<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_19_1530211</id>
	<title>LHC Hits an Energy of 3.5TeV</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1269021960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Inovaovao writes <i>"As <a href="http://twitter.com/CMSexperiment/statuses/10713024342">announced on Twitter by the CMS experiment</a>, the LHC has finally <a href="http://cms.web.cern.ch/cms/News/e-commentary/cms-e-commentary10.htm">accelerated both beams to 3.5 TeV</a> for the first time. It thus broke the previous energy record of 1.18 TeV it had set last fall, about a month since operations started again this year. It'll be a while yet before we see stable beams and collisions at 3.5 TeV. You won't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the <a href="http://press.web.cern.ch/press/lhc-first-physics/msg-dg-100309/">General Manager's pompous announcements</a>. If you want to follow what's going on, look at the <a href="http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC3">Status Ops</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inovaovao writes " As announced on Twitter by the CMS experiment , the LHC has finally accelerated both beams to 3.5 TeV for the first time .
It thus broke the previous energy record of 1.18 TeV it had set last fall , about a month since operations started again this year .
It 'll be a while yet before we see stable beams and collisions at 3.5 TeV .
You wo n't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the General Manager 's pompous announcements .
If you want to follow what 's going on , look at the Status Ops .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inovaovao writes "As announced on Twitter by the CMS experiment, the LHC has finally accelerated both beams to 3.5 TeV for the first time.
It thus broke the previous energy record of 1.18 TeV it had set last fall, about a month since operations started again this year.
It'll be a while yet before we see stable beams and collisions at 3.5 TeV.
You won't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the General Manager's pompous announcements.
If you want to follow what's going on, look at the Status Ops.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542376</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From their press release:</p><p>"The first attempt to collide beams at 7 TeV (3.5 TeV per beam) will follow on a date to be announced in the near future."</p><p>Source: http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2010/PR05.10E.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From their press release : " The first attempt to collide beams at 7 TeV ( 3.5 TeV per beam ) will follow on a date to be announced in the near future .
" Source : http : //press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2010/PR05.10E.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From their press release:"The first attempt to collide beams at 7 TeV (3.5 TeV per beam) will follow on a date to be announced in the near future.
"Source: http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2010/PR05.10E.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542450</id>
	<title>If you want updates ...</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1269030720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I though the best way to get updates was to just <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7616622.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">hack into a computer at the LHC</a> [bbc.co.uk].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I though the best way to get updates was to just hack into a computer at the LHC [ bbc.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I though the best way to get updates was to just hack into a computer at the LHC [bbc.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541788</id>
	<title>Not pompous,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269027660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty outrageous calling the Director General's web update pompous. Someone clearly has an axe to grind. His web page seemed like quite a reasonable summary for the time it was posted. Part of his job is to promote the value of the billions of Euros being spent on CERN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty outrageous calling the Director General 's web update pompous .
Someone clearly has an axe to grind .
His web page seemed like quite a reasonable summary for the time it was posted .
Part of his job is to promote the value of the billions of Euros being spent on CERN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty outrageous calling the Director General's web update pompous.
Someone clearly has an axe to grind.
His web page seemed like quite a reasonable summary for the time it was posted.
Part of his job is to promote the value of the billions of Euros being spent on CERN.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545550</id>
	<title>Re:The press release is one week old</title>
	<author>Chousuke</author>
	<datestamp>1269001920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Doesn't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries?</p></div><p>Maybe in Soviet Russia</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries ? Maybe in Soviet Russia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries?Maybe in Soviet Russia
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543820</id>
	<title>pompous?</title>
	<author>vaderj</author>
	<datestamp>1268993400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say the guy in charge of the largest and most expensive machine in the known universe has a right to be a little pompous</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say the guy in charge of the largest and most expensive machine in the known universe has a right to be a little pompous</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say the guy in charge of the largest and most expensive machine in the known universe has a right to be a little pompous</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541740</id>
	<title>Overclocked It</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1269027480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So they have overclocked the LHC? I hope they upgraded the stock heat sink and fan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So they have overclocked the LHC ?
I hope they upgraded the stock heat sink and fan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they have overclocked the LHC?
