<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_2330238</id>
	<title>Former TSA Analyst Charged With Computer Tampering</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1268234340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"A Transportation Security Administration analyst has been <a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/339185/former\_tsa\_analyst\_charged\_computer\_tampering/">indicted with tampering with databases</a> used by the TSA to identify possible terrorists who may be trying to fly in the US. If convicted, he faces 10 years in prison."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " A Transportation Security Administration analyst has been indicted with tampering with databases used by the TSA to identify possible terrorists who may be trying to fly in the US .
If convicted , he faces 10 years in prison .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "A Transportation Security Administration analyst has been indicted with tampering with databases used by the TSA to identify possible terrorists who may be trying to fly in the US.
If convicted, he faces 10 years in prison.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31442048</id>
	<title>update from this morning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268338860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/tsa-worker-charged-with-attempted-sabotage/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">Updated, and more professionally written.</a> [wired.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Updated , and more professionally written .
[ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Updated, and more professionally written.
[wired.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434476</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1268241720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, treason is playing Chess against a Russian.<br>Selling guns to Iran or helping terrorists is patriotism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , treason is playing Chess against a Russian.Selling guns to Iran or helping terrorists is patriotism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, treason is playing Chess against a Russian.Selling guns to Iran or helping terrorists is patriotism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31440012</id>
	<title>Re:Access is not part of your job</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1268330880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you attempted to do any part of what this guy does every day, you'd be in prison probably indefinitely, and he gets a paycheck.  Is that a double standard?</p><p>You would be accused of different infractions because you are not an employee in charge of maintaining that data.  Simply trying to log in would be attempted hacking or unauthorized access, where this guy probably logged in every day as part of his job.</p><p>You weren't cleared for access and given permission and credentials to access the information.  This guy's job was updating the database.  I'm guessing he used a front-end to do his work, not direct back-end access, and that may be the source of the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you attempted to do any part of what this guy does every day , you 'd be in prison probably indefinitely , and he gets a paycheck .
Is that a double standard ? You would be accused of different infractions because you are not an employee in charge of maintaining that data .
Simply trying to log in would be attempted hacking or unauthorized access , where this guy probably logged in every day as part of his job.You were n't cleared for access and given permission and credentials to access the information .
This guy 's job was updating the database .
I 'm guessing he used a front-end to do his work , not direct back-end access , and that may be the source of the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you attempted to do any part of what this guy does every day, you'd be in prison probably indefinitely, and he gets a paycheck.
Is that a double standard?You would be accused of different infractions because you are not an employee in charge of maintaining that data.
Simply trying to log in would be attempted hacking or unauthorized access, where this guy probably logged in every day as part of his job.You weren't cleared for access and given permission and credentials to access the information.
This guy's job was updating the database.
I'm guessing he used a front-end to do his work, not direct back-end access, and that may be the source of the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434708</id>
	<title>2 weeks notice?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268244780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone is going to be a problem, you can just let them go in most states. If you feel bad about letting them go, give the 2 weeks pay. You don't have to and you can let them go any time.<br>People think there is some mythical 2 week rule. No mater where you work, you could be let go tomorrow for any reason without notice.</p><p>So if this guy was some kind of problem they should have just given him his walking papers. If it was something else, well they are just stupid anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone is going to be a problem , you can just let them go in most states .
If you feel bad about letting them go , give the 2 weeks pay .
You do n't have to and you can let them go any time.People think there is some mythical 2 week rule .
No mater where you work , you could be let go tomorrow for any reason without notice.So if this guy was some kind of problem they should have just given him his walking papers .
If it was something else , well they are just stupid anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone is going to be a problem, you can just let them go in most states.
If you feel bad about letting them go, give the 2 weeks pay.
You don't have to and you can let them go any time.People think there is some mythical 2 week rule.
No mater where you work, you could be let go tomorrow for any reason without notice.So if this guy was some kind of problem they should have just given him his walking papers.
If it was something else, well they are just stupid anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31437236</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268322060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right and wrong.</p><p>'Non-binding Resolution Authorizing The President To Implement Measures' doesn't have the same ring nor get Glenn Beck's panties as wet as 'War'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right and wrong .
