<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_14_1028230</id>
	<title>Pi Day and an Interview With a Pi Researcher</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268568000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>JoshuaInNippon writes <i>"In honor of <a href="http://www.google.com/logos/piday10-hp.gif">Pi Day</a>, March 14 (or 3.14 for those who may need a hint), readers may be interested in reading <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-10430-Japan-Travel-Examiner~y2010m1d25-Interview-with-the-Japanese-researcher-who-found-25-Trillion-digits-of-Pi">an interview with Professor Daisuke Takahashi</a>, the Japanese researcher who <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/08/19/2249242/Pi-Calculated-To-Record-25-Trillion-Digits">found 2.5 trillion digits of Pi back in August</a>, before being apparently being <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/01/05/006243/New-Pi-Computation-Record-Using-a-Desktop-PC"> edged out in December</a> by a French computer programmer looking to prove his efficient coding abilities.  Professor Takahashi's interview gives some unique insight into one man who truly marvels at the number that has driven people to ever greater lengths to find more digits for centuries."</i>

Plant Kingdom adds <i>"There have been a number of proposals for alternatives to March 14 (see the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi\_day">Wikipedia page for Pi Day</a>).  Here's mine: when the Earth has gone through 1/pi-th of its orbit, as measured from Winter Solstice to Winter Solstice.  I've <a href="http://www.realpiday.org/">put together a web site to make the case</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>JoshuaInNippon writes " In honor of Pi Day , March 14 ( or 3.14 for those who may need a hint ) , readers may be interested in reading an interview with Professor Daisuke Takahashi , the Japanese researcher who found 2.5 trillion digits of Pi back in August , before being apparently being edged out in December by a French computer programmer looking to prove his efficient coding abilities .
Professor Takahashi 's interview gives some unique insight into one man who truly marvels at the number that has driven people to ever greater lengths to find more digits for centuries .
" Plant Kingdom adds " There have been a number of proposals for alternatives to March 14 ( see the Wikipedia page for Pi Day ) .
Here 's mine : when the Earth has gone through 1/pi-th of its orbit , as measured from Winter Solstice to Winter Solstice .
I 've put together a web site to make the case .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JoshuaInNippon writes "In honor of Pi Day, March 14 (or 3.14 for those who may need a hint), readers may be interested in reading an interview with Professor Daisuke Takahashi, the Japanese researcher who found 2.5 trillion digits of Pi back in August, before being apparently being  edged out in December by a French computer programmer looking to prove his efficient coding abilities.
Professor Takahashi's interview gives some unique insight into one man who truly marvels at the number that has driven people to ever greater lengths to find more digits for centuries.
"

Plant Kingdom adds "There have been a number of proposals for alternatives to March 14 (see the Wikipedia page for Pi Day).
Here's mine: when the Earth has gone through 1/pi-th of its orbit, as measured from Winter Solstice to Winter Solstice.
I've put together a web site to make the case.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473886</id>
	<title>Re:Pi day?</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1268598060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge, today is Steak and BJ Day</p></div><p>Please tell me the "big hunk of meat" in your fridge is for the steak part of that day.  You're doing it wrong if not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge , today is Steak and BJ DayPlease tell me the " big hunk of meat " in your fridge is for the steak part of that day .
You 're doing it wrong if not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge, today is Steak and BJ DayPlease tell me the "big hunk of meat" in your fridge is for the steak part of that day.
You're doing it wrong if not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474626</id>
	<title>While we're at it...</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1268561400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I propose February 31st, every year, be known henceforth as "Square Root of Negative One Day," or maybe "iDay" (which will be great for all those Apple fans out there).  This new holiday will be observed March 3rd, or March 2nd in a Leap Year.  Celebrations should focus principally on complex mathematics, but also on honest politicians, Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and temporary taxes.<br>
~Hal</htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose February 31st , every year , be known henceforth as " Square Root of Negative One Day , " or maybe " iDay " ( which will be great for all those Apple fans out there ) .
This new holiday will be observed March 3rd , or March 2nd in a Leap Year .
Celebrations should focus principally on complex mathematics , but also on honest politicians , Santa Claus , the Easter Bunny , and temporary taxes .
~ Hal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose February 31st, every year, be known henceforth as "Square Root of Negative One Day," or maybe "iDay" (which will be great for all those Apple fans out there).
This new holiday will be observed March 3rd, or March 2nd in a Leap Year.
Celebrations should focus principally on complex mathematics, but also on honest politicians, Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and temporary taxes.
~Hal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472804</id>
	<title>Re:Pi *Researcher*</title>
	<author>iris-n</author>
	<datestamp>1268588760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they are perfectly deterministic.</p><p>To calculate the numerical value of the digits I could understand as useless, but there are plenty of properties that are basis-independent, like it's irrationality, transcendence and normality.</p><p>Also, there are some quite beautiful representations, look for the continued fractions one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they are perfectly deterministic.To calculate the numerical value of the digits I could understand as useless , but there are plenty of properties that are basis-independent , like it 's irrationality , transcendence and normality.Also , there are some quite beautiful representations , look for the continued fractions one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they are perfectly deterministic.To calculate the numerical value of the digits I could understand as useless, but there are plenty of properties that are basis-independent, like it's irrationality, transcendence and normality.Also, there are some quite beautiful representations, look for the continued fractions one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471576</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268575140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surely, you mean 22nd July, there is no way those silly Americans can fub that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely , you mean 22nd July , there is no way those silly Americans can fub that ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely, you mean 22nd July, there is no way those silly Americans can fub that ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471454</id>
	<title>wouldn't it just be summer solstice?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268573160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shows how much us gov respects science, don't even understand the meaning of pi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shows how much us gov respects science , do n't even understand the meaning of pi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shows how much us gov respects science, don't even understand the meaning of pi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474616</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>mduse</author>
	<datestamp>1268561340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>even worse, what I don't get is how come make a celebration of something such abstract and universal as pi on a 3 -1 =2 months 14 days from a date (new year's day) that as nothing abstract nor universal...

I'm sure any other civilization that looks at new year's day just as another day to find the choice of the pi day rather frivolously occidental...</htmltext>
<tokenext>even worse , what I do n't get is how come make a celebration of something such abstract and universal as pi on a 3 -1 = 2 months 14 days from a date ( new year 's day ) that as nothing abstract nor universal.. . I 'm sure any other civilization that looks at new year 's day just as another day to find the choice of the pi day rather frivolously occidental.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>even worse, what I don't get is how come make a celebration of something such abstract and universal as pi on a 3 -1 =2 months 14 days from a date (new year's day) that as nothing abstract nor universal...

