<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_12_2216256</id>
	<title>Nearby Star Forecast To Skirt Solar System</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268393760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>PipianJ writes <i>"A recent preprint <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2160">posted on arXiv</a> by Vadim Bobylev presents some startling new numbers about <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24917/">a future close pass of one of our stellar neighbors</a>.  Based on studies of the <a href="http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/hipparcos.html">Hipparcos catalog</a>, Bobylev suggests that the nearby orange dwarf <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese\_710">Gliese 710</a> has an 86\% chance of skirting the outer bounds of the Solar System and the hypothesized <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort\_cloud">Oort Cloud</a> in the next 1.5 million years.  As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth.  This news about Gliese 710 <a href="http://astroprofspage.com/archives/664">isn't exactly new</a>, but it's one of the first times the probability of this near-miss has been quantified."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>PipianJ writes " A recent preprint posted on arXiv by Vadim Bobylev presents some startling new numbers about a future close pass of one of our stellar neighbors .
Based on studies of the Hipparcos catalog , Bobylev suggests that the nearby orange dwarf Gliese 710 has an 86 \ % chance of skirting the outer bounds of the Solar System and the hypothesized Oort Cloud in the next 1.5 million years .
As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets , the gravitational effects of Gliese 's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System , threatening Earth .
This news about Gliese 710 is n't exactly new , but it 's one of the first times the probability of this near-miss has been quantified .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PipianJ writes "A recent preprint posted on arXiv by Vadim Bobylev presents some startling new numbers about a future close pass of one of our stellar neighbors.
Based on studies of the Hipparcos catalog, Bobylev suggests that the nearby orange dwarf Gliese 710 has an 86\% chance of skirting the outer bounds of the Solar System and the hypothesized Oort Cloud in the next 1.5 million years.
As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth.
This news about Gliese 710 isn't exactly new, but it's one of the first times the probability of this near-miss has been quantified.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459532</id>
	<title>Re:Nemesis</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1268401140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen Nemesis</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen NemesisYes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen NemesisYes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461728</id>
	<title>Re:Fearmongering again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268418060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think about the gravitational effects, even at that distance. It *could* have significant effects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about the gravitational effects , even at that distance .
It * could * have significant effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about the gravitational effects, even at that distance.
It *could* have significant effects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462240</id>
	<title>What Fearmongering?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268511180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I, for one, welcome our new stellar driven icy overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I , for one , welcome our new stellar driven icy overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I, for one, welcome our new stellar driven icy overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674</id>
	<title>FSM SAVE US!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>XENU SAVE US!</htmltext>
<tokenext>XENU SAVE US !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XENU SAVE US!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460284</id>
	<title>Re:In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268405760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... I'll get right on it!</p></div><p>Famous last words!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I 'll get right on it ! Famous last words !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... I'll get right on it!Famous last words!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459932</id>
	<title>Re:Spooky Chant</title>
	<author>stwrtpj</author>
	<datestamp>1268403420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the year 1,502,000....</p></div><p>War was beginning</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the year 1,502,000....War was beginning</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the year 1,502,000....War was beginning
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459282</id>
	<title>Re:In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There isn't a millennium to waist... well maybe we can waist just few.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is n't a millennium to waist... well maybe we can waist just few .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There isn't a millennium to waist... well maybe we can waist just few.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460298</id>
	<title>Re:FSM SAVE US!</title>
	<author>shar303</author>
	<datestamp>1268405880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Light peace and universal karma to you all. L. Ron has passed into the clouds of unknowing where the Self is Unself and the mind is as unmind and all that sort of thing. L. Ron may have melted from the earth like snow, but, one thing lives on. His money. Please send cheque to address below."<br>The marharishi Veririshi, The Cayman Islands</p><p>Truth is, Duke Nukem will save us, by the time this star comes anywhere near the sequel should be about ready.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Light peace and universal karma to you all .
L. Ron has passed into the clouds of unknowing where the Self is Unself and the mind is as unmind and all that sort of thing .
L. Ron may have melted from the earth like snow , but , one thing lives on .
His money .
Please send cheque to address below .
" The marharishi Veririshi , The Cayman IslandsTruth is , Duke Nukem will save us , by the time this star comes anywhere near the sequel should be about ready .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Light peace and universal karma to you all.
L. Ron has passed into the clouds of unknowing where the Self is Unself and the mind is as unmind and all that sort of thing.
L. Ron may have melted from the earth like snow, but, one thing lives on.
His money.
Please send cheque to address below.
"The marharishi Veririshi, The Cayman IslandsTruth is, Duke Nukem will save us, by the time this star comes anywhere near the sequel should be about ready.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461474</id>
	<title>Will finally kill the dinosaurs on Isla Nublar!</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268415300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And so will disappear the last sign than man was ever here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And so will disappear the last sign than man was ever here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And so will disappear the last sign than man was ever here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459530</id>
	<title>We don't have time to waste, people</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1268401140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We must arm NOW!  That star *is* a weapon of mass destruction!  We don't want the smoking gun to be a black hole!  In this vial I have a sample of Hydrogen-- of the EXACT SAME MATERIAL detected in Gliese 710!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We must arm NOW !
