<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_11_2041221</id>
	<title>Half-Male, Half-Female Fowl Explain Birds' Sex Determination</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268297280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Kanan excerpts from a BBC report out of Scotland: <i>"A study of sexually scrambled chickens suggests that sex in birds is <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100310/full/news.2010.114.html">determined in a radically different way from that in mammals</a>. Researchers studied three chickens that appeared to be literally half-male and half-female, and found that nearly every cell in their bodies &mdash; from wattle to toe &mdash; has an inherent sex identity. This cell-by-cell sex orientation contrasts sharply with the situation in mammals, in which organism-wide sex identity is established through hormones."</i>

Kanan also supplies this  link to some <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/scotland/edinburgh\_and\_east/8561814.stm">pictures of the mixed-cell birds</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kanan excerpts from a BBC report out of Scotland : " A study of sexually scrambled chickens suggests that sex in birds is determined in a radically different way from that in mammals .
Researchers studied three chickens that appeared to be literally half-male and half-female , and found that nearly every cell in their bodies    from wattle to toe    has an inherent sex identity .
This cell-by-cell sex orientation contrasts sharply with the situation in mammals , in which organism-wide sex identity is established through hormones .
" Kanan also supplies this link to some pictures of the mixed-cell birds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kanan excerpts from a BBC report out of Scotland: "A study of sexually scrambled chickens suggests that sex in birds is determined in a radically different way from that in mammals.
Researchers studied three chickens that appeared to be literally half-male and half-female, and found that nearly every cell in their bodies — from wattle to toe — has an inherent sex identity.
This cell-by-cell sex orientation contrasts sharply with the situation in mammals, in which organism-wide sex identity is established through hormones.
"

Kanan also supplies this  link to some pictures of the mixed-cell birds.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31462016</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>fly1ngtux</author>
	<datestamp>1268421300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its only in recent days these are all made public. In the root class such stuff were defined private.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its only in recent days these are all made public .
In the root class such stuff were defined private .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its only in recent days these are all made public.
In the root class such stuff were defined private.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445544</id>
	<title>interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268306760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was younger my grandfather told me that one of the ducks he had switched sex's when the female of the trio died,<br>I never believed him...</p><p>But maybe it was more plausible then I thought</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was younger my grandfather told me that one of the ducks he had switched sex 's when the female of the trio died,I never believed him...But maybe it was more plausible then I thought</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was younger my grandfather told me that one of the ducks he had switched sex's when the female of the trio died,I never believed him...But maybe it was more plausible then I thought</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449082</id>
	<title>Re:About one in every 10,000 chickens is gynandrom</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1268337420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; That's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals, including humans.</p><p>Yeah, there are chimeras:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera\_(genetics)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera\_(genetics)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; That 's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals , including humans.Yeah , there are chimeras : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera \ _ ( genetics ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; That's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals, including humans.Yeah, there are chimeras:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera\_(genetics) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447128</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray!</title>
	<author>igny</author>
	<datestamp>1268314500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts.</i>
<br> <br>
I'd be more impressed if they found a confused half-chicken half-buffalo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts .
I 'd be more impressed if they found a confused half-chicken half-buffalo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts.
I'd be more impressed if they found a confused half-chicken half-buffalo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444054</id>
	<title>gynandromorphs?</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1268301360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't that be hermaphorochicken?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't that be hermaphorochicken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't that be hermaphorochicken?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448970</id>
	<title>A similar thing can happen in humans.</title>
	<author>msu320</author>
	<datestamp>1268334900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They call it Chimerism. Sorry to cook your goose...

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtZgxsAkA3s" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">video part 1</a> [youtube.com]

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45G\_HvrCjQo" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">video part 2</a> [youtube.com]

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera\_(genetics)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Link 1</a> [wikipedia.org]

<a href="http://rosalieee.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/tetragametic-chimerism/" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Link 2</a> [wordpress.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They call it Chimerism .
Sorry to cook your goose.. . video part 1 [ youtube.com ] video part 2 [ youtube.com ] Link 1 [ wikipedia.org ] Link 2 [ wordpress.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They call it Chimerism.
Sorry to cook your goose...

