<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_12_1422200</id>
	<title>On Social Networks, You Are Who You Know</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1268407680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://twitter.com/santoshmaharshi" rel="nofollow">santosh maharshi</a> writes <i>"On social networks like Facebook, even if you have kept your profile very private, people can just look at your friends list and <a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/on-facebook-you-are-who-you-know-10385/">infer lots of vital information about you</a>. Most of the social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn allow people to see your picture and your friends list as part of the open access for visitors (the article says that only 5\% of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends list). In a study titled <a href="http://www.mpi-sws.org/~gummadi/papers/inferring\_profiles.pdf">You Are Who You Know: Inferring User Profiles in Online Social Networks</a> (PDF), conducted by Alan Mislove of Northeastern University and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, an algorithm was tested that can accurately infer the personal attributes of Facebook users simply by looking at their friend lists. 'At Rice [University], the algorithm accurately predicted the correct dormitory, graduation year, and area of study for the many of the students. In fact, among these undergraduates, researchers found that &ldquo;with as little as 20 percent of the users providing attributes we can often infer the attributes for the remaining users with over 80 percent accuracy."'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>santosh maharshi writes " On social networks like Facebook , even if you have kept your profile very private , people can just look at your friends list and infer lots of vital information about you .
Most of the social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn allow people to see your picture and your friends list as part of the open access for visitors ( the article says that only 5 \ % of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends list ) .
In a study titled You Are Who You Know : Inferring User Profiles in Online Social Networks ( PDF ) , conducted by Alan Mislove of Northeastern University and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems , an algorithm was tested that can accurately infer the personal attributes of Facebook users simply by looking at their friend lists .
'At Rice [ University ] , the algorithm accurately predicted the correct dormitory , graduation year , and area of study for the many of the students .
In fact , among these undergraduates , researchers found that    with as little as 20 percent of the users providing attributes we can often infer the attributes for the remaining users with over 80 percent accuracy .
" ' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>santosh maharshi writes "On social networks like Facebook, even if you have kept your profile very private, people can just look at your friends list and infer lots of vital information about you.
Most of the social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn allow people to see your picture and your friends list as part of the open access for visitors (the article says that only 5\% of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends list).
In a study titled You Are Who You Know: Inferring User Profiles in Online Social Networks (PDF), conducted by Alan Mislove of Northeastern University and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, an algorithm was tested that can accurately infer the personal attributes of Facebook users simply by looking at their friend lists.
'At Rice [University], the algorithm accurately predicted the correct dormitory, graduation year, and area of study for the many of the students.
In fact, among these undergraduates, researchers found that “with as little as 20 percent of the users providing attributes we can often infer the attributes for the remaining users with over 80 percent accuracy.
"'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453524</id>
	<title>Choose your own poison</title>
	<author>Infonaut</author>
	<datestamp>1268418420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>it seems like a massive waste of time to...</i> </p><ul>
<li>watch mindless TV</li><li>care about professional sports</li><li>argue about obscure geek topics online</li><li>read romance novels</li><li>play poker</li><li>talk about the weather</li><li>sit at the bar drinking with friends</li><li>build plastic models</li><li>obsess about manga</li><li>...</li></ul><p>If people enjoy using Facebook, and their enjoyment of Facebook with all its banalities doesn't affect me, why do I care what they do? I have my own ways of wasting time, they have theirs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it seems like a massive waste of time to.. . watch mindless TVcare about professional sportsargue about obscure geek topics onlineread romance novelsplay pokertalk about the weathersit at the bar drinking with friendsbuild plastic modelsobsess about manga...If people enjoy using Facebook , and their enjoyment of Facebook with all its banalities does n't affect me , why do I care what they do ?
I have my own ways of wasting time , they have theirs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> it seems like a massive waste of time to... 
watch mindless TVcare about professional sportsargue about obscure geek topics onlineread romance novelsplay pokertalk about the weathersit at the bar drinking with friendsbuild plastic modelsobsess about manga...If people enjoy using Facebook, and their enjoyment of Facebook with all its banalities doesn't affect me, why do I care what they do?
I have my own ways of wasting time, they have theirs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452482</id>
	<title>My Wife</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has a gazillion "friends" for FarmVille- does that have any correlation with her real relationships? I think not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has a gazillion " friends " for FarmVille- does that have any correlation with her real relationships ?
I think not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has a gazillion "friends" for FarmVille- does that have any correlation with her real relationships?
I think not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456608</id>
	<title>Re:So true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268388780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no way to hide your friends list from friends in the new Facebook design. Major privacy flaw, IMO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way to hide your friends list from friends in the new Facebook design .
Major privacy flaw , IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way to hide your friends list from friends in the new Facebook design.
Major privacy flaw, IMO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452942</id>
	<title>Re:OK, and?</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1268415780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; if they're gay but in the closet<br><br>Being in the closet is pretty much history at this point.  I'm pretty sure there are now more people who openly admit to being gay than there are actual practicing homosexuals.  Saying you're gay is like having a tatoo:  your grandparents would have been appalled, but now it's a status symbol.  Also, chicks dig it and will hang out with you more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; if they 're gay but in the closetBeing in the closet is pretty much history at this point .
I 'm pretty sure there are now more people who openly admit to being gay than there are actual practicing homosexuals .
Saying you 're gay is like having a tatoo : your grandparents would have been appalled , but now it 's a status symbol .
Also , chicks dig it and will hang out with you more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; if they're gay but in the closetBeing in the closet is pretty much history at this point.
I'm pretty sure there are now more people who openly admit to being gay than there are actual practicing homosexuals.
Saying you're gay is like having a tatoo:  your grandparents would have been appalled, but now it's a status symbol.
Also, chicks dig it and will hang out with you more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456384</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>Godskitchen</author>
	<datestamp>1268387820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453436</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>eht</author>
	<datestamp>1268418060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My name is fairly uncommon, only 63 hits(66 hits if you use my abbreviated name), none of which are me at my current or any previous addresses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My name is fairly uncommon , only 63 hits ( 66 hits if you use my abbreviated name ) , none of which are me at my current or any previous addresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My name is fairly uncommon, only 63 hits(66 hits if you use my abbreviated name), none of which are me at my current or any previous addresses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453212</id>
	<title>Fine, for college students, it is easy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are a couple of things here...</p><p>1) *IF* facebook still exists in 10-15 years, and is still popular then, how many people who have graduated and moved on will still update facebook? Is there the potential for forgotten information to be used against them? For example, your forgotten facebook profile has you listed with a person from Pakistan as being friends and you apply for a job that requires a security clearance..</p><p>2) For people who are no longer in school, what does this say, if anything? Or is it exponentially more difficult then? Or rather than college, does it apply to work? For example, if X \% of your friends all work for company Y and part of that X\% is person A but they're all friends with everyone else in that X\%, does that also imply that they once worked for company Y? (This seems rather obvious...)</p><p>3) What about the exclusions? For example, if you have a group of 20 people and they're all friends with each other except one pair, what does that tell you about the relationship between those two? What are the odds that they've (a) had a disagreement and no longer talk (b) were in a relationship and broke up (c) don't need facebook to know they're friends or (d) just not friends?</p><p>Of course, being AC (and thus friendless), I qualify for (3).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a couple of things here...1 ) * IF * facebook still exists in 10-15 years , and is still popular then , how many people who have graduated and moved on will still update facebook ?
Is there the potential for forgotten information to be used against them ?
For example , your forgotten facebook profile has you listed with a person from Pakistan as being friends and you apply for a job that requires a security clearance..2 ) For people who are no longer in school , what does this say , if anything ?
Or is it exponentially more difficult then ?
Or rather than college , does it apply to work ?
For example , if X \ % of your friends all work for company Y and part of that X \ % is person A but they 're all friends with everyone else in that X \ % , does that also imply that they once worked for company Y ?
( This seems rather obvious... ) 3 ) What about the exclusions ?
For example , if you have a group of 20 people and they 're all friends with each other except one pair , what does that tell you about the relationship between those two ?
What are the odds that they 've ( a ) had a disagreement and no longer talk ( b ) were in a relationship and broke up ( c ) do n't need facebook to know they 're friends or ( d ) just not friends ? Of course , being AC ( and thus friendless ) , I qualify for ( 3 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a couple of things here...1) *IF* facebook still exists in 10-15 years, and is still popular then, how many people who have graduated and moved on will still update facebook?
Is there the potential for forgotten information to be used against them?
For example, your forgotten facebook profile has you listed with a person from Pakistan as being friends and you apply for a job that requires a security clearance..2) For people who are no longer in school, what does this say, if anything?
Or is it exponentially more difficult then?
Or rather than college, does it apply to work?
For example, if X \% of your friends all work for company Y and part of that X\% is person A but they're all friends with everyone else in that X\%, does that also imply that they once worked for company Y?
(This seems rather obvious...)3) What about the exclusions?
For example, if you have a group of 20 people and they're all friends with each other except one pair, what does that tell you about the relationship between those two?
What are the odds that they've (a) had a disagreement and no longer talk (b) were in a relationship and broke up (c) don't need facebook to know they're friends or (d) just not friends?Of course, being AC (and thus friendless), I qualify for (3).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454850</id>
	<title>It's only going to get worse...um...better?</title>
	<author>singingjim1</author>
	<datestamp>1268424600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like targeted marketing based on my personal information/friends/interests.  It seems to make sense to allow marketers into that part of your consumer life because it makes everyone's job easier. It's easier for them to push ads that you might be interested in and it's easier for you to find merchandise and services that you're actually interested in.  The gleaning of this type of information is only going to get more detailed and hopefully the marketing based on this information more intelligent.  Pandora's Box is opened and can't be shut so I hope at least they use the information for my benefit as well as theirs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like targeted marketing based on my personal information/friends/interests .
It seems to make sense to allow marketers into that part of your consumer life because it makes everyone 's job easier .
It 's easier for them to push ads that you might be interested in and it 's easier for you to find merchandise and services that you 're actually interested in .
The gleaning of this type of information is only going to get more detailed and hopefully the marketing based on this information more intelligent .
Pandora 's Box is opened and ca n't be shut so I hope at least they use the information for my benefit as well as theirs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like targeted marketing based on my personal information/friends/interests.
It seems to make sense to allow marketers into that part of your consumer life because it makes everyone's job easier.
It's easier for them to push ads that you might be interested in and it's easier for you to find merchandise and services that you're actually interested in.
The gleaning of this type of information is only going to get more detailed and hopefully the marketing based on this information more intelligent.
Pandora's Box is opened and can't be shut so I hope at least they use the information for my benefit as well as theirs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454876</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1268424720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you, you just made my day. The information they have on me is so completely wrong (other than getting my family members right) that I couldn't help but giggling. I guess there is an advantage to constantly checking random boxes when filling out personal surveys. There's so much data associated with my name that the aggregators are completely confounded.</p><p>PS. Contrary to spokeo, I'm not a 60 year old woman who plays football, drives a truck, collects dolls and enjoys birdwatching. Although seeing my old address reminds me, I should probably get to the DMV some day and update that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , you just made my day .
The information they have on me is so completely wrong ( other than getting my family members right ) that I could n't help but giggling .
I guess there is an advantage to constantly checking random boxes when filling out personal surveys .
There 's so much data associated with my name that the aggregators are completely confounded.PS .
Contrary to spokeo , I 'm not a 60 year old woman who plays football , drives a truck , collects dolls and enjoys birdwatching .
Although seeing my old address reminds me , I should probably get to the DMV some day and update that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, you just made my day.
The information they have on me is so completely wrong (other than getting my family members right) that I couldn't help but giggling.
