<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_25_1728248</id>
	<title>Obama's Twitter Account "Hacked"</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269538200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Oxford\_Comma\_Lover writes <i>"A 24-year-old living with his mother in France was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704094104575143391819054502.html?mod=googlenews\_wsj">arrested for 'hacking' into Obama's twitter</a> accounts. (Warning: WSJ does obnoxious paywall things. Your miles may vary.) Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people; he has no computer science training or financial motive.  He posted screenshots to a few boards and twitter found out within a few hours, either from a tip or from noticing when someone from France logs onto twitter as the President of the United States.  (He did not actually tweet as POTUS, but just wanted to show he could break into the account.)"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oxford \ _Comma \ _Lover writes " A 24-year-old living with his mother in France was arrested for 'hacking ' into Obama 's twitter accounts .
( Warning : WSJ does obnoxious paywall things .
Your miles may vary .
) Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people ; he has no computer science training or financial motive .
He posted screenshots to a few boards and twitter found out within a few hours , either from a tip or from noticing when someone from France logs onto twitter as the President of the United States .
( He did not actually tweet as POTUS , but just wanted to show he could break into the account .
) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oxford\_Comma\_Lover writes "A 24-year-old living with his mother in France was arrested for 'hacking' into Obama's twitter accounts.
(Warning: WSJ does obnoxious paywall things.
Your miles may vary.
) Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people; he has no computer science training or financial motive.
He posted screenshots to a few boards and twitter found out within a few hours, either from a tip or from noticing when someone from France logs onto twitter as the President of the United States.
(He did not actually tweet as POTUS, but just wanted to show he could break into the account.
)"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614650</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>Petron</author>
	<datestamp>1269544680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People don't understand what hacking is... They think it's some person in a dark basement typing lines and lines of code.
<br> <br>
Hacking is getting access to a system that you wouldn't normally have access to.  Hacks have many levels of complexity. From Script kiddy (gaining access from diddling with minor changes to scripts/code) to extremely complex.  This person was at a minor level of hacking, but he did gain access to a system he wouldn't normally have access to.
<br> <br>
Think of it this way: Stealing can mean somebody taking a piece of petty candy (worth a penny), but people who think of thieves tend to think of guys in black masks breaking into houses...</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't understand what hacking is... They think it 's some person in a dark basement typing lines and lines of code .
Hacking is getting access to a system that you would n't normally have access to .
Hacks have many levels of complexity .
From Script kiddy ( gaining access from diddling with minor changes to scripts/code ) to extremely complex .
This person was at a minor level of hacking , but he did gain access to a system he would n't normally have access to .
Think of it this way : Stealing can mean somebody taking a piece of petty candy ( worth a penny ) , but people who think of thieves tend to think of guys in black masks breaking into houses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't understand what hacking is... They think it's some person in a dark basement typing lines and lines of code.
Hacking is getting access to a system that you wouldn't normally have access to.
Hacks have many levels of complexity.
From Script kiddy (gaining access from diddling with minor changes to scripts/code) to extremely complex.
This person was at a minor level of hacking, but he did gain access to a system he wouldn't normally have access to.
Think of it this way: Stealing can mean somebody taking a piece of petty candy (worth a penny), but people who think of thieves tend to think of guys in black masks breaking into houses...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615792</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1269548400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, blame the victim. You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door. It's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me.</p> </div><p>My password is indeed 12345, and it's perfectly OK to post here because it is a SECRET password.</p><p>If you hack into my password and guess it, you should go to prison for life, just like you advocate!</p><p>Ooops, looks like you 'guessed' it from my post, er i mean hacked into my password..  Hope you either really enjoy prison, or really enjoy being a hypocrite.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , blame the victim .
You did n't install triple deadbolts on your door .
It 's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me .
My password is indeed 12345 , and it 's perfectly OK to post here because it is a SECRET password.If you hack into my password and guess it , you should go to prison for life , just like you advocate ! Ooops , looks like you 'guessed ' it from my post , er i mean hacked into my password.. Hope you either really enjoy prison , or really enjoy being a hypocrite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, blame the victim.
You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door.
It's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me.
My password is indeed 12345, and it's perfectly OK to post here because it is a SECRET password.If you hack into my password and guess it, you should go to prison for life, just like you advocate!Ooops, looks like you 'guessed' it from my post, er i mean hacked into my password..  Hope you either really enjoy prison, or really enjoy being a hypocrite.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614322</id>
	<title>Re:log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1269543540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>q: what is your favorite sport<br>a: football<br>incorrect<br>a baseball<br>incorrect<br>a: teleprompter tennis.<br>correct</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>q : what is your favorite sporta : footballincorrecta baseballincorrecta : teleprompter tennis.correct</tokentext>
<sentencetext>q: what is your favorite sporta: footballincorrecta baseballincorrecta: teleprompter tennis.correct</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1269542160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.</p></div><p>Yes, blame the victim. You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door. It's not <i>my</i> fault all your stuff got fenced by me. Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do? Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either. I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out. Ungrateful jerk...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If thats all it takes then the system is broken , not the people abusing it.Yes , blame the victim .
You did n't install triple deadbolts on your door .
It 's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me .
Jeez , I mean , what do you expect a criminal to do ?
Hey , btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you , I did n't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either .
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out .
Ungrateful jerk.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.Yes, blame the victim.
You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door.
It's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me.
Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do?
Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either.
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out.
Ungrateful jerk...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613878</id>
	<title>Follywood</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1269542220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now is when they offer him a job (as the movies would have you believe).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now is when they offer him a job ( as the movies would have you believe ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now is when they offer him a job (as the movies would have you believe).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615636</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1269547920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scary, I actually agree with you on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scary , I actually agree with you on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scary, I actually agree with you on this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854</id>
	<title>Good.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1269542160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.</p><p>If a door is locked, then people know they shouldn't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.If a door is locked , then people know they should n't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.If a door is locked, then people know they shouldn't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31626776</id>
	<title>Not so cunning</title>
	<author>Issarlk</author>
	<datestamp>1269620220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: "The man in question had no training in computers," said Mr. Coquillat. "He was just very cunning."

Not very cunning since he got himself into trouble that could send him into jail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " The man in question had no training in computers , " said Mr. Coquillat. " He was just very cunning .
" Not very cunning since he got himself into trouble that could send him into jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: "The man in question had no training in computers," said Mr. Coquillat. "He was just very cunning.
"

Not very cunning since he got himself into trouble that could send him into jail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614564</id>
	<title>Next Kevin Mitnik</title>
	<author>iPhr0stByt3</author>
	<datestamp>1269544440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Consider Kevin Mitnik. He was truly a technological wiz.  But according to his books, a majority of "hacks" were non-technical.  I see the above case as just another social engineering exploit.  <br> <br>  To address some of the above comments: Just becuase the victim or even twitter itself made it easy to gain access, that does not make it legal and the offender should be prosecuted.  That being said, I personally often do not provide real answers to password recovery questions, because none of the questions available are difficult enough.  And if I can pick my own question, I typically just provide a hint for the actual password that only I would understand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider Kevin Mitnik .
