<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_16_2354239</id>
	<title>The Bloodhound Will Stay On the Ground At 1,000 mph</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1268730600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"BBC reports that engineers designing the world's fastest car, the <a href="//entertainment.slashdot.org/story/08/10/24/1244211/1000-mph-Car-Planned">Bloodhound SSC</a>, built to smash the world land speed record of 763 mph set by the Thrust SuperSonic Car in 1997, believe they have a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8569553.stm">solution to keep the vehicle flat on the ground at 1,000 mph</a> after initial iterations of the car's aerodynamic shape produced dangerous amounts of lift at the vehicle's rear. John Piper, Bloodhound's technical director, said: 'We've had lift as high as 12 tonnes, and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest &mdash; that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly.' The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel, who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem. Before Intel's intervention, the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures' in 18 months. The latest modelling work run on Intel's network <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8439516.stm">investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks</a>. By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car's rear end, the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic. 'At Mach 1.3, we've close to zero lift, which is where we wanted to be,' says Piper. In late 2011, the Bloodhound, <a href="http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/car.cfm">powered by a rocket bolted to a Eurofighter-Typhoon jet engine</a>, will mount an assault on the land speed record, <a href="http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/adventure/the\_desert/hakskeen\_pan.cfm">driving across a dried up lakebed known as Hakskeen Pan</a>, in the Northern Cape of South Africa."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " BBC reports that engineers designing the world 's fastest car , the Bloodhound SSC , built to smash the world land speed record of 763 mph set by the Thrust SuperSonic Car in 1997 , believe they have a solution to keep the vehicle flat on the ground at 1,000 mph after initial iterations of the car 's aerodynamic shape produced dangerous amounts of lift at the vehicle 's rear .
John Piper , Bloodhound 's technical director , said : 'We 've had lift as high as 12 tonnes , and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest    that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly .
' The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel , who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem .
Before Intel 's intervention , the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures ' in 18 months .
The latest modelling work run on Intel 's network investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks .
By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car 's rear end , the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic .
'At Mach 1.3 , we 've close to zero lift , which is where we wanted to be, ' says Piper .
In late 2011 , the Bloodhound , powered by a rocket bolted to a Eurofighter-Typhoon jet engine , will mount an assault on the land speed record , driving across a dried up lakebed known as Hakskeen Pan , in the Northern Cape of South Africa .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that engineers designing the world's fastest car, the Bloodhound SSC, built to smash the world land speed record of 763 mph set by the Thrust SuperSonic Car in 1997, believe they have a solution to keep the vehicle flat on the ground at 1,000 mph after initial iterations of the car's aerodynamic shape produced dangerous amounts of lift at the vehicle's rear.
John Piper, Bloodhound's technical director, said: 'We've had lift as high as 12 tonnes, and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest — that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly.
' The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel, who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem.
Before Intel's intervention, the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures' in 18 months.
The latest modelling work run on Intel's network investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks.
By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car's rear end, the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic.
'At Mach 1.3, we've close to zero lift, which is where we wanted to be,' says Piper.
In late 2011, the Bloodhound, powered by a rocket bolted to a Eurofighter-Typhoon jet engine, will mount an assault on the land speed record, driving across a dried up lakebed known as Hakskeen Pan, in the Northern Cape of South Africa.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506070</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1268822160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Righto, time to ask the serious questions! But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?</p></div><p>Accelerating or decelerating?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Righto , time to ask the serious questions !
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour ? Accelerating or decelerating ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Righto, time to ask the serious questions!
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?Accelerating or decelerating?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508110</id>
	<title>Hands-free?</title>
	<author>ShannaraFan</author>
	<datestamp>1268839380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully it includes SYNC or some other means of hands-free cell phone use.  You know, for that ever-important phone call.  Can't really consider it a car until the driver can yak away while driving...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully it includes SYNC or some other means of hands-free cell phone use .
You know , for that ever-important phone call .
Ca n't really consider it a car until the driver can yak away while driving.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully it includes SYNC or some other means of hands-free cell phone use.
You know, for that ever-important phone call.
Can't really consider it a car until the driver can yak away while driving...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506214</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>drb\_chimaera</author>
	<datestamp>1268823720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, in factors of 88mph this thing goes to 11<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , in factors of 88mph this thing goes to 11 ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, in factors of 88mph this thing goes to 11 ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31517238</id>
	<title>Like other "records"</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1268830500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy once tried to convince me that the fastest fixed-wing aircraft was the space shuttle.  At that time I'm pretty sure it was the SR-71 Blackbird (and to the best of my knowledge it still is). The reason it's not the space shuttle is that the space shuttle is a SPACE craft, that just happens to have a pair of stubby little wings.
<br>
The same goes for this supposed "car". In order for a car to set a land-speed record, it should have to be powered exclusively by its wheels, and the wheels should in turn be required to be powered by a piston engine, not a jet and certainly not a damned rocket. Anything else would be like having the SR-71 Blackbird going full speed with its landing gear grazing a runway, and calling THAT a land speed record.
<br>
No, it should have to be an actual car, otherwise it's just meaningless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy once tried to convince me that the fastest fixed-wing aircraft was the space shuttle .
At that time I 'm pretty sure it was the SR-71 Blackbird ( and to the best of my knowledge it still is ) .
The reason it 's not the space shuttle is that the space shuttle is a SPACE craft , that just happens to have a pair of stubby little wings .
The same goes for this supposed " car " .
In order for a car to set a land-speed record , it should have to be powered exclusively by its wheels , and the wheels should in turn be required to be powered by a piston engine , not a jet and certainly not a damned rocket .
Anything else would be like having the SR-71 Blackbird going full speed with its landing gear grazing a runway , and calling THAT a land speed record .
No , it should have to be an actual car , otherwise it 's just meaningless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy once tried to convince me that the fastest fixed-wing aircraft was the space shuttle.
At that time I'm pretty sure it was the SR-71 Blackbird (and to the best of my knowledge it still is).
The reason it's not the space shuttle is that the space shuttle is a SPACE craft, that just happens to have a pair of stubby little wings.
The same goes for this supposed "car".
In order for a car to set a land-speed record, it should have to be powered exclusively by its wheels, and the wheels should in turn be required to be powered by a piston engine, not a jet and certainly not a damned rocket.
Anything else would be like having the SR-71 Blackbird going full speed with its landing gear grazing a runway, and calling THAT a land speed record.
No, it should have to be an actual car, otherwise it's just meaningless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508424</id>
	<title>Rocket</title>
	<author>Zygamorph</author>
	<datestamp>1268840460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it has a rocket engine then isn't it a rocket. If so the "land" speed record has a maximum velocity of whatever escape velocity is while still "touching" the ground.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it has a rocket engine then is n't it a rocket .
