<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_18_231242</id>
	<title>Details Emerge On Futurama's "Rebirth" (and Return)</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268912160000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Svippy writes <i>"As revealed last summer, <a href="//entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/06/10/1331258/Comedy-Central-Confirms-26-New-Futurama-Episodes"> <em>Futurama</em> will be returning this year</a>, and while there were conflicts about the cast of the show in the late summer of 2009, <a href="//news.slashdot.org/story/09/08/01/1132258/Original-Futurama-Cast-Seals-Deal-With-Fox">a deal was eventually secured</a>.  Last week, <a href="http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2010-3-4-new-futurama-episodes-premiere-on-comedy-central-in-june">Comedy Central confirmed the airing</a> of the first episode, '<a href="http://theinfosphere.org/Rebirth">Rebirth</a>,' will be 24 June 2010.  Several other details related to plot and production have surfaced over the months, and for those interested, a <a href="http://theinfosphere.org/Season\_6">full article is available on the subject</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Svippy writes " As revealed last summer , Futurama will be returning this year , and while there were conflicts about the cast of the show in the late summer of 2009 , a deal was eventually secured .
Last week , Comedy Central confirmed the airing of the first episode , 'Rebirth, ' will be 24 June 2010 .
Several other details related to plot and production have surfaced over the months , and for those interested , a full article is available on the subject .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Svippy writes "As revealed last summer,  Futurama will be returning this year, and while there were conflicts about the cast of the show in the late summer of 2009, a deal was eventually secured.
Last week, Comedy Central confirmed the airing of the first episode, 'Rebirth,' will be 24 June 2010.
Several other details related to plot and production have surfaced over the months, and for those interested, a full article is available on the subject.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530866</id>
	<title>I just got goosebumps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268916480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This post brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This post brought to you by Glagnar 's Human Rinds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31547176</id>
	<title>Is it going to be in HD?</title>
	<author>Paxtez</author>
	<datestamp>1269017220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because I want to see what Amy's obscene tattoo is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I want to see what Amy 's obscene tattoo is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I want to see what Amy's obscene tattoo is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534244</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1268997720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's one way and only one way to determine if an animal is intelligent. Dissect its brain! (And maybe you can find out where Farnsworth's voice is coming from).</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's one way and only one way to determine if an animal is intelligent .
Dissect its brain !
( And maybe you can find out where Farnsworth 's voice is coming from ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's one way and only one way to determine if an animal is intelligent.
Dissect its brain!
(And maybe you can find out where Farnsworth's voice is coming from).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532500</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268929440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fuck zoidberg, it's all about bender.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck zoidberg , it 's all about bender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck zoidberg, it's all about bender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533090</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1268935320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU</p><p>Added this line of text to get around the stupid lameness filter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUAdded this line of text to get around the stupid lameness filter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUAdded this line of text to get around the stupid lameness filter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531790</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268923140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hated the Zoidberg-heavy episodes.  They are my least favorite.</p><p>My most favorite episodes are the Fry-centric (Parasites Lost, The Devil's Hands Are Idle Playthings, etc).</p><p>The problem with the new episodes is that they are going to be on Comedy Central.  I don't know what it is about that station but I never watch it.  I used to watch the Futurama reruns every day on Cartoon Network but since they switched to Comedy Central I haven't watched a single one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hated the Zoidberg-heavy episodes .
They are my least favorite.My most favorite episodes are the Fry-centric ( Parasites Lost , The Devil 's Hands Are Idle Playthings , etc ) .The problem with the new episodes is that they are going to be on Comedy Central .
I do n't know what it is about that station but I never watch it .
I used to watch the Futurama reruns every day on Cartoon Network but since they switched to Comedy Central I have n't watched a single one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hated the Zoidberg-heavy episodes.
They are my least favorite.My most favorite episodes are the Fry-centric (Parasites Lost, The Devil's Hands Are Idle Playthings, etc).The problem with the new episodes is that they are going to be on Comedy Central.
I don't know what it is about that station but I never watch it.
I used to watch the Futurama reruns every day on Cartoon Network but since they switched to Comedy Central I haven't watched a single one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31539728</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>Goodgerster</author>
	<datestamp>1269019920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh jeez, I smell another cheap cross-over...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh jeez , I smell another cheap cross-over.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh jeez, I smell another cheap cross-over...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31543826</id>
	<title>Re:Yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268993400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Severely reduced pay all around!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Severely reduced pay all around !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Severely reduced pay all around!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31540724</id>
	<title>Re:Rebirth? Hopefully this does not mean reboot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269023340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reboot's 'reboot' was terrible. The show stopped becoming funny and their changes to the already dated CG just looked awful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reboot 's 'reboot ' was terrible .
The show stopped becoming funny and their changes to the already dated CG just looked awful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reboot's 'reboot' was terrible.
The show stopped becoming funny and their changes to the already dated CG just looked awful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31542948</id>
	<title>Whither Canada?</title>
	<author>Citizen of Earth</author>
	<datestamp>1268989740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When and where will these episodes be airing in Canada?  Teletoon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When and where will these episodes be airing in Canada ?
Teletoon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When and where will these episodes be airing in Canada?
Teletoon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531948</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1268924700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, you expect them to come up with new ideas or something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you expect them to come up with new ideas or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you expect them to come up with new ideas or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531924</id>
	<title>Re:And Zoidberg!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268924340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How's it taste?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How 's it taste ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How's it taste?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533214</id>
	<title>Best Futurama Line...</title>
	<author>drkim</author>
	<datestamp>1268936820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"It's like a movie, with this happening in it!"
<br>
-or-
<br>
"I had the most wonderful dream! And YOU were in it!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's like a movie , with this happening in it !
" -or- " I had the most wonderful dream !
And YOU were in it !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's like a movie, with this happening in it!
"

-or-

"I had the most wonderful dream!
And YOU were in it!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1268918160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good news, everyone!  I've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news , everyone !
I 've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news, everyone!