He was truly a technological wiz .
But according to his books , a majority of " hacks " were non-technical .
I see the above case as just another social engineering exploit .
To address some of the above comments : Just becuase the victim or even twitter itself made it easy to gain access , that does not make it legal and the offender should be prosecuted .
That being said , I personally often do not provide real answers to password recovery questions , because none of the questions available are difficult enough .
And if I can pick my own question , I typically just provide a hint for the actual password that only I would understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider Kevin Mitnik.
He was truly a technological wiz.
But according to his books, a majority of "hacks" were non-technical.
I see the above case as just another social engineering exploit.
To address some of the above comments: Just becuase the victim or even twitter itself made it easy to gain access, that does not make it legal and the offender should be prosecuted.
That being said, I personally often do not provide real answers to password recovery questions, because none of the questions available are difficult enough.
And if I can pick my own question, I typically just provide a hint for the actual password that only I would understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614060</id>
	<title>A Slap On the Wrists</title>
	<author>Normal Dan</author>
	<datestamp>1269542700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>is all he should get.  Perhaps he should be rewarded, he was given the twitter account of the POTUS and he didn't even do anything with it.  Now yes, the law says blah blah blah, however, this guy was just curious.  He wanted to challenge himself.  This country needs more people who are interested in more than American Idol and repeating the mantra "yes we can."  blah blah blah,  blah blah.  Curiosity is what science is all about, it's how progress is made, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is all he should get .
Perhaps he should be rewarded , he was given the twitter account of the POTUS and he did n't even do anything with it .
Now yes , the law says blah blah blah , however , this guy was just curious .
He wanted to challenge himself .
This country needs more people who are interested in more than American Idol and repeating the mantra " yes we can .
" blah blah blah , blah blah .
Curiosity is what science is all about , it 's how progress is made , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is all he should get.
Perhaps he should be rewarded, he was given the twitter account of the POTUS and he didn't even do anything with it.
Now yes, the law says blah blah blah, however, this guy was just curious.
He wanted to challenge himself.
This country needs more people who are interested in more than American Idol and repeating the mantra "yes we can.
"  blah blah blah,  blah blah.
Curiosity is what science is all about, it's how progress is made, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614014</id>
	<title>No excuses will save him.</title>
	<author>tlongshore</author>
	<datestamp>1269542580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Identifying weak links in the system is irrelevent as an excuse. That is what the secret service is for. This is one twitter account you should not mess with. Common sense did not prevail here.

If he does get prosecuted I will not feel sorry for him. Law of Darwin should take effect. He was not smart enough to make it in society.

I mean how stupid/arrogant do you have to be to mess with the POTUS?

And the besides what the OP/TFA says, This should not be considered hacking.

Unless you want to equate me hyjacking your car by finding the keys hidden in the glovebox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Identifying weak links in the system is irrelevent as an excuse .
That is what the secret service is for .
This is one twitter account you should not mess with .
Common sense did not prevail here .
If he does get prosecuted I will not feel sorry for him .
Law of Darwin should take effect .
He was not smart enough to make it in society .
I mean how stupid/arrogant do you have to be to mess with the POTUS ?
And the besides what the OP/TFA says , This should not be considered hacking .
Unless you want to equate me hyjacking your car by finding the keys hidden in the glovebox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Identifying weak links in the system is irrelevent as an excuse.
That is what the secret service is for.
This is one twitter account you should not mess with.
Common sense did not prevail here.
If he does get prosecuted I will not feel sorry for him.
Law of Darwin should take effect.
He was not smart enough to make it in society.
I mean how stupid/arrogant do you have to be to mess with the POTUS?
And the besides what the OP/TFA says, This should not be considered hacking.
Unless you want to equate me hyjacking your car by finding the keys hidden in the glovebox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614248</id>
	<title>Re:Good.</title>
	<author>pseudorand</author>
	<datestamp>1269543300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But no one kicked in any doors. All he did was tell people he found the key under the mat, a rather obvious place to look. Do we all really have a responsibility to keep the secrets of perfect strangers that we happen to learn? If he'd used the password, I'd say fine him or jail him, depending on how much trouble he caused or intended to cause. If he tried to sell the password, send him straight to jail. But if he simply embarrassed the whitehouse, thereby encouraging them to better secure their means of communication, then someone send that guy a metal for being a true patriot! And he's not even an American. Now don't we all feel bad about the whole freedom-fries thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But no one kicked in any doors .
All he did was tell people he found the key under the mat , a rather obvious place to look .
Do we all really have a responsibility to keep the secrets of perfect strangers that we happen to learn ?
If he 'd used the password , I 'd say fine him or jail him , depending on how much trouble he caused or intended to cause .
If he tried to sell the password , send him straight to jail .
But if he simply embarrassed the whitehouse , thereby encouraging them to better secure their means of communication , then someone send that guy a metal for being a true patriot !
And he 's not even an American .
Now do n't we all feel bad about the whole freedom-fries thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But no one kicked in any doors.
All he did was tell people he found the key under the mat, a rather obvious place to look.
Do we all really have a responsibility to keep the secrets of perfect strangers that we happen to learn?
If he'd used the password, I'd say fine him or jail him, depending on how much trouble he caused or intended to cause.
If he tried to sell the password, send him straight to jail.
But if he simply embarrassed the whitehouse, thereby encouraging them to better secure their means of communication, then someone send that guy a metal for being a true patriot!
And he's not even an American.
Now don't we all feel bad about the whole freedom-fries thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617198</id>
	<title>He didn't guess Obama's password</title>
	<author>Anonyme Connard</author>
	<datestamp>1269509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually he used social engineering to get the Yahoo address and the answer to the linked "secret question" (date and place of birth) of an employee of twitter, so he got access to his e-mails. There he discovered that this employee used the same type of password for all his accounts (gmXXX for gmail, twXXX for twitter etc.), then he could log into twitter as an admin...</p><p>The security hole is therefore in Yahoo's system for forgotten password (too easy question), and in Twitter's policy for employee's passwords (which, since that, has changed).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually he used social engineering to get the Yahoo address and the answer to the linked " secret question " ( date and place of birth ) of an employee of twitter , so he got access to his e-mails .
There he discovered that this employee used the same type of password for all his accounts ( gmXXX for gmail , twXXX for twitter etc .
) , then he could log into twitter as an admin...The security hole is therefore in Yahoo 's system for forgotten password ( too easy question ) , and in Twitter 's policy for employee 's passwords ( which , since that , has changed ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually he used social engineering to get the Yahoo address and the answer to the linked "secret question" (date and place of birth) of an employee of twitter, so he got access to his e-mails.
