<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_15_1257224</id>
	<title>Nose Scanners &mdash; the New Face of Biometrics?</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268659560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Forget fingerprints and ID cards, this photo story shows how <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/security/2010/03/11/photos-nose-scanners-the-new-face-of-biometrics-39745574/#story">the latest thing in biometrics is nose scanning</a>! Bath university researchers have claimed that the nose will soon be able to be used as a way of identifying a person. Apparently the 'PhotoFace system captures a 3D image of a person's face by taking several photos lit from different angles to throw shadows on the face and then building a model of facial features. The software determined that there are six main nose shapes: Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up.' Some cool pictures make this worth a click &mdash; but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Forget fingerprints and ID cards , this photo story shows how the latest thing in biometrics is nose scanning !
Bath university researchers have claimed that the nose will soon be able to be used as a way of identifying a person .
Apparently the 'PhotoFace system captures a 3D image of a person 's face by taking several photos lit from different angles to throw shadows on the face and then building a model of facial features .
The software determined that there are six main nose shapes : Roman , Greek , Nubian , Hawk , Snub and Turn-up .
' Some cool pictures make this worth a click    but what happens if a person breaks their nose ? !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Forget fingerprints and ID cards, this photo story shows how the latest thing in biometrics is nose scanning!
Bath university researchers have claimed that the nose will soon be able to be used as a way of identifying a person.
Apparently the 'PhotoFace system captures a 3D image of a person's face by taking several photos lit from different angles to throw shadows on the face and then building a model of facial features.
The software determined that there are six main nose shapes: Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up.
' Some cool pictures make this worth a click — but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482688</id>
	<title>Location Location Location</title>
	<author>spaceman375</author>
	<datestamp>1268671500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have many ways of identifying people; biometrics is only one category. Every means of identifying a person is hackable in some way. I would feel much safer if authentication were based on multiple sources. In particular, GPS tracking, bluetooth presence, facial recognition, each time you enter a password, all should be used to build a continuous track of your location, with confidence ratings as you move between various protocols. Credit card purchases, boarding an airplane, logging in at work; all should verify that your location data says that you are where they think you are, with a continuous trail leading to that location, before granting access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have many ways of identifying people ; biometrics is only one category .
Every means of identifying a person is hackable in some way .
I would feel much safer if authentication were based on multiple sources .
In particular , GPS tracking , bluetooth presence , facial recognition , each time you enter a password , all should be used to build a continuous track of your location , with confidence ratings as you move between various protocols .
Credit card purchases , boarding an airplane , logging in at work ; all should verify that your location data says that you are where they think you are , with a continuous trail leading to that location , before granting access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have many ways of identifying people; biometrics is only one category.
Every means of identifying a person is hackable in some way.
I would feel much safer if authentication were based on multiple sources.
In particular, GPS tracking, bluetooth presence, facial recognition, each time you enter a password, all should be used to build a continuous track of your location, with confidence ratings as you move between various protocols.
Credit card purchases, boarding an airplane, logging in at work; all should verify that your location data says that you are where they think you are, with a continuous trail leading to that location, before granting access.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31490948</id>
	<title>I Boke By Doze. I Boke It Two Tibes. It Beds Fuddy</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1268665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose?"</p><p>Segmented curvilinear correction. A broken nose only changes shape in the broken spot, almost always the bridge. The majority is intact. The database results will have those hits that match, say, 5 of the 6 measures. Those will then be subjected to 'morphing' within the constraints of the average (more likely within the standard deviation) of how bridges that most often fit with that nose type are bent and in what way. The Segment that doesn't fit will have the bent or Curved piece 'unbent' or made to fit a Linear model by a Correction algorithm. The result will be a correlation measure for that sixth piece to go along with the five segments already matched. It's not a certain measure, but it'll give a smaller number of likely possibles to start with, and if there's no positives, lesser correlations to look at.</p><p>What makes this article bogus (I won't call Bullshit because it looks like they really believe this will work) is variants on Groucho nose glasses. A simple fake nose will fool it. It doesn't even have to be a complete fake nose; flesh colored putty packed on to certain areas will make it a different nose.</p><p>&gt; Some cool pictures make this worth a click</p><p>Cool my ass. I've worked with police sketch artists. They have a book with all the examples in their software of all the parts of the face used as variables. Noses sans face are some of the ugliest pieces of human anatomy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose ?
" Segmented curvilinear correction .
A broken nose only changes shape in the broken spot , almost always the bridge .
The majority is intact .
The database results will have those hits that match , say , 5 of the 6 measures .
Those will then be subjected to 'morphing ' within the constraints of the average ( more likely within the standard deviation ) of how bridges that most often fit with that nose type are bent and in what way .
The Segment that does n't fit will have the bent or Curved piece 'unbent ' or made to fit a Linear model by a Correction algorithm .
The result will be a correlation measure for that sixth piece to go along with the five segments already matched .
It 's not a certain measure , but it 'll give a smaller number of likely possibles to start with , and if there 's no positives , lesser correlations to look at.What makes this article bogus ( I wo n't call Bullshit because it looks like they really believe this will work ) is variants on Groucho nose glasses .
A simple fake nose will fool it .
It does n't even have to be a complete fake nose ; flesh colored putty packed on to certain areas will make it a different nose. &gt; Some cool pictures make this worth a clickCool my ass .
I 've worked with police sketch artists .
They have a book with all the examples in their software of all the parts of the face used as variables .
Noses sans face are some of the ugliest pieces of human anatomy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose?
"Segmented curvilinear correction.
A broken nose only changes shape in the broken spot, almost always the bridge.
The majority is intact.
The database results will have those hits that match, say, 5 of the 6 measures.
Those will then be subjected to 'morphing' within the constraints of the average (more likely within the standard deviation) of how bridges that most often fit with that nose type are bent and in what way.
The Segment that doesn't fit will have the bent or Curved piece 'unbent' or made to fit a Linear model by a Correction algorithm.
The result will be a correlation measure for that sixth piece to go along with the five segments already matched.
It's not a certain measure, but it'll give a smaller number of likely possibles to start with, and if there's no positives, lesser correlations to look at.What makes this article bogus (I won't call Bullshit because it looks like they really believe this will work) is variants on Groucho nose glasses.
