<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_19_166256</id>
	<title>Memory Cards of 3,000 Phones Infected By Malware</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1269024900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett sends us a few links from IT World tracing a story about infected microSD cards in Vodaphone-supplied mobile phones. <i>"The original report came on March 8 after an employee of Panda Security plugged a newly ordered HTC Magic phone from Vodafone into a Windows computer, where it <a href="http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless/99707/panda-discovers-malware-htc-magic-phone">triggered an alert from the antivirus software</a>. Further inspection of the phone found the device's 8GB microSD memory card was infected with a client for the now-defunct Mariposa botnet, the Conficker worm, and a password stealer for the Lineage game. At that point it was at thought to be an issue with a specific refurbished phone. On Wednesday another phone surfaced with <a href="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/101253/malware-found-another-htc-magic-smartphone">traces of the Mariposa botnet</a>. And now Vodafone is saying that as many as <a href="http://www.itworld.com/\%5Bprimary-term\%5D/101644/malware-infected-memory-cards-3000-vodafone-mobiles">3,000 HTC Magic phones may be affected</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett sends us a few links from IT World tracing a story about infected microSD cards in Vodaphone-supplied mobile phones .
" The original report came on March 8 after an employee of Panda Security plugged a newly ordered HTC Magic phone from Vodafone into a Windows computer , where it triggered an alert from the antivirus software .
Further inspection of the phone found the device 's 8GB microSD memory card was infected with a client for the now-defunct Mariposa botnet , the Conficker worm , and a password stealer for the Lineage game .
At that point it was at thought to be an issue with a specific refurbished phone .
On Wednesday another phone surfaced with traces of the Mariposa botnet .
And now Vodafone is saying that as many as 3,000 HTC Magic phones may be affected .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett sends us a few links from IT World tracing a story about infected microSD cards in Vodaphone-supplied mobile phones.
"The original report came on March 8 after an employee of Panda Security plugged a newly ordered HTC Magic phone from Vodafone into a Windows computer, where it triggered an alert from the antivirus software.
Further inspection of the phone found the device's 8GB microSD memory card was infected with a client for the now-defunct Mariposa botnet, the Conficker worm, and a password stealer for the Lineage game.
At that point it was at thought to be an issue with a specific refurbished phone.
On Wednesday another phone surfaced with traces of the Mariposa botnet.
And now Vodafone is saying that as many as 3,000 HTC Magic phones may be affected.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542010</id>
	<title>iPhone pwnz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We behind the walled garden laugh at your plight!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We behind the walled garden laugh at your plight !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We behind the walled garden laugh at your plight!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542660</id>
	<title>Re:3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1269031680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you take the number of HTC Magic phones that shipped, and subtract the number that were returned, you get 3,000.</p><p>OK, that was mean. I've gotta get outside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you take the number of HTC Magic phones that shipped , and subtract the number that were returned , you get 3,000.OK , that was mean .
I 've got ta get outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you take the number of HTC Magic phones that shipped, and subtract the number that were returned, you get 3,000.OK, that was mean.
