<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_23_1740241</id>
	<title>Does This Headline Know You're Reading It?</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269371700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Not yet, but it could. German artificial intelligence researchers are combining JavaScript with eye-tracking hardware <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/ai/does-headline-know-you&rsquo;re-reading-it">to create 'text 2.0,' which 'infers user intentions.'</a> Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, and a bookmark automatically appears if you glance away. It can pronounce the words you're reading, and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of footnotes or even translations, biographies, definitions, and sound effects or animations, almost like the truly interactive books in Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age. 'With the help of an eye tracker, Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents effects just in time,' the researchers <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QocWsWd7fc&amp;feature=player\_embedded">explain in a video</a>. Meanwhile, DFKI has already created a free 'Processing Easy Eye Tracker plugin' (or PEEP) to manipulate windows with what they call 'gaze-controlled tab expose,' while there's speculation similar technology may be adopted by Apple. Apple has already purchased Tobii's eye-tracking hardware, and 'Whether these are for internal research only or for a future product, Apple is characteristically not saying.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Not yet , but it could .
German artificial intelligence researchers are combining JavaScript with eye-tracking hardware to create 'text 2.0, ' which 'infers user intentions .
' Unimportant words also fade out while you 're skimming the text , and a bookmark automatically appears if you glance away .
It can pronounce the words you 're reading , and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of footnotes or even translations , biographies , definitions , and sound effects or animations , almost like the truly interactive books in Neal Stephenson 's The Diamond Age .
'With the help of an eye tracker , Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents effects just in time, ' the researchers explain in a video .
Meanwhile , DFKI has already created a free 'Processing Easy Eye Tracker plugin ' ( or PEEP ) to manipulate windows with what they call 'gaze-controlled tab expose, ' while there 's speculation similar technology may be adopted by Apple .
Apple has already purchased Tobii 's eye-tracking hardware , and 'Whether these are for internal research only or for a future product , Apple is characteristically not saying .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Not yet, but it could.
German artificial intelligence researchers are combining JavaScript with eye-tracking hardware to create 'text 2.0,' which 'infers user intentions.
' Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, and a bookmark automatically appears if you glance away.
It can pronounce the words you're reading, and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of footnotes or even translations, biographies, definitions, and sound effects or animations, almost like the truly interactive books in Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age.
'With the help of an eye tracker, Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents effects just in time,' the researchers explain in a video.
Meanwhile, DFKI has already created a free 'Processing Easy Eye Tracker plugin' (or PEEP) to manipulate windows with what they call 'gaze-controlled tab expose,' while there's speculation similar technology may be adopted by Apple.
Apple has already purchased Tobii's eye-tracking hardware, and 'Whether these are for internal research only or for a future product, Apple is characteristically not saying.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588154</id>
	<title>on the other hand...</title>
	<author>notgm</author>
	<datestamp>1269376320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this would lead to great practical jokery when two webcam feeds get swapped.  hey, that's not what i'm looking at!  whoa, whoa, whoa!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this would lead to great practical jokery when two webcam feeds get swapped .
hey , that 's not what i 'm looking at !
whoa , whoa , whoa !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this would lead to great practical jokery when two webcam feeds get swapped.
hey, that's not what i'm looking at!
whoa, whoa, whoa!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587992</id>
	<title>In the immortal words of cats and dogs everywhere.</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269375480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DO NOT WANT.</p><p>Damn it, I guess this webcam built into my laptop has suddenly been rendered damned near completely useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DO NOT WANT.Damn it , I guess this webcam built into my laptop has suddenly been rendered damned near completely useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DO NOT WANT.Damn it, I guess this webcam built into my laptop has suddenly been rendered damned near completely useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588396</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269377580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it might fail right now, but just look at how far OCR and voice recognition have come. It'll get there eventually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it might fail right now , but just look at how far OCR and voice recognition have come .
It 'll get there eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it might fail right now, but just look at how far OCR and voice recognition have come.
It'll get there eventually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588226</id>
	<title>No But If You Keep Posting These Idiotic Stories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to rip your servers out of their cage!!!!!</p><p>Does that answers your stupid fucking question?</p><p>Yours In Vladivostok,<br>Kilgore T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to rip your servers out of their cage ! ! ! !
! Does that answers your stupid fucking question ? Yours In Vladivostok,Kilgore T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to rip your servers out of their cage!!!!
!Does that answers your stupid fucking question?Yours In Vladivostok,Kilgore T.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589230</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>bynary</author>
	<datestamp>1269338340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely not.  Call me old-fashioned, but I rather like having to look things up on my own.  This seems like the logical progression of Clippy, "It looks like you're trying to read some text.  Would you like help with..."  God help us all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely not .
Call me old-fashioned , but I rather like having to look things up on my own .
This seems like the logical progression of Clippy , " It looks like you 're trying to read some text .
Would you like help with... " God help us all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely not.
Call me old-fashioned, but I rather like having to look things up on my own.
This seems like the logical progression of Clippy, "It looks like you're trying to read some text.
Would you like help with..."  God help us all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012</id>
	<title>This will do wonders ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For porn<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>For porn : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For porn :/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588372</id>
	<title>Advertisments</title>
	<author>Joeseph64</author>
	<datestamp>1269377460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first thing I thought of with this is how annoying the advertisements on websites that use this will be...  Just imagine, the ads can then *always* be in your viewing area!

*shudder*</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing I thought of with this is how annoying the advertisements on websites that use this will be... Just imagine , the ads can then * always * be in your viewing area !
* shudder *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing I thought of with this is how annoying the advertisements on websites that use this will be...  Just imagine, the ads can then *always* be in your viewing area!
*shudder*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589576</id>
	<title>We see what we do not look at</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1269340320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... will fade out text you aren't reading...</p></div> </blockquote><p>
No no no hell no. Just because I'm not looking at the text doesn't mean I'm not reading it. Humans have this thing, see, it's call periphery vision.
</p><p>
The PS3 does this (as of it's latest "upgrade").  It presents you with a list of items-- say menu options, or a list of songs you've loaded. Then, after a few seconds, it FADES OUT all options that aren't highlighted.  So if you want to see all the options at once, you have to to constantly jog the cursor up and down.  (And to make it even more annoying, if the title of the option is longer than the display width, it'll start to autoscroll after a delay-- and that delay is longer than the fade-out delay).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... will fade out text you are n't reading.. . No no no hell no .
Just because I 'm not looking at the text does n't mean I 'm not reading it .
Humans have this thing , see , it 's call periphery vision .
The PS3 does this ( as of it 's latest " upgrade " ) .
It presents you with a list of items-- say menu options , or a list of songs you 've loaded .
Then , after a few seconds , it FADES OUT all options that are n't highlighted .
So if you want to see all the options at once , you have to to constantly jog the cursor up and down .
( And to make it even more annoying , if the title of the option is longer than the display width , it 'll start to autoscroll after a delay-- and that delay is longer than the fade-out delay ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... will fade out text you aren't reading... 
No no no hell no.
Just because I'm not looking at the text doesn't mean I'm not reading it.
Humans have this thing, see, it's call periphery vision.
The PS3 does this (as of it's latest "upgrade").
It presents you with a list of items-- say menu options, or a list of songs you've loaded.
Then, after a few seconds, it FADES OUT all options that aren't highlighted.
So if you want to see all the options at once, you have to to constantly jog the cursor up and down.
(And to make it even more annoying, if the title of the option is longer than the display width, it'll start to autoscroll after a delay-- and that delay is longer than the fade-out delay).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31614296</id>
	<title>would be good for dyslexics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am dyslexic and I could see how this could really help me.  I also have certain eye tracking issues and maybe this would help with that too, since I am always loosing my place and have a hard time moving from one line to the next.  Plus, I can't skim at all, so I might actually be able to with this technology.  Anyway, I have been in vision therapy for sometime now and a lot of the exercises I do would be augmented by this system and could potentially provide a synergistic effect.  Good luck!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am dyslexic and I could see how this could really help me .
I also have certain eye tracking issues and maybe this would help with that too , since I am always loosing my place and have a hard time moving from one line to the next .
Plus , I ca n't skim at all , so I might actually be able to with this technology .
Anyway , I have been in vision therapy for sometime now and a lot of the exercises I do would be augmented by this system and could potentially provide a synergistic effect .
Good luck !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am dyslexic and I could see how this could really help me.
I also have certain eye tracking issues and maybe this would help with that too, since I am always loosing my place and have a hard time moving from one line to the next.
Plus, I can't skim at all, so I might actually be able to with this technology.
Anyway, I have been in vision therapy for sometime now and a lot of the exercises I do would be augmented by this system and could potentially provide a synergistic effect.
Good luck!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588484</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269377940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The implications are scary! Imagine: a porno that knows your jerking to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The implications are scary !
Imagine : a porno that knows your jerking to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The implications are scary!
