<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_2241204</id>
	<title>Child Receives Trachea Grown From Own Stem Cells</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269430140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>kkleiner writes <i>"Doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) along with colleagues at the University College London, the Royal Free Hospital, and Careggi University Hospital in Florence have successfully <a href="http://singularityhub.com/2010/03/23/first-child-receives-organ-transplant-created-with-stem-cells/">transplanted a trachea into a 10 year old boy using his own stem cells</a>. A donor trachea was taken, stripped of its cells into a collagen-like scaffold, and then infused with the boy's stem cells. The trachea was surgically placed into the boy and allowed to develop in place. Because his own cells were used, there was little to no risk of rejection. This was the first time a child had received such a stem cell augmented transplant and the first time that a complete trachea had been used."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kkleiner writes " Doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital ( GOSH ) along with colleagues at the University College London , the Royal Free Hospital , and Careggi University Hospital in Florence have successfully transplanted a trachea into a 10 year old boy using his own stem cells .
A donor trachea was taken , stripped of its cells into a collagen-like scaffold , and then infused with the boy 's stem cells .
The trachea was surgically placed into the boy and allowed to develop in place .
Because his own cells were used , there was little to no risk of rejection .
This was the first time a child had received such a stem cell augmented transplant and the first time that a complete trachea had been used .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kkleiner writes "Doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) along with colleagues at the University College London, the Royal Free Hospital, and Careggi University Hospital in Florence have successfully transplanted a trachea into a 10 year old boy using his own stem cells.
A donor trachea was taken, stripped of its cells into a collagen-like scaffold, and then infused with the boy's stem cells.
The trachea was surgically placed into the boy and allowed to develop in place.
Because his own cells were used, there was little to no risk of rejection.
This was the first time a child had received such a stem cell augmented transplant and the first time that a complete trachea had been used.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605558</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>NEDHead</author>
	<datestamp>1269435120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cancer risks include death, disfigurement, and bad breath</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cancer risks include death , disfigurement , and bad breath</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cancer risks include death, disfigurement, and bad breath</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610950</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>wesborgmandvm</author>
	<datestamp>1269533340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency.</i> <br> <br>

But you can get iPS cells from a non-pluripotent adult somatic cells.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced\_pluripotent\_stem\_cell/" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced\_pluripotent\_stem\_cell/</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency .
But you can get iPS cells from a non-pluripotent adult somatic cells .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced \ _pluripotent \ _stem \ _cell/ [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency.
But you can get iPS cells from a non-pluripotent adult somatic cells.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced\_pluripotent\_stem\_cell/ [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606050</id>
	<title>All you really need to know about ESC politics</title>
	<author>NotSoHeavyD3</author>
	<datestamp>1269438780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know, this isn't a case of using embryonic stem cells but pretty much the politics of ESC work like this. Republicans will often give reasons that should make them be for it and yet are against it. Democrats on the other hand often give reasons to be against it but are for it. (But I just mostly shake my head when I hear either side talk.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , this is n't a case of using embryonic stem cells but pretty much the politics of ESC work like this .
Republicans will often give reasons that should make them be for it and yet are against it .
Democrats on the other hand often give reasons to be against it but are for it .
( But I just mostly shake my head when I hear either side talk .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, this isn't a case of using embryonic stem cells but pretty much the politics of ESC work like this.
Republicans will often give reasons that should make them be for it and yet are against it.
Democrats on the other hand often give reasons to be against it but are for it.
(But I just mostly shake my head when I hear either side talk.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's always some people who need surgery NOW and whether they get cancer in 2-5-10-20 years or not it's still a win. I'm all for medical testing and not rushing out unsafe procedures, but the reactions I see are mostly knee-jerk "it's STEM cells, omg you can't" not based on real research. In fact, they don't want the research done in the first place. Of course it's highly experimental medically, so was heart transplants. The first guy survived two weeks, but today we average 15 years. Research can prove or disprove (ok, don't get all philosophical on me) whether it helps medically, but it won't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies. And if it's not embryonic, they'll pretend there's no difference because only blind rage will do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's always some people who need surgery NOW and whether they get cancer in 2-5-10-20 years or not it 's still a win .
