<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_25_1524220</id>
	<title>How the Nintendo 3DS Might Handle 3D Display</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269535380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett writes <i>"Blogger Peter Smith weighs in with some possibilities for how the new Nintendo 3DS handheld gaming system will provide <a href="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/102113/nintendo-3ds-how-will-it-offer-3d-graphics-without-glasses">3D gaming without the need for 3D glasses</a>. The DSi has cameras, which means the 3DS will have to have them too if it's going to be backwards compatible. We've also heard rumors that the 'next DS' <a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/10/02/17/devs.provide.early.clues.to.ds.sequel.features/">will have tilt-sensors</a> better than the iPhone. With either the camera or tilt-sensors either of these 'faux 3D' systems would work. But since we've seen the DSi do this already, it doesn't seem likely that the new hardware will rely on the same old trick. Enter our friends at Engadget, who <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-3ds-to-come-with-3d-control-stick-vibration-and-sha/">uncovered some details</a> from Japanese newspapers. If they're right, the Nintendo 3DS will incorporate <a href="http://www.techjapan.com/Article1070.html">parallax barrier LCD screens</a> from Sharp (see also <a href="http://www.evl.uic.edu/core.php?mod=4&amp;type=1&amp;indi=315">this explanation of dynamic parallax barrier screens</a>). This is the same technology used in a few '3D Laptops.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett writes " Blogger Peter Smith weighs in with some possibilities for how the new Nintendo 3DS handheld gaming system will provide 3D gaming without the need for 3D glasses .
The DSi has cameras , which means the 3DS will have to have them too if it 's going to be backwards compatible .
We 've also heard rumors that the 'next DS ' will have tilt-sensors better than the iPhone .
With either the camera or tilt-sensors either of these 'faux 3D ' systems would work .
But since we 've seen the DSi do this already , it does n't seem likely that the new hardware will rely on the same old trick .
Enter our friends at Engadget , who uncovered some details from Japanese newspapers .
If they 're right , the Nintendo 3DS will incorporate parallax barrier LCD screens from Sharp ( see also this explanation of dynamic parallax barrier screens ) .
This is the same technology used in a few '3D Laptops .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett writes "Blogger Peter Smith weighs in with some possibilities for how the new Nintendo 3DS handheld gaming system will provide 3D gaming without the need for 3D glasses.
The DSi has cameras, which means the 3DS will have to have them too if it's going to be backwards compatible.
We've also heard rumors that the 'next DS' will have tilt-sensors better than the iPhone.
With either the camera or tilt-sensors either of these 'faux 3D' systems would work.
But since we've seen the DSi do this already, it doesn't seem likely that the new hardware will rely on the same old trick.
Enter our friends at Engadget, who uncovered some details from Japanese newspapers.
If they're right, the Nintendo 3DS will incorporate parallax barrier LCD screens from Sharp (see also this explanation of dynamic parallax barrier screens).
This is the same technology used in a few '3D Laptops.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613648</id>
	<title>Nothing significant unless...</title>
	<author>five40kix</author>
	<datestamp>1269541620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The controls on the DS change to allow for 3D interaction.  Now that would truly enhance the gameplay experience. fail</htmltext>
<tokenext>The controls on the DS change to allow for 3D interaction .
Now that would truly enhance the gameplay experience .
fail</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The controls on the DS change to allow for 3D interaction.
Now that would truly enhance the gameplay experience.
fail</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614256</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone Remember the Virtual Boy?</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1269543300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the Virtual Boy is why I no longer see the color red.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the Virtual Boy is why I no longer see the color red .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the Virtual Boy is why I no longer see the color red.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613860</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to see Descent in 3D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Descent was already available in 3d. Indeed, I had this running with shutter glasses by SimulEyes. It was very nice indeed...</p><p>http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php?t=23131&amp;sid=973ced396939e0eef2471b3689afd985</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Descent was already available in 3d .
Indeed , I had this running with shutter glasses by SimulEyes .
It was very nice indeed...http : //vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php ? t = 23131&amp;sid = 973ced396939e0eef2471b3689afd985</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Descent was already available in 3d.
Indeed, I had this running with shutter glasses by SimulEyes.
It was very nice indeed...http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php?t=23131&amp;sid=973ced396939e0eef2471b3689afd985</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492</id>
	<title>Face Tracking not necessary</title>
	<author>jeffeb3</author>
	<datestamp>1269544200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are talking about a low powered, portable toy.  Face tracking isn't likely to be part of the trick.
<br>
1) There's not enough processing to track the face.  You could make it work, but I personally don't feel that it fits in with the pattern Nintendo's previous elegant design solutions.
<br>
2) The user will naturally keep their face in the 3D focus sweet spot.  An HDTV is hard because people are spread across the room.  But for Nintendo, the user is always in front of the screen, and they are always within arms reach.
<br>
3) You can use the inertial sensors to change the angle of the sweet spot.  People are going to want to see around obstacles (and the game makers want to let them).  But you can train users to keep their head in one spot, and roll the DS to see around obstacles.  With that Parallax screen, you can adjust the sweet spot based on the amount of tilt of the DS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are talking about a low powered , portable toy .
Face tracking is n't likely to be part of the trick .
1 ) There 's not enough processing to track the face .
You could make it work , but I personally do n't feel that it fits in with the pattern Nintendo 's previous elegant design solutions .
2 ) The user will naturally keep their face in the 3D focus sweet spot .
An HDTV is hard because people are spread across the room .
But for Nintendo , the user is always in front of the screen , and they are always within arms reach .
3 ) You can use the inertial sensors to change the angle of the sweet spot .
People are going to want to see around obstacles ( and the game makers want to let them ) .
But you can train users to keep their head in one spot , and roll the DS to see around obstacles .
