<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_15_147201</id>
	<title>Iran Hacks US Spy Sites</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268664300000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>superapecommando writes <i>"Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps <a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/security/cybercrime/news/index.cfm?newsid=19368">hacked into 29 websites affiliated with US espionage networks</a>, Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Sunday. 'The hacked websites acted against Iran's national security under the cover of human rights activities,' Fars reported. It did not disclose details of the attacks.
The Internet has been used by Iranian opposition groups who contested the results of last year's elections there to organize demonstrations and share information about protests and arrests. The Revolutionary Guards is a military group that was founded after Iran's 1979 revolution. The group includes conventional army, navy, air force, and intelligence units, as well as the Basij paramilitary force and various business units."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>superapecommando writes " Iran 's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps hacked into 29 websites affiliated with US espionage networks , Iran 's semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Sunday .
'The hacked websites acted against Iran 's national security under the cover of human rights activities, ' Fars reported .
It did not disclose details of the attacks .
The Internet has been used by Iranian opposition groups who contested the results of last year 's elections there to organize demonstrations and share information about protests and arrests .
The Revolutionary Guards is a military group that was founded after Iran 's 1979 revolution .
The group includes conventional army , navy , air force , and intelligence units , as well as the Basij paramilitary force and various business units .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>superapecommando writes "Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps hacked into 29 websites affiliated with US espionage networks, Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Sunday.
'The hacked websites acted against Iran's national security under the cover of human rights activities,' Fars reported.
It did not disclose details of the attacks.
The Internet has been used by Iranian opposition groups who contested the results of last year's elections there to organize demonstrations and share information about protests and arrests.
The Revolutionary Guards is a military group that was founded after Iran's 1979 revolution.
The group includes conventional army, navy, air force, and intelligence units, as well as the Basij paramilitary force and various business units.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487188</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268645340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it is truly amazing how last week you didn't know what you're talking about, and this week you still don't.  Wait, that's completely un-amazing.</p><p>No, what's amazing is how happily you'll believe the very people who would be our alleged enemies in this alleged cyberwar because it supports your thesis.</p><p>Did you even read past the headline that the sites brought down were Iranian human rights web sites, alleged by Iran to be "affiliated with U.S. espionage services"?  Yeah, and all the Green Revolution protesters in Iran are actually U.S. agents deliberately fomenting revolt.  Also, homosexuals do not exist in Iran and the Holocaust never happened.  Official Iranian news sources said so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it is truly amazing how last week you did n't know what you 're talking about , and this week you still do n't .
Wait , that 's completely un-amazing.No , what 's amazing is how happily you 'll believe the very people who would be our alleged enemies in this alleged cyberwar because it supports your thesis.Did you even read past the headline that the sites brought down were Iranian human rights web sites , alleged by Iran to be " affiliated with U.S. espionage services " ?
Yeah , and all the Green Revolution protesters in Iran are actually U.S. agents deliberately fomenting revolt .
Also , homosexuals do not exist in Iran and the Holocaust never happened .
Official Iranian news sources said so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it is truly amazing how last week you didn't know what you're talking about, and this week you still don't.
Wait, that's completely un-amazing.No, what's amazing is how happily you'll believe the very people who would be our alleged enemies in this alleged cyberwar because it supports your thesis.Did you even read past the headline that the sites brought down were Iranian human rights web sites, alleged by Iran to be "affiliated with U.S. espionage services"?
Yeah, and all the Green Revolution protesters in Iran are actually U.S. agents deliberately fomenting revolt.
Also, homosexuals do not exist in Iran and the Holocaust never happened.
Official Iranian news sources said so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31488014</id>
	<title>Re:They also hacked goatse</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1268648520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They also hacked goatse</p></div></blockquote><p>
"There is no goatse in Iran" - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They also hacked goatse " There is no goatse in Iran " - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also hacked goatse
"There is no goatse in Iran" - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482444</id>
	<title>I don't get these hacks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are all these government spy groups in China and Iran using traceable IP's?  Why not just send their spy to any place in the EU or US with enough money to buy a laptop with a wireless connection and do their hacking by hopping on unencrypted wireless networks?  It's like spy's are getting ultra lazy and sloppy.  Like with the assasination in dubi a few weeks back.  Why were the spys caught on camera?  Didn't it dawn on them they they should have taken out the camera system to cover their tracks so that no one would know.  Instead we have them playing James Bond in plain view of the camera. Espionage is about doing things that don't lead back to you and leaves doubt about who did it and why.  Malicous Hacking tip 101 Don't use your own IP address to do any hacking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are all these government spy groups in China and Iran using traceable IP 's ?
Why not just send their spy to any place in the EU or US with enough money to buy a laptop with a wireless connection and do their hacking by hopping on unencrypted wireless networks ?
It 's like spy 's are getting ultra lazy and sloppy .
Like with the assasination in dubi a few weeks back .
Why were the spys caught on camera ?
Did n't it dawn on them they they should have taken out the camera system to cover their tracks so that no one would know .
Instead we have them playing James Bond in plain view of the camera .
Espionage is about doing things that do n't lead back to you and leaves doubt about who did it and why .
Malicous Hacking tip 101 Do n't use your own IP address to do any hacking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are all these government spy groups in China and Iran using traceable IP's?
Why not just send their spy to any place in the EU or US with enough money to buy a laptop with a wireless connection and do their hacking by hopping on unencrypted wireless networks?
It's like spy's are getting ultra lazy and sloppy.
Like with the assasination in dubi a few weeks back.
Why were the spys caught on camera?
Didn't it dawn on them they they should have taken out the camera system to cover their tracks so that no one would know.
Instead we have them playing James Bond in plain view of the camera.
Espionage is about doing things that don't lead back to you and leaves doubt about who did it and why.
Malicous Hacking tip 101 Don't use your own IP address to do any hacking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482262</id>
	<title>If the sites really were "hacked" . . .</title>
	<author>PeeAitchPee</author>
	<datestamp>1268669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>. . . why would any self-respecting hacker announce it?  If there was anything of any real value on there, why not continue to quietly gather as much info as you could?  This stinks worse than Pelosi's jock strap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
why would any self-respecting hacker announce it ?
If there was anything of any real value on there , why not continue to quietly gather as much info as you could ?
This stinks worse than Pelosi 's jock strap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
why would any self-respecting hacker announce it?
If there was anything of any real value on there, why not continue to quietly gather as much info as you could?
This stinks worse than Pelosi's jock strap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487714</id>
	<title>What's good for goose is good for gander</title>
	<author>iamacat</author>
	<datestamp>1268647440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Iran's government sees hacking US websites as a legitimate activity,  I take it that they don't mind either NSA folks or grassroot democracy enthusiasts hacking details of Iranian presidential security or nuclear reactor controls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Iran 's government sees hacking US websites as a legitimate activity , I take it that they do n't mind either NSA folks or grassroot democracy enthusiasts hacking details of Iranian presidential security or nuclear reactor controls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Iran's government sees hacking US websites as a legitimate activity,  I take it that they don't mind either NSA folks or grassroot democracy enthusiasts hacking details of Iranian presidential security or nuclear reactor controls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483730</id>
	<title>Re:Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268675880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is fancy 21st century Jennifer Garner style spying (high kick).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden.This is fancy 21st century Jennifer Garner style spying ( high kick ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden.This is fancy 21st century Jennifer Garner style spying (high kick).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972</id>
	<title>Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1268668140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our "enemies" in a very poor light, but this time I think we are looking at some pretty piss-poor Iranian folly.</p><p>Websites are passive. They respond to clients. They do not strike out on their own. So "hacking" them and shutting them down isn't really any sort of solution at all.</p><p>The Basij are a pretty rough security force compared to any typical military or paramilitary group. Despite their unprofessionalism, they are at the core of Iranian governmental security. They were instrumental in shutting down the election protests last year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our " enemies " in a very poor light , but this time I think we are looking at some pretty piss-poor Iranian folly.Websites are passive .
