<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_12_2034225</id>
	<title>Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At the Sun</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268387700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"BBC reports that Royal Observatory's 'Solar Stormwatch' <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8552471.stm">needs volunteers to help scientists spot Sun storms</a> &mdash; known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal\_mass\_ejection">coronal mass ejections</a> &mdash; before they cause damage on Earth. 'When you look up at the Sun obviously it's too bright to look at properly,' says Dr. Marek Kukula of the Royal Observatory, but 'with special instruments and telescopes you can see there's all sorts of stuff going on.' NASA already monitors the Sun using <a href="http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/">two 'STEREO' spacecraft that produce 3D images of earth's nearest star</a>, which can show the trajectory of these explosions. However, the sheer amount of data means NASA's scientists are unable to analyze the data as closely as they need &mdash; which is where the world's Internet population comes in. After a brief tutorial, <a href="http://solarstormwatch.com/">users get access to the actual 3-D images</a> taken by the STEREO spacecraft. If a user believes they have spotted the beginnings of a solar storm, they can bring it to the attention of scientists. 'Every little bit counts,' says Kukula. 'I've spoken to the scientists involved and they all agree that even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours, get bored and never touch it again it's all really useful &mdash; and helps them to do their work.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " BBC reports that Royal Observatory 's 'Solar Stormwatch ' needs volunteers to help scientists spot Sun storms    known as coronal mass ejections    before they cause damage on Earth .
'When you look up at the Sun obviously it 's too bright to look at properly, ' says Dr. Marek Kukula of the Royal Observatory , but 'with special instruments and telescopes you can see there 's all sorts of stuff going on .
' NASA already monitors the Sun using two 'STEREO ' spacecraft that produce 3D images of earth 's nearest star , which can show the trajectory of these explosions .
However , the sheer amount of data means NASA 's scientists are unable to analyze the data as closely as they need    which is where the world 's Internet population comes in .
After a brief tutorial , users get access to the actual 3-D images taken by the STEREO spacecraft .
If a user believes they have spotted the beginnings of a solar storm , they can bring it to the attention of scientists .
'Every little bit counts, ' says Kukula .
'I 've spoken to the scientists involved and they all agree that even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours , get bored and never touch it again it 's all really useful    and helps them to do their work .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "BBC reports that Royal Observatory's 'Solar Stormwatch' needs volunteers to help scientists spot Sun storms — known as coronal mass ejections — before they cause damage on Earth.
'When you look up at the Sun obviously it's too bright to look at properly,' says Dr. Marek Kukula of the Royal Observatory, but 'with special instruments and telescopes you can see there's all sorts of stuff going on.
' NASA already monitors the Sun using two 'STEREO' spacecraft that produce 3D images of earth's nearest star, which can show the trajectory of these explosions.
However, the sheer amount of data means NASA's scientists are unable to analyze the data as closely as they need — which is where the world's Internet population comes in.
After a brief tutorial, users get access to the actual 3-D images taken by the STEREO spacecraft.
If a user believes they have spotted the beginnings of a solar storm, they can bring it to the attention of scientists.
'Every little bit counts,' says Kukula.
'I've spoken to the scientists involved and they all agree that even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours, get bored and never touch it again it's all really useful — and helps them to do their work.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457444</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268391900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can't do it themselves?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ca n't do it themselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can't do it themselves?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458594</id>
	<title>Why Did You Use Sun Microsystems Logo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good lord, has that Ellison fellow gone out and purchased the real sun now?  Will he buy the moon next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good lord , has that Ellison fellow gone out and purchased the real sun now ?
Will he buy the moon next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good lord, has that Ellison fellow gone out and purchased the real sun now?
Will he buy the moon next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457458</id>
	<title>Required commment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268391960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>O.K. I'll take the night watch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>O.K .
I 'll take the night watch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O.K.
I'll take the night watch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460070</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1268404440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot."<br>
You've never been to L.A., have you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot .
" You 've never been to L.A. , have you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot.
"
You've never been to L.A., have you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457610</id>
	<title>I looked at the sun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268392620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and now I have to get someone else to read Slashdot to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and now I have to get someone else to read Slashdot to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and now I have to get someone else to read Slashdot to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31463040</id>
	<title>not to stare into the sun.So when I was six I did.</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1268483220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oblig <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/" title="imdb.com">Pi</a> [imdb.com] <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/quotes?qt0188424" title="imdb.com">quote</a> [imdb.com] (Darren Aronofsky, 1998).</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oblig Pi [ imdb.com ] quote [ imdb.com ] ( Darren Aronofsky , 1998 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oblig Pi [imdb.com] quote [imdb.com] (Darren Aronofsky, 1998).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457712</id>
	<title>For Free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Headline should read, "Scientists need people that want to feel important to do their work for free".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Headline should read , " Scientists need people that want to feel important to do their work for free " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headline should read, "Scientists need people that want to feel important to do their work for free".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461706</id>
	<title>Re:Sun Microsystems Logo?</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1268417820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot editors not understanding the sections well enough to separate the concepts they represent from the words in a story is not a new phenomenon.  There was at least one completely non-computer-related article in the Enlightenment section a few years ago, although I can't remember enough details to tell the full story.  The point is just that these darn kids need to get off my lawn or, at the very least, learn the right way to play lawn darts while they're on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot editors not understanding the sections well enough to separate the concepts they represent from the words in a story is not a new phenomenon .
There was at least one completely non-computer-related article in the Enlightenment section a few years ago , although I ca n't remember enough details to tell the full story .
The point is just that these darn kids need to get off my lawn or , at the very least , learn the right way to play lawn darts while they 're on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot editors not understanding the sections well enough to separate the concepts they represent from the words in a story is not a new phenomenon.