That star * is * a weapon of mass destruction !
We do n't want the smoking gun to be a black hole !
In this vial I have a sample of Hydrogen-- of the EXACT SAME MATERIAL detected in Gliese 710 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must arm NOW!
That star *is* a weapon of mass destruction!
We don't want the smoking gun to be a black hole!
In this vial I have a sample of Hydrogen-- of the EXACT SAME MATERIAL detected in Gliese 710!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31463050</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My ride home...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My ride home.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ride home...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458998</id>
	<title>Time to start building a Death Star</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1268398980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like we're going to need some mega firepower to deal with this threat.  Let's blow the bastage up to kingdom come before it gets here.  We have here a cyber recreation of Dr. Teller, whose devoted his now vast computational facilities to devising a star destroying laser beam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like we 're going to need some mega firepower to deal with this threat .
Let 's blow the bastage up to kingdom come before it gets here .
We have here a cyber recreation of Dr. Teller , whose devoted his now vast computational facilities to devising a star destroying laser beam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like we're going to need some mega firepower to deal with this threat.
Let's blow the bastage up to kingdom come before it gets here.
We have here a cyber recreation of Dr. Teller, whose devoted his now vast computational facilities to devising a star destroying laser beam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348</id>
	<title>Fearmongering again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268406060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a star moving close that is very different from ours. It moves to the oort could, and therefore definitely makes it visible. There is so much to learn.</p><p>And all you can think about is how it &ldquo;threatens&rdquo; earth? Have you seen the space in the solar system? Have you calculated the likeliness? And in 1.5 million years? I wouldn&rsquo;t be surprised if we manage to have a congested hyperspace freeway to Gliese 710 by then! Or if we are long extinct and replaced by ravens, other apes, dolphins and octopuses. Nature wouldn&rsquo;t care anyway.</p><p>Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously. And enjoy the wonders of nature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a star moving close that is very different from ours .
It moves to the oort could , and therefore definitely makes it visible .
There is so much to learn.And all you can think about is how it    threatens    earth ?
Have you seen the space in the solar system ?
Have you calculated the likeliness ?
And in 1.5 million years ?
I wouldn    t be surprised if we manage to have a congested hyperspace freeway to Gliese 710 by then !
Or if we are long extinct and replaced by ravens , other apes , dolphins and octopuses .
Nature wouldn    t care anyway.Please stop the fearmongering , if you want to be taken seriously .
And enjoy the wonders of nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a star moving close that is very different from ours.
It moves to the oort could, and therefore definitely makes it visible.
There is so much to learn.And all you can think about is how it “threatens” earth?
Have you seen the space in the solar system?
Have you calculated the likeliness?
And in 1.5 million years?
I wouldn’t be surprised if we manage to have a congested hyperspace freeway to Gliese 710 by then!
Or if we are long extinct and replaced by ravens, other apes, dolphins and octopuses.
Nature wouldn’t care anyway.Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously.
And enjoy the wonders of nature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31465948</id>
	<title>Re:Fearmongering again.</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268513100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously. And enjoy the wonders of nature</em></p><p>Aside from the domestic dangers, we haven't much else to look forward to.</p><p>I'm reminded about the folly of tempting God.</p><p>So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... we may as well look forward to 1.5 fairly fallow years, and the time to do something. It's a nice span of time for peace and prosperity. Serendipitous indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please stop the fearmongering , if you want to be taken seriously .
And enjoy the wonders of natureAside from the domestic dangers , we have n't much else to look forward to.I 'm reminded about the folly of tempting God.So ... we may as well look forward to 1.5 fairly fallow years , and the time to do something .
It 's a nice span of time for peace and prosperity .
Serendipitous indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please stop the fearmongering, if you want to be taken seriously.
And enjoy the wonders of natureAside from the domestic dangers, we haven't much else to look forward to.I'm reminded about the folly of tempting God.So ... we may as well look forward to 1.5 fairly fallow years, and the time to do something.
It's a nice span of time for peace and prosperity.
Serendipitous indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459080</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly SMART in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.

So, in short, how is this news? I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.</p></div><p>
There, Fixed that for you.
</p><p>
You're assuming that humanity will last the next 500<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets ?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly SMART in the next 1.5 million years , a lot of humanity is n't going to be on earth .
So , in short , how is this news ?
I do n't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years .
There , Fixed that for you .
You 're assuming that humanity will last the next 500 : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly SMART in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.
So, in short, how is this news?
I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.
There, Fixed that for you.