There he discovered that this employee used the same type of password for all his accounts (gmXXX for gmail, twXXX for twitter etc.
), then he could log into twitter as an admin...The security hole is therefore in Yahoo's system for forgotten password (too easy question), and in Twitter's policy for employee's passwords (which, since that, has changed).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614082</id>
	<title>not hacked</title>
	<author>vxice</author>
	<datestamp>1269542760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>just because you guessed a password does not mean you 'hacked' into anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>just because you guessed a password does not mean you 'hacked ' into anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just because you guessed a password does not mean you 'hacked' into anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</id>
	<title>Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1269542880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't even see how this can be dignified as "hacking" -- it's not even "script kiddy" in its complexity.  If this weren't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all.  But is the account even actually Obama's in the sense of, he actually takes the time to post on it himself?  Doesn't he have a country to run or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even see how this can be dignified as " hacking " -- it 's not even " script kiddy " in its complexity .
If this were n't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all .
But is the account even actually Obama 's in the sense of , he actually takes the time to post on it himself ?
Does n't he have a country to run or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even see how this can be dignified as "hacking" -- it's not even "script kiddy" in its complexity.
If this weren't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all.
But is the account even actually Obama's in the sense of, he actually takes the time to post on it himself?
Doesn't he have a country to run or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31620206</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1269524340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, he's right in this case.</p><p>If he had twittered something, then it'd be different - but this is about as white hat as it gets.</p><p>It's very similar to someone walking around turning doorknobs until he finds a house with an unlocked door, then leaving a note that your door was unlocked and he could've stolen everything.</p><p>It's not accurate to call a security question a "lock". Most sites have mandatory security questions - stuff like your first pet, mother's maiden name, or first school. In this day and age, all that info will be listed on the first page of Google, so unless you make your answer GHS75Y237HERDSNS94 or something, it's not a "lock".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , he 's right in this case.If he had twittered something , then it 'd be different - but this is about as white hat as it gets.It 's very similar to someone walking around turning doorknobs until he finds a house with an unlocked door , then leaving a note that your door was unlocked and he could 've stolen everything.It 's not accurate to call a security question a " lock " .
Most sites have mandatory security questions - stuff like your first pet , mother 's maiden name , or first school .
In this day and age , all that info will be listed on the first page of Google , so unless you make your answer GHS75Y237HERDSNS94 or something , it 's not a " lock " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, he's right in this case.If he had twittered something, then it'd be different - but this is about as white hat as it gets.It's very similar to someone walking around turning doorknobs until he finds a house with an unlocked door, then leaving a note that your door was unlocked and he could've stolen everything.It's not accurate to call a security question a "lock".
Most sites have mandatory security questions - stuff like your first pet, mother's maiden name, or first school.
In this day and age, all that info will be listed on the first page of Google, so unless you make your answer GHS75Y237HERDSNS94 or something, it's not a "lock".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614706</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1269544860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force. Think before you post.</p></div><p>My metaphor alleges nothing. On behalf of the accused, I plead innocence. As to thinking before I post, you've failed to consider the central argument I have made: The presence or absence of an access control mechanism does not relieve the person gaining entry from their ethicial and legal obligations in doing so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force .
Think before you post.My metaphor alleges nothing .
On behalf of the accused , I plead innocence .
As to thinking before I post , you 've failed to consider the central argument I have made : The presence or absence of an access control mechanism does not relieve the person gaining entry from their ethicial and legal obligations in doing so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force.
Think before you post.My metaphor alleges nothing.
On behalf of the accused, I plead innocence.
As to thinking before I post, you've failed to consider the central argument I have made: The presence or absence of an access control mechanism does not relieve the person gaining entry from their ethicial and legal obligations in doing so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31621564</id>
	<title>He broke into a Twitter admin account ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269534360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... in order to have access to twitter accounts. First, it contacted Twitter to inform them about their security flaws, but as he wanted to be famous, he then published his "hack" and disclosed some Twitter internal information which probably explains why Twitter registered a complaint against him (<a href="http://www.zataz.com/news/20044/hacker-croll--hackercroll--hacker-croll.html" title="zataz.com" rel="nofollow">source</a> [zataz.com], in French).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... in order to have access to twitter accounts .
First , it contacted Twitter to inform them about their security flaws , but as he wanted to be famous , he then published his " hack " and disclosed some Twitter internal information which probably explains why Twitter registered a complaint against him ( source [ zataz.com ] , in French ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... in order to have access to twitter accounts.
First, it contacted Twitter to inform them about their security flaws, but as he wanted to be famous, he then published his "hack" and disclosed some Twitter internal information which probably explains why Twitter registered a complaint against him (source [zataz.com], in French).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615688</id>
	<title>Re:Good.</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1269548100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, the person shouldn't have done this.  But you can make the technology a tad stronger I think.  Usually if you have to resort to a security question, it should e-mail you a new password to your password protected e-mail.  So to get in, you would need to have that information as well.  It sounds like Twitter's protection just lets you in with the security question, which I would say is broken by design.<br> <br>But still, I am with you: good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , the person should n't have done this .
But you can make the technology a tad stronger I think .
Usually if you have to resort to a security question , it should e-mail you a new password to your password protected e-mail .
So to get in , you would need to have that information as well .
It sounds like Twitter 's protection just lets you in with the security question , which I would say is broken by design .
But still , I am with you : good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, the person shouldn't have done this.
But you can make the technology a tad stronger I think.
Usually if you have to resort to a security question, it should e-mail you a new password to your password protected e-mail.
So to get in, you would need to have that information as well.
It sounds like Twitter's protection just lets you in with the security question, which I would say is broken by design.
But still, I am with you: good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614604</id>
	<title>and this is...</title>
	<author>dos4who</author>
	<datestamp>1269544560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True hacking.  Just to see if it can be done; not to do anything malicious.  Even though it ranks low on the evolutionary scale as far as hacking is concerned, good work, kid<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>True hacking .
Just to see if it can be done ; not to do anything malicious .
Even though it ranks low on the evolutionary scale as far as hacking is concerned , good work , kid : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True hacking.
Just to see if it can be done; not to do anything malicious.
Even though it ranks low on the evolutionary scale as far as hacking is concerned, good work, kid :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613938</id>
	<title>Fake?</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1269542400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it be fairly trivial to fake those screenshots?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be fairly trivial to fake those screenshots ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be fairly trivial to fake those screenshots?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615804</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269548460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think that this story is really about hacking (well, to me it isn't), but instead is about the complete stupidity of the questions system for recovering a password.  Make your password hard, but here's an easily guessed way to get the password back.  Personally I just fill the answers in with as many random letters as the form lets me, and don't forget my password.  But few users do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that this story is really about hacking ( well , to me it is n't ) , but instead is about the complete stupidity of the questions system for recovering a password .
Make your password hard , but here 's an easily guessed way to get the password back .
