<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_23_1516243</id>
	<title>Research Lets You Type Words By Thought Alone</title>
	<author>StoneLion</author>
	<datestamp>1269360900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"How about <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/224100013">typing on a computer just by thinking</a> about it? The downside is you have to wear a skull cap with electrodes that capture your brain waves like an EEG machine. According to this EE Times story, a team of researchers from Belgium and the Netherlands has presented Mind Speller, a thought-to-text device intended to help people with movement disabilities. The system does rely on a lot of processing on a remote computer, but it is a wireless system. And these thought-to-computer systems have wider applicability than medical support. One of the research groups involved in this development has already <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/202801670">looked at wireless electroencephalography</a> (EEG) to enable measures of emotion to be fed back into computer games."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " How about typing on a computer just by thinking about it ?
The downside is you have to wear a skull cap with electrodes that capture your brain waves like an EEG machine .
According to this EE Times story , a team of researchers from Belgium and the Netherlands has presented Mind Speller , a thought-to-text device intended to help people with movement disabilities .
The system does rely on a lot of processing on a remote computer , but it is a wireless system .
And these thought-to-computer systems have wider applicability than medical support .
One of the research groups involved in this development has already looked at wireless electroencephalography ( EEG ) to enable measures of emotion to be fed back into computer games .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "How about typing on a computer just by thinking about it?
The downside is you have to wear a skull cap with electrodes that capture your brain waves like an EEG machine.
According to this EE Times story, a team of researchers from Belgium and the Netherlands has presented Mind Speller, a thought-to-text device intended to help people with movement disabilities.
The system does rely on a lot of processing on a remote computer, but it is a wireless system.
And these thought-to-computer systems have wider applicability than medical support.
One of the research groups involved in this development has already looked at wireless electroencephalography (EEG) to enable measures of emotion to be fed back into computer games.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586454</id>
	<title>Re:Horrible horrible idea...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269369840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wanted to comment on the wrongness of the moderation this post received, but instead all my brain is thinking is that whoever the douche is that moderated this a troll mod needs their points taken away and needs to get laid something fierce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wanted to comment on the wrongness of the moderation this post received , but instead all my brain is thinking is that whoever the douche is that moderated this a troll mod needs their points taken away and needs to get laid something fierce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wanted to comment on the wrongness of the moderation this post received, but instead all my brain is thinking is that whoever the douche is that moderated this a troll mod needs their points taken away and needs to get laid something fierce.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585492</id>
	<title>Every thing I type hurts</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1269366180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so this would be wonderful.</p><p>Bursitis in right thumb, carpal tunnel both hands.  nerve damage from chemo.</p><p>I can type- but it's like level "2" (of 10) pain, every keystroke.</p><p>I looked into the NIA and have used voice software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so this would be wonderful.Bursitis in right thumb , carpal tunnel both hands .
nerve damage from chemo.I can type- but it 's like level " 2 " ( of 10 ) pain , every keystroke.I looked into the NIA and have used voice software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so this would be wonderful.Bursitis in right thumb, carpal tunnel both hands.
nerve damage from chemo.I can type- but it's like level "2" (of 10) pain, every keystroke.I looked into the NIA and have used voice software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589126</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269337800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/12/23/1511251/Typing-With-Your-Brain?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">last article that was posted</a> [slashdot.org] was only about typing individual letters, and of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.</p><p>And of course the researchers thought so too, which was fine because the technology isn&rsquo;t done yet.</p></div><p>Long way to go, even if you can "type" in any language. One of our goals will be to create a thought reader that is not language dependent. For instance, this would allow deaf-mutes (from birth) to communicate --have you ever thought what their minds tell them our voices sound like? What do you think they hear themselves sound like in their head?</p><p>There are two other goals beyond this. One is to not have to drill my head to place implants when I want to talk to my pheripheals with no middleman.  The ultimate goal is to connect \_two\_ skullcaps to gain telepathy and thought sharing. That last one will need a whole lot more understanding of how our neurons work. Well, get working now so our grandchildren can start enjoying this tech 100 years from now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The last article that was posted [ slashdot.org ] was only about typing individual letters , and of course people were quick to say how useless that was : slow and impractical.And of course the researchers thought so too , which was fine because the technology isn    t done yet.Long way to go , even if you can " type " in any language .
One of our goals will be to create a thought reader that is not language dependent .
For instance , this would allow deaf-mutes ( from birth ) to communicate --have you ever thought what their minds tell them our voices sound like ?
What do you think they hear themselves sound like in their head ? There are two other goals beyond this .
One is to not have to drill my head to place implants when I want to talk to my pheripheals with no middleman .
The ultimate goal is to connect \ _two \ _ skullcaps to gain telepathy and thought sharing .
That last one will need a whole lot more understanding of how our neurons work .
Well , get working now so our grandchildren can start enjoying this tech 100 years from now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last article that was posted [slashdot.org] was only about typing individual letters, and of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.And of course the researchers thought so too, which was fine because the technology isn’t done yet.Long way to go, even if you can "type" in any language.
One of our goals will be to create a thought reader that is not language dependent.
For instance, this would allow deaf-mutes (from birth) to communicate --have you ever thought what their minds tell them our voices sound like?
What do you think they hear themselves sound like in their head?There are two other goals beyond this.
One is to not have to drill my head to place implants when I want to talk to my pheripheals with no middleman.
The ultimate goal is to connect \_two\_ skullcaps to gain telepathy and thought sharing.
That last one will need a whole lot more understanding of how our neurons work.
Well, get working now so our grandchildren can start enjoying this tech 100 years from now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586592</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1269370320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.</p></div><p>Actually some of us said the hype was stupid.</p><p>By thought ALONE, eh?</p><p>So, like, no cables, computers, software, hardware...?  All I have to do is think, and my typing appears somewhere, without any intervening, like, STUFF?</p><p>Because that's what "alone" would seem to mean.  No one would think it reasonable or honest to say, "Automobile allows people to travel huge distances at high speeds by ARMS ALONE!"  even though that's what cruise control does.  We'd all recognize that as misleading and stupid.</p><p>So why do we keep seeing the same kinds of claim on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. about these arm/hand/finger replacement technologies?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>of course people were quick to say how useless that was : slow and impractical.Actually some of us said the hype was stupid.By thought ALONE , eh ? So , like , no cables , computers , software , hardware... ?
