<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_21_0811241</id>
	<title>Anti-Gamer South Australian Attorney General Quits</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269159120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:dbb@qad.com" rel="nofollow">dogbolter</a> writes <i>"South Australian Attorney General, Michael Atkinson, infamous for the banning of R18+ rated games and the censoring of political comment in Australia, has quit.  The recent South Australian election provided a massive swing against Atkinson's governing labor party.  As a direct result of the South Australian election result, <a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/attorney-general-michael-atkinson-to-quit-front-bench/story-fn2sdwup-1225843341005">he is standing down</a>.  Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer games."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>dogbolter writes " South Australian Attorney General , Michael Atkinson , infamous for the banning of R18 + rated games and the censoring of political comment in Australia , has quit .
The recent South Australian election provided a massive swing against Atkinson 's governing labor party .
As a direct result of the South Australian election result , he is standing down .
Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer games .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dogbolter writes "South Australian Attorney General, Michael Atkinson, infamous for the banning of R18+ rated games and the censoring of political comment in Australia, has quit.
The recent South Australian election provided a massive swing against Atkinson's governing labor party.
As a direct result of the South Australian election result, he is standing down.
Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer games.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194</id>
	<title>Game over Michael</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1269168780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Victory.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/administrator voice<br> <br>

Shock Horror, the system worked. Sorry for the rant but after numerous threads about the issue and countless uniformed "why don't you Aussies do something" posts I think we can are entitled to a little schadenfreude. We dealt with Atkinson within the system. I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now, between the censorship and NBN debacle he hasn't many people left who like him enough to vote for him.<br> <br>

However we can be certain the people behind Atkinson who are the driving the anti-game agenda aren't quitting as easily but still, this is a step in the right direction and I think it will be very hard for the puritans to replace Atkinson on the ratings board.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Victory .
/administrator voice Shock Horror , the system worked .
Sorry for the rant but after numerous threads about the issue and countless uniformed " why do n't you Aussies do something " posts I think we can are entitled to a little schadenfreude .
We dealt with Atkinson within the system .
I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now , between the censorship and NBN debacle he has n't many people left who like him enough to vote for him .
However we can be certain the people behind Atkinson who are the driving the anti-game agenda are n't quitting as easily but still , this is a step in the right direction and I think it will be very hard for the puritans to replace Atkinson on the ratings board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Victory.
/administrator voice 

Shock Horror, the system worked.
Sorry for the rant but after numerous threads about the issue and countless uniformed "why don't you Aussies do something" posts I think we can are entitled to a little schadenfreude.
We dealt with Atkinson within the system.
I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now, between the censorship and NBN debacle he hasn't many people left who like him enough to vote for him.
However we can be certain the people behind Atkinson who are the driving the anti-game agenda aren't quitting as easily but still, this is a step in the right direction and I think it will be very hard for the puritans to replace Atkinson on the ratings board.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886</id>
	<title>One Down!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269163620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I've heard in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well forever (In Australia anyway).<br>So can we all get Senator Conroy (the minister for fascism) to throw in the towel too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I 've heard in ... well forever ( In Australia anyway ) .So can we all get Senator Conroy ( the minister for fascism ) to throw in the towel too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I've heard in ... well forever (In Australia anyway).So can we all get Senator Conroy (the minister for fascism) to throw in the towel too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555862</id>
	<title>There's little to be said here other than...</title>
	<author>Mystery00</author>
	<datestamp>1269163200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's time for a LAN party.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's time for a LAN party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's time for a LAN party.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556000</id>
	<title>ooh yeah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AMF and amen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AMF and amen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AMF and amen!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555852</id>
	<title>Wow...</title>
	<author>dohzer</author>
	<datestamp>1269163020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There actually is a "Gaming God"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There actually is a " Gaming God " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There actually is a "Gaming God"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31562420</id>
	<title>Re:One Down!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269182160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I've heard in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well forever (In Australia anyway).</i></p><p>Have you heard of Senator Brian Harradine ? Did you \_like\_ John Howard ?</p><p>But yea, it is good news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I 've heard in ... well forever ( In Australia anyway ) .Have you heard of Senator Brian Harradine ?
Did you \ _like \ _ John Howard ? But yea , it is good news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as politics news this would have to be the best thing I've heard in ... well forever (In Australia anyway).Have you heard of Senator Brian Harradine ?
Did you \_like\_ John Howard ?But yea, it is good news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557634</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1269187320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.</p></div><p>Let's say that I don't believe in setting aside reservations for Native Americans, or giving them special rights with regard to gambling. I feel that it makes them second class citizens, and stunts their ability to be contributing members of a larger society.</p><p>So I should get a say in what happens to them, right? Just because I have an opinion? Even though eliminating reservations or leaving them be would have virtually no effect on my life what-so-ever?</p><p>Yeah, democracy makes lots of sense...</p><p>Next, you're gonna say I, as a man, can vote on whether female rape victims have the right free counseling, medical care care and an abortion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency ( which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males ) are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games.Let 's say that I do n't believe in setting aside reservations for Native Americans , or giving them special rights with regard to gambling .
I feel that it makes them second class citizens , and stunts their ability to be contributing members of a larger society.So I should get a say in what happens to them , right ?
Just because I have an opinion ?
Even though eliminating reservations or leaving them be would have virtually no effect on my life what-so-ever ? Yeah , democracy makes lots of sense...Next , you 're gon na say I , as a man , can vote on whether female rape victims have the right free counseling , medical care care and an abortion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.Let's say that I don't believe in setting aside reservations for Native Americans, or giving them special rights with regard to gambling.
I feel that it makes them second class citizens, and stunts their ability to be contributing members of a larger society.So I should get a say in what happens to them, right?
Just because I have an opinion?