video part 1 [youtube.com]

video part 2 [youtube.com]

Link 1 [wikipedia.org]

Link 2 [wordpress.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444326</id>
	<title>n00bs</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1268302200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're not the first ones to be checking out a nice-lookin' bird and then see from another angle that "she" is really a man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not the first ones to be checking out a nice-lookin ' bird and then see from another angle that " she " is really a man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not the first ones to be checking out a nice-lookin' bird and then see from another angle that "she" is really a man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444778</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1268303700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>First-year computer science students rejoice!  God doesn't know how to do OOD either!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First-year computer science students rejoice !
God does n't know how to do OOD either !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First-year computer science students rejoice!
God doesn't know how to do OOD either!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1268303580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In both cases, each cell has its own this.getGender() function.</p><p>In both cases, I would imagine the code looks something like this:</p><p><tt><br>class cell {<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; int gender;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>// should really be a bool, need to fix that at some point.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; proteinFactoryBuilder asdf;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>// find a better naming scheme<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</tt></p><p><tt>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; getGender() {<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/* I don't really have time to go back and fix this right now, but if I'd known I'd be making multicellular organisms with this shit I wouldn't have put this at the cellular level. Anyway, we're stuck with it, so for now I'm just returning the gender variable and I'll leave it to callers to figure out wtf to do with unexpected output. */<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; return gender;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; }<br>}<br></tt></p><p>Small wonder it's a little more confusing for birds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In both cases , each cell has its own this.getGender ( ) function.In both cases , I would imagine the code looks something like this : class cell {       int gender ; // should really be a bool , need to fix that at some point .
      proteinFactoryBuilder asdf ; // find a better naming scheme ... .. .       getGender ( ) { / * I do n't really have time to go back and fix this right now , but if I 'd known I 'd be making multicellular organisms with this shit I would n't have put this at the cellular level .
Anyway , we 're stuck with it , so for now I 'm just returning the gender variable and I 'll leave it to callers to figure out wtf to do with unexpected output .
* /           return gender ;       } } Small wonder it 's a little more confusing for birds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In both cases, each cell has its own this.getGender() function.In both cases, I would imagine the code looks something like this:class cell {
      int gender; // should really be a bool, need to fix that at some point.
      proteinFactoryBuilder asdf; // find a better naming scheme ... ...
      getGender() { /* I don't really have time to go back and fix this right now, but if I'd known I'd be making multicellular organisms with this shit I wouldn't have put this at the cellular level.
Anyway, we're stuck with it, so for now I'm just returning the gender variable and I'll leave it to callers to figure out wtf to do with unexpected output.
*/
          return gender;
      }}Small wonder it's a little more confusing for birds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447076</id>
	<title>Bi Bi Birdie</title>
	<author>Chemisor</author>
	<datestamp>1268314080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any bird can teach you something about the birds and the bees, assuming of course, that you're not a bee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any bird can teach you something about the birds and the bees , assuming of course , that you 're not a bee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any bird can teach you something about the birds and the bees, assuming of course, that you're not a bee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445102</id>
	<title>Re:What took so long?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268304960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Seriously. What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g. male vs. female....</i></p><p>Yeah you can see that their sex chromosomes are different.</p><p><i>So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?</i></p><p>Because to notice this you have to specifically study the birds who have cells that are mixed between male and female, and then notice that the sexual characteristics vary over the same organism in accordance with which cells are male and which female.</p><p>Otherwise, you're just observing that a chicken is genetically male or female, and has male or female traits.  That doesn't distinguish between a per-cell sexual determination, and mammals' overall hormone-based one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
What I 'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells , e.g .
male vs. female....Yeah you can see that their sex chromosomes are different.So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before , and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this ? Because to notice this you have to specifically study the birds who have cells that are mixed between male and female , and then notice that the sexual characteristics vary over the same organism in accordance with which cells are male and which female.Otherwise , you 're just observing that a chicken is genetically male or female , and has male or female traits .
That does n't distinguish between a per-cell sexual determination , and mammals ' overall hormone-based one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g.
male vs. female....Yeah you can see that their sex chromosomes are different.So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?Because to notice this you have to specifically study the birds who have cells that are mixed between male and female, and then notice that the sexual characteristics vary over the same organism in accordance with which cells are male and which female.Otherwise, you're just observing that a chicken is genetically male or female, and has male or female traits.