Imagine: a porno that knows your jerking to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31597618</id>
	<title>There was never text 1.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269445560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate the name. But this could be really useful for schools. Possibly learning to speed read, or just learning to read itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate the name .
But this could be really useful for schools .
Possibly learning to speed read , or just learning to read itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate the name.
But this could be really useful for schools.
Possibly learning to speed read, or just learning to read itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Mindcontrolled</author>
	<datestamp>1269337080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, Slashdot. How exactly did we come from a tech community always fascinated by new developments to this new shiny home of the technophobes? Nothing against a proper discussion about the pros and cons of a new subject, but why is every other thread these days swamped with mindless "Do not want!!", "Not going to work", "But I am a cross-eyed eskimo midget, this won't work for me so it is shit" and more and more and more crap like that. Yeah, I get it for this specific discussion - cat and STDIN/STDOUT is all a real man needs to handle data. I'll get off your fucking lawn now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , Slashdot .
How exactly did we come from a tech community always fascinated by new developments to this new shiny home of the technophobes ?
Nothing against a proper discussion about the pros and cons of a new subject , but why is every other thread these days swamped with mindless " Do not want ! !
" , " Not going to work " , " But I am a cross-eyed eskimo midget , this wo n't work for me so it is shit " and more and more and more crap like that .
Yeah , I get it for this specific discussion - cat and STDIN/STDOUT is all a real man needs to handle data .
I 'll get off your fucking lawn now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, Slashdot.
How exactly did we come from a tech community always fascinated by new developments to this new shiny home of the technophobes?
Nothing against a proper discussion about the pros and cons of a new subject, but why is every other thread these days swamped with mindless "Do not want!!
", "Not going to work", "But I am a cross-eyed eskimo midget, this won't work for me so it is shit" and more and more and more crap like that.
Yeah, I get it for this specific discussion - cat and STDIN/STDOUT is all a real man needs to handle data.
I'll get off your fucking lawn now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588954</id>
	<title>Re:Could work great with glasses</title>
	<author>justhatched</author>
	<datestamp>1269337140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not so sure, reading with progressive glasses makes people move their heads instead of using their eyes as anything off centre is blurry due to the vertical variable lens strength, so neither the tracking or the projection onto the glasses would not work well in this instance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not so sure , reading with progressive glasses makes people move their heads instead of using their eyes as anything off centre is blurry due to the vertical variable lens strength , so neither the tracking or the projection onto the glasses would not work well in this instance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not so sure, reading with progressive glasses makes people move their heads instead of using their eyes as anything off centre is blurry due to the vertical variable lens strength, so neither the tracking or the projection onto the glasses would not work well in this instance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588968</id>
	<title>The mouse</title>
	<author>Twillerror</author>
	<datestamp>1269337200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not that it would detect everyone, but I do feel like I tend to move the mouse close to a story I'm reading.</p><p>If you could tell the story closest to the middle of the page you might be able to infer it from scrolling as well. I tend to read about 1/3+ down the page. My head naturally rests so that I have to look up a bit to look at say the "slahsdot" logo on this page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that it would detect everyone , but I do feel like I tend to move the mouse close to a story I 'm reading.If you could tell the story closest to the middle of the page you might be able to infer it from scrolling as well .
I tend to read about 1/3 + down the page .
My head naturally rests so that I have to look up a bit to look at say the " slahsdot " logo on this page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that it would detect everyone, but I do feel like I tend to move the mouse close to a story I'm reading.If you could tell the story closest to the middle of the page you might be able to infer it from scrolling as well.
I tend to read about 1/3+ down the page.
My head naturally rests so that I have to look up a bit to look at say the "slahsdot" logo on this page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588036</id>
	<title>No it won't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd have to have the web cam turned on. Who in their right mind leaves the web cam on while surfing the web?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd have to have the web cam turned on .
Who in their right mind leaves the web cam on while surfing the web ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd have to have the web cam turned on.
Who in their right mind leaves the web cam on while surfing the web?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588230</id>
	<title>I have a lazy eye!</title>
	<author>Spectre</author>
	<datestamp>1269376740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, does the software understand the differences between:</p><p>Reading an article but being distracted by the ad on the side of the page<br>Reading an article but being distracted by the redhead walking by<br>Reading an article but I have a lazy eye that doesn't track<br>Reading an article but my ADD kicks in and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , does the software understand the differences between : Reading an article but being distracted by the ad on the side of the pageReading an article but being distracted by the redhead walking byReading an article but I have a lazy eye that does n't trackReading an article but my ADD kicks in and .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, does the software understand the differences between:Reading an article but being distracted by the ad on the side of the pageReading an article but being distracted by the redhead walking byReading an article but I have a lazy eye that doesn't trackReading an article but my ADD kicks in and ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588248</id>
	<title>Done before</title>
	<author>whitedsepdivine</author>
	<datestamp>1269376860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hasn't this been done somewhere for security.  IE: only what your eyes are looking at are in focus.  Therefore anyone looking over your shoulder wouldn't be able to read a paragraph on your screen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't this been done somewhere for security .
IE : only what your eyes are looking at are in focus .
Therefore anyone looking over your shoulder would n't be able to read a paragraph on your screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't this been done somewhere for security.
IE: only what your eyes are looking at are in focus.
Therefore anyone looking over your shoulder wouldn't be able to read a paragraph on your screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588948</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269337080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait for this technology because I LOVE being bombarded with ads!  Only a cranky old Luddite wouldn't welcome our new advertising overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for this technology because I LOVE being bombarded with ads !
Only a cranky old Luddite would n't welcome our new advertising overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for this technology because I LOVE being bombarded with ads!
Only a cranky old Luddite wouldn't welcome our new advertising overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589584</id>
	<title>Darn ! The emails of my girlfriend</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269340380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...will KNOW whether or not I read that remark of hers about going shopping together.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...will KNOW whether or not I read that remark of hers about going shopping together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...will KNOW whether or not I read that remark of hers about going shopping together.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589366</id>
	<title>Finally!  No more skipping my EULAs!</title>
	<author>seanonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269339120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From now on, all of those 30 page documents that you click through can make sure you read every last word of themselves.  How fantastic!</htmltext>
<tokenext>From now on , all of those 30 page documents that you click through can make sure you read every last word of themselves .
How fantastic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From now on, all of those 30 page documents that you click through can make sure you read every last word of themselves.
How fantastic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590608</id>
	<title>Re:YAY! more possibilities to accidentally do thin</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269344820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. Everyone who uses the &ldquo;mouse over = selection, single click = execution&rdquo; UI scheme, is completely mental, and should be forbidden from ever designing an UI again by court order.</p><p>But on a related note: It&rsquo;s interesting how KDE4 chose to take every single of those bad choices from Windows. The only ones they added are an even more annoying fiddly disaster. (Plasma configuration UI, I&rsquo;m looking at you. Especially at the Cashew, which has its own plasmoid called &ldquo;ihatethecashew&rdquo;.)<br>Dolphin is the prime example. It looks as if they chose the most annoying and least usable way for any single option in there. Which perfectly reminded me of how I had do the same in  Windows 95 (!) by going trough all the option and fixing them.<br>In fact I even plan on writing a KDE4antiDAU, just as I had a XPantiDAU and a custom CD for the old Windows line. (DAU = d&#252;mmster anzunehmender User = common German term, meaning &ldquo;dumbest assumable user&rdquo; [literally] or &ldquo;worst user scenario&rdquo; [meaning. Stemming from the worst case scenario for nuclear reactors.])</p><p>I should make a funny video series, mocking bad UI designs, in the style of Ricky Gervais and Lewis Black. ^^<br>KDE4 will definitely fill a season there. But Gnome, Windows and OS X too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Everyone who uses the    mouse over = selection , single click = execution    UI scheme , is completely mental , and should be forbidden from ever designing an UI again by court order.But on a related note : It    s interesting how KDE4 chose to take every single of those bad choices from Windows .
The only ones they added are an even more annoying fiddly disaster .
( Plasma configuration UI , I    m looking at you .
Especially at the Cashew , which has its own plasmoid called    ihatethecashew    .
) Dolphin is the prime example .
It looks as if they chose the most annoying and least usable way for any single option in there .
Which perfectly reminded me of how I had do the same in Windows 95 ( !
) by going trough all the option and fixing them.In fact I even plan on writing a KDE4antiDAU , just as I had a XPantiDAU and a custom CD for the old Windows line .
( DAU = d   mmster anzunehmender User = common German term , meaning    dumbest assumable user    [ literally ] or    worst user scenario    [ meaning .
Stemming from the worst case scenario for nuclear reactors .
] ) I should make a funny video series , mocking bad UI designs , in the style of Ricky Gervais and Lewis Black .
^ ^ KDE4 will definitely fill a season there .