Even though eliminating reservations or leaving them be would have virtually no effect on my life what-so-ever?Yeah, democracy makes lots of sense...Next, you're gonna say I, as a man, can vote on whether female rape victims have the right free counseling, medical care care and an abortion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558182</id>
	<title>Re:One Down!!!!</title>
	<author>bloodhawk</author>
	<datestamp>1269193020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTf you smoking, The last thing we want is a swing in labors favour. We want retards like conroy out not with more power.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTf you smoking , The last thing we want is a swing in labors favour .
We want retards like conroy out not with more power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTf you smoking, The last thing we want is a swing in labors favour.
We want retards like conroy out not with more power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31562546</id>
	<title>There's good news and bad news...</title>
	<author>FatLittleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1269183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, in Westminster parliamentary politics, resigning from the front bench is often the first move in positioning yourself to challenge for the leadership of the party...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , in Westminster parliamentary politics , resigning from the front bench is often the first move in positioning yourself to challenge for the leadership of the party.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, in Westminster parliamentary politics, resigning from the front bench is often the first move in positioning yourself to challenge for the leadership of the party...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31563574</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>jythie</author>
	<datestamp>1269192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is a worthwhile question.  A big piece of the answer is that his constituency does not believe in the censoring, even if only a small percentage of them are actively pushing him for the 18+ rating.  He is also the lone holdout among other AGs, so his personal opinion is running pretty strongly against, well, everyone.  He stopped 'representing' and is instead pushing his personal agenda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a worthwhile question .
A big piece of the answer is that his constituency does not believe in the censoring , even if only a small percentage of them are actively pushing him for the 18 + rating .
He is also the lone holdout among other AGs , so his personal opinion is running pretty strongly against , well , everyone .
He stopped 'representing ' and is instead pushing his personal agenda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a worthwhile question.
A big piece of the answer is that his constituency does not believe in the censoring, even if only a small percentage of them are actively pushing him for the 18+ rating.
He is also the lone holdout among other AGs, so his personal opinion is running pretty strongly against, well, everyone.
He stopped 'representing' and is instead pushing his personal agenda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555884</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say</title>
	<author>Rik Sweeney</author>
	<datestamp>1269163620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RAGE QUIT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RAGE QUIT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RAGE QUIT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559108</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>ZippyKitty</author>
	<datestamp>1269201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?  It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.  Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.</p></div><p>The judicial role is to prevent tyranny of the mob.  Just because most people don't like it is not reason to ban something (in theory - I know this doesn't hold well in reality).  To ban something you need to prove harm to others.  Banning things performed in your own home that does not harm others is against most constitutions and against the founding principles of most western democracies.  It isn't the AG's role to curry favour with the electorate.  It is to prevent the electorate from using superior numbers to squash the minority.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this : but how is the SA AG 's view on computer games flawed ?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency ( which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males ) are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games .
Given what he does , his decision is quite sensible.The judicial role is to prevent tyranny of the mob .
Just because most people do n't like it is not reason to ban something ( in theory - I know this does n't hold well in reality ) .
To ban something you need to prove harm to others .
Banning things performed in your own home that does not harm others is against most constitutions and against the founding principles of most western democracies .
It is n't the AG 's role to curry favour with the electorate .
It is to prevent the electorate from using superior numbers to squash the minority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.
Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.The judicial role is to prevent tyranny of the mob.
Just because most people don't like it is not reason to ban something (in theory - I know this doesn't hold well in reality).
To ban something you need to prove harm to others.
Banning things performed in your own home that does not harm others is against most constitutions and against the founding principles of most western democracies.
It isn't the AG's role to curry favour with the electorate.
It is to prevent the electorate from using superior numbers to squash the minority.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</id>
	<title>I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?  It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.  Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.</p><p>To cater to the sensibilities of other people, and decide that their needs come before some others, does not necessarily make him "anti" anyone. Just like how if x is not larger than 3, it does not automatically make is smaller than 3, but it could also be equal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this : but how is the SA AG 's view on computer games flawed ?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency ( which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males ) are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games .
Given what he does , his decision is quite sensible.To cater to the sensibilities of other people , and decide that their needs come before some others , does not necessarily make him " anti " anyone .
Just like how if x is not larger than 3 , it does not automatically make is smaller than 3 , but it could also be equal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.
Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.To cater to the sensibilities of other people, and decide that their needs come before some others, does not necessarily make him "anti" anyone.
Just like how if x is not larger than 3, it does not automatically make is smaller than 3, but it could also be equal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31581978</id>
	<title>my brethren</title>
	<author>shnull</author>
	<datestamp>1269351660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let us celebrate the demise of this fossil, for this is truly, a great day for gamers !! 3 cheers for gore !!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let us celebrate the demise of this fossil , for this is truly , a great day for gamers ! !
3 cheers for gore ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let us celebrate the demise of this fossil, for this is truly, a great day for gamers !!
3 cheers for gore !!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31562464</id>
	<title>1211 of 1254 polled are happy to see him gone</title>
	<author>bug1</author>
	<datestamp>1269182580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The poll results from the mentioned article are below, 96\% want him gone, he should have been pushed a long time ago, but at least he knows his time is up.</p><p>Thanks for voting!<br>Are you happy that Michael Atkinson will no longer be South Australia's Attorney-General?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Yes 96.57\% (1211 votes)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * No 3.43\% (43 votes)</p><p>Total votes: 1254</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The poll results from the mentioned article are below , 96 \ % want him gone , he should have been pushed a long time ago , but at least he knows his time is up.Thanks for voting ! Are you happy that Michael Atkinson will no longer be South Australia 's Attorney-General ?
