<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_12_0149233</id>
	<title>UK Gov't Wants Facebook To Feature Child Safety Button</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268394000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>judgecorp writes <i>"Harriet Harman, the deputy leader of the Labour Party, has said that UK government ministers are 'taking action' <a href="http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mps-urge-facebook-to-add-child-protection-button-5806">to get Facebook to add a British child protection button</a> (called CEOP) to its site. The move comes after the UK's Daily Mail withdrew allegations that teenagers on Facebook are continually pestered &mdash; though <a href="http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/facebook-threatens-legal-action-against-daily-mail-5801">Facebook is still considering suing the paper</a>. The campaign apparently ignores Facebook's assertion that it already has better child protection in place and the CEOP button would be limited to the UK."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>judgecorp writes " Harriet Harman , the deputy leader of the Labour Party , has said that UK government ministers are 'taking action ' to get Facebook to add a British child protection button ( called CEOP ) to its site .
The move comes after the UK 's Daily Mail withdrew allegations that teenagers on Facebook are continually pestered    though Facebook is still considering suing the paper .
The campaign apparently ignores Facebook 's assertion that it already has better child protection in place and the CEOP button would be limited to the UK .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>judgecorp writes "Harriet Harman, the deputy leader of the Labour Party, has said that UK government ministers are 'taking action' to get Facebook to add a British child protection button (called CEOP) to its site.
The move comes after the UK's Daily Mail withdrew allegations that teenagers on Facebook are continually pestered — though Facebook is still considering suing the paper.
The campaign apparently ignores Facebook's assertion that it already has better child protection in place and the CEOP button would be limited to the UK.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450220</id>
	<title>Doug Stanhope says .....</title>
	<author>kevinbr</author>
	<datestamp>1268399580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkDt\_TmEqqM&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkDt\_TmEqqM&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = JkDt \ _TmEqqM&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkDt\_TmEqqM&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450260</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Harriet Harman is your Obama?</p><p>God forbid you should criticize the president in front of black people.  He's like their retarded kid who's running the race in last place and they're <i>oh so proud of him.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Harriet Harman is your Obama ? God forbid you should criticize the president in front of black people .
He 's like their retarded kid who 's running the race in last place and they 're oh so proud of him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Harriet Harman is your Obama?God forbid you should criticize the president in front of black people.
He's like their retarded kid who's running the race in last place and they're oh so proud of him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450278</id>
	<title>even better idea</title>
	<author>jlebrech</author>
	<datestamp>1268400300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets have a hide Kids option. Unless they are related to oneself or friends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets have a hide Kids option .
Unless they are related to oneself or friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets have a hide Kids option.
Unless they are related to oneself or friends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450436</id>
	<title>It's the economy, stupid!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268401800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Owebama can suck mine!</p><p>from an ft.com article today:</p><p>"During the downturn many companies, including FedEx, cut their capital expenditures in response to falling demand, moves that in turn intensified the drop-off in economic activity. The levels have yet to recover.</p><p>Boosting investment spending was crucial to catalysing a sustainable recovery, Mr Smith said, because it created jobs. When people were worried about unemployment, they tended to spend less, undercutting a driver of the economy."</p><p>Pull your head out of your ass, Owebama.  People don't give a shit about your health care take-over socialist wet dream holy grail if they've been looking for a job for 9-12 months.  Bills get paid in this order: food, housing, energy, communications, THEN insurance.  Maybe if you wouldn't be so fucking myopic, your poll numbers wouldn't be in the shitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Owebama can suck mine ! from an ft.com article today : " During the downturn many companies , including FedEx , cut their capital expenditures in response to falling demand , moves that in turn intensified the drop-off in economic activity .
The levels have yet to recover.Boosting investment spending was crucial to catalysing a sustainable recovery , Mr Smith said , because it created jobs .
When people were worried about unemployment , they tended to spend less , undercutting a driver of the economy .
" Pull your head out of your ass , Owebama .
People do n't give a shit about your health care take-over socialist wet dream holy grail if they 've been looking for a job for 9-12 months .
Bills get paid in this order : food , housing , energy , communications , THEN insurance .
Maybe if you would n't be so fucking myopic , your poll numbers would n't be in the shitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Owebama can suck mine!from an ft.com article today:"During the downturn many companies, including FedEx, cut their capital expenditures in response to falling demand, moves that in turn intensified the drop-off in economic activity.
The levels have yet to recover.Boosting investment spending was crucial to catalysing a sustainable recovery, Mr Smith said, because it created jobs.
When people were worried about unemployment, they tended to spend less, undercutting a driver of the economy.
"Pull your head out of your ass, Owebama.
People don't give a shit about your health care take-over socialist wet dream holy grail if they've been looking for a job for 9-12 months.
Bills get paid in this order: food, housing, energy, communications, THEN insurance.
Maybe if you wouldn't be so fucking myopic, your poll numbers wouldn't be in the shitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone, or accidentally drove the car?</p></div></blockquote><p>"I'm sorry, officer. I was just sat in the car, then my hand slipped and started the ignition, then my feet slipped at the same time as my hand slipped and I ended up dropping the car into gear and driving off*, then my left foot kept slipping on to the clutch at the same time as my hand slipped on the gear stick. It was all just accidental driving."</p><p>* Note for Americans: We in the UK generally have these things called "gear sticks" and "clutch pedals" that let you change gear by yourself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone , or accidentally drove the car ?
" I 'm sorry , officer .
I was just sat in the car , then my hand slipped and started the ignition , then my feet slipped at the same time as my hand slipped and I ended up dropping the car into gear and driving off * , then my left foot kept slipping on to the clutch at the same time as my hand slipped on the gear stick .
It was all just accidental driving .
" * Note for Americans : We in the UK generally have these things called " gear sticks " and " clutch pedals " that let you change gear by yourself ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone, or accidentally drove the car?
"I'm sorry, officer.
I was just sat in the car, then my hand slipped and started the ignition, then my feet slipped at the same time as my hand slipped and I ended up dropping the car into gear and driving off*, then my left foot kept slipping on to the clutch at the same time as my hand slipped on the gear stick.
It was all just accidental driving.
"* Note for Americans: We in the UK generally have these things called "gear sticks" and "clutch pedals" that let you change gear by yourself ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450640</id>
	<title>Re:Not sure about who is right</title>
	<author>MoonBuggy</author>
	<datestamp>1268403300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just a warning, it's a button that reports "suspicious activity" directly to CEOP. I'm assuming that said report must include some identifying information of the parties involved or it would be no use to anyone.</p><p>I know Facebook are not exactly the bastions of privacy and security that we might like, but bowing to the pressure of a country other than the one in which they are based, and in doing so firing off arbitrary personal information about their users, is an understandable place to draw the line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just a warning , it 's a button that reports " suspicious activity " directly to CEOP .
I 'm assuming that said report must include some identifying information of the parties involved or it would be no use to anyone.I know Facebook are not exactly the bastions of privacy and security that we might like , but bowing to the pressure of a country other than the one in which they are based , and in doing so firing off arbitrary personal information about their users , is an understandable place to draw the line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just a warning, it's a button that reports "suspicious activity" directly to CEOP.
I'm assuming that said report must include some identifying information of the parties involved or it would be no use to anyone.I know Facebook are not exactly the bastions of privacy and security that we might like, but bowing to the pressure of a country other than the one in which they are based, and in doing so firing off arbitrary personal information about their users, is an understandable place to draw the line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453450</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook here</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1268418120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if for some reason the big X doesn't work, every PC and monitor is built with a large button on the front that makes anything offensive on the screen completely disappear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if for some reason the big X does n't work , every PC and monitor is built with a large button on the front that makes anything offensive on the screen completely disappear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if for some reason the big X doesn't work, every PC and monitor is built with a large button on the front that makes anything offensive on the screen completely disappear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451552</id>
	<title>Taking action</title>
	<author>DaveGod</author>
	<datestamp>1268409060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As TFA all-but underlines, child safety is not the issue here, it is that Harriet Harman is being seen to be taking action. "Doing something". </p><p>

I'm not quite sure how "getting in touch with Facebook to urge the use of the CEOP button" (i.e. asking for a favour that FB seems happy and well-armed to  openly criticise) is to be considered an achievement, but use of FB is in the press a lot so our government instinctively feels the need to exert control over it, however ineffectual and petty. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As TFA all-but underlines , child safety is not the issue here , it is that Harriet Harman is being seen to be taking action .
" Doing something " .
I 'm not quite sure how " getting in touch with Facebook to urge the use of the CEOP button " ( i.e .
asking for a favour that FB seems happy and well-armed to openly criticise ) is to be considered an achievement , but use of FB is in the press a lot so our government instinctively feels the need to exert control over it , however ineffectual and petty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As TFA all-but underlines, child safety is not the issue here, it is that Harriet Harman is being seen to be taking action.
"Doing something".
I'm not quite sure how "getting in touch with Facebook to urge the use of the CEOP button" (i.e.
asking for a favour that FB seems happy and well-armed to  openly criticise) is to be considered an achievement, but use of FB is in the press a lot so our government instinctively feels the need to exert control over it, however ineffectual and petty. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453054</id>
	<title>There is a really simple fix for this</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1268416500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need to worry folks.  In the event this gets passed, there is a really simple fix.</p><p>It's probably safe to assume that many MPs have their own FB pages, since it can be an effective method of campaigning to their younger voters.<br>So, all you need to do is create an account claiming to be a minor (or actually be a minor), friend the MPs, and click this pedo-panic button on all their accounts.  That'll shut it down right quick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to worry folks .
In the event this gets passed , there is a really simple fix.It 's probably safe to assume that many MPs have their own FB pages , since it can be an effective method of campaigning to their younger voters.So , all you need to do is create an account claiming to be a minor ( or actually be a minor ) , friend the MPs , and click this pedo-panic button on all their accounts .
That 'll shut it down right quick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to worry folks.
In the event this gets passed, there is a really simple fix.It's probably safe to assume that many MPs have their own FB pages, since it can be an effective method of campaigning to their younger voters.So, all you need to do is create an account claiming to be a minor (or actually be a minor), friend the MPs, and click this pedo-panic button on all their accounts.
That'll shut it down right quick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450564</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>malkavian</author>
	<datestamp>1268402700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as the money comes from the estates held by the royal family anyway, it's not the State's money "wasted" in the first place.  Abolish the monarchy, and the estates would revert to the family.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as the money comes from the estates held by the royal family anyway , it 's not the State 's money " wasted " in the first place .
Abolish the monarchy , and the estates would revert to the family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as the money comes from the estates held by the royal family anyway, it's not the State's money "wasted" in the first place.
Abolish the monarchy, and the estates would revert to the family.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453030</id>
	<title>There's going to be a General Election in 6 weeks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or thereabouts.</p><p>Is it any wonder that the discredited Labour Government that we've had hung around our necks for the past 4 years is generating so many "moral panic" issues?  If you speak against them, you're a criminal, a pervert or both.  Its really deperessing to be a UK citizen at the present time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or thereabouts.Is it any wonder that the discredited Labour Government that we 've had hung around our necks for the past 4 years is generating so many " moral panic " issues ?
