<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_25_2054238</id>
	<title>Dell To Leave China For India</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269507600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>halfEvilTech writes <i>"India's Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, told the Indian press that Dell chairman Michael Dell assured him that Dell was <a href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2010/03/24/dell-moving-factories-china-dell-computers-moving-25-billion-labor-equipment-china-india-citing-environment-concerns-western-companies-bailing-china/">moving $25 billion in factories from China to India</a>. Original motives were cited for environmental concerns. But later details come up as to Dell wanting a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>halfEvilTech writes " India 's Prime Minister , Manmohan Singh , told the Indian press that Dell chairman Michael Dell assured him that Dell was moving $ 25 billion in factories from China to India .
Original motives were cited for environmental concerns .
But later details come up as to Dell wanting a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>halfEvilTech writes "India's Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, told the Indian press that Dell chairman Michael Dell assured him that Dell was moving $25 billion in factories from China to India.
Original motives were cited for environmental concerns.
But later details come up as to Dell wanting a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618086</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>ed.han</author>
	<datestamp>1269513480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>because the plight of the american worker is the only metric by which one should evaluate anything?</htmltext>
<tokenext>because the plight of the american worker is the only metric by which one should evaluate anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because the plight of the american worker is the only metric by which one should evaluate anything?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617694</id>
	<title>Yow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this is true, it is a decison vastly more consequential than anything Google has done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is true , it is a decison vastly more consequential than anything Google has done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is true, it is a decison vastly more consequential than anything Google has done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617738</id>
	<title>Re:Yow!</title>
	<author>Un pobre guey</author>
	<datestamp>1269511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is apparently not true, however.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is apparently not true , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is apparently not true, however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619592</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1269521040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>read your article. the problem isn't that there aren't enough people to do the jobs, it's that the people aren't where the jobs are. in other words, an infrastructure problem, not a shortage.</p><p>china can always build thousands of crappy apts to bring more workers from the provinces in to do their telemarketing jobs every day. not a problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>read your article .
the problem is n't that there are n't enough people to do the jobs , it 's that the people are n't where the jobs are .
in other words , an infrastructure problem , not a shortage.china can always build thousands of crappy apts to bring more workers from the provinces in to do their telemarketing jobs every day .
not a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>read your article.
the problem isn't that there aren't enough people to do the jobs, it's that the people aren't where the jobs are.
in other words, an infrastructure problem, not a shortage.china can always build thousands of crappy apts to bring more workers from the provinces in to do their telemarketing jobs every day.
not a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619560</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1269520860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.</p></div><p>When that happens, a frustrated China will not be available for comment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.When that happens , a frustrated China will not be available for comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.When that happens, a frustrated China will not be available for comment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618306</id>
	<title>Re:India is not known for its workmanship....</title>
	<author>Xveers</author>
	<datestamp>1269514380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And what, twenty years ago you could say the same thing about China, probably even moreso. India has massive problems, yes. But they are problems that can be addressed, even better, dealt with in a manner far more farmilliar to western firms than in China. Twenty years ago, Chinese goods were invariably described as crap. Nowadays, the description varies from "meh, it's alright" to "they made that in China?". It all depends on which company is doing the manufacturing and how closely they watch their suppliers.<p>

As for sweatshops, a large reason you've seen them dissapear to an extent in China and other countries is not government crackdowns (any country that has large amounts of sweatshops is invariably one that will not do more than token raids and legal pressure) but from the companies employing said labor because the public outcry about using said labor can be business-killing. </p><p>

Give India the same capital and time that China got, and I'm certian that we'll see the at the least the same selection of quality. But with far more positive social benefits for India.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what , twenty years ago you could say the same thing about China , probably even moreso .
India has massive problems , yes .
But they are problems that can be addressed , even better , dealt with in a manner far more farmilliar to western firms than in China .
Twenty years ago , Chinese goods were invariably described as crap .
Nowadays , the description varies from " meh , it 's alright " to " they made that in China ? " .
It all depends on which company is doing the manufacturing and how closely they watch their suppliers .
As for sweatshops , a large reason you 've seen them dissapear to an extent in China and other countries is not government crackdowns ( any country that has large amounts of sweatshops is invariably one that will not do more than token raids and legal pressure ) but from the companies employing said labor because the public outcry about using said labor can be business-killing .
Give India the same capital and time that China got , and I 'm certian that we 'll see the at the least the same selection of quality .
But with far more positive social benefits for India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what, twenty years ago you could say the same thing about China, probably even moreso.
India has massive problems, yes.
But they are problems that can be addressed, even better, dealt with in a manner far more farmilliar to western firms than in China.
Twenty years ago, Chinese goods were invariably described as crap.
Nowadays, the description varies from "meh, it's alright" to "they made that in China?".
It all depends on which company is doing the manufacturing and how closely they watch their suppliers.
As for sweatshops, a large reason you've seen them dissapear to an extent in China and other countries is not government crackdowns (any country that has large amounts of sweatshops is invariably one that will not do more than token raids and legal pressure) but from the companies employing said labor because the public outcry about using said labor can be business-killing.
Give India the same capital and time that China got, and I'm certian that we'll see the at the least the same selection of quality.
But with far more positive social benefits for India.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618548</id>
	<title>The score</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269515580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is 2 - 1 in the game "corporate America vs. the Chinese government"

@see "CommonWealth" by Hardt and Negri, neo-Marxist doctrine. They point this out, and predict it, quite nicely...</htmltext>
<tokenext>is 2 - 1 in the game " corporate America vs. the Chinese government " @ see " CommonWealth " by Hardt and Negri , neo-Marxist doctrine .
They point this out , and predict it , quite nicely.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is 2 - 1 in the game "corporate America vs. the Chinese government"

@see "CommonWealth" by Hardt and Negri, neo-Marxist doctrine.
They point this out, and predict it, quite nicely...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617984</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wrong. Current chips coming from China have hardware backdoors in them - of a truth. No lie.
<br> <br>
To be honest, a lot manufacturing places have chips with backdoors in them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong .
Current chips coming from China have hardware backdoors in them - of a truth .
No lie .
To be honest , a lot manufacturing places have chips with backdoors in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong.
Current chips coming from China have hardware backdoors in them - of a truth.
No lie.
To be honest, a lot manufacturing places have chips with backdoors in them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</id>
	<title>It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another. Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they 'll be outsourced to another .
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another.
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31625090</id>
	<title>Google Should do this Too</title>
	<author>T.E.D.</author>
	<datestamp>1269613620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I honestly don't understand why every company doesn't do this. What's with the jones everybody has for China? Sure, they have a lot of people, but India will have <em>more</em> in a few years, and is on a much better course.

</p><p>China has no Rule of Law, so anything useful any company builds there will just be taken someday by the government (or one of their cronies). They have already been arbirarily arresting foriegn businessmen. Why anybody would want to try to do business there is beyond me.

</p><p>India has the same (or better) upside growth potential, will have a <em>larger</em> population, and actually has Rule of Law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly do n't understand why every company does n't do this .
What 's with the jones everybody has for China ?
Sure , they have a lot of people , but India will have more in a few years , and is on a much better course .
China has no Rule of Law , so anything useful any company builds there will just be taken someday by the government ( or one of their cronies ) .
They have already been arbirarily arresting foriegn businessmen .