If so the " land " speed record has a maximum velocity of whatever escape velocity is while still " touching " the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it has a rocket engine then isn't it a rocket.
If so the "land" speed record has a maximum velocity of whatever escape velocity is while still "touching" the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506354</id>
	<title>Re:Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>Ed Avis</author>
	<datestamp>1268825460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's okay, they're checking the calculations with pencil and paper afterwards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's okay , they 're checking the calculations with pencil and paper afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's okay, they're checking the calculations with pencil and paper afterwards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31512724</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>cynyr</author>
	<datestamp>1268854260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should see McLaren's new little scoop thing on this years cars[1]. It allows almost exactly what you are describing, effect wise anyways, as of right now it is worth about 5MPH down a straight way. This isn't so much about changing the cars surfaces, but changing the way air flows over them and making them not produce as much downforce but a lot less drag.

<br> <br>[1] <a href="http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2010/824/727.html" title="formula1.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2010/824/727.html</a> [formula1.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should see McLaren 's new little scoop thing on this years cars [ 1 ] .
It allows almost exactly what you are describing , effect wise anyways , as of right now it is worth about 5MPH down a straight way .
This is n't so much about changing the cars surfaces , but changing the way air flows over them and making them not produce as much downforce but a lot less drag .
[ 1 ] http : //www.formula1.com/news/technical/2010/824/727.html [ formula1.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should see McLaren's new little scoop thing on this years cars[1].
It allows almost exactly what you are describing, effect wise anyways, as of right now it is worth about 5MPH down a straight way.
This isn't so much about changing the cars surfaces, but changing the way air flows over them and making them not produce as much downforce but a lot less drag.
[1] http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2010/824/727.html [formula1.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506434</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268826780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're gonna see some serious shit..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're gon na see some serious shit. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're gonna see some serious shit..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510270</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1268847600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is NEVER a potential that the plane wont leave the treadmill.  Aircraft use propellers or jet engines to fly,  they dont care what the ground is doing.</p><p>I've flown in a plane that had ZERO ground speed.  we were doing 70mph airspeed and had lift, but our ground speed was zero mph.   WE were in a 70mph headwind.</p><p>Yes it was a small plane, and no we should not have been there in those conditions, we should have landed at a different airport and waited out the weather. BTW, the stall speed of the plane was less than 60mph for the pilots out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is NEVER a potential that the plane wont leave the treadmill .
Aircraft use propellers or jet engines to fly , they dont care what the ground is doing.I 've flown in a plane that had ZERO ground speed .
we were doing 70mph airspeed and had lift , but our ground speed was zero mph .
WE were in a 70mph headwind.Yes it was a small plane , and no we should not have been there in those conditions , we should have landed at a different airport and waited out the weather .
BTW , the stall speed of the plane was less than 60mph for the pilots out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is NEVER a potential that the plane wont leave the treadmill.
Aircraft use propellers or jet engines to fly,  they dont care what the ground is doing.I've flown in a plane that had ZERO ground speed.
we were doing 70mph airspeed and had lift, but our ground speed was zero mph.
WE were in a 70mph headwind.Yes it was a small plane, and no we should not have been there in those conditions, we should have landed at a different airport and waited out the weather.
BTW, the stall speed of the plane was less than 60mph for the pilots out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509622</id>
	<title>Re:In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>Kabuthunk</author>
	<datestamp>1268845500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What was the point of climbing Mount Everest?  What's the point of any "biggest" or "fastest" or "strongest" anything in the Guiness book of world records?</p><p>Multiple reasons, pick one or any:<br>For the thrill of doing something noone has ever done before<br>To bring worldwide attention to your company/firm/etc.<br>To obtain a better knowledge of the physics behind things, how to better design things to overcome problems, etc.  In general, further understanding.<br>To prove that you're better than "the other guys" who have attempted this but failed.<br>Etc.</p><p>Just because something doesn't have immediate profitability and instantaneous everyday use *RIGHT NOW* doesn't mean that it won't be of value to others, or in the future.  More knowledge is always better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the point of climbing Mount Everest ?
What 's the point of any " biggest " or " fastest " or " strongest " anything in the Guiness book of world records ? Multiple reasons , pick one or any : For the thrill of doing something noone has ever done beforeTo bring worldwide attention to your company/firm/etc.To obtain a better knowledge of the physics behind things , how to better design things to overcome problems , etc .
In general , further understanding.To prove that you 're better than " the other guys " who have attempted this but failed.Etc.Just because something does n't have immediate profitability and instantaneous everyday use * RIGHT NOW * does n't mean that it wo n't be of value to others , or in the future .
More knowledge is always better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the point of climbing Mount Everest?
What's the point of any "biggest" or "fastest" or "strongest" anything in the Guiness book of world records?Multiple reasons, pick one or any:For the thrill of doing something noone has ever done beforeTo bring worldwide attention to your company/firm/etc.To obtain a better knowledge of the physics behind things, how to better design things to overcome problems, etc.
In general, further understanding.To prove that you're better than "the other guys" who have attempted this but failed.Etc.Just because something doesn't have immediate profitability and instantaneous everyday use *RIGHT NOW* doesn't mean that it won't be of value to others, or in the future.
More knowledge is always better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506862</id>
	<title>Re:In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1268831400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Take rocket<br>2. Place it horizontal instead of vertical<br>3. ???<br>4. Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Take rocket2 .
Place it horizontal instead of vertical3 .
? ? ? 4. Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Take rocket2.
Place it horizontal instead of vertical3.
???4. Profit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510354</id>
	<title>Re:In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1268847780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anybody knows the point of this?</p></div><p>It proves that you can put wheels on a rocket?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody knows the point of this ? It proves that you can put wheels on a rocket ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody knows the point of this?It proves that you can put wheels on a rocket?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506560</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1268828460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it even matter?</p><p>Does it have to be a car to break the land speed record, or will any land vehicle do? If it's the latter, then this thing fits the bill and that's what matters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it even matter ? Does it have to be a car to break the land speed record , or will any land vehicle do ?
If it 's the latter , then this thing fits the bill and that 's what matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it even matter?Does it have to be a car to break the land speed record, or will any land vehicle do?
If it's the latter, then this thing fits the bill and that's what matters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506046</id>
	<title>Re:Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1268821980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>On stuff like this, you make damned sure your calculations are verifiable.  That said, the dynamics of the sound barrier are so complex that I think the chances are their models will not be good enough and some fool will end up as landscape to prove it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On stuff like this , you make damned sure your calculations are verifiable .