'Non-binding Resolution Authorizing The President To Implement Measures ' does n't have the same ring nor get Glenn Beck 's panties as wet as 'War' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right and wrong.
'Non-binding Resolution Authorizing The President To Implement Measures' doesn't have the same ring nor get Glenn Beck's panties as wet as 'War'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</id>
	<title>They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>skids</author>
	<datestamp>1268238360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not that it matters for the court case, but most people are going to be asking "well what was he trying to do?"</p><p>Delete his girlfriend's name? Add the name of the guy who slept with his wife?  I guess at least it leaves plenty of room for pointless speculation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that it matters for the court case , but most people are going to be asking " well what was he trying to do ?
" Delete his girlfriend 's name ?
Add the name of the guy who slept with his wife ?
I guess at least it leaves plenty of room for pointless speculation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that it matters for the court case, but most people are going to be asking "well what was he trying to do?
"Delete his girlfriend's name?
Add the name of the guy who slept with his wife?
I guess at least it leaves plenty of room for pointless speculation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434330</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the security protocol?</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1268240100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does make one wonder if the PHB that decided to give <i>notice</i> to a disgruntled employee with sensitive access will be held accountable for <b>his</b> stupidity?  Oh wait, what am I <i>thinking?</i></p><p>Someone needs to give his ex-manager an <i>education by example</i> of how to can someone safely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does make one wonder if the PHB that decided to give notice to a disgruntled employee with sensitive access will be held accountable for his stupidity ?
Oh wait , what am I thinking ? Someone needs to give his ex-manager an education by example of how to can someone safely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does make one wonder if the PHB that decided to give notice to a disgruntled employee with sensitive access will be held accountable for his stupidity?
Oh wait, what am I thinking?Someone needs to give his ex-manager an education by example of how to can someone safely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268241060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>War? What war? Did Congress declare war while I wasn't paying attention?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>War ?
What war ?
Did Congress declare war while I was n't paying attention ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>War?
What war?
Did Congress declare war while I wasn't paying attention?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434348</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>spydum</author>
	<datestamp>1268240220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably, read mail real fast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably , read mail real fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably, read mail real fast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435998</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1268307660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget his last name, --.  As in <tt>Ahmed');Drop Table No\_Fly\_List; --</tt></p><p>That name makes anything who follows him rather insignificant<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget his last name , -- .
As in Ahmed ' ) ; Drop Table No \ _Fly \ _List ; --That name makes anything who follows him rather insignificant ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget his last name, --.
As in Ahmed');Drop Table No\_Fly\_List; --That name makes anything who follows him rather insignificant ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434566</id>
	<title>Not justified</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268242740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He must not get punishment as whatever he did , his intentions were not bad.
<a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/new-life-cleanse-reviews-colon-cleansing-formula-1964637.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/new-life-cleanse-reviews-colon-cleansing-formula-1964637.html</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>He must not get punishment as whatever he did , his intentions were not bad .
http : //www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/new-life-cleanse-reviews-colon-cleansing-formula-1964637.html [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He must not get punishment as whatever he did , his intentions were not bad.
http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/new-life-cleanse-reviews-colon-cleansing-formula-1964637.html [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435298</id>
	<title>Innocent until proven guilty</title>
	<author>OrwellianLurker</author>
	<datestamp>1268340120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously guys? We read an unsubstantiated claim of "computer tampering" and automatically assume that he's guilty of treason or something equally malicious? The indictment was incredibly vague and we have little to go on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously guys ?
We read an unsubstantiated claim of " computer tampering " and automatically assume that he 's guilty of treason or something equally malicious ?
The indictment was incredibly vague and we have little to go on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously guys?
We read an unsubstantiated claim of "computer tampering" and automatically assume that he's guilty of treason or something equally malicious?
