<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_15_2012202</id>
	<title>Attack of the Killer Electrons</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268641920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"At the peak of a magnetic storm, the number of highly energetic 'killer electrons' strong enough to damage electronics and human tissue can increase by a factor of more than ten times, <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/astrophysics/killer-electrons-from-outer-space">posing a danger to spacecraft, satellites, and astronauts</a>. Killer electrons can penetrate satellite shielding, so if electrical discharges take place in vital components, a satellite can be damaged or even rendered inoperable.  For many years, the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understood, in spite of physicists' attempts at solving this puzzle. Now the ESA reports that data shows <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEM8DL9KF6G\_index\_0.html">the increase in the creation of a substantial number of killer electrons</a> is due to a two-step process. First, the initial acceleration is due to the strong shock-related magnetic field compression. Immediately after the impact of the interplanetary shock wave, Earth's magnetic field lines began wobbling at ultra low frequencies. In turn, these ULF waves effectively accelerate the seed electrons (provided by the first step) to become killer electrons. 'These new findings help us to improve the models predicting the radiation environment in which satellites and astronauts operate. With solar activity now ramping up, we expect more of these shocks to impact our magnetosphere over the months and years to come,' says Philippe Escoubet, ESA's Cluster mission manager."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " At the peak of a magnetic storm , the number of highly energetic 'killer electrons ' strong enough to damage electronics and human tissue can increase by a factor of more than ten times , posing a danger to spacecraft , satellites , and astronauts .
Killer electrons can penetrate satellite shielding , so if electrical discharges take place in vital components , a satellite can be damaged or even rendered inoperable .
For many years , the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understood , in spite of physicists ' attempts at solving this puzzle .
Now the ESA reports that data shows the increase in the creation of a substantial number of killer electrons is due to a two-step process .
First , the initial acceleration is due to the strong shock-related magnetic field compression .
Immediately after the impact of the interplanetary shock wave , Earth 's magnetic field lines began wobbling at ultra low frequencies .
In turn , these ULF waves effectively accelerate the seed electrons ( provided by the first step ) to become killer electrons .
'These new findings help us to improve the models predicting the radiation environment in which satellites and astronauts operate .
With solar activity now ramping up , we expect more of these shocks to impact our magnetosphere over the months and years to come, ' says Philippe Escoubet , ESA 's Cluster mission manager .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "At the peak of a magnetic storm, the number of highly energetic 'killer electrons' strong enough to damage electronics and human tissue can increase by a factor of more than ten times, posing a danger to spacecraft, satellites, and astronauts.
Killer electrons can penetrate satellite shielding, so if electrical discharges take place in vital components, a satellite can be damaged or even rendered inoperable.
For many years, the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understood, in spite of physicists' attempts at solving this puzzle.
Now the ESA reports that data shows the increase in the creation of a substantial number of killer electrons is due to a two-step process.
First, the initial acceleration is due to the strong shock-related magnetic field compression.
Immediately after the impact of the interplanetary shock wave, Earth's magnetic field lines began wobbling at ultra low frequencies.
In turn, these ULF waves effectively accelerate the seed electrons (provided by the first step) to become killer electrons.
'These new findings help us to improve the models predicting the radiation environment in which satellites and astronauts operate.
With solar activity now ramping up, we expect more of these shocks to impact our magnetosphere over the months and years to come,' says Philippe Escoubet, ESA's Cluster mission manager.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31491494</id>
	<title>Killer electrons from unannounced inteloper</title>
	<author>Cr0vv</author>
	<datestamp>1268669580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've posted on this before.  These electrons are being emitted from a small brown dwarf star interloping through our solar system, it's that simple.

Yeah, NASA knows but they won't say.

Crow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've posted on this before .
These electrons are being emitted from a small brown dwarf star interloping through our solar system , it 's that simple .
Yeah , NASA knows but they wo n't say .
Crow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've posted on this before.
These electrons are being emitted from a small brown dwarf star interloping through our solar system, it's that simple.
Yeah, NASA knows but they won't say.