I'm sure any other civilization that looks at new year's day just as another day to find the choice of the pi day rather frivolously occidental...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640</id>
	<title>Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1268575620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand that in the book "Contact" by Carl Sagan,  when the scientists meets the aliens he asks them a question:</p><p>Scientist: Do you believe in God?</p><p>Aliens: Yes.</p><p>(Astonished) Scientist: Really?!  Why?</p><p>Aliens: We have proof.</p><p>Scientist: Proof?!!!</p><p>Alien:  Yes, when we decoded Pi to (a very large number) we found a Message...</p><p>Of course this idea was exploited in a different way by the movie "Pi".  (Sorry didn't see it either.).  In any case, if Pi is truly Random (it is isn't it?) won't every possible message occur?  Just like those monkeys with their typewriters (if you don't know what a typewriter is look it up).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand that in the book " Contact " by Carl Sagan , when the scientists meets the aliens he asks them a question : Scientist : Do you believe in God ? Aliens : Yes .
( Astonished ) Scientist : Really ? !
Why ? Aliens : We have proof.Scientist : Proof ? ! !
! Alien : Yes , when we decoded Pi to ( a very large number ) we found a Message...Of course this idea was exploited in a different way by the movie " Pi " .
( Sorry did n't see it either. ) .
In any case , if Pi is truly Random ( it is is n't it ?
) wo n't every possible message occur ?
Just like those monkeys with their typewriters ( if you do n't know what a typewriter is look it up ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand that in the book "Contact" by Carl Sagan,  when the scientists meets the aliens he asks them a question:Scientist: Do you believe in God?Aliens: Yes.
(Astonished) Scientist: Really?!
Why?Aliens: We have proof.Scientist: Proof?!!
!Alien:  Yes, when we decoded Pi to (a very large number) we found a Message...Of course this idea was exploited in a different way by the movie "Pi".
(Sorry didn't see it either.).
In any case, if Pi is truly Random (it is isn't it?
) won't every possible message occur?
Just like those monkeys with their typewriters (if you don't know what a typewriter is look it up).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</id>
	<title>US-centricity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the UK, we have to wait until the 31st April to have pi day. We'll be waiting a while...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the UK , we have to wait until the 31st April to have pi day .
We 'll be waiting a while.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the UK, we have to wait until the 31st April to have pi day.
We'll be waiting a while...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472084</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>crazycheetah</author>
	<datestamp>1268581800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What drugs are you on that defy aging so well?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What drugs are you on that defy aging so well ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What drugs are you on that defy aging so well?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31475838</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>cephus440</author>
	<datestamp>1268569500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think like an OO programming language.  First you select the namespace, then the class, then the member.  Think of the internet, first you select WWW, then the site, then the top level domain.  I argue that the correct date format should be year.month.day.hour.minute.second.  Think about naming your directories by date, for instance, you want to sort all of the picture you took of your girlfriend from your cell phone.  If you were to name the directories by month, day, year, you would group all of the March's together and when you open the picture of your girlfriend you could inadvertently open the image of your girlfriend last year... good luck explaining that one.  BUT if you were to name the directories by year, month, day, then you'd be able to get more pictures<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think like an OO programming language .
First you select the namespace , then the class , then the member .
Think of the internet , first you select WWW , then the site , then the top level domain .
I argue that the correct date format should be year.month.day.hour.minute.second .
Think about naming your directories by date , for instance , you want to sort all of the picture you took of your girlfriend from your cell phone .
If you were to name the directories by month , day , year , you would group all of the March 's together and when you open the picture of your girlfriend you could inadvertently open the image of your girlfriend last year... good luck explaining that one .
BUT if you were to name the directories by year , month , day , then you 'd be able to get more pictures : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think like an OO programming language.
First you select the namespace, then the class, then the member.
Think of the internet, first you select WWW, then the site, then the top level domain.
I argue that the correct date format should be year.month.day.hour.minute.second.
Think about naming your directories by date, for instance, you want to sort all of the picture you took of your girlfriend from your cell phone.
If you were to name the directories by month, day, year, you would group all of the March's together and when you open the picture of your girlfriend you could inadvertently open the image of your girlfriend last year... good luck explaining that one.
BUT if you were to name the directories by year, month, day, then you'd be able to get more pictures :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480106</id>
	<title>Re: yeah, okay</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1268655060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Finally, if Pi gets its own day, I think its entirely fair that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden\_ratio" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">1.618</a> [wikipedia.org] get its own celebration.  Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi, so why didn't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day?</p><p>Sometimes, you CAN be <a href="http://www.gocomics.com/foxtrot/2009/02/08/" title="gocomics.com" rel="nofollow">too much</a> [gocomics.com] of a geek.</p></div><p>Lets celebrate this day with Themed Showers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , if Pi gets its own day , I think its entirely fair that 1.618 [ wikipedia.org ] get its own celebration .
Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi , so why did n't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day ? Sometimes , you CAN be too much [ gocomics.com ] of a geek.Lets celebrate this day with Themed Showers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, if Pi gets its own day, I think its entirely fair that 1.618 [wikipedia.org] get its own celebration.
Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi, so why didn't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day?Sometimes, you CAN be too much [gocomics.com] of a geek.Lets celebrate this day with Themed Showers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472156</id>
	<title>Re:Pi day?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268582520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So who's the lucky guy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So who 's the lucky guy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So who's the lucky guy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31476204</id>
	<title>Re:Bad news</title>
	<author>blai</author>
	<datestamp>1268572500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>O RLY?</htmltext>
<tokenext>O RLY ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O RLY?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473010</id>
	<title>Re:Don't forget.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268590680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our Mother's Day is in May, you insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Mother 's Day is in May , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Mother's Day is in May, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473286</id>
	<title>Re:What's the significance of 1/pi?</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1268593080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For every pi proportioality the reciprocal relation is a 1/pi proportionality, so it's every bit a significant. For a near-circular Earth orbit 1/pi of a year is the time when the earth has passed the equivalent of the diameter of it's orbit and swept an area the size of of a rectangle made from it's major and minor axis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For every pi proportioality the reciprocal relation is a 1/pi proportionality , so it 's every bit a significant .
For a near-circular Earth orbit 1/pi of a year is the time when the earth has passed the equivalent of the diameter of it 's orbit and swept an area the size of of a rectangle made from it 's major and minor axis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For every pi proportioality the reciprocal relation is a 1/pi proportionality, so it's every bit a significant.