With that Parallax screen , you can adjust the sweet spot based on the amount of tilt of the DS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are talking about a low powered, portable toy.
Face tracking isn't likely to be part of the trick.
1) There's not enough processing to track the face.
You could make it work, but I personally don't feel that it fits in with the pattern Nintendo's previous elegant design solutions.
2) The user will naturally keep their face in the 3D focus sweet spot.
An HDTV is hard because people are spread across the room.
But for Nintendo, the user is always in front of the screen, and they are always within arms reach.
3) You can use the inertial sensors to change the angle of the sweet spot.
People are going to want to see around obstacles (and the game makers want to let them).
But you can train users to keep their head in one spot, and roll the DS to see around obstacles.
With that Parallax screen, you can adjust the sweet spot based on the amount of tilt of the DS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31616546</id>
	<title>this FP for GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269507720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here, please do operatinfg systems, infinitesimally Goals. It's when person.  Ask your Flaws in the BSD grandstanders, the</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here , please do operatinfg systems , infinitesimally Goals .
It 's when person .
Ask your Flaws in the BSD grandstanders , the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here, please do operatinfg systems, infinitesimally Goals.
It's when person.
Ask your Flaws in the BSD grandstanders, the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</id>
	<title>Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>morphles</author>
	<datestamp>1269539460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yesterday i was checking anaglyph rendering capability of game i'm playing and then it hit me. Nether anaglyph nor interlaced glasses and probably not even VR glasses are full true 3d. Here is why:<br>glasses give you perception of depth that is very cool effect and all, but one thing is missing: you move your head you see different stuff. Now head tracking gives joust that and it is also very cool in itself. Now what i would really like to try is some glasses 3d (preferably non anaglyph, cause anaglyph is hard on eyes) + head tracking 3d (probably can be done much easier tracking glasses) to get real true 3d experience<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Well this rant is just to point out that there seems to be no real/true 3d yet unless you clobber something like this yourself using graphics card anaglyph render and some hacked up head tracking. Well one more point that such true 3d would be quite difficult to do for non interactive/non rendered graphics i.e. movies. But some day maybe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday i was checking anaglyph rendering capability of game i 'm playing and then it hit me .
Nether anaglyph nor interlaced glasses and probably not even VR glasses are full true 3d .
Here is why : glasses give you perception of depth that is very cool effect and all , but one thing is missing : you move your head you see different stuff .
Now head tracking gives joust that and it is also very cool in itself .
Now what i would really like to try is some glasses 3d ( preferably non anaglyph , cause anaglyph is hard on eyes ) + head tracking 3d ( probably can be done much easier tracking glasses ) to get real true 3d experience : ) Well this rant is just to point out that there seems to be no real/true 3d yet unless you clobber something like this yourself using graphics card anaglyph render and some hacked up head tracking .
Well one more point that such true 3d would be quite difficult to do for non interactive/non rendered graphics i.e .
movies. But some day maybe : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday i was checking anaglyph rendering capability of game i'm playing and then it hit me.
Nether anaglyph nor interlaced glasses and probably not even VR glasses are full true 3d.
Here is why:glasses give you perception of depth that is very cool effect and all, but one thing is missing: you move your head you see different stuff.
Now head tracking gives joust that and it is also very cool in itself.
Now what i would really like to try is some glasses 3d (preferably non anaglyph, cause anaglyph is hard on eyes) + head tracking 3d (probably can be done much easier tracking glasses) to get real true 3d experience :) Well this rant is just to point out that there seems to be no real/true 3d yet unless you clobber something like this yourself using graphics card anaglyph render and some hacked up head tracking.
Well one more point that such true 3d would be quite difficult to do for non interactive/non rendered graphics i.e.
movies. But some day maybe :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614426</id>
	<title>This IS real 3D</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1269543900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate the fact that some people are confusing holographs with 3D.
<p>
3D means you can view more than 2 dimensions.  As humans have only 2 eyes, and we get the real life 3d effect from using both eyes, if you provide different information to each eye, you get 3D that is as "real" as anything in real life.  It provides specific detailed information about which item is 'in front' of and 'behind' each item, unlike a photograph where you can do silly tricks like make it look like you are pushing the leaning Tower of Pisa over.  With these 3D screens, such cheap special effects no longer work.
</p><p>
Holograms however are MORE than 3D.  Witha  Hologram you can get up and move your HEAD to get something that is beyond simply 3D, but is instead something I would call "immersive".
</p><p>
Asking for immersive 3D and calling regular 3d fake is like saying those photographs you have are not really 2D because they don't move.  Bullcrap.   The immersion stuff is far beyond 3D and people should stop trying to claim that 3d = immersive Holograms
</p><p>
The problem is, there is no hard line between different levels of immersive.  They go from merely being able to move your head to get a different view, to being able to walk around or even THROUGH an object, similar to a star trek Holo-deck.
</p><p>
But that is way way beyond what any normal person calls 3D.   Stereoscopic vision, as per lenticular or this "parrallax" viewing counts as REAL 3D.  The information is just as much as you get in real life using both eyes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate the fact that some people are confusing holographs with 3D .
3D means you can view more than 2 dimensions .
As humans have only 2 eyes , and we get the real life 3d effect from using both eyes , if you provide different information to each eye , you get 3D that is as " real " as anything in real life .
It provides specific detailed information about which item is 'in front ' of and 'behind ' each item , unlike a photograph where you can do silly tricks like make it look like you are pushing the leaning Tower of Pisa over .
With these 3D screens , such cheap special effects no longer work .
Holograms however are MORE than 3D .
Witha Hologram you can get up and move your HEAD to get something that is beyond simply 3D , but is instead something I would call " immersive " .
Asking for immersive 3D and calling regular 3d fake is like saying those photographs you have are not really 2D because they do n't move .
