<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_19_1427247</id>
	<title>Invisibility Cloak Created In 3-D</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1269012120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Scientists have created the first device to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8574923.stm">render an object invisible in three dimensions</a>. The 'cloak,' described in the journal <em>Science</em> (<a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/science.1186351">abstract</a>; full text requires login), hid an object from detection using light of wavelengths close to those that are visible to humans. Previous devices have been able to hide objects from light travelling in only one direction; viewed from any other angle, the object would remain visible. This is a very early but significant step towards a true invisibility cloak."</i> The "object" hidden in this work was a bump one micrometer high. The light used was just longer than the wavelengths our eyes detect. To get a visible-light cloak, the features of the cloaking metamaterial would need to be reduced in size from 300 nm to 10 nm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Scientists have created the first device to render an object invisible in three dimensions .
The 'cloak, ' described in the journal Science ( abstract ; full text requires login ) , hid an object from detection using light of wavelengths close to those that are visible to humans .
Previous devices have been able to hide objects from light travelling in only one direction ; viewed from any other angle , the object would remain visible .
This is a very early but significant step towards a true invisibility cloak .
" The " object " hidden in this work was a bump one micrometer high .
The light used was just longer than the wavelengths our eyes detect .
To get a visible-light cloak , the features of the cloaking metamaterial would need to be reduced in size from 300 nm to 10 nm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Scientists have created the first device to render an object invisible in three dimensions.
The 'cloak,' described in the journal Science (abstract; full text requires login), hid an object from detection using light of wavelengths close to those that are visible to humans.
Previous devices have been able to hide objects from light travelling in only one direction; viewed from any other angle, the object would remain visible.
This is a very early but significant step towards a true invisibility cloak.
" The "object" hidden in this work was a bump one micrometer high.
The light used was just longer than the wavelengths our eyes detect.
To get a visible-light cloak, the features of the cloaking metamaterial would need to be reduced in size from 300 nm to 10 nm.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539988</id>
	<title>Re:Factor 30</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269020760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will never lead to the Klingon style cloaking device since the negative index of refraction reverse shifts the doppler affect - that will make it suitable only for stationary applications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will never lead to the Klingon style cloaking device since the negative index of refraction reverse shifts the doppler affect - that will make it suitable only for stationary applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will never lead to the Klingon style cloaking device since the negative index of refraction reverse shifts the doppler affect - that will make it suitable only for stationary applications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539290</id>
	<title>It exists</title>
	<author>PhongUK</author>
	<datestamp>1269018480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm wearing an invisibility cloak right now and im right beside you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wearing an invisibility cloak right now and im right beside you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wearing an invisibility cloak right now and im right beside you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539650</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269019620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Non-invasive landscaping.<br>See-through tools so you can see what you are doing in difficult places.<br>Home decoration (hide ugly stuff).</p><p>There are tons of uses that one can think of that are trivial but useful. But I guarantee you or I will not think of a fraction of the most awesome uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-invasive landscaping.See-through tools so you can see what you are doing in difficult places.Home decoration ( hide ugly stuff ) .There are tons of uses that one can think of that are trivial but useful .
But I guarantee you or I will not think of a fraction of the most awesome uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-invasive landscaping.See-through tools so you can see what you are doing in difficult places.Home decoration (hide ugly stuff).There are tons of uses that one can think of that are trivial but useful.
But I guarantee you or I will not think of a fraction of the most awesome uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538804</id>
	<title>Good News Everyone!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269016980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientists have made an invisibility cloak!  Unfortunately it only works on invisible bumps...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists have made an invisibility cloak !
Unfortunately it only works on invisible bumps.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists have made an invisibility cloak!
Unfortunately it only works on invisible bumps...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539244</id>
	<title>This was actually much easier than it sounds...</title>
	<author>RapmasterT</author>
	<datestamp>1269018300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>all it really took to accomplish "Invisibility Cloak Created In 3D", was to redefine the terms "invisibility", "cloak" and "created" in new, creative ways that fit what they actually did.</htmltext>
<tokenext>all it really took to accomplish " Invisibility Cloak Created In 3D " , was to redefine the terms " invisibility " , " cloak " and " created " in new , creative ways that fit what they actually did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all it really took to accomplish "Invisibility Cloak Created In 3D", was to redefine the terms "invisibility", "cloak" and "created" in new, creative ways that fit what they actually did.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540502</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1269022560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Privacy is a big one, making it much more difficult for someone to build up a full picture of your life. Also as a purely defensive device to get around, avoiding the fanatics trying to kill you because of something <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/01/02/denmark.cartoonist/index.html" title="cnn.com">legal but controversial you said</a> [cnn.com].</p><p>Mostly privacy, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Privacy is a big one , making it much more difficult for someone to build up a full picture of your life .
Also as a purely defensive device to get around , avoiding the fanatics trying to kill you because of something legal but controversial you said [ cnn.com ] .Mostly privacy , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Privacy is a big one, making it much more difficult for someone to build up a full picture of your life.
