<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_1830205</id>
	<title>Indian Military Hopes to Weaponize the Searing "Ghost Pepper"</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269456600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>coondoggie writes <i>"The military in India is <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/58922">looking to weaponize the world's hottest chili</a>, the bhut jolokia or 'ghost pepper,' according to a number of news outlets.  The Bhut Jolokia chili pepper from Assam, India is no ordinary pepper. In tests first conducted by the New Mexico State University in 2008 and subsequently confirmed by Guinness World records and others, the Bhut Jolokia reached over one million <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville\_heat\_units">Scoville heat units</a>, while the next  hottest, the Red Savina Habenero, clocks in at a mere 577,000. Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>coondoggie writes " The military in India is looking to weaponize the world 's hottest chili , the bhut jolokia or 'ghost pepper, ' according to a number of news outlets .
The Bhut Jolokia chili pepper from Assam , India is no ordinary pepper .
In tests first conducted by the New Mexico State University in 2008 and subsequently confirmed by Guinness World records and others , the Bhut Jolokia reached over one million Scoville heat units , while the next hottest , the Red Savina Habenero , clocks in at a mere 577,000 .
Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coondoggie writes "The military in India is looking to weaponize the world's hottest chili, the bhut jolokia or 'ghost pepper,' according to a number of news outlets.
The Bhut Jolokia chili pepper from Assam, India is no ordinary pepper.
In tests first conducted by the New Mexico State University in 2008 and subsequently confirmed by Guinness World records and others, the Bhut Jolokia reached over one million Scoville heat units, while the next  hottest, the Red Savina Habenero, clocks in at a mere 577,000.
Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602358</id>
	<title>Chemical Variant?</title>
	<author>dorpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269463260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could they mean that Bhut Jolokia has some different isomers of capsaicin with differing effects from "standard" pepper sprays?  I'd have looked it up on wikipedia but they're down at the moment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could they mean that Bhut Jolokia has some different isomers of capsaicin with differing effects from " standard " pepper sprays ?
I 'd have looked it up on wikipedia but they 're down at the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could they mean that Bhut Jolokia has some different isomers of capsaicin with differing effects from "standard" pepper sprays?
I'd have looked it up on wikipedia but they're down at the moment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994</id>
	<title>Sorry, but why?</title>
	<author>mother\_reincarnated</author>
	<datestamp>1269461820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be missing something here:</p><p>1) I'm pretty sure it's a banned weapon militarily speaking.</p><p>2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!? How would this be any different than any of the current commercial pepper sprays/balls/bombs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be missing something here : 1 ) I 'm pretty sure it 's a banned weapon militarily speaking.2 ) Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from ! ?
How would this be any different than any of the current commercial pepper sprays/balls/bombs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be missing something here:1) I'm pretty sure it's a banned weapon militarily speaking.2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!?
How would this be any different than any of the current commercial pepper sprays/balls/bombs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605060</id>
	<title>its cause bollywood and hollywood are buds now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269431880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they will need riot control measures<br>LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they will need riot control measuresLOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they will need riot control measuresLOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602898</id>
	<title>taste is subjective, and</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you dont rub peppers into your eye to see how hot they are, you taste them, douchebag</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you dont rub peppers into your eye to see how hot they are , you taste them , douchebag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you dont rub peppers into your eye to see how hot they are, you taste them, douchebag</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602950</id>
	<title>Just to put this in perspective:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269422340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pure <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsaicin" title="wikipedia.org">Capsaicin</a> [wikipedia.org] is at 16 million Scoville.<br>So you might say that 1/16th of that thing is pure Capsaicin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pure Capsaicin [ wikipedia.org ] is at 16 million Scoville.So you might say that 1/16th of that thing is pure Capsaicin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pure Capsaicin [wikipedia.org] is at 16 million Scoville.So you might say that 1/16th of that thing is pure Capsaicin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603892</id>
	<title>overrated</title>
	<author>K10W</author>
	<datestamp>1269426060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always considered the heat of nagas very overrated myself. I eat habaneros and bonnets most days and sometimes nagas although they cost more they are better flavour IMO. As for the heat they aren't what everyone makes out, most people I know who care for tasty heat are shocked they are less hot that they expect when they try them. Here in the UK I only buy my chilli from independent middle eastern and asian stores since nagas and habaneros are cheaper and they do more chilli varieties in my local ones and compared to the rubbish tesco sell are much much hotter. I've tried packets and packets of the dorset naga variety tesco sell and they are much weaker then decent bonnets and cost way over the odds at nearly &pound;1 for 2 or 3 (I can get about 12 or so for that price but hotter nicer flavour ones).

Now pure capsaicin is another matter. A friend of mine I studied with who also loves hot food tried some that was in the lab and his reaction convinced me it was a bad.......... very bad........... idea. He only tried the most miniscule dot your could imagine but it impressed him so much I doubt he'd do it again. Now that is something I'd love to see in food<nobr> <wbr></nobr>........ just not mine hehehehe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always considered the heat of nagas very overrated myself .
I eat habaneros and bonnets most days and sometimes nagas although they cost more they are better flavour IMO .
As for the heat they are n't what everyone makes out , most people I know who care for tasty heat are shocked they are less hot that they expect when they try them .
Here in the UK I only buy my chilli from independent middle eastern and asian stores since nagas and habaneros are cheaper and they do more chilli varieties in my local ones and compared to the rubbish tesco sell are much much hotter .
I 've tried packets and packets of the dorset naga variety tesco sell and they are much weaker then decent bonnets and cost way over the odds at nearly   1 for 2 or 3 ( I can get about 12 or so for that price but hotter nicer flavour ones ) .
Now pure capsaicin is another matter .
A friend of mine I studied with who also loves hot food tried some that was in the lab and his reaction convinced me it was a bad.......... very bad........... idea. He only tried the most miniscule dot your could imagine but it impressed him so much I doubt he 'd do it again .
Now that is something I 'd love to see in food ........ just not mine hehehehe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always considered the heat of nagas very overrated myself.
I eat habaneros and bonnets most days and sometimes nagas although they cost more they are better flavour IMO.
As for the heat they aren't what everyone makes out, most people I know who care for tasty heat are shocked they are less hot that they expect when they try them.
Here in the UK I only buy my chilli from independent middle eastern and asian stores since nagas and habaneros are cheaper and they do more chilli varieties in my local ones and compared to the rubbish tesco sell are much much hotter.
I've tried packets and packets of the dorset naga variety tesco sell and they are much weaker then decent bonnets and cost way over the odds at nearly £1 for 2 or 3 (I can get about 12 or so for that price but hotter nicer flavour ones).
Now pure capsaicin is another matter.
A friend of mine I studied with who also loves hot food tried some that was in the lab and his reaction convinced me it was a bad.......... very bad........... idea. He only tried the most miniscule dot your could imagine but it impressed him so much I doubt he'd do it again.
Now that is something I'd love to see in food ........ just not mine hehehehe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602874</id>
	<title>Capsaicin is not the only part to it</title>
	<author>gwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269422160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are some peppers (i.e. what we in Mexico call <em>pimiento morr&#243;n</em> -- Paprika or sweet pepper, depending on whom you ask) that have \_very\_ high capsaicin levels, but is completely non-hot, at least to our standards (I know that even Argentinians use it for salads, and you can't get any more non-spicy than Argentinians<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) ).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some peppers ( i.e .
what we in Mexico call pimiento morr   n -- Paprika or sweet pepper , depending on whom you ask ) that have \ _very \ _ high capsaicin levels , but is completely non-hot , at least to our standards ( I know that even Argentinians use it for salads , and you ca n't get any more non-spicy than Argentinians ; - ) ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some peppers (i.e.
what we in Mexico call pimiento morrón -- Paprika or sweet pepper, depending on whom you ask) that have \_very\_ high capsaicin levels, but is completely non-hot, at least to our standards (I know that even Argentinians use it for salads, and you can't get any more non-spicy than Argentinians ;-) ).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602488</id>
	<title>Re:Not needed?</title>
	<author>Stele</author>
	<datestamp>1269463800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll be wearing my full-body Lager-suit. Bring it on!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be wearing my full-body Lager-suit .
Bring it on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be wearing my full-body Lager-suit.
Bring it on!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602324</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1269463080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only does it taste good, but the capsaicin causes the release of endorphins.  So you catch a buzz off of it as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only does it taste good , but the capsaicin causes the release of endorphins .
So you catch a buzz off of it as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only does it taste good, but the capsaicin causes the release of endorphins.
So you catch a buzz off of it as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602136</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1269462360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll take a dozen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll take a dozen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll take a dozen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608360</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, but why?</title>
	<author>VJ42</author>
	<datestamp>1269514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!?</p> </div><p>Psychology. A bomb made from "the word's hottest pepper" sounds worse than pepper spray</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ) Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from ! ?
Psychology. A bomb made from " the word 's hottest pepper " sounds worse than pepper spray</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!?