Why anybody would want to try to do business there is beyond me .
India has the same ( or better ) upside growth potential , will have a larger population , and actually has Rule of Law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly don't understand why every company doesn't do this.
What's with the jones everybody has for China?
Sure, they have a lot of people, but India will have more in a few years, and is on a much better course.
China has no Rule of Law, so anything useful any company builds there will just be taken someday by the government (or one of their cronies).
They have already been arbirarily arresting foriegn businessmen.
Why anybody would want to try to do business there is beyond me.
India has the same (or better) upside growth potential, will have a larger population, and actually has Rule of Law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178</id>
	<title>How can I help you today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is my pleasure to be helping you today. I understand you are trying to move your factories from China to India. Just a moment and I will bring up your account. Ok I will look up moving your factories from China to India in our knowledge-base. Have you tried plugging in your factories?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is my pleasure to be helping you today .
I understand you are trying to move your factories from China to India .
Just a moment and I will bring up your account .
Ok I will look up moving your factories from China to India in our knowledge-base .
Have you tried plugging in your factories ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is my pleasure to be helping you today.
I understand you are trying to move your factories from China to India.
Just a moment and I will bring up your account.
Ok I will look up moving your factories from China to India in our knowledge-base.
Have you tried plugging in your factories?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618650</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>RajivSLK</author>
	<datestamp>1269516060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What happens when all that China has left, is China?</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and Wal-mart. I don't think Wal-mart can stop selling Chinese made goods without largely destroying itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when all that China has left , is China ?
  ... and Wal-mart .
I do n't think Wal-mart can stop selling Chinese made goods without largely destroying itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when all that China has left, is China?
   ... and Wal-mart.
I don't think Wal-mart can stop selling Chinese made goods without largely destroying itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617740</id>
	<title>Ahh, yes</title>
	<author>wampus</author>
	<datestamp>1269511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nexus404, known far and wide as a...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nexus404 , known far and wide as a... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nexus404, known far and wide as a...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619222</id>
	<title>Re:How about</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The USA, it's safer and conducive to enterprise,</i></p><p>The US has the second highest corporate tax rates in the world.  Some States taxes push their jurisdiction to #1 in the world for highest corporate tax places.  The US regulatory regime is among the most onerous for corporations and the one on its citizens keeps wages artificially high (60-70\% of wages are passed through in taxation).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The USA , it 's safer and conducive to enterprise,The US has the second highest corporate tax rates in the world .
Some States taxes push their jurisdiction to # 1 in the world for highest corporate tax places .
The US regulatory regime is among the most onerous for corporations and the one on its citizens keeps wages artificially high ( 60-70 \ % of wages are passed through in taxation ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The USA, it's safer and conducive to enterprise,The US has the second highest corporate tax rates in the world.
Some States taxes push their jurisdiction to #1 in the world for highest corporate tax places.
The US regulatory regime is among the most onerous for corporations and the one on its citizens keeps wages artificially high (60-70\% of wages are passed through in taxation).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624602</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269610860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or Nashville or Lebanon TN</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or Nashville or Lebanon TN</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or Nashville or Lebanon TN</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618446</id>
	<title>Do you hear that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269515040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... it's the sound of shit hitting the fan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it 's the sound of shit hitting the fan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it's the sound of shit hitting the fan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622526</id>
	<title>Smells ACTA</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1269544980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i would venture far to say that china is taking an opposing stance in acta negotiations, and american companies are repositioning themselves, also being tools for the acta negotiators to pressure china to agreement and also therefore threatening other countries. if china doesnt agree with acta, it basically fails. they have 1/7th of world population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i would venture far to say that china is taking an opposing stance in acta negotiations , and american companies are repositioning themselves , also being tools for the acta negotiators to pressure china to agreement and also therefore threatening other countries .
if china doesnt agree with acta , it basically fails .
they have 1/7th of world population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i would venture far to say that china is taking an opposing stance in acta negotiations, and american companies are repositioning themselves, also being tools for the acta negotiators to pressure china to agreement and also therefore threatening other countries.
if china doesnt agree with acta, it basically fails.
they have 1/7th of world population.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619852</id>
	<title>Bad conduct</title>
	<author>Panoptes</author>
	<datestamp>1269522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Conductive? Conducive!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Conductive ?
Conducive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conductive?
Conducive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31634546</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1269609240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dell? Austin? Never happen..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell ?
Austin ? Never happen. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell?
Austin? Never happen..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618478</id>
	<title>How about</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269515160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The USA, it's safer and conducive to enterprise, and with the economy in the pits a great time to negotiate with state governments, not to mention the karma factor Mr Dell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The USA , it 's safer and conducive to enterprise , and with the economy in the pits a great time to negotiate with state governments , not to mention the karma factor Mr Dell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The USA, it's safer and conducive to enterprise, and with the economy in the pits a great time to negotiate with state governments, not to mention the karma factor Mr Dell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618064</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX?</p></div><p>No, because they wouldn't pay very well.  American companies can't afford to pay the wages and benefits that Americans demand.  That's why they have so many jobs in other countries where such expectations are lower.  They also avoid different kinds of taxes and restrictions on what they can do and where.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX ? No , because they would n't pay very well .
American companies ca n't afford to pay the wages and benefits that Americans demand .
That 's why they have so many jobs in other countries where such expectations are lower .
They also avoid different kinds of taxes and restrictions on what they can do and where .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be even better if it was built in Twin Falls Idaho or Austin TX?No, because they wouldn't pay very well.
American companies can't afford to pay the wages and benefits that Americans demand.
That's why they have so many jobs in other countries where such expectations are lower.
They also avoid different kinds of taxes and restrictions on what they can do and where.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617786</id>
	<title>Conductive?</title>
	<author>ShadowRangerRIT</author>
	<datestamp>1269512280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure that wasn't "conducive"? I know Dell is an electronics manufacturer, but the company itself is likely non-conduc<b>t</b>ive in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure that was n't " conducive " ?
I know Dell is an electronics manufacturer , but the company itself is likely non-conductive in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure that wasn't "conducive"?
I know Dell is an electronics manufacturer, but the company itself is likely non-conductive in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618162</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1269513840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>never happen. china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US. that's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.</p><p>google and friends are pulling out for no other reason than it's costing them more to do business there than they are saving. don't kid yourself into thinking that they took some sort of moral high ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>never happen .
china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US .
that 's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.google and friends are pulling out for no other reason than it 's costing them more to do business there than they are saving .
do n't kid yourself into thinking that they took some sort of moral high ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never happen.
china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US.
that's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.google and friends are pulling out for no other reason than it's costing them more to do business there than they are saving.
don't kid yourself into thinking that they took some sort of moral high ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619190</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>anarche</author>
	<datestamp>1269519180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>never happen. china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US. that's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.</p></div><p>Bullshit, China has a labour <i>shortage</i>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/global/27yuan.html" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/global/27yuan.html</a> [nytimes.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>never happen .
china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US .
that 's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.Bullshit , China has a labour shortage http : //www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/global/27yuan.html [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never happen.
china has an infinite supply of workers ready to grind themselves into the ground to put $ on the pockets of execs back in the US.
that's just too sweet a deal for US corporations to pass up.Bullshit, China has a labour shortage
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/global/27yuan.html [nytimes.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617762</id>
	<title>Didn't they already do this?</title>
	<author>Khan</author>
	<datestamp>1269512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh wait, that was their Customer Service department. I wonder how that experiment went<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait , that was their Customer Service department .