All I have to do is think , and my typing appears somewhere , without any intervening , like , STUFF ? Because that 's what " alone " would seem to mean .
No one would think it reasonable or honest to say , " Automobile allows people to travel huge distances at high speeds by ARMS ALONE !
" even though that 's what cruise control does .
We 'd all recognize that as misleading and stupid.So why do we keep seeing the same kinds of claim on / .
about these arm/hand/finger replacement technologies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.Actually some of us said the hype was stupid.By thought ALONE, eh?So, like, no cables, computers, software, hardware...?
All I have to do is think, and my typing appears somewhere, without any intervening, like, STUFF?Because that's what "alone" would seem to mean.
No one would think it reasonable or honest to say, "Automobile allows people to travel huge distances at high speeds by ARMS ALONE!
"  even though that's what cruise control does.
We'd all recognize that as misleading and stupid.So why do we keep seeing the same kinds of claim on /.
about these arm/hand/finger replacement technologies?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586368</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, well..</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269369480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pictures in your head are what matter; the rest can be learned. These days you don't even need eye-hand coordination, since we have programs like Photoshop. Take some classes at your local university or community college, I'm sure they have an art department.</p><p>Coming up with an idea is the hard part, exersizing it is easy (which is why I don't have more journals than I do -- I have to wait for the muse to hit).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pictures in your head are what matter ; the rest can be learned .
These days you do n't even need eye-hand coordination , since we have programs like Photoshop .
Take some classes at your local university or community college , I 'm sure they have an art department.Coming up with an idea is the hard part , exersizing it is easy ( which is why I do n't have more journals than I do -- I have to wait for the muse to hit ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pictures in your head are what matter; the rest can be learned.
These days you don't even need eye-hand coordination, since we have programs like Photoshop.
Take some classes at your local university or community college, I'm sure they have an art department.Coming up with an idea is the hard part, exersizing it is easy (which is why I don't have more journals than I do -- I have to wait for the muse to hit).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587512</id>
	<title>Think about what I type?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1269373320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn! The next thing you know, they'll expect me to read TFA before posting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn !
The next thing you know , they 'll expect me to read TFA before posting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn!
The next thing you know, they'll expect me to read TFA before posting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585930</id>
	<title>"Tits!" would be fine...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1269367800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch out for that guy whose text is riddled with "DIE!", "DIE MOTHERFUCKER!", "I HATE YOU ALL!" and "ONE DAY YOU WILL ALL BURN!".</p><p>He brings a heavy looking sports-bag in the office one day - find a reason to quickly step outside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch out for that guy whose text is riddled with " DIE !
" , " DIE MOTHERFUCKER !
" , " I HATE YOU ALL !
" and " ONE DAY YOU WILL ALL BURN !
" .He brings a heavy looking sports-bag in the office one day - find a reason to quickly step outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch out for that guy whose text is riddled with "DIE!
", "DIE MOTHERFUCKER!
", "I HATE YOU ALL!
" and "ONE DAY YOU WILL ALL BURN!
".He brings a heavy looking sports-bag in the office one day - find a reason to quickly step outside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585478</id>
	<title>It may let you type by will alone...</title>
	<author>Rhacman</author>
	<datestamp>1269366120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>but will it set your mind in motion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>but will it set your mind in motion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but will it set your mind in motion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586012</id>
	<title>Select all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269367980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be so much easier to think "let&rsquo;s set so double the killer delete select all" than to say it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be so much easier to think " let    s set so double the killer delete select all " than to say it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be so much easier to think "let’s set so double the killer delete select all" than to say it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587754</id>
	<title>Clinical use for misdiagnosed "comatose" patients?</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1269374340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess if you're <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1230092/Rom-Houben-Patient-trapped-23-year-coma-conscious-along.html" title="dailymail.co.uk">Rom Houben</a> [dailymail.co.uk], you'd have a legitimate need for one of these things.</p><p>I mean, someone like Dr Steven Laureys would presumably come in, attach the electrode cap to your head, post the operating instructions on the ceiling over your bed, and leave you alone with it.  After a few hours, if you've typed out "OMG Help Me I'm trapped and I can't move -- oh and please scratch my nose!" then you're not comatose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess if you 're Rom Houben [ dailymail.co.uk ] , you 'd have a legitimate need for one of these things.I mean , someone like Dr Steven Laureys would presumably come in , attach the electrode cap to your head , post the operating instructions on the ceiling over your bed , and leave you alone with it .
After a few hours , if you 've typed out " OMG Help Me I 'm trapped and I ca n't move -- oh and please scratch my nose !
" then you 're not comatose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess if you're Rom Houben [dailymail.co.uk], you'd have a legitimate need for one of these things.I mean, someone like Dr Steven Laureys would presumably come in, attach the electrode cap to your head, post the operating instructions on the ceiling over your bed, and leave you alone with it.
After a few hours, if you've typed out "OMG Help Me I'm trapped and I can't move -- oh and please scratch my nose!
" then you're not comatose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585444</id>
	<title>wonderful</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1269366000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be far easier than typing with one hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be far easier than typing with one hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be far easier than typing with one hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585920</id>
	<title>Re:One thing this story has made me realise...</title>
	<author>AnonGCB</author>
	<datestamp>1269367740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1, though probably closer to every 6 hours. Still, not nearly as often as these comments would indicate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 , though probably closer to every 6 hours .
Still , not nearly as often as these comments would indicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1, though probably closer to every 6 hours.