There was at least one completely non-computer-related article in the Enlightenment section a few years ago, although I can't remember enough details to tell the full story.
The point is just that these darn kids need to get off my lawn or, at the very least, learn the right way to play lawn darts while they're on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459034</id>
	<title>Damn Lazy Editors</title>
	<author>coaxial</author>
	<datestamp>1268399160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can the editors PLEASE fix the icons?  This isn't Sun Microsystems.  This is about a star.  This is as bad as Enlightenment being used to refer to metaphysics rather than an old window manager.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can the editors PLEASE fix the icons ?
This is n't Sun Microsystems .
This is about a star .
This is as bad as Enlightenment being used to refer to metaphysics rather than an old window manager .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can the editors PLEASE fix the icons?
This isn't Sun Microsystems.
This is about a star.
This is as bad as Enlightenment being used to refer to metaphysics rather than an old window manager.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457952</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1268394180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Today's report:</p><p>"There's a little black spot on the sun today...it's the same old thing as yesterday...."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today 's report : " There 's a little black spot on the sun today...it 's the same old thing as yesterday.... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today's report:"There's a little black spot on the sun today...it's the same old thing as yesterday...."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461358</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1268413980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just before dawn the next day, skies all over planet Earth erupted in red, green, and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight. Indeed, stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba, the Bahamas, Jamaica, El Salvador, and Hawaii.</p></div><p>Say that an event like this were to happen, say, in the year 2012, just as Wired told us.

<br> <br>What would that look like? With the world electrical grid shorting out, and people going outside and looking up into the sky, and seeing a giant aurora <a href="http://www.hickerphoto.com/data/media/146/dempster\_aurora\_T1529.jpg" title="hickerphoto.com">snaking its way</a> [hickerphoto.com] across the celestial dome... what would that look like? Oh, I don't know, maybe a <b>giant rainbow serpent in the sky</b>, a <i>Quetzalcoatl</i> if you will, returning, as he promised, in 2012, the transition from the 4th to the 5th Mayan ages? <br> <br>;D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just before dawn the next day , skies all over planet Earth erupted in red , green , and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight .
Indeed , stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba , the Bahamas , Jamaica , El Salvador , and Hawaii.Say that an event like this were to happen , say , in the year 2012 , just as Wired told us .
What would that look like ?
With the world electrical grid shorting out , and people going outside and looking up into the sky , and seeing a giant aurora snaking its way [ hickerphoto.com ] across the celestial dome... what would that look like ?
Oh , I do n't know , maybe a giant rainbow serpent in the sky , a Quetzalcoatl if you will , returning , as he promised , in 2012 , the transition from the 4th to the 5th Mayan ages ?
; D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just before dawn the next day, skies all over planet Earth erupted in red, green, and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight.
Indeed, stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba, the Bahamas, Jamaica, El Salvador, and Hawaii.Say that an event like this were to happen, say, in the year 2012, just as Wired told us.
What would that look like?
With the world electrical grid shorting out, and people going outside and looking up into the sky, and seeing a giant aurora snaking its way [hickerphoto.com] across the celestial dome... what would that look like?
Oh, I don't know, maybe a giant rainbow serpent in the sky, a Quetzalcoatl if you will, returning, as he promised, in 2012, the transition from the 4th to the 5th Mayan ages?
;D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457676</id>
	<title>Re:Grumpy old man...</title>
	<author>MaximvsG</author>
	<datestamp>1268392980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>haha funny skit.  Here's the full paragraph:<p>

Life was a carnival! We entertained ourselves! We didn't need moooovin' pitchurrrres. In my day, there was only one show in town -- it was called "Stare at the sun!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... That's right! You'd sit in the middle of an open field and stare up at the sun till your eyeballs burst into flames! And you thought, "Oh, no! Maybe I shouldn't've stared directly into the burning sun with my eyes wide open." But it was too late! Your head was on fire and people were roastin' chickens over it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... And that's the way it was and we liked it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>haha funny skit .
Here 's the full paragraph : Life was a carnival !
We entertained ourselves !
We did n't need moooovin ' pitchurrrres .
In my day , there was only one show in town -- it was called " Stare at the sun !
" ... That 's right !
You 'd sit in the middle of an open field and stare up at the sun till your eyeballs burst into flames !
And you thought , " Oh , no !
Maybe I should n't've stared directly into the burning sun with my eyes wide open .
" But it was too late !
Your head was on fire and people were roastin ' chickens over it .
... And that 's the way it was and we liked it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haha funny skit.
Here's the full paragraph:

Life was a carnival!
We entertained ourselves!
We didn't need moooovin' pitchurrrres.
In my day, there was only one show in town -- it was called "Stare at the sun!
" ... That's right!
You'd sit in the middle of an open field and stare up at the sun till your eyeballs burst into flames!
And you thought, "Oh, no!
Maybe I shouldn't've stared directly into the burning sun with my eyes wide open.
" But it was too late!
Your head was on fire and people were roastin' chickens over it.
... And that's the way it was and we liked it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457466</id>
	<title>Grumpy old man...</title>
	<author>Lead Butthead</author>
	<datestamp>1268392020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lifted from SNL transcripts --</p><p>Grumpy Old Man: I'm oooooold! And I'm not happy! And I don't like things<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... In my day, there was only one show in town -- it was called "<b>Stare at the sun!</b>" .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it was and we liked it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lifted from SNL transcripts --Grumpy Old Man : I 'm oooooold !
And I 'm not happy !
And I do n't like things ... In my day , there was only one show in town -- it was called " Stare at the sun !
" .
... it was and we liked it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lifted from SNL transcripts --Grumpy Old Man: I'm oooooold!
And I'm not happy!
And I don't like things ... In my day, there was only one show in town -- it was called "Stare at the sun!