That doesn't distinguish between a per-cell sexual determination, and mammals' overall hormone-based one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444730</id>
	<title>Birds and the Bees</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does this mean for "the birds and the bees" now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does this mean for " the birds and the bees " now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does this mean for "the birds and the bees" now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448302</id>
	<title>Scientifically, this headline..</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1268324460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. wasn't  that interesting. The only reason to click on this story is to read some<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers comments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. was n't that interesting .
The only reason to click on this story is to read some /.ers comments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. wasn't  that interesting.
The only reason to click on this story is to read some /.ers comments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444960</id>
	<title>Re:What took so long?</title>
	<author>Muros</author>
	<datestamp>1268304360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously. What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g. male vs. female....</p><p>So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?</p></div><p>What they're saying is that the development of cells seems to be independent of the hormones that are present in the bloodstream. In mammals of mixed sex, the development of the entire body depends on the mix of hormones, you do not see distinct male and female parts of the body, even if the cells in those body parts are predominantly genetically of one sex. With these chickens the opposite is the case, and you could not infer that from studying a normal single sex bird.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
What I 'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells , e.g .
male vs. female....So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before , and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this ? What they 're saying is that the development of cells seems to be independent of the hormones that are present in the bloodstream .
In mammals of mixed sex , the development of the entire body depends on the mix of hormones , you do not see distinct male and female parts of the body , even if the cells in those body parts are predominantly genetically of one sex .
With these chickens the opposite is the case , and you could not infer that from studying a normal single sex bird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g.
male vs. female....So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?What they're saying is that the development of cells seems to be independent of the hormones that are present in the bloodstream.
In mammals of mixed sex, the development of the entire body depends on the mix of hormones, you do not see distinct male and female parts of the body, even if the cells in those body parts are predominantly genetically of one sex.
With these chickens the opposite is the case, and you could not infer that from studying a normal single sex bird.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1268301180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So would one of these hermaphrodite chickens be called a half-cock?</p><p>I agree with the section "Clucking confusing."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So would one of these hermaphrodite chickens be called a half-cock ? I agree with the section " Clucking confusing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So would one of these hermaphrodite chickens be called a half-cock?I agree with the section "Clucking confusing.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446932</id>
	<title>Oh great!</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1268313240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another story about Al Gore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another story about Al Gore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another story about Al Gore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448110</id>
	<title>I would have thought that</title>
	<author>ezzthetic</author>
	<datestamp>1268322180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the fact that it can talk, and apparently give a scientific lecture, would have been seen as much more newsworthy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the fact that it can talk , and apparently give a scientific lecture , would have been seen as much more newsworthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the fact that it can talk, and apparently give a scientific lecture, would have been seen as much more newsworthy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31443994</id>
	<title>I call fowl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go F your self bird!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go F your self bird !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go F your self bird!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444804</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is Sam a straight cock with a confusing lesbian side?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Sam a straight cock with a confusing lesbian side ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Sam a straight cock with a confusing lesbian side?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445448</id>
	<title>hom&amp;o</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268306400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OF AMERICA) today, purposes *BSD is</htmltext>
<tokenext>OF AMERICA ) today , purposes * BSD is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OF AMERICA) today, purposes *BSD is</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534</id>
	<title>silly</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1268302800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's well known that birds have a completely different sex determination mechanism than mammals. For example, mammals (other than the platypus) use X/Y or X/0 chromosomes to determine sex.  Birds on the other hand use Z/W chromosomes for sex determination, as do most fish, some insects and some reptiles. So the big eyed "Ooooh, who would've thunk that birds aren't handling it the way we mammals do?" attitude of the article seems kind of silly considering we've known about this striking difference for a long time. Imagine that it actually mattered... Suspect they just wanted a reason to publish those cool pictures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's well known that birds have a completely different sex determination mechanism than mammals .
For example , mammals ( other than the platypus ) use X/Y or X/0 chromosomes to determine sex .
Birds on the other hand use Z/W chromosomes for sex determination , as do most fish , some insects and some reptiles .
So the big eyed " Ooooh , who would 've thunk that birds are n't handling it the way we mammals do ?
