<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_13_032205</id>
	<title>Apple Loses Aussie Trademark Complaint Over "i" Name</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268502600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CuteSteveJobs writes <i>"Apple has been dealt a severe blow having been <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/mp3s/apples-future-wont-be-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-i-20100312-q27r.html">told that it no longer has a monopoly on the letter 'i' for product naming</a>. IP Australia, the government body that oversees trademark applications, <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/ATMO/2010/7.html">rejected Apple's complaint</a> against a company selling 'DOPi' laptop bags. Last year Australian computer company Macpro Computers claimed that after 26 years of flying its own Macpro brand that Apple was 'trying to burn us out' with legal fees. This was after Apple released its own Macpro line 3&#189; years ago. Apple lost that complaint, but is appealing. Last year Apple <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/apple-bites-over-woolworths-logo-20091005-ghzr.html">went after supermarket Woolworths</a> complaining their new logo which featured a 'W' fashioned into the shape of an apple. (Woolworths sells real apples.)"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CuteSteveJobs writes " Apple has been dealt a severe blow having been told that it no longer has a monopoly on the letter 'i ' for product naming .
IP Australia , the government body that oversees trademark applications , rejected Apple 's complaint against a company selling 'DOPi ' laptop bags .
Last year Australian computer company Macpro Computers claimed that after 26 years of flying its own Macpro brand that Apple was 'trying to burn us out ' with legal fees .
This was after Apple released its own Macpro line 3   years ago .
Apple lost that complaint , but is appealing .
Last year Apple went after supermarket Woolworths complaining their new logo which featured a 'W ' fashioned into the shape of an apple .
( Woolworths sells real apples .
) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CuteSteveJobs writes "Apple has been dealt a severe blow having been told that it no longer has a monopoly on the letter 'i' for product naming.
IP Australia, the government body that oversees trademark applications, rejected Apple's complaint against a company selling 'DOPi' laptop bags.
Last year Australian computer company Macpro Computers claimed that after 26 years of flying its own Macpro brand that Apple was 'trying to burn us out' with legal fees.
This was after Apple released its own Macpro line 3½ years ago.
Apple lost that complaint, but is appealing.
Last year Apple went after supermarket Woolworths complaining their new logo which featured a 'W' fashioned into the shape of an apple.
(Woolworths sells real apples.
)"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462738</id>
	<title>Re:The world.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268476920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with "R"<br>They'll go broke suing all the pirates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with " R " They 'll go broke suing all the pirates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with "R"They'll go broke suing all the pirates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464338</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268499720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple: iSuck</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple : iSuck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple: iSuck</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Jazz-Masta</author>
	<datestamp>1268423280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> If Apple were a person he would be a total douche</p></div><p>He'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.</p><p>Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe 'd also be wearing a turtleneck , have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino , goatee , and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah , and a liberal arts degree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008</id>
	<title>Trying to win trademark fights?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268421180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an app for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463262</id>
	<title>Re:Bad summary</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1268487660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article summary also said that Apple sells a "Macpro" computer.  They don't.  The computer's name is Mac Pro.  I don't think the litigation regarding the store name is ethical tough.</p><p>Apple doesn't seem to go after iAnything unless it's more similar to one of their product names than that, for example.  They didn't try stopping Cisco's iPhone before they had their own product, and later made a deal to use the name in the US.  I wish Apple would give up the "i" naming system though, it's starting to wear thin on me and strikes me as being unimaginative, lame and starting to feel stupid on an "Idiocracy" level.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article summary also said that Apple sells a " Macpro " computer .
They do n't .
The computer 's name is Mac Pro .
I do n't think the litigation regarding the store name is ethical tough.Apple does n't seem to go after iAnything unless it 's more similar to one of their product names than that , for example .
They did n't try stopping Cisco 's iPhone before they had their own product , and later made a deal to use the name in the US .
I wish Apple would give up the " i " naming system though , it 's starting to wear thin on me and strikes me as being unimaginative , lame and starting to feel stupid on an " Idiocracy " level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article summary also said that Apple sells a "Macpro" computer.
They don't.
The computer's name is Mac Pro.
I don't think the litigation regarding the store name is ethical tough.Apple doesn't seem to go after iAnything unless it's more similar to one of their product names than that, for example.
They didn't try stopping Cisco's iPhone before they had their own product, and later made a deal to use the name in the US.
I wish Apple would give up the "i" naming system though, it's starting to wear thin on me and strikes me as being unimaginative, lame and starting to feel stupid on an "Idiocracy" level.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463852</id>
	<title>Re:Way to stick it to the man!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268494920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apple didn't invent the 'i' concept anyways. The 'i' comes from "Internet" because we called it the "iNet" back in the BBS days.</i></p><p>I can't help thinking of those Sesame Street skits where one puppet says to another, "You wanna buy the letter I?"</p><p>Apple clearly thinks they bought the letter I from the fast-talking salesman... Hey Apple, I've got a bridge in New York you might be interested in...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple did n't invent the 'i ' concept anyways .
The 'i ' comes from " Internet " because we called it the " iNet " back in the BBS days.I ca n't help thinking of those Sesame Street skits where one puppet says to another , " You wan na buy the letter I ?
" Apple clearly thinks they bought the letter I from the fast-talking salesman... Hey Apple , I 've got a bridge in New York you might be interested in.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple didn't invent the 'i' concept anyways.
The 'i' comes from "Internet" because we called it the "iNet" back in the BBS days.I can't help thinking of those Sesame Street skits where one puppet says to another, "You wanna buy the letter I?
"Apple clearly thinks they bought the letter I from the fast-talking salesman... Hey Apple, I've got a bridge in New York you might be interested in...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462896</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268479980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He wouldn't be a simple douche. He would be an iDouche.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He would n't be a simple douche .
He would be an iDouche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wouldn't be a simple douche.
He would be an iDouche.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463278</id>
	<title>Evil Empire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268487900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever happened to Apple being the goodguys? They had this image of being friendly and having a great product, but ever since they released the iPod its like it was the catalyst that turned them to the darkside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever happened to Apple being the goodguys ?
They had this image of being friendly and having a great product , but ever since they released the iPod its like it was the catalyst that turned them to the darkside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever happened to Apple being the goodguys?
They had this image of being friendly and having a great product, but ever since they released the iPod its like it was the catalyst that turned them to the darkside.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462036</id>
	<title>A lesson for all ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268421600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no 'i' in dickheads<nobr> <wbr></nobr>............ oh wait</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no 'i ' in dickheads ............ oh wait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no 'i' in dickheads ............ oh wait</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462746</id>
	<title>I seem to recall...</title>
	<author>idji</author>
	<datestamp>1268477220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That there is a hamburger chain somewhere called Mac........ I wonder if they are next in the firing line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That there is a hamburger chain somewhere called Mac........ I wonder if they are next in the firing line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That there is a hamburger chain somewhere called Mac........ I wonder if they are next in the firing line.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462528</id>
	<title>Defend it or loose it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268472780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Companies (not just Apple) are somewhat obliged to defend their trademarks. To keep this IP companies must demonstrate that they are uniquely recognizable and associated with their products.</p><p>Aggressively going after anything that is close helps prevent dilution, and demonstrates that they are actively defending and using these trademarks.</p><p>Obviously Apple are wary of loosing it's brand image, so will contest anything remotely. If a precedent can be found where Apple have not defended their trade mark it provides other companies some leverage. Therefore this sends out a strong message to other companies and the legal system.</p><p>Copywriting an 'i' is going a bit far, especially as others have used it before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Companies ( not just Apple ) are somewhat obliged to defend their trademarks .