I've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938</id>
	<title>And Zoidberg!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268917020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This means I can go ahead and order another case of Soylent Soda!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This means I can go ahead and order another case of Soylent Soda !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means I can go ahead and order another case of Soylent Soda!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538148</id>
	<title>Re:The movies were SOOO bad</title>
	<author>KlaymenDK</author>
	<datestamp>1269015240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I second that.</p><p>What bummed me out was not only the crummosity of the movies, but also the fact that I live in a backward place where I can't get them from Blockbuster (and forget about downloading anything on my 3/4Mbit line), so I *bought* them when I finally saw them in a record shop. Worst money I ever spent!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I second that.What bummed me out was not only the crummosity of the movies , but also the fact that I live in a backward place where I ca n't get them from Blockbuster ( and forget about downloading anything on my 3/4Mbit line ) , so I * bought * them when I finally saw them in a record shop .
Worst money I ever spent !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I second that.What bummed me out was not only the crummosity of the movies, but also the fact that I live in a backward place where I can't get them from Blockbuster (and forget about downloading anything on my 3/4Mbit line), so I *bought* them when I finally saw them in a record shop.
Worst money I ever spent!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532334</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1268928180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then.</i>
<br> <br>
I'm gonna go with "2D movies" and "the internet".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then .
I 'm gon na go with " 2D movies " and " the internet " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then.
I'm gonna go with "2D movies" and "the internet".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834</id>
	<title>High def!</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1268923500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Animation wise, technology has developed significantly since Futurama  first aired, and in addition to the high-definition technology used for the films, season 6 (and presumably any subsequent seasons) will be broadcast in widescreen and high-definition where available.</p></div></blockquote><p>Thank god it's in high def! Now maybe we can finally see Amy's erotic tattoo!</p><p>Seriously though, who cares. The CGI portions will improve but honestly standard-def is just fine for Futurama. I'm not complaining mind you, I just don't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings. But then again, my frame of reference for high-def animation is Comcast's overly-compressed 720p feeds, so I may be completely off base.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Animation wise , technology has developed significantly since Futurama first aired , and in addition to the high-definition technology used for the films , season 6 ( and presumably any subsequent seasons ) will be broadcast in widescreen and high-definition where available.Thank god it 's in high def !
Now maybe we can finally see Amy 's erotic tattoo ! Seriously though , who cares .
The CGI portions will improve but honestly standard-def is just fine for Futurama .
I 'm not complaining mind you , I just do n't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings .
But then again , my frame of reference for high-def animation is Comcast 's overly-compressed 720p feeds , so I may be completely off base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Animation wise, technology has developed significantly since Futurama  first aired, and in addition to the high-definition technology used for the films, season 6 (and presumably any subsequent seasons) will be broadcast in widescreen and high-definition where available.Thank god it's in high def!
Now maybe we can finally see Amy's erotic tattoo!Seriously though, who cares.
The CGI portions will improve but honestly standard-def is just fine for Futurama.
I'm not complaining mind you, I just don't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings.
But then again, my frame of reference for high-def animation is Comcast's overly-compressed 720p feeds, so I may be completely off base.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532834</id>
	<title>Meh, Futurama was very hit or miss</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268932680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are episodes of Futurama that were good.  There were many episodes that were unwatchable.  And frankly, Futurama never produced a truly great episode, along the lines of The Simpson first Treehouse of Horror or Spongebob's (that's right bitches, I'm invoking Spongebob) P.O.O.P. episode.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are episodes of Futurama that were good .
There were many episodes that were unwatchable .
And frankly , Futurama never produced a truly great episode , along the lines of The Simpson first Treehouse of Horror or Spongebob 's ( that 's right bitches , I 'm invoking Spongebob ) P.O.O.P .
episode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are episodes of Futurama that were good.
There were many episodes that were unwatchable.
And frankly, Futurama never produced a truly great episode, along the lines of The Simpson first Treehouse of Horror or Spongebob's (that's right bitches, I'm invoking Spongebob) P.O.O.P.
episode.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31548372</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>nyri</author>
	<datestamp>1269083880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible...</p></div><p>Yes, in those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were REAL men, women were REAL women, and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri.</p></div><p>Damn. Don't leave out the jab at Star Trek. This is, after all, about sci-fi.</p><p>In those days men were REL men, women were REAL women, small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri. And all dared to brave unknown terrors, to do mighty deeds, <b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split\_infinitive" title="wikipedia.org">to</a> [wikipedia.org] boldly <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split\_infinitive" title="wikipedia.org">split infinitives</a> [wikipedia.org] that no man had split before</b> - and thus was the Empire forged.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space , and maybe , just maybe it was possible...Yes , in those days spirits were brave , the stakes were high , men were REAL men , women were REAL women , and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri.Damn .
Do n't leave out the jab at Star Trek .
This is , after all , about sci-fi.In those days men were REL men , women were REAL women , small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri .
And all dared to brave unknown terrors , to do mighty deeds , to [ wikipedia.org ] boldly split infinitives [ wikipedia.org ] that no man had split before - and thus was the Empire forged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible...Yes, in those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were REAL men, women were REAL women, and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri.Damn.
Don't leave out the jab at Star Trek.
This is, after all, about sci-fi.In those days men were REL men, women were REAL women, small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri.
And all dared to brave unknown terrors, to do mighty deeds,  to [wikipedia.org] boldly split infinitives [wikipedia.org] that no man had split before - and thus was the Empire forged.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531374</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268919900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome!!! Can't wait to watch it. Bender rules!! Bite my shiny metal @$$</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome ! ! !
Ca n't wait to watch it .
Bender rules ! !
Bite my shiny metal @ $ $</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome!!!
Can't wait to watch it.
Bender rules!!
Bite my shiny metal @$$</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531328</id>
	<title>Re:Yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268919480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dr Zoidberg: Yay! So I <i>didn't</i> lose my job!</p></div><p>Dr. Zoidberg: Once again, the conservative, sandwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr Zoidberg : Yay !