That said , the dynamics of the sound barrier are so complex that I think the chances are their models will not be good enough and some fool will end up as landscape to prove it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On stuff like this, you make damned sure your calculations are verifiable.
That said, the dynamics of the sound barrier are so complex that I think the chances are their models will not be good enough and some fool will end up as landscape to prove it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508222</id>
	<title>bumper sticker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268839680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if they will put "How do you like my driving? Dial 1-800-EAT-SHIT" as their bumper sticker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they will put " How do you like my driving ?
Dial 1-800-EAT-SHIT " as their bumper sticker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they will put "How do you like my driving?
Dial 1-800-EAT-SHIT" as their bumper sticker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506114</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1268822760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since most fighter jets, even wingless, would come off the ground at 1000 mph, the answer is yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since most fighter jets , even wingless , would come off the ground at 1000 mph , the answer is yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since most fighter jets, even wingless, would come off the ground at 1000 mph, the answer is yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507540</id>
	<title>Yes indeed! That bit is at the front of the car.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268836440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you, I'll be here all week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , I 'll be here all week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, I'll be here all week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506504</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>stiggle</author>
	<datestamp>1268827860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a jet engine pushing it up towards 1000mph, but its a solid fuelled rocket (liquid oxidiser) that pushes it over.<br>A lot of their design towards the end of last year was deciding whether to put the Jet over Rocket (JoR) or Rocket over Jet (RoJ) in the tail of the vehicle.</p><p>They decided on the JoR configuration as it provided better stability &amp; airflow through the jet.</p><p>This project is also about getting kids interested in engineering again, and they're making their data publicly available.</p><p>They've been touring with the full size model of the car visiting towns doing workshops with the school kids about the stuff they're doing and experiments &amp; tests the kids can do themselves.  They were kind enough to park the car outside my office when they were in my home town.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a jet engine pushing it up towards 1000mph , but its a solid fuelled rocket ( liquid oxidiser ) that pushes it over.A lot of their design towards the end of last year was deciding whether to put the Jet over Rocket ( JoR ) or Rocket over Jet ( RoJ ) in the tail of the vehicle.They decided on the JoR configuration as it provided better stability &amp; airflow through the jet.This project is also about getting kids interested in engineering again , and they 're making their data publicly available.They 've been touring with the full size model of the car visiting towns doing workshops with the school kids about the stuff they 're doing and experiments &amp; tests the kids can do themselves .
They were kind enough to park the car outside my office when they were in my home town .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a jet engine pushing it up towards 1000mph, but its a solid fuelled rocket (liquid oxidiser) that pushes it over.A lot of their design towards the end of last year was deciding whether to put the Jet over Rocket (JoR) or Rocket over Jet (RoJ) in the tail of the vehicle.They decided on the JoR configuration as it provided better stability &amp; airflow through the jet.This project is also about getting kids interested in engineering again, and they're making their data publicly available.They've been touring with the full size model of the car visiting towns doing workshops with the school kids about the stuff they're doing and experiments &amp; tests the kids can do themselves.
They were kind enough to park the car outside my office when they were in my home town.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506474</id>
	<title>Translation to standard units</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268827500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What they really mean is that the current land speed record is 1227 Km/h and they're trying to reach 1609 Km/h. Now, that's better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What they really mean is that the current land speed record is 1227 Km/h and they 're trying to reach 1609 Km/h .
Now , that 's better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they really mean is that the current land speed record is 1227 Km/h and they're trying to reach 1609 Km/h.
Now, that's better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506352</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>pecosdave</author>
	<datestamp>1268825460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those were cool videos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those were cool videos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those were cool videos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506288</id>
	<title>Hitch Hikers</title>
	<author>Galik</author>
	<datestamp>1268824620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This just <b> <i>has</i> </b> to be bad news for hitch-hikers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This just has to be bad news for hitch-hikers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just  has  to be bad news for hitch-hikers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506002</id>
	<title>What a fracking waste!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268821500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought we were all waiting for cars that fly. What a terrible waste of money, time and resources!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we were all waiting for cars that fly .
What a terrible waste of money , time and resources ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we were all waiting for cars that fly.
What a terrible waste of money, time and resources!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506078</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1268822220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please do remember that, originally, "car" was any vehicle drawn by animals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do remember that , originally , " car " was any vehicle drawn by animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please do remember that, originally, "car" was any vehicle drawn by animals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508488</id>
	<title>Budweiser rocket</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1268840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some wiki reading on the subject took me to the other two cars that have broken, or been said to have broken the sound barrier.  The ThrustSSC which definitely did, and the budweiser rocket which wasn't verified.</p><p>I had to laugh at the wiki page though for the budweiser rocket: </p><p><div class="quote"><p>No independent authority sanctioned the performance, although <b>United States Air Force radar tracked the vehicle and recorded the speed at 38 mph.</b> This was obviously an error, and is generally considered to represent the movement of a truck in the vicinity.</p></div><p>Some bias against land vehicles there I guess.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some wiki reading on the subject took me to the other two cars that have broken , or been said to have broken the sound barrier .
The ThrustSSC which definitely did , and the budweiser rocket which was n't verified.I had to laugh at the wiki page though for the budweiser rocket : No independent authority sanctioned the performance , although United States Air Force radar tracked the vehicle and recorded the speed at 38 mph .
This was obviously an error , and is generally considered to represent the movement of a truck in the vicinity.Some bias against land vehicles there I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some wiki reading on the subject took me to the other two cars that have broken, or been said to have broken the sound barrier.
The ThrustSSC which definitely did, and the budweiser rocket which wasn't verified.I had to laugh at the wiki page though for the budweiser rocket: No independent authority sanctioned the performance, although United States Air Force radar tracked the vehicle and recorded the speed at 38 mph.
