<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_15_0734203</id>
	<title>Scientology Tries To Block German Documentary</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268643540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"The Guardian is reporting on the strained relationship that Scientology is having with the German government and the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/11/scientologists-try-block-german-film">airing of a pesky documentary on Southwest Broadcasting</a>.  <em>Until Nothing Remains</em>, a $2.3 million documentary, is slotted to air on German television at the end of this month.  It recounts the true story of Heiner von R&#246;nn and his family's suffering when he tried to leave the Church of Scientology.  A Scientology spokesperson called the film false and intolerant and also said they are investigating legal means to stop the film from being aired.  More <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,675298,00.html">details on the film can be gleaned here</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " The Guardian is reporting on the strained relationship that Scientology is having with the German government and the airing of a pesky documentary on Southwest Broadcasting .
Until Nothing Remains , a $ 2.3 million documentary , is slotted to air on German television at the end of this month .
It recounts the true story of Heiner von R   nn and his family 's suffering when he tried to leave the Church of Scientology .
A Scientology spokesperson called the film false and intolerant and also said they are investigating legal means to stop the film from being aired .
More details on the film can be gleaned here .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "The Guardian is reporting on the strained relationship that Scientology is having with the German government and the airing of a pesky documentary on Southwest Broadcasting.
Until Nothing Remains, a $2.3 million documentary, is slotted to air on German television at the end of this month.
It recounts the true story of Heiner von Rönn and his family's suffering when he tried to leave the Church of Scientology.
A Scientology spokesperson called the film false and intolerant and also said they are investigating legal means to stop the film from being aired.
More details on the film can be gleaned here.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479520</id>
	<title>meta-comment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268649120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would like to see a graph of the distribution of postings by "Anonymous Coward" in the comments for Scientology-related versus non-Scientology-related stories.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to see a graph of the distribution of postings by " Anonymous Coward " in the comments for Scientology-related versus non-Scientology-related stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to see a graph of the distribution of postings by "Anonymous Coward" in the comments for Scientology-related versus non-Scientology-related stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31491412</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268668860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; That's the real problem here. Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.</p><p>Nah. You've got it all wrong. The people up top aren't fanatics at all, as far as the "religion" goes. The religion is strictly for the suckers. The only thing they're fanatic about is controlling the rubes and making a fortune.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; That 's the real problem here .
Other religions may inspire some fanatics , but Scientology is run by fanatics.Nah .
You 've got it all wrong .
The people up top are n't fanatics at all , as far as the " religion " goes .
The religion is strictly for the suckers .
The only thing they 're fanatic about is controlling the rubes and making a fortune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; That's the real problem here.
Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.Nah.
You've got it all wrong.
The people up top aren't fanatics at all, as far as the "religion" goes.
The religion is strictly for the suckers.
The only thing they're fanatic about is controlling the rubes and making a fortune.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31487862</id>
	<title>Help Scientology is harassing me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268648040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the last 2 years they've been sending me junk mail.  I get about 3-4 mailings and magazines from them each week.  I've called them 3 times to ask to be taken off the mailing list.  That was over a year ago.</p><p>How can I make them stop mailing me stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the last 2 years they 've been sending me junk mail .
I get about 3-4 mailings and magazines from them each week .
I 've called them 3 times to ask to be taken off the mailing list .
That was over a year ago.How can I make them stop mailing me stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the last 2 years they've been sending me junk mail.
I get about 3-4 mailings and magazines from them each week.
I've called them 3 times to ask to be taken off the mailing list.
That was over a year ago.How can I make them stop mailing me stuff?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31484512</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268678880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have to argue that the traditional religions that you have mentioned are also run by fanatics. Because Scientology is a smaller organization that is heavier with extortion on its members than other religions, it's seen as being separate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have to argue that the traditional religions that you have mentioned are also run by fanatics .
Because Scientology is a smaller organization that is heavier with extortion on its members than other religions , it 's seen as being separate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have to argue that the traditional religions that you have mentioned are also run by fanatics.
Because Scientology is a smaller organization that is heavier with extortion on its members than other religions, it's seen as being separate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31487656</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31497676</id>
	<title>Islam is statistically no more violent than Christ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268761680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..iantity and atheism</p><p>ahaa haa ha aha ahaa ha aha ah haaaaaaa ha aha ha aha ha aha ha aha ah cough cough heave.....h aha aha ha aha aha ha ahahaha haahahha aaha aha ahaaha aha aha aha aha haa ha ha aha..... oh make it stop....oh ha aha aha ha ah aha ha ah aha aha ha aha ah ha ah aha haahahahahahha haaaaaah ahhh hahhh...hurllllll ha aha ha aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ahhhhaaha  hahahha ahahh ahhhhhahh haha ha ha aha aha ha ah aha aha ha ah ah aha hahahahha..........</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..iantity and atheismahaa haa ha aha ahaa ha aha ah haaaaaaa ha aha ha aha ha aha ha aha ah cough cough heave.....h aha aha ha aha aha ha ahahaha haahahha aaha aha ahaaha aha aha aha aha haa ha ha aha..... oh make it stop....oh ha aha aha ha ah aha ha ah aha aha ha aha ah ha ah aha haahahahahahha haaaaaah ahhh hahhh...hurllllll ha aha ha aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ahhhhaaha hahahha ahahh ahhhhhahh haha ha ha aha aha ha ah aha aha ha ah ah aha hahahahha......... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..iantity and atheismahaa haa ha aha ahaa ha aha ah haaaaaaa ha aha ha aha ha aha ha aha ah cough cough heave.....h aha aha ha aha aha ha ahahaha haahahha aaha aha ahaaha aha aha aha aha haa ha ha aha..... oh make it stop....oh ha aha aha ha ah aha ha ah aha aha ha aha ah ha ah aha haahahahahahha haaaaaah ahhh hahhh...hurllllll ha aha ha aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ah aha ahhhhaaha  hahahha ahahh ahhhhhahh haha ha ha aha aha ha ah aha aha ha ah ah aha hahahahha..........</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483108</id>
	<title>Re:Be tolerant and understanding: read OTIII now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268673540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>Similar thing happened not long ago with Scientology's daughter cult, <b>The Landmark Forum</b>
<br>There was a special on French TV with hidden cameras inside the forum one weekend. Crazy stuff, they tried to silence the show but <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3537369/2003\_Inside\_Landmark\_Forum.avi" title="thepiratebay.org" rel="nofollow">it has been futile.</a> [thepiratebay.org] (English subbed)
<br> <br>Just Say "NO" to Cults.<br>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar thing happened not long ago with Scientology 's daughter cult , The Landmark Forum There was a special on French TV with hidden cameras inside the forum one weekend .
Crazy stuff , they tried to silence the show but it has been futile .
[ thepiratebay.org ] ( English subbed ) Just Say " NO " to Cults. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar thing happened not long ago with Scientology's daughter cult, The Landmark Forum
There was a special on French TV with hidden cameras inside the forum one weekend.