Bullcrap. The immersion stuff is far beyond 3D and people should stop trying to claim that 3d = immersive Holograms The problem is , there is no hard line between different levels of immersive .
They go from merely being able to move your head to get a different view , to being able to walk around or even THROUGH an object , similar to a star trek Holo-deck .
But that is way way beyond what any normal person calls 3D .
Stereoscopic vision , as per lenticular or this " parrallax " viewing counts as REAL 3D .
The information is just as much as you get in real life using both eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate the fact that some people are confusing holographs with 3D.
3D means you can view more than 2 dimensions.
As humans have only 2 eyes, and we get the real life 3d effect from using both eyes, if you provide different information to each eye, you get 3D that is as "real" as anything in real life.
It provides specific detailed information about which item is 'in front' of and 'behind' each item, unlike a photograph where you can do silly tricks like make it look like you are pushing the leaning Tower of Pisa over.
With these 3D screens, such cheap special effects no longer work.
Holograms however are MORE than 3D.
Witha  Hologram you can get up and move your HEAD to get something that is beyond simply 3D, but is instead something I would call "immersive".
Asking for immersive 3D and calling regular 3d fake is like saying those photographs you have are not really 2D because they don't move.
Bullcrap.   The immersion stuff is far beyond 3D and people should stop trying to claim that 3d = immersive Holograms

The problem is, there is no hard line between different levels of immersive.
They go from merely being able to move your head to get a different view, to being able to walk around or even THROUGH an object, similar to a star trek Holo-deck.
But that is way way beyond what any normal person calls 3D.
Stereoscopic vision, as per lenticular or this "parrallax" viewing counts as REAL 3D.
The information is just as much as you get in real life using both eyes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31618264</id>
	<title>Re:Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>sortius\_nod</author>
	<datestamp>1269514200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you mean something like this?</p><p><a href="http://kotaku.com/5499712/is-this-how-3d-will-work-on-the-nintendo-3ds" title="kotaku.com">http://kotaku.com/5499712/is-this-how-3d-will-work-on-the-nintendo-3ds</a> [kotaku.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you mean something like this ? http : //kotaku.com/5499712/is-this-how-3d-will-work-on-the-nintendo-3ds [ kotaku.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you mean something like this?http://kotaku.com/5499712/is-this-how-3d-will-work-on-the-nintendo-3ds [kotaku.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613744</id>
	<title>Re:Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1269541920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo released a game using the DSi camera for head tracking recently (it's only available in Japan) so you can expect this thing to do head tracking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo released a game using the DSi camera for head tracking recently ( it 's only available in Japan ) so you can expect this thing to do head tracking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo released a game using the DSi camera for head tracking recently (it's only available in Japan) so you can expect this thing to do head tracking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613350</id>
	<title>Enough with the gimmicks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269540780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please increase the power.  I'm a dissapointed DS owner.  The graphics suck so bad for 3d games it's hard to tell what the hell is going on.  Things like mario are ok.  But trying to play Madden or NFS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please increase the power .
I 'm a dissapointed DS owner .
The graphics suck so bad for 3d games it 's hard to tell what the hell is going on .
Things like mario are ok. But trying to play Madden or NFS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please increase the power.
I'm a dissapointed DS owner.
The graphics suck so bad for 3d games it's hard to tell what the hell is going on.
Things like mario are ok.  But trying to play Madden or NFS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613128</id>
	<title>oooh, wow</title>
	<author>twidarkling</author>
	<datestamp>1269540000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speculation! From a non-source.</p><p>Seriously, who cares how someone thinks they MIGHT or COULD do it? Unless someone has some info as to how they're LIKELY, or PROBABLY doing it (as good as it gets before actual announcements), it's just spitballing and time wasting. Come back when there's at least some evidence of how they'll go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speculation !
From a non-source.Seriously , who cares how someone thinks they MIGHT or COULD do it ?
Unless someone has some info as to how they 're LIKELY , or PROBABLY doing it ( as good as it gets before actual announcements ) , it 's just spitballing and time wasting .
Come back when there 's at least some evidence of how they 'll go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speculation!
From a non-source.Seriously, who cares how someone thinks they MIGHT or COULD do it?
Unless someone has some info as to how they're LIKELY, or PROBABLY doing it (as good as it gets before actual announcements), it's just spitballing and time wasting.
Come back when there's at least some evidence of how they'll go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613050</id>
	<title>Saying "No" to 3D for now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand why 3D television is the current fad. Since a decent number movies are now being made in 3D, there is some logic in a range of big-screen TVs for those into their audio-visual experiences. But, for the rest of us? Either you'll have recently upgraded to HDTV and one of the appropriate services (cable, Sky+HD, Freesat, whatever) and be wondering what the fuss was about, or you've up-upgraded one of those services, or your TV. <br>

Similarly with gaming, good on Nintendo for trying something different (ignoring its previous attempt with Virtual Boy [a good title if ever there was one for one of those 3D porn movies]) but 3D in such a small space seems counter-intuitive and even if it works well, I worry about how still you'll have to sit to get the full effect for extended periods. I can see the warning on games for that system saying "take a break every 10 minutes, for at least 30 minutes" - kind of breaking the fun part. <br>

So, give it a few years - when the content is properly there and its more than just crappy Doctor Who trailers that look rubbish in 2D (ie how 90\% of the world saw it), and the prices have dropped from bloody stupid to ouch, but I'll do it! Full rant from yesterday; <a href="http://bit.ly/9BKiRG" title="bit.ly">http://bit.ly/9BKiRG</a> [bit.ly]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand why 3D television is the current fad .
Since a decent number movies are now being made in 3D , there is some logic in a range of big-screen TVs for those into their audio-visual experiences .
But , for the rest of us ?
Either you 'll have recently upgraded to HDTV and one of the appropriate services ( cable , Sky + HD , Freesat , whatever ) and be wondering what the fuss was about , or you 've up-upgraded one of those services , or your TV .