Psychology. A bomb made from "the word's hottest pepper" sounds worse than pepper spray
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</id>
	<title>Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>Securityemo</author>
	<datestamp>1269462300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Isn't this going to be a war crime, even if it's very good at neutralizing personell for a while without killing them? Granted I've never been hit with pepper spray or similar, but from the descriptions given by police cadettes (having to have a dose used on themselves before being allowed to use it) I would probably (besides the self-defense trial issues) batter someone quite severely rather than spray them with that stuff. And that's *normal* pepper spray. It would probably be used for temporary area denial (or whatever the proper military term is), sure, but when I saw this I got quite vivid flashes of screaming women and children.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Is n't this going to be a war crime , even if it 's very good at neutralizing personell for a while without killing them ?
Granted I 've never been hit with pepper spray or similar , but from the descriptions given by police cadettes ( having to have a dose used on themselves before being allowed to use it ) I would probably ( besides the self-defense trial issues ) batter someone quite severely rather than spray them with that stuff .
And that 's * normal * pepper spray .
It would probably be used for temporary area denial ( or whatever the proper military term is ) , sure , but when I saw this I got quite vivid flashes of screaming women and children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Isn't this going to be a war crime, even if it's very good at neutralizing personell for a while without killing them?
Granted I've never been hit with pepper spray or similar, but from the descriptions given by police cadettes (having to have a dose used on themselves before being allowed to use it) I would probably (besides the self-defense trial issues) batter someone quite severely rather than spray them with that stuff.
And that's *normal* pepper spray.
It would probably be used for temporary area denial (or whatever the proper military term is), sure, but when I saw this I got quite vivid flashes of screaming women and children.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608</id>
	<title>OK ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... but how does this compare to the Merciless Pepper of Quetzalacatenango, also known as the Guatemalan Insanity Pepper?<p><div class="quote"><p>Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness</p></div><p>I thought SCOville was universally accepted to be a litigious outhouse?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... but how does this compare to the Merciless Pepper of Quetzalacatenango , also known as the Guatemalan Insanity Pepper ? Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotnessI thought SCOville was universally accepted to be a litigious outhouse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but how does this compare to the Merciless Pepper of Quetzalacatenango, also known as the Guatemalan Insanity Pepper?Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotnessI thought SCOville was universally accepted to be a litigious outhouse?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607350</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>rhook</author>
	<datestamp>1269453540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't that illegal (internationally) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering?</p></div><p>Its only illegal to use chemical weapons in warfare, any other time they are fair game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that illegal ( internationally ) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering ? Its only illegal to use chemical weapons in warfare , any other time they are fair game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that illegal (internationally) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering?Its only illegal to use chemical weapons in warfare, any other time they are fair game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604006</id>
	<title>Even nastier than the pepper!</title>
	<author>DominatorDan</author>
	<datestamp>1269426600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>This is what we should be weaponizing. Its much nastier and is also a carcinogen! Good times.....<br><br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphorbia#Toxicity (sorry, html tags don't seem to work for creating hyperlink....)</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what we should be weaponizing .
Its much nastier and is also a carcinogen !
Good times.....http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphorbia # Toxicity ( sorry , html tags do n't seem to work for creating hyperlink.... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what we should be weaponizing.
Its much nastier and is also a carcinogen!
Good times.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphorbia#Toxicity (sorry, html tags don't seem to work for creating hyperlink....)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603662</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>bmk67</author>
	<datestamp>1269425220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] Granted I've never been hit with pepper spray or similar [...]</p></div><p>I have been exposed to high concentrations of the stuff when I was in the military - CS is nasty stuff.  But a war crime?  Seriously?  I'd much rather be hit with this stuff than be shot, stabbed, or beaten.  I've also been exposed to pepper spray, which is similar.</p><p>Seriously, in protective clothing, it's slightly annoying.  With a gas mask, it's uncomfortable.  Without any kind of protective gear, it's very unpleasant, but not completely incapacitating.  You can remove yourself from exposure and the symptoms pass quickly.</p><p>I'd rather get hit with CS a hundred times than shot once.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] Granted I 've never been hit with pepper spray or similar [ ... ] I have been exposed to high concentrations of the stuff when I was in the military - CS is nasty stuff .
But a war crime ?
Seriously ? I 'd much rather be hit with this stuff than be shot , stabbed , or beaten .
I 've also been exposed to pepper spray , which is similar.Seriously , in protective clothing , it 's slightly annoying .
With a gas mask , it 's uncomfortable .
Without any kind of protective gear , it 's very unpleasant , but not completely incapacitating .
You can remove yourself from exposure and the symptoms pass quickly.I 'd rather get hit with CS a hundred times than shot once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] Granted I've never been hit with pepper spray or similar [...]I have been exposed to high concentrations of the stuff when I was in the military - CS is nasty stuff.
But a war crime?
Seriously?  I'd much rather be hit with this stuff than be shot, stabbed, or beaten.
I've also been exposed to pepper spray, which is similar.Seriously, in protective clothing, it's slightly annoying.
With a gas mask, it's uncomfortable.
Without any kind of protective gear, it's very unpleasant, but not completely incapacitating.
You can remove yourself from exposure and the symptoms pass quickly.I'd rather get hit with CS a hundred times than shot once.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602440</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1269463620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It depends on the person. <br> <br>

I make Naga Burgers using these peppers:<br>
<br>
Ground beef (120g (1/4 pound) is normal.)<br>
Mustard ("stone ground" with seeds): about 1.5 oz (3 tablespoons).<br>
10-12 drops Blair's Ultra Death. Other hot sauce may be used, but it should contain Naga Jolokia peppers. Otherwise it's not a Naga Burger, is it?<br>
1-3 Naga Jolokia (AKA Bhut Jolokia) peppers, minced finely.<br>
Crushed black peppercorns.<br> <br>


Mix beef, mustard, and hot sauce together. Once consistently mixed, form into a patty. Press the crushed black pepper into the patty to coat the surface (like for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steak\_au\_poivre" title="wikipedia.org">steak a poivre</a> [wikipedia.org]). Grill or pan-broil quickly at high temperature to sear the outside &amp; cook the inside to medium-rare. Resulting burger should be quite hot.<br>
<br>
That burger they just put the peppers on top, not sure how much it would affect the flavour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on the person .
I make Naga Burgers using these peppers : Ground beef ( 120g ( 1/4 pound ) is normal .
) Mustard ( " stone ground " with seeds ) : about 1.5 oz ( 3 tablespoons ) .
10-12 drops Blair 's Ultra Death .
Other hot sauce may be used , but it should contain Naga Jolokia peppers .
Otherwise it 's not a Naga Burger , is it ?
1-3 Naga Jolokia ( AKA Bhut Jolokia ) peppers , minced finely .
Crushed black peppercorns .
Mix beef , mustard , and hot sauce together .
Once consistently mixed , form into a patty .
Press the crushed black pepper into the patty to coat the surface ( like for steak a poivre [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
Grill or pan-broil quickly at high temperature to sear the outside &amp; cook the inside to medium-rare .
Resulting burger should be quite hot .
That burger they just put the peppers on top , not sure how much it would affect the flavour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on the person.
I make Naga Burgers using these peppers:

Ground beef (120g (1/4 pound) is normal.
)
Mustard ("stone ground" with seeds): about 1.5 oz (3 tablespoons).
10-12 drops Blair's Ultra Death.
Other hot sauce may be used, but it should contain Naga Jolokia peppers.
Otherwise it's not a Naga Burger, is it?
1-3 Naga Jolokia (AKA Bhut Jolokia) peppers, minced finely.
Crushed black peppercorns.
Mix beef, mustard, and hot sauce together.
Once consistently mixed, form into a patty.
Press the crushed black pepper into the patty to coat the surface (like for steak a poivre [wikipedia.org]).
Grill or pan-broil quickly at high temperature to sear the outside &amp; cook the inside to medium-rare.
Resulting burger should be quite hot.
That burger they just put the peppers on top, not sure how much it would affect the flavour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608268</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1269512460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(1) It instantly blisters skin on contact</p></div><p>But not the skin on your tongue?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>(2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.</p></div><p>Well, duh. It \_is\_ dangerous.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>(3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.</p></div><p>B-b-b-bullshit. Oil/grease is a solvent for capsicum, not the other way round.</p><p>For what it's worth, I have a sauce that is rated at 1.5 million Scoville, but I tend to use it sparingly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( 1 ) It instantly blisters skin on contactBut not the skin on your tongue ?
( 2 ) it 's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.Well , duh .
It \ _is \ _ dangerous .
( 3 ) Not only is it good for eating , but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways , engines , etc.B-b-b-bullshit .
Oil/grease is a solvent for capsicum , not the other way round.For what it 's worth , I have a sauce that is rated at 1.5 million Scoville , but I tend to use it sparingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(1) It instantly blisters skin on contactBut not the skin on your tongue?
(2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.Well, duh.
It \_is\_ dangerous.
(3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.B-b-b-bullshit.
Oil/grease is a solvent for capsicum, not the other way round.For what it's worth, I have a sauce that is rated at 1.5 million Scoville, but I tend to use it sparingly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242</id>
	<title>Re:OK ...</title>
	<author>Terminal Saint</author>
	<datestamp>1269462780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with Scoville units(and the reason they're NOT a universally accepted measure of chili hotness) is that it's a subjective measure. It's based on taste testing. American Spice Trade Association pungency units are a better measure, as they're determined using high performance liquid chromatography.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with Scoville units ( and the reason they 're NOT a universally accepted measure of chili hotness ) is that it 's a subjective measure .
It 's based on taste testing .