        * Yes 96.57 \ % ( 1211 votes )         * No 3.43 \ % ( 43 votes ) Total votes : 1254</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The poll results from the mentioned article are below, 96\% want him gone, he should have been pushed a long time ago, but at least he knows his time is up.Thanks for voting!Are you happy that Michael Atkinson will no longer be South Australia's Attorney-General?
        * Yes 96.57\% (1211 votes)
        * No 3.43\% (43 votes)Total votes: 1254</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</id>
	<title>I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To my knowledge he didn't 'ban' R18+ games, he simply didn't agree with the vote - which was required by each AG to get it through.<br>You could say he effectively banned them but it's more his lack of support than anything.</p><p>Also he stepped back into a backbench role, he's still in politics although yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.<br>As a Victorian I'm glad to see him go, the capital of this one state of South Australia, Adelaide is referred to as "the city of churches" (quite seriously) these morons have been causing the rest of the country for too long.</p><p>Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot, maybe Australia won't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.<br>Good riddance Atkinson, good riddance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To my knowledge he did n't 'ban ' R18 + games , he simply did n't agree with the vote - which was required by each AG to get it through.You could say he effectively banned them but it 's more his lack of support than anything.Also he stepped back into a backbench role , he 's still in politics although yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.As a Victorian I 'm glad to see him go , the capital of this one state of South Australia , Adelaide is referred to as " the city of churches " ( quite seriously ) these morons have been causing the rest of the country for too long.Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot , maybe Australia wo n't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.Good riddance Atkinson , good riddance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To my knowledge he didn't 'ban' R18+ games, he simply didn't agree with the vote - which was required by each AG to get it through.You could say he effectively banned them but it's more his lack of support than anything.Also he stepped back into a backbench role, he's still in politics although yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.As a Victorian I'm glad to see him go, the capital of this one state of South Australia, Adelaide is referred to as "the city of churches" (quite seriously) these morons have been causing the rest of the country for too long.Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot, maybe Australia won't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.Good riddance Atkinson, good riddance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556030</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?  It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.</p></div><p>No, his constituency is 75\% 40+ year old women, 24\% 50+ year old men and 1\% other.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this : but how is the SA AG 's view on computer games flawed ?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency ( which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males ) are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games.No , his constituency is 75 \ % 40 + year old women , 24 \ % 50 + year old men and 1 \ % other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.No, his constituency is 75\% 40+ year old women, 24\% 50+ year old men and 1\% other.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556314</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1269170280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why should his constituency matter? I can't vote against him, but he can stop me getting R rated games. I just wonder if he jumped or was pushed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should his constituency matter ?
I ca n't vote against him , but he can stop me getting R rated games .
I just wonder if he jumped or was pushed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should his constituency matter?
I can't vote against him, but he can stop me getting R rated games.
I just wonder if he jumped or was pushed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555896</id>
	<title>No quitting in this arena!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1269163800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finish him!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finish him !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finish him!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556270</id>
	<title>Re:One Down!!!!</title>
	<author>strack</author>
	<datestamp>1269169740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well theres a federal election coming up in australia in november. i dont think his seat is up for election this term, but if there is a swing far enough in labors favor, he wont hold the balance of power anymore, and hence have little influence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well theres a federal election coming up in australia in november .
i dont think his seat is up for election this term , but if there is a swing far enough in labors favor , he wont hold the balance of power anymore , and hence have little influence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well theres a federal election coming up in australia in november.
i dont think his seat is up for election this term, but if there is a swing far enough in labors favor, he wont hold the balance of power anymore, and hence have little influence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557016</id>
	<title>Knowing your enemy</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1269180780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is far better then the unknown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is far better then the unknown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is far better then the unknown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557678</id>
	<title>Re:I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1269187620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.</p></div><p>The problem with power vacuums is that they tend to suck in people who want power, and they're rarely honest about what they intend to do with that power. I do wish you luck though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.The problem with power vacuums is that they tend to suck in people who want power , and they 're rarely honest about what they intend to do with that power .
I do wish you luck though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes we do REALLY hope someone with a clue steps up for his old position.The problem with power vacuums is that they tend to suck in people who want power, and they're rarely honest about what they intend to do with that power.
I do wish you luck though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556072</id>
	<title>HUZZAH!</title>
	<author>grantek</author>
	<datestamp>1269166800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thread title is not -1 Redundant - it cannot be said enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thread title is not -1 Redundant - it can not be said enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thread title is not -1 Redundant - it cannot be said enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558134</id>
	<title>Re:No quitting in this arena!</title>
	<author>ImYourVirus</author>
	<datestamp>1269192540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But we'll have to wait for the no R18+ law to get removed before we can see his blood and guts flying everywhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But we 'll have to wait for the no R18 + law to get removed before we can see his blood and guts flying everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But we'll have to wait for the no R18+ law to get removed before we can see his blood and guts flying everywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556016</id>
	<title>Not quit as in quit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I make a point here.. he hasn't quit parliament, he's just quit cabinet.. he will still remain a member of Labor's government (or be in Opposition if Labor don't get over the line)..</p><p>I don't think this is quite the scalp everyone is looking for..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I make a point here.. he has n't quit parliament , he 's just quit cabinet.. he will still remain a member of Labor 's government ( or be in Opposition if Labor do n't get over the line ) ..I do n't think this is quite the scalp everyone is looking for. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I make a point here.. he hasn't quit parliament, he's just quit cabinet.. he will still remain a member of Labor's government (or be in Opposition if Labor don't get over the line)..I don't think this is quite the scalp everyone is looking for..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561010</id>
	<title>Re:Game over Michael</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1269171480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This has nothing to do with the system or R18+ video games. RTFA. Atkinson moved to the back bench to let younger blood take over and to spend more time with his family.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has nothing to do with the system or R18 + video games .
RTFA. Atkinson moved to the back bench to let younger blood take over and to spend more time with his family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has nothing to do with the system or R18+ video games.