I 'm all for medical testing and not rushing out unsafe procedures , but the reactions I see are mostly knee-jerk " it 's STEM cells , omg you ca n't " not based on real research .
In fact , they do n't want the research done in the first place .
Of course it 's highly experimental medically , so was heart transplants .
The first guy survived two weeks , but today we average 15 years .
Research can prove or disprove ( ok , do n't get all philosophical on me ) whether it helps medically , but it wo n't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies .
And if it 's not embryonic , they 'll pretend there 's no difference because only blind rage will do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's always some people who need surgery NOW and whether they get cancer in 2-5-10-20 years or not it's still a win.
I'm all for medical testing and not rushing out unsafe procedures, but the reactions I see are mostly knee-jerk "it's STEM cells, omg you can't" not based on real research.
In fact, they don't want the research done in the first place.
Of course it's highly experimental medically, so was heart transplants.
The first guy survived two weeks, but today we average 15 years.
Research can prove or disprove (ok, don't get all philosophical on me) whether it helps medically, but it won't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies.
And if it's not embryonic, they'll pretend there's no difference because only blind rage will do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610008</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1269529200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we do the same thing for evolution please?</p><p>i.e. if you don't believe in evolution, then you won't get any treatments that are based on our understanding of how human beings and/or pathogens have evolved.</p><p>Ironically, this policy would be an excellent source of natural selection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we do the same thing for evolution please ? i.e .
if you do n't believe in evolution , then you wo n't get any treatments that are based on our understanding of how human beings and/or pathogens have evolved.Ironically , this policy would be an excellent source of natural selection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we do the same thing for evolution please?i.e.
if you don't believe in evolution, then you won't get any treatments that are based on our understanding of how human beings and/or pathogens have evolved.Ironically, this policy would be an excellent source of natural selection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605646</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269435780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone's stance on stem cell research should be queried by the DMV and added to your driver's license, just like organ donation. Then when you need a medical procedure that has benefited from stem cell research, you get the version of the procedure that's in line with your beliefs.</p><p>I know... but I can dream can't I?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone 's stance on stem cell research should be queried by the DMV and added to your driver 's license , just like organ donation .
Then when you need a medical procedure that has benefited from stem cell research , you get the version of the procedure that 's in line with your beliefs.I know... but I can dream ca n't I ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone's stance on stem cell research should be queried by the DMV and added to your driver's license, just like organ donation.
Then when you need a medical procedure that has benefited from stem cell research, you get the version of the procedure that's in line with your beliefs.I know... but I can dream can't I?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606704</id>
	<title>Wonderful</title>
	<author>guygo</author>
	<datestamp>1269444960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More of this will come.  It's wonderful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More of this will come .
It 's wonderful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More of this will come.
It's wonderful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606152</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1269439500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Who is "we" in your question?  This was done by:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) along with colleagues at the University College London, the Royal Free Hospital, and Careggi University Hospital in Florence</p></div><p>2) If you meant the United States, this would be government funded had it been done in that country since it deals with adult stem cells.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Who is " we " in your question ?
This was done by : Great Ormond Street Hospital ( GOSH ) along with colleagues at the University College London , the Royal Free Hospital , and Careggi University Hospital in Florence2 ) If you meant the United States , this would be government funded had it been done in that country since it deals with adult stem cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Who is "we" in your question?
This was done by:Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) along with colleagues at the University College London, the Royal Free Hospital, and Careggi University Hospital in Florence2) If you meant the United States, this would be government funded had it been done in that country since it deals with adult stem cells.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605474</id>
	<title>"Minor" correction</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1269434580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The headline would be correct if we can synthesize the collagen molding and do away with the need for donor organ.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline would be correct if we can synthesize the collagen molding and do away with the need for donor organ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline would be correct if we can synthesize the collagen molding and do away with the need for donor organ.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606592</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1269443760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably fairly low, especially compared to the risks of a lifetime of anti-rejection meds (which carry a cancer risk of their own) and having a metal stent damage his aorta again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably fairly low , especially compared to the risks of a lifetime of anti-rejection meds ( which carry a cancer risk of their own ) and having a metal stent damage his aorta again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably fairly low, especially compared to the risks of a lifetime of anti-rejection meds (which carry a cancer risk of their own) and having a metal stent damage his aorta again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605424</id>
	<title>Can't wait for some extra neck vertebrae</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269434280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll never have to leave the house! If you know what I'm saying. This is slashdot, so I know that you do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll never have to leave the house !