Crow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487854</id>
	<title>workings of creators remain totally misunderstood</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if they thought anything like us, we wouldn't be here.</p><p>there is no 'protection' (none needed) from the creators' wwwildly popular, newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate, which is well underway.</p><p>never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, &amp; get ready to move. you'll never see it (the big flash) coming if you do not look (upwards)....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if they thought anything like us , we would n't be here.there is no 'protection ' ( none needed ) from the creators ' wwwildly popular , newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate , which is well underway.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators , &amp; get ready to move .
you 'll never see it ( the big flash ) coming if you do not look ( upwards ) ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if they thought anything like us, we wouldn't be here.there is no 'protection' (none needed) from the creators' wwwildly popular, newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate, which is well underway.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, &amp; get ready to move.
you'll never see it (the big flash) coming if you do not look (upwards)....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499058</id>
	<title>Re:Faraday cage?</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1268766960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Faraday cage blocks electromagnetic fields basically by reflecting them -- it's a mirror. An electron is not an electromagnetic field. An electron is an electron. Your Faraday cage is uncharged. Why would an electron interact with it? If the electron actually struck the metal, it MIGHT be bound to the metal, but at relativistic speeds an electron is more like a bullet which simply passes through things, dissipating energy as it goes.</p><p>Out in the wild universe, energies, velocities, and field strengths can become MUCH larger than anything we can easily produce on Earth. Even your trusty Faraday cage can't block an electric field which is strong enough to physically rip the electrons from the metal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Faraday cage blocks electromagnetic fields basically by reflecting them -- it 's a mirror .
An electron is not an electromagnetic field .
An electron is an electron .
Your Faraday cage is uncharged .
Why would an electron interact with it ?
If the electron actually struck the metal , it MIGHT be bound to the metal , but at relativistic speeds an electron is more like a bullet which simply passes through things , dissipating energy as it goes.Out in the wild universe , energies , velocities , and field strengths can become MUCH larger than anything we can easily produce on Earth .
Even your trusty Faraday cage ca n't block an electric field which is strong enough to physically rip the electrons from the metal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Faraday cage blocks electromagnetic fields basically by reflecting them -- it's a mirror.
An electron is not an electromagnetic field.
An electron is an electron.
Your Faraday cage is uncharged.
Why would an electron interact with it?
If the electron actually struck the metal, it MIGHT be bound to the metal, but at relativistic speeds an electron is more like a bullet which simply passes through things, dissipating energy as it goes.Out in the wild universe, energies, velocities, and field strengths can become MUCH larger than anything we can easily produce on Earth.
Even your trusty Faraday cage can't block an electric field which is strong enough to physically rip the electrons from the metal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489010</id>
	<title>So this is what is behind...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the runaway Toyotas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the runaway Toyotas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the runaway Toyotas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489866</id>
	<title>Killer protons</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268658480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Protons (cosmic rays) arrive in random directions from gamma ray bursts billions of light years away in every direction. The energies are usually in the MeV - GeV range, the flux is low, and regular shielding is enough to stop most of them. (Electrons like that arrive too, but they're like the BB pellets of cosmic rays.) Astronauts need to worry a little bit about solar wind and cosmic rays giving them cancer, but they need to worry more about orbiting paint chips traveling at 20000 mph. A paint chip once hit the space shuttle window and blasted a hole a few cm wide.
<br> <br>
Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy, measurable in <i>Joules</i>. Cancer is the least of your worries. It could blow your head clean off, or blast a circuit board into smithereens. [Hey MythBusters, are you listening?] We still don't really understand what phenomenon generates single particles with such a ridiculously high speed, but we're pretty sure black holes are involved in some way. Unfortunately you don't get much of a show when they strike the upper atmosphere because they glide to a stop as they generate a shitstorm of particle showers. If they actually hit the ground we might assume they were meteorites, or the hand of God... either shooting at people with bad aim, or punching holes in the ground and commanding us to play golf.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Protons ( cosmic rays ) arrive in random directions from gamma ray bursts billions of light years away in every direction .
The energies are usually in the MeV - GeV range , the flux is low , and regular shielding is enough to stop most of them .