But Gnome , Windows and OS X too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Everyone who uses the “mouse over = selection, single click = execution” UI scheme, is completely mental, and should be forbidden from ever designing an UI again by court order.But on a related note: It’s interesting how KDE4 chose to take every single of those bad choices from Windows.
The only ones they added are an even more annoying fiddly disaster.
(Plasma configuration UI, I’m looking at you.
Especially at the Cashew, which has its own plasmoid called “ihatethecashew”.
)Dolphin is the prime example.
It looks as if they chose the most annoying and least usable way for any single option in there.
Which perfectly reminded me of how I had do the same in  Windows 95 (!
) by going trough all the option and fixing them.In fact I even plan on writing a KDE4antiDAU, just as I had a XPantiDAU and a custom CD for the old Windows line.
(DAU = dümmster anzunehmender User = common German term, meaning “dumbest assumable user” [literally] or “worst user scenario” [meaning.
Stemming from the worst case scenario for nuclear reactors.
])I should make a funny video series, mocking bad UI designs, in the style of Ricky Gervais and Lewis Black.
^^KDE4 will definitely fill a season there.
But Gnome, Windows and OS X too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? Is this really what we wanted??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Is this really what we wanted ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Is this really what we wanted?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589794</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269341400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'll get off your fucking lawn now.</i></p><p>And take your soapbox with you.  There's a reason most people are against this type of stuff.  The applications it would be used for (note the word used for, not applied to) would be ads, ads, ads, and more ads.  It's not about the technology, it's about the damned money.  And it always has been for stuff like this.</p><p>Company that develops stuff like this:  And for a nominal fee, we'll align your ads on the page so they are always in the forefront of the viewers eyes.</p><p>So yeah, do not want.  It's fucking text, man.  Most people are quite capable of determining what they want to look at and what they don't want to look at.</p><p>So, my comment of "DO NOT WANT" still stands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll get off your fucking lawn now.And take your soapbox with you .
There 's a reason most people are against this type of stuff .
The applications it would be used for ( note the word used for , not applied to ) would be ads , ads , ads , and more ads .
It 's not about the technology , it 's about the damned money .
And it always has been for stuff like this.Company that develops stuff like this : And for a nominal fee , we 'll align your ads on the page so they are always in the forefront of the viewers eyes.So yeah , do not want .
It 's fucking text , man .
Most people are quite capable of determining what they want to look at and what they do n't want to look at.So , my comment of " DO NOT WANT " still stands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll get off your fucking lawn now.And take your soapbox with you.
There's a reason most people are against this type of stuff.
The applications it would be used for (note the word used for, not applied to) would be ads, ads, ads, and more ads.
It's not about the technology, it's about the damned money.
And it always has been for stuff like this.Company that develops stuff like this:  And for a nominal fee, we'll align your ads on the page so they are always in the forefront of the viewers eyes.So yeah, do not want.
It's fucking text, man.
Most people are quite capable of determining what they want to look at and what they don't want to look at.So, my comment of "DO NOT WANT" still stands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589884</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>frisket</author>
	<datestamp>1269341880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can think of <b>porn</b> a number of ways <b>chocolate</b> to retain the reader's <b>$$$</b> attention...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of porn a number of ways chocolate to retain the reader 's $ $ $ attention.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of porn a number of ways chocolate to retain the reader's $$$ attention...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591020</id>
	<title>Re: \_\_\_\_phobe</title>
	<author>TaoPhoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1269346440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We like tech. What we don't like is the increasing aggression used to cause as much pain as possible with tech. Possibly wore is the snarky "Disney" presentation of tech whose next immediate application is more State control.</p><p>News: India holds the Guinness Record for the spiciest pepper.<br>Phobe-News: The US miliary has announced plans to "weaponize it".</p><p>It's like an instinct gone awry:</p><p>I'll make you a deal. Name any nifty new piece of tech and I'll churn out a way to make you miserable with it. Fair?</p><p>It's like a social meta-virus. "Big Brother" and friends is almost a social drug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We like tech .
What we do n't like is the increasing aggression used to cause as much pain as possible with tech .
Possibly wore is the snarky " Disney " presentation of tech whose next immediate application is more State control.News : India holds the Guinness Record for the spiciest pepper.Phobe-News : The US miliary has announced plans to " weaponize it " .It 's like an instinct gone awry : I 'll make you a deal .
Name any nifty new piece of tech and I 'll churn out a way to make you miserable with it .
Fair ? It 's like a social meta-virus .
" Big Brother " and friends is almost a social drug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We like tech.
What we don't like is the increasing aggression used to cause as much pain as possible with tech.
Possibly wore is the snarky "Disney" presentation of tech whose next immediate application is more State control.News: India holds the Guinness Record for the spiciest pepper.Phobe-News: The US miliary has announced plans to "weaponize it".It's like an instinct gone awry:I'll make you a deal.
Name any nifty new piece of tech and I'll churn out a way to make you miserable with it.
Fair?It's like a social meta-virus.
"Big Brother" and friends is almost a social drug.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589242</id>
	<title>Re:It can only work if everyone has a webcam</title>
	<author>spazdor</author>
	<datestamp>1269338400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Webcams aimed at <i>Slashdot</i> users?<br>Who would like that, exactly, and why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Webcams aimed at Slashdot users ? Who would like that , exactly , and why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Webcams aimed at Slashdot users?Who would like that, exactly, and why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588688</id>
	<title>Oh, no</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1269335880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>  onLookAway( <br>
     popUp( "you looked away from this messages; please look back");<br>
      playSound("annoyingBleep.mid");<br>
      setPicture("porno\_woman.jpg");<br>
  );<p>
  onLookAt(
      popUp(" Please click the link");<br>
      playSound("click+click+click.mid");<br>
      setPicture("Advert.jpg");<br>
  );
</p><p>---</p><p>
It will happen It will happen, save us
</p><p>---</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Internet\%20Advertising/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Internet Advertising</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>onLookAway ( popUp ( " you looked away from this messages ; please look back " ) ; playSound ( " annoyingBleep.mid " ) ; setPicture ( " porno \ _woman.jpg " ) ; ) ; onLookAt ( popUp ( " Please click the link " ) ; playSound ( " click + click + click.mid " ) ; setPicture ( " Advert.jpg " ) ; ) ; --- It will happen It will happen , save us --- Internet Advertising [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  onLookAway( 
     popUp( "you looked away from this messages; please look back");
      playSound("annoyingBleep.mid");
      setPicture("porno\_woman.jpg");
  );
  onLookAt(
      popUp(" Please click the link");
      playSound("click+click+click.mid");
      setPicture("Advert.jpg");
  );
---
It will happen It will happen, save us
---
Internet Advertising [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588384</id>
	<title>I don't want this for web sites.</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269377520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want this for my MOUSE.  No, seriously.  I'd pay decent money for this.</p><p>If the tracking gets that good, you could put three buttons just below the spacebar:</p><p>
&nbsp; - Left Click<br>
&nbsp; - Track<br>
&nbsp; - Right Click</p><p>When I push the TRACK button, I want the cursor to go where I'm looking.  Then I can click on the right or left mouse buttons as desired, and even hold the mouse button to select, etc.</p><p>The reason I would want a "Track" button is to keep the thing from tracking the cursor with my typing all the time.  That would drive me as batty as the suggested application of this tech.</p><p>I suppose you could do a right-wink/left-wink thing as long as you made it so the eye needed to be closed for longer than an ordinary blink, but having.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want this for my MOUSE .
No , seriously .
I 'd pay decent money for this.If the tracking gets that good , you could put three buttons just below the spacebar :   - Left Click   - Track   - Right ClickWhen I push the TRACK button , I want the cursor to go where I 'm looking .
Then I can click on the right or left mouse buttons as desired , and even hold the mouse button to select , etc.The reason I would want a " Track " button is to keep the thing from tracking the cursor with my typing all the time .
That would drive me as batty as the suggested application of this tech.I suppose you could do a right-wink/left-wink thing as long as you made it so the eye needed to be closed for longer than an ordinary blink , but having .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want this for my MOUSE.
No, seriously.
I'd pay decent money for this.If the tracking gets that good, you could put three buttons just below the spacebar:
  - Left Click
  - Track
  - Right ClickWhen I push the TRACK button, I want the cursor to go where I'm looking.
Then I can click on the right or left mouse buttons as desired, and even hold the mouse button to select, etc.The reason I would want a "Track" button is to keep the thing from tracking the cursor with my typing all the time.
That would drive me as batty as the suggested application of this tech.I suppose you could do a right-wink/left-wink thing as long as you made it so the eye needed to be closed for longer than an ordinary blink, but having.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591228</id>
	<title>Re:This will do wonders ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269347280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Undressing her with your eyes' takes on a whole new meaning . . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Undressing her with your eyes ' takes on a whole new meaning .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Undressing her with your eyes' takes on a whole new meaning .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588262</id>
	<title>Not in a meeting</title>
	<author>sanche</author>
	<datestamp>1269376920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like it could get a lot of us in trouble.  I'm picturing "important" meetings where I'm called into the boss' office to give an opinion on something.  No more sitting down in front of his screen and practicing my "oh yeah, that's great" voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like it could get a lot of us in trouble .