They respond to clients .
They do not strike out on their own .
So " hacking " them and shutting them down is n't really any sort of solution at all.The Basij are a pretty rough security force compared to any typical military or paramilitary group .
Despite their unprofessionalism , they are at the core of Iranian governmental security .
They were instrumental in shutting down the election protests last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our "enemies" in a very poor light, but this time I think we are looking at some pretty piss-poor Iranian folly.Websites are passive.
They respond to clients.
They do not strike out on their own.
So "hacking" them and shutting them down isn't really any sort of solution at all.The Basij are a pretty rough security force compared to any typical military or paramilitary group.
Despite their unprofessionalism, they are at the core of Iranian governmental security.
They were instrumental in shutting down the election protests last year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482424</id>
	<title>Re:When are they</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1268670420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 29 websites were identified in a statement (in Farsi) released on a website operated by the Revolutionary Guards. <p>Most of these sites redirected to one site. But in all cases, they are minor sites run by random people, just like 1,000,000,000's of others on the Interwebs with negligable or non-existent "security". These are mostly "here today, gone tomorow" type web sites. This hardly qualifies as serious hacking of secure government-backed web sites.<br> <br>This is what's called "propaganda".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 29 websites were identified in a statement ( in Farsi ) released on a website operated by the Revolutionary Guards .
Most of these sites redirected to one site .
But in all cases , they are minor sites run by random people , just like 1,000,000,000 's of others on the Interwebs with negligable or non-existent " security " .
These are mostly " here today , gone tomorow " type web sites .
This hardly qualifies as serious hacking of secure government-backed web sites .
This is what 's called " propaganda " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 29 websites were identified in a statement (in Farsi) released on a website operated by the Revolutionary Guards.
Most of these sites redirected to one site.
But in all cases, they are minor sites run by random people, just like 1,000,000,000's of others on the Interwebs with negligable or non-existent "security".
These are mostly "here today, gone tomorow" type web sites.
This hardly qualifies as serious hacking of secure government-backed web sites.
This is what's called "propaganda".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482574</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268671140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>By the bye, Mr. Intel Analyst, OPSEC fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By the bye , Mr. Intel Analyst , OPSEC fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the bye, Mr. Intel Analyst, OPSEC fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice headline.  These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure.  More appropriate headline:  "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice headline .
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA 's cyberwar infrastructure .
More appropriate headline : " Iranian script kiddies take down website ; blame US " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice headline.
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure.
More appropriate headline:  "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483938</id>
	<title>sounlds like Iran has their version of Comical Ali</title>
	<author>mjwalshe</author>
	<datestamp>1268676780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect the list of sites hacked will incude targets like Amnesty and the BBC world service which is of course as well all know run by lizzards from the planet Zog who use subliminal meassages in the Archers to spread socialist propaganda.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)
<br> <br>
ps for non UK readers the Archers is a long running radio soap of stultifying boredom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect the list of sites hacked will incude targets like Amnesty and the BBC world service which is of course as well all know run by lizzards from the planet Zog who use subliminal meassages in the Archers to spread socialist propaganda .
: - ) ps for non UK readers the Archers is a long running radio soap of stultifying boredom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect the list of sites hacked will incude targets like Amnesty and the BBC world service which is of course as well all know run by lizzards from the planet Zog who use subliminal meassages in the Archers to spread socialist propaganda.
:-)
 
ps for non UK readers the Archers is a long running radio soap of stultifying boredom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31486144</id>
	<title>When does hacking become an act of war?</title>
	<author>Japher</author>
	<datestamp>1268684760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>At some point (I think we're already there) our computer infrastructure becomes so important to a nation that a cyber attack could be construed as an act of war. I wonder how long it will be before we see a physical military response to a cyber attack. We've already seen evidence that China attacked Google's corporate infrastructure a few months ago. Is this really all that dissimilar than Chinese agents coming to the US and physically breaking into Google's buildings? To relate things to the article, if it could be shown that Iran was indeed attacking CIA sites, would the US be justified in bombing Iranian intelligence facilities? Just some food for thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At some point ( I think we 're already there ) our computer infrastructure becomes so important to a nation that a cyber attack could be construed as an act of war .
I wonder how long it will be before we see a physical military response to a cyber attack .
We 've already seen evidence that China attacked Google 's corporate infrastructure a few months ago .
Is this really all that dissimilar than Chinese agents coming to the US and physically breaking into Google 's buildings ?
To relate things to the article , if it could be shown that Iran was indeed attacking CIA sites , would the US be justified in bombing Iranian intelligence facilities ?
Just some food for thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At some point (I think we're already there) our computer infrastructure becomes so important to a nation that a cyber attack could be construed as an act of war.
I wonder how long it will be before we see a physical military response to a cyber attack.
We've already seen evidence that China attacked Google's corporate infrastructure a few months ago.
Is this really all that dissimilar than Chinese agents coming to the US and physically breaking into Google's buildings?
To relate things to the article, if it could be shown that Iran was indeed attacking CIA sites, would the US be justified in bombing Iranian intelligence facilities?
Just some food for thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102</id>
	<title>article is propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Taco, you motherfucking tool, you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/jun/14/post155" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">innocent</a> [guardian.co.uk] people!</p><p>shame on you, <b>fuck!</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Taco , you motherfucking tool , you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto innocent [ guardian.co.uk ] people ! shame on you , fuck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taco, you motherfucking tool, you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto innocent [guardian.co.uk] people!shame on you, fuck!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268671740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government, and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress. Your analogy is flawed. Also most of what is on Fox is commentary, not news.  The "News" on Fox seems to be pretty much like the other news channels:  sensational and fluffy with a sprinkle of pseudo-intellectualism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government , and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress .
Your analogy is flawed .
Also most of what is on Fox is commentary , not news .
The " News " on Fox seems to be pretty much like the other news channels : sensational and fluffy with a sprinkle of pseudo-intellectualism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government, and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress.
Your analogy is flawed.
Also most of what is on Fox is commentary, not news.
The "News" on Fox seems to be pretty much like the other news channels:  sensational and fluffy with a sprinkle of pseudo-intellectualism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482284</id>
	<title>Flimsy excuse.</title>
	<author>nten</author>
	<datestamp>1268669700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is only Iran saying that they were spy websites.  Seems like a improvised excuse to censor their own populace to me.  Not that they need an excuse, but excuses decrease the amount of resulting discontent.  Just using the word "because" in a request has been shown to dramatically boost acquiescence.  As has been discussed before, the young educated Iranians that tend to be the ones protesting are quite tech aware on average, it wouldn't surprise me if they set the sites up entirely themselves with no prodding.  Iran is just as embarrassed about 'amateurs' making their jobs difficult as the superpowers are I'd guess.  "Oh no!  The sheeple can write html!  We are doomed!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is only Iran saying that they were spy websites .
Seems like a improvised excuse to censor their own populace to me .
Not that they need an excuse , but excuses decrease the amount of resulting discontent .
Just using the word " because " in a request has been shown to dramatically boost acquiescence .
As has been discussed before , the young educated Iranians that tend to be the ones protesting are quite tech aware on average , it would n't surprise me if they set the sites up entirely themselves with no prodding .
Iran is just as embarrassed about 'amateurs ' making their jobs difficult as the superpowers are I 'd guess .
" Oh no !
The sheeple can write html !
We are doomed !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is only Iran saying that they were spy websites.
Seems like a improvised excuse to censor their own populace to me.
Not that they need an excuse, but excuses decrease the amount of resulting discontent.
Just using the word "because" in a request has been shown to dramatically boost acquiescence.
As has been discussed before, the young educated Iranians that tend to be the ones protesting are quite tech aware on average, it wouldn't surprise me if they set the sites up entirely themselves with no prodding.
Iran is just as embarrassed about 'amateurs' making their jobs difficult as the superpowers are I'd guess.
"Oh no!
The sheeple can write html!
