<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_17_198250</id>
	<title>Japanese Researchers Develop World's Fastest Book Scanner</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268855340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"IEEE Spectrum reports that Tokyo University researchers have developed a <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/robotics-software/book-flipping-scanning">superfast book scanner that uses lasers and a high-speed camera</a> to achieve a capture rate of 200 pages per minute. You just quickly flip the book pages in front of the system and it digitizes the pages, building a 3D model of each and reconstructing it as a normal flat page. The prototype is large and bulky, but if this thing could be made smaller, one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone."</i> The article mentions <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/05/15/1834246/How-Googles-High-Speed-Book-Scanner-De-Warps-Pages">Google's similar dewarping system</a>; the difference here is speed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " IEEE Spectrum reports that Tokyo University researchers have developed a superfast book scanner that uses lasers and a high-speed camera to achieve a capture rate of 200 pages per minute .
You just quickly flip the book pages in front of the system and it digitizes the pages , building a 3D model of each and reconstructing it as a normal flat page .
The prototype is large and bulky , but if this thing could be made smaller , one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone .
" The article mentions Google 's similar dewarping system ; the difference here is speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "IEEE Spectrum reports that Tokyo University researchers have developed a superfast book scanner that uses lasers and a high-speed camera to achieve a capture rate of 200 pages per minute.
You just quickly flip the book pages in front of the system and it digitizes the pages, building a 3D model of each and reconstructing it as a normal flat page.
The prototype is large and bulky, but if this thing could be made smaller, one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone.
" The article mentions Google's similar dewarping system; the difference here is speed.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514408</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>mini me</author>
	<datestamp>1268817240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not use a dual-sided scanner?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not use a dual-sided scanner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not use a dual-sided scanner?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519046</id>
	<title>Re:High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>oljanx</author>
	<datestamp>1268846040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad I wasn't the only dirty-minded person who read "a handy" and immediately thought of something very much unlike a cellphone.  Or was I?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad I was n't the only dirty-minded person who read " a handy " and immediately thought of something very much unlike a cellphone .
Or was I ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad I wasn't the only dirty-minded person who read "a handy" and immediately thought of something very much unlike a cellphone.
Or was I?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514762</id>
	<title>Re:High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1268818380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.</p></div></blockquote><p>I assume you could use a regular camera and just get more regular rates of speed, but without breaking the spine which is pretty much the point of the lasers.</p><p>Or for speed, take the binding/glue off, and use a Fujistu Scansnap.  50 pages per minute IIRC.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used , they are going to have to get a lot better.I assume you could use a regular camera and just get more regular rates of speed , but without breaking the spine which is pretty much the point of the lasers.Or for speed , take the binding/glue off , and use a Fujistu Scansnap .
50 pages per minute IIRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.I assume you could use a regular camera and just get more regular rates of speed, but without breaking the spine which is pretty much the point of the lasers.Or for speed, take the binding/glue off, and use a Fujistu Scansnap.
50 pages per minute IIRC.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515928</id>
	<title>Re:Why are we scanning books</title>
	<author>ajrs</author>
	<datestamp>1268823060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, there was nothing of interest that was ever published without a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION.</p><p>I don't see what the big fuss about Gutenberg is.  Even the ancient Babylonians were using lasers to print on their clay tablets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , there was nothing of interest that was ever published without a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION.I do n't see what the big fuss about Gutenberg is .
Even the ancient Babylonians were using lasers to print on their clay tablets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, there was nothing of interest that was ever published without a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION.I don't see what the big fuss about Gutenberg is.
Even the ancient Babylonians were using lasers to print on their clay tablets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519148</id>
	<title>Sometimes it doesn't have to be this difficult</title>
	<author>uniquegeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268847420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A few months ago I asked my city's transit if they would post pdfs of the schedules on the web page.  They print route schedules/maps and provide them in malls, campuses, and larger public places all over the city.  Online, they use Navigo trip planner, links to pdfs and gifs of route maps, and text links to the schedules.  So obviously they have some graphic designer in a hole somewhere making this stuff, and probably with InDesign.<br>Despite all the obvious cost in printed materials, and huge effort in the web site, apparently it's too much to ask to export &amp; post a simple pdf of the indesign they used for the printed schedules.  My options are to go through every route and print to pdf with their tables that print strangely, or scan the actual schedule (or carry them, but I really need to minimize the junk I carry with me).  The other option is to use a data plan on a cell phone.  However, this has not stopped them from offering a "hip" TXT service to relate to the youth of today.  All I want to do is slap a copy on my desktop and laptop, and one on my Archos for good measure too.</p><p>My friend who works at a University had the job of going through archives of "important material" and scanning it in.  This "important material" had virtually all come to the email of the computer technical support... as in, they received it digitally, printed it, possibly deleted the email, but now want to scan and possibly OCR it.</p><p>I'm breaking my back and backpack from trying to cram CCNA &amp; MCSE books with a binder and a laptop with me.  No, seriously, I had minor back problems, but now they are much worse.</p><p>I used to work at a print shop where the teacher's society wanted to see if we could scan in the annual reports of the last ten years.  They were printed in a green and purple tone with had pretty much the same colour value.  They wanted small files (i.e. greyscale).  They did not have copies of the indesign/coreldraw/whatever file.</p><p>I understand the posted article has some merit with old books, but there are so many times I see at attempt to fix a problem that has solution in the first place.  If something is created with a digital file, then use it, for crying out loud.  It doesn't have to be this difficult.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A few months ago I asked my city 's transit if they would post pdfs of the schedules on the web page .
They print route schedules/maps and provide them in malls , campuses , and larger public places all over the city .
Online , they use Navigo trip planner , links to pdfs and gifs of route maps , and text links to the schedules .
So obviously they have some graphic designer in a hole somewhere making this stuff , and probably with InDesign.Despite all the obvious cost in printed materials , and huge effort in the web site , apparently it 's too much to ask to export &amp; post a simple pdf of the indesign they used for the printed schedules .
My options are to go through every route and print to pdf with their tables that print strangely , or scan the actual schedule ( or carry them , but I really need to minimize the junk I carry with me ) .
The other option is to use a data plan on a cell phone .
However , this has not stopped them from offering a " hip " TXT service to relate to the youth of today .
All I want to do is slap a copy on my desktop and laptop , and one on my Archos for good measure too.My friend who works at a University had the job of going through archives of " important material " and scanning it in .
This " important material " had virtually all come to the email of the computer technical support... as in , they received it digitally , printed it , possibly deleted the email , but now want to scan and possibly OCR it.I 'm breaking my back and backpack from trying to cram CCNA &amp; MCSE books with a binder and a laptop with me .
No , seriously , I had minor back problems , but now they are much worse.I used to work at a print shop where the teacher 's society wanted to see if we could scan in the annual reports of the last ten years .
They were printed in a green and purple tone with had pretty much the same colour value .
They wanted small files ( i.e .
greyscale ) . They did not have copies of the indesign/coreldraw/whatever file.I understand the posted article has some merit with old books , but there are so many times I see at attempt to fix a problem that has solution in the first place .
If something is created with a digital file , then use it , for crying out loud .
It does n't have to be this difficult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few months ago I asked my city's transit if they would post pdfs of the schedules on the web page.