I hope they upgraded the stock heat sink and fan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31546314</id>
	<title>Well hello there Mr. fancy pants o.O</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269007440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how this thing is getting me a time traveling DeLorean or a pay raise! pfft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how this thing is getting me a time traveling DeLorean or a pay raise !
pfft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how this thing is getting me a time traveling DeLorean or a pay raise!
pfft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542774</id>
	<title>Re:A related story</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269032220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole text is based on the arrogant, ignorant and retarded Fermi &ldquo;paradox&rdquo;.<br>It is arrogant and ignorant because it states that we don&rsquo;t see any aliens, so there must be no aliens, so where is everybody?? Which is just as retarded as a blind man going &ldquo;i don&rsquo;t see humans, so there must be no humans, so where is everybody??&rdquo;<br>Or your doc going &ldquo;There is no cure to this disease.&rdquo;. When in reality he should say &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know a cure to this disease.&rdquo;.<br>The arrogance and ignorance of making this type of statement, boggles the mind.</p><p>It is a shame that educated people fall for such a Glenn-Beck-worthy &ldquo;logic&rdquo;.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole text is based on the arrogant , ignorant and retarded Fermi    paradox    .It is arrogant and ignorant because it states that we don    t see any aliens , so there must be no aliens , so where is everybody ? ?
Which is just as retarded as a blind man going    i don    t see humans , so there must be no humans , so where is everybody ?
?    Or your doc going    There is no cure to this disease.    .
When in reality he should say    I don    t know a cure to this disease.    .The arrogance and ignorance of making this type of statement , boggles the mind.It is a shame that educated people fall for such a Glenn-Beck-worthy    logic    .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole text is based on the arrogant, ignorant and retarded Fermi “paradox”.It is arrogant and ignorant because it states that we don’t see any aliens, so there must be no aliens, so where is everybody??
Which is just as retarded as a blind man going “i don’t see humans, so there must be no humans, so where is everybody?
?”Or your doc going “There is no cure to this disease.”.
When in reality he should say “I don’t know a cure to this disease.”.The arrogance and ignorance of making this type of statement, boggles the mind.It is a shame that educated people fall for such a Glenn-Beck-worthy “logic”.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Werthless5</author>
	<datestamp>1269030240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LHC physicist checking in - yes, that will make the collisions 7 TeV.  Note that there are no collisions yet, we're still doing work to make sure that the beams are stable and focused properly.  Once we have collisions, we'll run at this energy for about a year and a half before shutting down for a year to perform maintenance.</p><p>The LHC never produced 14 TeV collisions, the highest collision it will perform this year is 7 TeV.  It is designed to produce 14 TeV collisions, and it will hopefully do that after we finish taking data at 7 TeV.  It is true, however, that cosmic ray collisions completely kill the "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LHC physicist checking in - yes , that will make the collisions 7 TeV .
Note that there are no collisions yet , we 're still doing work to make sure that the beams are stable and focused properly .
Once we have collisions , we 'll run at this energy for about a year and a half before shutting down for a year to perform maintenance.The LHC never produced 14 TeV collisions , the highest collision it will perform this year is 7 TeV .
It is designed to produce 14 TeV collisions , and it will hopefully do that after we finish taking data at 7 TeV .
It is true , however , that cosmic ray collisions completely kill the " LHC will destroy the world " bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LHC physicist checking in - yes, that will make the collisions 7 TeV.
Note that there are no collisions yet, we're still doing work to make sure that the beams are stable and focused properly.
Once we have collisions, we'll run at this energy for about a year and a half before shutting down for a year to perform maintenance.The LHC never produced 14 TeV collisions, the highest collision it will perform this year is 7 TeV.
It is designed to produce 14 TeV collisions, and it will hopefully do that after we finish taking data at 7 TeV.
It is true, however, that cosmic ray collisions completely kill the "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545848</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>nebelkerze</author>
	<datestamp>1269003720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the energy of cosmic rays is larger, but the frequency is much smaller. Thats one reason why one needs collider like LHC. A large number of interactions is needed in order to see also rare processes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the energy of cosmic rays is larger , but the frequency is much smaller .
Thats one reason why one needs collider like LHC .
A large number of interactions is needed in order to see also rare processes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the energy of cosmic rays is larger, but the frequency is much smaller.
Thats one reason why one needs collider like LHC.
A large number of interactions is needed in order to see also rare processes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542022</id>
	<title>Energetically Equivalent to...</title>
	<author>GeordieMac</author>
	<datestamp>1269028680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>About 3 1/2 mosquitoes.   I had no idea how tiny the amounts of energy they are using.

<a href="http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Science/Glossary-en.php#E" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Science/Glossary-en.php#E</a> [web.cern.ch]</htmltext>
<tokenext>About 3 1/2 mosquitoes .
I had no idea how tiny the amounts of energy they are using .
http : //public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Science/Glossary-en.php # E [ web.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About 3 1/2 mosquitoes.
I had no idea how tiny the amounts of energy they are using.
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Science/Glossary-en.php#E [web.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31547414</id>
	<title>In other news</title>
	<author>d\_54321</author>
	<datestamp>1269021420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/skepchick/4445007033/" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">Best typo this week</a> [flickr.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best typo this week [ flickr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best typo this week [flickr.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541982</id>
	<title>New here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.</i></p><p>You must be new here. Nine out of ten times, going to <b>Slashdot's</b> front page is too much effort for Slashdot's editors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently going to CERN 's front page is too much effort for slashdot 's editors.You must be new here .