RTFA. Atkinson moved to the back bench to let younger blood take over and to spend more time with his family.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556248</id>
	<title>Re:Sad result for Gamers4Croydon</title>
	<author>Orteko</author>
	<datestamp>1269169500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair they always had an uphill battle.</p><p>Atkinsons seat is one of the safest around - G4C's vote isn't actually half bad, they beat a large amount of minor parties and independents in the legaslative council.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair they always had an uphill battle.Atkinsons seat is one of the safest around - G4C 's vote is n't actually half bad , they beat a large amount of minor parties and independents in the legaslative council .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair they always had an uphill battle.Atkinsons seat is one of the safest around - G4C's vote isn't actually half bad, they beat a large amount of minor parties and independents in the legaslative council.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556066</id>
	<title>April Fools??</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1269166560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry, but this is all too good to be true, I had to check the date twice! Now all we need is for Conroy to admit he's completely wrong and step down!<br> <br>For a good laugh, you should complete the "Vote Now!" on the left hand side (no login required)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but this is all too good to be true , I had to check the date twice !
Now all we need is for Conroy to admit he 's completely wrong and step down !
For a good laugh , you should complete the " Vote Now !
" on the left hand side ( no login required )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but this is all too good to be true, I had to check the date twice!
Now all we need is for Conroy to admit he's completely wrong and step down!
For a good laugh, you should complete the "Vote Now!
" on the left hand side (no login required)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556238</id>
	<title>Re:Sad result for Gamers4Croydon</title>
	<author>rtb61</author>
	<datestamp>1269169380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> More importantly were the Greens coming in third all over the place, becoming the alternate to Labour rather than going to the right. In this case the right wanted to buy 500 tasers to tackle anyone they deemed as hooligans, the electric whip and so called conservatives always seem to go hand in hand. The reality is of course their is nothing conservative about using torture devices on citizens that is purely the field of radicals and fundamentalists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly were the Greens coming in third all over the place , becoming the alternate to Labour rather than going to the right .
In this case the right wanted to buy 500 tasers to tackle anyone they deemed as hooligans , the electric whip and so called conservatives always seem to go hand in hand .
The reality is of course their is nothing conservative about using torture devices on citizens that is purely the field of radicals and fundamentalists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> More importantly were the Greens coming in third all over the place, becoming the alternate to Labour rather than going to the right.
In this case the right wanted to buy 500 tasers to tackle anyone they deemed as hooligans, the electric whip and so called conservatives always seem to go hand in hand.
The reality is of course their is nothing conservative about using torture devices on citizens that is purely the field of radicals and fundamentalists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557504</id>
	<title>Not only games</title>
	<author>Ninth Marion</author>
	<datestamp>1269186180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Atkinson's censorship of games is a part of a pattern of behaviour. This is the man who also passed a law making <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100202/1840438016.shtml" title="techdirt.com" rel="nofollow">anonymous speech illegal specifically for this election campaign.</a> [techdirt.com] <br> He then had the cheek, after intense criticism, to say if he was re-elected he'd remove it <i>after</i> the election. It's likely that this was more damaging to the Labor party in this election than the R18 issue.<br>  <br> I am very happy to hear he no longer holds office, as I detest the man and what he stands for. Australia is now a slightly better place. Next up, hopefully, Conroy and the internet filter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Atkinson 's censorship of games is a part of a pattern of behaviour .
This is the man who also passed a law making anonymous speech illegal specifically for this election campaign .
[ techdirt.com ] He then had the cheek , after intense criticism , to say if he was re-elected he 'd remove it after the election .
It 's likely that this was more damaging to the Labor party in this election than the R18 issue .
I am very happy to hear he no longer holds office , as I detest the man and what he stands for .
Australia is now a slightly better place .
Next up , hopefully , Conroy and the internet filter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Atkinson's censorship of games is a part of a pattern of behaviour.
This is the man who also passed a law making anonymous speech illegal specifically for this election campaign.
[techdirt.com]  He then had the cheek, after intense criticism, to say if he was re-elected he'd remove it after the election.
It's likely that this was more damaging to the Labor party in this election than the R18 issue.
I am very happy to hear he no longer holds office, as I detest the man and what he stands for.
Australia is now a slightly better place.
Next up, hopefully, Conroy and the internet filter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556094</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Xiroth</author>
	<datestamp>1269167100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every independent survey run found wide support for an R rating for games amoung the Australian community: <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/rrated-games-may-be-on-shelves-soon/2008/02/24/1203788147712.html" title="smh.com.au">Link</a> [smh.com.au] (reference in there to a survey finding 88\% support). Atkinson is considerably more conservative than his base on the issue - this is (or was) a politician's individual crusade, not him representing his electorate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every independent survey run found wide support for an R rating for games amoung the Australian community : Link [ smh.com.au ] ( reference in there to a survey finding 88 \ % support ) .
Atkinson is considerably more conservative than his base on the issue - this is ( or was ) a politician 's individual crusade , not him representing his electorate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every independent survey run found wide support for an R rating for games amoung the Australian community: Link [smh.com.au] (reference in there to a survey finding 88\% support).
