<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_14_0353222</id>
	<title>Long-Running Underwater Robot Lost At Sea</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268589300000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>this\_boat\_is\_real writes <i>"Somewhere off the coast of Chile a pioneering underwater robot named <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/03/\_awesome\_underwater\_robot\_lost.html">Abe lies in a watery grave today</a>. The <a href="http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/subs/abe/abe.html">Autonomous Benthic Explorer</a>  was one of the first truly independent research submersibles, being both unmanned and un-tethered to its launching ship. While on its 222nd research dive on Friday all contact with the craft was lost, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has announced."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>this \ _boat \ _is \ _real writes " Somewhere off the coast of Chile a pioneering underwater robot named Abe lies in a watery grave today .
The Autonomous Benthic Explorer was one of the first truly independent research submersibles , being both unmanned and un-tethered to its launching ship .
While on its 222nd research dive on Friday all contact with the craft was lost , the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has announced .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this\_boat\_is\_real writes "Somewhere off the coast of Chile a pioneering underwater robot named Abe lies in a watery grave today.
The Autonomous Benthic Explorer  was one of the first truly independent research submersibles, being both unmanned and un-tethered to its launching ship.
While on its 222nd research dive on Friday all contact with the craft was lost, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has announced.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472090</id>
	<title>Re:they were right!</title>
	<author>snart</author>
	<datestamp>1268581860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better yet, see the director's cut. The added 20 or so minutes completely alter the film. It goes from a really good flick a nearly great flick. And Ed Harris is a total babe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , see the director 's cut .
The added 20 or so minutes completely alter the film .
It goes from a really good flick a nearly great flick .
And Ed Harris is a total babe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, see the director's cut.
The added 20 or so minutes completely alter the film.
It goes from a really good flick a nearly great flick.
And Ed Harris is a total babe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31473878</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1268597940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy.</p></div><p>Interesting. What displaces the oil when its pumped out of the reservoir?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy.Interesting .
What displaces the oil when its pumped out of the reservoir ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy.Interesting.
What displaces the oil when its pumped out of the reservoir?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471884</id>
	<title>Re:Release the Kraken?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268578860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't your declaration include the obligatory <i>car analogy</i>? Or at the very least a timely Toyota reference? Please try to be a little more entertaining or topical in regards to your proclamations of doom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't your declaration include the obligatory car analogy ?
Or at the very least a timely Toyota reference ?
Please try to be a little more entertaining or topical in regards to your proclamations of doom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't your declaration include the obligatory car analogy?
Or at the very least a timely Toyota reference?
Please try to be a little more entertaining or topical in regards to your proclamations of doom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470548</id>
	<title>Russians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268599560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those damn Russian water tentacles sneakin' around again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those damn Russian water tentacles sneakin ' around again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those damn Russian water tentacles sneakin' around again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194</id>
	<title>floaties?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought, "hey, maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface." Wow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought , " hey , maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface .
" Wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought, "hey, maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface.
" Wow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470670</id>
	<title>So long...</title>
	<author>idji</author>
	<datestamp>1268558880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>and thanks for all the fish!</htmltext>
<tokenext>and thanks for all the fish !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and thanks for all the fish!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470320</id>
	<title>When the world needs a hero...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268508900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there's only one fit to go into the Ocean.  No, not Superman.  His hair gel would contaminate it worse than the Exxon Valdez.  No, not Batman.   Money can't solve this problem.  No, not Spiderman.  He doesn't have Water-spider powers.  And no, not Wonder Woman.   It's that time of the month.  Yeah.</p><p>So we must get Aquaman, who can use his aquatic telepathy to save this missing craft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's only one fit to go into the Ocean .
No , not Superman .
His hair gel would contaminate it worse than the Exxon Valdez .
No , not Batman .
Money ca n't solve this problem .
No , not Spiderman .
He does n't have Water-spider powers .
And no , not Wonder Woman .
It 's that time of the month .
Yeah.So we must get Aquaman , who can use his aquatic telepathy to save this missing craft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's only one fit to go into the Ocean.
No, not Superman.
His hair gel would contaminate it worse than the Exxon Valdez.
No, not Batman.
Money can't solve this problem.
No, not Spiderman.
He doesn't have Water-spider powers.
And no, not Wonder Woman.
It's that time of the month.
Yeah.So we must get Aquaman, who can use his aquatic telepathy to save this missing craft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31474072</id>
	<title>NCC-1701/B</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268600040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The engineers must've been Trekkies:<br>http://dsg.whoi.edu:90/ships/auvs/abe\_description.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The engineers must 've been Trekkies : http : //dsg.whoi.edu : 90/ships/auvs/abe \ _description.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The engineers must've been Trekkies:http://dsg.whoi.edu:90/ships/auvs/abe\_description.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471688</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268576160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much did ABE cost? Is it worth a dive by another submersible to reacquire? Or is (was) it so autonomous that WHOI doesn't have a clear enough track to search from?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much did ABE cost ?
Is it worth a dive by another submersible to reacquire ?
Or is ( was ) it so autonomous that WHOI does n't have a clear enough track to search from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much did ABE cost?
Is it worth a dive by another submersible to reacquire?
Or is (was) it so autonomous that WHOI doesn't have a clear enough track to search from?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470450</id>
	<title>Isn't this the episode</title>
	<author>iplayfast</author>
	<datestamp>1268597640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this the episode where Gilligan finds a mysterious robot in the water and the professor tries to use it to communicate to the outside world, and the skipper hits Gilligan in the head with his hat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the episode where Gilligan finds a mysterious robot in the water and the professor tries to use it to communicate to the outside world , and the skipper hits Gilligan in the head with his hat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the episode where Gilligan finds a mysterious robot in the water and the professor tries to use it to communicate to the outside world, and the skipper hits Gilligan in the head with his hat?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31478644</id>
	<title>Re:Cthulhu strikes again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268595000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just read that comic and the next 4.  I found 3 misspelled words and two pluralization/grammar errors.  hello... spellcheck</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just read that comic and the next 4 .
I found 3 misspelled words and two pluralization/grammar errors .
hello... spellcheck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just read that comic and the next 4.
I found 3 misspelled words and two pluralization/grammar errors.
hello... spellcheck</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470426</id>
	<title>Nah...</title>
	<author>G-Man</author>
	<datestamp>1268597220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Underwater Robots, it's finally free!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Underwater Robots , it 's finally free !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Underwater Robots, it's finally free!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470292</id>
	<title>Cthulhu strikes again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268508660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Om Nom Nom Nom... tasty robot snack.<p>http://www.goominet.com/unspeakable-vault/vault/309/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Om Nom Nom Nom... tasty robot snack.http : //www.goominet.com/unspeakable-vault/vault/309/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Om Nom Nom Nom... tasty robot snack.http://www.goominet.com/unspeakable-vault/vault/309/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470328</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268509020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignorance and arrogance are a powerfully bad combination.</p><p>Wow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignorance and arrogance are a powerfully bad combination.Wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignorance and arrogance are a powerfully bad combination.Wow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475922</id>
	<title>China?</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1268570340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something like this would be VERY useful to a nation like China to grab on the way up. Hopefully, their was active sonor going around to make sure that nobody did that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something like this would be VERY useful to a nation like China to grab on the way up .