Still, not nearly as often as these comments would indicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31593382</id>
	<title>Re:One thing this story has made me realise...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269360720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the thing is: There is not much stimulation when you&rsquo;re alone in your basement.<br>If you ever get a GF, or go outside... or even both at the same time (*gasp*)... that will change. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the thing is : There is not much stimulation when you    re alone in your basement.If you ever get a GF , or go outside... or even both at the same time ( * gasp * ) ... that will change .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the thing is: There is not much stimulation when you’re alone in your basement.If you ever get a GF, or go outside... or even both at the same time (*gasp*)... that will change.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31592870</id>
	<title>Re:"Tits!" would be fine...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269356940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A reason? By the time you came up with it, it&rsquo;s already too late.<br>Oh, and even a single gas bottle can wreck the whole house, while fitting in that sports bag. So unless you step out of the whole building, you will be one of those who aren&rsquo;t liberated by death, but still alive under the rocks for a slow and painful death.</p><p>Better just make a quick run. You will have enough to think up an excuse when nothing happened and you came back.<br>(Protip: Raising you phone to your ear and running outside while saying hello always is a quick solution.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A reason ?
By the time you came up with it , it    s already too late.Oh , and even a single gas bottle can wreck the whole house , while fitting in that sports bag .
So unless you step out of the whole building , you will be one of those who aren    t liberated by death , but still alive under the rocks for a slow and painful death.Better just make a quick run .
You will have enough to think up an excuse when nothing happened and you came back .
( Protip : Raising you phone to your ear and running outside while saying hello always is a quick solution .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A reason?
By the time you came up with it, it’s already too late.Oh, and even a single gas bottle can wreck the whole house, while fitting in that sports bag.
So unless you step out of the whole building, you will be one of those who aren’t liberated by death, but still alive under the rocks for a slow and painful death.Better just make a quick run.
You will have enough to think up an excuse when nothing happened and you came back.
(Protip: Raising you phone to your ear and running outside while saying hello always is a quick solution.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31608318</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong title</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1269513360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they could they could scale the tech down a bit, maybe build it into a hat, combine it with some kind of HUD (either in the form of glasses or contacts), you'd have a true wearable computer.<br>The low typing speed is a small price to pay for something that cool/useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they could they could scale the tech down a bit , maybe build it into a hat , combine it with some kind of HUD ( either in the form of glasses or contacts ) , you 'd have a true wearable computer.The low typing speed is a small price to pay for something that cool/useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they could they could scale the tech down a bit, maybe build it into a hat, combine it with some kind of HUD (either in the form of glasses or contacts), you'd have a true wearable computer.The low typing speed is a small price to pay for something that cool/useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585420</id>
	<title>I've been using this for a while.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boobs I've been Boobs using this Boobs for a while Boobs and it does Boobs pretty well Boobs.  But it Boobs sometimes takes longer Boobs to go back and Boobs edit my writing.</p><p>So I don't bother.</p><p>Boobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boobs I 've been Boobs using this Boobs for a while Boobs and it does Boobs pretty well Boobs .
But it Boobs sometimes takes longer Boobs to go back and Boobs edit my writing.So I do n't bother.Boobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boobs I've been Boobs using this Boobs for a while Boobs and it does Boobs pretty well Boobs.
But it Boobs sometimes takes longer Boobs to go back and Boobs edit my writing.So I don't bother.Boobs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585356</id>
	<title>God help those with ADHD.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really don't think that <i>shit minimize slashdot, boss</i> <b>No i was just working on that TPS Report you wante</b> <i>ok, gone</i> this technology has too much use beyond <i>drop the pencil drop the pencil</i> the physically impairedPERIOD <i>bend at the hips bend at the hips</i> I'm sure that Hawking would love to be able to <i>http://www.engadget.com/ Sweet! new Android phone I wonder if I should switch.</i> <b>http://verizon.com damn nothing is affordable</b> http://att.com Damn it. WTF. Why do we get raped on these prices <b>ALT-TAB</b> Vector Canape. where was I. Oh yeah trying to record data on that <i>Crap forgot about that slashdot post I was making</i>. I think that if they could speed it up so that it could keep up with the <b>hrm that smells good. I wonder what is for lunch</b> normal mind it would be great. The soft wear damn it, no ware ware would have to keep track it's <i>wait, I thank that's only for it is. Um</i> its homophones and other things that were similar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't think that shit minimize slashdot , boss No i was just working on that TPS Report you wante ok , gone this technology has too much use beyond drop the pencil drop the pencil the physically impairedPERIOD bend at the hips bend at the hips I 'm sure that Hawking would love to be able to http : //www.engadget.com/ Sweet !
new Android phone I wonder if I should switch .
http : //verizon.com damn nothing is affordable http : //att.com Damn it .
WTF. Why do we get raped on these prices ALT-TAB Vector Canape .
where was I. Oh yeah trying to record data on that Crap forgot about that slashdot post I was making .
I think that if they could speed it up so that it could keep up with the hrm that smells good .
I wonder what is for lunch normal mind it would be great .
The soft wear damn it , no ware ware would have to keep track it 's wait , I thank that 's only for it is .
Um its homophones and other things that were similar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't think that shit minimize slashdot, boss No i was just working on that TPS Report you wante ok, gone this technology has too much use beyond drop the pencil drop the pencil the physically impairedPERIOD bend at the hips bend at the hips I'm sure that Hawking would love to be able to http://www.engadget.com/ Sweet!
new Android phone I wonder if I should switch.
http://verizon.com damn nothing is affordable http://att.com Damn it.
WTF. Why do we get raped on these prices ALT-TAB Vector Canape.
where was I. Oh yeah trying to record data on that Crap forgot about that slashdot post I was making.
I think that if they could speed it up so that it could keep up with the hrm that smells good.
I wonder what is for lunch normal mind it would be great.
The soft wear damn it, no ware ware would have to keep track it's wait, I thank that's only for it is.
Um its homophones and other things that were similar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585392</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, well..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel the same way and I think that it would be cool for music too. Also thinking... man I wonder how this girl looks naked and magically get it on your pc screen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel the same way and I think that it would be cool for music too .
Also thinking... man I wonder how this girl looks naked and magically get it on your pc screen : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel the same way and I think that it would be cool for music too.