Personally I just fill the answers in with as many random letters as the form lets me , and do n't forget my password .
But few users do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that this story is really about hacking (well, to me it isn't), but instead is about the complete stupidity of the questions system for recovering a password.
Make your password hard, but here's an easily guessed way to get the password back.
Personally I just fill the answers in with as many random letters as the form lets me, and don't forget my password.
But few users do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614488</id>
	<title>Re:Good.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1269544200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.</p></div><p>Not entirely accurate: Having a password is like a key. Anyone can possess it, but it's use is still governed by the permission of the owner. One password can be used by multiple people, or not.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If a door is locked, then people know they shouldn't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.</p></div><p>Again, not entirely accurate: The presence or absence of an access-control mechanism provides no information on its intended use. The door could be locked because it's a bathroom that connects two bedrooms, and the person on the other side left through the other door and forgot to unlock it. There's the implication that a locked door means no entry, but it's not always or necessarily true.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.Not entirely accurate : Having a password is like a key .
Anyone can possess it , but it 's use is still governed by the permission of the owner .
One password can be used by multiple people , or not.If a door is locked , then people know they should n't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.Again , not entirely accurate : The presence or absence of an access-control mechanism provides no information on its intended use .
The door could be locked because it 's a bathroom that connects two bedrooms , and the person on the other side left through the other door and forgot to unlock it .
There 's the implication that a locked door means no entry , but it 's not always or necessarily true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.Not entirely accurate: Having a password is like a key.
Anyone can possess it, but it's use is still governed by the permission of the owner.
One password can be used by multiple people, or not.If a door is locked, then people know they shouldn't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.Again, not entirely accurate: The presence or absence of an access-control mechanism provides no information on its intended use.
The door could be locked because it's a bathroom that connects two bedrooms, and the person on the other side left through the other door and forgot to unlock it.
There's the implication that a locked door means no entry, but it's not always or necessarily true.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615304</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1269546780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, what you are referring to is &ldquo;cracking&rdquo;.</p><p>&ldquo;Hacking&rdquo; is taking something and making it do something it wasn&rsquo;t meant to do. It could be perfectly <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=redneck\%20repair&amp;safe=active" title="google.com">within the realm of legality</a> [google.com], or it could be illegal. It depends on what you are doing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , what you are referring to is    cracking    .    Hacking    is taking something and making it do something it wasn    t meant to do .
It could be perfectly within the realm of legality [ google.com ] , or it could be illegal .
It depends on what you are doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, what you are referring to is “cracking”.“Hacking” is taking something and making it do something it wasn’t meant to do.
It could be perfectly within the realm of legality [google.com], or it could be illegal.
It depends on what you are doing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615608</id>
	<title>Re:log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269547740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And some fanbois might mod you a troll. Been there, seen it.</p><p>Protip: Always add the disclaimer at the BEGINNING of your comment! Because morons in rage never finish reading the comment, but jump to judging as soon as their rage treshold is reached. (YOU MAKE MORON ANGRY! MORON SMASH COMMENT!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And some fanbois might mod you a troll .
Been there , seen it.Protip : Always add the disclaimer at the BEGINNING of your comment !
Because morons in rage never finish reading the comment , but jump to judging as soon as their rage treshold is reached .
( YOU MAKE MORON ANGRY !
MORON SMASH COMMENT !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And some fanbois might mod you a troll.
Been there, seen it.Protip: Always add the disclaimer at the BEGINNING of your comment!
Because morons in rage never finish reading the comment, but jump to judging as soon as their rage treshold is reached.
(YOU MAKE MORON ANGRY!
MORON SMASH COMMENT!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928</id>
	<title>log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>q: "what city were you born in?"<br>a:"honolulu"<br>incorrect<br>a:"oahu"<br>incorrect<br>a:"kandahar"<br>correct</p><p>q: "what is your political affiliation?"<br>a:"democrat"<br>incorrect<br>a:"centrist"<br>incorrect<br>a:"fascist"<br>correct</p><p>q:"what is your favorite catchphrase?"<br>a:"yes we can"<br>incorrect<br>a:"change we can believe in"<br>incorrect<br>a:"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"<br>correct</p><p>(i love obama and i'm 100\% for common sense healthcare reform... i need to make this qualification because some tea party morons out there might actually take my joke seriously)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>q : " what city were you born in ?
" a : " honolulu " incorrecta : " oahu " incorrecta : " kandahar " correctq : " what is your political affiliation ?
" a : " democrat " incorrecta : " centrist " incorrecta : " fascist " correctq : " what is your favorite catchphrase ?
" a : " yes we can " incorrecta : " change we can believe in " incorrecta : " from each according to his abilities , to each according to his needs " correct ( i love obama and i 'm 100 \ % for common sense healthcare reform... i need to make this qualification because some tea party morons out there might actually take my joke seriously )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>q: "what city were you born in?
"a:"honolulu"incorrecta:"oahu"incorrecta:"kandahar"correctq: "what is your political affiliation?
"a:"democrat"incorrecta:"centrist"incorrecta:"fascist"correctq:"what is your favorite catchphrase?
"a:"yes we can"incorrecta:"change we can believe in"incorrecta:"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"correct(i love obama and i'm 100\% for common sense healthcare reform... i need to make this qualification because some tea party morons out there might actually take my joke seriously)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615808</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>esmrg</author>
	<datestamp>1269548460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It certainly qualifies as "hacking". See, it's the quotes that modify the meaning. For example, If you were to buy something with inkjet prints or photographs of dollar bills you could say: I tried to buy this candy bar with "money", and they turned me away. Or "sex" in place of masturbating in front of your monitor. Or Nickelback as "music". I could go on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It certainly qualifies as " hacking " .
See , it 's the quotes that modify the meaning .
For example , If you were to buy something with inkjet prints or photographs of dollar bills you could say : I tried to buy this candy bar with " money " , and they turned me away .
Or " sex " in place of masturbating in front of your monitor .
Or Nickelback as " music " .
I could go on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It certainly qualifies as "hacking".
See, it's the quotes that modify the meaning.
For example, If you were to buy something with inkjet prints or photographs of dollar bills you could say: I tried to buy this candy bar with "money", and they turned me away.
Or "sex" in place of masturbating in front of your monitor.
Or Nickelback as "music".
I could go on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614366</id>
	<title>Question based security</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1269543720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone already knows that question based security is not safe.</p><p>The news here is that the POTUS is not following basic security measures to keeps his accounts safe.<br>Which he really should be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone already knows that question based security is not safe.The news here is that the POTUS is not following basic security measures to keeps his accounts safe.Which he really should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone already knows that question based security is not safe.The news here is that the POTUS is not following basic security measures to keeps his accounts safe.Which he really should be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31616006</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>shadowrat</author>
	<datestamp>1269549180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody is going to have any sympathy for you, but you won't be punished. <br> <br>

However, if they happen to find the person who stole your bike in possession of your bike, they can be punished.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody is going to have any sympathy for you , but you wo n't be punished .