I 'm picturing " important " meetings where I 'm called into the boss ' office to give an opinion on something .
No more sitting down in front of his screen and practicing my " oh yeah , that 's great " voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like it could get a lot of us in trouble.
I'm picturing "important" meetings where I'm called into the boss' office to give an opinion on something.
No more sitting down in front of his screen and practicing my "oh yeah, that's great" voice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588276</id>
	<title>That dictionary thing is a good idea.</title>
	<author>blai</author>
	<datestamp>1269377040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everything else seemed like a b!tch. I wouldn't want words to come fading in and out, pictures appearing only if I stare at a word (new Google Adsense?), or compound words splitting just because I paused for a while. No.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything else seemed like a b ! tch .
I would n't want words to come fading in and out , pictures appearing only if I stare at a word ( new Google Adsense ?
) , or compound words splitting just because I paused for a while .
No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything else seemed like a b!tch.
I wouldn't want words to come fading in and out, pictures appearing only if I stare at a word (new Google Adsense?
), or compound words splitting just because I paused for a while.
No.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588608</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1269335400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Easy fix - exterminate all non-conformists.  We've been looking for the right excuse for decades.  There will be an unmarked van to pick you up shortly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy fix - exterminate all non-conformists .
We 've been looking for the right excuse for decades .
There will be an unmarked van to pick you up shortly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy fix - exterminate all non-conformists.
We've been looking for the right excuse for decades.
There will be an unmarked van to pick you up shortly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589868</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>frisket</author>
	<datestamp>1269341760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All your font are belong to us...</htmltext>
<tokenext>All your font are belong to us.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All your font are belong to us...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590166</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269343020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, "</p><p>Oh great! Yet MORE bloody GREY text which is almost impossible to read! Just what we need!</p><p>What is it with wanker web designers and making as much text as difficult to read as possible, by making it as light as possible, on a white background? The word 'bandwagon' springs to mind. And 'arrogant tossers'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Unimportant words also fade out while you 're skimming the text , " Oh great !
Yet MORE bloody GREY text which is almost impossible to read !
Just what we need ! What is it with wanker web designers and making as much text as difficult to read as possible , by making it as light as possible , on a white background ?
The word 'bandwagon ' springs to mind .
And 'arrogant tossers' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, "Oh great!
Yet MORE bloody GREY text which is almost impossible to read!
Just what we need!What is it with wanker web designers and making as much text as difficult to read as possible, by making it as light as possible, on a white background?
The word 'bandwagon' springs to mind.
And 'arrogant tossers'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588466</id>
	<title>Re:This will do wonders ...</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1269377820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it would more likely be used to screw website owners out of advertising revenue.  Now, instead of advertisers paying per impression (which they already pay a ridiculously low rate for), they can pay by how many users actually look at the ad.  I can see it now:
<br> <br>
<b>Website owner:</b> Your ad showed up 200,000 times on my site this month, so you owe me $1.50.<br>
<b>Advertiser:</b> Sorry, but our stats show that only 20 of those users actually looked at our ad for more than the 2 second minimum, so we only owe you 15 thousandths of a cent.  Don't spend it all in one place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it would more likely be used to screw website owners out of advertising revenue .
Now , instead of advertisers paying per impression ( which they already pay a ridiculously low rate for ) , they can pay by how many users actually look at the ad .
I can see it now : Website owner : Your ad showed up 200,000 times on my site this month , so you owe me $ 1.50 .
Advertiser : Sorry , but our stats show that only 20 of those users actually looked at our ad for more than the 2 second minimum , so we only owe you 15 thousandths of a cent .
Do n't spend it all in one place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it would more likely be used to screw website owners out of advertising revenue.
Now, instead of advertisers paying per impression (which they already pay a ridiculously low rate for), they can pay by how many users actually look at the ad.
I can see it now:
 
Website owner: Your ad showed up 200,000 times on my site this month, so you owe me $1.50.
Advertiser: Sorry, but our stats show that only 20 of those users actually looked at our ad for more than the 2 second minimum, so we only owe you 15 thousandths of a cent.
Don't spend it all in one place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588556</id>
	<title>Sweet!</title>
	<author>olau</author>
	<datestamp>1269335160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, these are various ideas that may not turn up to be useful in practice. But it shows that an e-reader has the potential to actually enhance the reading experience as opposed to just being a less heavy version of the book. That's just amazing!</p><p>Regardless, I liked the fade-out-fill-words idea. I want a button for that in my browser!</p><p>PS: To all the nay-sayers: this is research (DFKI is a German research instution), it's not some company trying to sell you a product. Give them some slack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , these are various ideas that may not turn up to be useful in practice .
But it shows that an e-reader has the potential to actually enhance the reading experience as opposed to just being a less heavy version of the book .
That 's just amazing ! Regardless , I liked the fade-out-fill-words idea .
I want a button for that in my browser ! PS : To all the nay-sayers : this is research ( DFKI is a German research instution ) , it 's not some company trying to sell you a product .
Give them some slack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, these are various ideas that may not turn up to be useful in practice.
But it shows that an e-reader has the potential to actually enhance the reading experience as opposed to just being a less heavy version of the book.
That's just amazing!Regardless, I liked the fade-out-fill-words idea.
I want a button for that in my browser!PS: To all the nay-sayers: this is research (DFKI is a German research instution), it's not some company trying to sell you a product.
Give them some slack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588310</id>
	<title>Do not want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269377220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, I'm already annoyed by those "auto-linkers" which put those stupid mouseover bubbles links on semi-random words on some websites, I don't need more tech that tries to "help me" read content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I 'm already annoyed by those " auto-linkers " which put those stupid mouseover bubbles links on semi-random words on some websites , I do n't need more tech that tries to " help me " read content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I'm already annoyed by those "auto-linkers" which put those stupid mouseover bubbles links on semi-random words on some websites, I don't need more tech that tries to "help me" read content.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589810</id>
	<title>I am most pleasantly surprised...</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269341520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....by the sheer amount of either revulsed or declining comments here. Proof that the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. crowd is still having common sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....by the sheer amount of either revulsed or declining comments here .
Proof that the / .
crowd is still having common sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....by the sheer amount of either revulsed or declining comments here.
Proof that the /.
crowd is still having common sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31595520</id>
	<title>Top Grade Acai</title>
	<author>AnneShirley</author>
	<datestamp>1269431940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i never lesion java script may help for developing robo.using artificial intelligence we make artificial robo.

<a href="http://topgradeacaiextreme.net/" title="topgradeacaiextreme.net" rel="nofollow">Top Grade Acai </a> [topgradeacaiextreme.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>i never lesion java script may help for developing robo.using artificial intelligence we make artificial robo .
Top Grade Acai [ topgradeacaiextreme.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i never lesion java script may help for developing robo.using artificial intelligence we make artificial robo.
Top Grade Acai  [topgradeacaiextreme.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588610</id>
	<title>Twitchy</title>
	<author>swm</author>
	<datestamp>1269335400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want web pages to stand still unless I type or click.</p><p>GUIs that respond to mouse position alone, with<br>- pop ups<br>- hover text<br>- raise/lower windows<br>- flashes or color changes<br>make me mental.</p><p>A GUI that responded to my eye movements...&lt;shudder&gt;...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want web pages to stand still unless I type or click.GUIs that respond to mouse position alone , with- pop ups- hover text- raise/lower windows- flashes or color changesmake me mental.A GUI that responded to my eye movements..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want web pages to stand still unless I type or click.GUIs that respond to mouse position alone, with- pop ups- hover text- raise/lower windows- flashes or color changesmake me mental.A GUI that responded to my eye movements......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588076</id>
	<title>Up next:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do-what-I-mean key. Call me old fashioned, but I prefer static displays without movement when I am reading. Unless this technology really does what I mean, they better make it so that I can turn it off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do-what-I-mean key .
Call me old fashioned , but I prefer static displays without movement when I am reading .
Unless this technology really does what I mean , they better make it so that I can turn it off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do-what-I-mean key.
Call me old fashioned, but I prefer static displays without movement when I am reading.
Unless this technology really does what I mean, they better make it so that I can turn it off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588686</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1269335880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.</p></div><p>Until they succeed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.Until they succeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.Until they succeed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589502</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing "2.0"</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1269339840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want my Web 5.1, with subtext in addition to the usual hypertext.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want my Web 5.1 , with subtext in addition to the usual hypertext .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want my Web 5.1, with subtext in addition to the usual hypertext.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592368</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1269353640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly.</p><p>I have no legs, and personally I think all this 'stairs' bullshit is just overblown nonsense that'll never catch on.  What happens if more than 6 people want to use the stairs at the same time?  What if you climb too high too fast and suffer some sort of badly imagined oxygen related problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly.I have no legs , and personally I think all this 'stairs ' bullshit is just overblown nonsense that 'll never catch on .