If you know what I 'm saying .
This is slashdot , so I know that you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll never have to leave the house!
If you know what I'm saying.
This is slashdot, so I know that you do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605468</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269434580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ought not to have been too much modification done to the stem cells themselves in the culturing process (eg immortalization).  But then I haven't read up on the behavior and molecular-level changes manifest in fresh harvested stem cells just based on the growth media and 2d plating methods.  Somebody who works with fresh harvests should respond.  Starting....now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ought not to have been too much modification done to the stem cells themselves in the culturing process ( eg immortalization ) .
But then I have n't read up on the behavior and molecular-level changes manifest in fresh harvested stem cells just based on the growth media and 2d plating methods .
Somebody who works with fresh harvests should respond .
Starting....now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ought not to have been too much modification done to the stem cells themselves in the culturing process (eg immortalization).
But then I haven't read up on the behavior and molecular-level changes manifest in fresh harvested stem cells just based on the growth media and 2d plating methods.
Somebody who works with fresh harvests should respond.
Starting....now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605780</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1269437040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are--- the restrictions on stem-cell funding have always been on embryonic stem cells, not on research involving stem cells derived from post-fetus-stage living humans, as is the case here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are--- the restrictions on stem-cell funding have always been on embryonic stem cells , not on research involving stem cells derived from post-fetus-stage living humans , as is the case here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are--- the restrictions on stem-cell funding have always been on embryonic stem cells, not on research involving stem cells derived from post-fetus-stage living humans, as is the case here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606370</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269441360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF?</p><p>Anti-abortion activists are some of the most prominent backers of adult stem-cell research, to the point where they are being criticized for turning adult stem-cell research into a talking point.</p><p>Tell me, where are these "fanatic anti-abortion" organizations that are opposing adult stem cell research?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ? Anti-abortion activists are some of the most prominent backers of adult stem-cell research , to the point where they are being criticized for turning adult stem-cell research into a talking point.Tell me , where are these " fanatic anti-abortion " organizations that are opposing adult stem cell research ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?Anti-abortion activists are some of the most prominent backers of adult stem-cell research, to the point where they are being criticized for turning adult stem-cell research into a talking point.Tell me, where are these "fanatic anti-abortion" organizations that are opposing adult stem cell research?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606138</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are... this is a form of adult stem cell use, which was not excluded by the bush ban on embryonic stem cell research.  this ban was also recently overturned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are... this is a form of adult stem cell use , which was not excluded by the bush ban on embryonic stem cell research .
this ban was also recently overturned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are... this is a form of adult stem cell use, which was not excluded by the bush ban on embryonic stem cell research.
this ban was also recently overturned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607850</id>
	<title>Re:3-D printing + Stem Cells</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269549960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I watched a TED talk on this very subject, and the benefit of taking an existing organ and removing the cells first is that the vast circulatory network remains intact.  In the lab they can literally print some organs using an inkjet printer, but getting the level of detail necessary to approximate a naturally grown circulatory network is still impossible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched a TED talk on this very subject , and the benefit of taking an existing organ and removing the cells first is that the vast circulatory network remains intact .
In the lab they can literally print some organs using an inkjet printer , but getting the level of detail necessary to approximate a naturally grown circulatory network is still impossible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched a TED talk on this very subject, and the benefit of taking an existing organ and removing the cells first is that the vast circulatory network remains intact.