This was obviously an error, and is generally considered to represent the movement of a truck in the vicinity.Some bias against land vehicles there I guess.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510104</id>
	<title>I Agree Completely with Microsoft</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1268847120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Open innovation is only possible through the licensing of third party IP rights,</p></div><p>As long as those rights are licensed through the GPL or a similar license focusing on free-as-in-speech, otherwise innovation is not open, but <i>closed, controlled and restricted</i> which <b>does not</b> lead to significant, rapid innovation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Open innovation is only possible through the licensing of third party IP rights,As long as those rights are licensed through the GPL or a similar license focusing on free-as-in-speech , otherwise innovation is not open , but closed , controlled and restricted which does not lead to significant , rapid innovation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open innovation is only possible through the licensing of third party IP rights,As long as those rights are licensed through the GPL or a similar license focusing on free-as-in-speech, otherwise innovation is not open, but closed, controlled and restricted which does not lead to significant, rapid innovation.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506054</id>
	<title>Re:Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>bronney</author>
	<datestamp>1268822040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new here:</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/16/2318223/The-State-of-Robotic-Surgery?art\_pos=3" title="slashdot.org">http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/16/2318223/The-State-of-Robotic-Surgery?art\_pos=3</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here : http : //hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/16/2318223/The-State-of-Robotic-Surgery ? art \ _pos = 3 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here:http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/16/2318223/The-State-of-Robotic-Surgery?art\_pos=3 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508994</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1268842920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>reindeer is rudundant, too</htmltext>
<tokenext>reindeer is rudundant , too</tokentext>
<sentencetext>reindeer is rudundant, too</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510342</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1268847780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The car goes back to a time when people actually cared about the land-speed record for vehicles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The car goes back to a time when people actually cared about the land-speed record for vehicles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The car goes back to a time when people actually cared about the land-speed record for vehicles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507386</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>Unsub</author>
	<datestamp>1268835480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ok, how about a really big hamster wheel?</htmltext>
<tokenext>ok , how about a really big hamster wheel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok, how about a really big hamster wheel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31517034</id>
	<title>Mach 1.3 == Really Frakin' Fast</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1268829300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The important thing isn't that it's precisely 1609 mph - it's that it's a big round number that's unarguably Really Fraking Fast.  Also, just being more than Mach 1 is impressive and probably unreliably dangerous as well.  And at that speed there's no point in having a Really Loud Stereo, because you're the only car on your block making sonic booms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The important thing is n't that it 's precisely 1609 mph - it 's that it 's a big round number that 's unarguably Really Fraking Fast .
Also , just being more than Mach 1 is impressive and probably unreliably dangerous as well .
And at that speed there 's no point in having a Really Loud Stereo , because you 're the only car on your block making sonic booms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The important thing isn't that it's precisely 1609 mph - it's that it's a big round number that's unarguably Really Fraking Fast.
Also, just being more than Mach 1 is impressive and probably unreliably dangerous as well.
And at that speed there's no point in having a Really Loud Stereo, because you're the only car on your block making sonic booms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506594</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1268828820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember watching an F1 race where just before the finish line the guy in second place does a 360deg flip lands on his wheels then rolls across the finish line still in secind place. I love youtube, took me 5 minutes to find it <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZmm8xFUlB8" title="youtube.com">at 2:13 on this compilation</a> [youtube.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember watching an F1 race where just before the finish line the guy in second place does a 360deg flip lands on his wheels then rolls across the finish line still in secind place .
I love youtube , took me 5 minutes to find it at 2 : 13 on this compilation [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember watching an F1 race where just before the finish line the guy in second place does a 360deg flip lands on his wheels then rolls across the finish line still in secind place.
I love youtube, took me 5 minutes to find it at 2:13 on this compilation [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505944</id>
	<title>Roosevelt said:</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1268820840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Speed, more speed".

And then:

"You ain't seen nothing yet".

Ha !</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Speed , more speed " .
And then : " You ai n't seen nothing yet " .
Ha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Speed, more speed".
And then:

"You ain't seen nothing yet".
Ha !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509114</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, that's why it is a batmobile, not a batcar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , that 's why it is a batmobile , not a batcar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, that's why it is a batmobile, not a batcar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506674</id>
	<title>Holy hell seatbelted to a nuclear warhead</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1268829600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This story made me think of the phrase "not enough of him left to fill a matchbox".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This story made me think of the phrase " not enough of him left to fill a matchbox " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story made me think of the phrase "not enough of him left to fill a matchbox".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508472</id>
	<title>So what, big deal</title>
	<author>Gyorg</author>
	<datestamp>1268840700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But do they have a working oscillation overthruster...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But do they have a working oscillation overthruster.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But do they have a working oscillation overthruster...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31513902</id>
	<title>Re:Hands-free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268858460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honk with one hand, cell on other hand...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honk with one hand , cell on other hand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honk with one hand, cell on other hand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510594</id>
	<title>Re:Car? Plane?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1268848440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone steals the wheerls and the battery out of it, would that make it a car?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone steals the wheerls and the battery out of it , would that make it a car ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone steals the wheerls and the battery out of it, would that make it a car?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506882</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>Richard\_at\_work</author>
	<datestamp>1268831580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every time I have seen the 'plane on a treadmill' problem stated, the way in which it was stated has always been flawed to a point where its ambiguous and unanswerable - there are some ways to state it where the result potentially is that the plane will never leave the treadmill, depending on how you interpret the question.<br> <br>

And I think that was the entire point of the question posed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I have seen the 'plane on a treadmill ' problem stated , the way in which it was stated has always been flawed to a point where its ambiguous and unanswerable - there are some ways to state it where the result potentially is that the plane will never leave the treadmill , depending on how you interpret the question .
And I think that was the entire point of the question posed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I have seen the 'plane on a treadmill' problem stated, the way in which it was stated has always been flawed to a point where its ambiguous and unanswerable - there are some ways to state it where the result potentially is that the plane will never leave the treadmill, depending on how you interpret the question.
And I think that was the entire point of the question posed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506462</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>WegianWarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1268827320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but after changes in the FIA and FIM rules between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land\_speed\_record#1963\_.E2.80.93\_present\_.28jet\_and\_rocket\_propulsion.29" title="wikipedia.org">1963 - 64</a> [wikipedia.org], the only thing it needs to qualify as a 'car' for the purpose of making a stab at the absolute land speed record is <b>four wheels or more</b>. Less than four wheels and it's a motorcycle.</p><p>There is however a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel-driven\_land\_speed\_record" title="wikipedia.org">seperate record for wheel driven cars</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but after changes in the FIA and FIM rules between 1963 - 64 [ wikipedia.org ] , the only thing it needs to qualify as a 'car ' for the purpose of making a stab at the absolute land speed record is four wheels or more .
Less than four wheels and it 's a motorcycle.There is however a seperate record for wheel driven cars [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but after changes in the FIA and FIM rules between 1963 - 64 [wikipedia.org], the only thing it needs to qualify as a 'car' for the purpose of making a stab at the absolute land speed record is four wheels or more.
Less than four wheels and it's a motorcycle.There is however a seperate record for wheel driven cars [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506768</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268830320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.</p><p>I guess. Even the world's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it can't fly.</p><p>I just don't see the point to taking an airplane, putting it on wheels, and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it's doing 1000MPH.</p><p>Why not just get a supersonic fighter and have it tow a little unicycle along the salt flats?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Depending on how the rules for " world 's fastest car " are written , how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.I guess .