( Electrons like that arrive too , but they 're like the BB pellets of cosmic rays .
) Astronauts need to worry a little bit about solar wind and cosmic rays giving them cancer , but they need to worry more about orbiting paint chips traveling at 20000 mph .
A paint chip once hit the space shuttle window and blasted a hole a few cm wide .
Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy , measurable in Joules .
Cancer is the least of your worries .
It could blow your head clean off , or blast a circuit board into smithereens .
[ Hey MythBusters , are you listening ?
] We still do n't really understand what phenomenon generates single particles with such a ridiculously high speed , but we 're pretty sure black holes are involved in some way .
Unfortunately you do n't get much of a show when they strike the upper atmosphere because they glide to a stop as they generate a shitstorm of particle showers .
If they actually hit the ground we might assume they were meteorites , or the hand of God... either shooting at people with bad aim , or punching holes in the ground and commanding us to play golf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Protons (cosmic rays) arrive in random directions from gamma ray bursts billions of light years away in every direction.
The energies are usually in the MeV - GeV range, the flux is low, and regular shielding is enough to stop most of them.
(Electrons like that arrive too, but they're like the BB pellets of cosmic rays.
) Astronauts need to worry a little bit about solar wind and cosmic rays giving them cancer, but they need to worry more about orbiting paint chips traveling at 20000 mph.
A paint chip once hit the space shuttle window and blasted a hole a few cm wide.
Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy, measurable in Joules.
Cancer is the least of your worries.
It could blow your head clean off, or blast a circuit board into smithereens.
[Hey MythBusters, are you listening?
] We still don't really understand what phenomenon generates single particles with such a ridiculously high speed, but we're pretty sure black holes are involved in some way.
Unfortunately you don't get much of a show when they strike the upper atmosphere because they glide to a stop as they generate a shitstorm of particle showers.
If they actually hit the ground we might assume they were meteorites, or the hand of God... either shooting at people with bad aim, or punching holes in the ground and commanding us to play golf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488044</id>
	<title>beta rays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268648640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>o noes! Beta rays have changed their name to killer electrons. We are doomed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>o noes !
Beta rays have changed their name to killer electrons .
We are doomed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>o noes!
Beta rays have changed their name to killer electrons.
We are doomed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488278</id>
	<title>Ban killer electrons.</title>
	<author>Grimbleton</author>
	<datestamp>1268649600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the children.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487498</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268646420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, first one to throw a stone...</p><p>How many of your alternatives have nothing to do with that phenomenon?</p><p>How do the two that might be used to descripe the phenomenon make a distinction towards all the normal electrons flying around in the interplanetary space (they move, so they are accelerated, and nearly anything out there is fast enough to be ionizing...)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , first one to throw a stone...How many of your alternatives have nothing to do with that phenomenon ? How do the two that might be used to descripe the phenomenon make a distinction towards all the normal electrons flying around in the interplanetary space ( they move , so they are accelerated , and nearly anything out there is fast enough to be ionizing... ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, first one to throw a stone...How many of your alternatives have nothing to do with that phenomenon?How do the two that might be used to descripe the phenomenon make a distinction towards all the normal electrons flying around in the interplanetary space (they move, so they are accelerated, and nearly anything out there is fast enough to be ionizing...)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488302</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268649720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhhh, except that X-rays are not electrons...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhhh , except that X-rays are not electrons.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhhh, except that X-rays are not electrons...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487938</id>
	<title>Want to bet...</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1268648280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone is now working on a killer electron death ray. That pisses me off because I'm still waiting for hand held blasters. And my Flying Car.<br> <br>Focus, Dammit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone is now working on a killer electron death ray .
That pisses me off because I 'm still waiting for hand held blasters .
And my Flying Car .
Focus , Dammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone is now working on a killer electron death ray.
That pisses me off because I'm still waiting for hand held blasters.
And my Flying Car.
Focus, Dammit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488450</id>
	<title>Taser International has already patented it</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1268650440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything that can fry the bejesus off your balls . . . is good for their business.
</p><p>Law enforcement authorities love'em.