They print route schedules/maps and provide them in malls, campuses, and larger public places all over the city.
Online, they use Navigo trip planner, links to pdfs and gifs of route maps, and text links to the schedules.
So obviously they have some graphic designer in a hole somewhere making this stuff, and probably with InDesign.Despite all the obvious cost in printed materials, and huge effort in the web site, apparently it's too much to ask to export &amp; post a simple pdf of the indesign they used for the printed schedules.
My options are to go through every route and print to pdf with their tables that print strangely, or scan the actual schedule (or carry them, but I really need to minimize the junk I carry with me).
The other option is to use a data plan on a cell phone.
However, this has not stopped them from offering a "hip" TXT service to relate to the youth of today.
All I want to do is slap a copy on my desktop and laptop, and one on my Archos for good measure too.My friend who works at a University had the job of going through archives of "important material" and scanning it in.
This "important material" had virtually all come to the email of the computer technical support... as in, they received it digitally, printed it, possibly deleted the email, but now want to scan and possibly OCR it.I'm breaking my back and backpack from trying to cram CCNA &amp; MCSE books with a binder and a laptop with me.
No, seriously, I had minor back problems, but now they are much worse.I used to work at a print shop where the teacher's society wanted to see if we could scan in the annual reports of the last ten years.
They were printed in a green and purple tone with had pretty much the same colour value.
They wanted small files (i.e.
greyscale).  They did not have copies of the indesign/coreldraw/whatever file.I understand the posted article has some merit with old books, but there are so many times I see at attempt to fix a problem that has solution in the first place.
If something is created with a digital file, then use it, for crying out loud.
It doesn't have to be this difficult.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514154</id>
	<title>Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268859420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When they get this going on an iPhone or whatever, you'll just wander into Chapters, flip through a book and read it at your leisure later. They'll never sell any more books until they ban "flipping".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When they get this going on an iPhone or whatever , you 'll just wander into Chapters , flip through a book and read it at your leisure later .
They 'll never sell any more books until they ban " flipping " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they get this going on an iPhone or whatever, you'll just wander into Chapters, flip through a book and read it at your leisure later.
They'll never sell any more books until they ban "flipping".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190</id>
	<title>High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>bhima</author>
	<datestamp>1268859540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used , they are going to have to get a lot better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514368</id>
	<title>Smartphone Book Scanner?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268817060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never going to happen unless you're scanning some tiny matchbook sized books.  Half the problem is turning the pages quickly and reliably.  Any handheld will be limited by your own mortal finger speed.  Besides, once one person scans a book and makes it freely available, it will be easier for you to get their copy instead of scanning your own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never going to happen unless you 're scanning some tiny matchbook sized books .
Half the problem is turning the pages quickly and reliably .
Any handheld will be limited by your own mortal finger speed .
Besides , once one person scans a book and makes it freely available , it will be easier for you to get their copy instead of scanning your own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never going to happen unless you're scanning some tiny matchbook sized books.
Half the problem is turning the pages quickly and reliably.
Any handheld will be limited by your own mortal finger speed.
Besides, once one person scans a book and makes it freely available, it will be easier for you to get their copy instead of scanning your own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168</id>
	<title>Prior Art.</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1268859480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Johnny 5: Alive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Johnny 5 : Alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Johnny 5: Alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515268</id>
	<title>Re:Bender did it first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268820240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd have to be pretty good at flipping pages. Some of them always stick together, and I'd hate to be in a space ship where the Captain is a robot who "read" the manual but skipped the page about turning on the life support systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd have to be pretty good at flipping pages .
Some of them always stick together , and I 'd hate to be in a space ship where the Captain is a robot who " read " the manual but skipped the page about turning on the life support systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd have to be pretty good at flipping pages.
Some of them always stick together, and I'd hate to be in a space ship where the Captain is a robot who "read" the manual but skipped the page about turning on the life support systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31524226</id>
	<title>Re:This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>kirill.s</author>
	<datestamp>1268933880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they mount that hand on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BigDog" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">BigDog</a> [wikipedia.org], we'd all have a pretty cool robotic overlord to welcome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they mount that hand on BigDog [ wikipedia.org ] , we 'd all have a pretty cool robotic overlord to welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they mount that hand on BigDog [wikipedia.org], we'd all have a pretty cool robotic overlord to welcome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515420</id>
	<title>Data did it earlier</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268820720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Star Trek TNG episode "The Royale" Data reads the paperback novel "Hotel Royale" in seconds by flipping through it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Star Trek TNG episode " The Royale " Data reads the paperback novel " Hotel Royale " in seconds by flipping through it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Star Trek TNG episode "The Royale" Data reads the paperback novel "Hotel Royale" in seconds by flipping through it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514498</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>necro81</author>
	<datestamp>1268817480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cutting the spine off a book you already own may or may not be sacrilege.  But doing that to your friend's book might strain your relationship.<br> <br>

The employees at Borders were not amused when I wheeled my band saw in.  They demanded that I pay for the book I'd just sawed up and scanned.  I told them "I'm certainly not paying money for that book <i>now</i>, look how ruined it is!  Besides, I already have a copy," as I waved my thumb drive in their face.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cutting the spine off a book you already own may or may not be sacrilege .
But doing that to your friend 's book might strain your relationship .
The employees at Borders were not amused when I wheeled my band saw in .
They demanded that I pay for the book I 'd just sawed up and scanned .
I told them " I 'm certainly not paying money for that book now , look how ruined it is !
Besides , I already have a copy , " as I waved my thumb drive in their face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cutting the spine off a book you already own may or may not be sacrilege.
But doing that to your friend's book might strain your relationship.
The employees at Borders were not amused when I wheeled my band saw in.
They demanded that I pay for the book I'd just sawed up and scanned.
I told them "I'm certainly not paying money for that book now, look how ruined it is!
Besides, I already have a copy," as I waved my thumb drive in their face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514406</id>
	<title>A de-warping system?</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1268817240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. Sulu would not be pleased...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Sulu would not be pleased.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Sulu would not be pleased...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514474</id>
	<title>And Scotty</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1268817420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is soooooo relieved...his warp engines really need a rest from Captain kirk's demands in galactic emergencies...</htmltext>
<tokenext>is soooooo relieved...his warp engines really need a rest from Captain kirk 's demands in galactic emergencies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is soooooo relieved...his warp engines really need a rest from Captain kirk's demands in galactic emergencies...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517930</id>
	<title>Re:This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268836200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty damn arrogant, that robotic hand.  Look, it's dribbling a ball *and* <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KxjVlaLBmk#t=1m4s" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">giving us the finger</a> [youtube.com] at the same time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty damn arrogant , that robotic hand .
Look , it 's dribbling a ball * and * giving us the finger [ youtube.com ] at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty damn arrogant, that robotic hand.
Look, it's dribbling a ball *and* giving us the finger [youtube.com] at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31521114</id>
	<title>Re:High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>moonbender</author>
	<datestamp>1268918100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a  particularly convenient false friend because the "alternatives" are regionalisms (ie either AE or BE) and much longer because <i>phone</i> is tacked onto them or, in their short forms, colloquial and have even stronger associations with one region. Of course, these days you can often get away with simply using <i>phone</i> by itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a particularly convenient false friend because the " alternatives " are regionalisms ( ie either AE or BE ) and much longer because phone is tacked onto them or , in their short forms , colloquial and have even stronger associations with one region .