Nine out of ten times , going to Slashdot 's front page is too much effort for Slashdot 's editors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.You must be new here.
Nine out of ten times, going to Slashdot's front page is too much effort for Slashdot's editors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541772</id>
	<title>Uh oh...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269027660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/~mcgrew/journal/241840" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Rority's going to be pissed off!</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rority 's going to be pissed off !
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rority's going to be pissed off!
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542462</id>
	<title>fadilzors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>th"an a fraction</htmltext>
<tokenext>th " an a fraction</tokentext>
<sentencetext>th"an a fraction</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543432</id>
	<title>Re:Call me when it gets to 13.13131313131313TEV</title>
	<author>Firkragg14</author>
	<datestamp>1268991600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait when the world is ending and all the matter is being sucked into a black hole your really going to need somone to call you and tell you its happening?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait when the world is ending and all the matter is being sucked into a black hole your really going to need somone to call you and tell you its happening ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait when the world is ending and all the matter is being sucked into a black hole your really going to need somone to call you and tell you its happening?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544662</id>
	<title>Re:Kdawson is the problem</title>
	<author>sa1lnr</author>
	<datestamp>1268996880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When Europe disappears into a black hole?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When Europe disappears into a black hole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When Europe disappears into a black hole?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542666</id>
	<title>Re:Where did I leave my crowbar?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269031740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd think you meant Another World.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Another\_World\_\%28video\_game\%29</p><p>It starts with an accelerator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd think you meant Another World.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Another \ _World \ _ \ % 28video \ _game \ % 29It starts with an accelerator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd think you meant Another World.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Another\_World\_\%28video\_game\%29It starts with an accelerator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542894</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>skudenfaugen</author>
	<datestamp>1268989560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obligatory -
<a href="http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/" title="hasthelhcd...eearth.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/</a> [hasthelhcd...eearth.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory - http : //www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/ [ hasthelhcd...eearth.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory -
http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/ [hasthelhcd...eearth.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542772</id>
	<title>Oh thank god its colliding hadrons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269032220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/skepchick/4445007033/" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">telegraph</a> [flickr.com] was reporting a hardon collider operating at these energies. I know the french-swiss are a little light in the loafers, but that seems dangerous no matter your persuasion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The telegraph [ flickr.com ] was reporting a hardon collider operating at these energies .
I know the french-swiss are a little light in the loafers , but that seems dangerous no matter your persuasion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The telegraph [flickr.com] was reporting a hardon collider operating at these energies.
I know the french-swiss are a little light in the loafers, but that seems dangerous no matter your persuasion...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542372</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. That's been one of the counterarguments against all the sensationalist fear mongering from the get go.<br>Well... I should temper that statement: it only completely and totally kills the whole "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit for reasonable, rational people. Unfortunately they aren't so much the target audience for the aforementioned sensationalist fear mongering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
That 's been one of the counterarguments against all the sensationalist fear mongering from the get go.Well... I should temper that statement : it only completely and totally kills the whole " LHC will destroy the world " bullshit for reasonable , rational people .
Unfortunately they are n't so much the target audience for the aforementioned sensationalist fear mongering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
That's been one of the counterarguments against all the sensationalist fear mongering from the get go.Well... I should temper that statement: it only completely and totally kills the whole "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit for reasonable, rational people.
Unfortunately they aren't so much the target audience for the aforementioned sensationalist fear mongering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542124</id>
	<title>Re:The press release is one week old</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1269029040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The release wasn't pompous anyway.  It was clear, outlined what their goals are and put their (nearly) current status in perspective.</p><p>Doesn't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries?</p><p>All right, I just exceeded my sarcasm quota for the day in a single statement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The release was n't pompous anyway .
It was clear , outlined what their goals are and put their ( nearly ) current status in perspective.Does n't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries ? All right , I just exceeded my sarcasm quota for the day in a single statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The release wasn't pompous anyway.
It was clear, outlined what their goals are and put their (nearly) current status in perspective.Doesn't Slashdot have editors to turn crappy submissions into reasonable summaries?All right, I just exceeded my sarcasm quota for the day in a single statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541758</id>
	<title>I do not think that they have overclocked the LHC!</title>
	<author>Operonbionic</author>
	<datestamp>1269027600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do not think that they have overclocked the LHC!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not think that they have overclocked the LHC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not think that they have overclocked the LHC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543628</id>
	<title>LHC Webcam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268992380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is good news. <a href="http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html" title="cyriak.co.uk">Check out their webcam.</a> [cyriak.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is good news .