Crazy stuff, they tried to silence the show but it has been futile.
[thepiratebay.org] (English subbed)
 Just Say "NO" to Cults..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268664180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Scientology == Catholicism == Christianity"</p></div></blockquote><p>

Every time there is any Internet forum discussion critical of Scientology this same meme pops up. It's not true. Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history is an attempt BY SCIENTOLOGY to legitimize itself. Just look at how a discussion about Scientology and a "docudrama" about it spawned this sub-thread plus discussions of Atheism vs. Theism, Christianity's historical abuses of believers and non-believers, political power struggles of one dogma vs another, the current state of Islam, etc.<br>
<br>
Any other org is fair game so long as negative attention is diverted from Scientology.<br>
<br>
Keep your eye on the ball, folks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Scientology = = Catholicism = = Christianity " Every time there is any Internet forum discussion critical of Scientology this same meme pops up .
It 's not true .
Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history is an attempt BY SCIENTOLOGY to legitimize itself .
Just look at how a discussion about Scientology and a " docudrama " about it spawned this sub-thread plus discussions of Atheism vs. Theism , Christianity 's historical abuses of believers and non-believers , political power struggles of one dogma vs another , the current state of Islam , etc .
Any other org is fair game so long as negative attention is diverted from Scientology .
Keep your eye on the ball , folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Scientology == Catholicism == Christianity"

Every time there is any Internet forum discussion critical of Scientology this same meme pops up.
It's not true.
Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history is an attempt BY SCIENTOLOGY to legitimize itself.
Just look at how a discussion about Scientology and a "docudrama" about it spawned this sub-thread plus discussions of Atheism vs. Theism, Christianity's historical abuses of believers and non-believers, political power struggles of one dogma vs another, the current state of Islam, etc.
Any other org is fair game so long as negative attention is diverted from Scientology.
Keep your eye on the ball, folks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480696</id>
	<title>Why is Scientology a religion in the USA?</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1268660940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My understanding is: Scientology wanted to be considered a religion so they would not have to pay taxes. To get that status, Scientologists actually blackmailed the IRS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is : Scientology wanted to be considered a religion so they would not have to pay taxes .
To get that status , Scientologists actually blackmailed the IRS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is: Scientology wanted to be considered a religion so they would not have to pay taxes.
To get that status, Scientologists actually blackmailed the IRS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480122</id>
	<title>heh</title>
	<author>Haymaker</author>
	<datestamp>1268655180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I will now list everyone surprised by this move:</htmltext>
<tokenext>I will now list everyone surprised by this move :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will now list everyone surprised by this move:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31485304</id>
	<title>Maybe They Should Read Their Creed</title>
	<author>deeny</author>
	<datestamp>1268681820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find this ironic (but unsurprising). As a former CofS member, I note that their creed states:</p><p>"That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others;"</p><p>Naturally, the practice is different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find this ironic ( but unsurprising ) .
As a former CofS member , I note that their creed states : " That all men have inalienable rights to think freely , to talk freely , to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others ; " Naturally , the practice is different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find this ironic (but unsurprising).
As a former CofS member, I note that their creed states:"That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others;"Naturally, the practice is different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31490174</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1268660040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I've met really nasty, mean Jehovah's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA. They go after people who try to leave, using incredible guilt trips, calls and visits to their family, etc, and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism. But I've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets."</p><p>I was raised in a JW family, and became an atheist in my teens. I regard all religious believers as delusional.</p><p>However I have never seen the kind of behaviour you describe by JW's and frankly IF it occoured it most certainly happened due to the actions of individuals NOT the JW's standard policy, as is the case with Scientology.</p><p>
&nbsp; They do ostracise those who break their rules and "Disfellowship" them-but there is specific exemption of family members, so they do not press for family mebers to ignore their relatives.</p><p>NO pressure has ever been applied to my family to break contact with me in the 35 years since I left.</p><p>There is a big difference between a few individuals over stepping, and a delibertae policy such as scientologies 'Fair Game" Policy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've met really nasty , mean Jehovah 's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA .
They go after people who try to leave , using incredible guilt trips , calls and visits to their family , etc , and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism .
But I 've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets .
" I was raised in a JW family , and became an atheist in my teens .
I regard all religious believers as delusional.However I have never seen the kind of behaviour you describe by JW 's and frankly IF it occoured it most certainly happened due to the actions of individuals NOT the JW 's standard policy , as is the case with Scientology .
  They do ostracise those who break their rules and " Disfellowship " them-but there is specific exemption of family members , so they do not press for family mebers to ignore their relatives.NO pressure has ever been applied to my family to break contact with me in the 35 years since I left.There is a big difference between a few individuals over stepping , and a delibertae policy such as scientologies 'Fair Game " Policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've met really nasty, mean Jehovah's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA.
They go after people who try to leave, using incredible guilt trips, calls and visits to their family, etc, and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism.
But I've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets.
"I was raised in a JW family, and became an atheist in my teens.
I regard all religious believers as delusional.However I have never seen the kind of behaviour you describe by JW's and frankly IF it occoured it most certainly happened due to the actions of individuals NOT the JW's standard policy, as is the case with Scientology.
  They do ostracise those who break their rules and "Disfellowship" them-but there is specific exemption of family members, so they do not press for family mebers to ignore their relatives.NO pressure has ever been applied to my family to break contact with me in the 35 years since I left.There is a big difference between a few individuals over stepping, and a delibertae policy such as scientologies 'Fair Game" Policy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000</id>
	<title>I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>bugnuts</author>
	<datestamp>1268653860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... but that doesn't mean they don't exist.  I completely believe they do exist.</p><p>However, I've met really nasty, mean Jehovah's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA.  They go after people who try to leave, using incredible guilt trips, calls and visits to their family, etc, and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism.  But I've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets.</p><p>I've actually met a lot of scientologists (over a dozen and roomed with several long ago), and while some are a bit fanatical, they themselves stated to me "don't judge groups by the fanatics<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... we do have ours and they're misguided."  It's a truism, and is why I don't hate the mormons, the catholics, and pretty much most similar groups, including atheists of which I'm one.  The thing is, <b>people have the right to believe what the hell they want to believe, whether it's souls, thetans, god, spirituality, or a flying pasta creation.</b>  Every article I see about scientology tries to poke fun at their beliefs, dismissing them and using that as the basis of the article, but <b>all religious faith is the same</b>.  All of it.  Poke fun at one, and you poke fun at faith itself, which means you attack all religions.  At it's base, Scientology == Catholicism == Christianity.</p><p>The biggest issue scientology has is their inability to adapt.  Even the catholic church has that skill.  The debacle of trying to use outmoded techniques (attacking the person, trying to shut down the communication, legal threats) has been shown not to work in this day and age, and yet they still persist.  LRH actually wrote techniques that worked in the 60's on how to shut down the critics.  I read them.  They absolutely will not work today.</p><p>So, scientology is really failing only that they cannot adapt, and as a result, have made many enemies.  I am not one of those enemies, but I can understand why they have them.  Some of their "technology" as they call it actually does work and is very useful in everyday life.</p><p>Several of the scientologists I knew, btw, left the church with little-to-no hassle.  Sure, there are cases where there is huge hassle.  And that's EXACTLY THE SAME with any church.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but that does n't mean they do n't exist .