Hopefully , their was active sonor going around to make sure that nobody did that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something like this would be VERY useful to a nation like China to grab on the way up.
Hopefully, their was active sonor going around to make sure that nobody did that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470830</id>
	<title>Re:It's a message from the Chilean mob...</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268561640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes.</i> <br> <br>


Not according to the official page:

<br> <br>

Page loaded Sunday March 14 2010 1:11:36 AM PT<br>
<a href="http://www.abevigoda.com/ffb.php" title="abevigoda.com">http://www.abevigoda.com/ffb.php</a> [abevigoda.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes .
Not according to the official page : Page loaded Sunday March 14 2010 1 : 11 : 36 AM PT http : //www.abevigoda.com/ffb.php [ abevigoda.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes.
Not according to the official page:

 

Page loaded Sunday March 14 2010 1:11:36 AM PT
http://www.abevigoda.com/ffb.php [abevigoda.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471880</id>
	<title>Maybe it found something better</title>
	<author>sharkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268578740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could be a robot amusement park down there.  With blackjack.  And hookers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be a robot amusement park down there .
With blackjack .
And hookers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be a robot amusement park down there.
With blackjack.
And hookers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470720</id>
	<title>Similar to Super Kamiokande</title>
	<author>alanw</author>
	<datestamp>1268560080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>An implosion,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... would have caused all of ABE&rsquo;s other spheres to implode</p></div><p>It's just the same as the way as a chain reaction at the Super Kamiokande neutrino observatory destroyed thousands of its photo-multiplier tubes</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Kamiokande" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Kamiokande</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An implosion , ... would have caused all of ABE    s other spheres to implodeIt 's just the same as the way as a chain reaction at the Super Kamiokande neutrino observatory destroyed thousands of its photo-multiplier tubeshttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Kamiokande [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An implosion, ... would have caused all of ABE’s other spheres to implodeIt's just the same as the way as a chain reaction at the Super Kamiokande neutrino observatory destroyed thousands of its photo-multiplier tubeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Kamiokande [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471408</id>
	<title>ABE had Enterprise starship reg number NCC-1701B</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268572200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well there are many sad to see it go but it did a lot of great research.  WHOI has a few more autonomous underwater robots - check out whoi.edu. BTW since the design of ABE was shaped like the Enterprise from Star Trek it had a registration number of NCC-1701B on its side - WHOI engineers are Trekkies too. My company is a videography contractor for WHOI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well there are many sad to see it go but it did a lot of great research .
WHOI has a few more autonomous underwater robots - check out whoi.edu .
BTW since the design of ABE was shaped like the Enterprise from Star Trek it had a registration number of NCC-1701B on its side - WHOI engineers are Trekkies too .
My company is a videography contractor for WHOI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well there are many sad to see it go but it did a lot of great research.
WHOI has a few more autonomous underwater robots - check out whoi.edu.
BTW since the design of ABE was shaped like the Enterprise from Star Trek it had a registration number of NCC-1701B on its side - WHOI engineers are Trekkies too.
My company is a videography contractor for WHOI.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31474440</id>
	<title>Went out for a pack of cigarettes...</title>
	<author>kimgkimg</author>
	<datestamp>1268560020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should have suspected something when it said it was just going down to the corner store for a pack of smokes...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have suspected something when it said it was just going down to the corner store for a pack of smokes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have suspected something when it said it was just going down to the corner store for a pack of smokes...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470258</id>
	<title>Re:they where right!</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1268508300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This movie is from the 80s... <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096754/" title="imdb.com">The Abyss</a> [imdb.com].  It even had a ship the Benthic Explorer, no doubt what this one was named after.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This movie is from the 80s... The Abyss [ imdb.com ] .
It even had a ship the Benthic Explorer , no doubt what this one was named after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This movie is from the 80s... The Abyss [imdb.com].
It even had a ship the Benthic Explorer, no doubt what this one was named after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470234</id>
	<title>It's a message from the Chilean mob...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abe is now sleeping with the fishes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470398</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268510340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought, "hey, maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface." Wow.</p></div><p>Engineering team says "If the submarine is operating at such high depths and pressures that titanium pressure enclosures and glass spheres fail, what would you make your balloon from?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought , " hey , maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface .
" Wow.Engineering team says " If the submarine is operating at such high depths and pressures that titanium pressure enclosures and glass spheres fail , what would you make your balloon from ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And nobody on the sub engineering team thought, "hey, maybe we should add a ballast balloon that floats it to the surface if it loses all contact with the surface.
" Wow.Engineering team says "If the submarine is operating at such high depths and pressures that titanium pressure enclosures and glass spheres fail, what would you make your balloon from?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470524</id>
	<title>Pirates</title>
	<author>moteyalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1268598960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to ask if they suspected that I had hacked the OS and made it meet me at sea so I could steal it ( as a joke ), and then<br>
I realized that this would make a good drug smuggling bot and really with all seriousness, isn't it possible that foul play could be at work and I'm guessing the device is worth at least a couple bucks to somebody who wants to get under the radar, so to speak.<br>
From TFA, it seems also that it could be asleep. Maybe it just overslept.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to ask if they suspected that I had hacked the OS and made it meet me at sea so I could steal it ( as a joke ) , and then I realized that this would make a good drug smuggling bot and really with all seriousness , is n't it possible that foul play could be at work and I 'm guessing the device is worth at least a couple bucks to somebody who wants to get under the radar , so to speak .
From TFA , it seems also that it could be asleep .
Maybe it just overslept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to ask if they suspected that I had hacked the OS and made it meet me at sea so I could steal it ( as a joke ), and then
I realized that this would make a good drug smuggling bot and really with all seriousness, isn't it possible that foul play could be at work and I'm guessing the device is worth at least a couple bucks to somebody who wants to get under the radar, so to speak.
From TFA, it seems also that it could be asleep.
Maybe it just overslept.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470206</id>
	<title>Who'd have thunk...</title>
	<author>Statecraftsman</author>
	<datestamp>1268507400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who'd have thunk it would be an unmanned submersible that would first become self-aware? <br> <br>/Oh, please let it be nuclear powered.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 'd have thunk it would be an unmanned submersible that would first become self-aware ?
/Oh , please let it be nuclear powered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who'd have thunk it would be an unmanned submersible that would first become self-aware?
/Oh, please let it be nuclear powered.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470724</id>
	<title>Occam's Razor</title>
	<author>$RANDOMLUSER</author>
	<datestamp>1268560080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A cron job didn't run.<br> <br> <br> <br>
(Posted at 03:47 GMT-6 14 March 2010)</htmltext>
<tokenext>A cron job did n't run .