So I did n't lose my job ! Dr .
Zoidberg : Once again , the conservative , sandwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr Zoidberg: Yay!
So I didn't lose my job!Dr.
Zoidberg: Once again, the conservative, sandwich-heavy portfolio pays off for the hungry investor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</id>
	<title>In this being</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268919840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this being the post-millennial / post-9/11 age, the world has become too cynical, and frankly...depressing.

 <p>Futurama's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle of science fiction. When one eyed purple aliens and rich asian chicks were still 'hot' - and not in a weird way. It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible (the US was rich and had all those mars landers planting flags). A time when no man would envy another, and there would be sexbots for all. It was a simpler time. Futurama is dead to me now.
</p><p>
Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this being the post-millennial / post-9/11 age , the world has become too cynical , and frankly...depressing .
Futurama 's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90 's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle of science fiction .
When one eyed purple aliens and rich asian chicks were still 'hot ' - and not in a weird way .
It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space , and maybe , just maybe it was possible ( the US was rich and had all those mars landers planting flags ) .
A time when no man would envy another , and there would be sexbots for all .
It was a simpler time .
Futurama is dead to me now .
Fox can bite my shiny metal ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this being the post-millennial / post-9/11 age, the world has become too cynical, and frankly...depressing.
Futurama's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle of science fiction.
When one eyed purple aliens and rich asian chicks were still 'hot' - and not in a weird way.
It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible (the US was rich and had all those mars landers planting flags).
A time when no man would envy another, and there would be sexbots for all.
It was a simpler time.
Futurama is dead to me now.
Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782</id>
	<title>Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Fluffeh</author>
	<datestamp>1268916000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>*Professor Farnsworth voice* Good news everybody! *end character voice*</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Professor Farnsworth voice * Good news everybody !
* end character voice *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Professor Farnsworth voice* Good news everybody!
*end character voice*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538660</id>
	<title>Re:Best Futurama Line...Zoidberg</title>
	<author>setrops</author>
	<datestamp>1269016560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Futurama is filled with gems but the one that got me the most was Zoidberg at a party saying<br>"I fertilized the caviar for ya!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Futurama is filled with gems but the one that got me the most was Zoidberg at a party saying " I fertilized the caviar for ya !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Futurama is filled with gems but the one that got me the most was Zoidberg at a party saying"I fertilized the caviar for ya!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531354</id>
	<title>Re:And Zoidberg!</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1268919780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mmmm, my kind of people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmmm , my kind of people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmmm, my kind of people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531738</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1268922780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>damn your Farnsworthian Paracosia!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>damn your Farnsworthian Paracosia !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>damn your Farnsworthian Paracosia!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532842</id>
	<title>Re:Hey Everybody!</title>
	<author>belg4mit</author>
	<datestamp>1268932800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called context bitch, learn to read the status bar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called context bitch , learn to read the status bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called context bitch, learn to read the status bar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531528</id>
	<title>Next step, the amusement park!</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1268920920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"My great unfulfilled ambition - to do my own amusement park - is really why I am doing Futurama. I'm not kidding. If this show takes off, I'm going to do an amusement park." - Matt Groening, Wired 7.02<br> <br>
That, and getting "Life In Hell" online. (For God's sake man! It's an intern, a scanner, and a Facebook page!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" My great unfulfilled ambition - to do my own amusement park - is really why I am doing Futurama .
I 'm not kidding .
If this show takes off , I 'm going to do an amusement park .
" - Matt Groening , Wired 7.02 That , and getting " Life In Hell " online .
( For God 's sake man !
It 's an intern , a scanner , and a Facebook page !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"My great unfulfilled ambition - to do my own amusement park - is really why I am doing Futurama.
I'm not kidding.
If this show takes off, I'm going to do an amusement park.
" - Matt Groening, Wired 7.02 
That, and getting "Life In Hell" online.
(For God's sake man!
It's an intern, a scanner, and a Facebook page!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531480</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1268920680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.</p></div></blockquote><p>Doesn't look so shiny to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.Does n't look so shiny to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.Doesn't look so shiny to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531152</id>
	<title>Slurm FTW</title>
	<author>actionbastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268918400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whimmy wham wham wozzle...let's party!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whimmy wham wham wozzle...let 's party !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whimmy wham wham wozzle...let's party!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533104</id>
	<title>Re:Hey Everybody!</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1268935500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.</p></div><p>Most people don't even seem to read what's on Slashdot now, so we figured since everyone only ever skims the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. summary that it would be the best thing to link to. I hear the next version of Slashcode will only allow 140 character summaries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to read last year 's Slashdot dupe.Most people do n't even seem to read what 's on Slashdot now , so we figured since everyone only ever skims the / .
summary that it would be the best thing to link to .
I hear the next version of Slashcode will only allow 140 character summaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.Most people don't even seem to read what's on Slashdot now, so we figured since everyone only ever skims the /.
summary that it would be the best thing to link to.
I hear the next version of Slashcode will only allow 140 character summaries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434</id>
	<title>Hey Everybody!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268920320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey folks, can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories?  When I click on the link "<i>Futurama</i> will be returning this year", I want to read the actual press release, or article, or whatever.  I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey folks , can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories ?
When I click on the link " Futurama will be returning this year " , I want to read the actual press release , or article , or whatever .
I do n't want to read last year 's Slashdot dupe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey folks, can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories?
When I click on the link "Futurama will be returning this year", I want to read the actual press release, or article, or whatever.