" attitude of the article seems kind of silly considering we 've known about this striking difference for a long time .
Imagine that it actually mattered... Suspect they just wanted a reason to publish those cool pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's well known that birds have a completely different sex determination mechanism than mammals.
For example, mammals (other than the platypus) use X/Y or X/0 chromosomes to determine sex.
Birds on the other hand use Z/W chromosomes for sex determination, as do most fish, some insects and some reptiles.
So the big eyed "Ooooh, who would've thunk that birds aren't handling it the way we mammals do?
" attitude of the article seems kind of silly considering we've known about this striking difference for a long time.
Imagine that it actually mattered... Suspect they just wanted a reason to publish those cool pictures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444496</id>
	<title>How to Sex Chicks</title>
	<author>handy\_vandal</author>
	<datestamp>1268302740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was about five years old, I happened to find my grandfather's copy of <em>How to Sex Chicks</em>. I didn't know much about the reproductive act, but I knew that there was something provocative about the phrase "sex chicks", although the book itself, on close examination, seemed innocent enough (how to tell if a baby chicken is a boy chicken or a girl chicken).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was about five years old , I happened to find my grandfather 's copy of How to Sex Chicks .
I did n't know much about the reproductive act , but I knew that there was something provocative about the phrase " sex chicks " , although the book itself , on close examination , seemed innocent enough ( how to tell if a baby chicken is a boy chicken or a girl chicken ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was about five years old, I happened to find my grandfather's copy of How to Sex Chicks.
I didn't know much about the reproductive act, but I knew that there was something provocative about the phrase "sex chicks", although the book itself, on close examination, seemed innocent enough (how to tell if a baby chicken is a boy chicken or a girl chicken).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444856</id>
	<title>Re:Changing Sex</title>
	<author>Narcocide</author>
	<datestamp>1268303940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which spice section are you shopping in?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which spice section are you shopping in ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which spice section are you shopping in?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444314</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>Mindcontrolled</author>
	<datestamp>1268302140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All definitions in the root class can be overloaded, I guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All definitions in the root class can be overloaded , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All definitions in the root class can be overloaded, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444836</id>
	<title>Er...</title>
	<author>Nomaxxx</author>
	<datestamp>1268303880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Nevermind. We're on Slashdot after all... *sight*</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Nevermind .
We 're on Slashdot after all... * sight *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Nevermind.
We're on Slashdot after all... *sight*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444800</id>
	<title>This thread...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>really puts me in a fowl mood...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>really puts me in a fowl mood.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really puts me in a fowl mood...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448384</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>chooks</author>
	<datestamp>1268325360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>int gender;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>// should really be a bool, need to fix that at some point.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
That's not a bug -- it's a feature. Some life forms (e.g. slime molds) have <a href="http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/2004/2/wildersideofsex.cfm" title="si.edu" rel="nofollow">more than two</a> [si.edu] "genders".

</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>int gender ; // should really be a bool , need to fix that at some point .
That 's not a bug -- it 's a feature .
Some life forms ( e.g .
slime molds ) have more than two [ si.edu ] " genders " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>int gender; // should really be a bool, need to fix that at some point.
That's not a bug -- it's a feature.
Some life forms (e.g.
slime molds) have more than two [si.edu] "genders".


	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532</id>
	<title>What took so long?</title>
	<author>Gertlex</author>
	<datestamp>1268302800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g. male vs. female....</p><p>So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
What I 'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells , e.g .
male vs. female....So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before , and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
What I'm inferring from the article is that you can see the difference in the cells, e.g.
male vs. female....So how the hell have they never noticed that female and male birds have these slightly different cells before, and reached the non-hormone driven conclusion before this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31443982</id>
	<title>The Colonel Says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its a new fad for KFC.  Hermaphrodite Chickens Taste Better</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a new fad for KFC .
Hermaphrodite Chickens Taste Better</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a new fad for KFC.
Hermaphrodite Chickens Taste Better</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447330</id>
	<title>Re:How to Sex Chicks</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1268315760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how many people who work at a farm talked about sexing chicks at length in public (like in a bar) just to creep out the people around them?<br>
<br>
"Man, yesterday I spent all day sexing chicks. After ten hours of sexing I was pretty beat."<br>
"Yeah, I know. And sometimes you stuff 'em into the box and some manage to get out and you have to go after them..."<br>
"Worst thing is, it turned out half of them were male. What do we do with three hundred male chicks?"<br>
"Well, you could sell them to that cat food factory."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many people who work at a farm talked about sexing chicks at length in public ( like in a bar ) just to creep out the people around them ?