I wonder how that experiment went ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait, that was their Customer Service department.
I wonder how that experiment went ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621036</id>
	<title>Damn right. I hate USA. Send them back to Brittain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269529920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and burn that fucking Constitution they use against me all the time, violating my property rites with their complexity of fraud concealed by their interpretive Due Process pool of court dictators that rend everyone other than theirselves to be subject to limited liability and regulations that none would accept with disclosure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and burn that fucking Constitution they use against me all the time , violating my property rites with their complexity of fraud concealed by their interpretive Due Process pool of court dictators that rend everyone other than theirselves to be subject to limited liability and regulations that none would accept with disclosure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and burn that fucking Constitution they use against me all the time, violating my property rites with their complexity of fraud concealed by their interpretive Due Process pool of court dictators that rend everyone other than theirselves to be subject to limited liability and regulations that none would accept with disclosure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621456</id>
	<title>Re:Off-shore devs ruined India's reputation.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269533700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the U.S., most sneakers are manufactured in China and many dress shoes are now manufactured in India.  I noticed this phenomenon when I recently visited a DSW (Discount Shoe Warehouse) in Houston, Texas.  Needless to say, the shoe quality was garbage.</p><p>When it comes to general product quality, if you think Chinese products are crap (they are), you haven't seen anything yet until you've seen Indian products.</p><p>Needless to say, I now go way out of my way to avoid products made in countries that are hotbeds of off-shored labor.  I have no problems with buying non-American goods (products made in Canada, Germany, and Japan have generally satisfied me.)  However, I absolutely, positively am not going to pay first-world prices for third-world garbage.</p><p>FWIW, I am an American (natural-born) born to Chinese (Taiwan) immigrants so I don't think my opinion is the result of xenophobia or racism.  Crap is crap and I'm sick to death of having my money wasted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the U.S. , most sneakers are manufactured in China and many dress shoes are now manufactured in India .
I noticed this phenomenon when I recently visited a DSW ( Discount Shoe Warehouse ) in Houston , Texas .
Needless to say , the shoe quality was garbage.When it comes to general product quality , if you think Chinese products are crap ( they are ) , you have n't seen anything yet until you 've seen Indian products.Needless to say , I now go way out of my way to avoid products made in countries that are hotbeds of off-shored labor .
I have no problems with buying non-American goods ( products made in Canada , Germany , and Japan have generally satisfied me .
) However , I absolutely , positively am not going to pay first-world prices for third-world garbage.FWIW , I am an American ( natural-born ) born to Chinese ( Taiwan ) immigrants so I do n't think my opinion is the result of xenophobia or racism .
Crap is crap and I 'm sick to death of having my money wasted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the U.S., most sneakers are manufactured in China and many dress shoes are now manufactured in India.
I noticed this phenomenon when I recently visited a DSW (Discount Shoe Warehouse) in Houston, Texas.
Needless to say, the shoe quality was garbage.When it comes to general product quality, if you think Chinese products are crap (they are), you haven't seen anything yet until you've seen Indian products.Needless to say, I now go way out of my way to avoid products made in countries that are hotbeds of off-shored labor.
I have no problems with buying non-American goods (products made in Canada, Germany, and Japan have generally satisfied me.
)  However, I absolutely, positively am not going to pay first-world prices for third-world garbage.FWIW, I am an American (natural-born) born to Chinese (Taiwan) immigrants so I don't think my opinion is the result of xenophobia or racism.
Crap is crap and I'm sick to death of having my money wasted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618592</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269515760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What happens when all that China has left, is China?</p></div><p>The Chinese will toss China against the wall and all the China will be smashed into little pieces in China.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when all that China has left , is China ? The Chinese will toss China against the wall and all the China will be smashed into little pieces in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when all that China has left, is China?The Chinese will toss China against the wall and all the China will be smashed into little pieces in China.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617892</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>\_Shad0w\_</author>
	<datestamp>1269512640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, Dell trades in countries besides the US.  No matter where they manufacture the damn things they're probably going to be shipping them abroad to a large proportion of their customers anyway.</p><p>I suspect it's only the base systems that are manufactured over there anyway, final configuration still takes place at the local level, I believe.  At least I can't see Dell building a system to my spec in India or China and then shipping it over to me in the UK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , Dell trades in countries besides the US .
No matter where they manufacture the damn things they 're probably going to be shipping them abroad to a large proportion of their customers anyway.I suspect it 's only the base systems that are manufactured over there anyway , final configuration still takes place at the local level , I believe .
At least I ca n't see Dell building a system to my spec in India or China and then shipping it over to me in the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, Dell trades in countries besides the US.
No matter where they manufacture the damn things they're probably going to be shipping them abroad to a large proportion of their customers anyway.I suspect it's only the base systems that are manufactured over there anyway, final configuration still takes place at the local level, I believe.
At least I can't see Dell building a system to my spec in India or China and then shipping it over to me in the UK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622248</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can thank the Brits for civilizing those people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can thank the Brits for civilizing those people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can thank the Brits for civilizing those people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618184</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll have their thriving lead paint and melamine industries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll have their thriving lead paint and melamine industries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll have their thriving lead paint and melamine industries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620368</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269525420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lenovo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620578</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269526740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when was China dirt poor?  It's the world's second largest economy and the government holds trillions of dollars in cash reserves.  The US on the other hand has a $11.4trillion national debt and close to a $1trillion trade deficit.  If I was a nation I think I'd rather be "dirt poor" China than the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when was China dirt poor ?
It 's the world 's second largest economy and the government holds trillions of dollars in cash reserves .
The US on the other hand has a $ 11.4trillion national debt and close to a $ 1trillion trade deficit .
If I was a nation I think I 'd rather be " dirt poor " China than the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when was China dirt poor?
It's the world's second largest economy and the government holds trillions of dollars in cash reserves.
The US on the other hand has a $11.4trillion national debt and close to a $1trillion trade deficit.
If I was a nation I think I'd rather be "dirt poor" China than the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618062</id>
	<title>India is not known for its workmanship....</title>
	<author>madhatter256</author>
	<datestamp>1269513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at how bad the call service for their tech-support is.... what's to say that hardware manufacturing will be any better?</p><p>The domestic market for Indian cars is very small and many of the big corporations there import many of their equipment.</p><p>Remember that you should stay away from writable dvd/cd media made in India....</p><p>Also, India has sweatshops, too, hundreds of them and a lax government crackdown on them....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at how bad the call service for their tech-support is.... what 's to say that hardware manufacturing will be any better ? The domestic market for Indian cars is very small and many of the big corporations there import many of their equipment.Remember that you should stay away from writable dvd/cd media made in India....Also , India has sweatshops , too , hundreds of them and a lax government crackdown on them... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at how bad the call service for their tech-support is.... what's to say that hardware manufacturing will be any better?The domestic market for Indian cars is very small and many of the big corporations there import many of their equipment.Remember that you should stay away from writable dvd/cd media made in India....Also, India has sweatshops, too, hundreds of them and a lax government crackdown on them....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618974</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1269517980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You missed the keyword of his post, even though it was repeated several times for emphasis.  <b>American</b>.  Apparently it doesn't matter (to him) if people get fed 24 hour propaganda, dissapeared off the street, tortured, executed, and harvested for organs; as long as it doesn't hurt Americans.  A sentiment all too common in my country I'm afraid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You missed the keyword of his post , even though it was repeated several times for emphasis .