Also thinking... man I wonder how this girl looks naked and magically get it on your pc screen :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136</id>
	<title>Yeah, well..</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1269364980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...what I want is to be able to transmit images from my brain onto a computer monitor.  I have a TON of (what I think as) really cool and creative images in my head, but completely lack the artistic ability to even begin to sketch/draw/paint them.</p><p>I doubt I'm the only one in this hellishly frustrating situation -\_-;;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...what I want is to be able to transmit images from my brain onto a computer monitor .
I have a TON of ( what I think as ) really cool and creative images in my head , but completely lack the artistic ability to even begin to sketch/draw/paint them.I doubt I 'm the only one in this hellishly frustrating situation - \ _- ; ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...what I want is to be able to transmit images from my brain onto a computer monitor.
I have a TON of (what I think as) really cool and creative images in my head, but completely lack the artistic ability to even begin to sketch/draw/paint them.I doubt I'm the only one in this hellishly frustrating situation -\_-;;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</id>
	<title>Interesting.</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1269364620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/12/23/1511251/Typing-With-Your-Brain?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">last article that was posted</a> [slashdot.org] was only about typing individual letters, and of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.</p><p>And of course the researchers thought so too, which was fine because the technology isn&rsquo;t done yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last article that was posted [ slashdot.org ] was only about typing individual letters , and of course people were quick to say how useless that was : slow and impractical.And of course the researchers thought so too , which was fine because the technology isn    t done yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last article that was posted [slashdot.org] was only about typing individual letters, and of course people were quick to say how useless that was: slow and impractical.And of course the researchers thought so too, which was fine because the technology isn’t done yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586182</id>
	<title>I had an eeg before...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269368700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My results from my previous eeg would have been: Nice breasts^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hbutt^H^H^H^Hweather! fflush(stdout);</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My results from my previous eeg would have been : Nice breasts ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hbutt ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hweather !
fflush ( stdout ) ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My results from my previous eeg would have been: Nice breasts^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hbutt^H^H^H^Hweather!
fflush(stdout);</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112</id>
	<title>I not so sure about this...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269364920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't this work a lot like the canine speech synthesizers in "Up", except instead of suddenly going "Squirrel!", it goes "Tits!" all the time?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this work a lot like the canine speech synthesizers in " Up " , except instead of suddenly going " Squirrel !
" , it goes " Tits !
" all the time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this work a lot like the canine speech synthesizers in "Up", except instead of suddenly going "Squirrel!
", it goes "Tits!
" all the time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587308</id>
	<title>Back to the Future</title>
	<author>cakelly</author>
	<datestamp>1269372600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Marty McFly: Hey, Doc Brown?

Emmet Brown: Don't say a word!  Come in.

Marty: Hey, Doc. It's Marty!

Doc: I don't want to know who you are. Put this on...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Marty McFly : Hey , Doc Brown ?
Emmet Brown : Do n't say a word !
Come in .
Marty : Hey , Doc .
It 's Marty !
Doc : I do n't want to know who you are .
Put this on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Marty McFly: Hey, Doc Brown?
Emmet Brown: Don't say a word!
Come in.
Marty: Hey, Doc.
It's Marty!
Doc: I don't want to know who you are.
Put this on...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585382</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the technology isn't done yet</p></div><p>Thoughts wander. The hands not only input data, they <i>filter</i> it. Unless this thing has something analogous, it's useless and will remain so, no matter how much you can input at a time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the technology is n't done yetThoughts wander .
The hands not only input data , they filter it .
Unless this thing has something analogous , it 's useless and will remain so , no matter how much you can input at a time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the technology isn't done yetThoughts wander.
The hands not only input data, they filter it.
Unless this thing has something analogous, it's useless and will remain so, no matter how much you can input at a time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589062</id>
	<title>Great Invention!</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1269337560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We could finally understand Stephen Hawkins and find out the secrets of the universe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could finally understand Stephen Hawkins and find out the secrets of the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could finally understand Stephen Hawkins and find out the secrets of the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587548</id>
	<title>No emotions into my RPGs thanks</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1269373500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to play someone else with different emotions in those games, not myself...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to play someone else with different emotions in those games , not myself.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to play someone else with different emotions in those games, not myself...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585486</id>
	<title>wait...</title>
	<author>Moheeheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1269366120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>..would it make ACI art of the women i think about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>..would it make ACI art of the women i think about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..would it make ACI art of the women i think about?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586268</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>smidget2k4</author>
	<datestamp>1269369060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was my initial reaction to it also.  Currently, people with total paralysis or "locked in syndrome" may be lucky enough to blink to communicate.  In fact, that is how the absolutely wonderful book, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Diving\_Bell\_and\_the\_Butterfly" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">The Diving Bell and the Butterfly</a> [wikipedia.org] by Jean-Dominique Bauby was written.<br> <br>
He suffered from locked in syndrome after a car crash and wrote the book by blinking character by character to a nurse.  Technology like this could really help people like that, and researchers who want to communicate with people otherwise unable to communicate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was my initial reaction to it also .
Currently , people with total paralysis or " locked in syndrome " may be lucky enough to blink to communicate .
In fact , that is how the absolutely wonderful book , The Diving Bell and the Butterfly [ wikipedia.org ] by Jean-Dominique Bauby was written .
He suffered from locked in syndrome after a car crash and wrote the book by blinking character by character to a nurse .
Technology like this could really help people like that , and researchers who want to communicate with people otherwise unable to communicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was my initial reaction to it also.
Currently, people with total paralysis or "locked in syndrome" may be lucky enough to blink to communicate.
In fact, that is how the absolutely wonderful book, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly [wikipedia.org] by Jean-Dominique Bauby was written.
He suffered from locked in syndrome after a car crash and wrote the book by blinking character by character to a nurse.
Technology like this could really help people like that, and researchers who want to communicate with people otherwise unable to communicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586086</id>
	<title>Tourette's Syndrome</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1269368400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would be an interesting device indeed for those paralyzed with sudden, repetitive, stereotyped thoughts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be an interesting device indeed for those paralyzed with sudden , repetitive , stereotyped thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be an interesting device indeed for those paralyzed with sudden, repetitive, stereotyped thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585266</id>
	<title>Research?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, if I do research, I can type with my thoughts alone?</p><p>What if I'm not a researcher? I still have to use a keyboard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , if I do research , I can type with my thoughts alone ? What if I 'm not a researcher ?