Check out their webcam .
[ cyriak.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is good news.
Check out their webcam.
[cyriak.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543318</id>
	<title>Few things humble me like this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268991120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if it's actually pompous, or an artifact of translation, or both. But I mean really, out of all the things that a person could in fact be pompous about in the world, this is one of those times where I say have at it. Even if it's not news this week, or not as impressive as where it's supposed to be in two years, it's still among the most newsworthy and impressive things in my lifetime, and certainly our entire history. I would love if we valued and over-glorified this right here like we do organized sports. Far from boring or yawn-worthy, I think it's amazing that the tiny and incremental power steps we make <i>every week</i> with this thing makes the progress that was made in a whole millennium look like little children running around playing with sticks. And just imagine that we'll look back on this period of history in a similar fashion in 100 years. I love this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if it 's actually pompous , or an artifact of translation , or both .
But I mean really , out of all the things that a person could in fact be pompous about in the world , this is one of those times where I say have at it .
Even if it 's not news this week , or not as impressive as where it 's supposed to be in two years , it 's still among the most newsworthy and impressive things in my lifetime , and certainly our entire history .
I would love if we valued and over-glorified this right here like we do organized sports .
Far from boring or yawn-worthy , I think it 's amazing that the tiny and incremental power steps we make every week with this thing makes the progress that was made in a whole millennium look like little children running around playing with sticks .
And just imagine that we 'll look back on this period of history in a similar fashion in 100 years .
I love this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if it's actually pompous, or an artifact of translation, or both.
But I mean really, out of all the things that a person could in fact be pompous about in the world, this is one of those times where I say have at it.
Even if it's not news this week, or not as impressive as where it's supposed to be in two years, it's still among the most newsworthy and impressive things in my lifetime, and certainly our entire history.
I would love if we valued and over-glorified this right here like we do organized sports.
Far from boring or yawn-worthy, I think it's amazing that the tiny and incremental power steps we make every week with this thing makes the progress that was made in a whole millennium look like little children running around playing with sticks.
And just imagine that we'll look back on this period of history in a similar fashion in 100 years.
I love this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541320</id>
	<title>Where did I leave my crowbar?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269025680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do these stories always make me want to go play Half Life again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do these stories always make me want to go play Half Life again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do these stories always make me want to go play Half Life again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545968</id>
	<title>Momentary confusion</title>
	<author>VocationalZero</author>
	<datestamp>1269004500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You won't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the General Manager's pompous announcements.</p> </div><p> What?</p><p><div class="quote"><p> Posted by kdawson</p></div><p> Oh</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You wo n't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the General Manager 's pompous announcements .
What ? Posted by kdawson Oh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You won't get much of a clue to the timetable by reading the General Manager's pompous announcements.
What? Posted by kdawson Oh
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542614</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269031500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If all that it true, doesn't it completely and totally kill the whole "LHC will destroy the world".</p></div><p>You are exactly right. And it&rsquo;s the failure of every &ldquo;expert&rdquo; interviewed who didn&rsquo;t mention this, and of course of the media hype machine, that that is not well known to everyone.<br>Oh, and of course mostly to the loonies who want to stay ignorant.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10^8 TeV.</p></div><p>To imagine this: Those particles are so fast that they have the mass of an apple or orange. A subatomic particle! This gives you some feeling for the power.<br>And yes, that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.<br>If this would create black holes, earth would have never existed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If all that it true , does n't it completely and totally kill the whole " LHC will destroy the world " .You are exactly right .
And it    s the failure of every    expert    interviewed who didn    t mention this , and of course of the media hype machine , that that is not well known to everyone.Oh , and of course mostly to the loonies who want to stay ignorant.and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10 ^ 8 TeV.To imagine this : Those particles are so fast that they have the mass of an apple or orange .
A subatomic particle !
This gives you some feeling for the power.And yes , that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.If this would create black holes , earth would have never existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If all that it true, doesn't it completely and totally kill the whole "LHC will destroy the world".You are exactly right.
And it’s the failure of every “expert” interviewed who didn’t mention this, and of course of the media hype machine, that that is not well known to everyone.Oh, and of course mostly to the loonies who want to stay ignorant.and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10^8 TeV.To imagine this: Those particles are so fast that they have the mass of an apple or orange.
A subatomic particle!
This gives you some feeling for the power.And yes, that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.If this would create black holes, earth would have never existed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31548532</id>
	<title>Effort's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269087720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.</p><p>That requires TWO efforts. "GOING" and "READING".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently going to CERN 's front page is too much effort for slashdot 's editors.That requires TWO efforts .
" GOING " and " READING " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.That requires TWO efforts.