Atkinson is considerably more conservative than his base on the issue - this is (or was) a politician's individual crusade, not him representing his electorate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31577806</id>
	<title>Re:I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1269264180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like how someone (likely a South Australian) tried to mod this troll, sorry mate but the rest of Australia are sick of your shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how someone ( likely a South Australian ) tried to mod this troll , sorry mate but the rest of Australia are sick of your shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how someone (likely a South Australian) tried to mod this troll, sorry mate but the rest of Australia are sick of your shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556038</id>
	<title>Re:Give us a break with the Aussie "stories", huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah no shit.</p><p>http://it.slashdot.org/tag/australia</p><p>How many other Aussie stories not tagged?</p><p>Slashdot mods were bad enough when they ignored everyone outside the USA besides Roland Piquepaille, but now that Roland is dead they ignore every one outside the USA and Australia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah no shit.http : //it.slashdot.org/tag/australiaHow many other Aussie stories not tagged ? Slashdot mods were bad enough when they ignored everyone outside the USA besides Roland Piquepaille , but now that Roland is dead they ignore every one outside the USA and Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah no shit.http://it.slashdot.org/tag/australiaHow many other Aussie stories not tagged?Slashdot mods were bad enough when they ignored everyone outside the USA besides Roland Piquepaille, but now that Roland is dead they ignore every one outside the USA and Australia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556084</id>
	<title>One step forward for internet freedom...</title>
	<author>matunos</author>
	<datestamp>1269166980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...two steps backwards for global warming.<br><br>(Then again, the "massive swing" was apparently in two of Australia's smaller states, with larger elections on the horizon.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>...two steps backwards for global warming .
( Then again , the " massive swing " was apparently in two of Australia 's smaller states , with larger elections on the horizon .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...two steps backwards for global warming.
(Then again, the "massive swing" was apparently in two of Australia's smaller states, with larger elections on the horizon.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559760</id>
	<title>Re:Game over Michael</title>
	<author>srjh</author>
	<datestamp>1269163320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now, between the censorship and NBN debacle he hasn't many people left who like him enough to vote for him.</p></div><p>As long as Conroy retains top billing in the Senate, he doesn't have much reason to worry. He's considerably less popular than other Labor senators, but because of internal factional politics, he's pretty much guaranteed top billing.</p><p>An overwhelming majority of Labor voters will mark "1" above the line and think nothing of it, if Conroy goes, it will be because Labor, not Australia as a whole, pushes him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now , between the censorship and NBN debacle he has n't many people left who like him enough to vote for him.As long as Conroy retains top billing in the Senate , he does n't have much reason to worry .
He 's considerably less popular than other Labor senators , but because of internal factional politics , he 's pretty much guaranteed top billing.An overwhelming majority of Labor voters will mark " 1 " above the line and think nothing of it , if Conroy goes , it will be because Labor , not Australia as a whole , pushes him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I wonder how Conroy is feeling about now, between the censorship and NBN debacle he hasn't many people left who like him enough to vote for him.As long as Conroy retains top billing in the Senate, he doesn't have much reason to worry.
He's considerably less popular than other Labor senators, but because of internal factional politics, he's pretty much guaranteed top billing.An overwhelming majority of Labor voters will mark "1" above the line and think nothing of it, if Conroy goes, it will be because Labor, not Australia as a whole, pushes him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556028</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed? It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency...are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.</p></div><p>First of all, he doesn't believe that. In a recent letter he wrote about this, he stated "this issue has little traction with my constituents who are more concerned with real-life issues than home entertainment in imaginary worlds". So it seems that he is not representing the will of his constituents, but he thinks that they don't care about it.</p><p>As to why it is flawed, that is because it is so out of step with the rest of the country. Adding an R rating for video games requires the agreement of all Attorneys General of all the states. Michael Atkinson is the only one who will not agree to it, despite the evidence suggesting that the majority of Australians support the introduction.</p><p>The main problem is that it doesn't stop kids from seeing adult games. In fact, because there is no R rating, games that would have received that tend to get MA15+ ratings. Those that aren't banned, that is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how is the SA AG 's view on computer games flawed ?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency...are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games.First of all , he does n't believe that .
In a recent letter he wrote about this , he stated " this issue has little traction with my constituents who are more concerned with real-life issues than home entertainment in imaginary worlds " .
So it seems that he is not representing the will of his constituents , but he thinks that they do n't care about it.As to why it is flawed , that is because it is so out of step with the rest of the country .
Adding an R rating for video games requires the agreement of all Attorneys General of all the states .
Michael Atkinson is the only one who will not agree to it , despite the evidence suggesting that the majority of Australians support the introduction.The main problem is that it does n't stop kids from seeing adult games .
In fact , because there is no R rating , games that would have received that tend to get MA15 + ratings .
Those that are n't banned , that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency...are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.First of all, he doesn't believe that.
In a recent letter he wrote about this, he stated "this issue has little traction with my constituents who are more concerned with real-life issues than home entertainment in imaginary worlds".
So it seems that he is not representing the will of his constituents, but he thinks that they don't care about it.As to why it is flawed, that is because it is so out of step with the rest of the country.
Adding an R rating for video games requires the agreement of all Attorneys General of all the states.
Michael Atkinson is the only one who will not agree to it, despite the evidence suggesting that the majority of Australians support the introduction.The main problem is that it doesn't stop kids from seeing adult games.
In fact, because there is no R rating, games that would have received that tend to get MA15+ ratings.
Those that aren't banned, that is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31564740</id>
	<title>Driven by fear of the unknown</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1269253020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer games</p></div><p>Wasn't that the problem in the first place, that this was someone with only half a clue?</p><p>This is so often the case, that people only understand enough to get scared or decide that they don't like it; I suspect we all do it, sometimes - I know I do. The thing is - that kind of people are also valuable members of society, and in a democracy we have to try to find a compromise that accomodates the interests of at least a majority of people.</p><p>To me it seems that the importance of games is hugely overstated. A computer game is only entertainment, and the problem I see is not about whether some games should be banned, but how we get people away from passive entertainment and into active participation in physical activity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer gamesWas n't that the problem in the first place , that this was someone with only half a clue ? This is so often the case , that people only understand enough to get scared or decide that they do n't like it ; I suspect we all do it , sometimes - I know I do .