American. Apparently it does n't matter ( to him ) if people get fed 24 hour propaganda , dissapeared off the street , tortured , executed , and harvested for organs ; as long as it does n't hurt Americans .
A sentiment all too common in my country I 'm afraid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You missed the keyword of his post, even though it was repeated several times for emphasis.
American.  Apparently it doesn't matter (to him) if people get fed 24 hour propaganda, dissapeared off the street, tortured, executed, and harvested for organs; as long as it doesn't hurt Americans.
A sentiment all too common in my country I'm afraid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618442</id>
	<title>Off-shore devs ruined India's reputation.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269514980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indian off-shore software developers have ruined the reputation of India for a great deal of Americans, over the past 15 years or so. They've just sent far too much broken, shitty software our way, that has caused us trouble day in and day out.</p><p>You may think it's just American software developers who hold this attitude. Don't worry, it's not. Most users who know that their software was developed in India have a similar distrust, too. After all, they're the ones who get stuck using the fecal software for hours each day.</p><p>This poor reputation has expanded beyond just software. Just the other day I was trying on shoes. I found a pair that felt okay, but I was suspicious about the quality. I looked at the label, and noticed they were manufactured in India. So I put them back in the box, and put the box back on the shelf right away. If Indian-built shoes are anything like Indian-built software, I want nothing to do with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indian off-shore software developers have ruined the reputation of India for a great deal of Americans , over the past 15 years or so .
They 've just sent far too much broken , shitty software our way , that has caused us trouble day in and day out.You may think it 's just American software developers who hold this attitude .
Do n't worry , it 's not .
Most users who know that their software was developed in India have a similar distrust , too .
After all , they 're the ones who get stuck using the fecal software for hours each day.This poor reputation has expanded beyond just software .
Just the other day I was trying on shoes .
I found a pair that felt okay , but I was suspicious about the quality .
I looked at the label , and noticed they were manufactured in India .
So I put them back in the box , and put the box back on the shelf right away .
If Indian-built shoes are anything like Indian-built software , I want nothing to do with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indian off-shore software developers have ruined the reputation of India for a great deal of Americans, over the past 15 years or so.
They've just sent far too much broken, shitty software our way, that has caused us trouble day in and day out.You may think it's just American software developers who hold this attitude.
Don't worry, it's not.
Most users who know that their software was developed in India have a similar distrust, too.
After all, they're the ones who get stuck using the fecal software for hours each day.This poor reputation has expanded beyond just software.
Just the other day I was trying on shoes.
I found a pair that felt okay, but I was suspicious about the quality.
I looked at the label, and noticed they were manufactured in India.
So I put them back in the box, and put the box back on the shelf right away.
If Indian-built shoes are anything like Indian-built software, I want nothing to do with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617900</id>
	<title>Why not Libya?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dell are traitors to their own country whether moving to China or India.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell are traitors to their own country whether moving to China or India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell are traitors to their own country whether moving to China or India.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</id>
	<title>doublespeak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise'
<br>
Read as "safer from industrial espionage and nationalization"</htmltext>
<tokenext>a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise ' Read as " safer from industrial espionage and nationalization "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a 'safer environment conductive to enterprise'

Read as "safer from industrial espionage and nationalization"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617808</id>
	<title>I would like them move to US</title>
	<author>CSHARP123</author>
	<datestamp>1269512340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know they would not do that citing cost and other crap. But I certainly would support any company moving production base from communist country to a democratic country. I know there are people here criticizing US, India and other democratic countries about certain draconian laws but these countries are much better than China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know they would not do that citing cost and other crap .
But I certainly would support any company moving production base from communist country to a democratic country .
I know there are people here criticizing US , India and other democratic countries about certain draconian laws but these countries are much better than China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know they would not do that citing cost and other crap.
But I certainly would support any company moving production base from communist country to a democratic country.
I know there are people here criticizing US, India and other democratic countries about certain draconian laws but these countries are much better than China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624462</id>
	<title>Re:How can I help you today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269609840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please do the needful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do the needful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please do the needful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617658</id>
	<title>alias, no government spies and lies</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1269511620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India not, but apparently spies and lies count for more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India not , but apparently spies and lies count for more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India not, but apparently spies and lies count for more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619616</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269521220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably dump their dollar and euro reserves and laugh manically while watching the world burn being reassured that them being so big and all, still have enough poor regions which produce enough food that can feed the rest of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably dump their dollar and euro reserves and laugh manically while watching the world burn being reassured that them being so big and all , still have enough poor regions which produce enough food that can feed the rest of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably dump their dollar and euro reserves and laugh manically while watching the world burn being reassured that them being so big and all, still have enough poor regions which produce enough food that can feed the rest of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618370</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1269514620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China. First google, then godaddy, now Dell. What happens when all that China has left, is China?<p>
My company did.  We abandoned a brand-new billion dollar semiconductor fabrication facility.  Officially it was because we didn't have enough work to fill it along with our several other (non-Chinese) fabs.  Rumor says it was at least partly because we were tired of competing with ourselves and our fourth-shift output.  However, it certainly wasn't anything to do with fear of nationalization or the unpleasantness surrounding that <a href="http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=29733&amp;t=China\%3A+++Verdict+in+Rio+Tinto+case+expected+on+Monday" title="speroforum.com">Australian Rio Tinto executive who was arrested and is currently being tried in China</a> [speroforum.com] for (again, rumor has it) not bribing enough people, although I think that should be at least considered.  Since the Rio Tinto trial was front-page Wall Street Journal news yesterday, I'm guessing that today a lot of people who make outsourcing decisions are thinking about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China .
First google , then godaddy , now Dell .
What happens when all that China has left , is China ?
My company did .
We abandoned a brand-new billion dollar semiconductor fabrication facility .
Officially it was because we did n't have enough work to fill it along with our several other ( non-Chinese ) fabs .
Rumor says it was at least partly because we were tired of competing with ourselves and our fourth-shift output .
However , it certainly was n't anything to do with fear of nationalization or the unpleasantness surrounding that Australian Rio Tinto executive who was arrested and is currently being tried in China [ speroforum.com ] for ( again , rumor has it ) not bribing enough people , although I think that should be at least considered .
Since the Rio Tinto trial was front-page Wall Street Journal news yesterday , I 'm guessing that today a lot of people who make outsourcing decisions are thinking about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.
First google, then godaddy, now Dell.
What happens when all that China has left, is China?
My company did.
We abandoned a brand-new billion dollar semiconductor fabrication facility.
Officially it was because we didn't have enough work to fill it along with our several other (non-Chinese) fabs.
Rumor says it was at least partly because we were tired of competing with ourselves and our fourth-shift output.
However, it certainly wasn't anything to do with fear of nationalization or the unpleasantness surrounding that Australian Rio Tinto executive who was arrested and is currently being tried in China [speroforum.com] for (again, rumor has it) not bribing enough people, although I think that should be at least considered.