We are doomed!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482914</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Article Title</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1268672520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A terrible story with a terrible summary on the font page of Slashdot.<br>So what else is new?<br>Really I tend to give the slashdot some slack but this is just terrible.  I mean really what are they thinking. And yes I know CW posted this trash but Slashdot doesn't have to repeat it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A terrible story with a terrible summary on the font page of Slashdot.So what else is new ? Really I tend to give the slashdot some slack but this is just terrible .
I mean really what are they thinking .
And yes I know CW posted this trash but Slashdot does n't have to repeat it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A terrible story with a terrible summary on the font page of Slashdot.So what else is new?Really I tend to give the slashdot some slack but this is just terrible.
I mean really what are they thinking.
And yes I know CW posted this trash but Slashdot doesn't have to repeat it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483650</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1268675460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Nice headline. These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure. More appropriate headline: "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".</i>
<br>
<br>
An even more accurate headline: "Iranian government takes down human rights websites, accusing them of 'espionage'."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice headline .
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA 's cyberwar infrastructure .
More appropriate headline : " Iranian script kiddies take down website ; blame US " .
An even more accurate headline : " Iranian government takes down human rights websites , accusing them of 'espionage' .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice headline.
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure.
More appropriate headline: "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".
An even more accurate headline: "Iranian government takes down human rights websites, accusing them of 'espionage'.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31485646</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268683140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our "enemies" in a very poor light"</p><p>All you had to say is "I'm a libtard" and we would have deduced the rest.  Got to love someone who admits biased cynicism towards their own country.</p><p>Let me guess...9/11 an inside job?  We're in Afghanistan to steal their non-existant oil?  Or is it to secretly benefit the european heroin market (which Haliburton owns a share of)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our " enemies " in a very poor light " All you had to say is " I 'm a libtard " and we would have deduced the rest .
Got to love someone who admits biased cynicism towards their own country.Let me guess...9/11 an inside job ?
We 're in Afghanistan to steal their non-existant oil ?
Or is it to secretly benefit the european heroin market ( which Haliburton owns a share of ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm usually the first one to blame America when I see slanted reporting that seemingly puts our "enemies" in a very poor light"All you had to say is "I'm a libtard" and we would have deduced the rest.
Got to love someone who admits biased cynicism towards their own country.Let me guess...9/11 an inside job?
We're in Afghanistan to steal their non-existant oil?
Or is it to secretly benefit the european heroin market (which Haliburton owns a share of)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482928</id>
	<title>you mean "ALLEGED"</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1268672520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never have I seen an article title more in need of the word "Alleged"</p><p>As in: Iran Hacks ALLEGED US Spy Sites</p><p>Like you are going to believe that "Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency" isn't going to make unsubstantiated claims?  (I know double negative, but here it ain't wrong).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never have I seen an article title more in need of the word " Alleged " As in : Iran Hacks ALLEGED US Spy SitesLike you are going to believe that " Iran 's semi-official Fars News Agency " is n't going to make unsubstantiated claims ?
( I know double negative , but here it ai n't wrong ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never have I seen an article title more in need of the word "Alleged"As in: Iran Hacks ALLEGED US Spy SitesLike you are going to believe that "Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency" isn't going to make unsubstantiated claims?
(I know double negative, but here it ain't wrong).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482228</id>
	<title>Not very impressive..</title>
	<author>Ziekheid</author>
	<datestamp>1268669340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Government related sites are hacked continously, it's just that only few stories actually arrive in "mainstream" media about it.<br>Have a look at the zone-h archive of defacements and note the number of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gov.X sites in the list: <a href="http://zone-h.org/archive/special=1" title="zone-h.org">http://zone-h.org/archive/special=1</a> [zone-h.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Government related sites are hacked continously , it 's just that only few stories actually arrive in " mainstream " media about it.Have a look at the zone-h archive of defacements and note the number of .gov.X sites in the list : http : //zone-h.org/archive/special = 1 [ zone-h.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Government related sites are hacked continously, it's just that only few stories actually arrive in "mainstream" media about it.Have a look at the zone-h archive of defacements and note the number of .gov.X sites in the list: http://zone-h.org/archive/special=1 [zone-h.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</id>
	<title>Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>A website is a passive entity that serves content; there's no such thing as a proactive-espionage-"attack" website. Grow up.</li><li>They were Iranian human rights websites.  The article says (in quotes) that the Fars news network drew a tie to US intelligence with no details to back up that claim.</li><li>Fars news somehow linked this incident to other US funded groups that were arrested on a different occasion? with no citation.</li></ul><p>First off, Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US.  They decide the news before it happens.  Second off, the only thing worse than this crappy article with no references is CmdrTaco's poor summary of it that insinuates that the US was funding these sites even though the article says nothing about that being true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A website is a passive entity that serves content ; there 's no such thing as a proactive-espionage- " attack " website .
Grow up.They were Iranian human rights websites .
The article says ( in quotes ) that the Fars news network drew a tie to US intelligence with no details to back up that claim.Fars news somehow linked this incident to other US funded groups that were arrested on a different occasion ?
with no citation.First off , Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US .
They decide the news before it happens .
Second off , the only thing worse than this crappy article with no references is CmdrTaco 's poor summary of it that insinuates that the US was funding these sites even though the article says nothing about that being true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
A website is a passive entity that serves content; there's no such thing as a proactive-espionage-"attack" website.
Grow up.They were Iranian human rights websites.
The article says (in quotes) that the Fars news network drew a tie to US intelligence with no details to back up that claim.Fars news somehow linked this incident to other US funded groups that were arrested on a different occasion?
with no citation.First off, Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US.
They decide the news before it happens.
Second off, the only thing worse than this crappy article with no references is CmdrTaco's poor summary of it that insinuates that the US was funding these sites even though the article says nothing about that being true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482422</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As much as I dislike Fox News comparing them to fars news is just not fair.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I dislike Fox News comparing them to fars news is just not fair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I dislike Fox News comparing them to fars news is just not fair.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483426</id>
	<title>Re:Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1268674500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they're talking about websites that are critical of human rights in Iran.  Their contention is that all the bad news about Iran is a western psy-ops ploy.</p><p>Calling such sites "spy websites" is not an oxymoron by any means.   Spying isn't just about getting information; it's about planting disinformation too.</p><p>The domains they are targeting mostly belong to one "KEYVAN RAFIEE", with a contact address in a small suburban condo building in Silver Spring MD. It is also the same address used for a small media production company.  Some of the domains under that name have as contract address a private home in Woodland CA.</p><p>Overall, this not inconsistent with this Mr. Rafiee being a private human rights activist, nor with him being a frontman for a US intelligence operation.</p><p>That said, the most credible explanation is this is just disinformation on Iran's part.  We've all seen the riots, which were definitely not staged. We've all heard the pronouncements of Mr. Ahmadinejad, which stink of propaganda.  This does not mean *we* don't have our own propaganda, but it's clear that the Iranian government would try to portray any criticism as being from the CIA, especially given the CIA's unfortunate history in that country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they 're talking about websites that are critical of human rights in Iran .
Their contention is that all the bad news about Iran is a western psy-ops ploy.Calling such sites " spy websites " is not an oxymoron by any means .
Spying is n't just about getting information ; it 's about planting disinformation too.The domains they are targeting mostly belong to one " KEYVAN RAFIEE " , with a contact address in a small suburban condo building in Silver Spring MD .
It is also the same address used for a small media production company .
Some of the domains under that name have as contract address a private home in Woodland CA.Overall , this not inconsistent with this Mr. Rafiee being a private human rights activist , nor with him being a frontman for a US intelligence operation.That said , the most credible explanation is this is just disinformation on Iran 's part .
We 've all seen the riots , which were definitely not staged .
We 've all heard the pronouncements of Mr. Ahmadinejad , which stink of propaganda .
This does not mean * we * do n't have our own propaganda , but it 's clear that the Iranian government would try to portray any criticism as being from the CIA , especially given the CIA 's unfortunate history in that country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they're talking about websites that are critical of human rights in Iran.