In the lab they can literally print some organs using an inkjet printer, but getting the level of detail necessary to approximate a naturally grown circulatory network is still impossible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606898</id>
	<title>TROLL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Common know7edge distribution make shower Don't just Fuck The Baby</htmltext>
<tokenext>Common know7edge distribution make shower Do n't just Fuck The Baby</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Common know7edge distribution make shower Don't just Fuck The Baby</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607864</id>
	<title>Awesome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269550200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if only companies weren't patenting the dna and genome of people without their knowledge to later charge them preventative costs to access this care...</p><p>Oh wait... whoops. I mean.. Aweseme. Go science!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if only companies were n't patenting the dna and genome of people without their knowledge to later charge them preventative costs to access this care...Oh wait... whoops. I mean.. Aweseme. Go science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if only companies weren't patenting the dna and genome of people without their knowledge to later charge them preventative costs to access this care...Oh wait... whoops. I mean.. Aweseme. Go science!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610120</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>kronosopher</author>
	<datestamp>1269529860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Without getting philosophical on you, the fact is that resistance to this or any kind of research is usually perpetuated by the establishment because it's classified a conflict of interest and therefore becomes the subject of undue and debilitating scrutiny, lack of funding, FUD, etc.
<br> <br>Anti-abortion advocates are fanatic because factions of that same establishment enact genocide and eugenics programs against mothers and their spawn, even going so far as pushing potential mothers for late-term abortions(which is known to significantly damage the body).
<br> <br>The IMF and World Bank aim to reduce populations by infiltrating and bankrupting the world's economies with a draconian "free market" agenda.  The other nations which the banks can't outright subjugate and enslave(those with a well-armed middle class) are also victim to an Orwellian gestapo-like police-state and institutionalized brainwashing by power-hungry psychopathic free market snake oil salesmen.  Government and major political groups are almost entirely co-opted by international corporations; and by leading their own opposition to failure, the corporatocracy ensures the success its profiteering agenda.

<br> <br>These psychopaths are often members of the elite and let me tell you they are not interested in giving you better healthcare.  This is not about anti-abortion fanatics or any other polarizing false dichotomy propagandized throughout media.  The establishment wants to kill you and your family.  If they can't kill you, they will directly and/or economically enslave you.   <br> <br>

On another note.. we in the US need to get out from under this "healthcare reform" NOW giving the medical industry back to the doctors before the insurance companies co-opt it and further plunge our economy into deeper depression.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without getting philosophical on you , the fact is that resistance to this or any kind of research is usually perpetuated by the establishment because it 's classified a conflict of interest and therefore becomes the subject of undue and debilitating scrutiny , lack of funding , FUD , etc .
Anti-abortion advocates are fanatic because factions of that same establishment enact genocide and eugenics programs against mothers and their spawn , even going so far as pushing potential mothers for late-term abortions ( which is known to significantly damage the body ) .
The IMF and World Bank aim to reduce populations by infiltrating and bankrupting the world 's economies with a draconian " free market " agenda .
The other nations which the banks ca n't outright subjugate and enslave ( those with a well-armed middle class ) are also victim to an Orwellian gestapo-like police-state and institutionalized brainwashing by power-hungry psychopathic free market snake oil salesmen .
Government and major political groups are almost entirely co-opted by international corporations ; and by leading their own opposition to failure , the corporatocracy ensures the success its profiteering agenda .
These psychopaths are often members of the elite and let me tell you they are not interested in giving you better healthcare .
This is not about anti-abortion fanatics or any other polarizing false dichotomy propagandized throughout media .
The establishment wants to kill you and your family .
If they ca n't kill you , they will directly and/or economically enslave you .
On another note.. we in the US need to get out from under this " healthcare reform " NOW giving the medical industry back to the doctors before the insurance companies co-opt it and further plunge our economy into deeper depression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without getting philosophical on you, the fact is that resistance to this or any kind of research is usually perpetuated by the establishment because it's classified a conflict of interest and therefore becomes the subject of undue and debilitating scrutiny, lack of funding, FUD, etc.
Anti-abortion advocates are fanatic because factions of that same establishment enact genocide and eugenics programs against mothers and their spawn, even going so far as pushing potential mothers for late-term abortions(which is known to significantly damage the body).
The IMF and World Bank aim to reduce populations by infiltrating and bankrupting the world's economies with a draconian "free market" agenda.