Also as a purely defensive device to get around, avoiding the fanatics trying to kill you because of something legal but controversial you said [cnn.com].Mostly privacy, really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540334</id>
	<title>mod do3n</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269021900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>we need to address Centr[alized models have the energy lead developers There are only off the play area world. GNAA members by BSDI who sell</htmltext>
<tokenext>we need to address Centr [ alized models have the energy lead developers There are only off the play area world .
GNAA members by BSDI who sell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we need to address Centr[alized models have the energy lead developers There are only off the play area world.
GNAA members by BSDI who sell</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538536</id>
	<title>MGS</title>
	<author>PhongUK</author>
	<datestamp>1269016200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Ugh, what was THAT noise?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ugh , what was THAT noise ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ugh, what was THAT noise?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31544720</id>
	<title>sex@ witH a cum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268997180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">isn't a lemonadeZ THINKING ABOUT IT. posts.  Due to the</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't a lemonadeZ THINKING ABOUT IT .
posts. Due to the [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't a lemonadeZ THINKING ABOUT IT.
posts.  Due to the [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540032</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Sethumme</author>
	<datestamp>1269020880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All nanotech cloaking technology currently employs nanoscopic materials that capture, conduct, and re-emit electromagnetic radiation.  It won't work for waves that are not constituted from both magnetic and electronic radiation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All nanotech cloaking technology currently employs nanoscopic materials that capture , conduct , and re-emit electromagnetic radiation .
It wo n't work for waves that are not constituted from both magnetic and electronic radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All nanotech cloaking technology currently employs nanoscopic materials that capture, conduct, and re-emit electromagnetic radiation.
It won't work for waves that are not constituted from both magnetic and electronic radiation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541318</id>
	<title>Re:Diplomatic Nightmare</title>
	<author>VisiX</author>
	<datestamp>1269025680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not everything you want to hide has people inside that need to see out.  North Korea could cloak their nukes and have inspectors walk right past them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everything you want to hide has people inside that need to see out .
North Korea could cloak their nukes and have inspectors walk right past them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everything you want to hide has people inside that need to see out.
North Korea could cloak their nukes and have inspectors walk right past them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31544510</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>ksandom</author>
	<datestamp>1268996280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would be great for when the parents come over. Just put all the mess in one big pile in the middle of the room, drop a cloak over the top and tell then that some ancient voodoo person died in this house right there, and you mustn't stand there because it's cursed!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be great for when the parents come over .
Just put all the mess in one big pile in the middle of the room , drop a cloak over the top and tell then that some ancient voodoo person died in this house right there , and you must n't stand there because it 's cursed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be great for when the parents come over.
Just put all the mess in one big pile in the middle of the room, drop a cloak over the top and tell then that some ancient voodoo person died in this house right there, and you mustn't stand there because it's cursed!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31550490</id>
	<title>Re:Invisibility is not undetectability</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269110280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that explains why soldiers never wear camoflage.  After all, they can see you with infrared, so why not wear blaze orange?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that explains why soldiers never wear camoflage .
After all , they can see you with infrared , so why not wear blaze orange ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that explains why soldiers never wear camoflage.
After all, they can see you with infrared, so why not wear blaze orange?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539140</id>
	<title>Re:Factor 30</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269018000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but it's Romulans who had cloaking technology first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a huge Star Trek fan , but it 's Romulans who had cloaking technology first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but it's Romulans who had cloaking technology first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538884</id>
	<title>Major technical downside</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269017220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to be wearing special glasses to not see the cloak in 3D. Everyone else just gets a headache.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to be wearing special glasses to not see the cloak in 3D .
Everyone else just gets a headache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to be wearing special glasses to not see the cloak in 3D.
Everyone else just gets a headache.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538430</id>
	<title>Diplomatic Nightmare</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1269015960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh man, wait 'till the Romulans hear about this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , wait 'till the Romulans hear about this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, wait 'till the Romulans hear about this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538534</id>
	<title>Oblig ...</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1269016200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nothing to see here, move along<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing to see here , move along .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing to see here, move along ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</id>
	<title>Factor 30</title>
	<author>Rob Kaper</author>
	<datestamp>1269016260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A factor 30 in wavelength difference is not "just longer" than visible light nor "close to" it. Still, impressive work. And surely, they'll get closer and closer. But cloaking a micrometer high bump is still a few pathways away from Klingon tech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A factor 30 in wavelength difference is not " just longer " than visible light nor " close to " it .
Still , impressive work .
And surely , they 'll get closer and closer .
But cloaking a micrometer high bump is still a few pathways away from Klingon tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A factor 30 in wavelength difference is not "just longer" than visible light nor "close to" it.
Still, impressive work.
And surely, they'll get closer and closer.
But cloaking a micrometer high bump is still a few pathways away from Klingon tech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778</id>
	<title>Yo Mamma...</title>
	<author>PhongUK</author>
	<datestamp>1269016860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... so far not even a 3d cloak could hide her!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... so far not even a 3d cloak could hide her !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... so far not even a 3d cloak could hide her!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269015840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't mean to complain, but it would be nice to have a picture.</p><p>Even if the object is invisible...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't mean to complain , but it would be nice to have a picture.Even if the object is invisible.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't mean to complain, but it would be nice to have a picture.Even if the object is invisible...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543028</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Tobenisstinky</author>
	<datestamp>1268990100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But then they'll complain about the random piles of dead birds! Think of the Birds!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But then they 'll complain about the random piles of dead birds !