Even the world 's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it ca n't fly.I just do n't see the point to taking an airplane , putting it on wheels , and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it 's doing 1000MPH.Why not just get a supersonic fighter and have it tow a little unicycle along the salt flats ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.I guess.
Even the world's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it can't fly.I just don't see the point to taking an airplane, putting it on wheels, and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it's doing 1000MPH.Why not just get a supersonic fighter and have it tow a little unicycle along the salt flats?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it's a jet engine (pushing against the air), it would be the old "Plane on a treadmill" problem. Meaning it would drive off the treadmill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's a jet engine ( pushing against the air ) , it would be the old " Plane on a treadmill " problem .
Meaning it would drive off the treadmill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's a jet engine (pushing against the air), it would be the old "Plane on a treadmill" problem.
Meaning it would drive off the treadmill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31515944</id>
	<title>The solution Intel provided...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was to build 6 tonne heatsink on top.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was to build 6 tonne heatsink on top .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was to build 6 tonne heatsink on top.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509010</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>serialband</author>
	<datestamp>1268842920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Righto, time to ask the serious questions! But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?</p></div></blockquote><p>Nothing without a flux capacitor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Righto , time to ask the serious questions !
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour ? Nothing without a flux capacitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Righto, time to ask the serious questions!
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?Nothing without a flux capacitor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507210</id>
	<title>How about some reverse wings?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268834340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can&rsquo;t imagine that they didn&rsquo;t come up with just attaching reverse wings / gigantic spoilers to it.<br>If they did, then what&rsquo;s the reason they don&rsquo;t use them? Sounds extremely obvious to me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can    t imagine that they didn    t come up with just attaching reverse wings / gigantic spoilers to it.If they did , then what    s the reason they don    t use them ?
Sounds extremely obvious to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can’t imagine that they didn’t come up with just attaching reverse wings / gigantic spoilers to it.If they did, then what’s the reason they don’t use them?
Sounds extremely obvious to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1268823360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on if it's a fixed aero-surface vehicle or not. F1 cars had variable surface aero-parts for one or two years before they were outright banned. The idea was that you could increase the angle of attack to increase downpressure in the corners, but make the car aerodynamically neutral in the straightaways so you're spending more power on thrust rather than dividing it between thrust and downforce. Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is. If John Carmack can write a javascript to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket (Armadillo Aerospace), you can design a fast car with dynamic aerosurfaces. Building a fixed aero car that's neutral at 1000mph but won't fly into the air and flip when you hit a rock is a lot harder to do. Check out this hella sweet video of a Le Mans car doing exactly that at 220mph: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM4guvo6Ifo" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM4guvo6Ifo</a> [youtube.com] <br>
&nbsp; <br>I'll admit this post was an excuse to post that video, but damn if it isn't cool. And that's at a quarter of the speed at which they'll be attempting this. It's not as easy as it looks.</p><p>Here's another cool video of the same thing happening. It's relatively common, even though they design against this exact sort of thing from happening. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y65oUlBMSUs" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y65oUlBMSUs</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on if it 's a fixed aero-surface vehicle or not .
F1 cars had variable surface aero-parts for one or two years before they were outright banned .
The idea was that you could increase the angle of attack to increase downpressure in the corners , but make the car aerodynamically neutral in the straightaways so you 're spending more power on thrust rather than dividing it between thrust and downforce .
Depending on how the rules for " world 's fastest car " are written , how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is .
If John Carmack can write a javascript to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket ( Armadillo Aerospace ) , you can design a fast car with dynamic aerosurfaces .
Building a fixed aero car that 's neutral at 1000mph but wo n't fly into the air and flip when you hit a rock is a lot harder to do .
Check out this hella sweet video of a Le Mans car doing exactly that at 220mph : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = wM4guvo6Ifo [ youtube.com ]   I 'll admit this post was an excuse to post that video , but damn if it is n't cool .
And that 's at a quarter of the speed at which they 'll be attempting this .
It 's not as easy as it looks.Here 's another cool video of the same thing happening .
It 's relatively common , even though they design against this exact sort of thing from happening .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = y65oUlBMSUs [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on if it's a fixed aero-surface vehicle or not.
F1 cars had variable surface aero-parts for one or two years before they were outright banned.
The idea was that you could increase the angle of attack to increase downpressure in the corners, but make the car aerodynamically neutral in the straightaways so you're spending more power on thrust rather than dividing it between thrust and downforce.
Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.
If John Carmack can write a javascript to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket (Armadillo Aerospace), you can design a fast car with dynamic aerosurfaces.
Building a fixed aero car that's neutral at 1000mph but won't fly into the air and flip when you hit a rock is a lot harder to do.
Check out this hella sweet video of a Le Mans car doing exactly that at 220mph: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM4guvo6Ifo [youtube.com] 
  I'll admit this post was an excuse to post that video, but damn if it isn't cool.
And that's at a quarter of the speed at which they'll be attempting this.
It's not as easy as it looks.Here's another cool video of the same thing happening.
It's relatively common, even though they design against this exact sort of thing from happening.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y65oUlBMSUs [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506770</id>
	<title>Re:Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1268830440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, cos when a company fucks up like that, it's not like they ever learn anything from it, and that company remains static for the rest of it's existence in this respect.</p><p>It is doomed to repeat these expensive costly mistakes, and would never do anything to rectify them.</p><p>Seriously, you think a 16 year old bug is in any way relevant to Intel's modern line of chips where processes, architecture, and methods have changed drastically? You realise that AMD wasn't even building their own design chips until 1996 and was just producing reverse engineered Intel clones? It was only 1997 that Cyrix was consumed by VIA too. 16 years is such a long time in the processor world, because things have changed so much in that time, that a bug that old is utterly irrelevant to the quality and trusworthiness or lack of of modern Intel chips.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , cos when a company fucks up like that , it 's not like they ever learn anything from it , and that company remains static for the rest of it 's existence in this respect.It is doomed to repeat these expensive costly mistakes , and would never do anything to rectify them.Seriously , you think a 16 year old bug is in any way relevant to Intel 's modern line of chips where processes , architecture , and methods have changed drastically ?
You realise that AMD was n't even building their own design chips until 1996 and was just producing reverse engineered Intel clones ?
It was only 1997 that Cyrix was consumed by VIA too .
16 years is such a long time in the processor world , because things have changed so much in that time , that a bug that old is utterly irrelevant to the quality and trusworthiness or lack of of modern Intel chips .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, cos when a company fucks up like that, it's not like they ever learn anything from it, and that company remains static for the rest of it's existence in this respect.It is doomed to repeat these expensive costly mistakes, and would never do anything to rectify them.Seriously, you think a 16 year old bug is in any way relevant to Intel's modern line of chips where processes, architecture, and methods have changed drastically?
