<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_0118228</id>
	<title>New Legislation Would Crack Down On Online Criminal Havens</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269445380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"The Hill reports that Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) have introduced a bill that would <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/88555-new-cybercrime-bill-would-penalize-safe-havens-for-hackers">penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals</a> operating within their borders. Under the bill the White House would have the responsibility of identifying countries that pose cyber threats and the president would have to present to Congress in an annual report. Countries identified as 'hacker havens' would then have to develop plans of action to combat cybercrimes or risk cuts to their US export dollars, foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants. Numerous American employers, including Cisco, HP, Microsoft, Symantec, PayPal, eBay, McAfee, American Express, Mastercard and Visa, as well as Facebook, are <a href="http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&amp;PressRelease\_id=8bcbfb97-1b78-be3e-e0e3-58aed09a749a&amp;Month=3&amp;Year=2010">supporting the Senators' legislation</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " The Hill reports that Senators Orrin Hatch ( R-Utah ) and Kirsten Gillibrand ( D-NY ) have introduced a bill that would penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals operating within their borders .
Under the bill the White House would have the responsibility of identifying countries that pose cyber threats and the president would have to present to Congress in an annual report .
Countries identified as 'hacker havens ' would then have to develop plans of action to combat cybercrimes or risk cuts to their US export dollars , foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants .
Numerous American employers , including Cisco , HP , Microsoft , Symantec , PayPal , eBay , McAfee , American Express , Mastercard and Visa , as well as Facebook , are supporting the Senators ' legislation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "The Hill reports that Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) have introduced a bill that would penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals operating within their borders.
Under the bill the White House would have the responsibility of identifying countries that pose cyber threats and the president would have to present to Congress in an annual report.
Countries identified as 'hacker havens' would then have to develop plans of action to combat cybercrimes or risk cuts to their US export dollars, foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants.
Numerous American employers, including Cisco, HP, Microsoft, Symantec, PayPal, eBay, McAfee, American Express, Mastercard and Visa, as well as Facebook, are supporting the Senators' legislation.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594568</id>
	<title>Re:You know...</title>
	<author>0123456</author>
	<datestamp>1269372780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.</p></div><p>If a government has passed a law which can be abused and hasn't abused it, that just means they haven't got around to it yet.</p><p>For example, I remember when British anti-terrorist laws were only going to be used against, like, terrorists, and not Icelandic banks and people who over-fill their garbage bins. Or when speed cameras were only going to be installed at accident blackspots. And the 1920 Firearms Act was not going to be used to ban gun ownership, merely ensure that they would only be in the hands of decent law-abiding people.</p><p>In fact, it's hard to think of a British law which can be abused which hasn't been; I doubt that America is very different.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you ca n't assume it will.If a government has passed a law which can be abused and has n't abused it , that just means they have n't got around to it yet.For example , I remember when British anti-terrorist laws were only going to be used against , like , terrorists , and not Icelandic banks and people who over-fill their garbage bins .
Or when speed cameras were only going to be installed at accident blackspots .
And the 1920 Firearms Act was not going to be used to ban gun ownership , merely ensure that they would only be in the hands of decent law-abiding people.In fact , it 's hard to think of a British law which can be abused which has n't been ; I doubt that America is very different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.If a government has passed a law which can be abused and hasn't abused it, that just means they haven't got around to it yet.For example, I remember when British anti-terrorist laws were only going to be used against, like, terrorists, and not Icelandic banks and people who over-fill their garbage bins.
Or when speed cameras were only going to be installed at accident blackspots.
And the 1920 Firearms Act was not going to be used to ban gun ownership, merely ensure that they would only be in the hands of decent law-abiding people.In fact, it's hard to think of a British law which can be abused which hasn't been; I doubt that America is very different.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594030</id>
	<title>If You Knew Orrin</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1269366300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>like i knew orrin, you'd wonder if this is really his way of setting up draconian ip enforcement for his hollywood pals' he's never been able to do otherwise. is it a secret hatch to hollywood?</htmltext>
<tokenext>like i knew orrin , you 'd wonder if this is really his way of setting up draconian ip enforcement for his hollywood pals ' he 's never been able to do otherwise .
is it a secret hatch to hollywood ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like i knew orrin, you'd wonder if this is really his way of setting up draconian ip enforcement for his hollywood pals' he's never been able to do otherwise.
is it a secret hatch to hollywood?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31604904</id>
	<title>This is targeted really at killing Wilikeaks.</title>
	<author>austinhook</author>
	<datestamp>1269430920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This legislation is primarily focused at killing Wikileaks. The rest is just a smokescreen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This legislation is primarily focused at killing Wikileaks .
The rest is just a smokescreen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This legislation is primarily focused at killing Wikileaks.
The rest is just a smokescreen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nations routinely "attack" each-other economically over trade-related issues in the form of tariffs, duties, quotas, et al. Has nothing to do imperialism or your hatred for America.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nations routinely " attack " each-other economically over trade-related issues in the form of tariffs , duties , quotas , et al .
Has nothing to do imperialism or your hatred for America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nations routinely "attack" each-other economically over trade-related issues in the form of tariffs, duties, quotas, et al.
Has nothing to do imperialism or your hatred for America.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593666</id>
	<title>This is a bad legislation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269363360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As shown with the Special 301 list which stated the Canada was needing to update copyright laws (which could label Canada a criminal haven since it doesn't have a DMCA). After it was issued about Canada being in the wrong, <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/20/0348239/Tech-Companies-Say-Dont-Blame-Canada-For-Copyright-Problems?art\_pos=7" title="slashdot.org">many companies publicly stated otherwise.</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>As shown with the Special 301 list which stated the Canada was needing to update copyright laws ( which could label Canada a criminal haven since it does n't have a DMCA ) .
After it was issued about Canada being in the wrong , many companies publicly stated otherwise .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As shown with the Special 301 list which stated the Canada was needing to update copyright laws (which could label Canada a criminal haven since it doesn't have a DMCA).
After it was issued about Canada being in the wrong, many companies publicly stated otherwise.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596892</id>
	<title>Watch out Canada...</title>
	<author>Firemouth</author>
	<datestamp>1269442380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're going to replace you with a giant red and blue flasher, and a pair of sirens!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're going to replace you with a giant red and blue flasher , and a pair of sirens !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're going to replace you with a giant red and blue flasher, and a pair of sirens!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593816</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1269364440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA summarized:  "If people from your country attack us, and you won't do anything about it, we won't trade with you so much."</p><p>How horribly fascist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA summarized : " If people from your country attack us , and you wo n't do anything about it , we wo n't trade with you so much .
" How horribly fascist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA summarized:  "If people from your country attack us, and you won't do anything about it, we won't trade with you so much.
"How horribly fascist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594078</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269366720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.  Take a look at the two pushing this bill: Hatch in particular has a history of supporting idiotic things like allowing copyright holders to destroy property of suspected infringers and Gillibrand has a hostory of taking large campaign contributions from parties directly related to legislation she was involved in.  It therefore shouldn't be terribly surprising that these two were involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
Take a look at the two pushing this bill : Hatch in particular has a history of supporting idiotic things like allowing copyright holders to destroy property of suspected infringers and Gillibrand has a hostory of taking large campaign contributions from parties directly related to legislation she was involved in .
It therefore should n't be terribly surprising that these two were involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
Take a look at the two pushing this bill: Hatch in particular has a history of supporting idiotic things like allowing copyright holders to destroy property of suspected infringers and Gillibrand has a hostory of taking large campaign contributions from parties directly related to legislation she was involved in.
It therefore shouldn't be terribly surprising that these two were involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31598116</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1269447600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay.</p></div><p>I doubt that the Scandinavian countries, which are self sufficient and reasonably wealthy by themselves, receive much foreign direct investment funds or trade assistance grants. I suppose that sanctions against their exports are possible (i.e. more expensive Ikea furniture or some such), but that would be counter-productive given the realities of the European Union and cross border European commerce and trade.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay.I doubt that the Scandinavian countries , which are self sufficient and reasonably wealthy by themselves , receive much foreign direct investment funds or trade assistance grants .
I suppose that sanctions against their exports are possible ( i.e .
more expensive Ikea furniture or some such ) , but that would be counter-productive given the realities of the European Union and cross border European commerce and trade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay.I doubt that the Scandinavian countries, which are self sufficient and reasonably wealthy by themselves, receive much foreign direct investment funds or trade assistance grants.
I suppose that sanctions against their exports are possible (i.e.
more expensive Ikea furniture or some such), but that would be counter-productive given the realities of the European Union and cross border European commerce and trade.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595718</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1269434160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno about that, I can see penalties against Nigeria happening. It would be interesting to see how tough they get with China and Russia which seem to be the biggest cybercrime havens. I'm sooooo f*ckin sure man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno about that , I can see penalties against Nigeria happening .
It would be interesting to see how tough they get with China and Russia which seem to be the biggest cybercrime havens .
I 'm sooooo f * ckin sure man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno about that, I can see penalties against Nigeria happening.
It would be interesting to see how tough they get with China and Russia which seem to be the biggest cybercrime havens.
I'm sooooo f*ckin sure man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594068</id>
	<title>exactly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269366600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>i bet all the people defending this, and the general foreign policy of acting like the cops of the world, would be outraged at the thought of having to follow canadian, french, russian, ect. law. They would probably call for a military strike of London if the shoe was on the other foot. Fucking hypocrites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i bet all the people defending this , and the general foreign policy of acting like the cops of the world , would be outraged at the thought of having to follow canadian , french , russian , ect .
law. They would probably call for a military strike of London if the shoe was on the other foot .
Fucking hypocrites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i bet all the people defending this, and the general foreign policy of acting like the cops of the world, would be outraged at the thought of having to follow canadian, french, russian, ect.
law. They would probably call for a military strike of London if the shoe was on the other foot.
Fucking hypocrites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594940</id>
	<title>Re:Well</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1269424380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I'm sure the UK will be on the right side of that law once our politicians completely ignore the Digital Economy Bill and end up accepting ACTA...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'm sure the UK will be on the right side of that law once our politicians completely ignore the Digital Economy Bill and end up accepting ACTA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I'm sure the UK will be on the right side of that law once our politicians completely ignore the Digital Economy Bill and end up accepting ACTA...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31600016</id>
	<title>Re:You know...</title>
	<author>Lithdren</author>
	<datestamp>1269454440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I will support this legistation, as soon as we can agree to stop any and all trade with China on Human Rights Violations full-stop, because human rights violations are vastly more important then cyber crime.