I guess there is an advantage to constantly checking random boxes when filling out personal surveys.
There's so much data associated with my name that the aggregators are completely confounded.PS.
Contrary to spokeo, I'm not a 60 year old woman who plays football, drives a truck, collects dolls and enjoys birdwatching.
Although seeing my old address reminds me, I should probably get to the DMV some day and update that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452406</id>
	<title>I'm impressed (not)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh wow, in an extremely closed and controlled system (university) they can find out my major, dorm, and year I graduated...wow, I'm stunned by the power of that algorithm.  This is so silly, I'm sure that by looking at my friends addresses one can probably tell which neighborhood I live in, but that's about it.  Big deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh wow , in an extremely closed and controlled system ( university ) they can find out my major , dorm , and year I graduated...wow , I 'm stunned by the power of that algorithm .
This is so silly , I 'm sure that by looking at my friends addresses one can probably tell which neighborhood I live in , but that 's about it .
Big deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh wow, in an extremely closed and controlled system (university) they can find out my major, dorm, and year I graduated...wow, I'm stunned by the power of that algorithm.
This is so silly, I'm sure that by looking at my friends addresses one can probably tell which neighborhood I live in, but that's about it.
Big deal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461422</id>
	<title>Or, to put it into words known to Slashdotters....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268414520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"All this has happened before, and all this will happen again."</p><p>"Watch your six!"</p><p>(and I DO wish<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. would get around to using JS that works on browsers other than FF and maybe IE...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" All this has happened before , and all this will happen again .
" " Watch your six !
" ( and I DO wish / .
would get around to using JS that works on browsers other than FF and maybe IE... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"All this has happened before, and all this will happen again.
""Watch your six!
"(and I DO wish /.
would get around to using JS that works on browsers other than FF and maybe IE...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457390</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>cyberfringe</author>
	<datestamp>1268391660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hah!  I doesn't know about me, and I've hardly been quiet on the Net.  So maybe there is still hope for "relative" obscurity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah !
I does n't know about me , and I 've hardly been quiet on the Net .
So maybe there is still hope for " relative " obscurity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah!
I doesn't know about me, and I've hardly been quiet on the Net.
So maybe there is still hope for "relative" obscurity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452834</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1268415180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently I'm a High School graduate in my late 70s living in a million dollar house in southern california.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently I 'm a High School graduate in my late 70s living in a million dollar house in southern california .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently I'm a High School graduate in my late 70s living in a million dollar house in southern california.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452674</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>blitzkrieg3</author>
	<datestamp>1268414400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But yeah, people shouldn't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy, for you, and for everyone you know.</p></div><p>That isn't the surprise. The surprise is that even if you go out of your way to <em>not</em> publicly document some things (such as high school), this information can be found out through your friends list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But yeah , people should n't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy , for you , and for everyone you know.That is n't the surprise .
The surprise is that even if you go out of your way to not publicly document some things ( such as high school ) , this information can be found out through your friends list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But yeah, people shouldn't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy, for you, and for everyone you know.That isn't the surprise.
The surprise is that even if you go out of your way to not publicly document some things (such as high school), this information can be found out through your friends list.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453406</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1268417940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, that's kind of strange.  I came up one result that's basically right in my neighborhood but doesn't seem to be me.  I came up with another result that, as far as I can tell, is an amalgam of me and my father.
</p><p>No real apparent record of me, though.  I'm happy about that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that 's kind of strange .
I came up one result that 's basically right in my neighborhood but does n't seem to be me .
I came up with another result that , as far as I can tell , is an amalgam of me and my father .
No real apparent record of me , though .
I 'm happy about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that's kind of strange.
I came up one result that's basically right in my neighborhood but doesn't seem to be me.
I came up with another result that, as far as I can tell, is an amalgam of me and my father.
No real apparent record of me, though.
I'm happy about that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452974</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>tabdelgawad</author>
	<datestamp>1268415960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the errors in my 'basic profile', the most useful info about me on that page is the profile of my neighborhood.  But that's always been available from my zip code, something I freely give to anyone who asks (including checkout clerks).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the errors in my 'basic profile ' , the most useful info about me on that page is the profile of my neighborhood .
But that 's always been available from my zip code , something I freely give to anyone who asks ( including checkout clerks ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the errors in my 'basic profile', the most useful info about me on that page is the profile of my neighborhood.
But that's always been available from my zip code, something I freely give to anyone who asks (including checkout clerks).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453168</id>
	<title>panopticon</title>
	<author>unchiujar</author>
	<datestamp>1268417040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a while the question from my perspective has been how long until we live in a panopticon not what can I do to keep privacy on the web ?  The results in the article are pretty obvious, the only way to keep information secret about yourself seems to become a hermit and use technologies from two centuries ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a while the question from my perspective has been how long until we live in a panopticon not what can I do to keep privacy on the web ?
The results in the article are pretty obvious , the only way to keep information secret about yourself seems to become a hermit and use technologies from two centuries ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a while the question from my perspective has been how long until we live in a panopticon not what can I do to keep privacy on the web ?
The results in the article are pretty obvious, the only way to keep information secret about yourself seems to become a hermit and use technologies from two centuries ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454218</id>
	<title>Value of data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268421660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geography can be determined by ip, so nothing new is given up there.   Besides whoever puts up those "find your classmates" banners who else would find where my dog graduated high school to be useful?   I could see some inference to age being valuable to determine my dog's membership in a target demographic, what else is commercially valuable with the information this dude can glean?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geography can be determined by ip , so nothing new is given up there .
Besides whoever puts up those " find your classmates " banners who else would find where my dog graduated high school to be useful ?
I could see some inference to age being valuable to determine my dog 's membership in a target demographic , what else is commercially valuable with the information this dude can glean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geography can be determined by ip, so nothing new is given up there.
Besides whoever puts up those "find your classmates" banners who else would find where my dog graduated high school to be useful?
I could see some inference to age being valuable to determine my dog's membership in a target demographic, what else is commercially valuable with the information this dude can glean?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452690</id>
	<title>Re:i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>Jeian</author>
	<datestamp>1268414520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disagree. I'm friends on Facebook with people I know from my childhood (like the family who lived down the street from me for 10 years) and can keep up with what's happening with them. I'm fairly certain that not everybody on my friend-list would remember to e-mail me about major events in their life, but if they post it on Facebook, there it is.</p><p>"i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?"</p><p>My friends do. Maybe they don't care about every single status update I post, but a lot of them care about the more significant things I post - including people who I wouldn't remember to e-mail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disagree .
I 'm friends on Facebook with people I know from my childhood ( like the family who lived down the street from me for 10 years ) and can keep up with what 's happening with them .
I 'm fairly certain that not everybody on my friend-list would remember to e-mail me about major events in their life , but if they post it on Facebook , there it is .
" i mean who really fucking cares , including yourself , about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life ?
" My friends do .
Maybe they do n't care about every single status update I post , but a lot of them care about the more significant things I post - including people who I would n't remember to e-mail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disagree.
I'm friends on Facebook with people I know from my childhood (like the family who lived down the street from me for 10 years) and can keep up with what's happening with them.
I'm fairly certain that not everybody on my friend-list would remember to e-mail me about major events in their life, but if they post it on Facebook, there it is.
"i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?
"My friends do.
Maybe they don't care about every single status update I post, but a lot of them care about the more significant things I post - including people who I wouldn't remember to e-mail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452558</id>
	<title>Re:i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn dude, you're pretty depressing. Got a Livejournal account?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn dude , you 're pretty depressing .
Got a Livejournal account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn dude, you're pretty depressing.
Got a Livejournal account?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454424</id>
	<title>Re:What this study shows is the value of network d</title>
	<author>Sax Maniac</author>
	<datestamp>1268422740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To compete with the people who are doing it for profit. I have some small amount of control over my own information. If I "opt out", then plenty of other companies will do it for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To compete with the people who are doing it for profit .
I have some small amount of control over my own information .
If I " opt out " , then plenty of other companies will do it for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To compete with the people who are doing it for profit.
I have some small amount of control over my own information.
If I "opt out", then plenty of other companies will do it for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452494</id>
	<title>Did I just see the 20-80 rule?</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268413500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, I hate it when I see the 20-80 rule, because now I know it's bullshit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , I hate it when I see the 20-80 rule , because now I know it 's bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, I hate it when I see the 20-80 rule, because now I know it's bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452526</id>
	<title>Re:i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>ddillman</author>
	<datestamp>1268413680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it seems like a giant ego bonfire, it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life. just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion. it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people's personalities: their vanity, their shallowness, and their mediocrity. i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?</p></div><p> yada yada yada...

</p><p>If you're so bothered by it, why are you wasting so much time ranting about it here?  Simply ignore and move on...  Oh, I see, it is we, the ones with the giant egos that need to listen to YOUR viewpoint.   Hypocrite.</p><p>I'll grant you a lot of the crap on social networking sites is indeed ego fanning, but I'll also counter with the fact that it makes keeping in touch with distant family and friends almost trivially easy, which can strengthen relationship bonds, and that's generally a good thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it seems like a giant ego bonfire , it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life .
just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion .
it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people 's personalities : their vanity , their shallowness , and their mediocrity .
i mean who really fucking cares , including yourself , about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life ?
yada yada yada.. . If you 're so bothered by it , why are you wasting so much time ranting about it here ?
Simply ignore and move on... Oh , I see , it is we , the ones with the giant egos that need to listen to YOUR viewpoint .
Hypocrite.I 'll grant you a lot of the crap on social networking sites is indeed ego fanning , but I 'll also counter with the fact that it makes keeping in touch with distant family and friends almost trivially easy , which can strengthen relationship bonds , and that 's generally a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it seems like a giant ego bonfire, it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life.
just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion.
it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people's personalities: their vanity, their shallowness, and their mediocrity.
i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?
yada yada yada...

If you're so bothered by it, why are you wasting so much time ranting about it here?
Simply ignore and move on...  Oh, I see, it is we, the ones with the giant egos that need to listen to YOUR viewpoint.
Hypocrite.I'll grant you a lot of the crap on social networking sites is indeed ego fanning, but I'll also counter with the fact that it makes keeping in touch with distant family and friends almost trivially easy, which can strengthen relationship bonds, and that's generally a good thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452162</id>
	<title>A good first step</title>
	<author>Robyrt</author>
	<datestamp>1268412000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but college students are some of the most strongly connected people around. They are more likely to be friends with their neighbors (who all share their age and occupation), Facebook adoption rates in their social circle are very high, and they have a very strong overlap between work, living arrangements and social life.</p><p>This isn't generally worrisome for the rest of us, who aren't Facebook friends with everyone on our street or office building.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but college students are some of the most strongly connected people around .
They are more likely to be friends with their neighbors ( who all share their age and occupation ) , Facebook adoption rates in their social circle are very high , and they have a very strong overlap between work , living arrangements and social life.This is n't generally worrisome for the rest of us , who are n't Facebook friends with everyone on our street or office building .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but college students are some of the most strongly connected people around.
They are more likely to be friends with their neighbors (who all share their age and occupation), Facebook adoption rates in their social circle are very high, and they have a very strong overlap between work, living arrangements and social life.This isn't generally worrisome for the rest of us, who aren't Facebook friends with everyone on our street or office building.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452708</id>
	<title>Re:i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268414580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is this something you have to have a tv to understand?  I'm better than everyone else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is this something you have to have a tv to understand ?
I 'm better than everyone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this something you have to have a tv to understand?
