<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_13_0453229</id>
	<title>Permanent Undersea Homes Soon; Temporary Ones Now</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268482800000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>MMBK writes <i>"Dennis Chamberland is one of the world's preeminent aquanauts. He's worked with NASA to develop living habitats and underwater plant growth labs, among other cool things. His next goal is establishing the world's first permanent underwater colony. <a href="http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/3/10/the-aquatic-life-of-dennis-chamberland-one-man-s-quest-to-colonize-the-sea">This video gets to the heart of his project</a>, literally and figuratively, as most is shot in his underwater habitat, Atlantica, off the coast of Key Largo, FL. The coolest part might be the moon pool, the room you swim into underwater."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MMBK writes " Dennis Chamberland is one of the world 's preeminent aquanauts .
He 's worked with NASA to develop living habitats and underwater plant growth labs , among other cool things .
His next goal is establishing the world 's first permanent underwater colony .
This video gets to the heart of his project , literally and figuratively , as most is shot in his underwater habitat , Atlantica , off the coast of Key Largo , FL .
The coolest part might be the moon pool , the room you swim into underwater .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MMBK writes "Dennis Chamberland is one of the world's preeminent aquanauts.
He's worked with NASA to develop living habitats and underwater plant growth labs, among other cool things.
His next goal is establishing the world's first permanent underwater colony.
This video gets to the heart of his project, literally and figuratively, as most is shot in his underwater habitat, Atlantica, off the coast of Key Largo, FL.
The coolest part might be the moon pool, the room you swim into underwater.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463228</id>
	<title>Doesn't get too interesting untill they find Adam</title>
	<author>MuscaDomestica</author>
	<datestamp>1268487240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then you get the cool Plasmids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you get the cool Plasmids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you get the cool Plasmids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463204</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>h4rm0ny</author>
	<datestamp>1268486820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's about time we as a species started living in the water a bit more. I don't know why we'd approach underwater homes ahead of living on the surface first. I'm sure you'd get used to the rocking and a giant village on a raft would be great.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time we as a species started living in the water a bit more .
I do n't know why we 'd approach underwater homes ahead of living on the surface first .
I 'm sure you 'd get used to the rocking and a giant village on a raft would be great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time we as a species started living in the water a bit more.
I don't know why we'd approach underwater homes ahead of living on the surface first.
I'm sure you'd get used to the rocking and a giant village on a raft would be great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463306</id>
	<title>Funny.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268488320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've dove in that lagoon and checked out the labs they have there.  One is used as a hotel that you can book a room in, the other is a lab.  It cracked me up that through the window of the research lab I could see a small fish tank with a fish in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've dove in that lagoon and checked out the labs they have there .
One is used as a hotel that you can book a room in , the other is a lab .
It cracked me up that through the window of the research lab I could see a small fish tank with a fish in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've dove in that lagoon and checked out the labs they have there.
One is used as a hotel that you can book a room in, the other is a lab.
It cracked me up that through the window of the research lab I could see a small fish tank with a fish in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465746</id>
	<title>Lose his patent?</title>
	<author>weston</author>
	<datestamp>1268511840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you."</i></p><p>Can that actually happen?</p><p>My understanding was that the whole point of patents is that you could tell everybody about your invention and still keep a claim to exclusive licensing power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dennis Chamberland : " I 'd lose my patent if I told you .
" Can that actually happen ? My understanding was that the whole point of patents is that you could tell everybody about your invention and still keep a claim to exclusive licensing power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you.
"Can that actually happen?My understanding was that the whole point of patents is that you could tell everybody about your invention and still keep a claim to exclusive licensing power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31470636</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1268557920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was then, this is now (in the 60s we had four function calculators that weighed pounds and cost $100s).
<p>Cousteau, the inventor of the first <i> <b>commercially successful</b></i> Aqua Lung did it in '43. <i>"Sea Hunt</i> came on in '58 when I was 11 and I watched it religiously and was fascinated by the undersea world. One assignment in grade school was to write a business letter ordering something. I was about 7 or 8 and ordered  a Porpoise Model CA single hose scuba tank, regulator, fins, weights, dive knife etc. The poor addled nun gave it back to me saying there's no such thing.
</p><p> Now, going to Cozumel, or any of the popular dive sites is something that any one can do, and you don't even have to buy equipment, you can just rent. Would I live in an under water domain? Sure. I'm retired now and could see myself living there at least part time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was then , this is now ( in the 60s we had four function calculators that weighed pounds and cost $ 100s ) .
Cousteau , the inventor of the first commercially successful Aqua Lung did it in '43 .
" Sea Hunt came on in '58 when I was 11 and I watched it religiously and was fascinated by the undersea world .
One assignment in grade school was to write a business letter ordering something .
I was about 7 or 8 and ordered a Porpoise Model CA single hose scuba tank , regulator , fins , weights , dive knife etc .
The poor addled nun gave it back to me saying there 's no such thing .
Now , going to Cozumel , or any of the popular dive sites is something that any one can do , and you do n't even have to buy equipment , you can just rent .
Would I live in an under water domain ?
Sure. I 'm retired now and could see myself living there at least part time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was then, this is now (in the 60s we had four function calculators that weighed pounds and cost $100s).
Cousteau, the inventor of the first  commercially successful Aqua Lung did it in '43.
"Sea Hunt came on in '58 when I was 11 and I watched it religiously and was fascinated by the undersea world.
One assignment in grade school was to write a business letter ordering something.
I was about 7 or 8 and ordered  a Porpoise Model CA single hose scuba tank, regulator, fins, weights, dive knife etc.
The poor addled nun gave it back to me saying there's no such thing.
Now, going to Cozumel, or any of the popular dive sites is something that any one can do, and you don't even have to buy equipment, you can just rent.
Would I live in an under water domain?
Sure. I'm retired now and could see myself living there at least part time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463232</id>
	<title>A fad</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1268487300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Underwater living causes bends and depressin, becasue of the altered lite. Also if a turtle noks into your wall you will die!!!!!@@!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Underwater living causes bends and depressin , becasue of the altered lite .
Also if a turtle noks into your wall you will die ! ! ! ! !
@ @ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Underwater living causes bends and depressin, becasue of the altered lite.
Also if a turtle noks into your wall you will die!!!!!
@@!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31480796</id>
	<title>Like 2012</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1268661600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw the movie where everything is almost underwater in the movie 2012, and i think learning to build big mobile underwater habitats is a wickedly good idea, just in case...i'm just saying</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw the movie where everything is almost underwater in the movie 2012 , and i think learning to build big mobile underwater habitats is a wickedly good idea , just in case...i 'm just saying</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw the movie where everything is almost underwater in the movie 2012, and i think learning to build big mobile underwater habitats is a wickedly good idea, just in case...i'm just saying</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463222</id>
	<title>seasteading.org</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1268487120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In won't be government agencies that will develop the first successful seasteads (and someday spacesteads), it will be the people trying to get away from them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In wo n't be government agencies that will develop the first successful seasteads ( and someday spacesteads ) , it will be the people trying to get away from them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In won't be government agencies that will develop the first successful seasteads (and someday spacesteads), it will be the people trying to get away from them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464036</id>
	<title>How is this being financed?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1268497020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They really need to beware of predatory lending practices when financing these habitats... they could very easily become underwater on their mortgage!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They really need to beware of predatory lending practices when financing these habitats... they could very easily become underwater on their mortgage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They really need to beware of predatory lending practices when financing these habitats... they could very easily become underwater on their mortgage!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464560</id>
	<title>Cool idea, but what's the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268502120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bubble house isn't getting any benefit from being in the water.  All the resources come from the surface.</p><p>Might as well set it on a parking lot.  Then it doesn't even need to be airtight.</p><p>I really wonder where the waste water goes.  Doubtful they're flushing the toilet into the lagoon.  Probably has a pipe buried beneath the floor that pumps<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......... back to the surface!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bubble house is n't getting any benefit from being in the water .