For a near-circular Earth orbit 1/pi of a year is the time when the earth has passed the equivalent of the diameter of it's orbit and swept an area the size of of a rectangle made from it's major and minor axis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472460</id>
	<title>Re:Ellipse != Circle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268585820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet there's pi, right in the middle of the equation for circumference of an ellipse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet there 's pi , right in the middle of the equation for circumference of an ellipse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet there's pi, right in the middle of the equation for circumference of an ellipse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471682</id>
	<title>new date...</title>
	<author>TheSHAD0W</author>
	<datestamp>1268576100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I vote for July 22nd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I vote for July 22nd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I vote for July 22nd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618</id>
	<title>What's the significance of 1/pi?</title>
	<author>Saint Stephen</author>
	<datestamp>1268575500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1/pi is not pi.  It's like celebrating the third time something happened by doing something one third of the way through and then stopping!</p><p>"When a circle's diameter is one unit, then the cirmcumference is pi units." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi]</p><p>So if a year is "one unit", we should celebrate pi every 3.14 years or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1/pi is not pi .
It 's like celebrating the third time something happened by doing something one third of the way through and then stopping !
" When a circle 's diameter is one unit , then the cirmcumference is pi units .
" [ http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi ] So if a year is " one unit " , we should celebrate pi every 3.14 years or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1/pi is not pi.
It's like celebrating the third time something happened by doing something one third of the way through and then stopping!
"When a circle's diameter is one unit, then the cirmcumference is pi units.
" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi]So if a year is "one unit", we should celebrate pi every 3.14 years or something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472848</id>
	<title>Re:What's the significance of 1/pi?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268589120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The diameter of Earth's orbit is one unit. In 1/pi of the year, the Earth travels a distance equal to this diameter. That's the signifigance, it's using pi in terms of arc length.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The diameter of Earth 's orbit is one unit .
In 1/pi of the year , the Earth travels a distance equal to this diameter .
That 's the signifigance , it 's using pi in terms of arc length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The diameter of Earth's orbit is one unit.
In 1/pi of the year, the Earth travels a distance equal to this diameter.
That's the signifigance, it's using pi in terms of arc length.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472360</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>quacking duck</author>
	<datestamp>1268584860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer writing yyyy-mm-dd, especially for anything programming-related.</p><p>In regular writing, I'm fine with seeing dd-mm-yyyy. mmm dd, yyyy is still okay since there's no ambiguity about what which the day and month are, but this leads to the laziness that results in....</p><p>mm-dd-yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy. Which are about the stupidest written conventions I've ever come across. Along with imperial measurements, why is the US hell-bent on foisting backwards systems on the rest of the world?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer writing yyyy-mm-dd , especially for anything programming-related.In regular writing , I 'm fine with seeing dd-mm-yyyy .
mmm dd , yyyy is still okay since there 's no ambiguity about what which the day and month are , but this leads to the laziness that results in....mm-dd-yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy .
Which are about the stupidest written conventions I 've ever come across .
Along with imperial measurements , why is the US hell-bent on foisting backwards systems on the rest of the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer writing yyyy-mm-dd, especially for anything programming-related.In regular writing, I'm fine with seeing dd-mm-yyyy.
mmm dd, yyyy is still okay since there's no ambiguity about what which the day and month are, but this leads to the laziness that results in....mm-dd-yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy.
Which are about the stupidest written conventions I've ever come across.
Along with imperial measurements, why is the US hell-bent on foisting backwards systems on the rest of the world?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473118</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1268591580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yay, Hungary wins again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>But the most annoying thing is when on cans of food you just see the numbers (2 digits for years) but there's no clue for format, and you have to guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay , Hungary wins again : ) But the most annoying thing is when on cans of food you just see the numbers ( 2 digits for years ) but there 's no clue for format , and you have to guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay, Hungary wins again :)But the most annoying thing is when on cans of food you just see the numbers (2 digits for years) but there's no clue for format, and you have to guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31479088</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>afabbro</author>
	<datestamp>1268644440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adopt ISO 8601 and you won't have to wait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adopt ISO 8601 and you wo n't have to wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adopt ISO 8601 and you won't have to wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31487034</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268644680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That only makes more sense with computers which automatically sort using the first digit first, so it provides proper sorting of filenames with dates in, otherwise it is more readable to put the day first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That only makes more sense with computers which automatically sort using the first digit first , so it provides proper sorting of filenames with dates in , otherwise it is more readable to put the day first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That only makes more sense with computers which automatically sort using the first digit first, so it provides proper sorting of filenames with dates in, otherwise it is more readable to put the day first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31484532</id>
	<title>No it isn't.</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1268679000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was Keen Day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was Keen Day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was Keen Day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268574060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.month</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.month</tokentext>
<sentencetext>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.month</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471742</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268577000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it's my birthday so shut up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's my birthday so shut up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's my birthday so shut up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473704</id>
	<title>Re:Pi day?</title>
	<author>ParadiseBob</author>
	<datestamp>1268596500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After steak and a blowjob, I'm not sure I've got room for pi....</htmltext>
<tokenext>After steak and a blowjob , I 'm not sure I 've got room for pi... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After steak and a blowjob, I'm not sure I've got room for pi....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471958</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1268579940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Year-Month-Day as in the ISO standard it's 2010-03-14.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Year-Month-Day as in the ISO standard it 's 2010-03-14 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Year-Month-Day as in the ISO standard it's 2010-03-14.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31477814</id>
	<title>1/pi of the orbit? shwa?</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1268584620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, if you wanted to use a circle as a metaphor for the year, then 2 pi radians would be a full circle, so wouldn't it make more sense to make it the day half way through the year (pi radians)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , if you wanted to use a circle as a metaphor for the year , then 2 pi radians would be a full circle , so would n't it make more sense to make it the day half way through the year ( pi radians ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, if you wanted to use a circle as a metaphor for the year, then 2 pi radians would be a full circle, so wouldn't it make more sense to make it the day half way through the year (pi radians)?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472052</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>GospelHead821</author>
	<datestamp>1268581320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Base 12 is an excellent base.  Metric/decimal is okay but we're not monkeys anymore.  Can't we please get over the fact that we have just 10 fingers?  Base 12 makes it a lot easier to work with common fractions.  Halves, quarters, AND thirds are all easy to calculate.  Assuming you accept that the inch is no more or less arbitrary than the centimetre as a unit of measure, then in base 12, feet and yards become completely sensible.  A great gross of yards (12^3 = 1728 yards = 5184 feet) is pretty close to today's arbitrary mile.  12-hour days make a lot more sense too.  If I remember correctly (and I might not; I welcome corrections if this is wrong), we do it that way in the first place because our timekeeping system evolved from Babylonian timekeeping and the Babylonians used a base-12 number system.</p><p>Of course, in base 12, pi is no longer 3.14159.  It approximates to 3.18480.  I wouldn't mind selecting a definition of pi day that frees us both from the Gregorian calendar AND from our monkey-finger numeric base.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Base 12 is an excellent base .
Metric/decimal is okay but we 're not monkeys anymore .
Ca n't we please get over the fact that we have just 10 fingers ?
Base 12 makes it a lot easier to work with common fractions .
Halves , quarters , AND thirds are all easy to calculate .