A simple fake nose will fool it.
It doesn't even have to be a complete fake nose; flesh colored putty packed on to certain areas will make it a different nose.&gt; Some cool pictures make this worth a clickCool my ass.
I've worked with police sketch artists.
They have a book with all the examples in their software of all the parts of the face used as variables.
Noses sans face are some of the ugliest pieces of human anatomy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104</id>
	<title>Article? What article?</title>
	<author>ekgringo</author>
	<datestamp>1268663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the first time ever, scientists at the Slashdot institute have actually managed to produce an article summary that is longer than the article linked, as well as providing new information not available in the article itself! How is this possible?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the first time ever , scientists at the Slashdot institute have actually managed to produce an article summary that is longer than the article linked , as well as providing new information not available in the article itself !
How is this possible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the first time ever, scientists at the Slashdot institute have actually managed to produce an article summary that is longer than the article linked, as well as providing new information not available in the article itself!
How is this possible?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481354</id>
	<title>Re:Biometrics waste of time.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would assume that part would be taken care of in thermal imaging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would assume that part would be taken care of in thermal imaging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would assume that part would be taken care of in thermal imaging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482430</id>
	<title>Re:What about the genitals?</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1268670420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please insert your penis into GILIAN's* mouth and wait while she extracts a DNA sample.</p><p>*Government Investigatory Laboratory In Android Nymphomaniac</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please insert your penis into GILIAN 's * mouth and wait while she extracts a DNA sample .
* Government Investigatory Laboratory In Android Nymphomaniac</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please insert your penis into GILIAN's* mouth and wait while she extracts a DNA sample.
*Government Investigatory Laboratory In Android Nymphomaniac</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481544</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1268666160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least people will be able to tell how honest you've been since your last ID card. If the shape of your nose has changed too much, you've been telling lies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least people will be able to tell how honest you 've been since your last ID card .
If the shape of your nose has changed too much , you 've been telling lies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least people will be able to tell how honest you've been since your last ID card.
If the shape of your nose has changed too much, you've been telling lies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481348</id>
	<title>High School just got worse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Life just keeps piling on for the poor suffering adolescent geek.  Now when he develops a giant zit on his nose, he doesn't just have to worry about the derision of his peers, but his nose-scanning locker won't open.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Life just keeps piling on for the poor suffering adolescent geek .
Now when he develops a giant zit on his nose , he does n't just have to worry about the derision of his peers , but his nose-scanning locker wo n't open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life just keeps piling on for the poor suffering adolescent geek.
Now when he develops a giant zit on his nose, he doesn't just have to worry about the derision of his peers, but his nose-scanning locker won't open.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481098</id>
	<title>This is perfect...</title>
	<author>Rivalz</author>
	<datestamp>1268663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine Hollywood movie studios requiring this. Or California's gov.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine Hollywood movie studios requiring this .
Or California 's gov .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine Hollywood movie studios requiring this.
Or California's gov.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482894</id>
	<title>Rule 34</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268672400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.</p></div><p>Somewhere in Japan, some mangaka is now making hentai based on this.</p><p>*VAGINAL SCAN UNSUCCESSFUL - DOUBLE-CHECK REQUIRED - PLEASE POSITION YOURSELF FOR ADDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION MS. HAJIMOTO*</p><p>"Uh...um...alright...OOOOH GOD..."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then they 'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs , which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.Somewhere in Japan , some mangaka is now making hentai based on this .
* VAGINAL SCAN UNSUCCESSFUL - DOUBLE-CHECK REQUIRED - PLEASE POSITION YOURSELF FOR ADDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION MS. HAJIMOTO * " Uh...um...alright...OOOOH GOD... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.Somewhere in Japan, some mangaka is now making hentai based on this.
*VAGINAL SCAN UNSUCCESSFUL - DOUBLE-CHECK REQUIRED - PLEASE POSITION YOURSELF FOR ADDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION MS. HAJIMOTO*"Uh...um...alright...OOOOH GOD..."
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482070</id>
	<title>For some reason...</title>
	<author>commodore73</author>
	<datestamp>1268668560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This made me think of the great Woody Allen movie "Sleeper", but I couldn't think of a joke quickly (would the technology still recognize the leader after the steamroller incident?). I didn't read every comment, but I didn't notice any about plastic surgery (many about broken noses though). I wouldn't have summarized this story on slashdot, or my summary would have included the word "ridiculous" at least once.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This made me think of the great Woody Allen movie " Sleeper " , but I could n't think of a joke quickly ( would the technology still recognize the leader after the steamroller incident ? ) .
I did n't read every comment , but I did n't notice any about plastic surgery ( many about broken noses though ) .
I would n't have summarized this story on slashdot , or my summary would have included the word " ridiculous " at least once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This made me think of the great Woody Allen movie "Sleeper", but I couldn't think of a joke quickly (would the technology still recognize the leader after the steamroller incident?).
I didn't read every comment, but I didn't notice any about plastic surgery (many about broken noses though).
I wouldn't have summarized this story on slashdot, or my summary would have included the word "ridiculous" at least once.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485702</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268683380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Worst possible choice [...] The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life. Never mind swelling</p></div></blockquote><p>You forgot one body part of us and our fellow<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers (rumors has it we are all males, OK?) which would actually be an even worse choice: It also grows (and changes) your entire life, never mind swelling<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst possible choice [ ... ] The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows ( and changes ) your entire life .
Never mind swellingYou forgot one body part of us and our fellow /.ers ( rumors has it we are all males , OK ?
) which would actually be an even worse choice : It also grows ( and changes ) your entire life , never mind swelling .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst possible choice [...] The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life.
Never mind swellingYou forgot one body part of us and our fellow /.ers (rumors has it we are all males, OK?
) which would actually be an even worse choice: It also grows (and changes) your entire life, never mind swelling ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482182</id>
	<title>Re:Article? What article?</title>
	<author>earthman</author>
	<datestamp>1268669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's possible because you only read the first of four pages of the article. The four different photos each have a different text beneath them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's possible because you only read the first of four pages of the article .