The thing is - that kind of people are also valuable members of society , and in a democracy we have to try to find a compromise that accomodates the interests of at least a majority of people.To me it seems that the importance of games is hugely overstated .
A computer game is only entertainment , and the problem I see is not about whether some games should be banned , but how we get people away from passive entertainment and into active participation in physical activity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer gamesWasn't that the problem in the first place, that this was someone with only half a clue?This is so often the case, that people only understand enough to get scared or decide that they don't like it; I suspect we all do it, sometimes - I know I do.
The thing is - that kind of people are also valuable members of society, and in a democracy we have to try to find a compromise that accomodates the interests of at least a majority of people.To me it seems that the importance of games is hugely overstated.
A computer game is only entertainment, and the problem I see is not about whether some games should be banned, but how we get people away from passive entertainment and into active participation in physical activity.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557890</id>
	<title>Re:I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269190140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a South Australian, I had no idea that we morons had been causing the country for too long!</p><p>If we did indeed cause the country, shouldn't you be kissing our arses right now?  Or at least give us back our Grand Pricks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a South Australian , I had no idea that we morons had been causing the country for too long ! If we did indeed cause the country , should n't you be kissing our arses right now ?
Or at least give us back our Grand Pricks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a South Australian, I had no idea that we morons had been causing the country for too long!If we did indeed cause the country, shouldn't you be kissing our arses right now?
Or at least give us back our Grand Pricks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557502</id>
	<title>Re:I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269186180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From SA here...</p><p>I never knew that Adelaide caused the rest of the country?!   Wow!  You guys should be kissing our arses then!  Give us back our Grand Pricks!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From SA here...I never knew that Adelaide caused the rest of the country ? !
Wow ! You guys should be kissing our arses then !
Give us back our Grand Pricks !
: -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From SA here...I never knew that Adelaide caused the rest of the country?!
Wow!  You guys should be kissing our arses then!
Give us back our Grand Pricks!
:-p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557952</id>
	<title>Great news</title>
	<author>sphazell</author>
	<datestamp>1269190740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is good lets hope the guy never again gets into a position where
he can threaten our freedoms and liberty. Not only was he against the R classification for
games but he was also an advocate for Internet and press censorship.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is good lets hope the guy never again gets into a position where he can threaten our freedoms and liberty .
Not only was he against the R classification for games but he was also an advocate for Internet and press censorship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is good lets hope the guy never again gets into a position where
he can threaten our freedoms and liberty.
Not only was he against the R classification for
games but he was also an advocate for Internet and press censorship.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557152</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1269182520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The point is that a cabinet minister has to consider more than just the views of his electorate, he has to work for the good of the whole state. Approximately 11200 people voted for Michael Atkinson (as their first preference) in the lower house, whereas about 8300 voted for Gamers 4 Croydon as their first preference for the Upper house (just shy of 10000 votes were distributed to their candidate before he was excluded), and several of the other minor parties also support an r18+ rating for games.<br>These is also the question of the harm done to South Australia's reputation interstate, especially as the premier has often spoken of the need to attract young interstate migrants to the state.</p><p>The key point is whether those 11000 people voted for him because of his policy on games (unlikely, there was a 14\% swing against him, and only a 3\% swing to the Family First Party (Christian right and the main "moral guardians") (indeed, Gamers 4 Croydon got more votes there than the FFP, suggesting that censorship wasn't the main issue there).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is that a cabinet minister has to consider more than just the views of his electorate , he has to work for the good of the whole state .
Approximately 11200 people voted for Michael Atkinson ( as their first preference ) in the lower house , whereas about 8300 voted for Gamers 4 Croydon as their first preference for the Upper house ( just shy of 10000 votes were distributed to their candidate before he was excluded ) , and several of the other minor parties also support an r18 + rating for games.These is also the question of the harm done to South Australia 's reputation interstate , especially as the premier has often spoken of the need to attract young interstate migrants to the state.The key point is whether those 11000 people voted for him because of his policy on games ( unlikely , there was a 14 \ % swing against him , and only a 3 \ % swing to the Family First Party ( Christian right and the main " moral guardians " ) ( indeed , Gamers 4 Croydon got more votes there than the FFP , suggesting that censorship was n't the main issue there ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is that a cabinet minister has to consider more than just the views of his electorate, he has to work for the good of the whole state.
Approximately 11200 people voted for Michael Atkinson (as their first preference) in the lower house, whereas about 8300 voted for Gamers 4 Croydon as their first preference for the Upper house (just shy of 10000 votes were distributed to their candidate before he was excluded), and several of the other minor parties also support an r18+ rating for games.These is also the question of the harm done to South Australia's reputation interstate, especially as the premier has often spoken of the need to attract young interstate migrants to the state.The key point is whether those 11000 people voted for him because of his policy on games (unlikely, there was a 14\% swing against him, and only a 3\% swing to the Family First Party (Christian right and the main "moral guardians") (indeed, Gamers 4 Croydon got more votes there than the FFP, suggesting that censorship wasn't the main issue there).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556202</id>
	<title>Re:Sad result for Gamers4Croydon</title>
	<author>Arbition</author>
	<datestamp>1269168900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least they beat Trevor Grace (AbortSA) in the upper house. Now we just need an Attorney General who isn't as morally backward as the last (That is, not so influenced by faith).</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they beat Trevor Grace ( AbortSA ) in the upper house .
Now we just need an Attorney General who is n't as morally backward as the last ( That is , not so influenced by faith ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they beat Trevor Grace (AbortSA) in the upper house.
Now we just need an Attorney General who isn't as morally backward as the last (That is, not so influenced by faith).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31564212</id>
	<title>Not the victory we were hoping for</title>
	<author>LuNa7ic</author>
	<datestamp>1269200460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of people here apparently haven't bothered to read even the summary, and as such are assuming we took a stand and kicked this guy out of office. This isn't true. Michael Atkinson won the election <b>easily</b>, and then announced he wouldn't be taking the job anyway, instead moving to a back-bench position in the Labour government to retire in 2014.