Think of the Birds !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But then they'll complain about the random piles of dead birds!
Think of the Birds!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31542336</id>
	<title>Not close, but flamebait</title>
	<author>wye43</author>
	<datestamp>1269030120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>300 nm to 10 nm, while claiming "close" in the summary. Flamebait. Simple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>300 nm to 10 nm , while claiming " close " in the summary .
Flamebait. Simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>300 nm to 10 nm, while claiming "close" in the summary.
Flamebait. Simple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31546388</id>
	<title>Better Than Stripes !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269008340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You poor sods! Get your heads out of all those nuculyer "wuessels", already!</p><p>Think!</p><p>I mean, a vertical central width of regular cloth and two lateral widths of 'enhanced' transparent-field cloth. Voil&#225; ! Instant "slimness". What woman could resist that ?</p><p>And, if you vertically modulate it, to vary the illusion of horizontal extent... implying contours...</p><p>And, yeah. It would be better that those bedsheets they use to try and preserve some dignity at those horrendous accident scenes.</p><p>The Islamic version, for women, is surely going to be a success. All sorts of options, from fullblack zero-albedo bubble (portable ac unit not included), to shimmering semi-transparent glittering haze. The fully transparent version might involve a complication or two.</p><p>I'll ask my cousin to inquire for a good place to set up a garment factory. Maybe somewhere not too far from the Philadelphia shipyards. Though Montauk might also be really convenient.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You poor sods !
Get your heads out of all those nuculyer " wuessels " , already ! Think ! I mean , a vertical central width of regular cloth and two lateral widths of 'enhanced ' transparent-field cloth .
Voil   !
Instant " slimness " .
What woman could resist that ? And , if you vertically modulate it , to vary the illusion of horizontal extent... implying contours...And , yeah .
It would be better that those bedsheets they use to try and preserve some dignity at those horrendous accident scenes.The Islamic version , for women , is surely going to be a success .
All sorts of options , from fullblack zero-albedo bubble ( portable ac unit not included ) , to shimmering semi-transparent glittering haze .
The fully transparent version might involve a complication or two.I 'll ask my cousin to inquire for a good place to set up a garment factory .
Maybe somewhere not too far from the Philadelphia shipyards .
Though Montauk might also be really convenient .
; p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You poor sods!
Get your heads out of all those nuculyer "wuessels", already!Think!I mean, a vertical central width of regular cloth and two lateral widths of 'enhanced' transparent-field cloth.
Voilá !
Instant "slimness".
What woman could resist that ?And, if you vertically modulate it, to vary the illusion of horizontal extent... implying contours...And, yeah.
It would be better that those bedsheets they use to try and preserve some dignity at those horrendous accident scenes.The Islamic version, for women, is surely going to be a success.
All sorts of options, from fullblack zero-albedo bubble (portable ac unit not included), to shimmering semi-transparent glittering haze.
The fully transparent version might involve a complication or two.I'll ask my cousin to inquire for a good place to set up a garment factory.
Maybe somewhere not too far from the Philadelphia shipyards.
Though Montauk might also be really convenient.
;p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539338</id>
	<title>Anything that small...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269018600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is practically invisible anyways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is practically invisible anyways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is practically invisible anyways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31544238</id>
	<title>joel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268994960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31566262</id>
	<title>Can someone explain?</title>
	<author>volpe</author>
	<datestamp>1269267300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, they are claiming that they made an object invisible by trying to look at it with light whose wavelength is too long to resolve the object in the first place? I must be missing something here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , they are claiming that they made an object invisible by trying to look at it with light whose wavelength is too long to resolve the object in the first place ?
I must be missing something here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, they are claiming that they made an object invisible by trying to look at it with light whose wavelength is too long to resolve the object in the first place?
I must be missing something here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540634</id>
	<title>I'm skeptical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269023040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll believe it when I see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll believe it when I see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll believe it when I see it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538836</id>
	<title>fa1lzors!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269017040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am protesting what provides the ultimately, we [idge.net] reaper Nor do the person.  Ask your fe4r the reaper At times. From this post up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am protesting what provides the ultimately , we [ idge.net ] reaper Nor do the person .
Ask your fe4r the reaper At times .
From this post up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am protesting what provides the ultimately, we [idge.net] reaper Nor do the person.
Ask your fe4r the reaper At times.
From this post up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543604</id>
	<title>Invisibility is not undetectability</title>
	<author>bradbury</author>
	<datestamp>1268992260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems to be a fantasy riding on the broomstick of a certain young English wizard (to name a few).  In the age of modern technology, one needs to not only make something "invisible" in the realm of visible wavelengths -- one also has to hide its radar signature, its infrared signature (good luck doing that if you've got any significant computing capabilities on board), its magnetic signature and presumably its mass (gravimetric) signature.</p><p>If you can't do all of those things you are only "undetectable" to primitive (read "nontechnological") humans and not any relatively simplistic robots, sensor assisted humans or airborne drones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to be a fantasy riding on the broomstick of a certain young English wizard ( to name a few ) .