You're assuming that humanity will last the next 500 :P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462826</id>
	<title>WITHIN the next 1.5M years...</title>
	<author>throughwithit</author>
	<datestamp>1268478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...so, he isn't necessarily saying that it will be 1.5M years before this happens, or even in ~1.5M years, but sometime within that timeframe.

We ought not deduce that we have such a long time to prepare, nor fail to account for the possibility of other intruding or impacting bodies headed our way even sooner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...so , he is n't necessarily saying that it will be 1.5M years before this happens , or even in ~ 1.5M years , but sometime within that timeframe .
We ought not deduce that we have such a long time to prepare , nor fail to account for the possibility of other intruding or impacting bodies headed our way even sooner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so, he isn't necessarily saying that it will be 1.5M years before this happens, or even in ~1.5M years, but sometime within that timeframe.
We ought not deduce that we have such a long time to prepare, nor fail to account for the possibility of other intruding or impacting bodies headed our way even sooner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459280</id>
	<title>Nibiru/Marduk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are slightly off... its Nibiru/Marduk... or heraps this near miss is what sends Planet X hurtiling our way.  "Sometime in the next 1.5 million years" woul then translate to 2.5 years from now, and the near miss is on 12.21.2012.  Time to <a href="2012ins.com" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">get insured</a> [slashdot.org]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are slightly off... its Nibiru/Marduk... or heraps this near miss is what sends Planet X hurtiling our way .
" Sometime in the next 1.5 million years " woul then translate to 2.5 years from now , and the near miss is on 12.21.2012 .
Time to get insured [ slashdot.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are slightly off... its Nibiru/Marduk... or heraps this near miss is what sends Planet X hurtiling our way.
"Sometime in the next 1.5 million years" woul then translate to 2.5 years from now, and the near miss is on 12.21.2012.
Time to get insured [slashdot.org]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462032</id>
	<title>Unless we do something stupid?</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1268421480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhm.  Are you living on the same planet the rest of us are?<br>The sheer, seething mass of rampant stupidity is only slightly below the point where it implodes and collapses into a stupidity singularity.<br>If we ARE actually alive in 1.5 million years, it'll prove two things.</p><p>1: There IS a God.<br>2: He's one warped motherfucker for keeping us around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhm .
Are you living on the same planet the rest of us are ? The sheer , seething mass of rampant stupidity is only slightly below the point where it implodes and collapses into a stupidity singularity.If we ARE actually alive in 1.5 million years , it 'll prove two things.1 : There IS a God.2 : He 's one warped motherfucker for keeping us around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhm.
Are you living on the same planet the rest of us are?The sheer, seething mass of rampant stupidity is only slightly below the point where it implodes and collapses into a stupidity singularity.If we ARE actually alive in 1.5 million years, it'll prove two things.1: There IS a God.2: He's one warped motherfucker for keeping us around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459024</id>
	<title>OH NOES!</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1268399100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth.</p></div><p>Its in 1.5 million years. We will have lazors (Firefox spell check couldn't figure out it's lasers) to shoot the comets by then.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the gravitational effects of Gliese 's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System , threatening Earth.Its in 1.5 million years .
We will have lazors ( Firefox spell check could n't figure out it 's lasers ) to shoot the comets by then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth.Its in 1.5 million years.
We will have lazors (Firefox spell check couldn't figure out it's lasers) to shoot the comets by then.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461266</id>
	<title>Too little, too late ....</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1268413080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I don't suspect we'll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012, and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects," said Kirkpatrick."</p><p>Too little, too late<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... If we've only started a few years before, we might have saved ourselves from 2012<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't suspect we 'll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012 , and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects , " said Kirkpatrick .
" Too little , too late ... If we 've only started a few years before , we might have saved ourselves from 2012 : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't suspect we'll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012, and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects," said Kirkpatrick.
"Too little, too late ... If we've only started a few years before, we might have saved ourselves from 2012 :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459074</id>
	<title>Re:Nemesis</title>
	<author>Moldiver</author>
	<datestamp>1268399340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it *is* Nemesis...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it * is * Nemesis.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it *is* Nemesis...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459624</id>
	<title>Nibiru / Marduk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268401620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah!  This "near miss" was predicted thousands of years ago by the Sumarians and it winds up responsible hurling a planet toward us that we can't see right now. Planet's Name? Nirbiru/Marduk/Planet X, or whatever they're calling it these days.</p><p>Of course, that means that "sometime in the next 1.5 million years" should probably read "in the next 2 years" so that the Planet X has sufficient time to reach us by December 21st, 2012.  Time to <a href="http://2012ins.com/" title="2012ins.com" rel="nofollow">Get Insured</a> [2012ins.com]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah !
This " near miss " was predicted thousands of years ago by the Sumarians and it winds up responsible hurling a planet toward us that we ca n't see right now .
Planet 's Name ?