To keep this IP companies must demonstrate that they are uniquely recognizable and associated with their products.Aggressively going after anything that is close helps prevent dilution , and demonstrates that they are actively defending and using these trademarks.Obviously Apple are wary of loosing it 's brand image , so will contest anything remotely .
If a precedent can be found where Apple have not defended their trade mark it provides other companies some leverage .
Therefore this sends out a strong message to other companies and the legal system.Copywriting an 'i ' is going a bit far , especially as others have used it before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Companies (not just Apple) are somewhat obliged to defend their trademarks.
To keep this IP companies must demonstrate that they are uniquely recognizable and associated with their products.Aggressively going after anything that is close helps prevent dilution, and demonstrates that they are actively defending and using these trademarks.Obviously Apple are wary of loosing it's brand image, so will contest anything remotely.
If a precedent can be found where Apple have not defended their trade mark it provides other companies some leverage.
Therefore this sends out a strong message to other companies and the legal system.Copywriting an 'i' is going a bit far, especially as others have used it before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462944</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>John Saffran</author>
	<datestamp>1268480760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If Apple were a person he would be a total douche</p></div><p>If Apple released an iDouche bag, I wonder how many fanboys would buy one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheIf Apple released an iDouche bag , I wonder how many fanboys would buy one . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheIf Apple released an iDouche bag, I wonder how many fanboys would buy one ..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31493106</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>ixache</author>
	<datestamp>1268736480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty.</p></div><p>In the universe we are talking about, the legal system in question is an alien one, and not every legal case has to be argued that way (with the losing lawyer dying in the end at the hands of its victor), only the most important ones: in other less important cases, honor can be restored with some kind of settlement<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If the government had manufactured evidence [...]</p></div><p>You're mostly right up to this point: in the book (which is actually not <em>Whipping Star</em>, but <em>The Dosadi Experiment</em>, the second book in the series), a powerful alien faction commits massive (planet-scale, multi-generation) human and alien rights violations...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>you would never find out [...]</p></div><p>... except Jorj X. McKie, agent extraordinaire of the Bureau of Sabotage (a government agency outgrown of the need of curbing bureaucratc efficiency, if you can imagine that!), finds out...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>all because no lawyer would take a hopeless case.</p></div><p>... and takes on the hopeless endeavour of fighting the case on enemy ground (the byzantine alien legal system, of which he is the only registered non-native lawyer), knowing full well that he must win (for the sake of all what's good, but also love and revenge), and that if he wins, he'd have to kill his opponent (a female from the alien faction) and by doing this he'd be committing murder / stellar casus belli / trespassing jurisdiction / being rude or some other gross and terrible thing, I can't remember. How will he get out of this quagmire?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended. Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged.</p></div><p>Sorry to disapoint!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>From my summary, you can see clearly all the pulp elements in the book (Rightful Retribution, yeah!), but they make for an enjoyable read, and really there is a lot more to it than that: in true Frank Herberts's style, the book has very typical themes that every reader of the Dune series should be familiar with (individual behaviour and adaptation under pressure, immortality, mind games, etc.) And of course it's also a book that makes you think, so I highly recommend it.</p><p>Hope this helps</p><p>Xavier</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty.In the universe we are talking about , the legal system in question is an alien one , and not every legal case has to be argued that way ( with the losing lawyer dying in the end at the hands of its victor ) , only the most important ones : in other less important cases , honor can be restored with some kind of settlement ...If the government had manufactured evidence [ ... ] You 're mostly right up to this point : in the book ( which is actually not Whipping Star , but The Dosadi Experiment , the second book in the series ) , a powerful alien faction commits massive ( planet-scale , multi-generation ) human and alien rights violations...you would never find out [ ... ] ... except Jorj X. McKie , agent extraordinaire of the Bureau of Sabotage ( a government agency outgrown of the need of curbing bureaucratc efficiency , if you can imagine that !
) , finds out...all because no lawyer would take a hopeless case.... and takes on the hopeless endeavour of fighting the case on enemy ground ( the byzantine alien legal system , of which he is the only registered non-native lawyer ) , knowing full well that he must win ( for the sake of all what 's good , but also love and revenge ) , and that if he wins , he 'd have to kill his opponent ( a female from the alien faction ) and by doing this he 'd be committing murder / stellar casus belli / trespassing jurisdiction / being rude or some other gross and terrible thing , I ca n't remember .
How will he get out of this quagmire ?
; ) I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended .
Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged.Sorry to disapoint !
: ) From my summary , you can see clearly all the pulp elements in the book ( Rightful Retribution , yeah !
) , but they make for an enjoyable read , and really there is a lot more to it than that : in true Frank Herberts 's style , the book has very typical themes that every reader of the Dune series should be familiar with ( individual behaviour and adaptation under pressure , immortality , mind games , etc .
) And of course it 's also a book that makes you think , so I highly recommend it.Hope this helpsXavier</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty.In the universe we are talking about, the legal system in question is an alien one, and not every legal case has to be argued that way (with the losing lawyer dying in the end at the hands of its victor), only the most important ones: in other less important cases, honor can be restored with some kind of settlement ...If the government had manufactured evidence [...]You're mostly right up to this point: in the book (which is actually not Whipping Star, but The Dosadi Experiment, the second book in the series), a powerful alien faction commits massive (planet-scale, multi-generation) human and alien rights violations...you would never find out [...]... except Jorj X. McKie, agent extraordinaire of the Bureau of Sabotage (a government agency outgrown of the need of curbing bureaucratc efficiency, if you can imagine that!
), finds out...all because no lawyer would take a hopeless case.... and takes on the hopeless endeavour of fighting the case on enemy ground (the byzantine alien legal system, of which he is the only registered non-native lawyer), knowing full well that he must win (for the sake of all what's good, but also love and revenge), and that if he wins, he'd have to kill his opponent (a female from the alien faction) and by doing this he'd be committing murder / stellar casus belli / trespassing jurisdiction / being rude or some other gross and terrible thing, I can't remember.
How will he get out of this quagmire?
;)I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended.
Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged.Sorry to disapoint!
:)From my summary, you can see clearly all the pulp elements in the book (Rightful Retribution, yeah!
), but they make for an enjoyable read, and really there is a lot more to it than that: in true Frank Herberts's style, the book has very typical themes that every reader of the Dune series should be familiar with (individual behaviour and adaptation under pressure, immortality, mind games, etc.
) And of course it's also a book that makes you think, so I highly recommend it.Hope this helpsXavier
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462934</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1268480640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If Apple were a person he would be a total douche, but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Apple <em>is</em> a person, according to the Supreme Court. And not just a person, but an aristocrat with rights and no responsibilites. And, just like every other company, Apple is a complete sociopath.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple were a person he would be a total douche , but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag .
Apple is a person , according to the Supreme Court .
And not just a person , but an aristocrat with rights and no responsibilites .
And , just like every other company , Apple is a complete sociopath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple were a person he would be a total douche, but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag.