( Posted at 03 : 47 GMT-6 14 March 2010 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A cron job didn't run.
(Posted at 03:47 GMT-6 14 March 2010)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192</id>
	<title>they where right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>all the movies form the fifties about giant sea monsters being released by earthquakes are true! We must prepare are selves by watching hours of scifi original movies!

Its also no coincidence, 222nd dive? that's 1/3 evil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>all the movies form the fifties about giant sea monsters being released by earthquakes are true !
We must prepare are selves by watching hours of scifi original movies !
Its also no coincidence , 222nd dive ?
that 's 1/3 evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all the movies form the fifties about giant sea monsters being released by earthquakes are true!
We must prepare are selves by watching hours of scifi original movies!
Its also no coincidence, 222nd dive?
that's 1/3 evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472440</id>
	<title>Cthulhu</title>
	<author>Decessus</author>
	<datestamp>1268585580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470528</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1268599020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Learn to ballast, idiot. It would be dependent on the strength of the pumps and ballast tanks. Look at the pic. There aren't any ballast mechanisms or even elevation control surfaces other than two vertical propellers. Think of ABE as an undersea helicopter(or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogyro" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">autogyro</a> [wikipedia.org] to be precise) rather than a submarine. <br> <br>

Also, it's hull markings indicate NCC-1701 B. Badass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Learn to ballast , idiot .
It would be dependent on the strength of the pumps and ballast tanks .
Look at the pic .
There are n't any ballast mechanisms or even elevation control surfaces other than two vertical propellers .
Think of ABE as an undersea helicopter ( or autogyro [ wikipedia.org ] to be precise ) rather than a submarine .
Also , it 's hull markings indicate NCC-1701 B. Badass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Learn to ballast, idiot.
It would be dependent on the strength of the pumps and ballast tanks.
Look at the pic.
There aren't any ballast mechanisms or even elevation control surfaces other than two vertical propellers.
Think of ABE as an undersea helicopter(or autogyro [wikipedia.org] to be precise) rather than a submarine.
Also, it's hull markings indicate NCC-1701 B. Badass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471004</id>
	<title>long running......</title>
	<author>3seas</author>
	<datestamp>1268564160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmmm....Maybe it just ran away....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmmm....Maybe it just ran away... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmmm....Maybe it just ran away....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470178</id>
	<title>Re:Release the Kraken?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what she said!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what she said !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what she said!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470752</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268560620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And yet..., if those engineers are so smart, how come poor ABE is rusting at the bottom of the ocean with only some ugly fishes for company. I think next time they should throw in a balloon, just in case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet... , if those engineers are so smart , how come poor ABE is rusting at the bottom of the ocean with only some ugly fishes for company .
I think next time they should throw in a balloon , just in case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet..., if those engineers are so smart, how come poor ABE is rusting at the bottom of the ocean with only some ugly fishes for company.
I think next time they should throw in a balloon, just in case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475180</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it saw something it shouldn't</title>
	<author>catchy\_handle</author>
	<datestamp>1268564580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just happened to finish reading a good book about the history of deep sea exploration "Eternal Darkness", by Robert Ballard.  He has been involved in this field since the 1970's &amp; was former director at Woods Hole.  <br> <br>

Anyway, the US Navy hired these guys to find the Thresher, and they did.  He also discovered the Titanic.  Great book, highly recommended.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just happened to finish reading a good book about the history of deep sea exploration " Eternal Darkness " , by Robert Ballard .
He has been involved in this field since the 1970 's &amp; was former director at Woods Hole .
Anyway , the US Navy hired these guys to find the Thresher , and they did .
He also discovered the Titanic .
Great book , highly recommended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just happened to finish reading a good book about the history of deep sea exploration "Eternal Darkness", by Robert Ballard.
He has been involved in this field since the 1970's &amp; was former director at Woods Hole.
Anyway, the US Navy hired these guys to find the Thresher, and they did.
He also discovered the Titanic.
Great book, highly recommended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470414</id>
	<title>That explains last weeks episode of Lost...</title>
	<author>avatar139</author>
	<datestamp>1268597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Charles Widmore must have been monitoring ABE when it somehow found the Island. I expect we'll see a fake press release showing ABE's resting place any time now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Charles Widmore must have been monitoring ABE when it somehow found the Island .
I expect we 'll see a fake press release showing ABE 's resting place any time now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Charles Widmore must have been monitoring ABE when it somehow found the Island.
I expect we'll see a fake press release showing ABE's resting place any time now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470578</id>
	<title>ALERT SLASHDOT</title>
	<author>Stephen Tennant</author>
	<datestamp>1268600160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Activate tearducts and proceed with robot mourning routine!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Activate tearducts and proceed with robot mourning routine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Activate tearducts and proceed with robot mourning routine!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470496</id>
	<title>I have to assume there will be a followup design?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268598240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>After such an illustrious career shouldn't they use this as the basis of their next design only adding to it additional features that have been proven on more recent designs from other teams? I mean making all these one-off designs like all the underwater robots seem to be has to be the least efficient way to go from both a cash perspective as well as a getting science done perspective.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After such an illustrious career should n't they use this as the basis of their next design only adding to it additional features that have been proven on more recent designs from other teams ?
I mean making all these one-off designs like all the underwater robots seem to be has to be the least efficient way to go from both a cash perspective as well as a getting science done perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After such an illustrious career shouldn't they use this as the basis of their next design only adding to it additional features that have been proven on more recent designs from other teams?
I mean making all these one-off designs like all the underwater robots seem to be has to be the least efficient way to go from both a cash perspective as well as a getting science done perspective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471476</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it saw something it shouldn't</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1268573400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>And maybe, just maybe, one of the glass flotation spheres had a flaw in it and it imploded, like they said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And maybe , just maybe , one of the glass flotation spheres had a flaw in it and it imploded , like they said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And maybe, just maybe, one of the glass flotation spheres had a flaw in it and it imploded, like they said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471342</id>
	<title>Re:they were right!</title>
	<author>halowolf</author>
	<datestamp>1268570940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But watch the directors cut so that the ending actually makes some sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But watch the directors cut so that the ending actually makes some sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But watch the directors cut so that the ending actually makes some sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471602</id>
	<title>To Go Where No Robot Has Gone Before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268575440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I couldn't help to notice the similarities in this robot's design to the Starship Enterprise.  As I looked closer it appears that somebody else had the same thought - the serial number on the robot is "NCC-1701B"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could n't help to notice the similarities in this robot 's design to the Starship Enterprise .
As I looked closer it appears that somebody else had the same thought - the serial number on the robot is " NCC-1701B " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I couldn't help to notice the similarities in this robot's design to the Starship Enterprise.
As I looked closer it appears that somebody else had the same thought - the serial number on the robot is "NCC-1701B"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400</id>
	<title>Re:they were right!</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1268510340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Abyss is famous for its animation of the water tentacle.  Way ahead of its time.  Younger readers who have not seen it should check it out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Abyss is famous for its animation of the water tentacle .