The four different photos each have a different text beneath them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's possible because you only read the first of four pages of the article.
The four different photos each have a different text beneath them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482862</id>
	<title>Re:Before you know it</title>
	<author>Nabbler</author>
	<datestamp>1268672220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't actually map the entire DNA of every person, even the british cops, they use some main markers, and those do actually sometimes double up, plus you can fake or spoil DNA very easily by using someone else's hair or spit or some such.
<br> <br>
But I fear the worse too for the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't actually map the entire DNA of every person , even the british cops , they use some main markers , and those do actually sometimes double up , plus you can fake or spoil DNA very easily by using someone else 's hair or spit or some such .
But I fear the worse too for the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't actually map the entire DNA of every person, even the british cops, they use some main markers, and those do actually sometimes double up, plus you can fake or spoil DNA very easily by using someone else's hair or spit or some such.
But I fear the worse too for the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481216</id>
	<title>DNA (Douglas N Adams, that is) would have loved it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would finally have enabled Douglas Adams to use the awesome power of his nose for the forces of good.</p><p>He had a famously large hooter.</p><p>See <a href="http://tdv.com/personal\_worlds/douglas\_a/nose/nose.html" title="tdv.com" rel="nofollow">this link</a> [tdv.com] for Douglas's own views on his nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would finally have enabled Douglas Adams to use the awesome power of his nose for the forces of good.He had a famously large hooter.See this link [ tdv.com ] for Douglas 's own views on his nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would finally have enabled Douglas Adams to use the awesome power of his nose for the forces of good.He had a famously large hooter.See this link [tdv.com] for Douglas's own views on his nose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482606</id>
	<title>RTFA before posting the summary</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1268671200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did the submitter read the story?</p><p><i>While able to process images more quickly than conventional biometric identification techniques such as whole face recognition, <b>the system's recognition rates were comparatively low</b> and researchers recommend it as an addition to existing biometrics rather than a replacement.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did the submitter read the story ? While able to process images more quickly than conventional biometric identification techniques such as whole face recognition , the system 's recognition rates were comparatively low and researchers recommend it as an addition to existing biometrics rather than a replacement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did the submitter read the story?While able to process images more quickly than conventional biometric identification techniques such as whole face recognition, the system's recognition rates were comparatively low and researchers recommend it as an addition to existing biometrics rather than a replacement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406</id>
	<title>One positive aspect...  (was:Re:Before you know..)</title>
	<author>beh</author>
	<datestamp>1268665260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the positive side, if anyone beats you up and breaks your nose, they can now be sued for aiding and abetting terrorism by making the 'nose database' useless...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the positive side , if anyone beats you up and breaks your nose , they can now be sued for aiding and abetting terrorism by making the 'nose database ' useless.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the positive side, if anyone beats you up and breaks your nose, they can now be sued for aiding and abetting terrorism by making the 'nose database' useless...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483386</id>
	<title>Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know.</title>
	<author>Syberz</author>
	<datestamp>1268674380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How useless is this, at any given point there has to be about 50-100 people in Beverly Hills that have the same nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How useless is this , at any given point there has to be about 50-100 people in Beverly Hills that have the same nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How useless is this, at any given point there has to be about 50-100 people in Beverly Hills that have the same nose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482932</id>
	<title>Re:Before you know it</title>
	<author>Nabbler</author>
	<datestamp>1268672580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh and also they use things like the face and nose because then CCTV can scan and recognize on-the-run without asking permission or stopping people and from a distance.
One of the first to use CCTV (security cams) facial recognition in europe was McDonald BTW, to alert them of unwanted troublemakers that tried to return.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh and also they use things like the face and nose because then CCTV can scan and recognize on-the-run without asking permission or stopping people and from a distance .
One of the first to use CCTV ( security cams ) facial recognition in europe was McDonald BTW , to alert them of unwanted troublemakers that tried to return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh and also they use things like the face and nose because then CCTV can scan and recognize on-the-run without asking permission or stopping people and from a distance.
One of the first to use CCTV (security cams) facial recognition in europe was McDonald BTW, to alert them of unwanted troublemakers that tried to return.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481926</id>
	<title>Mistaken Identity</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1268667900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh great.  Now I'm going to have to deal with Cyrano de Bergerac being on the no-fly list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great .
Now I 'm going to have to deal with Cyrano de Bergerac being on the no-fly list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great.
Now I'm going to have to deal with Cyrano de Bergerac being on the no-fly list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481086</id>
	<title>Biometrics waste of time.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously. Wow. What a waste of energy and resources. It's called a nose mold, costs like ten cents. Security theater at it's finest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
Wow. What a waste of energy and resources .
It 's called a nose mold , costs like ten cents .
Security theater at it 's finest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
Wow. What a waste of energy and resources.
It's called a nose mold, costs like ten cents.
Security theater at it's finest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31484042</id>
	<title>Re:What about my nose?</title>
	<author>Nick Number</author>
	<datestamp>1268677080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!</p></div><p>Sorry sir, but we can't allow you on this flight.  Our system identifies you as the evil Lee Marvin from <i>Cat Ballou</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm Tycho Brahe , you insensitive clod ! Sorry sir , but we ca n't allow you on this flight .
Our system identifies you as the evil Lee Marvin from Cat Ballou .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!Sorry sir, but we can't allow you on this flight.
Our system identifies you as the evil Lee Marvin from Cat Ballou.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481198</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>SerpentMage</author>
	<datestamp>1268664000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two words....</p><p>Michael Jackson</p><p>nuff said...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words....Michael Jacksonnuff said.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words....Michael Jacksonnuff said...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485750</id>
	<title>One word</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268683560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>burka</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>burka</tokentext>
<sentencetext>burka</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482206</id>
	<title>Rul</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm scared. The next step of biometrical scanner will be the colon deepness. May god have marcy of our souls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm scared .
The next step of biometrical scanner will be the colon deepness .
May god have marcy of our souls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm scared.
The next step of biometrical scanner will be the colon deepness.