Untill that happends, shut your yap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I will support this legistation , as soon as we can agree to stop any and all trade with China on Human Rights Violations full-stop , because human rights violations are vastly more important then cyber crime .
Untill that happends , shut your yap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will support this legistation, as soon as we can agree to stop any and all trade with China on Human Rights Violations full-stop, because human rights violations are vastly more important then cyber crime.
Untill that happends, shut your yap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593862</id>
	<title>More like the Pot calling the kettle black</title>
	<author>Burz</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scads of cyber criminals and spies here in the good ole USA? Say it ain't so!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scads of cyber criminals and spies here in the good ole USA ?
Say it ai n't so !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scads of cyber criminals and spies here in the good ole USA?
Say it ain't so!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594398</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1269370260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Imperialist America strikes again!</p></div><p>We outsourced imperialism awhile ago. We're mostly consultants now for other countries. Didn't you get the memo?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/not joking</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imperialist America strikes again ! We outsourced imperialism awhile ago .
We 're mostly consultants now for other countries .
Did n't you get the memo ?
/not joking</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imperialist America strikes again!We outsourced imperialism awhile ago.
We're mostly consultants now for other countries.
Didn't you get the memo?
/not joking
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594116</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>tvz</author>
	<datestamp>1269367080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is nothing but a attempt to limit free speech on the internet. We figured out that cyberwar bullshit is a good enough reason to make developing countries filter, monitor, and log web access, basically set up their own little great firewall or lose US funding i.e. starve to death. This bill has little to do with hackers it's mainly to suppress the oppressed and enforce globalism. Free speech in developing countries is dangerous to the corporations exploiting them such as the ones backing this serious human rights abuse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nothing but a attempt to limit free speech on the internet .
We figured out that cyberwar bullshit is a good enough reason to make developing countries filter , monitor , and log web access , basically set up their own little great firewall or lose US funding i.e .
starve to death .
This bill has little to do with hackers it 's mainly to suppress the oppressed and enforce globalism .
Free speech in developing countries is dangerous to the corporations exploiting them such as the ones backing this serious human rights abuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nothing but a attempt to limit free speech on the internet.
We figured out that cyberwar bullshit is a good enough reason to make developing countries filter, monitor, and log web access, basically set up their own little great firewall or lose US funding i.e.
starve to death.
This bill has little to do with hackers it's mainly to suppress the oppressed and enforce globalism.
Free speech in developing countries is dangerous to the corporations exploiting them such as the ones backing this serious human rights abuse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31621336</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>BillMike</author>
	<datestamp>1269532440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Support!

<a href="http://www.mytiffanycvs.com/" title="mytiffanycvs.com" rel="nofollow">Discount tiffany jewelry</a> [mytiffanycvs.com]
<a href="http://www.mytiffanycvs.com/" title="mytiffanycvs.com" rel="nofollow"> </a> [mytiffanycvs.com]<a href="http://www.mytiffanycvs.com/" title="mytiffanycvs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytiffanycvs.com/</a> [mytiffanycvs.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Support !
Discount tiffany jewelry [ mytiffanycvs.com ] [ mytiffanycvs.com ] http : //www.mytiffanycvs.com/ [ mytiffanycvs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Support!
Discount tiffany jewelry [mytiffanycvs.com]
  [mytiffanycvs.com]http://www.mytiffanycvs.com/ [mytiffanycvs.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594606</id>
	<title>Police ?</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269373260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The US still acting as the world's cop ? This is a thought model of the Bush era. Aged and provenly not working, that is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The US still acting as the world 's cop ?
This is a thought model of the Bush era .
Aged and provenly not working , that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US still acting as the world's cop ?
This is a thought model of the Bush era.
Aged and provenly not working, that is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595270</id>
	<title>while there's still time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-d5x-CiTUs" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-d5x-CiTUs</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = o-d5x-CiTUs [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-d5x-CiTUs [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593814</id>
	<title>The last gasp attempts</title>
	<author>future assassin</author>
	<datestamp>1269364440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>from a dying empire. Threaten anyone and every one to fall in line like the tyrants citizen citizens and encroach on others sovereignty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>from a dying empire .
Threaten anyone and every one to fall in line like the tyrants citizen citizens and encroach on others sovereignty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from a dying empire.
Threaten anyone and every one to fall in line like the tyrants citizen citizens and encroach on others sovereignty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595096</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1269427140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wow. "Obey our laws or else!" Imperialist America strikes again!</i></p><p>You mean "Crack down on people ripping us off or we'll stop sending you shit"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
" Obey our laws or else !
" Imperialist America strikes again ! You mean " Crack down on people ripping us off or we 'll stop sending you shit "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
"Obey our laws or else!
" Imperialist America strikes again!You mean "Crack down on people ripping us off or we'll stop sending you shit"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593848</id>
	<title>Re:Well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh? Are you sure they don't mean botnet command centers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh ?
Are you sure they do n't mean botnet command centers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh?
Are you sure they don't mean botnet command centers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269367080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperialism" title="merriam-webster.com">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperialism</a> [merriam-webster.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Main Entry: imperialism<br>Function: noun<br>Date: 1800</p><p>1 : imperial government, authority, or system<br>2 : the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or <i>by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas; broadly : the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence</i></p> </div><p>If you don't think forcing another country to obey our laws by violating their national sovereignty through political and military influence isn't imperialism, <b>you're fucking stupid.</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperialism [ merriam-webster.com ] Main Entry : imperialismFunction : nounDate : 18001 : imperial government , authority , or system2 : the policy , practice , or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas ; broadly : the extension or imposition of power , authority , or influence If you do n't think forcing another country to obey our laws by violating their national sovereignty through political and military influence is n't imperialism , you 're fucking stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperialism [merriam-webster.com] Main Entry: imperialismFunction: nounDate: 18001 : imperial government, authority, or system2 : the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas; broadly : the extension or imposition of power, authority, or influence If you don't think forcing another country to obey our laws by violating their national sovereignty through political and military influence isn't imperialism, you're fucking stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594884</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1269421380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If making decisions about whether or not to trade with different countries is imperialism, then all countries are empires.  I'm not thrilled about this legislation, but you're just crying wolf here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If making decisions about whether or not to trade with different countries is imperialism , then all countries are empires .
I 'm not thrilled about this legislation , but you 're just crying wolf here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If making decisions about whether or not to trade with different countries is imperialism, then all countries are empires.
I'm not thrilled about this legislation, but you're just crying wolf here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593920</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow. "Obey our laws or else!" Imperialist America strikes again!</p></div><p>How else do you expect these things to work?<br>The money and business opportunities we send there way is soft power.<br>And the threat of removing that money is hard power.</p><p>If [Country] doesn't like our policies, they can always align themselves with Russia or China.</p><p>P.S. Sorry Canada</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
" Obey our laws or else !
" Imperialist America strikes again ! How else do you expect these things to work ? The money and business opportunities we send there way is soft power.And the threat of removing that money is hard power.If [ Country ] does n't like our policies , they can always align themselves with Russia or China.P.S .
Sorry Canada</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
"Obey our laws or else!
" Imperialist America strikes again!How else do you expect these things to work?The money and business opportunities we send there way is soft power.And the threat of removing that money is hard power.If [Country] doesn't like our policies, they can always align themselves with Russia or China.P.S.
Sorry Canada
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593696</id>
	<title>Good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269363600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see how serious they are. How about starting with China?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see how serious they are .
How about starting with China ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see how serious they are.
How about starting with China?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595046</id>
	<title>Wrong solution.</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1269426420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The solution would be more resiliant systems because there will be a time when those bugs, holes and security issues, both technical and social, will be used by foreign governments. Going after the small people like carders etc is not the answer to the real problem, complete lack of any security responsibility from the various vendors.</p><p>Im actually grateful that "cyber criminals" exist because without them it security would be if possible even worse than today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The solution would be more resiliant systems because there will be a time when those bugs , holes and security issues , both technical and social , will be used by foreign governments .
Going after the small people like carders etc is not the answer to the real problem , complete lack of any security responsibility from the various vendors.Im actually grateful that " cyber criminals " exist because without them it security would be if possible even worse than today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The solution would be more resiliant systems because there will be a time when those bugs, holes and security issues, both technical and social, will be used by foreign governments.
Going after the small people like carders etc is not the answer to the real problem, complete lack of any security responsibility from the various vendors.Im actually grateful that "cyber criminals" exist because without them it security would be if possible even worse than today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594162</id>
	<title>Re:Not want to be bitching...</title>
	<author>XeroSine</author>
	<datestamp>1269367380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well look at who's in office......mr arrogance himself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well look at who 's in office......mr arrogance himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well look at who's in office......mr arrogance himself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593686</id>
	<title>Here we go again...</title>
	<author>whitespiral</author>
	<datestamp>1269363540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just like child porn, cybercrime is another excuse to go after their real goal: Dictate who does what on the web. Soon after, they'll say file sharing is cybercrime, and they will twist another country's arm to impose their ACTA crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like child porn , cybercrime is another excuse to go after their real goal : Dictate who does what on the web .
Soon after , they 'll say file sharing is cybercrime , and they will twist another country 's arm to impose their ACTA crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like child porn, cybercrime is another excuse to go after their real goal: Dictate who does what on the web.
Soon after, they'll say file sharing is cybercrime, and they will twist another country's arm to impose their ACTA crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594344</id>
	<title>Re:This is not about hacker havens</title>
	<author>NetNed</author>
	<datestamp>1269369480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the next racket reminiscent of "The War on Drugs" that never ends and sucks money like vacuum cleaner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the next racket reminiscent of " The War on Drugs " that never ends and sucks money like vacuum cleaner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the next racket reminiscent of "The War on Drugs" that never ends and sucks money like vacuum cleaner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31599248</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269451560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...you're fucking stupid"</p><p>Says the person that hasn't yet mastered double-negatives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...you 're fucking stupid " Says the person that has n't yet mastered double-negatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...you're fucking stupid"Says the person that hasn't yet mastered double-negatives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</id>
	<title>Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269362940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow.  "Obey our laws or else!"  Imperialist America strikes again!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
" Obey our laws or else !
" Imperialist America strikes again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
"Obey our laws or else!
"  Imperialist America strikes again!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593968</id>
	<title>Hey</title>
	<author>NetNed</author>
	<datestamp>1269365640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a roll call of supporters that stand to lose the most from foreign "hackers" that don't conform to their EULA doctrine. Great idea, lets police other countries even more and spread real law enforcement dollars even more thin while enforcing patient right of companies so they can make their bottom lines a little more appealing. This is what happens when you have analysis's that do the "we are <b>potentially</b> losing X amount of dollars because of pirating and hacking".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a roll call of supporters that stand to lose the most from foreign " hackers " that do n't conform to their EULA doctrine .
Great idea , lets police other countries even more and spread real law enforcement dollars even more thin while enforcing patient right of companies so they can make their bottom lines a little more appealing .
This is what happens when you have analysis 's that do the " we are potentially losing X amount of dollars because of pirating and hacking " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a roll call of supporters that stand to lose the most from foreign "hackers" that don't conform to their EULA doctrine.
Great idea, lets police other countries even more and spread real law enforcement dollars even more thin while enforcing patient right of companies so they can make their bottom lines a little more appealing.
This is what happens when you have analysis's that do the "we are potentially losing X amount of dollars because of pirating and hacking".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593748</id>
	<title>so will the WTO give Antigua even more free IP ove</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1269364080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so will the WTO give Antigua even more free IP over this as the US may try to push the Online gambling ban?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so will the WTO give Antigua even more free IP over this as the US may try to push the Online gambling ban ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so will the WTO give Antigua even more free IP over this as the US may try to push the Online gambling ban?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916</id>
	<title>Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime</title>
	<author>zondag</author>
	<datestamp>1269365280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.enigmasoftware.com/top-20-countries-the-most-cybercrime/" title="enigmasoftware.com" rel="nofollow">Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime</a> [enigmasoftware.com]
<p>
So apparently, if you add up all of Europe we'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime. But the hypocrisy aside, Europe won't be the target of US sanctions.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime [ enigmasoftware.com ] So apparently , if you add up all of Europe we 'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime .
But the hypocrisy aside , Europe wo n't be the target of US sanctions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime [enigmasoftware.com]