The indictment was incredibly vague and we have little to go on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434556</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>Simon80</author>
	<datestamp>1268242560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Little Ahm-y tables, we call him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Little Ahm-y tables , we call him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Little Ahm-y tables, we call him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434410</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1268241060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I'd rather know exactly <em>how</em> he did it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'd rather know exactly how he did it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'd rather know exactly how he did it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435740</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the security protocol?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, they should have fired him on a Friday. Studies have statistically shown that there's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , they should have fired him on a Friday .
Studies have statistically shown that there 's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, they should have fired him on a Friday.
Studies have statistically shown that there's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434160</id>
	<title>Dismissed, Downsized, or Dismembered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So was it poor performance, over staffed department, or scapegoat for a possibly security breach and/or coverup?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So was it poor performance , over staffed department , or scapegoat for a possibly security breach and/or coverup ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So was it poor performance, over staffed department, or scapegoat for a possibly security breach and/or coverup?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434540</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1268242440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May I speculate wildly?</p><p>Some database hicckup happened that resulted in a slightly malformed database. The guy saw it, was enough of a guru to know the format and also how to fix it easily so it works again.</p><p>Presto database tampering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May I speculate wildly ? Some database hicckup happened that resulted in a slightly malformed database .
The guy saw it , was enough of a guru to know the format and also how to fix it easily so it works again.Presto database tampering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May I speculate wildly?Some database hicckup happened that resulted in a slightly malformed database.
The guy saw it, was enough of a guru to know the format and also how to fix it easily so it works again.Presto database tampering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436578</id>
	<title>He's not a TSA agent</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1268316660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's a data analyst, or maybe a sysop (the article is a bit light on the details), but not an agent.  And he's not the first one of those to go off the reservation and get smacked.  Happens a couple times a year, and gets reported here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's a data analyst , or maybe a sysop ( the article is a bit light on the details ) , but not an agent .
And he 's not the first one of those to go off the reservation and get smacked .
Happens a couple times a year , and gets reported here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's a data analyst, or maybe a sysop (the article is a bit light on the details), but not an agent.
And he's not the first one of those to go off the reservation and get smacked.
Happens a couple times a year, and gets reported here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434638</id>
	<title>Re:Where are the terrorism charges?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1268243820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, he just messed with a database containing your personal info. He didn't download a movie for crying out loud!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , he just messed with a database containing your personal info .
He did n't download a movie for crying out loud !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, he just messed with a database containing your personal info.
He didn't download a movie for crying out loud!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435260</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>War? What war? Did Congress declare war while I wasn't paying attention?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, but a whole bunch of Muslim preachers did.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>War ?
What war ?
Did Congress declare war while I was n't paying attention ? No , but a whole bunch of Muslim preachers did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>War?
What war?
Did Congress declare war while I wasn't paying attention?No, but a whole bunch of Muslim preachers did.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434296</id>
	<title>If he is convicted of actually aiding terrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268239680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He could lose a small part of his pension.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He could lose a small part of his pension .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He could lose a small part of his pension.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434786</id>
	<title>Re:Where are the terrorism charges?</title>
	<author>mandelbr0t</author>
	<datestamp>1268246100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yea, but YOU didn't get to write the laws. Funny how "unlawful" can sometimes be synonymous with "unpopular". Given enough emergency powers and enough time, they are no longer synonyms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , but YOU did n't get to write the laws .
Funny how " unlawful " can sometimes be synonymous with " unpopular " .
Given enough emergency powers and enough time , they are no longer synonyms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, but YOU didn't get to write the laws.
Funny how "unlawful" can sometimes be synonymous with "unpopular".
Given enough emergency powers and enough time, they are no longer synonyms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178</id>
	<title>Where are the terrorism charges?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I did the same thing I would be accused of violating DMCA, across federal borders, with intent to destabilize the National Security. I would be lucky to get away with a life sentence without parole.

This guy is getting as much as somebody stealing a really big TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I did the same thing I would be accused of violating DMCA , across federal borders , with intent to destabilize the National Security .
I would be lucky to get away with a life sentence without parole .
This guy is getting as much as somebody stealing a really big TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I did the same thing I would be accused of violating DMCA, across federal borders, with intent to destabilize the National Security.
