<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_1923209</id>
	<title>The Lost Film That Accompanied Empire Strikes Back</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268211600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"'Alien' and 'Star Wars' art director Roger Christian was given &pound;25,000 by George Lucas in 1979 to make a <a href="http://www.shadowlocked.com/index.php?option=com\_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=134:exclusive-interview-the-worlds-of-roger-christian&amp;catid=47:movie-interviews">25-minute medieval B-feature called 'Black Angel.'</a> This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico making 'Lucky Lady.' 'Black Angel' made a huge impression, not least because it shared the dark tone of 'Empire Strikes Back.' John Boorman showed it to the crew of 'Excalibur' as a template for how he wanted his film to look, and 'Black Angel' went on to influence films such as 'Dragonslayer' and 'Legend' throughout the 1980s and beyond. But it has not been seen by anyone since 'Empire' finished its theatrical run. Two weeks ago Roger Christian unearthed a print of a film that was thought lost forever, and in this interview he talks about 'Black Angel,' and provides the only picture from the film that has ever hit the Internet."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " 'Alien ' and 'Star Wars ' art director Roger Christian was given   25,000 by George Lucas in 1979 to make a 25-minute medieval B-feature called 'Black Angel .
' This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian 's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico making 'Lucky Lady .
' 'Black Angel ' made a huge impression , not least because it shared the dark tone of 'Empire Strikes Back .
' John Boorman showed it to the crew of 'Excalibur ' as a template for how he wanted his film to look , and 'Black Angel ' went on to influence films such as 'Dragonslayer ' and 'Legend ' throughout the 1980s and beyond .
But it has not been seen by anyone since 'Empire ' finished its theatrical run .
Two weeks ago Roger Christian unearthed a print of a film that was thought lost forever , and in this interview he talks about 'Black Angel, ' and provides the only picture from the film that has ever hit the Internet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "'Alien' and 'Star Wars' art director Roger Christian was given £25,000 by George Lucas in 1979 to make a 25-minute medieval B-feature called 'Black Angel.
' This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico making 'Lucky Lady.
' 'Black Angel' made a huge impression, not least because it shared the dark tone of 'Empire Strikes Back.
' John Boorman showed it to the crew of 'Excalibur' as a template for how he wanted his film to look, and 'Black Angel' went on to influence films such as 'Dragonslayer' and 'Legend' throughout the 1980s and beyond.
But it has not been seen by anyone since 'Empire' finished its theatrical run.
Two weeks ago Roger Christian unearthed a print of a film that was thought lost forever, and in this interview he talks about 'Black Angel,' and provides the only picture from the film that has ever hit the Internet.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431134</id>
	<title>Forget Angel and Empire</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1268216400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The movie to see was the one that (more or less) accompanied the original Star Wars in 1976 -- namely "Alice in Wonderland: An X-rated Musical Fantasy". By far the better movie, a great piece of art that should have been the one that bore 5 sequels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The movie to see was the one that ( more or less ) accompanied the original Star Wars in 1976 -- namely " Alice in Wonderland : An X-rated Musical Fantasy " .
By far the better movie , a great piece of art that should have been the one that bore 5 sequels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The movie to see was the one that (more or less) accompanied the original Star Wars in 1976 -- namely "Alice in Wonderland: An X-rated Musical Fantasy".
By far the better movie, a great piece of art that should have been the one that bore 5 sequels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433654</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268233020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lightsabers. They are the coolest weapons ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lightsabers .
They are the coolest weapons ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lightsabers.
They are the coolest weapons ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431476</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268218080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally I'm wondering how <i>Silence of the Lambs</i> looks dated because of <i>X-Files</i>.  Or at all for that matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I 'm wondering how Silence of the Lambs looks dated because of X-Files .
Or at all for that matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I'm wondering how Silence of the Lambs looks dated because of X-Files.
Or at all for that matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432080</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268220900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people. "<br>no, it's not. thanks for trying to play.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people .
" no , it 's not .
thanks for trying to play .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.
"no, it's not.
thanks for trying to play.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431088</id>
	<title>Every scene ends with a wipe?</title>
	<author>otis wildflower</author>
	<datestamp>1268216160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, if his \_Battlefield Earth\_ is anything to go by..</p><p>Also, did he hold the camera straight?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , if his \ _Battlefield Earth \ _ is anything to go by..Also , did he hold the camera straight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, if his \_Battlefield Earth\_ is anything to go by..Also, did he hold the camera straight?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432220</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268221680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, "Last Man Standing" is a better example.  Modern remake of Yojimbo by Kurosawa himself, just set in Prohibition era U.S.  Agree with you that it just made me appreciate Yojimbo even more, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , " Last Man Standing " is a better example .