All the resources come from the surface.Might as well set it on a parking lot .
Then it does n't even need to be airtight.I really wonder where the waste water goes .
Doubtful they 're flushing the toilet into the lagoon .
Probably has a pipe buried beneath the floor that pumps ......... back to the surface !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bubble house isn't getting any benefit from being in the water.
All the resources come from the surface.Might as well set it on a parking lot.
Then it doesn't even need to be airtight.I really wonder where the waste water goes.
Doubtful they're flushing the toilet into the lagoon.
Probably has a pipe buried beneath the floor that pumps ......... back to the surface!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31471300</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>DavidShor</author>
	<datestamp>1268570160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_waters" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_waters</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_Seabed\_Authority" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_Seabed\_Authority</a> [wikipedia.org] are instructive.
<p>.</p><p>
Basically, it's not allowed to "own" parcels of ocean far off the coast, and everything you do is subject to the International Tribunal of the law of the Sea or the International Seabed Authority.
</p><p>
The whole "International Waters as a free-for-all" thing is really a bit of a myth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International \ _waters [ wikipedia.org ] and http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International \ _Seabed \ _Authority [ wikipedia.org ] are instructive .
. Basically , it 's not allowed to " own " parcels of ocean far off the coast , and everything you do is subject to the International Tribunal of the law of the Sea or the International Seabed Authority .
The whole " International Waters as a free-for-all " thing is really a bit of a myth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_waters [wikipedia.org] and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International\_Seabed\_Authority [wikipedia.org] are instructive.
.
Basically, it's not allowed to "own" parcels of ocean far off the coast, and everything you do is subject to the International Tribunal of the law of the Sea or the International Seabed Authority.
The whole "International Waters as a free-for-all" thing is really a bit of a myth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464668</id>
	<title>Hygiene</title>
	<author>IonOtter</author>
	<datestamp>1268503140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing they didn't cover very much, is the one thing that is actually most important:  hygiene.</p><p>Bacteria and especially fungi absolutely thrive under pressure, and a mild case of Athlete's Foot can rapidly become severe, even hazardous as the infection gets worse.  Fungal infections were one of the most serious problems onboard the previous endeavors, as they were impossible to eradicate once established in the living areas.  Bacterial infections were even more dangerous, as the partial pressure ratio of gases in the atmosphere-and also the bloodstream-effectively doubles, giving the bugs plenty of fuel.</p><p>They did touch on the hygiene issue with the shower, but didn't say why other than the obvious reasons?  But if you're going to live underwater, under more than one atmosphere, hygiene becomes absolutely vital.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing they did n't cover very much , is the one thing that is actually most important : hygiene.Bacteria and especially fungi absolutely thrive under pressure , and a mild case of Athlete 's Foot can rapidly become severe , even hazardous as the infection gets worse .
Fungal infections were one of the most serious problems onboard the previous endeavors , as they were impossible to eradicate once established in the living areas .
Bacterial infections were even more dangerous , as the partial pressure ratio of gases in the atmosphere-and also the bloodstream-effectively doubles , giving the bugs plenty of fuel.They did touch on the hygiene issue with the shower , but did n't say why other than the obvious reasons ?
But if you 're going to live underwater , under more than one atmosphere , hygiene becomes absolutely vital .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing they didn't cover very much, is the one thing that is actually most important:  hygiene.Bacteria and especially fungi absolutely thrive under pressure, and a mild case of Athlete's Foot can rapidly become severe, even hazardous as the infection gets worse.
Fungal infections were one of the most serious problems onboard the previous endeavors, as they were impossible to eradicate once established in the living areas.
Bacterial infections were even more dangerous, as the partial pressure ratio of gases in the atmosphere-and also the bloodstream-effectively doubles, giving the bugs plenty of fuel.They did touch on the hygiene issue with the shower, but didn't say why other than the obvious reasons?
But if you're going to live underwater, under more than one atmosphere, hygiene becomes absolutely vital.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466108</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268470980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, consider the novelty of, say, an underwater shopping mall. Suppose you have a large, walk-through entrance near the coast, glass everywhere, and you can spend the afternoon in coffee shops, department stores, a park, etc. all while looking up and out and beautiful sea creatures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , consider the novelty of , say , an underwater shopping mall .
Suppose you have a large , walk-through entrance near the coast , glass everywhere , and you can spend the afternoon in coffee shops , department stores , a park , etc .
all while looking up and out and beautiful sea creatures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, consider the novelty of, say, an underwater shopping mall.
Suppose you have a large, walk-through entrance near the coast, glass everywhere, and you can spend the afternoon in coffee shops, department stores, a park, etc.
all while looking up and out and beautiful sea creatures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463842</id>
	<title>Global warming solution. . .</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1268494740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here we go - just start replacing current coastal buildings with these, and when the sea level rises 8 or 10 feet, everyone will be ready.</p><p>[JohnHodgemanVoice]You're welcome![/JohnHodgemanVoice]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here we go - just start replacing current coastal buildings with these , and when the sea level rises 8 or 10 feet , everyone will be ready .
[ JohnHodgemanVoice ] You 're welcome !
[ /JohnHodgemanVoice ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here we go - just start replacing current coastal buildings with these, and when the sea level rises 8 or 10 feet, everyone will be ready.
[JohnHodgemanVoice]You're welcome!
[/JohnHodgemanVoice]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463318</id>
	<title>Unda da sea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268488440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for that lame song in my head all day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for that lame song in my head all day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for that lame song in my head all day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463990</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268496540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  It sounds like a real pain in the ass.  It might be cool to have an underwater hotel, but I think I would get sick of this after about a week.  On the plus side, I wouldn't have to worry about niggers breaking into my house since most of them are afraid of water.  Wetbacks - well that's another story.  They love to swim, but mostly only in the Rio Grande.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
It sounds like a real pain in the ass .
It might be cool to have an underwater hotel , but I think I would get sick of this after about a week .
On the plus side , I would n't have to worry about niggers breaking into my house since most of them are afraid of water .
Wetbacks - well that 's another story .
They love to swim , but mostly only in the Rio Grande .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
It sounds like a real pain in the ass.
It might be cool to have an underwater hotel, but I think I would get sick of this after about a week.
On the plus side, I wouldn't have to worry about niggers breaking into my house since most of them are afraid of water.
Wetbacks - well that's another story.
They love to swim, but mostly only in the Rio Grande.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464376</id>
	<title>You have to look with better eyes than that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268500140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There have been underwater habitats off of key largo for a while now, since the sixties, at least, and from what I've seen (in ads for UW vacations, and a discovery special about a UMD research vessel) they're pretty cramped.  Also, they're saturation dives albeit shallow ones.</p><p>I wouldn't want to live in anything with a moon pool for the saturation reason alone, leaving out the small space and constant danger.  It certainly wouldn't be a good place to raise a family (what would extended saturation dives do for children's developing bones, I wonder.)</p><p>Considering the expense and danger, these things will always be just a curiosity. A pretty neat one, though.  I wish they'd kept the Abyss set open for dive tourism.  That would've been a pretty awesome dive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have been underwater habitats off of key largo for a while now , since the sixties , at least , and from what I 've seen ( in ads for UW vacations , and a discovery special about a UMD research vessel ) they 're pretty cramped .
Also , they 're saturation dives albeit shallow ones.I would n't want to live in anything with a moon pool for the saturation reason alone , leaving out the small space and constant danger .