May god have marcy of our souls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482778</id>
	<title>Where's Matt Damon?</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1268671920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The nose plays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nose plays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nose plays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485530</id>
	<title>Re:Next exciting biometrics tech: a-hole scanners</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268682660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dental records are already used as a very reliable form of identification (generally of corpses, not really practical for every-day identification of living people).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dental records are already used as a very reliable form of identification ( generally of corpses , not really practical for every-day identification of living people ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dental records are already used as a very reliable form of identification (generally of corpses, not really practical for every-day identification of living people).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31487548</id>
	<title>Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES</title>
	<author>jpstanle</author>
	<datestamp>1268646720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thoughts exactly. As an American who has only recently started playing the sport of rugby football, even my limited experience has painfully demonstrated how reconfigurable the human nose is.</p><p>As a sidenote, being kicked in the face while laying at the bottom of a ruck sure does make you feel alive =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly .
As an American who has only recently started playing the sport of rugby football , even my limited experience has painfully demonstrated how reconfigurable the human nose is.As a sidenote , being kicked in the face while laying at the bottom of a ruck sure does make you feel alive = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.
As an American who has only recently started playing the sport of rugby football, even my limited experience has painfully demonstrated how reconfigurable the human nose is.As a sidenote, being kicked in the face while laying at the bottom of a ruck sure does make you feel alive =)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481276</id>
	<title>Re:I am worried...</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1268664420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Inside? Really?</p><p>Damn, I won't get one of those at home. If I snort too much, I can't get back in! Talk about an effective anti-drug campaign.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Inside ?
Really ? Damn , I wo n't get one of those at home .
If I snort too much , I ca n't get back in !
Talk about an effective anti-drug campaign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Inside?
Really?Damn, I won't get one of those at home.
If I snort too much, I can't get back in!
Talk about an effective anti-drug campaign.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482558</id>
	<title>Re:I am worried...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268671080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is not to be, erm, <b>sniffed</b> at</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is not to be , erm , sniffed at</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is not to be, erm, sniffed at</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482336</id>
	<title>Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!</p></div></blockquote><p>It would be a denial of service <strong>attack</strong>.</p><p>Running afoul of felony battery laws while also breaking DMCA protections!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but what happens if a person breaks their nose ?
! It would be a denial of service attack.Running afoul of felony battery laws while also breaking DMCA protections !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but what happens if a person breaks their nose?
!It would be a denial of service attack.Running afoul of felony battery laws while also breaking DMCA protections!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481252</id>
	<title>Re:Article? What article?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For the first time ever</p></div><p>You must be new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the first time everYou must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the first time everYou must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</id>
	<title>Before you know it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268663280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Biometrics are going to use your DNA for verification, which is the only fool-proof system.  I mean, come on, how would you fake someone else's DNA?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::cough::GATTACA::cough::</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Biometrics are going to use your DNA for verification , which is the only fool-proof system .
I mean , come on , how would you fake someone else 's DNA ?
: : cough : : GATTACA : : cough : :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Biometrics are going to use your DNA for verification, which is the only fool-proof system.
I mean, come on, how would you fake someone else's DNA?
::cough::GATTACA::cough::</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334</id>
	<title>What about my nose?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm Tycho Brahe , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060</id>
	<title>I am worried...</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1268663340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will they scan also the inside of the nose ?!? It would be very awful to analyze...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will they scan also the inside of the nose ? ! ?
It would be very awful to analyze.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will they scan also the inside of the nose ?!?
It would be very awful to analyze...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31491996</id>
	<title>Same old EPIC FAILURE.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268675040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn&rsquo;t matter if it&rsquo;s any body part, or a card or anything &ldquo;that you have&rdquo;. As long as there is no accompanying &ldquo;that you know&rdquo;, it&rsquo;s insecure. Period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doesn    t matter if it    s any body part , or a card or anything    that you have    .
As long as there is no accompanying    that you know    , it    s insecure .
Period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn’t matter if it’s any body part, or a card or anything “that you have”.
As long as there is no accompanying “that you know”, it’s insecure.
Period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483696</id>
	<title>Broken nose?</title>
	<author>KitFox</author>
	<datestamp>1268675760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Broken nose... Lose fingers to a saw... go blind... </p><p>It simply stands as a standard that there is no standard that is 100\% effective or unbreakable or loss-proof.  Things can only be "More Secure" or "Less Secure".  Generally the more secure they are, the easier it is to lose them as well.</p><p>The only major difference between passwords and biometrics is that one is knowledge-based and one is physical.  Neither are fully secure. There is the difference between how easy it is to potentially steal or duplicate somebody's biometric signature versus how easy it is to steal or duplicate a password of similar relative "strength" in any given situation.  Compare the process of stealing an 8-digit numeric key code versus duplicating somebody's fingerprint in a way that the scanner will recognize for example.</p><p>But with the low recognition rate, and the recommendation to use this as an additional layer of security, itreally is just that, an addition layer.  Just like IP access lists.  The duplicated fingerprint will do you no good as the nose knows!</p><p>So yeah, looks like they reach in but failed to pick a true winner (sorry).  But as an extra layer of entropy, the speed makes it potentially more useful than face recognition, and due to the multiple angles and shadows, it doesn't suffer from "Photo in front of the camera" problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Broken nose... Lose fingers to a saw... go blind... It simply stands as a standard that there is no standard that is 100 \ % effective or unbreakable or loss-proof .
Things can only be " More Secure " or " Less Secure " .
Generally the more secure they are , the easier it is to lose them as well.The only major difference between passwords and biometrics is that one is knowledge-based and one is physical .
Neither are fully secure .
There is the difference between how easy it is to potentially steal or duplicate somebody 's biometric signature versus how easy it is to steal or duplicate a password of similar relative " strength " in any given situation .
Compare the process of stealing an 8-digit numeric key code versus duplicating somebody 's fingerprint in a way that the scanner will recognize for example.But with the low recognition rate , and the recommendation to use this as an additional layer of security , itreally is just that , an addition layer .
Just like IP access lists .
The duplicated fingerprint will do you no good as the nose knows ! So yeah , looks like they reach in but failed to pick a true winner ( sorry ) .