" Man , yesterday I spent all day sexing chicks .
After ten hours of sexing I was pretty beat .
" " Yeah , I know .
And sometimes you stuff 'em into the box and some manage to get out and you have to go after them... " " Worst thing is , it turned out half of them were male .
What do we do with three hundred male chicks ?
" " Well , you could sell them to that cat food factory .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many people who work at a farm talked about sexing chicks at length in public (like in a bar) just to creep out the people around them?
"Man, yesterday I spent all day sexing chicks.
After ten hours of sexing I was pretty beat.
"
"Yeah, I know.
And sometimes you stuff 'em into the box and some manage to get out and you have to go after them..."
"Worst thing is, it turned out half of them were male.
What do we do with three hundred male chicks?
"
"Well, you could sell them to that cat food factory.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444822</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>fusiongyro</author>
	<datestamp>1268303820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I gathered, in mammals it's more like all the cells are Observers and what they're observing are hormonal signals that indicate sex.</p><p>And as someone else observed, this is about sex, not gender identity or sexual orientation. This will get messy in a hurry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I gathered , in mammals it 's more like all the cells are Observers and what they 're observing are hormonal signals that indicate sex.And as someone else observed , this is about sex , not gender identity or sexual orientation .
This will get messy in a hurry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I gathered, in mammals it's more like all the cells are Observers and what they're observing are hormonal signals that indicate sex.And as someone else observed, this is about sex, not gender identity or sexual orientation.
This will get messy in a hurry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445314</id>
	<title>Re:silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268305920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Platypus? Who'd be weird enough to mention a platypus on slashdot?<br>
Waitaminute... <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=hans+reiser+platypus" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Hans</a> [google.com], is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Platypus ?
Who 'd be weird enough to mention a platypus on slashdot ?
Waitaminute... Hans [ google.com ] , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Platypus?
Who'd be weird enough to mention a platypus on slashdot?
Waitaminute... Hans [google.com], is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444700</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>danlip</author>
	<datestamp>1268303460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the common ancestor of all animals almost certainly reproduced asexually (as do many primitive animals today), so it would not be defined by the root class.  There are of course more recent common ancestors between birds and mammals, but XY seems unique to mammals.<br>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZW\_sex-determination\_system" title="wikipedia.org">ZW sex-determination system</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="X0sex-determinationsystem" title="slashdot.org">X0 sex-determination system</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the common ancestor of all animals almost certainly reproduced asexually ( as do many primitive animals today ) , so it would not be defined by the root class .
There are of course more recent common ancestors between birds and mammals , but XY seems unique to mammals.See ZW sex-determination system [ wikipedia.org ] and X0 sex-determination system [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the common ancestor of all animals almost certainly reproduced asexually (as do many primitive animals today), so it would not be defined by the root class.
There are of course more recent common ancestors between birds and mammals, but XY seems unique to mammals.See ZW sex-determination system [wikipedia.org] and X0 sex-determination system [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31455328</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268426580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.<br>Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE</i></p><p>Actually, no. Mammals, even humans, can have XXY and XYY genes. There are mammals, even humans, born with both penuses and vaginas, and others with both testes and ovaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So each cell has it 's own this.getSexualOrientation ( ) function.Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL \ _ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALEActually , no .
Mammals , even humans , can have XXY and XYY genes .
There are mammals , even humans , born with both penuses and vaginas , and others with both testes and ovaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALEActually, no.
Mammals, even humans, can have XXY and XYY genes.
There are mammals, even humans, born with both penuses and vaginas, and others with both testes and ovaries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444600</id>
	<title>Hurray!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts.</p><p>I suppose we&rsquo;d better not be going off half-cocked, though. More grant money!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts.I suppose we    d better not be going off half-cocked , though .
More grant money !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we can produce twice as many chicken breasts.I suppose we’d better not be going off half-cocked, though.