I'm better than everyone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452270</id>
	<title>Blinding revelation</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1268412540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stereotypes work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stereotypes work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stereotypes work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452320</id>
	<title>Re:OK, and?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Way to Go, slashdot readers! Completely overgeneralizing a research article!</p><p> The point is that it doesn't even have to be "most" of your Facebook friends.  You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people.  This is not as obvious as it sounds.  The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it's possible to infer other information (like shopping, political, geographic, demographic, etc) from information reflected by your friends.  If it really is that obvious, why doesn't everybody <i>already</i> do it <i>effectively</i>?  It's because it's not easy and not at all obvious. Facebook and Google have some impressive algorithms for this type of thing but nothing systematic and not as quantified as anybody might think. </p><p>You'd think people would welcome fundamental research into an obviously useful area.  Sheesh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Way to Go , slashdot readers !
Completely overgeneralizing a research article !
The point is that it does n't even have to be " most " of your Facebook friends .
You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people .
This is not as obvious as it sounds .
The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it 's possible to infer other information ( like shopping , political , geographic , demographic , etc ) from information reflected by your friends .
If it really is that obvious , why does n't everybody already do it effectively ?
It 's because it 's not easy and not at all obvious .
Facebook and Google have some impressive algorithms for this type of thing but nothing systematic and not as quantified as anybody might think .
You 'd think people would welcome fundamental research into an obviously useful area .
Sheesh</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Way to Go, slashdot readers!
Completely overgeneralizing a research article!
The point is that it doesn't even have to be "most" of your Facebook friends.
You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people.
This is not as obvious as it sounds.
The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it's possible to infer other information (like shopping, political, geographic, demographic, etc) from information reflected by your friends.
If it really is that obvious, why doesn't everybody already do it effectively?
It's because it's not easy and not at all obvious.
Facebook and Google have some impressive algorithms for this type of thing but nothing systematic and not as quantified as anybody might think.
You'd think people would welcome fundamental research into an obviously useful area.
Sheesh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31455128</id>
	<title>Re:OK, and?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1268425680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Way to Go, slashdot readers! Completely overgeneralizing a research article!</p></div></blockquote><p>If you actually bother to <i>read</i> the article, the grandparent pretty much got it right.  The information the study located is information people (mostly) aren't particularly trying to hide.  (And if you read the study, you'll also note they made no effort to determine or confirm if the data is accurate.)<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>The point is that it doesn't even have to be "most" of your Facebook friends. You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people.</p></div></blockquote><p>Which discover amounts to "duh".  If you look at my friends list on Facebook or Livejournal, it's trivially easy to determine my interests.  But, as the grandparent correctly points out - that's because I make no effort to hide those interests.<br>
&nbsp; <br>The study notably fails to demonstrate that by such analysis that you can find out anything 'surprising' (E.G. not already publicly disclosed).<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it's possible to infer other information (like shopping, political, geographic, demographic, etc) from information reflected by your friends.</p></div></blockquote><p>This type of research demonstrates no such thing.  They don't even demonstrate the accuracy of their current research by comparing their predictions with ground truth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way to Go , slashdot readers !
Completely overgeneralizing a research article ! If you actually bother to read the article , the grandparent pretty much got it right .
The information the study located is information people ( mostly ) are n't particularly trying to hide .
( And if you read the study , you 'll also note they made no effort to determine or confirm if the data is accurate .
)   The point is that it does n't even have to be " most " of your Facebook friends .
You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people.Which discover amounts to " duh " .
If you look at my friends list on Facebook or Livejournal , it 's trivially easy to determine my interests .
But , as the grandparent correctly points out - that 's because I make no effort to hide those interests .
  The study notably fails to demonstrate that by such analysis that you can find out anything 'surprising ' ( E.G .
not already publicly disclosed ) .
  The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it 's possible to infer other information ( like shopping , political , geographic , demographic , etc ) from information reflected by your friends.This type of research demonstrates no such thing .
They do n't even demonstrate the accuracy of their current research by comparing their predictions with ground truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way to Go, slashdot readers!
Completely overgeneralizing a research article!If you actually bother to read the article, the grandparent pretty much got it right.
The information the study located is information people (mostly) aren't particularly trying to hide.
(And if you read the study, you'll also note they made no effort to determine or confirm if the data is accurate.
)
  The point is that it doesn't even have to be "most" of your Facebook friends.
You can infer a surprising amount of information based on a relatively small sampling of people.Which discover amounts to "duh".
If you look at my friends list on Facebook or Livejournal, it's trivially easy to determine my interests.
But, as the grandparent correctly points out - that's because I make no effort to hide those interests.
  The study notably fails to demonstrate that by such analysis that you can find out anything 'surprising' (E.G.
not already publicly disclosed).
  The proper extension is that this type of research indicates it's possible to infer other information (like shopping, political, geographic, demographic, etc) from information reflected by your friends.This type of research demonstrates no such thing.
They don't even demonstrate the accuracy of their current research by comparing their predictions with ground truth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453182</id>
	<title>Sometimes you want this info to be public</title>
	<author>zero\_out</author>
	<datestamp>1268417100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The last time I was looking for a job, I searched my name on Google and came up with a lot of hits that had nothing to do with me.  Some were good, some were bad.  In all, there were at least four distinct people on the first six pages of hits, with my name.</p><p>For example, there was one person who is a police officer in another state that was on the first page.  If someone were to mistake me for that person, I wouldn't mind.  However, there is no way someone would mistake me for him, due to age, occupation, and location differences.</p><p>Another person on the first page was someone I definitely did NOT want to be mistaken for.  Unfortunately, this person works in IT, went to school in the same state as I did, and is just a couple years younger than I am.  The possibility for mistaking me for this person was rather high.</p><p>There are a few ways I could fix this problem, but most would take way too long.  I could publish some papers, speak at conferences, etc., but that would take years to get me on the first page of search results.  Alternatively, I could make my Facebook profile public, even though it wouldn't have as much impact.  It was perfectly clean, since I don't participate in any questionable activities (street racing, binge drinking, drugs, bad-mouthing bosses, etc).  I also don't include information about religion/politics.  My friends have similar values that I do, so even if someone were to infer information about me based on them, they would have every reason to believe that I am a normal, decent person, with strong morals and good character.  Sure, this won't immediately get the real me to show up on the first page of search results, but it was a quick and simple thing that got me moving toward my goal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last time I was looking for a job , I searched my name on Google and came up with a lot of hits that had nothing to do with me .
Some were good , some were bad .
In all , there were at least four distinct people on the first six pages of hits , with my name.For example , there was one person who is a police officer in another state that was on the first page .
If someone were to mistake me for that person , I would n't mind .
However , there is no way someone would mistake me for him , due to age , occupation , and location differences.Another person on the first page was someone I definitely did NOT want to be mistaken for .
Unfortunately , this person works in IT , went to school in the same state as I did , and is just a couple years younger than I am .
The possibility for mistaking me for this person was rather high.There are a few ways I could fix this problem , but most would take way too long .
I could publish some papers , speak at conferences , etc. , but that would take years to get me on the first page of search results .
Alternatively , I could make my Facebook profile public , even though it would n't have as much impact .
It was perfectly clean , since I do n't participate in any questionable activities ( street racing , binge drinking , drugs , bad-mouthing bosses , etc ) .
I also do n't include information about religion/politics .
My friends have similar values that I do , so even if someone were to infer information about me based on them , they would have every reason to believe that I am a normal , decent person , with strong morals and good character .
Sure , this wo n't immediately get the real me to show up on the first page of search results , but it was a quick and simple thing that got me moving toward my goal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last time I was looking for a job, I searched my name on Google and came up with a lot of hits that had nothing to do with me.
Some were good, some were bad.
In all, there were at least four distinct people on the first six pages of hits, with my name.For example, there was one person who is a police officer in another state that was on the first page.
If someone were to mistake me for that person, I wouldn't mind.
However, there is no way someone would mistake me for him, due to age, occupation, and location differences.Another person on the first page was someone I definitely did NOT want to be mistaken for.
Unfortunately, this person works in IT, went to school in the same state as I did, and is just a couple years younger than I am.
The possibility for mistaking me for this person was rather high.There are a few ways I could fix this problem, but most would take way too long.
I could publish some papers, speak at conferences, etc., but that would take years to get me on the first page of search results.
Alternatively, I could make my Facebook profile public, even though it wouldn't have as much impact.
It was perfectly clean, since I don't participate in any questionable activities (street racing, binge drinking, drugs, bad-mouthing bosses, etc).
I also don't include information about religion/politics.
My friends have similar values that I do, so even if someone were to infer information about me based on them, they would have every reason to believe that I am a normal, decent person, with strong morals and good character.
Sure, this won't immediately get the real me to show up on the first page of search results, but it was a quick and simple thing that got me moving toward my goal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453224</id>
	<title>Correlation</title>
	<author>durnurd</author>
	<datestamp>1268417220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see a correlation between the 20\% of friends and 80\% success rate.  So all they have to do is gather data from 0\% of friends, and they're 100\% likely to guess the user's info!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a correlation between the 20 \ % of friends and 80 \ % success rate .
So all they have to do is gather data from 0 \ % of friends , and they 're 100 \ % likely to guess the user 's info !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a correlation between the 20\% of friends and 80\% success rate.
So all they have to do is gather data from 0\% of friends, and they're 100\% likely to guess the user's info!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156</id>
	<title>It could go a lot deeper</title>
	<author>ShaggyZet</author>
	<datestamp>1268411940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the study proves a fairly obvious hypothesis, what your social network could say about you could go a lot deeper than that. It's not much of a leap to determine religion, politics, sexual orientation or various other things that people don't fully consider, or could even be used to violate equal opportunity housing or hiring laws. I think there are a lot of great things about social networking, and facebook in particular, but the how it's changing cultural views and expectations of privacy is shocking and fast, and I don't think we'll have perspective on whats happening for years to come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the study proves a fairly obvious hypothesis , what your social network could say about you could go a lot deeper than that .
It 's not much of a leap to determine religion , politics , sexual orientation or various other things that people do n't fully consider , or could even be used to violate equal opportunity housing or hiring laws .
I think there are a lot of great things about social networking , and facebook in particular , but the how it 's changing cultural views and expectations of privacy is shocking and fast , and I do n't think we 'll have perspective on whats happening for years to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the study proves a fairly obvious hypothesis, what your social network could say about you could go a lot deeper than that.
It's not much of a leap to determine religion, politics, sexual orientation or various other things that people don't fully consider, or could even be used to violate equal opportunity housing or hiring laws.
I think there are a lot of great things about social networking, and facebook in particular, but the how it's changing cultural views and expectations of privacy is shocking and fast, and I don't think we'll have perspective on whats happening for years to come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452382</id>
	<title>Project Gaydar</title>
	<author>pkalkul</author>
	<datestamp>1268413020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of replies to this seem to be dismissing it as irrelevant.  Yes, social networks are not private.  But determining aspects of your identity that you yourself do not choose to post can have serious implications.  <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/09/20/project\_gaydar\_an\_mit\_experiment\_raises\_new\_questions\_about\_online\_privacy/" title="boston.com" rel="nofollow">Project Gaydar</a> [boston.com] at MIT showed that it was possible to determine sexual orientation via social networks.  In many parts of the world, including the US, this matters.  As might information about what preexisting medical conditions you might have...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of replies to this seem to be dismissing it as irrelevant .
Yes , social networks are not private .
But determining aspects of your identity that you yourself do not choose to post can have serious implications .
Project Gaydar [ boston.com ] at MIT showed that it was possible to determine sexual orientation via social networks .
In many parts of the world , including the US , this matters .
As might information about what preexisting medical conditions you might have.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of replies to this seem to be dismissing it as irrelevant.
Yes, social networks are not private.