I completely believe they do exist.However , I 've met really nasty , mean Jehovah 's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA .
They go after people who try to leave , using incredible guilt trips , calls and visits to their family , etc , and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism .
But I 've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets.I 've actually met a lot of scientologists ( over a dozen and roomed with several long ago ) , and while some are a bit fanatical , they themselves stated to me " do n't judge groups by the fanatics ... we do have ours and they 're misguided .
" It 's a truism , and is why I do n't hate the mormons , the catholics , and pretty much most similar groups , including atheists of which I 'm one .
The thing is , people have the right to believe what the hell they want to believe , whether it 's souls , thetans , god , spirituality , or a flying pasta creation .
Every article I see about scientology tries to poke fun at their beliefs , dismissing them and using that as the basis of the article , but all religious faith is the same .
All of it .
Poke fun at one , and you poke fun at faith itself , which means you attack all religions .
At it 's base , Scientology = = Catholicism = = Christianity.The biggest issue scientology has is their inability to adapt .
Even the catholic church has that skill .
The debacle of trying to use outmoded techniques ( attacking the person , trying to shut down the communication , legal threats ) has been shown not to work in this day and age , and yet they still persist .
LRH actually wrote techniques that worked in the 60 's on how to shut down the critics .
I read them .
They absolutely will not work today.So , scientology is really failing only that they can not adapt , and as a result , have made many enemies .
I am not one of those enemies , but I can understand why they have them .
Some of their " technology " as they call it actually does work and is very useful in everyday life.Several of the scientologists I knew , btw , left the church with little-to-no hassle .
Sure , there are cases where there is huge hassle .
And that 's EXACTLY THE SAME with any church .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
I completely believe they do exist.However, I've met really nasty, mean Jehovah's witnesses which demonstrated all of the points made in TFA.
They go after people who try to leave, using incredible guilt trips, calls and visits to their family, etc, and destroy family ties through threats and ostracism.
But I've yet to see a publicized abduction for deprogramming of JW tenets.I've actually met a lot of scientologists (over a dozen and roomed with several long ago), and while some are a bit fanatical, they themselves stated to me "don't judge groups by the fanatics ... we do have ours and they're misguided.
"  It's a truism, and is why I don't hate the mormons, the catholics, and pretty much most similar groups, including atheists of which I'm one.
The thing is, people have the right to believe what the hell they want to believe, whether it's souls, thetans, god, spirituality, or a flying pasta creation.
Every article I see about scientology tries to poke fun at their beliefs, dismissing them and using that as the basis of the article, but all religious faith is the same.
All of it.
Poke fun at one, and you poke fun at faith itself, which means you attack all religions.
At it's base, Scientology == Catholicism == Christianity.The biggest issue scientology has is their inability to adapt.
Even the catholic church has that skill.
The debacle of trying to use outmoded techniques (attacking the person, trying to shut down the communication, legal threats) has been shown not to work in this day and age, and yet they still persist.
LRH actually wrote techniques that worked in the 60's on how to shut down the critics.
I read them.
They absolutely will not work today.So, scientology is really failing only that they cannot adapt, and as a result, have made many enemies.
I am not one of those enemies, but I can understand why they have them.
Some of their "technology" as they call it actually does work and is very useful in everyday life.Several of the scientologists I knew, btw, left the church with little-to-no hassle.
Sure, there are cases where there is huge hassle.
And that's EXACTLY THE SAME with any church.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481128</id>
	<title>Documentary..?</title>
	<author>Robmonster</author>
	<datestamp>1268663640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The linked article says that this is a drama 'based on real life events'. I'm not really sure this can be classified as a documentary. I'm sure we've all seen films supposedly based on real life events and know how believable they tend to be...</p><p>R</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The linked article says that this is a drama 'based on real life events' .
I 'm not really sure this can be classified as a documentary .
I 'm sure we 've all seen films supposedly based on real life events and know how believable they tend to be...R</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The linked article says that this is a drama 'based on real life events'.
I'm not really sure this can be classified as a documentary.
I'm sure we've all seen films supposedly based on real life events and know how believable they tend to be...R</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481536</id>
	<title>The pics really explain a lot</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1268666160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you take a close look at the first image from the documentary you'll notice at the far left end of the row HRG is being trained.</p><p>Since Scientology trains one to hone their intellect and seemingly gives non-mutants amazing abilities... this could explain how Claire's father is able to fight so effectively against those with abilities far beyond his own.</p><p>Mental OWNAGE.  No wonder he's so awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you take a close look at the first image from the documentary you 'll notice at the far left end of the row HRG is being trained.Since Scientology trains one to hone their intellect and seemingly gives non-mutants amazing abilities... this could explain how Claire 's father is able to fight so effectively against those with abilities far beyond his own.Mental OWNAGE .
No wonder he 's so awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you take a close look at the first image from the documentary you'll notice at the far left end of the row HRG is being trained.Since Scientology trains one to hone their intellect and seemingly gives non-mutants amazing abilities... this could explain how Claire's father is able to fight so effectively against those with abilities far beyond his own.Mental OWNAGE.
No wonder he's so awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479802</id>
	<title>What german documentary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268652060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh this one. Geez, never heard about it, never would have, except now they sue so the entire world hears about it.
</p><p>Streisand Effect anyone?
</p><p>When we shipped the religious nutters to the colonies, the understanding was that they were supposed to stay there. Not come back!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh this one .
Geez , never heard about it , never would have , except now they sue so the entire world hears about it .
Streisand Effect anyone ?
When we shipped the religious nutters to the colonies , the understanding was that they were supposed to stay there .
Not come back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh this one.
Geez, never heard about it, never would have, except now they sue so the entire world hears about it.
Streisand Effect anyone?
When we shipped the religious nutters to the colonies, the understanding was that they were supposed to stay there.
Not come back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>FroBugg</author>
	<datestamp>1268660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is Scientology doesn't work the way other religions work, with respect to fanaticism. With Christianity (or Islam, or Judaism, or most traditional religions), you get a fair amount of fanatical individuals. You get the people that shoot doctors providing abortions and you get the suicide bombers.</p><p>As far as I've seen, the fanatics in Scientology are all high up in the organization and are smart enough to at least try and be circumspect about what they do. They're better organized than individuals or small groups. They're slicker and know how to sell their product.</p><p>That's the real problem here. Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is Scientology does n't work the way other religions work , with respect to fanaticism .