But as an extra layer of entropy , the speed makes it potentially more useful than face recognition , and due to the multiple angles and shadows , it does n't suffer from " Photo in front of the camera " problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Broken nose... Lose fingers to a saw... go blind... It simply stands as a standard that there is no standard that is 100\% effective or unbreakable or loss-proof.
Things can only be "More Secure" or "Less Secure".
Generally the more secure they are, the easier it is to lose them as well.The only major difference between passwords and biometrics is that one is knowledge-based and one is physical.
Neither are fully secure.
There is the difference between how easy it is to potentially steal or duplicate somebody's biometric signature versus how easy it is to steal or duplicate a password of similar relative "strength" in any given situation.
Compare the process of stealing an 8-digit numeric key code versus duplicating somebody's fingerprint in a way that the scanner will recognize for example.But with the low recognition rate, and the recommendation to use this as an additional layer of security, itreally is just that, an addition layer.
Just like IP access lists.
The duplicated fingerprint will do you no good as the nose knows!So yeah, looks like they reach in but failed to pick a true winner (sorry).
But as an extra layer of entropy, the speed makes it potentially more useful than face recognition, and due to the multiple angles and shadows, it doesn't suffer from "Photo in front of the camera" problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481144</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1268663700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life.</i></p><p>Your identification card is updated on a fairly regular basis already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows ( and changes ) your entire life.Your identification card is updated on a fairly regular basis already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life.Your identification card is updated on a fairly regular basis already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481446</id>
	<title>Better than the alternative.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268665500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd rather see the words:
"Please insert nose to verify identity." than "Processing colonic map." on the ATM of the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather see the words : " Please insert nose to verify identity .
" than " Processing colonic map .
" on the ATM of the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather see the words:
"Please insert nose to verify identity.
" than "Processing colonic map.
" on the ATM of the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120</id>
	<title>Next exciting biometrics tech: a-hole scanners</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1268663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another stupid idea.  Next is the ear scanner, the hair scanner, the tooth scanner (all of the above is out in the public, for someone to make a replica of any part of your body that is out in the open, is just a matter of time).  Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.</p><p>This is dumb.  Of-course Michael Jackson could use this better than others, he changed his nose shape more often than other people change their hair color and his nose was not out in the public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another stupid idea .
Next is the ear scanner , the hair scanner , the tooth scanner ( all of the above is out in the public , for someone to make a replica of any part of your body that is out in the open , is just a matter of time ) .
Then they 'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs , which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.This is dumb .
Of-course Michael Jackson could use this better than others , he changed his nose shape more often than other people change their hair color and his nose was not out in the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another stupid idea.
Next is the ear scanner, the hair scanner, the tooth scanner (all of the above is out in the public, for someone to make a replica of any part of your body that is out in the open, is just a matter of time).
Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.This is dumb.
Of-course Michael Jackson could use this better than others, he changed his nose shape more often than other people change their hair color and his nose was not out in the public.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482812</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>ISoldat53</author>
	<datestamp>1268671980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The other part that keeps growing is the ear and they have been taking ear prints for a long time now. Usually they are taken from suspects after forensics has found an impression on something like a door or window.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The other part that keeps growing is the ear and they have been taking ear prints for a long time now .
Usually they are taken from suspects after forensics has found an impression on something like a door or window .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The other part that keeps growing is the ear and they have been taking ear prints for a long time now.
Usually they are taken from suspects after forensics has found an impression on something like a door or window.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422</id>
	<title>Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES?</title>
	<author>evilandi</author>
	<datestamp>1268665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lemme get this straight. Bath, a town internationally known for its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby\_union" title="wikipedia.org">Rugby Football</a> [wikipedia.org] team, is proposing we use noses for biometric ID?</p><p>Rugby being the game for which the phrase "full contact sport" is not so much an understatement as a warning of imminent loss of life? Like American Football only without the pads and helmets? The game where a broken nose is probably the most common injury?</p><p>The Bath Rugby team probably have only one intact nose between all 15 players.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lem me get this straight .
Bath , a town internationally known for its Rugby Football [ wikipedia.org ] team , is proposing we use noses for biometric ID ? Rugby being the game for which the phrase " full contact sport " is not so much an understatement as a warning of imminent loss of life ?
Like American Football only without the pads and helmets ?
The game where a broken nose is probably the most common injury ? The Bath Rugby team probably have only one intact nose between all 15 players .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lemme get this straight.
Bath, a town internationally known for its Rugby Football [wikipedia.org] team, is proposing we use noses for biometric ID?Rugby being the game for which the phrase "full contact sport" is not so much an understatement as a warning of imminent loss of life?
Like American Football only without the pads and helmets?
The game where a broken nose is probably the most common injury?The Bath Rugby team probably have only one intact nose between all 15 players.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481718</id>
	<title>Re:We need to scan everything</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1268667000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fingerprints can be faked, it is well known with scotch tape and talc powder, noses change over time, and are only useful to weight other factors.  Thats why we also scan your tongue, your eyes, and of course your butt. ( Just drop your pants and sit on the butt scanner - no, it's not a photocopier. )<br>- <em>With apologies to Monsters vs Aliens</em></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fingerprints can be faked , it is well known with scotch tape and talc powder , noses change over time , and are only useful to weight other factors .
Thats why we also scan your tongue , your eyes , and of course your butt .
( Just drop your pants and sit on the butt scanner - no , it 's not a photocopier .
) - With apologies to Monsters vs Aliens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fingerprints can be faked, it is well known with scotch tape and talc powder, noses change over time, and are only useful to weight other factors.
Thats why we also scan your tongue, your eyes, and of course your butt.
( Just drop your pants and sit on the butt scanner - no, it's not a photocopier.
)- With apologies to Monsters vs Aliens</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31492384</id>
	<title>Would that work in Hollywood?</title>
	<author>kimgkimg</author>
	<datestamp>1268680680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rhinoplasty capital of the world?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rhinoplasty capital of the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rhinoplasty capital of the world?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482062</id>
	<title>Michael Jackson would've had problems</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1268668500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean look at how his nose "morphed" over the years!  I think some of the shapes it went through weren't even human, not according to this software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean look at how his nose " morphed " over the years !