However , if they happen to find the person who stole your bike in possession of your bike , they can be punished .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody is going to have any sympathy for you, but you won't be punished.
However, if they happen to find the person who stole your bike in possession of your bike, they can be punished.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614170</id>
	<title>"Hacked" is way too much.</title>
	<author>ThePangolino</author>
	<datestamp>1269543000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Way too much!

Let me also suppose the poor guy will get sued and maybe jailed for what he did. The thing I wonder is what will happen if my Twitter account was """"""hacked"""""" like this? Will it deserve a story in Slashdot?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way too much !
Let me also suppose the poor guy will get sued and maybe jailed for what he did .
The thing I wonder is what will happen if my Twitter account was " " " " " " hacked " " " " " " like this ?
Will it deserve a story in Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way too much!
Let me also suppose the poor guy will get sued and maybe jailed for what he did.
The thing I wonder is what will happen if my Twitter account was """"""hacked"""""" like this?
Will it deserve a story in Slashdot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615350</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269546960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't even see how this can be dignified as "hacking" -- it's not even "script kiddy" in its complexity.  If this weren't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all.  But is the account even actually Obama's in the sense of, he actually takes the time to post on it himself?  Doesn't he have a country to run or something?</p></div><p>Time to run the country?  That's <i>other</i> peoples time.  As President, he gets to do what he wants when he wants, and he's got a massive staff to support it.</p><p>Dwight Eisenhower said he never had as much free time as he did when he was President.</p><p>And FWIW, I certainly don't want decisions made by a harried and weary President who doesn't have time to post to Twitter or, heaven forbid, troll Slashdot as an AC.  Now <b>THAT</b> would be funny if we found a President who trolled Slashdot as an AC.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even see how this can be dignified as " hacking " -- it 's not even " script kiddy " in its complexity .
If this were n't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all .
But is the account even actually Obama 's in the sense of , he actually takes the time to post on it himself ?
Does n't he have a country to run or something ? Time to run the country ?
That 's other peoples time .
As President , he gets to do what he wants when he wants , and he 's got a massive staff to support it.Dwight Eisenhower said he never had as much free time as he did when he was President.And FWIW , I certainly do n't want decisions made by a harried and weary President who does n't have time to post to Twitter or , heaven forbid , troll Slashdot as an AC .
Now THAT would be funny if we found a President who trolled Slashdot as an AC .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even see how this can be dignified as "hacking" -- it's not even "script kiddy" in its complexity.
If this weren't the President then I doubt it would even be news at all.
But is the account even actually Obama's in the sense of, he actually takes the time to post on it himself?
Doesn't he have a country to run or something?Time to run the country?
That's other peoples time.
As President, he gets to do what he wants when he wants, and he's got a massive staff to support it.Dwight Eisenhower said he never had as much free time as he did when he was President.And FWIW, I certainly don't want decisions made by a harried and weary President who doesn't have time to post to Twitter or, heaven forbid, troll Slashdot as an AC.
Now THAT would be funny if we found a President who trolled Slashdot as an AC.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617944</id>
	<title>Re:Fake?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think he faked his arrest.</p><p>(yes, I know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think he faked his arrest .
( yes , I know ... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think he faked his arrest.
(yes, I know ...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614514</id>
	<title>PGP Signed Info</title>
	<author>al0ha</author>
	<datestamp>1269544320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless an electronic communication is PGP signed it should never be trusted so use of Twitter by all Twits, especially POTUS, is ridiculous as it is completely insecure and unverifiable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless an electronic communication is PGP signed it should never be trusted so use of Twitter by all Twits , especially POTUS , is ridiculous as it is completely insecure and unverifiable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless an electronic communication is PGP signed it should never be trusted so use of Twitter by all Twits, especially POTUS, is ridiculous as it is completely insecure and unverifiable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614174</id>
	<title>My secret question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is what is my favorite sports team...</p><p>That I'm posting on Slashdot should tell you how legit my answer is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is what is my favorite sports team...That I 'm posting on Slashdot should tell you how legit my answer is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is what is my favorite sports team...That I'm posting on Slashdot should tell you how legit my answer is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750</id>
	<title>He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1269541920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people</p></div><p>If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous peopleIf thats all it takes then the system is broken , not the people abusing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous peopleIf thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615082</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1269546000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.</p></div><p>Yes, blame the victim. You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door. It's not <i>my</i> fault all your stuff got fenced by me. Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do? Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either. I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out. Ungrateful jerk...</p></div><p>Yes, blame the retards, yourself included. What this guy did, was turn the knob on your door and discover it was essentially unlocked. He didn't enter your house, look at your ramen noodles, or sell any of your useless shit to the pawn shop.</p><p>

In this specific case, I believe the POTUS is just as retarded as you are. That makes the real victim here the guy that didn't do anything, yet is still taking the same amount of heat as if he had.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If thats all it takes then the system is broken , not the people abusing it.Yes , blame the victim .
You did n't install triple deadbolts on your door .
It 's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me .
Jeez , I mean , what do you expect a criminal to do ?
Hey , btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you , I did n't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either .
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out .
Ungrateful jerk...Yes , blame the retards , yourself included .
What this guy did , was turn the knob on your door and discover it was essentially unlocked .
He did n't enter your house , look at your ramen noodles , or sell any of your useless shit to the pawn shop .
In this specific case , I believe the POTUS is just as retarded as you are .
That makes the real victim here the guy that did n't do anything , yet is still taking the same amount of heat as if he had .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.Yes, blame the victim.
You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door.
It's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me.
Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do?
Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either.
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out.
Ungrateful jerk...Yes, blame the retards, yourself included.
What this guy did, was turn the knob on your door and discover it was essentially unlocked.
He didn't enter your house, look at your ramen noodles, or sell any of your useless shit to the pawn shop.
In this specific case, I believe the POTUS is just as retarded as you are.
That makes the real victim here the guy that didn't do anything, yet is still taking the same amount of heat as if he had.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614332</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WHAT lock?</p><p>I walked by your door, and it turns out you hung a PHOTOGRAPH of a lock and there was no security.<br>That's like leaving a shoebox of money on the sidewalk with a note "please do not take or open".</p><p>Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force. Think before you post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WHAT lock ? I walked by your door , and it turns out you hung a PHOTOGRAPH of a lock and there was no security.That 's like leaving a shoebox of money on the sidewalk with a note " please do not take or open " .Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force .
Think before you post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHAT lock?I walked by your door, and it turns out you hung a PHOTOGRAPH of a lock and there was no security.That's like leaving a shoebox of money on the sidewalk with a note "please do not take or open".Your metaphor alleges direct physical access and brute force.