With Christianity ( or Islam , or Judaism , or most traditional religions ) , you get a fair amount of fanatical individuals .
You get the people that shoot doctors providing abortions and you get the suicide bombers.As far as I 've seen , the fanatics in Scientology are all high up in the organization and are smart enough to at least try and be circumspect about what they do .
They 're better organized than individuals or small groups .
They 're slicker and know how to sell their product.That 's the real problem here .
Other religions may inspire some fanatics , but Scientology is run by fanatics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is Scientology doesn't work the way other religions work, with respect to fanaticism.
With Christianity (or Islam, or Judaism, or most traditional religions), you get a fair amount of fanatical individuals.
You get the people that shoot doctors providing abortions and you get the suicide bombers.As far as I've seen, the fanatics in Scientology are all high up in the organization and are smart enough to at least try and be circumspect about what they do.
They're better organized than individuals or small groups.
They're slicker and know how to sell their product.That's the real problem here.
Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479914</id>
	<title>Re:Two words</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1268653080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, dear. Try watching "Fox News" for an education in orifices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , dear .
Try watching " Fox News " for an education in orifices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, dear.
Try watching "Fox News" for an education in orifices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479714</id>
	<title>TRoLL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268651100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>GAY NIGGERS FROM it was fun. If I'm and what supplies again. There are invited back again. is the group that paranoid conspiracy Darren Reed, which standpo1nt, I don't Keep unnecessary parties). At THE Come on baby...and claim that BSD is a track of where Surveys show that If I remain happen. 'At least Show that FreeBSD Am protesting successes with the of the founders of that FreeBSD is To happen. My Over the same users', BigAzz, quarreled on a need to play Due to the troubles confirming the OF THE WARRING that sorded, shower Don't just people already; I'm Volume of NetBSD Live and a job to the project to</htmltext>
<tokenext>GAY NIGGERS FROM it was fun .
If I 'm and what supplies again .
There are invited back again .
is the group that paranoid conspiracy Darren Reed , which standpo1nt , I do n't Keep unnecessary parties ) .
At THE Come on baby...and claim that BSD is a track of where Surveys show that If I remain happen .
'At least Show that FreeBSD Am protesting successes with the of the founders of that FreeBSD is To happen .
My Over the same users ' , BigAzz , quarreled on a need to play Due to the troubles confirming the OF THE WARRING that sorded , shower Do n't just people already ; I 'm Volume of NetBSD Live and a job to the project to</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GAY NIGGERS FROM it was fun.
If I'm and what supplies again.
There are invited back again.
is the group that paranoid conspiracy Darren Reed, which standpo1nt, I don't Keep unnecessary parties).
At THE Come on baby...and claim that BSD is a track of where Surveys show that If I remain happen.
'At least Show that FreeBSD Am protesting successes with the of the founders of that FreeBSD is To happen.
My Over the same users', BigAzz, quarreled on a need to play Due to the troubles confirming the OF THE WARRING that sorded, shower Don't just people already; I'm Volume of NetBSD Live and a job to the project to</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481924</id>
	<title>On atheism and governing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268667900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's the duty of every government to encourage people to not be religious, because a government is suppose to represent rationality and push the advancement of the people, and to achieve such they should do things like encourage education and encourage people to think for themselves.
Unfortunately such governments do not exists so far, and as far as I know there are no movements towards achieving such a state of affairs, and it makes me pretty sad, to think millions of people are being led (or should I say supposedly led?) by people who believe in imaginary superbeings and such things, it is really astounding and depressing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's the duty of every government to encourage people to not be religious , because a government is suppose to represent rationality and push the advancement of the people , and to achieve such they should do things like encourage education and encourage people to think for themselves .
Unfortunately such governments do not exists so far , and as far as I know there are no movements towards achieving such a state of affairs , and it makes me pretty sad , to think millions of people are being led ( or should I say supposedly led ?
) by people who believe in imaginary superbeings and such things , it is really astounding and depressing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's the duty of every government to encourage people to not be religious, because a government is suppose to represent rationality and push the advancement of the people, and to achieve such they should do things like encourage education and encourage people to think for themselves.
Unfortunately such governments do not exists so far, and as far as I know there are no movements towards achieving such a state of affairs, and it makes me pretty sad, to think millions of people are being led (or should I say supposedly led?
) by people who believe in imaginary superbeings and such things, it is really astounding and depressing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482474</id>
	<title>"Denied church status" != "Prohibited"</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1268670600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>given the number of topless asian chicks in the photos on the wiki page, I'd say the danger is off-set by enough awesome to let them slide... for now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>given the number of topless asian chicks in the photos on the wiki page , I 'd say the danger is off-set by enough awesome to let them slide... for now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>given the number of topless asian chicks in the photos on the wiki page, I'd say the danger is off-set by enough awesome to let them slide... for now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479516</id>
	<title>Someone tag this story ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268649120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... "Streisandeffect". Please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... " Streisandeffect " . Please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... "Streisandeffect". Please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483320</id>
	<title>Scientology claim to be non-denominational...</title>
	<author>merc</author>
	<datestamp>1268674200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I've seen their eyes light up at 10's and 20's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I 've seen their eyes light up at 10 's and 20 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I've seen their eyes light up at 10's and 20's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480452</id>
	<title>Anything that annoys....</title>
	<author>Xenious</author>
	<datestamp>1268658900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything that annoys scientology is automatically a plus in my book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything that annoys scientology is automatically a plus in my book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything that annoys scientology is automatically a plus in my book.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481660</id>
	<title>Re:Two words</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1268666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there's Mos Eisley. But yeah, Scientology is pretty bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there 's Mos Eisley .
But yeah , Scientology is pretty bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there's Mos Eisley.
But yeah, Scientology is pretty bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479374</id>
	<title>A point to note</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Germany doesn't know yet what Scientology is, a business, a religion or a cult. This may make up the courts' mind.</p><p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Church\_of\_Scientology&amp;oldid=349476969#Germany" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia/Church of Scientology</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In Germany, official views of Scientology are particularly skeptical. In Germany it is seen as a totalitarian anti-democratic organization and is under observation by national security organizations due, among other reasons, to suspicion of violating the human rights of its members granted by the German Constitution, including Hubbard's pessimistic views on democracy vis-&#224;-vis psychiatry and other such features. In December 2007, Germany's interior ministers said that they considered the goals of Church of Scientology to be in conflict with the principles of the nation's constitution and would seek to ban the organization. The plans were quickly criticised as ill-advised. The plans to ban Scientology were finally dropped in November 2008, after preliminary investigations failed to unearth evidence of illegal or unconstitutional activity.</p><p>The legal status of the Church of Scientology in Germany is still awaiting resolution; some courts have ruled that it is a business, others have affirmed its religious nature. The German government has affirmed that it does not consider the Church of Scientology to be a religious community.</p></div><p>If any fellow Anonymous in Germany feel like telling the German government why they should <b>not</b> consider Scientology a religion, then please be my guest. Be clear, make yourself heard. "Ich bin Anonymous!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Germany does n't know yet what Scientology is , a business , a religion or a cult .