But determining aspects of your identity that you yourself do not choose to post can have serious implications.
Project Gaydar [boston.com] at MIT showed that it was possible to determine sexual orientation via social networks.
In many parts of the world, including the US, this matters.
As might information about what preexisting medical conditions you might have...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461224</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>barzok</author>
	<datestamp>1268412660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It found me twice - once in an apartment I lived in 5 years ago, for only one year. It said I lived there 5 years. The other address is my current address, it's got my length of residence right, but has my house valued at $1M. It's worth about 12\% of that. It lists my wife on the current entry, but not the old apartment, despite the fact that we were married when we lived in the apartment. My wife's data is very wrong as well, differing from my own info in areas that should be common - home value (still inflated, but not as much) &amp; length of residence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It found me twice - once in an apartment I lived in 5 years ago , for only one year .
It said I lived there 5 years .
The other address is my current address , it 's got my length of residence right , but has my house valued at $ 1M .
It 's worth about 12 \ % of that .
It lists my wife on the current entry , but not the old apartment , despite the fact that we were married when we lived in the apartment .
My wife 's data is very wrong as well , differing from my own info in areas that should be common - home value ( still inflated , but not as much ) &amp; length of residence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It found me twice - once in an apartment I lived in 5 years ago, for only one year.
It said I lived there 5 years.
The other address is my current address, it's got my length of residence right, but has my house valued at $1M.
It's worth about 12\% of that.
It lists my wife on the current entry, but not the old apartment, despite the fact that we were married when we lived in the apartment.
My wife's data is very wrong as well, differing from my own info in areas that should be common - home value (still inflated, but not as much) &amp; length of residence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452972</id>
	<title>Re:It could go a lot deeper</title>
	<author>mdf356</author>
	<datestamp>1268415960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not much of a leap to determine religion, politics, sexual orientation or various other things that people don't fully consider</p></div><p>I'm not sure I believe this (I haven't read TFA yet).  While I think you could infer where I grew up and went to High School from my friends list, I think you'd have a very hard time with my political orientation, sexual orientation, or religion, since my Facebook friends (like my real-life friends) come from a diverse set of backgrounds.</p><p>It's not surprising people in college mostly know other people in college from about the same year as them and possibly the same major.  Someone in their 30s presumably has a more diverse set of friends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not much of a leap to determine religion , politics , sexual orientation or various other things that people do n't fully considerI 'm not sure I believe this ( I have n't read TFA yet ) .
While I think you could infer where I grew up and went to High School from my friends list , I think you 'd have a very hard time with my political orientation , sexual orientation , or religion , since my Facebook friends ( like my real-life friends ) come from a diverse set of backgrounds.It 's not surprising people in college mostly know other people in college from about the same year as them and possibly the same major .
Someone in their 30s presumably has a more diverse set of friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not much of a leap to determine religion, politics, sexual orientation or various other things that people don't fully considerI'm not sure I believe this (I haven't read TFA yet).
While I think you could infer where I grew up and went to High School from my friends list, I think you'd have a very hard time with my political orientation, sexual orientation, or religion, since my Facebook friends (like my real-life friends) come from a diverse set of backgrounds.It's not surprising people in college mostly know other people in college from about the same year as them and possibly the same major.
Someone in their 30s presumably has a more diverse set of friends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453084</id>
	<title>Re:Uhhh, Duh?</title>
	<author>heritage727</author>
	<datestamp>1268416680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hasn't this been known since the beginning of time?</p></div><p>Since just <i>after</i> the beginning of time, actually. You'll notice that some of the researchers were from the Max Planck Institute. The next paper in the series is "Social Networking Among Bosons During the Inflationary Epoch."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't this been known since the beginning of time ? Since just after the beginning of time , actually .
You 'll notice that some of the researchers were from the Max Planck Institute .
The next paper in the series is " Social Networking Among Bosons During the Inflationary Epoch .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't this been known since the beginning of time?Since just after the beginning of time, actually.
You'll notice that some of the researchers were from the Max Planck Institute.
The next paper in the series is "Social Networking Among Bosons During the Inflationary Epoch.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452416</id>
	<title>Yeah...</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268413200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was in middle school during the mid-90's (I turn 26 next month), I started getting into chat rooms (as many people did around that time.)  My parents taught me from an early age to be very aware of what information I put out there, and it has served me quite well.  I rarely talk about work, and if I do it is done in a very generic, non-identifiable way.  Most of my friends on social networking sites are from K-12, and I use it primarily to keep in contact with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in middle school during the mid-90 's ( I turn 26 next month ) , I started getting into chat rooms ( as many people did around that time .
) My parents taught me from an early age to be very aware of what information I put out there , and it has served me quite well .
I rarely talk about work , and if I do it is done in a very generic , non-identifiable way .
Most of my friends on social networking sites are from K-12 , and I use it primarily to keep in contact with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in middle school during the mid-90's (I turn 26 next month), I started getting into chat rooms (as many people did around that time.
)  My parents taught me from an early age to be very aware of what information I put out there, and it has served me quite well.
I rarely talk about work, and if I do it is done in a very generic, non-identifiable way.
Most of my friends on social networking sites are from K-12, and I use it primarily to keep in contact with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452242</id>
	<title>nah</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1268412360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is yet another "correlation does not mean causation" result from a university. Which does lead me to correlate that universities are a possible cause of a lot of bad/worthless research these days. This study certainly seems to fall into that category. God only knows how people get funding for this kind of study.<br> <br>

I have Facebook "friends" that I barely know, people I've not seen in decades, people I once worked with. I'd be astonished if you can draw ANY accurate conclusions about me from any of those connections. You MAY be able to draw some conclusions about SOME people from their friends list. But even if you can, is that info really of any real use? Yes, advertisers might buy it, but really they are buying fool's gold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is yet another " correlation does not mean causation " result from a university .
Which does lead me to correlate that universities are a possible cause of a lot of bad/worthless research these days .
This study certainly seems to fall into that category .
God only knows how people get funding for this kind of study .
I have Facebook " friends " that I barely know , people I 've not seen in decades , people I once worked with .
I 'd be astonished if you can draw ANY accurate conclusions about me from any of those connections .
You MAY be able to draw some conclusions about SOME people from their friends list .
But even if you can , is that info really of any real use ?
Yes , advertisers might buy it , but really they are buying fool 's gold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is yet another "correlation does not mean causation" result from a university.
Which does lead me to correlate that universities are a possible cause of a lot of bad/worthless research these days.
This study certainly seems to fall into that category.
God only knows how people get funding for this kind of study.
I have Facebook "friends" that I barely know, people I've not seen in decades, people I once worked with.
I'd be astonished if you can draw ANY accurate conclusions about me from any of those connections.
You MAY be able to draw some conclusions about SOME people from their friends list.
But even if you can, is that info really of any real use?
Yes, advertisers might buy it, but really they are buying fool's gold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452866</id>
	<title>Re:i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1268415360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Henry David Thoreau said it best 150 years ago:</p><blockquote><div><p>Just so hollow and ineffectual, for the most part, is our ordinary conversation. Surface meets surface. When our life ceases to be inward and private, conversation degenerates into mere gossip. We rarely meet a man who can tell us any news which he has not read in a newspaper, or been told by his neighbor; and, for the most part, the only difference between us and our fellow is that he has seen the newspaper, or been out to tea, and we have not. In proportion as our inward life fails, we go more constantly and desperately to the post-office. You may depend on it, that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters, proud of his extensive correspondence, has not heard from himself this long while.</p><p><i>Life Without Principle, 1863</i></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Henry David Thoreau said it best 150 years ago : Just so hollow and ineffectual , for the most part , is our ordinary conversation .
Surface meets surface .
When our life ceases to be inward and private , conversation degenerates into mere gossip .
We rarely meet a man who can tell us any news which he has not read in a newspaper , or been told by his neighbor ; and , for the most part , the only difference between us and our fellow is that he has seen the newspaper , or been out to tea , and we have not .
In proportion as our inward life fails , we go more constantly and desperately to the post-office .
You may depend on it , that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters , proud of his extensive correspondence , has not heard from himself this long while.Life Without Principle , 1863</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Henry David Thoreau said it best 150 years ago:Just so hollow and ineffectual, for the most part, is our ordinary conversation.
Surface meets surface.
When our life ceases to be inward and private, conversation degenerates into mere gossip.
We rarely meet a man who can tell us any news which he has not read in a newspaper, or been told by his neighbor; and, for the most part, the only difference between us and our fellow is that he has seen the newspaper, or been out to tea, and we have not.
In proportion as our inward life fails, we go more constantly and desperately to the post-office.
You may depend on it, that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters, proud of his extensive correspondence, has not heard from himself this long while.Life Without Principle, 1863 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453220</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I poked around a little on their site.  It's amazing how the terms of service state things like "this is not to be used for marketing, blah blah blah..." when marketing appears to be the only reason for such an information aggregator to exist.  They CLAIM they are a social networking site, but no honest social networking site would automatically scrape info such as estimated value of the home you live in (Which I do know to be available from the records of the city I live in... so at least I know where they got that from.)<br> <br>

And on a related note, the company does have an <a href="http://www.spokeo.com/privacy" title="spokeo.com" rel="nofollow">opt out</a> [spokeo.com] of sorts.  I have no idea whether the company would actually honor the request that your info be blocked.  Hmm... that page actually might be showing me how the company REALLY makes money... there is a link to "My Privacy Reputation Defender."  Wow. that scares me a little bit more.  "See how much info we can scoop up about you on the web?  We can block it for a low monthly fee!"  I am highly suspicious of the claim that that this Reputation Defender company can go in and remove your info from other databases like it claims.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I poked around a little on their site .
It 's amazing how the terms of service state things like " this is not to be used for marketing , blah blah blah... " when marketing appears to be the only reason for such an information aggregator to exist .
They CLAIM they are a social networking site , but no honest social networking site would automatically scrape info such as estimated value of the home you live in ( Which I do know to be available from the records of the city I live in... so at least I know where they got that from .
) And on a related note , the company does have an opt out [ spokeo.com ] of sorts .
I have no idea whether the company would actually honor the request that your info be blocked .
Hmm... that page actually might be showing me how the company REALLY makes money... there is a link to " My Privacy Reputation Defender .
" Wow .
that scares me a little bit more .
" See how much info we can scoop up about you on the web ?
We can block it for a low monthly fee !
" I am highly suspicious of the claim that that this Reputation Defender company can go in and remove your info from other databases like it claims .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I poked around a little on their site.
It's amazing how the terms of service state things like "this is not to be used for marketing, blah blah blah..." when marketing appears to be the only reason for such an information aggregator to exist.
They CLAIM they are a social networking site, but no honest social networking site would automatically scrape info such as estimated value of the home you live in (Which I do know to be available from the records of the city I live in... so at least I know where they got that from.
) 

And on a related note, the company does have an opt out [spokeo.com] of sorts.
I have no idea whether the company would actually honor the request that your info be blocked.
Hmm... that page actually might be showing me how the company REALLY makes money... there is a link to "My Privacy Reputation Defender.
"  Wow.
that scares me a little bit more.
"See how much info we can scoop up about you on the web?
We can block it for a low monthly fee!
"  I am highly suspicious of the claim that that this Reputation Defender company can go in and remove your info from other databases like it claims.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453600</id>
	<title>Re:Friends are now always public - nasty facebook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268418840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting, that must have changed within the last 48 hours or so, since I was on Facebook a few days ago and saw somebody's profile with a private friends list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting , that must have changed within the last 48 hours or so , since I was on Facebook a few days ago and saw somebody 's profile with a private friends list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting, that must have changed within the last 48 hours or so, since I was on Facebook a few days ago and saw somebody's profile with a private friends list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453112</id>
	<title>Not true at all</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1268416740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I friended most of my high school classmates, whom are all morons. I'm not. I just didn't want to be rude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I friended most of my high school classmates , whom are all morons .