I still have to use a keyboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, if I do research, I can type with my thoughts alone?What if I'm not a researcher?
I still have to use a keyboard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585306</id>
	<title>Re:I not so sure about this...</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269365580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if #$^\%@! I have *&amp;#^$@ Tourette's Syndrome #&amp;*$@! you #*&amp;^@ insensitive clod?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if # $ ^ \ % @ !
I have * &amp; # ^ $ @ Tourette 's Syndrome # &amp; * $ @ !
you # * &amp; ^ @ insensitive clod ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if #$^\%@!
I have *&amp;#^$@ Tourette's Syndrome #&amp;*$@!
you #*&amp;^@ insensitive clod?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586888</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269371220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It takes Stephen Hawking something like 17 minutes to put together a sentence (or is it paragraph?) using his "tab" selection system. One shouldn't underestimate the uses of something like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It takes Stephen Hawking something like 17 minutes to put together a sentence ( or is it paragraph ?
) using his " tab " selection system .
One should n't underestimate the uses of something like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It takes Stephen Hawking something like 17 minutes to put together a sentence (or is it paragraph?
) using his "tab" selection system.
One shouldn't underestimate the uses of something like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585158</id>
	<title>woops!</title>
	<author>newdsfornerds</author>
	<datestamp>1269365040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While logged in a root I thought, "rm -rf<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/"

Damn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While logged in a root I thought , " rm -rf / " Damn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While logged in a root I thought, "rm -rf /"

Damn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585746</id>
	<title>Wrong title</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1269367080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can not write words by thought alone. This device allows to (painstakingly at a very slow speed) type letters. This is a great stuff but this is not the device you are looking for. This is mostly for disabled people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can not write words by thought alone .
This device allows to ( painstakingly at a very slow speed ) type letters .
This is a great stuff but this is not the device you are looking for .
This is mostly for disabled people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can not write words by thought alone.
This device allows to (painstakingly at a very slow speed) type letters.
This is a great stuff but this is not the device you are looking for.
This is mostly for disabled people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31595292</id>
	<title>Eye tracking can do better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As this technology relies on the user focusing on letters you can be faster and more relieable with simple eye tracking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As this technology relies on the user focusing on letters you can be faster and more relieable with simple eye tracking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As this technology relies on the user focusing on letters you can be faster and more relieable with simple eye tracking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585334</id>
	<title>I've sex been testing this system</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>girls and it works babes quite well beer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>girls and it works babes quite well beer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>girls and it works babes quite well beer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31590434</id>
	<title>Sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269344160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this is really FUCK great! Always wanted to PUSSY be able to type with my SEX mind!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is really FUCK great !
Always wanted to PUSSY be able to type with my SEX mind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is really FUCK great!
Always wanted to PUSSY be able to type with my SEX mind!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585558</id>
	<title>Writing business letters</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1269366360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Sirs [porn]</p><p>I would like to enquire about your [porn] new line of [porn] fasteners for [porn] light duty fabric [porn][porn][porn]. I would like to [porn] get [porn] samples and estimated costs [porn] ffor these fasteners [porn]. Please call me [porn][porn] at your earliest opportunity [porn].<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Sirs [ porn ] I would like to enquire about your [ porn ] new line of [ porn ] fasteners for [ porn ] light duty fabric [ porn ] [ porn ] [ porn ] .
I would like to [ porn ] get [ porn ] samples and estimated costs [ porn ] ffor these fasteners [ porn ] .
Please call me [ porn ] [ porn ] at your earliest opportunity [ porn ] .
.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Sirs [porn]I would like to enquire about your [porn] new line of [porn] fasteners for [porn] light duty fabric [porn][porn][porn].
I would like to [porn] get [porn] samples and estimated costs [porn] ffor these fasteners [porn].
Please call me [porn][porn] at your earliest opportunity [porn].
...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>captaindomon</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>People won't think it is slow and impractical if they have suffered total paralysis for some reason, and this is their first chance to communicate with the outside world and loved ones. Sure, I'm not going to use it for replacing my keyboard any time soon, but this technology in the right setting will seem so incredibly miraculous it will change people's lives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People wo n't think it is slow and impractical if they have suffered total paralysis for some reason , and this is their first chance to communicate with the outside world and loved ones .
Sure , I 'm not going to use it for replacing my keyboard any time soon , but this technology in the right setting will seem so incredibly miraculous it will change people 's lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People won't think it is slow and impractical if they have suffered total paralysis for some reason, and this is their first chance to communicate with the outside world and loved ones.
Sure, I'm not going to use it for replacing my keyboard any time soon, but this technology in the right setting will seem so incredibly miraculous it will change people's lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585698</id>
	<title>Still just typing</title>
	<author>SiliconEntity</author>
	<datestamp>1269366900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amusing comments but the reality is that this is still the same old P300. You concentrate on a letter, they flash different letters on the screen for about 30 seconds, and it makes a guess at what letter you were thinking of. Then if it's right you go on to the next letter. Super super slow. Eye blink signals are probably just as fast. And if you can't use your eyes you probably can't use P300. I think there have been some studies trying to extract P300 signals from audio cues but they have not been too successful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amusing comments but the reality is that this is still the same old P300 .
You concentrate on a letter , they flash different letters on the screen for about 30 seconds , and it makes a guess at what letter you were thinking of .
Then if it 's right you go on to the next letter .
Super super slow .
Eye blink signals are probably just as fast .
And if you ca n't use your eyes you probably ca n't use P300 .
I think there have been some studies trying to extract P300 signals from audio cues but they have not been too successful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amusing comments but the reality is that this is still the same old P300.
You concentrate on a letter, they flash different letters on the screen for about 30 seconds, and it makes a guess at what letter you were thinking of.
Then if it's right you go on to the next letter.
Super super slow.
Eye blink signals are probably just as fast.
And if you can't use your eyes you probably can't use P300.