You realise that AMD wasn't even building their own design chips until 1996 and was just producing reverse engineered Intel clones?
It was only 1997 that Cyrix was consumed by VIA too.
16 years is such a long time in the processor world, because things have changed so much in that time, that a bug that old is utterly irrelevant to the quality and trusworthiness or lack of of modern Intel chips.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</id>
	<title>I'm debating if this thing really counts as a car.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268821200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car?  To really be a "car" I would almost argue it needs to be propelled by the wheels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car ?
To really be a " car " I would almost argue it needs to be propelled by the wheels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car?
To really be a "car" I would almost argue it needs to be propelled by the wheels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506304</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But isn't the whole point to break a landspeed record?  Surely you could even compete if you fitted a wheelchair with rockets?  Or how about a submarine?<br>Oh, that would be one hell of a sight, a submarine going across land at 1000mph.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But is n't the whole point to break a landspeed record ?
Surely you could even compete if you fitted a wheelchair with rockets ?
Or how about a submarine ? Oh , that would be one hell of a sight , a submarine going across land at 1000mph .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But isn't the whole point to break a landspeed record?
Surely you could even compete if you fitted a wheelchair with rockets?
Or how about a submarine?Oh, that would be one hell of a sight, a submarine going across land at 1000mph.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942</id>
	<title>Easier solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268820840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't they make it drive on a treadmill?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't they make it drive on a treadmill ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't they make it drive on a treadmill?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507734</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You surely meant 880 miles per hour...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You surely meant 880 miles per hour.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You surely meant 880 miles per hour...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509042</id>
	<title>Re:What a fracking waste!!!</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1268843100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>just put it in reverse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>just put it in reverse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just put it in reverse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31538156</id>
	<title>Re:Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269015240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it must be assumed that they ALL are.</p></div><p>Your computer must be wrong, you posted from your computer, therefore your post is also wrong!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it must be assumed that they ALL are.Your computer must be wrong , you posted from your computer , therefore your post is also wrong !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it must be assumed that they ALL are.Your computer must be wrong, you posted from your computer, therefore your post is also wrong!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510228</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1268847480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I don't even know why they ripped the wings off! I mean, just bolt them on upside down, if you're having trouble staying on the ground. If the wings provide enough lift to keep the plane in the air while supersonic, they should provide enough downforce mounted upside down to keep it on the ground!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I do n't even know why they ripped the wings off !
I mean , just bolt them on upside down , if you 're having trouble staying on the ground .
If the wings provide enough lift to keep the plane in the air while supersonic , they should provide enough downforce mounted upside down to keep it on the ground !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I don't even know why they ripped the wings off!
I mean, just bolt them on upside down, if you're having trouble staying on the ground.
If the wings provide enough lift to keep the plane in the air while supersonic, they should provide enough downforce mounted upside down to keep it on the ground!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507980</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1268838660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If John Carmack can write a javascript</i></p><p>Totally OT, I know, but just FYI, you don't write "a javascript".  It's not "java script", it's javascript.  After all, I don't "write a python" or "a perl", do I?  No.  I write a "python script" or a "perl script".  So yes, the correct phrasing is "a javascript script", which sounds a little ridiculous, but is nevertheless correct.  Or you could use the less clumsy "a javascript program" or "a javascript application".  Or you could rephrase it as "If John Carmack can write software to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket in javascript".  But please, not "a javascript".  It just sounds silly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If John Carmack can write a javascriptTotally OT , I know , but just FYI , you do n't write " a javascript " .
It 's not " java script " , it 's javascript .
After all , I do n't " write a python " or " a perl " , do I ?
No. I write a " python script " or a " perl script " .
So yes , the correct phrasing is " a javascript script " , which sounds a little ridiculous , but is nevertheless correct .
Or you could use the less clumsy " a javascript program " or " a javascript application " .
Or you could rephrase it as " If John Carmack can write software to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket in javascript " .
But please , not " a javascript " .
It just sounds silly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If John Carmack can write a javascriptTotally OT, I know, but just FYI, you don't write "a javascript".
It's not "java script", it's javascript.
After all, I don't "write a python" or "a perl", do I?
No.  I write a "python script" or a "perl script".
So yes, the correct phrasing is "a javascript script", which sounds a little ridiculous, but is nevertheless correct.
Or you could use the less clumsy "a javascript program" or "a javascript application".
Or you could rephrase it as "If John Carmack can write software to control thrust for a vertical takeoff rocket in javascript".
But please, not "a javascript".
It just sounds silly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356</id>
	<title>Car? Plane?</title>
	<author>Terrasque</author>
	<datestamp>1268835300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me see.. Rocket engine, uplift much higher than weight, 1000mph...</p><p>That's a jet plane, not a car. Sure, it got better landing wheels than normal, and a bit special body, but it's still a goddamn jet plane.<br>If that's a car, we've had flying cars for over 50 years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see.. Rocket engine , uplift much higher than weight , 1000mph...That 's a jet plane , not a car .
Sure , it got better landing wheels than normal , and a bit special body , but it 's still a goddamn jet plane.If that 's a car , we 've had flying cars for over 50 years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see.. Rocket engine, uplift much higher than weight, 1000mph...That's a jet plane, not a car.
Sure, it got better landing wheels than normal, and a bit special body, but it's still a goddamn jet plane.If that's a car, we've had flying cars for over 50 years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506018</id>
	<title>And for the rest of the world...</title>
	<author>iJusten</author>
	<datestamp>1268821620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>763 mph=1 228 km/h
<br>1000 mph=1609 km/h</htmltext>
<tokenext>763 mph = 1 228 km/h 1000 mph = 1609 km/h</tokentext>
<sentencetext>763 mph=1 228 km/h
1000 mph=1609 km/h</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974</id>
	<title>Intel FPU?</title>
	<author>dltaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1268821200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in their right mind would trust an Intel FPU with their life?</p><p>Yeah, it may look like a troll, but some of us remember the FDIV bug.</p><p>Every billion, or so, calculations might be wrong, but, since you never know WHICH is wrong in an application, it must be assumed that they ALL are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would trust an Intel FPU with their life ? Yeah , it may look like a troll , but some of us remember the FDIV bug.Every billion , or so , calculations might be wrong , but , since you never know WHICH is wrong in an application , it must be assumed that they ALL are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would trust an Intel FPU with their life?Yeah, it may look like a troll, but some of us remember the FDIV bug.Every billion, or so, calculations might be wrong, but, since you never know WHICH is wrong in an application, it must be assumed that they ALL are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507456</id>
	<title>two birds one stone</title>
	<author>FishTankX</author>
	<datestamp>1268835900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's an idea to make it stay on the ground.</p><p>If you're splashing money all around, why not mass produce a tube that the car can run in, that can be partially evacuated down to like 20\% normal air pressure?</p><p>Since the car is using it's own oxidizer, oxygen being provided to the jet engine won't be as much of an issue. And the total lack of drag on the vehicle should atleast double it's speed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's an idea to make it stay on the ground.If you 're splashing money all around , why not mass produce a tube that the car can run in , that can be partially evacuated down to like 20 \ % normal air pressure ? Since the car is using it 's own oxidizer , oxygen being provided to the jet engine wo n't be as much of an issue .