" .
... it was and we liked it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457810</id>
	<title>Thomas Dolby</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IlHgbOWj4o" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">She blinded me with science!</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She blinded me with science !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She blinded me with science!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot.  at least, i hope so.  well played, sir.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot .
at least , i hope so .
well played , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot.
at least, i hope so.
well played, sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457754</id>
	<title>remaining eye tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>should have had it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>should have had it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>should have had it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458014</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268394600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you stare at the sun long enough, the Calliope will crash to the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you stare at the sun long enough , the Calliope will crash to the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you stare at the sun long enough, the Calliope will crash to the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460462</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>niktemadur</author>
	<datestamp>1268406900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot.  at least, i hope so.  well played, sir.</p></div><p>Here's a dirty little secret:  "Blinded By The Light" is actually a Bruce Springsteen song, from his debut album.  After who knows how many albums, it's curious that Manfred Mann are only remembered for cover versions, the other being "Do Wah Diddy Diddy", actually by a band called The Exciters.<br>Manfred Mann, however, did OWN those songs with their versions, so I'm not putting them down, much as Jimi Hendrix owned Bob Dylan's "All Along The Watchtower", or Led Zeppelin owned Joan Baez' "Babe I'm Gonna Leave You".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot .
at least , i hope so .
well played , sir.Here 's a dirty little secret : " Blinded By The Light " is actually a Bruce Springsteen song , from his debut album .
After who knows how many albums , it 's curious that Manfred Mann are only remembered for cover versions , the other being " Do Wah Diddy Diddy " , actually by a band called The Exciters.Manfred Mann , however , did OWN those songs with their versions , so I 'm not putting them down , much as Jimi Hendrix owned Bob Dylan 's " All Along The Watchtower " , or Led Zeppelin owned Joan Baez ' " Babe I 'm Gon na Leave You " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this HAS to be the first manfred mann reference on slashdot.
at least, i hope so.
well played, sir.Here's a dirty little secret:  "Blinded By The Light" is actually a Bruce Springsteen song, from his debut album.
After who knows how many albums, it's curious that Manfred Mann are only remembered for cover versions, the other being "Do Wah Diddy Diddy", actually by a band called The Exciters.Manfred Mann, however, did OWN those songs with their versions, so I'm not putting them down, much as Jimi Hendrix owned Bob Dylan's "All Along The Watchtower", or Led Zeppelin owned Joan Baez' "Babe I'm Gonna Leave You".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464388</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268500320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am not so sure we will see such a huge solar flare in the next few years. We are still near a deep solar minimum that was reached in mid-2009, meaning sunspot activity is very low. What we need is such volunteers looking at the Sun closer to a solar maximum, in about 5-6 years. I hope this link will come up again then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not so sure we will see such a huge solar flare in the next few years .
We are still near a deep solar minimum that was reached in mid-2009 , meaning sunspot activity is very low .
What we need is such volunteers looking at the Sun closer to a solar maximum , in about 5-6 years .
I hope this link will come up again then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not so sure we will see such a huge solar flare in the next few years.
We are still near a deep solar minimum that was reached in mid-2009, meaning sunspot activity is very low.
What we need is such volunteers looking at the Sun closer to a solar maximum, in about 5-6 years.
I hope this link will come up again then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460534</id>
	<title>Animated wallpaper</title>
	<author>gr8\_phk</author>
	<datestamp>1268407620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why the OS needs to support animated wall paper. Then you can have your desktop continually updated with images of the sun. If even just the folks at NASA did this it might provide adequate monitoring for 8 hours a day. A screen saver could be nice too - I wonder which would get seen more often...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why the OS needs to support animated wall paper .
Then you can have your desktop continually updated with images of the sun .
If even just the folks at NASA did this it might provide adequate monitoring for 8 hours a day .
A screen saver could be nice too - I wonder which would get seen more often.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why the OS needs to support animated wall paper.
Then you can have your desktop continually updated with images of the sun.
If even just the folks at NASA did this it might provide adequate monitoring for 8 hours a day.
A screen saver could be nice too - I wonder which would get seen more often...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459178</id>
	<title>Mechanical Turk</title>
	<author>EdgeCreeper</author>
	<datestamp>1268399760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This reminds me of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon\_Mechanical\_Turk" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Amazon Mechanical Turk</a> [wikipedia.org], which crowdsources people to do tasks which computers have trouble doing.  It has been used to attempt to find people like Steve Fosset using satellite images and asking people to go through them.  The search was unsuccessful though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of Amazon Mechanical Turk [ wikipedia.org ] , which crowdsources people to do tasks which computers have trouble doing .
It has been used to attempt to find people like Steve Fosset using satellite images and asking people to go through them .
The search was unsuccessful though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of Amazon Mechanical Turk [wikipedia.org], which crowdsources people to do tasks which computers have trouble doing.
It has been used to attempt to find people like Steve Fosset using satellite images and asking people to go through them.
The search was unsuccessful though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458588</id>
	<title>The Solar System is the Star</title>
	<author>MSDos-486</author>
	<datestamp>1268397240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What happens when the Oracle System's Star goes Supernova ? Is it going to SPARC?...Is Coffee going to be supplied?...I haven't read much of the comments, but am I the only one to notice the subject icon on this story is the wrong Sun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when the Oracle System 's Star goes Supernova ?
Is it going to SPARC ? ...Is Coffee going to be supplied ? ...I have n't read much of the comments , but am I the only one to notice the subject icon on this story is the wrong Sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when the Oracle System's Star goes Supernova ?
Is it going to SPARC?...Is Coffee going to be supplied?...I haven't read much of the comments, but am I the only one to notice the subject icon on this story is the wrong Sun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</id>
	<title>Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268391420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mama always told me not to look into the eyes of the sun.</p><p>(But Mama, that's where the fun is!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mama always told me not to look into the eyes of the sun .