I 'm not .
I just did n't want to be rude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I friended most of my high school classmates, whom are all morons.
I'm not.
I just didn't want to be rude.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636</id>
	<title>What this study shows is the value of network data</title>
	<author>mantis2009</author>
	<datestamp>1268414160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For anyone who isn't clear on why Facebook and Twitter are so valuable, this study is yet another example of how much rich information is embedded in social network data.

It's easy to imagine applications for pulling information out of social network data.  Who would be interested in such data?  Advertisers, ex-girlfriends, social researchers, police detectives, anti-terrorism, intelligence agencies... the list goes on and on.

Pretty much any project with interests in the social world would benefit from social networking data.  It's valuable.

Why you would give away your social networking data to Facebook, Twitter, or Google for free?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For anyone who is n't clear on why Facebook and Twitter are so valuable , this study is yet another example of how much rich information is embedded in social network data .
It 's easy to imagine applications for pulling information out of social network data .
Who would be interested in such data ?
Advertisers , ex-girlfriends , social researchers , police detectives , anti-terrorism , intelligence agencies... the list goes on and on .
Pretty much any project with interests in the social world would benefit from social networking data .
It 's valuable .
Why you would give away your social networking data to Facebook , Twitter , or Google for free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For anyone who isn't clear on why Facebook and Twitter are so valuable, this study is yet another example of how much rich information is embedded in social network data.
It's easy to imagine applications for pulling information out of social network data.
Who would be interested in such data?
Advertisers, ex-girlfriends, social researchers, police detectives, anti-terrorism, intelligence agencies... the list goes on and on.
Pretty much any project with interests in the social world would benefit from social networking data.
It's valuable.
Why you would give away your social networking data to Facebook, Twitter, or Google for free?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454662</id>
	<title>Re:You're not nobody</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268423820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's 80\% accurate for me too. On Slashdot, you are who everyone is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's 80 \ % accurate for me too .
On Slashdot , you are who everyone is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's 80\% accurate for me too.
On Slashdot, you are who everyone is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452218</id>
	<title>Not so shocking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This only works assuming the public use of Facebook is ubiquitous. If only half of your friends are on the network, or if only half of them allow information about them to be publicly visible, the accuracy of the predictions will suffer greatly. This in turn means that the algorithm will more accurately predict the traits of people who have the trait of not caring about their online privacy. It's a calculation based on an assumption. In other words, bollocks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This only works assuming the public use of Facebook is ubiquitous .
If only half of your friends are on the network , or if only half of them allow information about them to be publicly visible , the accuracy of the predictions will suffer greatly .
This in turn means that the algorithm will more accurately predict the traits of people who have the trait of not caring about their online privacy .
It 's a calculation based on an assumption .
In other words , bollocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This only works assuming the public use of Facebook is ubiquitous.
If only half of your friends are on the network, or if only half of them allow information about them to be publicly visible, the accuracy of the predictions will suffer greatly.
This in turn means that the algorithm will more accurately predict the traits of people who have the trait of not caring about their online privacy.
It's a calculation based on an assumption.
In other words, bollocks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452776</id>
	<title>I thought it was You Are Who You Eat...</title>
	<author>croftj</author>
	<datestamp>1268414940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess facebook runs by different rules than regular life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess facebook runs by different rules than regular life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess facebook runs by different rules than regular life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452438</id>
	<title>Bad Summary, or Bad Premise</title>
	<author>ddillman</author>
	<datestamp>1268413260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This might work pretty well for a small, relatively tight group like students at a particular university.  I bet it gets worse as we get out into the real world and develop friends with wider interests from different backgrounds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This might work pretty well for a small , relatively tight group like students at a particular university .
I bet it gets worse as we get out into the real world and develop friends with wider interests from different backgrounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might work pretty well for a small, relatively tight group like students at a particular university.
I bet it gets worse as we get out into the real world and develop friends with wider interests from different backgrounds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457906</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268393940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet they were unable to locate me.  Not even a trace. My web using habits reflect my personal life, I keep to myself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet they were unable to locate me .
Not even a trace .
My web using habits reflect my personal life , I keep to myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet they were unable to locate me.
Not even a trace.
My web using habits reflect my personal life, I keep to myself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452960</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268415900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if your name is Steve Johnson? Good luck finding youself in the sea of Johnsons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if your name is Steve Johnson ?
Good luck finding youself in the sea of Johnsons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if your name is Steve Johnson?
Good luck finding youself in the sea of Johnsons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456694</id>
	<title>Re:So true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268389140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a "friend"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a " friend " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a "friend"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453354</id>
	<title>IF they can get linkage data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only people on my friends list on Facebook even know I'm on Facebook, and they already know me.  My account is quite well locked down, there's no evidence of my existance unless you're on my friends list, and even the email that FB has for me is a special one used only there, so there's no linking me that way either.</p><p>FB could make some inferences since they have the data.  But not anyone else.  Yes, I've blocked every app too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only people on my friends list on Facebook even know I 'm on Facebook , and they already know me .
My account is quite well locked down , there 's no evidence of my existance unless you 're on my friends list , and even the email that FB has for me is a special one used only there , so there 's no linking me that way either.FB could make some inferences since they have the data .
But not anyone else .
Yes , I 've blocked every app too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only people on my friends list on Facebook even know I'm on Facebook, and they already know me.
My account is quite well locked down, there's no evidence of my existance unless you're on my friends list, and even the email that FB has for me is a special one used only there, so there's no linking me that way either.FB could make some inferences since they have the data.
But not anyone else.
Yes, I've blocked every app too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452900</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>hatten</author>
	<datestamp>1268415600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That website doesn't say very much unless you cough up money. I'm happy that the only thing it got correct was which city I live in, and some IP adresses. It didn't even get my real name correct! Although it might have helped a bit that I don't live in the states.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That website does n't say very much unless you cough up money .
I 'm happy that the only thing it got correct was which city I live in , and some IP adresses .
It did n't even get my real name correct !
Although it might have helped a bit that I do n't live in the states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That website doesn't say very much unless you cough up money.
I'm happy that the only thing it got correct was which city I live in, and some IP adresses.
It didn't even get my real name correct!
Although it might have helped a bit that I don't live in the states.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036</id>
	<title>You have friends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268411400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>with common tastes. News at 11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>with common tastes .
News at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with common tastes.
News at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453736</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Terwin</author>
	<datestamp>1268419440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, 108 matches in the US<br>10 in my state<br>2 regarding places I actually have family.<br>My mother is a male in his 20's (Jacky is a very male name, obviously)</p><p>And apparently I only paid about 1/3 the value of my house...</p><p>I feel much reassured about my personal privacy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , 108 matches in the US10 in my state2 regarding places I actually have family.My mother is a male in his 20 's ( Jacky is a very male name , obviously ) And apparently I only paid about 1/3 the value of my house...I feel much reassured about my personal privacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, 108 matches in the US10 in my state2 regarding places I actually have family.My mother is a male in his 20's (Jacky is a very male name, obviously)And apparently I only paid about 1/3 the value of my house...I feel much reassured about my personal privacy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454520</id>
	<title>Rice dataset</title>
	<author>jefromi</author>
	<datestamp>1268423100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It should be noted that Rice is different from most US universities in that students stay at the same residential college (dorm) for all four years of undergrad. It's probably harder to deduce for other universities - though probably still easier than inferring major.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be noted that Rice is different from most US universities in that students stay at the same residential college ( dorm ) for all four years of undergrad .
It 's probably harder to deduce for other universities - though probably still easier than inferring major .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be noted that Rice is different from most US universities in that students stay at the same residential college (dorm) for all four years of undergrad.
It's probably harder to deduce for other universities - though probably still easier than inferring major.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344</id>
	<title>So true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I friended an old colleague of mine who has a prominent sales position at a tech firm, and was curious why he hid his friend list. So I browsed his news and watched his wall for ahwile and soon realized he just didn't want people to know he was gay. It wasn't blatent, but you could tell that a large number of people leaving messages were loudly gay, talking about gay iissues like gay marriage, etc..</p><p>Of course I never knew this whan I actually worked with him, and we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites - although I afterwards realized that he was very good looking and never seemed to have a current girl friend, only talked about ex's. It all fit really.</p><p>So the article struck a chord with me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I friended an old colleague of mine who has a prominent sales position at a tech firm , and was curious why he hid his friend list .
So I browsed his news and watched his wall for ahwile and soon realized he just did n't want people to know he was gay .
It was n't blatent , but you could tell that a large number of people leaving messages were loudly gay , talking about gay iissues like gay marriage , etc..Of course I never knew this whan I actually worked with him , and we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites - although I afterwards realized that he was very good looking and never seemed to have a current girl friend , only talked about ex 's .
It all fit really.So the article struck a chord with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I friended an old colleague of mine who has a prominent sales position at a tech firm, and was curious why he hid his friend list.
So I browsed his news and watched his wall for ahwile and soon realized he just didn't want people to know he was gay.
It wasn't blatent, but you could tell that a large number of people leaving messages were loudly gay, talking about gay iissues like gay marriage, etc..Of course I never knew this whan I actually worked with him, and we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites - although I afterwards realized that he was very good looking and never seemed to have a current girl friend, only talked about ex's.
It all fit really.So the article struck a chord with me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461568</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually the point of Spokeo is to get you to blurt out your real details on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the point of Spokeo is to get you to blurt out your real details on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the point of Spokeo is to get you to blurt out your real details on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453110</id>
	<title>Mutual friends = instant gaydar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>sexual orientation</p></div><p>Look at the bright side of it: Use Facebook for search of potential mates. One glance at "mutual friends" =&gt; instant gaydar.</p><p>
And the best thing: those who are not member of "the family" have a much harder time to figure it out (they'll need to actually visit your friends' pages one by one and hope that those aren't closeted either...)</p><p>
So it's a good thing: it reveals info to those people who should know, while reasonably hiding it from those who shouldn't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>sexual orientationLook at the bright side of it : Use Facebook for search of potential mates .
One glance at " mutual friends " = &gt; instant gaydar .
And the best thing : those who are not member of " the family " have a much harder time to figure it out ( they 'll need to actually visit your friends ' pages one by one and hope that those are n't closeted either... ) So it 's a good thing : it reveals info to those people who should know , while reasonably hiding it from those who should n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sexual orientationLook at the bright side of it: Use Facebook for search of potential mates.
One glance at "mutual friends" =&gt; instant gaydar.
And the best thing: those who are not member of "the family" have a much harder time to figure it out (they'll need to actually visit your friends' pages one by one and hope that those aren't closeted either...)
So it's a good thing: it reveals info to those people who should know, while reasonably hiding it from those who shouldn't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634</id>
	<title>Friends are now always public - nasty facebook.</title>
	<author>dwheeler</author>
	<datestamp>1268414160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation.php" title="facebook.com">
Facebook has now changed their policy to eliminate privacy, in particular, friend lists are always public</a> [facebook.com].
At one time you could make this private, as noted in this report.
I made my own friend list private when I first joined it, but Facebook now ignores my configuration.
If you <i>can</i> make friend lists private, please let know how... it sure isn't easy, and Facebook's
current documentation says that it cannot be made private.
</p><p>
Making public the private data you gave a company, without your consent, should be illegal.... but it appears that Facebook can do it with impunity.