If you speak against them , you 're a criminal , a pervert or both .
Its really deperessing to be a UK citizen at the present time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or thereabouts.Is it any wonder that the discredited Labour Government that we've had hung around our necks for the past 4 years is generating so many "moral panic" issues?
If you speak against them, you're a criminal, a pervert or both.
Its really deperessing to be a UK citizen at the present time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452232</id>
	<title>Re:hmmmm</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268412300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find your post offensive and have clicked on the CEOP button Slashdot has installed.  Prepare for a visit!</p><p>Seriously, what good would this button do in preventing anything?  If the child is duped into meeting up with Chester Molester, then they aren't going to press the button.  If the child is suspicious, they are going to either use the existing "report as offensive" button <b>which already exists</b>, or they are going to yell for Mom or Dad who will call CEOP on the telephone so they can respond in time to maybe send an armed response team to meet up with Chester and make sure he goes to jail where he'll get all the sexual attention he needs from the hardened inmates.  Nothin' Bubba likes better than being the first to soften up a child molester.</p><p>Something like this just invites abuses of the system, and/or lacks the immediate response times needed to actually catch the actual dangerous pedophiles and make sure they go away for a long time.  It's actually going to discourage useful reports (those that happen quickly enough to prevent issues) and encourage abuses of the reporting system. Like those two girls last year who reported they were stuck in a storm drain system over Facebook rather than calling the local police for help.</p><p>It doesn't hurt that this was all based on a made-up article that initially created false claims about a social network that was NOT Facebook, then some asshat editor changed the name of the social network to Facebook.  I'd be far more worried about someone getting targeted on a more random site like Slashdot's private messaging system, where fewer people are looking and private messages are private.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your post offensive and have clicked on the CEOP button Slashdot has installed .
Prepare for a visit ! Seriously , what good would this button do in preventing anything ?
If the child is duped into meeting up with Chester Molester , then they are n't going to press the button .
If the child is suspicious , they are going to either use the existing " report as offensive " button which already exists , or they are going to yell for Mom or Dad who will call CEOP on the telephone so they can respond in time to maybe send an armed response team to meet up with Chester and make sure he goes to jail where he 'll get all the sexual attention he needs from the hardened inmates .
Nothin ' Bubba likes better than being the first to soften up a child molester.Something like this just invites abuses of the system , and/or lacks the immediate response times needed to actually catch the actual dangerous pedophiles and make sure they go away for a long time .
It 's actually going to discourage useful reports ( those that happen quickly enough to prevent issues ) and encourage abuses of the reporting system .
Like those two girls last year who reported they were stuck in a storm drain system over Facebook rather than calling the local police for help.It does n't hurt that this was all based on a made-up article that initially created false claims about a social network that was NOT Facebook , then some asshat editor changed the name of the social network to Facebook .
I 'd be far more worried about someone getting targeted on a more random site like Slashdot 's private messaging system , where fewer people are looking and private messages are private .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your post offensive and have clicked on the CEOP button Slashdot has installed.
Prepare for a visit!Seriously, what good would this button do in preventing anything?
If the child is duped into meeting up with Chester Molester, then they aren't going to press the button.
If the child is suspicious, they are going to either use the existing "report as offensive" button which already exists, or they are going to yell for Mom or Dad who will call CEOP on the telephone so they can respond in time to maybe send an armed response team to meet up with Chester and make sure he goes to jail where he'll get all the sexual attention he needs from the hardened inmates.
Nothin' Bubba likes better than being the first to soften up a child molester.Something like this just invites abuses of the system, and/or lacks the immediate response times needed to actually catch the actual dangerous pedophiles and make sure they go away for a long time.
It's actually going to discourage useful reports (those that happen quickly enough to prevent issues) and encourage abuses of the reporting system.
Like those two girls last year who reported they were stuck in a storm drain system over Facebook rather than calling the local police for help.It doesn't hurt that this was all based on a made-up article that initially created false claims about a social network that was NOT Facebook, then some asshat editor changed the name of the social network to Facebook.
I'd be far more worried about someone getting targeted on a more random site like Slashdot's private messaging system, where fewer people are looking and private messages are private.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</id>
	<title>Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly this isn't a shock given our current government's tracks record.<br>
&nbsp; - Licence to take kids to football practice<br>
&nbsp; - Licence to own a dog (and third party liability insurance)<br>
&nbsp; - CCTV Cameras on every street corner<br>
&nbsp; - An "equality opportunity" amendment which promotes racist and sexist hiring (what the hell?)<br>
&nbsp; - Virtual strip search at every airport<br>
&nbsp; - ID Cards<br>
&nbsp; - et al</p><p>Being extremely liberal is great. But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love (e.g. Personal Freedom, less interference).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly this is n't a shock given our current government 's tracks record .
  - Licence to take kids to football practice   - Licence to own a dog ( and third party liability insurance )   - CCTV Cameras on every street corner   - An " equality opportunity " amendment which promotes racist and sexist hiring ( what the hell ?
)   - Virtual strip search at every airport   - ID Cards   - et alBeing extremely liberal is great .
But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love ( e.g .
Personal Freedom , less interference ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly this isn't a shock given our current government's tracks record.
  - Licence to take kids to football practice
  - Licence to own a dog (and third party liability insurance)
  - CCTV Cameras on every street corner
  - An "equality opportunity" amendment which promotes racist and sexist hiring (what the hell?
)
  - Virtual strip search at every airport
  - ID Cards
  - et alBeing extremely liberal is great.
But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love (e.g.
Personal Freedom, less interference).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450532</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous Cowpat</author>
	<datestamp>1268402520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified. They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end. This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they cannot employ men.</p></div><p>It also encourages widening of the qualification gap between men and women, since men will now have to get themselves higher qualified to get a job.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified .
They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end .
This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they can not employ men.It also encourages widening of the qualification gap between men and women , since men will now have to get themselves higher qualified to get a job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified.
They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end.
This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they cannot employ men.It also encourages widening of the qualification gap between men and women, since men will now have to get themselves higher qualified to get a job.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450578</id>
	<title>British Children?!</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1268402820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait a sec. Since when did the British start having children again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a sec .
Since when did the British start having children again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a sec.
Since when did the British start having children again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453320</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't make any sense</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1268417640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think its more about the section you missed:</p><p>* Parent sees conversation child is having<br>* Parent presses button</p><p>I assume either that, or the grooming is so obvious and blatant that even the child reports the pervert. Obviously, those children that use the button were never going to see the stranger's puppies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think its more about the section you missed : * Parent sees conversation child is having * Parent presses buttonI assume either that , or the grooming is so obvious and blatant that even the child reports the pervert .
Obviously , those children that use the button were never going to see the stranger 's puppies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think its more about the section you missed:* Parent sees conversation child is having* Parent presses buttonI assume either that, or the grooming is so obvious and blatant that even the child reports the pervert.
Obviously, those children that use the button were never going to see the stranger's puppies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136</id>
	<title>Not sure about who is right</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1268398860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could argue that the UK government is just trying to interfere in how a private non-uk business runs its site, but then again, if you leave it to private industry, actors claiming to be doctors would be telling you that smoking is healthy. Private industry does have a reputation for ignoring the welfare of its customers for the sake of profits.
</p><p>Just as car makers prefered killing a few customers over the message that cars could be dangerous by installing seatbelts, facebook hardly wants to carry the message that social networking is not all fun and games to strongly.
</p><p>From what I know of the warning button, it is just a link to a site where you can get advice about how to stay safe. So fairly similar to a "smoking can kill you" sticker. The truly stupid won't read it, but who knows, it might work and what is the harm?
</p><p>Yeah, yeah, parents should tell their kids. Except a lot of parents don't have a clue about what their kids are up to. They did not grow up with the internet, don't know the capabilities. Kids are incredibly stupid if you let them, but then kids are also famous for not reading warnings anyway.
</p><p>But why is facebook so opposed to it? Does it have a serious complaint, or is it seatbelts all over again? Yeah the summary says that facebook claims their own warnings are good enough. Right... and why should we take their word for it? They would hardly say "we don't want the button and our own systems suck because we don't give a shit". They got a reason not to want the button, and I need a little bit more then obvious marketing speech to see why. Because I can see a very simple reason why they really don't want it. It might scare people of using their service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could argue that the UK government is just trying to interfere in how a private non-uk business runs its site , but then again , if you leave it to private industry , actors claiming to be doctors would be telling you that smoking is healthy .
Private industry does have a reputation for ignoring the welfare of its customers for the sake of profits .
Just as car makers prefered killing a few customers over the message that cars could be dangerous by installing seatbelts , facebook hardly wants to carry the message that social networking is not all fun and games to strongly .
From what I know of the warning button , it is just a link to a site where you can get advice about how to stay safe .
So fairly similar to a " smoking can kill you " sticker .
The truly stupid wo n't read it , but who knows , it might work and what is the harm ?
Yeah , yeah , parents should tell their kids .
Except a lot of parents do n't have a clue about what their kids are up to .
They did not grow up with the internet , do n't know the capabilities .
Kids are incredibly stupid if you let them , but then kids are also famous for not reading warnings anyway .
But why is facebook so opposed to it ?
Does it have a serious complaint , or is it seatbelts all over again ?
Yeah the summary says that facebook claims their own warnings are good enough .
Right... and why should we take their word for it ?
They would hardly say " we do n't want the button and our own systems suck because we do n't give a shit " .
They got a reason not to want the button , and I need a little bit more then obvious marketing speech to see why .
Because I can see a very simple reason why they really do n't want it .
It might scare people of using their service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could argue that the UK government is just trying to interfere in how a private non-uk business runs its site, but then again, if you leave it to private industry, actors claiming to be doctors would be telling you that smoking is healthy.
Private industry does have a reputation for ignoring the welfare of its customers for the sake of profits.
Just as car makers prefered killing a few customers over the message that cars could be dangerous by installing seatbelts, facebook hardly wants to carry the message that social networking is not all fun and games to strongly.
From what I know of the warning button, it is just a link to a site where you can get advice about how to stay safe.
So fairly similar to a "smoking can kill you" sticker.
The truly stupid won't read it, but who knows, it might work and what is the harm?
Yeah, yeah, parents should tell their kids.
Except a lot of parents don't have a clue about what their kids are up to.
They did not grow up with the internet, don't know the capabilities.
Kids are incredibly stupid if you let them, but then kids are also famous for not reading warnings anyway.
But why is facebook so opposed to it?
Does it have a serious complaint, or is it seatbelts all over again?
Yeah the summary says that facebook claims their own warnings are good enough.
Right... and why should we take their word for it?
They would hardly say "we don't want the button and our own systems suck because we don't give a shit".
They got a reason not to want the button, and I need a little bit more then obvious marketing speech to see why.
Because I can see a very simple reason why they really don't want it.
It might scare people of using their service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052</id>
	<title>Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1268398080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since its Harriet Harman involved I expect that the pressing of the button will result in the immediate rounding up of all males over 12 involved in the conversation for incarceration without trial. And it obviously won't matter what was said, because it will be the "emotion affect" on the kid pressing the button that counts, not the actual words.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since its Harriet Harman involved I expect that the pressing of the button will result in the immediate rounding up of all males over 12 involved in the conversation for incarceration without trial .