I think there have been some studies trying to extract P300 signals from audio cues but they have not been too successful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589374</id>
	<title>Dreams?</title>
	<author>Psmylie</author>
	<datestamp>1269339180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What would be cool is if they made this sensitive enough, and trained someone well enough, that they could use it to communicate while dreaming.<br>Of course, all you'd see is line after line of "The blue fish is mellooooow... How's that snarker, Mr. Handle? Where did I leave my other lung..." and the like, but it would still be fascinating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be cool is if they made this sensitive enough , and trained someone well enough , that they could use it to communicate while dreaming.Of course , all you 'd see is line after line of " The blue fish is mellooooow... How 's that snarker , Mr. Handle ? Where did I leave my other lung... " and the like , but it would still be fascinating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be cool is if they made this sensitive enough, and trained someone well enough, that they could use it to communicate while dreaming.Of course, all you'd see is line after line of "The blue fish is mellooooow... How's that snarker, Mr. Handle? Where did I leave my other lung..." and the like, but it would still be fascinating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585464</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>twidarkling</author>
	<datestamp>1269366060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Specifically it detects and interprets what are known as P300 event-related potentials in the EEG-signals of a person that is selecting characters from a display presenting alternate rows and columns of characters.</p></div><p>It sounds like they haven't made any progress in speed what-so-fucking-ever, they've simply made it more comfortable to wear, and changed the interface very slightly.</p><p>If they want to speed it up, why not use the predictive texting stuff? It's usually fairly accurate, and if it doesn't bring up the word they want, they keep doing the letter-by-letter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Specifically it detects and interprets what are known as P300 event-related potentials in the EEG-signals of a person that is selecting characters from a display presenting alternate rows and columns of characters.It sounds like they have n't made any progress in speed what-so-fucking-ever , they 've simply made it more comfortable to wear , and changed the interface very slightly.If they want to speed it up , why not use the predictive texting stuff ?
It 's usually fairly accurate , and if it does n't bring up the word they want , they keep doing the letter-by-letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Specifically it detects and interprets what are known as P300 event-related potentials in the EEG-signals of a person that is selecting characters from a display presenting alternate rows and columns of characters.It sounds like they haven't made any progress in speed what-so-fucking-ever, they've simply made it more comfortable to wear, and changed the interface very slightly.If they want to speed it up, why not use the predictive texting stuff?
It's usually fairly accurate, and if it doesn't bring up the word they want, they keep doing the letter-by-letter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587842</id>
	<title>Backspace</title>
	<author>casals</author>
	<datestamp>1269374760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does it work?

"The brown dog jumped over the lazy fo no wait that's wrong no dammit erase it no don't write erase no no you no erase e ra se back go back backspace erase it oh era no you fucking piece of shit just erase the fucking thing oh gosh how do you start again new control n new document create new fuck work thats it Im taking off this fuck--"</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it work ?
" The brown dog jumped over the lazy fo no wait that 's wrong no dammit erase it no do n't write erase no no you no erase e ra se back go back backspace erase it oh era no you fucking piece of shit just erase the fucking thing oh gosh how do you start again new control n new document create new fuck work thats it Im taking off this fuck-- "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it work?
"The brown dog jumped over the lazy fo no wait that's wrong no dammit erase it no don't write erase no no you no erase e ra se back go back backspace erase it oh era no you fucking piece of shit just erase the fucking thing oh gosh how do you start again new control n new document create new fuck work thats it Im taking off this fuck--"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587764</id>
	<title>Re:I not so sure about this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269374340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not how biofeedback devices work. These types of devices work not by reading our brain, but instead by our brains learning how to broadcast what the devices can read. Our brains are the ones adjusting to the device, not the other way around. So after the initial training period where our brains learn how to generate the correct nervous impulses, it becomes a matter of us thinking what we want to "type."</p><p>There will still be the possibility of distracted typing, as any touch typist can tell you (it's a bizarre feeling when you type an entire sentence that's entirely different from what you intended to type and yet is still complete with no errors in spelling or grammar), but it's not likely to receive every thought we have since our brains still have to have the intention to "type" the words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not how biofeedback devices work .
These types of devices work not by reading our brain , but instead by our brains learning how to broadcast what the devices can read .
Our brains are the ones adjusting to the device , not the other way around .
So after the initial training period where our brains learn how to generate the correct nervous impulses , it becomes a matter of us thinking what we want to " type .
" There will still be the possibility of distracted typing , as any touch typist can tell you ( it 's a bizarre feeling when you type an entire sentence that 's entirely different from what you intended to type and yet is still complete with no errors in spelling or grammar ) , but it 's not likely to receive every thought we have since our brains still have to have the intention to " type " the words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not how biofeedback devices work.
These types of devices work not by reading our brain, but instead by our brains learning how to broadcast what the devices can read.
Our brains are the ones adjusting to the device, not the other way around.
So after the initial training period where our brains learn how to generate the correct nervous impulses, it becomes a matter of us thinking what we want to "type.
"There will still be the possibility of distracted typing, as any touch typist can tell you (it's a bizarre feeling when you type an entire sentence that's entirely different from what you intended to type and yet is still complete with no errors in spelling or grammar), but it's not likely to receive every thought we have since our brains still have to have the intention to "type" the words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585020</id>
	<title>Title goes here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First?</p><p>Gotta post something on-topic... FIRST! LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First ? Got ta post something on-topic... FIRST ! LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First?Gotta post something on-topic... FIRST! LOL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585430</id>
	<title>My Latest Project</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>B......O....T<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....N..... E..... T.....</p><p>l..a..u..n..c..h..e..d<br>a..g..a..i..n..s..t..</p><p>B..i..l..l..    G..a. t..e..s..'</p><p>N..u..c..l..e..a..r..    R..e..a..c..t..o..r..</p><p>Yous At M.I.T.,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>B......O....T .....N..... E..... T.....l..a..u..n..c..h..e..da..g..a..i..n..s..t..B..i..l..l.. G..a. t..e..s..'N..u..c..l..e..a..r.. R..e..a..c..t..o..r..Yous At M.I.T.,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>B......O....T .....N..... E..... T.....l..a..u..n..c..h..e..da..g..a..i..n..s..t..B..i..l..l..    G..a. t..e..s..'N..u..c..l..e..a..r..    R..e..a..c..t..o..r..Yous At M.I.T.,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585056</id>
	<title>Pause might be a problem</title>
	<author>ShadowRangerRIT</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using this in computer games seems nifty, but I can see some definite issues that it would introduce. Lets say you use emotional feedback to adjust difficulty; you want them challenged but not frustrated. Problem is, if they pause the game, get a snack, and come back, you can't make them resume the same emotional state they had when they paused. When they come back refreshed, the game will assume it isn't challenging them anymore and unleash hell.</p><p>I'm not saying this can't be worked around (wait a couple minutes after a pause before allowing difficulty to adjust), but the fact that human emotional state can't be controlled as precisely as a game controller means that using it in a game means rethinking a lot of existing paradigms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using this in computer games seems nifty , but I can see some definite issues that it would introduce .