( But Mama , that 's where the fun is !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mama always told me not to look into the eyes of the sun.
(But Mama, that's where the fun is!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457324</id>
	<title>Solar Stormwatch!</title>
	<author>jfengel</author>
	<datestamp>1268391420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great name, Solar Stormwatch!  It sounds like they should get uniforms.</p><p>I think Solar Weather@HOME would have been cheerier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great name , Solar Stormwatch !
It sounds like they should get uniforms.I think Solar Weather @ HOME would have been cheerier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great name, Solar Stormwatch!
It sounds like they should get uniforms.I think Solar Weather@HOME would have been cheerier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457640</id>
	<title>09:13, Personal note:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268392800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six, I did. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal. I was terrified, alone in that darkness. Slowly daylight crept in through the bandages, and I could see, but something else had changed inside of me. That day I had my first headache.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun .
So once when I was six , I did .
The doctors did n't know if my eyes would ever heal .
I was terrified , alone in that darkness .
Slowly daylight crept in through the bandages , and I could see , but something else had changed inside of me .
That day I had my first headache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun.
So once when I was six, I did.
The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal.
I was terrified, alone in that darkness.
Slowly daylight crept in through the bandages, and I could see, but something else had changed inside of me.
That day I had my first headache.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31470514</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1268598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But what could we DO about it?</p></div><p>
We could upload commands to our orbiting spacecraft to go into safe mode and shut down sensitive electronics and what not. Most modern spacecraft are designed with a safe mode that can be triggered manually just for cases involving heavy solar activity. Believe it or not, those of us on the spacecraft industry do plan ahead from time to time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what could we DO about it ?
We could upload commands to our orbiting spacecraft to go into safe mode and shut down sensitive electronics and what not .
Most modern spacecraft are designed with a safe mode that can be triggered manually just for cases involving heavy solar activity .
Believe it or not , those of us on the spacecraft industry do plan ahead from time to time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what could we DO about it?
We could upload commands to our orbiting spacecraft to go into safe mode and shut down sensitive electronics and what not.
Most modern spacecraft are designed with a safe mode that can be triggered manually just for cases involving heavy solar activity.
Believe it or not, those of us on the spacecraft industry do plan ahead from time to time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459754</id>
	<title>Sunspots</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1268402280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&quot;Sunspots...cast a glare in my eyes.&quot;</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sunspots...cast a glare in my eyes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sunspots...cast a glare in my eyes.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31467084</id>
	<title>Re:Are they going to 'train' an algorithm?</title>
	<author>k2dbk</author>
	<datestamp>1268478060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In addition to the tutorials available on the site, there are a number of interviews with the scientists where they explain specifically they wants humans to look at the images. In fact, they want multiple people to look at each set of images to try to get a more objective opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to the tutorials available on the site , there are a number of interviews with the scientists where they explain specifically they wants humans to look at the images .
In fact , they want multiple people to look at each set of images to try to get a more objective opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to the tutorials available on the site, there are a number of interviews with the scientists where they explain specifically they wants humans to look at the images.
In fact, they want multiple people to look at each set of images to try to get a more objective opinion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459328</id>
	<title>Don't stare at the sun...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't stare at the sun...you'll use up all the light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't stare at the sun...you 'll use up all the light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't stare at the sun...you'll use up all the light.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460700</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1268408880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you have a Madman bummer drummers and Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you have a Madman bummer drummers and Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you have a Madman bummer drummers and Indians in the summer with a teenage diplomat?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457872</id>
	<title>Re:sunspots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know, I was about to apply for the job, I mean, I've got the expertise when it comes to sipping drinks with umbrellas and staring at the sun with shades on...</p><p>but dammit, I read the summary. I should know better than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , I was about to apply for the job , I mean , I 've got the expertise when it comes to sipping drinks with umbrellas and staring at the sun with shades on...but dammit , I read the summary .
I should know better than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, I was about to apply for the job, I mean, I've got the expertise when it comes to sipping drinks with umbrellas and staring at the sun with shades on...but dammit, I read the summary.
I should know better than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31463056</id>
	<title>But if you're first to discover TEOTWAWKI erupting</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1268483820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you'll get Armageddon to bear your name, or that of your <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120591/quotes?qt0459109" title="imdb.com">wife</a> [imdb.com].<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)<blockquote><div><p>even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours, get bored and never touch it again it's all really useful</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you 'll get Armageddon to bear your name , or that of your wife [ imdb.com ] .
; - ) even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours , get bored and never touch it again it 's all really useful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you'll get Armageddon to bear your name, or that of your wife [imdb.com].
;-)even if you log-on and just do it for a few hours, get bored and never touch it again it's all really useful
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457798</id>
	<title>Thank you (bye)</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1268393460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How to save the Earth via the World Wide Web"</p><p>When I first read it; I scoffed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but the more I thought about it, the more I now know it's true. Here's a simple test:</p><p>From the perspective of the "little man"<br>- Reports surface scorching Sun vomit approaching earth<br>- Report received<br>- Man eventually fries</p><p>From the perspective of Dr. Strangelove<br>- Receives report<br>- Replies: Thank you (bye)<br>- Closes hatch<br>- Proceeds to repopulate the Earth with super models</p><p>(Insert song here: "We'll Meet Again" by Vera Lynn)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How to save the Earth via the World Wide Web " When I first read it ; I scoffed ... but the more I thought about it , the more I now know it 's true .