Way ahead of its time .
Younger readers who have not seen it should check it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Abyss is famous for its animation of the water tentacle.
Way ahead of its time.
Younger readers who have not seen it should check it out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470288</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268508600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone think to look inside the Woods Hole?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone think to look inside the Woods Hole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone think to look inside the Woods Hole?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471032</id>
	<title>Last message was ominous...</title>
	<author>DiamondGeezer</author>
	<datestamp>1268564760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...something about "Should a man keep the sweat of his brow..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>...something about " Should a man keep the sweat of his brow... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...something about "Should a man keep the sweat of his brow..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31473208</id>
	<title>It's not a "sub" and they do get stuck or lost</title>
	<author>ScottFree2600</author>
	<datestamp>1268592180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In 2003, I was on a small team using a similar WHOI system called REMUS to take surveys of ports and waterways, looking for mines. We had been training with the system, mainly in Southern California and when Iraq started up, they decided that they wanted to try the new technology there. We did, and it was successful.  <a href="http://www.joetalbot.net/pages/030401-N-3783H-075A.htm" title="joetalbot.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.joetalbot.net/pages/030401-N-3783H-075A.htm</a> [joetalbot.net]
In the course of our training, we managed to get the things stuck, beached and lost several times despite a system that would take it to the surface when it's little PC-104 mind was blown. Remember, there are things down there (plants, critters, caves, rocks, ships and junk) that are unknown to us before these things are launched (that's often why we launch them, you know? To take surveys?). These things navigate underwater using a small network of buoy "transponders" the respond to pings from the unit. The slight response delay (caused by the water and very predictable) tells the unit how far it is from the buoy, who's locations are known to the units (windows) programming software.

These things are pretty cool and useful, but they're also kind of primitive. We used to attach a "pinger" to the units so that when they got stuck, we could recover them with divers. A pinger is a small capsule that contains a device that periodically emits a 20-70 khz "ping" that is easily picked up by a hand held, very directional receiver carried by a diver. <a href="http://www.benthos.com/undersea-pingers-locators-product-overview.asp" title="benthos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.benthos.com/undersea-pingers-locators-product-overview.asp</a> [benthos.com] Given what the system is worth, I would imagine that it has a pinger for location as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In 2003 , I was on a small team using a similar WHOI system called REMUS to take surveys of ports and waterways , looking for mines .
We had been training with the system , mainly in Southern California and when Iraq started up , they decided that they wanted to try the new technology there .
We did , and it was successful .
http : //www.joetalbot.net/pages/030401-N-3783H-075A.htm [ joetalbot.net ] In the course of our training , we managed to get the things stuck , beached and lost several times despite a system that would take it to the surface when it 's little PC-104 mind was blown .
Remember , there are things down there ( plants , critters , caves , rocks , ships and junk ) that are unknown to us before these things are launched ( that 's often why we launch them , you know ?
To take surveys ? ) .
These things navigate underwater using a small network of buoy " transponders " the respond to pings from the unit .
The slight response delay ( caused by the water and very predictable ) tells the unit how far it is from the buoy , who 's locations are known to the units ( windows ) programming software .
These things are pretty cool and useful , but they 're also kind of primitive .
We used to attach a " pinger " to the units so that when they got stuck , we could recover them with divers .
A pinger is a small capsule that contains a device that periodically emits a 20-70 khz " ping " that is easily picked up by a hand held , very directional receiver carried by a diver .
http : //www.benthos.com/undersea-pingers-locators-product-overview.asp [ benthos.com ] Given what the system is worth , I would imagine that it has a pinger for location as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 2003, I was on a small team using a similar WHOI system called REMUS to take surveys of ports and waterways, looking for mines.
We had been training with the system, mainly in Southern California and when Iraq started up, they decided that they wanted to try the new technology there.
We did, and it was successful.
http://www.joetalbot.net/pages/030401-N-3783H-075A.htm [joetalbot.net]
In the course of our training, we managed to get the things stuck, beached and lost several times despite a system that would take it to the surface when it's little PC-104 mind was blown.
Remember, there are things down there (plants, critters, caves, rocks, ships and junk) that are unknown to us before these things are launched (that's often why we launch them, you know?
To take surveys?).
These things navigate underwater using a small network of buoy "transponders" the respond to pings from the unit.
The slight response delay (caused by the water and very predictable) tells the unit how far it is from the buoy, who's locations are known to the units (windows) programming software.
These things are pretty cool and useful, but they're also kind of primitive.
We used to attach a "pinger" to the units so that when they got stuck, we could recover them with divers.
A pinger is a small capsule that contains a device that periodically emits a 20-70 khz "ping" that is easily picked up by a hand held, very directional receiver carried by a diver.
http://www.benthos.com/undersea-pingers-locators-product-overview.asp [benthos.com] Given what the system is worth, I would imagine that it has a pinger for location as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470364</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>perpenso</author>
	<datestamp>1268509800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything? (If it did, it apparently didn't work)  You'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment.</p></div></blockquote><p>

A heavy device needs a lot of lift and that translates into a large physical volume of gas at depth.  Keep in mind that every 33 feet of depth is one additional atmosphere of pressure.  66 feet down you need three times as much gas to inflate a lift bag as you would on the surface.  At great depths it may be impractical to carry enough gas.<br> <br>

--<br>
<a href="http://www.perpenso.com/calc/" title="perpenso.com" rel="nofollow">Perpenso Calc</a> [perpenso.com] for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything ?
( If it did , it apparently did n't work ) You 'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment .
A heavy device needs a lot of lift and that translates into a large physical volume of gas at depth .
Keep in mind that every 33 feet of depth is one additional atmosphere of pressure .
66 feet down you need three times as much gas to inflate a lift bag as you would on the surface .
At great depths it may be impractical to carry enough gas .
-- Perpenso Calc [ perpenso.com ] for iPhone and iPod touch , scientific and bill/tip calculator , fractions , complex numbers , RPN</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything?
(If it did, it apparently didn't work)  You'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment.
A heavy device needs a lot of lift and that translates into a large physical volume of gas at depth.
Keep in mind that every 33 feet of depth is one additional atmosphere of pressure.
66 feet down you need three times as much gas to inflate a lift bag as you would on the surface.
At great depths it may be impractical to carry enough gas.