Of course , these days you can often get away with simply using phone by itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a  particularly convenient false friend because the "alternatives" are regionalisms (ie either AE or BE) and much longer because phone is tacked onto them or, in their short forms, colloquial and have even stronger associations with one region.
Of course, these days you can often get away with simply using phone by itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519758</id>
	<title>Re:Why are we scanning books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268943180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because believe it or not there is content produced before 1990 that still has utility; particularly once reproduction, shipping, and storage costs are diminished to almost nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because believe it or not there is content produced before 1990 that still has utility ; particularly once reproduction , shipping , and storage costs are diminished to almost nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because believe it or not there is content produced before 1990 that still has utility; particularly once reproduction, shipping, and storage costs are diminished to almost nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515592</id>
	<title>Publishing industry will follow the music industry</title>
	<author>hawguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268821500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technology like this will cause the publishing industry to go the way of the music and movie industries.
</p><p>
Right now the publishing industry is where the  music industry was 7 years ago. Multiple incompatible book formats, DRM that lets rights holders yank your paid content away from you, DRM/formats that leave you tied to specific vendor readers, etc.
</p><p>
The barrier of scanning a book has made the publishing industry think that they don't need to provide books in a format that users want and feel that they can keep books locked down by DRM.
</p><p>
Even if DRM succeeds in keeping e-books from being redistributed, scanning technology keeps moving forward. All it's going to take is some enterprising company to buy one of these scanners and become the "AllofMP3" of the book world -- selling e-books in open, non-DRM formats for $1/each and the publisher's business model will fail miserably and they'll try doing the same catch-up that the music industry is involved in in trying to give users a reasonably priced legal product that can compete with the cheap illegal copies.
</p><p>
it won't even take new scanning technology for this to happen -- a scanning "peer-to-peer" service can be formed where thousands of subscribers are asked to scan and proofread  a single page from new releases, which are them compiled into a central database to form a complete scanned book archive.
</p><p>
Whether they like it or not, the book industry is going to be forced into open, interoperable standards for books, and lower prices that consumers have come to expect from industries where nearly all of the manufacturing and distribution costs have been eliminated by electronic distribution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technology like this will cause the publishing industry to go the way of the music and movie industries .
Right now the publishing industry is where the music industry was 7 years ago .
Multiple incompatible book formats , DRM that lets rights holders yank your paid content away from you , DRM/formats that leave you tied to specific vendor readers , etc .
The barrier of scanning a book has made the publishing industry think that they do n't need to provide books in a format that users want and feel that they can keep books locked down by DRM .
Even if DRM succeeds in keeping e-books from being redistributed , scanning technology keeps moving forward .
All it 's going to take is some enterprising company to buy one of these scanners and become the " AllofMP3 " of the book world -- selling e-books in open , non-DRM formats for $ 1/each and the publisher 's business model will fail miserably and they 'll try doing the same catch-up that the music industry is involved in in trying to give users a reasonably priced legal product that can compete with the cheap illegal copies .
it wo n't even take new scanning technology for this to happen -- a scanning " peer-to-peer " service can be formed where thousands of subscribers are asked to scan and proofread a single page from new releases , which are them compiled into a central database to form a complete scanned book archive .
Whether they like it or not , the book industry is going to be forced into open , interoperable standards for books , and lower prices that consumers have come to expect from industries where nearly all of the manufacturing and distribution costs have been eliminated by electronic distribution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technology like this will cause the publishing industry to go the way of the music and movie industries.
Right now the publishing industry is where the  music industry was 7 years ago.
Multiple incompatible book formats, DRM that lets rights holders yank your paid content away from you, DRM/formats that leave you tied to specific vendor readers, etc.
The barrier of scanning a book has made the publishing industry think that they don't need to provide books in a format that users want and feel that they can keep books locked down by DRM.
Even if DRM succeeds in keeping e-books from being redistributed, scanning technology keeps moving forward.
All it's going to take is some enterprising company to buy one of these scanners and become the "AllofMP3" of the book world -- selling e-books in open, non-DRM formats for $1/each and the publisher's business model will fail miserably and they'll try doing the same catch-up that the music industry is involved in in trying to give users a reasonably priced legal product that can compete with the cheap illegal copies.
it won't even take new scanning technology for this to happen -- a scanning "peer-to-peer" service can be formed where thousands of subscribers are asked to scan and proofread  a single page from new releases, which are them compiled into a central database to form a complete scanned book archive.
Whether they like it or not, the book industry is going to be forced into open, interoperable standards for books, and lower prices that consumers have come to expect from industries where nearly all of the manufacturing and distribution costs have been eliminated by electronic distribution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515266</id>
	<title>Re:Prior Art.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268820180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Need input! Input, input, input!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Need input !
Input , input , input !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Need input!
Input, input, input!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516122</id>
	<title>This begs a deeper question</title>
	<author>zappepcs</author>
	<datestamp>1268823840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When established industries become prey for new technology, why do they resist and ask for protection? This is a fundamental question of society. We protect indigenous peoples. We have copyright and patents. We do much to preserve the old along with the new - backwards compatibility. Why do we not simply tell such industries that it's time to change and support them through the change? Yes, I get the whole free market thing, but rather than fight them to force them to accept change, why don't we offer them ideas and methods to change their business model to match the change in consumer requirements?</p><p>No, I'm not being trollish or suggesting stupidity. Why can't we crowd-source ideas for how these industries can recover from game changing technology? Must we wait for Jobs to tell us?</p><p>It's just a question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When established industries become prey for new technology , why do they resist and ask for protection ?
This is a fundamental question of society .
We protect indigenous peoples .
We have copyright and patents .
We do much to preserve the old along with the new - backwards compatibility .
Why do we not simply tell such industries that it 's time to change and support them through the change ?
Yes , I get the whole free market thing , but rather than fight them to force them to accept change , why do n't we offer them ideas and methods to change their business model to match the change in consumer requirements ? No , I 'm not being trollish or suggesting stupidity .
Why ca n't we crowd-source ideas for how these industries can recover from game changing technology ?
Must we wait for Jobs to tell us ? It 's just a question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When established industries become prey for new technology, why do they resist and ask for protection?
This is a fundamental question of society.
We protect indigenous peoples.
We have copyright and patents.
We do much to preserve the old along with the new - backwards compatibility.
Why do we not simply tell such industries that it's time to change and support them through the change?
Yes, I get the whole free market thing, but rather than fight them to force them to accept change, why don't we offer them ideas and methods to change their business model to match the change in consumer requirements?No, I'm not being trollish or suggesting stupidity.
Why can't we crowd-source ideas for how these industries can recover from game changing technology?
Must we wait for Jobs to tell us?It's just a question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514866</id>
	<title>Deja-vu</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1268818800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a similar post in <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/12/13/1747201/The-DIY-Book-Scanner?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">december last year</a> [slashdot.org]. Main difference seems to be speed. That did 400 pages in 20 minutes, this new one does 200 in 1 minute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a similar post in december last year [ slashdot.org ] .