Here 's a simple test : From the perspective of the " little man " - Reports surface scorching Sun vomit approaching earth- Report received- Man eventually friesFrom the perspective of Dr. Strangelove- Receives report- Replies : Thank you ( bye ) - Closes hatch- Proceeds to repopulate the Earth with super models ( Insert song here : " We 'll Meet Again " by Vera Lynn )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How to save the Earth via the World Wide Web"When I first read it; I scoffed ... but the more I thought about it, the more I now know it's true.
Here's a simple test:From the perspective of the "little man"- Reports surface scorching Sun vomit approaching earth- Report received- Man eventually friesFrom the perspective of Dr. Strangelove- Receives report- Replies: Thank you (bye)- Closes hatch- Proceeds to repopulate the Earth with super models(Insert song here: "We'll Meet Again" by Vera Lynn)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459874</id>
	<title>Looking forward to the blooper reel</title>
	<author>Fr05t</author>
	<datestamp>1268402940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"CRAP! I got a coronal mass ejection right in the eye!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" CRAP !
I got a coronal mass ejection right in the eye !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"CRAP!
I got a coronal mass ejection right in the eye!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458058</id>
	<title>I've heard it both ways.</title>
	<author>st1ckybit</author>
	<datestamp>1268394840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's funny.  I thought a coronal mass ejection was what happened after I ate at Chipotle.  I've not had a lot of luck getting volunteers to watch that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's funny .
I thought a coronal mass ejection was what happened after I ate at Chipotle .
I 've not had a lot of luck getting volunteers to watch that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's funny.
I thought a coronal mass ejection was what happened after I ate at Chipotle.
I've not had a lot of luck getting volunteers to watch that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458576</id>
	<title>image tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it amusing the the image tag is for sun microsystems. I am surprised no one has mentioned it till now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it amusing the the image tag is for sun microsystems .
I am surprised no one has mentioned it till now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it amusing the the image tag is for sun microsystems.
I am surprised no one has mentioned it till now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459814</id>
	<title>Sun Microsystems Logo?</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1268402640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I missing something, but the article seems to be using the Oracle|Sun logo, while this is an astronomy discussion of the Sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I missing something , but the article seems to be using the Oracle | Sun logo , while this is an astronomy discussion of the Sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I missing something, but the article seems to be using the Oracle|Sun logo, while this is an astronomy discussion of the Sun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457750</id>
	<title>Re:sunspots</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1268393340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Engineer Needs Volunteers to Do Work for Him"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Engineer Needs Volunteers to Do Work for Him "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Engineer Needs Volunteers to Do Work for Him"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31479938</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1268653320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not look at sun with remaining eye</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not look at sun with remaining eye</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not look at sun with remaining eye</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457498</id>
	<title>Someone has to say it</title>
	<author>balneary</author>
	<datestamp>1268392140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not look at sun with remaining eye!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not look at sun with remaining eye !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not look at sun with remaining eye!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457868</id>
	<title>My favorite planet is the sun</title>
	<author>mr100percent</author>
	<datestamp>1268393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, if you stare at it head-on it'll burn your eyes out. But it's hard not to. I once took a pair of binoculars and stared at the Sun for over an hour. Curiosity I guess...<br>Taken from <a href="http://cubs.fandome.com/video/26578/SNL-Will-Ferrell-as-Harry-Caray/" title="fandome.com">one of the best SNL skits</a> [fandome.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , if you stare at it head-on it 'll burn your eyes out .
But it 's hard not to .
I once took a pair of binoculars and stared at the Sun for over an hour .
Curiosity I guess...Taken from one of the best SNL skits [ fandome.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, if you stare at it head-on it'll burn your eyes out.
But it's hard not to.
I once took a pair of binoculars and stared at the Sun for over an hour.
Curiosity I guess...Taken from one of the best SNL skits [fandome.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540</id>
	<title>Are they going to 'train' an algorithm?</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1268392380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder, instead of having humans analyzing these things forever, could they use the interactions with humans to 'train' some sort of visual analysis algorithm so that it learns how to identify the 'interesting' images? Then, in the future, maybe a computer can alert Nasa scientists of particularly 'interesting' images for them to manually analyze, while no longer needing public 'screening' by humans?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder , instead of having humans analyzing these things forever , could they use the interactions with humans to 'train ' some sort of visual analysis algorithm so that it learns how to identify the 'interesting ' images ?
Then , in the future , maybe a computer can alert Nasa scientists of particularly 'interesting ' images for them to manually analyze , while no longer needing public 'screening ' by humans ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder, instead of having humans analyzing these things forever, could they use the interactions with humans to 'train' some sort of visual analysis algorithm so that it learns how to identify the 'interesting' images?
Then, in the future, maybe a computer can alert Nasa scientists of particularly 'interesting' images for them to manually analyze, while no longer needing public 'screening' by humans?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457670</id>
	<title>From the Chicken Little Observatory . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1268392980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How come I suspect that the Royal Observatory is going to be inundated with false positives, claiming, "The sky is falling!  The sky is falling!"
</p><p>However, this might be cool if they throw in a pair of 3D glasses . . .
</p><p>. . . and a NASA secret decoder ring, so that you can snoop on what their other satellites and thingies are up to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How come I suspect that the Royal Observatory is going to be inundated with false positives , claiming , " The sky is falling !
The sky is falling !
" However , this might be cool if they throw in a pair of 3D glasses .
. .
. .
. and a NASA secret decoder ring , so that you can snoop on what their other satellites and thingies are up to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How come I suspect that the Royal Observatory is going to be inundated with false positives, claiming, "The sky is falling!
The sky is falling!
"
However, this might be cool if they throw in a pair of 3D glasses .
. .
. .
. and a NASA secret decoder ring, so that you can snoop on what their other satellites and thingies are up to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457600</id>
	<title>Access to 3D images...</title>
	<author>reginaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1268392560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"After a brief tutorial, users get access to the actual 3-D images taken by the STEREO spacecraft"<br> <br>Sweet!  Do they send me complimentary solarstormwatch 3D viewing glasses, or do I need to use the ones I stole from Avatar?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" After a brief tutorial , users get access to the actual 3-D images taken by the STEREO spacecraft " Sweet !