I've gotta get outside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31544680</id>
	<title>Re:what s the safest cellphones?</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1268996940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just want a cellphone that allows, well, you know, to call people.</p><p>What would be the simplest, easiest, cellphone with the least functionality (no bluetooth, no Java, no appstore, no memory card) that would fit me?</p><p>You know, one with ten numbers and a "call" and a "hang up" button?</p></div><p>You say you want "simplest and easiest".  Think deeply about what you're trying to do.  Do you actually want to talk to a "number", or do you really intend to talk to a specific person?  This is a real question, and not intended to be a smart-assed comment.</p><p>Most people assume a simple phone is one that dials numbers, but that's because we've been trained by 80 years of technological limits that have forced us to abstract human conversations behind strings of digits.  With new phones that have contact lists, you don't need the numbers other than for initial input into the machine.  You set the number once (or save it if they call you first) and never dial the digits again.</p><p>That leads directly to a repeat of the first question:  do you want to hunt through a contact list, or do you still just want to talk to someone?  Again, we've been trained by the limits of our recent cell phone technology to accept 2=ABC, 3=DEF, etc.  But that sucks for searching.  Arrow-up and arrow-down are frustrating for average numbers of contacts, and the experience gets worse the more people you know.</p><p>If you honestly want to just talk to someone, you should really be asking for a phone with voice recognition dialing.  Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Sony Ericsson all have phones that can voice dial without training based on the names you've entered in the contact list, and I'm sure there are many others out there.  Pushing the "call" button and saying "Call John Smith" is about as simple and easy and clear and direct as it gets.  You should look into that, rather than constraining your requirements with limits that no longer need to exist.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want a cellphone that allows , well , you know , to call people.What would be the simplest , easiest , cellphone with the least functionality ( no bluetooth , no Java , no appstore , no memory card ) that would fit me ? You know , one with ten numbers and a " call " and a " hang up " button ? You say you want " simplest and easiest " .
Think deeply about what you 're trying to do .
Do you actually want to talk to a " number " , or do you really intend to talk to a specific person ?
This is a real question , and not intended to be a smart-assed comment.Most people assume a simple phone is one that dials numbers , but that 's because we 've been trained by 80 years of technological limits that have forced us to abstract human conversations behind strings of digits .
With new phones that have contact lists , you do n't need the numbers other than for initial input into the machine .
You set the number once ( or save it if they call you first ) and never dial the digits again.That leads directly to a repeat of the first question : do you want to hunt through a contact list , or do you still just want to talk to someone ?
Again , we 've been trained by the limits of our recent cell phone technology to accept 2 = ABC , 3 = DEF , etc .
But that sucks for searching .
Arrow-up and arrow-down are frustrating for average numbers of contacts , and the experience gets worse the more people you know.If you honestly want to just talk to someone , you should really be asking for a phone with voice recognition dialing .
Motorola , Nokia , Apple , Sony Ericsson all have phones that can voice dial without training based on the names you 've entered in the contact list , and I 'm sure there are many others out there .
Pushing the " call " button and saying " Call John Smith " is about as simple and easy and clear and direct as it gets .
You should look into that , rather than constraining your requirements with limits that no longer need to exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want a cellphone that allows, well, you know, to call people.What would be the simplest, easiest, cellphone with the least functionality (no bluetooth, no Java, no appstore, no memory card) that would fit me?You know, one with ten numbers and a "call" and a "hang up" button?You say you want "simplest and easiest".
Think deeply about what you're trying to do.
Do you actually want to talk to a "number", or do you really intend to talk to a specific person?
This is a real question, and not intended to be a smart-assed comment.Most people assume a simple phone is one that dials numbers, but that's because we've been trained by 80 years of technological limits that have forced us to abstract human conversations behind strings of digits.
With new phones that have contact lists, you don't need the numbers other than for initial input into the machine.
You set the number once (or save it if they call you first) and never dial the digits again.That leads directly to a repeat of the first question:  do you want to hunt through a contact list, or do you still just want to talk to someone?
Again, we've been trained by the limits of our recent cell phone technology to accept 2=ABC, 3=DEF, etc.
But that sucks for searching.
Arrow-up and arrow-down are frustrating for average numbers of contacts, and the experience gets worse the more people you know.If you honestly want to just talk to someone, you should really be asking for a phone with voice recognition dialing.
Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Sony Ericsson all have phones that can voice dial without training based on the names you've entered in the contact list, and I'm sure there are many others out there.
Pushing the "call" button and saying "Call John Smith" is about as simple and easy and clear and direct as it gets.