It certainly would n't be a good place to raise a family ( what would extended saturation dives do for children 's developing bones , I wonder .
) Considering the expense and danger , these things will always be just a curiosity .
A pretty neat one , though .
I wish they 'd kept the Abyss set open for dive tourism .
That would 've been a pretty awesome dive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have been underwater habitats off of key largo for a while now, since the sixties, at least, and from what I've seen (in ads for UW vacations, and a discovery special about a UMD research vessel) they're pretty cramped.
Also, they're saturation dives albeit shallow ones.I wouldn't want to live in anything with a moon pool for the saturation reason alone, leaving out the small space and constant danger.
It certainly wouldn't be a good place to raise a family (what would extended saturation dives do for children's developing bones, I wonder.
)Considering the expense and danger, these things will always be just a curiosity.
A pretty neat one, though.
I wish they'd kept the Abyss set open for dive tourism.
That would've been a pretty awesome dive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268488860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With 1960's technology.  He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.  But using modern technology it could be.</p><p>While I wouldn't want to live underwater myself, if this is done responsibly I am all for it.  We talk about colonizing space, this is actually a step in that direction, and a lot cheaper and will push the same types of technology if we are ever going to colonize space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With 1960 's technology .
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then .
But using modern technology it could be.While I would n't want to live underwater myself , if this is done responsibly I am all for it .
We talk about colonizing space , this is actually a step in that direction , and a lot cheaper and will push the same types of technology if we are ever going to colonize space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With 1960's technology.
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.
But using modern technology it could be.While I wouldn't want to live underwater myself, if this is done responsibly I am all for it.
We talk about colonizing space, this is actually a step in that direction, and a lot cheaper and will push the same types of technology if we are ever going to colonize space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464910</id>
	<title>Will it allow me to escape Obamacare?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268505480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DO...  NOT... WANT!!!</p><p>Obongo: "We're going to make sure every man, woman, and child has insurance, regardless of pre-existing conditions."</p><p>Public: "But doesn't that defeat the point of insurance?  Isn't that a bit like buying homeowner's insurance after your house has already burned down?  Why wouldn't I just drop my insurance, pay the federal fine, and then if I ever really need health insurance just buy it then?"</p><p>Obongo: "Insurance companies are evil profit whores, but we're going to pay them directly with tax dollars to add millions of new customers.  That will show those greedy motherfuckers!"</p><p>Public: "What?  That doesn't even make sense."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DO... NOT... WANT ! !
! Obongo : " We 're going to make sure every man , woman , and child has insurance , regardless of pre-existing conditions .
" Public : " But does n't that defeat the point of insurance ?
Is n't that a bit like buying homeowner 's insurance after your house has already burned down ?
Why would n't I just drop my insurance , pay the federal fine , and then if I ever really need health insurance just buy it then ?
" Obongo : " Insurance companies are evil profit whores , but we 're going to pay them directly with tax dollars to add millions of new customers .
That will show those greedy motherfuckers !
" Public : " What ?
That does n't even make sense .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DO...  NOT... WANT!!
!Obongo: "We're going to make sure every man, woman, and child has insurance, regardless of pre-existing conditions.
"Public: "But doesn't that defeat the point of insurance?
Isn't that a bit like buying homeowner's insurance after your house has already burned down?
Why wouldn't I just drop my insurance, pay the federal fine, and then if I ever really need health insurance just buy it then?
"Obongo: "Insurance companies are evil profit whores, but we're going to pay them directly with tax dollars to add millions of new customers.
That will show those greedy motherfuckers!
"Public: "What?
That doesn't even make sense.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463710</id>
	<title>Yay!</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1268493360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... no more having to mow the lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... no more having to mow the lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... no more having to mow the lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322</id>
	<title>Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268488560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Sounds cool, but I think there are some practical downsides to living underwater.&nbsp; UPS/Fedex deliveries.&nbsp; Service calls.&nbsp; Public utilities (fresh water, sewer, electrical, gas).&nbsp; General safety in the face of disasters becomes much more of a concern.<br><br>Water cooling your servers might be easier--as long as the saltwater doesn't corrode your fittings.<br><br>Best leave this to plant growth labs instead of primary living quarters.<br><br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds cool , but I think there are some practical downsides to living underwater.   UPS/Fedex deliveries.   Service calls.   Public utilities ( fresh water , sewer , electrical , gas ) .   General safety in the face of disasters becomes much more of a concern.Water cooling your servers might be easier--as long as the saltwater does n't corrode your fittings.Best leave this to plant growth labs instead of primary living quarters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds cool, but I think there are some practical downsides to living underwater.  UPS/Fedex deliveries.  Service calls.  Public utilities (fresh water, sewer, electrical, gas).  General safety in the face of disasters becomes much more of a concern.Water cooling your servers might be easier--as long as the saltwater doesn't corrode your fittings.Best leave this to plant growth labs instead of primary living quarters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466796</id>
	<title>Another source for the video?</title>
	<author>Willbur</author>
	<datestamp>1268475780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  The video isn't playing for me.  Is there another version out there?  I found this: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMCtzuEoOlM" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMCtzuEoOlM</a> [youtube.com] , but it's only a short ad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The video is n't playing for me .
Is there another version out there ?
I found this : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = EMCtzuEoOlM [ youtube.com ] , but it 's only a short ad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  The video isn't playing for me.
Is there another version out there?
I found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMCtzuEoOlM [youtube.com] , but it's only a short ad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465860</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Risha</author>
	<datestamp>1268512680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.aboardtheworld.com/" title="aboardtheworld.com" rel="nofollow">Permanent cruise ship homes</a> [aboardtheworld.com] already exist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Permanent cruise ship homes [ aboardtheworld.com ] already exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Permanent cruise ship homes [aboardtheworld.com] already exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463952</id>
	<title>Woot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268496180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an avid diver, I think this is totally awesome!</p><p>I would be completely down to move in somewhere like this. For my whole life? Of course not. For months at a time - absolutely!<br>He's right about us trashing the oceans; watching coral reefs bleach and die over the years is incredibly depressing, not to mention the Japanese affinity for whales....</p><p>Video was slashdotted, been able to watch a couple minutes so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an avid diver , I think this is totally awesome ! I would be completely down to move in somewhere like this .
For my whole life ?
Of course not .
For months at a time - absolutely ! He 's right about us trashing the oceans ; watching coral reefs bleach and die over the years is incredibly depressing , not to mention the Japanese affinity for whales....Video was slashdotted , been able to watch a couple minutes so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an avid diver, I think this is totally awesome!I would be completely down to move in somewhere like this.
For my whole life?
Of course not.
For months at a time - absolutely!He's right about us trashing the oceans; watching coral reefs bleach and die over the years is incredibly depressing, not to mention the Japanese affinity for whales....Video was slashdotted, been able to watch a couple minutes so far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1268489520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot." Besides the beautiful scenery, what exactly is the purpose of living underwater?  You can't go outside.  You won't have any neighbors per se.  The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient, which means expensive and perfect, and you can't make improvements to it.  So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn.  And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.</p><p>In short, I think you're going to spend the entire time wanting to go to the surface, so you can go shopping, eat at a restaurant, hold down a job, or make friends.  Forced exile is useful...how?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I 'm torn between " visionary " and " crackpot .
" Besides the beautiful scenery , what exactly is the purpose of living underwater ?
You ca n't go outside .
You wo n't have any neighbors per se .
The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient , which means expensive and perfect , and you ca n't make improvements to it .
So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn .
And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.In short , I think you 're going to spend the entire time wanting to go to the surface , so you can go shopping , eat at a restaurant , hold down a job , or make friends .