Do they send me complimentary solarstormwatch 3D viewing glasses , or do I need to use the ones I stole from Avatar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"After a brief tutorial, users get access to the actual 3-D images taken by the STEREO spacecraft" Sweet!
Do they send me complimentary solarstormwatch 3D viewing glasses, or do I need to use the ones I stole from Avatar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457614</id>
	<title>First CME</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268392680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next they will need meta meta moderators to sift through all the phony reports of sun spots. <br>
Actually this could be contracted out to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. -for a fee- as they have experience.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next they will need meta meta moderators to sift through all the phony reports of sun spots .
Actually this could be contracted out to / .
-for a fee- as they have experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next they will need meta meta moderators to sift through all the phony reports of sun spots.
Actually this could be contracted out to /.
-for a fee- as they have experience.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458744</id>
	<title>Re:I've heard it both ways.</title>
	<author>Earthquake Retrofit</author>
	<datestamp>1268397840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My roommate saw this headline and laughed, "It's a good thing only smart people read that site."</htmltext>
<tokenext>My roommate saw this headline and laughed , " It 's a good thing only smart people read that site .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My roommate saw this headline and laughed, "It's a good thing only smart people read that site.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31463020</id>
	<title>Don't stare at sun with remaining eye</title>
	<author>Orlando</author>
	<datestamp>1268482620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..</p><p>Orlando</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..Orlando</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..Orlando</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457762</id>
	<title>Don't go natural</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1268393340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably is easier/cheaper to build AIs smart enough for recognizing patterns that should be evident for half-blind volunteers, than building artificial eyes for them after several get damaged vision. Shit (and retinal burns) happens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably is easier/cheaper to build AIs smart enough for recognizing patterns that should be evident for half-blind volunteers , than building artificial eyes for them after several get damaged vision .
Shit ( and retinal burns ) happens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably is easier/cheaper to build AIs smart enough for recognizing patterns that should be evident for half-blind volunteers, than building artificial eyes for them after several get damaged vision.
Shit (and retinal burns) happens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460126</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rather than a parking lot, could it have a Toyota Prius-like effect and make some cars go out of control?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than a parking lot , could it have a Toyota Prius-like effect and make some cars go out of control ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than a parking lot, could it have a Toyota Prius-like effect and make some cars go out of control?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464646</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268502900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is actually a Police song, not manfred mann. so suck it. and Fuck the mods for deleting my first comment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is actually a Police song , not manfred mann .
so suck it .
and Fuck the mods for deleting my first comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is actually a Police song, not manfred mann.
so suck it.
and Fuck the mods for deleting my first comment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461238</id>
	<title>Re:Are they going to 'train' an algorithm?</title>
	<author>graft</author>
	<datestamp>1268412840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume that they'd prefer to do this, but a supervised learning method that builds a classifier function requires that you have a training set that is already classified - a set of images that contain storms and a set of images that don't contain storms. My guess is, since this system just went online and started generating images, they don't really have a huge number of examples to draw from. And the data is pretty noisy, as you can see, so training a machine to be reliable would probably require a large input set. So they're counting on us humans being able to do the machines' jobs for a while, until there's enough examples that you can train your function.

In addition, training the machine to spot "interesting stuff" is much harder, maybe impossible, depending on your definition of "interesting stuff". Human eyeballs are better in that regard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume that they 'd prefer to do this , but a supervised learning method that builds a classifier function requires that you have a training set that is already classified - a set of images that contain storms and a set of images that do n't contain storms .
My guess is , since this system just went online and started generating images , they do n't really have a huge number of examples to draw from .
And the data is pretty noisy , as you can see , so training a machine to be reliable would probably require a large input set .
So they 're counting on us humans being able to do the machines ' jobs for a while , until there 's enough examples that you can train your function .
In addition , training the machine to spot " interesting stuff " is much harder , maybe impossible , depending on your definition of " interesting stuff " .
Human eyeballs are better in that regard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume that they'd prefer to do this, but a supervised learning method that builds a classifier function requires that you have a training set that is already classified - a set of images that contain storms and a set of images that don't contain storms.
My guess is, since this system just went online and started generating images, they don't really have a huge number of examples to draw from.
And the data is pretty noisy, as you can see, so training a machine to be reliable would probably require a large input set.
So they're counting on us humans being able to do the machines' jobs for a while, until there's enough examples that you can train your function.
In addition, training the machine to spot "interesting stuff" is much harder, maybe impossible, depending on your definition of "interesting stuff".
Human eyeballs are better in that regard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459704</id>
	<title>Re:09:13, Personal note:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268402100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Restate my assumptions: One, Mathematics is the language of nature. Two, Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. Three: If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge. Therefore, there are patterns everywhere in nature. Evidence: The cycling of disease epidemics;the wax and wane of caribou populations; sun spot cycles; the rise and fall of the Nile. So, what about the stock market? The universe of numbers that represents the global economy. Millions of hands at work, billions of minds. A vast network, screaming with life. An organism. A natural organism. My hypothesis: Within the stock market, there is a pattern as well... Right in front of me... hiding behind the numbers. Always has been.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Restate my assumptions : One , Mathematics is the language of nature .
Two , Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers .
Three : If you graph the numbers of any system , patterns emerge .
Therefore , there are patterns everywhere in nature .
Evidence : The cycling of disease epidemics ; the wax and wane of caribou populations ; sun spot cycles ; the rise and fall of the Nile .
So , what about the stock market ?
The universe of numbers that represents the global economy .