I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674</id>
	<title>Fox Sunday/Friday victims of the early 2000s</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1268931000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fox killed Futurama by bad scheduling. See, they put the show on various slots Sunday nights, but because of the variable length of NFL football game coverage, the Sunday night lineup was often damaged by running late, being joined in progress, not being shown to the whole nation, and other problems. The only rules were that The Simpsons must run untouched at as close to 8pm ET as possible.</p><p>Furthermore, they killed several shows by putting them on Friday nights during the spring and summer... because not only is that a traditional slow night for TV viewing, but Fox-owned stations in New York (the biggest local TV area), Boston (4th biggest) and other markets showed local baseball games on most Fridays, causing new episodes of serial series to air in the late-late-night timeslots in those areas.</p><p>Fox has fixed these problems by allowing Fox Sports to control the network up until 8pm ET on Sundays, filling the gap between the end of the games and the set signoff time with a postgame show called The OT when needed. West coast affiliates are left on their own until 8pm PT, and the entire nation sees the Sunday lineup from 8/7-to-10/9 as they should. Fox has also stopped buying local baseball packages for their owned stations and encouraged other affiliates to get out of the local sports broadcast business.</p><p>Many geek favorites like Futurama and Sliders got caught up in this mess. It's nice to see that the producers of such shows have found other outlets that treat them better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox killed Futurama by bad scheduling .
See , they put the show on various slots Sunday nights , but because of the variable length of NFL football game coverage , the Sunday night lineup was often damaged by running late , being joined in progress , not being shown to the whole nation , and other problems .
The only rules were that The Simpsons must run untouched at as close to 8pm ET as possible.Furthermore , they killed several shows by putting them on Friday nights during the spring and summer... because not only is that a traditional slow night for TV viewing , but Fox-owned stations in New York ( the biggest local TV area ) , Boston ( 4th biggest ) and other markets showed local baseball games on most Fridays , causing new episodes of serial series to air in the late-late-night timeslots in those areas.Fox has fixed these problems by allowing Fox Sports to control the network up until 8pm ET on Sundays , filling the gap between the end of the games and the set signoff time with a postgame show called The OT when needed .
West coast affiliates are left on their own until 8pm PT , and the entire nation sees the Sunday lineup from 8/7-to-10/9 as they should .
Fox has also stopped buying local baseball packages for their owned stations and encouraged other affiliates to get out of the local sports broadcast business.Many geek favorites like Futurama and Sliders got caught up in this mess .
It 's nice to see that the producers of such shows have found other outlets that treat them better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox killed Futurama by bad scheduling.
See, they put the show on various slots Sunday nights, but because of the variable length of NFL football game coverage, the Sunday night lineup was often damaged by running late, being joined in progress, not being shown to the whole nation, and other problems.
The only rules were that The Simpsons must run untouched at as close to 8pm ET as possible.Furthermore, they killed several shows by putting them on Friday nights during the spring and summer... because not only is that a traditional slow night for TV viewing, but Fox-owned stations in New York (the biggest local TV area), Boston (4th biggest) and other markets showed local baseball games on most Fridays, causing new episodes of serial series to air in the late-late-night timeslots in those areas.Fox has fixed these problems by allowing Fox Sports to control the network up until 8pm ET on Sundays, filling the gap between the end of the games and the set signoff time with a postgame show called The OT when needed.
West coast affiliates are left on their own until 8pm PT, and the entire nation sees the Sunday lineup from 8/7-to-10/9 as they should.
Fox has also stopped buying local baseball packages for their owned stations and encouraged other affiliates to get out of the local sports broadcast business.Many geek favorites like Futurama and Sliders got caught up in this mess.
It's nice to see that the producers of such shows have found other outlets that treat them better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31543822</id>
	<title>Glad the whole main cast from Futurama is back</title>
	<author>sagematt</author>
	<datestamp>1268993400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...And Zoidberg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...And Zoidberg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And Zoidberg.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531238</id>
	<title>Tough contract negotiations</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1268918880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No doubt, Comedy Central had to kiss some shiny metal ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt , Comedy Central had to kiss some shiny metal ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt, Comedy Central had to kiss some shiny metal ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533162</id>
	<title>Re:Fox Sunday/Friday victims of the early 2000s</title>
	<author>VoltageX</author>
	<datestamp>1268936220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm fairly sure the networks in other countries killed it in the same way. I never quite know which episode they're going to show in Australia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fairly sure the networks in other countries killed it in the same way .
I never quite know which episode they 're going to show in Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fairly sure the networks in other countries killed it in the same way.
I never quite know which episode they're going to show in Australia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31537636</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1269014040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Morgan Freeman?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Morgan Freeman ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Morgan Freeman?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424</id>
	<title>Re:Good News!</title>
	<author>Theswager</author>
	<datestamp>1268920260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he says everybody not everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>he says everybody not everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he says everybody not everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534992</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269006240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rich Asian Chicks aren't hot anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rich Asian Chicks are n't hot anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rich Asian Chicks aren't hot anymore?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534938</id>
	<title>HA! (Ouch!)</title>
	<author>DG</author>
	<datestamp>1269005760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh man... I misread your nick as "knuth" not "kurth", and the thought of Don Knuth doing a Futurama/Professor Farnsworth reference had coffee coming out of my nose.</p><p>Funny AND painful.</p><p>DG</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man... I misread your nick as " knuth " not " kurth " , and the thought of Don Knuth doing a Futurama/Professor Farnsworth reference had coffee coming out of my nose.Funny AND painful.DG</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man... I misread your nick as "knuth" not "kurth", and the thought of Don Knuth doing a Futurama/Professor Farnsworth reference had coffee coming out of my nose.Funny AND painful.DG</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532374</id>
	<title>Re:Next step, the amusement park!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268928480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wait for "Bender's Wild Ride". It'll be crazier than Vegas, on E, a fifth of tequila, no pants, and a pack of transsexuals chasing you for the money you owe them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait for " Bender 's Wild Ride " .
It 'll be crazier than Vegas , on E , a fifth of tequila , no pants , and a pack of transsexuals chasing you for the money you owe them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait for "Bender's Wild Ride".