Their contention is that all the bad news about Iran is a western psy-ops ploy.Calling such sites "spy websites" is not an oxymoron by any means.
Spying isn't just about getting information; it's about planting disinformation too.The domains they are targeting mostly belong to one "KEYVAN RAFIEE", with a contact address in a small suburban condo building in Silver Spring MD.
It is also the same address used for a small media production company.
Some of the domains under that name have as contract address a private home in Woodland CA.Overall, this not inconsistent with this Mr. Rafiee being a private human rights activist, nor with him being a frontman for a US intelligence operation.That said, the most credible explanation is this is just disinformation on Iran's part.
We've all seen the riots, which were definitely not staged.
We've all heard the pronouncements of Mr. Ahmadinejad, which stink of propaganda.
This does not mean *we* don't have our own propaganda, but it's clear that the Iranian government would try to portray any criticism as being from the CIA, especially given the CIA's unfortunate history in that country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482354</id>
	<title>It's a website. Not a war.</title>
	<author>khasim</author>
	<datestamp>1268670060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war, I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin.</p></div></blockquote><p>And they were right to do that. A sysadmin knows the difference between a website and a war. Websites are cracked all the time by script kiddies. Websites are shut down all the time by lawyers.</p><p>Who cares? All this does is attract MORE attention to whatever content those websites were hosting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war , I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin.And they were right to do that .
A sysadmin knows the difference between a website and a war .
Websites are cracked all the time by script kiddies .
Websites are shut down all the time by lawyers.Who cares ?
All this does is attract MORE attention to whatever content those websites were hosting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war, I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin.And they were right to do that.
A sysadmin knows the difference between a website and a war.
Websites are cracked all the time by script kiddies.
Websites are shut down all the time by lawyers.Who cares?
All this does is attract MORE attention to whatever content those websites were hosting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482076</id>
	<title>who remembers this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>YOU HAVE BEEN HACKED BY IRANESE<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br>

but really. remember when defacing websites was almost always politically driven? some of the 2600 website hack archives from the 90s should refresh your memory... now 'hacking' is almost entirely data mining for advertisement profit... very sad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>YOU HAVE BEEN HACKED BY IRANESE but really .
remember when defacing websites was almost always politically driven ?
some of the 2600 website hack archives from the 90s should refresh your memory... now 'hacking ' is almost entirely data mining for advertisement profit... very sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YOU HAVE BEEN HACKED BY IRANESE     

but really.
remember when defacing websites was almost always politically driven?
some of the 2600 website hack archives from the 90s should refresh your memory... now 'hacking' is almost entirely data mining for advertisement profit... very sad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483402</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268674440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fars is the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican Party.  The difference is that in America we have our choice between two flavors of overbearing government, where in Iran they only have one choice.  Fox New's favorite flavor of overbearing government is not in power right now so all you hear from them is an unending flood of "criticism".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fars is the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican Party .
The difference is that in America we have our choice between two flavors of overbearing government , where in Iran they only have one choice .
Fox New 's favorite flavor of overbearing government is not in power right now so all you hear from them is an unending flood of " criticism " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fars is the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican Party.
The difference is that in America we have our choice between two flavors of overbearing government, where in Iran they only have one choice.
Fox New's favorite flavor of overbearing government is not in power right now so all you hear from them is an unending flood of "criticism".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482852</id>
	<title>Free Speech = Shady Business</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268672160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good one Comrade</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good one Comrade</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good one Comrade</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482380</id>
	<title>Tariq Aziz School of Public Relations</title>
	<author>m509272</author>
	<datestamp>1268670180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously these loons have attended the Tariq Aziz School of Public Relations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously these loons have attended the Tariq Aziz School of Public Relations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously these loons have attended the Tariq Aziz School of Public Relations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31494536</id>
	<title>Hey Akbar!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1268750580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see my house from here!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see my house from here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see my house from here!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483468</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1268674680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The list of domains confirms what you're saying:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>EN-HRANA.COM<br>EN-HRANA.INFO<br>EN-HRANA.ORG<br>HRAICP.COM<br>HRAICP.INFO<br>HRAICP.NET<br>HRAICP.ORG<br>HRAIRAN.INFO<br>HRA-IRAN.INFO<br>HRA-IRAN.ORG<br>HRA-NA.INFO<br>HRANEWS.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS1.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS2.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS3.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS4.INFO<br>HRA-NEWS5.INFO<br>K-RAFIEE.INFO<br>LC-HRA.COM<br>NEWS-HRA.INFO<br>RADIO-HRA.INFO<br>hra-iran.com<br>hra-news.org<br>hrairan.org<br>hra-iran.net<br>kamangar.info<br>hra-news.org<br>bsc-iran.org</p></div><p>Even if we take Iran's claim to be true, these sites aren't going to have the protections a normal CIA site would have (if for no other reason than to obfuscate the connection between the site and the CIA).  Conversely, I wouldn't be surprised if the CIA has "honeypot" sites set up just to find the "Iranian script kiddies."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The list of domains confirms what you 're saying : EN-HRANA.COMEN-HRANA.INFOEN-HRANA.ORGHRAICP.COMHRAICP.INFOHRAICP.NETHRAICP.ORGHRAIRAN.INFOHRA-IRAN.INFOHRA-IRAN.ORGHRA-NA.INFOHRANEWS.INFOHRA-NEWS.INFOHRA-NEWS1.INFOHRA-NEWS2.INFOHRA-NEWS3.INFOHRA-NEWS4.INFOHRA-NEWS5.INFOK-RAFIEE.INFOLC-HRA.COMNEWS-HRA.INFORADIO-HRA.INFOhra-iran.comhra-news.orghrairan.orghra-iran.netkamangar.infohra-news.orgbsc-iran.orgEven if we take Iran 's claim to be true , these sites are n't going to have the protections a normal CIA site would have ( if for no other reason than to obfuscate the connection between the site and the CIA ) .
Conversely , I would n't be surprised if the CIA has " honeypot " sites set up just to find the " Iranian script kiddies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The list of domains confirms what you're saying:EN-HRANA.COMEN-HRANA.INFOEN-HRANA.ORGHRAICP.COMHRAICP.INFOHRAICP.NETHRAICP.ORGHRAIRAN.INFOHRA-IRAN.INFOHRA-IRAN.ORGHRA-NA.INFOHRANEWS.INFOHRA-NEWS.INFOHRA-NEWS1.INFOHRA-NEWS2.INFOHRA-NEWS3.INFOHRA-NEWS4.INFOHRA-NEWS5.INFOK-RAFIEE.INFOLC-HRA.COMNEWS-HRA.INFORADIO-HRA.INFOhra-iran.comhra-news.orghrairan.orghra-iran.netkamangar.infohra-news.orgbsc-iran.orgEven if we take Iran's claim to be true, these sites aren't going to have the protections a normal CIA site would have (if for no other reason than to obfuscate the connection between the site and the CIA).