American Spice Trade Association pungency units are a better measure , as they 're determined using high performance liquid chromatography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with Scoville units(and the reason they're NOT a universally accepted measure of chili hotness) is that it's a subjective measure.
It's based on taste testing.
American Spice Trade Association pungency units are a better measure, as they're determined using high performance liquid chromatography.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601692</id>
	<title>Indeed.</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1269460680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is something else I've weaponized, but it won't give you that searing sensation...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something else I 've weaponized , but it wo n't give you that searing sensation.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something else I've weaponized, but it won't give you that searing sensation...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604186</id>
	<title>Re:OK ...</title>
	<author>rivetgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269427380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh...no.  Scoville units are a measure of the amount of capsaicin.  It is entirely objective</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh...no .
Scoville units are a measure of the amount of capsaicin .
It is entirely objective</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh...no.
Scoville units are a measure of the amount of capsaicin.
It is entirely objective</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31606296</id>
	<title>Why not just use capsaicin?</title>
	<author>dpbsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1269440880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least one pepper sauce company has been offering <a href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/worlds-hottest-hot-sauce-pepper-extract-can-kill.html" title="buzzle.com">pure capsaicin</a> [buzzle.com] since 2006. It seems like more of a publicity stunt than a product, but it's not fabulously expensive. <a href="http://www.cosmicchile.com/site/the-source.html" title="cosmicchile.com">Another company</a> [cosmicchile.com] offers a 7,000,000 Scoville unit for $90 an ounce. Capsaicin was synthesized in 1930. I don't know whether it's cheaper to synthesize it or purify it from natural sources, but either way it doesn't seem as if military uses would depend on finding any particularly hot natural peppers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least one pepper sauce company has been offering pure capsaicin [ buzzle.com ] since 2006 .
It seems like more of a publicity stunt than a product , but it 's not fabulously expensive .
Another company [ cosmicchile.com ] offers a 7,000,000 Scoville unit for $ 90 an ounce .
Capsaicin was synthesized in 1930 .
I do n't know whether it 's cheaper to synthesize it or purify it from natural sources , but either way it does n't seem as if military uses would depend on finding any particularly hot natural peppers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least one pepper sauce company has been offering pure capsaicin [buzzle.com] since 2006.
It seems like more of a publicity stunt than a product, but it's not fabulously expensive.
Another company [cosmicchile.com] offers a 7,000,000 Scoville unit for $90 an ounce.
Capsaicin was synthesized in 1930.
I don't know whether it's cheaper to synthesize it or purify it from natural sources, but either way it doesn't seem as if military uses would depend on finding any particularly hot natural peppers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602356</id>
	<title>I really like Buth Jolokia - great taste</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1269463200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to recomment Buth Jolokia as a great chili, beyond just the high capsaicin content: it's a chili with a particular, very pleasant flavor.</p><p>As for "weaponizing it", there is one problem: individual sensitivity to capsaicin is extremely variable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to recomment Buth Jolokia as a great chili , beyond just the high capsaicin content : it 's a chili with a particular , very pleasant flavor.As for " weaponizing it " , there is one problem : individual sensitivity to capsaicin is extremely variable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to recomment Buth Jolokia as a great chili, beyond just the high capsaicin content: it's a chili with a particular, very pleasant flavor.As for "weaponizing it", there is one problem: individual sensitivity to capsaicin is extremely variable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604468</id>
	<title>Re:Not the Next Hottest</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1269428580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The hottest food my wife makes is when the chilli soaks into vegetables. On its own it just washed away but in conjunction with other food it literally sticks around and does its job.</p><p>Also I am puzzled about this assertion:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>bhut jolokia chilies can be used as a food additive for troops operating in cold conditions</p></div><p>In my experience chili makes you feel colder because it induces perspiration, even if there might be a misleading feeling of inner warmth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The hottest food my wife makes is when the chilli soaks into vegetables .
On its own it just washed away but in conjunction with other food it literally sticks around and does its job.Also I am puzzled about this assertion : bhut jolokia chilies can be used as a food additive for troops operating in cold conditionsIn my experience chili makes you feel colder because it induces perspiration , even if there might be a misleading feeling of inner warmth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hottest food my wife makes is when the chilli soaks into vegetables.
On its own it just washed away but in conjunction with other food it literally sticks around and does its job.Also I am puzzled about this assertion:bhut jolokia chilies can be used as a food additive for troops operating in cold conditionsIn my experience chili makes you feel colder because it induces perspiration, even if there might be a misleading feeling of inner warmth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604340</id>
	<title>You know that Vindaloo is short for....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269428040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Vindictive In A Loo"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Vindictive In A Loo "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Vindictive In A Loo"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602378</id>
	<title>Anyone else?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this thread making anyone else's mouth water, or is it just me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this thread making anyone else 's mouth water , or is it just me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this thread making anyone else's mouth water, or is it just me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607724</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>stub667</author>
	<datestamp>1269460020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amazing isn't it. India announces they are doing chemical weapons research, and nobody seems to care because it is fully organic and tastes great!</p><p>I must remember this PR tactic next time I'm looking for more cost effective ways to give permanent blindness and 3rd degree burns to crowds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing is n't it .
India announces they are doing chemical weapons research , and nobody seems to care because it is fully organic and tastes great ! I must remember this PR tactic next time I 'm looking for more cost effective ways to give permanent blindness and 3rd degree burns to crowds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing isn't it.
India announces they are doing chemical weapons research, and nobody seems to care because it is fully organic and tastes great!I must remember this PR tactic next time I'm looking for more cost effective ways to give permanent blindness and 3rd degree burns to crowds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726</id>
	<title>Not the Next Hottest</title>
	<author>hardburn</author>
	<datestamp>1269460800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next hottest down would be the closely-related Dorset Naga, which is around 900k - 1M scovilles.</p><p>But that's if you believe the Scoville scale, which is a subjective measurement of capsaicin content. I've had sauces that advertise a 250k rating that don't seem as hot as some 50k stuff. Makers seem to artifically inflate their ratings all the time, and how the heat hits you can change a lot, too. I've never had the oppertunity to try a Dorset Naga myself, but I've heard they don't have much heat until about 20 minutes later (at which time you might have already had quite a few, popping them like candy).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next hottest down would be the closely-related Dorset Naga , which is around 900k - 1M scovilles.But that 's if you believe the Scoville scale , which is a subjective measurement of capsaicin content .
I 've had sauces that advertise a 250k rating that do n't seem as hot as some 50k stuff .
Makers seem to artifically inflate their ratings all the time , and how the heat hits you can change a lot , too .
I 've never had the oppertunity to try a Dorset Naga myself , but I 've heard they do n't have much heat until about 20 minutes later ( at which time you might have already had quite a few , popping them like candy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next hottest down would be the closely-related Dorset Naga, which is around 900k - 1M scovilles.But that's if you believe the Scoville scale, which is a subjective measurement of capsaicin content.
I've had sauces that advertise a 250k rating that don't seem as hot as some 50k stuff.
Makers seem to artifically inflate their ratings all the time, and how the heat hits you can change a lot, too.
I've never had the oppertunity to try a Dorset Naga myself, but I've heard they don't have much heat until about 20 minutes later (at which time you might have already had quite a few, popping them like candy).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603530</id>
	<title>...Good thing they're mostly vegetarian....</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1269424620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I wouldn't want them trying to restaurant-ize the casualties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I would n't want them trying to restaurant-ize the casualties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I wouldn't want them trying to restaurant-ize the casualties.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602696</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1269421440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel. (3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.</i></p><p>the guy who sold it was ragingly full of shit.</p><p>I have let it sit on my skin for 20 minutes to prove it's a fake claim...  Won $100.00 in the office after that and eating a taco with it on it. (they dont understand that sour cream really kills it's burn)</p><p>It's not acid, it dont burn the skin and is worthless for degreasing driveways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it : ( 1 ) It instantly blisters skin on contact ( 2 ) it 's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel .
( 3 ) Not only is it good for eating , but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways , engines , etc.the guy who sold it was ragingly full of shit.I have let it sit on my skin for 20 minutes to prove it 's a fake claim... Won $ 100.00 in the office after that and eating a taco with it on it .
( they dont understand that sour cream really kills it 's burn ) It 's not acid , it dont burn the skin and is worthless for degreasing driveways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.
(3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.the guy who sold it was ragingly full of shit.I have let it sit on my skin for 20 minutes to prove it's a fake claim...  Won $100.00 in the office after that and eating a taco with it on it.
(they dont understand that sour cream really kills it's burn)It's not acid, it dont burn the skin and is worthless for degreasing driveways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604302</id>
	<title>Over one million?</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1269427920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guys, I have to offer you this piece of advice.  As someone who's been down this road before.</p><p>At this point, you should smash your scouter.  Stop relying on machines to measure these things, the numbers are only going to psyche you out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guys , I have to offer you this piece of advice .
As someone who 's been down this road before.At this point , you should smash your scouter .
Stop relying on machines to measure these things , the numbers are only going to psyche you out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guys, I have to offer you this piece of advice.
As someone who's been down this road before.At this point, you should smash your scouter.