So apparently, if you add up all of Europe we'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime.
But the hypocrisy aside, Europe won't be the target of US sanctions.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595902</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1269436140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how is that supposed to happen?  The US is by far the biggest exporter of money in the world.  The reason this legislation would work is because the US can withhold that money to coerce other countries to comply.  It doesn't work the other way around, because the other countries don't have leverage against the US.</p><p>One could argue that China (and Japan, actually) has leverage in the form of all the US debt they hold.  But if China leveraging that debt against the US was a good thing for them, they'd have done it already.  Truth is, China would hurt themselves as much as the US in the process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how is that supposed to happen ?
The US is by far the biggest exporter of money in the world .
The reason this legislation would work is because the US can withhold that money to coerce other countries to comply .
It does n't work the other way around , because the other countries do n't have leverage against the US.One could argue that China ( and Japan , actually ) has leverage in the form of all the US debt they hold .
But if China leveraging that debt against the US was a good thing for them , they 'd have done it already .
Truth is , China would hurt themselves as much as the US in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how is that supposed to happen?
The US is by far the biggest exporter of money in the world.
The reason this legislation would work is because the US can withhold that money to coerce other countries to comply.
It doesn't work the other way around, because the other countries don't have leverage against the US.One could argue that China (and Japan, actually) has leverage in the form of all the US debt they hold.
But if China leveraging that debt against the US was a good thing for them, they'd have done it already.
Truth is, China would hurt themselves as much as the US in the process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594900</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>polle404</author>
	<datestamp>1269422880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals operating within their borders.</p></div><p>And by whose laws are these persons criminals?
<br>This would be a job for UN, not US, if I'm not mistaken?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals operating within their borders.And by whose laws are these persons criminals ?
This would be a job for UN , not US , if I 'm not mistaken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...penalize foreign countries that fail to crack down on cyber criminals operating within their borders.And by whose laws are these persons criminals?
This would be a job for UN, not US, if I'm not mistaken?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594974</id>
	<title>Hmmm. Export DOllars?</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1269425040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, does that mean that we will not IMPORT from them? If so, Canada, Russia, North Korea, South Korea and AMERICA are the biggest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , does that mean that we will not IMPORT from them ?
If so , Canada , Russia , North Korea , South Korea and AMERICA are the biggest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, does that mean that we will not IMPORT from them?
If so, Canada, Russia, North Korea, South Korea and AMERICA are the biggest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594258</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>WidgetGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1269368640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Puts me in mind of a corollary flowing directly from the "Everything in moderation" rule: "Everything in moderation.  Including moderation."
<br> <br>
Works for me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Puts me in mind of a corollary flowing directly from the " Everything in moderation " rule : " Everything in moderation .
Including moderation .
" Works for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Puts me in mind of a corollary flowing directly from the "Everything in moderation" rule: "Everything in moderation.
Including moderation.
"
 
Works for me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594422</id>
	<title>When did the rest of the world have to obey US law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last time I checked, enacting a rule in the White House does not affect the law of any other country.</p><p>In fact, I see this quite often with Americans. Many times, when in other countries they expect to be treated by US law and not the law of the country they're in. Sometimes I want to whack you guys with a 2x4. Your nationality has nothing to do with laws that are enforced based on geography.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last time I checked , enacting a rule in the White House does not affect the law of any other country.In fact , I see this quite often with Americans .
Many times , when in other countries they expect to be treated by US law and not the law of the country they 're in .
Sometimes I want to whack you guys with a 2x4 .
Your nationality has nothing to do with laws that are enforced based on geography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last time I checked, enacting a rule in the White House does not affect the law of any other country.In fact, I see this quite often with Americans.
Many times, when in other countries they expect to be treated by US law and not the law of the country they're in.
Sometimes I want to whack you guys with a 2x4.
Your nationality has nothing to do with laws that are enforced based on geography.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012</id>
	<title>This is not about hacker havens</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1269366120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This is a future backdoor for enforcing upcoming ACTA, and for cracking down on file sharing/other perceived piracy/copyright infringements.
And ultimately for imposing global internet censorship (controls on perceived indecent or perceived dangerous content).
</p><p>
This isn't about hacker havens or real bad guys. Lobbyists aren't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens'.
</p><p>
The big bucks are coming down from the **AA
</p><p>
Not that stopping crime is a bad thing.
But this sort of thing is going to be abused going forward.

</p><p>
It's contrary to free trade.
And while the current intent may be great, the future consequences could be dire, if some agreement can't be reached early to limit its scope.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a future backdoor for enforcing upcoming ACTA , and for cracking down on file sharing/other perceived piracy/copyright infringements .
And ultimately for imposing global internet censorship ( controls on perceived indecent or perceived dangerous content ) .
This is n't about hacker havens or real bad guys .
Lobbyists are n't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens' .
The big bucks are coming down from the * * AA Not that stopping crime is a bad thing .
But this sort of thing is going to be abused going forward .
It 's contrary to free trade .
And while the current intent may be great , the future consequences could be dire , if some agreement ca n't be reached early to limit its scope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This is a future backdoor for enforcing upcoming ACTA, and for cracking down on file sharing/other perceived piracy/copyright infringements.
And ultimately for imposing global internet censorship (controls on perceived indecent or perceived dangerous content).
This isn't about hacker havens or real bad guys.
Lobbyists aren't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens'.
The big bucks are coming down from the **AA

Not that stopping crime is a bad thing.
But this sort of thing is going to be abused going forward.
It's contrary to free trade.
And while the current intent may be great, the future consequences could be dire, if some agreement can't be reached early to limit its scope.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594436</id>
	<title>Re:This is not about hacker havens</title>
	<author>Fireshadow</author>
	<datestamp>1269370860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lobbyists aren't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens'.</p> </div><p>
Close. From 2006 to 2010, Kirsten Gillibrand received $424,434 in campaign donations from individuals at "Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexner".  This is a law firm that specializes in Intellectual Property and International Arbitration among other things.  From 2009 to 2010, Hatch received $25,050 from HP's PAC and individuals in campaign donations.
</p><p>
I have my opinion as to the bills true authors.  Conduct your own research though.  Form your own opinion.
</p><p>
References:
Open secrets dot org.  (www.opensecrets.org). Always entertaining to look up a representatives name to see who the donors are.
</p><ul>
 <li>Hatch<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=N00009869&amp;type=I" title="opensecrets.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=N00009869&amp;type=I</a> [opensecrets.org]</li>
  <li>Gillibrand<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;cid=N00027658&amp;type=I" title="opensecrets.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;cid=N00027658&amp;type=I</a> [opensecrets.org]</li>
</ul><p>
 Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexner<a href="http://www.bsfllp.com/practices/100" title="bsfllp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bsfllp.com/practices/100</a> [bsfllp.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lobbyists are n't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens' .
Close. From 2006 to 2010 , Kirsten Gillibrand received $ 424,434 in campaign donations from individuals at " Boies , Schiller &amp; Flexner " .
This is a law firm that specializes in Intellectual Property and International Arbitration among other things .
From 2009 to 2010 , Hatch received $ 25,050 from HP 's PAC and individuals in campaign donations .
I have my opinion as to the bills true authors .
Conduct your own research though .
Form your own opinion .
References : Open secrets dot org .
( www.opensecrets.org ) . Always entertaining to look up a representatives name to see who the donors are .
Hatchhttp : //www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php ? cycle = 2010&amp;cid = N00009869&amp;type = I [ opensecrets.org ] Gillibrandhttp : //www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php ? cycle = Career&amp;cid = N00027658&amp;type = I [ opensecrets.org ] Boies , Schiller &amp; Flexnerhttp : //www.bsfllp.com/practices/100 [ bsfllp.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lobbyists aren't handling billions of bucks wanting representatives to shut down 'hacker havens'.
Close. From 2006 to 2010, Kirsten Gillibrand received $424,434 in campaign donations from individuals at "Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexner".
This is a law firm that specializes in Intellectual Property and International Arbitration among other things.
From 2009 to 2010, Hatch received $25,050 from HP's PAC and individuals in campaign donations.
I have my opinion as to the bills true authors.
Conduct your own research though.
Form your own opinion.
References:
Open secrets dot org.
(www.opensecrets.org). Always entertaining to look up a representatives name to see who the donors are.
Hatchhttp://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=N00009869&amp;type=I [opensecrets.org]
  Gillibrandhttp://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;cid=N00027658&amp;type=I [opensecrets.org]

 Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexnerhttp://www.bsfllp.com/practices/100 [bsfllp.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31599578</id>
	<title>Oh God ! why dont America Keep to itself...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269452820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who do they think they are to check on foreign countries....<br>Wat do they think , that other country people are ignorant fool or people who are not capable of managing themselves....<br>The world will be a better place if everyone mind their own jobs and keep their nose out of other peoples business</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who do they think they are to check on foreign countries....Wat do they think , that other country people are ignorant fool or people who are not capable of managing themselves....The world will be a better place if everyone mind their own jobs and keep their nose out of other peoples business</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who do they think they are to check on foreign countries....Wat do they think , that other country people are ignorant fool or people who are not capable of managing themselves....The world will be a better place if everyone mind their own jobs and keep their nose out of other peoples business</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</id>
	<title>What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269362880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for "criminal" activity (e.g. dissent, political freedom, etc.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for " criminal " activity ( e.g .
dissent , political freedom , etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for "criminal" activity (e.g.
dissent, political freedom, etc.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594612</id>
	<title>Re:Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercr</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269373380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <a href="http://www.enigmasoftware.com/top-20-countries-the-most-cybercrime/" title="enigmasoftware.com" rel="nofollow">Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime</a> [enigmasoftware.com]</p><p>So apparently, if you add up all of Europe we'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime. But the hypocrisy aside, Europe won't be the target of US sanctions.</p></div><p>Does that mean US should start cleaning their act first?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime [ enigmasoftware.com ] So apparently , if you add up all of Europe we 'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime .
But the hypocrisy aside , Europe wo n't be the target of US sanctions.Does that mean US should start cleaning their act first ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercrime [enigmasoftware.com]So apparently, if you add up all of Europe we'd match the US as the largest source of cybercrime.
But the hypocrisy aside, Europe won't be the target of US sanctions.Does that mean US should start cleaning their act first?
:P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596824</id>
	<title>Re:Top 20 Countries Found to Have the Most Cybercr</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1269441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quoting from that chart....<br>
<i>Each country lists 6 contributing factors, share of malicious computer activity, malicious code rank, <b>spam zombies rank</b>, phishing web site hosts rank, <b>bot rank and attack origin</b>, to substantiate its cybercrime ranking.</i> <br>
So in otherwords being a victim-- having a hijacked computer-- gets you ranked up on that chart.  Thats real clever.  I thought the point of all this was C&amp;C servers that the ISPs refused to disconnect, not mom and pop having a zombified computer that they are unaware of?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quoting from that chart... . Each country lists 6 contributing factors , share of malicious computer activity , malicious code rank , spam zombies rank , phishing web site hosts rank , bot rank and attack origin , to substantiate its cybercrime ranking .
So in otherwords being a victim-- having a hijacked computer-- gets you ranked up on that chart .
Thats real clever .
I thought the point of all this was C&amp;C servers that the ISPs refused to disconnect , not mom and pop having a zombified computer that they are unaware of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quoting from that chart....
Each country lists 6 contributing factors, share of malicious computer activity, malicious code rank, spam zombies rank, phishing web site hosts rank, bot rank and attack origin, to substantiate its cybercrime ranking.
So in otherwords being a victim-- having a hijacked computer-- gets you ranked up on that chart.
Thats real clever.
I thought the point of all this was C&amp;C servers that the ISPs refused to disconnect, not mom and pop having a zombified computer that they are unaware of?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596324</id>
	<title>We should clean up our own act first.</title>
	<author>dremspider</author>
	<datestamp>1269438780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://maliciousnetworks.org/top20c.php" title="maliciousnetworks.org" rel="nofollow">http://maliciousnetworks.org/top20c.php</a> [maliciousnetworks.org]

Who is the number one haven for malicious machines? The US. Not that I disagree with this. I do think it is a step in the right direction. We need to start working together as a world to combat threats on the Internet. If it takes cutting off funding, then I am for it. I would like to see if go further and have the companies who are "supporting" this to agree to NOT send work to these countries. The reason cheap labor exists in a lot of these countries is due to the lack of regulations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //maliciousnetworks.org/top20c.php [ maliciousnetworks.org ] Who is the number one haven for malicious machines ?
The US .
Not that I disagree with this .
I do think it is a step in the right direction .
We need to start working together as a world to combat threats on the Internet .
If it takes cutting off funding , then I am for it .
I would like to see if go further and have the companies who are " supporting " this to agree to NOT send work to these countries .
The reason cheap labor exists in a lot of these countries is due to the lack of regulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://maliciousnetworks.org/top20c.php [maliciousnetworks.org]