Since the Rio Tinto trial was front-page Wall Street Journal news yesterday, I'm guessing that today a lot of people who make outsourcing decisions are thinking about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620152</id>
	<title>What about the Rio Tinto factor?</title>
	<author>WeirdJohn</author>
	<datestamp>1269523980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to wonder if the Stern Hu case is a factor in this.  For those not in the know, Stern Hu is an Australian who is currently on trial in China for accepting bribes and industrial espionage.  Mr Hu works for Rio Tinto, the iron ore giant that China failed to buy last year.</p><p>Everyone knows that bribery is a large part of doing business in China.  Stern has been in court for 3 days now.  Even consulate officials have been denied presence at the trial, relying on state reports of what went on each day.  Stern has admitted he took bribes, although he challenges the amount claimed.  He will be sentenced on Monday - the trial started last Monday.</p><p>In the article, Michael Dell talks about how he wants to do business in "places with a legal system".  I think that the Hu case, Rio Tinto's experience, and the events with Google would be making any enterprise re-evaluate the cost and risk of dealing with China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder if the Stern Hu case is a factor in this .
For those not in the know , Stern Hu is an Australian who is currently on trial in China for accepting bribes and industrial espionage .
Mr Hu works for Rio Tinto , the iron ore giant that China failed to buy last year.Everyone knows that bribery is a large part of doing business in China .
Stern has been in court for 3 days now .
Even consulate officials have been denied presence at the trial , relying on state reports of what went on each day .
Stern has admitted he took bribes , although he challenges the amount claimed .
He will be sentenced on Monday - the trial started last Monday.In the article , Michael Dell talks about how he wants to do business in " places with a legal system " .
I think that the Hu case , Rio Tinto 's experience , and the events with Google would be making any enterprise re-evaluate the cost and risk of dealing with China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder if the Stern Hu case is a factor in this.
For those not in the know, Stern Hu is an Australian who is currently on trial in China for accepting bribes and industrial espionage.
Mr Hu works for Rio Tinto, the iron ore giant that China failed to buy last year.Everyone knows that bribery is a large part of doing business in China.
Stern has been in court for 3 days now.
Even consulate officials have been denied presence at the trial, relying on state reports of what went on each day.
Stern has admitted he took bribes, although he challenges the amount claimed.
He will be sentenced on Monday - the trial started last Monday.In the article, Michael Dell talks about how he wants to do business in "places with a legal system".
I think that the Hu case, Rio Tinto's experience, and the events with Google would be making any enterprise re-evaluate the cost and risk of dealing with China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618010</id>
	<title>India safer?  Define safer.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>India safer?  In some ways I suppose but it depends on what you are talking about.  The Indian government is less draconian and less likely to try to compete with you.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expropriation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Expropriation</a> [wikipedia.org] is probably less of a concern in India.  The rupee has somewhat better <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian\_rupee#Convertibility" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">convertibility</a> [wikipedia.org] than the yuan and currency flows are less stringently controlled.  Plus there is a much larger contingent of English speakers than in China.  India's legal system is slightly less hostile to foreigners than China's though both are to be avoided if possible.  Freedom of speech is obviously better in India though China doesn't have quite the death grip on speech everyone here seems to think they do.</p><p>On the other hand, India's infrastructure is badly trailing that of China, there is less foreign capital to improve things, corruption is a huge issue in India, business regulations are as bad if not worse than China, and transport costs are somewhat worse.  Despite the number of engineers, India has less experience with certain types of manufacturing.  India is a democracy (which is good) but that doesn't always make doing business there easier - in fact it often makes it harder due to populist policies.</p><p>There has been something of a "gotta be in China" attitude but China isn't always the best place to make things.  There are places with cheaper labor (Vietnam for instance) and places with better logistics (Singapore) and places with expertise silos (Japan) that might make better choices.  Plus betting everything on China is risky by itself.  Doing business in China is hard, risky, requires constant oversight, and a long term perspective. Anyone thinking they can just produce stuff cheaply in China with little difficulty is going to lose a lot of money very quickly.</p><p>I've done global sourcing in both countries - it's difficult no matter which way you go.  I've personally been in a factory in Chengdu where parts for Dell computers were being assembled.  Moving production from China to India might be a good idea from a diversification standpoint (bad idea to do everything in China) but it's only marginally safer in my opinion depending on exactly what one means by safer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>India safer ?
In some ways I suppose but it depends on what you are talking about .
The Indian government is less draconian and less likely to try to compete with you .
Expropriation [ wikipedia.org ] is probably less of a concern in India .
The rupee has somewhat better convertibility [ wikipedia.org ] than the yuan and currency flows are less stringently controlled .
Plus there is a much larger contingent of English speakers than in China .
India 's legal system is slightly less hostile to foreigners than China 's though both are to be avoided if possible .
Freedom of speech is obviously better in India though China does n't have quite the death grip on speech everyone here seems to think they do.On the other hand , India 's infrastructure is badly trailing that of China , there is less foreign capital to improve things , corruption is a huge issue in India , business regulations are as bad if not worse than China , and transport costs are somewhat worse .
Despite the number of engineers , India has less experience with certain types of manufacturing .
India is a democracy ( which is good ) but that does n't always make doing business there easier - in fact it often makes it harder due to populist policies.There has been something of a " got ta be in China " attitude but China is n't always the best place to make things .
There are places with cheaper labor ( Vietnam for instance ) and places with better logistics ( Singapore ) and places with expertise silos ( Japan ) that might make better choices .
Plus betting everything on China is risky by itself .
Doing business in China is hard , risky , requires constant oversight , and a long term perspective .
Anyone thinking they can just produce stuff cheaply in China with little difficulty is going to lose a lot of money very quickly.I 've done global sourcing in both countries - it 's difficult no matter which way you go .
I 've personally been in a factory in Chengdu where parts for Dell computers were being assembled .
Moving production from China to India might be a good idea from a diversification standpoint ( bad idea to do everything in China ) but it 's only marginally safer in my opinion depending on exactly what one means by safer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India safer?
In some ways I suppose but it depends on what you are talking about.
The Indian government is less draconian and less likely to try to compete with you.
Expropriation [wikipedia.org] is probably less of a concern in India.
The rupee has somewhat better convertibility [wikipedia.org] than the yuan and currency flows are less stringently controlled.
Plus there is a much larger contingent of English speakers than in China.
India's legal system is slightly less hostile to foreigners than China's though both are to be avoided if possible.
Freedom of speech is obviously better in India though China doesn't have quite the death grip on speech everyone here seems to think they do.On the other hand, India's infrastructure is badly trailing that of China, there is less foreign capital to improve things, corruption is a huge issue in India, business regulations are as bad if not worse than China, and transport costs are somewhat worse.
Despite the number of engineers, India has less experience with certain types of manufacturing.
India is a democracy (which is good) but that doesn't always make doing business there easier - in fact it often makes it harder due to populist policies.There has been something of a "gotta be in China" attitude but China isn't always the best place to make things.
There are places with cheaper labor (Vietnam for instance) and places with better logistics (Singapore) and places with expertise silos (Japan) that might make better choices.
Plus betting everything on China is risky by itself.
Doing business in China is hard, risky, requires constant oversight, and a long term perspective.
Anyone thinking they can just produce stuff cheaply in China with little difficulty is going to lose a lot of money very quickly.I've done global sourcing in both countries - it's difficult no matter which way you go.
I've personally been in a factory in Chengdu where parts for Dell computers were being assembled.