Nirbiru/Marduk/Planet X , or whatever they 're calling it these days.Of course , that means that " sometime in the next 1.5 million years " should probably read " in the next 2 years " so that the Planet X has sufficient time to reach us by December 21st , 2012 .
Time to Get Insured [ 2012ins.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah!
This "near miss" was predicted thousands of years ago by the Sumarians and it winds up responsible hurling a planet toward us that we can't see right now.
Planet's Name?
Nirbiru/Marduk/Planet X, or whatever they're calling it these days.Of course, that means that "sometime in the next 1.5 million years" should probably read "in the next 2 years" so that the Planet X has sufficient time to reach us by December 21st, 2012.
Time to Get Insured [2012ins.com]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459896</id>
	<title>Oops a couple of decimals off</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268403120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>False alarm. We were a couple of decimal places off. It won't reach the Oort Cloud for another 1.5 years and the comets shouldn't reach the inner solar system until some time in December of 2012 so there's nothing to worry about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>False alarm .
We were a couple of decimal places off .
It wo n't reach the Oort Cloud for another 1.5 years and the comets should n't reach the inner solar system until some time in December of 2012 so there 's nothing to worry about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>False alarm.
We were a couple of decimal places off.
It won't reach the Oort Cloud for another 1.5 years and the comets shouldn't reach the inner solar system until some time in December of 2012 so there's nothing to worry about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459208</id>
	<title>Don't worry . . .</title>
	<author>StefanJ</author>
	<datestamp>1268399820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I learned in my Texas astronomy class the comets will harmlessly splash against the crystal spheres that support the planets and sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I learned in my Texas astronomy class the comets will harmlessly splash against the crystal spheres that support the planets and sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I learned in my Texas astronomy class the comets will harmlessly splash against the crystal spheres that support the planets and sun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459872</id>
	<title>I am your hero, thanks to entanglement!</title>
	<author>assemblerex</author>
	<datestamp>1268402940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've already found a way to live that long, and deflect any danger. We all live in complete harmony in that age, with all the comforts imaginable.
<br>
As long as you don't try to prove me wrong,
thanks to entanglement it's a done deal.
<br>
You can thank me at the bar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already found a way to live that long , and deflect any danger .
We all live in complete harmony in that age , with all the comforts imaginable .
As long as you do n't try to prove me wrong , thanks to entanglement it 's a done deal .
You can thank me at the bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already found a way to live that long, and deflect any danger.
We all live in complete harmony in that age, with all the comforts imaginable.
As long as you don't try to prove me wrong,
thanks to entanglement it's a done deal.
You can thank me at the bar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31496850</id>
	<title>Re:FSM SAVE US!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268758800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>remember, we dealt with y2k around 1998. so something that may happen in 1.5 million years<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>remember , we dealt with y2k around 1998. so something that may happen in 1.5 million years .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>remember, we dealt with y2k around 1998. so something that may happen in 1.5 million years ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856</id>
	<title>Nemesis</title>
	<author>ChefInnocent</author>
	<datestamp>1268398260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/nemesis-comets-earth-am-100311.html" title="space.com">Nemesis</a> [space.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen Nemesis [ space.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would stars like this be a better theory for sending Oort Cloud material to the inner Solar system than a hypothetical unseen Nemesis [space.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461942</id>
	<title>Re:We don't have time to waste, people</title>
	<author>zx75</author>
	<datestamp>1268420640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One might even call it... a death star?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One might even call it... a death star ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One might even call it... a death star?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31463144</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>t0p</author>
	<datestamp>1268485440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Earth will have great historic, nostalgic, spiritual and commercial value.  It is the homeworld - the place where the human race began - the trade in trashy souvenirs alone will be huge.  We can't let all that get knocked out by some no-name comet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Earth will have great historic , nostalgic , spiritual and commercial value .
It is the homeworld - the place where the human race began - the trade in trashy souvenirs alone will be huge .
We ca n't let all that get knocked out by some no-name comet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earth will have great historic, nostalgic, spiritual and commercial value.
It is the homeworld - the place where the human race began - the trade in trashy souvenirs alone will be huge.