Stop relying on machines to measure these things, the numbers are only going to psyche you out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607896</id>
	<title>Re:OK ...</title>
	<author>EricTheO</author>
	<datestamp>1269507660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original Dr. Scoville did indeed use test subjects to grade the hotness of chili's. When a new more accurate scientific method of recording capsaicin levels was invented they named it after Dr. Scoville. I wonder about this weaponizing of chili's, as it is now Pepper Sprays use a concentrated extract that they actually have to delute to make it safe enough for use on perps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original Dr. Scoville did indeed use test subjects to grade the hotness of chili 's .
When a new more accurate scientific method of recording capsaicin levels was invented they named it after Dr. Scoville. I wonder about this weaponizing of chili 's , as it is now Pepper Sprays use a concentrated extract that they actually have to delute to make it safe enough for use on perps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original Dr. Scoville did indeed use test subjects to grade the hotness of chili's.
When a new more accurate scientific method of recording capsaicin levels was invented they named it after Dr. Scoville. I wonder about this weaponizing of chili's, as it is now Pepper Sprays use a concentrated extract that they actually have to delute to make it safe enough for use on perps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605914</id>
	<title>the same idiotic logic is used against tasers</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1269437880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tasers are potentially lethal, pepper spray is very painful...</p><p>so we should go back to good old guns?</p><p>its easy to argue against pepper spray or the taser when their negative effects are examined in a vacuum, but in reality, the only context that matters, they are used as a LESS lethal choice</p><p>its kind of like griping about the problems of government controlling healthcare, which are real problems. but as if the alternative, corporate controlled healthcare, is any better!</p><p>people need to stop basing their opinions on the negatives of certain choices, without considering the negatives of your other choices, which can be even worse</p><p>its some sort horrible logic fail, but its incredibly common in the formation of people's opinions</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tasers are potentially lethal , pepper spray is very painful...so we should go back to good old guns ? its easy to argue against pepper spray or the taser when their negative effects are examined in a vacuum , but in reality , the only context that matters , they are used as a LESS lethal choiceits kind of like griping about the problems of government controlling healthcare , which are real problems .
but as if the alternative , corporate controlled healthcare , is any better ! people need to stop basing their opinions on the negatives of certain choices , without considering the negatives of your other choices , which can be even worseits some sort horrible logic fail , but its incredibly common in the formation of people 's opinions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tasers are potentially lethal, pepper spray is very painful...so we should go back to good old guns?its easy to argue against pepper spray or the taser when their negative effects are examined in a vacuum, but in reality, the only context that matters, they are used as a LESS lethal choiceits kind of like griping about the problems of government controlling healthcare, which are real problems.
but as if the alternative, corporate controlled healthcare, is any better!people need to stop basing their opinions on the negatives of certain choices, without considering the negatives of your other choices, which can be even worseits some sort horrible logic fail, but its incredibly common in the formation of people's opinions</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605694</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>stonewallred</author>
	<datestamp>1269436200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And you dear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. sir, got given a whole big handful of lies by a hip huckster out to do as he did. Part you and your money right on the spot. The only thing that might have been true is the cleaning, and if it is,there are thousands of things that clean better and cheaper. But no blisters, not expensive and doubt it is better than any common degreaser for cleaning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you dear / .
sir , got given a whole big handful of lies by a hip huckster out to do as he did .
Part you and your money right on the spot .
The only thing that might have been true is the cleaning , and if it is,there are thousands of things that clean better and cheaper .
But no blisters , not expensive and doubt it is better than any common degreaser for cleaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you dear /.
sir, got given a whole big handful of lies by a hip huckster out to do as he did.
Part you and your money right on the spot.
The only thing that might have been true is the cleaning, and if it is,there are thousands of things that clean better and cheaper.
But no blisters, not expensive and doubt it is better than any common degreaser for cleaning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604578</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper Spray</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269429060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should be using Resiniferatoxin, it's significantly more potent than capsaicin.  Of course, that isn't found in peppers...</p><p>The only down-side I see is it actually doesn't cause any physical damage except to pain receptors. so anybody who has been hit with RTX poison gas recovers and comes back the next day feeling absolutely no pain.  If you use it on someone, you'd better kill them or you've just created a super soldier!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should be using Resiniferatoxin , it 's significantly more potent than capsaicin .
Of course , that is n't found in peppers...The only down-side I see is it actually does n't cause any physical damage except to pain receptors .
so anybody who has been hit with RTX poison gas recovers and comes back the next day feeling absolutely no pain .
If you use it on someone , you 'd better kill them or you 've just created a super soldier !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should be using Resiniferatoxin, it's significantly more potent than capsaicin.
Of course, that isn't found in peppers...The only down-side I see is it actually doesn't cause any physical damage except to pain receptors.
so anybody who has been hit with RTX poison gas recovers and comes back the next day feeling absolutely no pain.
If you use it on someone, you'd better kill them or you've just created a super soldier!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602798</id>
	<title>Call me juvenile ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269421800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>In fact, Indian farmers say Bhut paste can be used for everything from sauces to tear gas.  And there in lies the military's interest.</p>  </div><p>The Indian military is interested in the many uses of Bhut paste?  I<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I don't know how to respond to this in a mature manner.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : In fact , Indian farmers say Bhut paste can be used for everything from sauces to tear gas .
And there in lies the military 's interest .
The Indian military is interested in the many uses of Bhut paste ?
I ... I do n't know how to respond to this in a mature manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA:In fact, Indian farmers say Bhut paste can be used for everything from sauces to tear gas.
And there in lies the military's interest.
The Indian military is interested in the many uses of Bhut paste?
I ... I don't know how to respond to this in a mature manner.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</id>
	<title>WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The active ingredient that makes that pepper so hot is Capsaicin, the same stuff in pepper spray.<br><br>Is it actually cheaper for them to use the local grown pepper with a variable yield than just using the pure substance with a controlled yield?<br><br>The article says they want to use it for troops in cold areas. This scares me. It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science. Just because it tastes hot doesn't mean it'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest. (In fact, they are more likely to succumb to hypothermia if they try to 'reduce' the 'heat' from those peppers by taking off clothes or drinking cold liquids or sucking snow.)<br><br>I'm going to throw out a guess that this isn't about the effectiveness of the pepper, but rather a homegrown movement to use a local product (in an inferior form) rather than a possibly foreign product. Sometimes the politicians in India are know to do stupid things like that.<br>Come to think of it, sometimes US politicians do the same thing...<br>(Buy American! Even if it's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada, or where-ever.)<br><br>One last thing, don't forget that exposure to high doses of Capsaicin can seriously mess you up, and in some extreme cases, kill.<br>(For example, gassing someone who has asthma.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The active ingredient that makes that pepper so hot is Capsaicin , the same stuff in pepper spray.Is it actually cheaper for them to use the local grown pepper with a variable yield than just using the pure substance with a controlled yield ? The article says they want to use it for troops in cold areas .
This scares me .
It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science .
Just because it tastes hot does n't mean it 'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest .
( In fact , they are more likely to succumb to hypothermia if they try to 'reduce ' the 'heat ' from those peppers by taking off clothes or drinking cold liquids or sucking snow .
) I 'm going to throw out a guess that this is n't about the effectiveness of the pepper , but rather a homegrown movement to use a local product ( in an inferior form ) rather than a possibly foreign product .
Sometimes the politicians in India are know to do stupid things like that.Come to think of it , sometimes US politicians do the same thing... ( Buy American !
Even if it 's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada , or where-ever .
) One last thing , do n't forget that exposure to high doses of Capsaicin can seriously mess you up , and in some extreme cases , kill .
( For example , gassing someone who has asthma .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The active ingredient that makes that pepper so hot is Capsaicin, the same stuff in pepper spray.Is it actually cheaper for them to use the local grown pepper with a variable yield than just using the pure substance with a controlled yield?The article says they want to use it for troops in cold areas.
This scares me.
It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science.
Just because it tastes hot doesn't mean it'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest.
(In fact, they are more likely to succumb to hypothermia if they try to 'reduce' the 'heat' from those peppers by taking off clothes or drinking cold liquids or sucking snow.
)I'm going to throw out a guess that this isn't about the effectiveness of the pepper, but rather a homegrown movement to use a local product (in an inferior form) rather than a possibly foreign product.
Sometimes the politicians in India are know to do stupid things like that.Come to think of it, sometimes US politicians do the same thing...(Buy American!
Even if it's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada, or where-ever.
)One last thing, don't forget that exposure to high doses of Capsaicin can seriously mess you up, and in some extreme cases, kill.
(For example, gassing someone who has asthma.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602288</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1269462960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fine, if you don't want me to use peper spray against you I'll just shoot you in the head with a 9mm pistol.  Wait a second...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fine , if you do n't want me to use peper spray against you I 'll just shoot you in the head with a 9mm pistol .
Wait a second.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fine, if you don't want me to use peper spray against you I'll just shoot you in the head with a 9mm pistol.
Wait a second...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608630</id>
	<title>Re:OK ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269518520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does Dr Pepper stack up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does Dr Pepper stack up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does Dr Pepper stack up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602416</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>NeoSkandranon</author>
	<datestamp>1269463500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not difficult normalize the capsaicin content in the process of extraction, therefore there is nothing inherently inferior about taking this direction. Most herbal extracts specified that the active parts are normalized to X\% +- a bit. Green tea extract would be a good example.</p><p>You could perhaps argue that synthesis is cheaper or whatnot, but you must compare the abundant farmland and no shortage of people to grow them vs having an insdustrial plant and appropriately trained personnel, and so forth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not difficult normalize the capsaicin content in the process of extraction , therefore there is nothing inherently inferior about taking this direction .