What happens if more than 6 people want to use the stairs at the same time ?
What if you climb too high too fast and suffer some sort of badly imagined oxygen related problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly.I have no legs, and personally I think all this 'stairs' bullshit is just overblown nonsense that'll never catch on.
What happens if more than 6 people want to use the stairs at the same time?
What if you climb too high too fast and suffer some sort of badly imagined oxygen related problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589712</id>
	<title>Solution in search of a problem</title>
	<author>leifb</author>
	<datestamp>1269340980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about we teach people to do purely visual (1000 wpm+) reading, so they can teach themselves what words mean, before we start putting shiny nonsense in the way of their comprehension?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we teach people to do purely visual ( 1000 wpm + ) reading , so they can teach themselves what words mean , before we start putting shiny nonsense in the way of their comprehension ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we teach people to do purely visual (1000 wpm+) reading, so they can teach themselves what words mean, before we start putting shiny nonsense in the way of their comprehension?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590002</id>
	<title>Where's The Obligatory Yakov?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269342300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All this time and nobody came up with:</p><p>In Soviet Russia, Web Page READS YOU!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All this time and nobody came up with : In Soviet Russia , Web Page READS YOU ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this time and nobody came up with:In Soviet Russia, Web Page READS YOU!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588192</id>
	<title>A useful tool!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to set mine to always dim the words <i>ambidextrous</i>, <i>quagmire</i>, and <i>porcelain</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to set mine to always dim the words ambidextrous , quagmire , and porcelain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to set mine to always dim the words ambidextrous, quagmire, and porcelain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590742</id>
	<title>Diamond Age</title>
	<author>konohitowa</author>
	<datestamp>1269345360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been a while since I read <i>Diamond Age</i>, but wasn't there a human behind the technology?</p><p>That aside, I think this is pretty cool tech. I keep waiting for the eye trackers to check interpupillary distance so that focus works within rendered 3D enviros. But this is a nice start. I just hope they remove that awful background music from the production version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been a while since I read Diamond Age , but was n't there a human behind the technology ? That aside , I think this is pretty cool tech .
I keep waiting for the eye trackers to check interpupillary distance so that focus works within rendered 3D enviros .
But this is a nice start .
I just hope they remove that awful background music from the production version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been a while since I read Diamond Age, but wasn't there a human behind the technology?That aside, I think this is pretty cool tech.
I keep waiting for the eye trackers to check interpupillary distance so that focus works within rendered 3D enviros.
But this is a nice start.
I just hope they remove that awful background music from the production version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588200</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1269376620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But this is slashdot, where people only read the headline! Who needs sophisticated AI to tell us that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But this is slashdot , where people only read the headline !
Who needs sophisticated AI to tell us that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this is slashdot, where people only read the headline!
Who needs sophisticated AI to tell us that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588182</id>
	<title>Awful</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1269376440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't want to be tracked on how I'm reading something and skimming isn't always the best thing but to then fade out words they think that don't matter is just bad, imo, and some times those seemingly irrelevant words can change the context of things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to be tracked on how I 'm reading something and skimming is n't always the best thing but to then fade out words they think that do n't matter is just bad , imo , and some times those seemingly irrelevant words can change the context of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to be tracked on how I'm reading something and skimming isn't always the best thing but to then fade out words they think that don't matter is just bad, imo, and some times those seemingly irrelevant words can change the context of things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588104</id>
	<title>Nothing "2.0"</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1269376020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or am I the only one who won't use it just because they used the hackneyed "2.0" thing?</p><p>Come on, even a clumsy forced acronym like "READ IT" (READable Interactive Text) would be more explanatory, and wouldn't date it at circa 2010 for the rest of its product life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or am I the only one who wo n't use it just because they used the hackneyed " 2.0 " thing ? Come on , even a clumsy forced acronym like " READ IT " ( READable Interactive Text ) would be more explanatory , and would n't date it at circa 2010 for the rest of its product life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or am I the only one who won't use it just because they used the hackneyed "2.0" thing?Come on, even a clumsy forced acronym like "READ IT" (READable Interactive Text) would be more explanatory, and wouldn't date it at circa 2010 for the rest of its product life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588884</id>
	<title>Gentlemen...</title>
	<author>derfy</author>
	<datestamp>1269336840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are one step closer to this: <a href="http://xkcd.com/462/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/462/</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are one step closer to this : http : //xkcd.com/462/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are one step closer to this: http://xkcd.com/462/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588802</id>
	<title>Wrong link in summary</title>
	<author>PapayaSF</author>
	<datestamp>1269336360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article summarized and quoted is not linked in the summary. The actual article <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/ai/does-headline-know-you're-reading-it" title="hplusmagazine.com">here</a> [hplusmagazine.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article summarized and quoted is not linked in the summary .
The actual article here [ hplusmagazine.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article summarized and quoted is not linked in the summary.
The actual article here [hplusmagazine.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588770</id>
	<title>No.  I mean it.  No.</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1269336240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want the text.  The FRAKKING TEXT.  Please.</p><p>I don't want to go to a link for an overview of some cool product, hardware, or process, and get a VIDEO.  that I can't skim, can't read quietly at my desk, can't even read at lunch because it is too noisy to hear the soundtrack.</p><p>The Web 2.0 is going frakking nuts over features.  When do we get the next<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com bubble burst so we can get rid of these people?</p><p>And this idea has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PREFERENCES.  It has everything to do with tracking my eyeballs and figuring out how to manipulate me even better than they do now.</p><p>I know it's retro, but most of the time, when I'm reading something, EFFECTS get in the way.  Just give me the text.</p><p>And I want it when I want it.  Think you can predict when I'm bored?  It won't be a hard decision for you if this crap comes to my screen.  You'll sense I'm bored about 12 seconds in, and I won't change until I navigate way from your junk.</p><p>Arrghhh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want the text .
The FRAKKING TEXT .
Please.I do n't want to go to a link for an overview of some cool product , hardware , or process , and get a VIDEO .
that I ca n't skim , ca n't read quietly at my desk , ca n't even read at lunch because it is too noisy to hear the soundtrack.The Web 2.0 is going frakking nuts over features .
When do we get the next .com bubble burst so we can get rid of these people ? And this idea has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PREFERENCES .
It has everything to do with tracking my eyeballs and figuring out how to manipulate me even better than they do now.I know it 's retro , but most of the time , when I 'm reading something , EFFECTS get in the way .
Just give me the text.And I want it when I want it .
Think you can predict when I 'm bored ?
It wo n't be a hard decision for you if this crap comes to my screen .
You 'll sense I 'm bored about 12 seconds in , and I wo n't change until I navigate way from your junk.Arrghhh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want the text.
The FRAKKING TEXT.
Please.I don't want to go to a link for an overview of some cool product, hardware, or process, and get a VIDEO.
that I can't skim, can't read quietly at my desk, can't even read at lunch because it is too noisy to hear the soundtrack.The Web 2.0 is going frakking nuts over features.
When do we get the next .com bubble burst so we can get rid of these people?And this idea has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PREFERENCES.
It has everything to do with tracking my eyeballs and figuring out how to manipulate me even better than they do now.I know it's retro, but most of the time, when I'm reading something, EFFECTS get in the way.
Just give me the text.And I want it when I want it.
Think you can predict when I'm bored?
It won't be a hard decision for you if this crap comes to my screen.
You'll sense I'm bored about 12 seconds in, and I won't change until I navigate way from your junk.Arrghhh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590604</id>
	<title>I'm not reading this</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1269344760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not reading the article, I'm not reading any of the comments and any website that implements this will go in the hosts file to my local web server (on a non-standard port) that serves up a custom "Warning, retards built this site" message in whatever format requested - html, png, gif, or anything else.  My webcam is turned around backwards to point at the undecorated, antique white walls and if they can think they see a face or eyeballs in that it's not going to be moving.</p><p>It's rare that I refuse a technology outright, but my eyeballs move for a reason and you're not going to track them, even if it helps me.  Call me a luddite, but no no and fuck no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not reading the article , I 'm not reading any of the comments and any website that implements this will go in the hosts file to my local web server ( on a non-standard port ) that serves up a custom " Warning , retards built this site " message in whatever format requested - html , png , gif , or anything else .
My webcam is turned around backwards to point at the undecorated , antique white walls and if they can think they see a face or eyeballs in that it 's not going to be moving.It 's rare that I refuse a technology outright , but my eyeballs move for a reason and you 're not going to track them , even if it helps me .