Who is the number one haven for malicious machines?
The US.
Not that I disagree with this.
I do think it is a step in the right direction.
We need to start working together as a world to combat threats on the Internet.
If it takes cutting off funding, then I am for it.
I would like to see if go further and have the companies who are "supporting" this to agree to NOT send work to these countries.
The reason cheap labor exists in a lot of these countries is due to the lack of regulations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597324</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1269444420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'd guess it's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy' and 'copyright infringement'.</i> </p><p>And you'd probably be right, given that it's Orrin Hatch that's sponsoring the bill.  Orrin has very strong RIAA ties and is a very strong supporter of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd guess it 's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy ' and 'copyright infringement' .
And you 'd probably be right , given that it 's Orrin Hatch that 's sponsoring the bill .
Orrin has very strong RIAA ties and is a very strong supporter of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd guess it's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy' and 'copyright infringement'.
And you'd probably be right, given that it's Orrin Hatch that's sponsoring the bill.
Orrin has very strong RIAA ties and is a very strong supporter of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594426</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least Norway will not be invaded to destroy Pirate Bay. Only penalized.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least Norway will not be invaded to destroy Pirate Bay .
Only penalized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least Norway will not be invaded to destroy Pirate Bay.
Only penalized.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595406</id>
	<title>"Countries of Cyber Concern"</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1269430800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you point a finger at someone else, three are pointing back at you.</p><p>US Federal Guvmint - ACTA, DMCA, NSA wiretaps, full laundry list available online.<br>Cisco - <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/05/leaked-cisco-do/" title="wired.com">Great Firewall of China</a> [wired.com], 'nuff said.<br>Visa/Mastercard/Amex - <a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/is\_3d\_secure\_insecure" title="csoonline.com">Insecure</a> [csoonline.com] <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/01/28/195216/Why-Verified-By-Visa-System-Is-Insecure?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">data practices</a> [slashdot.org] while raping their customers with fees.<br>Facebook - In bed with Zynga, whose CEO has admitted he's a <a href="http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/96024-Zynga-CEO-Admits-to-Being-a-Scammer" title="escapistmagazine.com">scammer</a> [escapistmagazine.com] and that his games are rife with malware.<br>Google - Censorship in China (until they got pwned).<br>Microsoft - No comment needed (with a CEO that looks like <a href="http://www.winandmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/steveballmer.jpg" title="winandmac.com">Satan</a> [winandmac.com], it's not really necessary).</p><p>The only reason the *AAs aren't jumping on the bandwagon at this point is that they'd bring to stench of their bad PR all over this legislation and alert the public to what's it's really all about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you point a finger at someone else , three are pointing back at you.US Federal Guvmint - ACTA , DMCA , NSA wiretaps , full laundry list available online.Cisco - Great Firewall of China [ wired.com ] , 'nuff said.Visa/Mastercard/Amex - Insecure [ csoonline.com ] data practices [ slashdot.org ] while raping their customers with fees.Facebook - In bed with Zynga , whose CEO has admitted he 's a scammer [ escapistmagazine.com ] and that his games are rife with malware.Google - Censorship in China ( until they got pwned ) .Microsoft - No comment needed ( with a CEO that looks like Satan [ winandmac.com ] , it 's not really necessary ) .The only reason the * AAs are n't jumping on the bandwagon at this point is that they 'd bring to stench of their bad PR all over this legislation and alert the public to what 's it 's really all about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you point a finger at someone else, three are pointing back at you.US Federal Guvmint - ACTA, DMCA, NSA wiretaps, full laundry list available online.Cisco - Great Firewall of China [wired.com], 'nuff said.Visa/Mastercard/Amex - Insecure [csoonline.com] data practices [slashdot.org] while raping their customers with fees.Facebook - In bed with Zynga, whose CEO has admitted he's a scammer [escapistmagazine.com] and that his games are rife with malware.Google - Censorship in China (until they got pwned).Microsoft - No comment needed (with a CEO that looks like Satan [winandmac.com], it's not really necessary).The only reason the *AAs aren't jumping on the bandwagon at this point is that they'd bring to stench of their bad PR all over this legislation and alert the public to what's it's really all about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597038</id>
	<title>Re:This is a bad legislation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269443100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good! I hope they do put us on the list.</p><p>We'll just stop selling our oil to the US and sell it to the Chicoms. You know, people who actually have money to pay us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good !
I hope they do put us on the list.We 'll just stop selling our oil to the US and sell it to the Chicoms .
You know , people who actually have money to pay us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good!
I hope they do put us on the list.We'll just stop selling our oil to the US and sell it to the Chicoms.
You know, people who actually have money to pay us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594602</id>
	<title>So we stop bribing them after we find criminals?</title>
	<author>sounds</author>
	<datestamp>1269373200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the economic climate, why can't we find Senators who will simply eliminate US export dollars, foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants categorically?  Why should our government be sending our tax dollars outside the country anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the economic climate , why ca n't we find Senators who will simply eliminate US export dollars , foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants categorically ?
Why should our government be sending our tax dollars outside the country anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the economic climate, why can't we find Senators who will simply eliminate US export dollars, foreign-direct investment funds and trade assistance grants categorically?
Why should our government be sending our tax dollars outside the country anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593756</id>
	<title>Single serving friend!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'All hail the empire'... 25 more years(maybe) of the current over fifty illiterate electronic generation!<br>I'm with the US gov... We're here to help! (Right)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'All hail the empire'... 25 more years ( maybe ) of the current over fifty illiterate electronic generation ! I 'm with the US gov... We 're here to help !
( Right )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'All hail the empire'... 25 more years(maybe) of the current over fifty illiterate electronic generation!I'm with the US gov... We're here to help!
(Right)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594150</id>
	<title>No Disney?</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1269367320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Numerous American employers, including Cisco, HP, Microsoft, Symantec, PayPal, eBay, McAfee, American Express, Mastercard and Visa, as well as Facebook, are supporting the Senators' legislation."</p></div><p>What, no Disney?  No Sony?  No RIAA and MPAA members?  Did the others tell them to hide in the back and not to come out until the law is passed?</p><p>I'm all for going after the spammers and shit, but I sure as hell don't trust the US Gov't to use a very narrow definition of "cyber criminal" when big media pull out their cheque books.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Numerous American employers , including Cisco , HP , Microsoft , Symantec , PayPal , eBay , McAfee , American Express , Mastercard and Visa , as well as Facebook , are supporting the Senators ' legislation .
" What , no Disney ?
No Sony ?
No RIAA and MPAA members ?
Did the others tell them to hide in the back and not to come out until the law is passed ? I 'm all for going after the spammers and shit , but I sure as hell do n't trust the US Gov't to use a very narrow definition of " cyber criminal " when big media pull out their cheque books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Numerous American employers, including Cisco, HP, Microsoft, Symantec, PayPal, eBay, McAfee, American Express, Mastercard and Visa, as well as Facebook, are supporting the Senators' legislation.
"What, no Disney?
No Sony?
No RIAA and MPAA members?
Did the others tell them to hide in the back and not to come out until the law is passed?I'm all for going after the spammers and shit, but I sure as hell don't trust the US Gov't to use a very narrow definition of "cyber criminal" when big media pull out their cheque books.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594096</id>
	<title>Attack the foreign hackers!</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1269366900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You see, we have several technology darlings here in the US that like to make software that's hopelessly insecure.  Sure, more secure software like Unix and its derivatives were invented here too, but we don't like them because they have command lines, and command lines are icky.
</p><p>So because we can't be bothered to run software that's reasonably able to do e-commerce in an e-commerce era, we need a goat.  It's best if that's a foreign goat.  We're going to point our fingers at the foreign hackers and say that <i>they</i> are the ones hampering our eBay and our Amazon and our banking websites.
</p><p>Because requiring secure clients to do e-commerce would be too hard.  Nobody here would go for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You see , we have several technology darlings here in the US that like to make software that 's hopelessly insecure .
Sure , more secure software like Unix and its derivatives were invented here too , but we do n't like them because they have command lines , and command lines are icky .
So because we ca n't be bothered to run software that 's reasonably able to do e-commerce in an e-commerce era , we need a goat .
It 's best if that 's a foreign goat .
We 're going to point our fingers at the foreign hackers and say that they are the ones hampering our eBay and our Amazon and our banking websites .
Because requiring secure clients to do e-commerce would be too hard .
Nobody here would go for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You see, we have several technology darlings here in the US that like to make software that's hopelessly insecure.
Sure, more secure software like Unix and its derivatives were invented here too, but we don't like them because they have command lines, and command lines are icky.
So because we can't be bothered to run software that's reasonably able to do e-commerce in an e-commerce era, we need a goat.
It's best if that's a foreign goat.
We're going to point our fingers at the foreign hackers and say that they are the ones hampering our eBay and our Amazon and our banking websites.
Because requiring secure clients to do e-commerce would be too hard.
Nobody here would go for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31605542</id>
	<title>Re:You know...</title>
	<author>Rakarra</author>
	<datestamp>1269435000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.</p></div><p>Sure you do. It's the Law of Unintended Consequences. Several large media-related bills (and non-media related bills for that matter) have been abused in ways the original authors didn't necessarily intend, or at least that many supporters didn't think would happen. Overreaching sections of the DMCA making it impossible to sample works for critique or personal use. The PATRIOT Act being used to get ISP records for a Stargate SG-1 fansite webmaster suspected of copyright infringement. It's also been invoked to keep homeless away from train stations.</p><p>If a bill contains a provision that -could- be abused, and it would benefit those who would have the ability to do so, then yes, you should assume that it will be abused.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you ca n't assume it will.Sure you do .
It 's the Law of Unintended Consequences .
Several large media-related bills ( and non-media related bills for that matter ) have been abused in ways the original authors did n't necessarily intend , or at least that many supporters did n't think would happen .
Overreaching sections of the DMCA making it impossible to sample works for critique or personal use .
The PATRIOT Act being used to get ISP records for a Stargate SG-1 fansite webmaster suspected of copyright infringement .
It 's also been invoked to keep homeless away from train stations.If a bill contains a provision that -could- be abused , and it would benefit those who would have the ability to do so , then yes , you should assume that it will be abused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.Sure you do.
It's the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Several large media-related bills (and non-media related bills for that matter) have been abused in ways the original authors didn't necessarily intend, or at least that many supporters didn't think would happen.
Overreaching sections of the DMCA making it impossible to sample works for critique or personal use.
The PATRIOT Act being used to get ISP records for a Stargate SG-1 fansite webmaster suspected of copyright infringement.
It's also been invoked to keep homeless away from train stations.If a bill contains a provision that -could- be abused, and it would benefit those who would have the ability to do so, then yes, you should assume that it will be abused.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593868</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>singlevalley</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our internet lords...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our internet lords.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our internet lords...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597944</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1269447000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So all trade sanctions, even those related to human rights violations, are "imperialism" in your opinion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So all trade sanctions , even those related to human rights violations , are " imperialism " in your opinion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So all trade sanctions, even those related to human rights violations, are "imperialism" in your opinion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594590</id>
	<title>The US has the right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269372960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The USA has the right to not give aid and to not trade with certain countries. Either way, this is going to be used to force IP laws globally. The funny thing about cyber war, is that it is called a war. We have nuclear weapons and the potential to destroy each other. Does that mean we're at nuclear war? What we are seeing is cyber espionage and preparations for cyber warfare. The only way this can be fought is if the world largely stands against the American government. The American people need to also stand against their government, which is clearly no longer representing them or acting in their best interests.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The USA has the right to not give aid and to not trade with certain countries .
Either way , this is going to be used to force IP laws globally .
The funny thing about cyber war , is that it is called a war .
We have nuclear weapons and the potential to destroy each other .
Does that mean we 're at nuclear war ?
What we are seeing is cyber espionage and preparations for cyber warfare .
The only way this can be fought is if the world largely stands against the American government .
The American people need to also stand against their government , which is clearly no longer representing them or acting in their best interests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The USA has the right to not give aid and to not trade with certain countries.
Either way, this is going to be used to force IP laws globally.
The funny thing about cyber war, is that it is called a war.
We have nuclear weapons and the potential to destroy each other.
Does that mean we're at nuclear war?
What we are seeing is cyber espionage and preparations for cyber warfare.
The only way this can be fought is if the world largely stands against the American government.
The American people need to also stand against their government, which is clearly no longer representing them or acting in their best interests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</id>
	<title>Not want to be bitching...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269363600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>But as a non-american I really really really DO NOT want US laws. If I would, I would move to the US.