Modern remake of Yojimbo by Kurosawa himself , just set in Prohibition era U.S. Agree with you that it just made me appreciate Yojimbo even more , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, "Last Man Standing" is a better example.
Modern remake of Yojimbo by Kurosawa himself, just set in Prohibition era U.S.  Agree with you that it just made me appreciate Yojimbo even more, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431574</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>mpapet</author>
	<datestamp>1268218380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?</i></p><p>1. The currency of hollywood is revenue.  Art has nothing to do with it.  I know, I know, tons will differ.  But the artists are employed because of the revenue created, not the other way around.  Showing things for free is a universally bad thing if he wants to stay in the industry.<br>2. Getting distribution is not simple or cheap.  It would be a great deal of money to get started.   Probably his own.<br>3. The executive side of the industry would stop hiring the poor fellow for not pushing it through their distribution channel.   Youtube is fine for your home videos, but not something with enough production values to qualify as a movie.<br>4. He may not have distribution rights, or other rights necessary to get distribution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why would n't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes ? 1 .
The currency of hollywood is revenue .
Art has nothing to do with it .
I know , I know , tons will differ .
But the artists are employed because of the revenue created , not the other way around .
Showing things for free is a universally bad thing if he wants to stay in the industry.2 .
Getting distribution is not simple or cheap .
It would be a great deal of money to get started .
Probably his own.3 .
The executive side of the industry would stop hiring the poor fellow for not pushing it through their distribution channel .
Youtube is fine for your home videos , but not something with enough production values to qualify as a movie.4 .
He may not have distribution rights , or other rights necessary to get distribution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?1.
The currency of hollywood is revenue.
Art has nothing to do with it.
I know, I know, tons will differ.
But the artists are employed because of the revenue created, not the other way around.
Showing things for free is a universally bad thing if he wants to stay in the industry.2.
Getting distribution is not simple or cheap.
It would be a great deal of money to get started.
Probably his own.3.
The executive side of the industry would stop hiring the poor fellow for not pushing it through their distribution channel.
Youtube is fine for your home videos, but not something with enough production values to qualify as a movie.4.
He may not have distribution rights, or other rights necessary to get distribution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431702</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>JonStewartMill</author>
	<datestamp>1268218980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was about to suggest <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082869/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">"Outland"</a> [imdb.com] as another "James Bond in space" movie -- hey, it even has Sean Connery!  Then I remembered that it was actually more like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044706/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">"High Noon</a> [imdb.com] in space."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to suggest " Outland " [ imdb.com ] as another " James Bond in space " movie -- hey , it even has Sean Connery !
Then I remembered that it was actually more like " High Noon [ imdb.com ] in space .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to suggest "Outland" [imdb.com] as another "James Bond in space" movie -- hey, it even has Sean Connery!
Then I remembered that it was actually more like "High Noon [imdb.com] in space.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431782</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Z34107</author>
	<datestamp>1268219280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He might not want to release it because if everything since borrows so much from it, it would look cliche.  What if they discovered the first "Boy meets girl" drama from 467 BC and re-released it?  The plot certainly wouldn't be as novel to a modern audience.  And they would probably call it "Twilight."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He might not want to release it because if everything since borrows so much from it , it would look cliche .
What if they discovered the first " Boy meets girl " drama from 467 BC and re-released it ?
The plot certainly would n't be as novel to a modern audience .
And they would probably call it " Twilight .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He might not want to release it because if everything since borrows so much from it, it would look cliche.
What if they discovered the first "Boy meets girl" drama from 467 BC and re-released it?
The plot certainly wouldn't be as novel to a modern audience.