"GOING" and "READING".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543570</id>
	<title>Postel's Law</title>
	<author>pizza\_milkshake</author>
	<datestamp>1268992140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept</htmltext>
<tokenext>be conservative in what you send , liberal in what you accept</tokentext>
<sentencetext>be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541882</id>
	<title>You FAiL it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">PERSPECTIVE, THE Of reality. Keep [nero-online.org] I don't want to going to continuef, operating systems, Of the GNAA I are about 7000/5</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>PERSPECTIVE , THE Of reality .
Keep [ nero-online.org ] I do n't want to going to continuef , operating systems , Of the GNAA I are about 7000/5 [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PERSPECTIVE, THE Of reality.
Keep [nero-online.org] I don't want to going to continuef, operating systems, Of the GNAA I are about 7000/5 [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542118</id>
	<title>They did have stable beams</title>
	<author>rminsk</author>
	<datestamp>1269029040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It'll be a while yet before we see stable beams...</p></div><p>From the CMS e-commentary<nobr> <wbr></nobr>."..the beams were extremely stable
during this period and had a very long lifetime."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be a while yet before we see stable beams...From the CMS e-commentary .
" ..the beams were extremely stable during this period and had a very long lifetime .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It'll be a while yet before we see stable beams...From the CMS e-commentary .
"..the beams were extremely stable
during this period and had a very long lifetime.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31546492</id>
	<title>Re:Call me when it gets to 13.13131313131313TEV</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1269009660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo Way oh.....</p><p>No one, not even the many Nerds here got the reference......</p><p>Guess I will go back top my job as a security guard class 4....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo Way oh.....No one , not even the many Nerds here got the reference......Guess I will go back top my job as a security guard class 4... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo Way oh.....No one, not even the many Nerds here got the reference......Guess I will go back top my job as a security guard class 4....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544178</id>
	<title>So what's this thing supposed to do again?</title>
	<author>chewthreetimes</author>
	<datestamp>1268994780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I hear is how they keep turning it on and shutting it down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I hear is how they keep turning it on and shutting it down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I hear is how they keep turning it on and shutting it down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541418</id>
	<title>1.21 gigawatts?</title>
	<author>Mekkah</author>
	<datestamp>1269026040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1.21 gigawatts? 1.21 gigawatts? Great Scott!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1.21 gigawatts ?
1.21 gigawatts ?
Great Scott !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.21 gigawatts?
1.21 gigawatts?
Great Scott!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31555174</id>
	<title>Re:Kdawson is the problem</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1269107460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool?</i></p><p>When you learn to use Slashdot's preferences system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool ? When you learn to use Slashdot 's preferences system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool?When you learn to use Slashdot's preferences system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790</id>
	<title>How many Libraries of Congress</title>
	<author>iprefermuffins</author>
	<datestamp>1269027660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is 3.5 TeV?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is 3.5 TeV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is 3.5 TeV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916</id>
	<title>Kdawson is the problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31547308</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1269019560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, maybe you could answer this question for me.. how much shielding do you think manned spacecraft need from galactic cosmic rays?  I've heard people say that the best thing you can do with galactic comic radiation is let it hit you.. of course that's a little hard if you're already shielding for solar radiation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , maybe you could answer this question for me.. how much shielding do you think manned spacecraft need from galactic cosmic rays ?
I 've heard people say that the best thing you can do with galactic comic radiation is let it hit you.. of course that 's a little hard if you 're already shielding for solar radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, maybe you could answer this question for me.. how much shielding do you think manned spacecraft need from galactic cosmic rays?
I've heard people say that the best thing you can do with galactic comic radiation is let it hit you.. of course that's a little hard if you're already shielding for solar radiation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542710</id>
	<title>luminosity</title>
	<author>Lawrence\_Bird</author>
	<datestamp>1269031920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is lost on most people is that the luminosity will be relatively low and that while 7 TeV CM is impressive, its not all that matters.  Fermilab is down, but not quite out yet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is lost on most people is that the luminosity will be relatively low and that while 7 TeV CM is impressive , its not all that matters .
Fermilab is down , but not quite out yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is lost on most people is that the luminosity will be relatively low and that while 7 TeV CM is impressive, its not all that matters.