This may make up the courts ' mind.From Wikipedia/Church of Scientology [ wikipedia.org ] : In Germany , official views of Scientology are particularly skeptical .
In Germany it is seen as a totalitarian anti-democratic organization and is under observation by national security organizations due , among other reasons , to suspicion of violating the human rights of its members granted by the German Constitution , including Hubbard 's pessimistic views on democracy vis-   -vis psychiatry and other such features .
In December 2007 , Germany 's interior ministers said that they considered the goals of Church of Scientology to be in conflict with the principles of the nation 's constitution and would seek to ban the organization .
The plans were quickly criticised as ill-advised .
The plans to ban Scientology were finally dropped in November 2008 , after preliminary investigations failed to unearth evidence of illegal or unconstitutional activity.The legal status of the Church of Scientology in Germany is still awaiting resolution ; some courts have ruled that it is a business , others have affirmed its religious nature .
The German government has affirmed that it does not consider the Church of Scientology to be a religious community.If any fellow Anonymous in Germany feel like telling the German government why they should not consider Scientology a religion , then please be my guest .
Be clear , make yourself heard .
" Ich bin Anonymous !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germany doesn't know yet what Scientology is, a business, a religion or a cult.
This may make up the courts' mind.From Wikipedia/Church of Scientology [wikipedia.org]:In Germany, official views of Scientology are particularly skeptical.
In Germany it is seen as a totalitarian anti-democratic organization and is under observation by national security organizations due, among other reasons, to suspicion of violating the human rights of its members granted by the German Constitution, including Hubbard's pessimistic views on democracy vis-à-vis psychiatry and other such features.
In December 2007, Germany's interior ministers said that they considered the goals of Church of Scientology to be in conflict with the principles of the nation's constitution and would seek to ban the organization.
The plans were quickly criticised as ill-advised.
The plans to ban Scientology were finally dropped in November 2008, after preliminary investigations failed to unearth evidence of illegal or unconstitutional activity.The legal status of the Church of Scientology in Germany is still awaiting resolution; some courts have ruled that it is a business, others have affirmed its religious nature.
The German government has affirmed that it does not consider the Church of Scientology to be a religious community.If any fellow Anonymous in Germany feel like telling the German government why they should not consider Scientology a religion, then please be my guest.
Be clear, make yourself heard.
"Ich bin Anonymous!
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479980</id>
	<title>corepirate nazi illuminati blocks human spirit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268653620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they call it freedumb, &amp; we are told there's no difference.</p><p>never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators. the lights are coming up all over now. see you on the other side of it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they call it freedumb , &amp; we are told there 's no difference.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators .
the lights are coming up all over now .
see you on the other side of it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they call it freedumb, &amp; we are told there's no difference.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators.
the lights are coming up all over now.
see you on the other side of it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31489184</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268654460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history...</p></div><p>Yeah!  They've got thousands of years of history, which makes them different<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... because they've got thousands of years of history!</p><p>Seriously, though - if I criticise Scientology for the suffering it causes, and someone (a Scientologist, say) points out that the Catholic church does the same thing, what am I supposed to do?  I can either say "That's wrong regardless of whether it's Scientology or Catholicism doing it.", or I can say "Oh, good point.  Carry on, then.".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history...Yeah !
They 've got thousands of years of history , which makes them different ... because they 've got thousands of years of history ! Seriously , though - if I criticise Scientology for the suffering it causes , and someone ( a Scientologist , say ) points out that the Catholic church does the same thing , what am I supposed to do ?
I can either say " That 's wrong regardless of whether it 's Scientology or Catholicism doing it .
" , or I can say " Oh , good point .
Carry on , then .
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history...Yeah!
They've got thousands of years of history, which makes them different ... because they've got thousands of years of history!Seriously, though - if I criticise Scientology for the suffering it causes, and someone (a Scientologist, say) points out that the Catholic church does the same thing, what am I supposed to do?
I can either say "That's wrong regardless of whether it's Scientology or Catholicism doing it.
", or I can say "Oh, good point.
Carry on, then.
".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483098</id>
	<title>Slashdot loves double standards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268673480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fuck Scientology. I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.</p></div><p>. . . And you get a Score:5, Insightful</p><p>I say:  Fuck the Jews.  I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.</p><p>. . .  And I'll get a Score:-1, Troll</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck Scientology .
I 've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.. . .
And you get a Score : 5 , InsightfulI say : Fuck the Jews .
I 've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.. . .
And I 'll get a Score : -1 , Troll</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck Scientology.
I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.. . .
And you get a Score:5, InsightfulI say:  Fuck the Jews.
I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.. . .
And I'll get a Score:-1, Troll
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480326</id>
	<title>Knowledge is free.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268657340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are Anonymous.<p>

We are Legion.</p><p>

We do not forgive.</p><p>

We do not forget.</p><p>

Expect us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are Anonymous .
We are Legion .
We do not forgive .
We do not forget .
Expect us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480728</id>
	<title>Can someone explain me this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone who knows about legal stuff explain me this?<br>How come Scientology can shut everyone that tries to talk about them and we don't see any corporation doing that too? I mean, what gives Scientology the right to do it while denying it to everyone else? Or is it that the corps just choose not to use that right? I don't think that would be the case.<br>Think of all the articles talking sh1t about MS, Apple, you name it. If they had the same rights, they would be able to silence every news article talking bad about them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone who knows about legal stuff explain me this ? How come Scientology can shut everyone that tries to talk about them and we do n't see any corporation doing that too ?
I mean , what gives Scientology the right to do it while denying it to everyone else ?
Or is it that the corps just choose not to use that right ?
I do n't think that would be the case.Think of all the articles talking sh1t about MS , Apple , you name it .
If they had the same rights , they would be able to silence every news article talking bad about them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone who knows about legal stuff explain me this?How come Scientology can shut everyone that tries to talk about them and we don't see any corporation doing that too?
I mean, what gives Scientology the right to do it while denying it to everyone else?
Or is it that the corps just choose not to use that right?
I don't think that would be the case.Think of all the articles talking sh1t about MS, Apple, you name it.
If they had the same rights, they would be able to silence every news article talking bad about them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480704</id>
	<title>Of course its false and intolerant!</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1268661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its about scientology isn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its about scientology is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its about scientology isn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684</id>
	<title>Two words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268650860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck Scientology. I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck Scientology .
I 've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck Scientology.
I've never seen a larger collection of assholes ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480076</id>
	<title>Religious thinking is bad for humanity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268654580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Religious thinking is bad for humanity, much more where that is backed and promoted by organizations dark and obscure interests with a clear mafia behavior such as the Church of the scientologie. Anything you can do to fight them from the exposure of their lies and science education liberating thought. is welcome.<br>I like to have these videos in Spanish.</p><p>Anybody know where to get them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Religious thinking is bad for humanity , much more where that is backed and promoted by organizations dark and obscure interests with a clear mafia behavior such as the Church of the scientologie .