Main difference seems to be speed .
That did 400 pages in 20 minutes , this new one does 200 in 1 minute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a similar post in december last year [slashdot.org].
Main difference seems to be speed.
That did 400 pages in 20 minutes, this new one does 200 in 1 minute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31518026</id>
	<title>Smart Phone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268837040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah, we can use a smart phone... all it needs is... LASERS and... a high speed high res camera...  I'm sure that 3MP camera with no flash you have on your phone will work out just fine... you just need to duct tape a laser pointer on there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , we can use a smart phone... all it needs is... LASERS and... a high speed high res camera... I 'm sure that 3MP camera with no flash you have on your phone will work out just fine... you just need to duct tape a laser pointer on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, we can use a smart phone... all it needs is... LASERS and... a high speed high res camera...  I'm sure that 3MP camera with no flash you have on your phone will work out just fine... you just need to duct tape a laser pointer on there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514400</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1268817180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade (finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade)</p></div><p>Note to self<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. remember not to use Vim's method on priceless, one off books that are irreplaceable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade ( finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade ) Note to self .. remember not to use Vim 's method on priceless , one off books that are irreplaceable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade (finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade)Note to self .. remember not to use Vim's method on priceless, one off books that are irreplaceable.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340</id>
	<title>Re:High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268820480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By the way: &ldquo;handy&rdquo; is not used as a term for a mobile phone aka cell phone in the English language.<br>I know it&rsquo;s used in Germany, and people from there are prone to mess it up, because it&rsquo;s a foreign English word in the German language.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By the way :    handy    is not used as a term for a mobile phone aka cell phone in the English language.I know it    s used in Germany , and people from there are prone to mess it up , because it    s a foreign English word in the German language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the way: “handy” is not used as a term for a mobile phone aka cell phone in the English language.I know it’s used in Germany, and people from there are prone to mess it up, because it’s a foreign English word in the German language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</id>
	<title>Why are we scanning books</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1268821740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why the fuck are we scanning books? Isn't there, you know, a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION which is used during typesetting? This reminds me of that crazy story of the person who printed out a spreadsheet, scanned it in, printed out the scan, laid it on a wooden table, took a digital picture of it, then uploaded it to his web site (or something like that).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the fuck are we scanning books ?
Is n't there , you know , a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION which is used during typesetting ?
This reminds me of that crazy story of the person who printed out a spreadsheet , scanned it in , printed out the scan , laid it on a wooden table , took a digital picture of it , then uploaded it to his web site ( or something like that ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the fuck are we scanning books?
Isn't there, you know, a DIGITAL REPRESENTATION which is used during typesetting?
This reminds me of that crazy story of the person who printed out a spreadsheet, scanned it in, printed out the scan, laid it on a wooden table, took a digital picture of it, then uploaded it to his web site (or something like that).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514624</id>
	<title>Re:This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268817840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>High-speed robot hand... from Japan.</p><p>No comment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>High-speed robot hand... from Japan.No comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>High-speed robot hand... from Japan.No comment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514418</id>
	<title>What It Will Be Used For</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1268817240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Watanabe told me he was particularly interested in scanning manga comics"  Why does cool Japanese tech always end up back at tentacle rape?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Watanabe told me he was particularly interested in scanning manga comics " Why does cool Japanese tech always end up back at tentacle rape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Watanabe told me he was particularly interested in scanning manga comics"  Why does cool Japanese tech always end up back at tentacle rape?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514076</id>
	<title>why make it smaller?</title>
	<author>Michael Kristopeit</author>
	<datestamp>1268859120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>we just need a few at libraries to digitize everything for everyone... no need to make it any smaller.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we just need a few at libraries to digitize everything for everyone... no need to make it any smaller .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we just need a few at libraries to digitize everything for everyone... no need to make it any smaller.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</id>
	<title>Faster method</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1268816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Faster method:</p><p>Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade (finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade)</p><p>Run thru sheet feeder scanner twice, once for each side.</p><p>A bit of scripting hackery later, one fresh PDF!  Or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.djvu, or whatever.</p><p>For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book, realize that many books were printed on acid paper; yellowing, decaying, brittle, and will soon be dust regardless of what you do, so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.</p><p>The bandsaw trick also works on magazines, you know, the things we used to read before websites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Faster method : Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade ( finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade ) Run thru sheet feeder scanner twice , once for each side.A bit of scripting hackery later , one fresh PDF !
Or .djvu , or whatever.For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book , realize that many books were printed on acid paper ; yellowing , decaying , brittle , and will soon be dust regardless of what you do , so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.The bandsaw trick also works on magazines , you know , the things we used to read before websites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Faster method:Cut the spine of the book off with a bandsaw with a metal cutting blade (finer pitch teeth than typical wood blade)Run thru sheet feeder scanner twice, once for each side.A bit of scripting hackery later, one fresh PDF!
Or .djvu, or whatever.For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book, realize that many books were printed on acid paper; yellowing, decaying, brittle, and will soon be dust regardless of what you do, so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.The bandsaw trick also works on magazines, you know, the things we used to read before websites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516032</id>
	<title>Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene?  Check!</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1268823420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fastest <b>non-destructive</b> book scanner.</p><p>The fastest are ones where you chop off the binding, run the pages through an industrial scanning machine, and dump the blob off into modern character recognition software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fastest non-destructive book scanner.The fastest are ones where you chop off the binding , run the pages through an industrial scanning machine , and dump the blob off into modern character recognition software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fastest non-destructive book scanner.The fastest are ones where you chop off the binding, run the pages through an industrial scanning machine, and dump the blob off into modern character recognition software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515578</id>
	<title>I'm not impressed</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1268821440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, it can scan 200 pages per minute... but I could swear I saw it's lips moving as it was reading!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , it can scan 200 pages per minute... but I could swear I saw it 's lips moving as it was reading !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, it can scan 200 pages per minute... but I could swear I saw it's lips moving as it was reading!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519144</id>
	<title>pdftk</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1268847420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your script might be very simple if you use pdftk. It's a very powerful pdf merging and exploding program.</htmltext>
<tokenext>your script might be very simple if you use pdftk .
It 's a very powerful pdf merging and exploding program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your script might be very simple if you use pdftk.
It's a very powerful pdf merging and exploding program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514748</id>
	<title>Bad summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268818380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The prototype is large and bulky, but if this thing could be made smaller, one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone.</p></div><p>You lost me here. How exactly do I scan an <i>entire book or magazine</i> in <i>seconds</i> using <i>only a smartphone</i>. Somehow I imagine this technology is slightly more than software, unless cameras start coming with super-fast automated page turners attached.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The prototype is large and bulky , but if this thing could be made smaller , one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone.You lost me here .
How exactly do I scan an entire book or magazine in seconds using only a smartphone .
Somehow I imagine this technology is slightly more than software , unless cameras start coming with super-fast automated page turners attached .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The prototype is large and bulky, but if this thing could be made smaller, one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone.You lost me here.
How exactly do I scan an entire book or magazine in seconds using only a smartphone.