We can't let all that get knocked out by some no-name comet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461018</id>
	<title>What an opportunity</title>
	<author>greenskyx</author>
	<datestamp>1268411100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With light speed travel so unlikely it's a rare chance to visit another solar system (if we're still around then).</htmltext>
<tokenext>With light speed travel so unlikely it 's a rare chance to visit another solar system ( if we 're still around then ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With light speed travel so unlikely it's a rare chance to visit another solar system (if we're still around then).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460664</id>
	<title>This is an opportunity, not a threat!</title>
	<author>cperciva</author>
	<datestamp>1268408640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Providing that humanity still exists in the year 1.5M but hasn't yet spread to other solar systems, this is a huge opportunity: Rather than needing to travel 3-4 light years in order to reach another star, we'll need to travel less than one light year -- thus making the trip both faster and much cheaper.</p><p>Who knows, it might even be possible to slowly spread across the entire galaxy without ever venturing into interstellar space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Providing that humanity still exists in the year 1.5M but has n't yet spread to other solar systems , this is a huge opportunity : Rather than needing to travel 3-4 light years in order to reach another star , we 'll need to travel less than one light year -- thus making the trip both faster and much cheaper.Who knows , it might even be possible to slowly spread across the entire galaxy without ever venturing into interstellar space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Providing that humanity still exists in the year 1.5M but hasn't yet spread to other solar systems, this is a huge opportunity: Rather than needing to travel 3-4 light years in order to reach another star, we'll need to travel less than one light year -- thus making the trip both faster and much cheaper.Who knows, it might even be possible to slowly spread across the entire galaxy without ever venturing into interstellar space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459980</id>
	<title>Re:FSM SAVE US!</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1268403780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this is after 2012 right?</p><p>Phfft!  No problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is after 2012 right ? Phfft !
No problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is after 2012 right?Phfft!
No problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460154</id>
	<title>Re:OH NOES!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268405040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Its in 1.5 million years. We will have lazors</p></div><p>Only because the sharks will be running the planet by then.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its in 1.5 million years .
We will have lazorsOnly because the sharks will be running the planet by then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its in 1.5 million years.
We will have lazorsOnly because the sharks will be running the planet by then.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</id>
	<title>So....</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268399040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> in the next 1.5 million years. As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth</p> </div><p>

So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth. <br> <br>

So, in short, how is this news? I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>in the next 1.5 million years .
As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets , the gravitational effects of Gliese 's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System , threatening Earth So , in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets ?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years , a lot of humanity is n't going to be on earth .
So , in short , how is this news ?
I do n't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> in the next 1.5 million years.
As the Oort Cloud is thought to be the source of many long-period comets, the gravitational effects of Gliese's passing could send a shower of comets into the inner Solar System, threatening Earth 

So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.
So, in short, how is this news?
I don't think anyone is going to be around in 1.5 million years.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152</id>
	<title>Spooky Chant</title>
	<author>Fieryphoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1268399640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the year 1,502,000....</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the year 1,502,000... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the year 1,502,000....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461558</id>
	<title>Astronomy picture of the day of Gliese 710</title>
	<author>gront</author>
	<datestamp>1268416380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991211.html" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991211.html</a> [nasa.gov] <p>

Astronomy picture of the day for December 11, 1999.</p><p>

The star field shown [in the image at the above link] is based on the Palomar Digitized Sky Survey and is 1/4 degree wide (about half the diameter of the full moon).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991211.html [ nasa.gov ] Astronomy picture of the day for December 11 , 1999 .
The star field shown [ in the image at the above link ] is based on the Palomar Digitized Sky Survey and is 1/4 degree wide ( about half the diameter of the full moon ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991211.html [nasa.gov] 

Astronomy picture of the day for December 11, 1999.
The star field shown [in the image at the above link] is based on the Palomar Digitized Sky Survey and is 1/4 degree wide (about half the diameter of the full moon).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462678</id>
	<title>Oh crap</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1268475900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're all going to die in 1.5 million years!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're all going to die in 1.5 million years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're all going to die in 1.5 million years!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460192</id>
	<title>Maybe ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268405220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... it'll capture Pluto. Not that we'd care one way or the other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it 'll capture Pluto .
Not that we 'd care one way or the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it'll capture Pluto.
Not that we'd care one way or the other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786</id>
	<title>In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>Kratisto</author>
	<datestamp>1268398020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... I'll get right on it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I 'll get right on it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I'll get right on it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460046</id>
	<title>mod do3N</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Bunch of gay ne6ros</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bunch of gay ne6ros [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bunch of gay ne6ros [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461614</id>
	<title>Re:In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>arcticinfantry</author>
	<datestamp>1268416920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG!!!  Who modded this Interesting?  I'd think infinity Naive is the only thing that's appropriate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG ! ! !
Who modded this Interesting ?
I 'd think infinity Naive is the only thing that 's appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG!!!
Who modded this Interesting?
I'd think infinity Naive is the only thing that's appropriate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31463252</id>
	<title>Change velocity by 200 m/sec</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1268487540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, how do you change the velocity of the solar system by 200 meters/sec ? That's all we need to dodge Gliese 710, and we have a few hundred thousand years to think about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , how do you change the velocity of the solar system by 200 meters/sec ?
That 's all we need to dodge Gliese 710 , and we have a few hundred thousand years to think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, how do you change the velocity of the solar system by 200 meters/sec ?