Apple is a person, according to the Supreme Court.
And not just a person, but an aristocrat with rights and no responsibilites.
And, just like every other company, Apple is a complete sociopath.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461884</id>
	<title>It's always been Apple's motto</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268419980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So sue me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So sue me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So sue me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462910</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>TechForensics</author>
	<datestamp>1268480280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt;Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.</p></div><p>Where is the surprise here?  They want what's best for them whichever side of the argument they're on.  People are generally like this, and corporations are known to be even less even-handed than people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Apple does n't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.Where is the surprise here ?
They want what 's best for them whichever side of the argument they 're on .
People are generally like this , and corporations are known to be even less even-handed than people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.Where is the surprise here?
They want what's best for them whichever side of the argument they're on.
People are generally like this, and corporations are known to be even less even-handed than people.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462078</id>
	<title>Now we're down to 25 alphabets?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268422320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? A trademark on a small caps letter? like iSmall and SMALLi? then Google goes after gNames, MS goes after mORENames, etc.</p><p>[sarcasm]Luckily, IBM is IBM and not iBM[/sarcasm], and it was around first, etc. And ATI == ATi ? This article reminds me of madtv's iRack: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw2nkoGLhrE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw2nkoGLhrE</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I wonder if, in the future, the Apple wikipedia page will get swapped out for the company's - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple</a> [wikipedia.org] and then it copyrights good health.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
A trademark on a small caps letter ?
like iSmall and SMALLi ?
then Google goes after gNames , MS goes after mORENames , etc .
[ sarcasm ] Luckily , IBM is IBM and not iBM [ /sarcasm ] , and it was around first , etc .
And ATI = = ATi ?
This article reminds me of madtv 's iRack : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = rw2nkoGLhrE [ youtube.com ] I wonder if , in the future , the Apple wikipedia page will get swapped out for the company 's - http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple [ wikipedia.org ] and then it copyrights good health .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
A trademark on a small caps letter?
like iSmall and SMALLi?
then Google goes after gNames, MS goes after mORENames, etc.
[sarcasm]Luckily, IBM is IBM and not iBM[/sarcasm], and it was around first, etc.
And ATI == ATi ?
This article reminds me of madtv's iRack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw2nkoGLhrE [youtube.com]I wonder if, in the future, the Apple wikipedia page will get swapped out for the company's - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple [wikipedia.org] and then it copyrights good health.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463588</id>
	<title>Re:igoatee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268492160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So he is an evil twin from an alternate universe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So he is an evil twin from an alternate universe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So he is an evil twin from an alternate universe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462310</id>
	<title>Erm... no?</title>
	<author>algormortis</author>
	<datestamp>1268512080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quote from the above summary:<p><div class="quote"><p>(Woolworths sells real apples.)</p></div><p>Quote from the article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Woolworths' application includes a wide class for electrical goods and technology, putting it in direct competition with Apple should the retailer choose to brand computers, music players or other devices.</p></div><p>I guess the following bit from the article was just taken out of context:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>''Based on this logic, they would have to take action against every fruit-seller.''</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quote from the above summary : ( Woolworths sells real apples .
) Quote from the article : Woolworths ' application includes a wide class for electrical goods and technology , putting it in direct competition with Apple should the retailer choose to brand computers , music players or other devices.I guess the following bit from the article was just taken out of context : ''Based on this logic , they would have to take action against every fruit-seller .
' '</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quote from the above summary:(Woolworths sells real apples.
)Quote from the article:Woolworths' application includes a wide class for electrical goods and technology, putting it in direct competition with Apple should the retailer choose to brand computers, music players or other devices.I guess the following bit from the article was just taken out of context:''Based on this logic, they would have to take action against every fruit-seller.
''
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31503822</id>
	<title>Puhlease</title>
	<author>countach</author>
	<datestamp>1268749620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A "severe blow". Puhlease. Apple could care less about this. Sure, they will go to court to get as much trademark leeway as they can, but nobody in Cupertino is sweating the supposed loss of "i".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A " severe blow " .
Puhlease. Apple could care less about this .
Sure , they will go to court to get as much trademark leeway as they can , but nobody in Cupertino is sweating the supposed loss of " i " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A "severe blow".
Puhlease. Apple could care less about this.
Sure, they will go to court to get as much trademark leeway as they can, but nobody in Cupertino is sweating the supposed loss of "i".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463654</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1268493000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That must suck on appeal.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That must suck on appeal.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That must suck on appeal.- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463118</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268484960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p> If Apple were a person he would be a total douche</p></div><p>He'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.</p><p>Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.</p></div><p>Hey That's hurtful<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe 'd also be wearing a turtleneck , have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino , goatee , and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah , and a liberal arts degree.Hey That 's hurtful : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.Hey That's hurtful :P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462446</id>
	<title>Re:Great news...</title>
	<author>tuxgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268471400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Last year Apple went after supermarket Woolworths complaining their new logo which featured a 'W' fashioned into the shape of an apple. (Woolworths sells real apples.)"</p></div></blockquote><p>Makes me wonder if Apple will next go after Apple Records.<br>The Beatles used them near the end as their label<br>The label has an Apple on it<br>Things that make you go Hmmm</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last year Apple went after supermarket Woolworths complaining their new logo which featured a 'W ' fashioned into the shape of an apple .
( Woolworths sells real apples .
) " Makes me wonder if Apple will next go after Apple Records.The Beatles used them near the end as their labelThe label has an Apple on itThings that make you go Hmmm</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Last year Apple went after supermarket Woolworths complaining their new logo which featured a 'W' fashioned into the shape of an apple.
(Woolworths sells real apples.
)"Makes me wonder if Apple will next go after Apple Records.The Beatles used them near the end as their labelThe label has an Apple on itThings that make you go Hmmm
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31465516</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268510040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this some poor attempt at humor?</p><p>The Macintosh (not the absence of a "k") is named for the <em>apple</em> variety.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntosh\_\%28apple\%29</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this some poor attempt at humor ? The Macintosh ( not the absence of a " k " ) is named for the apple variety .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntosh \ _ \ % 28apple \ % 29</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this some poor attempt at humor?The Macintosh (not the absence of a "k") is named for the apple variety.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntosh\_\%28apple\%29</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462136</id>
	<title>The world.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268423160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Powered by 26 letters, and therefore a maximum of 26 companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Powered by 26 letters , and therefore a maximum of 26 companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Powered by 26 letters, and therefore a maximum of 26 companies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461954</id>
	<title>You mean Apple doesn't sell real apples...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The local grocery store in Silicon Valley has four organic apples in a hermetically sealed plastic box with a sticker on top to win a real <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboard" title="wikipedia.org">skateboard</a> [wikipedia.org] for $3 USD.  This is something that Steve Jobs would've come up with, although the skateboard would've been Steve Wozniak's idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The local grocery store in Silicon Valley has four organic apples in a hermetically sealed plastic box with a sticker on top to win a real skateboard [ wikipedia.org ] for $ 3 USD .
This is something that Steve Jobs would 've come up with , although the skateboard would 've been Steve Wozniak 's idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The local grocery store in Silicon Valley has four organic apples in a hermetically sealed plastic box with a sticker on top to win a real skateboard [wikipedia.org] for $3 USD.