I've mostly stopped using Facebook because Facebook seems to be becoming actively hostile to privacy of any kind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has now changed their policy to eliminate privacy , in particular , friend lists are always public [ facebook.com ] .
At one time you could make this private , as noted in this report .
I made my own friend list private when I first joined it , but Facebook now ignores my configuration .
If you can make friend lists private , please let know how... it sure is n't easy , and Facebook 's current documentation says that it can not be made private .
Making public the private data you gave a company , without your consent , should be illegal.... but it appears that Facebook can do it with impunity .
I 've mostly stopped using Facebook because Facebook seems to be becoming actively hostile to privacy of any kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Facebook has now changed their policy to eliminate privacy, in particular, friend lists are always public [facebook.com].
At one time you could make this private, as noted in this report.
I made my own friend list private when I first joined it, but Facebook now ignores my configuration.
If you can make friend lists private, please let know how... it sure isn't easy, and Facebook's
current documentation says that it cannot be made private.
Making public the private data you gave a company, without your consent, should be illegal.... but it appears that Facebook can do it with impunity.
I've mostly stopped using Facebook because Facebook seems to be becoming actively hostile to privacy of any kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452202</id>
	<title>Yes, obviously</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1268412180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why I'm highly selective about my friends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I 'm highly selective about my friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I'm highly selective about my friends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454300</id>
	<title>I am very very popular</title>
	<author>WillAffleckUW</author>
	<datestamp>1268422080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to realize that people use social networks for different things.</p><p>My nephew, who is 2 weeks old, has a FB page, so that my sis and brother-in-law can post pics and vids and news about him, as well as "friend" relatives from that page.</p><p>Technically, I'm very very popular, which was true before games became a thing on FB, but the addition of games has caused my popularity to explode, so that now you might surmise I have a lot of conservative southern friends, but that would be incorrect, as I just play games with them, and delete their posts on my Wall most of the time.</p><p>In addition, some of my friends have multiple accounts, some of which are for historical or ficitional personae (e.g. famous environmentalists or writers in the 18th century), which have "friends" who like that personae, in addition to being used as spare accounts in games to get around game limits.</p><p>People trust the Internet far more than they should. Just because Google tells you something, or it's on a Wiki, does NOT mean it is true or WAS true.  We're all SCA personae, partially based on our own selves or an aspect of our selves, and partially based on a mythology or activity that we overexpress in the context of the network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to realize that people use social networks for different things.My nephew , who is 2 weeks old , has a FB page , so that my sis and brother-in-law can post pics and vids and news about him , as well as " friend " relatives from that page.Technically , I 'm very very popular , which was true before games became a thing on FB , but the addition of games has caused my popularity to explode , so that now you might surmise I have a lot of conservative southern friends , but that would be incorrect , as I just play games with them , and delete their posts on my Wall most of the time.In addition , some of my friends have multiple accounts , some of which are for historical or ficitional personae ( e.g .
famous environmentalists or writers in the 18th century ) , which have " friends " who like that personae , in addition to being used as spare accounts in games to get around game limits.People trust the Internet far more than they should .
Just because Google tells you something , or it 's on a Wiki , does NOT mean it is true or WAS true .
We 're all SCA personae , partially based on our own selves or an aspect of our selves , and partially based on a mythology or activity that we overexpress in the context of the network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to realize that people use social networks for different things.My nephew, who is 2 weeks old, has a FB page, so that my sis and brother-in-law can post pics and vids and news about him, as well as "friend" relatives from that page.Technically, I'm very very popular, which was true before games became a thing on FB, but the addition of games has caused my popularity to explode, so that now you might surmise I have a lot of conservative southern friends, but that would be incorrect, as I just play games with them, and delete their posts on my Wall most of the time.In addition, some of my friends have multiple accounts, some of which are for historical or ficitional personae (e.g.
famous environmentalists or writers in the 18th century), which have "friends" who like that personae, in addition to being used as spare accounts in games to get around game limits.People trust the Internet far more than they should.
Just because Google tells you something, or it's on a Wiki, does NOT mean it is true or WAS true.
We're all SCA personae, partially based on our own selves or an aspect of our selves, and partially based on a mythology or activity that we overexpress in the context of the network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348</id>
	<title>i'm not on facebook</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1268412900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it seems like a giant ego bonfire, it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life. just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion. it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people's personalities: their vanity, their shallowness, and their mediocrity. i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?</p><p>and now i find the someone, in fact, does care: the demons of id theft and invasion of privacy and spam marketing... as invited into your life, by your own vanity</p><p>do the best thing you can ever do for yourself: lose facebook. don't go to another social networking site, just simply drop completely off the radar of this fad whose only value is to reinforce and amplify the worst parts of your personality, and to turn you into fodder to be harvested by search spiders and marketing algorithms</p><p>you've offered your life up to harvesting by a depersonalizing machine. grow some character by becoming real, and lose the ridiculous mask called facebook. if the lunch meat called spam became the catchword for depersonalized email message, i'd like to offer that social networking be known as soylent green: it's people! social networking sites like facebook are everyday people, ground up, processed and extruded into depersonalized marketing diarrhea: soylent green</p><p>why would you do that to yourself? teenagers: you are exempt, its a useful tool for social exploration. anyone older than 24: you're pathetic</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it seems like a giant ego bonfire , it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life .
just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion .
it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people 's personalities : their vanity , their shallowness , and their mediocrity .
i mean who really fucking cares , including yourself , about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life ? and now i find the someone , in fact , does care : the demons of id theft and invasion of privacy and spam marketing... as invited into your life , by your own vanitydo the best thing you can ever do for yourself : lose facebook .
do n't go to another social networking site , just simply drop completely off the radar of this fad whose only value is to reinforce and amplify the worst parts of your personality , and to turn you into fodder to be harvested by search spiders and marketing algorithmsyou 've offered your life up to harvesting by a depersonalizing machine .
grow some character by becoming real , and lose the ridiculous mask called facebook .
if the lunch meat called spam became the catchword for depersonalized email message , i 'd like to offer that social networking be known as soylent green : it 's people !
social networking sites like facebook are everyday people , ground up , processed and extruded into depersonalized marketing diarrhea : soylent greenwhy would you do that to yourself ?
teenagers : you are exempt , its a useful tool for social exploration .
anyone older than 24 : you 're pathetic</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it seems like a giant ego bonfire, it seems like a massive waste of time to tweak minor pointless trivia about your social life.
just the very thought of it fills me with tedium and exhaustion.
it seems to reinforce the worst aspects of people's personalities: their vanity, their shallowness, and their mediocrity.
i mean who really fucking cares, including yourself, about this running narrative about the pointless banalities of your life?and now i find the someone, in fact, does care: the demons of id theft and invasion of privacy and spam marketing... as invited into your life, by your own vanitydo the best thing you can ever do for yourself: lose facebook.
don't go to another social networking site, just simply drop completely off the radar of this fad whose only value is to reinforce and amplify the worst parts of your personality, and to turn you into fodder to be harvested by search spiders and marketing algorithmsyou've offered your life up to harvesting by a depersonalizing machine.
grow some character by becoming real, and lose the ridiculous mask called facebook.
if the lunch meat called spam became the catchword for depersonalized email message, i'd like to offer that social networking be known as soylent green: it's people!
social networking sites like facebook are everyday people, ground up, processed and extruded into depersonalized marketing diarrhea: soylent greenwhy would you do that to yourself?
teenagers: you are exempt, its a useful tool for social exploration.
anyone older than 24: you're pathetic</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453132</id>
	<title>Re:What could possibly happen?</title>
	<author>TheMidget</author>
	<datestamp>1268416860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him?</p></div><p>He might figure other, less public, details about you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him ? He might figure other , less public , details about you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him?He might figure other, less public, details about you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453104</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Zenaku</author>
	<datestamp>1268416740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just tried it.  It was . . . interesting.</p><p>There were 8 results for my first and last name.  Two of them were "me."</p><p>One "me" was at the address I lived prior to this one.  It had my age and zodiac sign (seriously Spokeo?) correct, but had no information on my occupation, education, or hobbies, had my marital status wrong, and claimed that the estimated value of my home was greater than one million dollars.  (Wow.  I bought and sold that house for arround 250K.  And Spokeo itself noted that the neighborhood was "below average" and had a median home value of 200K).  The only things it said about my "lifestyle" were that I am not interested in politics and love shopping. . . both the opposite of true.</p><p>The other "me" was at my parent's address, where I have not lived since I was in high-school 15+ years ago.  It listed me as being in my late 50's (I'm 32), married (I am, but sure wasn't when I lived there), the owner of that home (nope), and listed every single hobby and lifestyle interest you can think of, most of which have zero to do with me.</p><p>So. . . not so spooked out by Spokeo.  If anything, it provides useful disinformation to protect me from the covert agents of the shadow government that is out to get me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just tried it .
It was .
. .
interesting.There were 8 results for my first and last name .
Two of them were " me .
" One " me " was at the address I lived prior to this one .
It had my age and zodiac sign ( seriously Spokeo ?
) correct , but had no information on my occupation , education , or hobbies , had my marital status wrong , and claimed that the estimated value of my home was greater than one million dollars .
( Wow. I bought and sold that house for arround 250K .
And Spokeo itself noted that the neighborhood was " below average " and had a median home value of 200K ) .
The only things it said about my " lifestyle " were that I am not interested in politics and love shopping .
. .
both the opposite of true.The other " me " was at my parent 's address , where I have not lived since I was in high-school 15 + years ago .
It listed me as being in my late 50 's ( I 'm 32 ) , married ( I am , but sure was n't when I lived there ) , the owner of that home ( nope ) , and listed every single hobby and lifestyle interest you can think of , most of which have zero to do with me.So .
. .
not so spooked out by Spokeo .
If anything , it provides useful disinformation to protect me from the covert agents of the shadow government that is out to get me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just tried it.
It was .
. .
interesting.There were 8 results for my first and last name.
Two of them were "me.
"One "me" was at the address I lived prior to this one.
It had my age and zodiac sign (seriously Spokeo?
) correct, but had no information on my occupation, education, or hobbies, had my marital status wrong, and claimed that the estimated value of my home was greater than one million dollars.
(Wow.  I bought and sold that house for arround 250K.
And Spokeo itself noted that the neighborhood was "below average" and had a median home value of 200K).
The only things it said about my "lifestyle" were that I am not interested in politics and love shopping.
. .
both the opposite of true.The other "me" was at my parent's address, where I have not lived since I was in high-school 15+ years ago.
It listed me as being in my late 50's (I'm 32), married (I am, but sure wasn't when I lived there), the owner of that home (nope), and listed every single hobby and lifestyle interest you can think of, most of which have zero to do with me.So.
. .
not so spooked out by Spokeo.
If anything, it provides useful disinformation to protect me from the covert agents of the shadow government that is out to get me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452586</id>
	<title>Ha! They all laughed when ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who is laughing now? When I cut off all contacts with the real world and spent all my time playing on line games in the cyberworld, they were all laughing and told me to get a life. Now, all their information is available for all on line retailers and the data bases that connect cyber names with real world names. My cyber name is the only one that resolves to NULL in their real world names data base and crashes their systems!<p>

I assure you, me becoming the savior of the world by crashing the databases of these creeps is entirely inadvertent. My real regret is that I have not yet been able to crash the real world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is laughing now ?
When I cut off all contacts with the real world and spent all my time playing on line games in the cyberworld , they were all laughing and told me to get a life .
Now , all their information is available for all on line retailers and the data bases that connect cyber names with real world names .
My cyber name is the only one that resolves to NULL in their real world names data base and crashes their systems !