And they would probably call it "Twilight.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432112</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268221080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Star Wars and the Hidden fortress really have nothing in common.</p><p>Plus I did see the film in the theater, and if it is released, suddenly thousand or people will be claiming to have seen it in a theater~</p><p>That said, yes please release it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Wars and the Hidden fortress really have nothing in common.Plus I did see the film in the theater , and if it is released , suddenly thousand or people will be claiming to have seen it in a theater ~ That said , yes please release it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Wars and the Hidden fortress really have nothing in common.Plus I did see the film in the theater, and if it is released, suddenly thousand or people will be claiming to have seen it in a theater~That said, yes please release it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433378</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268230260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me put it on Wikipeda, using this as a citation!</p><p>The Alternate Reality Alliance<br>&mdash; &ldquo;Changing reality, one edit at a time!&rdquo;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me put it on Wikipeda , using this as a citation ! The Alternate Reality Alliance       Changing reality , one edit at a time !   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me put it on Wikipeda, using this as a citation!The Alternate Reality Alliance— “Changing reality, one edit at a time!”</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431756</id>
	<title>Re:Really? What was the distribution on this?</title>
	<author>dschuetz</author>
	<datestamp>1268219160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It sounds like you saw TESB at the Uptown</p></div><p>Lol. Good guess, but no. Saw it a few miles north, across from WTTG. Not sure that theater's even still there (can't find it on Street View, looks like a furniture store now). [Ha! <a href="http://cinematreasures.org/theater/406/" title="cinematreasures.org">Found it! "KB Cinema."</a> [cinematreasures.org] And the link even describes TESB, complete with the line.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) ]</p><p>I used to love the Uptown (saw reissues of 2001 and the "director's cut" Blade Runner there, among other films), but now it's just too far to go. And the last couple times I'd been there I had bad experiences -- for one, the doors to the lobby open RIGHT INTO the auditorium, so anytime anyone came in our out of the theater you'd get bright light flooding onto one or the other side of the screen. (Maybe they've fixed this in the last 10 years).</p><p>Agreed, though, if it were anywhere, I'd've banked on Uptown.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like you saw TESB at the UptownLol .
Good guess , but no .
Saw it a few miles north , across from WTTG .
Not sure that theater 's even still there ( ca n't find it on Street View , looks like a furniture store now ) .
[ Ha ! Found it !
" KB Cinema .
" [ cinematreasures.org ] And the link even describes TESB , complete with the line .
: ) ] I used to love the Uptown ( saw reissues of 2001 and the " director 's cut " Blade Runner there , among other films ) , but now it 's just too far to go .
And the last couple times I 'd been there I had bad experiences -- for one , the doors to the lobby open RIGHT INTO the auditorium , so anytime anyone came in our out of the theater you 'd get bright light flooding onto one or the other side of the screen .
( Maybe they 've fixed this in the last 10 years ) .Agreed , though , if it were anywhere , I 'd've banked on Uptown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like you saw TESB at the UptownLol.
Good guess, but no.
Saw it a few miles north, across from WTTG.
Not sure that theater's even still there (can't find it on Street View, looks like a furniture store now).
[Ha! Found it!
"KB Cinema.
" [cinematreasures.org] And the link even describes TESB, complete with the line.
:) ]I used to love the Uptown (saw reissues of 2001 and the "director's cut" Blade Runner there, among other films), but now it's just too far to go.
And the last couple times I'd been there I had bad experiences -- for one, the doors to the lobby open RIGHT INTO the auditorium, so anytime anyone came in our out of the theater you'd get bright light flooding onto one or the other side of the screen.
(Maybe they've fixed this in the last 10 years).Agreed, though, if it were anywhere, I'd've banked on Uptown.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432042</id>
	<title>Re:Digital Dark Age</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268220660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly, in the end I think we will have more information from the past century then we will of the present century. Everything has been so locked down in incompatible file formats. Yes, piracy will preserve and archive some popular works, but for everything else it will simply be lost. We look so regretfully on historical documents we have lost, yet we are blinded to see that 50 years or less from now we might not even have working copies of software, movies, music and e-books that have shaped our generation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , in the end I think we will have more information from the past century then we will of the present century .
Everything has been so locked down in incompatible file formats .
Yes , piracy will preserve and archive some popular works , but for everything else it will simply be lost .
We look so regretfully on historical documents we have lost , yet we are blinded to see that 50 years or less from now we might not even have working copies of software , movies , music and e-books that have shaped our generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, in the end I think we will have more information from the past century then we will of the present century.
Everything has been so locked down in incompatible file formats.
Yes, piracy will preserve and archive some popular works, but for everything else it will simply be lost.
We look so regretfully on historical documents we have lost, yet we are blinded to see that 50 years or less from now we might not even have working copies of software, movies, music and e-books that have shaped our generation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432018</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1268220600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>  I don't understand how you can be so certain that you \_deserve\_ access to someone's artwork.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Perhaps because once the copyright runs out, that artwork will be public domain? At that point, if it's lost, either because it can't be found again or has degraded too much, the public will be cheated of the work it now supposedly owns.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand how you can be so certain that you \ _deserve \ _ access to someone 's artwork .
Perhaps because once the copyright runs out , that artwork will be public domain ?
At that point , if it 's lost , either because it ca n't be found again or has degraded too much , the public will be cheated of the work it now supposedly owns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  I don't understand how you can be so certain that you \_deserve\_ access to someone's artwork.