Similarly with gaming , good on Nintendo for trying something different ( ignoring its previous attempt with Virtual Boy [ a good title if ever there was one for one of those 3D porn movies ] ) but 3D in such a small space seems counter-intuitive and even if it works well , I worry about how still you 'll have to sit to get the full effect for extended periods .
I can see the warning on games for that system saying " take a break every 10 minutes , for at least 30 minutes " - kind of breaking the fun part .
So , give it a few years - when the content is properly there and its more than just crappy Doctor Who trailers that look rubbish in 2D ( ie how 90 \ % of the world saw it ) , and the prices have dropped from bloody stupid to ouch , but I 'll do it !
Full rant from yesterday ; http : //bit.ly/9BKiRG [ bit.ly ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand why 3D television is the current fad.
Since a decent number movies are now being made in 3D, there is some logic in a range of big-screen TVs for those into their audio-visual experiences.
But, for the rest of us?
Either you'll have recently upgraded to HDTV and one of the appropriate services (cable, Sky+HD, Freesat, whatever) and be wondering what the fuss was about, or you've up-upgraded one of those services, or your TV.
Similarly with gaming, good on Nintendo for trying something different (ignoring its previous attempt with Virtual Boy [a good title if ever there was one for one of those 3D porn movies]) but 3D in such a small space seems counter-intuitive and even if it works well, I worry about how still you'll have to sit to get the full effect for extended periods.
I can see the warning on games for that system saying "take a break every 10 minutes, for at least 30 minutes" - kind of breaking the fun part.
So, give it a few years - when the content is properly there and its more than just crappy Doctor Who trailers that look rubbish in 2D (ie how 90\% of the world saw it), and the prices have dropped from bloody stupid to ouch, but I'll do it!
Full rant from yesterday; http://bit.ly/9BKiRG [bit.ly]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615224</id>
	<title>a real shame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269546540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd much prefer no parallax filter and a camera-based head tracker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd much prefer no parallax filter and a camera-based head tracker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd much prefer no parallax filter and a camera-based head tracker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31627682</id>
	<title>Re:Well, Yeah but...</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1269623940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/nintendos-iwata-muses-about-kindle-like-business-model-for-futu/" title="engadget.com">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/nintendos-iwata-muses-about-kindle-like-business-model-for-futu/</a> [engadget.com]<br>Nintendo was able to secure free WiFi for a lot of major network operators in Europe.<br>If they include a tranceiver for downloading games then using the built in microphone to make phone calls should be trivial.<br>Don't get your hopes up though, I can imagine Nintendo acting very conservatively here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe : http : //www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/nintendos-iwata-muses-about-kindle-like-business-model-for-futu/ [ engadget.com ] Nintendo was able to secure free WiFi for a lot of major network operators in Europe.If they include a tranceiver for downloading games then using the built in microphone to make phone calls should be trivial.Do n't get your hopes up though , I can imagine Nintendo acting very conservatively here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe: http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/nintendos-iwata-muses-about-kindle-like-business-model-for-futu/ [engadget.com]Nintendo was able to secure free WiFi for a lot of major network operators in Europe.If they include a tranceiver for downloading games then using the built in microphone to make phone calls should be trivial.Don't get your hopes up though, I can imagine Nintendo acting very conservatively here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613716</id>
	<title>You Fai7 It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">the reaper In a are A few good</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>the reaper In a are A few good [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the reaper In a are A few good [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613246</id>
	<title>Outdated Speculation</title>
	<author>RobertM1968</author>
	<datestamp>1269540420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... this was just covered on the news this morning (or late last night) where they actually revealed how they are really doing it. Thus, I guess this speculation is late and outdated already...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... this was just covered on the news this morning ( or late last night ) where they actually revealed how they are really doing it .
Thus , I guess this speculation is late and outdated already.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... this was just covered on the news this morning (or late last night) where they actually revealed how they are really doing it.
Thus, I guess this speculation is late and outdated already...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31625900</id>
	<title>Re:Well, Yeah but...</title>
	<author>stillnotelf</author>
	<datestamp>1269617160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if you like SideTalkin'!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you like SideTalkin ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you like SideTalkin'!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612866</id>
	<title>3Dxxx</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>3D adult oriented games incoming</htmltext>
<tokenext>3D adult oriented games incoming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3D adult oriented games incoming</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615412</id>
	<title>pCubee 3D Cube Display for Nintendo 3DS in 2020</title>
	<author>i4u</author>
	<datestamp>1269547200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Researchers at the University of British Columbia have developed a cool 3D display dubbed pCubee. Imagine the Nintendo 3DS be like this interactive cube, Sony would start taking the 3DS seriously.<br>Users playing with pCubee experience new interaction techniques for 3D scene manipulation in a cubic display.<br>Watch the awesome demo video <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article32279.html" title="i4u.com">here</a> [i4u.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Researchers at the University of British Columbia have developed a cool 3D display dubbed pCubee .
Imagine the Nintendo 3DS be like this interactive cube , Sony would start taking the 3DS seriously.Users playing with pCubee experience new interaction techniques for 3D scene manipulation in a cubic display.Watch the awesome demo video here [ i4u.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Researchers at the University of British Columbia have developed a cool 3D display dubbed pCubee.
Imagine the Nintendo 3DS be like this interactive cube, Sony would start taking the 3DS seriously.Users playing with pCubee experience new interaction techniques for 3D scene manipulation in a cubic display.Watch the awesome demo video here [i4u.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612862</id>
	<title>Coons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What do you call a nigger with a stutter?  A cocoon!
<br> <br>
Bet you don't have the balls to mod this +1 Funny and piss off the easily offended irritable little bedwetters who get mad at this sort of thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you call a nigger with a stutter ?