This is something that Steve Jobs would've come up with, although the skateboard would've been Steve Wozniak's idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462112</id>
	<title>Re:Bad summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268422740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but if I saw a product which was the palindrome of a completely different sort of product, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the real one and the other. Obviously this "DOPi" product exists only to fool the honest consumer merely looking to save a few bucks on a Genuine Apple&#174; iPod(tm). Imagine the poor saps' surprise when their newly purchased laptop bag refuses to play music!</p><p>In other news, <b>Wal</b>*Mart are suing Pixar for blatantly ripping their name off with the title of the film <b>Wall</b>-E; and they have scores of confused cinema-goers willing to testify in their favour. In partnership with the City of Berlin, Pink Floyd have indicated that they will launch a similar lawsuit, seeking damages for The Berlin <b>Wall</b> and the two-part song "Another Brick In The <b>Wall</b>", respectively. No response yet from Humpty Dumpty's legal team.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but if I saw a product which was the palindrome of a completely different sort of product , I would n't be able to tell the difference between the real one and the other .
Obviously this " DOPi " product exists only to fool the honest consumer merely looking to save a few bucks on a Genuine Apple   iPod ( tm ) .
Imagine the poor saps ' surprise when their newly purchased laptop bag refuses to play music ! In other news , Wal * Mart are suing Pixar for blatantly ripping their name off with the title of the film Wall-E ; and they have scores of confused cinema-goers willing to testify in their favour .
In partnership with the City of Berlin , Pink Floyd have indicated that they will launch a similar lawsuit , seeking damages for The Berlin Wall and the two-part song " Another Brick In The Wall " , respectively .
No response yet from Humpty Dumpty 's legal team .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but if I saw a product which was the palindrome of a completely different sort of product, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the real one and the other.
Obviously this "DOPi" product exists only to fool the honest consumer merely looking to save a few bucks on a Genuine Apple® iPod(tm).
Imagine the poor saps' surprise when their newly purchased laptop bag refuses to play music!In other news, Wal*Mart are suing Pixar for blatantly ripping their name off with the title of the film Wall-E; and they have scores of confused cinema-goers willing to testify in their favour.
In partnership with the City of Berlin, Pink Floyd have indicated that they will launch a similar lawsuit, seeking damages for The Berlin Wall and the two-part song "Another Brick In The Wall", respectively.
No response yet from Humpty Dumpty's legal team.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469282</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268496180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck that.  I want a lawyer of excellent caliber who would fight for me to sue Mother Teresa.</p><p>The legal system is by necessity complicated and diverse.   I want the best lawyer on earth representing my interests.  Without lawyers who aren't afraid to litigate the only people would have lawyers and the only people who would have good legal defense are the corporations.</p><p>If it's your 'simple country lawyer' vs the Apple legal team would you ever dare stand up to Apple if your life depended on it?  I wouldn't.  Even if they sued me for something I was pretty certain I was in the clear for I wouldn't call Apple's bluff.   After all their lawyers could find a loop hole where I was guilty. It just "wouldn't be worth it".</p><p>Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty.   If the government had manufactured evidence you would never find out because no lawyer would take a hopeless case.  I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended.  Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck that .
I want a lawyer of excellent caliber who would fight for me to sue Mother Teresa.The legal system is by necessity complicated and diverse .
I want the best lawyer on earth representing my interests .
Without lawyers who are n't afraid to litigate the only people would have lawyers and the only people who would have good legal defense are the corporations.If it 's your 'simple country lawyer ' vs the Apple legal team would you ever dare stand up to Apple if your life depended on it ?
I would n't .
Even if they sued me for something I was pretty certain I was in the clear for I would n't call Apple 's bluff .
After all their lawyers could find a loop hole where I was guilty .
It just " would n't be worth it " .Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty .
If the government had manufactured evidence you would never find out because no lawyer would take a hopeless case .
I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended .
Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck that.
I want a lawyer of excellent caliber who would fight for me to sue Mother Teresa.The legal system is by necessity complicated and diverse.
I want the best lawyer on earth representing my interests.
Without lawyers who aren't afraid to litigate the only people would have lawyers and the only people who would have good legal defense are the corporations.If it's your 'simple country lawyer' vs the Apple legal team would you ever dare stand up to Apple if your life depended on it?
I wouldn't.
Even if they sued me for something I was pretty certain I was in the clear for I wouldn't call Apple's bluff.
After all their lawyers could find a loop hole where I was guilty.
It just "wouldn't be worth it".Who would ever defend people who even looked like there was a CHANCE that they were guilty.
If the government had manufactured evidence you would never find out because no lawyer would take a hopeless case.
I hope that was how all those Frank Herbert books ended.
Corporations running the planet and corrupt governments going unchallenged.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463108</id>
	<title>How...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268484720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... iLaughed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... iLaughed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... iLaughed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968</id>
	<title>Bad summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems clear, avoiding the anti-Apple stance of the article and the summary, that Apple went after someone for infringing on "iPod", which is "DOPi" backwards. They didn't go after them for using iSomething. This looked like an infringement of their existing trademark, but they didn't win.</p><p>Nothing to see here.  Move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems clear , avoiding the anti-Apple stance of the article and the summary , that Apple went after someone for infringing on " iPod " , which is " DOPi " backwards .
They did n't go after them for using iSomething .
This looked like an infringement of their existing trademark , but they did n't win.Nothing to see here .
Move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems clear, avoiding the anti-Apple stance of the article and the summary, that Apple went after someone for infringing on "iPod", which is "DOPi" backwards.
They didn't go after them for using iSomething.
This looked like an infringement of their existing trademark, but they didn't win.Nothing to see here.
Move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463142</id>
	<title>Re:Trying to win trademark fights?</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1268485380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's an app for that.</p></div><p>iAsshole?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app for that.iAsshole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app for that.iAsshole?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461980</id>
	<title>Former Apple Trademark lawyer gets interviewed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and said "iTold you so".</p><p>Ugh, I just died a little inside (Pun Allergy).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and said " iTold you so " .Ugh , I just died a little inside ( Pun Allergy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and said "iTold you so".Ugh, I just died a little inside (Pun Allergy).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462500</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1268472000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, of course. We already said he'd be a total douche.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , of course .
We already said he 'd be a total douche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, of course.
We already said he'd be a total douche.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462340</id>
	<title>Mother Nature looses her appeal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268512800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a severe blow to food naming conventions Mother Nature has lost her bid to retain the name "Apple" for the fruit of the same name. In a compromise Apple is allowing Mother Nature to have their unused trademark iSlate for all apple type fruits. This is seen as a victory for the US and Mom's iSlate pie!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a severe blow to food naming conventions Mother Nature has lost her bid to retain the name " Apple " for the fruit of the same name .
In a compromise Apple is allowing Mother Nature to have their unused trademark iSlate for all apple type fruits .
This is seen as a victory for the US and Mom 's iSlate pie !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a severe blow to food naming conventions Mother Nature has lost her bid to retain the name "Apple" for the fruit of the same name.
In a compromise Apple is allowing Mother Nature to have their unused trademark iSlate for all apple type fruits.
This is seen as a victory for the US and Mom's iSlate pie!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463896</id>
	<title>Re:Say what you want about Microsoft...</title>
	<author>Das Auge</author>
	<datestamp>1268495460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I incorrectly modded it down.  So, here's me undoing it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I incorrectly modded it down .