Forced exile is useful...how ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot.
" Besides the beautiful scenery, what exactly is the purpose of living underwater?
You can't go outside.
You won't have any neighbors per se.
The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient, which means expensive and perfect, and you can't make improvements to it.
So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn.
And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.In short, I think you're going to spend the entire time wanting to go to the surface, so you can go shopping, eat at a restaurant, hold down a job, or make friends.
Forced exile is useful...how?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463462</id>
	<title>Sales Pitch...</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1268490240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, sure it ain't one of those la di da above ground places, but if you like dank... hey forget about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , sure it ai n't one of those la di da above ground places , but if you like dank... hey forget about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, sure it ain't one of those la di da above ground places, but if you like dank... hey forget about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463288</id>
	<title>Where's my frickin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268488020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..flying car?

I wont be happy until I can fly home and play Duke Nukem Forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..flying car ?
I wont be happy until I can fly home and play Duke Nukem Forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..flying car?
I wont be happy until I can fly home and play Duke Nukem Forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464154</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>KarlIsNotMyName</author>
	<datestamp>1268498280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like moving to another, living underwater might keep you safe from certain mass extinction events on the surface of the Earth.</p><p>We could also build a city a few hundred feet under the surface. Wouldn't be able to sustain it without the resources on the surface for quite a while yet, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like moving to another , living underwater might keep you safe from certain mass extinction events on the surface of the Earth.We could also build a city a few hundred feet under the surface .
Would n't be able to sustain it without the resources on the surface for quite a while yet , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like moving to another, living underwater might keep you safe from certain mass extinction events on the surface of the Earth.We could also build a city a few hundred feet under the surface.
Wouldn't be able to sustain it without the resources on the surface for quite a while yet, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31504898</id>
	<title>Re:Unda da sea</title>
	<author>zurmikopa</author>
	<datestamp>1268760360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gah! Now you've infected us all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gah !
Now you 've infected us all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gah!
Now you've infected us all!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464922</id>
	<title>A new life, under the sea</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1268505600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Under the sea,<br>under the sea.<br>No accusations,<br>just friendly crustaceans,<br>under the sea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Under the sea,under the sea.No accusations,just friendly crustaceans,under the sea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Under the sea,under the sea.No accusations,just friendly crustaceans,under the sea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268496900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure about sea-steading as a reliable way of life but escaping tyrannical gov'ts might be an interesting exercise. As far as I understand, the coastal shelf is in most areas 'claimed' already by one country or another, and I don't think we have the technology to build far enough away from the "shallow" water over the shelves to reasonably escape gov't claims to the area. I could be wrong - I've never seen maps of the sea borders of coastal countries, nor do I know what the laws are regarding owning "land" in areas off the coast, and whether you could declare undeveloped seabed as unclaimed for the purposes of claiming it as an independent nation.

<br> <br>You're really on point there - might as well buy your way into a nicer country, assuming you can find one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure about sea-steading as a reliable way of life but escaping tyrannical gov'ts might be an interesting exercise .
As far as I understand , the coastal shelf is in most areas 'claimed ' already by one country or another , and I do n't think we have the technology to build far enough away from the " shallow " water over the shelves to reasonably escape gov't claims to the area .
I could be wrong - I 've never seen maps of the sea borders of coastal countries , nor do I know what the laws are regarding owning " land " in areas off the coast , and whether you could declare undeveloped seabed as unclaimed for the purposes of claiming it as an independent nation .
You 're really on point there - might as well buy your way into a nicer country , assuming you can find one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure about sea-steading as a reliable way of life but escaping tyrannical gov'ts might be an interesting exercise.
As far as I understand, the coastal shelf is in most areas 'claimed' already by one country or another, and I don't think we have the technology to build far enough away from the "shallow" water over the shelves to reasonably escape gov't claims to the area.
I could be wrong - I've never seen maps of the sea borders of coastal countries, nor do I know what the laws are regarding owning "land" in areas off the coast, and whether you could declare undeveloped seabed as unclaimed for the purposes of claiming it as an independent nation.
You're really on point there - might as well buy your way into a nicer country, assuming you can find one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465712</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1268511600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The other thing you could do is unobtainium mining. Since most of the sea floor has not been mined, we could mine for stuff like platinum, gold, indium, and those trendy rare-earth metals. There's also uranium and thorium everywhere and no-one will care if you build a nuclear power plant out there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The other thing you could do is unobtainium mining .
Since most of the sea floor has not been mined , we could mine for stuff like platinum , gold , indium , and those trendy rare-earth metals .
There 's also uranium and thorium everywhere and no-one will care if you build a nuclear power plant out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The other thing you could do is unobtainium mining.
Since most of the sea floor has not been mined, we could mine for stuff like platinum, gold, indium, and those trendy rare-earth metals.
There's also uranium and thorium everywhere and no-one will care if you build a nuclear power plant out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466294</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268472120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think that the world population will level off anytime soon?<br>The only way I can see that happening is if food production can't keep up.  When that happens, we'll just have more wars, starving people, and dead.<br>Not exactly a good outcome, in my opinion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think that the world population will level off anytime soon ? The only way I can see that happening is if food production ca n't keep up .
When that happens , we 'll just have more wars , starving people , and dead.Not exactly a good outcome , in my opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think that the world population will level off anytime soon?The only way I can see that happening is if food production can't keep up.
When that happens, we'll just have more wars, starving people, and dead.Not exactly a good outcome, in my opinion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464748</id>
	<title>Beneath the surface..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268504160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lies the future! SeaQuest FTW</p><p>Cool show.. except for when it went (way) off the rails on occasion.</p><p>About damn time we started colonizing the ocean one way or another.. there's a whole lot of space out there!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lies the future !
SeaQuest FTWCool show.. except for when it went ( way ) off the rails on occasion.About damn time we started colonizing the ocean one way or another.. there 's a whole lot of space out there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lies the future!
SeaQuest FTWCool show.. except for when it went (way) off the rails on occasion.About damn time we started colonizing the ocean one way or another.. there's a whole lot of space out there!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463984</id>
	<title>Oblig Simpsons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268496480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Homer: Stupid Flounders</htmltext>
<tokenext>Homer : Stupid Flounders</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Homer: Stupid Flounders</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463358</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268489100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One interesting problem that they encountered was human waste disposal.</p><p>Their first approach was to vent it into the surrounding water directly. They had to stop doing this after the turds started floating to the surface and lingering. Most people don't realize this, but the Red Sea is actually quite calm due to it almost being a lake. These lingering turds posed a health risk, so they had to find an alternative method.</p><p>Their next approach was to store the feces and urine in plastic bags. This proved to be a better solution, but often times they suffered from burst bags that spilled their contents all over, a shortage of bags, and stockpiles of bags when a trip to the surface had to be postponed.</p><p>The project was canceled at this point, so they never tried any additional methods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One interesting problem that they encountered was human waste disposal.Their first approach was to vent it into the surrounding water directly .
They had to stop doing this after the turds started floating to the surface and lingering .
Most people do n't realize this , but the Red Sea is actually quite calm due to it almost being a lake .
These lingering turds posed a health risk , so they had to find an alternative method.Their next approach was to store the feces and urine in plastic bags .
This proved to be a better solution , but often times they suffered from burst bags that spilled their contents all over , a shortage of bags , and stockpiles of bags when a trip to the surface had to be postponed.The project was canceled at this point , so they never tried any additional methods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One interesting problem that they encountered was human waste disposal.Their first approach was to vent it into the surrounding water directly.
They had to stop doing this after the turds started floating to the surface and lingering.
Most people don't realize this, but the Red Sea is actually quite calm due to it almost being a lake.