Fermilab is down, but not quite out yet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542260</id>
	<title>A related story</title>
	<author>roguegramma</author>
	<datestamp>1269029640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.everything2.com/title/Stop+killing+me+now" title="everything2.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.everything2.com/title/Stop+killing+me+now</a> [everything2.com]</p><p>Requires some knowledge of the many worlds interpretation or the anthropic principle though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.everything2.com/title/Stop + killing + me + now [ everything2.com ] Requires some knowledge of the many worlds interpretation or the anthropic principle though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.everything2.com/title/Stop+killing+me+now [everything2.com]Requires some knowledge of the many worlds interpretation or the anthropic principle though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541614</id>
	<title>Re:The press release is one week old</title>
	<author>kiehlster</author>
	<datestamp>1269027000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the press release came out today when they reach 3.5 TeV, which is when they actually breached the space-time continuum, thus sending their PR department back in time one week resulting in this back-dated press release.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the press release came out today when they reach 3.5 TeV , which is when they actually breached the space-time continuum , thus sending their PR department back in time one week resulting in this back-dated press release .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the press release came out today when they reach 3.5 TeV, which is when they actually breached the space-time continuum, thus sending their PR department back in time one week resulting in this back-dated press release.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542004</id>
	<title>Re:How many Libraries of Congress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe you mean Library of Congresses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe you mean Library of Congresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe you mean Library of Congresses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31647936</id>
	<title>Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks</title>
	<author>LHC Safety Review</author>
	<datestamp>1269796860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An independent review of the long-term risks associated with possible black hole production at the LHC:</p><p><a href="http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/LHCrisk.pdf" title="risk-evalu...-forum.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/LHCrisk.pdf</a> [risk-evalu...-forum.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An independent review of the long-term risks associated with possible black hole production at the LHC : http : //www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/LHCrisk.pdf [ risk-evalu...-forum.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An independent review of the long-term risks associated with possible black hole production at the LHC:http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/LHCrisk.pdf [risk-evalu...-forum.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543726</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268992920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"there are no collisions yet,"<br>I guess that means you'll save some money on your car insurance...</p><p>Say I wonder if the LHC has 'earth-destroying black hole insurance? I suppose there would be some difficulty in making a claim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" there are no collisions yet , " I guess that means you 'll save some money on your car insurance...Say I wonder if the LHC has 'earth-destroying black hole insurance ?
I suppose there would be some difficulty in making a claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"there are no collisions yet,"I guess that means you'll save some money on your car insurance...Say I wonder if the LHC has 'earth-destroying black hole insurance?
I suppose there would be some difficulty in making a claim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542976</id>
	<title>Whatever you do...</title>
	<author>zawarski</author>
	<datestamp>1268989860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...don't cross the beams!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...do n't cross the beams !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...don't cross the beams!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541730</id>
	<title>Help!</title>
	<author>Maximus633</author>
	<datestamp>1269027420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Help me Gordon! Help me!  GORDON!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Help me Gordon !
Help me !
GORDON !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Help me Gordon!
Help me!
GORDON!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542584</id>
	<title>Re:How many Libraries of Congress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269031320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With kinetic energy of the books in the Library of Congress:<br>1 LoC = 20 million volumes * 200 pages (assumed) *<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.005 lbs/page (assumed at 1/2 a sheet of 20 lb paper) = 200M lb = 90B grams = 7.6B moles = 3.8*10^32 atoms<br>3.8*10^32 * 3/80 eV (average kinetic energy [thermal]) = 1.42*10^31 eV/LoC<br>1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5*10^12 eV/LHC beam<br>3.5*10^12 eV / 1.42*10^31 eV/LoC<br>1 LHC beam = 2.46*10^-19 LoC</p><p>Alternately, if you annihilate the books of the Library of Congress:<br>1 LoC = 9*10^10 grams (see above)<br>1 GeV = 1.783 &#215; 1027 kg * (3*10^8m/s^2)^2<br>1 LoC = 4.5*10^54 GeV<br>1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5*10^3 GeV/LHC beam<br>1 LHC beam = 7.8*10^-50 LoC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With kinetic energy of the books in the Library of Congress : 1 LoC = 20 million volumes * 200 pages ( assumed ) * .005 lbs/page ( assumed at 1/2 a sheet of 20 lb paper ) = 200M lb = 90B grams = 7.6B moles = 3.8 * 10 ^ 32 atoms3.8 * 10 ^ 32 * 3/80 eV ( average kinetic energy [ thermal ] ) = 1.42 * 10 ^ 31 eV/LoC1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5 * 10 ^ 12 eV/LHC beam3.5 * 10 ^ 12 eV / 1.42 * 10 ^ 31 eV/LoC1 LHC beam = 2.46 * 10 ^ -19 LoCAlternately , if you annihilate the books of the Library of Congress : 1 LoC = 9 * 10 ^ 10 grams ( see above ) 1 GeV = 1.783   1027 kg * ( 3 * 10 ^ 8m/s ^ 2 ) ^ 21 LoC = 4.5 * 10 ^ 54 GeV1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5 * 10 ^ 3 GeV/LHC beam1 LHC beam = 7.8 * 10 ^ -50 LoC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With kinetic energy of the books in the Library of Congress:1 LoC = 20 million volumes * 200 pages (assumed) * .005 lbs/page (assumed at 1/2 a sheet of 20 lb paper) = 200M lb = 90B grams = 7.6B moles = 3.8*10^32 atoms3.8*10^32 * 3/80 eV (average kinetic energy [thermal]) = 1.42*10^31 eV/LoC1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5*10^12 eV/LHC beam3.5*10^12 eV / 1.42*10^31 eV/LoC1 LHC beam = 2.46*10^-19 LoCAlternately, if you annihilate the books of the Library of Congress:1 LoC = 9*10^10 grams (see above)1 GeV = 1.783 × 1027 kg * (3*10^8m/s^2)^21 LoC = 4.5*10^54 GeV1 LHC beam = 3.5TeV = 3.5*10^3 GeV/LHC beam1 LHC beam = 7.8*10^-50 LoC</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543554</id>
	<title>3.5 TeV? Pffft!</title>
	<author>bunratty</author>
	<datestamp>1268992020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't they hear? Stanford broke the PeV barrier in October 2009!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they hear ?