You should look into that, rather than constraining your requirements with limits that no longer need to exist.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542964</id>
	<title>Format</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1268989800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Format your storage media before you use it.<br>China or not.</p><p>Until malware in firmware becomes widespread enough to worry about, or until they inject malware into blank optical discs, it's a simple step that will prevent a lot of shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Format your storage media before you use it.China or not.Until malware in firmware becomes widespread enough to worry about , or until they inject malware into blank optical discs , it 's a simple step that will prevent a lot of shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Format your storage media before you use it.China or not.Until malware in firmware becomes widespread enough to worry about, or until they inject malware into blank optical discs, it's a simple step that will prevent a lot of shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542778</id>
	<title>Lineage</title>
	<author>Chees0rz</author>
	<datestamp>1269032280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can I just say it's amazing that Lineage is still popular enough in Asian countries that people are stealing passwords for it like this.  If only it held on in the US... that game gave me so many lovely hours of punching ents.<p><div class="quote"><p>No bark... no fruit!</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I just say it 's amazing that Lineage is still popular enough in Asian countries that people are stealing passwords for it like this .
If only it held on in the US... that game gave me so many lovely hours of punching ents.No bark... no fruit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I just say it's amazing that Lineage is still popular enough in Asian countries that people are stealing passwords for it like this.
If only it held on in the US... that game gave me so many lovely hours of punching ents.No bark... no fruit!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542062</id>
	<title>Let me just say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542136</id>
	<title>Malware and what else...</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1269029160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...do you suppose shipped out on those SD cards.  I know where my mind strays, but more likely it was probably a bunch of pictures of cats and annoying ringtones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...do you suppose shipped out on those SD cards .
I know where my mind strays , but more likely it was probably a bunch of pictures of cats and annoying ringtones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...do you suppose shipped out on those SD cards.
I know where my mind strays, but more likely it was probably a bunch of pictures of cats and annoying ringtones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542280</id>
	<title>Re:3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269029760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>it sounds like a completely arbitrary number. In related news, they also said the cards might be in other phones, not just the HTC ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it sounds like a completely arbitrary number .
In related news , they also said the cards might be in other phones , not just the HTC ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it sounds like a completely arbitrary number.
In related news, they also said the cards might be in other phones, not just the HTC ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542962</id>
	<title>Re:3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268989800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;"Democracy is the pathetic belief in the wisdom of collective ignorance." -- H.L. Mencken</p><p>Actually studies have found that when you take a mob of people, and have them make guesses, they often come-up with the right answer.  For example, ask an audience to guess how many jellybeans are in a jar, average their answers, and you'll have the correct answer +/- 1 jellybean.</p><p>BACK TO TOPIC:</p><p>What good is an 8 gigabyte RAM card?  You can't even run Windows 95 on that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; " Democracy is the pathetic belief in the wisdom of collective ignorance .
" -- H.L .
MenckenActually studies have found that when you take a mob of people , and have them make guesses , they often come-up with the right answer .
For example , ask an audience to guess how many jellybeans are in a jar , average their answers , and you 'll have the correct answer + /- 1 jellybean.BACK TO TOPIC : What good is an 8 gigabyte RAM card ?
You ca n't even run Windows 95 on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;"Democracy is the pathetic belief in the wisdom of collective ignorance.
" -- H.L.
MenckenActually studies have found that when you take a mob of people, and have them make guesses, they often come-up with the right answer.
For example, ask an audience to guess how many jellybeans are in a jar, average their answers, and you'll have the correct answer +/- 1 jellybean.BACK TO TOPIC:What good is an 8 gigabyte RAM card?
You can't even run Windows 95 on that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31545344</id>
	<title>oh crap</title>
	<author>Maave</author>
	<datestamp>1269000420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Holy crap, that's a lot more phones than I last read.
And the Mariposa botnet isn't completely out of the picture. It may be old, but it's still a possible threat, especially if someone has access to phone cards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap , that 's a lot more phones than I last read .
And the Mariposa botnet is n't completely out of the picture .
It may be old , but it 's still a possible threat , especially if someone has access to phone cards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap, that's a lot more phones than I last read.
And the Mariposa botnet isn't completely out of the picture.