The arrogance is striking. Btw, ca</htmltext>
<tokenext>But as a non-american I really really really DO NOT want US laws .
If I would , I would move to the US .
The arrogance is striking .
Btw , ca</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But as a non-american I really really really DO NOT want US laws.
If I would, I would move to the US.
The arrogance is striking.
Btw, ca</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593904</id>
	<title>...and what about Tax Havens?</title>
	<author>Col Bat Guano</author>
	<datestamp>1269365220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we likely to see legislation against tax havens that allow people to secrete money away from legitimate taxation and policing enquiries?</p><p>Oh silly me - that's where the politicians and their rich friends put their money...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we likely to see legislation against tax havens that allow people to secrete money away from legitimate taxation and policing enquiries ? Oh silly me - that 's where the politicians and their rich friends put their money.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we likely to see legislation against tax havens that allow people to secrete money away from legitimate taxation and policing enquiries?Oh silly me - that's where the politicians and their rich friends put their money...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593894</id>
	<title>For given definitions of cyber crime...</title>
	<author>LuNa7ic</author>
	<datestamp>1269365100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's the bet the most immediate target is Spain, for the cyber-crime of not enforcing US copyright law?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the bet the most immediate target is Spain , for the cyber-crime of not enforcing US copyright law ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the bet the most immediate target is Spain, for the cyber-crime of not enforcing US copyright law?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595592</id>
	<title>Re:No Disney?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's like the term "terrorist". It's been abused so much it should not be a word anymore. The citizens of American are being targeted as terrorists simply because they love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Simply because they buy up guns, go to church, speak out against federal wickedness, question 9-11-01, Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc.</p><p>I think the real issue is big government. The power rests in We The People, not in Washington DC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's like the term " terrorist " .
It 's been abused so much it should not be a word anymore .
The citizens of American are being targeted as terrorists simply because they love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights .
Simply because they buy up guns , go to church , speak out against federal wickedness , question 9-11-01 , Ruby Ridge , Waco , etc.I think the real issue is big government .
The power rests in We The People , not in Washington DC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's like the term "terrorist".
It's been abused so much it should not be a word anymore.
The citizens of American are being targeted as terrorists simply because they love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Simply because they buy up guns, go to church, speak out against federal wickedness, question 9-11-01, Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc.I think the real issue is big government.
The power rests in We The People, not in Washington DC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595624</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1269433200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So then every nation to ever raise a trade dispute is an empire. If you believe that, <b>you're a fucking douchebag.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So then every nation to ever raise a trade dispute is an empire .
If you believe that , you 're a fucking douchebag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So then every nation to ever raise a trade dispute is an empire.
If you believe that, you're a fucking douchebag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594870</id>
	<title>s/Reactive/Proactive</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1269464280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to see "Don't click on that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.exe attachment" PSA's on TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see " Do n't click on that .exe attachment " PSA 's on TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see "Don't click on that .exe attachment" PSA's on TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593834</id>
	<title>Re:Not want to be bitching...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an american, this  strikes me as a terrible idea. I really really DO NOT want the US to rule the world, and I find the arrogance in this act apalling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an american , this strikes me as a terrible idea .
I really really DO NOT want the US to rule the world , and I find the arrogance in this act apalling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an american, this  strikes me as a terrible idea.
I really really DO NOT want the US to rule the world, and I find the arrogance in this act apalling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595398</id>
	<title>Re:Not want to be bitching...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269430740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not American arrogance but an influencing drive for global domination, not by Americans, but by the global elite who run and influence the largest banks of the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not American arrogance but an influencing drive for global domination , not by Americans , but by the global elite who run and influence the largest banks of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not American arrogance but an influencing drive for global domination, not by Americans, but by the global elite who run and influence the largest banks of the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595276</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah,</p><p>It's another excuse for the global elite to attempt wrest our freedoms from us. Americans, it's in the spirit of America that we must never let "international law" or otherwise unconstitutional law (HealthCare Bill that just got "signed" into "law") take our God-given freedoms away. Regardless if you believe in the God of the Bible or not, you were born with a free will in a free country that has a Bill of Rights and a Constitution. The power rests in the bosom of America's citizens. Not in central powers that are corrupt beyond imagination.</p><p>The Internet must remain a free and open channel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah,It 's another excuse for the global elite to attempt wrest our freedoms from us .
Americans , it 's in the spirit of America that we must never let " international law " or otherwise unconstitutional law ( HealthCare Bill that just got " signed " into " law " ) take our God-given freedoms away .
Regardless if you believe in the God of the Bible or not , you were born with a free will in a free country that has a Bill of Rights and a Constitution .
The power rests in the bosom of America 's citizens .
Not in central powers that are corrupt beyond imagination.The Internet must remain a free and open channel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah,It's another excuse for the global elite to attempt wrest our freedoms from us.
Americans, it's in the spirit of America that we must never let "international law" or otherwise unconstitutional law (HealthCare Bill that just got "signed" into "law") take our God-given freedoms away.
Regardless if you believe in the God of the Bible or not, you were born with a free will in a free country that has a Bill of Rights and a Constitution.
The power rests in the bosom of America's citizens.
Not in central powers that are corrupt beyond imagination.The Internet must remain a free and open channel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269366300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for "criminal" activity (e.g. dissent, political freedom, etc.)</p></div><p>i'd guess it's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy' and 'copyright infringement'. This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for " criminal " activity ( e.g .
dissent , political freedom , etc .
) i 'd guess it 's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy ' and 'copyright infringement' .
This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This legislation is just going to blow up in our face as soon as other countries start demanding that we rat out our citizens for "criminal" activity (e.g.
dissent, political freedom, etc.
)i'd guess it's more targeted at illegal activity such as 'piracy' and 'copyright infringement'.
This smacks of RIAA/MPAA and leverage against countries such as Sweden for their lack of ability to close down The Pirate Bay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594610</id>
	<title>YOU FAiL IT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269373380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>all servers. Coming risk lloking even Come Here but now Of vario0s BSD worthwhile. So I</htmltext>
<tokenext>all servers .
Coming risk lloking even Come Here but now Of vario0s BSD worthwhile .
So I</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all servers.
Coming risk lloking even Come Here but now Of vario0s BSD worthwhile.
So I</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31698398</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>c79106428</author>
	<datestamp>1270114320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="ahref=" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.jeanscvs.com/</a> [slashdot.org] "&gt;2010 Fashion True Religion Jeans  <p>
<a href="http://discount-windows7.com/" title="discount-windows7.com" rel="nofollow">Windows 7 </a> [discount-windows7.com] </p><p>
<a href="ahref=" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.selldvdmall.com/</a> [slashdot.org]"&gt;DVD  </p><p>
<a href="ahref=" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.popularsalon.com/</a> [slashdot.org]"&gt;CHI Camo Collection </p><p>
<a href="&rdquo;http://www.popularholder.com&rdquo;" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">clothings</a> [slashdot.org] </p><p>
<a href="http://www.trade-softs.com/" title="trade-softs.com" rel="nofollow">trade-softs</a> [trade-softs.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.jeanscvs.com/ [ slashdot.org ] " &gt; 2010 Fashion True Religion Jeans Windows 7 [ discount-windows7.com ] http : //www.selldvdmall.com/ [ slashdot.org ] " &gt; DVD http : //www.popularsalon.com/ [ slashdot.org ] " &gt; CHI Camo Collection clothings [ slashdot.org ] trade-softs [ trade-softs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.jeanscvs.com/ [slashdot.org] "&gt;2010 Fashion True Religion Jeans  
Windows 7  [discount-windows7.com] 
http://www.selldvdmall.com/ [slashdot.org]"&gt;DVD  
http://www.popularsalon.com/ [slashdot.org]"&gt;CHI Camo Collection 
clothings [slashdot.org] 
trade-softs [trade-softs.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593730</id>
	<title>Slashdot is run by 4chan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269363840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is the mentally ill lying psychopath thief Christopher Poole (AKA Moot) in action.</p><p>http://www.anontalk.com/dump/mootard.txt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the mentally ill lying psychopath thief Christopher Poole ( AKA Moot ) in action.http : //www.anontalk.com/dump/mootard.txt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the mentally ill lying psychopath thief Christopher Poole (AKA Moot) in action.http://www.anontalk.com/dump/mootard.txt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594852</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>s/et al./etc./<br>Don't use expressions and abbreviations you don't understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>s/et al./etc./Do n't use expressions and abbreviations you do n't understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>s/et al./etc./Don't use expressions and abbreviations you don't understand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594056</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1269366540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Imperialist America strikes again!</p></div><p>Aw, someone's mad because -their- empire's evil plans aren't making it onto slashdot...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imperialist America strikes again ! Aw , someone 's mad because -their- empire 's evil plans are n't making it onto slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imperialist America strikes again!Aw, someone's mad because -their- empire's evil plans aren't making it onto slashdot...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31604062</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269426840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's ridiculous.  The US government is enacting legislation that they want to enforce in other countries?</p><p>Are they the world police now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's ridiculous .
The US government is enacting legislation that they want to enforce in other countries ? Are they the world police now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's ridiculous.
The US government is enacting legislation that they want to enforce in other countries?Are they the world police now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593804</id>
	<title>First up...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..Canada and all those other countries that decline to enact DMCA-style laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..Canada and all those other countries that decline to enact DMCA-style laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..Canada and all those other countries that decline to enact DMCA-style laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593590</id>
	<title>Criminal Havens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269362640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Partying was going on in a two-story cookie-cutter house in Thousand Oaks, California. The medium-sized crowd ebbed and flowed to the beats of Bob Marley, the Grateful Dead, and the albums of umpteen niggers who'd made it big blathering about bitches and bullets.<br> <br>

Roberto was a loveable microcephalic who was always invited to the parties because he was willing to perform clownish acts, often involuntarily, so that he could entertain the guests and barter his idiocy for some of that sweet, opalescent Columbian flake cocaine being doled out by the spoonful on the dinner table. Budweiser is the best beer to drink with cocaine as there's just something about its sharp back-palate taste which accentuates the drip of the cocaine, dissolving in snot, running down the back of the nasal passages and numbing the upper gums if not the entire forehead if the shit was good, before forming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocaethylene" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">cocaethylene</a> [wikipedia.org] in the bloodstream.<br> <br>

The stupor was so infectious and prevalent that the young adult men lined up to compete against each other for the underleg region of Mara, a Catholic girl with genital warts. She didn't look bad, and tequila-soaked condoms would surely mitigate the pathogens responsible for causing cauliflower-crotch. Meanwhile, Roberto tossed some vomit across the kitchen floor in a line so perfect that its straightness was rivalled only by the white ones on the table, or perhaps the one <a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bdd\_1243483147" title="liveleak.com" rel="nofollow">Daniel Victor Jones</a> [liveleak.com] painted across the 210 freeway when he incinerated his dog and blew his head off on live television in 1998. <br> <br>

The host of the party, Seb, didn't take kindly to Roberto's antics and insisted that Roberto chug a whole beer at once or else he would never see his expensive prescription glasses again. Roberto, afraid of puking again, took a nervous preliminary gulp before he unwittingly raised the beercan full of Seb's piss, chugging it all in one swing and finishing with a sigh of relief. Roberto was religious when it suited him, and so he attributed the absence of vomit to divine intervention. He would've realized the unfortunate truth had his consciousness drifted to artist Andres Serrano's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss\_Christ" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> <i>Piss Christ</i> </a> [wikipedia.org] if he had any sense of association. He received his glasses amidst a sea of roaring laughter. <br> <br>

As we traversed the hallway of the second floor, a bedroom door popped open and an unknown male staggered out of the bedroom and down the stairs while pulling up his pants. Inside the bedroom, the pungent air thick as a ghost, Mara reclined on the bed. Both of her arms were raised with her hands behind her head, revealing her flawless underarms which appeared to be airbrushed and showed no signs of irritation, perspiration, stubble, or residue as her left nipple peeked out above the covers. No condoms were seen anywhere in the room.<br> <br>

Mike, the resident idiot <i>savant</i>, wore a grin rivalling that of the Cheshire Cat. His smile was not purely one of happiness(though he was feeling good), he was showing the bruxism of nightlong cocaine abuse. Hours of cocaine abuse causes clenching and grinding of the teeth. This is not necessarily due to its action on the jaw, but its effect on the gums. It causes a dull, painless ache which leads to the urge to grab a steel scribe and pick the living hell out of the dental vestibules. Fortunately, most cocaine abusers fall asleep from exhaustion before they suffer the sensation of underskin bugs which are more of a tweeker(not cokehead) problem.<br> <br>