Most herbal extracts specified that the active parts are normalized to X \ % + - a bit .
Green tea extract would be a good example.You could perhaps argue that synthesis is cheaper or whatnot , but you must compare the abundant farmland and no shortage of people to grow them vs having an insdustrial plant and appropriately trained personnel , and so forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not difficult normalize the capsaicin content in the process of extraction, therefore there is nothing inherently inferior about taking this direction.
Most herbal extracts specified that the active parts are normalized to X\% +- a bit.
Green tea extract would be a good example.You could perhaps argue that synthesis is cheaper or whatnot, but you must compare the abundant farmland and no shortage of people to grow them vs having an insdustrial plant and appropriately trained personnel, and so forth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602452</id>
	<title>I'm Indian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and will be among the few complaining that this isn't hot enough and asking for more of this pepper when they finally drop the bomb!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and will be among the few complaining that this is n't hot enough and asking for more of this pepper when they finally drop the bomb !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and will be among the few complaining that this isn't hot enough and asking for more of this pepper when they finally drop the bomb!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602564</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>Stele</author>
	<datestamp>1269464040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's a lot of seriously unhealthy-looking people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's a lot of seriously unhealthy-looking people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's a lot of seriously unhealthy-looking people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604602</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269429180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sure hope so, something needs to replace the habenero for serious heat, because the habanero tastes like crap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure hope so , something needs to replace the habenero for serious heat , because the habanero tastes like crap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure hope so, something needs to replace the habenero for serious heat, because the habanero tastes like crap!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31606038</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>MarcQuadra</author>
	<datestamp>1269438660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then I guess I've had war crimes perpetrated on me by Providence Police. I've been sprayed as an innocent bystander twice. Once when a mounted officer sprayed at a bus shelter downtown (there was a fight going on nearby, officers were pretty much spraying into the crowd). The other time was a party where the police announced themselves by spraying -up the stairs- into a crowded room, effectively turning an out-of-hand party into a dangerous encapsulated stampede.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I guess I 've had war crimes perpetrated on me by Providence Police .
I 've been sprayed as an innocent bystander twice .
Once when a mounted officer sprayed at a bus shelter downtown ( there was a fight going on nearby , officers were pretty much spraying into the crowd ) .
The other time was a party where the police announced themselves by spraying -up the stairs- into a crowded room , effectively turning an out-of-hand party into a dangerous encapsulated stampede .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I guess I've had war crimes perpetrated on me by Providence Police.
I've been sprayed as an innocent bystander twice.
Once when a mounted officer sprayed at a bus shelter downtown (there was a fight going on nearby, officers were pretty much spraying into the crowd).
The other time was a party where the police announced themselves by spraying -up the stairs- into a crowded room, effectively turning an out-of-hand party into a dangerous encapsulated stampede.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31613108</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269539940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea the pepper spray is torture has never made sense to me.  It's just pain - it doesn't actually damage you.  Yeah, it can drive you nuts, yeah your body is <i>designed</i> to fear extreme pain because pain=death to your body, whether that is real or not.  But for example, throwing a pepper-bomb into a crowd instead of opening fire on the crowd or spraying someone in the face with pepper-spray instead of shooting them in the face - I don't see how the pepper spray makes the attacker worse off than the bullets do.</p><p>Isn't that a kinder way to subdue a person than a bullet to the brain?  A bullet may be less painful, but it robs you of every future possibility in your life.  There can be no greater harm done to a person than to take his life.  Yet it's a-ok to shoot someone in the head under the Geneva Convention, just as long as you didn't spray them with pepper spray and cause them pain for a few hours?  WTF?</p><p>They say pepper spray is inhumane, but I can't see how it is less humane than a bullet, and a bullet is the only thing allowed.</p><p>Now, if it causes intense pain <i>then</i> kills you, yeah, that's worse than a bullet, because if you are going to die it's better to die quickly.  But not-dieing is better than both.</p><p>If you want to ban certain techniques that's fine, saying you can only use it for large crowd control or whatever, good on ya, but banning it outright seems foolish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea the pepper spray is torture has never made sense to me .
It 's just pain - it does n't actually damage you .
Yeah , it can drive you nuts , yeah your body is designed to fear extreme pain because pain = death to your body , whether that is real or not .
But for example , throwing a pepper-bomb into a crowd instead of opening fire on the crowd or spraying someone in the face with pepper-spray instead of shooting them in the face - I do n't see how the pepper spray makes the attacker worse off than the bullets do.Is n't that a kinder way to subdue a person than a bullet to the brain ?
A bullet may be less painful , but it robs you of every future possibility in your life .
There can be no greater harm done to a person than to take his life .
Yet it 's a-ok to shoot someone in the head under the Geneva Convention , just as long as you did n't spray them with pepper spray and cause them pain for a few hours ?
WTF ? They say pepper spray is inhumane , but I ca n't see how it is less humane than a bullet , and a bullet is the only thing allowed.Now , if it causes intense pain then kills you , yeah , that 's worse than a bullet , because if you are going to die it 's better to die quickly .
But not-dieing is better than both.If you want to ban certain techniques that 's fine , saying you can only use it for large crowd control or whatever , good on ya , but banning it outright seems foolish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea the pepper spray is torture has never made sense to me.
It's just pain - it doesn't actually damage you.
Yeah, it can drive you nuts, yeah your body is designed to fear extreme pain because pain=death to your body, whether that is real or not.
But for example, throwing a pepper-bomb into a crowd instead of opening fire on the crowd or spraying someone in the face with pepper-spray instead of shooting them in the face - I don't see how the pepper spray makes the attacker worse off than the bullets do.Isn't that a kinder way to subdue a person than a bullet to the brain?
A bullet may be less painful, but it robs you of every future possibility in your life.
There can be no greater harm done to a person than to take his life.
Yet it's a-ok to shoot someone in the head under the Geneva Convention, just as long as you didn't spray them with pepper spray and cause them pain for a few hours?
WTF?They say pepper spray is inhumane, but I can't see how it is less humane than a bullet, and a bullet is the only thing allowed.Now, if it causes intense pain then kills you, yeah, that's worse than a bullet, because if you are going to die it's better to die quickly.
But not-dieing is better than both.If you want to ban certain techniques that's fine, saying you can only use it for large crowd control or whatever, good on ya, but banning it outright seems foolish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601680</id>
	<title>Military Application</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw invading Iraq, next time do India. Don't forget the nachos though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw invading Iraq , next time do India .
Do n't forget the nachos though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw invading Iraq, next time do India.
Don't forget the nachos though!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602530</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pepper spray as a war crime?  Seriously?  Yes, it is terrible and everything but that's the point.  The police will give you multiple opportunities for compliance before resorting to their weapons.  As in all uses of force, its use will (or will not) be merited by the circumstances of the situation.  Don't want to get pepper sprayed?  Then don't resist arrest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pepper spray as a war crime ?
Seriously ? Yes , it is terrible and everything but that 's the point .
The police will give you multiple opportunities for compliance before resorting to their weapons .
As in all uses of force , its use will ( or will not ) be merited by the circumstances of the situation .
Do n't want to get pepper sprayed ?
Then do n't resist arrest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pepper spray as a war crime?
Seriously?  Yes, it is terrible and everything but that's the point.
The police will give you multiple opportunities for compliance before resorting to their weapons.
As in all uses of force, its use will (or will not) be merited by the circumstances of the situation.
Don't want to get pepper sprayed?
Then don't resist arrest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602508</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1269463860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've gotten the juice from these things in my eyes (mistake cooking Naga Burgers, see above for recipe) and it burns a bit. My eye watered for almost 5 minutes, and it was rather hard to keep open. I'd not really call it torture though, it wasn't that bad. I'm also very, very used to spice, reaction will vary from person to person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've gotten the juice from these things in my eyes ( mistake cooking Naga Burgers , see above for recipe ) and it burns a bit .
My eye watered for almost 5 minutes , and it was rather hard to keep open .
I 'd not really call it torture though , it was n't that bad .
I 'm also very , very used to spice , reaction will vary from person to person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've gotten the juice from these things in my eyes (mistake cooking Naga Burgers, see above for recipe) and it burns a bit.
My eye watered for almost 5 minutes, and it was rather hard to keep open.
I'd not really call it torture though, it wasn't that bad.
I'm also very, very used to spice, reaction will vary from person to person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602448</id>
	<title>This is stupid</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1269463620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 'hotness' of all peppers is caused by the presence of one particular chemical:  Capsaicin.
<p>
The nature of the pepper is irrelevant unless you are eating the raw pepper.  Pure CAPSAICIN will always have the maximum possible Scoville value of about 16,000,000.
</p><p>
The idea of the 'special' extra hot is moronic.  Anyone can take a regular old jalapeno pepper, distill it's juices down 1,000 time and make something hotter than the Bhut Jolokia.
</p><p>
In fact, law enforcement grade pepper spray is at least 5x worse than even the Bhut Jolokia.