The other nations which the banks can't outright subjugate and enslave(those with a well-armed middle class) are also victim to an Orwellian gestapo-like police-state and institutionalized brainwashing by power-hungry psychopathic free market snake oil salesmen.
Government and major political groups are almost entirely co-opted by international corporations; and by leading their own opposition to failure, the corporatocracy ensures the success its profiteering agenda.
These psychopaths are often members of the elite and let me tell you they are not interested in giving you better healthcare.
This is not about anti-abortion fanatics or any other polarizing false dichotomy propagandized throughout media.
The establishment wants to kill you and your family.
If they can't kill you, they will directly and/or economically enslave you.
On another note.. we in the US need to get out from under this "healthcare reform" NOW giving the medical industry back to the doctors before the insurance companies co-opt it and further plunge our economy into deeper depression.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610458</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269531480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, being myself part of a fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies, I'm totally OK with research on non embryonic stem cells, which can never be grown into individuals. I am not a biologist, and don't remember where I read/heard about that, so feel free to confirm or infirm that.</p><p>I read TFA and it only talks about stem cells, so I don't know if they're embryonic or not in this case. But I would assume not, because it would be a given in a scientific publication to detail whether the boy had been therapeutically cloned before the procedure or not. This is nowhere mentioned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , being myself part of a fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies , I 'm totally OK with research on non embryonic stem cells , which can never be grown into individuals .
I am not a biologist , and do n't remember where I read/heard about that , so feel free to confirm or infirm that.I read TFA and it only talks about stem cells , so I do n't know if they 're embryonic or not in this case .
But I would assume not , because it would be a given in a scientific publication to detail whether the boy had been therapeutically cloned before the procedure or not .
This is nowhere mentioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, being myself part of a fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies, I'm totally OK with research on non embryonic stem cells, which can never be grown into individuals.
I am not a biologist, and don't remember where I read/heard about that, so feel free to confirm or infirm that.I read TFA and it only talks about stem cells, so I don't know if they're embryonic or not in this case.
But I would assume not, because it would be a given in a scientific publication to detail whether the boy had been therapeutically cloned before the procedure or not.
This is nowhere mentioned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372</id>
	<title>Cancer?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1269433860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Little risk of rejection, but what is the risk of cancer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Little risk of rejection , but what is the risk of cancer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Little risk of rejection, but what is the risk of cancer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610550</id>
	<title>Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269531960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the kid's own embryonic stem cells had been harvested for this kind of experimental work, he would never have developed a problem with his trachea. Isn't this why we need to fully fund embryonic stem cell research with everyone's tax dollars?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/irony</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the kid 's own embryonic stem cells had been harvested for this kind of experimental work , he would never have developed a problem with his trachea .
Is n't this why we need to fully fund embryonic stem cell research with everyone 's tax dollars ?
/irony</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the kid's own embryonic stem cells had been harvested for this kind of experimental work, he would never have developed a problem with his trachea.
Isn't this why we need to fully fund embryonic stem cell research with everyone's tax dollars?
/irony</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882</id>
	<title>3-D printing + Stem Cells</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of using a donor and then stripping cells to get the collogen scaffold, next they should do 3-D printing of collogen into any shape they want. "Grown" organs in the future will not be grown, they will be built layer-by-layer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of using a donor and then stripping cells to get the collogen scaffold , next they should do 3-D printing of collogen into any shape they want .
" Grown " organs in the future will not be grown , they will be built layer-by-layer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of using a donor and then stripping cells to get the collogen scaffold, next they should do 3-D printing of collogen into any shape they want.
"Grown" organs in the future will not be grown, they will be built layer-by-layer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31608734</id>
	<title>Re:3-D printing + Stem Cells</title>
	<author>tokenshi</author>
	<datestamp>1269520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then covered in caramel, dropped into a friar and served a la mode.</p><p>mmmm... trachea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then covered in caramel , dropped into a friar and served a la mode.mmmm... trachea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then covered in caramel, dropped into a friar and served a la mode.mmmm... trachea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31614180</id>
	<title>Re:let me just say</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1269543060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good job indeed.  Good job at writing the prequel to the new "Repo Man" movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good job indeed .