I assure you , me becoming the savior of the world by crashing the databases of these creeps is entirely inadvertent .
My real regret is that I have not yet been able to crash the real world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is laughing now?
When I cut off all contacts with the real world and spent all my time playing on line games in the cyberworld, they were all laughing and told me to get a life.
Now, all their information is available for all on line retailers and the data bases that connect cyber names with real world names.
My cyber name is the only one that resolves to NULL in their real world names data base and crashes their systems!
I assure you, me becoming the savior of the world by crashing the databases of these creeps is entirely inadvertent.
My real regret is that I have not yet been able to crash the real world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453686</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>klenwell</author>
	<datestamp>1268419260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>go to <a href="http://www.spokeo.com/" title="spokeo.com">Spokeo</a> [spokeo.com] and type in your name</p></div><p>And by searching for my name on their site, I'm sure I'm only giving them a little more information with which to ferret me out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>go to Spokeo [ spokeo.com ] and type in your nameAnd by searching for my name on their site , I 'm sure I 'm only giving them a little more information with which to ferret me out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>go to Spokeo [spokeo.com] and type in your nameAnd by searching for my name on their site, I'm sure I'm only giving them a little more information with which to ferret me out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31459732</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1268402220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...go to Spokeo and type in your name.</p><p>Result:<br>"A team of untrained hedgehogs searched high and low for the page you were looking for, but alas, they could not find it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; ...go to Spokeo and type in your name.Result : " A team of untrained hedgehogs searched high and low for the page you were looking for , but alas , they could not find it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; ...go to Spokeo and type in your name.Result:"A team of untrained hedgehogs searched high and low for the page you were looking for, but alas, they could not find it.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>WinterSolstice</author>
	<datestamp>1268411940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess I'm nobody, since I have no facebook account LOL</p><p>But yeah, people shouldn't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy, for you, and for everyone you know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess I 'm nobody , since I have no facebook account LOLBut yeah , people should n't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy , for you , and for everyone you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess I'm nobody, since I have no facebook account LOLBut yeah, people shouldn't be surprised that publicly documenting every facet of your life results in less privacy, for you, and for everyone you know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</id>
	<title>Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>jackpot777</author>
	<datestamp>1268412600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want to see just how much of 'you' (and anyone else in the US) there is out there for all to see, go to <a href="http://www.spokeo.com/" title="spokeo.com">Spokeo</a> [spokeo.com] and type in your name. It got my marital status wrong and had a few gaps regarding interests. But my address was on the button and it provided the view of my house from Google StreetView. Just in case I win the lottery and someone wants to kidnap me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to see just how much of 'you ' ( and anyone else in the US ) there is out there for all to see , go to Spokeo [ spokeo.com ] and type in your name .
It got my marital status wrong and had a few gaps regarding interests .
But my address was on the button and it provided the view of my house from Google StreetView .
Just in case I win the lottery and someone wants to kidnap me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to see just how much of 'you' (and anyone else in the US) there is out there for all to see, go to Spokeo [spokeo.com] and type in your name.
It got my marital status wrong and had a few gaps regarding interests.
But my address was on the button and it provided the view of my house from Google StreetView.
Just in case I win the lottery and someone wants to kidnap me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457012</id>
	<title>Re:What this study shows is the value of network d</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1268390220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>None of my ex-girl friends want to know anything or have anything to do with me. At least, that's what they say each time, after I track them down again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>None of my ex-girl friends want to know anything or have anything to do with me .
At least , that 's what they say each time , after I track them down again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>None of my ex-girl friends want to know anything or have anything to do with me.
At least, that's what they say each time, after I track them down again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454084</id>
	<title>So Use Multiple Accounts</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1268420940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have a facespacester account, but I've been thinking that I probably need to sign up sooner or later.  So, in order to mitigate the privacy threats, I'm looking at creating domain-specific accounts.  One for my high-school friends, another for 'professional' use, another for family, another for hookups, etc.</p><p>Anyone know if there is a plugin for firefox (or any other browser actually) that facilitates this approach?  I think I saw an app a few days ago that was designed to amalgamate different accounts (one friendster, one myspace, one facebook, etc, kind of like pidgin does for chat systems).  Something like that plus going the extra steps to spoof the user-agent so that any automated correlation system on those sites would at least think I was a bunch of different users behind a firewall rather than probably the same guy with a bunch of accounts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have a facespacester account , but I 've been thinking that I probably need to sign up sooner or later .
So , in order to mitigate the privacy threats , I 'm looking at creating domain-specific accounts .
One for my high-school friends , another for 'professional ' use , another for family , another for hookups , etc.Anyone know if there is a plugin for firefox ( or any other browser actually ) that facilitates this approach ?
I think I saw an app a few days ago that was designed to amalgamate different accounts ( one friendster , one myspace , one facebook , etc , kind of like pidgin does for chat systems ) .
Something like that plus going the extra steps to spoof the user-agent so that any automated correlation system on those sites would at least think I was a bunch of different users behind a firewall rather than probably the same guy with a bunch of accounts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have a facespacester account, but I've been thinking that I probably need to sign up sooner or later.
So, in order to mitigate the privacy threats, I'm looking at creating domain-specific accounts.
One for my high-school friends, another for 'professional' use, another for family, another for hookups, etc.Anyone know if there is a plugin for firefox (or any other browser actually) that facilitates this approach?
I think I saw an app a few days ago that was designed to amalgamate different accounts (one friendster, one myspace, one facebook, etc, kind of like pidgin does for chat systems).
Something like that plus going the extra steps to spoof the user-agent so that any automated correlation system on those sites would at least think I was a bunch of different users behind a firewall rather than probably the same guy with a bunch of accounts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456128</id>
	<title>That's not deep.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268386800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Still obvious. Very Obvious. Not insightful. Bad mods. Need to be beaten with a clue stick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still obvious .
Very Obvious .
Not insightful .
Bad mods .
Need to be beaten with a clue stick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still obvious.
Very Obvious.
Not insightful.
Bad mods.
Need to be beaten with a clue stick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453492</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268418300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in there at the correct address, but that was about the end of the correctness.  Marital status, kids, interests, everything else was wrongity wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in there at the correct address , but that was about the end of the correctness .
Marital status , kids , interests , everything else was wrongity wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in there at the correct address, but that was about the end of the correctness.
Marital status, kids, interests, everything else was wrongity wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452852</id>
	<title>Re:Friends are now always public - nasty facebook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268415300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you gave them all that data and your consent to do whatever they wanted with it.<br>Next time you are about to tick the "I have read and agree to the terms and conditions" box, I suggest actually reading it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you gave them all that data and your consent to do whatever they wanted with it.Next time you are about to tick the " I have read and agree to the terms and conditions " box , I suggest actually reading it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you gave them all that data and your consent to do whatever they wanted with it.Next time you are about to tick the "I have read and agree to the terms and conditions" box, I suggest actually reading it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31462182</id>
	<title>Re:Friends are now always public - nasty facebook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268423940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you <i>can</i> make friend lists private, please let know how... it sure isn't easy, and Facebook's<br>current documentation says that it cannot be made private.</p></div><p>Go to your profile.<br>Click on the pen on the top-right corner of the Friends list box.<br>Uncheck 'show your friends list to everyone'.</p><p>This, however, will still leave your friendslists visible to your friends.  That, you cannot block.  Any applications that any of your friends use will be able to dig this information, along with any other information visible to your friends from your profile.  It is not enough that you don't use those applications, if your friends do, the supposedly "private" information flows to third parties without your consent.  The consent of your Friend is enough.</p><p>I'm still not sure what to think about Facebook.  I use it for events and for catching up with people and to share photographs to those who are interested while on travelling.  It is also a good tool to hook up with That great person who you spent the wonderful time with while travelling but never bothered to exchange contact details.  I only share stuff there that I'm willing to admit to anyone.  This includes rejecting friends invitations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can make friend lists private , please let know how... it sure is n't easy , and Facebook'scurrent documentation says that it can not be made private.Go to your profile.Click on the pen on the top-right corner of the Friends list box.Uncheck 'show your friends list to everyone'.This , however , will still leave your friendslists visible to your friends .
That , you can not block .
Any applications that any of your friends use will be able to dig this information , along with any other information visible to your friends from your profile .
It is not enough that you do n't use those applications , if your friends do , the supposedly " private " information flows to third parties without your consent .
The consent of your Friend is enough.I 'm still not sure what to think about Facebook .
I use it for events and for catching up with people and to share photographs to those who are interested while on travelling .
It is also a good tool to hook up with That great person who you spent the wonderful time with while travelling but never bothered to exchange contact details .
I only share stuff there that I 'm willing to admit to anyone .
This includes rejecting friends invitations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can make friend lists private, please let know how... it sure isn't easy, and Facebook'scurrent documentation says that it cannot be made private.Go to your profile.Click on the pen on the top-right corner of the Friends list box.Uncheck 'show your friends list to everyone'.This, however, will still leave your friendslists visible to your friends.
That, you cannot block.
Any applications that any of your friends use will be able to dig this information, along with any other information visible to your friends from your profile.
It is not enough that you don't use those applications, if your friends do, the supposedly "private" information flows to third parties without your consent.
The consent of your Friend is enough.I'm still not sure what to think about Facebook.
I use it for events and for catching up with people and to share photographs to those who are interested while on travelling.
It is also a good tool to hook up with That great person who you spent the wonderful time with while travelling but never bothered to exchange contact details.
I only share stuff there that I'm willing to admit to anyone.
This includes rejecting friends invitations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454232</id>
	<title>Re:What this study shows is the value of network d</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268421780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...ex-girlfriends..."</p><p>This is Slashdot, you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...ex-girlfriends... " This is Slashdot , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...ex-girlfriends..."This is Slashdot, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452278</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>Lije Baley</author>
	<datestamp>1268412540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I don't, you presumptuous clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I do n't , you presumptuous clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I don't, you presumptuous clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452200</id>
	<title>I'm sure that marketing companies have known this</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1268412120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure that marketing companies have known this for years. The give-away is when they get it wrong. I get lots of adverts for cheap calls to India and for services to "send money home". I'm not Indian but most of my friends are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that marketing companies have known this for years .
The give-away is when they get it wrong .
I get lots of adverts for cheap calls to India and for services to " send money home " .
I 'm not Indian but most of my friends are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that marketing companies have known this for years.
The give-away is when they get it wrong.
I get lots of adverts for cheap calls to India and for services to "send money home".
I'm not Indian but most of my friends are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453322</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1268417700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, you're nobody on "social networks like Facebook" if you don't have an account.  Fair enough?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you 're nobody on " social networks like Facebook " if you do n't have an account .
Fair enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you're nobody on "social networks like Facebook" if you don't have an account.
Fair enough?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456030</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>rlgines</author>
	<datestamp>1268386380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank goodness for spokeo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...   I now know that my deceased wife was actually a male<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>This site would be quite funny<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... except for the fact that people will do look ups on this site and assume that it is correct.  I'm just happy to know that even though I live in a below average neighborhood<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... my home is worth more than $1,000,000!!!!   WooHoo!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank goodness for spokeo ... I now know that my deceased wife was actually a male ...This site would be quite funny ... except for the fact that people will do look ups on this site and assume that it is correct .
I 'm just happy to know that even though I live in a below average neighborhood ... my home is worth more than $ 1,000,000 ! ! ! !
WooHoo ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank goodness for spokeo ...   I now know that my deceased wife was actually a male ...This site would be quite funny ... except for the fact that people will do look ups on this site and assume that it is correct.