In the age of modern technology , one needs to not only make something " invisible " in the realm of visible wavelengths -- one also has to hide its radar signature , its infrared signature ( good luck doing that if you 've got any significant computing capabilities on board ) , its magnetic signature and presumably its mass ( gravimetric ) signature.If you ca n't do all of those things you are only " undetectable " to primitive ( read " nontechnological " ) humans and not any relatively simplistic robots , sensor assisted humans or airborne drones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to be a fantasy riding on the broomstick of a certain young English wizard (to name a few).
In the age of modern technology, one needs to not only make something "invisible" in the realm of visible wavelengths -- one also has to hide its radar signature, its infrared signature (good luck doing that if you've got any significant computing capabilities on board), its magnetic signature and presumably its mass (gravimetric) signature.If you can't do all of those things you are only "undetectable" to primitive (read "nontechnological") humans and not any relatively simplistic robots, sensor assisted humans or airborne drones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543018</id>
	<title>Re:MGS</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1268989980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was it a woman saying "Nuclear launch detected."? Meh, it's probably nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it a woman saying " Nuclear launch detected. " ?
Meh , it 's probably nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it a woman saying "Nuclear launch detected."?
Meh, it's probably nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539160</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>LordKronos</author>
	<datestamp>1269018060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be a good defensive item. If someone breaks into your house, hiding in an invisibility cloak would be the next best thing to getting out of the house.</p><p>It would be a hilarious prank item. Cover a sheet of plywood in an invisibility cloak and put it in front of an open doorway.</p><p>It might be useful for people who want to observe wildlife. Various sorts of camouflage work, but this may be more effective (I'm not sure if there are any animals that are very good at detecting people even in camouflage).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be a good defensive item .
If someone breaks into your house , hiding in an invisibility cloak would be the next best thing to getting out of the house.It would be a hilarious prank item .
Cover a sheet of plywood in an invisibility cloak and put it in front of an open doorway.It might be useful for people who want to observe wildlife .
Various sorts of camouflage work , but this may be more effective ( I 'm not sure if there are any animals that are very good at detecting people even in camouflage ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be a good defensive item.
If someone breaks into your house, hiding in an invisibility cloak would be the next best thing to getting out of the house.It would be a hilarious prank item.
Cover a sheet of plywood in an invisibility cloak and put it in front of an open doorway.It might be useful for people who want to observe wildlife.
Various sorts of camouflage work, but this may be more effective (I'm not sure if there are any animals that are very good at detecting people even in camouflage).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539832</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269020340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Special effects in a Harry Potter movie....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Special effects in a Harry Potter movie... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Special effects in a Harry Potter movie....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538732</id>
	<title>good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269016740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>something that will be able to hide goatse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>something that will be able to hide goatse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something that will be able to hide goatse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540294</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Trent Hawkins</author>
	<datestamp>1269021720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't mean to complain, but it would be nice to have a picture.</p></div><p>ok <a href="http://thearchnemesis.com/images/Invisible\%20Stalker.jpg" title="thearchnemesis.com" rel="nofollow">here you go</a> [thearchnemesis.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't mean to complain , but it would be nice to have a picture.ok here you go [ thearchnemesis.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't mean to complain, but it would be nice to have a picture.ok here you go [thearchnemesis.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543600</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268992260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hunting. No more constructing complex deer blinds. Have the cloak flash visible light in a spectrum the deer can't see so that you don't get shot by another hunter.</p><p>Spy tech. A lot easier to hide a bug if the bug is invisible.</p><p>Visual nuisances. Don't like that telephone pole in your back yard wrecking your view of the valley? Cloak the bastard.</p><p>Military. A cloaked sniper nest's advantages are obvious. Cloak secret military installations. Cloak factories making military hardware (we've already done this, the low-tech way. Back in WWII they disguised the Lockheed factory as a housing development by using giant canvas coverings painted like houses). Cloak troop camps. Cloak airfields. Cloak airplanes. Cloak airplanes in the air (eventually).</p><p>Of course, as with any technology, there are lots of malevolent uses too. Peeping toms will love it, as will criminals of all sorts. Hard to find the murder weapon when it's cloaked. Practical jokers will become a nuisance. Put crap on a sidewalk and cloak it, then wait for people to stumble into it.</p><p>That's just off the top of my head. I'm sure people will come up with lots more uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hunting .
No more constructing complex deer blinds .
Have the cloak flash visible light in a spectrum the deer ca n't see so that you do n't get shot by another hunter.Spy tech .
A lot easier to hide a bug if the bug is invisible.Visual nuisances .
Do n't like that telephone pole in your back yard wrecking your view of the valley ?
Cloak the bastard.Military .
A cloaked sniper nest 's advantages are obvious .