These lingering turds posed a health risk, so they had to find an alternative method.Their next approach was to store the feces and urine in plastic bags.
This proved to be a better solution, but often times they suffered from burst bags that spilled their contents all over, a shortage of bags, and stockpiles of bags when a trip to the surface had to be postponed.The project was canceled at this point, so they never tried any additional methods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464202</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268498640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With 1960's technology.  He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.</p></div><p>You mean, if you give the people Internet access and Slashdot, they will happily forget that the view out of the window isn't that great?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With 1960 's technology .
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.You mean , if you give the people Internet access and Slashdot , they will happily forget that the view out of the window is n't that great ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With 1960's technology.
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.You mean, if you give the people Internet access and Slashdot, they will happily forget that the view out of the window isn't that great?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464514</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268501760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes I'm sure it would be lovely until the smokers who live on a giant oil tanker show up and ruins your day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes I 'm sure it would be lovely until the smokers who live on a giant oil tanker show up and ruins your day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes I'm sure it would be lovely until the smokers who live on a giant oil tanker show up and ruins your day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468182</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1268486460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot."<br><br>That's a false dichotomy.  It's entirely possible to be both.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Yeah I 'm torn between " visionary " and " crackpot .
" That 's a false dichotomy .
It 's entirely possible to be both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot.
"That's a false dichotomy.
It's entirely possible to be both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463726</id>
	<title>Andrew Ryan anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268493540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where the hell is the Bioshock tag guys<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where the hell is the Bioshock tag guys : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where the hell is the Bioshock tag guys :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268495340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just can't see the motivation for living underwater, outside of a couple of tiny niches like deep-sea mining or off-shore oil drilling. The latest estimates are that world population will level off fairly soon, and there really is no shortage of land. Even for eccentrics who want to live in isolation near the water, it would probably be cheaper and logistically easier to build a cottage somewhere on the coast line far away from the city.
<p> . </p><p>
Some people have brought up sea-steading or escaping tyrannical governments, but wouldn't a cruise ships fill that role more effectively at a fraction of the cost? (That's assuming the thinking of the movement is sound. The French are not exactly tyrants, but they had no problem bombing that green-peace vessel in the 80's. If you're rich enough to live in an underwater city, you're probably better off buying your way into to a nice Western Country...)
</p><p>
Maybe I'm missing something. Feel free to fill me in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't see the motivation for living underwater , outside of a couple of tiny niches like deep-sea mining or off-shore oil drilling .
The latest estimates are that world population will level off fairly soon , and there really is no shortage of land .
Even for eccentrics who want to live in isolation near the water , it would probably be cheaper and logistically easier to build a cottage somewhere on the coast line far away from the city .
. Some people have brought up sea-steading or escaping tyrannical governments , but would n't a cruise ships fill that role more effectively at a fraction of the cost ?
( That 's assuming the thinking of the movement is sound .
The French are not exactly tyrants , but they had no problem bombing that green-peace vessel in the 80 's .
If you 're rich enough to live in an underwater city , you 're probably better off buying your way into to a nice Western Country... ) Maybe I 'm missing something .
Feel free to fill me in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't see the motivation for living underwater, outside of a couple of tiny niches like deep-sea mining or off-shore oil drilling.
The latest estimates are that world population will level off fairly soon, and there really is no shortage of land.
Even for eccentrics who want to live in isolation near the water, it would probably be cheaper and logistically easier to build a cottage somewhere on the coast line far away from the city.
. 
Some people have brought up sea-steading or escaping tyrannical governments, but wouldn't a cruise ships fill that role more effectively at a fraction of the cost?
(That's assuming the thinking of the movement is sound.
The French are not exactly tyrants, but they had no problem bombing that green-peace vessel in the 80's.
If you're rich enough to live in an underwater city, you're probably better off buying your way into to a nice Western Country...)

Maybe I'm missing something.
Feel free to fill me in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463998</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Hausx</author>
	<datestamp>1268496600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because you can't develop plasmids in the nice Western Countries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because you ca n't develop plasmids in the nice Western Countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because you can't develop plasmids in the nice Western Countries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468940</id>
	<title>Re:Lose his patent?</title>
	<author>BillX</author>
	<datestamp>1268492760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If so, it means it's a patent application he's "thinking about" but hasn't actually filed yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If so , it means it 's a patent application he 's " thinking about " but has n't actually filed yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so, it means it's a patent application he's "thinking about" but hasn't actually filed yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465750</id>
	<title>Re:he's patented the key technology</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1268511840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Carbon dioxide scrubbing is already a solved problem. You mix baking soda with quick lime (CaO) and produce limestone. You then heat up the limestone and release the carbon dioxide gas in a closed container.<br> <br>

If he does have a better CO2 capture method, he should use it to capture CO2 from the air, as CO2 + Hydrogen = gasoline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Carbon dioxide scrubbing is already a solved problem .
You mix baking soda with quick lime ( CaO ) and produce limestone .
You then heat up the limestone and release the carbon dioxide gas in a closed container .
If he does have a better CO2 capture method , he should use it to capture CO2 from the air , as CO2 + Hydrogen = gasoline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carbon dioxide scrubbing is already a solved problem.
You mix baking soda with quick lime (CaO) and produce limestone.
You then heat up the limestone and release the carbon dioxide gas in a closed container.
If he does have a better CO2 capture method, he should use it to capture CO2 from the air, as CO2 + Hydrogen = gasoline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520</id>
	<title>Anybody Remember Seaquest</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1268491080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a SciFi series called Seaquest DSV Starring Roy Sheider. TheSub of the title went round patrolling among undersea colonies.<br>The second season was called Seaquest 2032.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a SciFi series called Seaquest DSV Starring Roy Sheider .
TheSub of the title went round patrolling among undersea colonies.The second season was called Seaquest 2032 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a SciFi series called Seaquest DSV Starring Roy Sheider.
TheSub of the title went round patrolling among undersea colonies.The second season was called Seaquest 2032.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464640</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268502840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly are they using in terms of technology that was invented after the 60's?<br>Stainless steel? 1821<br>Rubber gaskets? 1839<br>Tempered glass? 1943</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly are they using in terms of technology that was invented after the 60 's ? Stainless steel ?
1821Rubber gaskets ?
1839Tempered glass ?
1943</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly are they using in terms of technology that was invented after the 60's?Stainless steel?
1821Rubber gaskets?
1839Tempered glass?
1943</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192</id>
	<title>Cousteau</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268486520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was tried in the 1960s in the Red Sea</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was tried in the 1960s in the Red Sea</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was tried in the 1960s in the Red Sea</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464274</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot." Besides the beautiful scenery, what exactly is the purpose of living underwater? You can't go outside. You won't have any neighbors per se. The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient, which means expensive and perfect, and you can't make improvements to it. So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn. And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.</p></div><p>So basically you're saying that this will make an almost perfect selection process for future astronauts.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I 'm torn between " visionary " and " crackpot .
" Besides the beautiful scenery , what exactly is the purpose of living underwater ?
You ca n't go outside .
You wo n't have any neighbors per se .
The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient , which means expensive and perfect , and you ca n't make improvements to it .
So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn .
And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.So basically you 're saying that this will make an almost perfect selection process for future astronauts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I'm torn between "visionary" and "crackpot.
" Besides the beautiful scenery, what exactly is the purpose of living underwater?
You can't go outside.
You won't have any neighbors per se.
The whole house has got to be completely self-sufficient, which means expensive and perfect, and you can't make improvements to it.
So much for teaching your kids to play baseball or mowing the lawn.