Mike had Tourette's syndrome. Whether or not the label was fabricated by his guilt ridden mother who used drugs while he was <i>in utero</i> was a matter of debate, but totally not appropriate for discussion then. What was fact, however, was that drugs affected Mike more than they affected the rest of us. Mike had a <i>penchant</i> for punk rock music, and so he invited us to give him a "wild haircut". We settled on a mullet wit</htmltext>
<tokenext>Partying was going on in a two-story cookie-cutter house in Thousand Oaks , California .
The medium-sized crowd ebbed and flowed to the beats of Bob Marley , the Grateful Dead , and the albums of umpteen niggers who 'd made it big blathering about bitches and bullets .
Roberto was a loveable microcephalic who was always invited to the parties because he was willing to perform clownish acts , often involuntarily , so that he could entertain the guests and barter his idiocy for some of that sweet , opalescent Columbian flake cocaine being doled out by the spoonful on the dinner table .
Budweiser is the best beer to drink with cocaine as there 's just something about its sharp back-palate taste which accentuates the drip of the cocaine , dissolving in snot , running down the back of the nasal passages and numbing the upper gums if not the entire forehead if the shit was good , before forming cocaethylene [ wikipedia.org ] in the bloodstream .
The stupor was so infectious and prevalent that the young adult men lined up to compete against each other for the underleg region of Mara , a Catholic girl with genital warts .
She did n't look bad , and tequila-soaked condoms would surely mitigate the pathogens responsible for causing cauliflower-crotch .
Meanwhile , Roberto tossed some vomit across the kitchen floor in a line so perfect that its straightness was rivalled only by the white ones on the table , or perhaps the one Daniel Victor Jones [ liveleak.com ] painted across the 210 freeway when he incinerated his dog and blew his head off on live television in 1998 .
The host of the party , Seb , did n't take kindly to Roberto 's antics and insisted that Roberto chug a whole beer at once or else he would never see his expensive prescription glasses again .
Roberto , afraid of puking again , took a nervous preliminary gulp before he unwittingly raised the beercan full of Seb 's piss , chugging it all in one swing and finishing with a sigh of relief .
Roberto was religious when it suited him , and so he attributed the absence of vomit to divine intervention .
He would 've realized the unfortunate truth had his consciousness drifted to artist Andres Serrano 's Piss Christ [ wikipedia.org ] if he had any sense of association .
He received his glasses amidst a sea of roaring laughter .
As we traversed the hallway of the second floor , a bedroom door popped open and an unknown male staggered out of the bedroom and down the stairs while pulling up his pants .
Inside the bedroom , the pungent air thick as a ghost , Mara reclined on the bed .
Both of her arms were raised with her hands behind her head , revealing her flawless underarms which appeared to be airbrushed and showed no signs of irritation , perspiration , stubble , or residue as her left nipple peeked out above the covers .
No condoms were seen anywhere in the room .
Mike , the resident idiot savant , wore a grin rivalling that of the Cheshire Cat .
His smile was not purely one of happiness ( though he was feeling good ) , he was showing the bruxism of nightlong cocaine abuse .
Hours of cocaine abuse causes clenching and grinding of the teeth .
This is not necessarily due to its action on the jaw , but its effect on the gums .
It causes a dull , painless ache which leads to the urge to grab a steel scribe and pick the living hell out of the dental vestibules .
Fortunately , most cocaine abusers fall asleep from exhaustion before they suffer the sensation of underskin bugs which are more of a tweeker ( not cokehead ) problem .
Mike had Tourette 's syndrome .
Whether or not the label was fabricated by his guilt ridden mother who used drugs while he was in utero was a matter of debate , but totally not appropriate for discussion then .
What was fact , however , was that drugs affected Mike more than they affected the rest of us .
Mike had a penchant for punk rock music , and so he invited us to give him a " wild haircut " .
We settled on a mullet wit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Partying was going on in a two-story cookie-cutter house in Thousand Oaks, California.
The medium-sized crowd ebbed and flowed to the beats of Bob Marley, the Grateful Dead, and the albums of umpteen niggers who'd made it big blathering about bitches and bullets.
Roberto was a loveable microcephalic who was always invited to the parties because he was willing to perform clownish acts, often involuntarily, so that he could entertain the guests and barter his idiocy for some of that sweet, opalescent Columbian flake cocaine being doled out by the spoonful on the dinner table.
Budweiser is the best beer to drink with cocaine as there's just something about its sharp back-palate taste which accentuates the drip of the cocaine, dissolving in snot, running down the back of the nasal passages and numbing the upper gums if not the entire forehead if the shit was good, before forming cocaethylene [wikipedia.org] in the bloodstream.
The stupor was so infectious and prevalent that the young adult men lined up to compete against each other for the underleg region of Mara, a Catholic girl with genital warts.
She didn't look bad, and tequila-soaked condoms would surely mitigate the pathogens responsible for causing cauliflower-crotch.
Meanwhile, Roberto tossed some vomit across the kitchen floor in a line so perfect that its straightness was rivalled only by the white ones on the table, or perhaps the one Daniel Victor Jones [liveleak.com] painted across the 210 freeway when he incinerated his dog and blew his head off on live television in 1998.
The host of the party, Seb, didn't take kindly to Roberto's antics and insisted that Roberto chug a whole beer at once or else he would never see his expensive prescription glasses again.
Roberto, afraid of puking again, took a nervous preliminary gulp before he unwittingly raised the beercan full of Seb's piss, chugging it all in one swing and finishing with a sigh of relief.
Roberto was religious when it suited him, and so he attributed the absence of vomit to divine intervention.
He would've realized the unfortunate truth had his consciousness drifted to artist Andres Serrano's  Piss Christ  [wikipedia.org] if he had any sense of association.
He received his glasses amidst a sea of roaring laughter.
As we traversed the hallway of the second floor, a bedroom door popped open and an unknown male staggered out of the bedroom and down the stairs while pulling up his pants.
Inside the bedroom, the pungent air thick as a ghost, Mara reclined on the bed.
Both of her arms were raised with her hands behind her head, revealing her flawless underarms which appeared to be airbrushed and showed no signs of irritation, perspiration, stubble, or residue as her left nipple peeked out above the covers.
No condoms were seen anywhere in the room.
Mike, the resident idiot savant, wore a grin rivalling that of the Cheshire Cat.
His smile was not purely one of happiness(though he was feeling good), he was showing the bruxism of nightlong cocaine abuse.
Hours of cocaine abuse causes clenching and grinding of the teeth.
This is not necessarily due to its action on the jaw, but its effect on the gums.
It causes a dull, painless ache which leads to the urge to grab a steel scribe and pick the living hell out of the dental vestibules.
Fortunately, most cocaine abusers fall asleep from exhaustion before they suffer the sensation of underskin bugs which are more of a tweeker(not cokehead) problem.
Mike had Tourette's syndrome.
Whether or not the label was fabricated by his guilt ridden mother who used drugs while he was in utero was a matter of debate, but totally not appropriate for discussion then.
What was fact, however, was that drugs affected Mike more than they affected the rest of us.
Mike had a penchant for punk rock music, and so he invited us to give him a "wild haircut".
We settled on a mullet wit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593668</id>
	<title>Pointless</title>
	<author>Skarecrow77</author>
	<datestamp>1269363360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is pointless legislation because they very country it's targeting (*coughpeople'srepubliccough*), we refuse to recognize for their already existing undeclared "warfare" against the US, such as their currency manipulation.</p><p>"Cyber warfare" will just be one more thing we ignore for economic/political reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is pointless legislation because they very country it 's targeting ( * coughpeople'srepubliccough * ) , we refuse to recognize for their already existing undeclared " warfare " against the US , such as their currency manipulation .
" Cyber warfare " will just be one more thing we ignore for economic/political reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is pointless legislation because they very country it's targeting (*coughpeople'srepubliccough*), we refuse to recognize for their already existing undeclared "warfare" against the US, such as their currency manipulation.
"Cyber warfare" will just be one more thing we ignore for economic/political reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595346</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>DarkOx</author>
	<datestamp>1269430200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you think that they want something other than that to happen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think that they want something other than that to happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think that they want something other than that to happen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636</id>
	<title>Well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269363000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And by Cyber-Threats, they mean that they fail to encforce the DMCA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And by Cyber-Threats , they mean that they fail to encforce the DMCA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And by Cyber-Threats, they mean that they fail to encforce the DMCA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31599764</id>
	<title>Like clockwork...</title>
	<author>ivogan</author>
	<datestamp>1269453540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet another boneheaded attempt at forcing our views/policies/laws/etc onto other countries.  It makes me reminisce of the grade school playground antics from my youth.  "If you're not with us, you're against us" comes to mind as well...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another boneheaded attempt at forcing our views/policies/laws/etc onto other countries .
It makes me reminisce of the grade school playground antics from my youth .
" If you 're not with us , you 're against us " comes to mind as well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another boneheaded attempt at forcing our views/policies/laws/etc onto other countries.
It makes me reminisce of the grade school playground antics from my youth.
"If you're not with us, you're against us" comes to mind as well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596594</id>
	<title>Being as this IS Hatch</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1269440400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I expect an anti-Linux section to be hidden in the bill to be exploited after passing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect an anti-Linux section to be hidden in the bill to be exploited after passing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect an anti-Linux section to be hidden in the bill to be exploited after passing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595976</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly go wrong</title>
	<author>OldHawk777</author>
	<datestamp>1269436620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, looks like, it could be another corporate-welfare fuckUS bill that protects bigbiz and ignores threats to the US Nation and People.</p><p>The fiat sales pitch is usually flag, god, fear, homeland defense, evil, security... and indicates more [BigBrother] fuckUS bigbiz by biggov laws.</p><p>Biggov (law) is all about bigbiz (economics), never about freedom from threat and welfare (QoL) for US People.</p><p>GodBless the biggies from US buggies, and keep the biggies from controlling/oppressing our life any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , looks like , it could be another corporate-welfare fuckUS bill that protects bigbiz and ignores threats to the US Nation and People.The fiat sales pitch is usually flag , god , fear , homeland defense , evil , security... and indicates more [ BigBrother ] fuckUS bigbiz by biggov laws.Biggov ( law ) is all about bigbiz ( economics ) , never about freedom from threat and welfare ( QoL ) for US People.GodBless the biggies from US buggies , and keep the biggies from controlling/oppressing our life any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, looks like, it could be another corporate-welfare fuckUS bill that protects bigbiz and ignores threats to the US Nation and People.The fiat sales pitch is usually flag, god, fear, homeland defense, evil, security... and indicates more [BigBrother] fuckUS bigbiz by biggov laws.Biggov (law) is all about bigbiz (economics), never about freedom from threat and welfare (QoL) for US People.GodBless the biggies from US buggies, and keep the biggies from controlling/oppressing our life any more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306</id>
	<title>You know...</title>
	<author>Superdarion</author>
	<datestamp>1269369060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.<br> <br>