That's all we need to dodge Gliese 710, and we have a few hundred thousand years to think about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461538</id>
	<title>Re:In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1268416200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red Matter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red Matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red Matter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460626</id>
	<title>frequency seems a bit off.</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1268408340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Technology Review blog claims that one star approaches within a parsec once every two million years. I understand the Wolf 424 system will also approach within a parsec (nearest approach is supposed to be somewhere around a lightyear) 9,000 years from now. It seems unlikely to me that the frequency is that low. Maybe they're counting large stars, not the red dwarfs (Wolf 424 is a binary red dwarf pair).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Technology Review blog claims that one star approaches within a parsec once every two million years .
I understand the Wolf 424 system will also approach within a parsec ( nearest approach is supposed to be somewhere around a lightyear ) 9,000 years from now .
It seems unlikely to me that the frequency is that low .
Maybe they 're counting large stars , not the red dwarfs ( Wolf 424 is a binary red dwarf pair ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Technology Review blog claims that one star approaches within a parsec once every two million years.
I understand the Wolf 424 system will also approach within a parsec (nearest approach is supposed to be somewhere around a lightyear) 9,000 years from now.
It seems unlikely to me that the frequency is that low.
Maybe they're counting large stars, not the red dwarfs (Wolf 424 is a binary red dwarf pair).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460676</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>manekineko2</author>
	<datestamp>1268408700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the huge size of the 1.5 million number, it's all moot anyway, but if we haven't figured out a way out of the solar system by then, it seems like a great way to hitch a ride with the rogue star.  Sure, it's much weaker than the sun, but if by then we have the technology to park a couple of space stations or asteroids that much closer to it, seems like a great way to do extra-solar colonization on the cheap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the huge size of the 1.5 million number , it 's all moot anyway , but if we have n't figured out a way out of the solar system by then , it seems like a great way to hitch a ride with the rogue star .
Sure , it 's much weaker than the sun , but if by then we have the technology to park a couple of space stations or asteroids that much closer to it , seems like a great way to do extra-solar colonization on the cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the huge size of the 1.5 million number, it's all moot anyway, but if we haven't figured out a way out of the solar system by then, it seems like a great way to hitch a ride with the rogue star.
Sure, it's much weaker than the sun, but if by then we have the technology to park a couple of space stations or asteroids that much closer to it, seems like a great way to do extra-solar colonization on the cheap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459720</id>
	<title>Binary System?</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1268402160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what are the odds of this thing being captured into a long orbit? I would imagine this will set off a shower like dropping a ball of water into a screen, but I'm also curious if this will just graze us, or if our suns gravity would be sufficient to actually capture this dwarf and create a binary system?</p><p>1.5 Million years though. At least we have some time...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what are the odds of this thing being captured into a long orbit ?
I would imagine this will set off a shower like dropping a ball of water into a screen , but I 'm also curious if this will just graze us , or if our suns gravity would be sufficient to actually capture this dwarf and create a binary system ? 1.5 Million years though .
At least we have some time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what are the odds of this thing being captured into a long orbit?
I would imagine this will set off a shower like dropping a ball of water into a screen, but I'm also curious if this will just graze us, or if our suns gravity would be sufficient to actually capture this dwarf and create a binary system?1.5 Million years though.
At least we have some time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31464278</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1268499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets? Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth. </i></p><p>Chances are, we are going to do something incredible stupid and not survive to that point anyway.</p><p>And also, we'd have to colonize outside the solar system to be safe here.  Mars would be just as threatened by the comets as Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets ?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years , a lot of humanity is n't going to be on earth .
Chances are , we are going to do something incredible stupid and not survive to that point anyway.And also , we 'd have to colonize outside the solar system to be safe here .
Mars would be just as threatened by the comets as Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in 1.5 million years we might possibly be threatened by some comets?
Something tells me that unless we do something incredibly stupid in the next 1.5 million years, a lot of humanity isn't going to be on earth.
Chances are, we are going to do something incredible stupid and not survive to that point anyway.And also, we'd have to colonize outside the solar system to be safe here.
Mars would be just as threatened by the comets as Earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218</id>
	<title>Re:In 1.5 Million Years...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You joke, but it would probably take 1.5 million years to develop a technology that is capable of diverting or destroying a star.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You joke , but it would probably take 1.5 million years to develop a technology that is capable of diverting or destroying a star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You joke, but it would probably take 1.5 million years to develop a technology that is capable of diverting or destroying a star.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461394</id>
	<title>Re:Spooky Chant</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1268414280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice Conan O'Brien reference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice Conan O'Brien reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice Conan O'Brien reference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459780</id>
	<title>Re:Spooky Chant</title>
	<author>Dthief</author>
	<datestamp>1268402400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the year 1,502,000....</p></div><p>*The year 1,502,010</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the year 1,502,000.... * The year 1,502,010</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the year 1,502,000....*The year 1,502,010
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459840</id>
	<title>I know who will cover it!</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1268402820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Larry King. He'll still be alive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Larry King .
He 'll still be alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Larry King.