Good job at writing the prequel to the new " Repo Man " movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good job indeed.
Good job at writing the prequel to the new "Repo Man" movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606102</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are not funding cure with one's own cells because much more profit could be made with patented lines of donor cells.  70 different cures are in use now without any infant or fetus death but there is no big money in that for big medicine.  You own skin cells can provide stem cells to grow new organs, new heart tissue, new bone marrow for leukaemia cure.  Without big medicine owning the donor cells, only your &amp; the local clinic benefit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are not funding cure with one 's own cells because much more profit could be made with patented lines of donor cells .
70 different cures are in use now without any infant or fetus death but there is no big money in that for big medicine .
You own skin cells can provide stem cells to grow new organs , new heart tissue , new bone marrow for leukaemia cure .
Without big medicine owning the donor cells , only your &amp; the local clinic benefit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are not funding cure with one's own cells because much more profit could be made with patented lines of donor cells.
70 different cures are in use now without any infant or fetus death but there is no big money in that for big medicine.
You own skin cells can provide stem cells to grow new organs, new heart tissue, new bone marrow for leukaemia cure.
Without big medicine owning the donor cells, only your &amp; the local clinic benefit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607352</id>
	<title>The near future</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1269453600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok,so now we can grow a trachea, an esophagus and bronchi. All tubular structures. Which means intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon) could be re-grown too.
<br> <br>
The future is looking very bright indeed. Now we just have to work on the organs like the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas etc. And I don't think those are very far off, they've pretty much figured out how to vascularize large organs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok,so now we can grow a trachea , an esophagus and bronchi .
All tubular structures .
Which means intestine ( duodenum , jejunum , ileum and colon ) could be re-grown too .
The future is looking very bright indeed .
Now we just have to work on the organs like the heart , lungs , liver , kidneys , pancreas etc .
And I do n't think those are very far off , they 've pretty much figured out how to vascularize large organs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok,so now we can grow a trachea, an esophagus and bronchi.
All tubular structures.
Which means intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon) could be re-grown too.
The future is looking very bright indeed.
Now we just have to work on the organs like the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas etc.
And I don't think those are very far off, they've pretty much figured out how to vascularize large organs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605758</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because deluded fools think Space is where it's at. Even though we've had decades to work in space, nothing's come of it. Because, well, space is EMPTY.</p><p>However, because we live in a very conservative time, and people are basically stupid, they think it's "playing God" when we grow tissue like this.</p><p>Of course, industrialized farming, suburbs, antibiotics, giving birth in hospitals and medicine in general aren't "playing God".</p><p>The other issue is that just around the corner will be life extension technology, and that's where people's built-in deathoid prejudices really come out. Even though we live longer than ever and healthier too, somehow living even longer is bad.</p><p>Weird. As soon as I can I'd grow my own replacement organs and slap those babies in there. As a matter of fact, I'd love to keep tissue samples of my present organs on ice so I can pop those babies in a reactor, in case there's something unforeseen with stem cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because deluded fools think Space is where it 's at .
Even though we 've had decades to work in space , nothing 's come of it .
Because , well , space is EMPTY.However , because we live in a very conservative time , and people are basically stupid , they think it 's " playing God " when we grow tissue like this.Of course , industrialized farming , suburbs , antibiotics , giving birth in hospitals and medicine in general are n't " playing God " .The other issue is that just around the corner will be life extension technology , and that 's where people 's built-in deathoid prejudices really come out .
Even though we live longer than ever and healthier too , somehow living even longer is bad.Weird .
As soon as I can I 'd grow my own replacement organs and slap those babies in there .
As a matter of fact , I 'd love to keep tissue samples of my present organs on ice so I can pop those babies in a reactor , in case there 's something unforeseen with stem cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because deluded fools think Space is where it's at.
Even though we've had decades to work in space, nothing's come of it.
Because, well, space is EMPTY.However, because we live in a very conservative time, and people are basically stupid, they think it's "playing God" when we grow tissue like this.Of course, industrialized farming, suburbs, antibiotics, giving birth in hospitals and medicine in general aren't "playing God".The other issue is that just around the corner will be life extension technology, and that's where people's built-in deathoid prejudices really come out.