--
Perpenso Calc [perpenso.com] for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154</id>
	<title>Release the Kraken?</title>
	<author>greg\_barton</author>
	<datestamp>1268506680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we are well and truly fucked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we are well and truly fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we are well and truly fucked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471820</id>
	<title>What really happened...</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1268578140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It became self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It became self-aware at 2 : 14 a.m. Eastern time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It became self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>Solandri</author>
	<datestamp>1268568300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been a while since I worked with the WHOI folks so my memory is a bit hazy.  But generally these underwater submersibles come with:
<ul>
<li>A descent weight, used to make the craft negatively buoyant for the initial descent, then dropped to leave it neutrally buoyant.</li>
<li>An ascent weight, dropped at the end of the mission to make the neutrally buoyant craft positively buoyant.</li>
<li>A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy.</li>
</ul><p>
Air doesn't work because of the enormous pressure involved.  A 3000 psi scuba tank could only inflate a balloon down to about 2000 meters.  Below that, the water pressure is greater than that inside the tank, and opening the valve would result in water forcing the balloon into the tank, rather than air inflating the balloon.  A 10000 psi high pressure tank would work at 5000 meters, but would only result in about a 30\% increase in volume, meaning you'd need a very big tank to be able to raise the entire craft in a catastrophic failure.  Furthermore, the air would expand as the craft rose, risking rupturing the balloon.  That's why the buoyancy control uses an oil bladder - oil is relatively incompressible.
<br> <br>
Dropping the ascent weight helps raise the craft at the end of a mission.  But usually they're relatively lightweight so you can attach them manually.  The <a href="http://www.benthos.com/undersea-flotation-device-housing-glass-spheres.asp" title="benthos.com">17-inch glass spheres</a> [benthos.com] typically used to house equipment provides over 50 pounds of buoyancy.  The failure of one of these spheres at a depth of 3000 meters (~4500 psi) would release (4500 psi) * 4/3 * pi * (8.5 inches)^3 = 1.3 MJ of energy.  A stick of dynamite is about 2.1 MJ, so losing one sphere is pretty much guaranteed to cause all the other spheres to fail.  If the remainder of the craft somehow survived all that energy release, the loss in buoyancy would overwhelm what buoyancy you'd get by dropping the ascent weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been a while since I worked with the WHOI folks so my memory is a bit hazy .
But generally these underwater submersibles come with : A descent weight , used to make the craft negatively buoyant for the initial descent , then dropped to leave it neutrally buoyant .
An ascent weight , dropped at the end of the mission to make the neutrally buoyant craft positively buoyant .
A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy .
Air does n't work because of the enormous pressure involved .
A 3000 psi scuba tank could only inflate a balloon down to about 2000 meters .
Below that , the water pressure is greater than that inside the tank , and opening the valve would result in water forcing the balloon into the tank , rather than air inflating the balloon .
A 10000 psi high pressure tank would work at 5000 meters , but would only result in about a 30 \ % increase in volume , meaning you 'd need a very big tank to be able to raise the entire craft in a catastrophic failure .
Furthermore , the air would expand as the craft rose , risking rupturing the balloon .
That 's why the buoyancy control uses an oil bladder - oil is relatively incompressible .
Dropping the ascent weight helps raise the craft at the end of a mission .
But usually they 're relatively lightweight so you can attach them manually .
The 17-inch glass spheres [ benthos.com ] typically used to house equipment provides over 50 pounds of buoyancy .
The failure of one of these spheres at a depth of 3000 meters ( ~ 4500 psi ) would release ( 4500 psi ) * 4/3 * pi * ( 8.5 inches ) ^ 3 = 1.3 MJ of energy .
A stick of dynamite is about 2.1 MJ , so losing one sphere is pretty much guaranteed to cause all the other spheres to fail .
If the remainder of the craft somehow survived all that energy release , the loss in buoyancy would overwhelm what buoyancy you 'd get by dropping the ascent weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been a while since I worked with the WHOI folks so my memory is a bit hazy.
But generally these underwater submersibles come with:

A descent weight, used to make the craft negatively buoyant for the initial descent, then dropped to leave it neutrally buoyant.
An ascent weight, dropped at the end of the mission to make the neutrally buoyant craft positively buoyant.
A bladder which can be pumped with oil from a reservoir tank to fine-tune buoyancy.
Air doesn't work because of the enormous pressure involved.
A 3000 psi scuba tank could only inflate a balloon down to about 2000 meters.
Below that, the water pressure is greater than that inside the tank, and opening the valve would result in water forcing the balloon into the tank, rather than air inflating the balloon.
A 10000 psi high pressure tank would work at 5000 meters, but would only result in about a 30\% increase in volume, meaning you'd need a very big tank to be able to raise the entire craft in a catastrophic failure.
Furthermore, the air would expand as the craft rose, risking rupturing the balloon.
That's why the buoyancy control uses an oil bladder - oil is relatively incompressible.
Dropping the ascent weight helps raise the craft at the end of a mission.
But usually they're relatively lightweight so you can attach them manually.
The 17-inch glass spheres [benthos.com] typically used to house equipment provides over 50 pounds of buoyancy.
The failure of one of these spheres at a depth of 3000 meters (~4500 psi) would release (4500 psi) * 4/3 * pi * (8.5 inches)^3 = 1.3 MJ of energy.
A stick of dynamite is about 2.1 MJ, so losing one sphere is pretty much guaranteed to cause all the other spheres to fail.
If the remainder of the craft somehow survived all that energy release, the loss in buoyancy would overwhelm what buoyancy you'd get by dropping the ascent weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908</id>
	<title>Is this the reason why military subs don't go deep</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1268589720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for that great explanation.  Do you think that this is the reason why military subs don't go deep, because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system?  I assume that if they did use such a system, when they flooded the ballast tanks in a crash dive a lot of oil would have to be "dumped" overboard; expensive, not easily replenished and leaves a big oil slick that would reveal your location (as opposed to a lot of quickly dispersing bubbles like in the movies).</p><p>So because of that, even though they can have titanium hulls and whatnot, military subs can't go below a couple of thousand meters.  Regardless of their "crush depth" there must be a point of no return.  What do you think?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that great explanation .
Do you think that this is the reason why military subs do n't go deep , because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system ?
I assume that if they did use such a system , when they flooded the ballast tanks in a crash dive a lot of oil would have to be " dumped " overboard ; expensive , not easily replenished and leaves a big oil slick that would reveal your location ( as opposed to a lot of quickly dispersing bubbles like in the movies ) .So because of that , even though they can have titanium hulls and whatnot , military subs ca n't go below a couple of thousand meters .
Regardless of their " crush depth " there must be a point of no return .
What do you think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that great explanation.
Do you think that this is the reason why military subs don't go deep, because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system?
I assume that if they did use such a system, when they flooded the ballast tanks in a crash dive a lot of oil would have to be "dumped" overboard; expensive, not easily replenished and leaves a big oil slick that would reveal your location (as opposed to a lot of quickly dispersing bubbles like in the movies).So because of that, even though they can have titanium hulls and whatnot, military subs can't go below a couple of thousand meters.
Regardless of their "crush depth" there must be a point of no return.
What do you think?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470202</id>
	<title>Bad choice for movie night</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe showing the sub "Free Willy" wasn't the best move.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe showing the sub " Free Willy " was n't the best move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe showing the sub "Free Willy" wasn't the best move.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470144</id>
	<title>Slashdotters And Niggers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268506560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdotters are like naive people who go to Africa for the very first time.  They look out the window and say, "Hey, look at all the niggers!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotters are like naive people who go to Africa for the very first time .