And it obviously wo n't matter what was said , because it will be the " emotion affect " on the kid pressing the button that counts , not the actual words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since its Harriet Harman involved I expect that the pressing of the button will result in the immediate rounding up of all males over 12 involved in the conversation for incarceration without trial.
And it obviously won't matter what was said, because it will be the "emotion affect" on the kid pressing the button that counts, not the actual words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450276</id>
	<title>Porn Director for Parliament</title>
	<author>alanw</author>
	<datestamp>1268400240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sooner the general election comes the better - there are only weeks left of the current parliament, and so all the politicians are posturing not in the expectation of changing the law, but only in the hope of getting re-elected.</p><p>In today's news, the Lib Dem's have selected a female porn director as their prospective candidate, so perhaps there is some hope left.</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/kent/8563214.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/kent/8563214.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sooner the general election comes the better - there are only weeks left of the current parliament , and so all the politicians are posturing not in the expectation of changing the law , but only in the hope of getting re-elected.In today 's news , the Lib Dem 's have selected a female porn director as their prospective candidate , so perhaps there is some hope left.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/kent/8563214.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sooner the general election comes the better - there are only weeks left of the current parliament, and so all the politicians are posturing not in the expectation of changing the law, but only in the hope of getting re-elected.In today's news, the Lib Dem's have selected a female porn director as their prospective candidate, so perhaps there is some hope left.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/kent/8563214.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078</id>
	<title>And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that got done by the police for <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6861077.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">driving without due care and attention</a> [timesonline.co.uk]?</p><p>So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that got done by the police for driving without due care and attention [ timesonline.co.uk ] ? So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that got done by the police for driving without due care and attention [timesonline.co.uk]?So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450238</id>
	<title>"Arsebook", anyone?</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268399820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a British politician, you automatically go on "Arsebook".</p><p>If you're a parent without parental responsibility, your "Facebook" account gets transferred to "Arsebook".</p><p>And if you've queued up at midnight for a computer game or an iPhone, you go into the "Arsebook" "What A Total Arse" section.</p><p>That'll soon learn them...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a British politician , you automatically go on " Arsebook " .If you 're a parent without parental responsibility , your " Facebook " account gets transferred to " Arsebook " .And if you 've queued up at midnight for a computer game or an iPhone , you go into the " Arsebook " " What A Total Arse " section.That 'll soon learn them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a British politician, you automatically go on "Arsebook".If you're a parent without parental responsibility, your "Facebook" account gets transferred to "Arsebook".And if you've queued up at midnight for a computer game or an iPhone, you go into the "Arsebook" "What A Total Arse" section.That'll soon learn them...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456976</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking as a UK resident.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268390100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I laughed when i saw this guys username.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I laughed when i saw this guys username .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I laughed when i saw this guys username.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451856</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1268410500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That \_is\_ liberal. I think you're running into problems that both liberal and conservative are illdefined misused concepts, and can sometimes mean the same thing.</p><p>When I oppose authoritarian laws, I'm liberal in the sense of supporting freedom - but I'm not liberal in the sense of wanting change, as the point is I don't want change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That \ _is \ _ liberal .
I think you 're running into problems that both liberal and conservative are illdefined misused concepts , and can sometimes mean the same thing.When I oppose authoritarian laws , I 'm liberal in the sense of supporting freedom - but I 'm not liberal in the sense of wanting change , as the point is I do n't want change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That \_is\_ liberal.
I think you're running into problems that both liberal and conservative are illdefined misused concepts, and can sometimes mean the same thing.When I oppose authoritarian laws, I'm liberal in the sense of supporting freedom - but I'm not liberal in the sense of wanting change, as the point is I don't want change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450110</id>
	<title>Dear Parents...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268398620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The following list of things should not be considered as trustworthy babysitters and are no substitute for proper parenting skills:</p><p>An Internet connected PC<br>A box of fireworks<br>A games console<br>A set of throwing knives</p><p>Now kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The following list of things should not be considered as trustworthy babysitters and are no substitute for proper parenting skills : An Internet connected PCA box of fireworksA games consoleA set of throwing knivesNow kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you 're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The following list of things should not be considered as trustworthy babysitters and are no substitute for proper parenting skills:An Internet connected PCA box of fireworksA games consoleA set of throwing knivesNow kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452488</id>
	<title>Re:The Thing that Irks me is...</title>
	<author>Alioth</author>
	<datestamp>1268413440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the Britishness test is a joke - you can try it online - it's full of questions that are totally irrelevant. For instance, questions about speed limits, whose proper place is on the driving test, not a citizenship test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Britishness test is a joke - you can try it online - it 's full of questions that are totally irrelevant .
For instance , questions about speed limits , whose proper place is on the driving test , not a citizenship test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Britishness test is a joke - you can try it online - it's full of questions that are totally irrelevant.
For instance, questions about speed limits, whose proper place is on the driving test, not a citizenship test.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452386</id>
	<title>Re:Harridan Harperson can suck my cock.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is Harriet Harperdaughter you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is Harriet Harperdaughter you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is Harriet Harperdaughter you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450214</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1268399520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean extremely communist.  And American conservatives don't love personal freedom, unless it's theft, gay sex, and firing black people.  The gun-toting rebels you're thinking of are "libertarian."</p><p>Liberal/conservative is bullshit and meaningless.  Just semantics, yes, but it's starting to tick me off that "liberal" includes fighting global warming, and fat unemployment checks for laid-off union workers (General Motors).  The two issues couldn't be more different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean extremely communist .
And American conservatives do n't love personal freedom , unless it 's theft , gay sex , and firing black people .
The gun-toting rebels you 're thinking of are " libertarian .
" Liberal/conservative is bullshit and meaningless .
Just semantics , yes , but it 's starting to tick me off that " liberal " includes fighting global warming , and fat unemployment checks for laid-off union workers ( General Motors ) .
The two issues could n't be more different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean extremely communist.
And American conservatives don't love personal freedom, unless it's theft, gay sex, and firing black people.
The gun-toting rebels you're thinking of are "libertarian.
"Liberal/conservative is bullshit and meaningless.
Just semantics, yes, but it's starting to tick me off that "liberal" includes fighting global warming, and fat unemployment checks for laid-off union workers (General Motors).
The two issues couldn't be more different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450658</id>
	<title>This will cause so many false positives.</title>
	<author>dotKuro</author>
	<datestamp>1268403480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of the kind of playground "grassing" that was so common. Miss, he's stolen my jacket! Miss, he's stabbing me with his pencil! Miss, he's put my shoes in the toilet! This will be an online version of that. An eternal hell of kids thinking other kids are pedos and reporting them for the slightest offences. Facebook will become like Club Penguin.

As for CEOP, it's on some sites already and the people who run it are incompetents, and widely known to be. Any kid with a brain blocks the offending person and LOICs any hate sites.

Apart from anything else, Harman is a gynosupremist bitch. Feminism's one thing, incriminating every single male in existence is another. If she was male, she wouldn't even be in. Although I'm British, I hate the bias of British politics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the kind of playground " grassing " that was so common .
Miss , he 's stolen my jacket !
Miss , he 's stabbing me with his pencil !
Miss , he 's put my shoes in the toilet !
This will be an online version of that .
An eternal hell of kids thinking other kids are pedos and reporting them for the slightest offences .
Facebook will become like Club Penguin .
As for CEOP , it 's on some sites already and the people who run it are incompetents , and widely known to be .
Any kid with a brain blocks the offending person and LOICs any hate sites .
Apart from anything else , Harman is a gynosupremist bitch .
Feminism 's one thing , incriminating every single male in existence is another .
If she was male , she would n't even be in .
Although I 'm British , I hate the bias of British politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the kind of playground "grassing" that was so common.
Miss, he's stolen my jacket!
Miss, he's stabbing me with his pencil!
Miss, he's put my shoes in the toilet!
This will be an online version of that.
An eternal hell of kids thinking other kids are pedos and reporting them for the slightest offences.
Facebook will become like Club Penguin.
As for CEOP, it's on some sites already and the people who run it are incompetents, and widely known to be.
Any kid with a brain blocks the offending person and LOICs any hate sites.
Apart from anything else, Harman is a gynosupremist bitch.
Feminism's one thing, incriminating every single male in existence is another.
If she was male, she wouldn't even be in.
Although I'm British, I hate the bias of British politics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450848</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what's really funny:</p><p>Sion Simon, the MP for Birmingham, Erdington recently resigned.  Harman's all-women shortlists were promptly abandoned for the selection of the next Labour candidate because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... her husband wanted the job.  And he was given it without any kind of selection procedure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what 's really funny : Sion Simon , the MP for Birmingham , Erdington recently resigned .
Harman 's all-women shortlists were promptly abandoned for the selection of the next Labour candidate because ... her husband wanted the job .
And he was given it without any kind of selection procedure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what's really funny:Sion Simon, the MP for Birmingham, Erdington recently resigned.
Harman's all-women shortlists were promptly abandoned for the selection of the next Labour candidate because ... her husband wanted the job.
And he was given it without any kind of selection procedure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451792</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>ChiRaven</author>
	<datestamp>1268410140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>

 - et al</p><p>Being extremely liberal is great. But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love (e.g. Personal Freedom, less interference).</p></div><p>Love, but increasingly do not HAVE.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- et alBeing extremely liberal is great .
But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love ( e.g .
Personal Freedom , less interference ) .Love , but increasingly do not HAVE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

 - et alBeing extremely liberal is great.
But some days I wish the UK had a little more of the things American conservatives love (e.g.
Personal Freedom, less interference).Love, but increasingly do not HAVE.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453998</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What part of what you listed is "liberal"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What part of what you listed is " liberal " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What part of what you listed is "liberal"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450424</id>
	<title>Tyranny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268401680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Let the sum of parents and children decide what is appropriate by giving them a way to blacklist things".</p><p>The sum of people will pretty much decide most discussions, people, and services are inappropriate for children, and this faceless entity will offer children no way to complain or get access either way. This is actually <b>pure tyranny</b>, even when its practiced on children.</p><p>Furthermore, social networks are about people, and the context under which this is apparently also being pushed is that you also can protect children physically - but you obviously can't know in advance who is going to rape or kill kids. Perhaps some reporting mechanism helps with harassment (which you can already report as is now), but definitely not rape or murder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Let the sum of parents and children decide what is appropriate by giving them a way to blacklist things " .The sum of people will pretty much decide most discussions , people , and services are inappropriate for children , and this faceless entity will offer children no way to complain or get access either way .
This is actually pure tyranny , even when its practiced on children.Furthermore , social networks are about people , and the context under which this is apparently also being pushed is that you also can protect children physically - but you obviously ca n't know in advance who is going to rape or kill kids .
Perhaps some reporting mechanism helps with harassment ( which you can already report as is now ) , but definitely not rape or murder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Let the sum of parents and children decide what is appropriate by giving them a way to blacklist things".The sum of people will pretty much decide most discussions, people, and services are inappropriate for children, and this faceless entity will offer children no way to complain or get access either way.