Even though we live longer than ever and healthier too, somehow living even longer is bad.Weird.
As soon as I can I'd grow my own replacement organs and slap those babies in there.
As a matter of fact, I'd love to keep tissue samples of my present organs on ice so I can pop those babies in a reactor, in case there's something unforeseen with stem cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605548</id>
	<title>let me just say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269435060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>holy crap.<br> <br>good job, guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>holy crap .
good job , guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>holy crap.
good job, guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607060</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1269448560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We never stopped funding it. We weren't funding research based on the stem cells from dead human embryos.</p><p>I know you weren't interested in the answer, but I wanted to point out your douchebaggery.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We never stopped funding it .
We were n't funding research based on the stem cells from dead human embryos.I know you were n't interested in the answer , but I wanted to point out your douchebaggery.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We never stopped funding it.
We weren't funding research based on the stem cells from dead human embryos.I know you weren't interested in the answer, but I wanted to point out your douchebaggery.LK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607510</id>
	<title>As immensely cool as this is...</title>
	<author>strawberryutopia</author>
	<datestamp>1269456360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...wake me up when they do this with a larynx. I know a significant subset of the population who'd pay good money for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...wake me up when they do this with a larynx .
I know a significant subset of the population who 'd pay good money for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...wake me up when they do this with a larynx.
I know a significant subset of the population who'd pay good money for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610060</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269529500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but it won't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies. And if it's not embryonic, they'll pretend there's no difference because only blind rage will do.</p></div><p>I was under the impression that the "anti-abortion crowd" has been trying to get out the message that cord blood and other non-embryonic sources of stem cells have been yielding the most promising results so far. Now that I know that I am blinded by rage, I'll have to go back and reconsider it all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but it wo n't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies .
And if it 's not embryonic , they 'll pretend there 's no difference because only blind rage will do.I was under the impression that the " anti-abortion crowd " has been trying to get out the message that cord blood and other non-embryonic sources of stem cells have been yielding the most promising results so far .
Now that I know that I am blinded by rage , I 'll have to go back and reconsider it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it won't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies.
And if it's not embryonic, they'll pretend there's no difference because only blind rage will do.I was under the impression that the "anti-abortion crowd" has been trying to get out the message that cord blood and other non-embryonic sources of stem cells have been yielding the most promising results so far.
Now that I know that I am blinded by rage, I'll have to go back and reconsider it all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606488</id>
	<title>Combo Breaker</title>
	<author>sick\_em</author>
	<datestamp>1269442440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait a second, stem cells that regenerate but will probably give you cancer, and <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/24/2232241/First-Anti-Cancer-Nanoparticle-Trial-on-Humans-a-Success?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">  nanoparticles that eat cancer for breakfast<nobr> <wbr></nobr></a> [slashdot.org]...if my math works out correctly regeration + cancer - cancer = regeneration (or at least non-rejectable organ transfers). Can anyone say ultra combo?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a second , stem cells that regenerate but will probably give you cancer , and nanoparticles that eat cancer for breakfast [ slashdot.org ] ...if my math works out correctly regeration + cancer - cancer = regeneration ( or at least non-rejectable organ transfers ) .
Can anyone say ultra combo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a second, stem cells that regenerate but will probably give you cancer, and   nanoparticles that eat cancer for breakfast  [slashdot.org]...if my math works out correctly regeration + cancer - cancer = regeneration (or at least non-rejectable organ transfers).
Can anyone say ultra combo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31608044</id>
	<title>won't someone think of the children!</title>
	<author>saiha</author>
	<datestamp>1269509220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need more of this to convince people that it is absolutely worth it to research and use stem cells as much as we can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need more of this to convince people that it is absolutely worth it to research and use stem cells as much as we can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need more of this to convince people that it is absolutely worth it to research and use stem cells as much as we can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607082</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1269448740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Why are we not funding this</i> Who's "we". If you are a Wal-Mart shopper, you probably are funding it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are we not funding this Who 's " we " .
If you are a Wal-Mart shopper , you probably are funding it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are we not funding this Who's "we".