They look out the window and say , " Hey , look at all the niggers !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotters are like naive people who go to Africa for the very first time.
They look out the window and say, "Hey, look at all the niggers!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471498</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1268573760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't inflate a balloon at those depths.  Not without a lot of pressure which means a very heavy tank.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't inflate a balloon at those depths .
Not without a lot of pressure which means a very heavy tank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't inflate a balloon at those depths.
Not without a lot of pressure which means a very heavy tank.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471462</id>
	<title>Re:I have to assume there will be a followup desig</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1268573220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't make very many of them.  They're often made with the best technology available at the time.  They're usually made with a specific set of tasks in mind, then later modified.  Abe was around 15 years old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't make very many of them .
They 're often made with the best technology available at the time .
They 're usually made with a specific set of tasks in mind , then later modified .
Abe was around 15 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't make very many of them.
They're often made with the best technology available at the time.
They're usually made with a specific set of tasks in mind, then later modified.
Abe was around 15 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475188</id>
	<title>Re:Is this the reason why military subs don't go d</title>
	<author>deroby</author>
	<datestamp>1268564700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't they be able to 'fly' out of such situations ? "Simply put the nose upwards and set the throttle to Full Ahead" so to speak<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Agreed, once you lose engines at such depth you're hosed big time(*), but then again I would assume there is quite some redundancy in said vehicles.</p><p>Just thinking about this, my only training have been "Hunt for the Red October" and the "688 Attack sub" manual<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the latter being very educational btw.</p><p>(*: I'm so funny =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't they be able to 'fly ' out of such situations ?
" Simply put the nose upwards and set the throttle to Full Ahead " so to speak ...Agreed , once you lose engines at such depth you 're hosed big time ( * ) , but then again I would assume there is quite some redundancy in said vehicles.Just thinking about this , my only training have been " Hunt for the Red October " and the " 688 Attack sub " manual ... the latter being very educational btw .
( * : I 'm so funny = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't they be able to 'fly' out of such situations ?
"Simply put the nose upwards and set the throttle to Full Ahead" so to speak ...Agreed, once you lose engines at such depth you're hosed big time(*), but then again I would assume there is quite some redundancy in said vehicles.Just thinking about this, my only training have been "Hunt for the Red October" and the "688 Attack sub" manual ... the latter being very educational btw.
(*: I'm so funny =)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470920</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268562840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Use mineral oil to make it very slightly buoyant, so that if power fails it floats to the surface.  Pretty much incompressible.  If you fill the whole thing you don't need the hull to withstand significant pressure.  If you want a faster ascent, also add a balloon that gets inflated from a canister of liquid CO2.  Hold the valve closed with a solenoid actuator.

Rocket science is engineering, but not all engineering is rocket science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use mineral oil to make it very slightly buoyant , so that if power fails it floats to the surface .
Pretty much incompressible .
If you fill the whole thing you do n't need the hull to withstand significant pressure .
If you want a faster ascent , also add a balloon that gets inflated from a canister of liquid CO2 .
Hold the valve closed with a solenoid actuator .
Rocket science is engineering , but not all engineering is rocket science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use mineral oil to make it very slightly buoyant, so that if power fails it floats to the surface.
Pretty much incompressible.
If you fill the whole thing you don't need the hull to withstand significant pressure.
If you want a faster ascent, also add a balloon that gets inflated from a canister of liquid CO2.
Hold the valve closed with a solenoid actuator.
Rocket science is engineering, but not all engineering is rocket science.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471340</id>
	<title>Benthic Explorer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268570940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that a vehicle from James Cameron's "The Abyss"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that a vehicle from James Cameron 's " The Abyss " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that a vehicle from James Cameron's "The Abyss"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470260</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268508360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it did have multiple failsafes. and it didnt work due to glass shrapnel from the buoyancy pods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it did have multiple failsafes .
and it didnt work due to glass shrapnel from the buoyancy pods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it did have multiple failsafes.
and it didnt work due to glass shrapnel from the buoyancy pods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31473786</id>
	<title>Probably snagged by ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1268597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a local fishing net. If the Chinese figured it had aphrodisiac powers, they've probably eaten it by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a local fishing net .
If the Chinese figured it had aphrodisiac powers , they 've probably eaten it by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a local fishing net.
If the Chinese figured it had aphrodisiac powers, they've probably eaten it by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31476124</id>
	<title>Re:Is this the reason why military subs don't go d</title>
	<author>Solandri</author>
	<datestamp>1268571900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Thanks for that great explanation. Do you think that this is the reason why military subs don't go deep, because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Pretty much any military sub able to operate for long times underwater is nuclear powered.  With that as an energy source, you don't really need to worry about fine-tuning your buoyancy.  You can just propel yourself up or down.  These small research subs are battery-powered, so you don't want to waste energy fighting a slightly rising or slightly sinking craft.  Fine-tuning their buoyancy one and getting it over with saves a lot of energy.
<br> <br>
The depth limit on a big sub has more to do with the type of pressure hull they use.  A military sub uses a cylindrical pressure hull.  This results in unequal stresses in the hull around the endcaps and the bulkheads, making it weaker for the thickness of the hull.  You could make one capable of reaching 5000 m of depth, but its hull would have to be unreasonably thick and it would probably sink like a rock without a huge oil-filled gondola above it.
<br> <br>
The really deep submersibles use spherical pressure hulls.  A sphere results in equal loading on the hull, allowing you to take maximum advantage of the hull material's strength, and thus minimizing the thickness.  The deepest diving sub I know of with a cylindrical pressure hull is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NR-1\_Deep\_Submergence\_Craft" title="wikipedia.org">the US Navy's NR-1</a> [wikipedia.org] which was recently taken out of service.  It's nuclear powered, and can operate down to about 700 meters.  Officially, it was used for oceanographic research and to investigate and recover items from sunken USN vessels (it helped with debris recovery from the space shuttle Challenger accident as well).  Unofficially, everyone in the field knows it was used to help maintain <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS" title="wikipedia.org">SOSUS</a> [wikipedia.org], recover stuff from sunken Soviet vessels, and wiretapping Soviet undersea cables.
<br> <br>
Most navies also operate <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep\_Submergence\_Rescue\_Vehicle" title="wikipedia.org">DSRVs, deep submergence rescue vehicles</a> [wikipedia.org], to recover survivors from a sunken submarine.  But those use a spherical pressure hull.  Most of the submarine-like volume in front of and behind the center is filled with oil tanks for buoyancy.  The outer fairing is simply for hydrodynamics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that great explanation .
Do you think that this is the reason why military subs do n't go deep , because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system ?
Pretty much any military sub able to operate for long times underwater is nuclear powered .
With that as an energy source , you do n't really need to worry about fine-tuning your buoyancy .
You can just propel yourself up or down .
These small research subs are battery-powered , so you do n't want to waste energy fighting a slightly rising or slightly sinking craft .