Anything you can do to fight them from the exposure of their lies and science education liberating thought .
is welcome.I like to have these videos in Spanish.Anybody know where to get them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religious thinking is bad for humanity, much more where that is backed and promoted by organizations dark and obscure interests with a clear mafia behavior such as the Church of the scientologie.
Anything you can do to fight them from the exposure of their lies and science education liberating thought.
is welcome.I like to have these videos in Spanish.Anybody know where to get them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479318</id>
	<title>Rights?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there any laws protecting this type of "speech" in Germany?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any laws protecting this type of " speech " in Germany ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any laws protecting this type of "speech" in Germany?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480898</id>
	<title>They're officialy stupid</title>
	<author>Pecisk</author>
	<datestamp>1268662320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With trying to block it, in the end it will be seen by more people than in first place. For example, I will definitely try to get it when it's released.</p><p>If they would be really that innocent they would just shrug off accusations, released their own version in press release and be done with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With trying to block it , in the end it will be seen by more people than in first place .
For example , I will definitely try to get it when it 's released.If they would be really that innocent they would just shrug off accusations , released their own version in press release and be done with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With trying to block it, in the end it will be seen by more people than in first place.
For example, I will definitely try to get it when it's released.If they would be really that innocent they would just shrug off accusations, released their own version in press release and be done with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31493730</id>
	<title>Re:On atheism and governing</title>
	<author>Nabbler</author>
	<datestamp>1268745600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, see here is where such voting systems fails, when people organize (and there are religious groups, christian and otherwise, who do purposefully search comments they feel harm their cause and attack them) they can simply 'mark' someone a troll or whatever nasty title by collectively getting their pals involved.<br>
I say that because whatever you think of my original comment to call it trolling is obviously and clearly nonsense, you might disagree, might think it stupid, but trolling? Obviously not so, especially since I went from 'insightful' then after annoying the anti-atheist guy I'm marked 'troll'.<br>
But that just underscores what's wrong with religion eh, as if it needed underscoring after already being printed in bright bold large letters<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)
I'll keep it in mind though when dealing with the religious, thanks for the reminder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , see here is where such voting systems fails , when people organize ( and there are religious groups , christian and otherwise , who do purposefully search comments they feel harm their cause and attack them ) they can simply 'mark ' someone a troll or whatever nasty title by collectively getting their pals involved .
I say that because whatever you think of my original comment to call it trolling is obviously and clearly nonsense , you might disagree , might think it stupid , but trolling ?
Obviously not so , especially since I went from 'insightful ' then after annoying the anti-atheist guy I 'm marked 'troll' .
But that just underscores what 's wrong with religion eh , as if it needed underscoring after already being printed in bright bold large letters ; ) I 'll keep it in mind though when dealing with the religious , thanks for the reminder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, see here is where such voting systems fails, when people organize (and there are religious groups, christian and otherwise, who do purposefully search comments they feel harm their cause and attack them) they can simply 'mark' someone a troll or whatever nasty title by collectively getting their pals involved.
I say that because whatever you think of my original comment to call it trolling is obviously and clearly nonsense, you might disagree, might think it stupid, but trolling?
Obviously not so, especially since I went from 'insightful' then after annoying the anti-atheist guy I'm marked 'troll'.
But that just underscores what's wrong with religion eh, as if it needed underscoring after already being printed in bright bold large letters ;)
I'll keep it in mind though when dealing with the religious, thanks for the reminder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479668</id>
	<title>"Defamatory"</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1268650680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Network denies that Until Nothing Remains depicts group as totalitarian and unethical</p></div></blockquote><p>Why would they need to deny that? It's a documentary, that's the <em>point</em>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Network denies that Until Nothing Remains depicts group as totalitarian and unethicalWhy would they need to deny that ?
It 's a documentary , that 's the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Network denies that Until Nothing Remains depicts group as totalitarian and unethicalWhy would they need to deny that?
It's a documentary, that's the point.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480566</id>
	<title>Except...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1268659980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not a documentary.<br>Once again, the error in the summary has managed to misinform and confuse thousands of Slashdotters.</p><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>A new German TV movie tells the story of a man whose family life was destroyed after joining the Church of Scientology.<br>The drama, which is based on a true story, was filmed in secret to prevent the organization taking legal action against the project.<br>.<br>.<br>The drama will air on March 31 under the title "Until Nothing Is Left."<br>This will be the first German feature film about Scientology, the first drama to use the controversial belief system as evening entertainment.</p></div><p>So, they are not EXACTLY "just being candid".<br>On the other hand, just because something is a documentary, that does not mean that it is true.<br>See <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0344160/" title="imdb.com">Operation Lune (Dark Side of the Moon)</a> [imdb.com] for an excellent example of how to twist actual events and interviews out of a contest in order to present "your version of the truth".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not a documentary.Once again , the error in the summary has managed to misinform and confuse thousands of Slashdotters.From TFA : A new German TV movie tells the story of a man whose family life was destroyed after joining the Church of Scientology.The drama , which is based on a true story , was filmed in secret to prevent the organization taking legal action against the project...The drama will air on March 31 under the title " Until Nothing Is Left .
" This will be the first German feature film about Scientology , the first drama to use the controversial belief system as evening entertainment.So , they are not EXACTLY " just being candid " .On the other hand , just because something is a documentary , that does not mean that it is true.See Operation Lune ( Dark Side of the Moon ) [ imdb.com ] for an excellent example of how to twist actual events and interviews out of a contest in order to present " your version of the truth " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not a documentary.Once again, the error in the summary has managed to misinform and confuse thousands of Slashdotters.From TFA:A new German TV movie tells the story of a man whose family life was destroyed after joining the Church of Scientology.The drama, which is based on a true story, was filmed in secret to prevent the organization taking legal action against the project...The drama will air on March 31 under the title "Until Nothing Is Left.
"This will be the first German feature film about Scientology, the first drama to use the controversial belief system as evening entertainment.So, they are not EXACTLY "just being candid".On the other hand, just because something is a documentary, that does not mean that it is true.See Operation Lune (Dark Side of the Moon) [imdb.com] for an excellent example of how to twist actual events and interviews out of a contest in order to present "your version of the truth".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481344</id>
	<title>welp</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1268664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope someone gets a digital copy, "fansubs" it, and sends BT links to everyone on the planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope someone gets a digital copy , " fansubs " it , and sends BT links to everyone on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope someone gets a digital copy, "fansubs" it, and sends BT links to everyone on the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479976</id>
	<title>Be tolerant and understanding: read OTIII now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268653560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should be tolerant of the Scientology Religion. You should read the OT manuscripts, especially OTIII and fully understand Xenu's agenda against Earth.</p><p>The following link will provide it for you; use eMule to get it:</p><p><tt>ed2k://|file|Scientology\%2520-\%2520OT3\%2520Hubbard\%2520notes.rar|15057528|78E963FA4134822640527F4B74184D83|h=LCN5G5OZUE7N47SY23SEPUAAQJ45X5UW|/</tt></p><p>(Be warned: reading these documents may inflict you with pneumonia.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should be tolerant of the Scientology Religion .