So , here 's me undoing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I incorrectly modded it down.
So, here's me undoing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463136</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>orangeplanet64</author>
	<datestamp>1268485320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.</p></div><p>Oh snap..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , and a liberal arts degree.Oh snap. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.Oh snap..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882</id>
	<title>iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268419980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This post has been taken to court by Apple due to violations regarding the iFirst.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This post has been taken to court by Apple due to violations regarding the iFirst .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post has been taken to court by Apple due to violations regarding the iFirst.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463112</id>
	<title>Apple Trademarks iAustralia</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1268484840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, Apple successfully trademarked iAustralia, and is headed off to world court to demand that the country of Australia change its name because it infringes.  Australian representatives cried fowl over Apple providing fully loaded iPods to judges and iPads for use during trial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , Apple successfully trademarked iAustralia , and is headed off to world court to demand that the country of Australia change its name because it infringes .
Australian representatives cried fowl over Apple providing fully loaded iPods to judges and iPads for use during trial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, Apple successfully trademarked iAustralia, and is headed off to world court to demand that the country of Australia change its name because it infringes.
Australian representatives cried fowl over Apple providing fully loaded iPods to judges and iPads for use during trial.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020</id>
	<title>Can we do some research please?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268421300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Research is fun!<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark#Maintaining\_rights</p><p>Yet another trademark case. Are we sure this is just not a case of a big corporation suing just to cover it's ass because it can? If I had an international trademark and $35 billion in cash and short term investments, I would sue people even if I knew I would lose. With that sort of money, better safe than sorry.</p><p>Let's bash companies for factually correct reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Research is fun ! http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark # Maintaining \ _rightsYet another trademark case .
Are we sure this is just not a case of a big corporation suing just to cover it 's ass because it can ?
If I had an international trademark and $ 35 billion in cash and short term investments , I would sue people even if I knew I would lose .
With that sort of money , better safe than sorry.Let 's bash companies for factually correct reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Research is fun!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark#Maintaining\_rightsYet another trademark case.
Are we sure this is just not a case of a big corporation suing just to cover it's ass because it can?
If I had an international trademark and $35 billion in cash and short term investments, I would sue people even if I knew I would lose.
With that sort of money, better safe than sorry.Let's bash companies for factually correct reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462548</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1268473200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company</p></div><p>I don't think Apple is crying, it's cold, hard business action.  They know the rules of the game, and they are willing to stretch them to the limits of what they can.  Sometimes they lose, and that's ok, it's part of the game. But there's no crying.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple does n't care about other peoples names but then cries over some companyI do n't think Apple is crying , it 's cold , hard business action .
They know the rules of the game , and they are willing to stretch them to the limits of what they can .
Sometimes they lose , and that 's ok , it 's part of the game .
But there 's no crying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some companyI don't think Apple is crying, it's cold, hard business action.
They know the rules of the game, and they are willing to stretch them to the limits of what they can.
Sometimes they lose, and that's ok, it's part of the game.
But there's no crying.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462420</id>
	<title>Re:Can we do some research please?</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1268470980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On that I have to disagree.  The approach is short-sighted as there is at least one other cost you are not considering -- "good will."  Apple is burning its public image with these sorts of abusive legal actions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On that I have to disagree .
The approach is short-sighted as there is at least one other cost you are not considering -- " good will .
" Apple is burning its public image with these sorts of abusive legal actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On that I have to disagree.
The approach is short-sighted as there is at least one other cost you are not considering -- "good will.
"  Apple is burning its public image with these sorts of abusive legal actions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463150</id>
	<title>Re:Say what you want about Microsoft...</title>
	<author>orangeplanet64</author>
	<datestamp>1268485500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but if Apple was as big as Microsoft...</p></div><p>Starbucks will be overloaded</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but if Apple was as big as Microsoft...Starbucks will be overloaded</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but if Apple was as big as Microsoft...Starbucks will be overloaded
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462904</id>
	<title>Re:Trying to win trademark fights?</title>
	<author>jeti</author>
	<datestamp>1268480220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's been removed from the AppStore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's been removed from the AppStore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's been removed from the AppStore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1268420820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's weird Apple even cries over such, especially when other companies have been using similar names for years. Adding an i before a word in name, what an invention. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPad#Product\_name" title="wikipedia.org">iPad</a> [wikipedia.org] has the same story too, and then Apple just came along and took it. There's even a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu\_iPAD" title="wikipedia.org">hand-held device Fujitsu iPAD</a> [wikipedia.org] from 2002.</p><p>Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple. Just like they didn't care about Nokia's patents but instantly cries when someone even considers anything close to Apple's patents. If Apple were a person he would be a total douche, but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's weird Apple even cries over such , especially when other companies have been using similar names for years .
Adding an i before a word in name , what an invention .
iPad [ wikipedia.org ] has the same story too , and then Apple just came along and took it .
There 's even a hand-held device Fujitsu iPAD [ wikipedia.org ] from 2002.Apple does n't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple .
Just like they did n't care about Nokia 's patents but instantly cries when someone even considers anything close to Apple 's patents .
If Apple were a person he would be a total douche , but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's weird Apple even cries over such, especially when other companies have been using similar names for years.
Adding an i before a word in name, what an invention.
iPad [wikipedia.org] has the same story too, and then Apple just came along and took it.
There's even a hand-held device Fujitsu iPAD [wikipedia.org] from 2002.Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.
Just like they didn't care about Nokia's patents but instantly cries when someone even considers anything close to Apple's patents.
If Apple were a person he would be a total douche, but of course we again see some Apple fanboys coming to defend this douchebag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463722</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Stele</author>
	<datestamp>1268493480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino</i></p><p>Is that the one made with calf's milk or veal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chinoIs that the one made with calf 's milk or veal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chinoIs that the one made with calf's milk or veal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462986</id>
	<title>Apple</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1268481780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iLitigiousBastards</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iLitigiousBastards</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iLitigiousBastards</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31470714</id>
	<title>Poor iiNet</title>
	<author>cavebison</author>
	<datestamp>1268559960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple could get them on provocation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple could get them on provocation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple could get them on provocation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463870</id>
	<title>Re:Say what you want about Microsoft...</title>
	<author>16K Ram Pack</author>
	<datestamp>1268495160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's why Microsoft got bigger than Apple. Because they were actually less evil and more open than Apple were.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's why Microsoft got bigger than Apple .
Because they were actually less evil and more open than Apple were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's why Microsoft got bigger than Apple.
Because they were actually less evil and more open than Apple were.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463138</id>
	<title>Half CALF???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268485320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> If Apple were a person he would be a total douche</p></div><p>He'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.</p><p>Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope you mean half CAF or CAFE. Whether he's a douche maybe up for debate but whether he takes half a cow (even a small one) in his coffee isn't!</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe 'd also be wearing a turtleneck , have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino , goatee , and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah , and a liberal arts degree.I hope you mean half CAF or CAFE .
Whether he 's a douche maybe up for debate but whether he takes half a cow ( even a small one ) in his coffee is n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If Apple were a person he would be a total doucheHe'd also be wearing a turtleneck, have a starbucks double half-calf-frappa-moccha-chino, goatee, and thick black-rimmed glasses.Oh yeah, and a liberal arts degree.I hope you mean half CAF or CAFE.