Fine-tuning their buoyancy one and getting it over with saves a lot of energy .
The depth limit on a big sub has more to do with the type of pressure hull they use .
A military sub uses a cylindrical pressure hull .
This results in unequal stresses in the hull around the endcaps and the bulkheads , making it weaker for the thickness of the hull .
You could make one capable of reaching 5000 m of depth , but its hull would have to be unreasonably thick and it would probably sink like a rock without a huge oil-filled gondola above it .
The really deep submersibles use spherical pressure hulls .
A sphere results in equal loading on the hull , allowing you to take maximum advantage of the hull material 's strength , and thus minimizing the thickness .
The deepest diving sub I know of with a cylindrical pressure hull is the US Navy 's NR-1 [ wikipedia.org ] which was recently taken out of service .
It 's nuclear powered , and can operate down to about 700 meters .
Officially , it was used for oceanographic research and to investigate and recover items from sunken USN vessels ( it helped with debris recovery from the space shuttle Challenger accident as well ) .
Unofficially , everyone in the field knows it was used to help maintain SOSUS [ wikipedia.org ] , recover stuff from sunken Soviet vessels , and wiretapping Soviet undersea cables .
Most navies also operate DSRVs , deep submergence rescue vehicles [ wikipedia.org ] , to recover survivors from a sunken submarine .
But those use a spherical pressure hull .
Most of the submarine-like volume in front of and behind the center is filled with oil tanks for buoyancy .
The outer fairing is simply for hydrodynamics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that great explanation.
Do you think that this is the reason why military subs don't go deep, because otherwise they would have to use an unwieldy oil bladder based bouyancy control system?
Pretty much any military sub able to operate for long times underwater is nuclear powered.
With that as an energy source, you don't really need to worry about fine-tuning your buoyancy.
You can just propel yourself up or down.
These small research subs are battery-powered, so you don't want to waste energy fighting a slightly rising or slightly sinking craft.
Fine-tuning their buoyancy one and getting it over with saves a lot of energy.
The depth limit on a big sub has more to do with the type of pressure hull they use.
A military sub uses a cylindrical pressure hull.
This results in unequal stresses in the hull around the endcaps and the bulkheads, making it weaker for the thickness of the hull.
You could make one capable of reaching 5000 m of depth, but its hull would have to be unreasonably thick and it would probably sink like a rock without a huge oil-filled gondola above it.
The really deep submersibles use spherical pressure hulls.
A sphere results in equal loading on the hull, allowing you to take maximum advantage of the hull material's strength, and thus minimizing the thickness.
The deepest diving sub I know of with a cylindrical pressure hull is the US Navy's NR-1 [wikipedia.org] which was recently taken out of service.
It's nuclear powered, and can operate down to about 700 meters.
Officially, it was used for oceanographic research and to investigate and recover items from sunken USN vessels (it helped with debris recovery from the space shuttle Challenger accident as well).
Unofficially, everyone in the field knows it was used to help maintain SOSUS [wikipedia.org], recover stuff from sunken Soviet vessels, and wiretapping Soviet undersea cables.
Most navies also operate DSRVs, deep submergence rescue vehicles [wikipedia.org], to recover survivors from a sunken submarine.
But those use a spherical pressure hull.
Most of the submarine-like volume in front of and behind the center is filled with oil tanks for buoyancy.
The outer fairing is simply for hydrodynamics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470686</id>
	<title>Re:they where right!</title>
	<author>WinstonWolfIT</author>
	<datestamp>1268559240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spell-check has failed you young padewan. WERE. WERE.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spell-check has failed you young padewan .
WERE. WERE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spell-check has failed you young padewan.
WERE. WERE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31480724</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The biggest shame about this is that if they don't ever recover poor ABE<br>they'll never figure out exactly what happened to improve on ABE II</p><p>Although I"m sure they'll theorise plenty though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest shame about this is that if they do n't ever recover poor ABEthey 'll never figure out exactly what happened to improve on ABE IIAlthough I " m sure they 'll theorise plenty though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest shame about this is that if they don't ever recover poor ABEthey'll never figure out exactly what happened to improve on ABE IIAlthough I"m sure they'll theorise plenty though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</id>
	<title>Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>JesseL</author>
	<datestamp>1268507460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything? (If it did, it apparently didn't work)</p><p>You'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything ?
( If it did , it apparently did n't work ) You 'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if it had any kind of watchdog controlled system to inflate a flotation device or anything?
(If it did, it apparently didn't work)You'd think it would be a sensible feature to have on such an expensive and unique piece of equipment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471240</id>
	<title>Re:no skynet tag?</title>
	<author>empgodot</author>
	<datestamp>1268568960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new underwater robot overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new underwater robot overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new underwater robot overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472708</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe it saw something it shouldn't</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1268587980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If one of the glass spheres implodes at depth, then can you hear it?</p><p>Does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If one of the glass spheres implodes at depth , then can you hear it ? Does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If one of the glass spheres implodes at depth, then can you hear it?Does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471668</id>
	<title>Re:floaties?</title>
	<author>conureman</author>
	<datestamp>1268575920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you fill it with something less dense than water, (gasoline, for instance), then it saves a lot of stress on the materials. I'm sure that the art has advanced a bit since 1957, but failure is almost always still a possibility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you fill it with something less dense than water , ( gasoline , for instance ) , then it saves a lot of stress on the materials .
I 'm sure that the art has advanced a bit since 1957 , but failure is almost always still a possibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you fill it with something less dense than water, (gasoline, for instance), then it saves a lot of stress on the materials.
I'm sure that the art has advanced a bit since 1957, but failure is almost always still a possibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268508420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the WHOI press release: "<b>ABE was equipped with several independent systems to bring it back to the surface at the end of a dive or should a fault occur.</b> The Melville  remained in the vicinity to see if ABE had resurfaced, at first searching for ABE&rsquo;s strobe lights in the darkness. Researchers tried to establish radio contact with ABE in the event it had surfaced, but attempts turned up nothing."</p><p>Protip: the people that design these things can, and likely do, fit square pegs in round holes.</p><p>Suggesting "durrr, attach a balloon" is, in my not very humble opinion, insulting to the engineers behind these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the WHOI press release : " ABE was equipped with several independent systems to bring it back to the surface at the end of a dive or should a fault occur .
The Melville remained in the vicinity to see if ABE had resurfaced , at first searching for ABE    s strobe lights in the darkness .
Researchers tried to establish radio contact with ABE in the event it had surfaced , but attempts turned up nothing .
" Protip : the people that design these things can , and likely do , fit square pegs in round holes.Suggesting " durrr , attach a balloon " is , in my not very humble opinion , insulting to the engineers behind these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the WHOI press release: "ABE was equipped with several independent systems to bring it back to the surface at the end of a dive or should a fault occur.
The Melville  remained in the vicinity to see if ABE had resurfaced, at first searching for ABE’s strobe lights in the darkness.