It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech.<br> <br>

Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your head and don't assume this measure will be abused. Then ask yourselves: will this work? If you come up with an answer while in that state of mind, fine, but until then keep all your "evil US is censoring me!" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you ca n't assume it will .
It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech .
Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your head and do n't assume this measure will be abused .
Then ask yourselves : will this work ?
If you come up with an answer while in that state of mind , fine , but until then keep all your " evil US is censoring me !
" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you 're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.
It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech.
Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your head and don't assume this measure will be abused.
Then ask yourselves: will this work?
If you come up with an answer while in that state of mind, fine, but until then keep all your "evil US is censoring me!
" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595370</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269430440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares? The US only gives aid to countries who are in extreme need anyway like Haiti.</p><p>The US should be more affraid if other countries would do the same. If China would pass a bill that the US should stop telling them what to do or they would stop financing their huge military spendings (also called budget deficit), what could the US do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares ?
The US only gives aid to countries who are in extreme need anyway like Haiti.The US should be more affraid if other countries would do the same .
If China would pass a bill that the US should stop telling them what to do or they would stop financing their huge military spendings ( also called budget deficit ) , what could the US do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares?
The US only gives aid to countries who are in extreme need anyway like Haiti.The US should be more affraid if other countries would do the same.
If China would pass a bill that the US should stop telling them what to do or they would stop financing their huge military spendings (also called budget deficit), what could the US do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596074</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the Empire</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1269437220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If some countries had the political and military leverage, the US would be in deep shit if that catches on...</p><p>See it in whatever way you want, the US are (ab)using its dominant position in global politics to cram their laws down the throats of other nations. Imagine Iran having the upper military and economic hand and being able to force their views on decency on the rest of the globe and you see what the rest of the world thinks of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If some countries had the political and military leverage , the US would be in deep shit if that catches on...See it in whatever way you want , the US are ( ab ) using its dominant position in global politics to cram their laws down the throats of other nations .
Imagine Iran having the upper military and economic hand and being able to force their views on decency on the rest of the globe and you see what the rest of the world thinks of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If some countries had the political and military leverage, the US would be in deep shit if that catches on...See it in whatever way you want, the US are (ab)using its dominant position in global politics to cram their laws down the throats of other nations.
Imagine Iran having the upper military and economic hand and being able to force their views on decency on the rest of the globe and you see what the rest of the world thinks of this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594364</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269369660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Me thinks that with the ACTA beginning to go down in flames that the organizations are attempting to backdoor in copy protection.</p><p>As an American, I find it offensive that our bought and paid for (by industry) politicians would have the unmitigated audacity to attempt to enforce generally ignored law upon the rest of the world via trade restraints.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me thinks that with the ACTA beginning to go down in flames that the organizations are attempting to backdoor in copy protection.As an American , I find it offensive that our bought and paid for ( by industry ) politicians would have the unmitigated audacity to attempt to enforce generally ignored law upon the rest of the world via trade restraints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me thinks that with the ACTA beginning to go down in flames that the organizations are attempting to backdoor in copy protection.As an American, I find it offensive that our bought and paid for (by industry) politicians would have the unmitigated audacity to attempt to enforce generally ignored law upon the rest of the world via trade restraints.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595030</id>
	<title>Re:More like the Pot calling the kettle black</title>
	<author>jabuzz</author>
	<datestamp>1269426300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw that for years the USA harbored Irish terrorists. That is people convicted of blowing things up and murder. They did the same with north African terrorists that blew things up and murdered in France. Of course as soon as USA suffered a major foreign terrorist attack on it's own soil their tune changed.</p><p>This double standard is why the USA has such a bad perception in most of the rest of the World.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw that for years the USA harbored Irish terrorists .
That is people convicted of blowing things up and murder .
They did the same with north African terrorists that blew things up and murdered in France .
Of course as soon as USA suffered a major foreign terrorist attack on it 's own soil their tune changed.This double standard is why the USA has such a bad perception in most of the rest of the World .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw that for years the USA harbored Irish terrorists.
That is people convicted of blowing things up and murder.
They did the same with north African terrorists that blew things up and murdered in France.
Of course as soon as USA suffered a major foreign terrorist attack on it's own soil their tune changed.This double standard is why the USA has such a bad perception in most of the rest of the World.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594942</id>
	<title>Re:You know...</title>
	<author>polle404</author>
	<datestamp>1269424440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.</p></div><p>Just because something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it won't be.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech.</p></div><p>well, to be fair, a lot of it is, and if not, then it's just aimed at lining the pockets of shareholders, over the rights of the people.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your head</p></div><p>Let's not... It's pretty important to most of us in here...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Then ask yourselves: will this work?</p> </div><p>No. Do you honestly believe f.eks. China gives a s... about this?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>until then keep all your "evil US is censoring me!" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA.</p></div><p>...because *AA has such a good trackrecord of respecting peoples rights, sure...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you ca n't assume it will.Just because something has the potential to be abused you ca n't assume it wo n't be.It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech.well , to be fair , a lot of it is , and if not , then it 's just aimed at lining the pockets of shareholders , over the rights of the people.Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your headLet 's not... It 's pretty important to most of us in here...Then ask yourselves : will this work ?
No. Do you honestly believe f.eks .
China gives a s... about this ? until then keep all your " evil US is censoring me !
" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you 're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA....because * AA has such a good trackrecord of respecting peoples rights , sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just 'cause something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it will.Just because something has the potential to be abused you can't assume it won't be.It seems to me that any measure the US takes in order to fix this or that is seen by slashdoters as evil incarnated trying to destroy our god-given free speech.well, to be fair, a lot of it is, and if not, then it's just aimed at lining the pockets of shareholders, over the rights of the people.Just for a second get the free-speech crap out of your headLet's not... It's pretty important to most of us in here...Then ask yourselves: will this work?
No. Do you honestly believe f.eks.
China gives a s... about this?until then keep all your "evil US is censoring me!
" crap to yourselves or at least accept the fact that you're just ranting because it comes from the makers of the RIAA....because *AA has such a good trackrecord of respecting peoples rights, sure...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593910</id>
	<title>Hypocracy at its finest</title>
	<author>allcaps</author>
	<datestamp>1269365280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, would America end up penalizing itself?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , would America end up penalizing itself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, would America end up penalizing itself?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593840</id>
	<title>Re:Not want to be bitching...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're not being forced to follow US laws. This is the US deciding to whom it will give money. I think that's a perfectly appropriate thing for the US to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not being forced to follow US laws .
This is the US deciding to whom it will give money .
I think that 's a perfectly appropriate thing for the US to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not being forced to follow US laws.
This is the US deciding to whom it will give money.
I think that's a perfectly appropriate thing for the US to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595214</id>
	<title>Bill not intended for **AA but cyber warfare</title>
	<author>Veneratio</author>
	<datestamp>1269428580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a lot of people going off on a tangent about this proposed Bill and how it might help the RIAA/MPAA, but it seems to be designed to get a handle on the blatant (possibly state sanctioned) cyber attacks from countries such as China.</p><p>Right now, there isn't any actual internationally accepted law surrounding Cyber Warfare. In other words, there is no consensus about what kind of cyber attack crosses the line to such an extent that it becomes an act of war. A large problem with cyber attacks is attribution. Not knowing who really attacked you limits your options in terms of a proportional response, and this is a big issue for policymakers everywhere. Essentially it has caused most governments to (at best) apply a strictly passive defense to their critical infrastructure, instead of an immediate offensive response (ie. packetting whoever is attacking you).</p><p>In the physical world an invading force would immediately be met with physical violence and quite possibly international outrage towards the offending party, acting (in most cases) as a deterrent. Right now, there is no such deterrent in the arena of Cyber Warfare and countries such as China seem to be actively exploiting that. They know that even IF they get caught, they can simply deny government involvement and blame it on non-state actors. Of course, those "non-state actors" are never actually brought to justice, making the whole exercise futile.</p><p>It seems to me that this Bill is designed to counter this problem by imposing sanctions against countries who either engage in Cyber Warfare or harbor those convenient "non-state actors", and as such seems a sane step forward.</p><p>Of course, one can only hope that such a Bill would not be abused by the **AA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a lot of people going off on a tangent about this proposed Bill and how it might help the RIAA/MPAA , but it seems to be designed to get a handle on the blatant ( possibly state sanctioned ) cyber attacks from countries such as China.Right now , there is n't any actual internationally accepted law surrounding Cyber Warfare .
In other words , there is no consensus about what kind of cyber attack crosses the line to such an extent that it becomes an act of war .
A large problem with cyber attacks is attribution .
Not knowing who really attacked you limits your options in terms of a proportional response , and this is a big issue for policymakers everywhere .
Essentially it has caused most governments to ( at best ) apply a strictly passive defense to their critical infrastructure , instead of an immediate offensive response ( ie .
packetting whoever is attacking you ) .In the physical world an invading force would immediately be met with physical violence and quite possibly international outrage towards the offending party , acting ( in most cases ) as a deterrent .
Right now , there is no such deterrent in the arena of Cyber Warfare and countries such as China seem to be actively exploiting that .
They know that even IF they get caught , they can simply deny government involvement and blame it on non-state actors .
Of course , those " non-state actors " are never actually brought to justice , making the whole exercise futile.It seems to me that this Bill is designed to counter this problem by imposing sanctions against countries who either engage in Cyber Warfare or harbor those convenient " non-state actors " , and as such seems a sane step forward.Of course , one can only hope that such a Bill would not be abused by the * * AA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a lot of people going off on a tangent about this proposed Bill and how it might help the RIAA/MPAA, but it seems to be designed to get a handle on the blatant (possibly state sanctioned) cyber attacks from countries such as China.Right now, there isn't any actual internationally accepted law surrounding Cyber Warfare.
In other words, there is no consensus about what kind of cyber attack crosses the line to such an extent that it becomes an act of war.
A large problem with cyber attacks is attribution.
Not knowing who really attacked you limits your options in terms of a proportional response, and this is a big issue for policymakers everywhere.
Essentially it has caused most governments to (at best) apply a strictly passive defense to their critical infrastructure, instead of an immediate offensive response (ie.
packetting whoever is attacking you).In the physical world an invading force would immediately be met with physical violence and quite possibly international outrage towards the offending party, acting (in most cases) as a deterrent.
Right now, there is no such deterrent in the arena of Cyber Warfare and countries such as China seem to be actively exploiting that.
They know that even IF they get caught, they can simply deny government involvement and blame it on non-state actors.
Of course, those "non-state actors" are never actually brought to justice, making the whole exercise futile.It seems to me that this Bill is designed to counter this problem by imposing sanctions against countries who either engage in Cyber Warfare or harbor those convenient "non-state actors", and as such seems a sane step forward.Of course, one can only hope that such a Bill would not be abused by the **AA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31621336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31599248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31604062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31598116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31605542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31698398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0118228_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31600016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594124
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595624
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597944
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594884
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31599248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31600016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31605542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31604062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31698398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31621336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31597324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31598116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31596824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31594150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31595592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0118228.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0118228.31593696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