And the lack of sunshine is a psychological disaster waiting to happen.So basically you're saying that this will make an almost perfect selection process for future astronauts.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464056</id>
	<title>Giant Sea Monsters!</title>
	<author>bipbop</author>
	<datestamp>1268497380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, I'd be afraid living at the bottom of the sea, because of abyssal gigantism (look it up!).  This may be a bit irrational on my part, but there's some HUGE monsters, and over time we just seem to discover scarier and huger ones, like Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni.  Even if it turned out to be perfectly safe, I'd be harboring an irrational fear of these beasts CRUSHING MY HOUSE while I lived there.  Yikes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I 'd be afraid living at the bottom of the sea , because of abyssal gigantism ( look it up ! ) .
This may be a bit irrational on my part , but there 's some HUGE monsters , and over time we just seem to discover scarier and huger ones , like Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni .
Even if it turned out to be perfectly safe , I 'd be harboring an irrational fear of these beasts CRUSHING MY HOUSE while I lived there .
Yikes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I'd be afraid living at the bottom of the sea, because of abyssal gigantism (look it up!).
This may be a bit irrational on my part, but there's some HUGE monsters, and over time we just seem to discover scarier and huger ones, like Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni.
Even if it turned out to be perfectly safe, I'd be harboring an irrational fear of these beasts CRUSHING MY HOUSE while I lived there.
Yikes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463264</id>
	<title>Rapture?</title>
	<author>thePowersGang</author>
	<datestamp>1268487660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope to god this doesn't turn into a real life Bioshock... or maybe not, Rapture seems like a cool idea without the Adam mutated splicers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope to god this does n't turn into a real life Bioshock... or maybe not , Rapture seems like a cool idea without the Adam mutated splicers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope to god this doesn't turn into a real life Bioshock... or maybe not, Rapture seems like a cool idea without the Adam mutated splicers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465124</id>
	<title>I can see it now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268507100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am Andrew Ryan.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Andrew Ryan.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Andrew Ryan.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31475586</id>
	<title>Re:he's patented the key technology</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268567520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He&rsquo;s a total idiot:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you."</p></div><p> <strong>All</strong> patents are <em>by definition</em> published openly! Or else nobody could check if it&rsquo;s patented. Here&rsquo;s one I found in a 5 second Google search: <a href="http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090054763" title="faqs.org">http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090054763</a> [faqs.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He    s a total idiot : Dennis Chamberland : " I 'd lose my patent if I told you .
" All patents are by definition published openly !
Or else nobody could check if it    s patented .
Here    s one I found in a 5 second Google search : http : //www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090054763 [ faqs.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He’s a total idiot:Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you.
" All patents are by definition published openly!
Or else nobody could check if it’s patented.
Here’s one I found in a 5 second Google search: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090054763 [faqs.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465356</id>
	<title>Re:Asimov?</title>
	<author>Mark J Tilford</author>
	<datestamp>1268508900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waterclap</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waterclap</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waterclap</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468468</id>
	<title>Aquarius habitat has been doing this for decades</title>
	<author>DeanPentcheff</author>
	<datestamp>1268488680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very peculiar that nowhere in the discussion here or Chamberland's video does anyone mention NOAA's Aquarius habitat, in operation since 1988: <a href="http://www.uncw.edu/aquarius/" title="uncw.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.uncw.edu/aquarius/</a> [uncw.edu] . Aquarius has been in operation as a civilian research station underwater off Key Largo for years. Before that it was in the Virgin Islands. It is operated by NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) for marine biology research and NASA training. It's an amazing place where researchers get to do 10-day research projects that would be difficult or impossible to run from the surface.</p><p>But what's not mentioned by Chamberland or anyone involved in his little promo piece is that living underwater is grueling. You're in a single-wide trailer equivalent with multiple other people. Going outside is wonderfully liberating, but y'know, it's cold. Even in Florida, once you've been in the water for a few hours, you're cold. Then you do it again. And again. It's humid and pretty much everyone gets skin problems after a few days.</p><p>And you can't come up. You've saturated to 55-foot depth after a day, so you'd get the bends if you surfaced. So all your diving is done with cave-diving rigs that are designed for diving where there's no surface to go to. If you get in trouble, you have to get back to the habitat, not the surface. Oh, you'd probably survive if you had to surface, but it wouldn't be healthy or pretty. At the end of the 10-day mission it takes 18 hours to decompress to surface pressure.</p><p>That said, it is really truly astounding to live underwater for a while. Looking out through the window at dinner at the fish, and realizing that they're looking at you: you're the one in the aquarium. It's a trip.</p><p>But it's an incredibly resource-intensive thing to do. Rough estimates I recall from my Aquarius trips were that it cost about US$10,000 per day to support four researchers in the habitat. That's not sustainable for daily life.</p><p>As far as I can tell, Dennis Chamberland wants to set up some sort of high-end hotel-like underwater facility. More power to him. But don't pretend that we're all going to have the chance to go live under the ocean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very peculiar that nowhere in the discussion here or Chamberland 's video does anyone mention NOAA 's Aquarius habitat , in operation since 1988 : http : //www.uncw.edu/aquarius/ [ uncw.edu ] .
Aquarius has been in operation as a civilian research station underwater off Key Largo for years .
Before that it was in the Virgin Islands .
It is operated by NOAA ( the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ) for marine biology research and NASA training .
It 's an amazing place where researchers get to do 10-day research projects that would be difficult or impossible to run from the surface.But what 's not mentioned by Chamberland or anyone involved in his little promo piece is that living underwater is grueling .
You 're in a single-wide trailer equivalent with multiple other people .
Going outside is wonderfully liberating , but y'know , it 's cold .
Even in Florida , once you 've been in the water for a few hours , you 're cold .
Then you do it again .
And again .
It 's humid and pretty much everyone gets skin problems after a few days.And you ca n't come up .
You 've saturated to 55-foot depth after a day , so you 'd get the bends if you surfaced .
So all your diving is done with cave-diving rigs that are designed for diving where there 's no surface to go to .
If you get in trouble , you have to get back to the habitat , not the surface .
Oh , you 'd probably survive if you had to surface , but it would n't be healthy or pretty .
At the end of the 10-day mission it takes 18 hours to decompress to surface pressure.That said , it is really truly astounding to live underwater for a while .
Looking out through the window at dinner at the fish , and realizing that they 're looking at you : you 're the one in the aquarium .
It 's a trip.But it 's an incredibly resource-intensive thing to do .
Rough estimates I recall from my Aquarius trips were that it cost about US $ 10,000 per day to support four researchers in the habitat .
That 's not sustainable for daily life.As far as I can tell , Dennis Chamberland wants to set up some sort of high-end hotel-like underwater facility .
More power to him .
But do n't pretend that we 're all going to have the chance to go live under the ocean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very peculiar that nowhere in the discussion here or Chamberland's video does anyone mention NOAA's Aquarius habitat, in operation since 1988: http://www.uncw.edu/aquarius/ [uncw.edu] .
Aquarius has been in operation as a civilian research station underwater off Key Largo for years.
Before that it was in the Virgin Islands.
It is operated by NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) for marine biology research and NASA training.
It's an amazing place where researchers get to do 10-day research projects that would be difficult or impossible to run from the surface.But what's not mentioned by Chamberland or anyone involved in his little promo piece is that living underwater is grueling.
You're in a single-wide trailer equivalent with multiple other people.
Going outside is wonderfully liberating, but y'know, it's cold.
Even in Florida, once you've been in the water for a few hours, you're cold.
Then you do it again.
And again.
It's humid and pretty much everyone gets skin problems after a few days.And you can't come up.
You've saturated to 55-foot depth after a day, so you'd get the bends if you surfaced.