Assuming you accept that the inch is no more or less arbitrary than the centimetre as a unit of measure , then in base 12 , feet and yards become completely sensible .
A great gross of yards ( 12 ^ 3 = 1728 yards = 5184 feet ) is pretty close to today 's arbitrary mile .
12-hour days make a lot more sense too .
If I remember correctly ( and I might not ; I welcome corrections if this is wrong ) , we do it that way in the first place because our timekeeping system evolved from Babylonian timekeeping and the Babylonians used a base-12 number system.Of course , in base 12 , pi is no longer 3.14159 .
It approximates to 3.18480 .
I would n't mind selecting a definition of pi day that frees us both from the Gregorian calendar AND from our monkey-finger numeric base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Base 12 is an excellent base.
Metric/decimal is okay but we're not monkeys anymore.
Can't we please get over the fact that we have just 10 fingers?
Base 12 makes it a lot easier to work with common fractions.
Halves, quarters, AND thirds are all easy to calculate.
Assuming you accept that the inch is no more or less arbitrary than the centimetre as a unit of measure, then in base 12, feet and yards become completely sensible.
A great gross of yards (12^3 = 1728 yards = 5184 feet) is pretty close to today's arbitrary mile.
12-hour days make a lot more sense too.
If I remember correctly (and I might not; I welcome corrections if this is wrong), we do it that way in the first place because our timekeeping system evolved from Babylonian timekeeping and the Babylonians used a base-12 number system.Of course, in base 12, pi is no longer 3.14159.
It approximates to 3.18480.
I wouldn't mind selecting a definition of pi day that frees us both from the Gregorian calendar AND from our monkey-finger numeric base.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474480</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>TimboJones</author>
	<datestamp>1268560260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?  03014159?  The digit 0 does not appear in pi until the 32nd position after the decimal point.  Surely you're not trying to equate 0 with a decimal point?</p><p>Please just let go of this archaic month/day/year standard.  Obviously it's not even used consistently - 03/01 vs. January 3?  If the month should come first when spelled out, how can one with clear conscience insist that it come second when in numeric form?</p><p>Really, why deny any day its connection to pi?  Find any reason at all to equate any date with pi and eat pie as often as you can, because pie is good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
03014159 ? The digit 0 does not appear in pi until the 32nd position after the decimal point .
Surely you 're not trying to equate 0 with a decimal point ? Please just let go of this archaic month/day/year standard .
Obviously it 's not even used consistently - 03/01 vs. January 3 ?
If the month should come first when spelled out , how can one with clear conscience insist that it come second when in numeric form ? Really , why deny any day its connection to pi ?
Find any reason at all to equate any date with pi and eat pie as often as you can , because pie is good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
03014159?  The digit 0 does not appear in pi until the 32nd position after the decimal point.
Surely you're not trying to equate 0 with a decimal point?Please just let go of this archaic month/day/year standard.
Obviously it's not even used consistently - 03/01 vs. January 3?
If the month should come first when spelled out, how can one with clear conscience insist that it come second when in numeric form?Really, why deny any day its connection to pi?
Find any reason at all to equate any date with pi and eat pie as often as you can, because pie is good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</id>
	<title>Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268573700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is stupid, who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format? Do you frequently find yourself asking "Hmm, I wonder what month it is?" And always make people look in the center to find out the date? WTF</p><p>It's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is stupid , who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format ?
Do you frequently find yourself asking " Hmm , I wonder what month it is ?
" And always make people look in the center to find out the date ?
WTFIt 's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is stupid, who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format?
Do you frequently find yourself asking "Hmm, I wonder what month it is?
" And always make people look in the center to find out the date?
WTFIt's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808</id>
	<title>Pi *Researcher*</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1268578020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly is there to research about pi? Its digits are random. They change simply by switching to a different base so no pattern can be truly meaningful just an artifact of the chosen representation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly is there to research about pi ?
Its digits are random .
They change simply by switching to a different base so no pattern can be truly meaningful just an artifact of the chosen representation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly is there to research about pi?
Its digits are random.
They change simply by switching to a different base so no pattern can be truly meaningful just an artifact of the chosen representation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472188</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268582880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad you are a year early<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I think you mean "3:14 on 15th September 265<b>4</b>".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad you are a year early ... I think you mean " 3 : 14 on 15th September 2654 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad you are a year early ... I think you mean "3:14 on 15th September 2654".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472300</id>
	<title>Re:Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1268584260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, you're right, I wasn't using the right definition of random.  Thanks for telling me about "normal" numbers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , you 're right , I was n't using the right definition of random .
Thanks for telling me about " normal " numbers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, you're right, I wasn't using the right definition of random.
Thanks for telling me about "normal" numbers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471714</id>
	<title>Sponsored by GLaDOS</title>
	<author>lennier1</author>
	<datestamp>1268576340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all know the Pi is a lie.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know the Pi is a lie .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know the Pi is a lie.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473198</id>
	<title>And now our Pi Day anthem!</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1268592120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>C'mon, you know the words, er, numbers!<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZSHr5E7fZY" title="youtube.com">pi - Kate Bush</a> [youtube.com] <br>
<br>
This version only takes six minutes to sing. The extended version? You don't even want to know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon , you know the words , er , numbers !
pi - Kate Bush [ youtube.com ] This version only takes six minutes to sing .
The extended version ?
You do n't even want to know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon, you know the words, er, numbers!
pi - Kate Bush [youtube.com] 

This version only takes six minutes to sing.
The extended version?
You don't even want to know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418</id>
	<title>Don't forget.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget it's also mother's day. And nobody makes better pi than mom.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/duck</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget it 's also mother 's day .
And nobody makes better pi than mom .
/duck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget it's also mother's day.
And nobody makes better pi than mom.
/duck</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472548</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>Enokcc</author>
	<datestamp>1268586420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically <i>and</i> intuitively can't get the month or day mixed up</p></div><p>Yes, the only ordering of the triple {day, month, year} that is a total order in Z^3 which corresponds the chronology is (year,month,day).  So does year*10000+month*100+day in Z, a good reason to name anythings date sensitive this way on computer to keep things in order.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically and intuitively ca n't get the month or day mixed upYes , the only ordering of the triple { day , month , year } that is a total order in Z ^ 3 which corresponds the chronology is ( year,month,day ) .
So does year * 10000 + month * 100 + day in Z , a good reason to name anythings date sensitive this way on computer to keep things in order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically and intuitively can't get the month or day mixed upYes, the only ordering of the triple {day, month, year} that is a total order in Z^3 which corresponds the chronology is (year,month,day).