Think before you post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31619340</id>
	<title>if your forced to have backup questions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269519840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>protip: choose questions that let you put a password as your answer, and make sure the passwords are ugly-er than your main password</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>protip : choose questions that let you put a password as your answer , and make sure the passwords are ugly-er than your main password</tokentext>
<sentencetext>protip: choose questions that let you put a password as your answer, and make sure the passwords are ugly-er than your main password</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613902</id>
	<title>Who cares</title>
	<author>snowwrestler</author>
	<datestamp>1269542280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What important data is stored within that Twitter account? What crucial lines of communication flow through it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What important data is stored within that Twitter account ?
What crucial lines of communication flow through it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What important data is stored within that Twitter account?
What crucial lines of communication flow through it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614392</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Victim"? Well, to make your analogy better, it's more like you found the house with a simple password lock system, you tried guessing the answer and the door unlocked. Then you opened the door just for kicks, and subsequently closed it. Big whoop. If anything the "victim" should be grateful that you pointed out the security weakness before someone who really wanted to steal stuff figured it out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Victim " ?
Well , to make your analogy better , it 's more like you found the house with a simple password lock system , you tried guessing the answer and the door unlocked .
Then you opened the door just for kicks , and subsequently closed it .
Big whoop .
If anything the " victim " should be grateful that you pointed out the security weakness before someone who really wanted to steal stuff figured it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Victim"?
Well, to make your analogy better, it's more like you found the house with a simple password lock system, you tried guessing the answer and the door unlocked.
Then you opened the door just for kicks, and subsequently closed it.
Big whoop.
If anything the "victim" should be grateful that you pointed out the security weakness before someone who really wanted to steal stuff figured it out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614536</id>
	<title>Re:log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1269544380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations, it's not easy to several different proofs that you are a moron in just two short sentences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , it 's not easy to several different proofs that you are a moron in just two short sentences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, it's not easy to several different proofs that you are a moron in just two short sentences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614634</id>
	<title>His password:</title>
	<author>jjohn</author>
	<datestamp>1269544620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pre$ident</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pre $ ident</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pre$ident</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31622294</id>
	<title>Security Questions Do Suck</title>
	<author>Apple Acolyte</author>
	<datestamp>1269542100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad more people are waking up the fact that easily guessed security challenge questions suck donkey balls. Most of us probably go along and give weak answers that could be guessed, worst of which is likely Mother's Maiden Name since it's almost as common a data point as one's Socialist Insecurity number. I wish more sites would implement Chase's persistent cookie check that has you authenticate with a randomly generated code that gets emailed to the account's email address on file if the cookie isn't present. Of course, that still leaves one vulnerable if the email account gets hacked, but it's better than redundant and weak security questions. I dread having to fill those out, and it's especially painful on sites that require a bunch of them.<br><br>Oh, and by the way, I love - absolutely LOVE - seeing Socialists argue about whether or not the corrupt health care takeover legislation counts as real "reform" or does not because it doesn't go far enough in completely Socializing medicine. Ah leftists, you continually amaze me. Kudos to your side on successfully infiltrating and actively undermining our country, by the way.<br><br>The Constitution shall rise again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad more people are waking up the fact that easily guessed security challenge questions suck donkey balls .
Most of us probably go along and give weak answers that could be guessed , worst of which is likely Mother 's Maiden Name since it 's almost as common a data point as one 's Socialist Insecurity number .
I wish more sites would implement Chase 's persistent cookie check that has you authenticate with a randomly generated code that gets emailed to the account 's email address on file if the cookie is n't present .
Of course , that still leaves one vulnerable if the email account gets hacked , but it 's better than redundant and weak security questions .
I dread having to fill those out , and it 's especially painful on sites that require a bunch of them.Oh , and by the way , I love - absolutely LOVE - seeing Socialists argue about whether or not the corrupt health care takeover legislation counts as real " reform " or does not because it does n't go far enough in completely Socializing medicine .
Ah leftists , you continually amaze me .
Kudos to your side on successfully infiltrating and actively undermining our country , by the way.The Constitution shall rise again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad more people are waking up the fact that easily guessed security challenge questions suck donkey balls.
Most of us probably go along and give weak answers that could be guessed, worst of which is likely Mother's Maiden Name since it's almost as common a data point as one's Socialist Insecurity number.
I wish more sites would implement Chase's persistent cookie check that has you authenticate with a randomly generated code that gets emailed to the account's email address on file if the cookie isn't present.
Of course, that still leaves one vulnerable if the email account gets hacked, but it's better than redundant and weak security questions.
I dread having to fill those out, and it's especially painful on sites that require a bunch of them.Oh, and by the way, I love - absolutely LOVE - seeing Socialists argue about whether or not the corrupt health care takeover legislation counts as real "reform" or does not because it doesn't go far enough in completely Socializing medicine.
Ah leftists, you continually amaze me.
Kudos to your side on successfully infiltrating and actively undermining our country, by the way.The Constitution shall rise again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614494</id>
	<title>Re:Not "hacking"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269544200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems "hacking" these days refers to gaining unauthorized *electronic* access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems " hacking " these days refers to gaining unauthorized * electronic * access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems "hacking" these days refers to gaining unauthorized *electronic* access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31632360</id>
	<title>He didn't ram any tweets down our throats? (n/t)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269597540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>because that's totally be a sign it was him for real.</htmltext>
<tokenext>because that 's totally be a sign it was him for real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because that's totally be a sign it was him for real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31618314</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269514380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No actually it's the physical equivalent of breaking-and-entering.  You may not have taken anything but you still cracked the lock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No actually it 's the physical equivalent of breaking-and-entering .
You may not have taken anything but you still cracked the lock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No actually it's the physical equivalent of breaking-and-entering.
You may not have taken anything but you still cracked the lock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31727650</id>
	<title>I like being able to write my own questions</title>
	<author>OrwellianLurker</author>
	<datestamp>1270381560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I have to use pre-determined questions, then I have to remember the answer. If I can write my own questions, I can associate things. I rarely even use question and answers. I have some weird, completely random sentence, with a strange answer that I can easily remember.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I have to use pre-determined questions , then I have to remember the answer .
If I can write my own questions , I can associate things .
I rarely even use question and answers .
I have some weird , completely random sentence , with a strange answer that I can easily remember .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I have to use pre-determined questions, then I have to remember the answer.
If I can write my own questions, I can associate things.
I rarely even use question and answers.
I have some weird, completely random sentence, with a strange answer that I can easily remember.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615048</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269545820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hilariously, when Sarah Palin got hit by the exact same kind of attack, "blaming the victim" is exactly what the vast majority of Slashdot commenter did.</p><p>Then Obama's account gets attacked...and suddenly such comments are shunned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hilariously , when Sarah Palin got hit by the exact same kind of attack , " blaming the victim " is exactly what the vast majority of Slashdot commenter did.Then Obama 's account gets attacked...and suddenly such comments are shunned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hilariously, when Sarah Palin got hit by the exact same kind of attack, "blaming the victim" is exactly what the vast majority of Slashdot commenter did.Then Obama's account gets attacked...and suddenly such comments are shunned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614088</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>gambino21</author>
	<datestamp>1269542760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What victim?  It says he didn't even make any posts.  This seems more like opening the unlocked front door of your house, saying "yep it's open" and then leaving without taking anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What victim ?