This is actually pure tyranny, even when its practiced on children.Furthermore, social networks are about people, and the context under which this is apparently also being pushed is that you also can protect children physically - but you obviously can't know in advance who is going to rape or kill kids.
Perhaps some reporting mechanism helps with harassment (which you can already report as is now), but definitely not rape or murder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800</id>
	<title>Speaking as a UK resident.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You basically only have to walk down the street with your ears open.</p><p>Back when I were a lad, it was routine to insult kids who were not of your group, fatty, lanky, ginger, smelly, stinky, etc.</p><p>Today the default insult is "paedo"</p><p>I've lost count of the number of times I have seen teenagers and younger, of both sexes, respond to an adult who tells them off for something, eg "stop fucking around with my car" with chants of "paedo!"</p><p>Teachers in UK schools essentially live in fear of one of the kids responding to being told off for setting fire to little johnny in 2A with an accusation of violence or sexual assault being made against the teacher.</p><p>You won't find a small kid who does not already;</p><p>a/ own a mobile phone<br>b/ know the childline and other abuse numbers by heart</p><p>We are sowing what we reaped.</p><p>I say in all sincerity, there are a LOT of adults today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped, and simply walk on by, deliberately seeing nothing, as being the only safe option.</p><p><a href="http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com">http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You basically only have to walk down the street with your ears open.Back when I were a lad , it was routine to insult kids who were not of your group , fatty , lanky , ginger , smelly , stinky , etc.Today the default insult is " paedo " I 've lost count of the number of times I have seen teenagers and younger , of both sexes , respond to an adult who tells them off for something , eg " stop fucking around with my car " with chants of " paedo !
" Teachers in UK schools essentially live in fear of one of the kids responding to being told off for setting fire to little johnny in 2A with an accusation of violence or sexual assault being made against the teacher.You wo n't find a small kid who does not already ; a/ own a mobile phoneb/ know the childline and other abuse numbers by heartWe are sowing what we reaped.I say in all sincerity , there are a LOT of adults today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped , and simply walk on by , deliberately seeing nothing , as being the only safe option.http : //falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You basically only have to walk down the street with your ears open.Back when I were a lad, it was routine to insult kids who were not of your group, fatty, lanky, ginger, smelly, stinky, etc.Today the default insult is "paedo"I've lost count of the number of times I have seen teenagers and younger, of both sexes, respond to an adult who tells them off for something, eg "stop fucking around with my car" with chants of "paedo!
"Teachers in UK schools essentially live in fear of one of the kids responding to being told off for setting fire to little johnny in 2A with an accusation of violence or sexual assault being made against the teacher.You won't find a small kid who does not already;a/ own a mobile phoneb/ know the childline and other abuse numbers by heartWe are sowing what we reaped.I say in all sincerity, there are a LOT of adults today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped, and simply walk on by, deliberately seeing nothing, as being the only safe option.http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450086</id>
	<title>johnvpetersen</title>
	<author>johnvpetersen</author>
	<datestamp>1268398320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this begins to open the door to bringing products liability to the web....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this begins to open the door to bringing products liability to the web... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this begins to open the door to bringing products liability to the web....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450526</id>
	<title>Incorrect Summary</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1268402520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The button is not called CEOP. CEOP is the <a href="http://www.ceop.gov.uk/" title="ceop.gov.uk">Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre</a> [ceop.gov.uk]. The button is apparently called <a href="http://www.ceop.gov.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2010/ceop\_09032010.asp" title="ceop.gov.uk">"CLICKCEOP"</a> [ceop.gov.uk], but is mostly referred to as the "paedophile panic" button in the press or simply the "button" on the CEOP site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The button is not called CEOP .
CEOP is the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre [ ceop.gov.uk ] .
The button is apparently called " CLICKCEOP " [ ceop.gov.uk ] , but is mostly referred to as the " paedophile panic " button in the press or simply the " button " on the CEOP site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The button is not called CEOP.
CEOP is the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre [ceop.gov.uk].
The button is apparently called "CLICKCEOP" [ceop.gov.uk], but is mostly referred to as the "paedophile panic" button in the press or simply the "button" on the CEOP site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068</id>
	<title>Muhehehe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We already have <a href="http://www.radio.cz/en/article/125010" title="radio.cz">bad experience</a> [radio.cz] with child protection buttons, and I seriously doubt that this one will do more good than harm. What's happened to good old parenting?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have bad experience [ radio.cz ] with child protection buttons , and I seriously doubt that this one will do more good than harm .
What 's happened to good old parenting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have bad experience [radio.cz] with child protection buttons, and I seriously doubt that this one will do more good than harm.
What's happened to good old parenting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452286</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268412600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why women put up with this I dont know. Not only is she sexist against men, but in doing so she is painting women as been helpless, needy, fragile and need urgent protection. If that isnt being downright sexist AGAINST women I don't know what is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why women put up with this I dont know .
Not only is she sexist against men , but in doing so she is painting women as been helpless , needy , fragile and need urgent protection .
If that isnt being downright sexist AGAINST women I do n't know what is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why women put up with this I dont know.
Not only is she sexist against men, but in doing so she is painting women as been helpless, needy, fragile and need urgent protection.
If that isnt being downright sexist AGAINST women I don't know what is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456088</id>
	<title>but viewing nude children "for safety" is ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268386620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the same government that declared that any picture of a nude child is a criminal offence, EXCEPT when they do it in the airport through the strip-scanner machines, for which they gave themselves a waiver to force everyone through the virtual peep show. Because it's for our safety.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the same government that declared that any picture of a nude child is a criminal offence , EXCEPT when they do it in the airport through the strip-scanner machines , for which they gave themselves a waiver to force everyone through the virtual peep show .
Because it 's for our safety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the same government that declared that any picture of a nude child is a criminal offence, EXCEPT when they do it in the airport through the strip-scanner machines, for which they gave themselves a waiver to force everyone through the virtual peep show.
Because it's for our safety.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451526</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268408880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Step 1 and Step 2 happened a long time ago. Nothing is done in the name of "Her Majesty" although traditions based around these words exist.</p><p>Regards step 3, most countries get very upset if you try to sell off their national treasurers.</p><p>I can't decide if you're a troll or an idiot. Your nick, bullshitDeamon, implies a troll; the fact that you've been mod'd insightful implies that you, like the moderators, are an idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 and Step 2 happened a long time ago .
Nothing is done in the name of " Her Majesty " although traditions based around these words exist.Regards step 3 , most countries get very upset if you try to sell off their national treasurers.I ca n't decide if you 're a troll or an idiot .
Your nick , bullshitDeamon , implies a troll ; the fact that you 've been mod 'd insightful implies that you , like the moderators , are an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1 and Step 2 happened a long time ago.
Nothing is done in the name of "Her Majesty" although traditions based around these words exist.Regards step 3, most countries get very upset if you try to sell off their national treasurers.I can't decide if you're a troll or an idiot.
Your nick, bullshitDeamon, implies a troll; the fact that you've been mod'd insightful implies that you, like the moderators, are an idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450916</id>
	<title>Re:Muhehehe</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1268405400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"you come across something worrisome on the internet - child pornography or extremism for example - you anonymously push the button on your browser, and the police are notified and check it out. What happened in practice though was that the button was sending not only the site in question but your recent browsing history as well"</p></div><p>  Oh that's just great.  I can hear the police officer now as he visits my home, "Thank you for reporting that child porn site.  Unfortunately you also self-reported yourself to be buying illegal copies of Nintendo games on ebay, and browsing the danish site seventeen.com.  You are under arrest."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" you come across something worrisome on the internet - child pornography or extremism for example - you anonymously push the button on your browser , and the police are notified and check it out .
What happened in practice though was that the button was sending not only the site in question but your recent browsing history as well " Oh that 's just great .
I can hear the police officer now as he visits my home , " Thank you for reporting that child porn site .
Unfortunately you also self-reported yourself to be buying illegal copies of Nintendo games on ebay , and browsing the danish site seventeen.com .
You are under arrest .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"you come across something worrisome on the internet - child pornography or extremism for example - you anonymously push the button on your browser, and the police are notified and check it out.
What happened in practice though was that the button was sending not only the site in question but your recent browsing history as well"  Oh that's just great.
I can hear the police officer now as he visits my home, "Thank you for reporting that child porn site.
Unfortunately you also self-reported yourself to be buying illegal copies of Nintendo games on ebay, and browsing the danish site seventeen.com.
You are under arrest.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453130</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So after you've wasted your time removing the Queen, who is effectively a figurehead (apparently she DOES have power, tradition just prevents her from using it), are you actually going to get around to addressing the problems the poster brought up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So after you 've wasted your time removing the Queen , who is effectively a figurehead ( apparently she DOES have power , tradition just prevents her from using it ) , are you actually going to get around to addressing the problems the poster brought up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So after you've wasted your time removing the Queen, who is effectively a figurehead (apparently she DOES have power, tradition just prevents her from using it), are you actually going to get around to addressing the problems the poster brought up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452682</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1268414520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, we have to hope that if this goes through, the children of the UK will take up action, seek out politicians on sites that implement this, and mark them all as child molesters.  They should then immediately report to the nearest and most scandalous paper that the accusation was made.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , we have to hope that if this goes through , the children of the UK will take up action , seek out politicians on sites that implement this , and mark them all as child molesters .
They should then immediately report to the nearest and most scandalous paper that the accusation was made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, we have to hope that if this goes through, the children of the UK will take up action, seek out politicians on sites that implement this, and mark them all as child molesters.
They should then immediately report to the nearest and most scandalous paper that the accusation was made.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453120</id>
	<title>The CEOP Button in all its glory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the <a href="http://www.ceop.gov.uk/" title="ceop.gov.uk" rel="nofollow">CEOP</a> [ceop.gov.uk] site.</p><p>First time I've had a look at it, and I can see why Facebook don't want that Big Brother, all seeing eye button on any of their pages!</p><p>Its all "If you're not for us, you're against us" stuff.  If anything smacks of fascism, this does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the CEOP [ ceop.gov.uk ] site.First time I 've had a look at it , and I can see why Facebook do n't want that Big Brother , all seeing eye button on any of their pages ! Its all " If you 're not for us , you 're against us " stuff .
If anything smacks of fascism , this does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the CEOP [ceop.gov.uk] site.First time I've had a look at it, and I can see why Facebook don't want that Big Brother, all seeing eye button on any of their pages!Its all "If you're not for us, you're against us" stuff.
If anything smacks of fascism, this does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450350</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1268401080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that an amployer can see what you crimes where is in itself a violation of privacy. If you did the time, you should be able to do a job.</p><p>Now what could be asked for certain jobs would be some sort of security. What could be asked is a paper that verifies if you got that security level or not. With the unions pretty strict I can assume that in Europe not every job could require the highest level.<br>That would mean that a child molester might not get a job in a kindergaten, but could get a job at a bank. An ex-drugdealer can't get a job as police, but could as waiter.</p><p>One can dream, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that an amployer can see what you crimes where is in itself a violation of privacy .
If you did the time , you should be able to do a job.Now what could be asked for certain jobs would be some sort of security .
What could be asked is a paper that verifies if you got that security level or not .