It'll be crazier than Vegas, on E, a fifth of tequila, no pants, and a pack of transsexuals chasing you for the money you owe them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062</id>
	<title>Re:Yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268917800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hermes: You lost your job 6 years ago you fat lobster!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hermes : You lost your job 6 years ago you fat lobster !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hermes: You lost your job 6 years ago you fat lobster!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533504</id>
	<title>Re:Fox Sunday/Friday victims of the early 2000s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268941020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DEATH BY SNOO SNOO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DEATH BY SNOO SNOO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DEATH BY SNOO SNOO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531394</id>
	<title>Future</title>
	<author>skyriser2</author>
	<datestamp>1268920020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The present may stink, but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday."<br>- Fry, Futurama</p><p>(More at <a href="http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes?search=futurama" title="quoteaddict.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes?search=futurama</a> [quoteaddict.com])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The present may stink , but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday .
" - Fry , Futurama ( More at http : //www.quoteaddict.com/quotes ? search = futurama [ quoteaddict.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The present may stink, but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday.
"- Fry, Futurama(More at http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes?search=futurama [quoteaddict.com])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532368</id>
	<title>Re:Yay!</title>
	<author>Xaduurv</author>
	<datestamp>1268928480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hermes: Sweet Sally in the Alley!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hermes : Sweet Sally in the Alley !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hermes: Sweet Sally in the Alley!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532494</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1268929320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Good news, everyone! I've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this!</p></div><p>That's weird. You sound exactly like Professor Farnsworth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news , everyone !
I 've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this ! That 's weird .
You sound exactly like Professor Farnsworth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news, everyone!
I've invented a device that lets you hear my voice in your head as you read this!That's weird.
You sound exactly like Professor Farnsworth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530874</id>
	<title>Futurama is best #2</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1268916540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>with Everyone Loves Hypnotoad at #1 of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with Everyone Loves Hypnotoad at # 1 of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with Everyone Loves Hypnotoad at #1 of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531656</id>
	<title>Best birthday present ever</title>
	<author>nonades</author>
	<datestamp>1268922120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I have a reason to be excited for my 24th birthday!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I have a reason to be excited for my 24th birthday !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I have a reason to be excited for my 24th birthday!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776</id>
	<title>Good News!</title>
	<author>kurth</author>
	<datestamp>1268915940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good News Everyone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good News Everyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good News Everyone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531408</id>
	<title>Re:Yay!</title>
	<author>Jahava</author>
	<datestamp>1268920140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This thread is bad and you should <em>feel</em> bad!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This thread is bad and you should feel bad !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thread is bad and you should feel bad!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534800</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>grendel03</author>
	<datestamp>1269004440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FFFFFFFF</p><p>I had to reread this entire topic to continue the effect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FFFFFFFFI had to reread this entire topic to continue the effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FFFFFFFFI had to reread this entire topic to continue the effect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830</id>
	<title>Yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268916300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dr Zoidberg: Yay! So I <i>didn't</i> lose my job!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr Zoidberg : Yay !
So I did n't lose my job !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr Zoidberg: Yay!
So I didn't lose my job!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532550</id>
	<title>Futurama???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268929860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Futurama? Futurama?  What about reboot?  When are they going to bring back reboot?  When are they going to reboot reboot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Futurama ?
Futurama ? What about reboot ?
When are they going to bring back reboot ?
When are they going to reboot reboot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Futurama?
Futurama?  What about reboot?
When are they going to bring back reboot?
When are they going to reboot reboot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533712</id>
	<title>I always keep it real</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1269031740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note the nick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note the nick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note the nick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533222</id>
	<title>Re:High def!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268936940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The easiest way to see how nice cartoons can look in HD (USA only, sorry) is to tune into the PBSHD that seems to come in free HD packages. It is not that it looks much different, since 2D means no gradients, but you can still observer very well detailed backgrounds, and finer resolution lines. There's currently some grammar girl cartoon at 4PM East Coast time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The easiest way to see how nice cartoons can look in HD ( USA only , sorry ) is to tune into the PBSHD that seems to come in free HD packages .
It is not that it looks much different , since 2D means no gradients , but you can still observer very well detailed backgrounds , and finer resolution lines .
There 's currently some grammar girl cartoon at 4PM East Coast time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The easiest way to see how nice cartoons can look in HD (USA only, sorry) is to tune into the PBSHD that seems to come in free HD packages.
It is not that it looks much different, since 2D means no gradients, but you can still observer very well detailed backgrounds, and finer resolution lines.
There's currently some grammar girl cartoon at 4PM East Coast time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533930</id>
	<title>The movies were SOOO bad</title>
	<author>bonaldo2000</author>
	<datestamp>1268992980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why has no one mentioned that almost everything in the movies sucked?
If they continue down that line, the new episodes will, more or less, not be worth watching.
It's like the movies were not made by the same people who made the original! (but they were, weren't they?)

The jokes generally were not anywhere near as funny as those in the series. But the worst part was that they actually just seemed not to care for the overall story, characters and feel from the series. Some examples:
- Why SUDDENLY is the mighty race of Niblonians all captured by Mom?! How does that fit with them, more or less, knowing everything and saving the universe in the series?
- Why are the Niblonians defeated by "the mighty brooms" of those scammer people? It just doesn't make sense.
- Why is Bender suddenly a murderous psychopath. He throws his own son into burning lava?! Those who wrote that seem to forget that, yes, Bender is "evil" but you have to be able to think he is alright deep down. You can't really think that when he burns his own son.
- Why are many of the animations made a lot more gory? There is no need for that. There are parts here and there that are actually disgusting.
- Kiff gets KILLED! I mean WHAT? OK, he gets revived but it still sucks.

The list goes on (but not here!). In general, I don't think the movies are hated as much as they deserve. They suck, plain and simple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why has no one mentioned that almost everything in the movies sucked ?
If they continue down that line , the new episodes will , more or less , not be worth watching .
It 's like the movies were not made by the same people who made the original !
( but they were , were n't they ?
) The jokes generally were not anywhere near as funny as those in the series .
But the worst part was that they actually just seemed not to care for the overall story , characters and feel from the series .