If you are a Wal-Mart shopper, you probably are funding it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607602</id>
	<title>Trachea translated</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just to spare non-specialists the google: The trachea is the <i>windpipe</i>.<br>
Would've been nice to include in TFS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to spare non-specialists the google : The trachea is the windpipe .
Would 've been nice to include in TFS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to spare non-specialists the google: The trachea is the windpipe.
Would've been nice to include in TFS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605378</id>
	<title>tags</title>
	<author>phrostie</author>
	<datestamp>1269433920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we need a AFJ tag</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we need a AFJ tag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we need a AFJ tag</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605658</id>
	<title>Re:"Minor" correction</title>
	<author>Zorque</author>
	<datestamp>1269435900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The donor only donated the frame upon which the cells grew, they were still the child's own cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The donor only donated the frame upon which the cells grew , they were still the child 's own cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The donor only donated the frame upon which the cells grew, they were still the child's own cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</id>
	<title>In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269434460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are we not funding this???</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are we not funding this ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are we not funding this??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605358</id>
	<title>Great Ormond Street Hospital</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269433800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh my GOSH.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my GOSH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my GOSH.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605788</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are. We're not funding the type research that uses of stem cells harvested from aborted embryos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are .
We 're not funding the type research that uses of stem cells harvested from aborted embryos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are.
We're not funding the type research that uses of stem cells harvested from aborted embryos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605924</id>
	<title>Stem Cell Hucksters Spam, Email Servers Crash</title>
	<author>WidgetGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1269437940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...adjusting "penis enlargement" spam filter to let emails with "stem cells" in the subject or body through...
<br> <br>
You're never too rich, too thin or too well-hung.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...adjusting " penis enlargement " spam filter to let emails with " stem cells " in the subject or body through.. . You 're never too rich , too thin or too well-hung .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...adjusting "penis enlargement" spam filter to let emails with "stem cells" in the subject or body through...
 
You're never too rich, too thin or too well-hung.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607634</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because noone really wants to give out Darth Vader insurance. It attracts the wrong kind of attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because noone really wants to give out Darth Vader insurance .
It attracts the wrong kind of attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because noone really wants to give out Darth Vader insurance.
It attracts the wrong kind of attention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610730</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269532620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies</p></div><p>Is there type of human embryo that isn't an unborn baby?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babiesIs there type of human embryo that is n't an unborn baby ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babiesIs there type of human embryo that isn't an unborn baby?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607162</id>
	<title>Best part of this post</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1269449820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 'gosh' tag.</p><p>Thats pretty much exactly what I thought when I read the title.  I knew we'd eventually pull this type of stuff off, but still now that its starting to happen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... thats pretty freaking cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'gosh ' tag.Thats pretty much exactly what I thought when I read the title .
I knew we 'd eventually pull this type of stuff off , but still now that its starting to happen ... thats pretty freaking cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'gosh' tag.Thats pretty much exactly what I thought when I read the title.
I knew we'd eventually pull this type of stuff off, but still now that its starting to happen ... thats pretty freaking cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605808</id>
	<title>Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin...</title>
	<author>LordLucless</author>
	<datestamp>1269437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, you are. Or at least, you could be. The restrictions on federal funding are on <strong>embryonic</strong> stem cell research. Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency. Adult stem cells are interesting because they don't trigger rejection. Generally, nobody has any problem with adult-stem research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , you are .
Or at least , you could be .
The restrictions on federal funding are on embryonic stem cell research .
Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency .
Adult stem cells are interesting because they do n't trigger rejection .
Generally , nobody has any problem with adult-stem research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, you are.
Or at least, you could be.
The restrictions on federal funding are on embryonic stem cell research.
Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency.
Adult stem cells are interesting because they don't trigger rejection.
Generally, nobody has any problem with adult-stem research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607334</id>
	<title>Website...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269453120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have a website regarding this procedure... http://www.throated.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have a website regarding this procedure... http : //www.throated.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have a website regarding this procedure... http://www.throated.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31608734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31614180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_2241204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31614180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31608734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31608044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605728
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610458
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31607352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31606488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31610550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_2241204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_2241204.31605358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