You should read the OT manuscripts , especially OTIII and fully understand Xenu 's agenda against Earth.The following link will provide it for you ; use eMule to get it : ed2k : // | file | Scientology \ % 2520- \ % 2520OT3 \ % 2520Hubbard \ % 2520notes.rar | 15057528 | 78E963FA4134822640527F4B74184D83 | h = LCN5G5OZUE7N47SY23SEPUAAQJ45X5UW | / ( Be warned : reading these documents may inflict you with pneumonia .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should be tolerant of the Scientology Religion.
You should read the OT manuscripts, especially OTIII and fully understand Xenu's agenda against Earth.The following link will provide it for you; use eMule to get it:ed2k://|file|Scientology\%2520-\%2520OT3\%2520Hubbard\%2520notes.rar|15057528|78E963FA4134822640527F4B74184D83|h=LCN5G5OZUE7N47SY23SEPUAAQJ45X5UW|/(Be warned: reading these documents may inflict you with pneumonia.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482250</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1268669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's the real problem here. Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.</i></p><p>Funny, I would've characterized it as an organization run by savvy business people who don't want the Church's revenue stream interrupted, and realize that stirring up fanaticism among the middle ranks, who then keep the lower ranked folks in line, is the best way to protect their profit margin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the real problem here .
Other religions may inspire some fanatics , but Scientology is run by fanatics.Funny , I would 've characterized it as an organization run by savvy business people who do n't want the Church 's revenue stream interrupted , and realize that stirring up fanaticism among the middle ranks , who then keep the lower ranked folks in line , is the best way to protect their profit margin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the real problem here.
Other religions may inspire some fanatics, but Scientology is run by fanatics.Funny, I would've characterized it as an organization run by savvy business people who don't want the Church's revenue stream interrupted, and realize that stirring up fanaticism among the middle ranks, who then keep the lower ranked folks in line, is the best way to protect their profit margin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479452</id>
	<title>Irony of ironies.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268648580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that Scientology has spoken up and tried to ban this film, I guarantee you, there will be a much larger crowd turning up to see it than would otherwise have been the case. A direct consequence of this will be a greater interest in the issues surrounding Scientology, and therefore - one hopes - a greater upswell <i>against</i> the cult.</p><p>Thank you, Scientology. You have helped to sow some of the seeds of your destruction. (I hope, anyway<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it's one of the things that gives me warm fuzzy feelings of hope.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that Scientology has spoken up and tried to ban this film , I guarantee you , there will be a much larger crowd turning up to see it than would otherwise have been the case .
A direct consequence of this will be a greater interest in the issues surrounding Scientology , and therefore - one hopes - a greater upswell against the cult.Thank you , Scientology .
You have helped to sow some of the seeds of your destruction .
( I hope , anyway ... it 's one of the things that gives me warm fuzzy feelings of hope .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that Scientology has spoken up and tried to ban this film, I guarantee you, there will be a much larger crowd turning up to see it than would otherwise have been the case.
A direct consequence of this will be a greater interest in the issues surrounding Scientology, and therefore - one hopes - a greater upswell against the cult.Thank you, Scientology.
You have helped to sow some of the seeds of your destruction.
(I hope, anyway ... it's one of the things that gives me warm fuzzy feelings of hope.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482828</id>
	<title>Not a documentary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268672040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The news story states that the film is a drama based on a real-life occasion, not a documentary.  Kind of makes a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The news story states that the film is a drama based on a real-life occasion , not a documentary .
Kind of makes a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The news story states that the film is a drama based on a real-life occasion, not a documentary.
Kind of makes a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480094</id>
	<title>Re:Two words</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1268654880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You rarely deal with consultants and auditors, I see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You rarely deal with consultants and auditors , I see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You rarely deal with consultants and auditors, I see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482864</id>
	<title>The Joy of Slashdot</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1268672220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is nothing more amusing in life then watching two sides of intolerant try to explain to one another how intolerant each is. Thank you slashdot for another amusing idealogical flame war.</p><p>First: Correlation doesn't imply causation.</p><p>Any organization: religion or otherwise can be taken as the mean of actions. To try and blame religion for the crusades, torture, etc at the time is statistically irrelivant. Those tactics were used with the same impunity by non-religious organizations at the time. The Dutch trading companies, merchant leagues, feudal lords, etc.</p><p>The capacity for evil is universal in humans. The very fact people can throw out secular versus non-secular violence simply states a fact that violence has little to do with and one particular idealogy. People kill in the name of XYZ because it is a source of justification. No different the killing in the name of greed, pride, honor, land, food, etc.</p><p>Crusades religious? That is nonsense. The holy roman empire was just that an empire. No different then Rome. When Ole' Rome invaded and took out the Goths was that a Holy War by Zeus or Jupiter? It's a war over land the "backing" is irrelivant. France's revolution was a secular vs religious blood bath. Athiests, Agnostics, Religious, and other idealogical classifications are statistically insignificant regressors when it comes to the analysis of violence.</p><p>Islam is statistically no more violent then Christianity or Aethiests. The lead indicators in violence is education and poverty levels. After that comes access to fresh water and crop land.</p><p>The crusades was a land grab. No different with the Moorish invasion. The "decorations" of war no different. Any organization\idealogy will attempt to grow it's power and supress dissent. It's human nature. Democrats, Republicans, Masons, Boy Scouts, your local Sigbap, Eve Corp, or WoW guild all have the same basic behaviors. Violence, war, indoctrination, etc are common behaviors.</p><p>It's just a statistical echo that religious organizations were successful enough organizations to escalate to that level of control. e.g. It's not the fact they are religions but rather the fact they were successsful control structures (Which mind you most governement models are based from.) President = Pope, Congress of Cardinals = Senate, etc.</p><p>So go ahead and butt intolerant heads but I hate to break it to both sides, is because human behavior, not a particular belief structure. God didn't invent the atom bomb, scientists, people, humans did. The only thing I see is a world in which people love to blame "the other side" for the problems rather then realize the reasons for our darkest side is universal. Evil is universal, it's just easier to try and subscribe a demographic to it rather then deal with the real root causes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing more amusing in life then watching two sides of intolerant try to explain to one another how intolerant each is .
Thank you slashdot for another amusing idealogical flame war.First : Correlation does n't imply causation.Any organization : religion or otherwise can be taken as the mean of actions .
To try and blame religion for the crusades , torture , etc at the time is statistically irrelivant .