Some examples : - Why SUDDENLY is the mighty race of Niblonians all captured by Mom ? !
How does that fit with them , more or less , knowing everything and saving the universe in the series ?
- Why are the Niblonians defeated by " the mighty brooms " of those scammer people ?
It just does n't make sense .
- Why is Bender suddenly a murderous psychopath .
He throws his own son into burning lava ? !
Those who wrote that seem to forget that , yes , Bender is " evil " but you have to be able to think he is alright deep down .
You ca n't really think that when he burns his own son .
- Why are many of the animations made a lot more gory ?
There is no need for that .
There are parts here and there that are actually disgusting .
- Kiff gets KILLED !
I mean WHAT ?
OK , he gets revived but it still sucks .
The list goes on ( but not here ! ) .
In general , I do n't think the movies are hated as much as they deserve .
They suck , plain and simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why has no one mentioned that almost everything in the movies sucked?
If they continue down that line, the new episodes will, more or less, not be worth watching.
It's like the movies were not made by the same people who made the original!
(but they were, weren't they?
)

The jokes generally were not anywhere near as funny as those in the series.
But the worst part was that they actually just seemed not to care for the overall story, characters and feel from the series.
Some examples:
- Why SUDDENLY is the mighty race of Niblonians all captured by Mom?!
How does that fit with them, more or less, knowing everything and saving the universe in the series?
- Why are the Niblonians defeated by "the mighty brooms" of those scammer people?
It just doesn't make sense.
- Why is Bender suddenly a murderous psychopath.
He throws his own son into burning lava?!
Those who wrote that seem to forget that, yes, Bender is "evil" but you have to be able to think he is alright deep down.
You can't really think that when he burns his own son.
- Why are many of the animations made a lot more gory?
There is no need for that.
There are parts here and there that are actually disgusting.
- Kiff gets KILLED!
I mean WHAT?
OK, he gets revived but it still sucks.
The list goes on (but not here!).
In general, I don't think the movies are hated as much as they deserve.
They suck, plain and simple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534570</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>molecular</author>
	<datestamp>1269001980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.</p></div></blockquote><p>Doesn't look so shiny to me.</p></div><p>According to the mythbusters, one can actually polish shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.Does n't look so shiny to me.According to the mythbusters , one can actually polish shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox can bite my shiny metal ass.Doesn't look so shiny to me.According to the mythbusters, one can actually polish shit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531004</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1268917440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully most of the problems were related to the weird format (where they wanted to be able to air it in 1/2 hour time slots, but also sell the movies as standalone DVDs).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully most of the problems were related to the weird format ( where they wanted to be able to air it in 1/2 hour time slots , but also sell the movies as standalone DVDs ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully most of the problems were related to the weird format (where they wanted to be able to air it in 1/2 hour time slots, but also sell the movies as standalone DVDs).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533070</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268935200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In what world do you live where rich asian chicks aren't hot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In what world do you live where rich asian chicks are n't hot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what world do you live where rich asian chicks aren't hot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31535568</id>
	<title>Magnum PI was great television,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269008520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Magnum e was much better.  But we all know that Magnum <i>i</i> was the best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Magnum e was much better .
But we all know that Magnum i was the best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Magnum e was much better.
But we all know that Magnum i was the best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532438</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>blueg3</author>
	<datestamp>1268928960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hooray! Now Zoidberg is the popular one!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hooray !
Now Zoidberg is the popular one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hooray!
Now Zoidberg is the popular one!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533150</id>
	<title>NOT FUNNY!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268935980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be the only nerd in the world who realises it, but FUTURAMA IS NOT FUNNY!!!</p><p>It's painful to watch. It reminds me of the unfunny HD Simpsons. It's such a try-hard show. Everything is overexplained and predictable. The characters are boring and empathisable.</p><p>I hate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be the only nerd in the world who realises it , but FUTURAMA IS NOT FUNNY ! !
! It 's painful to watch .
It reminds me of the unfunny HD Simpsons .
It 's such a try-hard show .
Everything is overexplained and predictable .
The characters are boring and empathisable.I hate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be the only nerd in the world who realises it, but FUTURAMA IS NOT FUNNY!!
!It's painful to watch.
It reminds me of the unfunny HD Simpsons.
It's such a try-hard show.
Everything is overexplained and predictable.
The characters are boring and empathisable.I hate it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</id>
	<title>hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268915880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of my favorite shows of all time, though most of the recent movies were kind of disappointing.  The first one was good though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my favorite shows of all time , though most of the recent movies were kind of disappointing .
The first one was good though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my favorite shows of all time, though most of the recent movies were kind of disappointing.
The first one was good though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533318</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>z0idberg</author>
	<datestamp>1268938260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, there were some contract disputes.<br>What can I say?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , there were some contract disputes.What can I say ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, there were some contract disputes.What can I say?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531954</id>
	<title>Re:Good News!</title>
	<author>skine</author>
	<datestamp>1268924700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>he says everybody not everyone.</p></div><p>I think you're thinking of Dr. Nick Riviera.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>he says everybody not everyone.I think you 're thinking of Dr. Nick Riviera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he says everybody not everyone.I think you're thinking of Dr. Nick Riviera.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532938</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1268933940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny, I was more disappointed with the first than any of the others.</p><p>Think back to how you felt when you first saw it. Sure, in retrospect, it had a hugely solid and downright impressive sci-fi plot, but it also got weighed down by all the fan service (which I kind of liked, but ultimately didn't). Ironically, I think the best parts of it were the musical numbers, which everyone crapped on at the time.</p><p>Beast With a Billion Backs was great because of how bizarre it was, and how uncomfortable it made people (which is also the main reason so many dislike it). With Bender's Game, Futurama finally returned comfortably to form, but it was strictly Fantasy, not Sci-Fi, so I understand if it upset some fans. Into the Wild Green Yonder was Futurama in top form, with a solidly Sci-Fi (by Star Trek standards, at least) plot.</p><p>Anyway, they all did have a problem. That problem is that they were feature-length films, which Futurama had never been before, which had to be designed to be chopped up into four episode-length bites each. The effect was rather jarring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , I was more disappointed with the first than any of the others.Think back to how you felt when you first saw it .