I would be lucky to get away with a life sentence without parole.
This guy is getting as much as somebody stealing a really big TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31450148</id>
	<title>How do we know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268398980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No Fly" databases are a fairly hot topic right now.  How do we know he's not being set up to discredit anything he might have to say about his previous duties???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No Fly " databases are a fairly hot topic right now .
How do we know he 's not being set up to discredit anything he might have to say about his previous duties ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No Fly" databases are a fairly hot topic right now.
How do we know he's not being set up to discredit anything he might have to say about his previous duties??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434358</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268240340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what trials are for, the prosecution would be absolutely foolish to speculate why when filing charges, and give the defense a chance to answer that in the press, and let the extremist wingbats (left and right) who dominate public opinion these days a chance to try the case in the media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what trials are for , the prosecution would be absolutely foolish to speculate why when filing charges , and give the defense a chance to answer that in the press , and let the extremist wingbats ( left and right ) who dominate public opinion these days a chance to try the case in the media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what trials are for, the prosecution would be absolutely foolish to speculate why when filing charges, and give the defense a chance to answer that in the press, and let the extremist wingbats (left and right) who dominate public opinion these days a chance to try the case in the media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168</id>
	<title>Where's the security protocol?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>seven days after he'd being given two weeks notice that he was being dismissed</i></p><p>So, you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country doesn't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>seven days after he 'd being given two weeks notice that he was being dismissedSo , you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country does n't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seven days after he'd being given two weeks notice that he was being dismissedSo, you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country doesn't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434236</id>
	<title>Finally, some liability?</title>
	<author>Wayne247</author>
	<datestamp>1268239140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's about time that a TSA agent steps over the line enough for the justice system to finally react and hit back. So far the TSA has been running their own show and making up their own laws so much that I became genuinely scared of passing through the USA on my next trip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time that a TSA agent steps over the line enough for the justice system to finally react and hit back .
So far the TSA has been running their own show and making up their own laws so much that I became genuinely scared of passing through the USA on my next trip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time that a TSA agent steps over the line enough for the justice system to finally react and hit back.
So far the TSA has been running their own show and making up their own laws so much that I became genuinely scared of passing through the USA on my next trip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435222</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the security protocol?</title>
	<author>Maxmin</author>
	<datestamp>1268339220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole thing smells fishy: the <a href="http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site36/2010/0310/20100310\_013757\_douglas\_duchak\_indictment.pdf" title="mnginteractive.com">indictment</a> [mnginteractive.com]'s first odd bit is its vagueness about what Duchak was up to, specifically.  No details.</p><p>The second weird thing is that DOJ doesn't want him held - no bail mentioned (nor in any newstory that I've found), and the "will not seek detention" box is checked on the indictment form (pre-trial detention.)</p><p>Likewise, the indictment says "five days or less" for the trial duration.  I once sat for a sexual assault trial, and despite being an open-and-shut case of guy-grabs-coworkers-boobs-in-front-of-witnesses, it lasted 4-1/2 days.</p><p>Three federal agents are listed, you can bet their affidavits spell out more of what he did... and they don't appear to be online.  Further searching, looks like there's absolutely nothing within<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gov that bears our Duchak's name.</p><p>Under other circumstances (and administrations), this might have been a highly-touted smackdown in the war against whatever.  Not so here...</p><p>But hey!  There's a <a href="http://whitepages.anywho.com/results.php?ReportType=34&amp;qi=0&amp;qk=10&amp;qn=Duchak&amp;qs=CO" title="anywho.com">Douglas James Duchak listed in the whitepages</a> [anywho.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Let's see if he can fill us in...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole thing smells fishy : the indictment [ mnginteractive.com ] 's first odd bit is its vagueness about what Duchak was up to , specifically .
No details.The second weird thing is that DOJ does n't want him held - no bail mentioned ( nor in any newstory that I 've found ) , and the " will not seek detention " box is checked on the indictment form ( pre-trial detention .