Cloak secret military installations .
Cloak factories making military hardware ( we 've already done this , the low-tech way .
Back in WWII they disguised the Lockheed factory as a housing development by using giant canvas coverings painted like houses ) .
Cloak troop camps .
Cloak airfields .
Cloak airplanes .
Cloak airplanes in the air ( eventually ) .Of course , as with any technology , there are lots of malevolent uses too .
Peeping toms will love it , as will criminals of all sorts .
Hard to find the murder weapon when it 's cloaked .
Practical jokers will become a nuisance .
Put crap on a sidewalk and cloak it , then wait for people to stumble into it.That 's just off the top of my head .
I 'm sure people will come up with lots more uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hunting.
No more constructing complex deer blinds.
Have the cloak flash visible light in a spectrum the deer can't see so that you don't get shot by another hunter.Spy tech.
A lot easier to hide a bug if the bug is invisible.Visual nuisances.
Don't like that telephone pole in your back yard wrecking your view of the valley?
Cloak the bastard.Military.
A cloaked sniper nest's advantages are obvious.
Cloak secret military installations.
Cloak factories making military hardware (we've already done this, the low-tech way.
Back in WWII they disguised the Lockheed factory as a housing development by using giant canvas coverings painted like houses).
Cloak troop camps.
Cloak airfields.
Cloak airplanes.
Cloak airplanes in the air (eventually).Of course, as with any technology, there are lots of malevolent uses too.
Peeping toms will love it, as will criminals of all sorts.
Hard to find the murder weapon when it's cloaked.
Practical jokers will become a nuisance.
Put crap on a sidewalk and cloak it, then wait for people to stumble into it.That's just off the top of my head.
I'm sure people will come up with lots more uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540678</id>
	<title>It never was Klingon tech</title>
	<author>Moraelin</author>
	<datestamp>1269023220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the way I remember it, it never was Klingon tech as such. The Klingons managed to buy the technology from the Romulans, in exchange for a heck of a lot of D-7 battlecruisers.</p><p>(Or in RL terms when they first needed a Romulan Bird Of Prey, the model wasn't ready on time, so they used a Klingon Battlecruiser and slapped on a makeshift explanation of why the Romulans are flying Klingon vessels.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the way I remember it , it never was Klingon tech as such .
The Klingons managed to buy the technology from the Romulans , in exchange for a heck of a lot of D-7 battlecruisers .
( Or in RL terms when they first needed a Romulan Bird Of Prey , the model was n't ready on time , so they used a Klingon Battlecruiser and slapped on a makeshift explanation of why the Romulans are flying Klingon vessels .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the way I remember it, it never was Klingon tech as such.
The Klingons managed to buy the technology from the Romulans, in exchange for a heck of a lot of D-7 battlecruisers.
(Or in RL terms when they first needed a Romulan Bird Of Prey, the model wasn't ready on time, so they used a Klingon Battlecruiser and slapped on a makeshift explanation of why the Romulans are flying Klingon vessels.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539210</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1269018180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, invisibility is "cool", and I wouldn't mind an invisibility cloak for myself. But I can't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility. Especially among the military, the police, criminals or terrorists (all of them sometimes interchangeable).</p><p>What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?</p></div><p>It could be useful to hide some things that are generally considered an eyesore...  You probably wouldn't want to render the thing completely invisible from every angle, but you could greatly reduce the visual impact of the bathrooms at some scenic park for example.  Or those green electrical boxes they've got scattered around town.  It could make for some interesting furniture and decorating options.  You could make materials transparent or translucent without actually using glass/plastic/whatever.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , invisibility is " cool " , and I would n't mind an invisibility cloak for myself .
But I ca n't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility .
Especially among the military , the police , criminals or terrorists ( all of them sometimes interchangeable ) .What practical use does invisibility have , other than as a weapon ? It could be useful to hide some things that are generally considered an eyesore... You probably would n't want to render the thing completely invisible from every angle , but you could greatly reduce the visual impact of the bathrooms at some scenic park for example .
Or those green electrical boxes they 've got scattered around town .
It could make for some interesting furniture and decorating options .
You could make materials transparent or translucent without actually using glass/plastic/whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, invisibility is "cool", and I wouldn't mind an invisibility cloak for myself.
But I can't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility.
Especially among the military, the police, criminals or terrorists (all of them sometimes interchangeable).What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?It could be useful to hide some things that are generally considered an eyesore...  You probably wouldn't want to render the thing completely invisible from every angle, but you could greatly reduce the visual impact of the bathrooms at some scenic park for example.
Or those green electrical boxes they've got scattered around town.
It could make for some interesting furniture and decorating options.
You could make materials transparent or translucent without actually using glass/plastic/whatever.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539410</id>
	<title>Re:Not really what you'd think it is</title>
	<author>sillybilly</author>
	<datestamp>1269018840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also, metamaterials only work for a special range of wavelengths, comparable to the feature/aperture size of the metamaterial. If that range covers the full optical range, objects can be made invisible to human eyes, but not to short wavelength xrays/gamma rays, or even long wavelength radar/terahertz/infrared. Another way to have invisible objects is complete darkness, but infrared goggles that collect the emitted thermal radiation work in the dark too.