Sure , in retrospect , it had a hugely solid and downright impressive sci-fi plot , but it also got weighed down by all the fan service ( which I kind of liked , but ultimately did n't ) .
Ironically , I think the best parts of it were the musical numbers , which everyone crapped on at the time.Beast With a Billion Backs was great because of how bizarre it was , and how uncomfortable it made people ( which is also the main reason so many dislike it ) .
With Bender 's Game , Futurama finally returned comfortably to form , but it was strictly Fantasy , not Sci-Fi , so I understand if it upset some fans .
Into the Wild Green Yonder was Futurama in top form , with a solidly Sci-Fi ( by Star Trek standards , at least ) plot.Anyway , they all did have a problem .
That problem is that they were feature-length films , which Futurama had never been before , which had to be designed to be chopped up into four episode-length bites each .
The effect was rather jarring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, I was more disappointed with the first than any of the others.Think back to how you felt when you first saw it.
Sure, in retrospect, it had a hugely solid and downright impressive sci-fi plot, but it also got weighed down by all the fan service (which I kind of liked, but ultimately didn't).
Ironically, I think the best parts of it were the musical numbers, which everyone crapped on at the time.Beast With a Billion Backs was great because of how bizarre it was, and how uncomfortable it made people (which is also the main reason so many dislike it).
With Bender's Game, Futurama finally returned comfortably to form, but it was strictly Fantasy, not Sci-Fi, so I understand if it upset some fans.
Into the Wild Green Yonder was Futurama in top form, with a solidly Sci-Fi (by Star Trek standards, at least) plot.Anyway, they all did have a problem.
That problem is that they were feature-length films, which Futurama had never been before, which had to be designed to be chopped up into four episode-length bites each.
The effect was rather jarring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531908</id>
	<title>Re:Good News!</title>
	<author>Camann</author>
	<datestamp>1268924160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D1cap6yETA" title="youtube.com">What?</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533710</id>
	<title>Firefly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269031680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish firefly would rebirth and return.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish firefly would rebirth and return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish firefly would rebirth and return.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532488</id>
	<title>Re:High def!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268929260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least you took the time to write out your indecision in full.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you took the time to write out your indecision in full .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you took the time to write out your indecision in full.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1268924460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>Futurama's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle...<br>A time when no man would envy another, and there would be sexbots for all. It was a simpler time. Futurama is dead to me now.<br></i><br>Classic!  Strangely enough, your post fell through a wormhole in the space-time continuum, and onto a much earlier Slashdot thread in 1999.  It sparked a discussion about how the REAL golden age was actually in the waning says of the 1980s when the world was still scared of the Russians, people still thought Magnum PI was great television, and Ollie North was givin 'em hell, and 2400 baud modems were state of the art.  (Simpler times as you say)</p><p>If I find a post from 2020 that falls through the space-time continuum I'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Futurama 's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90 's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle...A time when no man would envy another , and there would be sexbots for all .
It was a simpler time .
Futurama is dead to me now.Classic !
Strangely enough , your post fell through a wormhole in the space-time continuum , and onto a much earlier Slashdot thread in 1999 .
It sparked a discussion about how the REAL golden age was actually in the waning says of the 1980s when the world was still scared of the Russians , people still thought Magnum PI was great television , and Ollie North was givin 'em hell , and 2400 baud modems were state of the art .
( Simpler times as you say ) If I find a post from 2020 that falls through the space-time continuum I 'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Futurama's humor was meant for the waning years of the 90's when the world was scared of Y2K and still revered Star Trek and Twilight zone as pinnacle...A time when no man would envy another, and there would be sexbots for all.
It was a simpler time.
Futurama is dead to me now.Classic!
Strangely enough, your post fell through a wormhole in the space-time continuum, and onto a much earlier Slashdot thread in 1999.
It sparked a discussion about how the REAL golden age was actually in the waning says of the 1980s when the world was still scared of the Russians, people still thought Magnum PI was great television, and Ollie North was givin 'em hell, and 2400 baud modems were state of the art.
(Simpler times as you say)If I find a post from 2020 that falls through the space-time continuum I'll let you know what the great things that exist today people are nostalgic for then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</id>
	<title>Re:hmm</title>
	<author>antifoidulus</author>
	<datestamp>1268918160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the movies suffered from the same basic flaw, not nearly enough Zoidberg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the movies suffered from the same basic flaw , not nearly enough Zoidberg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the movies suffered from the same basic flaw, not nearly enough Zoidberg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531476</id>
	<title>All glory to the Hypnotoad</title>
	<author>grapeape</author>
	<datestamp>1268920620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama...Must watch return of Futurama...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531792</id>
	<title>Rebirth? Hopefully this does not mean reboot.</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1268923200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only franchise "Reboot" I've liked is Reboot iself.</p><p>Futurama is perfection as designed; a good mix of classic cel and modern CGI animation, the perfect mix of fart jokes, puns, and science and math humor, as well as subtle story arcs (well, mainly the on-again off-again almost-romance between Fry and Leela, Fry's being the most important "person" in the Universe, and Nibbler's continual influence on keeping society going) that don't cause you to lose interest if you miss a few episodes, but add lot to the show.</p><p>I hope the "rebirth" doesn't mean a Tim Burton or Lucas-style franchise reboot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only franchise " Reboot " I 've liked is Reboot iself.Futurama is perfection as designed ; a good mix of classic cel and modern CGI animation , the perfect mix of fart jokes , puns , and science and math humor , as well as subtle story arcs ( well , mainly the on-again off-again almost-romance between Fry and Leela , Fry 's being the most important " person " in the Universe , and Nibbler 's continual influence on keeping society going ) that do n't cause you to lose interest if you miss a few episodes , but add lot to the show.I hope the " rebirth " does n't mean a Tim Burton or Lucas-style franchise reboot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only franchise "Reboot" I've liked is Reboot iself.Futurama is perfection as designed; a good mix of classic cel and modern CGI animation, the perfect mix of fart jokes, puns, and science and math humor, as well as subtle story arcs (well, mainly the on-again off-again almost-romance between Fry and Leela, Fry's being the most important "person" in the Universe, and Nibbler's continual influence on keeping society going) that don't cause you to lose interest if you miss a few episodes, but add lot to the show.I hope the "rebirth" doesn't mean a Tim Burton or Lucas-style franchise reboot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533168</id>
	<title>Re:Hey Everybody!</title>
	<author>seandiggity</author>
	<datestamp>1268936340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hey folks, can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories?  When I click on the link "<i>Futurama</i> will be returning this year", I want to read the actual press release, or article, or whatever.  I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.</p></div><p>I actually read your post, then scrolled back up and clicked the link you were complaining about, as if I hadn't read your warning.  Now I feel like today's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. dupe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey folks , can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories ?