So does year*10000+month*100+day in Z, a good reason to name anythings date sensitive this way on computer to keep things in order.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471516</id>
	<title>Celebration</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1268574000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To celebrate, I'll be having pie for dinner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To celebrate , I 'll be having pie for dinner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To celebrate, I'll be having pie for dinner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268578620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is stupid, who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format?</p></div><p>The person that noticed that we generally say "March 14th, 2010", so it's more intuitive.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.</p></div><p>Oh please, it isn't done right where you are, either.  It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically <i>and</i> intuitively can't get the month or day mixed up.  Your preference is simply different, not less stupid.  This isn't one of those topics you can use to pose as one of the smarter people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is stupid , who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format ? The person that noticed that we generally say " March 14th , 2010 " , so it 's more intuitive.It 's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.Oh please , it is n't done right where you are , either .
It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically and intuitively ca n't get the month or day mixed up .
Your preference is simply different , not less stupid .
This is n't one of those topics you can use to pose as one of the smarter people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is stupid, who thought MONTH - DAY - YEAR is a reasonable date format?The person that noticed that we generally say "March 14th, 2010", so it's more intuitive.It's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.Oh please, it isn't done right where you are, either.
It should be 2010-03-14 so it sorts chronologically and intuitively can't get the month or day mixed up.
Your preference is simply different, not less stupid.
This isn't one of those topics you can use to pose as one of the smarter people.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473676</id>
	<title>PI IS EXACTLY 3!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268596260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PI IS EXACTLY 3!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PI IS EXACTLY 3 ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PI IS EXACTLY 3!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472770</id>
	<title>Why 1/pi?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268588520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand why one would choose 2 radians (which gives one pi'th of the orbit) as opposed to the much simpler and more obvious pi radians (one half of the orbit). Does that make it too simple? Or is it just the fact that we already celebrate that day?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand why one would choose 2 radians ( which gives one pi'th of the orbit ) as opposed to the much simpler and more obvious pi radians ( one half of the orbit ) .
Does that make it too simple ?
Or is it just the fact that we already celebrate that day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand why one would choose 2 radians (which gives one pi'th of the orbit) as opposed to the much simpler and more obvious pi radians (one half of the orbit).
Does that make it too simple?
Or is it just the fact that we already celebrate that day?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472116</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268582160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or Fahrenheit instead of Celsius ?<br>Anyone knows that water freeze at 0 and boil at 100</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or Fahrenheit instead of Celsius ? Anyone knows that water freeze at 0 and boil at 100</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or Fahrenheit instead of Celsius ?Anyone knows that water freeze at 0 and boil at 100</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472152</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>crazycheetah</author>
	<datestamp>1268582520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you could say, "The 14th day of the 3rd month of the year 2010."  Which would translate to 14-3-2010. Just sayin'...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you could say , " The 14th day of the 3rd month of the year 2010 .
" Which would translate to 14-3-2010 .
Just sayin'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you could say, "The 14th day of the 3rd month of the year 2010.
"  Which would translate to 14-3-2010.
Just sayin'...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471834</id>
	<title>Assoc Prof Daisuke Takahashi</title>
	<author>strongpassword</author>
	<datestamp>1268578260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The prof is also a pretty mean ice skater (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisuke\_Takahashi" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisuke\_Takahashi</a> [wikipedia.org])

I'm sure he runs rings around his competition (nudge nudge).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The prof is also a pretty mean ice skater ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisuke \ _Takahashi [ wikipedia.org ] ) I 'm sure he runs rings around his competition ( nudge nudge ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The prof is also a pretty mean ice skater (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisuke\_Takahashi [wikipedia.org])

I'm sure he runs rings around his competition (nudge nudge).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31475166</id>
	<title>On a completely unrelated geeky note:</title>
	<author>el3mentary</author>
	<datestamp>1268564520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is also Albert Einstein's 131st Birthday today, pity he's dead really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also Albert Einstein 's 131st Birthday today , pity he 's dead really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also Albert Einstein's 131st Birthday today, pity he's dead really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472026</id>
	<title>2010-03-14 per ISO 8601</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1268580960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to ISO 8601, today is 2010-03-14. Feel free to celebrate the other Pi Day about four months later when it'll be 22/7 in your locale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to ISO 8601 , today is 2010-03-14 .
Feel free to celebrate the other Pi Day about four months later when it 'll be 22/7 in your locale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to ISO 8601, today is 2010-03-14.
Feel free to celebrate the other Pi Day about four months later when it'll be 22/7 in your locale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473384</id>
	<title>Re:Pi day?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1268593920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pi day is irrational, but at least it's real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pi day is irrational , but at least it 's real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pi day is irrational, but at least it's real.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31482014</id>
	<title>Super Mega Pi Day Coming Soon</title>
	<author>manlygeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268668320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting for the magic Pi Day of All Pi Day's in this millenium... that's right March 14, 2015 (3.1415)!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the magic Pi Day of All Pi Day 's in this millenium... that 's right March 14 , 2015 ( 3.1415 ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the magic Pi Day of All Pi Day's in this millenium... that's right March 14, 2015 (3.1415)!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471712</id>
	<title>Re:Ellipse != Circle</title>
	<author>xous</author>
	<datestamp>1268576340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I recall correctly Pi is used to calculate the Area, Surface area, and volume of an Ellipse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I recall correctly Pi is used to calculate the Area , Surface area , and volume of an Ellipse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I recall correctly Pi is used to calculate the Area, Surface area, and volume of an Ellipse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471908</id>
	<title>hognoxious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268579100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is america hognoxious.   we do the date the right way</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is america hognoxious .
we do the date the right way</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is america hognoxious.
we do the date the right way</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416</id>
	<title>Pi day?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge, today is <a href="http://steakandbjday.com/" title="steakandbjday.com">Steak and BJ Day</a> [steakandbjday.com].  Pi day just isn't nearly as fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge , today is Steak and BJ Day [ steakandbjday.com ] .
Pi day just is n't nearly as fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the big hunk of meat in my 'fridge, today is Steak and BJ Day [steakandbjday.com].
Pi day just isn't nearly as fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471560</id>
	<title>a French computer programmer?</title>
	<author>short</author>
	<datestamp>1268574840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Calling Fabrice Bellard "a French computer programmer"?  Is it a joke?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Calling Fabrice Bellard " a French computer programmer " ?
Is it a joke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Calling Fabrice Bellard "a French computer programmer"?
Is it a joke?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474078</id>
	<title>ISO too</title>
	<author>Xtifr</author>
	<datestamp>1268600040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.month</p></div><p>Actually, since we're ignoring year, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO\_8601" title="wikipedia.org">ISO 8601</a> [wikipedia.org] format (yyyy-mm-dd) makes this Pi Day too--and given that there is an ISO date format, and given that it solves the sorting problem so thoroughly, I'd say that a format which uses day.month is, at best, less stupid.  But still pretty stupid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.monthActually , since we 're ignoring year , the ISO 8601 [ wikipedia.org ] format ( yyyy-mm-dd ) makes this Pi Day too--and given that there is an ISO date format , and given that it solves the sorting problem so thoroughly , I 'd say that a format which uses day.month is , at best , less stupid .