It may be old, but it's still a possible threat, especially if someone has access to phone cards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542864</id>
	<title>Probably incidental</title>
	<author>mbessey</author>
	<datestamp>1268989440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the one case I'm familiar with, which was at another company, the infection was traced to a single PC on the production floor that was just *packed* with malware. Apparently, it had been re-purposed from somebody's desk to the QA station when production capacity was expanded.</p><p>This was at a reputable, top-tier contract manufacturing company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the one case I 'm familiar with , which was at another company , the infection was traced to a single PC on the production floor that was just * packed * with malware .
Apparently , it had been re-purposed from somebody 's desk to the QA station when production capacity was expanded.This was at a reputable , top-tier contract manufacturing company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the one case I'm familiar with, which was at another company, the infection was traced to a single PC on the production floor that was just *packed* with malware.
Apparently, it had been re-purposed from somebody's desk to the QA station when production capacity was expanded.This was at a reputable, top-tier contract manufacturing company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543718</id>
	<title>Anti-virus programs not so stupid?</title>
	<author>godel\_56</author>
	<datestamp>1268992800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are frequent slashdot postings saying that anti-virus programs are a waste of time.
 <p>Maybe this is one example of why it might be a good idea to have one available for an occasional scan. Admittedly anyone running a *nix based computer would not have had a problem with this malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are frequent slashdot postings saying that anti-virus programs are a waste of time .
Maybe this is one example of why it might be a good idea to have one available for an occasional scan .
Admittedly anyone running a * nix based computer would not have had a problem with this malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are frequent slashdot postings saying that anti-virus programs are a waste of time.
Maybe this is one example of why it might be a good idea to have one available for an occasional scan.
Admittedly anyone running a *nix based computer would not have had a problem with this malware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543566</id>
	<title>Re:3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1268992080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ran it on a 1.2GB hard drive when it first came out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran it on a 1.2GB hard drive when it first came out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran it on a 1.2GB hard drive when it first came out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31548000</id>
	<title>Similiar Experience</title>
	<author>boliboboli</author>
	<datestamp>1269117720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I purchased a digital picture frame made by Insignia in 2008. When Plugged into my PC my AV(Nod32 Eset) found two files it listed as viruses. After removing them, the picture frame worked fine.</p><p>About a month later Insignia sent a letter explaining there may have been viruses on the internal memory of the frame.I think this happens quite a bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I purchased a digital picture frame made by Insignia in 2008 .
When Plugged into my PC my AV ( Nod32 Eset ) found two files it listed as viruses .
After removing them , the picture frame worked fine.About a month later Insignia sent a letter explaining there may have been viruses on the internal memory of the frame.I think this happens quite a bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I purchased a digital picture frame made by Insignia in 2008.
When Plugged into my PC my AV(Nod32 Eset) found two files it listed as viruses.
After removing them, the picture frame worked fine.About a month later Insignia sent a letter explaining there may have been viruses on the internal memory of the frame.I think this happens quite a bit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060</id>
	<title>what s the safest cellphones?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268990280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm one of the nerdiest<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. nerd.  This post typed on an old IBM Model M (a modded 'blind' one, mind you) and I've got several of these.  Next to me is an HP LasertJet 4M+ which gives me an erection everytime I netcat a PostScript file directly to its IP address (I also have got several of these and I "upgrade" them etc.).</p><p>Yet I don't care about apps on my phone.  I don't care about surfing with my phone.  I don't care about calendar on my phone.</p><p>I actually don't give a flying f*ck about my phone (please don't mod troll nor spam). To me it's really just a device allowing to give and answer calls.</p><p>I've got two 24" screens and I work on them 10 hours / day and when I'm off the online world, I'm off: I don't want to check my GMail account anymore, I don't want to follow my eBay auctions. I'm done.</p><p>I just want a cellphone that allows, well, you know, to call people.</p><p>What would be the simplest, easiest, cellphone with the least functionality (no bluetooth, no Java, no appstore, no memory card) that would fit me?</p><p>You know, one with ten numbers and a "call" and a "hang up" button?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm one of the nerdiest / .
nerd. This post typed on an old IBM Model M ( a modded 'blind ' one , mind you ) and I 've got several of these .