Moving production from China to India might be a good idea from a diversification standpoint (bad idea to do everything in China) but it's only marginally safer in my opinion depending on exactly what one means by safer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617732</id>
	<title>The funny thing is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>that China has already stolen all that they can. Now Dell is going to send it to India. If Dell was smart, they would at least split the work between America and India.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that China has already stolen all that they can .
Now Dell is going to send it to India .
If Dell was smart , they would at least split the work between America and India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that China has already stolen all that they can.
Now Dell is going to send it to India.
If Dell was smart, they would at least split the work between America and India.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618100</id>
	<title>Re:Conductive?</title>
	<author>ShadowRangerRIT</author>
	<datestamp>1269513480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a note: TFA actually uses the correct word. Is it so hard for submitters to actually copy and paste the correct words when they are directly quoting in the first place?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a note : TFA actually uses the correct word .
Is it so hard for submitters to actually copy and paste the correct words when they are directly quoting in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a note: TFA actually uses the correct word.
Is it so hard for submitters to actually copy and paste the correct words when they are directly quoting in the first place?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1269511260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Dell can guarantee their parts are made in India and not China, I just might be getting a Dell next year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Dell can guarantee their parts are made in India and not China , I just might be getting a Dell next year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Dell can guarantee their parts are made in India and not China, I just might be getting a Dell next year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621838</id>
	<title>US Economy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269536580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>US Businesses have the goal \ requirement \ mission of making profit.  Developing countries have SO MUCH untapped potential for making that profit.  US Businesses will go there.<br>In the meantime, US Businesses DO NOT have obligations to be in the US  . . . especially if not making profit.  In fact, if not making profit, some one's job will be on the line.<br>what is the future bringing to the US ?</p><p>Thinking, Dude . . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>US Businesses have the goal \ requirement \ mission of making profit .
Developing countries have SO MUCH untapped potential for making that profit .
US Businesses will go there.In the meantime , US Businesses DO NOT have obligations to be in the US .
. .
especially if not making profit .
In fact , if not making profit , some one 's job will be on the line.what is the future bringing to the US ? Thinking , Dude .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>US Businesses have the goal \ requirement \ mission of making profit.
Developing countries have SO MUCH untapped potential for making that profit.
US Businesses will go there.In the meantime, US Businesses DO NOT have obligations to be in the US  .
. .
especially if not making profit.
In fact, if not making profit, some one's job will be on the line.what is the future bringing to the US ?Thinking, Dude .
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622778</id>
	<title>Corruption</title>
	<author>Anonymous Bullard</author>
	<datestamp>1269634680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regarding corruption, I just recently came across a study comparing corruption in countries like China, Russia and India. It was noted that in <i>India</i> corruption patterns resemble a <i>pyramid</i>: lighter at the top but heavier at lower levels; in <i>China</i> where the (only nominally) Communist Party controls all aspects of power, corruption was heaviest at the more powerful levels of the machinery (also taking into account the rampant cronyism prevalent at the very top through family connections) while the less powerful lower levels weren't as corrupt (<i>upside down pyramid</i>).</p><p>In <i>Russia</i> corruption was prevalent at <i>all levels</i>.</p><p>Of course the less tangible <i>moral corruption</i> (e.g. of criminal policies of the state/government/Party) wasn't being taken into account...</p><p>What this means for foreign investors is that in India companies (dealing largely with higher levels of the government) are less likely to be exposed to the large scale corruption at business levels present in China, while Indian consumers are also more likely to purchase foreign or indian-made foreign goods than the nationalistic Chinese (thanks to systematic "anti-colonial" propaganda). While India has moved towards less protectionism (import duties) since the 1990s, there also remain tax incentives for manufacturing goods domestically in India, something that can add up considering the size of the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regarding corruption , I just recently came across a study comparing corruption in countries like China , Russia and India .
It was noted that in India corruption patterns resemble a pyramid : lighter at the top but heavier at lower levels ; in China where the ( only nominally ) Communist Party controls all aspects of power , corruption was heaviest at the more powerful levels of the machinery ( also taking into account the rampant cronyism prevalent at the very top through family connections ) while the less powerful lower levels were n't as corrupt ( upside down pyramid ) .In Russia corruption was prevalent at all levels.Of course the less tangible moral corruption ( e.g .
of criminal policies of the state/government/Party ) was n't being taken into account...What this means for foreign investors is that in India companies ( dealing largely with higher levels of the government ) are less likely to be exposed to the large scale corruption at business levels present in China , while Indian consumers are also more likely to purchase foreign or indian-made foreign goods than the nationalistic Chinese ( thanks to systematic " anti-colonial " propaganda ) .
While India has moved towards less protectionism ( import duties ) since the 1990s , there also remain tax incentives for manufacturing goods domestically in India , something that can add up considering the size of the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regarding corruption, I just recently came across a study comparing corruption in countries like China, Russia and India.
It was noted that in India corruption patterns resemble a pyramid: lighter at the top but heavier at lower levels; in China where the (only nominally) Communist Party controls all aspects of power, corruption was heaviest at the more powerful levels of the machinery (also taking into account the rampant cronyism prevalent at the very top through family connections) while the less powerful lower levels weren't as corrupt (upside down pyramid).In Russia corruption was prevalent at all levels.Of course the less tangible moral corruption (e.g.
of criminal policies of the state/government/Party) wasn't being taken into account...What this means for foreign investors is that in India companies (dealing largely with higher levels of the government) are less likely to be exposed to the large scale corruption at business levels present in China, while Indian consumers are also more likely to purchase foreign or indian-made foreign goods than the nationalistic Chinese (thanks to systematic "anti-colonial" propaganda).
While India has moved towards less protectionism (import duties) since the 1990s, there also remain tax incentives for manufacturing goods domestically in India, something that can add up considering the size of the market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618136</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NO NO NO</p><p>FFS Dell is not leaving China.</p><p>How can people believe this shit without reading into it? Seems like any breaking news could just set people off...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NO NO NOFFS Dell is not leaving China.How can people believe this shit without reading into it ?
Seems like any breaking news could just set people off.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO NO NOFFS Dell is not leaving China.How can people believe this shit without reading into it?
Seems like any breaking news could just set people off...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621128</id>
	<title>Soap opera, anyone?</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1269530760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a relationship issue to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a relationship issue to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a relationship issue to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618464</id>
	<title>Woohoo! Support will improve</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269515100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now that reps will be factory-based!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now that reps will be factory-based ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now that reps will be factory-based!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617688</id>
	<title>Reliable source?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a hard time finding one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a hard time finding one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a hard time finding one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618626</id>
	<title>Dont worry China Microsoft will stay</title>
	<author>yossarianuk</author>
	<datestamp>1269516000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even though Google, Domain registrar GoDaddy and now Dell seem to be pulling out of China (in Google's case its pretty certain) there's one Company that has no qualms about staying.<br> <br>

Good oldie Microsoft has said they have no problem following the countries laws.<br> <br>
This is strange considering Ballmer's obvious aversion to communism <br> <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/31/ms\_ballmer\_linux\_is\_communism/" title="theregister.co.uk" rel="nofollow"> MS' Ballmer: Linux is communism</a> [theregister.co.uk]  (although I would argue that china is not nor ever has been a true communist state) <br>
Lucky China...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even though Google , Domain registrar GoDaddy and now Dell seem to be pulling out of China ( in Google 's case its pretty certain ) there 's one Company that has no qualms about staying .