With the unions pretty strict I can assume that in Europe not every job could require the highest level.That would mean that a child molester might not get a job in a kindergaten , but could get a job at a bank .
An ex-drugdealer ca n't get a job as police , but could as waiter.One can dream , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that an amployer can see what you crimes where is in itself a violation of privacy.
If you did the time, you should be able to do a job.Now what could be asked for certain jobs would be some sort of security.
What could be asked is a paper that verifies if you got that security level or not.
With the unions pretty strict I can assume that in Europe not every job could require the highest level.That would mean that a child molester might not get a job in a kindergaten, but could get a job at a bank.
An ex-drugdealer can't get a job as police, but could as waiter.One can dream, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well, step one is abolish the crown.  Step two is abolish everything done in the name of "her royal highness," "her majesty," or "the crown."  I'd say step 3 would be to auction off the crown jewels to pay off the national debt, but aren't they actually made of aluminum or something?  That's not as precious a metal as it used to be...</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , step one is abolish the crown .
Step two is abolish everything done in the name of " her royal highness , " " her majesty , " or " the crown .
" I 'd say step 3 would be to auction off the crown jewels to pay off the national debt , but are n't they actually made of aluminum or something ?
That 's not as precious a metal as it used to be.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, step one is abolish the crown.
Step two is abolish everything done in the name of "her royal highness," "her majesty," or "the crown.
"  I'd say step 3 would be to auction off the crown jewels to pay off the national debt, but aren't they actually made of aluminum or something?
That's not as precious a metal as it used to be...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452742</id>
	<title>Re:Harridan Harperson can suck my cock.</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1268414700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't she the one whose husband's porn ended up in her expenses? At a guess she wouldn't know how to suck cock otherwise he wouldn't be try to get free porn through her expenses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't she the one whose husband 's porn ended up in her expenses ?
At a guess she would n't know how to suck cock otherwise he would n't be try to get free porn through her expenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't she the one whose husband's porn ended up in her expenses?
At a guess she wouldn't know how to suck cock otherwise he wouldn't be try to get free porn through her expenses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451352</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>spiffmastercow</author>
	<datestamp>1268408040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You think American conservatives love personal freedom?  They're the ones who took most of our personal freedoms away.  The only freedom they support is the freedom to own guns (I'm ambivilent on this issue).  How easily GWB is forgotten, it seems..</htmltext>
<tokenext>You think American conservatives love personal freedom ?
They 're the ones who took most of our personal freedoms away .
The only freedom they support is the freedom to own guns ( I 'm ambivilent on this issue ) .
How easily GWB is forgotten , it seems. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think American conservatives love personal freedom?
They're the ones who took most of our personal freedoms away.
The only freedom they support is the freedom to own guns (I'm ambivilent on this issue).
How easily GWB is forgotten, it seems..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451876</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1268410620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just so you know, there are conservatives and conservatives. The ones who ACTUALLY value Personal Freedom and less interference are practically extinct. The ones who talk about personal freedom while trampling it at every turn are running rampant. They're the same ones who talk about fiscal responsibility while creating record deficits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just so you know , there are conservatives and conservatives .
The ones who ACTUALLY value Personal Freedom and less interference are practically extinct .
The ones who talk about personal freedom while trampling it at every turn are running rampant .
They 're the same ones who talk about fiscal responsibility while creating record deficits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just so you know, there are conservatives and conservatives.
The ones who ACTUALLY value Personal Freedom and less interference are practically extinct.
The ones who talk about personal freedom while trampling it at every turn are running rampant.
They're the same ones who talk about fiscal responsibility while creating record deficits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450262</id>
	<title>hmmmm</title>
	<author>zerointeger</author>
	<datestamp>1268400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good parenting is a better option.</p><p>Having a button in any type of chat application which either party can flag a conversation with is so interfering with a UI that you all hate the idea?</p><p>I don't have kids, and I cannot think of anything better then good parenting but I also cannot see any harm adding a simple for the sole purpose of making it easier to handle things such as bots, scammers, predators etc.</p><p>The only problem I can really see is misuse of the button when an ex-girlfriend decides she wants to fuck with her ex-boyfriend in a malicious manner.</p><p>I suppose filtering and priority detection can be implemented to possibly eliminate false positives etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good parenting is a better option.Having a button in any type of chat application which either party can flag a conversation with is so interfering with a UI that you all hate the idea ? I do n't have kids , and I can not think of anything better then good parenting but I also can not see any harm adding a simple for the sole purpose of making it easier to handle things such as bots , scammers , predators etc.The only problem I can really see is misuse of the button when an ex-girlfriend decides she wants to fuck with her ex-boyfriend in a malicious manner.I suppose filtering and priority detection can be implemented to possibly eliminate false positives etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good parenting is a better option.Having a button in any type of chat application which either party can flag a conversation with is so interfering with a UI that you all hate the idea?I don't have kids, and I cannot think of anything better then good parenting but I also cannot see any harm adding a simple for the sole purpose of making it easier to handle things such as bots, scammers, predators etc.The only problem I can really see is misuse of the button when an ex-girlfriend decides she wants to fuck with her ex-boyfriend in a malicious manner.I suppose filtering and priority detection can be implemented to possibly eliminate false positives etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450738</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hate to be her defender, but for the point of completeness, she was parking whilst on the phone.</p><p>still a crime, yes but one slightly different when travelling at 3mph as opposed to 70mph (as implied)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hate to be her defender , but for the point of completeness , she was parking whilst on the phone.still a crime , yes but one slightly different when travelling at 3mph as opposed to 70mph ( as implied )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hate to be her defender, but for the point of completeness, she was parking whilst on the phone.still a crime, yes but one slightly different when travelling at 3mph as opposed to 70mph (as implied)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453312</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>* Note for British pricks: we have plenty of cars with manual transmissions in the United States as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Note for British pricks : we have plenty of cars with manual transmissions in the United States as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* Note for British pricks: we have plenty of cars with manual transmissions in the United States as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451178</id>
	<title>The Thing that Irks me is...</title>
	<author>coofercat</author>
	<datestamp>1268406900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing that Irks me about this is that it says that somehow the UK is due for special treatment. This sort of attitude comes out of the US all the time (on the back of "we're the biggest economy"), but we Brits don't deserve special treatment because we're the same as everyone else - thinking of ourselves modestly is a British thing to do. Perhaps HH needs to sit the "Britishness test" we're subjecting wannabe residents to these days?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>The other thing that irks me is that if kids are getting pestered, they're perfectly at liberty to go sign up at another social network and get away from it. I realise they don't want to do that, but that's one of the harsh choices of life. Further more, there are already are plenty of routes to report abuse on Facebook, including the parent looking over your shoulder. Unfortunately, the "parent" in that sentence appears to be turning into "the government". I don't want much from Facebook, but I hope they prepare a nice pot of tea and then tell the UK government to "bloody well shut up" about this.</p><p>Let's be honest, very few UK governments last more than about 10 years before they get voted out in a hail of glory for the new guys. Even though I'm not in love with the alternative, they at least provide a bit of contrast (not as much as us Pirates, but hey, it's a start).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing that Irks me about this is that it says that somehow the UK is due for special treatment .
This sort of attitude comes out of the US all the time ( on the back of " we 're the biggest economy " ) , but we Brits do n't deserve special treatment because we 're the same as everyone else - thinking of ourselves modestly is a British thing to do .
Perhaps HH needs to sit the " Britishness test " we 're subjecting wannabe residents to these days ?
; - ) The other thing that irks me is that if kids are getting pestered , they 're perfectly at liberty to go sign up at another social network and get away from it .
I realise they do n't want to do that , but that 's one of the harsh choices of life .
Further more , there are already are plenty of routes to report abuse on Facebook , including the parent looking over your shoulder .
Unfortunately , the " parent " in that sentence appears to be turning into " the government " .
I do n't want much from Facebook , but I hope they prepare a nice pot of tea and then tell the UK government to " bloody well shut up " about this.Let 's be honest , very few UK governments last more than about 10 years before they get voted out in a hail of glory for the new guys .
Even though I 'm not in love with the alternative , they at least provide a bit of contrast ( not as much as us Pirates , but hey , it 's a start ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing that Irks me about this is that it says that somehow the UK is due for special treatment.
This sort of attitude comes out of the US all the time (on the back of "we're the biggest economy"), but we Brits don't deserve special treatment because we're the same as everyone else - thinking of ourselves modestly is a British thing to do.
Perhaps HH needs to sit the "Britishness test" we're subjecting wannabe residents to these days?
;-)The other thing that irks me is that if kids are getting pestered, they're perfectly at liberty to go sign up at another social network and get away from it.
I realise they don't want to do that, but that's one of the harsh choices of life.
Further more, there are already are plenty of routes to report abuse on Facebook, including the parent looking over your shoulder.
Unfortunately, the "parent" in that sentence appears to be turning into "the government".
I don't want much from Facebook, but I hope they prepare a nice pot of tea and then tell the UK government to "bloody well shut up" about this.Let's be honest, very few UK governments last more than about 10 years before they get voted out in a hail of glory for the new guys.
Even though I'm not in love with the alternative, they at least provide a bit of contrast (not as much as us Pirates, but hey, it's a start).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450248</id>
	<title>Double-speak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a canonical example of political double-speak.</p><p>It appears that in American, liberal (Freedom, free, unrestricted), has come to mean socialism. (WTF?)<br>Socialism is the polar opposite of liberalism, since (for better or worse) it requires coercion.</p><p>This is an application of Hitler's big lie propaganda idea.<br>To make matters worse, American "fake liberalism" has become intermixed with actual issues of liberty. How anyone knows who to vote for is a mystery to me.</p><p>All the political labels ultimately mean nothing however, as people are either fundamentally individualist, or fundamentally collectivist; with all their other beliefs cascading from these root beliefs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a canonical example of political double-speak.It appears that in American , liberal ( Freedom , free , unrestricted ) , has come to mean socialism .
( WTF ? ) Socialism is the polar opposite of liberalism , since ( for better or worse ) it requires coercion.This is an application of Hitler 's big lie propaganda idea.To make matters worse , American " fake liberalism " has become intermixed with actual issues of liberty .
How anyone knows who to vote for is a mystery to me.All the political labels ultimately mean nothing however , as people are either fundamentally individualist , or fundamentally collectivist ; with all their other beliefs cascading from these root beliefs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a canonical example of political double-speak.It appears that in American, liberal (Freedom, free, unrestricted), has come to mean socialism.
(WTF?)Socialism is the polar opposite of liberalism, since (for better or worse) it requires coercion.This is an application of Hitler's big lie propaganda idea.To make matters worse, American "fake liberalism" has become intermixed with actual issues of liberty.