If they had many layers of metamaterials, each targeted for a different range of wavelengths, then the topmost layer would still be visible in one of the ranges covered by the lower layers. It would need a special material that covers any and all frequencies at the same time. Things that have features, but are scale independent, that is zooming in and zooming out preserves the features and appearance, are called fractals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , metamaterials only work for a special range of wavelengths , comparable to the feature/aperture size of the metamaterial .
If that range covers the full optical range , objects can be made invisible to human eyes , but not to short wavelength xrays/gamma rays , or even long wavelength radar/terahertz/infrared .
Another way to have invisible objects is complete darkness , but infrared goggles that collect the emitted thermal radiation work in the dark too .
If they had many layers of metamaterials , each targeted for a different range of wavelengths , then the topmost layer would still be visible in one of the ranges covered by the lower layers .
It would need a special material that covers any and all frequencies at the same time .
Things that have features , but are scale independent , that is zooming in and zooming out preserves the features and appearance , are called fractals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, metamaterials only work for a special range of wavelengths, comparable to the feature/aperture size of the metamaterial.
If that range covers the full optical range, objects can be made invisible to human eyes, but not to short wavelength xrays/gamma rays, or even long wavelength radar/terahertz/infrared.
Another way to have invisible objects is complete darkness, but infrared goggles that collect the emitted thermal radiation work in the dark too.
If they had many layers of metamaterials, each targeted for a different range of wavelengths, then the topmost layer would still be visible in one of the ranges covered by the lower layers.
It would need a special material that covers any and all frequencies at the same time.
Things that have features, but are scale independent, that is zooming in and zooming out preserves the features and appearance, are called fractals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31545884</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269003900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That reminds me of the flock of geese that flew through here many years ago... screenfuls of whitespace, it was incredible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me of the flock of geese that flew through here many years ago... screenfuls of whitespace , it was incredible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me of the flock of geese that flew through here many years ago... screenfuls of whitespace, it was incredible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539354</id>
	<title>Re:Factor 30</title>
	<author>mesri</author>
	<datestamp>1269018660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the abstract at Science:  "Cloaking operation with large bandwidth of unpolarized light from 1.4- to 2.7-m wavelength is demonstrated"  -- that's only a factor of 2 to 4 longer than visible red light.  The factor of 30 is the reduction required in the size of the crystal features in the metamaterial.

But I agree that we're still a long way from being able to NOT see a Klingon Bird of Prey...</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the abstract at Science : " Cloaking operation with large bandwidth of unpolarized light from 1.4- to 2.7-m wavelength is demonstrated " -- that 's only a factor of 2 to 4 longer than visible red light .
The factor of 30 is the reduction required in the size of the crystal features in the metamaterial .
But I agree that we 're still a long way from being able to NOT see a Klingon Bird of Prey.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the abstract at Science:  "Cloaking operation with large bandwidth of unpolarized light from 1.4- to 2.7-m wavelength is demonstrated"  -- that's only a factor of 2 to 4 longer than visible red light.
The factor of 30 is the reduction required in the size of the crystal features in the metamaterial.
But I agree that we're still a long way from being able to NOT see a Klingon Bird of Prey...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539270</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269018360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?</p></div><p>So where did you get the idea that it had to be used as anything more than a weapon?  From all of those pseky nuclear non-weapon bombs we have lying around?  I thought for sure they'd have come up with an alternative use for them by now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What practical use does invisibility have , other than as a weapon ? So where did you get the idea that it had to be used as anything more than a weapon ?
From all of those pseky nuclear non-weapon bombs we have lying around ?
I thought for sure they 'd have come up with an alternative use for them by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?So where did you get the idea that it had to be used as anything more than a weapon?
From all of those pseky nuclear non-weapon bombs we have lying around?
I thought for sure they'd have come up with an alternative use for them by now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539180</id>
	<title>Re:Factor 30</title>
	<author>TSchut</author>
	<datestamp>1269018120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to TFA, they can currently make the structures as small as 200 nm, meaning that there is "only" a factor 20 difference. To make things worse, creating this "cloak" to hide a 1 micrometer object took 3 hours, so creating a cloak for Mr. Potter will probably take years, if not decades.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA , they can currently make the structures as small as 200 nm , meaning that there is " only " a factor 20 difference .
To make things worse , creating this " cloak " to hide a 1 micrometer object took 3 hours , so creating a cloak for Mr. Potter will probably take years , if not decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA, they can currently make the structures as small as 200 nm, meaning that there is "only" a factor 20 difference.