Next to me is an HP LasertJet 4M + which gives me an erection everytime I netcat a PostScript file directly to its IP address ( I also have got several of these and I " upgrade " them etc .
) .Yet I do n't care about apps on my phone .
I do n't care about surfing with my phone .
I do n't care about calendar on my phone.I actually do n't give a flying f * ck about my phone ( please do n't mod troll nor spam ) .
To me it 's really just a device allowing to give and answer calls.I 've got two 24 " screens and I work on them 10 hours / day and when I 'm off the online world , I 'm off : I do n't want to check my GMail account anymore , I do n't want to follow my eBay auctions .
I 'm done.I just want a cellphone that allows , well , you know , to call people.What would be the simplest , easiest , cellphone with the least functionality ( no bluetooth , no Java , no appstore , no memory card ) that would fit me ? You know , one with ten numbers and a " call " and a " hang up " button ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm one of the nerdiest /.
nerd.  This post typed on an old IBM Model M (a modded 'blind' one, mind you) and I've got several of these.
Next to me is an HP LasertJet 4M+ which gives me an erection everytime I netcat a PostScript file directly to its IP address (I also have got several of these and I "upgrade" them etc.
).Yet I don't care about apps on my phone.
I don't care about surfing with my phone.
I don't care about calendar on my phone.I actually don't give a flying f*ck about my phone (please don't mod troll nor spam).
To me it's really just a device allowing to give and answer calls.I've got two 24" screens and I work on them 10 hours / day and when I'm off the online world, I'm off: I don't want to check my GMail account anymore, I don't want to follow my eBay auctions.
I'm done.I just want a cellphone that allows, well, you know, to call people.What would be the simplest, easiest, cellphone with the least functionality (no bluetooth, no Java, no appstore, no memory card) that would fit me?You know, one with ten numbers and a "call" and a "hang up" button?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542104</id>
	<title>Cleary the worst example of pre-installed software</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Dell prepped a new machine for shipping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Dell prepped a new machine for shipping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Dell prepped a new machine for shipping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543716</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone pwnz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268992800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, it isn't the walled garden. It is properly called the "Lavender Curtain" - it may protect you but it is also turning you gay at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , it is n't the walled garden .
It is properly called the " Lavender Curtain " - it may protect you but it is also turning you gay at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, it isn't the walled garden.
It is properly called the "Lavender Curtain" - it may protect you but it is also turning you gay at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543056</id>
	<title>quality control</title>
	<author>jmnormand</author>
	<datestamp>1268990280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>and this is what happens when you buy from the lowest bidder in china.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and this is what happens when you buy from the lowest bidder in china .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and this is what happens when you buy from the lowest bidder in china.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542290</id>
	<title>Magic Phone</title>
	<author>bigredradio</author>
	<datestamp>1269029760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[ insert joke here ]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ insert joke here ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[ insert joke here ]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547266</id>
	<title>Re:Probably incidental</title>
	<author>Hamsterdan</author>
	<datestamp>1269018840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why The Fsck are they using Windows to format SD cards?<br><br>Since most cards are in Fat32, Linux can do it, OSX can do it, BeOS could do it, and my guess is even eComstation can do it.<br><br>Why the heck are they using a *Windows* machine to prep the card in the beginning?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why The Fsck are they using Windows to format SD cards ? Since most cards are in Fat32 , Linux can do it , OSX can do it , BeOS could do it , and my guess is even eComstation can do it.Why the heck are they using a * Windows * machine to prep the card in the beginning ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why The Fsck are they using Windows to format SD cards?Since most cards are in Fat32, Linux can do it, OSX can do it, BeOS could do it, and my guess is even eComstation can do it.Why the heck are they using a *Windows* machine to prep the card in the beginning?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542122</id>
	<title>Smart phones?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269029040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long before dedicated code will be found to use smart mobiles for some kind of bot-nets?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before dedicated code will be found to use smart mobiles for some kind of bot-nets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before dedicated code will be found to use smart mobiles for some kind of bot-nets?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542458</id>
	<title>It's a Windows malware, right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:<br>With the first phone, the Mariposa botnet code automatically ran and attempted to infect a computer. Mariposa was at one time one of the largest botnets, but security researchers were able to shut it down in December after disabling its command-and-control servers</p><p>It's a Windows malware, right? So a "Windows" computer connect to the phones sdcard and attempts to autorun whatever on it.<br>I don't see how the malware can somehow activated and affect Android Linux O/S running on ARM chip inside a user-mode VM.<br>Do botnets have legs now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : With the first phone , the Mariposa botnet code automatically ran and attempted to infect a computer .