) Likewise , the indictment says " five days or less " for the trial duration .
I once sat for a sexual assault trial , and despite being an open-and-shut case of guy-grabs-coworkers-boobs-in-front-of-witnesses , it lasted 4-1/2 days.Three federal agents are listed , you can bet their affidavits spell out more of what he did... and they do n't appear to be online .
Further searching , looks like there 's absolutely nothing within .gov that bears our Duchak 's name.Under other circumstances ( and administrations ) , this might have been a highly-touted smackdown in the war against whatever .
Not so here...But hey !
There 's a Douglas James Duchak listed in the whitepages [ anywho.com ] ...Let 's see if he can fill us in.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole thing smells fishy: the indictment [mnginteractive.com]'s first odd bit is its vagueness about what Duchak was up to, specifically.
No details.The second weird thing is that DOJ doesn't want him held - no bail mentioned (nor in any newstory that I've found), and the "will not seek detention" box is checked on the indictment form (pre-trial detention.
)Likewise, the indictment says "five days or less" for the trial duration.
I once sat for a sexual assault trial, and despite being an open-and-shut case of guy-grabs-coworkers-boobs-in-front-of-witnesses, it lasted 4-1/2 days.Three federal agents are listed, you can bet their affidavits spell out more of what he did... and they don't appear to be online.
Further searching, looks like there's absolutely nothing within .gov that bears our Duchak's name.Under other circumstances (and administrations), this might have been a highly-touted smackdown in the war against whatever.
Not so here...But hey!
There's a Douglas James Duchak listed in the whitepages [anywho.com] ...Let's see if he can fill us in...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436744</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the security protocol?</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1268318220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country doesn't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this!</p></div><p>It's probably an Access database and Clippy told them something was fishy...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country does n't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this ! It 's probably an Access database and Clippy told them something was fishy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you have this super-secure database system that is really important so the country doesn't get overrun by terrorists and then you do this!It's probably an Access database and Clippy told them something was fishy...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434612</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And desertion by members of the armed services in time of war is punishable by death, and yet somehow George W. Bush was never court-martialed, convicted, and appropriately sentenced.  Sometimes the system works, sometimes it doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And desertion by members of the armed services in time of war is punishable by death , and yet somehow George W. Bush was never court-martialed , convicted , and appropriately sentenced .
Sometimes the system works , sometimes it does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And desertion by members of the armed services in time of war is punishable by death, and yet somehow George W. Bush was never court-martialed, convicted, and appropriately sentenced.
Sometimes the system works, sometimes it doesn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434384</id>
	<title>Re:Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Killer Orca</author>
	<datestamp>1268240640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death.  NOT prison.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>I believe the legal term here is "light treason".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death .
NOT prison .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article \ _Three \ _of \ _the \ _United \ _States \ _Constitution # Section \ _3 : \ _Treason [ wikipedia.org ] I believe the legal term here is " light treason " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death.
NOT prison.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason [wikipedia.org] I believe the legal term here is "light treason".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338</id>
	<title>Aiding the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268240100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death.  NOT prison.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death .
NOT prison .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article \ _Three \ _of \ _the \ _United \ _States \ _Constitution # Section \ _3 : \ _Treason [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aiding the enemy during a time of war is considered treason and according to US laws treason is punishable by death.
NOT prison.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article\_Three\_of\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Section\_3:\_Treason [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435488</id>
	<title>Re:Where are the treason charges?</title>
	<author>Dr Herbert West</author>
	<datestamp>1268298900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>really, I'd like to know-- does this fall under that category? INAL....</htmltext>
<tokenext>really , I 'd like to know-- does this fall under that category ?
INAL... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really, I'd like to know-- does this fall under that category?