A cocoon !
Bet you do n't have the balls to mod this + 1 Funny and piss off the easily offended irritable little bedwetters who get mad at this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you call a nigger with a stutter?
A cocoon!
Bet you don't have the balls to mod this +1 Funny and piss off the easily offended irritable little bedwetters who get mad at this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613714</id>
	<title>Slashdot</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269541800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idle speculation for nerds. Stuff that's likely completely irrelevant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idle speculation for nerds .
Stuff that 's likely completely irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idle speculation for nerds.
Stuff that's likely completely irrelevant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613874</id>
	<title>Anyone Remember the Virtual Boy?</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1269542220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Virtual Boy, Nintendo's first attempt at a 3D video game system, was an utter failure; I bought mine a year after its release for 30 dollars, marked down from 200.</p><p>I actually kind of liked playing games in 3D, it really does change the experience. But the system game me pretty severe headaches after an hour of playing. I'd like to see how they can avoid that this time around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Virtual Boy , Nintendo 's first attempt at a 3D video game system , was an utter failure ; I bought mine a year after its release for 30 dollars , marked down from 200.I actually kind of liked playing games in 3D , it really does change the experience .
But the system game me pretty severe headaches after an hour of playing .
I 'd like to see how they can avoid that this time around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Virtual Boy, Nintendo's first attempt at a 3D video game system, was an utter failure; I bought mine a year after its release for 30 dollars, marked down from 200.I actually kind of liked playing games in 3D, it really does change the experience.
But the system game me pretty severe headaches after an hour of playing.
I'd like to see how they can avoid that this time around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613772</id>
	<title>or 3M LCD screen?</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1269541980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a rumor that the 3DS will use the <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article32184.html" title="i4u.com">3M film 3D LCD screen</a> [i4u.com].</p><p>The screen is a frame-sequential two-view autostereoscopic system based on directional backlight.  The left eye frame is displayed with the backlight applied on one side of the 3M film that directs the light into your left eye, the right eye frame is then displayed with the backlight applied to the other side of the 3M file to direct the light into your right eye.</p><p>I have one on the viewfinder of my <a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/3d/camera/finepix\_real3dw1/" title="fujifilm.com">Fuji FinePix Real 3D</a> [fujifilm.com] stereoscopic digital camera, and it works pretty well.  You do have to position yourself fairly precisely in front of the screen to get the stereoscopic effect, but that is not too hard with a portable device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a rumor that the 3DS will use the 3M film 3D LCD screen [ i4u.com ] .The screen is a frame-sequential two-view autostereoscopic system based on directional backlight .
The left eye frame is displayed with the backlight applied on one side of the 3M film that directs the light into your left eye , the right eye frame is then displayed with the backlight applied to the other side of the 3M file to direct the light into your right eye.I have one on the viewfinder of my Fuji FinePix Real 3D [ fujifilm.com ] stereoscopic digital camera , and it works pretty well .
You do have to position yourself fairly precisely in front of the screen to get the stereoscopic effect , but that is not too hard with a portable device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a rumor that the 3DS will use the 3M film 3D LCD screen [i4u.com].The screen is a frame-sequential two-view autostereoscopic system based on directional backlight.
The left eye frame is displayed with the backlight applied on one side of the 3M film that directs the light into your left eye, the right eye frame is then displayed with the backlight applied to the other side of the 3M file to direct the light into your right eye.I have one on the viewfinder of my Fuji FinePix Real 3D [fujifilm.com] stereoscopic digital camera, and it works pretty well.
You do have to position yourself fairly precisely in front of the screen to get the stereoscopic effect, but that is not too hard with a portable device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916</id>
	<title>This is why I love competition</title>
	<author>hansoloaf</author>
	<datestamp>1269539280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When iPhone came on board with games, etc, I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft.<br> <br>Competition brings that.<br> <br>So the more variety of products (iPhone, iPad, Android, etc etc) the better it is for all of us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When iPhone came on board with games , etc , I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft .
Competition brings that .
So the more variety of products ( iPhone , iPad , Android , etc etc ) the better it is for all of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When iPhone came on board with games, etc, I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft.
Competition brings that.
So the more variety of products (iPhone, iPad, Android, etc etc) the better it is for all of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613080</id>
	<title>3D is fine and all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but I'm more interested in:</p><p>Screens that are more resistant to scratches, hinge mechanisms that don't get all loose and weird, higher resolution displays, better sound (with headphones the DS actually puts out decent sound, but the internal speakers are worthless), and larger ad-hoc wifi range.</p><p>The DS is a fantastic piece of hardware, don't get me wrong...but those are the improvements I would like to see the most, ESPECIALLY the larger ad-hoc range.  When a bunch of friends and I are playing Civ Rev and I have to go to the bathroom, or one of them decides to dip out for a quick cig, it would be nice to be able to keep the wireless connected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but I 'm more interested in : Screens that are more resistant to scratches , hinge mechanisms that do n't get all loose and weird , higher resolution displays , better sound ( with headphones the DS actually puts out decent sound , but the internal speakers are worthless ) , and larger ad-hoc wifi range.The DS is a fantastic piece of hardware , do n't get me wrong...but those are the improvements I would like to see the most , ESPECIALLY the larger ad-hoc range .
When a bunch of friends and I are playing Civ Rev and I have to go to the bathroom , or one of them decides to dip out for a quick cig , it would be nice to be able to keep the wireless connected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but I'm more interested in:Screens that are more resistant to scratches, hinge mechanisms that don't get all loose and weird, higher resolution displays, better sound (with headphones the DS actually puts out decent sound, but the internal speakers are worthless), and larger ad-hoc wifi range.The DS is a fantastic piece of hardware, don't get me wrong...but those are the improvements I would like to see the most, ESPECIALLY the larger ad-hoc range.