</p><p>
Anyone making a pepper spray looks for the CHEAPEST pepper you can find, on a dollar per Capsaicin basis, not giving a rat's a$$ about hot hot the original pepper was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'hotness ' of all peppers is caused by the presence of one particular chemical : Capsaicin .
The nature of the pepper is irrelevant unless you are eating the raw pepper .
Pure CAPSAICIN will always have the maximum possible Scoville value of about 16,000,000 .
The idea of the 'special ' extra hot is moronic .
Anyone can take a regular old jalapeno pepper , distill it 's juices down 1,000 time and make something hotter than the Bhut Jolokia .
In fact , law enforcement grade pepper spray is at least 5x worse than even the Bhut Jolokia .
Anyone making a pepper spray looks for the CHEAPEST pepper you can find , on a dollar per Capsaicin basis , not giving a rat 's a $ $ about hot hot the original pepper was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'hotness' of all peppers is caused by the presence of one particular chemical:  Capsaicin.
The nature of the pepper is irrelevant unless you are eating the raw pepper.
Pure CAPSAICIN will always have the maximum possible Scoville value of about 16,000,000.
The idea of the 'special' extra hot is moronic.
Anyone can take a regular old jalapeno pepper, distill it's juices down 1,000 time and make something hotter than the Bhut Jolokia.
In fact, law enforcement grade pepper spray is at least 5x worse than even the Bhut Jolokia.
Anyone making a pepper spray looks for the CHEAPEST pepper you can find, on a dollar per Capsaicin basis, not giving a rat's a$$ about hot hot the original pepper was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602670</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, but why?</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1269421260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The hippies will be happy knowing that they are getting doused with organic free trade capsicum rather than some polluting lab created capsicum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The hippies will be happy knowing that they are getting doused with organic free trade capsicum rather than some polluting lab created capsicum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hippies will be happy knowing that they are getting doused with organic free trade capsicum rather than some polluting lab created capsicum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607712</id>
	<title>Missing the point</title>
	<author>tanveer1979</author>
	<datestamp>1269459840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not really being designed as a chemical weapon on the battlefield, but more of an anti terrorist weapon where there can be hostage crisis etc.,<br>For example, to flush out people holed up in caves etc.,<br>Traditionally, you would lob a grenade and kill everyone, hostages included.<br>with a pepper grenade, you would just get everyone on their knees with eyes and lungs burning. So without loss of life, lots of hostage situations can be defused.<br>Its being though of an alternative to tear gas, which is not really very effective in many cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not really being designed as a chemical weapon on the battlefield , but more of an anti terrorist weapon where there can be hostage crisis etc.,For example , to flush out people holed up in caves etc.,Traditionally , you would lob a grenade and kill everyone , hostages included.with a pepper grenade , you would just get everyone on their knees with eyes and lungs burning .
So without loss of life , lots of hostage situations can be defused.Its being though of an alternative to tear gas , which is not really very effective in many cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not really being designed as a chemical weapon on the battlefield, but more of an anti terrorist weapon where there can be hostage crisis etc.,For example, to flush out people holed up in caves etc.,Traditionally, you would lob a grenade and kill everyone, hostages included.with a pepper grenade, you would just get everyone on their knees with eyes and lungs burning.
So without loss of life, lots of hostage situations can be defused.Its being though of an alternative to tear gas, which is not really very effective in many cases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31618648</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269516060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I lived in San Antonio for 9 years and never heard of this restaurant.  I looked online and they are only a few miles from my house, but only existed since 2004.  I guess they've got a good gimmick for getting on TV, but they aren't know much in San Antonio.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I lived in San Antonio for 9 years and never heard of this restaurant .
I looked online and they are only a few miles from my house , but only existed since 2004 .
I guess they 've got a good gimmick for getting on TV , but they are n't know much in San Antonio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lived in San Antonio for 9 years and never heard of this restaurant.
I looked online and they are only a few miles from my house, but only existed since 2004.
I guess they've got a good gimmick for getting on TV, but they aren't know much in San Antonio.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602286</id>
	<title>Pepper Spray</title>
	<author>TheLostSamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1269462960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So... they're trying to make pepper spray?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... they 're trying to make pepper spray ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... they're trying to make pepper spray?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604192</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, but why?</title>
	<author>JobyOne</author>
	<datestamp>1269427440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) You may well be right about that. Pepper spray on a small scale isn't illegal though, but I would imagine dusting a whole city with it might run afoul of international law.</p><p>2) It grows on trees - only valid if the processing to weaponize is easy enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) You may well be right about that .
Pepper spray on a small scale is n't illegal though , but I would imagine dusting a whole city with it might run afoul of international law.2 ) It grows on trees - only valid if the processing to weaponize is easy enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) You may well be right about that.
Pepper spray on a small scale isn't illegal though, but I would imagine dusting a whole city with it might run afoul of international law.2) It grows on trees - only valid if the processing to weaponize is easy enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601926</id>
	<title>Re:Not the Next Hottest</title>
	<author>Thyamine</author>
	<datestamp>1269461520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the Scoville scale measures the actual amount of capsaicin in a pepper.  The test that Scoville himself invented was subjective.  But because of the work he did on it, they named the quantitative units after him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the Scoville scale measures the actual amount of capsaicin in a pepper .
The test that Scoville himself invented was subjective .
But because of the work he did on it , they named the quantitative units after him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the Scoville scale measures the actual amount of capsaicin in a pepper.
The test that Scoville himself invented was subjective.
But because of the work he did on it, they named the quantitative units after him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604324</id>
	<title>Re:Military Application</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1269428040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want good food go to Malaysia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want good food go to Malaysia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want good food go to Malaysia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</id>
	<title>Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>logicassasin</author>
	<datestamp>1269460860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kO7MlHgJLA</p><p>Hopefully that's the right link.</p><p>There's a burger in TX that uses this pepper called the Four Horsemen Burger. As of the taping of this episode of Man Vs Food, only three people had managed to finish one in 25 minutes, with an additional 5 minutes of waiting without liquids. The host of the show became number 4, though it looked like he wasn't going to get past even the first bite.</p><p>Isn't that illegal (internationally) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 3kO7MlHgJLAHopefully that 's the right link.There 's a burger in TX that uses this pepper called the Four Horsemen Burger .
As of the taping of this episode of Man Vs Food , only three people had managed to finish one in 25 minutes , with an additional 5 minutes of waiting without liquids .
The host of the show became number 4 , though it looked like he was n't going to get past even the first bite.Is n't that illegal ( internationally ) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kO7MlHgJLAHopefully that's the right link.There's a burger in TX that uses this pepper called the Four Horsemen Burger.
As of the taping of this episode of Man Vs Food, only three people had managed to finish one in 25 minutes, with an additional 5 minutes of waiting without liquids.
The host of the show became number 4, though it looked like he wasn't going to get past even the first bite.Isn't that illegal (internationally) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620</id>
	<title>Tastes great</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1269460380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read this on military.com this morning. <br> <br>http://www.military.com/news/article/india-to-weaponize-worlds-hottest-chili.html<br> <br>They apparently eat this because it tastes good.  To each his own.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read this on military.com this morning .
http : //www.military.com/news/article/india-to-weaponize-worlds-hottest-chili.html They apparently eat this because it tastes good .
To each his own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read this on military.com this morning.
http://www.military.com/news/article/india-to-weaponize-worlds-hottest-chili.html They apparently eat this because it tastes good.
To each his own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602834</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>ubercam</author>
	<datestamp>1269421980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been in a bar where someone pepper-sprayed somebody else and the place cleared out in minutes. I'm asthmatic but it's mainly allergy induced, and I was coughing like crazy and I couldn't see because my eyes were stinging and watering like crazy. I wasn't even sprayed directly, it was just in the air. At first I didn't know what was happening until I got outside and my mouth felt like it was on fire.</p><p>Not fun for about 5-10 minutes until everything was more or less back to normal. After that, I couldn't imagine being sprayed directly in the face!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been in a bar where someone pepper-sprayed somebody else and the place cleared out in minutes .
I 'm asthmatic but it 's mainly allergy induced , and I was coughing like crazy and I could n't see because my eyes were stinging and watering like crazy .
I was n't even sprayed directly , it was just in the air .
At first I did n't know what was happening until I got outside and my mouth felt like it was on fire.Not fun for about 5-10 minutes until everything was more or less back to normal .
After that , I could n't imagine being sprayed directly in the face !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been in a bar where someone pepper-sprayed somebody else and the place cleared out in minutes.
I'm asthmatic but it's mainly allergy induced, and I was coughing like crazy and I couldn't see because my eyes were stinging and watering like crazy.
I wasn't even sprayed directly, it was just in the air.
At first I didn't know what was happening until I got outside and my mouth felt like it was on fire.Not fun for about 5-10 minutes until everything was more or less back to normal.
After that, I couldn't imagine being sprayed directly in the face!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603134</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>SecurityGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1269423180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This scares me. It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science.</p></div> </blockquote><p>I'm going to go out on a limb and say this doesn't exactly break new ground.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This scares me .
It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science .
I 'm going to go out on a limb and say this does n't exactly break new ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This scares me.
It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say this doesn't exactly break new ground.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603074</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1269422880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In India it's a weapon, in Texas it's a condiment. Yeah, that sounds about right.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In India it 's a weapon , in Texas it 's a condiment .