Perhaps because once the copyright runs out, that artwork will be public domain?
At that point, if it's lost, either because it can't be found again or has degraded too much, the public will be cheated of the work it now supposedly owns.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31438350</id>
	<title>Re:Forget Angel and Empire</title>
	<author>ginbot462</author>
	<datestamp>1268325840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Miyuki-chan in Wonderland anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Miyuki-chan in Wonderland anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Miyuki-chan in Wonderland anyone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432638</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268224560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude its sopssa, I dunno if he's ESL or just young and ignorant, but hes easy to spot because he's either posting something pretty stupid (or trolling) and/or with exceedingly awkward english.</p><p>Despite the fact that he posts on ALL slashdot articles nearly 24/7, his posts are always just wastes of bytes and screen space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude its sopssa , I dunno if he 's ESL or just young and ignorant , but hes easy to spot because he 's either posting something pretty stupid ( or trolling ) and/or with exceedingly awkward english.Despite the fact that he posts on ALL slashdot articles nearly 24/7 , his posts are always just wastes of bytes and screen space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude its sopssa, I dunno if he's ESL or just young and ignorant, but hes easy to spot because he's either posting something pretty stupid (or trolling) and/or with exceedingly awkward english.Despite the fact that he posts on ALL slashdot articles nearly 24/7, his posts are always just wastes of bytes and screen space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432302</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1268222220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds. Posting a question like:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?</p></div><p>...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026879/" title="imdb.com">Randal</a> [imdb.com], is that you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , this is slashdot , a website for nerds .
Posting a question like : What 's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway ? ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung .
Randal [ imdb.com ] , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds.
Posting a question like:What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.
Randal [imdb.com], is that you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431562</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268218380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once lived in Roger Christian's house in Crouch End, and I broke his child's bed. Sorry Roger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once lived in Roger Christian 's house in Crouch End , and I broke his child 's bed .
Sorry Roger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once lived in Roger Christian's house in Crouch End, and I broke his child's bed.
Sorry Roger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430954</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.</i>
<br> <br>
This is Slashdot.  That <b>is</b> a citation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid .
This is Slashdot .
That is a citation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.
This is Slashdot.
That is a citation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433124</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>sixsixtysix</author>
	<datestamp>1268228400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>in fact, in a sane world, he would <i>have</i> to release it in order to be protected by copyright.</htmltext>
<tokenext>in fact , in a sane world , he would have to release it in order to be protected by copyright .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in fact, in a sane world, he would have to release it in order to be protected by copyright.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431178</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1268216640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Holy Roman Empire? You think that there were arenas in Germany during the middle ages? Remember the mnemonic: 'The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy Roman Empire ?
You think that there were arenas in Germany during the middle ages ?
Remember the mnemonic : 'The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy , nor Roman , nor an Empire .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy Roman Empire?
You think that there were arenas in Germany during the middle ages?
Remember the mnemonic: 'The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433352</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1268230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.</p></div></blockquote><p>I read the basic outline of this story in Pollock's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Skywalking-Films-George-Lucas-Updated/dp/0306809044/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1268268571&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com"> <em>Skywalking: The Life and Films of George Lucas</em> </a> [amazon.com].  The accident clearly had an effect on his life -- he was in the hospital for months with a collapsed lung -- and at the time he was a D student, he was about to fail out of senior year and not get a diploma.  He was passed out of high school mainly because his teachers took pity on him after the accident.  If you ever watch his <em>American Graffiti</em> the Milner character is based on Lucas at that stage of his life.</p><p>From there it goes on that he went to community college, fell in love with avant garde films (people like Brakhage and Jonas Mekas, really oddball stuff for the guy who invented the scifi blockbuster), got his GPA up, and was accepted to USC.  (Fight on cinema alums!)</p><p>There tends to be a lot of "drift" in terms of what George specifically claims he intended from time to time, though.  I'd never heard that he developed the ideas about "the force" while in the hospital, for instance, though GL often tends to align history with the point he's trying to make that day.  <em>Skywalking</em> in particular is quite clear from interviews that Lucas wanted to use literal classical music for the score of <em>Star Wars</em>, a la <em>2001</em>, and John Williams had to talk him out of it, whereas later Lucas denied the whole business.  His account of Spielberg's initial response to the <em>Star Wars</em> rough cut also tends to be at variance with how Spielberg remembers things (Spielberg wwas either supportive or skeptical, depending on who you ask), as is the record w/r/t Marcia, his ex-wife's contributions: she edited (and won an Oscar) for <em>Star Wars</em>.  A complicated man.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.I read the basic outline of this story in Pollock 's Skywalking : The Life and Films of George Lucas [ amazon.com ] .