</p><p>"Oh, please, resist arrest . . . this Taser Killer Electron is all charged up and ready to go . . . now tell me . . . do you feel lucky . . . punk!
</p><p>Taser Killer Electron . . . when regular, wimpy-ass electrons just can't get the job done!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything that can fry the bejesus off your balls .
. .
is good for their business .
Law enforcement authorities love'em .
" Oh , please , resist arrest .
. .
this Taser Killer Electron is all charged up and ready to go .
. .
now tell me .
. .
do you feel lucky .
. .
punk ! Taser Killer Electron .
. .
when regular , wimpy-ass electrons just ca n't get the job done !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything that can fry the bejesus off your balls .
. .
is good for their business.
Law enforcement authorities love'em.
"Oh, please, resist arrest .
. .
this Taser Killer Electron is all charged up and ready to go .
. .
now tell me .
. .
do you feel lucky .
. .
punk!
Taser Killer Electron .
. .
when regular, wimpy-ass electrons just can't get the job done!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31515124</id>
	<title>Killer electrons?</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1268819760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're gonna need a smaller boat...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're gon na need a smaller boat.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're gonna need a smaller boat...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490362</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>Bruce Perens</author>
	<datestamp>1268661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right. Sorry. It's not an X-ray until it hits something. If I'm not mistaken, you get an X-ray photon when an accelerated electron hits certain materials, from knocking another electron, or bremsstrahlung.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right .
Sorry. It 's not an X-ray until it hits something .
If I 'm not mistaken , you get an X-ray photon when an accelerated electron hits certain materials , from knocking another electron , or bremsstrahlung .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.
Sorry. It's not an X-ray until it hits something.
If I'm not mistaken, you get an X-ray photon when an accelerated electron hits certain materials, from knocking another electron, or bremsstrahlung.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31498018</id>
	<title>Air Traffic Control system- Next Gen- GPS</title>
	<author>BubbaDave</author>
	<datestamp>1268763000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will rightly be called killer electrons when the GPS system goes tango-uniform and I can't fly home and strangle somone!</p><p>Dave</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will rightly be called killer electrons when the GPS system goes tango-uniform and I ca n't fly home and strangle somone ! Dave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will rightly be called killer electrons when the GPS system goes tango-uniform and I can't fly home and strangle somone!Dave</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488334</id>
	<title>But... but... Look at the fangs!</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1268649840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's no ordinary electron. That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered subatomic particle you ever set eyes on. Look, that electron's got a mean streak a mile wide, it's a killer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's no ordinary electron .
That 's the most foul , cruel , and bad-tempered subatomic particle you ever set eyes on .
Look , that electron 's got a mean streak a mile wide , it 's a killer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's no ordinary electron.
That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered subatomic particle you ever set eyes on.
Look, that electron's got a mean streak a mile wide, it's a killer!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</id>
	<title>All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>Bruce Perens</author>
	<datestamp>1268646120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Killer electrons. Geez, Just because ESA has to write to the level of a broad, uneducated audience, doesn't mean that Slashdot is that audience. Please write to the level of your audience.</p><p>
How about X-Rays, Roentgen Rays, Ionizing radiation, Accelerated electrons, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Killer electrons .
Geez , Just because ESA has to write to the level of a broad , uneducated audience , does n't mean that Slashdot is that audience .
Please write to the level of your audience .
How about X-Rays , Roentgen Rays , Ionizing radiation , Accelerated electrons , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Killer electrons.
Geez, Just because ESA has to write to the level of a broad, uneducated audience, doesn't mean that Slashdot is that audience.
Please write to the level of your audience.
How about X-Rays, Roentgen Rays, Ionizing radiation, Accelerated electrons, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487496</id>
	<title>A little heavy on the electrons...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268646420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can also turn your skin into rubber, rock, and fire or turn you invisibile. Oh noes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can also turn your skin into rubber , rock , and fire or turn you invisibile .
Oh noes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can also turn your skin into rubber, rock, and fire or turn you invisibile.