Lets say you use emotional feedback to adjust difficulty ; you want them challenged but not frustrated .
Problem is , if they pause the game , get a snack , and come back , you ca n't make them resume the same emotional state they had when they paused .
When they come back refreshed , the game will assume it is n't challenging them anymore and unleash hell.I 'm not saying this ca n't be worked around ( wait a couple minutes after a pause before allowing difficulty to adjust ) , but the fact that human emotional state ca n't be controlled as precisely as a game controller means that using it in a game means rethinking a lot of existing paradigms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using this in computer games seems nifty, but I can see some definite issues that it would introduce.
Lets say you use emotional feedback to adjust difficulty; you want them challenged but not frustrated.
Problem is, if they pause the game, get a snack, and come back, you can't make them resume the same emotional state they had when they paused.
When they come back refreshed, the game will assume it isn't challenging them anymore and unleash hell.I'm not saying this can't be worked around (wait a couple minutes after a pause before allowing difficulty to adjust), but the fact that human emotional state can't be controlled as precisely as a game controller means that using it in a game means rethinking a lot of existing paradigms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586274</id>
	<title>Shotgun of words</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1269369060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The image I see for me using this would just be a shotgun blast of words spewing onto the screen without any particular form or direction. It takes so much control for me to just type a sentence without other thoughts crossing into the stream of words. Without the physical filter of selectively typing words it would become incoherent babble almost instantaneously.</p><p>Damn that was a workout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The image I see for me using this would just be a shotgun blast of words spewing onto the screen without any particular form or direction .
It takes so much control for me to just type a sentence without other thoughts crossing into the stream of words .
Without the physical filter of selectively typing words it would become incoherent babble almost instantaneously.Damn that was a workout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The image I see for me using this would just be a shotgun blast of words spewing onto the screen without any particular form or direction.
It takes so much control for me to just type a sentence without other thoughts crossing into the stream of words.
Without the physical filter of selectively typing words it would become incoherent babble almost instantaneously.Damn that was a workout.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585532</id>
	<title>Awesome!</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1269366300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait for them to get it hooked up to my iPod so I can write while I jog. I don't care about silly hats if I can transcribe my thoughts. I realize I'll need to edit the output, but that's a small price to pay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for them to get it hooked up to my iPod so I can write while I jog .
I do n't care about silly hats if I can transcribe my thoughts .
I realize I 'll need to edit the output , but that 's a small price to pay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for them to get it hooked up to my iPod so I can write while I jog.
I don't care about silly hats if I can transcribe my thoughts.
I realize I'll need to edit the output, but that's a small price to pay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31588148</id>
	<title>Re:Multilingual</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Multilingual people dont think in language</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Multilingual people dont think in language</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Multilingual people dont think in language</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585080</id>
	<title>Cool tech</title>
	<author>Anarki2004</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really think this is an amazing bit of technology, I'm just afraid of what it could potentially be turned into. This is not something I would want law enforcement to start practicing. OTOH, it seems to have the potential to help a great deal of people too, so guess you have to take the good with the bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really think this is an amazing bit of technology , I 'm just afraid of what it could potentially be turned into .
This is not something I would want law enforcement to start practicing .
OTOH , it seems to have the potential to help a great deal of people too , so guess you have to take the good with the bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really think this is an amazing bit of technology, I'm just afraid of what it could potentially be turned into.
This is not something I would want law enforcement to start practicing.
OTOH, it seems to have the potential to help a great deal of people too, so guess you have to take the good with the bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586680</id>
	<title>What psycho mod said troll?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Troll?  Really?  Mods, either you think it's funny and should mod it that way, or you don't and should leave it alone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll ?
Really ? Mods , either you think it 's funny and should mod it that way , or you do n't and should leave it alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll?
Really?  Mods, either you think it's funny and should mod it that way, or you don't and should leave it alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604</id>
	<title>One thing this story has made me realise...</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1269366540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is just how little I apparently think about sex, relative to the general population.  There is a period of roughly once every 24 hours where the subject comes up, for the most part, and that is it.  If I go outside, and happen to run into some women, it might be more than that, but on days when I stay in, it genuinely doesn't.</p><p>I guess I'm just really abnormal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is just how little I apparently think about sex , relative to the general population .
There is a period of roughly once every 24 hours where the subject comes up , for the most part , and that is it .
If I go outside , and happen to run into some women , it might be more than that , but on days when I stay in , it genuinely does n't.I guess I 'm just really abnormal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is just how little I apparently think about sex, relative to the general population.
There is a period of roughly once every 24 hours where the subject comes up, for the most part, and that is it.
If I go outside, and happen to run into some women, it might be more than that, but on days when I stay in, it genuinely doesn't.I guess I'm just really abnormal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585326</id>
	<title>Mmmmmm...</title>
	<author>Walterk</author>
	<datestamp>1269365640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Booooobiiiieeees!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Booooobiiiieeees !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Booooobiiiieeees!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585094</id>
	<title>Multilingual</title>
	<author>Wowsers</author>
	<datestamp>1269364920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You better not be multilingual, you get stuck on a word in one language, and your thoughts on "oh damn, what's that word, sounds like whatever" gets put into your document as you're trying to remember the damn word you wanted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You better not be multilingual , you get stuck on a word in one language , and your thoughts on " oh damn , what 's that word , sounds like whatever " gets put into your document as you 're trying to remember the damn word you wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You better not be multilingual, you get stuck on a word in one language, and your thoughts on "oh damn, what's that word, sounds like whatever" gets put into your document as you're trying to remember the damn word you wanted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040</id>
	<title>Horrible horrible idea...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269364740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the surface, this sounds shit fuck fantastic, but reality is, I gotta take a crap our brains don't focus my leg itches like that.  Well, at least titties mine doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the surface , this sounds shit fuck fantastic , but reality is , I got ta take a crap our brains do n't focus my leg itches like that .