<p>
Yes, the arsehole is going, but no, we didn't beat him. The vast majority of voters, as always, don't know or care about these issues, so the battle is far from won.
</p><p>
For the record, his attitude towards video games aren't the only reason we want to be rid of him. The man has a history of saying stupid things in an an official capacity that come back to bite him. He accused a <a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/attorney-general-mike-atkinson-meets-his-invisible-man-aaron-fornarino/story-fn2sdwup-1225826491256" title="adelaidenow.com.au" rel="nofollow">blogger</a> [adelaidenow.com.au] of being a non-existent sock puppet for Liberal party criticism, and he lied about a bikie gang supposedly <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200403/s1071563.htm" title="abc.net.au" rel="nofollow">barbecuing</a> [abc.net.au] a cat to threaten him. I'm sure you all remember him banning anonymous political speech in the lead up to the recent elections as well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people here apparently have n't bothered to read even the summary , and as such are assuming we took a stand and kicked this guy out of office .
This is n't true .
Michael Atkinson won the election easily , and then announced he would n't be taking the job anyway , instead moving to a back-bench position in the Labour government to retire in 2014 .
Yes , the arsehole is going , but no , we did n't beat him .
The vast majority of voters , as always , do n't know or care about these issues , so the battle is far from won .
For the record , his attitude towards video games are n't the only reason we want to be rid of him .
The man has a history of saying stupid things in an an official capacity that come back to bite him .
He accused a blogger [ adelaidenow.com.au ] of being a non-existent sock puppet for Liberal party criticism , and he lied about a bikie gang supposedly barbecuing [ abc.net.au ] a cat to threaten him .
I 'm sure you all remember him banning anonymous political speech in the lead up to the recent elections as well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of people here apparently haven't bothered to read even the summary, and as such are assuming we took a stand and kicked this guy out of office.
This isn't true.
Michael Atkinson won the election easily, and then announced he wouldn't be taking the job anyway, instead moving to a back-bench position in the Labour government to retire in 2014.
Yes, the arsehole is going, but no, we didn't beat him.
The vast majority of voters, as always, don't know or care about these issues, so the battle is far from won.
For the record, his attitude towards video games aren't the only reason we want to be rid of him.
The man has a history of saying stupid things in an an official capacity that come back to bite him.
He accused a blogger [adelaidenow.com.au] of being a non-existent sock puppet for Liberal party criticism, and he lied about a bikie gang supposedly barbecuing [abc.net.au] a cat to threaten him.
I'm sure you all remember him banning anonymous political speech in the lead up to the recent elections as well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556606</id>
	<title>The battle will never be over</title>
	<author>romiz</author>
	<datestamp>1269175380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And in the meanwhile, in Switzerland, politicians have passed the first step for making a <a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/38103/Switzerland-passes-violent-games-ban" title="mcvuk.com">law</a> [mcvuk.com] targeting all games that "require cruel acts of violence against humans and humanlike creatures for in-game success&rdquo;. The objective of this law is to make it forbidden to produce, advertise, import, sell or distribute such games.  It seems, however, that this is not the final vote, and there is a real possibility that <a href="http://www.tdg.ch/actu/suisse/jeux-video-violents-bientot-bannis-2010-03-19" title="www.tdg.ch">public outrage</a> [www.tdg.ch], from gamers as well as games companies, could bring the politicians to back down on this, and simply make it forbidden in the law to sell 18-rated PEGI games to minors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And in the meanwhile , in Switzerland , politicians have passed the first step for making a law [ mcvuk.com ] targeting all games that " require cruel acts of violence against humans and humanlike creatures for in-game success    .
The objective of this law is to make it forbidden to produce , advertise , import , sell or distribute such games .
It seems , however , that this is not the final vote , and there is a real possibility that public outrage [ www.tdg.ch ] , from gamers as well as games companies , could bring the politicians to back down on this , and simply make it forbidden in the law to sell 18-rated PEGI games to minors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in the meanwhile, in Switzerland, politicians have passed the first step for making a law [mcvuk.com] targeting all games that "require cruel acts of violence against humans and humanlike creatures for in-game success”.
The objective of this law is to make it forbidden to produce, advertise, import, sell or distribute such games.
It seems, however, that this is not the final vote, and there is a real possibility that public outrage [www.tdg.ch], from gamers as well as games companies, could bring the politicians to back down on this, and simply make it forbidden in the law to sell 18-rated PEGI games to minors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082</id>
	<title>Sad result for Gamers4Croydon</title>
	<author>Gadget\_Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1269166920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't a great election result for <a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org">Gamers4croydon</a> [gamers4croydon.org], who were standing against the Attorney General on the platform of allowing R18+ ratings. They only received <a href="http://www.ecsa.sa.gov.au/election2010//results/electoral608.htm" title="sa.gov.au">3.7\% of the vote</a> [sa.gov.au]. In fact, there were more informal (or invalid) votes at 5\%.</p><p>Still, they will be happy with the final outcome, even if it wasn't a victory for grass roots campaigning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't a great election result for Gamers4croydon [ gamers4croydon.org ] , who were standing against the Attorney General on the platform of allowing R18 + ratings .
They only received 3.7 \ % of the vote [ sa.gov.au ] .
In fact , there were more informal ( or invalid ) votes at 5 \ % .Still , they will be happy with the final outcome , even if it was n't a victory for grass roots campaigning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't a great election result for Gamers4croydon [gamers4croydon.org], who were standing against the Attorney General on the platform of allowing R18+ ratings.
They only received 3.7\% of the vote [sa.gov.au].