Oh noes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487574</id>
	<title>Tin-foil hats coming back in style?</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1268646840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tin-foil hats, a bit of duct tape, don't forget to deposit sperm or ova before you go, and think of all the money you'll save by being able to glow in the dark<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even better than a CF bulb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tin-foil hats , a bit of duct tape , do n't forget to deposit sperm or ova before you go , and think of all the money you 'll save by being able to glow in the dark ... even better than a CF bulb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tin-foil hats, a bit of duct tape, don't forget to deposit sperm or ova before you go, and think of all the money you'll save by being able to glow in the dark ... even better than a CF bulb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489190</id>
	<title>Re:But, the big question is.....</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1268654460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them?!?!</p></div></blockquote><p>Tinfoil will stop anything.  The question is, "how thick does it need to be?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them ? ! ?
! Tinfoil will stop anything .
The question is , " how thick does it need to be ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them?!?
!Tinfoil will stop anything.
The question is, "how thick does it need to be?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487672</id>
	<title>Electrons?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268647200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't they do a movie about this a few years back?  The electrons were all unusually large, and red, though.  Seems to me they were almost, I dunno, tomato-shaped.</p><p>I'm not Herman Farbage, so I'm not terribly concerned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they do a movie about this a few years back ?
The electrons were all unusually large , and red , though .
Seems to me they were almost , I dunno , tomato-shaped.I 'm not Herman Farbage , so I 'm not terribly concerned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they do a movie about this a few years back?
The electrons were all unusually large, and red, though.
Seems to me they were almost, I dunno, tomato-shaped.I'm not Herman Farbage, so I'm not terribly concerned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499866</id>
	<title>Re:Killer protons</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1268770080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy, measurable in Joules. Cancer is the least of your worries. It could blow your head clean off</p></div></blockquote><p>Are you entirely sure about that? While I will agree that it's a huge amount of energy for a single particle, that particle is tiny. It's going to leave a very very small hole going in and out. Even if the entire energy of that particle was transferred into your head, would it really make it explode?</p><p>It takes 4.2 joule to heat one gram of water 1C. A brain is 1.5 kg and probably 50\% water. So 750 grams of water at 38C. Getting that to boiling point (which might make your head explode) would require 195,300 joule. According to google that is <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&amp;rls=en-GB&amp;q=195300+joule+in+GeV&amp;sourceid=opera&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8" title="google.com">1.21 &#215; 10^15 gigaelectron volts</a> [google.com]. I rounded it down slightly, just to get that 1.21 Giga[...]volt. By comparison, the Higgs Boson is expected to be between 115 and 150 GeV.</p><p>I'm not a physicist, not even by a long shot, but the idea that a single proton can blow your head clean off is probably in the same realm of realism as bad guys being thrown back across a room when hit by pistol fire. But I'd love for someone who HAS a background in physics to show me wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy , measurable in Joules .
Cancer is the least of your worries .
It could blow your head clean offAre you entirely sure about that ?
While I will agree that it 's a huge amount of energy for a single particle , that particle is tiny .
It 's going to leave a very very small hole going in and out .
Even if the entire energy of that particle was transferred into your head , would it really make it explode ? It takes 4.2 joule to heat one gram of water 1C .
A brain is 1.5 kg and probably 50 \ % water .
So 750 grams of water at 38C .
Getting that to boiling point ( which might make your head explode ) would require 195,300 joule .
According to google that is 1.21   10 ^ 15 gigaelectron volts [ google.com ] .
I rounded it down slightly , just to get that 1.21 Giga [ ... ] volt .
By comparison , the Higgs Boson is expected to be between 115 and 150 GeV.I 'm not a physicist , not even by a long shot , but the idea that a single proton can blow your head clean off is probably in the same realm of realism as bad guys being thrown back across a room when hit by pistol fire .
But I 'd love for someone who HAS a background in physics to show me wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Occasionally a relativistic proton arrives with a respectable human-scale energy, measurable in Joules.
Cancer is the least of your worries.
It could blow your head clean offAre you entirely sure about that?
While I will agree that it's a huge amount of energy for a single particle, that particle is tiny.
It's going to leave a very very small hole going in and out.
Even if the entire energy of that particle was transferred into your head, would it really make it explode?It takes 4.2 joule to heat one gram of water 1C.