When I click on the link " Futurama will be returning this year " , I want to read the actual press release , or article , or whatever .
I do n't want to read last year 's Slashdot dupe.I actually read your post , then scrolled back up and clicked the link you were complaining about , as if I had n't read your warning .
Now I feel like today 's / .
dupe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey folks, can we please stop linking to previous Slashdot stories?
When I click on the link "Futurama will be returning this year", I want to read the actual press release, or article, or whatever.
I don't want to read last year's Slashdot dupe.I actually read your post, then scrolled back up and clicked the link you were complaining about, as if I hadn't read your warning.
Now I feel like today's /.
dupe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532604</id>
	<title>You still have Zoidberg</title>
	<author>gijoel</author>
	<datestamp>1268930340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You <b>all</b> still have Zoidberg!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You all still have Zoidberg !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You all still have Zoidberg!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31535270</id>
	<title>Time being off.</title>
	<author>486Hawk</author>
	<datestamp>1269007560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can Comedy Central reset their clock. I hate it when the dvr records a show of them only to have the last 2 minutes cut off. Let them standardize it with everyone else.<br>Put Futurama back on Adult Swim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can Comedy Central reset their clock .
I hate it when the dvr records a show of them only to have the last 2 minutes cut off .
Let them standardize it with everyone else.Put Futurama back on Adult Swim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can Comedy Central reset their clock.
I hate it when the dvr records a show of them only to have the last 2 minutes cut off.
Let them standardize it with everyone else.Put Futurama back on Adult Swim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31541082</id>
	<title>Re:Good News!</title>
	<author>spartacus\_prime</author>
	<datestamp>1269024780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've invented a device which makes you read this in your head , in my voice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532224</id>
	<title>Re:High def!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268927280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] I just don't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings.</p></div><p>I'd say you can tell that to the anime junkies, but you've most likely already been torn to shreds and violated by a rabid bunch of otaku five minutes after you made that post for ever saying such blasphemous things against their religion, so my words would fall on deaf ears.  Er, dead ears.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] I just do n't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings.I 'd say you can tell that to the anime junkies , but you 've most likely already been torn to shreds and violated by a rabid bunch of otaku five minutes after you made that post for ever saying such blasphemous things against their religion , so my words would fall on deaf ears .
Er , dead ears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] I just don't think high def is that big of a deal for an animated series made up mostly of classic 2D line drawings.I'd say you can tell that to the anime junkies, but you've most likely already been torn to shreds and violated by a rabid bunch of otaku five minutes after you made that post for ever saying such blasphemous things against their religion, so my words would fall on deaf ears.
Er, dead ears.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510</id>
	<title>Re:In this being</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1268929560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible...</p></div><p>Yes, in those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were REAL men, women were REAL women, and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space , and maybe , just maybe it was possible...Yes , in those days spirits were brave , the stakes were high , men were REAL men , women were REAL women , and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a time when a young man could still dream of being a delivery boy in space, and maybe, just maybe it was possible...Yes, in those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were REAL men, women were REAL women, and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were REAL small furry creatures from Aplha Centauri.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531484</id>
	<title>Flame jacket on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brain slugs would totally kick the asses of hypnotoads, hands down.</p><p>a. Brain Slugs have their own political party; the Brain Slug Party. Where is the political arm of the Hypnotoads? They are soft on politics!</p><p>b. They are quiet. Have you ever had a hypnotoad try to sneak up on you? All you hear is BZZWAAAAAZAAAAAAWAAAAWAAAA. You never see the brain slug coming, until it's too late.</p><p>c. They're so damn cute.</p><p>Accepting your (futile) arguments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain slugs would totally kick the asses of hypnotoads , hands down.a .
Brain Slugs have their own political party ; the Brain Slug Party .
Where is the political arm of the Hypnotoads ?
They are soft on politics ! b .
They are quiet .
Have you ever had a hypnotoad try to sneak up on you ?
All you hear is BZZWAAAAAZAAAAAAWAAAAWAAAA .
You never see the brain slug coming , until it 's too late.c .
They 're so damn cute.Accepting your ( futile ) arguments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain slugs would totally kick the asses of hypnotoads, hands down.a.
Brain Slugs have their own political party; the Brain Slug Party.
Where is the political arm of the Hypnotoads?
They are soft on politics!b.
They are quiet.
Have you ever had a hypnotoad try to sneak up on you?
All you hear is BZZWAAAAAZAAAAAAWAAAAWAAAA.
You never see the brain slug coming, until it's too late.c.
They're so damn cute.Accepting your (futile) arguments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530874</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31548372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31543826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31541082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31535568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31540724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31537636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31539728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_231242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31540724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31541082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31538148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31543826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531930
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31535568
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531480
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532510
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533712
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31548372
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31539728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31537636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31534800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31533090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31530874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31532374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_231242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_231242.31531152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