But still pretty stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>idiot american system of month.day instead of day.monthActually, since we're ignoring year, the ISO 8601 [wikipedia.org] format (yyyy-mm-dd) makes this Pi Day too--and given that there is an ISO date format, and given that it solves the sorting problem so thoroughly, I'd say that a format which uses day.month is, at best, less stupid.
But still pretty stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471866</id>
	<title>Re:Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>mrsurb</author>
	<datestamp>1268578560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In "Contact" the conceit was that the message occurred much earlier than would be statistically expected. The protagonist found another "message" in a non-base-ten expansion which decoded to bitmap image of a circle. Circles within circles!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In " Contact " the conceit was that the message occurred much earlier than would be statistically expected .
The protagonist found another " message " in a non-base-ten expansion which decoded to bitmap image of a circle .
Circles within circles !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In "Contact" the conceit was that the message occurred much earlier than would be statistically expected.
The protagonist found another "message" in a non-base-ten expansion which decoded to bitmap image of a circle.
Circles within circles!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474340</id>
	<title>Re:Don't forget.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268559000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those who celebrate one do not celebrate the other. It is no coincidence these two events are held on the same day as they are mutually exclusive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those who celebrate one do not celebrate the other .
It is no coincidence these two events are held on the same day as they are mutually exclusive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those who celebrate one do not celebrate the other.
It is no coincidence these two events are held on the same day as they are mutually exclusive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31478048</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268586360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably forever...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably forever.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably forever...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31487770</id>
	<title>This epoch?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268647680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sun, 21 Jul 2069 00:37:33 GMT</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun , 21 Jul 2069 00 : 37 : 33 GMT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun, 21 Jul 2069 00:37:33 GMT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472520</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1268586300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just celebrate on Quadectober 3, duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just celebrate on Quadectober 3 , duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just celebrate on Quadectober 3, duh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471758</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268577240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly!  Pi Day really should be on the 3rd day of the 14th month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
Pi Day really should be on the 3rd day of the 14th month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
Pi Day really should be on the 3rd day of the 14th month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471458</id>
	<title>I just got off the toilet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268573160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I shit out an Obama.<br> <br>PLOP!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I shit out an Obama .
PLOP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I shit out an Obama.
PLOP!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472788</id>
	<title>historical precedent for Pi day celebration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268588640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Oh, a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwirWWnzJKM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">wise guy</a> [youtube.com], eh?  Yuck-yuck-yuck".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Oh , a wise guy [ youtube.com ] , eh ?
Yuck-yuck-yuck " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Oh, a wise guy [youtube.com], eh?
Yuck-yuck-yuck".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448</id>
	<title>Bad news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No matter how clever your code or how powerful your computer is, you'll never get all digits of PI. There are infinitely many. You'd think a math professor would know something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter how clever your code or how powerful your computer is , you 'll never get all digits of PI .
There are infinitely many .
You 'd think a math professor would know something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter how clever your code or how powerful your computer is, you'll never get all digits of PI.
There are infinitely many.
You'd think a math professor would know something like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472184</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>slugstone</author>
	<datestamp>1268582820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Surely, you mean 22nd July, there is no way those silly Americans can fub that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div><p>hey, just us a little room and we will.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely , you mean 22nd July , there is no way those silly Americans can fub that ; - ) hey , just us a little room and we will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely, you mean 22nd July, there is no way those silly Americans can fub that ;-)hey, just us a little room and we will.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473354</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1268593560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit."</p><p>Or: Metric is like throwing out base 60 and using some unit that you can't divide evenly by 3, 4, or 6.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit .
" Or : Metric is like throwing out base 60 and using some unit that you ca n't divide evenly by 3 , 4 , or 6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's like throwing away metric and using some crazy-ass divisible by 12 unit.
"Or: Metric is like throwing out base 60 and using some unit that you can't divide evenly by 3, 4, or 6.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472978</id>
	<title>Re:Pi *Researcher*</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1268590380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's still an unsolved problem as to whether Pi is "random" (that is, whether it's a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal\_number" title="wikipedia.org"> Normal number </a> [wikipedia.org] in base 10. Even if it is, it may not be normal in another base.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's still an unsolved problem as to whether Pi is " random " ( that is , whether it 's a Normal number [ wikipedia.org ] in base 10 .
Even if it is , it may not be normal in another base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's still an unsolved problem as to whether Pi is "random" (that is, whether it's a  Normal number  [wikipedia.org] in base 10.
Even if it is, it may not be normal in another base.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471438</id>
	<title>sende</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>realy look like <a href="http://www.sendebaglan.com/" title="sendebaglan.com" rel="nofollow">Video izle</a> [sendebaglan.com] system</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>realy look like Video izle [ sendebaglan.com ] system</tokentext>
<sentencetext>realy look like Video izle [sendebaglan.com] system</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471634</id>
	<title>RE: yeah, okay</title>
	<author>Anarchduke</author>
	<datestamp>1268575620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh Jesus.  Really?<br> <br>
Okay, I'm about to troll, but...
<br> <br>
First, do we really need a holiday for every fucking thing out there?  Where the hell is dung beetle day?  Aardwolf week?  Permian Extinction Day?
<br> <br>
Secondly, you invested enough energy into worrying about WHICH day should be Pi day that you created a website over it?
<br> <br>
Finally, if Pi gets its own day, I think its entirely fair that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden\_ratio" title="wikipedia.org">1.618</a> [wikipedia.org] get its own celebration.  Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi, so why didn't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day?
<br> <br>
Sometimes, you CAN be <a href="http://www.gocomics.com/foxtrot/2009/02/08/" title="gocomics.com">too much</a> [gocomics.com] of a geek.
<br> <br>
--------------
<br>
End of Troll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh Jesus .
Really ? Okay , I 'm about to troll , but.. . First , do we really need a holiday for every fucking thing out there ?
Where the hell is dung beetle day ?
Aardwolf week ?
Permian Extinction Day ?
Secondly , you invested enough energy into worrying about WHICH day should be Pi day that you created a website over it ?
Finally , if Pi gets its own day , I think its entirely fair that 1.618 [ wikipedia.org ] get its own celebration .
Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi , so why did n't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day ?
Sometimes , you CAN be too much [ gocomics.com ] of a geek .
-------------- End of Troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh Jesus.
Really? 
Okay, I'm about to troll, but...
 
First, do we really need a holiday for every fucking thing out there?
Where the hell is dung beetle day?
Aardwolf week?
Permian Extinction Day?
Secondly, you invested enough energy into worrying about WHICH day should be Pi day that you created a website over it?