A brain is 1.5 kg and probably 50\% water.
So 750 grams of water at 38C.
Getting that to boiling point (which might make your head explode) would require 195,300 joule.
According to google that is 1.21 × 10^15 gigaelectron volts [google.com].
I rounded it down slightly, just to get that 1.21 Giga[...]volt.
By comparison, the Higgs Boson is expected to be between 115 and 150 GeV.I'm not a physicist, not even by a long shot, but the idea that a single proton can blow your head clean off is probably in the same realm of realism as bad guys being thrown back across a room when hit by pistol fire.
But I'd love for someone who HAS a background in physics to show me wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744</id>
	<title>But, the big question is.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big question is.... will tinfoil stop them?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31492124</id>
	<title>Positrons</title>
	<author>declaneven1</author>
	<datestamp>1268676780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah!! positrons are our only last hope. <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/denta-smile-md-review-how-effective-dentasmile-md-is-1954951.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/denta-smile-md-review-how-effective-dentasmile-md-is-1954951.html</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ! !
positrons are our only last hope .
http : //www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/denta-smile-md-review-how-effective-dentasmile-md-is-1954951.html [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!!
positrons are our only last hope.
http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/denta-smile-md-review-how-effective-dentasmile-md-is-1954951.html [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487826</id>
	<title>I'm not worried!</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1268647920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not worried! The positrons will save us!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not worried !
The positrons will save us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not worried!
The positrons will save us!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028</id>
	<title>Faraday cage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268648580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't said electron be routed around astronauts if they are in a metallic space station, and what satellites have exposed circuitry? And how can electrons kill without current?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't said electron be routed around astronauts if they are in a metallic space station , and what satellites have exposed circuitry ?
And how can electrons kill without current ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't said electron be routed around astronauts if they are in a metallic space station, and what satellites have exposed circuitry?
And how can electrons kill without current?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488356</id>
	<title>Really..</title>
	<author>anonymousNR</author>
	<datestamp>1268649960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am having a big problem these days figuring out which article at slashdot does not belong to Idle category.
<br>
Yeah I know this is Redundant. <br> I needed a good place to start burning my karma anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am having a big problem these days figuring out which article at slashdot does not belong to Idle category .
Yeah I know this is Redundant .
I needed a good place to start burning my karma anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am having a big problem these days figuring out which article at slashdot does not belong to Idle category.
Yeah I know this is Redundant.
I needed a good place to start burning my karma anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488986</id>
	<title>Re:Killer Electrons</title>
	<author>Prince Vegeta SSJ4</author>
	<datestamp>1268653260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have found the "god particle".  It is simply the anti-Killer Electron or life-giving positron.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have found the " god particle " .
It is simply the anti-Killer Electron or life-giving positron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have found the "god particle".
It is simply the anti-Killer Electron or life-giving positron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487616</id>
	<title>LHC to the rescue</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268647020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA: <i>Thanks to this analysis of Cluster data, if the killer electrons happen to be ejected towards Earth, we now know that they can strike the atmosphere within just 15 minutes.</i>
<br> <br>
"Take off every Killer Positron, for great justice!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : Thanks to this analysis of Cluster data , if the killer electrons happen to be ejected towards Earth , we now know that they can strike the atmosphere within just 15 minutes .
" Take off every Killer Positron , for great justice !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: Thanks to this analysis of Cluster data, if the killer electrons happen to be ejected towards Earth, we now know that they can strike the atmosphere within just 15 minutes.