Well , at least titties mine does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the surface, this sounds shit fuck fantastic, but reality is, I gotta take a crap our brains don't focus my leg itches like that.
Well, at least titties mine doesn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31593888</id>
	<title>If this tech is available now</title>
	<author>cavebison</author>
	<datestamp>1269365040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why hasn't Stephen Hawking been using it?</p><p>Surely he'd be the best advertising for them?</p><p>Mainly from just using it, of course, not from what he says with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why has n't Stephen Hawking been using it ? Surely he 'd be the best advertising for them ? Mainly from just using it , of course , not from what he says with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why hasn't Stephen Hawking been using it?Surely he'd be the best advertising for them?Mainly from just using it, of course, not from what he says with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31588048</id>
	<title>welcome, editor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just thought I would be polite and welcome our new editorial overland, StoneLion. Here's hoping he doesn't turn out to be another kdawson. ; )</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just thought I would be polite and welcome our new editorial overland , StoneLion .
Here 's hoping he does n't turn out to be another kdawson .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just thought I would be polite and welcome our new editorial overland, StoneLion.
Here's hoping he doesn't turn out to be another kdawson.
; )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587160</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1269372120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to most Web2.0 internet users, ANYTHING that requires thought for input would be considered "useless, slow, and impractial"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to most Web2.0 internet users , ANYTHING that requires thought for input would be considered " useless , slow , and impractial " : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to most Web2.0 internet users, ANYTHING that requires thought for input would be considered "useless, slow, and impractial" :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589706</id>
	<title>They'll get the form factor down...</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1269340920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and the surgery to implant it into the base of your skull is so painless it's no wonder I'm number 1!</p><p><a href="http://www.yzzerdd.com/" title="yzzerdd.com">http://www.yzzerdd.com/</a> [yzzerdd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and the surgery to implant it into the base of your skull is so painless it 's no wonder I 'm number 1 ! http : //www.yzzerdd.com/ [ yzzerdd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the surgery to implant it into the base of your skull is so painless it's no wonder I'm number 1!http://www.yzzerdd.com/ [yzzerdd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585324</id>
	<title>type by PENIS thought eh?</title>
	<author>blai</author>
	<datestamp>1269365640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That'd explain those college SEX essays where paragraphPORNs have random words inside a sentence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 'd explain those college SEX essays where paragraphPORNs have random words inside a sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That'd explain those college SEX essays where paragraphPORNs have random words inside a sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585892</id>
	<title>Gives a whole new meaning to....</title>
	<author>jda104</author>
	<datestamp>1269367620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'Gives a whole new meaning to "Freudian slip."</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Gives a whole new meaning to " Freudian slip .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Gives a whole new meaning to "Freudian slip.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589114</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting.</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1269337740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bu think of the possibilities... humanity beyond slashdot might finally have an incentive to form coherent thoughts</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bu think of the possibilities... humanity beyond slashdot might finally have an incentive to form coherent thoughts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bu think of the possibilities... humanity beyond slashdot might finally have an incentive to form coherent thoughts</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31595452</id>
	<title>If \_research\_ let you type by thought alone...</title>
	<author>Anubis IV</author>
	<datestamp>1269431220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...then I'd have my thesis done by now. At least, that's what I keep telling myself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...then I 'd have my thesis done by now .
At least , that 's what I keep telling myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...then I'd have my thesis done by now.
At least, that's what I keep telling myself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587938</id>
	<title>Let's see,</title>
	<author>Bromskloss</author>
	<datestamp>1269375300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should I comment on this story? Nah, it's not so important, what I have to say, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should I comment on this story ?
Nah , it 's not so important , what I have to say , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should I comment on this story?
Nah, it's not so important, what I have to say, anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31595050</id>
	<title>Okay, so what does the dead salmon have to say?</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1269426540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or any of the comatose patients which "facilitators" tell us are really alive and conscious?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or any of the comatose patients which " facilitators " tell us are really alive and conscious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or any of the comatose patients which "facilitators" tell us are really alive and conscious?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585198</id>
	<title>Re:Horrible horrible idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>sex sex Mine titties sex hot receptionist boobies pick up milk sex sex doesn't short skirt boobies either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>sex sex Mine titties sex hot receptionist boobies pick up milk sex sex does n't short skirt boobies either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sex sex Mine titties sex hot receptionist boobies pick up milk sex sex doesn't short skirt boobies either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31588290</id>
	<title>I want my S.Q.U.I.D.</title>
	<author>Skratchez</author>
	<datestamp>1269377100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just know that training my computer to recognize words in my mind would end up with me juxtaposing all of my brain farts into a completely unusable jumble. Or it would train me to clarify my internal monologue (dialogue?) so I made sense to myself. One of those. And a lot of proofreading would be mandatory for everything I "typed" with this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just know that training my computer to recognize words in my mind would end up with me juxtaposing all of my brain farts into a completely unusable jumble .
Or it would train me to clarify my internal monologue ( dialogue ?
) so I made sense to myself .
One of those .
And a lot of proofreading would be mandatory for everything I " typed " with this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just know that training my computer to recognize words in my mind would end up with me juxtaposing all of my brain farts into a completely unusable jumble.
Or it would train me to clarify my internal monologue (dialogue?
) so I made sense to myself.
One of those.
And a lot of proofreading would be mandatory for everything I "typed" with this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31588148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31592870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31593382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31608318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1516243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31608318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31589114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31593382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31586454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31592870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31587938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1516243.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31585094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1516243.31588148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