It says he did n't even make any posts .
This seems more like opening the unlocked front door of your house , saying " yep it 's open " and then leaving without taking anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What victim?
It says he didn't even make any posts.
This seems more like opening the unlocked front door of your house, saying "yep it's open" and then leaving without taking anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615814</id>
	<title>Re:log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269548520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i love obama</p></div><p> - why, is he your cousin?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and i'm 100\% for common sense healthcare reform</p></div><p> - certainly, but do you think what was passed is actually a healthcare or a reform or it that common sense was applied?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i love obama - why , is he your cousin ? and i 'm 100 \ % for common sense healthcare reform - certainly , but do you think what was passed is actually a healthcare or a reform or it that common sense was applied ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i love obama - why, is he your cousin?and i'm 100\% for common sense healthcare reform - certainly, but do you think what was passed is actually a healthcare or a reform or it that common sense was applied?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614022</id>
	<title>Re:Good.</title>
	<author>badpazzword</author>
	<datestamp>1269542580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be accurate if you could choose to not have a password.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be accurate if you could choose to not have a password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be accurate if you could choose to not have a password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615618</id>
	<title>Re:Password recovery methods are stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269547800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I usually fill them up with: de67587tuyjhfhfmuyrfm =&#197;=UP=C/p0d8jgyjhedtw4trgdngdnyrtky.</p><p>Not many will guess that by reading my blag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I usually fill them up with : de67587tuyjhfhfmuyrfm =   = UP = C/p0d8jgyjhedtw4trgdngdnyrtky.Not many will guess that by reading my blag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I usually fill them up with: de67587tuyjhfhfmuyrfm =Å=UP=C/p0d8jgyjhedtw4trgdngdnyrtky.Not many will guess that by reading my blag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614204</id>
	<title>Password recovery methods are stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I type a huge string of random gibberish into those stupid "Password Recovery" sections that ask me questions that any person that does any amount of research into my life can figure out.</p><p>Those things are stupid and the fact that so many sites still use them is completely stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I type a huge string of random gibberish into those stupid " Password Recovery " sections that ask me questions that any person that does any amount of research into my life can figure out.Those things are stupid and the fact that so many sites still use them is completely stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I type a huge string of random gibberish into those stupid "Password Recovery" sections that ask me questions that any person that does any amount of research into my life can figure out.Those things are stupid and the fact that so many sites still use them is completely stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614158</id>
	<title>really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A 24-year-old living with his mother...</p><p>I take offense to that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A 24-year-old living with his mother...I take offense to that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 24-year-old living with his mother...I take offense to that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1269542520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although blaming the victim is never politically correct, realistically they generally do share some of the blame.  If I leave my bike sitting on the sidewalk of any major city and fail to lock it to anything, do you really think it's not my fault at all when it gets stolen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although blaming the victim is never politically correct , realistically they generally do share some of the blame .
If I leave my bike sitting on the sidewalk of any major city and fail to lock it to anything , do you really think it 's not my fault at all when it gets stolen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although blaming the victim is never politically correct, realistically they generally do share some of the blame.
If I leave my bike sitting on the sidewalk of any major city and fail to lock it to anything, do you really think it's not my fault at all when it gets stolen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614072</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's less like "not installing triple deadbolts" than it is a case of leaving the key under your front doormat where anyone with a modicum of resourcefulness and motivation can find it.</p><p>What do you think your insurance company would say if you got robbed, and you had been so stupid as to leave the key under your doormat?</p><p>Yes, of course: "Oh, poor victim. Not your fault. Let us write you out a check."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's less like " not installing triple deadbolts " than it is a case of leaving the key under your front doormat where anyone with a modicum of resourcefulness and motivation can find it.What do you think your insurance company would say if you got robbed , and you had been so stupid as to leave the key under your doormat ? Yes , of course : " Oh , poor victim .
Not your fault .
Let us write you out a check .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's less like "not installing triple deadbolts" than it is a case of leaving the key under your front doormat where anyone with a modicum of resourcefulness and motivation can find it.What do you think your insurance company would say if you got robbed, and you had been so stupid as to leave the key under your doormat?Yes, of course: "Oh, poor victim.
Not your fault.
Let us write you out a check.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615440</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269547260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on! You know exactly that a normal password is not triple deadbolts. A normal password is exactly like a normal door lock!<br>And this here is like putting the key to the White House&rsquo;s front door under the rug! Stupid, stupid, stupid!<br>And the guy basically just went: &ldquo;Ha ha, do you know those stupid people who put their keys under the rug? It&rsquo;s the <em>first</em> thing any robber would think of! These people are so <em>stupid</em>! But imagine if the president would do that. Lol. Oh, wait... He DOES! LOOOOL! EPIC FAIL!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... But let&rsquo;s not be a dick and just show them how much of a failure they are. Maybe they learn something from it. ^^&rdquo;</p><p>I would have done the exact same thing. And so would you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on !
You know exactly that a normal password is not triple deadbolts .
A normal password is exactly like a normal door lock ! And this here is like putting the key to the White House    s front door under the rug !
Stupid , stupid , stupid ! And the guy basically just went :    Ha ha , do you know those stupid people who put their keys under the rug ?
It    s the first thing any robber would think of !
These people are so stupid !
But imagine if the president would do that .
Lol. Oh , wait... He DOES !
LOOOOL ! EPIC FAIL !
... But let    s not be a dick and just show them how much of a failure they are .
Maybe they learn something from it .
^ ^    I would have done the exact same thing .
And so would you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on!
You know exactly that a normal password is not triple deadbolts.
A normal password is exactly like a normal door lock!And this here is like putting the key to the White House’s front door under the rug!
Stupid, stupid, stupid!And the guy basically just went: “Ha ha, do you know those stupid people who put their keys under the rug?
It’s the first thing any robber would think of!
These people are so stupid!
But imagine if the president would do that.
Lol. Oh, wait... He DOES!
LOOOOL! EPIC FAIL!
... But let’s not be a dick and just show them how much of a failure they are.
Maybe they learn something from it.
^^”I would have done the exact same thing.
And so would you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614236</id>
	<title>How?</title>
	<author>iprefermuffins</author>
	<datestamp>1269543180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a little confused how this guy's "hack" worked as described. I just checked Twitter and it doesn't have password recovery questions. And the "forgot password" form offers to send a password reset link to the email address associated with the account, so it's not going to be a way in unless you have access to the email too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a little confused how this guy 's " hack " worked as described .
I just checked Twitter and it does n't have password recovery questions .