"Take off every Killer Positron, for great justice!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490578</id>
	<title>by a factor of X times</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268662560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>increase by a factor of more than ten times</p></div><p>Just like the <a href="http://slashdot.org/tag/xtimesless" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">x times less</a> [slashdot.org] phrase, the "by a factor of X times" phrase just makes me wish that Slashdot would implement <a href="http://xkcd.com/481" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">last-chance review</a> [xkcd.com] before an editor is allowed to post.</p><p>For reference, "ten times" is a factor of <b>1</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>increase by a factor of more than ten timesJust like the x times less [ slashdot.org ] phrase , the " by a factor of X times " phrase just makes me wish that Slashdot would implement last-chance review [ xkcd.com ] before an editor is allowed to post.For reference , " ten times " is a factor of 1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>increase by a factor of more than ten timesJust like the x times less [slashdot.org] phrase, the "by a factor of X times" phrase just makes me wish that Slashdot would implement last-chance review [xkcd.com] before an editor is allowed to post.For reference, "ten times" is a factor of 1.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488368</id>
	<title>Title humor</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1268650020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In case someone does not get the joke embedded in the title:<br><a href="http://www.badmovies.org/movies/killtomato/killtomato-song.wav" title="badmovies.org">http://www.badmovies.org/movies/killtomato/killtomato-song.wav</a> [badmovies.org]</p><p>Attaaaaaaack of the killer electrons!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In case someone does not get the joke embedded in the title : http : //www.badmovies.org/movies/killtomato/killtomato-song.wav [ badmovies.org ] Attaaaaaaack of the killer electrons !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case someone does not get the joke embedded in the title:http://www.badmovies.org/movies/killtomato/killtomato-song.wav [badmovies.org]Attaaaaaaack of the killer electrons!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487380</id>
	<title>Killer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268646060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So we've rediscovered that lightning can damage both human flesh and electrical equipment?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we 've rediscovered that lightning can damage both human flesh and electrical equipment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we've rediscovered that lightning can damage both human flesh and electrical equipment?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487954</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>dnahelicase</author>
	<datestamp>1268648340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the slashdot audience is already well versed in the idea that these killer electron waves can cause all sorts of conditions, regardless of what you call them.  I just hope that if it happens to me that I'll get a good super-power and not be a reject from society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the slashdot audience is already well versed in the idea that these killer electron waves can cause all sorts of conditions , regardless of what you call them .
I just hope that if it happens to me that I 'll get a good super-power and not be a reject from society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the slashdot audience is already well versed in the idea that these killer electron waves can cause all sorts of conditions, regardless of what you call them.
I just hope that if it happens to me that I'll get a good super-power and not be a reject from society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>blueg3</author>
	<datestamp>1268648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How about X-Rays, Roentgen Rays, Ionizing radiation, Accelerated electrons, etc.</p></div><p>How about them? X-Rays and Roentgen Rays refer to photons, not electrons (except, in English, Roentgen Rays is generally not used). Ionizing radiation is incredibly vague; it's more often used to refer to photons than electrons. Accelerated electrons at least gets the particle right, but is also far too general. A paper on "How are accelerated electrons produced?" could simply answer, "They're accelerated."</p><p>Like it or not, "killer electrons" appears to be the preferred term for electrons produced in this manner, at least among some journal papers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about X-Rays , Roentgen Rays , Ionizing radiation , Accelerated electrons , etc.How about them ?
X-Rays and Roentgen Rays refer to photons , not electrons ( except , in English , Roentgen Rays is generally not used ) .
Ionizing radiation is incredibly vague ; it 's more often used to refer to photons than electrons .
Accelerated electrons at least gets the particle right , but is also far too general .
A paper on " How are accelerated electrons produced ?
" could simply answer , " They 're accelerated .
" Like it or not , " killer electrons " appears to be the preferred term for electrons produced in this manner , at least among some journal papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about X-Rays, Roentgen Rays, Ionizing radiation, Accelerated electrons, etc.How about them?
X-Rays and Roentgen Rays refer to photons, not electrons (except, in English, Roentgen Rays is generally not used).
Ionizing radiation is incredibly vague; it's more often used to refer to photons than electrons.
Accelerated electrons at least gets the particle right, but is also far too general.
A paper on "How are accelerated electrons produced?
" could simply answer, "They're accelerated.
"Like it or not, "killer electrons" appears to be the preferred term for electrons produced in this manner, at least among some journal papers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489534</id>
	<title>Re:But, the big question is.....</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1268656500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To a superfast electron, a tinfoil hat is 99\% empty space. They'll just pass right through.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To a superfast electron , a tinfoil hat is 99 \ % empty space .