How anyone knows who to vote for is a mystery to me.All the political labels ultimately mean nothing however, as people are either fundamentally individualist, or fundamentally collectivist; with all their other beliefs cascading from these root beliefs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450370</id>
	<title>About those allegations...</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1268401200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The paper got a story from a guy who did a quick-and-dirty unpublished study on how quickly they were approached on a different site entirely, the DM ghostwrote it into a different story entirely about Facebook, ignored the original author's corrections, and put it up on the front page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The paper got a story from a guy who did a quick-and-dirty unpublished study on how quickly they were approached on a different site entirely , the DM ghostwrote it into a different story entirely about Facebook , ignored the original author 's corrections , and put it up on the front page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The paper got a story from a guy who did a quick-and-dirty unpublished study on how quickly they were approached on a different site entirely, the DM ghostwrote it into a different story entirely about Facebook, ignored the original author's corrections, and put it up on the front page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450188</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1268399280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time?</p></div><p>Legally, I think it's currently ok to run over kids *if* they are fully clothed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time ? Legally , I think it 's currently ok to run over kids * if * they are fully clothed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So presumably Facebook is a danger to kids whilst her talking on a mobile phone while driving is safe for kids who could be out in the street at the time?Legally, I think it's currently ok to run over kids *if* they are fully clothed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450728</id>
	<title>Re:Muhehehe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What's happened to good old parenting?</p></div></blockquote><p>People want the kids but not the responsibility, so they're outsourcing the responsibility and blaming everyone but themselves when they do a bad job.</p><p>And I say this as a guy in his mid-20s with a kid approaching 2. The wife and I are both annoyed at times by all of these laws and complaints from parents who basically don't want to do a proper job of bringing their kids up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's happened to good old parenting ? People want the kids but not the responsibility , so they 're outsourcing the responsibility and blaming everyone but themselves when they do a bad job.And I say this as a guy in his mid-20s with a kid approaching 2 .
The wife and I are both annoyed at times by all of these laws and complaints from parents who basically do n't want to do a proper job of bringing their kids up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's happened to good old parenting?People want the kids but not the responsibility, so they're outsourcing the responsibility and blaming everyone but themselves when they do a bad job.And I say this as a guy in his mid-20s with a kid approaching 2.
The wife and I are both annoyed at times by all of these laws and complaints from parents who basically don't want to do a proper job of bringing their kids up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450714</id>
	<title>Public relations exercise</title>
	<author>Faluzeer</author>
	<datestamp>1268403960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm</p><p>I have come to the conclusion that for professional politicians it is far more important to be seen to be doing something (anything), than it is for them to actually do something effectively.</p><p>This appears to be nothing more than a public relations exercise designed to show the voters that the government has their best interest at heart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HmmmI have come to the conclusion that for professional politicians it is far more important to be seen to be doing something ( anything ) , than it is for them to actually do something effectively.This appears to be nothing more than a public relations exercise designed to show the voters that the government has their best interest at heart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HmmmI have come to the conclusion that for professional politicians it is far more important to be seen to be doing something (anything), than it is for them to actually do something effectively.This appears to be nothing more than a public relations exercise designed to show the voters that the government has their best interest at heart.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451640</id>
	<title>Sue the Daily Mail eh?</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1268409420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> though Facebook is still considering suing the paper</p> </div><p> Facebook, please sue the Daily Mail. Sue them 'till they can't afford to print any more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>though Facebook is still considering suing the paper Facebook , please sue the Daily Mail .
Sue them 'till they ca n't afford to print any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> though Facebook is still considering suing the paper  Facebook, please sue the Daily Mail.
Sue them 'till they can't afford to print any more.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450140</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268398920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Being extremely liberal is great</p></div><p>Somebody has kidnapped the word "liberal" here. I thought the word had something to do with freedom, which seems to be absent in the list above.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being extremely liberal is greatSomebody has kidnapped the word " liberal " here .
I thought the word had something to do with freedom , which seems to be absent in the list above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being extremely liberal is greatSomebody has kidnapped the word "liberal" here.
I thought the word had something to do with freedom, which seems to be absent in the list above.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450154</id>
	<title>Child-Safety Button</title>
	<author>gencha</author>
	<datestamp>1268399040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There already is such a button on every computer. It's more widely known as the power button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There already is such a button on every computer .
It 's more widely known as the power button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There already is such a button on every computer.
It's more widely known as the power button.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452916</id>
	<title>Over-13 only</title>
	<author>jc79</author>
	<datestamp>1268415660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From Facebook's <a href="http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">Terms of Use:</a> [facebook.com]</p><ul>
<li> You will not use Facebook if you are under 13.</li><li> You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.</li></ul><p>So, given that there are no sex offenders or children on facebook, what's the big deal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From Facebook 's Terms of Use : [ facebook.com ] You will not use Facebook if you are under 13 .
You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.So , given that there are no sex offenders or children on facebook , what 's the big deal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Facebook's Terms of Use: [facebook.com]
 You will not use Facebook if you are under 13.
You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.So, given that there are no sex offenders or children on facebook, what's the big deal?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450644</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268403360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, direct 4chans<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ towards it.  I'd give it about 2 days before it was removed on abuse reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , direct 4chans /b/ towards it .
I 'd give it about 2 days before it was removed on abuse reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, direct 4chans /b/ towards it.
I'd give it about 2 days before it was removed on abuse reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451338</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>dintlu</author>
	<datestamp>1268407920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, have your kid create a Facebook account and visit the profiles of every Labor party representative, employee, and intern you can find, accusing each and every one of them of child abuse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , have your kid create a Facebook account and visit the profiles of every Labor party representative , employee , and intern you can find , accusing each and every one of them of child abuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, have your kid create a Facebook account and visit the profiles of every Labor party representative, employee, and intern you can find, accusing each and every one of them of child abuse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450408</id>
	<title>OMG they're coming through the screen!</title>
	<author>t0p</author>
	<datestamp>1268401560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what's this panic button for precisely?  So little Eric/Erica can press it when the predatory perverts reach out through the monitor?</p><p>I would have thought Eric/Erica wouldn't realise "little Chester" is a nonce until they've gone to the park to meet up with their new friend.  I don't think Chester the Molester is going to properly introduce himself online.  That would kinda interfere with the grooming process.</p><p>And what's wrong with the usual "report this post/message" kinda link?  Would a special "OMG he's touching me" button, for Brit kids only, be more effective in some way?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's this panic button for precisely ?
So little Eric/Erica can press it when the predatory perverts reach out through the monitor ? I would have thought Eric/Erica would n't realise " little Chester " is a nonce until they 've gone to the park to meet up with their new friend .
I do n't think Chester the Molester is going to properly introduce himself online .
That would kinda interfere with the grooming process.And what 's wrong with the usual " report this post/message " kinda link ?
Would a special " OMG he 's touching me " button , for Brit kids only , be more effective in some way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's this panic button for precisely?
So little Eric/Erica can press it when the predatory perverts reach out through the monitor?I would have thought Eric/Erica wouldn't realise "little Chester" is a nonce until they've gone to the park to meet up with their new friend.
I don't think Chester the Molester is going to properly introduce himself online.
That would kinda interfere with the grooming process.And what's wrong with the usual "report this post/message" kinda link?
Would a special "OMG he's touching me" button, for Brit kids only, be more effective in some way?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452792</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking as a UK resident.</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1268415000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We are sowing what we reaped.</p></div><p>What?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are sowing what we reaped.What ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are sowing what we reaped.What?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451988</id>
	<title>Daily Hate...</title>
	<author>advocate\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1268411100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yup, currently the Daily Hate is a campaign against Facebook... there's been a leading news item every day now where they've deliberately blown something up that's had the slightest connection to Facebook... highly emotive language in the items as well and seriously anti-Facebook comment moderation going on in the online comments... anyone who dares to be pro-Facebook promptly gets howled down with a flood of red arrows... they're only green arrowed for a short time before some block voting happens</p><p>apparently no male is considered safe, we're all potential peados on Facebook...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yup , currently the Daily Hate is a campaign against Facebook... there 's been a leading news item every day now where they 've deliberately blown something up that 's had the slightest connection to Facebook... highly emotive language in the items as well and seriously anti-Facebook comment moderation going on in the online comments... anyone who dares to be pro-Facebook promptly gets howled down with a flood of red arrows... they 're only green arrowed for a short time before some block voting happensapparently no male is considered safe , we 're all potential peados on Facebook.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yup, currently the Daily Hate is a campaign against Facebook... there's been a leading news item every day now where they've deliberately blown something up that's had the slightest connection to Facebook... highly emotive language in the items as well and seriously anti-Facebook comment moderation going on in the online comments... anyone who dares to be pro-Facebook promptly gets howled down with a flood of red arrows... they're only green arrowed for a short time before some block voting happensapparently no male is considered safe, we're all potential peados on Facebook...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453330</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking as a UK resident.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268417700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I say in all sincerity, there are a LOT of <b>males</b> today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped, and simply walk on by, deliberately seeing nothing, as being the only safe option.</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say in all sincerity , there are a LOT of males today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped , and simply walk on by , deliberately seeing nothing , as being the only safe option.Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say in all sincerity, there are a LOT of males today who have learned this lesson so well that they could witness either an adult women or a schoolgirl being gang raped, and simply walk on by, deliberately seeing nothing, as being the only safe option.Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.<br>It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with "because she was a women." Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.</p><p>Ultimately we differ in opinion because she believes the means justify the ends (e.g. positively biased for women will counterbalance history and everyone will be equal), where I believe we promote *equality* and the problem will fix its self in time.</p><p>She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified. They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end. This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they cannot employ men.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with " because she was a women .
" Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.Ultimately we differ in opinion because she believes the means justify the ends ( e.g .
positively biased for women will counterbalance history and everyone will be equal ) , where I believe we promote * equality * and the problem will fix its self in time.She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified .
They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end .
This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they can not employ men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with "because she was a women.
" Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.Ultimately we differ in opinion because she believes the means justify the ends (e.g.
positively biased for women will counterbalance history and everyone will be equal), where I believe we promote *equality* and the problem will fix its self in time.She for example introduced a bill that mandated they employ women over men if both are equally qualified.
They also placed no limits on how far this should go or when it should end.
This bill directly impacts jobs that are already dominated by women so they cannot employ men.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451860</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268410560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conservatives like personal freedom as in the freedom given to 'corporate persons'. However, they are very glad to stomp on your freedom to be gay or speak what language you want if it's not english.<br>Personal freedom as they define it is used to shaft people and not to actually free them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conservatives like personal freedom as in the freedom given to 'corporate persons' .
However , they are very glad to stomp on your freedom to be gay or speak what language you want if it 's not english.Personal freedom as they define it is used to shaft people and not to actually free them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conservatives like personal freedom as in the freedom given to 'corporate persons'.