Good oldie Microsoft has said they have no problem following the countries laws .
This is strange considering Ballmer 's obvious aversion to communism MS ' Ballmer : Linux is communism [ theregister.co.uk ] ( although I would argue that china is not nor ever has been a true communist state ) Lucky China.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even though Google, Domain registrar GoDaddy and now Dell seem to be pulling out of China (in Google's case its pretty certain) there's one Company that has no qualms about staying.
Good oldie Microsoft has said they have no problem following the countries laws.
This is strange considering Ballmer's obvious aversion to communism   MS' Ballmer: Linux is communism [theregister.co.uk]  (although I would argue that china is not nor ever has been a true communist state) 
Lucky China...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619142</id>
	<title>Re:doublespeak</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1269518820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>China's version of capitalism is the caricature of capitalism they painted in the pre-Deng era; capitalism as unrestrained rapacity.   There's an element of truth in that, but capitalism can't be unrestrained in a democratic country with a free press.   American capitalism would be everything China said it was, except for business ethics, which would not exist if it were not for fear of shame and public retaliation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>China 's version of capitalism is the caricature of capitalism they painted in the pre-Deng era ; capitalism as unrestrained rapacity .
There 's an element of truth in that , but capitalism ca n't be unrestrained in a democratic country with a free press .
American capitalism would be everything China said it was , except for business ethics , which would not exist if it were not for fear of shame and public retaliation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China's version of capitalism is the caricature of capitalism they painted in the pre-Deng era; capitalism as unrestrained rapacity.
There's an element of truth in that, but capitalism can't be unrestrained in a democratic country with a free press.
American capitalism would be everything China said it was, except for business ethics, which would not exist if it were not for fear of shame and public retaliation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619736</id>
	<title>last time I checked everybody wants to go to China</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269521820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know the mods fell asleep at the switch on this story, but it would not have made much sense regardless.</p><p>Nobody is clambering to set up shop in India for good reasons that many have enumerated (never mind China, there are more comprehensive ventures in Malaysia or Singapore than in vaporware India).</p><p>At the end of the day, Dell won't be going anywhere else unless there are simple economic advantages (environmental issues would only figure as equivalent monetary conversion of good PR mileage).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know the mods fell asleep at the switch on this story , but it would not have made much sense regardless.Nobody is clambering to set up shop in India for good reasons that many have enumerated ( never mind China , there are more comprehensive ventures in Malaysia or Singapore than in vaporware India ) .At the end of the day , Dell wo n't be going anywhere else unless there are simple economic advantages ( environmental issues would only figure as equivalent monetary conversion of good PR mileage ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know the mods fell asleep at the switch on this story, but it would not have made much sense regardless.Nobody is clambering to set up shop in India for good reasons that many have enumerated (never mind China, there are more comprehensive ventures in Malaysia or Singapore than in vaporware India).At the end of the day, Dell won't be going anywhere else unless there are simple economic advantages (environmental issues would only figure as equivalent monetary conversion of good PR mileage).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618990</id>
	<title>Currency War</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1269518100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Dells move to diversify it's manufacturing is a smart move especially with a <a href="http://english.cctv.com/program/bizchina/20100325/103100.shtml" title="cctv.com"> currency war </a> [cctv.com]with China v EU,USA in the offing. You can bet that wont be good and Chinese made goods will be facing down the barrel of a 25-40\% tariff slapped on them. Any US or EU company with all their manufacturing based in China are placing their long term viability on risky ground if they don't diversify their manufacturing starting now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Dells move to diversify it 's manufacturing is a smart move especially with a currency war [ cctv.com ] with China v EU,USA in the offing .
You can bet that wont be good and Chinese made goods will be facing down the barrel of a 25-40 \ % tariff slapped on them .
Any US or EU company with all their manufacturing based in China are placing their long term viability on risky ground if they do n't diversify their manufacturing starting now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Dells move to diversify it's manufacturing is a smart move especially with a  currency war  [cctv.com]with China v EU,USA in the offing.
You can bet that wont be good and Chinese made goods will be facing down the barrel of a 25-40\% tariff slapped on them.
Any US or EU company with all their manufacturing based in China are placing their long term viability on risky ground if they don't diversify their manufacturing starting now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619122</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>anarche</author>
	<datestamp>1269518700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Countries don't (and shouldn't) have friends.
<br> <br>
Friends put other friends feeling and needs before their own. If a Government ever did this they would be failing at their job.
<br> <br>
Aussie speaking, very happy to have the USA as allies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Countries do n't ( and should n't ) have friends .
Friends put other friends feeling and needs before their own .
If a Government ever did this they would be failing at their job .
Aussie speaking , very happy to have the USA as allies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Countries don't (and shouldn't) have friends.
Friends put other friends feeling and needs before their own.
If a Government ever did this they would be failing at their job.
Aussie speaking, very happy to have the USA as allies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618120</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1269513600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What happens when all that China has left, is China?</p></div><p>Then they'll have North Korea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when all that China has left , is China ? Then they 'll have North Korea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when all that China has left, is China?Then they'll have North Korea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620930</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269528960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another. Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.</p></div><p>Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they 'll be outsourced to another .
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.Ignorance is bliss , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another.
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617920</id>
	<title>Sell dell now!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>25 billion move?  Shorting dell stocks immediately. Someone have to go to jail if this is not true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>25 billion move ?
Shorting dell stocks immediately .
Someone have to go to jail if this is not true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>25 billion move?
Shorting dell stocks immediately.
Someone have to go to jail if this is not true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Seor Jojoba</author>
	<datestamp>1269512520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings.  It also doesn't seem to have the taste for global imperialism that China does.  In China, you can disappear for protesting on the street.  In China, you put in an application if you'd like to move to another city.  In China, the internet is filtered.  India should be a great friend of the United States.  Americans have a lot in common with them, and in that part of the world, America could use more friends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings .
It also does n't seem to have the taste for global imperialism that China does .
In China , you can disappear for protesting on the street .
In China , you put in an application if you 'd like to move to another city .
In China , the internet is filtered .
India should be a great friend of the United States .
Americans have a lot in common with them , and in that part of the world , America could use more friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings.
It also doesn't seem to have the taste for global imperialism that China does.
In China, you can disappear for protesting on the street.
In China, you put in an application if you'd like to move to another city.
In China, the internet is filtered.
India should be a great friend of the United States.
Americans have a lot in common with them, and in that part of the world, America could use more friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31627720</id>
	<title>Re:doublespeak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>safe until the latest suicide bomber from Pakistan decides to attack you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>safe until the latest suicide bomber from Pakistan decides to attack you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>safe until the latest suicide bomber from Pakistan decides to attack you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621160</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269530940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can disappear in india for criticizing any number of politicians, movie stars, religious leaders.<br>The government may not have a hand in it (unless the politician is the incumbent), but the effects are the same nevertheless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can disappear in india for criticizing any number of politicians , movie stars , religious leaders.The government may not have a hand in it ( unless the politician is the incumbent ) , but the effects are the same nevertheless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can disappear in india for criticizing any number of politicians, movie stars, religious leaders.The government may not have a hand in it (unless the politician is the incumbent), but the effects are the same nevertheless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618018</id>
	<title>Sadly just wishful thinking I'm affraid!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or some form of self promotion for the author?  I have a post on Slashdot: touch me now...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or some form of self promotion for the author ?