He'll still be alive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461354</id>
	<title>Finally, Planet X!</title>
	<author>heidaro</author>
	<datestamp>1268413980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always knew these idiots were right.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIDlqR1jnKA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIDlqR1jnKA</a> [youtube.com]

The reptile people are just hiding it from us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always knew these idiots were right .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = MIDlqR1jnKA [ youtube.com ] The reptile people are just hiding it from us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always knew these idiots were right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIDlqR1jnKA [youtube.com]

The reptile people are just hiding it from us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460066</id>
	<title>How will this look from the Earth?</title>
	<author>Required Snark</author>
	<datestamp>1268404440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a non-astronomer, I wonder how this will appear from the inner sloar system, i.e. the earth? How bright will it be, will it be visible during the day, which parts of the earth will it be visible from, when will it start to be visible?  These are all non-comet/end of the world questions, so i know that they are typically non-Slashdot ideas, but I'm still interested.
<p>
Any astronomy types out there who can figure this out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a non-astronomer , I wonder how this will appear from the inner sloar system , i.e .
the earth ?
How bright will it be , will it be visible during the day , which parts of the earth will it be visible from , when will it start to be visible ?
These are all non-comet/end of the world questions , so i know that they are typically non-Slashdot ideas , but I 'm still interested .
Any astronomy types out there who can figure this out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a non-astronomer, I wonder how this will appear from the inner sloar system, i.e.
the earth?
How bright will it be, will it be visible during the day, which parts of the earth will it be visible from, when will it start to be visible?
These are all non-comet/end of the world questions, so i know that they are typically non-Slashdot ideas, but I'm still interested.
Any astronomy types out there who can figure this out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459556</id>
	<title>H. G. Wells, 1911</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268401260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/456/456.txt" title="gutenberg.org">H. G. Wells, "The Star" (1911)</a> [gutenberg.org]</p><p>It was on the first day of the New Year that the announcement was made, almost simultaneously from three observatories, that the motion of the planet Neptune, the outermost of all the planets that wheel about the sun, had become very erratic....</p><p>Beyond the orbit of Neptune there is space, vacant so far as human observation has penetrated, without warmth or light or sound, blank emptiness, for twenty million times a million miles.  That is the smallest estimate of the distance to be traversed before the very nearest of the stars is attained.  And, saving a few comets more unsubstantial than the thinnest flame, no matter had ever to human knowledge crossed this gulf of space, until early in the twentieth century this strange wanderer appeared....</p><p>On the third day of the new year the newspaper readers of two hemispheres were made aware for the first time of the real importance of this unusual apparition in the heavens.  "A Planetary Collision," one London paper headed the news, and proclaimed Duchaine's opinion that this strange new planet would probably collide with Neptune....</p><p>And when next it rose over Europe everywhere were crowds of watchers on hilly slopes, on house-roofs, in open spaces, staring eastward for the rising of the great new star.  It rose with a white glow in front of it, like the glare of a white fire, and those who had seen it come into existence the night before cried out at the sight of it.  "It is larger," they cried.  "It is brighter!"  And, indeed the moon a quarter full and sinking in the west was in its apparent size beyond comparison, but scarcely in all its breadth had it as much brightness now as the little circle of the strange new star.</p><p>"It is brighter!" cried the people clustering in the streets. But in the dim observatories the watchers held their<br>breath and peered at one another.  "\_It is nearer\_," they said.  "\_Nearer!\_"</p><p>[Most of the story tells of  how star approaches close to Earth, creating considerable havoc...]</p><p>But the star had passed, and men, hunger-driven and gathering courage only slowly, might creep back to their ruined cities, buried granaries, and sodden fields.  Such few ships as had escaped the storms of that time came stunned and shattered and sounding their way cautiously through the new marks and shoals of once familiar ports....</p><p>The Martian astronomers--for there are astronomers on Mars, although they are very different beings from men--were naturally profoundly interested by these things.  They saw them from their own standpoint of course.  "Considering the mass and temperature of the missile that was flung through our solar system into the sun," one wrote, "it is astonishing what a little damage the earth, which it missed so narrowly, has sustained.  All the familiar continental markings and the masses of the seas remain intact, and indeed the only difference seems to be a shrinkage of the white discoloration (supposed to be frozen water) round either pole."  Which only shows how small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem, at a distance of a few million miles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>H. G. Wells , " The Star " ( 1911 ) [ gutenberg.org ] It was on the first day of the New Year that the announcement was made , almost simultaneously from three observatories , that the motion of the planet Neptune , the outermost of all the planets that wheel about the sun , had become very erratic....Beyond the orbit of Neptune there is space , vacant so far as human observation has penetrated , without warmth or light or sound , blank emptiness , for twenty million times a million miles .
That is the smallest estimate of the distance to be traversed before the very nearest of the stars is attained .
And , saving a few comets more unsubstantial than the thinnest flame , no matter had ever to human knowledge crossed this gulf of space , until early in the twentieth century this strange wanderer appeared....On the third day of the new year the newspaper readers of two hemispheres were made aware for the first time of the real importance of this unusual apparition in the heavens .