Conversely, I wouldn't be surprised if the CIA has "honeypot" sites set up just to find the "Iranian script kiddies.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31485622</id>
	<title>Outsource that problem to the groups here</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1268683080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in this link on the left menu list <a href="http://www.keygenmusic.net/?lang=en" title="keygenmusic.net">http://www.keygenmusic.net/?lang=en</a> [keygenmusic.net]</p><p>they will set iran government straight if they have the motivation to. after all this is a valid case of freedom - people vs tyrants.</p><p>btw site compiles keygen musics. top 100 list really worth listening to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in this link on the left menu list http : //www.keygenmusic.net/ ? lang = en [ keygenmusic.net ] they will set iran government straight if they have the motivation to .
after all this is a valid case of freedom - people vs tyrants.btw site compiles keygen musics .
top 100 list really worth listening to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in this link on the left menu list http://www.keygenmusic.net/?lang=en [keygenmusic.net]they will set iran government straight if they have the motivation to.
after all this is a valid case of freedom - people vs tyrants.btw site compiles keygen musics.
top 100 list really worth listening to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483444</id>
	<title>Re:Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1268674560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if part of what the CIA tries to do is support activists and destabilize the regime, they would run sites such as that.</p><p>I mean propaganda is generally part of an intelligence effort, so I wouldn't be shocked if it were a CIA site, in the sense that the CIA is trying to support opposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if part of what the CIA tries to do is support activists and destabilize the regime , they would run sites such as that.I mean propaganda is generally part of an intelligence effort , so I would n't be shocked if it were a CIA site , in the sense that the CIA is trying to support opposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if part of what the CIA tries to do is support activists and destabilize the regime, they would run sites such as that.I mean propaganda is generally part of an intelligence effort, so I wouldn't be shocked if it were a CIA site, in the sense that the CIA is trying to support opposition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487174</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268645220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Websites are passive. They respond to clients. They do not strike out on their own. So "hacking" them and shutting them down isn't really any sort of solution at all.</p></div><p>Right. Even more when we will stop to recognize the act of hacking a website as something higher than spray painting a cock on a wall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Websites are passive .
They respond to clients .
They do not strike out on their own .
So " hacking " them and shutting them down is n't really any sort of solution at all.Right .
Even more when we will stop to recognize the act of hacking a website as something higher than spray painting a cock on a wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Websites are passive.
They respond to clients.
They do not strike out on their own.
So "hacking" them and shutting them down isn't really any sort of solution at all.Right.
Even more when we will stop to recognize the act of hacking a website as something higher than spray painting a cock on a wall.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482848</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268672100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hra-iran.org is a human rights web site located in Arizona.<br>The linked report is from "Computer World".<br>Get a clue people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hra-iran.org is a human rights web site located in Arizona.The linked report is from " Computer World " .Get a clue people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hra-iran.org is a human rights web site located in Arizona.The linked report is from "Computer World".Get a clue people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482780</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Article Title</title>
	<author>DeadCatX2</author>
	<datestamp>1268671920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The article has a little trouble using quotations, or at least maybe that's how people do it in the UK? I don't mean that as an offense, but rather, in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks.</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn\_greenwald/2009/03/12/anonymity/" title="salon.com">Peppered</a> [salon.com] <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn\_greenwald/2009/03/06/anonymity/" title="salon.com">with quotes</a> [salon.com] <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn\_greenwald/2009/04/18/allen/" title="salon.com">attributed to</a> [salon.com] <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn\_greenwald/2009/12/26/airstrikes/" title="salon.com">anonymous</a> [salon.com], <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn\_greenwald/2009/05/31/rosen/index.html/" title="salon.com">unnamed sources</a> [salon.com].</p><p>I don't see the practical difference between a lack of quotation marks and a lack of sources.  Both are so prone to bullshit as to be worthless.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article has a little trouble using quotations , or at least maybe that 's how people do it in the UK ?
I do n't mean that as an offense , but rather , in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks.Peppered [ salon.com ] with quotes [ salon.com ] attributed to [ salon.com ] anonymous [ salon.com ] , unnamed sources [ salon.com ] .I do n't see the practical difference between a lack of quotation marks and a lack of sources .
Both are so prone to bullshit as to be worthless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article has a little trouble using quotations, or at least maybe that's how people do it in the UK?
I don't mean that as an offense, but rather, in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks.Peppered [salon.com] with quotes [salon.com] attributed to [salon.com] anonymous [salon.com], unnamed sources [salon.com].I don't see the practical difference between a lack of quotation marks and a lack of sources.
Both are so prone to bullshit as to be worthless.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482098</id>
	<title>Not 29 Web Sites</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1268668680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was 29 domains, but some of them pointed to the same site. I wouldn't be surprised if they were CIA fronts. The way back machine has it, but it isn't in English.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was 29 domains , but some of them pointed to the same site .
I would n't be surprised if they were CIA fronts .
The way back machine has it , but it is n't in English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was 29 domains, but some of them pointed to the same site.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were CIA fronts.
The way back machine has it, but it isn't in English.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482294</id>
	<title>Re:Not 29 Web Sites</title>
	<author>Critical Facilities</author>
	<datestamp>1268669700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wouldn't be surprised if they were CIA fronts</p></div><p>That would surprise me.  What <i>wouldn't</i> surprise me is if the 29 domains are all linked to the Iranian government.  I think this is a ruse,  designed to create the illusion that the Iranian government is a) capable enough to pre-emptively strike its "cyber attackers and b) to paint the Iranian government as a victim of attack,  as opposed to the attacker.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't be surprised if they were CIA frontsThat would surprise me .
What would n't surprise me is if the 29 domains are all linked to the Iranian government .
I think this is a ruse , designed to create the illusion that the Iranian government is a ) capable enough to pre-emptively strike its " cyber attackers and b ) to paint the Iranian government as a victim of attack , as opposed to the attacker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't be surprised if they were CIA frontsThat would surprise me.
What wouldn't surprise me is if the 29 domains are all linked to the Iranian government.
I think this is a ruse,  designed to create the illusion that the Iranian government is a) capable enough to pre-emptively strike its "cyber attackers and b) to paint the Iranian government as a victim of attack,  as opposed to the attacker.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482434</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SEEE!!!!!!!!   This is why you should never take your tinfoil hat off!  You become one of them just like DJ Jones.</p><p>Oh yes we are on to you, we. are. on. to. you.  You may have got Mr. Jones, but you will never get us all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SEEE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
This is why you should never take your tinfoil hat off !
You become one of them just like DJ Jones.Oh yes we are on to you , we .
are. on .
to. you .
You may have got Mr. Jones , but you will never get us all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SEEE!!!!!!!!
This is why you should never take your tinfoil hat off!
You become one of them just like DJ Jones.Oh yes we are on to you, we.
are. on.
to. you.
You may have got Mr. Jones, but you will never get us all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482132</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>HungryHobo</author>
	<datestamp>1268668860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This still isn't a "cyberwar" this is just iran arresting human rights activists and calling them spies/traitor with a thin justification.</p><p>Anything governments try is still lost in the noise <a href="http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/" title="attrition.org">http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/</a> [attrition.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This still is n't a " cyberwar " this is just iran arresting human rights activists and calling them spies/traitor with a thin justification.Anything governments try is still lost in the noise http : //www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/ [ attrition.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This still isn't a "cyberwar" this is just iran arresting human rights activists and calling them spies/traitor with a thin justification.Anything governments try is still lost in the noise http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/ [attrition.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050</id>
	<title>When are they</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1268668440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't they getting tired of this crap? First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots. Then it was the Chinese, and again it turned out to be some random idiots. Now it's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new "attack"?</p><p>Perhaps the real question is why are these computers so easy to crack in the first place...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't they getting tired of this crap ?
First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots .
Then it was the Chinese , and again it turned out to be some random idiots .
Now it 's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new " attack " ? Perhaps the real question is why are these computers so easy to crack in the first place.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't they getting tired of this crap?
First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots.
Then it was the Chinese, and again it turned out to be some random idiots.
Now it's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new "attack"?Perhaps the real question is why are these computers so easy to crack in the first place...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487898</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>vxice</author>
	<datestamp>1268648160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ever notice how almost all "terrorists" are Al Qada?  And how there are hundreds of Al Qada "affiliate" groups?  Yes many are separate but many pretend to be separate to look that way and insulate themselves and still many more are loosely aligned.  These sites can be pro-active.  From the sound of it they were places to organize protests and other similar activity or contact new people interested in "improving" their country.  Just as any site that advocates protests and attempts to locate new contacts who think bombing buildings to wake America up to the consequences of its activities in Palestine to hopefully stop those activities would be labeled a terrorist training site with propaganda and promptly shut down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever notice how almost all " terrorists " are Al Qada ?
And how there are hundreds of Al Qada " affiliate " groups ?
Yes many are separate but many pretend to be separate to look that way and insulate themselves and still many more are loosely aligned .