I have a post on Slashdot : touch me now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or some form of self promotion for the author?
I have a post on Slashdot: touch me now...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618624</id>
	<title>Re:pandemic?</title>
	<author>hackingbear</author>
	<datestamp>1269515940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What happens when all that China has left, is China?</p></div><p>That's not likely to happen. But let's say it does. Then all we will do is to target our complaints to whichever <em>third-world</em> country picking up the businesses of making cheap crap products on cheap labors while at the same time polluting the environment. Those who think these are caused by the particular politics or government in China are just naive and have not really visited a third-world country.
</p><p>Also those businesses are not going to move back to the developed world, not until we make ourself third0world country by allowing people flooding in from Mexico and other third countries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when all that China has left , is China ? That 's not likely to happen .
But let 's say it does .
Then all we will do is to target our complaints to whichever third-world country picking up the businesses of making cheap crap products on cheap labors while at the same time polluting the environment .
Those who think these are caused by the particular politics or government in China are just naive and have not really visited a third-world country .
Also those businesses are not going to move back to the developed world , not until we make ourself third0world country by allowing people flooding in from Mexico and other third countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when all that China has left, is China?That's not likely to happen.
But let's say it does.
Then all we will do is to target our complaints to whichever third-world country picking up the businesses of making cheap crap products on cheap labors while at the same time polluting the environment.
Those who think these are caused by the particular politics or government in China are just naive and have not really visited a third-world country.
Also those businesses are not going to move back to the developed world, not until we make ourself third0world country by allowing people flooding in from Mexico and other third countries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618414</id>
	<title>Slight correction</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1269514860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can't afford to pay the wages/benefits and ALSO pay their C*O's assloads of money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ca n't afford to pay the wages/benefits and ALSO pay their C * O 's assloads of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can't afford to pay the wages/benefits and ALSO pay their C*O's assloads of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31633432</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269602460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another. Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.</p></div><p>China and India are in no way dirt poor</p><p>and they are building factories to make money by selling there, has nothing to with american job, if anything it will increase american jobs</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they 'll be outsourced to another .
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.China and India are in no way dirt poorand they are building factories to make money by selling there , has nothing to with american job , if anything it will increase american jobs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So instead of American jobs being outsourced to one dirt-poor foreign country they'll be outsourced to another.
Total significance to the American worker and the American customer -- nothing.China and India are in no way dirt poorand they are building factories to make money by selling there, has nothing to with american job, if anything it will increase american jobs
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618808</id>
	<title>Hey!</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1269517020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears that this article has been debunked.</p><p>Why no main-page correction to the article, or are we simply going for sensationalism now?</p><p>Editors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears that this article has been debunked.Why no main-page correction to the article , or are we simply going for sensationalism now ? Editors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears that this article has been debunked.Why no main-page correction to the article, or are we simply going for sensationalism now?Editors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618166</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need an application to move to another city, learn what you're talking about dicksucker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need an application to move to another city , learn what you 're talking about dicksucker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need an application to move to another city, learn what you're talking about dicksucker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622738</id>
	<title>Re:How can I help you today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269634080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hello. You are extremely unoriginal. How about purchasing a bucket of humor from the nearest Walmart?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello .
You are extremely unoriginal .
How about purchasing a bucket of humor from the nearest Walmart ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello.
You are extremely unoriginal.
How about purchasing a bucket of humor from the nearest Walmart?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906</id>
	<title>pandemic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.  First google, then godaddy, now Dell.  What happens when all that China has left, is China?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China .
First google , then godaddy , now Dell .
What happens when all that China has left , is China ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder how many more US companies are going to pull out of China.
First google, then godaddy, now Dell.
What happens when all that China has left, is China?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622314</id>
	<title>Dell Changes Name</title>
	<author>KingKaneOfNod</author>
	<datestamp>1269542580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now to be known as 'Delhi'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now to be known as 'Delhi' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now to be known as 'Delhi'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619238</id>
	<title>Re:doublespeak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269519360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thankyouplaseverymuch</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thankyouplaseverymuch</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thankyouplaseverymuch</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619014</id>
	<title>Re:alias, no government spies and lies</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1269518220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India not</p></div><p>Yeah, it's impressive that like half the world's CD-Rs and DVD-Rs are made there in steam-powered plants. Actually, I heard that in some plants they do it by hand!<br> <br>
No, really.<br> <br>
This probably explains why I'm having trouble getting them for under 10p each.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India notYeah , it 's impressive that like half the world 's CD-Rs and DVD-Rs are made there in steam-powered plants .
Actually , I heard that in some plants they do it by hand !
No , really .
This probably explains why I 'm having trouble getting them for under 10p each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is the little issue of China having electricity and India notYeah, it's impressive that like half the world's CD-Rs and DVD-Rs are made there in steam-powered plants.
Actually, I heard that in some plants they do it by hand!
No, really.
This probably explains why I'm having trouble getting them for under 10p each.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618072</id>
	<title>China ain't going to be happy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wonder if this would drive them to go to war just wondering, after all the U.S. coperations are moving alot of their assests out of China, and China isn't going to be as powerful as it use to be, it would tick of many because of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wonder if this would drive them to go to war just wondering , after all the U.S. coperations are moving alot of their assests out of China , and China is n't going to be as powerful as it use to be , it would tick of many because of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wonder if this would drive them to go to war just wondering, after all the U.S. coperations are moving alot of their assests out of China, and China isn't going to be as powerful as it use to be, it would tick of many because of this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618596</id>
	<title>no, cheaper</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1269515820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Read as "safer from industrial espionage and nationalization"</i>

</p><p>Read as "we think it will save us money", but the story is supposedly bogus (or Dell wasn't ready to admit it yet, or leaked it to scare their Chinese vendors, etc.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read as " safer from industrial espionage and nationalization " Read as " we think it will save us money " , but the story is supposedly bogus ( or Dell was n't ready to admit it yet , or leaked it to scare their Chinese vendors , etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Read as "safer from industrial espionage and nationalization"

Read as "we think it will save us money", but the story is supposedly bogus (or Dell wasn't ready to admit it yet, or leaked it to scare their Chinese vendors, etc.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617896</id>
	<title>Re:doublespeak</title>
	<author>Bluesman</author>
	<datestamp>1269512700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conductive doesn't sound safe to me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conductive does n't sound safe to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conductive doesn't sound safe to me...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618286</id>
	<title>Re:It's a lose lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269514320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings.</p></div><p>ha aha ha ha ha haaaaa haaaa hhaahaha ahhaa haaa.</p><p>I'm sorry, you were dreaming? oops, saying?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings.ha aha ha ha ha haaaaa haaaa hhaahaha ahhaa haaa.I 'm sorry , you were dreaming ?
oops , saying ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India is a democracy with a much better record of treating its citizens as free human beings.ha aha ha ha ha haaaaa haaaa hhaahaha ahhaa haaa.I'm sorry, you were dreaming?
oops, saying?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31634546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31633432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31627720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_2054238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617860
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618442
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31633432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619190
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31620368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31621036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31627720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31619142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31622738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_2054238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31617838
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618064
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31618414
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31624602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_2054238.31634546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