Somehow I imagine this technology is slightly more than software, unless cameras start coming with super-fast automated page turners attached.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150</id>
	<title>Copyright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268859420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, my, isn't <em>this</em> going to be a huge copyright scandal in a few years?  I could walk into Borders, scan a few books onto my iPhone, and walk right out without paying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , my , is n't this going to be a huge copyright scandal in a few years ?
I could walk into Borders , scan a few books onto my iPhone , and walk right out without paying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, my, isn't this going to be a huge copyright scandal in a few years?
I could walk into Borders, scan a few books onto my iPhone, and walk right out without paying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31518552</id>
	<title>Simpler Solution</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1268841660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get a really powerful computer.  Write a program that simulates a billion monkeys typing on a billion typewriters<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

Moore's law says this will soon be the cheaper method</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a really powerful computer .
Write a program that simulates a billion monkeys typing on a billion typewriters .. . Moore 's law says this will soon be the cheaper method</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a really powerful computer.
Write a program that simulates a billion monkeys typing on a billion typewriters ...

Moore's law says this will soon be the cheaper method</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514080</id>
	<title>Yay for chinks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268859120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Always there to be smarter than the rest of the world (and to play Starcraft)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Always there to be smarter than the rest of the world ( and to play Starcraft )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Always there to be smarter than the rest of the world (and to play Starcraft)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515484</id>
	<title>Re:Bender did it first</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1268821020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh noez "prior art"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh noez " prior art "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh noez "prior art"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</id>
	<title>Bender did it first</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1268818740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was an episode of Futurama where Bender is captaining the ship, and Fry asks him if he's read the manual. Bender flips through the several-hundred-page book in about a half second and proclaims "Done", then proceeds to quote it.</p><p>It always seemed like a plausible thing to me. Isn't that what they're doing here?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an episode of Futurama where Bender is captaining the ship , and Fry asks him if he 's read the manual .
Bender flips through the several-hundred-page book in about a half second and proclaims " Done " , then proceeds to quote it.It always seemed like a plausible thing to me .
Is n't that what they 're doing here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was an episode of Futurama where Bender is captaining the ship, and Fry asks him if he's read the manual.
Bender flips through the several-hundred-page book in about a half second and proclaims "Done", then proceeds to quote it.It always seemed like a plausible thing to me.
Isn't that what they're doing here?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224</id>
	<title>Here we go...</title>
	<author>trurl7</author>
	<datestamp>1268816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Yes, but does it run Linux....<br>2) Imagine a beowulf cluster of these...<br>3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/furlough?<br>4) I can't read you insensitive clod.<br>5) In Soviet Russia, the book scans the book scanner...wait that's not quite right...ah, got it,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  the book scans you!<br>6.1) Scan books real fast<br>6.2) Tie into massive database that indexes every perceivable medium on the planet<br>6.3) Get sued by publishers.<br>6.4)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....<br>6.5) Profit!!<br>7) How fast can it build a 3d model of Natalie Portman with hot gritz?<br>8) The CIA will use this to scan every page of the manuscripts you've stored in your apartment and will come for your tin foil.<br>9) Netcraft confirms: reading is dying...<br>10) A book scanner is like a car that drives really fast over a highway full of book pages...</p><p>Someone needs to fix the above list for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Yes , but does it run Linux....2 ) Imagine a beowulf cluster of these...3 ) I ca n't understand 200 pages/minute , what 's that in LOC/furlough ? 4 ) I ca n't read you insensitive clod.5 ) In Soviet Russia , the book scans the book scanner...wait that 's not quite right...ah , got it , ... the book scans you ! 6.1 ) Scan books real fast6.2 ) Tie into massive database that indexes every perceivable medium on the planet6.3 ) Get sued by publishers.6.4 ) ....6.5 ) Profit !
! 7 ) How fast can it build a 3d model of Natalie Portman with hot gritz ? 8 ) The CIA will use this to scan every page of the manuscripts you 've stored in your apartment and will come for your tin foil.9 ) Netcraft confirms : reading is dying...10 ) A book scanner is like a car that drives really fast over a highway full of book pages...Someone needs to fix the above list for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Yes, but does it run Linux....2) Imagine a beowulf cluster of these...3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/furlough?4) I can't read you insensitive clod.5) In Soviet Russia, the book scans the book scanner...wait that's not quite right...ah, got it, ...  the book scans you!6.1) Scan books real fast6.2) Tie into massive database that indexes every perceivable medium on the planet6.3) Get sued by publishers.6.4) ....6.5) Profit!
!7) How fast can it build a 3d model of Natalie Portman with hot gritz?8) The CIA will use this to scan every page of the manuscripts you've stored in your apartment and will come for your tin foil.9) Netcraft confirms: reading is dying...10) A book scanner is like a car that drives really fast over a highway full of book pages...Someone needs to fix the above list for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515800</id>
	<title>Re:Copyright</title>
	<author>gwern</author>
	<datestamp>1268822460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't it outrageous? I mean, one could also buy a few books, scan them at leisure and return them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it outrageous ?
I mean , one could also buy a few books , scan them at leisure and return them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it outrageous?
I mean, one could also buy a few books, scan them at leisure and return them!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516690</id>
	<title>Re:Why are we scanning books</title>
	<author>Linuxmonger</author>
	<datestamp>1268826840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because typesetting hasn't been digital for very long in any real sense. I know companies that still maintain and use hot lead presses to do printing.<br>
I've worked in the printing industry for almost twenty years, seen the revolution, thought it would have been over by now but it isn't.<br> <br>--<br>Youngster!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because typesetting has n't been digital for very long in any real sense .
I know companies that still maintain and use hot lead presses to do printing .
I 've worked in the printing industry for almost twenty years , seen the revolution , thought it would have been over by now but it is n't .
--Youngster !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because typesetting hasn't been digital for very long in any real sense.
I know companies that still maintain and use hot lead presses to do printing.
I've worked in the printing industry for almost twenty years, seen the revolution, thought it would have been over by now but it isn't.
--Youngster!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515272</id>
	<title>And we'll all fly around on jetpacks ...</title>
	<author>frovingslosh</author>
	<datestamp>1268820240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b> <i>one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone</i> </b> </p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I guess this claim was made because we all know that soon smartphones will all have lasers and high speed cameras.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone ... I guess this claim was made because we all know that soon smartphones will all have lasers and high speed cameras .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  one day we could scan a book or magazine in seconds using a smartphone   ... I guess this claim was made because we all know that soon smartphones will all have lasers and high speed cameras.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31551012</id>
	<title>Re:Why are we scanning books</title>
	<author>Radio\_active\_cgb</author>
	<datestamp>1269114240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes, all you have access to is a printed document.</p><p>Sure, the source files would be nice, but the publishers are not likely to release them. More likely, they never existed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes , all you have access to is a printed document.Sure , the source files would be nice , but the publishers are not likely to release them .
More likely , they never existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes, all you have access to is a printed document.Sure, the source files would be nice, but the publishers are not likely to release them.
More likely, they never existed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515552</id>
	<title>Re:Bender did it first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268821260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do realize fictional cartoon characters don't really count as "prior art", don't you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize fictional cartoon characters do n't really count as " prior art " , do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize fictional cartoon characters don't really count as "prior art", don't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514528</id>
	<title>Re:Copyright</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268817600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know! Can you believe that even now you can go into Borders or Barnes and Nobel and -read- an entire book! And guess what? The employees there think its perfectly natural! There was a man there who said he had spent -3- hours just reading a book and drinking coffee! Talk about outrageous!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know !