And the " forgot password " form offers to send a password reset link to the email address associated with the account , so it 's not going to be a way in unless you have access to the email too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a little confused how this guy's "hack" worked as described.
I just checked Twitter and it doesn't have password recovery questions.
And the "forgot password" form offers to send a password reset link to the email address associated with the account, so it's not going to be a way in unless you have access to the email too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614458</id>
	<title>Wanker</title>
	<author>Capt.DrumkenBum</author>
	<datestamp>1269544080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After he got access he should have used Twitter to declare war on Vatican City.<br>
Size: 0.17 sq. mi. (0.44 sq. km)<br>
Population: 783 (2005 census)<br>
Location: Rome, Italy</htmltext>
<tokenext>After he got access he should have used Twitter to declare war on Vatican City .
Size : 0.17 sq .
mi. ( 0.44 sq .
km ) Population : 783 ( 2005 census ) Location : Rome , Italy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After he got access he should have used Twitter to declare war on Vatican City.
Size: 0.17 sq.
mi. (0.44 sq.
km)
Population: 783 (2005 census)
Location: Rome, Italy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614238</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1269543180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, blame the victim. You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door. It's not <i>my</i> fault all your stuff got fenced by me. Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do? Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either. I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out. Ungrateful jerk...</p></div><p>it is not like "Blaming the Victim" means you do not blame the perp. Just because the criminal is wrong dose not mean that you have to ignore the stupidity of the victim if it exists. I really have a problem with people who just post crap with no thought put in whatsoever.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , blame the victim .
You did n't install triple deadbolts on your door .
It 's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me .
Jeez , I mean , what do you expect a criminal to do ?
Hey , btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you , I did n't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either .
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out .
Ungrateful jerk...it is not like " Blaming the Victim " means you do not blame the perp .
Just because the criminal is wrong dose not mean that you have to ignore the stupidity of the victim if it exists .
I really have a problem with people who just post crap with no thought put in whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, blame the victim.
You didn't install triple deadbolts on your door.
It's not my fault all your stuff got fenced by me.
Jeez, I mean, what do you expect a criminal to do?
Hey, btw -- what kind of slashdot poster are you, I didn't find any ramen to eat while you were out running errands either.
I really wanted to have a snack after cleaning the place out.
Ungrateful jerk...it is not like "Blaming the Victim" means you do not blame the perp.
Just because the criminal is wrong dose not mean that you have to ignore the stupidity of the victim if it exists.
I really have a problem with people who just post crap with no thought put in whatsoever.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617812</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely not. In fact, one could even argue that you "dumped" the bike as trash.</p><p>Now, if you were to lock the bike -- even with a cheap, flimsy lock -- then it's pretty clear to anyone that taking the bike would be considered theft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely not .
In fact , one could even argue that you " dumped " the bike as trash.Now , if you were to lock the bike -- even with a cheap , flimsy lock -- then it 's pretty clear to anyone that taking the bike would be considered theft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely not.
In fact, one could even argue that you "dumped" the bike as trash.Now, if you were to lock the bike -- even with a cheap, flimsy lock -- then it's pretty clear to anyone that taking the bike would be considered theft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614350</id>
	<title>twitter diplomacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>POTUS: cher @Canada, nous avons assez de vos d&#233;rision les bombardiers voler &#224; midi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>POTUS : cher @ Canada , nous avons assez de vos d   rision les bombardiers voler   midi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>POTUS: cher @Canada, nous avons assez de vos dérision les bombardiers voler à midi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614132</id>
	<title>Re:log of 'hacked' password recovery session:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Keep it coming!  You dumb ass teabaggers are marginalizing the Republican party more and more each day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep it coming !
You dumb ass teabaggers are marginalizing the Republican party more and more each day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep it coming!
You dumb ass teabaggers are marginalizing the Republican party more and more each day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614308</id>
	<title>Re:He shouldn't be arrested</title>
	<author>G2GAlone</author>
	<datestamp>1269543480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you saw a quarter on the ground would you refuse to pick it up because it belonged to someone at one point? It's just laying there on the ground. The person that lost it probably doesn't even care, right? Where do you draw the line on morality and circumstances?

I know it's a far stretch but even though the blame is obviously on the hacker, don't you think the POTUS should be a bit more careful? Especially in this day and age. I would be tempted to give him a firm slap in the face if I knew he had ever considered using "password" for an account password, or his mother's maiden name for a security question. *looks over shoulder for secret service*.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you saw a quarter on the ground would you refuse to pick it up because it belonged to someone at one point ?
It 's just laying there on the ground .
The person that lost it probably does n't even care , right ?
Where do you draw the line on morality and circumstances ?
I know it 's a far stretch but even though the blame is obviously on the hacker , do n't you think the POTUS should be a bit more careful ?
Especially in this day and age .
I would be tempted to give him a firm slap in the face if I knew he had ever considered using " password " for an account password , or his mother 's maiden name for a security question .
* looks over shoulder for secret service * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you saw a quarter on the ground would you refuse to pick it up because it belonged to someone at one point?
It's just laying there on the ground.
The person that lost it probably doesn't even care, right?
Where do you draw the line on morality and circumstances?
I know it's a far stretch but even though the blame is obviously on the hacker, don't you think the POTUS should be a bit more careful?
Especially in this day and age.
I would be tempted to give him a firm slap in the face if I knew he had ever considered using "password" for an account password, or his mother's maiden name for a security question.
*looks over shoulder for secret service*.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31623340</id>
	<title>Wrong</title>
	<author>mauhiz</author>
	<datestamp>1269598680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to a French interview ( <a href="http://www.zataz.com/news/19125/Rencontre-avec-Hacker-Croll--le-visiteur-de-Twitter.html" title="zataz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zataz.com/news/19125/Rencontre-avec-Hacker-Croll--le-visiteur-de-Twitter.html</a> [zataz.com] ), he did not hack Obama's account, just some random employee from Twitter. He did gain admin privileges, but he did not hack twitter; and the password recovery was from Yahoo's webmail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to a French interview ( http : //www.zataz.com/news/19125/Rencontre-avec-Hacker-Croll--le-visiteur-de-Twitter.html [ zataz.com ] ) , he did not hack Obama 's account , just some random employee from Twitter .
He did gain admin privileges , but he did not hack twitter ; and the password recovery was from Yahoo 's webmail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to a French interview ( http://www.zataz.com/news/19125/Rencontre-avec-Hacker-Croll--le-visiteur-de-Twitter.html [zataz.com] ), he did not hack Obama's account, just some random employee from Twitter.
He did gain admin privileges, but he did not hack twitter; and the password recovery was from Yahoo's webmail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31620206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31618314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31616006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1728248_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614332
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614706
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614088
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31618314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31620206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613980
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617812
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31616006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615618
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31613938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31617944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1728248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31614650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1728248.31615804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