More grant money!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447276</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>dwye</author>
	<datestamp>1268315460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your example code is cute, except that the inheritance system is more like Common LISP (inheritance from an instance) rather than C++ (inheritance from a Platonic Ideal of the class).  Please rewrite appropriately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your example code is cute , except that the inheritance system is more like Common LISP ( inheritance from an instance ) rather than C + + ( inheritance from a Platonic Ideal of the class ) .
Please rewrite appropriately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your example code is cute, except that the inheritance system is more like Common LISP (inheritance from an instance) rather than C++ (inheritance from a Platonic Ideal of the class).
Please rewrite appropriately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444876</id>
	<title>Doesn't apply to Slashdot</title>
	<author>Nomaxxx</author>
	<datestamp>1268304000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that as we all know is 100\% male oriented.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that as we all know is 100 \ % male oriented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that as we all know is 100\% male oriented.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446044</id>
	<title>Who cares about the details???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268308800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy Shit, Talking Birds!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy Shit , Talking Birds ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy Shit, Talking Birds!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445038</id>
	<title>Badly formed title</title>
	<author>101010\_or\_0x2A</author>
	<datestamp>1268304660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone else wonder how " Half-Male, Half-Female Fowl" can explain anything to anyone, seeing as they are...fowl?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else wonder how " Half-Male , Half-Female Fowl " can explain anything to anyone , seeing as they are...fowl ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else wonder how " Half-Male, Half-Female Fowl" can explain anything to anyone, seeing as they are...fowl?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448344</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>BraksDad</author>
	<datestamp>1268324940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And flees (do birds have flees or some equivalent?) jumping off would be going off half-cock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And flees ( do birds have flees or some equivalent ?
) jumping off would be going off half-cock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And flees (do birds have flees or some equivalent?
) jumping off would be going off half-cock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446192</id>
	<title>Jurassic Park</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268309340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need for the ridiculous frogs in the plot anymore !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need for the ridiculous frogs in the plot anymore !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need for the ridiculous frogs in the plot anymore !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447388</id>
	<title>Re:silly</title>
	<author>LurkerXXX</author>
	<datestamp>1268316060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably also worth mentioning sex determination in reptiles, which is sometimes determined by the temperature the eggs were incubated at, rather than simply by what chromosomes were transferred.  Biology can be a wild thing.</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=experts-temperature-sex-determination-reptiles" title="scientificamerican.com">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=experts-temperature-sex-determination-reptiles</a> [scientificamerican.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably also worth mentioning sex determination in reptiles , which is sometimes determined by the temperature the eggs were incubated at , rather than simply by what chromosomes were transferred .
Biology can be a wild thing.http : //www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm ? id = experts-temperature-sex-determination-reptiles [ scientificamerican.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably also worth mentioning sex determination in reptiles, which is sometimes determined by the temperature the eggs were incubated at, rather than simply by what chromosomes were transferred.
Biology can be a wild thing.http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=experts-temperature-sex-determination-reptiles [scientificamerican.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596</id>
	<title>Changing Sex</title>
	<author>spribyl</author>
	<datestamp>1268303100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I wonder if the applies to spices that can change sex at "will".  I seem to recall that there are some fish, frogs and lizards that can do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I wonder if the applies to spices that can change sex at " will " .
I seem to recall that there are some fish , frogs and lizards that can do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I wonder if the applies to spices that can change sex at "will".
I seem to recall that there are some fish, frogs and lizards that can do this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446264</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1268309700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently. Sex has to be specified in each single object through a getter/setter method.</p><p>But the root class has only one private method. All we know is if we inherit the class we're alive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently .
Sex has to be specified in each single object through a getter/setter method.But the root class has only one private method .
All we know is if we inherit the class we 're alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently.
Sex has to be specified in each single object through a getter/setter method.But the root class has only one private method.
All we know is if we inherit the class we're alive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444128</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>pwnies</author>
	<datestamp>1268301540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's actually what the story's headline was. I'll still give you credit for wit though seeing as no one on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. rtfa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's actually what the story 's headline was .
I 'll still give you credit for wit though seeing as no one on / .
rtfa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's actually what the story's headline was.