Whether he's a douche maybe up for debate but whether he takes half a cow (even a small one) in his coffee isn't!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998</id>
	<title>Way to stick it to the man!</title>
	<author>hellop2</author>
	<datestamp>1268421120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple didn't invent the 'i' concept anyways.  The 'i' comes from "Internet" because we called it the "iNet" back in the BBS days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple did n't invent the 'i ' concept anyways .
The 'i ' comes from " Internet " because we called it the " iNet " back in the BBS days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple didn't invent the 'i' concept anyways.
The 'i' comes from "Internet" because we called it the "iNet" back in the BBS days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462406</id>
	<title>Re:Can we do some research please?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268513940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and you'd have some judges throwing the book at you for wasting their time.<p>
i hope your not a CEO of any company...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and you 'd have some judges throwing the book at you for wasting their time .
i hope your not a CEO of any company.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and you'd have some judges throwing the book at you for wasting their time.
i hope your not a CEO of any company...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461974</id>
	<title>The first sign of trouble was...</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1268420880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462822</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1268478840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well that would certainly get rid of lawyers; then who would defence the innocent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that would certainly get rid of lawyers ; then who would defence the innocent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that would certainly get rid of lawyers; then who would defence the innocent?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463376</id>
	<title>Re:Can we do some research please?</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1268489400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has no choice. If they do not bring a suit (even one that may lose) later trademark cases that are more blatant have stronger grounds to argue that the term is now generic since Apple hasn't been protecting it.</p><p>No one said that trademark law was sensible.</p><p>The Woolworths one was about a blanket trademark - Woolworths wanted a blanket trademark for their new logo (ie, to cover every sector of business, including computing) and Apple sued to exclude them from that section due to infringement. It's highly unlikely Woolworths will ever release a computer product, but again - you have to do these things in advance. If you do nothing (ie, "goodwill" then that can be used against you as "you don;t care if we use this name... it never bothered you before".</p><p>It would be better if there was some other way to lodge a complaint about a name that didn't involve a court, so that there wouldn't have to be a trademark suit in clear cases like this that still have a fringe connection (eg, iPod backwards, made for mp3 players) so that Apple's (or anyone's) trademark protection requirement is met without them having to sue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has no choice .
If they do not bring a suit ( even one that may lose ) later trademark cases that are more blatant have stronger grounds to argue that the term is now generic since Apple has n't been protecting it.No one said that trademark law was sensible.The Woolworths one was about a blanket trademark - Woolworths wanted a blanket trademark for their new logo ( ie , to cover every sector of business , including computing ) and Apple sued to exclude them from that section due to infringement .
It 's highly unlikely Woolworths will ever release a computer product , but again - you have to do these things in advance .
If you do nothing ( ie , " goodwill " then that can be used against you as " you don ; t care if we use this name... it never bothered you before " .It would be better if there was some other way to lodge a complaint about a name that did n't involve a court , so that there would n't have to be a trademark suit in clear cases like this that still have a fringe connection ( eg , iPod backwards , made for mp3 players ) so that Apple 's ( or anyone 's ) trademark protection requirement is met without them having to sue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has no choice.
If they do not bring a suit (even one that may lose) later trademark cases that are more blatant have stronger grounds to argue that the term is now generic since Apple hasn't been protecting it.No one said that trademark law was sensible.The Woolworths one was about a blanket trademark - Woolworths wanted a blanket trademark for their new logo (ie, to cover every sector of business, including computing) and Apple sued to exclude them from that section due to infringement.
It's highly unlikely Woolworths will ever release a computer product, but again - you have to do these things in advance.
If you do nothing (ie, "goodwill" then that can be used against you as "you don;t care if we use this name... it never bothered you before".It would be better if there was some other way to lodge a complaint about a name that didn't involve a court, so that there wouldn't have to be a trademark suit in clear cases like this that still have a fringe connection (eg, iPod backwards, made for mp3 players) so that Apple's (or anyone's) trademark protection requirement is met without them having to sue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31470534</id>
	<title>We don't need no stinkin' trademark</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1268599080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm trademarking <i>"Phoghat</i> because the band <i>"Foghat",</i> said they'd see me in court</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm trademarking " Phoghat because the band " Foghat " , said they 'd see me in court</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm trademarking "Phoghat because the band "Foghat", said they'd see me in court</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461988</id>
	<title>Proof the Australian legal system is broken</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1268421060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>First AFACT (Australia's RIAA) lose and courts clearly state that ISP's are not responsible for policing their users now they have the audacity to claim Apple has no right to destroy other companies over vague allusions to product names or names they have been using for 20 years.<br> <br>

Preposterous I say, this simply cannot stand, as an Australian I demand that our legal system be fixed so that innocent mega-corporations can no longer be inconvenienced by our clearly erroneous laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First AFACT ( Australia 's RIAA ) lose and courts clearly state that ISP 's are not responsible for policing their users now they have the audacity to claim Apple has no right to destroy other companies over vague allusions to product names or names they have been using for 20 years .
Preposterous I say , this simply can not stand , as an Australian I demand that our legal system be fixed so that innocent mega-corporations can no longer be inconvenienced by our clearly erroneous laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First AFACT (Australia's RIAA) lose and courts clearly state that ISP's are not responsible for policing their users now they have the audacity to claim Apple has no right to destroy other companies over vague allusions to product names or names they have been using for 20 years.
Preposterous I say, this simply cannot stand, as an Australian I demand that our legal system be fixed so that innocent mega-corporations can no longer be inconvenienced by our clearly erroneous laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950</id>
	<title>Say what you want about Microsoft...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but if Apple was as big as Microsoft is now and had the same legal attitude, the legal climate in computing would look even far worse than it does now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but if Apple was as big as Microsoft is now and had the same legal attitude , the legal climate in computing would look even far worse than it does now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but if Apple was as big as Microsoft is now and had the same legal attitude, the legal climate in computing would look even far worse than it does now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462326</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268512440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out the 2003 Canadian film, "The Corporation." Does a nice job detailing the history of business corporations and the mind-boggling power they now have in our society. A really interesting aspect that is brought up is how corporate ideology is so similar to psychopathic people -- both have dangerous pathological mindsets. They're both negatives to society, more destructive than constructive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the 2003 Canadian film , " The Corporation .
" Does a nice job detailing the history of business corporations and the mind-boggling power they now have in our society .
A really interesting aspect that is brought up is how corporate ideology is so similar to psychopathic people -- both have dangerous pathological mindsets .
They 're both negatives to society , more destructive than constructive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the 2003 Canadian film, "The Corporation.
" Does a nice job detailing the history of business corporations and the mind-boggling power they now have in our society.
A really interesting aspect that is brought up is how corporate ideology is so similar to psychopathic people -- both have dangerous pathological mindsets.
They're both negatives to society, more destructive than constructive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462294</id>
	<title>It's a kwaZulu prefix, get over it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268511900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IF anyone has a right to complain, it's the Zulus. In kwaZulu (their language), an i- is prefixed to any loan word, and the following word is then capitalized. So radio in kwaZulu would be: iRadio. Looks familiar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IF anyone has a right to complain , it 's the Zulus .