I think some of the shapes it went through were n't even human , not according to this software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean look at how his nose "morphed" over the years!
I think some of the shapes it went through weren't even human, not according to this software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483138</id>
	<title>I can move my nose...</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1268673660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously &mdash; the very tip &mdash; kinda like a rabbit does. (It is a real "chick-magnet", BTW.)

</p><p>When posing for an ID-picture, I always move it a little bit so that it looks a different on the picture from what is is in normal (relaxed) position. I don't think, the described method would identify me from those pictures...

</p><p>You can train yourself to do it, BTW &mdash; an hour or two in front of the mirror and you'll "get it".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously    the very tip    kinda like a rabbit does .
( It is a real " chick-magnet " , BTW .
) When posing for an ID-picture , I always move it a little bit so that it looks a different on the picture from what is is in normal ( relaxed ) position .
I do n't think , the described method would identify me from those pictures.. . You can train yourself to do it , BTW    an hour or two in front of the mirror and you 'll " get it " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously — the very tip — kinda like a rabbit does.
(It is a real "chick-magnet", BTW.
)

When posing for an ID-picture, I always move it a little bit so that it looks a different on the picture from what is is in normal (relaxed) position.
I don't think, the described method would identify me from those pictures...

You can train yourself to do it, BTW — an hour or two in front of the mirror and you'll "get it".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</id>
	<title>Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is really a bad idea. The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life. Never mind swelling from colds, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really a bad idea .
The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows ( and changes ) your entire life .
Never mind swelling from colds , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really a bad idea.
The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life.
Never mind swelling from colds, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481100</id>
	<title>Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Add a CowboyNeal option and you've got the next Slashdot poll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add a CowboyNeal option and you 've got the next Slashdot poll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add a CowboyNeal option and you've got the next Slashdot poll.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483852</id>
	<title>Unfortunately this Technology</title>
	<author>tdp252</author>
	<datestamp>1268676360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't work for the likes of Cher and Heidi Montag.   Their plastic surgeries change their identity every few weeks !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't work for the likes of Cher and Heidi Montag .
Their plastic surgeries change their identity every few weeks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't work for the likes of Cher and Heidi Montag.
Their plastic surgeries change their identity every few weeks !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485500</id>
	<title>What about...</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1268682600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...scanning a person's ass cleavage for identity purposes ? Recent research has shown that ass cleavage is in shape, length and depth absolutely unique to any person. With the added advantage the ass cleavage has over the nose: it cannot break.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...scanning a person 's ass cleavage for identity purposes ?
Recent research has shown that ass cleavage is in shape , length and depth absolutely unique to any person .
With the added advantage the ass cleavage has over the nose : it can not break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...scanning a person's ass cleavage for identity purposes ?
Recent research has shown that ass cleavage is in shape, length and depth absolutely unique to any person.
With the added advantage the ass cleavage has over the nose: it cannot break.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481608</id>
	<title>You Know What They Say...</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1268666520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A nose by any other name would still smell</htmltext>
<tokenext>A nose by any other name would still smell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A nose by any other name would still smell</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481870</id>
	<title>Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1268667600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In case they want to do ears, rugby players used to have them ripped off before they started taping them to their heads them, now cauliflower ear is a more common injury.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In case they want to do ears , rugby players used to have them ripped off before they started taping them to their heads them , now cauliflower ear is a more common injury .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case they want to do ears, rugby players used to have them ripped off before they started taping them to their heads them, now cauliflower ear is a more common injury.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482486</id>
	<title>Not to inturrupt your rant, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268670660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's a Nubian?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a Nubian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a Nubian?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481362</id>
	<title>Nose job?</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1268664960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will people now have to get clearance from the NSA/FBI/DOD in order to get a nose job?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will people now have to get clearance from the NSA/FBI/DOD in order to get a nose job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will people now have to get clearance from the NSA/FBI/DOD in order to get a nose job?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481774</id>
	<title>When will biometrics go the way of jetpacks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268667180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously.  No one cares for biometrics.  Aside from making for very sick dismemberment jokes in spy movies, biometrics haven't done much to go mainstream.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
No one cares for biometrics .
Aside from making for very sick dismemberment jokes in spy movies , biometrics have n't done much to go mainstream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
No one cares for biometrics.
Aside from making for very sick dismemberment jokes in spy movies, biometrics haven't done much to go mainstream.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481450</id>
	<title>Re:Worst possible choice</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1268665560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is really a bad idea.</p></div><p>Welcome to the always exciting and perpetually almost ready for prime-time world of biometrics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really a bad idea.Welcome to the always exciting and perpetually almost ready for prime-time world of biometrics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really a bad idea.Welcome to the always exciting and perpetually almost ready for prime-time world of biometrics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483504</id>
	<title>It doesn't matter</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1268674920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't really matter what the biometric is of, the whole idea has been shown to fail. It turns out that a key feature necessary for authentication is that a credential can be revoked and a new one issued whenever it has been compromised. That is just not practical for biometrics. If it can be measured, someone can capture that measurement and create a fake.</p><p>As shown on Mythbusters, the more expensive the fingerprint reader was, the easier it was to fake it out, but all of them failed one way or another.</p><p>If we start lining up and shooting marketing departments, we might one day be able to produce a biometric system that would only fall for very difficult surgical duplications (and so raise the bar quite high), but such systems would likely cost several orders of magnitude more than other equally secure methods that we already have available. Meanwhile, in those few cases where the access is important enough to resort to the surgical approach and someone does so, we're right back to the inability to issue a new ID.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't really matter what the biometric is of , the whole idea has been shown to fail .
It turns out that a key feature necessary for authentication is that a credential can be revoked and a new one issued whenever it has been compromised .
That is just not practical for biometrics .
If it can be measured , someone can capture that measurement and create a fake.As shown on Mythbusters , the more expensive the fingerprint reader was , the easier it was to fake it out , but all of them failed one way or another.If we start lining up and shooting marketing departments , we might one day be able to produce a biometric system that would only fall for very difficult surgical duplications ( and so raise the bar quite high ) , but such systems would likely cost several orders of magnitude more than other equally secure methods that we already have available .