And the total lack of drag on the vehicle should atleast double it 's speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's an idea to make it stay on the ground.If you're splashing money all around, why not mass produce a tube that the car can run in, that can be partially evacuated down to like 20\% normal air pressure?Since the car is using it's own oxidizer, oxygen being provided to the jet engine won't be as much of an issue.
And the total lack of drag on the vehicle should atleast double it's speed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506522</id>
	<title>A solution, at last.</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1268828100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally - no more of those long, boring police chase videotapes coming out of L.A.</p><p>Just "This is Action 4 News enroute to a reported car chase on the I-<strong>TABOOOOOM</strong>....what the hell was that?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally - no more of those long , boring police chase videotapes coming out of L.A.Just " This is Action 4 News enroute to a reported car chase on the I-TABOOOOOM....what the hell was that ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally - no more of those long, boring police chase videotapes coming out of L.A.Just "This is Action 4 News enroute to a reported car chase on the I-TABOOOOOM....what the hell was that?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506876</id>
	<title>Re:In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>kiehlster</author>
	<datestamp>1268831520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm still waiting for a commercially available supersonic commuter car.  With the Bloodhound, I could get to work in 1.5 minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still waiting for a commercially available supersonic commuter car .
With the Bloodhound , I could get to work in 1.5 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still waiting for a commercially available supersonic commuter car.
With the Bloodhound, I could get to work in 1.5 minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506438</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1268826840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they need to build is a car that can do that at the touch of a button and land on all 4 wheels.. kind of like in Speed Racer. Entirely pointless, but it would be fun on a victory lap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they need to build is a car that can do that at the touch of a button and land on all 4 wheels.. kind of like in Speed Racer .
Entirely pointless , but it would be fun on a victory lap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they need to build is a car that can do that at the touch of a button and land on all 4 wheels.. kind of like in Speed Racer.
Entirely pointless, but it would be fun on a victory lap!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</id>
	<title>But what happens when...</title>
	<author>Fluffeh</author>
	<datestamp>1268820780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Righto, time to ask the serious questions! But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Righto , time to ask the serious questions !
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Righto, time to ask the serious questions!
But what happens when they hit 88 miles per hour?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509110</id>
	<title>Umm..</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1268843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Intel, Intel, hmm.  Why does that remind me of something?  Hmm, something with floating point bugs or something, hmm.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intel , Intel , hmm .
Why does that remind me of something ?
Hmm , something with floating point bugs or something , hmm .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intel, Intel, hmm.
Why does that remind me of something?
Hmm, something with floating point bugs or something, hmm.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506170</id>
	<title>I don't think it does</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only thing it has in common with a car is that it has wheels and runs on the ground. Given its size and weight it would be more accurate to call it a jet powered truck.</p><p>IMO the real land speed record is the wheel driven ones , not the one where you just strap a huge rocket on the back and try and stay on the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing it has in common with a car is that it has wheels and runs on the ground .
Given its size and weight it would be more accurate to call it a jet powered truck.IMO the real land speed record is the wheel driven ones , not the one where you just strap a huge rocket on the back and try and stay on the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing it has in common with a car is that it has wheels and runs on the ground.
Given its size and weight it would be more accurate to call it a jet powered truck.IMO the real land speed record is the wheel driven ones , not the one where you just strap a huge rocket on the back and try and stay on the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506730</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Yaur</author>
	<datestamp>1268830080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its supersonic... so active areo would work different if at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its supersonic... so active areo would work different if at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its supersonic... so active areo would work different if at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506684</id>
	<title>Re:In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>Brian the Bold</author>
	<datestamp>1268829660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p><p>Because records are always increased with time, because it can be done.</p><p>Bloodhound SSC is a project designed to showcase British engineering capabilities and talent and to enthuse and encourage the next generations of engineers who are currently at school and have not yet decided what they want to do for a career.</p><p>Have a look at the project web site, all the information is there.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/" title="bloodhoundssc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/</a> [bloodhoundssc.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes.Because records are always increased with time , because it can be done.Bloodhound SSC is a project designed to showcase British engineering capabilities and talent and to enthuse and encourage the next generations of engineers who are currently at school and have not yet decided what they want to do for a career.Have a look at the project web site , all the information is there.http : //www.bloodhoundssc.com/ [ bloodhoundssc.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.Because records are always increased with time, because it can be done.Bloodhound SSC is a project designed to showcase British engineering capabilities and talent and to enthuse and encourage the next generations of engineers who are currently at school and have not yet decided what they want to do for a career.Have a look at the project web site, all the information is there.http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/ [bloodhoundssc.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31511268</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268850240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it an African car or a European car?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it an African car or a European car ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it an African car or a European car?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272</id>
	<title>In all seriousness...</title>
	<author>OpenSourced</author>
	<datestamp>1268824440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody knows the point of this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody knows the point of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody knows the point of this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507208</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>NekSnappa</author>
	<datestamp>1268834340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Beginning this year they have re-introduced limited adjustability of the front wing in F1.<br>
<a href="http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2009/0/617.html" title="formula1.com">http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2009/0/617.html</a> [formula1.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beginning this year they have re-introduced limited adjustability of the front wing in F1 .
http : //www.formula1.com/news/technical/2009/0/617.html [ formula1.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beginning this year they have re-introduced limited adjustability of the front wing in F1.
http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2009/0/617.html [formula1.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31529956</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268911200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are raising a fair point. There's a separate record for wheel-driven vehicles, divided into "special" cars and "production" cars, and as you can imagine, they are far slower. But the Land Speed Record (which is the famous one that people tend to remember) just requires a wheeled vehicle that stays on the land. The article is using the term "car" loosely to include "special land vehicles designed to beat the Land Speed Record".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>And of course, one of the biggest challenges - as TFA makes clear - actually is keeping the thing on the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are raising a fair point .
There 's a separate record for wheel-driven vehicles , divided into " special " cars and " production " cars , and as you can imagine , they are far slower .