So all your diving is done with cave-diving rigs that are designed for diving where there's no surface to go to.
If you get in trouble, you have to get back to the habitat, not the surface.
Oh, you'd probably survive if you had to surface, but it wouldn't be healthy or pretty.
At the end of the 10-day mission it takes 18 hours to decompress to surface pressure.That said, it is really truly astounding to live underwater for a while.
Looking out through the window at dinner at the fish, and realizing that they're looking at you: you're the one in the aquarium.
It's a trip.But it's an incredibly resource-intensive thing to do.
Rough estimates I recall from my Aquarius trips were that it cost about US$10,000 per day to support four researchers in the habitat.
That's not sustainable for daily life.As far as I can tell, Dennis Chamberland wants to set up some sort of high-end hotel-like underwater facility.
More power to him.
But don't pretend that we're all going to have the chance to go live under the ocean.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468126</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1268485920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's still not practical, nor will be for the forseeable future.<br><br>*Possible*, perhaps, but not practical.  To be practical, there would have to be some benefit to it besides novelty.  You'd have to be able to build whole cities down there and, importantly, these cities would have to support themselves economically in some fashion.  That's just not going to happen now or soon.<br><br>I suppose you could build an exotic resort down there, and charge rich people an arm and a leg to visit for a week at a time.  Beyond that, there's no practical benefit at this time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still not practical , nor will be for the forseeable future .
* Possible * , perhaps , but not practical .
To be practical , there would have to be some benefit to it besides novelty .
You 'd have to be able to build whole cities down there and , importantly , these cities would have to support themselves economically in some fashion .
That 's just not going to happen now or soon.I suppose you could build an exotic resort down there , and charge rich people an arm and a leg to visit for a week at a time .
Beyond that , there 's no practical benefit at this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still not practical, nor will be for the forseeable future.
*Possible*, perhaps, but not practical.
To be practical, there would have to be some benefit to it besides novelty.
You'd have to be able to build whole cities down there and, importantly, these cities would have to support themselves economically in some fashion.
That's just not going to happen now or soon.I suppose you could build an exotic resort down there, and charge rich people an arm and a leg to visit for a week at a time.
Beyond that, there's no practical benefit at this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463272</id>
	<title>growing gills, being bait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268487720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>imagining that we'll find some way to 'live' (underwater?, on another planet?) without an atmosphere/land might be easier on the brain than realizing that the winds of change are blowing at gale force, &amp; there is NOWHERE left to hide. that's not to say we cannot be rescued, once we get in touch with the facts of the matters. however, it appears that as a group, we don't know/care enough about ourselves/others to seriously consider the possibilities, as that may interfere with our rapidly declining LIEfstyles.</p><p>never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, who knew these days would arrive. see you on the other side of it? after the big flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>imagining that we 'll find some way to 'live ' ( underwater ? , on another planet ?
) without an atmosphere/land might be easier on the brain than realizing that the winds of change are blowing at gale force , &amp; there is NOWHERE left to hide .
that 's not to say we can not be rescued , once we get in touch with the facts of the matters .
however , it appears that as a group , we do n't know/care enough about ourselves/others to seriously consider the possibilities , as that may interfere with our rapidly declining LIEfstyles.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators , who knew these days would arrive .
see you on the other side of it ?
after the big flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagining that we'll find some way to 'live' (underwater?, on another planet?
) without an atmosphere/land might be easier on the brain than realizing that the winds of change are blowing at gale force, &amp; there is NOWHERE left to hide.
that's not to say we cannot be rescued, once we get in touch with the facts of the matters.
however, it appears that as a group, we don't know/care enough about ourselves/others to seriously consider the possibilities, as that may interfere with our rapidly declining LIEfstyles.never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, who knew these days would arrive.
see you on the other side of it?
after the big flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468628</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>DesScorp</author>
	<datestamp>1268490060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With 1960's technology.  He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.  But using modern technology it could be.</p><p>&gt;</p> </div><p>It's still impractical.  Even with newer technology, living under the sea is hugely impractical. This is a neat idea that's a lot like rocket packs or flying cars; perhaps doable, but so impractical as to ensure that it never becomes widespread.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With 1960 's technology .
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then .
But using modern technology it could be. &gt; It 's still impractical .
Even with newer technology , living under the sea is hugely impractical .
This is a neat idea that 's a lot like rocket packs or flying cars ; perhaps doable , but so impractical as to ensure that it never becomes widespread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With 1960's technology.
He said in the video that it was impractical to do it back then.
But using modern technology it could be.&gt; It's still impractical.
Even with newer technology, living under the sea is hugely impractical.
This is a neat idea that's a lot like rocket packs or flying cars; perhaps doable, but so impractical as to ensure that it never becomes widespread.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31530744</id>
	<title>Re:Cousteau</title>
	<author>UnknownSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1268915700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>one possibility: Carbon nanotubes<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon\_nanotube" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon\_nanotube</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>one possibility : Carbon nanotubeshttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon \ _nanotube [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one possibility: Carbon nanotubeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon\_nanotube [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463216</id>
	<title>Poor Hennessey.</title>
	<author>EdZ</author>
	<datestamp>1268486940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It'll all be great until Zissou up and pilfers it while you're out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll all be great until Zissou up and pilfers it while you 're out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll all be great until Zissou up and pilfers it while you're out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463398</id>
	<title>Pioneers...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268489640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not much of a pioneer, so this 4-person habitat doesn't sound like my thing, but wake me when they've got it up to a few thousand people and internet access and it could be fun to live there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not much of a pioneer , so this 4-person habitat does n't sound like my thing , but wake me when they 've got it up to a few thousand people and internet access and it could be fun to live there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not much of a pioneer, so this 4-person habitat doesn't sound like my thing, but wake me when they've got it up to a few thousand people and internet access and it could be fun to live there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463702</id>
	<title>Rapture?</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1268493300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I am Andrew Ryan, and I am here to ask you a question: Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his own brow?<br>
No, says the man in Washington. It belongs to the poor.<br>
No, says the man in the Vatican. It belongs to God.<br>
No, says the man in Moscow. It belongs to everyone.<br>
I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose...<br>
Rapture!<br>
A city where the artist would not fear the censors.<br>
Where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality.<br>
Where the great would not be constrained by the small.<br>
With the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city, as well.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Andrew Ryan , and I am here to ask you a question : Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his own brow ?
No , says the man in Washington .
It belongs to the poor .
No , says the man in the Vatican .
It belongs to God .
No , says the man in Moscow .
It belongs to everyone .
I rejected those answers .
Instead , I chose something different .
I chose the impossible .
I chose.. . Rapture ! A city where the artist would not fear the censors .
Where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality .
Where the great would not be constrained by the small .
With the sweat of your brow , Rapture can become your city , as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Andrew Ryan, and I am here to ask you a question: Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his own brow?
No, says the man in Washington.
It belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican.
It belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow.
It belongs to everyone.
I rejected those answers.
Instead, I chose something different.
I chose the impossible.
I chose...
Rapture!
A city where the artist would not fear the censors.
Where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality.
Where the great would not be constrained by the small.
With the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city, as well.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468910</id>
	<title>Re:Anybody Remember Seaquest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268492520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The graphics were done on Amigas using VideoToaster and Lightwave iirc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The graphics were done on Amigas using VideoToaster and Lightwave iirc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The graphics were done on Amigas using VideoToaster and Lightwave iirc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464544</id>
	<title>Could they find a duller host</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268502000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't watch this video late at night. It's a real snoozer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't watch this video late at night .
It 's a real snoozer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't watch this video late at night.