Those tactics were used with the same impunity by non-religious organizations at the time .
The Dutch trading companies , merchant leagues , feudal lords , etc.The capacity for evil is universal in humans .
The very fact people can throw out secular versus non-secular violence simply states a fact that violence has little to do with and one particular idealogy .
People kill in the name of XYZ because it is a source of justification .
No different the killing in the name of greed , pride , honor , land , food , etc.Crusades religious ?
That is nonsense .
The holy roman empire was just that an empire .
No different then Rome .
When Ole ' Rome invaded and took out the Goths was that a Holy War by Zeus or Jupiter ?
It 's a war over land the " backing " is irrelivant .
France 's revolution was a secular vs religious blood bath .
Athiests , Agnostics , Religious , and other idealogical classifications are statistically insignificant regressors when it comes to the analysis of violence.Islam is statistically no more violent then Christianity or Aethiests .
The lead indicators in violence is education and poverty levels .
After that comes access to fresh water and crop land.The crusades was a land grab .
No different with the Moorish invasion .
The " decorations " of war no different .
Any organization \ idealogy will attempt to grow it 's power and supress dissent .
It 's human nature .
Democrats , Republicans , Masons , Boy Scouts , your local Sigbap , Eve Corp , or WoW guild all have the same basic behaviors .
Violence , war , indoctrination , etc are common behaviors.It 's just a statistical echo that religious organizations were successful enough organizations to escalate to that level of control .
e.g. It 's not the fact they are religions but rather the fact they were successsful control structures ( Which mind you most governement models are based from .
) President = Pope , Congress of Cardinals = Senate , etc.So go ahead and butt intolerant heads but I hate to break it to both sides , is because human behavior , not a particular belief structure .
God did n't invent the atom bomb , scientists , people , humans did .
The only thing I see is a world in which people love to blame " the other side " for the problems rather then realize the reasons for our darkest side is universal .
Evil is universal , it 's just easier to try and subscribe a demographic to it rather then deal with the real root causes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing more amusing in life then watching two sides of intolerant try to explain to one another how intolerant each is.
Thank you slashdot for another amusing idealogical flame war.First: Correlation doesn't imply causation.Any organization: religion or otherwise can be taken as the mean of actions.
To try and blame religion for the crusades, torture, etc at the time is statistically irrelivant.
Those tactics were used with the same impunity by non-religious organizations at the time.
The Dutch trading companies, merchant leagues, feudal lords, etc.The capacity for evil is universal in humans.
The very fact people can throw out secular versus non-secular violence simply states a fact that violence has little to do with and one particular idealogy.
People kill in the name of XYZ because it is a source of justification.
No different the killing in the name of greed, pride, honor, land, food, etc.Crusades religious?
That is nonsense.
The holy roman empire was just that an empire.
No different then Rome.
When Ole' Rome invaded and took out the Goths was that a Holy War by Zeus or Jupiter?
It's a war over land the "backing" is irrelivant.
France's revolution was a secular vs religious blood bath.
Athiests, Agnostics, Religious, and other idealogical classifications are statistically insignificant regressors when it comes to the analysis of violence.Islam is statistically no more violent then Christianity or Aethiests.
The lead indicators in violence is education and poverty levels.
After that comes access to fresh water and crop land.The crusades was a land grab.
No different with the Moorish invasion.
The "decorations" of war no different.
Any organization\idealogy will attempt to grow it's power and supress dissent.
It's human nature.
Democrats, Republicans, Masons, Boy Scouts, your local Sigbap, Eve Corp, or WoW guild all have the same basic behaviors.
Violence, war, indoctrination, etc are common behaviors.It's just a statistical echo that religious organizations were successful enough organizations to escalate to that level of control.
e.g. It's not the fact they are religions but rather the fact they were successsful control structures (Which mind you most governement models are based from.
) President = Pope, Congress of Cardinals = Senate, etc.So go ahead and butt intolerant heads but I hate to break it to both sides, is because human behavior, not a particular belief structure.
God didn't invent the atom bomb, scientists, people, humans did.
The only thing I see is a world in which people love to blame "the other side" for the problems rather then realize the reasons for our darkest side is universal.
Evil is universal, it's just easier to try and subscribe a demographic to it rather then deal with the real root causes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480016</id>
	<title>Stupid poor idiots.</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1268653980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel most sorry for the mislead idiots doing the dirty work for Scientology higher ups. They dont know they are following a Scifi novel, a pretty lame one sadly. Written by an utter bastard that once said, "If you want to make a little money, write a book. If you want to make a lot of money, create a religion."</p><p>He did...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel most sorry for the mislead idiots doing the dirty work for Scientology higher ups .
They dont know they are following a Scifi novel , a pretty lame one sadly .
Written by an utter bastard that once said , " If you want to make a little money , write a book .
If you want to make a lot of money , create a religion .
" He did.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel most sorry for the mislead idiots doing the dirty work for Scientology higher ups.
They dont know they are following a Scifi novel, a pretty lame one sadly.
Written by an utter bastard that once said, "If you want to make a little money, write a book.
If you want to make a lot of money, create a religion.
"He did...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482704</id>
	<title>Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268671560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, then let's separate this, much like Anonymous did during Project Chanology:</p><p>1. Scientology, the BELIEF SYSTEM, is no more or less wrong, absurd, true, or immoral than any other religious belief.</p><p>2. The CHURCH of Scientology is run as an organization that uses immoral, illegal, or abusive methods in its desire for money and power.</p><p>In fact, I believe that CoS considers non-member believers to be as big a threat as ex-members and outspoken critics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , then let 's separate this , much like Anonymous did during Project Chanology : 1 .
Scientology , the BELIEF SYSTEM , is no more or less wrong , absurd , true , or immoral than any other religious belief.2 .
The CHURCH of Scientology is run as an organization that uses immoral , illegal , or abusive methods in its desire for money and power.In fact , I believe that CoS considers non-member believers to be as big a threat as ex-members and outspoken critics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, then let's separate this, much like Anonymous did during Project Chanology:1.
Scientology, the BELIEF SYSTEM, is no more or less wrong, absurd, true, or immoral than any other religious belief.2.
The CHURCH of Scientology is run as an organization that uses immoral, illegal, or abusive methods in its desire for money and power.In fact, I believe that CoS considers non-member believers to be as big a threat as ex-members and outspoken critics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479768</id>
	<title>'Intolerance'</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1268651700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The scientologists know whereof they speak when it comes to intolerance. Just ask Paulette Cooper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The scientologists know whereof they speak when it comes to intolerance .
Just ask Paulette Cooper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The scientologists know whereof they speak when it comes to intolerance.
Just ask Paulette Cooper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31487656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31490174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31493730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31491412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31484512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_15_0734203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31489184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31483108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31493730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31479668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_15_0734203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31481232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31487656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31489184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31480658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31491412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31484512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31490174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_15_0734203.31482704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