INAL....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434658</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1268244120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>oblig. <a href="http://xkcd.com/327/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/327/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>oblig .
http : //xkcd.com/327/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oblig.
http://xkcd.com/327/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424</id>
	<title>Re:They missed "why?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268241180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>He was just searching for information about the infamous terrorist, Ahmed');Drop Table No\_Fly\_List;.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was just searching for information about the infamous terrorist , Ahmed ' ) ; Drop Table No \ _Fly \ _List ; .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was just searching for information about the infamous terrorist, Ahmed');Drop Table No\_Fly\_List;.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434292</id>
	<title>Public knowledge</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268239680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If things like this were public knowledge similar to "most wanted" lists, perhaps abuses like this wouldn't happen. Secret lists will only lead to more abuses the more we rely on them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If things like this were public knowledge similar to " most wanted " lists , perhaps abuses like this would n't happen .
Secret lists will only lead to more abuses the more we rely on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If things like this were public knowledge similar to "most wanted" lists, perhaps abuses like this wouldn't happen.
Secret lists will only lead to more abuses the more we rely on them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434414</id>
	<title>The article is like a Progress in Iraq press repor</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1268241060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes a claim without any relevant details. For example, if this former employee were doing a normal security assessment to file a report on what they need to lock down after he's gone, one which his new boss didn't ask for or understand as appropriate security practice, he could face exactly these kind of charges. Or if he were plugging a hole used by the NSA for warrant-free tapping and injection of data, knowing that the hole was a constitutional violation mandated by his previous boss, and whose discovery and protest over its existence was the reason he was fired, I'd applaud his desire though not his means to plug such a hole.</p><p>Let's be quite clear: the TSA has inherited bad staff, bad bureaucracy, and bad guidance from the White House itself down to all the agencies it was created to oversee and merge and which it has profoundly failed to coordinate. The result is a security and policy nightmare, the kind of political football that incompetent middle managers flock to because it's so hard to close, and it's so hard to actually measure its work product. I'm not surprised that an employee being terminated was mishandled, or misbehaved by the agency's standards. But the agency engages in so much blatantly civil rights abuse that it's unreasonable to believe its claims of cyber attack without far more detail about what was attacked, and why.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes a claim without any relevant details .
For example , if this former employee were doing a normal security assessment to file a report on what they need to lock down after he 's gone , one which his new boss did n't ask for or understand as appropriate security practice , he could face exactly these kind of charges .
Or if he were plugging a hole used by the NSA for warrant-free tapping and injection of data , knowing that the hole was a constitutional violation mandated by his previous boss , and whose discovery and protest over its existence was the reason he was fired , I 'd applaud his desire though not his means to plug such a hole.Let 's be quite clear : the TSA has inherited bad staff , bad bureaucracy , and bad guidance from the White House itself down to all the agencies it was created to oversee and merge and which it has profoundly failed to coordinate .
The result is a security and policy nightmare , the kind of political football that incompetent middle managers flock to because it 's so hard to close , and it 's so hard to actually measure its work product .
I 'm not surprised that an employee being terminated was mishandled , or misbehaved by the agency 's standards .
But the agency engages in so much blatantly civil rights abuse that it 's unreasonable to believe its claims of cyber attack without far more detail about what was attacked , and why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes a claim without any relevant details.
For example, if this former employee were doing a normal security assessment to file a report on what they need to lock down after he's gone, one which his new boss didn't ask for or understand as appropriate security practice, he could face exactly these kind of charges.
Or if he were plugging a hole used by the NSA for warrant-free tapping and injection of data, knowing that the hole was a constitutional violation mandated by his previous boss, and whose discovery and protest over its existence was the reason he was fired, I'd applaud his desire though not his means to plug such a hole.Let's be quite clear: the TSA has inherited bad staff, bad bureaucracy, and bad guidance from the White House itself down to all the agencies it was created to oversee and merge and which it has profoundly failed to coordinate.
The result is a security and policy nightmare, the kind of political football that incompetent middle managers flock to because it's so hard to close, and it's so hard to actually measure its work product.
I'm not surprised that an employee being terminated was mishandled, or misbehaved by the agency's standards.
But the agency engages in so much blatantly civil rights abuse that it's unreasonable to believe its claims of cyber attack without far more detail about what was attacked, and why.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31437236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31440012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_2330238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31437236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31440012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_2330238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31434330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31436744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_2330238.31435740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