" A Planetary Collision , " one London paper headed the news , and proclaimed Duchaine 's opinion that this strange new planet would probably collide with Neptune....And when next it rose over Europe everywhere were crowds of watchers on hilly slopes , on house-roofs , in open spaces , staring eastward for the rising of the great new star .
It rose with a white glow in front of it , like the glare of a white fire , and those who had seen it come into existence the night before cried out at the sight of it .
" It is larger , " they cried .
" It is brighter !
" And , indeed the moon a quarter full and sinking in the west was in its apparent size beyond comparison , but scarcely in all its breadth had it as much brightness now as the little circle of the strange new star .
" It is brighter !
" cried the people clustering in the streets .
But in the dim observatories the watchers held theirbreath and peered at one another .
" \ _It is nearer \ _ , " they said .
" \ _Nearer ! \ _ " [ Most of the story tells of how star approaches close to Earth , creating considerable havoc... ] But the star had passed , and men , hunger-driven and gathering courage only slowly , might creep back to their ruined cities , buried granaries , and sodden fields .
Such few ships as had escaped the storms of that time came stunned and shattered and sounding their way cautiously through the new marks and shoals of once familiar ports....The Martian astronomers--for there are astronomers on Mars , although they are very different beings from men--were naturally profoundly interested by these things .
They saw them from their own standpoint of course .
" Considering the mass and temperature of the missile that was flung through our solar system into the sun , " one wrote , " it is astonishing what a little damage the earth , which it missed so narrowly , has sustained .
All the familiar continental markings and the masses of the seas remain intact , and indeed the only difference seems to be a shrinkage of the white discoloration ( supposed to be frozen water ) round either pole .
" Which only shows how small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem , at a distance of a few million miles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>H. G. Wells, "The Star" (1911) [gutenberg.org]It was on the first day of the New Year that the announcement was made, almost simultaneously from three observatories, that the motion of the planet Neptune, the outermost of all the planets that wheel about the sun, had become very erratic....Beyond the orbit of Neptune there is space, vacant so far as human observation has penetrated, without warmth or light or sound, blank emptiness, for twenty million times a million miles.
That is the smallest estimate of the distance to be traversed before the very nearest of the stars is attained.
And, saving a few comets more unsubstantial than the thinnest flame, no matter had ever to human knowledge crossed this gulf of space, until early in the twentieth century this strange wanderer appeared....On the third day of the new year the newspaper readers of two hemispheres were made aware for the first time of the real importance of this unusual apparition in the heavens.
"A Planetary Collision," one London paper headed the news, and proclaimed Duchaine's opinion that this strange new planet would probably collide with Neptune....And when next it rose over Europe everywhere were crowds of watchers on hilly slopes, on house-roofs, in open spaces, staring eastward for the rising of the great new star.
It rose with a white glow in front of it, like the glare of a white fire, and those who had seen it come into existence the night before cried out at the sight of it.
"It is larger," they cried.
"It is brighter!
"  And, indeed the moon a quarter full and sinking in the west was in its apparent size beyond comparison, but scarcely in all its breadth had it as much brightness now as the little circle of the strange new star.
"It is brighter!
" cried the people clustering in the streets.
But in the dim observatories the watchers held theirbreath and peered at one another.
"\_It is nearer\_," they said.
"\_Nearer!\_"[Most of the story tells of  how star approaches close to Earth, creating considerable havoc...]But the star had passed, and men, hunger-driven and gathering courage only slowly, might creep back to their ruined cities, buried granaries, and sodden fields.
Such few ships as had escaped the storms of that time came stunned and shattered and sounding their way cautiously through the new marks and shoals of once familiar ports....The Martian astronomers--for there are astronomers on Mars, although they are very different beings from men--were naturally profoundly interested by these things.
They saw them from their own standpoint of course.
"Considering the mass and temperature of the missile that was flung through our solar system into the sun," one wrote, "it is astonishing what a little damage the earth, which it missed so narrowly, has sustained.
All the familiar continental markings and the masses of the seas remain intact, and indeed the only difference seems to be a shrinkage of the white discoloration (supposed to be frozen water) round either pole.
"  Which only shows how small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem, at a distance of a few million miles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459750</id>
	<title>Global warming save us</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1268402280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Global warming melts ice. Quick, run your cars 24/7 and heat up the earth so we can melt those comets before they hit the ground* and do damage!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Global warming melts ice .
Quick , run your cars 24/7 and heat up the earth so we can melt those comets before they hit the ground * and do damage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global warming melts ice.
Quick, run your cars 24/7 and heat up the earth so we can melt those comets before they hit the ground* and do damage!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31463144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31464278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31496850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31465948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2216256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31496850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31465948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31458998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31462032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31464278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31463144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31461394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31459024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2216256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2216256.31460066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