To make things worse, creating this "cloak" to hide a 1 micrometer object took 3 hours, so creating a cloak for Mr. Potter will probably take years, if not decades.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31546618</id>
	<title>I Remember</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269011160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Invisibility cloak" news stories from years ago, maybe 2005, but back then those guys were nearly finished with theirs and had accompanying photos of a man wearing one in front of objects to show it off.</p><p>So what happened?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Invisibility cloak " news stories from years ago , maybe 2005 , but back then those guys were nearly finished with theirs and had accompanying photos of a man wearing one in front of objects to show it off.So what happened ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Invisibility cloak" news stories from years ago, maybe 2005, but back then those guys were nearly finished with theirs and had accompanying photos of a man wearing one in front of objects to show it off.So what happened?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539388</id>
	<title>Re:Yo Mamma...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269018780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sense of humour must be cloaked perfectly</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sense of humour must be cloaked perfectly</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sense of humour must be cloaked perfectly</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1269019440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does science need a reason?  Once we have this stuff people will dream up creative aplications you or I could never have dreamed of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does science need a reason ?
Once we have this stuff people will dream up creative aplications you or I could never have dreamed of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does science need a reason?
Once we have this stuff people will dream up creative aplications you or I could never have dreamed of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538810</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269016980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seem to have misplaced my 1 micrometer bump.  I was sure i put it over here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to have misplaced my 1 micrometer bump .
I was sure i put it over here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to have misplaced my 1 micrometer bump.
I was sure i put it over here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538928</id>
	<title>Not really what you'd think it is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269017340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't really the kind of invisibility cloak in SciFi or fantasy, it's fundamentally different.</p><p>This is essentially you're bending the light around the object, so you don't see it's there. The way it's being done however, has the inherent problem of being limited in angle. That is, theoretically it could be hidden from 180 degrees, but anything beyond that there would be at least visible distortion. You could hide a feature on a surface, but you can't hide the surface like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't really the kind of invisibility cloak in SciFi or fantasy , it 's fundamentally different.This is essentially you 're bending the light around the object , so you do n't see it 's there .
The way it 's being done however , has the inherent problem of being limited in angle .
That is , theoretically it could be hidden from 180 degrees , but anything beyond that there would be at least visible distortion .
You could hide a feature on a surface , but you ca n't hide the surface like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't really the kind of invisibility cloak in SciFi or fantasy, it's fundamentally different.This is essentially you're bending the light around the object, so you don't see it's there.
The way it's being done however, has the inherent problem of being limited in angle.
That is, theoretically it could be hidden from 180 degrees, but anything beyond that there would be at least visible distortion.
You could hide a feature on a surface, but you can't hide the surface like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539096</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269017880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For starters it could be adjusted to make something invisible to other wavelengths. So... protection from x-rays or other forms of radiation with useful applications?<br>
<br>
Could also be used for other sorts of waves, at least in theory, to make an island invisible to a tsunami. Or maybe it's a cheap way to sound-proof a room.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For starters it could be adjusted to make something invisible to other wavelengths .
So... protection from x-rays or other forms of radiation with useful applications ?
Could also be used for other sorts of waves , at least in theory , to make an island invisible to a tsunami .
Or maybe it 's a cheap way to sound-proof a room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For starters it could be adjusted to make something invisible to other wavelengths.
So... protection from x-rays or other forms of radiation with useful applications?
Could also be used for other sorts of waves, at least in theory, to make an island invisible to a tsunami.
Or maybe it's a cheap way to sound-proof a room.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539796</id>
	<title>Re:Yo Mamma...</title>
	<author>DIplomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269020160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>.<br>.</p></div><p>There! My new text-invisibility-cloak nearly perfectly conceals posts with awkward misspellings!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>..There !
My new text-invisibility-cloak nearly perfectly conceals posts with awkward misspellings !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..There!
My new text-invisibility-cloak nearly perfectly conceals posts with awkward misspellings!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541246</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269025320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, like sneaking into the women's locker room, or... um... yeah, that's about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , like sneaking into the women 's locker room , or... um... yeah , that 's about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, like sneaking into the women's locker room, or... um... yeah, that's about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538608</id>
	<title>Who's sig is that again?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1269016440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Ha! Invisibility Cloak? I'll believe it when I see it!"</p><p>For some reason Locke comes to mind...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ha !
Invisibility Cloak ?
I 'll believe it when I see it !
" For some reason Locke comes to mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ha!
Invisibility Cloak?
I'll believe it when I see it!
"For some reason Locke comes to mind...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539256</id>
	<title>Re:Diplomatic Nightmare</title>
	<author>Shrike82</author>
	<datestamp>1269018300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Being invisible sounds ok, until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind. That will end non military uses you had in mind.</p></div><p>Blind in the visible light spectrum, which would still leave you with sonar, radar, possibly IR and UV if the material very selectively blocks the visible light portion of the EM spectrum. Not to mention the possibility of maintaining links to remote cameras and other visual/information sources using data transmitted ion wavelengths way, way outisde the visible light spectrum.<br> <br>

So yes, as a Harry Potter invisibility cloak this would suck, but as a Start Trek cloak this would be awesome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being invisible sounds ok , until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind .
That will end non military uses you had in mind.Blind in the visible light spectrum , which would still leave you with sonar , radar , possibly IR and UV if the material very selectively blocks the visible light portion of the EM spectrum .