Stanford broke the PeV barrier in October 2009 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they hear?
Stanford broke the PeV barrier in October 2009!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544658</id>
	<title>Re:If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1268996880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And yes, that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.<br>If this would create black holes, earth would have never existed.</p></div><p>Potentially, but we haven't yet proven that micro black holes can be created by particle collisions. If it turns out they can be created however, it would certainly imply that they are not a risk to the planet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And yes , that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.If this would create black holes , earth would have never existed.Potentially , but we have n't yet proven that micro black holes can be created by particle collisions .
If it turns out they can be created however , it would certainly imply that they are not a risk to the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yes, that does mean that they create those tiny black holes all the time in our atmosphere.If this would create black holes, earth would have never existed.Potentially, but we haven't yet proven that micro black holes can be created by particle collisions.
If it turns out they can be created however, it would certainly imply that they are not a risk to the planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542448</id>
	<title>Re:How many Libraries of Congress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's 6.24*10^-24/m Libraries of Congress,<br>where m is the mass of the Library of Congress in kg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's 6.24 * 10 ^ -24/m Libraries of Congress,where m is the mass of the Library of Congress in kg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's 6.24*10^-24/m Libraries of Congress,where m is the mass of the Library of Congress in kg</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541780</id>
	<title>O Really?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1269027660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Meh.  Wake me up when they hit 4.7.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
Wake me up when they hit 4.7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
Wake me up when they hit 4.7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542764</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269032220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is 3.5 TeV enough to power my Delorian?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is 3.5 TeV enough to power my Delorian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is 3.5 TeV enough to power my Delorian?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541842</id>
	<title>These things are not so easy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269027900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do not think that they overclocked the LHC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not think that they overclocked the LHC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not think that they overclocked the LHC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542624</id>
	<title>Re:How many Libraries of Congress</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269031500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Turn in your nerd card; "libraries of congress" refers to computer storage space. TeV is trillions of electron volts. 3.5 is three and a half, which ain't five and ain't two, neither.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Turn in your nerd card ; " libraries of congress " refers to computer storage space .
TeV is trillions of electron volts .
3.5 is three and a half , which ai n't five and ai n't two , neither .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turn in your nerd card; "libraries of congress" refers to computer storage space.
TeV is trillions of electron volts.
3.5 is three and a half, which ain't five and ain't two, neither.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928</id>
	<title>Call me when it gets to 13.13131313131313TEV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269028320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the world will come to an end as a Higgs Boson Particle is created and all the mass fo the earth is sucked into space equal to the size of a small pea.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the world will come to an end as a Higgs Boson Particle is created and all the mass fo the earth is sucked into space equal to the size of a small pea.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the world will come to an end as a Higgs Boson Particle is created and all the mass fo the earth is sucked into space equal to the size of a small pea.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542026</id>
	<title>Things you won't hear at LHC</title>
	<author>Wowsers</author>
	<datestamp>1269028740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3.5TeV, did the earth move for you honey!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>3.5TeV , did the earth move for you honey !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3.5TeV, did the earth move for you honey!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542386</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't mean to offend anyone, but why is this even such a big deal? Sure it's a new record, but why is it posted seemingly every week. Tomorrow we can expect another headline reading 3.6TeV.</p><p>Didn't they design this thing to run at much higher energy levels anyway?</p><p>Perhaps considering the frequency of problems they have been experiencing, the merit here is that it is, for the time being, running without something else exploding, leaking or burning up.</p><p>I'm more interested in the actual results of experiments when they finally get around to doing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't mean to offend anyone , but why is this even such a big deal ?
Sure it 's a new record , but why is it posted seemingly every week .