Millions of hands at work , billions of minds .
A vast network , screaming with life .
An organism .
A natural organism .
My hypothesis : Within the stock market , there is a pattern as well... Right in front of me... hiding behind the numbers .
Always has been .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Restate my assumptions: One, Mathematics is the language of nature.
Two, Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers.
Three: If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge.
Therefore, there are patterns everywhere in nature.
Evidence: The cycling of disease epidemics;the wax and wane of caribou populations; sun spot cycles; the rise and fall of the Nile.
So, what about the stock market?
The universe of numbers that represents the global economy.
Millions of hands at work, billions of minds.
A vast network, screaming with life.
An organism.
A natural organism.
My hypothesis: Within the stock market, there is a pattern as well... Right in front of me... hiding behind the numbers.
Always has been.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459128</id>
	<title>Strange</title>
	<author>Jorl17</author>
	<datestamp>1268399520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The picture on this story is Sun's symbol, not a picture of 'the sun'. Nice badonkadonk, by the way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The picture on this story is Sun 's symbol , not a picture of 'the sun' .
Nice badonkadonk , by the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The picture on this story is Sun's symbol, not a picture of 'the sun'.
Nice badonkadonk, by the way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457892</id>
	<title>Re:sunspots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At The Sun"</p></div><p>It is way better than The Mirror</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At The Sun " It is way better than The Mirror</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At The Sun"It is way better than The Mirror
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457838</id>
	<title>Nice implementation...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...of the crowd sourcing techniques that everyone on the web is going ga-ga about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...of the crowd sourcing techniques that everyone on the web is going ga-ga about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...of the crowd sourcing techniques that everyone on the web is going ga-ga about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190</id>
	<title>Re:But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1268395560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I should hope we have some ability to mitigate damage by disconnecting or shutting off equipment and using shielding, but even just knowing what will be destroyed and when can be useful. If there is reason to believe, for example, the computers in cars would get fried and make cars unusable, it would be good to know that before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot. Kind of like how better tornado detection doesn't do much to reduce property damage, but has greatly reduced fatalities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I should hope we have some ability to mitigate damage by disconnecting or shutting off equipment and using shielding , but even just knowing what will be destroyed and when can be useful .
If there is reason to believe , for example , the computers in cars would get fried and make cars unusable , it would be good to know that before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot .
Kind of like how better tornado detection does n't do much to reduce property damage , but has greatly reduced fatalities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I should hope we have some ability to mitigate damage by disconnecting or shutting off equipment and using shielding, but even just knowing what will be destroyed and when can be useful.
If there is reason to believe, for example, the computers in cars would get fried and make cars unusable, it would be good to know that before the highway at rush hour becomes a 5 mile long parking lot.
Kind of like how better tornado detection doesn't do much to reduce property damage, but has greatly reduced fatalities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31462102</id>
	<title>Re:Why the logo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268422560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was actually a clever idea to start using the logo for something useful now that Sun Microsystems itself is burning out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was actually a clever idea to start using the logo for something useful now that Sun Microsystems itself is burning out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was actually a clever idea to start using the logo for something useful now that Sun Microsystems itself is burning out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457594</id>
	<title>link...</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1268392560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://solarstormwatch.com/" title="solarstormwatch.com">http://solarstormwatch.com/</a> [solarstormwatch.com]

slashdotted...</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //solarstormwatch.com/ [ solarstormwatch.com ] slashdotted.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://solarstormwatch.com/ [solarstormwatch.com]

slashdotted...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457734</id>
	<title>Drat, and double drat</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1268393280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I was going to go analyze some images right now, but it seems the page won't load.....
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>....guess I'll just bookmark this one for later...
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...deletion from list of unused bookmarks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I was going to go analyze some images right now , but it seems the page wo n't load.... . ....guess I 'll just bookmark this one for later.. . ...deletion from list of unused bookmarks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I was going to go analyze some images right now, but it seems the page won't load.....
  ....guess I'll just bookmark this one for later...
  ...deletion from list of unused bookmarks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460402</id>
	<title>YUO FAIL EIT!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268406420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BUWLA, or BSD and was taken over I've never seen happiness Another least of which is[ and exciting; have their moments [amazingkreskin.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>BUWLA , or BSD and was taken over I 've never seen happiness Another least of which is [ and exciting ; have their moments [ amazingkreskin.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BUWLA, or BSD and was taken over I've never seen happiness Another least of which is[ and exciting; have their moments [amazingkreskin.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459056</id>
	<title>Why the logo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can anybody tell me why they put sun microsystem logo in this article?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anybody tell me why they put sun microsystem logo in this article ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anybody tell me why they put sun microsystem logo in this article?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457548</id>
	<title>My Eyes!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268392380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>qo[lasdf apjfaldsjdf' adka;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>qo [ lasdf apjfaldsjdf ' adka ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>qo[lasdf apjfaldsjdf' adka;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457494</id>
	<title>coronal mass ejections</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1268392140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Coronal mass ejections? I think I saw a clip of that on redtube.com.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coronal mass ejections ?
I think I saw a clip of that on redtube.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coronal mass ejections?