When a bunch of friends and I are playing Civ Rev and I have to go to the bathroom, or one of them decides to dip out for a quick cig, it would be nice to be able to keep the wireless connected.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613294</id>
	<title>I think I'll need</title>
	<author>taliesinangelus</author>
	<datestamp>1269540600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Best Buy to sync the cameras for me</htmltext>
<tokenext>Best Buy to sync the cameras for me</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best Buy to sync the cameras for me</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31617492</id>
	<title>Re:Well, Yeah but...</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1269510840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're two different things. Which is also why gaming is easily 100 times better on the DS than the iPhone and more so compared to other devices. My DSi does allow me to surf the net so I can check my email which is enough for me to be honest. It's not like I make that many calls on my G1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're two different things .
Which is also why gaming is easily 100 times better on the DS than the iPhone and more so compared to other devices .
My DSi does allow me to surf the net so I can check my email which is enough for me to be honest .
It 's not like I make that many calls on my G1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're two different things.
Which is also why gaming is easily 100 times better on the DS than the iPhone and more so compared to other devices.
My DSi does allow me to surf the net so I can check my email which is enough for me to be honest.
It's not like I make that many calls on my G1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31616452</id>
	<title>Portrait view</title>
	<author>The\_Marone</author>
	<datestamp>1269550680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume that any of these 3D screen technologies are unable to switch from landscape to portrait without losing either the 3D effect or the picture altogether.  That is assuming also that the 3DS will have two unique screens.  This may hurt the DS/DSi backwards compatibily aspect.

It could also be a single screen device where the screen would be virtually split in two and rotated to portrait for DS/DSi games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume that any of these 3D screen technologies are unable to switch from landscape to portrait without losing either the 3D effect or the picture altogether .
That is assuming also that the 3DS will have two unique screens .
This may hurt the DS/DSi backwards compatibily aspect .
It could also be a single screen device where the screen would be virtually split in two and rotated to portrait for DS/DSi games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume that any of these 3D screen technologies are unable to switch from landscape to portrait without losing either the 3D effect or the picture altogether.
That is assuming also that the 3DS will have two unique screens.
This may hurt the DS/DSi backwards compatibily aspect.
It could also be a single screen device where the screen would be virtually split in two and rotated to portrait for DS/DSi games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31616498</id>
	<title>Re:This is why I love competition</title>
	<author>LordSnooty</author>
	<datestamp>1269507600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mmmm, just what I'm hankering for is a bigger range of locked-down devices which I cannot upgrade nor run my own programs on.<br> <br>This segment of the market is the biggest threat to the general-purpose computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmmm , just what I 'm hankering for is a bigger range of locked-down devices which I can not upgrade nor run my own programs on .
This segment of the market is the biggest threat to the general-purpose computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmmm, just what I'm hankering for is a bigger range of locked-down devices which I cannot upgrade nor run my own programs on.
This segment of the market is the biggest threat to the general-purpose computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31626852</id>
	<title>Re:Well, Yeah but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269620460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So retailers can charge $600 extra for 'smart phone' functionality too? No thank you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So retailers can charge $ 600 extra for 'smart phone ' functionality too ?
No thank you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So retailers can charge $600 extra for 'smart phone' functionality too?
No thank you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615356</id>
	<title>Re:Face Tracking not necessary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269547020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what, you consider the abomination that is Wii to be "elegant"?<br>you consider the DS to be "elegant"?</p><p>Nintendo may be good at making toys, but they can't design for shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what , you consider the abomination that is Wii to be " elegant " ? you consider the DS to be " elegant " ? Nintendo may be good at making toys , but they ca n't design for shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what, you consider the abomination that is Wii to be "elegant"?you consider the DS to be "elegant"?Nintendo may be good at making toys, but they can't design for shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614526</id>
	<title>Depth of field</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269544320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Head tracking wouldn't do it.<br>If you want a true 3D illusion, you need eye tracking and something to determine what the eye is actually focusing on.<br>Right now when you're looking at a "3D" picture, only certain things will be in focus, everything else will be blurry, no matter how much you focus on them.<br>Head tracking will do nothing for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Head tracking would n't do it.If you want a true 3D illusion , you need eye tracking and something to determine what the eye is actually focusing on.Right now when you 're looking at a " 3D " picture , only certain things will be in focus , everything else will be blurry , no matter how much you focus on them.Head tracking will do nothing for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Head tracking wouldn't do it.If you want a true 3D illusion, you need eye tracking and something to determine what the eye is actually focusing on.Right now when you're looking at a "3D" picture, only certain things will be in focus, everything else will be blurry, no matter how much you focus on them.Head tracking will do nothing for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870</id>
	<title>Well, Yeah but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I make a phone call with it yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I make a phone call with it yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I make a phone call with it yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613430</id>
	<title>I'd like to see Descent in 3D</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1269540960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that there are a lot of 3D solutions for PCs that actually work, I'd love to see a new version of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descent\_(video\_game)" title="wikipedia.org">Descent. </a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>I have NO interest in 3D television.  I've seen it  back when Pepsi did that 3D superbowl commercial - it was the only superbowl I ever watched and it was to see the 3D advert, and it's nice and all, but I don't want 3D television. Why? If it introduces ANY flicker, I am not interested. If it tempts directors to have things move toward the camera just for the 3D effect, like most 3D movies, it will degrade the quality of productions.    Thanks, but no thanks.</p><p>What I care about in a television is 120Hz (I see the "stop motion" effect on the big screen throughout the films and I find it really distracting and the 120Hz eliminates that distraction), good black levels and great contrast ratios, and of course, halfway decent sound. Internet "widgets" are a plus, as is online firmware updates, but not a requirement (I rarely ever use the widgets on my Samsung LN46B650 because most of the widgets are so horrible). Widgets for Hulu, Crackle, and most importantly Netflix would be a big WIN.</p><p>But 3D? I won't say no one needs it, because I'd be like the open source zealots who try to use Linux for every single client, but I will say that I think it will cause directors to focus (no pun intended) more on using cliche 3D gags than they will on the quality of the dialog.</p><p>Oh, and if you think pr0n is going to be the advent of 3D, like HDTV, do you really want to see herpes scars in 3D?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that there are a lot of 3D solutions for PCs that actually work , I 'd love to see a new version of Descent .