I'll still give you credit for wit though seeing as no one on /.
rtfa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449736</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268391480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

I'm sure you are aware that humans are mammals and humans do not come in 2 genders. There is such a thing called intersexed which is considered a 3rd gender. Maybe people should stop being ignorant  and look it up sometime. (Referring to yours and another child post off yours.) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex</a> [wikipedia.org] It is more common than you think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL \ _ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE .
I 'm sure you are aware that humans are mammals and humans do not come in 2 genders .
There is such a thing called intersexed which is considered a 3rd gender .
Maybe people should stop being ignorant and look it up sometime .
( Referring to yours and another child post off yours .
) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex [ wikipedia.org ] It is more common than you think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE.
I'm sure you are aware that humans are mammals and humans do not come in 2 genders.
There is such a thing called intersexed which is considered a 3rd gender.
Maybe people should stop being ignorant  and look it up sometime.
(Referring to yours and another child post off yours.
) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex [wikipedia.org] It is more common than you think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444646</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>northernfrights</author>
	<datestamp>1268303220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ohhhhhhhh, ok.  Now I get it.  Geez when I RTFA it was like reading a whole new language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ohhhhhhhh , ok. Now I get it .
Geez when I RTFA it was like reading a whole new language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ohhhhhhhh, ok.  Now I get it.
Geez when I RTFA it was like reading a whole new language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447120</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268314440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>evidently  god uses C++<br>(fucking figures as soon as I get out of a data structures exam ends, I have to see this shit)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>evidently god uses C + + ( fucking figures as soon as I get out of a data structures exam ends , I have to see this shit )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>evidently  god uses C++(fucking figures as soon as I get out of a data structures exam ends, I have to see this shit)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31468788</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>strawberryutopia</author>
	<datestamp>1268491500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE."</p><p>Or both or neither or something else entirely<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p><p>(I'm presuming by 'sexual orientation' you mean either sexual or gender identity, as opposed to who they are attracted to)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL \ _ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE .
" Or both or neither or something else entirely : P ( I 'm presuming by 'sexual orientation ' you mean either sexual or gender identity , as opposed to who they are attracted to )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE.
"Or both or neither or something else entirely :P(I'm presuming by 'sexual orientation' you mean either sexual or gender identity, as opposed to who they are attracted to)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444728</id>
	<title>Re:Changing Sex</title>
	<author>northernfrights</author>
	<datestamp>1268303580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot dinosaurs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot dinosaurs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot dinosaurs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446348</id>
	<title>Re:n00bs</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268310240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But don&rsquo;t you know about the bird?<br>Because everybody knows about the bird.<br>Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,<br>ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,<br>don&rsquo;t. you. know. about. the. biiird?<br>Everybody knows about the biird...<br>Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,<br>ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,<br>Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,<br>ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But don    t you know about the bird ? Because everybody knows about the bird.Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,don    t .
you. know .
about. the .
biiird ? Everybody knows about the biird...Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba , baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But don’t you know about the bird?Because everybody knows about the bird.Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,don’t.
you. know.
about. the.
biiird?Everybody knows about the biird...Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,Ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba,ba-ba-ba baa-baa-ba baba-baba ba, baba-baba-ba baba-baba-ba.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444028</id>
	<title>About one in every 10,000 chickens is gynandromorp</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1268301240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>About one in every 10,000 chickens is gynandromorphous, to use the technical term.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals, including humans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>About one in every 10,000 chickens is gynandromorphous , to use the technical term.That 's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals , including humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About one in every 10,000 chickens is gynandromorphous, to use the technical term.That's somewhat close to the rate of intersex conditions in mammals, including humans.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</id>
	<title>Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.
<br>
<br>
Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE.
<br>
<br>
This is interesting because I thought we all inherited from a common ancestor. Was sexual orientation not defined in the root class?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So each cell has it 's own this.getSexualOrientation ( ) function .
Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL \ _ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE .
This is interesting because I thought we all inherited from a common ancestor .
Was sexual orientation not defined in the root class ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.
Whereas mammals have a global static variable where SEXUAL\_ORIENTATION = MALE or FEMALE.
This is interesting because I thought we all inherited from a common ancestor.