I think I saw a clip of that on redtube.com.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706</id>
	<title>But what difference will it make?</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1268393160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any coronal ejection EMP pointed at us will arrive just at the time we see it giving us a warning time of a day, perhaps.</p><p>But what could we <i>DO</i> about it?</p><p>Here's a quote from one Mr. Carrington (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/06may\_carringtonflare.htm) from the last time this happened in 1859:</p><p><i>On that morning, he was capturing the likeness of an enormous group of sunspots. Suddenly, before his eyes, two brilliant beads of blinding white light appeared over the sunspots, intensified rapidly, and became kidney-shaped. Realizing that he was witnessing something unprecedented and "being somewhat flurried by the surprise," Carrington later wrote, "I hastily ran to call someone to witness the exhibition with me. On returning within 60 seconds, I was mortified to find that it was already much changed and enfeebled." He and his witness watched the white spots contract to mere pinpoints and disappear.</i></p><p><i>It was 11:23 AM. Only five minutes had passed.</i></p><p><i>Just before dawn the next day, skies all over planet Earth erupted in red, green, and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight. Indeed, stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba, the Bahamas, Jamaica, El Salvador, and Hawaii.</i></p><p><i>Even more disconcerting, telegraph systems worldwide went haywire. Spark discharges shocked telegraph operators and set the telegraph paper on fire. Even when telegraphers disconnected the batteries powering the lines, aurora-induced electric currents in the wires still allowed messages to be transmitted.<br></i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any coronal ejection EMP pointed at us will arrive just at the time we see it giving us a warning time of a day , perhaps.But what could we DO about it ? Here 's a quote from one Mr. Carrington ( http : //science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/06may \ _carringtonflare.htm ) from the last time this happened in 1859 : On that morning , he was capturing the likeness of an enormous group of sunspots .
Suddenly , before his eyes , two brilliant beads of blinding white light appeared over the sunspots , intensified rapidly , and became kidney-shaped .
Realizing that he was witnessing something unprecedented and " being somewhat flurried by the surprise , " Carrington later wrote , " I hastily ran to call someone to witness the exhibition with me .
On returning within 60 seconds , I was mortified to find that it was already much changed and enfeebled .
" He and his witness watched the white spots contract to mere pinpoints and disappear.It was 11 : 23 AM .
Only five minutes had passed.Just before dawn the next day , skies all over planet Earth erupted in red , green , and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight .
Indeed , stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba , the Bahamas , Jamaica , El Salvador , and Hawaii.Even more disconcerting , telegraph systems worldwide went haywire .
Spark discharges shocked telegraph operators and set the telegraph paper on fire .
Even when telegraphers disconnected the batteries powering the lines , aurora-induced electric currents in the wires still allowed messages to be transmitted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any coronal ejection EMP pointed at us will arrive just at the time we see it giving us a warning time of a day, perhaps.But what could we DO about it?Here's a quote from one Mr. Carrington (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/06may\_carringtonflare.htm) from the last time this happened in 1859:On that morning, he was capturing the likeness of an enormous group of sunspots.
Suddenly, before his eyes, two brilliant beads of blinding white light appeared over the sunspots, intensified rapidly, and became kidney-shaped.
Realizing that he was witnessing something unprecedented and "being somewhat flurried by the surprise," Carrington later wrote, "I hastily ran to call someone to witness the exhibition with me.
On returning within 60 seconds, I was mortified to find that it was already much changed and enfeebled.
" He and his witness watched the white spots contract to mere pinpoints and disappear.It was 11:23 AM.
Only five minutes had passed.Just before dawn the next day, skies all over planet Earth erupted in red, green, and purple auroras so brilliant that newspapers could be read as easily as in daylight.
Indeed, stunning auroras pulsated even at near tropical latitudes over Cuba, the Bahamas, Jamaica, El Salvador, and Hawaii.Even more disconcerting, telegraph systems worldwide went haywire.
Spark discharges shocked telegraph operators and set the telegraph paper on fire.
Even when telegraphers disconnected the batteries powering the lines, aurora-induced electric currents in the wires still allowed messages to be transmitted.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458264</id>
	<title>Does it come with free 3D glasses??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268395920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it come with free 3D glasses??</p><p>The BORING sun always looks 2D to me. It'd be nice for a change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it come with free 3D glasses ?
? The BORING sun always looks 2D to me .
It 'd be nice for a change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it come with free 3D glasses?
?The BORING sun always looks 2D to me.
It'd be nice for a change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457314</id>
	<title>Imagine a beowulf cluster of volunteers</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1268391420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>first</htmltext>
<tokenext>first</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457878</id>
	<title>obligatory Dilbert</title>
	<author>screff</author>
	<datestamp>1268393820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they just need help with logging in.

<a href="http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2007-11-16/" title="dilbert.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2007-11-16/</a> [dilbert.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they just need help with logging in .
http : //www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2007-11-16/ [ dilbert.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they just need help with logging in.
http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2007-11-16/ [dilbert.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328</id>
	<title>sunspots</title>
	<author>nemeosis</author>
	<datestamp>1268391420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At the Sun"</p><p>There's a spot burning a hole in my eye from just reading that title..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At the Sun " There 's a spot burning a hole in my eye from just reading that title. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Scientists Need Volunteers To Look At the Sun"There's a spot burning a hole in my eye from just reading that title..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457528</id>
	<title>Re:Mama always told me...</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1268392320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least now I'm not the only one staring at the sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least now I 'm not the only one staring at the sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least now I'm not the only one staring at the sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457644</id>
	<title>Volume of data</title>
	<author>Yaur</author>
	<datestamp>1268392800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the problem is just the volume of data and not the lack of a good algorithm to do the detection wouldn't it be smart to go the folding@home/seti@home route and just throw massive numbers of donated CPU cycles at the problem?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the problem is just the volume of data and not the lack of a good algorithm to do the detection would n't it be smart to go the folding @ home/seti @ home route and just throw massive numbers of donated CPU cycles at the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the problem is just the volume of data and not the lack of a good algorithm to do the detection wouldn't it be smart to go the folding@home/seti@home route and just throw massive numbers of donated CPU cycles at the problem?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31463040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31479938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31467084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31462102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31470514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_2034225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31463040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31479938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31462102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31470514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31464388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458190
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460126
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31460070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31467084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31461238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31459704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31457750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_2034225.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_2034225.31458744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