Mariposa was at one time one of the largest botnets , but security researchers were able to shut it down in December after disabling its command-and-control serversIt 's a Windows malware , right ?
So a " Windows " computer connect to the phones sdcard and attempts to autorun whatever on it.I do n't see how the malware can somehow activated and affect Android Linux O/S running on ARM chip inside a user-mode VM.Do botnets have legs now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:With the first phone, the Mariposa botnet code automatically ran and attempted to infect a computer.
Mariposa was at one time one of the largest botnets, but security researchers were able to shut it down in December after disabling its command-and-control serversIt's a Windows malware, right?
So a "Windows" computer connect to the phones sdcard and attempts to autorun whatever on it.I don't see how the malware can somehow activated and affect Android Linux O/S running on ARM chip inside a user-mode VM.Do botnets have legs now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542762</id>
	<title>Re:Cleary the worst example of pre-installed softw</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1269032220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
It happened with some iPods several years back.  As far as I heard, the iPods were quality-tested using an infected Windows machine in the Chinese factory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It happened with some iPods several years back .
As far as I heard , the iPods were quality-tested using an infected Windows machine in the Chinese factory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It happened with some iPods several years back.
As far as I heard, the iPods were quality-tested using an infected Windows machine in the Chinese factory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547172</id>
	<title>Re:what s the safest cellphones?</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1269017160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there are some very basic phones available intended for old folks. Often they have things like big buttons and big displays too. e.g. <a href="http://www.doro.com/global/businessunit/dorocare/Product?c=11900&amp;p=330GSM" title="doro.com">http://www.doro.com/global/businessunit/dorocare/Product?c=11900&amp;p=330GSM</a> [doro.com] (that one doesn't do the US bands unfortunately but I'd be very surprised if there weren't similar devices that did)</p><p>For the most part though if you still have decent vision I'd suggest just getting a basic nokia and ignoring any features you aren't interested in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there are some very basic phones available intended for old folks .
Often they have things like big buttons and big displays too .
e.g. http : //www.doro.com/global/businessunit/dorocare/Product ? c = 11900&amp;p = 330GSM [ doro.com ] ( that one does n't do the US bands unfortunately but I 'd be very surprised if there were n't similar devices that did ) For the most part though if you still have decent vision I 'd suggest just getting a basic nokia and ignoring any features you are n't interested in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there are some very basic phones available intended for old folks.
Often they have things like big buttons and big displays too.
e.g. http://www.doro.com/global/businessunit/dorocare/Product?c=11900&amp;p=330GSM [doro.com] (that one doesn't do the US bands unfortunately but I'd be very surprised if there weren't similar devices that did)For the most part though if you still have decent vision I'd suggest just getting a basic nokia and ignoring any features you aren't interested in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542150</id>
	<title>Honest Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269029160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is stuff like this malicious? Like someone at the memory card plant put the virus executables on the hardware? Or is it just a case of the worker having an infected computer, which then infected the memory cards?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is stuff like this malicious ?
Like someone at the memory card plant put the virus executables on the hardware ?