It's a real snoozer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464694</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>karnal</author>
	<datestamp>1268503380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The more I think about it, the more I come to actually like this scenario.</p><p>I live closer to the city, and with some of my neighbors - barking dogs, yelling drunken fights etc.  It gets old pretty quick, and having something underwater means it can be as quiet as me and my wife want it to be.</p><p>I'm fine with people, but I'd rather come home and not have to deal with neighbors.  I know, I could move, but financially right now is not the time to do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The more I think about it , the more I come to actually like this scenario.I live closer to the city , and with some of my neighbors - barking dogs , yelling drunken fights etc .
It gets old pretty quick , and having something underwater means it can be as quiet as me and my wife want it to be.I 'm fine with people , but I 'd rather come home and not have to deal with neighbors .
I know , I could move , but financially right now is not the time to do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more I think about it, the more I come to actually like this scenario.I live closer to the city, and with some of my neighbors - barking dogs, yelling drunken fights etc.
It gets old pretty quick, and having something underwater means it can be as quiet as me and my wife want it to be.I'm fine with people, but I'd rather come home and not have to deal with neighbors.
I know, I could move, but financially right now is not the time to do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463550</id>
	<title>below sea level</title>
	<author>scheveningen</author>
	<datestamp>1268491560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having lived below sea level in Holland for the most of my life: duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having lived below sea level in Holland for the most of my life : duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having lived below sea level in Holland for the most of my life: duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463408</id>
	<title>Moon pool?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1268489700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This underwater colony sounds awesome. Would you kindly reserve me an apartment there?</p><p>Incidentally - will the moon pool be filled with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonmilk" title="wikipedia.org">moon milk</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This underwater colony sounds awesome .
Would you kindly reserve me an apartment there ? Incidentally - will the moon pool be filled with moon milk [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This underwater colony sounds awesome.
Would you kindly reserve me an apartment there?Incidentally - will the moon pool be filled with moon milk [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463690</id>
	<title>"A new generation of children will be born there &</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1268493240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> &ndash; the first citizens of a new $there civilization"</p></div></blockquote><p>
$there is "space" on even decades, "ocean" on odd?<br>
Except for $there, the mantra seems to have been reiterated unchanged ever since Jules Verne or so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>   the first citizens of a new $ there civilization " $ there is " space " on even decades , " ocean " on odd ?
Except for $ there , the mantra seems to have been reiterated unchanged ever since Jules Verne or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> – the first citizens of a new $there civilization"
$there is "space" on even decades, "ocean" on odd?
Except for $there, the mantra seems to have been reiterated unchanged ever since Jules Verne or so.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463490</id>
	<title>use it for a prison!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268490600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then it would be the setting of a crappy "near future" sci fi movie or maybe a decent video game</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then it would be the setting of a crappy " near future " sci fi movie or maybe a decent video game</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then it would be the setting of a crappy "near future" sci fi movie or maybe a decent video game</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464348</id>
	<title>mm memory serves me</title>
	<author>MrShaggy</author>
	<datestamp>1268499780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>James Bond has already dealt with this menace</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>James Bond has already dealt with this menace</tokentext>
<sentencetext>James Bond has already dealt with this menace</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463658</id>
	<title>Re:Good luck calling 911</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1268493000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only difference between "crackpot" and "visionary" is the degree of of appeal the crack/vision holds for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only difference between " crackpot " and " visionary " is the degree of of appeal the crack/vision holds for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only difference between "crackpot" and "visionary" is the degree of of appeal the crack/vision holds for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463848</id>
	<title>Letting Leviathan loose 1st,and growing from there</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1268494800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the first expedition will be initiated by the submersion of the Leviathan</p></div></blockquote><p>A page right out of the Illuminatus! trilogy. Eye optional?<br>
So for once they <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/03/13/0443251/JPL-Background-Check-Case-Reaches-Supreme-Court" title="slashdot.org">let someone work for NASA</a> [slashdot.org] who knows his conspiracy literature.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)<br>
Best tongue-in-cheek mission name ever since the obviously Doom-playing Russians calling theirs <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/01/07/1447217/Russias-Mars-Mission-Raising-Concerns" title="slashdot.org">Phobos</a> [slashdot.org]-<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/07/17/226255/Russia-To-Study-Martian-Moons-Once-Again" title="slashdot.org">Grunt</a> [slashdot.org].</p><blockquote><div><p>Hagbard Celine: The sea is crueler than the land, sometimes.<br>
Howard: The sea is cleaner than the land. There's no hate. Just death when and as needed.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the first expedition will be initiated by the submersion of the LeviathanA page right out of the Illuminatus !
trilogy. Eye optional ?
So for once they let someone work for NASA [ slashdot.org ] who knows his conspiracy literature .
; - ) Best tongue-in-cheek mission name ever since the obviously Doom-playing Russians calling theirs Phobos [ slashdot.org ] -Grunt [ slashdot.org ] .Hagbard Celine : The sea is crueler than the land , sometimes .
Howard : The sea is cleaner than the land .
There 's no hate .
Just death when and as needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the first expedition will be initiated by the submersion of the LeviathanA page right out of the Illuminatus!
trilogy. Eye optional?
So for once they let someone work for NASA [slashdot.org] who knows his conspiracy literature.
;-)
Best tongue-in-cheek mission name ever since the obviously Doom-playing Russians calling theirs Phobos [slashdot.org]-Grunt [slashdot.org].Hagbard Celine: The sea is crueler than the land, sometimes.
Howard: The sea is cleaner than the land.
There's no hate.
Just death when and as needed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463224</id>
	<title>Asimov?</title>
	<author>celibate for life</author>
	<datestamp>1268487240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't there an Asimov short story about an experimental underwater city that needed Government resources to expand while the Government granted all funding to outerspace colonization?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't there an Asimov short story about an experimental underwater city that needed Government resources to expand while the Government granted all funding to outerspace colonization ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't there an Asimov short story about an experimental underwater city that needed Government resources to expand while the Government granted all funding to outerspace colonization?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850</id>
	<title>he's patented the key technology</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1268505060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dennis Chamberland: "So, the key problem is carbon dioxide scrubbing"</p><p>Interviewer: "And you've solved it?"</p><p>Dennis Chamberland: "Yep!"</p><p>Interviewer: "So, what is it?"</p><p>Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you."</p><p>So, basically, he wants us all to live underwater, paying patent royalties to him.  You'll be paying for two gas bills- one to heat your underwater habitat, the other to breathe.</p><p>I'd really like to know how someone working on this for NASA managed to get a patent.  That patent should be public property.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dennis Chamberland : " So , the key problem is carbon dioxide scrubbing " Interviewer : " And you 've solved it ?
" Dennis Chamberland : " Yep !
" Interviewer : " So , what is it ?
" Dennis Chamberland : " I 'd lose my patent if I told you .
" So , basically , he wants us all to live underwater , paying patent royalties to him .
You 'll be paying for two gas bills- one to heat your underwater habitat , the other to breathe.I 'd really like to know how someone working on this for NASA managed to get a patent .
That patent should be public property .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dennis Chamberland: "So, the key problem is carbon dioxide scrubbing"Interviewer: "And you've solved it?
"Dennis Chamberland: "Yep!
"Interviewer: "So, what is it?
"Dennis Chamberland: "I'd lose my patent if I told you.
"So, basically, he wants us all to live underwater, paying patent royalties to him.
You'll be paying for two gas bills- one to heat your underwater habitat, the other to breathe.I'd really like to know how someone working on this for NASA managed to get a patent.
That patent should be public property.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31530744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31470636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31504898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31471300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_0453229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31475586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31504898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31471300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31470636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464640
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31530744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31466796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465746
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31465750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31475586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_0453229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31463658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31468182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_0453229.31464694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