[ wikipedia.org ] I have NO interest in 3D television .
I 've seen it back when Pepsi did that 3D superbowl commercial - it was the only superbowl I ever watched and it was to see the 3D advert , and it 's nice and all , but I do n't want 3D television .
Why ? If it introduces ANY flicker , I am not interested .
If it tempts directors to have things move toward the camera just for the 3D effect , like most 3D movies , it will degrade the quality of productions .
Thanks , but no thanks.What I care about in a television is 120Hz ( I see the " stop motion " effect on the big screen throughout the films and I find it really distracting and the 120Hz eliminates that distraction ) , good black levels and great contrast ratios , and of course , halfway decent sound .
Internet " widgets " are a plus , as is online firmware updates , but not a requirement ( I rarely ever use the widgets on my Samsung LN46B650 because most of the widgets are so horrible ) .
Widgets for Hulu , Crackle , and most importantly Netflix would be a big WIN.But 3D ?
I wo n't say no one needs it , because I 'd be like the open source zealots who try to use Linux for every single client , but I will say that I think it will cause directors to focus ( no pun intended ) more on using cliche 3D gags than they will on the quality of the dialog.Oh , and if you think pr0n is going to be the advent of 3D , like HDTV , do you really want to see herpes scars in 3D ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that there are a lot of 3D solutions for PCs that actually work, I'd love to see a new version of Descent.
[wikipedia.org]I have NO interest in 3D television.
I've seen it  back when Pepsi did that 3D superbowl commercial - it was the only superbowl I ever watched and it was to see the 3D advert, and it's nice and all, but I don't want 3D television.
Why? If it introduces ANY flicker, I am not interested.
If it tempts directors to have things move toward the camera just for the 3D effect, like most 3D movies, it will degrade the quality of productions.
Thanks, but no thanks.What I care about in a television is 120Hz (I see the "stop motion" effect on the big screen throughout the films and I find it really distracting and the 120Hz eliminates that distraction), good black levels and great contrast ratios, and of course, halfway decent sound.
Internet "widgets" are a plus, as is online firmware updates, but not a requirement (I rarely ever use the widgets on my Samsung LN46B650 because most of the widgets are so horrible).
Widgets for Hulu, Crackle, and most importantly Netflix would be a big WIN.But 3D?
I won't say no one needs it, because I'd be like the open source zealots who try to use Linux for every single client, but I will say that I think it will cause directors to focus (no pun intended) more on using cliche 3D gags than they will on the quality of the dialog.Oh, and if you think pr0n is going to be the advent of 3D, like HDTV, do you really want to see herpes scars in 3D?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615022</id>
	<title>Re:Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1269545760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder... It doesn't make much sense to me to employ any kind of stereoscopic or similar display method on a device so small. Not only does the size of the screen mean any 3d effect achieved will be quite subdued, and I guess you'll end up calculating each frame twice (or three times for the triple-veil display?). Maybe the horizontal resolution for each angle is one third of the actual display resolution (don't know, don't care to look it up right now), but if so, that too seems like a picture quality compromise more than a plus. Now, head-tracking, on the other hand, would seem ideal for a small device. Since the screen is small, you wouldn't need to move your head much in relation to it to get a significantly different view. This would probably enable interesting gameplay mechanics as well beyond just a feeling of depth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder... It does n't make much sense to me to employ any kind of stereoscopic or similar display method on a device so small .
Not only does the size of the screen mean any 3d effect achieved will be quite subdued , and I guess you 'll end up calculating each frame twice ( or three times for the triple-veil display ? ) .
Maybe the horizontal resolution for each angle is one third of the actual display resolution ( do n't know , do n't care to look it up right now ) , but if so , that too seems like a picture quality compromise more than a plus .
Now , head-tracking , on the other hand , would seem ideal for a small device .
Since the screen is small , you would n't need to move your head much in relation to it to get a significantly different view .
This would probably enable interesting gameplay mechanics as well beyond just a feeling of depth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder... It doesn't make much sense to me to employ any kind of stereoscopic or similar display method on a device so small.
Not only does the size of the screen mean any 3d effect achieved will be quite subdued, and I guess you'll end up calculating each frame twice (or three times for the triple-veil display?).
Maybe the horizontal resolution for each angle is one third of the actual display resolution (don't know, don't care to look it up right now), but if so, that too seems like a picture quality compromise more than a plus.
Now, head-tracking, on the other hand, would seem ideal for a small device.
Since the screen is small, you wouldn't need to move your head much in relation to it to get a significantly different view.
This would probably enable interesting gameplay mechanics as well beyond just a feeling of depth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615266</id>
	<title>Re:Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269546660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, it's not true 3D.  If it was, the bullets would come out of the screen and kill you.</p><p>Be careful how much reality you really wish for.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , it 's not true 3D .
If it was , the bullets would come out of the screen and kill you.Be careful how much reality you really wish for .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, it's not true 3D.