In kwaZulu ( their language ) , an i- is prefixed to any loan word , and the following word is then capitalized .
So radio in kwaZulu would be : iRadio .
Looks familiar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IF anyone has a right to complain, it's the Zulus.
In kwaZulu (their language), an i- is prefixed to any loan word, and the following word is then capitalized.
So radio in kwaZulu would be: iRadio.
Looks familiar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740</id>
	<title>Oh the irony</title>
	<author>plusser</author>
	<datestamp>1268476920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When talking of trademarks, the Australian Woothworths company actually had absolutely nothing to do with the FW Woolworth company and its famous US and UK stores (and apparently stores in other countries that are still trading under the Woolworths brand).  One of the founders of the Australian company, Ernest Robert Williams, called the company Woolworths as part of a dare, only to find that FW Woolworth had not trademarked the name in Australia, therefore the trademark was deemed valid.</p><p>This highlight the issue of trademarks.  Even in a globalised society, a company cannot expect by implication that its trademark will automatically be protected across the world, without registering the trademark correctly.  If it were, could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the "i" letter since the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975?</p><p>Perhaps somebody could trademark the word iDIOT, to prevent situations like this from occurring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When talking of trademarks , the Australian Woothworths company actually had absolutely nothing to do with the FW Woolworth company and its famous US and UK stores ( and apparently stores in other countries that are still trading under the Woolworths brand ) .
One of the founders of the Australian company , Ernest Robert Williams , called the company Woolworths as part of a dare , only to find that FW Woolworth had not trademarked the name in Australia , therefore the trademark was deemed valid.This highlight the issue of trademarks .
Even in a globalised society , a company can not expect by implication that its trademark will automatically be protected across the world , without registering the trademark correctly .
If it were , could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the " i " letter since the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975 ? Perhaps somebody could trademark the word iDIOT , to prevent situations like this from occurring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When talking of trademarks, the Australian Woothworths company actually had absolutely nothing to do with the FW Woolworth company and its famous US and UK stores (and apparently stores in other countries that are still trading under the Woolworths brand).
One of the founders of the Australian company, Ernest Robert Williams, called the company Woolworths as part of a dare, only to find that FW Woolworth had not trademarked the name in Australia, therefore the trademark was deemed valid.This highlight the issue of trademarks.
Even in a globalised society, a company cannot expect by implication that its trademark will automatically be protected across the world, without registering the trademark correctly.
If it were, could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the "i" letter since the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975?Perhaps somebody could trademark the word iDIOT, to prevent situations like this from occurring.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462916</id>
	<title>Re:Bad summary</title>
	<author>t0p</author>
	<datestamp>1268480280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Apple argued: "Our customers will see the DOPi bag and think 'Hey that's iPod backwards! I'd better buy an official iPod-backwards bag to put my laptop in.  Even though my laptop isn't called "iPod"'..."

Of course, Apple's  attack-lawyers would have worded it better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Apple argued : " Our customers will see the DOPi bag and think 'Hey that 's iPod backwards !
I 'd better buy an official iPod-backwards bag to put my laptop in .
Even though my laptop is n't called " iPod " '... " Of course , Apple 's attack-lawyers would have worded it better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Apple argued: "Our customers will see the DOPi bag and think 'Hey that's iPod backwards!
I'd better buy an official iPod-backwards bag to put my laptop in.
Even though my laptop isn't called "iPod"'..."

Of course, Apple's  attack-lawyers would have worded it better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461930</id>
	<title>Great news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much apple fanbois want to believe in their beloved company and their jesus CEO, Apple is actually worse than even SCO.<br> <br>
I wish they lose all the legal battles everywhere against all.
<br> <br>
iFuckApple</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much apple fanbois want to believe in their beloved company and their jesus CEO , Apple is actually worse than even SCO .
I wish they lose all the legal battles everywhere against all .
iFuckApple</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much apple fanbois want to believe in their beloved company and their jesus CEO, Apple is actually worse than even SCO.
I wish they lose all the legal battles everywhere against all.
iFuckApple</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462060</id>
	<title>Re:Way to stick it to the man!</title>
	<author>hellop2</author>
	<datestamp>1268421960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or "inet" or even more common, "Inet" which some BBSers insisted upon, because the word "Internet" was considered a proper noun.<br> <br>

Here is an article from 1995 from the ACM: <a href="http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-1/inet-history.html" title="acm.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-1/inet-history.html.</a> [acm.org] <br> <br>

It's an article on Internet History.  Notice the filename contains the word "inet" meaning "Internet".<br> <br>

Was Apple's first use of the "i" trademark before 1995?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or " inet " or even more common , " Inet " which some BBSers insisted upon , because the word " Internet " was considered a proper noun .
Here is an article from 1995 from the ACM : http : //www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-1/inet-history.html .
[ acm.org ] It 's an article on Internet History .
Notice the filename contains the word " inet " meaning " Internet " .
Was Apple 's first use of the " i " trademark before 1995 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or "inet" or even more common, "Inet" which some BBSers insisted upon, because the word "Internet" was considered a proper noun.
Here is an article from 1995 from the ACM: http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds2-1/inet-history.html.
[acm.org]  

It's an article on Internet History.
Notice the filename contains the word "inet" meaning "Internet".
Was Apple's first use of the "i" trademark before 1995?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31465758</id>
	<title>iEvil</title>
	<author>cpotoso</author>
	<datestamp>1268511900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple is iEvil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is iEvil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is iEvil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461972</id>
	<title>Assholes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any chance these fuckers can be declared vexatious litigants?</p><p>Most of these are ridiculous and meritless, and Apple is only hoping to crush their opponents under a torrent of legal fees.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any chance these fuckers can be declared vexatious litigants ? Most of these are ridiculous and meritless , and Apple is only hoping to crush their opponents under a torrent of legal fees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any chance these fuckers can be declared vexatious litigants?Most of these are ridiculous and meritless, and Apple is only hoping to crush their opponents under a torrent of legal fees.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462820</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>flonker</author>
	<datestamp>1268478780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem being, of course, some people wouldn't get representation and would end up being steamrolled.  A more fair approach would be that only the lawyer bringing the case would need to win it or die trying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem being , of course , some people would n't get representation and would end up being steamrolled .
A more fair approach would be that only the lawyer bringing the case would need to win it or die trying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem being, of course, some people wouldn't get representation and would end up being steamrolled.
A more fair approach would be that only the lawyer bringing the case would need to win it or die trying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464260</id>
	<title>Re:Oh the irony</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1268499180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; If it were, could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the "i" letter since<br>&gt; the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975?</p><p>Not in the USA.  There would be no infringement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; If it were , could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the " i " letter since &gt; the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975 ? Not in the USA .
There would be no infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; If it were, could Volkswagen sue Apple for the use of the "i" letter since&gt; the company first used the designation on the Golf GTi in 1975?Not in the USA.
There would be no infringement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462938</id>
	<title>Re:Way to stick it to the man!</title>
	<author>t0p</author>
	<datestamp>1268480700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I remember when Ford made the Escort XR3i.  That was in the 1980s, I believe, which clearly precedes Apple's use of the letter "i".</p><p>Anyway, what makes Apple think they own the right to use a letter of the alphabet?  They gonna go after the Eskimos for branding their ice-houses as  iGloos?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I remember when Ford made the Escort XR3i .