Yeah , that sounds about right .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In India it's a weapon, in Texas it's a condiment.
Yeah, that sounds about right.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601732</id>
	<title>Interesting idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but will using condiments provide 100\% protection?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but will using condiments provide 100 \ % protection ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but will using condiments provide 100\% protection?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602838</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1269422040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was at our local police college not too long ago.  I thought that the pepper spray was deliciously spicy and that was about it, plenty of other people like myself who aren't effected by it either.  My sinus is completely messed up which makes using it on me, useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was at our local police college not too long ago .
I thought that the pepper spray was deliciously spicy and that was about it , plenty of other people like myself who are n't effected by it either .
My sinus is completely messed up which makes using it on me , useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was at our local police college not too long ago.
I thought that the pepper spray was deliciously spicy and that was about it, plenty of other people like myself who aren't effected by it either.
My sinus is completely messed up which makes using it on me, useless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602342</id>
	<title>from what i read in the press</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1269463140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is that they are making hand grenades with this ghost pepper, have they considered painball guns and instead of paint in the paintballs use powdered or jelled ghost pepper</htmltext>
<tokenext>is that they are making hand grenades with this ghost pepper , have they considered painball guns and instead of paint in the paintballs use powdered or jelled ghost pepper</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is that they are making hand grenades with this ghost pepper, have they considered painball guns and instead of paint in the paintballs use powdered or jelled ghost pepper</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602364</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1269463260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where do you think they get pure capsaicin?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where do you think they get pure capsaicin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where do you think they get pure capsaicin?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603302</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269423780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it is being used for a weapon they have to protect the supply.  If their source is canada and the go to war with the supplier (or an ally) resupply would be impossible .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it is being used for a weapon they have to protect the supply .
If their source is canada and the go to war with the supplier ( or an ally ) resupply would be impossible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it is being used for a weapon they have to protect the supply.
If their source is canada and the go to war with the supplier (or an ally) resupply would be impossible .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601706</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a great plan, but what if the target is carry a nice mango Lassi (yogurt based drink) to counter the heat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a great plan , but what if the target is carry a nice mango Lassi ( yogurt based drink ) to counter the heat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a great plan, but what if the target is carry a nice mango Lassi (yogurt based drink) to counter the heat?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602298</id>
	<title>SCOville units?</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1269463020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And SCOville units are a measurement of how annoying a lawsuit is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And SCOville units are a measurement of how annoying a lawsuit is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And SCOville units are a measurement of how annoying a lawsuit is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31606846</id>
	<title>Point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the wiki article;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville\_heat\_units, it say that law enforcement grade pepper spray is five times as strong as the bhut jolokia so what the point?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the wiki article ; http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville \ _heat \ _units , it say that law enforcement grade pepper spray is five times as strong as the bhut jolokia so what the point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the wiki article;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville\_heat\_units, it say that law enforcement grade pepper spray is five times as strong as the bhut jolokia so what the point?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605562</id>
	<title>What about cow Vindaloo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269435120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about cow Vindaloo?  That was enough to drive a T\_Rex crazy!  Ask Lister or Rimmer about that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about cow Vindaloo ?
That was enough to drive a T \ _Rex crazy !
Ask Lister or Rimmer about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about cow Vindaloo?
That was enough to drive a T\_Rex crazy!
Ask Lister or Rimmer about that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604400</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>The Mighty Buzzard</author>
	<datestamp>1269428340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not cruel and unusual if there are people out there who will pay for the experience.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not cruel and unusual if there are people out there who will pay for the experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not cruel and unusual if there are people out there who will pay for the experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601728</id>
	<title>Gas! Gas! Gas!</title>
	<author>Guppy</author>
	<datestamp>1269460800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They could try weaponizing extra-spicy Chana Masala too, but that might violate the Chemical Weapons Convention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could try weaponizing extra-spicy Chana Masala too , but that might violate the Chemical Weapons Convention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could try weaponizing extra-spicy Chana Masala too, but that might violate the Chemical Weapons Convention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602246</id>
	<title>What's the point?</title>
	<author>Andy Dodd</author>
	<datestamp>1269462780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are already well established techniques for concentrating/purifying capsaicin.</p><p>It's even done commercially for non-weapons uses, plenty of hot sauces have Scoville ratings well above that of any natural pepper - <a href="http://www.hotsauceworld.com/bl6amrepeexe.html" title="hotsauceworld.com">http://www.hotsauceworld.com/bl6amrepeexe.html</a> [hotsauceworld.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are already well established techniques for concentrating/purifying capsaicin.It 's even done commercially for non-weapons uses , plenty of hot sauces have Scoville ratings well above that of any natural pepper - http : //www.hotsauceworld.com/bl6amrepeexe.html [ hotsauceworld.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are already well established techniques for concentrating/purifying capsaicin.It's even done commercially for non-weapons uses, plenty of hot sauces have Scoville ratings well above that of any natural pepper - http://www.hotsauceworld.com/bl6amrepeexe.html [hotsauceworld.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603224</id>
	<title>We have proof !</title>
	<author>burni2</author>
	<datestamp>1269423480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we have to invade india, they posses nuclear, chemical(ghost pepper) and biological(*) weapons.</p><p>(*) River Ghanges - half burned dead bodies, shit, etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we have to invade india , they posses nuclear , chemical ( ghost pepper ) and biological ( * ) weapons .
( * ) River Ghanges - half burned dead bodies , shit , etc . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we have to invade india, they posses nuclear, chemical(ghost pepper) and biological(*) weapons.
(*) River Ghanges - half burned dead bodies, shit, etc ..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603150</id>
	<title>The more interesting question for pepperheads</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1269423180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that mean I cannot import them anymore since I would have to ask the EU whether it's ok for me to import that military hardware, and they're routinely rubberstamping such requests with "no"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean I can not import them anymore since I would have to ask the EU whether it 's ok for me to import that military hardware , and they 're routinely rubberstamping such requests with " no " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean I cannot import them anymore since I would have to ask the EU whether it's ok for me to import that military hardware, and they're routinely rubberstamping such requests with "no"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718</id>
	<title>Not needed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From past experience I can recommened the development of a chicken Vindaloo bomb.  It will cause injuries when dropped then again about 24 hours later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From past experience I can recommened the development of a chicken Vindaloo bomb .
It will cause injuries when dropped then again about 24 hours later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From past experience I can recommened the development of a chicken Vindaloo bomb.
It will cause injuries when dropped then again about 24 hours later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602054</id>
	<title>What's the news here?</title>
	<author>Excelcia</author>
	<datestamp>1269462060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pepper spray manufacturers have long been extracting pure capsaicinoids to put in their products.  It doesn't matter how hot the supplying pepper is, once the capsaicinoid is extracted and purified it has a rating of from 8m-16m scoville heat units (depending on which capsaicinoid they're extracting).  OC sprays and grenades dilute that down to about 5m when they use it.  So whether the capsiacinoid comes from the "legendary ghost pepper" or a pimento, it doesn't really matter.  There is nothing new here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pepper spray manufacturers have long been extracting pure capsaicinoids to put in their products .
It does n't matter how hot the supplying pepper is , once the capsaicinoid is extracted and purified it has a rating of from 8m-16m scoville heat units ( depending on which capsaicinoid they 're extracting ) .
OC sprays and grenades dilute that down to about 5m when they use it .
So whether the capsiacinoid comes from the " legendary ghost pepper " or a pimento , it does n't really matter .
There is nothing new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pepper spray manufacturers have long been extracting pure capsaicinoids to put in their products.
It doesn't matter how hot the supplying pepper is, once the capsaicinoid is extracted and purified it has a rating of from 8m-16m scoville heat units (depending on which capsaicinoid they're extracting).
OC sprays and grenades dilute that down to about 5m when they use it.
So whether the capsiacinoid comes from the "legendary ghost pepper" or a pimento, it doesn't really matter.
There is nothing new here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602876</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"(Buy American! Even if it's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada, or where-ever.)"</p><p>Come on... when the hell was the last time you heard any politician say "buy American"?  I bet you haven't heard it since the 80s, since nobody has said it since the 80s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ( Buy American !
Even if it 's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada , or where-ever .
) " Come on... when the hell was the last time you heard any politician say " buy American " ?
I bet you have n't heard it since the 80s , since nobody has said it since the 80s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"(Buy American!
Even if it's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada, or where-ever.
)"Come on... when the hell was the last time you heard any politician say "buy American"?
I bet you haven't heard it since the 80s, since nobody has said it since the 80s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602830</id>
	<title>I saw that movie...</title>
	<author>Antiocheian</author>
	<datestamp>1269421980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw the "Spices" movie. It was terrible. A hot chick constantly praising "Spices, oh thank you Spices".</p><p>Total bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw the " Spices " movie .
It was terrible .
A hot chick constantly praising " Spices , oh thank you Spices " .Total bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw the "Spices" movie.
It was terrible.
A hot chick constantly praising "Spices, oh thank you Spices".Total bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602908</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing about capsaicin is that you can grow your tolerance to ridiculous levels. Another thing is that people who haven't done so have ridiculously low tolerance<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Some notes about interesting things:</p><p>1) Rule about "contaminating" body parts with chillies: the pain that burns twice as hard burns for half as long.<br>2) Seriously? The cheapest capsaicin I've found is in the form of 5M SHU extract over internet and I live in socialist northern european nanny state for goddess' sake.<br>3) You read that from the Dave's bottle, didn't you? It's a joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing about capsaicin is that you can grow your tolerance to ridiculous levels .
