over the edge and qualify them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rockstar get most of the way there already since the GTA series is produced in the UK by Brits, and is in English.If the main character was British, or even maybe just several subsidiary characters, then that should push them over the edge and qualify them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623052</id>
	<title>Promoting "Britishness"</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1269595440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> the games in question must promote Britishness</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
</p><ul>
<li>Most characters must have bad teeth</li>
<li>Must like warm beer and bad cooking</li>
<li>Must have characters who can't understand each other because they all speak different dialects of "The Queen's English"</li>
<li>You're automatically a "terr'rist"</li>
<li> <b>"Hot Coffee" features <a href="http://cdn.mashcast.com/sites/pythonline.mashcast.com/files/imagecache/full\_media/WelshmanWithSheep.png" title="mashcast.com" rel="nofollow">Welshmen</a> [mashcast.com] and <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/four-sheep-for-every-welshman-1252746.html" title="independent.co.uk" rel="nofollow">sheep</a> [independent.co.uk] </b></li>
</ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the games in question must promote Britishness So .. . Most characters must have bad teeth Must like warm beer and bad cooking Must have characters who ca n't understand each other because they all speak different dialects of " The Queen 's English " You 're automatically a " terr'rist " " Hot Coffee " features Welshmen [ mashcast.com ] and sheep [ independent.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the games in question must promote Britishness

So ...

Most characters must have bad teeth
Must like warm beer and bad cooking
Must have characters who can't understand each other because they all speak different dialects of "The Queen's English"
You're automatically a "terr'rist"
 "Hot Coffee" features Welshmen [mashcast.com] and sheep [independent.co.uk] 

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626140</id>
	<title>Dundee Surely? :-)</title>
	<author>Stooshie</author>
	<datestamp>1269618000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't it be set in Dundee since that's where it's written.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't it be set in Dundee since that 's where it 's written .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't it be set in Dundee since that's where it's written.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623252</id>
	<title>Bah.</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1269597840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>GTA gets lots of flak for volence. But it's nothing new.
<br> <br>
But no one remembers Carmageddon, obviously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>GTA gets lots of flak for volence .
But it 's nothing new .
But no one remembers Carmageddon , obviously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GTA gets lots of flak for volence.
But it's nothing new.
But no one remembers Carmageddon, obviously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623632</id>
	<title>Re:GTA Moscow?</title>
	<author>dltaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1269601920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't that made into one of the <i>Bourne</i> movies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't that made into one of the Bourne movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't that made into one of the Bourne movies?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625786</id>
	<title>I'd buy it only if...</title>
	<author>master\_p</author>
	<datestamp>1269616740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackadder" title="wikipedia.org">he</a> [wikipedia.org] was the star in the game!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...he [ wikipedia.org ] was the star in the game ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...he [wikipedia.org] was the star in the game!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1269600540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game. Especially in the early parts where you're generally short on cash - somehow beating pedestrians and prostitutes to death for their spare change to pay the fee doesn't seem to promote quite the image of Britishness I would guess the law is aiming at.</p><p>On that note, a game involving binge drinking, violence, knife crime, teenage pregnancy, police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote "Britishness" at the moment, but I can't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game .
Especially in the early parts where you 're generally short on cash - somehow beating pedestrians and prostitutes to death for their spare change to pay the fee does n't seem to promote quite the image of Britishness I would guess the law is aiming at.On that note , a game involving binge drinking , violence , knife crime , teenage pregnancy , police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote " Britishness " at the moment , but I ca n't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be keen on seeing how they could implement the congestion charge into the game.
Especially in the early parts where you're generally short on cash - somehow beating pedestrians and prostitutes to death for their spare change to pay the fee doesn't seem to promote quite the image of Britishness I would guess the law is aiming at.On that note, a game involving binge drinking, violence, knife crime, teenage pregnancy, police brutality and political corruption would definitely promote "Britishness" at the moment, but I can't see Our Glorious Leaders giving it the official stamp of approval...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31631610</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that?</title>
	<author>tomtomtom</author>
	<datestamp>1269594540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(Or steal a bicycle? Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles', they're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London, and cars can't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps. Of course, look out for the police on bicycles.)</p></div><p>Even better, for pure silliness factor, how about a <a href="http://www.tfl.gov.uk/modalpages/2648.aspx" title="tfl.gov.uk">Thames Clipper</a> [tfl.gov.uk]!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Or steal a bicycle ?
Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles ' , they 're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London , and cars ca n't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps .
Of course , look out for the police on bicycles .
) Even better , for pure silliness factor , how about a Thames Clipper [ tfl.gov.uk ] !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Or steal a bicycle?
Plenty of criminals use bicycles as getaway 'vehicles', they're much faster than cars in central &amp; inner London, and cars can't chase bicycles down narrow streets or steps.
Of course, look out for the police on bicycles.
)Even better, for pure silliness factor, how about a Thames Clipper [tfl.gov.uk]!
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623720</id>
	<title>Re:name change needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269602940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twoc, it's like a twat who's a bit of a cock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twoc , it 's like a twat who 's a bit of a cock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twoc, it's like a twat who's a bit of a cock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625888</id>
	<title>Bonus points</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269617160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bonus points for putting an indestructible blue phone booth somewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bonus points for putting an indestructible blue phone booth somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bonus points for putting an indestructible blue phone booth somewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623294</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid score system</title>
	<author>vtechpilot</author>
	<datestamp>1269598260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Item A is the only one that really matters. It doesn't matter if it is (C) made in the UK, by (D) EEA employees, if the end product is just an imitation of US culture. Item B is meant to prevent it from just being an non-diverse outsiders caricature of British culture, which is what a game about warm beer, bad cooking and drinking tea would be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Item A is the only one that really matters .
It does n't matter if it is ( C ) made in the UK , by ( D ) EEA employees , if the end product is just an imitation of US culture .
Item B is meant to prevent it from just being an non-diverse outsiders caricature of British culture , which is what a game about warm beer , bad cooking and drinking tea would be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Item A is the only one that really matters.
It doesn't matter if it is (C) made in the UK, by (D) EEA employees, if the end product is just an imitation of US culture.
Item B is meant to prevent it from just being an non-diverse outsiders caricature of British culture, which is what a game about warm beer, bad cooking and drinking tea would be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624174</id>
	<title>Re:GTA Moscow?</title>
	<author>HopefulIntern</author>
	<datestamp>1269607560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be the easiest game ever. As long as you dont <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omon#High-profile\_operations" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">organise gay rights protests</a> [wikipedia.org] you should be ignored by the police.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be the easiest game ever .
As long as you dont organise gay rights protests [ wikipedia.org ] you should be ignored by the police .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be the easiest game ever.
As long as you dont organise gay rights protests [wikipedia.org] you should be ignored by the police.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31631610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31636156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31629034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_0657237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31636156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623500
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624002
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31631610
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31629034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31626458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31627048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31622970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_0657237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31623584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31624018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_0657237.31625502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