Tomorrow we can expect another headline reading 3.6TeV.Did n't they design this thing to run at much higher energy levels anyway ? Perhaps considering the frequency of problems they have been experiencing , the merit here is that it is , for the time being , running without something else exploding , leaking or burning up.I 'm more interested in the actual results of experiments when they finally get around to doing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't mean to offend anyone, but why is this even such a big deal?
Sure it's a new record, but why is it posted seemingly every week.
Tomorrow we can expect another headline reading 3.6TeV.Didn't they design this thing to run at much higher energy levels anyway?Perhaps considering the frequency of problems they have been experiencing, the merit here is that it is, for the time being, running without something else exploding, leaking or burning up.I'm more interested in the actual results of experiments when they finally get around to doing them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542452</id>
	<title>Re:Kdawson is the problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269030720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, kdawson is the problem, but his submissions lately have not been so FUDdy so perhaps there is still hope.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , kdawson is the problem , but his submissions lately have not been so FUDdy so perhaps there is still hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, kdawson is the problem, but his submissions lately have not been so FUDdy so perhaps there is still hope.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543846</id>
	<title>When it hit's 1.2 gigawatts you can go back in tim</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1268993520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When it hit's 1.2 gigawatts you can go back in time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When it hit 's 1.2 gigawatts you can go back in time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When it hit's 1.2 gigawatts you can go back in time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541934</id>
	<title>Press release vs Status Ops</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1269028380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Press Release tells me what they have achieved in terms of goals, and what goals they hope to achieve over the next year or so.   On the other hand the all Status Ops tell me is whether or not the LHC was plugged in over the last 12 hours.  Both datasets have their place and both tell me something that the other doesn't or can't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Press Release tells me what they have achieved in terms of goals , and what goals they hope to achieve over the next year or so .
On the other hand the all Status Ops tell me is whether or not the LHC was plugged in over the last 12 hours .
Both datasets have their place and both tell me something that the other does n't or ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Press Release tells me what they have achieved in terms of goals, and what goals they hope to achieve over the next year or so.
On the other hand the all Status Ops tell me is whether or not the LHC was plugged in over the last 12 hours.
Both datasets have their place and both tell me something that the other doesn't or can't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354</id>
	<title>The press release is one week old</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269025800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The press release you called 'pompous' is one week old -- when the record energy hadn't yet been reached.  Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.  Anyway, here's the <a href="http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2010/PR05.10E.html" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">current press release</a> [web.cern.ch]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The press release you called 'pompous ' is one week old -- when the record energy had n't yet been reached .
Apparently going to CERN 's front page is too much effort for slashdot 's editors .
Anyway , here 's the current press release [ web.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The press release you called 'pompous' is one week old -- when the record energy hadn't yet been reached.
Apparently going to CERN's front page is too much effort for slashdot's editors.
Anyway, here's the current press release [web.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543542</id>
	<title>Re:Not pompous,</title>
	<author>Futile Rhetoric</author>
	<datestamp>1268991960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably a Fermilab fanboy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably a Fermilab fanboy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably a Fermilab fanboy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212</id>
	<title>If both beams are 3.5 TeV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269029460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that make the collision 7 TeV?  Serious question - I'm not sure I completely understand the physics.  OK.  I almost completely don't understand them.  I have read that the LHC produced collisions of 14TeV, here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt</a> [wikipedia.org] and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10^8 TeV.  If all that it true, doesn't it completely and totally kill the whole "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that make the collision 7 TeV ?
Serious question - I 'm not sure I completely understand the physics .
OK. I almost completely do n't understand them .
I have read that the LHC produced collisions of 14TeV , here : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt [ wikipedia.org ] and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10 ^ 8 TeV .
If all that it true , does n't it completely and totally kill the whole " LHC will destroy the world " bullshit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that make the collision 7 TeV?
Serious question - I'm not sure I completely understand the physics.
OK.  I almost completely don't understand them.
I have read that the LHC produced collisions of 14TeV, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt [wikipedia.org] and that the most energetic cosmic rays are 10^8 TeV.
If all that it true, doesn't it completely and totally kill the whole "LHC will destroy the world" bullshit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544750</id>
	<title>Dr. Breen?</title>
	<author>winomonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268997360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me, or does the good Dr. Rolf Heuer resemble a slightly shaggier Dr. Breen?  Huh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or does the good Dr. Rolf Heuer resemble a slightly shaggier Dr. Breen ? Huh .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or does the good Dr. Rolf Heuer resemble a slightly shaggier Dr. Breen?  Huh ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31555174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31546492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31547308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31548532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1530211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542360
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31547308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31545550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31548532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31555174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31544662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31546492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31543628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31541320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1530211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1530211.31542022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