Call me a luddite , but no no and fuck no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not reading the article, I'm not reading any of the comments and any website that implements this will go in the hosts file to my local web server (on a non-standard port) that serves up a custom "Warning, retards built this site" message in whatever format requested - html, png, gif, or anything else.
My webcam is turned around backwards to point at the undecorated, antique white walls and if they can think they see a face or eyeballs in that it's not going to be moving.It's rare that I refuse a technology outright, but my eyeballs move for a reason and you're not going to track them, even if it helps me.
Call me a luddite, but no no and fuck no.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Eladith</author>
	<datestamp>1269377280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Text that can understand the intentions of the reader and respond accordingly could be quite useful, for example by explaining some portion of text in more detail. Unfortunately intelligent enough content production system required for such is probably way harder to implement than ads that follow the reader's gaze.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Text that can understand the intentions of the reader and respond accordingly could be quite useful , for example by explaining some portion of text in more detail .
Unfortunately intelligent enough content production system required for such is probably way harder to implement than ads that follow the reader 's gaze .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Text that can understand the intentions of the reader and respond accordingly could be quite useful, for example by explaining some portion of text in more detail.
Unfortunately intelligent enough content production system required for such is probably way harder to implement than ads that follow the reader's gaze.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589498</id>
	<title>I work in eye tracking for research</title>
	<author>comp.sci</author>
	<datestamp>1269339840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and text has to be pretty large for this to function adequately. Tracking progress through a text, sure - but the current state is that we can't tell EXACTLY where the user is looking (the size of the red dot in the video is extremely misleading). We can narrow it down to about the size of a quarter on the screen. Likely not enough for "on the fly translations" of single words but definitely enough for some simpler things (like tracking which ads you're looking at).</htmltext>
<tokenext>and text has to be pretty large for this to function adequately .
Tracking progress through a text , sure - but the current state is that we ca n't tell EXACTLY where the user is looking ( the size of the red dot in the video is extremely misleading ) .
We can narrow it down to about the size of a quarter on the screen .
Likely not enough for " on the fly translations " of single words but definitely enough for some simpler things ( like tracking which ads you 're looking at ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and text has to be pretty large for this to function adequately.
Tracking progress through a text, sure - but the current state is that we can't tell EXACTLY where the user is looking (the size of the red dot in the video is extremely misleading).
We can narrow it down to about the size of a quarter on the screen.
Likely not enough for "on the fly translations" of single words but definitely enough for some simpler things (like tracking which ads you're looking at).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588898</id>
	<title>YAY! more possibilities to accidentally do things!</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1269336900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already hate when webpages open menus, just because I moved my mouse over them (and not even a damn delay - they open instantly, god damn it!) and I also hated mouse gestures, because I don't want the OS to interfere with what I'm doing, just because I coincidentally moved the mouse in a certain way...<br> <br>

that's why I think this (and also the mind-writing from earlier today) are very very VERY bad ideas... some people might find them exciting, but that's just people who haven't been around computers long enough to know all the (similar) bad ideas, that already existed before...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already hate when webpages open menus , just because I moved my mouse over them ( and not even a damn delay - they open instantly , god damn it !
) and I also hated mouse gestures , because I do n't want the OS to interfere with what I 'm doing , just because I coincidentally moved the mouse in a certain way.. . that 's why I think this ( and also the mind-writing from earlier today ) are very very VERY bad ideas... some people might find them exciting , but that 's just people who have n't been around computers long enough to know all the ( similar ) bad ideas , that already existed before.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already hate when webpages open menus, just because I moved my mouse over them (and not even a damn delay - they open instantly, god damn it!
) and I also hated mouse gestures, because I don't want the OS to interfere with what I'm doing, just because I coincidentally moved the mouse in a certain way... 

that's why I think this (and also the mind-writing from earlier today) are very very VERY bad ideas... some people might find them exciting, but that's just people who haven't been around computers long enough to know all the (similar) bad ideas, that already existed before...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589692</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1269340860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sheesh. A software system that can infer my intent? I can't even infer my own intent about half the time.</p><p>That's my wife's job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sheesh .
A software system that can infer my intent ?
I ca n't even infer my own intent about half the time.That 's my wife 's job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sheesh.
A software system that can infer my intent?
I can't even infer my own intent about half the time.That's my wife's job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588796</id>
	<title>Why read...</title>
	<author>Sir Holo</author>
	<datestamp>1269336360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text...</p></div><p>So...  if text is fluffy...  then why would you read it?<br>
<br>
Isn't column-filling text an artifact of the pre-internet age?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unimportant words also fade out while you 're skimming the text...So... if text is fluffy... then why would you read it ?
Is n't column-filling text an artifact of the pre-internet age ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text...So...  if text is fluffy...  then why would you read it?
Isn't column-filling text an artifact of the pre-internet age?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589488</id>
	<title>Re:Duct tape</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1269339720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Duct tape on the camera, or tape your eyelids and eyeballs wide open so the camera can't see normal movement?<br>
Or duct tape googly eyes all over your face?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Duct tape on the camera , or tape your eyelids and eyeballs wide open so the camera ca n't see normal movement ?
Or duct tape googly eyes all over your face ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duct tape on the camera, or tape your eyelids and eyeballs wide open so the camera can't see normal movement?
Or duct tape googly eyes all over your face?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</id>
	<title>Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet another product that will fail. I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly. Let alone what happens if you wear glasses. The refraction or in some cases polarized lens and bifocals will throw such setups into disarray.</p><p>What hapens if more than one person is looking at the screen?  I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that couldn't detect black people in less than perfect lighting. What happens if some is wearing a colored contact lens?  Will that throw the system off?</p><p>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another product that will fail .
I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly .
Let alone what happens if you wear glasses .
The refraction or in some cases polarized lens and bifocals will throw such setups into disarray.What hapens if more than one person is looking at the screen ?
I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that could n't detect black people in less than perfect lighting .
What happens if some is wearing a colored contact lens ?
Will that throw the system off ? These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another product that will fail.
I am cross eyed no surgery will ever be able to straighten my eyes out enough for a computer to track corectly.
Let alone what happens if you wear glasses.
The refraction or in some cases polarized lens and bifocals will throw such setups into disarray.What hapens if more than one person is looking at the screen?
I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that couldn't detect black people in less than perfect lighting.
What happens if some is wearing a colored contact lens?
Will that throw the system off?These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588500</id>
	<title>Text 2.0?</title>
	<author>rugatero</author>
	<datestamp>1269334800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Text has been around for over 7000 years, and we're only now approaching version 2.0?  And people thought Debian had a long release cycle...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Text has been around for over 7000 years , and we 're only now approaching version 2.0 ?
And people thought Debian had a long release cycle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Text has been around for over 7000 years, and we're only now approaching version 2.0?
And people thought Debian had a long release cycle...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588346</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269377340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not really, I mean, not a lot of people have eye problems, or wear glasses, I mean sure it's a big percentage but still not big enough to discourage further research. The problem is privacy, not backing or something else, if Google or any other advertising giant would think they could get away with it, money would start pouring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really , I mean , not a lot of people have eye problems , or wear glasses , I mean sure it 's a big percentage but still not big enough to discourage further research .
The problem is privacy , not backing or something else , if Google or any other advertising giant would think they could get away with it , money would start pouring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really, I mean, not a lot of people have eye problems, or wear glasses, I mean sure it's a big percentage but still not big enough to discourage further research.
The problem is privacy, not backing or something else, if Google or any other advertising giant would think they could get away with it, money would start pouring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588272</id>
	<title>Will be combined with advertisement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because BUY COCA COLA at the moment people often don't even look at advertisements and may even BUY COCA COLA mentally block out areas of the screen such as sidebars and banners. With this technology, advertisers can require BUY COCA COLA that whenever someone is reading a text and not looking BUY COCA COLA at advertisements at all then every five minutes the words that you are a few milliseconds away from BUY COCA COLA reading will change to reflect an advertising message.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because BUY COCA COLA at the moment people often do n't even look at advertisements and may even BUY COCA COLA mentally block out areas of the screen such as sidebars and banners .
With this technology , advertisers can require BUY COCA COLA that whenever someone is reading a text and not looking BUY COCA COLA at advertisements at all then every five minutes the words that you are a few milliseconds away from BUY COCA COLA reading will change to reflect an advertising message .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because BUY COCA COLA at the moment people often don't even look at advertisements and may even BUY COCA COLA mentally block out areas of the screen such as sidebars and banners.
With this technology, advertisers can require BUY COCA COLA that whenever someone is reading a text and not looking BUY COCA COLA at advertisements at all then every five minutes the words that you are a few milliseconds away from BUY COCA COLA reading will change to reflect an advertising message.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588604</id>
	<title>The Help Desk Tickets</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1269335400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We got this new Text 2.0 and stuff and now my computer crashes every time I look at it. Like, seriously. Every time. I think I have a virus."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We got this new Text 2.0 and stuff and now my computer crashes every time I look at it .