They 'll just pass right through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To a superfast electron, a tinfoil hat is 99\% empty space.
They'll just pass right through.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490478</id>
	<title>Re:Faraday cage?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1268661960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; And how can electrons kill without current?</p><p>You can call them "high-energy beta particles" if it makes you more comfortable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; And how can electrons kill without current ? You can call them " high-energy beta particles " if it makes you more comfortable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; And how can electrons kill without current?You can call them "high-energy beta particles" if it makes you more comfortable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487788</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't talk to me about X-Rays. After 30 years and 500 comic strips I'm still waiting for my X-ray glasses!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't talk to me about X-Rays .
After 30 years and 500 comic strips I 'm still waiting for my X-ray glasses !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't talk to me about X-Rays.
After 30 years and 500 comic strips I'm still waiting for my X-ray glasses!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488786</id>
	<title>Obvious</title>
	<author>sycodon</author>
	<datestamp>1268652120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>For many years, the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understood</i></p><p>Isn't it obvious? Climate Change of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For many years , the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understoodIs n't it obvious ?
Climate Change of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For many years, the mechanism by which killer electrons are produced has remained poorly understoodIsn't it obvious?
Climate Change of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488684</id>
	<title>Heh did anyone else read that wrong?</title>
	<author>bobdown2001</author>
	<datestamp>1268651520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It certainly wasn't "electrons" I saw at first glance.  I thought there must have been some cheap dodgy form of Viagra on the market with really bad side effects!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It certainly was n't " electrons " I saw at first glance .
I thought there must have been some cheap dodgy form of Viagra on the market with really bad side effects !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It certainly wasn't "electrons" I saw at first glance.
I thought there must have been some cheap dodgy form of Viagra on the market with really bad side effects!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487262</id>
	<title>Oh yeah?</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268645640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got your killer electrons right here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::points down::</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got your killer electrons right here : : points down : :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got your killer electrons right here ::points down::</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31491616</id>
	<title>Ten times? Ten times compared to what?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268670900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>can increase by a factor of more than ten times</p></div><p>So let&rsquo;s say, from<br>0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001<br>to<br>0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001<br>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>can increase by a factor of more than ten timesSo let    s say , from0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001to0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can increase by a factor of more than ten timesSo let’s say, from0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001to0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487542</id>
	<title>Re:All of My Electrons are Certified Organic</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268646660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Killers, shock, penetrations, human tissue...I guess they tried to attract moviegoers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Killers , shock , penetrations , human tissue...I guess they tried to attract moviegoers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Killers, shock, penetrations, human tissue...I guess they tried to attract moviegoers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488270</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yeah?</title>
	<author>Notegg Nornoggin</author>
	<datestamp>1268649540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got a foil hat so suck muh dick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a foil hat so suck muh dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a foil hat so suck muh dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31495268</id>
	<title>Re:Faraday cage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not that simple.  These electrons are moving at such high energies that it takes a thick layer of lead, a strong magnetic field, an atmosphere or a million volts of potential to stop them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not that simple .
These electrons are moving at such high energies that it takes a thick layer of lead , a strong magnetic field , an atmosphere or a million volts of potential to stop them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not that simple.
These electrons are moving at such high energies that it takes a thick layer of lead, a strong magnetic field, an atmosphere or a million volts of potential to stop them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487458</id>
	<title>Killer Electrons</title>
	<author>GMThomas</author>
	<datestamp>1268646300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe if they wouldn't be so negative all the time, they wouldn't want to kill anyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if they would n't be so negative all the time , they would n't want to kill anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if they wouldn't be so negative all the time, they wouldn't want to kill anyone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488926</id>
	<title>sex with A Trollkore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268652840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>had 3ecome lik4e</htmltext>
<tokenext>had 3ecome lik4e</tokentext>
<sentencetext>had 3ecome lik4e</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31491204</id>
	<title>Are They Really Killers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268667240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did these electrons ever kill anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did these electrons ever kill anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did these electrons ever kill anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31495268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_2012202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31495268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31490362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31489866
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31499866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31488334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31487854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_2012202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_2012202.31498018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