These sites can be pro-active .
From the sound of it they were places to organize protests and other similar activity or contact new people interested in " improving " their country .
Just as any site that advocates protests and attempts to locate new contacts who think bombing buildings to wake America up to the consequences of its activities in Palestine to hopefully stop those activities would be labeled a terrorist training site with propaganda and promptly shut down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever notice how almost all "terrorists" are Al Qada?
And how there are hundreds of Al Qada "affiliate" groups?
Yes many are separate but many pretend to be separate to look that way and insulate themselves and still many more are loosely aligned.
These sites can be pro-active.
From the sound of it they were places to organize protests and other similar activity or contact new people interested in "improving" their country.
Just as any site that advocates protests and attempts to locate new contacts who think bombing buildings to wake America up to the consequences of its activities in Palestine to hopefully stop those activities would be labeled a terrorist training site with propaganda and promptly shut down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483156</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>DJ Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1268673720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK... and Fox News is the mouth piece of the Republican Party. The fact that Rupert Mudoch's media machine is openly against a democratic administration is not surprising to anyone. My analogy is not flawed, I merely alluded to the fact that the opinions put forth by both Fox News and Fars News are decided well before the facts are divulged. They are equivalent propaganda machines with heavy ties to one political party.  Neither one can be considered a respectable "news" organization by any journalistic standards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK... and Fox News is the mouth piece of the Republican Party .
The fact that Rupert Mudoch 's media machine is openly against a democratic administration is not surprising to anyone .
My analogy is not flawed , I merely alluded to the fact that the opinions put forth by both Fox News and Fars News are decided well before the facts are divulged .
They are equivalent propaganda machines with heavy ties to one political party .
Neither one can be considered a respectable " news " organization by any journalistic standards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK... and Fox News is the mouth piece of the Republican Party.
The fact that Rupert Mudoch's media machine is openly against a democratic administration is not surprising to anyone.
My analogy is not flawed, I merely alluded to the fact that the opinions put forth by both Fox News and Fars News are decided well before the facts are divulged.
They are equivalent propaganda machines with heavy ties to one political party.
Neither one can be considered a respectable "news" organization by any journalistic standards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482954</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1268672700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nice headline.  These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure.  More appropriate headline:  "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".</p></div><p>Well it <i>is</i> called the "Farce News Agency."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice headline .
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA 's cyberwar infrastructure .
More appropriate headline : " Iranian script kiddies take down website ; blame US " .Well it is called the " Farce News Agency .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice headline.
These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure.
More appropriate headline:  "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".Well it is called the "Farce News Agency.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482478</id>
	<title>The Biggest CyberSecurity Threat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is this <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">botnet</a> [microsoft.com].</p><p>I hope this helps your work in securing your computers and networks.</p><p>Yours In Ufa,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is this botnet [ microsoft.com ] .I hope this helps your work in securing your computers and networks.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this botnet [microsoft.com].I hope this helps your work in securing your computers and networks.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483722</id>
	<title>Damn, no troll points left</title>
	<author>bigredradio</author>
	<datestamp>1268675880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't have any moderator points, so I give you a -11 Troll. There are always better methods of persuasion than calling someone a motherfucking tool and a fuck. It doesn't help to further your point. Just makes you look immature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't have any moderator points , so I give you a -11 Troll .
There are always better methods of persuasion than calling someone a motherfucking tool and a fuck .
It does n't help to further your point .
Just makes you look immature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't have any moderator points, so I give you a -11 Troll.
There are always better methods of persuasion than calling someone a motherfucking tool and a fuck.
It doesn't help to further your point.
Just makes you look immature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483452</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268674620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First off, Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US. They decide the news before it happens.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government, and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress. Your analogy is flawed.</p></div></div><p>You setup a strawman analogy to mischaracterize.<br>Thanks for contributing nothing to the discussion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First off , Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US .
They decide the news before it happens.Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government , and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress .
Your analogy is flawed.You setup a strawman analogy to mischaracterize.Thanks for contributing nothing to the discussion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First off, Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US.
They decide the news before it happens.Last time I checked Fars was the mouthpiece of the Iranian government, and Fox has been extremely critical of the current administration and congress.
Your analogy is flawed.You setup a strawman analogy to mischaracterize.Thanks for contributing nothing to the discussion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988</id>
	<title>Amazing</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1268668200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war, I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin.  I guess being an intelligence analyst might count for something here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war , I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin .
I guess being an intelligence analyst might count for something here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last week when I posted that we were in fact actually at cyber war, I was roundly ridiculed for not knowing what I was talking about because I am not a sysadmin.
I guess being an intelligence analyst might count for something here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31484642</id>
	<title>Honeypot?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1268679360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the CIA creates a bunch of generic Human Rights websites (read: Honeypot), and Iran hacks them, can the US gov't via the United Nations or Fox News or whatever basically start telling the world that Iran as a gov't is hacking websites?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the CIA creates a bunch of generic Human Rights websites ( read : Honeypot ) , and Iran hacks them , can the US gov't via the United Nations or Fox News or whatever basically start telling the world that Iran as a gov't is hacking websites ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the CIA creates a bunch of generic Human Rights websites (read: Honeypot), and Iran hacks them, can the US gov't via the United Nations or Fox News or whatever basically start telling the world that Iran as a gov't is hacking websites?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940</id>
	<title>They also hacked goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268667960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">They also hacked goatse</a> [goatse.fr]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They also hacked goatse [ goatse.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also hacked goatse [goatse.fr]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483638</id>
	<title>$400 million to destabilize Iran?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268675460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone have any more information about one of the last sentences "US$400 million allocated to the US Central Intelligence Agency to destabilise Iran"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone have any more information about one of the last sentences " US $ 400 million allocated to the US Central Intelligence Agency to destabilise Iran " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone have any more information about one of the last sentences "US$400 million allocated to the US Central Intelligence Agency to destabilise Iran"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482452</id>
	<title>Iranians hack Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and start posting articles with accurate headlines, proper spelling and punctuation.  Now THAT would be a feat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and start posting articles with accurate headlines , proper spelling and punctuation .
Now THAT would be a feat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and start posting articles with accurate headlines, proper spelling and punctuation.
Now THAT would be a feat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292</id>
	<title>Bad Article Title</title>
	<author>introspekt.i</author>
	<datestamp>1268669700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The title acts as if Iran actually did hack 29 US "spy sites" (wtf).  Whether or not this is actually true remains to be seen.  The article has a little trouble using quotations, or at least maybe that's how people do it in the UK?  I don't mean that as an offense, but rather, in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks. <p><div class="quote"><p>It was not clear whether HRAI had ties to US intelligence organisations or whether the Fars report labeled them as such due to their apparent sympathy for opposition protesters. The Fars report did not tie any of the websites to a specific US government entity.</p></div><p>This article seems shoddy to me, as these claims are as of yet unsubstantiated.  Why doesn't Iran use its magic firewall to block these sites instead of hack them?  Smells like a publicity stunt against to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The title acts as if Iran actually did hack 29 US " spy sites " ( wtf ) .
Whether or not this is actually true remains to be seen .
The article has a little trouble using quotations , or at least maybe that 's how people do it in the UK ?
I do n't mean that as an offense , but rather , in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks .
It was not clear whether HRAI had ties to US intelligence organisations or whether the Fars report labeled them as such due to their apparent sympathy for opposition protesters .
The Fars report did not tie any of the websites to a specific US government entity.This article seems shoddy to me , as these claims are as of yet unsubstantiated .
Why does n't Iran use its magic firewall to block these sites instead of hack them ?
Smells like a publicity stunt against to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title acts as if Iran actually did hack 29 US "spy sites" (wtf).
Whether or not this is actually true remains to be seen.
The article has a little trouble using quotations, or at least maybe that's how people do it in the UK?
I don't mean that as an offense, but rather, in US papers we seem to pepper the articles with double quote marks.