Meanwhile , in those few cases where the access is important enough to resort to the surgical approach and someone does so , we 're right back to the inability to issue a new ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't really matter what the biometric is of, the whole idea has been shown to fail.
It turns out that a key feature necessary for authentication is that a credential can be revoked and a new one issued whenever it has been compromised.
That is just not practical for biometrics.
If it can be measured, someone can capture that measurement and create a fake.As shown on Mythbusters, the more expensive the fingerprint reader was, the easier it was to fake it out, but all of them failed one way or another.If we start lining up and shooting marketing departments, we might one day be able to produce a biometric system that would only fall for very difficult surgical duplications (and so raise the bar quite high), but such systems would likely cost several orders of magnitude more than other equally secure methods that we already have available.
Meanwhile, in those few cases where the access is important enough to resort to the surgical approach and someone does so, we're right back to the inability to issue a new ID.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482886</id>
	<title>Brain Scan</title>
	<author>Rolgar</author>
	<datestamp>1268672340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe we should patent the brain scan for ID since that will be the next idea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe we should patent the brain scan for ID since that will be the next idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe we should patent the brain scan for ID since that will be the next idea?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483676</id>
	<title>Re:What about my nose?</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1268675580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho\_Brahe" title="wikipedia.org">411</a> [wikipedia.org] for those who are curious...<blockquote><div><p>While studying at University of Rostock in Germany, on 29 December 1566 Tycho lost part of his nose in a duel with fellow Danish nobleman Manderup Parsbjerg.  Tycho had earlier quarrelled with Parsbjerg at a wedding dance at professor Lucas Bacmeister's house on the 10th, and again on the 27th. The duel two days later (in the dark) resulted in Tycho losing the bridge of his nose.  From this event Tycho became interested in medicine  and alchemy.  For the rest of his life, he was said to have worn a realistic replacement made of silver and gold, using a paste to keep it attached.  Some people, such as Fredric Ihren and Cecil Adams have suggested that the false nose also had copper. Ihren wrote that when Tycho's tomb was opened in 24 June 1901 green marks were found on his skull, suggesting copper.  Cecil Adams also mentions a green colouring and that medical experts examined the remains.  Some historians have speculated that he wore a number of different prosthetics for different occasions, noting that a copper  nose would have been more comfortable and less heavy than a precious metal one.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 411 [ wikipedia.org ] for those who are curious...While studying at University of Rostock in Germany , on 29 December 1566 Tycho lost part of his nose in a duel with fellow Danish nobleman Manderup Parsbjerg .
Tycho had earlier quarrelled with Parsbjerg at a wedding dance at professor Lucas Bacmeister 's house on the 10th , and again on the 27th .
The duel two days later ( in the dark ) resulted in Tycho losing the bridge of his nose .
From this event Tycho became interested in medicine and alchemy .
For the rest of his life , he was said to have worn a realistic replacement made of silver and gold , using a paste to keep it attached .
Some people , such as Fredric Ihren and Cecil Adams have suggested that the false nose also had copper .
Ihren wrote that when Tycho 's tomb was opened in 24 June 1901 green marks were found on his skull , suggesting copper .
Cecil Adams also mentions a green colouring and that medical experts examined the remains .
Some historians have speculated that he wore a number of different prosthetics for different occasions , noting that a copper nose would have been more comfortable and less heavy than a precious metal one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 411 [wikipedia.org] for those who are curious...While studying at University of Rostock in Germany, on 29 December 1566 Tycho lost part of his nose in a duel with fellow Danish nobleman Manderup Parsbjerg.
Tycho had earlier quarrelled with Parsbjerg at a wedding dance at professor Lucas Bacmeister's house on the 10th, and again on the 27th.
The duel two days later (in the dark) resulted in Tycho losing the bridge of his nose.
From this event Tycho became interested in medicine  and alchemy.
For the rest of his life, he was said to have worn a realistic replacement made of silver and gold, using a paste to keep it attached.
Some people, such as Fredric Ihren and Cecil Adams have suggested that the false nose also had copper.
Ihren wrote that when Tycho's tomb was opened in 24 June 1901 green marks were found on his skull, suggesting copper.
Cecil Adams also mentions a green colouring and that medical experts examined the remains.
Some historians have speculated that he wore a number of different prosthetics for different occasions, noting that a copper  nose would have been more comfortable and less heavy than a precious metal one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481262</id>
	<title>The second most common cosmetic surgery?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1268664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rhinoplasty makes this pointless.<br> <br>Well done folks... Well done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rhinoplasty makes this pointless .
Well done folks... Well done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rhinoplasty makes this pointless.
Well done folks... Well done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481416</id>
	<title>Like this?</title>
	<author>nathan s</author>
	<datestamp>1268665260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/08/dna-samples-used-by-crime-labs-faked-in-research-lab.ars" title="arstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/08/dna-samples-used-by-crime-labs-faked-in-research-lab.ars</a> [arstechnica.com]</p><p>Granted, they say it carries markers of having been lab-tampered, but that detecting the markers requires currently-unusual sophistication.  Interesting, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/08/dna-samples-used-by-crime-labs-faked-in-research-lab.ars [ arstechnica.com ] Granted , they say it carries markers of having been lab-tampered , but that detecting the markers requires currently-unusual sophistication .
Interesting , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/08/dna-samples-used-by-crime-labs-faked-in-research-lab.ars [arstechnica.com]Granted, they say it carries markers of having been lab-tampered, but that detecting the markers requires currently-unusual sophistication.
Interesting, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481342</id>
	<title>Heuristic scanning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see... Nose completely free of boogers, but horrifically scarred by fingernails? Log in as root, must be the administrator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see... Nose completely free of boogers , but horrifically scarred by fingernails ?
Log in as root , must be the administrator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see... Nose completely free of boogers, but horrifically scarred by fingernails?
Log in as root, must be the administrator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31484396</id>
	<title>what happens if a person breaks their nose</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1268678520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!"</p><p>You just need to phone DHS and reactivate your face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose ? !
" You just need to phone DHS and reactivate your face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!