However, they are very glad to stomp on your freedom to be gay or speak what language you want if it's not english.Personal freedom as they define it is used to shaft people and not to actually free them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451328</id>
	<title>Re:Not sure about who is right</title>
	<author>HungryHobo</author>
	<datestamp>1268407860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if china requires a "report dissent" button so that Chinese teenagers can report people for calling for a free tibet etc.<br>A few years later you're catching a connecting flight through a Chinese airport....</p><p>It's not that hard to teach your kids basic net safety.<br>It's just a pity that social networks fly in the face of it.</p><p>I grew up with the simple rules of :</p><p>Never give out your real name.<br>Never tell people where you live.</p><p>Now of course I worry about my younger cousin since those rules seem to have gone out of fashion to be replaced by it being the norm to post photographs of yourself, post up your full name, full address, date of birth and then post on friends pages about which paths you like to take home from school.</p><p>I'm in my early 20's, I'm part of the post endless September generation but pre social networking generation.<br>The I can't decide if the social media generation is retarded or just less paranoid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if china requires a " report dissent " button so that Chinese teenagers can report people for calling for a free tibet etc.A few years later you 're catching a connecting flight through a Chinese airport....It 's not that hard to teach your kids basic net safety.It 's just a pity that social networks fly in the face of it.I grew up with the simple rules of : Never give out your real name.Never tell people where you live.Now of course I worry about my younger cousin since those rules seem to have gone out of fashion to be replaced by it being the norm to post photographs of yourself , post up your full name , full address , date of birth and then post on friends pages about which paths you like to take home from school.I 'm in my early 20 's , I 'm part of the post endless September generation but pre social networking generation.The I ca n't decide if the social media generation is retarded or just less paranoid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if china requires a "report dissent" button so that Chinese teenagers can report people for calling for a free tibet etc.A few years later you're catching a connecting flight through a Chinese airport....It's not that hard to teach your kids basic net safety.It's just a pity that social networks fly in the face of it.I grew up with the simple rules of :Never give out your real name.Never tell people where you live.Now of course I worry about my younger cousin since those rules seem to have gone out of fashion to be replaced by it being the norm to post photographs of yourself, post up your full name, full address, date of birth and then post on friends pages about which paths you like to take home from school.I'm in my early 20's, I'm part of the post endless September generation but pre social networking generation.The I can't decide if the social media generation is retarded or just less paranoid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450284</id>
	<title>Useless and Clueless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Harriet Harman is, in all likelihood, the most useless fucking cunt in a position of power at this moment in time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Harriet Harman is , in all likelihood , the most useless fucking cunt in a position of power at this moment in time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Harriet Harman is, in all likelihood, the most useless fucking cunt in a position of power at this moment in time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451896</id>
	<title>Re:British Children?!</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1268410740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't even about children - the widely publicised murder that was associated with this case, which is being used to force these new measures in, was of a 17 year old. In the UK, that's over the AOC. A big red button wouldn't have done anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't even about children - the widely publicised murder that was associated with this case , which is being used to force these new measures in , was of a 17 year old .
In the UK , that 's over the AOC .
A big red button would n't have done anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't even about children - the widely publicised murder that was associated with this case, which is being used to force these new measures in, was of a 17 year old.
In the UK, that's over the AOC.
A big red button wouldn't have done anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450580</id>
	<title>Harriot Harmon. Never get her drunk.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268402820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is Harriot Harman who argues that being drunk is no defence for men accused of rape (fair enough)... but strangely, she also argues that woman cannot be held to have 'consented' if they are drunk.</p><p>She was also responsible for the repeal of the defence in murder cases of 'provocation', which was a defence used primarily by men (again, fair enough). Strange then that at the same time, Harriot brought in a new defence which allowed abused women to claim long term abuse by the husband, as a defence if they then murdered their partner - rather than, say, leave them.</p><p>She goes on to argue that the low conviction rate of alleged rapists is proof, in itself, that too many men are getting away with rape (might be true), but fails to acknowledge the alternative explanation, that too many false allegations of rape are being submitted by women.</p><p>Harriot is one awful tub of man hating menopausal angst.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is Harriot Harman who argues that being drunk is no defence for men accused of rape ( fair enough ) ... but strangely , she also argues that woman can not be held to have 'consented ' if they are drunk.She was also responsible for the repeal of the defence in murder cases of 'provocation ' , which was a defence used primarily by men ( again , fair enough ) .
Strange then that at the same time , Harriot brought in a new defence which allowed abused women to claim long term abuse by the husband , as a defence if they then murdered their partner - rather than , say , leave them.She goes on to argue that the low conviction rate of alleged rapists is proof , in itself , that too many men are getting away with rape ( might be true ) , but fails to acknowledge the alternative explanation , that too many false allegations of rape are being submitted by women.Harriot is one awful tub of man hating menopausal angst .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is Harriot Harman who argues that being drunk is no defence for men accused of rape (fair enough)... but strangely, she also argues that woman cannot be held to have 'consented' if they are drunk.She was also responsible for the repeal of the defence in murder cases of 'provocation', which was a defence used primarily by men (again, fair enough).
Strange then that at the same time, Harriot brought in a new defence which allowed abused women to claim long term abuse by the husband, as a defence if they then murdered their partner - rather than, say, leave them.She goes on to argue that the low conviction rate of alleged rapists is proof, in itself, that too many men are getting away with rape (might be true), but fails to acknowledge the alternative explanation, that too many false allegations of rape are being submitted by women.Harriot is one awful tub of man hating menopausal angst.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452848</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>hairyfeet</author>
	<datestamp>1268415300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is cause you poor little Limey folks have them little beep beep mini cars, and you need that gear shift to poke the hamsters in the ass to get the little suckers to run harder on the hamster wheels to get your little beep beep up the hill.</p><p>

So don't blame us just cause our cars are big and we still get gas by the gallon. Poor little Limeys, do you use a shoehorn to get into those little beep beep cars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is cause you poor little Limey folks have them little beep beep mini cars , and you need that gear shift to poke the hamsters in the ass to get the little suckers to run harder on the hamster wheels to get your little beep beep up the hill .
So do n't blame us just cause our cars are big and we still get gas by the gallon .
Poor little Limeys , do you use a shoehorn to get into those little beep beep cars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is cause you poor little Limey folks have them little beep beep mini cars, and you need that gear shift to poke the hamsters in the ass to get the little suckers to run harder on the hamster wheels to get your little beep beep up the hill.
So don't blame us just cause our cars are big and we still get gas by the gallon.
Poor little Limeys, do you use a shoehorn to get into those little beep beep cars?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450344</id>
	<title>Re:Not surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268401020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no fan of the monarchy but I'll bet you that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil\_list" title="wikipedia.org">Civil List</a> [wikipedia.org] wastes about 1000 times less public money than the lazy good-for-nothings who draw unemployment benefit who can't be bothered to get a job, the proportion of the 3,000,000 drawing sickness benefit who have nothing wrong with them, and the amount the National Health Service wastes on overpaid managers &amp; giving free treatment to health tourists.</p><p>Our monarchy hasn't helped its reputation with the silly scandals in recent years but the undeniable fact is that they do give something back to the country by encouraging trade and tourism.</p><p>And if we're going to scrap the monarchy, let's also scrap the hereditary peers and the "boys club on an endless public-funded jolly" that is the House Of Lords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no fan of the monarchy but I 'll bet you that the Civil List [ wikipedia.org ] wastes about 1000 times less public money than the lazy good-for-nothings who draw unemployment benefit who ca n't be bothered to get a job , the proportion of the 3,000,000 drawing sickness benefit who have nothing wrong with them , and the amount the National Health Service wastes on overpaid managers &amp; giving free treatment to health tourists.Our monarchy has n't helped its reputation with the silly scandals in recent years but the undeniable fact is that they do give something back to the country by encouraging trade and tourism.And if we 're going to scrap the monarchy , let 's also scrap the hereditary peers and the " boys club on an endless public-funded jolly " that is the House Of Lords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no fan of the monarchy but I'll bet you that the Civil List [wikipedia.org] wastes about 1000 times less public money than the lazy good-for-nothings who draw unemployment benefit who can't be bothered to get a job, the proportion of the 3,000,000 drawing sickness benefit who have nothing wrong with them, and the amount the National Health Service wastes on overpaid managers &amp; giving free treatment to health tourists.Our monarchy hasn't helped its reputation with the silly scandals in recent years but the undeniable fact is that they do give something back to the country by encouraging trade and tourism.And if we're going to scrap the monarchy, let's also scrap the hereditary peers and the "boys club on an endless public-funded jolly" that is the House Of Lords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450594</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1268402940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair - and it twists my titties to say anything nice about Zanulabour - this is a Harridan Hormone policy, not nuLabour.  She's utterly, utterly deranged.

</p><p>Although of course it <em>is</em> exactly the sort of tabloid friendly knee-jerk bullshit policy that they do so love enacting.  Fortunately they won't have time, although I'm sure they'll announce it then accuse everyone else of being Soft on Child Predators.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair - and it twists my titties to say anything nice about Zanulabour - this is a Harridan Hormone policy , not nuLabour .
She 's utterly , utterly deranged .
Although of course it is exactly the sort of tabloid friendly knee-jerk bullshit policy that they do so love enacting .
Fortunately they wo n't have time , although I 'm sure they 'll announce it then accuse everyone else of being Soft on Child Predators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair - and it twists my titties to say anything nice about Zanulabour - this is a Harridan Hormone policy, not nuLabour.
She's utterly, utterly deranged.
Although of course it is exactly the sort of tabloid friendly knee-jerk bullshit policy that they do so love enacting.
Fortunately they won't have time, although I'm sure they'll announce it then accuse everyone else of being Soft on Child Predators.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451018</id>
	<title>How ever did we manage before?!</title>
	<author>Handbrewer</author>
	<datestamp>1268406060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How on earth did anyone manage to become adults before, without being constantly molested or our minds corrupted by such evils as pictures of nipples and reproductive organs.

Thanks to all the silly "think of the children", "beware of terrorists" laws lately i feel SO MUCH SAFER. George Orwell would weep.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How on earth did anyone manage to become adults before , without being constantly molested or our minds corrupted by such evils as pictures of nipples and reproductive organs .
Thanks to all the silly " think of the children " , " beware of terrorists " laws lately i feel SO MUCH SAFER .
George Orwell would weep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How on earth did anyone manage to become adults before, without being constantly molested or our minds corrupted by such evils as pictures of nipples and reproductive organs.
Thanks to all the silly "think of the children", "beware of terrorists" laws lately i feel SO MUCH SAFER.
George Orwell would weep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</id>
	<title>Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Allowing Children on the internet to quickly and easily label anyone they like a child abuser. What could possibly go wrong?
<br> <br>
It gets better though, if you are ever <b>accused</b> of child abuse, it goes on record and will be returned whenever an employer does a background check. Doesn't matter if the allegations are complete rubbish and everyone acknowledges this. It'll still haunt you for life.
<br> <br>
To top it all off, there's a condition that the government can put on your record making the information on your background check confidential to anyone. Including yourself. You can fail a background check and never you have failed one. The employer can't tell you you've failed, so if there's a mistake on your background check, it is impossible to get it remedied and your life is basically ruined.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Allowing Children on the internet to quickly and easily label anyone they like a child abuser .
What could possibly go wrong ?
It gets better though , if you are ever accused of child abuse , it goes on record and will be returned whenever an employer does a background check .
Does n't matter if the allegations are complete rubbish and everyone acknowledges this .
It 'll still haunt you for life .
To top it all off , there 's a condition that the government can put on your record making the information on your background check confidential to anyone .
Including yourself .
You can fail a background check and never you have failed one .
The employer ca n't tell you you 've failed , so if there 's a mistake on your background check , it is impossible to get it remedied and your life is basically ruined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allowing Children on the internet to quickly and easily label anyone they like a child abuser.
What could possibly go wrong?
It gets better though, if you are ever accused of child abuse, it goes on record and will be returned whenever an employer does a background check.