It was not clear whether HRAI had ties to US intelligence organisations or whether the Fars report labeled them as such due to their apparent sympathy for opposition protesters.
The Fars report did not tie any of the websites to a specific US government entity.This article seems shoddy to me, as these claims are as of yet unsubstantiated.
Why doesn't Iran use its magic firewall to block these sites instead of hack them?
Smells like a publicity stunt against to me.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482388</id>
	<title>Softhack</title>
	<author>nten</author>
	<datestamp>1268670180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So one side hacks computers because the other side is using computers to hack brains.  I don't consider that just cause.  Humans have built in firewalls against BS.  Yes they can be overcome, but generally that is called persuasion, or deception depending on the validity of the information being uploaded.  And keeping your populace sheltered from the outside might prevent the internet from hacking them, but in face to face conversations they will be even more vulnerable due to their ignorance.</p><p>On the bright side, I can't wait to watch the wars between cognitive dictatorships once we all upload.*</p><p>* Yes someone *has* been reading too much Stross.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So one side hacks computers because the other side is using computers to hack brains .
I do n't consider that just cause .
Humans have built in firewalls against BS .
Yes they can be overcome , but generally that is called persuasion , or deception depending on the validity of the information being uploaded .
And keeping your populace sheltered from the outside might prevent the internet from hacking them , but in face to face conversations they will be even more vulnerable due to their ignorance.On the bright side , I ca n't wait to watch the wars between cognitive dictatorships once we all upload .
* * Yes someone * has * been reading too much Stross .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So one side hacks computers because the other side is using computers to hack brains.
I don't consider that just cause.
Humans have built in firewalls against BS.
Yes they can be overcome, but generally that is called persuasion, or deception depending on the validity of the information being uploaded.
And keeping your populace sheltered from the outside might prevent the internet from hacking them, but in face to face conversations they will be even more vulnerable due to their ignorance.On the bright side, I can't wait to watch the wars between cognitive dictatorships once we all upload.
** Yes someone *has* been reading too much Stross.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483244</id>
	<title>Re:you mean "ALLEGED"</title>
	<author>GuruBuckaroo</author>
	<datestamp>1268673960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention "Claims". Proper headline, knowing where this article comes from, should be:</p><p> <b>Iran Claims it has hacked Alleged US Spy Sites</b> </p><p>Geez. This is like people believing the USSR's Pravda back in the Cold War.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention " Claims " .
Proper headline , knowing where this article comes from , should be : Iran Claims it has hacked Alleged US Spy Sites Geez .
This is like people believing the USSR 's Pravda back in the Cold War .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention "Claims".
Proper headline, knowing where this article comes from, should be: Iran Claims it has hacked Alleged US Spy Sites Geez.
This is like people believing the USSR's Pravda back in the Cold War.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483154</id>
	<title>Re:article is propaganda</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268673720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Taco, you motherfucking tool, you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/jun/14/post155" title="guardian.co.uk">innocent</a> [guardian.co.uk] people!</p><p>shame on you, <b>fuck!</b> </p></div><p>Oh yeah, <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080611115143/http://www.president.ir/en/?ArtID=10114" title="archive.org">the Iranians themselves</a> [archive.org] are <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070927213903/http://www.iribnews.ir/Full\_en.asp?news\_id=200247" title="archive.org">the embodiment of innocence</a> [archive.org]... (I strongly recommend you to check the TLDs again.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Taco , you motherfucking tool , you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto innocent [ guardian.co.uk ] people ! shame on you , fuck !
Oh yeah , the Iranians themselves [ archive.org ] are the embodiment of innocence [ archive.org ] ... ( I strongly recommend you to check the TLDs again .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taco, you motherfucking tool, you are pushing your own people to yet another unwinnable war for oil onto innocent [guardian.co.uk] people!shame on you, fuck!
Oh yeah, the Iranians themselves [archive.org] are the embodiment of innocence [archive.org]... (I strongly recommend you to check the TLDs again.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</id>
	<title>Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden. Why would you have a site if you are a spy?

Oh...I get it to prop up the idea of a cyberwar. So when you get hacked you can tell everyone , "See I told you it was true!". Of course my next question is for the Iranians: dude why would the United State operate a spy website? Do you really think that the US government would put sensitive info in a website?

Of course we are talking about the United States so anything is possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden .
Why would you have a site if you are a spy ?
Oh...I get it to prop up the idea of a cyberwar .
So when you get hacked you can tell everyone , " See I told you it was true ! " .
Of course my next question is for the Iranians : dude why would the United State operate a spy website ?
Do you really think that the US government would put sensitive info in a website ?
Of course we are talking about the United States so anything is possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the idea of being a spy was to stay hidden.
Why would you have a site if you are a spy?
Oh...I get it to prop up the idea of a cyberwar.
So when you get hacked you can tell everyone , "See I told you it was true!".
Of course my next question is for the Iranians: dude why would the United State operate a spy website?
Do you really think that the US government would put sensitive info in a website?
Of course we are talking about the United States so anything is possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482756</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Nabbler</author>
	<datestamp>1268671800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately the CIA and such do often infiltrate/use (and even set up) such organizations to sneak into areas where they have trouble getting into, that's been documented and admitted on a few occasions. So in that light I cannot blame iran for being distrusting, and I tend to think they are frequently right, like in that case with those US 'hikers' in freaking iraq (what?) who 'accidentally' sneaked into iraq, that was as believable as, well, uhm, the bible or something I suppose, and I don't think any sane person did not raise an eyebrow on that story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately the CIA and such do often infiltrate/use ( and even set up ) such organizations to sneak into areas where they have trouble getting into , that 's been documented and admitted on a few occasions .
So in that light I can not blame iran for being distrusting , and I tend to think they are frequently right , like in that case with those US 'hikers ' in freaking iraq ( what ?
) who 'accidentally ' sneaked into iraq , that was as believable as , well , uhm , the bible or something I suppose , and I do n't think any sane person did not raise an eyebrow on that story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately the CIA and such do often infiltrate/use (and even set up) such organizations to sneak into areas where they have trouble getting into, that's been documented and admitted on a few occasions.
So in that light I cannot blame iran for being distrusting, and I tend to think they are frequently right, like in that case with those US 'hikers' in freaking iraq (what?
) who 'accidentally' sneaked into iraq, that was as believable as, well, uhm, the bible or something I suppose, and I don't think any sane person did not raise an eyebrow on that story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482460</id>
	<title>Re:Because US was using twitter as a weapon...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What evidence do we have that "the US" was doing the lying, and not Iranian dissidents or Iranian expatriots themselves?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What evidence do we have that " the US " was doing the lying , and not Iranian dissidents or Iranian expatriots themselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What evidence do we have that "the US" was doing the lying, and not Iranian dissidents or Iranian expatriots themselves?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483032</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268673120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So bad we don't have Iranians here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. Just because you don't see one here doesn't mean there can be no hacker from them. They may just don't have that sense of humor. It's disappointing to see no real funny post under this topic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So bad we do n't have Iranians here on / .
Just because you do n't see one here does n't mean there can be no hacker from them .
They may just do n't have that sense of humor .
It 's disappointing to see no real funny post under this topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So bad we don't have Iranians here on /.
Just because you don't see one here doesn't mean there can be no hacker from them.
They may just don't have that sense of humor.
It's disappointing to see no real funny post under this topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483982</id>
	<title>Re:Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>pcolaman</author>
	<datestamp>1268676900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are missing the point here.  What is more plausible?  The idea that these were connected to the US and we were just being OMGLOLSTOOPED and left the sites vulnerable, or that these were in fact controlled by Iran and this is all just Propaganda to help justify their position.  What's really sad is how many people seem to believe that Iran is somehow capable of performing cyberattacks against legitimate CIA systems.  Guarantee you, these sites have no real connection to US Intelligence, and if they do, it's likely as someone else pointed out that they are "honeypots to find the script kiddies."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are missing the point here .
What is more plausible ?