Researchers tried to establish radio contact with ABE in the event it had surfaced, but attempts turned up nothing.
"Protip: the people that design these things can, and likely do, fit square pegs in round holes.Suggesting "durrr, attach a balloon" is, in my not very humble opinion, insulting to the engineers behind these things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470538</id>
	<title>Re:they where right!</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1268599140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We must prepare are selves</p></div></blockquote><p>Sorry, but I need to you're innate.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We must prepare are selvesSorry , but I need to you 're innate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must prepare are selvesSorry, but I need to you're innate.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470650</id>
	<title>Big Bloop?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268558280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this the same area that the "Big Bloop" was supposedly triangulated to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the same area that the " Big Bloop " was supposedly triangulated to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the same area that the "Big Bloop" was supposedly triangulated to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322</id>
	<title>Maybe it saw something it shouldn't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268570580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the increasing capability of these things being able to explore more and more of the ocean's depths, they might be stumbling upon things certain people/governments don't want them too.</p><p>How 'bout the wreck of the Thresher (U.S. Nuclear powered submarine), or the Soviet nuclear sub that the Glomar Challenger tried to bring up (under cover as a geo-physics expedition run by Howard Hughes).  I believe the Soviet sub had nuclear weapons on board (either as torpedos or missiles, maybe mines).</p><p>I think there may be a few nukes that were accidentally lost (there was a B-52 that dropped four of them off of the coast of Spain I think).  The respective governments "claimed" to have recovered them.  There's also tons of wadiowactive waste (sorry just saw Chekov in Star Trek) that Russia has dumped into the oceans; might make for a good "dirty" bomb.</p><p>My favorite is the jettisoned lunar module that the Apollo 13 crew used as a lifeboat to get them back to earth.  One of its science experiments used plutonium.  Shortly before re-entry it was released so that it would crash into the ocean in the Mariana's Trench.  (I suppose the plutonium container was designed to survive re-entry amongst other things in case of a catastrophic accident during launch).  Well now the Japanese have a R.O.V. capable of diving even there, the deepest place on the planet.</p><p>So these are just the things we know about.  Maybe there was something poor ABE ran into that was someone didn't want uncovered.  To keep their secrets safe would it be easy to put a mine that would be triggered by the rover's bright lights or sonar pings?  Might be a lot cheaper than trying to haul up say an entire nuclear sub.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the increasing capability of these things being able to explore more and more of the ocean 's depths , they might be stumbling upon things certain people/governments do n't want them too.How 'bout the wreck of the Thresher ( U.S. Nuclear powered submarine ) , or the Soviet nuclear sub that the Glomar Challenger tried to bring up ( under cover as a geo-physics expedition run by Howard Hughes ) .
I believe the Soviet sub had nuclear weapons on board ( either as torpedos or missiles , maybe mines ) .I think there may be a few nukes that were accidentally lost ( there was a B-52 that dropped four of them off of the coast of Spain I think ) .
The respective governments " claimed " to have recovered them .
There 's also tons of wadiowactive waste ( sorry just saw Chekov in Star Trek ) that Russia has dumped into the oceans ; might make for a good " dirty " bomb.My favorite is the jettisoned lunar module that the Apollo 13 crew used as a lifeboat to get them back to earth .
One of its science experiments used plutonium .
Shortly before re-entry it was released so that it would crash into the ocean in the Mariana 's Trench .
( I suppose the plutonium container was designed to survive re-entry amongst other things in case of a catastrophic accident during launch ) .
Well now the Japanese have a R.O.V .
capable of diving even there , the deepest place on the planet.So these are just the things we know about .
Maybe there was something poor ABE ran into that was someone did n't want uncovered .
To keep their secrets safe would it be easy to put a mine that would be triggered by the rover 's bright lights or sonar pings ?
Might be a lot cheaper than trying to haul up say an entire nuclear sub .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the increasing capability of these things being able to explore more and more of the ocean's depths, they might be stumbling upon things certain people/governments don't want them too.How 'bout the wreck of the Thresher (U.S. Nuclear powered submarine), or the Soviet nuclear sub that the Glomar Challenger tried to bring up (under cover as a geo-physics expedition run by Howard Hughes).
I believe the Soviet sub had nuclear weapons on board (either as torpedos or missiles, maybe mines).I think there may be a few nukes that were accidentally lost (there was a B-52 that dropped four of them off of the coast of Spain I think).
The respective governments "claimed" to have recovered them.
There's also tons of wadiowactive waste (sorry just saw Chekov in Star Trek) that Russia has dumped into the oceans; might make for a good "dirty" bomb.My favorite is the jettisoned lunar module that the Apollo 13 crew used as a lifeboat to get them back to earth.
One of its science experiments used plutonium.
Shortly before re-entry it was released so that it would crash into the ocean in the Mariana's Trench.
(I suppose the plutonium container was designed to survive re-entry amongst other things in case of a catastrophic accident during launch).
Well now the Japanese have a R.O.V.
capable of diving even there, the deepest place on the planet.So these are just the things we know about.
Maybe there was something poor ABE ran into that was someone didn't want uncovered.
To keep their secrets safe would it be easy to put a mine that would be triggered by the rover's bright lights or sonar pings?
Might be a lot cheaper than trying to haul up say an entire nuclear sub.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196</id>
	<title>no skynet tag?</title>
	<author>MoFoQ</author>
	<datestamp>1268507280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what? no skynet tag?</p><p>bet the robot became self-aware and decided "to hell with this....I'm making a break for it!"</p><p>Now, it's probably in league with those sharks with laser beams.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what ?
no skynet tag ? bet the robot became self-aware and decided " to hell with this....I 'm making a break for it !
" Now , it 's probably in league with those sharks with laser beams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what?
no skynet tag?bet the robot became self-aware and decided "to hell with this....I'm making a break for it!
"Now, it's probably in league with those sharks with laser beams.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472630</id>
	<title>Re:they where right!</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1268587080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not worried about that.  We should be concerned for our children's children, when a gigantic sea monster calling itself A'e comes up from the deep, wanting to "join with its creator".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not worried about that .
We should be concerned for our children 's children , when a gigantic sea monster calling itself A'e comes up from the deep , wanting to " join with its creator " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not worried about that.
We should be concerned for our children's children, when a gigantic sea monster calling itself A'e comes up from the deep, wanting to "join with its creator".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470928</id>
	<title>Re:Failsafe recovery?</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268562960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we cut out the "Protip" bullshit? Thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we cut out the " Protip " bullshit ?
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we cut out the "Protip" bullshit?
Thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470148</id>
	<title>first!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268506620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and now back to 4chan before i get slashdot cancer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and now back to 4chan before i get slashdot cancer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and now back to 4chan before i get slashdot cancer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31473878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31480724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31476124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31474440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_14_0353222_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31478644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31473878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472908
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475188
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31476124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31475180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31474440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31478644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470400
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471342
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31472630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_14_0353222.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470752
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31471498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31480724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_14_0353222.31470288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