"You just need to phone DHS and reactivate your face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481910</id>
	<title>Plastic Surgery</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1268667840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously?! Don't they know that a nose job is the second most popular plastic surgery?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ? !
Do n't they know that a nose job is the second most popular plastic surgery ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?!
Don't they know that a nose job is the second most popular plastic surgery?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482856</id>
	<title>Re:Article? What article?</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1268672160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shame on me for having to double-check... I should have known it's definitely not a kdawson post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shame on me for having to double-check... I should have known it 's definitely not a kdawson post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shame on me for having to double-check... I should have known it's definitely not a kdawson post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481666</id>
	<title>What about the genitals?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, TSA!</p><p>You've already got the millimeter body scanners rolling out across the US and rest of the world. Kick it up a notch! Go straight for the biometric genital scanning!</p><p>Pfft, privacy. You don't need privacy. You need safety. Now drop your drawers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , TSA ! You 've already got the millimeter body scanners rolling out across the US and rest of the world .
Kick it up a notch !
Go straight for the biometric genital scanning ! Pfft , privacy .
You do n't need privacy .
You need safety .
Now drop your drawers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, TSA!You've already got the millimeter body scanners rolling out across the US and rest of the world.
Kick it up a notch!
Go straight for the biometric genital scanning!Pfft, privacy.
You don't need privacy.
You need safety.
Now drop your drawers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31484612</id>
	<title>mo3 uP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268679300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fueling internal told reporters, [nero-online.org]. around return it and shower. For Been looking f[or! invited back again. GNAA and support [amazingkreskin.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fueling internal told reporters , [ nero-online.org ] .
around return it and shower .
For Been looking f [ or !
invited back again .
GNAA and support [ amazingkreskin.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fueling internal told reporters, [nero-online.org].
around return it and shower.
For Been looking f[or!
invited back again.
GNAA and support [amazingkreskin.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482240</id>
	<title>Nose Scanners?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268669460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I smell a rat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I smell a rat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smell a rat!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481482</id>
	<title>Odd</title>
	<author>Alarindris</author>
	<datestamp>1268665740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why don't they just scan the whole face?  <br> <br>As if the nose were more unique than the rest of the face plus the nose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't they just scan the whole face ?
As if the nose were more unique than the rest of the face plus the nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't they just scan the whole face?
As if the nose were more unique than the rest of the face plus the nose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485878</id>
	<title>Jennifer Grey...</title>
	<author>zawarski</author>
	<datestamp>1268683980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...enough said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...enough said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...enough said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481722</id>
	<title>Please, Oh, Please...</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1268667000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Don't let the security-crazed among us start thinking about what other stickout-y parts of the human anatomy they could photograph from six angles, digitize and put on our passports.  All to keep the children and kittens safe, of course. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't let the security-crazed among us start thinking about what other stickout-y parts of the human anatomy they could photograph from six angles , digitize and put on our passports .
All to keep the children and kittens safe , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Don't let the security-crazed among us start thinking about what other stickout-y parts of the human anatomy they could photograph from six angles, digitize and put on our passports.
All to keep the children and kittens safe, of course. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482412</id>
	<title>Life mirrors art I guess...</title>
	<author>EriktheGreen</author>
	<datestamp>1268670300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
There was an old cartoon from back in the 80s when the first really painful desktop security measures were put in place... back when people still ran unpatched OSs and downloading updates (via dial-up modem) wasn't common.
</p><p>
I think it was "The Fifth Wave" series.  Wish I could find it to post a link.
</p><p>
Basically, it was a manager turning to an employee looking stubborn at his computer terminal and saying "Now c'mon, Bob, you know nose scanning is our best defense against unauthorized computer use!"  The nose scanners were cups on thick cords hanging from the ceiling like airline oxygen masks.
</p><p>
Biometrics is a cute marketing trick, but it's no substitute for good security process.  That's why I like signing in to my laptop using the "fingerprint" of a small area on the underside of my scrotum.  Any legitimate reason to doff one's pants at work is good.  "I'm just logging in."   or "Whoops, there goes my screensaver.  Zzzzzzzip...."

</p><p>
Erik</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an old cartoon from back in the 80s when the first really painful desktop security measures were put in place... back when people still ran unpatched OSs and downloading updates ( via dial-up modem ) was n't common .
I think it was " The Fifth Wave " series .
Wish I could find it to post a link .
Basically , it was a manager turning to an employee looking stubborn at his computer terminal and saying " Now c'mon , Bob , you know nose scanning is our best defense against unauthorized computer use !
" The nose scanners were cups on thick cords hanging from the ceiling like airline oxygen masks .
Biometrics is a cute marketing trick , but it 's no substitute for good security process .
That 's why I like signing in to my laptop using the " fingerprint " of a small area on the underside of my scrotum .
Any legitimate reason to doff one 's pants at work is good .
" I 'm just logging in .
" or " Whoops , there goes my screensaver .
Zzzzzzzip.... " Erik</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
There was an old cartoon from back in the 80s when the first really painful desktop security measures were put in place... back when people still ran unpatched OSs and downloading updates (via dial-up modem) wasn't common.
I think it was "The Fifth Wave" series.
Wish I could find it to post a link.
Basically, it was a manager turning to an employee looking stubborn at his computer terminal and saying "Now c'mon, Bob, you know nose scanning is our best defense against unauthorized computer use!
"  The nose scanners were cups on thick cords hanging from the ceiling like airline oxygen masks.
Biometrics is a cute marketing trick, but it's no substitute for good security process.
That's why I like signing in to my laptop using the "fingerprint" of a small area on the underside of my scrotum.
Any legitimate reason to doff one's pants at work is good.
"I'm just logging in.
"   or "Whoops, there goes my screensaver.
Zzzzzzzip...."


Erik</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483526</id>
	<title>The Terrorists can beat this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268675040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>by trimming their nose hair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by trimming their nose hair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by trimming their nose hair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482254</id>
	<title>Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know.</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1268669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget anyone who feeds you too many donuts..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget anyone who feeds you too many donuts. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget anyone who feeds you too many donuts..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31484042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31492384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31487548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_1257224_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31484042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31492384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31483386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31485530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31482486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_1257224.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31481870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_1257224.31487548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