But the Land Speed Record ( which is the famous one that people tend to remember ) just requires a wheeled vehicle that stays on the land .
The article is using the term " car " loosely to include " special land vehicles designed to beat the Land Speed Record " .
: - ) And of course , one of the biggest challenges - as TFA makes clear - actually is keeping the thing on the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are raising a fair point.
There's a separate record for wheel-driven vehicles, divided into "special" cars and "production" cars, and as you can imagine, they are far slower.
But the Land Speed Record (which is the famous one that people tend to remember) just requires a wheeled vehicle that stays on the land.
The article is using the term "car" loosely to include "special land vehicles designed to beat the Land Speed Record".
:-)And of course, one of the biggest challenges - as TFA makes clear - actually is keeping the thing on the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507334</id>
	<title>Commander Green?</title>
	<author>X10</author>
	<datestamp>1268835240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pilot of the thing is Commander Green. Isn't he supposed to be in an old computer game?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pilot of the thing is Commander Green .
Is n't he supposed to be in an old computer game ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pilot of the thing is Commander Green.
Isn't he supposed to be in an old computer game?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506900</id>
	<title>Re:Easier solution</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268831700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because if it vibrates at the right resonant frequency on the treadmill, it might accidentally be transported <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic\_treadmill" title="wikipedia.org">to the 30th century or to Earth-Two.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because if it vibrates at the right resonant frequency on the treadmill , it might accidentally be transported to the 30th century or to Earth-Two .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because if it vibrates at the right resonant frequency on the treadmill, it might accidentally be transported to the 30th century or to Earth-Two.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31520968</id>
	<title>Captain obvious said</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1268917080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Up until this point, we've had some big issues. We've had lift as high as 12 tonnes, and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest - that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly,"</i>
<p> Well, Duh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Up until this point , we 've had some big issues .
We 've had lift as high as 12 tonnes , and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest - that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly , " Well , Duh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Up until this point, we've had some big issues.
We've had lift as high as 12 tonnes, and when you consider the car is six-and-a-half tonnes at its heaviest - that amount of lift is enough to make the car fly,"
 Well, Duh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508168</id>
	<title>Racewalking</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268839560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt;&gt;Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.</p><p>I guess. Even the world's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it can't fly.</p><p>I just don't see the point to taking an airplane, putting it on wheels, and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it's doing 1000MPH.</p></div><p>It's every bit as pointless as racewalking, where if both your feet are off the ground at any time you're disqualified.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Depending on how the rules for " world 's fastest car " are written , how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.I guess .
Even the world 's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it ca n't fly.I just do n't see the point to taking an airplane , putting it on wheels , and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it 's doing 1000MPH.It 's every bit as pointless as racewalking , where if both your feet are off the ground at any time you 're disqualified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Depending on how the rules for "world's fastest car" are written, how the aero is done determines how impressive this really is.I guess.
Even the world's fastest car will be doing between 0 and 10MPH in Los Angeles traffic if it can't fly.I just don't see the point to taking an airplane, putting it on wheels, and spending effort trying to get it not to fly when it's doing 1000MPH.It's every bit as pointless as racewalking, where if both your feet are off the ground at any time you're disqualified.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506888</id>
	<title>The race is on</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1268831640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are 3 teams racing to break this record.  <a href="http://www.pprune.org/jet-blast/370877-land-speed-record-uk-vs-us-canada-vs-australia.html" title="pprune.org">The Brits, the Aussies and a USA/Canada team</a> [pprune.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are 3 teams racing to break this record .
The Brits , the Aussies and a USA/Canada team [ pprune.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are 3 teams racing to break this record.
The Brits, the Aussies and a USA/Canada team [pprune.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509502</id>
	<title>They could have saved a lot of money...</title>
	<author>WeatherGod</author>
	<datestamp>1268844960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel, who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem. Before Intel's intervention, the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures' in 18 months. The latest modelling work run on Intel's network investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks [CC]. By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car's rear end, the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic.</p></div><p>Why didn't they just consult Sir Mix-A-Lot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel , who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem .
Before Intel 's intervention , the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures ' in 18 months .
The latest modelling work run on Intel 's network investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks [ CC ] .
By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car 's rear end , the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic.Why did n't they just consult Sir Mix-A-Lot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The design effort has been aided by project sponsor Intel, who brought immense computing power to bear on the lift problem.
Before Intel's intervention, the design team had worked through 11 different 'architectures' in 18 months.
The latest modelling work run on Intel's network investigated 55 configurations in eight weeks [CC].
By playing with the position and shape of key elements of the car's rear end, the design team found the best way to manage the shockwave passing around and under the vehicle as it goes supersonic.Why didn't they just consult Sir Mix-A-Lot?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506412</id>
	<title>Re:But what happens when...</title>
	<author>Laser\_iCE</author>
	<datestamp>1268826420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not what happens when it hits 88<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it's when it drops under 50 that you should be watching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not what happens when it hits 88 ... it 's when it drops under 50 that you should be watching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not what happens when it hits 88 ... it's when it drops under 50 that you should be watching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506280</id>
	<title>Re:And for the rest of the world...</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1268824500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1.31 Mach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1.31 Mach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.31 Mach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507472</id>
	<title>Re:I'm debating if this thing really counts as a c</title>
	<author>Jawn98685</author>
	<datestamp>1268835960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car? </p></div><p>Yes. It rolls along <i>on it's wheels</i> and not on wings. It is steered by moving it's (usually front) <i>wheels</i>, not by aerodynamic control surfaces like rudders and ailerons. Indeed, whatever aerodynamic features it has are there primarily to ensure that it stays on the ground, rolling on and being steered by it's wheels.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car ?
Yes. It rolls along on it 's wheels and not on wings .
It is steered by moving it 's ( usually front ) wheels , not by aerodynamic control surfaces like rudders and ailerons .
Indeed , whatever aerodynamic features it has are there primarily to ensure that it stays on the ground , rolling on and being steered by it 's wheels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, you rip the wings off of a fighter jet and make it stay on the ground does it become a car?
Yes. It rolls along on it's wheels and not on wings.
It is steered by moving it's (usually front) wheels, not by aerodynamic control surfaces like rudders and ailerons.
Indeed, whatever aerodynamic features it has are there primarily to ensure that it stays on the ground, rolling on and being steered by it's wheels.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31517034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31513902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31512724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31529956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31511268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31538156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_2354239_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31517034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31511268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506882
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506504
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31513902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31529956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507980
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31512724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506768
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31508168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31505974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31538156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31507540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31510354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31509622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_2354239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_2354239.31506522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