Like , seriously .
Every time .
I think I have a virus .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We got this new Text 2.0 and stuff and now my computer crashes every time I look at it.
Like, seriously.
Every time.
I think I have a virus.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589608</id>
	<title>Seriously, though:</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269340560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I DON'T want to be treated as a frakkin' pair of eyeballs, dammit !</htmltext>
<tokenext>I DO N'T want to be treated as a frakkin ' pair of eyeballs , dammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I DON'T want to be treated as a frakkin' pair of eyeballs, dammit !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590266</id>
	<title>You're not tracking my eyes</title>
	<author>paxcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1269343380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but you can fade out the unimportant parts for me. I hope it doesn't dumben me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but you can fade out the unimportant parts for me .
I hope it does n't dumben me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but you can fade out the unimportant parts for me.
I hope it doesn't dumben me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589510</id>
	<title>AI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269339960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You want to engage the user? You want heroines gamers will care about? Two words: eye contact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You want to engage the user ?
You want heroines gamers will care about ?
Two words : eye contact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want to engage the user?
You want heroines gamers will care about?
Two words: eye contact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588442</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing "2.0"</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1269377760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of Web tech in this country. The Web 1.0 was the Web to own. Then the other guy came out with a Web 2.0. Were we scared? Hell, no. Because we hit back with a little thing called the Web 3.0. That's three point zero with parallel synergetic AJAX. For multimedia. But you know what happened next? Shut up, I'm telling you what happened&mdash;the bastards went to Web 4.0. Now we're standing around with our keyboards in our hands, selling Web 3.0 with AJAX. Multimedia or not, suddenly we're the chumps. Well, fuck it. We're going to Web 5.0.</p><p>Sure, we could go to Web 4.0 next, like the competition. That seems like the logical thing to do. After all, three worked out pretty well, and four is the next number after three. So let's play it safe. Let's make a heavier javascript library and call it the ZQuery. Why innovate when we can follow? Oh, I know why: Because we're a business, that's why!</p><p>You think it's crazy? It is crazy. But I don't give a shit. From now on, we're the ones who have the edge in the Web versioning game.</p><p>What part of this don't you understand? If Web 2.0 is good, and Web 3.0 is better, obviously Web 5.0 would make us the best fucking Web that ever existed. Comprende? We didn't claw our way to the top of the Web game by clinging to the Web 2.0 industry standard. We got here by taking chances. Well, Web 5.0 is the biggest chance of all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would someone tell me how this happened ?
We were the fucking vanguard of Web tech in this country .
The Web 1.0 was the Web to own .
Then the other guy came out with a Web 2.0 .
Were we scared ?
Hell , no .
Because we hit back with a little thing called the Web 3.0 .
That 's three point zero with parallel synergetic AJAX .
For multimedia .
But you know what happened next ?
Shut up , I 'm telling you what happened    the bastards went to Web 4.0 .
Now we 're standing around with our keyboards in our hands , selling Web 3.0 with AJAX .
Multimedia or not , suddenly we 're the chumps .
Well , fuck it .
We 're going to Web 5.0.Sure , we could go to Web 4.0 next , like the competition .
That seems like the logical thing to do .
After all , three worked out pretty well , and four is the next number after three .
So let 's play it safe .
Let 's make a heavier javascript library and call it the ZQuery .
Why innovate when we can follow ?
Oh , I know why : Because we 're a business , that 's why ! You think it 's crazy ?
It is crazy .
But I do n't give a shit .
From now on , we 're the ones who have the edge in the Web versioning game.What part of this do n't you understand ?
If Web 2.0 is good , and Web 3.0 is better , obviously Web 5.0 would make us the best fucking Web that ever existed .
Comprende ? We did n't claw our way to the top of the Web game by clinging to the Web 2.0 industry standard .
We got here by taking chances .
Well , Web 5.0 is the biggest chance of all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would someone tell me how this happened?
We were the fucking vanguard of Web tech in this country.
The Web 1.0 was the Web to own.
Then the other guy came out with a Web 2.0.
Were we scared?
Hell, no.
Because we hit back with a little thing called the Web 3.0.
That's three point zero with parallel synergetic AJAX.
For multimedia.
But you know what happened next?
Shut up, I'm telling you what happened—the bastards went to Web 4.0.
Now we're standing around with our keyboards in our hands, selling Web 3.0 with AJAX.
Multimedia or not, suddenly we're the chumps.
Well, fuck it.
We're going to Web 5.0.Sure, we could go to Web 4.0 next, like the competition.
That seems like the logical thing to do.
After all, three worked out pretty well, and four is the next number after three.
So let's play it safe.
Let's make a heavier javascript library and call it the ZQuery.
Why innovate when we can follow?
Oh, I know why: Because we're a business, that's why!You think it's crazy?
It is crazy.
But I don't give a shit.
From now on, we're the ones who have the edge in the Web versioning game.What part of this don't you understand?
If Web 2.0 is good, and Web 3.0 is better, obviously Web 5.0 would make us the best fucking Web that ever existed.
Comprende? We didn't claw our way to the top of the Web game by clinging to the Web 2.0 industry standard.
We got here by taking chances.
Well, Web 5.0 is the biggest chance of all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589756</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>Yoozer</author>
	<datestamp>1269341160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What has been seen... cannot be unseen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What has been seen... can not be unseen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What has been seen... cannot be unseen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591650</id>
	<title>Re:This will do wonders ...</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1269349320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I've got eyes, pervert."</p><p>Yes it would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've got eyes , pervert .
" Yes it would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've got eyes, pervert.
"Yes it would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588464</id>
	<title>The headlines become self aware....</title>
	<author>oscarwumpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269377820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and we are all slapped with sexual harassment lawsuits for staring at the headlines' tits. Starting now, I am going to only read internet postings with crossed eyes: take that, technology!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and we are all slapped with sexual harassment lawsuits for staring at the headlines ' tits .
Starting now , I am going to only read internet postings with crossed eyes : take that , technology !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and we are all slapped with sexual harassment lawsuits for staring at the headlines' tits.
Starting now, I am going to only read internet postings with crossed eyes: take that, technology!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589178</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269338100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy solution, calibration software. Just like track pads have.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy solution , calibration software .
Just like track pads have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy solution, calibration software.
Just like track pads have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589168</id>
	<title>Re:In Soviet Russia Webpage reads you?</title>
	<author>shadowfaxcrx</author>
	<datestamp>1269338040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The auto-bookmark when you look away might be nice, but dimming text you're not looking at that second is just plain stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The auto-bookmark when you look away might be nice , but dimming text you 're not looking at that second is just plain stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The auto-bookmark when you look away might be nice, but dimming text you're not looking at that second is just plain stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589698</id>
	<title>Zippy, you've changed!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269340920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You always used to put the random words in <b>bold</b> type, not dim <i>italics</i>!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You always used to put the random words in bold type , not dim italics !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You always used to put the random words in bold type, not dim italics!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589134</id>
	<title>Jitter</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1269337860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately I can no longer find the source, but I seem to recall that jitter makes this pretty unworkable: that is, human eyes are almost never absolutely, 100\% still.  And when they do move, it is not necessarily to an exact point, but rather to a general area/region of a certain size.
<p>
Found this when I was looking for a way to make eye-tracking window focus changes because I was tired of typing into the wrong window<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)
</p><p>
All that said - TFA points to the thought controlled computing article source, and I can't (won't) view video at work -- maybe TFV addresses this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately I can no longer find the source , but I seem to recall that jitter makes this pretty unworkable : that is , human eyes are almost never absolutely , 100 \ % still .
And when they do move , it is not necessarily to an exact point , but rather to a general area/region of a certain size .
Found this when I was looking for a way to make eye-tracking window focus changes because I was tired of typing into the wrong window ; ) All that said - TFA points to the thought controlled computing article source , and I ca n't ( wo n't ) view video at work -- maybe TFV addresses this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately I can no longer find the source, but I seem to recall that jitter makes this pretty unworkable: that is, human eyes are almost never absolutely, 100\% still.
And when they do move, it is not necessarily to an exact point, but rather to a general area/region of a certain size.