Can you believe that even now you can go into Borders or Barnes and Nobel and -read- an entire book !
And guess what ?
The employees there think its perfectly natural !
There was a man there who said he had spent -3- hours just reading a book and drinking coffee !
Talk about outrageous !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know!
Can you believe that even now you can go into Borders or Barnes and Nobel and -read- an entire book!
And guess what?
The employees there think its perfectly natural!
There was a man there who said he had spent -3- hours just reading a book and drinking coffee!
Talk about outrageous!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519156</id>
	<title>Re:Bender did it first</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1268847480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Superman did it once too, in one of the movies or TV episodes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Superman did it once too , in one of the movies or TV episodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Superman did it once too, in one of the movies or TV episodes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516756</id>
	<title>Re:Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268827260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no, but it's so fast it goes mudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamuda *BOOM* ZA WARUDO!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no , but it 's so fast it goes mudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamuda * BOOM * ZA WARUDO !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, but it's so fast it goes mudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamudamuda *BOOM* ZA WARUDO!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31520574</id>
	<title>Re:Copyright</title>
	<author>knarf</author>
	<datestamp>1268912100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>scan a few books onto my <strong>i</strong>Phone</p></div></blockquote><p>
Strange the way people seem to make the same typo. The <strong>i</strong> is rather close to the <strong>p</strong> but not next to it, so why do so many people put a 'i' in front of the word 'phone'? The summary did not mention any specific phone, just that this technology might be shrunk to fit in a phone.
</p><p>Don't be an iTool or iDroid! Use normal words! A phone is a phone and does not need a vowel prepended to become viable. If this scanner technology ever comes to fruition the Apple-branded version of it would most likely be hobbled by some agreement with content publishers so it could not be used to <i>'walk into Borders, scan a few books'</i> as it would check some embedded watermark and refuse to scan more than 1 page.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>scan a few books onto my iPhone Strange the way people seem to make the same typo .
The i is rather close to the p but not next to it , so why do so many people put a 'i ' in front of the word 'phone ' ?
The summary did not mention any specific phone , just that this technology might be shrunk to fit in a phone .
Do n't be an iTool or iDroid !
Use normal words !
A phone is a phone and does not need a vowel prepended to become viable .
If this scanner technology ever comes to fruition the Apple-branded version of it would most likely be hobbled by some agreement with content publishers so it could not be used to 'walk into Borders , scan a few books ' as it would check some embedded watermark and refuse to scan more than 1 page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>scan a few books onto my iPhone
Strange the way people seem to make the same typo.
The i is rather close to the p but not next to it, so why do so many people put a 'i' in front of the word 'phone'?
The summary did not mention any specific phone, just that this technology might be shrunk to fit in a phone.
Don't be an iTool or iDroid!
Use normal words!
A phone is a phone and does not need a vowel prepended to become viable.
If this scanner technology ever comes to fruition the Apple-branded version of it would most likely be hobbled by some agreement with content publishers so it could not be used to 'walk into Borders, scan a few books' as it would check some embedded watermark and refuse to scan more than 1 page.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519652</id>
	<title>Why in the world</title>
	<author>ffflala</author>
	<datestamp>1268855100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would anyone scan a magazine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would anyone scan a magazine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would anyone scan a magazine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514606</id>
	<title>Re:This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>Digana</author>
	<datestamp>1268817840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=1207" title="qwantz.com">I want to hear you had to go to the hospital for an emergency maxilofacial reconstruction.</a> [qwantz.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to hear you had to go to the hospital for an emergency maxilofacial reconstruction .
[ qwantz.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to hear you had to go to the hospital for an emergency maxilofacial reconstruction.
[qwantz.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516370</id>
	<title>Re:Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268825040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi I are Japan. I are readin my books with lazors, ROR!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi I are Japan .
I are readin my books with lazors , ROR !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi I are Japan.
I are readin my books with lazors, ROR!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517254</id>
	<title>Re:Prior Art.</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1268830560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does no one here read Vernor Vinge?</p><p>(Spoilerish bit follows.  Only a spoiler for the worst of purists, but they have been warned.)</p><p><a href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/08/30/review-rainbows-end/" title="teleread.org">Rainbow's End</a> [teleread.org] has an act where an virtual book cartel deploys a giant vacuum/shredder/optical scanner to the UCSD Geisel Library.  It sucks in books a shelf at a time, feeds them thru a wood chipper, and the shreds pass thru a tunnel lined with optical scanners.  A photo is taken of each bit, and software reconstructs the books.</p><p>Needless to say, this idea displeases many people, and the climax of the novel takes place as the bibliovorous machine threatens the library.</p><p>(End spoilerish bit.)</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows\_End" title="wikipedia.org">Rainbow's End</a> [wikipedia.org] should be on Slashdot's list of top 10 reads.  I'm surprised it hasn't spawned a half dozen cliches here, e.g., <i>belief circles</i> and <i>Scooch-a-mouts</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does no one here read Vernor Vinge ?
( Spoilerish bit follows .
Only a spoiler for the worst of purists , but they have been warned .
) Rainbow 's End [ teleread.org ] has an act where an virtual book cartel deploys a giant vacuum/shredder/optical scanner to the UCSD Geisel Library .
It sucks in books a shelf at a time , feeds them thru a wood chipper , and the shreds pass thru a tunnel lined with optical scanners .
A photo is taken of each bit , and software reconstructs the books.Needless to say , this idea displeases many people , and the climax of the novel takes place as the bibliovorous machine threatens the library .
( End spoilerish bit .
) Rainbow 's End [ wikipedia.org ] should be on Slashdot 's list of top 10 reads .
I 'm surprised it has n't spawned a half dozen cliches here , e.g. , belief circles and Scooch-a-mouts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does no one here read Vernor Vinge?
(Spoilerish bit follows.
Only a spoiler for the worst of purists, but they have been warned.
)Rainbow's End [teleread.org] has an act where an virtual book cartel deploys a giant vacuum/shredder/optical scanner to the UCSD Geisel Library.
It sucks in books a shelf at a time, feeds them thru a wood chipper, and the shreds pass thru a tunnel lined with optical scanners.
A photo is taken of each bit, and software reconstructs the books.Needless to say, this idea displeases many people, and the climax of the novel takes place as the bibliovorous machine threatens the library.
(End spoilerish bit.
)Rainbow's End [wikipedia.org] should be on Slashdot's list of top 10 reads.
I'm surprised it hasn't spawned a half dozen cliches here, e.g., belief circles and Scooch-a-mouts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515330</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>Antony T Curtis</author>
	<datestamp>1268820420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AFAIK, what you described isn't too far off the technique used by Google to scan non-valuable material.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK , what you described is n't too far off the technique used by Google to scan non-valuable material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK, what you described isn't too far off the technique used by Google to scan non-valuable material.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514896</id>
	<title>Re:Here we go...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268818980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but will it blend?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but will it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but will it blend?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516082</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>ArundelCastle</author>
	<datestamp>1268823660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book, realize that many books were printed on acid paper; yellowing, decaying, brittle, and will soon be dust regardless of what you do, so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.</p></div><p>Ah, the Tim Taylor method.  Any ideas for how to do the same thing with books that are 100-600 years old without causing damage?<br>That's kinda my field, so pardon me if I prefer we correspond via e-mail instead of putting you within 50 feet of our illuminated manuscripts.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book , realize that many books were printed on acid paper ; yellowing , decaying , brittle , and will soon be dust regardless of what you do , so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.Ah , the Tim Taylor method .