Doesn't matter if the allegations are complete rubbish and everyone acknowledges this.
It'll still haunt you for life.
To top it all off, there's a condition that the government can put on your record making the information on your background check confidential to anyone.
Including yourself.
You can fail a background check and never you have failed one.
The employer can't tell you you've failed, so if there's a mistake on your background check, it is impossible to get it remedied and your life is basically ruined.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31455846</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking as a UK resident.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268385420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Parsons was a good Party man, but with that keen girl of his in the Spies, it was only a matter of time before she turned him in to the Thought Police.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Parsons was a good Party man , but with that keen girl of his in the Spies , it was only a matter of time before she turned him in to the Thought Police .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Parsons was a good Party man, but with that keen girl of his in the Spies, it was only a matter of time before she turned him in to the Thought Police.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450416</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>Gordonjcp</author>
	<datestamp>1268401620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention?</i> </p><p>Yes, she did.  She deliberately chose to talk on her phone while attempting to drive, meaning that she was not fully in control of her car.</p><p>Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone, or accidentally drove the car?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention ?
Yes , she did .
She deliberately chose to talk on her phone while attempting to drive , meaning that she was not fully in control of her car.Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone , or accidentally drove the car ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention?
Yes, she did.
She deliberately chose to talk on her phone while attempting to drive, meaning that she was not fully in control of her car.Or are you suggesting she somehow accidentally answered the phone, or accidentally drove the car?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450176</id>
	<title>Simpler Solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No children should be allowed on the Internet or World Wide Web for their own safety. "Think of the children." Politicians and parents these days are all idiots; maybe they should be banned from the Internet and World Wide Web as well. Problem solved - nobody allowed except adults without children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No children should be allowed on the Internet or World Wide Web for their own safety .
" Think of the children .
" Politicians and parents these days are all idiots ; maybe they should be banned from the Internet and World Wide Web as well .
Problem solved - nobody allowed except adults without children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No children should be allowed on the Internet or World Wide Web for their own safety.
"Think of the children.
" Politicians and parents these days are all idiots; maybe they should be banned from the Internet and World Wide Web as well.
Problem solved - nobody allowed except adults without children.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450498</id>
	<title>Re:Well - Since its Harriet Harman involved</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1268402340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with "because she was a women."</p> </div><p>woman...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.</p></div><p>woman.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with " because she was a women .
" woman...Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is shocking how sexist she is and how much she gets away with "because she was a women.
" woman...Heck she was even short listed for her position BECAUSE she was a women.woman.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450152</id>
	<title>It doesn't make any sense</title>
	<author>benjymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>* Child meets someone online.<br>* Child gets on with person.<br>* Child agrees to meet up with person.<br>* Child meets up with person.<br>* Bad things happen.</p><p>How would having a big "Click here to report this person" button help?  If they're willing to meet up, then they're obviously not suspicious about the person's intentions.  Even a big flashing "Are you sure this person isn't going to try and do nasty things to you?" banner on screen would quickly be ignored and forgotten about</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Child meets someone online .
* Child gets on with person .
* Child agrees to meet up with person .
* Child meets up with person .
* Bad things happen.How would having a big " Click here to report this person " button help ?
If they 're willing to meet up , then they 're obviously not suspicious about the person 's intentions .
Even a big flashing " Are you sure this person is n't going to try and do nasty things to you ?
" banner on screen would quickly be ignored and forgotten about</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* Child meets someone online.
* Child gets on with person.
* Child agrees to meet up with person.
* Child meets up with person.
* Bad things happen.How would having a big "Click here to report this person" button help?
If they're willing to meet up, then they're obviously not suspicious about the person's intentions.
Even a big flashing "Are you sure this person isn't going to try and do nasty things to you?
" banner on screen would quickly be ignored and forgotten about</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450842</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Parents...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268404860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them.</p></div><p>He ha. Very nicely said.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you 're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them.He ha .
Very nicely said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now kindly stop with trying to fulfill your lives by shitting out more kids that you're not prepared to be responsible for and expecting the rest of us to make concessions for them.He ha.
Very nicely said.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450256</id>
	<title>Re:And This Would Be The Same Harriet Harman....</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1268400000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate these kinds of smear arguments. What do they accomplish? Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention? Does that mean she condones road accidents? She's a human being, and as such, is capable of mistakes, and making bad decisions given in split seconds.</p><p>If you think she's a bad politician, why not focus on her politics instead?</p><p>Actually, it's kind of funny. According to your article, she was allegedly in an accident and didn't stop to give the details. The primary factor in her decision not to give details would have been considering what mud-slingers such as yourself would say had she been caught and 'fessed up. So, by your twisted logic, <b>you</b> condone people dodging the responsibilities for their actions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate these kinds of smear arguments .
What do they accomplish ?
Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention ?
Does that mean she condones road accidents ?
She 's a human being , and as such , is capable of mistakes , and making bad decisions given in split seconds.If you think she 's a bad politician , why not focus on her politics instead ? Actually , it 's kind of funny .
According to your article , she was allegedly in an accident and did n't stop to give the details .
The primary factor in her decision not to give details would have been considering what mud-slingers such as yourself would say had she been caught and 'fessed up .
So , by your twisted logic , you condone people dodging the responsibilities for their actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate these kinds of smear arguments.
What do they accomplish?
Did she come to conscious decision that she would drive without due care and attention?
Does that mean she condones road accidents?
She's a human being, and as such, is capable of mistakes, and making bad decisions given in split seconds.If you think she's a bad politician, why not focus on her politics instead?Actually, it's kind of funny.
According to your article, she was allegedly in an accident and didn't stop to give the details.
The primary factor in her decision not to give details would have been considering what mud-slingers such as yourself would say had she been caught and 'fessed up.
So, by your twisted logic, you condone people dodging the responsibilities for their actions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450114</id>
	<title>Facebook here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We respect your concerns about child safety, so we've installed a Child Safety Button for our younger users.  It's a big "X" located in the upper-right corner of Facebook.  Macs don't use X technology, so we built a red button for their Facebook instead.  We're pretty sure those are the only two Facebooks anyone uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We respect your concerns about child safety , so we 've installed a Child Safety Button for our younger users .
It 's a big " X " located in the upper-right corner of Facebook .
Macs do n't use X technology , so we built a red button for their Facebook instead .
We 're pretty sure those are the only two Facebooks anyone uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We respect your concerns about child safety, so we've installed a Child Safety Button for our younger users.
It's a big "X" located in the upper-right corner of Facebook.
Macs don't use X technology, so we built a red button for their Facebook instead.
We're pretty sure those are the only two Facebooks anyone uses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456056</id>
	<title>Re:British Children?!</title>
	<author>makomk</author>
	<datestamp>1268386500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the way the age at which someone stops being treated like a child is increasing here in the UK, who knows? You're not allowed to leave school and get a full-time job until 18 these days...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the way the age at which someone stops being treated like a child is increasing here in the UK , who knows ?
You 're not allowed to leave school and get a full-time job until 18 these days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the way the age at which someone stops being treated like a child is increasing here in the UK, who knows?
You're not allowed to leave school and get a full-time job until 18 these days...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450290</id>
	<title>What do you do to such a media outlet?</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1268400420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>However, it has since emerged that Williams-Thomas was not using Facebook for his research but a different, unspecified social network. In a message on Twitter he claims that the reference to Facebook was introduced by editors at the paper, despite being told it was wrong.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>The only way to fix this is to make defamation a graduated crime. If the Daily Mail pulls a complete hail mary by putting a front page confession, then let them off lightly. If they put it on page Z30 where no one reads, then fine them to the point that they won't make a red cent in profit for two business quarters. If they won't retract it, but fight it, knowing full well that what they did was defamation, then let Faceboook and this journalist pick their bones clean.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , it has since emerged that Williams-Thomas was not using Facebook for his research but a different , unspecified social network .
In a message on Twitter he claims that the reference to Facebook was introduced by editors at the paper , despite being told it was wrong .
The only way to fix this is to make defamation a graduated crime .
If the Daily Mail pulls a complete hail mary by putting a front page confession , then let them off lightly .
If they put it on page Z30 where no one reads , then fine them to the point that they wo n't make a red cent in profit for two business quarters .
If they wo n't retract it , but fight it , knowing full well that what they did was defamation , then let Faceboook and this journalist pick their bones clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, it has since emerged that Williams-Thomas was not using Facebook for his research but a different, unspecified social network.
In a message on Twitter he claims that the reference to Facebook was introduced by editors at the paper, despite being told it was wrong.
The only way to fix this is to make defamation a graduated crime.
If the Daily Mail pulls a complete hail mary by putting a front page confession, then let them off lightly.
If they put it on page Z30 where no one reads, then fine them to the point that they won't make a red cent in profit for two business quarters.
If they won't retract it, but fight it, knowing full well that what they did was defamation, then let Faceboook and this journalist pick their bones clean.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450720</id>
	<title>Think of the children... Fuck the Children!</title>
	<author>ICLKennyG</author>
	<datestamp>1268403960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most dangerous phrase ever uttered by society "There ought to be a law..." and I'm a lawyer.  This shit is just out of hand.<br> <br>

It's a good thing George Carlin is dead, cause this would kill him. I just keep replaying his stand up bit in my head. <br> <br>Daintywoman: Think of the children!  Think of the children! Think of th...<br>George: Fuck the Children!  (And this is Mr. Conductor Talking)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most dangerous phrase ever uttered by society " There ought to be a law... " and I 'm a lawyer .
This shit is just out of hand .
It 's a good thing George Carlin is dead , cause this would kill him .
I just keep replaying his stand up bit in my head .
Daintywoman : Think of the children !
Think of the children !
Think of th...George : Fuck the Children !
( And this is Mr. Conductor Talking )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most dangerous phrase ever uttered by society "There ought to be a law..." and I'm a lawyer.
This shit is just out of hand.
It's a good thing George Carlin is dead, cause this would kill him.
I just keep replaying his stand up bit in my head.
Daintywoman: Think of the children!
Think of the children!
Think of th...George: Fuck the Children!
(And this is Mr. Conductor Talking)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026</id>
	<title>Harridan Harperson can suck my cock.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Harridan Harperson can suck my cock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Harridan Harperson can suck my cock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Harridan Harperson can suck my cock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450734</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Labour policy</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1268404080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait until my nephew in the UK is old enough to accuse various MP's of molestation, even if he's never met them.</p><p>"You want a PS4 for Christmas kiddo? Here's a list of names. Ruin their lives for me. Thanks."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait until my nephew in the UK is old enough to accuse various MP 's of molestation , even if he 's never met them .
" You want a PS4 for Christmas kiddo ?
Here 's a list of names .
Ruin their lives for me .
Thanks. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait until my nephew in the UK is old enough to accuse various MP's of molestation, even if he's never met them.
"You want a PS4 for Christmas kiddo?
Here's a list of names.
Ruin their lives for me.
Thanks."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31455846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_12_0149233_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31455846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450416
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450762
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452848
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450140
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450344
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31453130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31452742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450578
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451896
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31456056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31451328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_12_0149233.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_12_0149233.31450290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