The idea that these were connected to the US and we were just being OMGLOLSTOOPED and left the sites vulnerable , or that these were in fact controlled by Iran and this is all just Propaganda to help justify their position .
What 's really sad is how many people seem to believe that Iran is somehow capable of performing cyberattacks against legitimate CIA systems .
Guarantee you , these sites have no real connection to US Intelligence , and if they do , it 's likely as someone else pointed out that they are " honeypots to find the script kiddies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are missing the point here.
What is more plausible?
The idea that these were connected to the US and we were just being OMGLOLSTOOPED and left the sites vulnerable, or that these were in fact controlled by Iran and this is all just Propaganda to help justify their position.
What's really sad is how many people seem to believe that Iran is somehow capable of performing cyberattacks against legitimate CIA systems.
Guarantee you, these sites have no real connection to US Intelligence, and if they do, it's likely as someone else pointed out that they are "honeypots to find the script kiddies.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31484492</id>
	<title>Re:Worst summary ever</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268678880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um, where have you been? I can create a website that attacks people, in fact many exists. How many bot nets are running on servers?</p><p>I can write a script to begin an attack at a certain time or event.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um , where have you been ?
I can create a website that attacks people , in fact many exists .
How many bot nets are running on servers ? I can write a script to begin an attack at a certain time or event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um, where have you been?
I can create a website that attacks people, in fact many exists.
How many bot nets are running on servers?I can write a script to begin an attack at a certain time or event.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481976</id>
	<title>meghhhhh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes lets have all our shit on the internet. god forbid we use an intranet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes lets have all our shit on the internet .
god forbid we use an intranet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes lets have all our shit on the internet.
god forbid we use an intranet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482152</id>
	<title>Re:When are they</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps you should read the article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you should read the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you should read the article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482198</id>
	<title>Wordpress and/or plugin security issues?</title>
	<author>dclozier</author>
	<datestamp>1268669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering some (all?) were using Wordpress the hacking may have been trivial depending on what plugins were in use. (or perhaps there is an unknown issue with Wordpress it's self)<br>
There may not have been that much expertise needed in this "hacking".
<br> <br>
<a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:0KLjk6HUgUQJ:www.en-hrana.com/+EN-HRANA.COM&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" title="74.125.95.132" rel="nofollow">
</a> [74.125.95.132]<a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:0KLjk6HUgUQJ:www.en-hrana.com/+EN-HRANA.COM&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" title="74.125.95.132" rel="nofollow">http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:0KLjk6HUgUQJ:www.en-hrana.com/+EN-HRANA.COM&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a</a> [74.125.95.132]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering some ( all ?
) were using Wordpress the hacking may have been trivial depending on what plugins were in use .
( or perhaps there is an unknown issue with Wordpress it 's self ) There may not have been that much expertise needed in this " hacking " .
[ 74.125.95.132 ] http : //74.125.95.132/search ? q = cache : 0KLjk6HUgUQJ : www.en-hrana.com/ + EN-HRANA.COM&amp;cd = 1&amp;hl = en&amp;ct = clnk&amp;gl = us&amp;client = firefox-a [ 74.125.95.132 ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering some (all?
) were using Wordpress the hacking may have been trivial depending on what plugins were in use.
(or perhaps there is an unknown issue with Wordpress it's self)
There may not have been that much expertise needed in this "hacking".
[74.125.95.132]http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:0KLjk6HUgUQJ:www.en-hrana.com/+EN-HRANA.COM&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a [74.125.95.132]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174</id>
	<title>Because US was using twitter as a weapon...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Among other shady things we have been up to....</p><p>China (as well as Iran and Al-Jazeera) accused the US in state newspapers of using twitter to sow discord in Iran by creating accounts and distributing false information to get people whipped up during the protests. They even linked to a few of the particularly shady accounts that dont seem to really be people on the ground but gained thousands of followers by supplying news of people being shot in the street and leaders (falsely) being arrested.</p><p>It is no wonder that Iran and China have taken steps to limit the influence that the US can have in domestic affairs by simply creating a twitter troll account.</p><p>Information warfare on the web 2.0... Interesting stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Among other shady things we have been up to....China ( as well as Iran and Al-Jazeera ) accused the US in state newspapers of using twitter to sow discord in Iran by creating accounts and distributing false information to get people whipped up during the protests .
They even linked to a few of the particularly shady accounts that dont seem to really be people on the ground but gained thousands of followers by supplying news of people being shot in the street and leaders ( falsely ) being arrested.It is no wonder that Iran and China have taken steps to limit the influence that the US can have in domestic affairs by simply creating a twitter troll account.Information warfare on the web 2.0... Interesting stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among other shady things we have been up to....China (as well as Iran and Al-Jazeera) accused the US in state newspapers of using twitter to sow discord in Iran by creating accounts and distributing false information to get people whipped up during the protests.
They even linked to a few of the particularly shady accounts that dont seem to really be people on the ground but gained thousands of followers by supplying news of people being shot in the street and leaders (falsely) being arrested.It is no wonder that Iran and China have taken steps to limit the influence that the US can have in domestic affairs by simply creating a twitter troll account.Information warfare on the web 2.0... Interesting stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483196</id>
	<title>Re:Because US was using twitter as a weapon...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268673840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new here.  Knee-jerk predjudice is all the evidence you need on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here .
Knee-jerk predjudice is all the evidence you need on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here.
Knee-jerk predjudice is all the evidence you need on /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482264</id>
	<title>Re:When are they</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots. Then it was the Chinese, and again it turned out to be some random idiots. Now it's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new "attack"?</p></div><p>Well, the Iranians say it was the Iranians.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots .
Then it was the Chinese , and again it turned out to be some random idiots .
Now it 's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new " attack " ? Well , the Iranians say it was the Iranians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First it was the North Koreans and it turned out to be some random idiots.
Then it was the Chinese, and again it turned out to be some random idiots.
Now it's the Iranians... three guesses as to who is REALLY responsible for THIS new "attack"?Well, the Iranians say it was the Iranians.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31496276</id>
	<title>Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1268756820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, it ignores that hacking the website is not the same as hacking internal stuff.  The classified internet stuff wasn't touched.  They might have made KFC.com say "Burger King ruels! LOLOLOL", but they didn't find the secret ingredient that makes you crave chicken fornightly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , it ignores that hacking the website is not the same as hacking internal stuff .
The classified internet stuff was n't touched .
They might have made KFC.com say " Burger King ruels !
LOLOLOL " , but they did n't find the secret ingredient that makes you crave chicken fornightly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, it ignores that hacking the website is not the same as hacking internal stuff.
The classified internet stuff wasn't touched.
They might have made KFC.com say "Burger King ruels!
LOLOLOL", but they didn't find the secret ingredient that makes you crave chicken fornightly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483298</id>
	<title>Re:Spy Websites?!?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1268674140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they actually mean here is "websites that support our dissidents". Which may well be true, and it still doesn't make it wrong or criminal.</p><p>It's the exact same thing in Russia. Pretty much all human rights organizations are blamed to be "CIA fronts" with the purpose of "destabilizing the country" via criticism of the government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they actually mean here is " websites that support our dissidents " .
Which may well be true , and it still does n't make it wrong or criminal.It 's the exact same thing in Russia .
Pretty much all human rights organizations are blamed to be " CIA fronts " with the purpose of " destabilizing the country " via criticism of the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they actually mean here is "websites that support our dissidents".
Which may well be true, and it still doesn't make it wrong or criminal.It's the exact same thing in Russia.
Pretty much all human rights organizations are blamed to be "CIA fronts" with the purpose of "destabilizing the country" via criticism of the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483238</id>
	<title>Congratulations Iran</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268673960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've admitted to being a bunch of script kiddies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've admitted to being a bunch of script kiddies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've admitted to being a bunch of script kiddies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31485646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31484492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31488014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31496276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_147201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31496276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31485646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31486144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482444
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31494536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31484642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31481940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31488014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_147201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31484492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31487898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31483156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_147201.31482434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