Any ideas for how to do the same thing with books that are 100-600 years old without causing damage ? That 's kinda my field , so pardon me if I prefer we correspond via e-mail instead of putting you within 50 feet of our illuminated manuscripts .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of us brought up that its sacrilegious to damage a book, realize that many books were printed on acid paper; yellowing, decaying, brittle, and will soon be dust regardless of what you do, so may as well preserve the content and properly recycle the pulp.Ah, the Tim Taylor method.
Any ideas for how to do the same thing with books that are 100-600 years old without causing damage?That's kinda my field, so pardon me if I prefer we correspond via e-mail instead of putting you within 50 feet of our illuminated manuscripts.
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519702</id>
	<title>Re:Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1268855940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you mad? Do you really want Sharks reading?</p><p>"Oh, so THAT'S how an A-Bomb works..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you mad ?
Do you really want Sharks reading ?
" Oh , so THAT 'S how an A-Bomb works... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you mad?
Do you really want Sharks reading?
"Oh, so THAT'S how an A-Bomb works..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516096</id>
	<title>Now the question is</title>
	<author>Kanasta</author>
	<datestamp>1268823780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how long it takes for the authors guild or whatever they're called to brand this as a purely copyright infringement machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how long it takes for the authors guild or whatever they 're called to brand this as a purely copyright infringement machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how long it takes for the authors guild or whatever they're called to brand this as a purely copyright infringement machine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515768</id>
	<title>Google Patents?</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1268822340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe that Google owns the patents on this approach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that Google owns the patents on this approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that Google owns the patents on this approach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517968</id>
	<title>If expense is no object</title>
	<author>bjs555</author>
	<datestamp>1268836560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Got a CAT scanner sitting around? Stick the book under it and image each page as a thin slice.</p><p>I don't really know if this is technically feasible. How does ink react to xrays? How thin can a image slice be? How fast does a CAT scanner run? Maybe someone with CAT scanner knowledge can fill me in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Got a CAT scanner sitting around ?
Stick the book under it and image each page as a thin slice.I do n't really know if this is technically feasible .
How does ink react to xrays ?
How thin can a image slice be ?
How fast does a CAT scanner run ?
Maybe someone with CAT scanner knowledge can fill me in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Got a CAT scanner sitting around?
Stick the book under it and image each page as a thin slice.I don't really know if this is technically feasible.
How does ink react to xrays?
How thin can a image slice be?
How fast does a CAT scanner run?
Maybe someone with CAT scanner knowledge can fill me in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515460</id>
	<title>fastest?</title>
	<author>trb</author>
	<datestamp>1268820900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe the narrator in the video says that the high speed camera is scanning 1000x1000 pixels, and the book he is scanning has very large type, with fewer than 20 text lines per page.  I imagine that this scanner can't scan normal text as fast as the Google book scanner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the narrator in the video says that the high speed camera is scanning 1000x1000 pixels , and the book he is scanning has very large type , with fewer than 20 text lines per page .
I imagine that this scanner ca n't scan normal text as fast as the Google book scanner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the narrator in the video says that the high speed camera is scanning 1000x1000 pixels, and the book he is scanning has very large type, with fewer than 20 text lines per page.
I imagine that this scanner can't scan normal text as fast as the Google book scanner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514502</id>
	<title>difference is resolution, actually</title>
	<author>tmbdev</author>
	<datestamp>1268817480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The article mentions Google's similar dewarping system; the difference here is speed.</i></p><p>There is nothing preventing Google from pushing high speed video through their book software.  In fact, they could probably do that with very little work, since you can use an off-the-shelf high speed video recorder and then just push the frames through the regular processing pipeline.</p><p>The reason they don't (and nobody else does) is because it's not useful.  For getting acceptable quality from book scanning, you need upwards of 10 Mpixels to get anything decent.  Even if you had a 10 Mpixel high speed camera, you still need some control over lighting and camera/book angles for decent results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article mentions Google 's similar dewarping system ; the difference here is speed.There is nothing preventing Google from pushing high speed video through their book software .
In fact , they could probably do that with very little work , since you can use an off-the-shelf high speed video recorder and then just push the frames through the regular processing pipeline.The reason they do n't ( and nobody else does ) is because it 's not useful .
For getting acceptable quality from book scanning , you need upwards of 10 Mpixels to get anything decent .
Even if you had a 10 Mpixel high speed camera , you still need some control over lighting and camera/book angles for decent results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article mentions Google's similar dewarping system; the difference here is speed.There is nothing preventing Google from pushing high speed video through their book software.
In fact, they could probably do that with very little work, since you can use an off-the-shelf high speed video recorder and then just push the frames through the regular processing pipeline.The reason they don't (and nobody else does) is because it's not useful.
For getting acceptable quality from book scanning, you need upwards of 10 Mpixels to get anything decent.
Even if you had a 10 Mpixel high speed camera, you still need some control over lighting and camera/book angles for decent results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516048</id>
	<title>Re:High Speed Camera</title>
	<author>pixelpusher220</author>
	<datestamp>1268823480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.</i>
<br> <br>

Just throw it faster!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used , they are going to have to get a lot better .
Just throw it faster !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project uses a high speed camera... so if a camera from a handy is going to be used, they are going to have to get a lot better.
Just throw it faster!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</id>
	<title>This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>AdmiralXyz</author>
	<datestamp>1268816640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy has produced some really fascinating work, I strongly recommend checking out some more of it if you have some free time. The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KxjVlaLBmk" title="youtube.com">high-speed robot hand</a> [youtube.com] he developed literally made my jaw drop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy has produced some really fascinating work , I strongly recommend checking out some more of it if you have some free time .
The high-speed robot hand [ youtube.com ] he developed literally made my jaw drop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy has produced some really fascinating work, I strongly recommend checking out some more of it if you have some free time.
The high-speed robot hand [youtube.com] he developed literally made my jaw drop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</id>
	<title>Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1268859060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it come with a shark-mount?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it come with a shark-mount ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it come with a shark-mount?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514554</id>
	<title>Re:Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1268817720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does it come with a shark-mount?</p></div><p>Warning: Do not look at shark with remaining eye.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it come with a shark-mount ? Warning : Do not look at shark with remaining eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it come with a shark-mount?Warning: Do not look at shark with remaining eye.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517898</id>
	<title>Large and Bulky?</title>
	<author>number17</author>
	<datestamp>1268835840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would not consider that a large and bulky scanner at all.  Check out these scanners being used by Robarts Library in Toronto for the Internet Archive project: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/15573112@N03/4252089363/in/set-72157623030966641/" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/15573112@N03/4252089363/in/set-72157623030966641/</a> [flickr.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would not consider that a large and bulky scanner at all .