That was in the 1980s , I believe , which clearly precedes Apple 's use of the letter " i " .Anyway , what makes Apple think they own the right to use a letter of the alphabet ?
They gon na go after the Eskimos for branding their ice-houses as iGloos ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I remember when Ford made the Escort XR3i.
That was in the 1980s, I believe, which clearly precedes Apple's use of the letter "i".Anyway, what makes Apple think they own the right to use a letter of the alphabet?
They gonna go after the Eskimos for branding their ice-houses as  iGloos?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</id>
	<title>Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1268511720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Frank Herbert, the author of "Dune" wrote a couple of novels set in a universe where lawyers who chose to fight a case literally had to fight it...and die if they lost. "Whipping Star" was one of them. </p><p> I think he was onto something. I, for one, would pay big money to see lawyers die. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frank Herbert , the author of " Dune " wrote a couple of novels set in a universe where lawyers who chose to fight a case literally had to fight it...and die if they lost .
" Whipping Star " was one of them .
I think he was onto something .
I , for one , would pay big money to see lawyers die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Frank Herbert, the author of "Dune" wrote a couple of novels set in a universe where lawyers who chose to fight a case literally had to fight it...and die if they lost.
"Whipping Star" was one of them.
I think he was onto something.
I, for one, would pay big money to see lawyers die. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464016</id>
	<title>Re:Sci Fi to the Rescue...Again</title>
	<author>TheTurtlesMoves</author>
	<datestamp>1268496720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think he was onto something. I, for one, would pay big money to see lawyers die.</p></div><p>You lie. You would just download the video coverage with bit torrent. Piracy is hurting the legal system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he was onto something .
I , for one , would pay big money to see lawyers die.You lie .
You would just download the video coverage with bit torrent .
Piracy is hurting the legal system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he was onto something.
I, for one, would pay big money to see lawyers die.You lie.
You would just download the video coverage with bit torrent.
Piracy is hurting the legal system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462126</id>
	<title>Re:Say what you want about Microsoft...</title>
	<author>You'reJustSlashFlock</author>
	<datestamp>1268423040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple was not founded by the Borg King, thus it cannot be Evil.  And by no measure is Apple as large as Microsoft (including the size of the founders' charity foundation).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple was not founded by the Borg King , thus it can not be Evil .
And by no measure is Apple as large as Microsoft ( including the size of the founders ' charity foundation ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple was not founded by the Borg King, thus it cannot be Evil.
And by no measure is Apple as large as Microsoft (including the size of the founders' charity foundation).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469446</id>
	<title>Re:Oh the irony</title>
	<author>lokpest</author>
	<datestamp>1268497860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, trademarks are registered in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark\_classification" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">specific classes</a> [wikipedia.org]. There are 45 classes and every regristration for each class needs a specific description and comes with a fee. That plus given the fact that trademarks not used "degenerates" its mostly not worth to hog everything everywhere.
<br>
<br>
My guess is that theese two "Woothworths" are not only in different parts of the world but registered in different classes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , trademarks are registered in specific classes [ wikipedia.org ] .
There are 45 classes and every regristration for each class needs a specific description and comes with a fee .
That plus given the fact that trademarks not used " degenerates " its mostly not worth to hog everything everywhere .
My guess is that theese two " Woothworths " are not only in different parts of the world but registered in different classes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, trademarks are registered in specific classes [wikipedia.org].
There are 45 classes and every regristration for each class needs a specific description and comes with a fee.
That plus given the fact that trademarks not used "degenerates" its mostly not worth to hog everything everywhere.
My guess is that theese two "Woothworths" are not only in different parts of the world but registered in different classes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462370</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1268513280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I first came across the Apple Mac I remember thinking how strange it was to name something after a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackintosh" title="wikipedia.org">coat</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first came across the Apple Mac I remember thinking how strange it was to name something after a coat [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first came across the Apple Mac I remember thinking how strange it was to name something after a coat [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464292</id>
	<title>Re:The first sign of trouble was...</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1268499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo.</p></div><p>Hey! That's a good one! iGetIt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo.Hey !
That 's a good one !
iGetIt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when the ruling was headlined iDon'tThinkSo.Hey!
That's a good one!
iGetIt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461958</id>
	<title>I think they lost it at the point where</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They told the Australian court that the country would have to change its name to Australya.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They told the Australian court that the country would have to change its name to Australya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They told the Australian court that the country would have to change its name to Australya.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462160</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268423520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at no point have they ever said "Don't be Evil".  Heck, they came out of the same mould as M$, so one must argue they are evil by induction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at no point have they ever said " Do n't be Evil " .
Heck , they came out of the same mould as M $ , so one must argue they are evil by induction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at no point have they ever said "Don't be Evil".
Heck, they came out of the same mould as M$, so one must argue they are evil by induction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464758</id>
	<title>Re:The world.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268504220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with "R"
They'll go broke suing all the pirates.</p></div><p>Pirates 'R' Us - no, wait...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with " R " They 'll go broke suing all the pirates.Pirates 'R ' Us - no , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bummer to be the company that gets stuck with "R"
They'll go broke suing all the pirates.Pirates 'R' Us - no, wait...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462206</id>
	<title>Re:iFirst</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1268510820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.</p></div><p>It's trademark law, they're supposed to.  You're trying to attribute hypocrisy to a situation that's actually created by the system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple does n't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.It 's trademark law , they 're supposed to .
You 're trying to attribute hypocrisy to a situation that 's actually created by the system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple doesn't care about other peoples names but then cries over some company that has been using Macpro name for over 25 years before Apple.It's trademark law, they're supposed to.
You're trying to attribute hypocrisy to a situation that's actually created by the system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464310</id>
	<title>Re:Bad summary</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1268499540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least one person read the summary before going into FROTH\_AT\_THE\_MOUTH mode...</p><p>Now all we need is for some company to do something with lleD, utnubU, etc., etc. since those trademarks are obviously available and are OK to use by most of these posters' statements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least one person read the summary before going into FROTH \ _AT \ _THE \ _MOUTH mode...Now all we need is for some company to do something with lleD , utnubU , etc. , etc .
since those trademarks are obviously available and are OK to use by most of these posters ' statements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least one person read the summary before going into FROTH\_AT\_THE\_MOUTH mode...Now all we need is for some company to do something with lleD, utnubU, etc., etc.
since those trademarks are obviously available and are OK to use by most of these posters' statements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464382</id>
	<title>Re:Proof the Australian legal system is broken</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1268500140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Totally agree. Further proof: no only did Woolworth's get away with stealing Apple's logo, they even <a href="http://www.woolworths.com.au/wps/wcm/connect/website/woolworths/about-us/our-story/september+-+1924/september+1924" title="woolworths.com.au">stole their own name</a> [woolworths.com.au]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Totally agree .
Further proof : no only did Woolworth 's get away with stealing Apple 's logo , they even stole their own name [ woolworths.com.au ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Totally agree.
Further proof: no only did Woolworth's get away with stealing Apple's logo, they even stole their own name [woolworths.com.au]!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461988</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31465516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31493106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_13_032205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462144
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463588
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463118
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463722
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463136
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462500
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462370
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31465516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31465758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31463654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31469282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31493106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31462446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_13_032205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31461974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_13_032205.31464292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