Finally, if Pi gets its own day, I think its entirely fair that 1.618 [wikipedia.org] get its own celebration.
Phi is easily as fascinating a number as Pi, so why didn't you get your panties in a twist over not having Phi day?
Sometimes, you CAN be too much [gocomics.com] of a geek.
--------------

End of Troll.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828</id>
	<title>Re:Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>jc42</author>
	<datestamp>1268578260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In any case, if Pi is truly Random (it is isn't it?) won't every possible message occur?</i></p><p>Hmmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... You must be using an unusual definition of "random", which usually means that the value is unpredictable.  Pi is the opposite of random.  It's precisely defined and always has the same value for anyone who calculates it correctly.  (Which leaves out the religious folks, but that's to be expected for anything requiring validity.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)  Pi would even be the same in a different universe with different physical laws, because its value isn't dependent on anything physical.</p><p>As for every message occurring, I think you're thinking of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal\_number" title="wikipedia.org">normal numbers</a> [wikipedia.org].  There is a conjecture that pi is normal, but it hasn't been proved.  So far, statistics of the digits of pi are consistent with it being normal to as many digits as have been tested.  A normal number does contain every possible message, in every possible encoding. If pi is normal, then so is e.  [The proof is trivial for anyone who knows the well-known equation relating e and pi.]</p><p>And yes, this mathematical (ab)use of the word "normal" is one of the silliest things that mathematicians have ever done.  But there is a long tradition of such silly misuse of common words as mathematical terms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In any case , if Pi is truly Random ( it is is n't it ?
) wo n't every possible message occur ? Hmmm ... You must be using an unusual definition of " random " , which usually means that the value is unpredictable .
Pi is the opposite of random .
It 's precisely defined and always has the same value for anyone who calculates it correctly .
( Which leaves out the religious folks , but that 's to be expected for anything requiring validity .
; - ) Pi would even be the same in a different universe with different physical laws , because its value is n't dependent on anything physical.As for every message occurring , I think you 're thinking of normal numbers [ wikipedia.org ] .
There is a conjecture that pi is normal , but it has n't been proved .
So far , statistics of the digits of pi are consistent with it being normal to as many digits as have been tested .
A normal number does contain every possible message , in every possible encoding .
If pi is normal , then so is e. [ The proof is trivial for anyone who knows the well-known equation relating e and pi .
] And yes , this mathematical ( ab ) use of the word " normal " is one of the silliest things that mathematicians have ever done .
But there is a long tradition of such silly misuse of common words as mathematical terms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In any case, if Pi is truly Random (it is isn't it?
) won't every possible message occur?Hmmm ... You must be using an unusual definition of "random", which usually means that the value is unpredictable.
Pi is the opposite of random.
It's precisely defined and always has the same value for anyone who calculates it correctly.
(Which leaves out the religious folks, but that's to be expected for anything requiring validity.
;-)  Pi would even be the same in a different universe with different physical laws, because its value isn't dependent on anything physical.As for every message occurring, I think you're thinking of normal numbers [wikipedia.org].
There is a conjecture that pi is normal, but it hasn't been proved.
So far, statistics of the digits of pi are consistent with it being normal to as many digits as have been tested.
A normal number does contain every possible message, in every possible encoding.
If pi is normal, then so is e.  [The proof is trivial for anyone who knows the well-known equation relating e and pi.
]And yes, this mathematical (ab)use of the word "normal" is one of the silliest things that mathematicians have ever done.
But there is a long tradition of such silly misuse of common words as mathematical terms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31476306</id>
	<title>Why are we celebrating an inadequate number ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268573100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2 pi would probably make really much more sense !</p><p>http://www.math.utah.edu/~palais/pi.html<br>http://www.math.utah.edu/\%7Epalais/pi.pdf</p><p>So I will wait until the 28^th of June</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 pi would probably make really much more sense ! http : //www.math.utah.edu/ ~ palais/pi.htmlhttp : //www.math.utah.edu/ \ % 7Epalais/pi.pdfSo I will wait until the 28 ^ th of June</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 pi would probably make really much more sense !http://www.math.utah.edu/~palais/pi.htmlhttp://www.math.utah.edu/\%7Epalais/pi.pdfSo I will wait until the 28^th of June</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473448</id>
	<title>Re:Bad news</title>
	<author>Calydor</author>
	<datestamp>1268594340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No matter how clever your comments on Slashdot or how powerful your work ethic is, you'll never get all the money in the world. There are (technically, due to the ability to print more) infinitely many, so you may as well stop trying to get some of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter how clever your comments on Slashdot or how powerful your work ethic is , you 'll never get all the money in the world .
There are ( technically , due to the ability to print more ) infinitely many , so you may as well stop trying to get some of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter how clever your comments on Slashdot or how powerful your work ethic is, you'll never get all the money in the world.
There are (technically, due to the ability to print more) infinitely many, so you may as well stop trying to get some of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474816</id>
	<title>Re:Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268562660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not random? Surely you'd never heard of Buffon's needle?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not random ?
Surely you 'd never heard of Buffon 's needle ?
.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not random?
Surely you'd never heard of Buffon's needle?
...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473242</id>
	<title>Party Time???</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1268592600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> I hope they're already planning for a really, really big Pi Day blow-out in 2016. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they 're already planning for a really , really big Pi Day blow-out in 2016 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I hope they're already planning for a really, really big Pi Day blow-out in 2016. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471976</id>
	<title>Call me back end of April</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268580300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most of the world use DD.MM.YYYY. Therefore PI day is the 31st April.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the world use DD.MM.YYYY .
Therefore PI day is the 31st April .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the world use DD.MM.YYYY.
Therefore PI day is the 31st April.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268575440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I shall be celebrating at 3:14 on 15th September 2653</htmltext>
<tokenext>I shall be celebrating at 3 : 14 on 15th September 2653</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I shall be celebrating at 3:14 on 15th September 2653</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472838</id>
	<title>Re:What's the significance of 1/pi?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268589060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you could celebrate after going through pi radians (half of the orbit).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could celebrate after going through pi radians ( half of the orbit ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could celebrate after going through pi radians (half of the orbit).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480010</id>
	<title>Re:Did he find a message?</title>
	<author>epine</author>
	<datestamp>1268653920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, I've seen those decodings.  In base 8 it's a glowing testament to the crystalline clarity of the signal/noise ratio of the future universe when it cools to micro-degrees Kelvin.  Decoded in base 6, it's a screech of satanic positrons travelling backward in time to the original inferno.</p><p>Decoded in base seven, it contains the message "these digits intentionally left blank".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I 've seen those decodings .
In base 8 it 's a glowing testament to the crystalline clarity of the signal/noise ratio of the future universe when it cools to micro-degrees Kelvin .