Found this when I was looking for a way to make eye-tracking window focus changes because I was tired of typing into the wrong window ;)

All that said - TFA points to the thought controlled computing article source, and I can't (won't) view video at work -- maybe TFV addresses this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588228</id>
	<title>Serious invasion of privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All they need to do is show an attractive male and female swimsuit model and measure which one my eyes spend more time on, and they've pretty reliably established my sexual preferences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All they need to do is show an attractive male and female swimsuit model and measure which one my eyes spend more time on , and they 've pretty reliably established my sexual preferences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All they need to do is show an attractive male and female swimsuit model and measure which one my eyes spend more time on, and they've pretty reliably established my sexual preferences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31593586</id>
	<title>What they really said</title>
	<author>BillX</author>
	<datestamp>1269362520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, and <b>ads</b> automatically appears if you glance away. It can pronounce the words you're reading, and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of <b>ads</b> or even <b>video ads</b>, <b>noisy ads</b> or <b>noisy video ads</b>, almost like the truly interactive <b>ads</b> in <b>Minority Report</b>. 'With the help of an eye tracker, Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents <b>tampon ads</b> just in time,' the researchers explain in a video.</p><p>Fixed that for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unimportant words also fade out while you 're skimming the text , and ads automatically appears if you glance away .
It can pronounce the words you 're reading , and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of ads or even video ads , noisy ads or noisy video ads , almost like the truly interactive ads in Minority Report .
'With the help of an eye tracker , Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents tampon ads just in time, ' the researchers explain in a video.Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unimportant words also fade out while you're skimming the text, and ads automatically appears if you glance away.
It can pronounce the words you're reading, and reading certain words can trigger the appearance of ads or even video ads, noisy ads or noisy video ads, almost like the truly interactive ads in Minority Report.
'With the help of an eye tracker, Text 2.0 follows your progress and presents tampon ads just in time,' the researchers explain in a video.Fixed that for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590174</id>
	<title>Yuck.</title>
	<author>pubwvj</author>
	<datestamp>1269343080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This I do not need. It's worse than Flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This I do not need .
It 's worse than Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This I do not need.
It's worse than Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587982</id>
	<title>Duct tape</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/problem</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/problem</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/problem</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588350</id>
	<title>Bad presentation!</title>
	<author>gaggle</author>
	<datestamp>1269377340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or is that just a horrible video? Especially for Slashdotters.. If they would simply recut it, showing each of the useful features (bookmarking, skimming, translation, read-aloud) it would have made me interested. It sounds like a cool research project but right now the smarminess of the video has me running for the hills.
<br> <br>
(And what's with the first link? Seems to be to some totally different topic, but maybe that's my bad for trying to read the article)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is that just a horrible video ?
Especially for Slashdotters.. If they would simply recut it , showing each of the useful features ( bookmarking , skimming , translation , read-aloud ) it would have made me interested .
It sounds like a cool research project but right now the smarminess of the video has me running for the hills .
( And what 's with the first link ?
Seems to be to some totally different topic , but maybe that 's my bad for trying to read the article )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is that just a horrible video?
Especially for Slashdotters.. If they would simply recut it, showing each of the useful features (bookmarking, skimming, translation, read-aloud) it would have made me interested.
It sounds like a cool research project but right now the smarminess of the video has me running for the hills.
(And what's with the first link?
Seems to be to some totally different topic, but maybe that's my bad for trying to read the article)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588008</id>
	<title>It can only work if everyone has a webcam</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1269375540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This only works if everyone has a webcam that is sending feedback to the website. I can see how everybody on slashdot would like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This only works if everyone has a webcam that is sending feedback to the website .
I can see how everybody on slashdot would like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This only works if everyone has a webcam that is sending feedback to the website.
I can see how everybody on slashdot would like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587996</id>
	<title>No comment.</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1269375480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The headline requested your interaction but as of post time has received no comment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline requested your interaction but as of post time has received no comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline requested your interaction but as of post time has received no comment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588144</id>
	<title>Could work great with glasses</title>
	<author>pegasustonans</author>
	<datestamp>1269376260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A great application for this would be as an overlay on glasses.</p><p>If I could get on-the-fly translations of shop-signs and menus projected on to my glasses, it would be awesome.</p><p>I could also see this as the next powerpoint whizz-bang animated presentation tool, and that doesn't make me quite as happy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A great application for this would be as an overlay on glasses.If I could get on-the-fly translations of shop-signs and menus projected on to my glasses , it would be awesome.I could also see this as the next powerpoint whizz-bang animated presentation tool , and that does n't make me quite as happy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A great application for this would be as an overlay on glasses.If I could get on-the-fly translations of shop-signs and menus projected on to my glasses, it would be awesome.I could also see this as the next powerpoint whizz-bang animated presentation tool, and that doesn't make me quite as happy...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592074</id>
	<title>Better idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269351720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I often read texts with a television on nearby. So I would look away quite a lot.<br>It would be handier when in stead of following my eyes it would follow some kind of puck I had next to the keyboard. It's not clear to me how the system can distinguish between translate this, show word break etcetera. Maybe a button on the puck would help. It could show a menu and I would choose from a list.<br>I hope I can patent it!<br>Cheers,<br>Gerie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I often read texts with a television on nearby .
So I would look away quite a lot.It would be handier when in stead of following my eyes it would follow some kind of puck I had next to the keyboard .
It 's not clear to me how the system can distinguish between translate this , show word break etcetera .
Maybe a button on the puck would help .
It could show a menu and I would choose from a list.I hope I can patent it ! Cheers,Gerie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I often read texts with a television on nearby.
So I would look away quite a lot.It would be handier when in stead of following my eyes it would follow some kind of puck I had next to the keyboard.
It's not clear to me how the system can distinguish between translate this, show word break etcetera.
Maybe a button on the puck would help.
It could show a menu and I would choose from a list.I hope I can patent it!Cheers,Gerie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588120</id>
	<title>This sounds excellent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in combination with a bit of tape.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in combination with a bit of tape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in combination with a bit of tape.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31593640</id>
	<title>Block that java</title>
	<author>whipnet</author>
	<datestamp>1269363000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NoScript FTW!

*</htmltext>
<tokenext>NoScript FTW !
*</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NoScript FTW!
*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31604950</id>
	<title>Eyetracking for Multiple Monitors,  Window focus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269431220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eyetracking for changing monitor screens, and/or window focus, would be pretty cool.<br>especially if it could be enabled/disabled quickly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eyetracking for changing monitor screens , and/or window focus , would be pretty cool.especially if it could be enabled/disabled quickly .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eyetracking for changing monitor screens, and/or window focus, would be pretty cool.especially if it could be enabled/disabled quickly ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592150</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>IICV</author>
	<datestamp>1269352200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that couldn't detect black people in less than perfect lighting.</p></div></blockquote><p>You may be confusing reality with <a href="http://www.tvfanatic.com/shows/better-off-ted/episodes/season\_1/racial-sensitivity/" title="tvfanatic.com">Better Off Ted.</a> [tvfanatic.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that could n't detect black people in less than perfect lighting.You may be confusing reality with Better Off Ted .
[ tvfanatic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I forgot who but some one recently made camera with motion sensing that couldn't detect black people in less than perfect lighting.You may be confusing reality with Better Off Ted.
[tvfanatic.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590370</id>
	<title>Yeah right.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269343860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As if I would give a website constant access to my webcam. I don&rsquo;t even give that to friends, because, who looks presentable when sitting in front of his PC alone? ^^</p><p>Protip: Look at chatroulette for the answer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As if I would give a website constant access to my webcam .
I don    t even give that to friends , because , who looks presentable when sitting in front of his PC alone ?
^ ^ Protip : Look at chatroulette for the answer .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As if I would give a website constant access to my webcam.
I don’t even give that to friends, because, who looks presentable when sitting in front of his PC alone?
^^Protip: Look at chatroulette for the answer.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588400</id>
	<title>Re:Do companies pay attention to details</title>
	<author>Dumnezeu</author>
	<datestamp>1269377640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.</p></div><p>True, but the concept is still pretty cool! What if you apply it to something else, like a "smart" book? What if the text automatically changes the appearance so that people with eye problems won't need to wear their glasses or will be able to read when even their glasses couldn't help. Those "details" you speak of are actually details. As a product, in its current state, Text 2.0 will fail... but don't forget, there are still many people with lots of money out there who are interested in these weird projects. All one has to see is the potential of a product, not the product its self.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.True , but the concept is still pretty cool !
What if you apply it to something else , like a " smart " book ?
What if the text automatically changes the appearance so that people with eye problems wo n't need to wear their glasses or will be able to read when even their glasses could n't help .
Those " details " you speak of are actually details .
As a product , in its current state , Text 2.0 will fail... but do n't forget , there are still many people with lots of money out there who are interested in these weird projects .
All one has to see is the potential of a product , not the product its self .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These lab tests always seem to fail in the real world.True, but the concept is still pretty cool!
What if you apply it to something else, like a "smart" book?
What if the text automatically changes the appearance so that people with eye problems won't need to wear their glasses or will be able to read when even their glasses couldn't help.
Those "details" you speak of are actually details.
As a product, in its current state, Text 2.0 will fail... but don't forget, there are still many people with lots of money out there who are interested in these weird projects.
All one has to see is the potential of a product, not the product its self.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1740241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31587966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31591228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31590608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31592368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1740241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31588192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1740241.31589698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