In fact, there were more informal (or invalid) votes at 5\%.Still, they will be happy with the final outcome, even if it wasn't a victory for grass roots campaigning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556026</id>
	<title>he's known for opposing the rating not the games</title>
	<author>outsider007</author>
	<datestamp>1269166080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me he's made it easier for kids to get the games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me he 's made it easier for kids to get the games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me he's made it easier for kids to get the games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560424</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Rennt</author>
	<datestamp>1269167580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) Are you really advocating tyranny by majority? Censorship is evil, popular support does not make it OK.<br>
2) There was no evidence of "majority" support. Maybe Atkinson did believe it, but he certainly wasn't listening to his constituents.<br>
3) [minor issue] Your gaming demographic is off. The average age is over 25, and most of them are quite computer illiterate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Are you really advocating tyranny by majority ?
Censorship is evil , popular support does not make it OK . 2 ) There was no evidence of " majority " support .
Maybe Atkinson did believe it , but he certainly was n't listening to his constituents .
3 ) [ minor issue ] Your gaming demographic is off .
The average age is over 25 , and most of them are quite computer illiterate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Are you really advocating tyranny by majority?
Censorship is evil, popular support does not make it OK.
2) There was no evidence of "majority" support.
Maybe Atkinson did believe it, but he certainly wasn't listening to his constituents.
3) [minor issue] Your gaming demographic is off.
The average age is over 25, and most of them are quite computer illiterate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561938</id>
	<title>Re:I know nothing of politics, however,......</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1269178860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot, maybe Australia won't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.</p></div><p>If possible please help to get the word out to send emails of support to Joe Hockey, an MP who has strongly and vocally opposed the internet filter and is doing a damn good job! If we as a community show support so such people im sure they are likely to continue with those actions!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot , maybe Australia wo n't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.If possible please help to get the word out to send emails of support to Joe Hockey , an MP who has strongly and vocally opposed the internet filter and is doing a damn good job !
If we as a community show support so such people im sure they are likely to continue with those actions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if we can just get rid of this Stephen Conroy idiot, maybe Australia won't be a laughing stock for tech news and articles for a while again.If possible please help to get the word out to send emails of support to Joe Hockey, an MP who has strongly and vocally opposed the internet filter and is doing a damn good job!
If we as a community show support so such people im sure they are likely to continue with those actions!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555890</id>
	<title>Fantastic.. but still sign the petition!</title>
	<author>ihaveamo</author>
	<datestamp>1269163740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of game shops have petitions to sign - Aussies, if you are dropping by one to pick up the latest austrlian-modified (aka heavily-censored) version of whatever, ask to sign the petition. (I found one to sign, right at the front of the store "GAME", in the Brisbane CBD).

More info about the craziness of no R18+ games for Australia is <a href="http://www.r18games.com.au/" title="r18games.com.au" rel="nofollow"> Here </a> [r18games.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of game shops have petitions to sign - Aussies , if you are dropping by one to pick up the latest austrlian-modified ( aka heavily-censored ) version of whatever , ask to sign the petition .
( I found one to sign , right at the front of the store " GAME " , in the Brisbane CBD ) .
More info about the craziness of no R18 + games for Australia is Here [ r18games.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of game shops have petitions to sign - Aussies, if you are dropping by one to pick up the latest austrlian-modified (aka heavily-censored) version of whatever, ask to sign the petition.
(I found one to sign, right at the front of the store "GAME", in the Brisbane CBD).
More info about the craziness of no R18+ games for Australia is  Here  [r18games.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555994</id>
	<title>Give us a break with the Aussie "stories", huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a whole world of nations out there besides your own, ya know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a whole world of nations out there besides your own , ya know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a whole world of nations out there besides your own, ya know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558072</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is a bad idea to ask this</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1269191880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?  It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.  Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.</p><p>To cater to the sensibilities of other people, and decide that their needs come before some others, does not necessarily make him "anti" anyone. Just like how if x is not larger than 3, it does not automatically make is smaller than 3, but it could also be equal.</p></div><p>Even if this is the view of his constituency, you're talking about tyranny of the majority, which is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, problem with a democratic government.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this : but how is the SA AG 's view on computer games flawed ?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency ( which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males ) are not supportive of a " wider range " of content in video games .
Given what he does , his decision is quite sensible.To cater to the sensibilities of other people , and decide that their needs come before some others , does not necessarily make him " anti " anyone .
Just like how if x is not larger than 3 , it does not automatically make is smaller than 3 , but it could also be equal.Even if this is the view of his constituency , you 're talking about tyranny of the majority , which is one of the biggest , if not the biggest , problem with a democratic government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I will be called a troll for asking this: but how is the SA AG's view on computer games flawed?
It should be obvious to anyone that he believes that the views of his constituency (which BTW is more than just teenaged and 18-25 year old anglophone middle class computer-literate males) are not supportive of a "wider range" of content in video games.
Given what he does, his decision is quite sensible.To cater to the sensibilities of other people, and decide that their needs come before some others, does not necessarily make him "anti" anyone.
Just like how if x is not larger than 3, it does not automatically make is smaller than 3, but it could also be equal.Even if this is the view of his constituency, you're talking about tyranny of the majority, which is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, problem with a democratic government.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560486</id>
	<title>Re:Sad result for Gamers4Croydon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269168120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right, rate is so low.<br><a href="http://www.neistesenvar.com/" title="neistesenvar.com" rel="nofollow">alisveris</a> [neistesenvar.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , rate is so low.alisveris [ neistesenvar.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, rate is so low.alisveris [neistesenvar.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31577806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31562420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31563574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_0811241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31563574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31560486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31577806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31562420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31557504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31561010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31559760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31558134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_0811241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31555994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_0811241.31556038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