Or is it just a case of the worker having an infected computer , which then infected the memory cards ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is stuff like this malicious?
Like someone at the memory card plant put the virus executables on the hardware?
Or is it just a case of the worker having an infected computer, which then infected the memory cards?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543670</id>
	<title>Found csrxx.exe on myTouch 3G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268992500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Decided to perform a virus scan on my newly aquired myTouch 3G phone which comes with an 8GB memory card, and my antivirus showed two infected files.  Time to give T-Mobile a friendly call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Decided to perform a virus scan on my newly aquired myTouch 3G phone which comes with an 8GB memory card , and my antivirus showed two infected files .
Time to give T-Mobile a friendly call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Decided to perform a virus scan on my newly aquired myTouch 3G phone which comes with an 8GB memory card, and my antivirus showed two infected files.
Time to give T-Mobile a friendly call.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31544374</id>
	<title>No surprise</title>
	<author>inkrypted</author>
	<datestamp>1268995620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This comes as no surprise to me and I remember thinking when i saw console systems such as the Dreamcast go online how long will it be before these systems act as gateways for malware as they continue to make devices more networkable. Now days with all the major consoles and smart phones online and tethiered to your PC it seems more dangerous than ever. How many of you have anti virus for your Playstation 3 , Xbox 360, WII, Iphone, or Droid?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This comes as no surprise to me and I remember thinking when i saw console systems such as the Dreamcast go online how long will it be before these systems act as gateways for malware as they continue to make devices more networkable .
Now days with all the major consoles and smart phones online and tethiered to your PC it seems more dangerous than ever .
How many of you have anti virus for your Playstation 3 , Xbox 360 , WII , Iphone , or Droid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This comes as no surprise to me and I remember thinking when i saw console systems such as the Dreamcast go online how long will it be before these systems act as gateways for malware as they continue to make devices more networkable.
Now days with all the major consoles and smart phones online and tethiered to your PC it seems more dangerous than ever.
How many of you have anti virus for your Playstation 3 , Xbox 360, WII, Iphone, or Droid?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543450</id>
	<title>Do you...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268991660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Believe in magic?  I sure as hell don't.  iPhone FTW!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe in magic ?
I sure as hell do n't .
iPhone FTW ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe in magic?
I sure as hell don't.
iPhone FTW!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542320</id>
	<title>Whew!  Glad I Use Windows Mobile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like Apple, too small a base to target !!</p><p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1597220/mac-os-x-zero-day-flaws" title="theinquirer.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1597220/mac-os-x-zero-day-flaws</a> [theinquirer.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like Apple , too small a base to target !
! http : //www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1597220/mac-os-x-zero-day-flaws [ theinquirer.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like Apple, too small a base to target !
!http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1597220/mac-os-x-zero-day-flaws [theinquirer.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542756</id>
	<title>The real question is</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1269032160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Apple have a patent on this already?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Apple have a patent on this already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Apple have a patent on this already?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542560</id>
	<title>Re:3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1269031200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps they run them in batches of 3000 and the skid before and the skid after were clean?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they run them in batches of 3000 and the skid before and the skid after were clean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they run them in batches of 3000 and the skid before and the skid after were clean?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542172</id>
	<title>Ah-Ha!!!</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1269029280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sense the Evil Hand of Steve Jobs behind this!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sense the Evil Hand of Steve Jobs behind this ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sense the Evil Hand of Steve Jobs behind this!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186</id>
	<title>3,000 sounds like an arbitrary number</title>
	<author>grahamsaa</author>
	<datestamp>1269029340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do they know it's not 2,000 or 10,000.  Hell, earlier this week it was an "isolated incident."</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they know it 's not 2,000 or 10,000 .
Hell , earlier this week it was an " isolated incident .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they know it's not 2,000 or 10,000.
Hell, earlier this week it was an "isolated incident.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_166256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31544680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31544680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31547266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31543718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_166256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_166256.31542122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