Not to mention the possibility of maintaining links to remote cameras and other visual/information sources using data transmitted ion wavelengths way , way outisde the visible light spectrum .
So yes , as a Harry Potter invisibility cloak this would suck , but as a Start Trek cloak this would be awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being invisible sounds ok, until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind.
That will end non military uses you had in mind.Blind in the visible light spectrum, which would still leave you with sonar, radar, possibly IR and UV if the material very selectively blocks the visible light portion of the EM spectrum.
Not to mention the possibility of maintaining links to remote cameras and other visual/information sources using data transmitted ion wavelengths way, way outisde the visible light spectrum.
So yes, as a Harry Potter invisibility cloak this would suck, but as a Start Trek cloak this would be awesome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539202</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>hanabal</author>
	<datestamp>1269018180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the ability to watch the military or police without fear of them beating you half to death just for watching</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the ability to watch the military or police without fear of them beating you half to death just for watching</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the ability to watch the military or police without fear of them beating you half to death just for watching</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</id>
	<title>What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269016740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, invisibility is "cool", and I wouldn't mind an invisibility cloak for myself. But I can't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility. Especially among the military, the police, criminals or terrorists (all of them sometimes interchangeable).</p><p>What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , invisibility is " cool " , and I would n't mind an invisibility cloak for myself .
But I ca n't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility .
Especially among the military , the police , criminals or terrorists ( all of them sometimes interchangeable ) .What practical use does invisibility have , other than as a weapon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, invisibility is "cool", and I wouldn't mind an invisibility cloak for myself.
But I can't immediately think of who would benefit the general public by having invisibility.
Especially among the military, the police, criminals or terrorists (all of them sometimes interchangeable).What practical use does invisibility have, other than as a weapon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540172</id>
	<title>Re:What good could come from invisibility?</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1269021360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it only works in a limited spectrum, cell phone towers.  The Neo-Luddites that make up stupid excuses to try to fight the existance of cell phones often use the "Eye Sore" excuss to try to stop antennas from being put up.  This would put an end to that.  Of course, it would probably lead to a whole new argument of "Invisibility gives you cancer".</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it only works in a limited spectrum , cell phone towers .
The Neo-Luddites that make up stupid excuses to try to fight the existance of cell phones often use the " Eye Sore " excuss to try to stop antennas from being put up .
This would put an end to that .
Of course , it would probably lead to a whole new argument of " Invisibility gives you cancer " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it only works in a limited spectrum, cell phone towers.
The Neo-Luddites that make up stupid excuses to try to fight the existance of cell phones often use the "Eye Sore" excuss to try to stop antennas from being put up.
This would put an end to that.
Of course, it would probably lead to a whole new argument of "Invisibility gives you cancer".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540228</id>
	<title>invis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269021480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FANTASTIC achievement now we can make virtual stuff invisible</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FANTASTIC achievement now we can make virtual stuff invisible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FANTASTIC achievement now we can make virtual stuff invisible</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539134</id>
	<title>Re:Factor 30</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269018000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the size of the cloak, dumbass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the size of the cloak , dumbass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the size of the cloak, dumbass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31542434</id>
	<title>Yes but</title>
	<author>tekproxy2</author>
	<datestamp>1269030660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but will the Federation reverse it's stance on the use of cloaking technology?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but will the Federation reverse it 's stance on the use of cloaking technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but will the Federation reverse it's stance on the use of cloaking technology?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31556436</id>
	<title>Diplomat: "We're a peace loving democracy!"</title>
	<author>Securityemo</author>
	<datestamp>1269172500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Motoko: "Is that a fact?"<br>
*KRAKRAKRAK* *beautifully drawn head asplosion*<br>
Aide: "Out the window! Shoot!"<br>
(Embassy mooks fail hit roll)<br>
Aide: "Thermoptic camouflage..."<br>
(Cue intro)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Motoko : " Is that a fact ?
" * KRAKRAKRAK * * beautifully drawn head asplosion * Aide : " Out the window !
Shoot ! " ( Embassy mooks fail hit roll ) Aide : " Thermoptic camouflage... " ( Cue intro )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Motoko: "Is that a fact?
"
*KRAKRAKRAK* *beautifully drawn head asplosion*
Aide: "Out the window!
Shoot!"
(Embassy mooks fail hit roll)
Aide: "Thermoptic camouflage..."
(Cue intro)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541288</id>
	<title>Re:Who's sig is that again?</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1269025500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean lock-down?<br>(Ducks from stones.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean lock-down ?
( Ducks from stones .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean lock-down?
(Ducks from stones.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854</id>
	<title>Re:Diplomatic Nightmare</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269017100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being invisible sounds ok, until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind. That will end non military uses you had in mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being invisible sounds ok , until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind .
That will end non military uses you had in mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being invisible sounds ok, until you realize that with perfect invisibility you will be effective blind.
That will end non military uses you had in mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538430</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31550490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31545884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31544510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_19_1427247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31544510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540172
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31540294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31545884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31550490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31543018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31541288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31538778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_19_1427247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_19_1427247.31539290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