I'm just happy to know that even though I live in a below average neighborhood ... my home is worth more than $1,000,000!!!!
WooHoo!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982</id>
	<title>You're not nobody</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You went go college and studied computer science, achieving at least an Associates Degree. You usually wear decent clothing (slacks, button-shirt, etc.) not jeans and tee shirts.
<br> <br>
You are a sysadmin and use BSD, GNU/Linux, AIX, IRIX and SunOS/Solaris but GNU/Linux exclusively on your personal PC (but think Macs are okay and are quite capable at using them as well), think Windows OSes barely qualify for the "OS" label, know what a Vax is and even know your way around VMS, and are a first rate perl-monger.
<br> <br>
You think emacs is of the devil and probably have many esoteric vi command keys memorized.
<br> <br>
While you surf the intarwebs regularly you know there were tubes before webs and still read Usenet on occasion.
<br> <br>
You are fairly libertarian but likely not a card-carrying member of the Libertarian party.
<br> <br>
Furthermore, you are an avid reader and at one time played DOOM way too much.
<br> <br>
Oh, and despite all this, you found someone who loved you enough to accept your marriage proposal.
<br> <br>
I could tell you more about yourself but that's just what I got in the first 60 seconds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You went go college and studied computer science , achieving at least an Associates Degree .
You usually wear decent clothing ( slacks , button-shirt , etc .
) not jeans and tee shirts .
You are a sysadmin and use BSD , GNU/Linux , AIX , IRIX and SunOS/Solaris but GNU/Linux exclusively on your personal PC ( but think Macs are okay and are quite capable at using them as well ) , think Windows OSes barely qualify for the " OS " label , know what a Vax is and even know your way around VMS , and are a first rate perl-monger .
You think emacs is of the devil and probably have many esoteric vi command keys memorized .
While you surf the intarwebs regularly you know there were tubes before webs and still read Usenet on occasion .
You are fairly libertarian but likely not a card-carrying member of the Libertarian party .
Furthermore , you are an avid reader and at one time played DOOM way too much .
Oh , and despite all this , you found someone who loved you enough to accept your marriage proposal .
I could tell you more about yourself but that 's just what I got in the first 60 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You went go college and studied computer science, achieving at least an Associates Degree.
You usually wear decent clothing (slacks, button-shirt, etc.
) not jeans and tee shirts.
You are a sysadmin and use BSD, GNU/Linux, AIX, IRIX and SunOS/Solaris but GNU/Linux exclusively on your personal PC (but think Macs are okay and are quite capable at using them as well), think Windows OSes barely qualify for the "OS" label, know what a Vax is and even know your way around VMS, and are a first rate perl-monger.
You think emacs is of the devil and probably have many esoteric vi command keys memorized.
While you surf the intarwebs regularly you know there were tubes before webs and still read Usenet on occasion.
You are fairly libertarian but likely not a card-carrying member of the Libertarian party.
Furthermore, you are an avid reader and at one time played DOOM way too much.
Oh, and despite all this, you found someone who loved you enough to accept your marriage proposal.
I could tell you more about yourself but that's just what I got in the first 60 seconds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452176</id>
	<title>What could possibly happen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him?</p><p>Scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him ? Scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A potential employeur might use this algorithm to predict my graduation year and area of study instead of just looking at the resume I sent him?Scary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452054</id>
	<title>Uhhh, Duh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268411460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hasn't this been known since the beginning of time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't this been known since the beginning of time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't this been known since the beginning of time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453384</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure that marketing companies have known th</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like they hit the nail on the head with you, even though you're not Indian.</p><p>Think about it - maybe s/he makes plenty of calls to India, or has family there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they hit the nail on the head with you , even though you 're not Indian.Think about it - maybe s/he makes plenty of calls to India , or has family there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they hit the nail on the head with you, even though you're not Indian.Think about it - maybe s/he makes plenty of calls to India, or has family there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457150</id>
	<title>Re:Kick it up a notch: spokeo.com</title>
	<author>Sporkinum</author>
	<datestamp>1268390760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be doing all right with keeping a low profile, as I was not listed, even trying a few variations on my name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be doing all right with keeping a low profile , as I was not listed , even trying a few variations on my name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be doing all right with keeping a low profile, as I was not listed, even trying a few variations on my name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453502</id>
	<title>Re:So true</title>
	<author>Oxygen99</author>
	<datestamp>1268418300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites"</i> <br> <br>

Yeah, so, ummm, I have this "old colleague of mine"...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites " Yeah , so , ummm , I have this " old colleague of mine " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"we litterally spent man weeks together at customer sites"  

Yeah, so, ummm, I have this "old colleague of mine"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452298</id>
	<title>What happens in Vegas, stays on facebook</title>
	<author>shambler.com</author>
	<datestamp>1268412660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What happens in Vegas, stays on facebook</htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens in Vegas , stays on facebook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens in Vegas, stays on facebook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452166</id>
	<title>What about slashdot?</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1268412000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No wonder so many slashdotters post as anonymous cowards!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No wonder so many slashdotters post as anonymous cowards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wonder so many slashdotters post as anonymous cowards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142</id>
	<title>OK, and?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268411940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The things they found out aren't things most people have any reason to keep secret.  OK, if you see that most of my Facebook friends went to Cowpie High or Mediocre State University, and you'll realize that I, too, probably went to Cowpie High and Mediocre State.  So what?  Mediocre State is on my (sometimes publicly available) resume, and it's not like its any secret that I went to Cowpie High either. (and yes, the school's actual nickname among the students was that)</p><p>Much more interesting would be if they could figure things which people are trying to keep private.  Where they buried the bodies of their "missing" parents, if they're gay but in the closet (I think there already was an article about that over a year ago, though), membership in the Secret Order of Inquisitors and Torturers (friending Dick Cheney is the giveaway here), etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The things they found out are n't things most people have any reason to keep secret .
OK , if you see that most of my Facebook friends went to Cowpie High or Mediocre State University , and you 'll realize that I , too , probably went to Cowpie High and Mediocre State .
So what ?
Mediocre State is on my ( sometimes publicly available ) resume , and it 's not like its any secret that I went to Cowpie High either .
( and yes , the school 's actual nickname among the students was that ) Much more interesting would be if they could figure things which people are trying to keep private .
Where they buried the bodies of their " missing " parents , if they 're gay but in the closet ( I think there already was an article about that over a year ago , though ) , membership in the Secret Order of Inquisitors and Torturers ( friending Dick Cheney is the giveaway here ) , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The things they found out aren't things most people have any reason to keep secret.
OK, if you see that most of my Facebook friends went to Cowpie High or Mediocre State University, and you'll realize that I, too, probably went to Cowpie High and Mediocre State.
So what?
Mediocre State is on my (sometimes publicly available) resume, and it's not like its any secret that I went to Cowpie High either.
(and yes, the school's actual nickname among the students was that)Much more interesting would be if they could figure things which people are trying to keep private.
Where they buried the bodies of their "missing" parents, if they're gay but in the closet (I think there already was an article about that over a year ago, though), membership in the Secret Order of Inquisitors and Torturers (friending Dick Cheney is the giveaway here), etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452318</id>
	<title>Prior Art:  Very Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a list of my <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=\%22Social+networks\%22&amp;hl=en&amp;btnG=Search&amp;as\_sdt=4000001&amp;as\_sdtp=on" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">references</a> [google.com].</p><p>You may now return to regular daily activities of checking your cell phone every 10 minutes and reading Fartbook.</p><p>Yours In Ufa,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a list of my references [ google.com ] .You may now return to regular daily activities of checking your cell phone every 10 minutes and reading Fartbook.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a list of my references [google.com].You may now return to regular daily activities of checking your cell phone every 10 minutes and reading Fartbook.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461646</id>
	<title>Re:You're not nobody</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1268417220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A couple hundred people just got chills reading that post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple hundred people just got chills reading that post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple hundred people just got chills reading that post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453490</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268418240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the folks who have a small handful of "real friends" and then very high numbers (many hundreds) of game friends like Mafia Wars? One might think I lived in the middle east or Scandinavia based on those metrics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the folks who have a small handful of " real friends " and then very high numbers ( many hundreds ) of game friends like Mafia Wars ?
One might think I lived in the middle east or Scandinavia based on those metrics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the folks who have a small handful of "real friends" and then very high numbers (many hundreds) of game friends like Mafia Wars?
One might think I lived in the middle east or Scandinavia based on those metrics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454320</id>
	<title>Re:You have friends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268422140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That isn't the surprise.</p></div><p>"What is that? It isn't the surprise. I've never seen it before."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is n't the surprise .
" What is that ?
It is n't the surprise .
I 've never seen it before .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That isn't the surprise.
"What is that?
It isn't the surprise.
I've never seen it before.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452352</id>
	<title>Tell me who your friends are ...</title>
	<author>tukang</author>
	<datestamp>1268412900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... and I will tell you who you are. Nothing new here please move along.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and I will tell you who you are .
Nothing new here please move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and I will tell you who you are.
Nothing new here please move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461378</id>
	<title>Well, I tried</title>
	<author>bingoUV</author>
	<datestamp>1268414160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the article says that only 5\% of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends list</p></div><p>Not that I use Facebook much, but I did try to hide as much as possible. But when I logged in Facebook a month or so later, Facebook "helpfully" showed me a page, ostensibly to give me a "higher control" of my privacy settings. This page had all the privacy settings marked the equivalent of "publicly visible" and if I wanted to hide them again, I would have to painstakingly do this for each of the settings (a 2 step process for about 8 items). I couldn't see any obvious way to "mark all private", or even to keep the status quo. But a simple "OK" would mark all the items as publicly visible. I went ahead and did that painstaking process to ensure my privacy but it has been 2 months, and I haven't logged back in.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the article says that only 5 \ % of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends listNot that I use Facebook much , but I did try to hide as much as possible .
But when I logged in Facebook a month or so later , Facebook " helpfully " showed me a page , ostensibly to give me a " higher control " of my privacy settings .
This page had all the privacy settings marked the equivalent of " publicly visible " and if I wanted to hide them again , I would have to painstakingly do this for each of the settings ( a 2 step process for about 8 items ) .
I could n't see any obvious way to " mark all private " , or even to keep the status quo .
But a simple " OK " would mark all the items as publicly visible .
I went ahead and did that painstaking process to ensure my privacy but it has been 2 months , and I have n't logged back in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the article says that only 5\% of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends listNot that I use Facebook much, but I did try to hide as much as possible.
But when I logged in Facebook a month or so later, Facebook "helpfully" showed me a page, ostensibly to give me a "higher control" of my privacy settings.
This page had all the privacy settings marked the equivalent of "publicly visible" and if I wanted to hide them again, I would have to painstakingly do this for each of the settings (a 2 step process for about 8 items).
I couldn't see any obvious way to "mark all private", or even to keep the status quo.
But a simple "OK" would mark all the items as publicly visible.
I went ahead and did that painstaking process to ensure my privacy but it has been 2 months, and I haven't logged back in.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452734</id>
	<title>Re:What happens in Vegas, stays on facebook</title>
	<author>nobodylocalhost</author>
	<datestamp>1268414700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's when you face punch the ass who tagged you, since you can find out who they are and where they live from facebook via the algorithm in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's when you face punch the ass who tagged you , since you can find out who they are and where they live from facebook via the algorithm in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's when you face punch the ass who tagged you, since you can find out who they are and where they live from facebook via the algorithm in TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452298</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31462182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31459732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31455128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_1422200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31455128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31459732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31457390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31462182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452674
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452982
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31461646
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31454662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453490
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31456128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31453132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_1422200.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_1422200.31452270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