Check out these scanners being used by Robarts Library in Toronto for the Internet Archive project : http : //www.flickr.com/photos/15573112 @ N03/4252089363/in/set-72157623030966641/ [ flickr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would not consider that a large and bulky scanner at all.
Check out these scanners being used by Robarts Library in Toronto for the Internet Archive project: http://www.flickr.com/photos/15573112@N03/4252089363/in/set-72157623030966641/ [flickr.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517052</id>
	<title>time is of the essence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268829480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>last remaining copies of works disappear everyday. everything needs to be scanned in. it's pitiful that right now it's basically impossible to find a freely downloadable pdf of the public domain book "the compleat housewife" Eliza Smith 1727 or other such books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>last remaining copies of works disappear everyday .
everything needs to be scanned in .
it 's pitiful that right now it 's basically impossible to find a freely downloadable pdf of the public domain book " the compleat housewife " Eliza Smith 1727 or other such books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>last remaining copies of works disappear everyday.
everything needs to be scanned in.
it's pitiful that right now it's basically impossible to find a freely downloadable pdf of the public domain book "the compleat housewife" Eliza Smith 1727 or other such books.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519196</id>
	<title>widely done, even when there is a digital version</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268847900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always assumed licensed, translated Japanese comics were made by acquiring the digital masters from the Japanese publishing companies and using staff translators, maybe even in collaboration with the original author. I was very wrong.<br><br>Tokyopop, a large importer of Japanese comics, has a video explaining their technique. They have a contact in Japan purchase off-the-self tankobon (compiled volumes) and ship them to the states, where they microwave them to loosen the binding, and scan them in. Then they outsource the airbrushing out the text bubbles and the translation to generic hourly translators, and sell them on US bookshelves for whatever outrageous price they get.  I literally thought it was a joke. It's hard to believe a company could have the gall to sell such a product as new. The image quality difference between licensed manga and the very same volume that I have directly imported from Japan is glaringly obvious and they use cheap shit paper too.<br><br>Moral? Download fan scanslations. Like most pirated goods, not only are they free, they are better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always assumed licensed , translated Japanese comics were made by acquiring the digital masters from the Japanese publishing companies and using staff translators , maybe even in collaboration with the original author .
I was very wrong.Tokyopop , a large importer of Japanese comics , has a video explaining their technique .
They have a contact in Japan purchase off-the-self tankobon ( compiled volumes ) and ship them to the states , where they microwave them to loosen the binding , and scan them in .
Then they outsource the airbrushing out the text bubbles and the translation to generic hourly translators , and sell them on US bookshelves for whatever outrageous price they get .
I literally thought it was a joke .
It 's hard to believe a company could have the gall to sell such a product as new .
The image quality difference between licensed manga and the very same volume that I have directly imported from Japan is glaringly obvious and they use cheap shit paper too.Moral ?
Download fan scanslations .
Like most pirated goods , not only are they free , they are better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always assumed licensed, translated Japanese comics were made by acquiring the digital masters from the Japanese publishing companies and using staff translators, maybe even in collaboration with the original author.
I was very wrong.Tokyopop, a large importer of Japanese comics, has a video explaining their technique.
They have a contact in Japan purchase off-the-self tankobon (compiled volumes) and ship them to the states, where they microwave them to loosen the binding, and scan them in.
Then they outsource the airbrushing out the text bubbles and the translation to generic hourly translators, and sell them on US bookshelves for whatever outrageous price they get.
I literally thought it was a joke.
It's hard to believe a company could have the gall to sell such a product as new.
The image quality difference between licensed manga and the very same volume that I have directly imported from Japan is glaringly obvious and they use cheap shit paper too.Moral?
Download fan scanslations.
Like most pirated goods, not only are they free, they are better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515514</id>
	<title>Re:This is Masatoshi Ishikawa</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1268821140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, the robot hand is great, but I suggest you try it out on a hotdog first, before you go straight to the main reason every slashdotter needs a robot hand...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , the robot hand is great , but I suggest you try it out on a hotdog first , before you go straight to the main reason every slashdotter needs a robot hand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, the robot hand is great, but I suggest you try it out on a hotdog first, before you go straight to the main reason every slashdotter needs a robot hand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514392</id>
	<title>The bad news</title>
	<author>RJCantrell</author>
	<datestamp>1268817180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is that it can only scan child-porn manga.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is that it can only scan child-porn manga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is that it can only scan child-porn manga.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515368</id>
	<title>Re:Faster method</title>
	<author>Stormalong</author>
	<datestamp>1268820540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Proprietor: Why don't you try W. H. Smith's?<br>Customer: I did, they sent me here.<br>Proprietor: DID they.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Proprietor : Why do n't you try W. H. Smith 's ? Customer : I did , they sent me here.Proprietor : DID they .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proprietor: Why don't you try W. H. Smith's?Customer: I did, they sent me here.Proprietor: DID they.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31522628</id>
	<title>Wow....</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1268926200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>200 pages per minute, that would be like 3 minutes a book (big one). When these come out to the public, I want one!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>200 pages per minute , that would be like 3 minutes a book ( big one ) .
When these come out to the public , I want one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>200 pages per minute, that would be like 3 minutes a book (big one).
When these come out to the public, I want one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514486</id>
	<title>Re:Here we go...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268817480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/furlough?</p><p>[...]</p><p>Someone needs to fix the above list for me.</p></div><p>3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/fortnight?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>3 ) I ca n't understand 200 pages/minute , what 's that in LOC/furlough ? [ .. .
] Someone needs to fix the above list for me.3 ) I ca n't understand 200 pages/minute , what 's that in LOC/fortnight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/furlough?[...
]Someone needs to fix the above list for me.3) I can't understand 200 pages/minute, what's that in LOC/fortnight?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514286</id>
	<title>Re:Did someone say lasers?</title>
	<author>kandela</author>
	<datestamp>1268816700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget the shark-mount. <b>I have to turn my own pages!?</b> </p><p>Oh well, I guess I'll just stick to buying books that are advertised as page turners.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget the shark-mount .
I have to turn my own pages ! ?
Oh well , I guess I 'll just stick to buying books that are advertised as page turners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget the shark-mount.
I have to turn my own pages!?
Oh well, I guess I'll just stick to buying books that are advertised as page turners.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31518988</id>
	<title>Re:Copyright</title>
	<author>Vasheron</author>
	<datestamp>1268845560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You will not be scanning books with an iPhone... at least not with this technique. This system uses structured light to deduce the curvature of the page, which requires a synchronized and calibrated camera/projector system - i.e. very specialized hardware and not something likely to show up on a piece of consumer electronics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You will not be scanning books with an iPhone... at least not with this technique .
This system uses structured light to deduce the curvature of the page , which requires a synchronized and calibrated camera/projector system - i.e .
very specialized hardware and not something likely to show up on a piece of consumer electronics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will not be scanning books with an iPhone... at least not with this technique.
This system uses structured light to deduce the curvature of the page, which requires a synchronized and calibrated camera/projector system - i.e.
very specialized hardware and not something likely to show up on a piece of consumer electronics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31520574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31521114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31551012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31518988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31524226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_198250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31518988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31520574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31521114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31517930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31524226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31514854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_198250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31516690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31551012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31515928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_198250.31519196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