Was sexual orientation not defined in the root class?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444426</id>
	<title>Lends more to the old paradox chicken or the egg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268302500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now you'll have a fresh material to argue which came first...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you 'll have a fresh material to argue which came first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you'll have a fresh material to argue which came first...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448150</id>
	<title>"Half cock"?</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268322540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow.  How often will you ever read that outside of a police report about a domestic dispute?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
How often will you ever read that outside of a police report about a domestic dispute ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
How often will you ever read that outside of a police report about a domestic dispute?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446284</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268309820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.</p> </div><p>That&rsquo;s Java right? Then, wouldn&rsquo;t that be <tt>this.getFactoryFactory().getOrientationDeterminationFactory(this.getFactoryFactory().OrientationDeterminator.SEXUAL).getSexualOrientationDeterminator().execute()</tt>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So each cell has it 's own this.getSexualOrientation ( ) function .
That    s Java right ?
Then , wouldn    t that be this.getFactoryFactory ( ) .getOrientationDeterminationFactory ( this.getFactoryFactory ( ) .OrientationDeterminator.SEXUAL ) .getSexualOrientationDeterminator ( ) .execute ( ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So each cell has it's own this.getSexualOrientation() function.
That’s Java right?
Then, wouldn’t that be this.getFactoryFactory().getOrientationDeterminationFactory(this.getFactoryFactory().OrientationDeterminator.SEXUAL).getSexualOrientationDeterminator().execute()?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444766</id>
	<title>Re:Object-sex-oriented?</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1268303700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mammals actually handle sex inheritance in an inverted arrangement from birds.  Whereas mammals use the X/Y system, where males are the heterogametic type (XY) and females are the homogametic type (XX), birds (and some other animals) use a "ZW system" where males are ZZ and females are ZW.  A notable feature of ZW determination is that the Z chromosome is more like a full-fledged chromosome with many genes, unlike the mammalian Y chromosome which has been paring down its genes so that it contains the sex-determining gene SRY, some genes necessary for sperm production, and little else.
<br> <br>
This might go a long way towards explaining gynandromorphism in birds.  In mammals, maleness is handled in a top-down fashion- the Y chromosome does not explicitly specify most aspects of the male phenotype, instead simply encouraging the cells that go on to make androgens, which then go on to produce a cascade of developmental effects throughout the body.  In birds, the Z and W chromosomes both may have enough genes that sex determination can be handled from the bottom up, locally in each cell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mammals actually handle sex inheritance in an inverted arrangement from birds .
Whereas mammals use the X/Y system , where males are the heterogametic type ( XY ) and females are the homogametic type ( XX ) , birds ( and some other animals ) use a " ZW system " where males are ZZ and females are ZW .
A notable feature of ZW determination is that the Z chromosome is more like a full-fledged chromosome with many genes , unlike the mammalian Y chromosome which has been paring down its genes so that it contains the sex-determining gene SRY , some genes necessary for sperm production , and little else .
This might go a long way towards explaining gynandromorphism in birds .
In mammals , maleness is handled in a top-down fashion- the Y chromosome does not explicitly specify most aspects of the male phenotype , instead simply encouraging the cells that go on to make androgens , which then go on to produce a cascade of developmental effects throughout the body .
In birds , the Z and W chromosomes both may have enough genes that sex determination can be handled from the bottom up , locally in each cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mammals actually handle sex inheritance in an inverted arrangement from birds.
Whereas mammals use the X/Y system, where males are the heterogametic type (XY) and females are the homogametic type (XX), birds (and some other animals) use a "ZW system" where males are ZZ and females are ZW.
A notable feature of ZW determination is that the Z chromosome is more like a full-fledged chromosome with many genes, unlike the mammalian Y chromosome which has been paring down its genes so that it contains the sex-determining gene SRY, some genes necessary for sperm production, and little else.
This might go a long way towards explaining gynandromorphism in birds.
In mammals, maleness is handled in a top-down fashion- the Y chromosome does not explicitly specify most aspects of the male phenotype, instead simply encouraging the cells that go on to make androgens, which then go on to produce a cascade of developmental effects throughout the body.
In birds, the Z and W chromosomes both may have enough genes that sex determination can be handled from the bottom up, locally in each cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31462016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31468788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31455328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_2041221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31443982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31443994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31449736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31468788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31462016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31446264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31455328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31445314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31447388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_2041221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31448344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_2041221.31444128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