Decoded in base 6 , it 's a screech of satanic positrons travelling backward in time to the original inferno.Decoded in base seven , it contains the message " these digits intentionally left blank " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I've seen those decodings.
In base 8 it's a glowing testament to the crystalline clarity of the signal/noise ratio of the future universe when it cools to micro-degrees Kelvin.
Decoded in base 6, it's a screech of satanic positrons travelling backward in time to the original inferno.Decoded in base seven, it contains the message "these digits intentionally left blank".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471756</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>isorox</author>
	<datestamp>1268577240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Huh? Pi isn't 14.3 or 14/3.</i></p><p>No, but it's close to 22nd July.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ?
Pi is n't 14.3 or 14/3.No , but it 's close to 22nd July .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?
Pi isn't 14.3 or 14/3.No, but it's close to 22nd July.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472986</id>
	<title>Re:Don't forget.</title>
	<author>witherstaff</author>
	<datestamp>1268590380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You get your bitch ass back in the kitchen and make me some pie!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You get your bitch ass back in the kitchen and make me some pie !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You get your bitch ass back in the kitchen and make me some pie!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472332</id>
	<title>I think not quite right.</title>
	<author>gbutler69</author>
	<datestamp>1268584680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seem to recall that the Babylonians used a base-60 system (which subsumes base-12 within it). The prime factors of base-60 are: 2, 2, 3, 5 (or easily 3,4,5) which matches up really nice with a 3,4,5 triangle for example.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to recall that the Babylonians used a base-60 system ( which subsumes base-12 within it ) .
The prime factors of base-60 are : 2 , 2 , 3 , 5 ( or easily 3,4,5 ) which matches up really nice with a 3,4,5 triangle for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to recall that the Babylonians used a base-60 system (which subsumes base-12 within it).
The prime factors of base-60 are: 2, 2, 3, 5 (or easily 3,4,5) which matches up really nice with a 3,4,5 triangle for example.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474930</id>
	<title>Re:US-centricity</title>
	<author>Malc</author>
	<datestamp>1268563200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that 22nd July is more appropriate because we can only ever approximate pi anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that 22nd July is more appropriate because we can only ever approximate pi anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that 22nd July is more appropriate because we can only ever approximate pi anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472706</id>
	<title>Takahashi</title>
	<author>Subm</author>
	<datestamp>1268587980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Professor Takahashi uses the <a href="http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/09/living\_large\_ta.html" title="blogs.com" rel="nofollow">Takahashi</a> [blogs.com] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takahashi\_method" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Method</a> [wikipedia.org] to present his results, it will be the longest presentation ever -- 2.5 trillion slides!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Professor Takahashi uses the Takahashi [ blogs.com ] Method [ wikipedia.org ] to present his results , it will be the longest presentation ever -- 2.5 trillion slides !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Professor Takahashi uses the Takahashi [blogs.com] Method [wikipedia.org] to present his results, it will be the longest presentation ever -- 2.5 trillion slides!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484</id>
	<title>Ellipse != Circle</title>
	<author>Mattwolf7</author>
	<datestamp>1268573460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pi is relevant to the circumference of circles.

The earth has an elliptical orbit. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pi is relevant to the circumference of circles .
The earth has an elliptical orbit .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pi is relevant to the circumference of circles.
The earth has an elliptical orbit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</id>
	<title>I don't get it</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1268572200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh?  Pi isn't 14.3 or 14/3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ?
Pi is n't 14.3 or 14/3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?
Pi isn't 14.3 or 14/3.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474184</id>
	<title>Oh boy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268557680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought everybody was celebrating 'Pee Day'...<br>No wonder that party of mine stank!  (if you know what I mean)</p><p>In the beginning everything went quite fluid, though</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought everybody was celebrating 'Pee Day'...No wonder that party of mine stank !
( if you know what I mean ) In the beginning everything went quite fluid , though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought everybody was celebrating 'Pee Day'...No wonder that party of mine stank!
(if you know what I mean)In the beginning everything went quite fluid, though</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472416</id>
	<title>Efficient coding abilities?</title>
	<author>beatsme</author>
	<datestamp>1268585340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm missing something here, but if the point is to calculate more digits than the last guy, can't the algorithm (efficient or not) just run for a longer time?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm missing something here , but if the point is to calculate more digits than the last guy , ca n't the algorithm ( efficient or not ) just run for a longer time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm missing something here, but if the point is to calculate more digits than the last guy, can't the algorithm (efficient or not) just run for a longer time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471862</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it</title>
	<author>rjch</author>
	<datestamp>1268578500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, obviously Pi day is January 3rd.  Though to be completely accurate, Pi day won't occur until January 3rd, 4159.  A Wednesday, for anyone who's interested.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , obviously Pi day is January 3rd .
Though to be completely accurate , Pi day wo n't occur until January 3rd , 4159 .
A Wednesday , for anyone who 's interested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, obviously Pi day is January 3rd.
Though to be completely accurate, Pi day won't occur until January 3rd, 4159.
A Wednesday, for anyone who's interested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471510</id>
	<title>Math vs. practicality</title>
	<author>Mathinker</author>
	<datestamp>1268574000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a mathematician, I understand Plant Kingdom's problem with making Mar-14 Pi Day (and even worse since it's not using a computer-friendly date format).</p><p>And as a mathematician, I also understand that sometimes there is no way to push mathematical elegance over practical considerations. In this case, it's obvious that if we want to have a Pi Day which is looking to be at all known in popular circles, it absolutely <b>has</b> to be based on being a fixed day in the Gregorian calendar year (or at least as fixed as something like the US President's day --- the n-th particular-weekday in particular-month).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a mathematician , I understand Plant Kingdom 's problem with making Mar-14 Pi Day ( and even worse since it 's not using a computer-friendly date format ) .And as a mathematician , I also understand that sometimes there is no way to push mathematical elegance over practical considerations .
In this case , it 's obvious that if we want to have a Pi Day which is looking to be at all known in popular circles , it absolutely has to be based on being a fixed day in the Gregorian calendar year ( or at least as fixed as something like the US President 's day --- the n-th particular-weekday in particular-month ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a mathematician, I understand Plant Kingdom's problem with making Mar-14 Pi Day (and even worse since it's not using a computer-friendly date format).And as a mathematician, I also understand that sometimes there is no way to push mathematical elegance over practical considerations.
In this case, it's obvious that if we want to have a Pi Day which is looking to be at all known in popular circles, it absolutely has to be based on being a fixed day in the Gregorian calendar year (or at least as fixed as something like the US President's day --- the n-th particular-weekday in particular-month).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31487034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31476204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31479088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31475838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31478048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_1028230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31475838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31487034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31478048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31479088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31474816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31472770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31480106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_1028230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31471448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31473448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_1028230.31476204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