If it was, the bullets would come out of the screen and kill you.Be careful how much reality you really wish for.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613078</id>
	<title>types of 3d</title>
	<author>goombah99</author>
	<datestamp>1269539820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While 3D seems like a simple enough concept, faking 3D on a screen can go several different routes.</p><p>the kind you have in theaters or with shutter glasses approximates supplying each eye with a different image just like it would in real life.  So what's the catch?  well you get the same two images no matter where you sit in the theater.  So 1) it can't be perfectly correct for every point of view in the theater  2)  you don't see the expected change if you move.   that is if you move you'd expect to be able to see around one object blocking your view of another.  but that does not happen with this kind of 3D.</p><p>then there are ones that try to broadcast a different image at every different angle.  You can't really do that in practice so you broadcast one or two images at a couple angles and let interpolation happen.</p><p>lenticular lenses and these blocked screen do this second type.</p><p>this recovers the head-motion 3d but has the drawback of having less of a sweet spot where each eye gets the perfectly registered image.   However even when this fails, it can fall back to monocular 3D where at least the view point is right.</p><p>this kind of 3d is better for up close viewing by a single person.   that is, for a hand controller.</p><p>A final kind of 3D is monocular 3D.   there there is one image but you eye track or tilt track in a way that lets you update the image for the new point of view.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While 3D seems like a simple enough concept , faking 3D on a screen can go several different routes.the kind you have in theaters or with shutter glasses approximates supplying each eye with a different image just like it would in real life .
So what 's the catch ?
well you get the same two images no matter where you sit in the theater .
So 1 ) it ca n't be perfectly correct for every point of view in the theater 2 ) you do n't see the expected change if you move .
that is if you move you 'd expect to be able to see around one object blocking your view of another .
but that does not happen with this kind of 3D.then there are ones that try to broadcast a different image at every different angle .
You ca n't really do that in practice so you broadcast one or two images at a couple angles and let interpolation happen.lenticular lenses and these blocked screen do this second type.this recovers the head-motion 3d but has the drawback of having less of a sweet spot where each eye gets the perfectly registered image .
However even when this fails , it can fall back to monocular 3D where at least the view point is right.this kind of 3d is better for up close viewing by a single person .
that is , for a hand controller.A final kind of 3D is monocular 3D .
there there is one image but you eye track or tilt track in a way that lets you update the image for the new point of view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While 3D seems like a simple enough concept, faking 3D on a screen can go several different routes.the kind you have in theaters or with shutter glasses approximates supplying each eye with a different image just like it would in real life.
So what's the catch?
well you get the same two images no matter where you sit in the theater.
So 1) it can't be perfectly correct for every point of view in the theater  2)  you don't see the expected change if you move.
that is if you move you'd expect to be able to see around one object blocking your view of another.
but that does not happen with this kind of 3D.then there are ones that try to broadcast a different image at every different angle.
You can't really do that in practice so you broadcast one or two images at a couple angles and let interpolation happen.lenticular lenses and these blocked screen do this second type.this recovers the head-motion 3d but has the drawback of having less of a sweet spot where each eye gets the perfectly registered image.
However even when this fails, it can fall back to monocular 3D where at least the view point is right.this kind of 3d is better for up close viewing by a single person.
that is, for a hand controller.A final kind of 3D is monocular 3D.
there there is one image but you eye track or tilt track in a way that lets you update the image for the new point of view.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615020</id>
	<title>Wow, that DS looks NOTHING like a GBA...</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1269545760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The story had a related article from earlier.  In it, they posted a picture of a GBA next to the DS article...<br><br>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-announces-3ds-the-glasses-free-3d-successor-to-the-d/<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...unless the next gen DS is going retro on us.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>The story had a related article from earlier .
In it , they posted a picture of a GBA next to the DS article...http : //www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-announces-3ds-the-glasses-free-3d-successor-to-the-d/ ...unless the next gen DS is going retro on us .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story had a related article from earlier.
In it, they posted a picture of a GBA next to the DS article...http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-announces-3ds-the-glasses-free-3d-successor-to-the-d/ ...unless the next gen DS is going retro on us.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614378</id>
	<title>Re:Not full/real 3D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should be called "stereo vision". In addition to what you pointed out, the focus, or depth of field is also generally fixed (in games traditionally there isn't this limitation though) so your eyes can't focus on things in the background for instance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be called " stereo vision " .
In addition to what you pointed out , the focus , or depth of field is also generally fixed ( in games traditionally there is n't this limitation though ) so your eyes ca n't focus on things in the background for instance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be called "stereo vision".
In addition to what you pointed out, the focus, or depth of field is also generally fixed (in games traditionally there isn't this limitation though) so your eyes can't focus on things in the background for instance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615942</id>
	<title>Re:Face Tracking not necessary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269548940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They already have a DSi game with face tracking http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/dsiware/krgj/index.html.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They already have a DSi game with face tracking http : //www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/dsiware/krgj/index.html .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already have a DSi game with face tracking http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/dsiware/krgj/index.html.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613484</id>
	<title>Re:This is why I love competition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When iPhone came on board with games, etc, I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft.</p></div><p>So Nintendo is only innovating their handheld because of competition from the iPhone? What about the Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance, Game Boy Advance SP, Game Boy Pocket, Game Boy Light, Game Boy Micro, DS, DS Lite, DSi, DS XL....?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When iPhone came on board with games , etc , I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft.So Nintendo is only innovating their handheld because of competition from the iPhone ?
What about the Game Boy Color , Game Boy Advance , Game Boy Advance SP , Game Boy Pocket , Game Boy Light , Game Boy Micro , DS , DS Lite , DSi , DS XL.... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When iPhone came on board with games, etc, I knew there will be potentially improved products from Nintendo and eventually Sony/Microsoft.So Nintendo is only innovating their handheld because of competition from the iPhone?
What about the Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance, Game Boy Advance SP, Game Boy Pocket, Game Boy Light, Game Boy Micro, DS, DS Lite, DSi, DS XL....?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31618264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31625900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31617492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31627682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31616498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1524220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31626852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31618264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31616498
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31614492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31615942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31613350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31625900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31626852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31617492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31627682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1524220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1524220.31612866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