Another thing is that people who have n't done so have ridiculously low tolerance ; ) Some notes about interesting things : 1 ) Rule about " contaminating " body parts with chillies : the pain that burns twice as hard burns for half as long.2 ) Seriously ?
The cheapest capsaicin I 've found is in the form of 5M SHU extract over internet and I live in socialist northern european nanny state for goddess ' sake.3 ) You read that from the Dave 's bottle , did n't you ?
It 's a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing about capsaicin is that you can grow your tolerance to ridiculous levels.
Another thing is that people who haven't done so have ridiculously low tolerance ;)Some notes about interesting things:1) Rule about "contaminating" body parts with chillies: the pain that burns twice as hard burns for half as long.2) Seriously?
The cheapest capsaicin I've found is in the form of 5M SHU extract over internet and I live in socialist northern european nanny state for goddess' sake.3) You read that from the Dave's bottle, didn't you?
It's a joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924</id>
	<title>Re:Tastes great</title>
	<author>Raul654</author>
	<datestamp>1269461520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back when I was working in New Mexico, there was a fair in Taos. One of the guys there was selling Dave's hot sauces, including their new ghost pepper variety. I bought the "temporary insanity" (57,000 scoville units according to <a href="http://www.gourmetmikes.com/dateinsa.html" title="gourmetmikes.com">this</a> [gourmetmikes.com]), and it's too hot for me except small doses. About a year later, the bottle is still mostly full.</p><p>My roommate, who has a much higher threshold for spicy food than anyone I've ever met, brought the newly unveiled ghost pepper brand (2.5 million scoville units, according to the bottle, if memory serves).</p><p>The dealer gave us a taste of it (a tiny drop on the tip of a toothpick) and my god did it burn.</p><p>The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.  (3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.</p><p>In short - ghost peppers are not something you play around with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back when I was working in New Mexico , there was a fair in Taos .
One of the guys there was selling Dave 's hot sauces , including their new ghost pepper variety .
I bought the " temporary insanity " ( 57,000 scoville units according to this [ gourmetmikes.com ] ) , and it 's too hot for me except small doses .
About a year later , the bottle is still mostly full.My roommate , who has a much higher threshold for spicy food than anyone I 've ever met , brought the newly unveiled ghost pepper brand ( 2.5 million scoville units , according to the bottle , if memory serves ) .The dealer gave us a taste of it ( a tiny drop on the tip of a toothpick ) and my god did it burn.The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it : ( 1 ) It instantly blisters skin on contact ( 2 ) it 's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel .
( 3 ) Not only is it good for eating , but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways , engines , etc.In short - ghost peppers are not something you play around with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back when I was working in New Mexico, there was a fair in Taos.
One of the guys there was selling Dave's hot sauces, including their new ghost pepper variety.
I bought the "temporary insanity" (57,000 scoville units according to this [gourmetmikes.com]), and it's too hot for me except small doses.
About a year later, the bottle is still mostly full.My roommate, who has a much higher threshold for spicy food than anyone I've ever met, brought the newly unveiled ghost pepper brand (2.5 million scoville units, according to the bottle, if memory serves).The dealer gave us a taste of it (a tiny drop on the tip of a toothpick) and my god did it burn.The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel.
(3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.In short - ghost peppers are not something you play around with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31612842</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough?</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1269539040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just because it tastes hot doesn't mean it'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest.</p></div><p>Actually capsaicin tricks your body into thinking it is warmer than it actually is - that's why hot food makes you sweat.  In fact the reason so many people in hot climates eat spicy food is because it tricks your body into thinking it is warmer, which cranks up your body's natural <i>cooling</i> mechanism, actually cooling you off significantly for several hours.</p><p>In cold weather, this is the exact <i>opposite</i> of what you want if you intend people to survive in extreme conditions.  You want circulation to your extremities to essentially stop, and all heat to stay in your core.  What they may be going for, however, is making their troops more capable of doing work in cold weather, which the increased circulation triggered by the capsaicin would do at the cost of losing body heat more quickly.  Alcohol does the same thing, which is why drinking in cold weather makes you feel warm.  Alcohol has the obvious side-effect of inebriation, however, so that's out.</p><p>It all depends on what you're after.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because it tastes hot does n't mean it 'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest.Actually capsaicin tricks your body into thinking it is warmer than it actually is - that 's why hot food makes you sweat .
In fact the reason so many people in hot climates eat spicy food is because it tricks your body into thinking it is warmer , which cranks up your body 's natural cooling mechanism , actually cooling you off significantly for several hours.In cold weather , this is the exact opposite of what you want if you intend people to survive in extreme conditions .
You want circulation to your extremities to essentially stop , and all heat to stay in your core .
What they may be going for , however , is making their troops more capable of doing work in cold weather , which the increased circulation triggered by the capsaicin would do at the cost of losing body heat more quickly .
Alcohol does the same thing , which is why drinking in cold weather makes you feel warm .
Alcohol has the obvious side-effect of inebriation , however , so that 's out.It all depends on what you 're after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because it tastes hot doesn't mean it'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest.Actually capsaicin tricks your body into thinking it is warmer than it actually is - that's why hot food makes you sweat.
In fact the reason so many people in hot climates eat spicy food is because it tricks your body into thinking it is warmer, which cranks up your body's natural cooling mechanism, actually cooling you off significantly for several hours.In cold weather, this is the exact opposite of what you want if you intend people to survive in extreme conditions.
You want circulation to your extremities to essentially stop, and all heat to stay in your core.
What they may be going for, however, is making their troops more capable of doing work in cold weather, which the increased circulation triggered by the capsaicin would do at the cost of losing body heat more quickly.
Alcohol does the same thing, which is why drinking in cold weather makes you feel warm.
Alcohol has the obvious side-effect of inebriation, however, so that's out.It all depends on what you're after.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601892</id>
	<title>Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX</title>
	<author>Cocoronixx</author>
	<datestamp>1269461460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that Pepper spray is considered a chemical weapon and is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention (which India signed &amp; ratified). I'd assume that this would fall under the same ban.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper\_spray" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper\_spray</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical\_Weapons\_Convention" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical\_Weapons\_Convention</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that Pepper spray is considered a chemical weapon and is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention ( which India signed &amp; ratified ) .
I 'd assume that this would fall under the same ban.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper \ _spray [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical \ _Weapons \ _Convention [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that Pepper spray is considered a chemical weapon and is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention (which India signed &amp; ratified).
I'd assume that this would fall under the same ban.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper\_spray [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical\_Weapons\_Convention [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602946</id>
	<title>Re:Pepper spray is torturous.</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1269422340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If used in war, it is actually a war crime, since it's a chemical weapon banned under the chemical weapon convention.</p><p>Use in domestic policing isn't covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention, so pepper spray used by your local police dept isn't a war crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If used in war , it is actually a war crime , since it 's a chemical weapon banned under the chemical weapon convention.Use in domestic policing is n't covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention , so pepper spray used by your local police dept is n't a war crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If used in war, it is actually a war crime, since it's a chemical weapon banned under the chemical weapon convention.Use in domestic policing isn't covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention, so pepper spray used by your local police dept isn't a war crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605294</id>
	<title>Re:Call me juvenile ...</title>
	<author>VorlonFog</author>
	<datestamp>1269433380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't laugh, the term's already been used : <a href="http://www.buttpaste.com/BLButtPaste.php" title="buttpaste.com">http://www.buttpaste.com/BLButtPaste.php</a> [buttpaste.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't laugh , the term 's already been used : http : //www.buttpaste.com/BLButtPaste.php [ buttpaste.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't laugh, the term's already been used : http://www.buttpaste.com/BLButtPaste.php [buttpaste.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602290</id>
	<title>Pepper Abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269462960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before some sicko puts one of these peppers in a cat's anus.  Don't lie and say you weren't thinking the same exact question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before some sicko puts one of these peppers in a cat 's anus .
Do n't lie and say you were n't thinking the same exact question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before some sicko puts one of these peppers in a cat's anus.
Don't lie and say you weren't thinking the same exact question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602432</id>
	<title>Re:What's the news here?</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269463560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention that the capsaicinoid levels in a pepper are highly variable due to growing regions and conditions.  In some regions of India the pepper isn't as hot even though it is the same species.  Add to that the amount of rain, sun, etc. all affect levels of the chemical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that the capsaicinoid levels in a pepper are highly variable due to growing regions and conditions .
In some regions of India the pepper is n't as hot even though it is the same species .
Add to that the amount of rain , sun , etc .
all affect levels of the chemical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that the capsaicinoid levels in a pepper are highly variable due to growing regions and conditions.
In some regions of India the pepper isn't as hot even though it is the same species.
Add to that the amount of rain, sun, etc.
all affect levels of the chemical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602054</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31613108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31612842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31606038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31618648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1830205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602530
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31613108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31606038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31612842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31618648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604186
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31607896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31603150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31605694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31608268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31604468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31601926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1830205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1830205.31602356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