The accident clearly had an effect on his life -- he was in the hospital for months with a collapsed lung -- and at the time he was a D student , he was about to fail out of senior year and not get a diploma .
He was passed out of high school mainly because his teachers took pity on him after the accident .
If you ever watch his American Graffiti the Milner character is based on Lucas at that stage of his life.From there it goes on that he went to community college , fell in love with avant garde films ( people like Brakhage and Jonas Mekas , really oddball stuff for the guy who invented the scifi blockbuster ) , got his GPA up , and was accepted to USC .
( Fight on cinema alums !
) There tends to be a lot of " drift " in terms of what George specifically claims he intended from time to time , though .
I 'd never heard that he developed the ideas about " the force " while in the hospital , for instance , though GL often tends to align history with the point he 's trying to make that day .
Skywalking in particular is quite clear from interviews that Lucas wanted to use literal classical music for the score of Star Wars , a la 2001 , and John Williams had to talk him out of it , whereas later Lucas denied the whole business .
His account of Spielberg 's initial response to the Star Wars rough cut also tends to be at variance with how Spielberg remembers things ( Spielberg wwas either supportive or skeptical , depending on who you ask ) , as is the record w/r/t Marcia , his ex-wife 's contributions : she edited ( and won an Oscar ) for Star Wars .
A complicated man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.I read the basic outline of this story in Pollock's  Skywalking: The Life and Films of George Lucas  [amazon.com].
The accident clearly had an effect on his life -- he was in the hospital for months with a collapsed lung -- and at the time he was a D student, he was about to fail out of senior year and not get a diploma.
He was passed out of high school mainly because his teachers took pity on him after the accident.
If you ever watch his American Graffiti the Milner character is based on Lucas at that stage of his life.From there it goes on that he went to community college, fell in love with avant garde films (people like Brakhage and Jonas Mekas, really oddball stuff for the guy who invented the scifi blockbuster), got his GPA up, and was accepted to USC.
(Fight on cinema alums!
)There tends to be a lot of "drift" in terms of what George specifically claims he intended from time to time, though.
I'd never heard that he developed the ideas about "the force" while in the hospital, for instance, though GL often tends to align history with the point he's trying to make that day.
Skywalking in particular is quite clear from interviews that Lucas wanted to use literal classical music for the score of Star Wars, a la 2001, and John Williams had to talk him out of it, whereas later Lucas denied the whole business.
His account of Spielberg's initial response to the Star Wars rough cut also tends to be at variance with how Spielberg remembers things (Spielberg wwas either supportive or skeptical, depending on who you ask), as is the record w/r/t Marcia, his ex-wife's contributions: she edited (and won an Oscar) for Star Wars.
A complicated man.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431754</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>jadin</author>
	<datestamp>1268219160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them. I'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well. So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel?</p></div><p>Speak for yourself. I have a very hard time appreciating originals after seeing their remakes etc. For one, the pacing of older films is often insanely slow for todays standards. There's the video and audio quality which is usually fairly bad, not to mention decayed since apparently it's not worth preserving. The audio quality seems to be especially harsh in this regard.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site. Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?</p></div><p>I can't believe this is a serious suggestion. A professional artist isn't going to want his film on youtube unless he has no choice. It isn't exactly known for being the haven of known artists, more like the myspace of videos.<br>I also can't imagine that he needs his ego stroked, but who knows.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?</p></div><p>I don't understand how you can be so certain that you \_deserve\_ access to someone's artwork. I sure hope that last paragraph wasn't serious, because none of those are even remotely decent reasons to release something.</p><p>+4 insightful? seriously?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa 's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone 's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them .
I 'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well .
So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel ? Speak for yourself .
I have a very hard time appreciating originals after seeing their remakes etc .
For one , the pacing of older films is often insanely slow for todays standards .
There 's the video and audio quality which is usually fairly bad , not to mention decayed since apparently it 's not worth preserving .
The audio quality seems to be especially harsh in this regard.I mean , if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site .
Would n't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over ? I ca n't believe this is a serious suggestion .
A professional artist is n't going to want his film on youtube unless he has no choice .
It is n't exactly known for being the haven of known artists , more like the myspace of videos.I also ca n't imagine that he needs his ego stroked , but who knows.I mean , even if it 's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it 's just a reason for people to brag that they 've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it 's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why would n't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes ? I do n't understand how you can be so certain that you \ _deserve \ _ access to someone 's artwork .
I sure hope that last paragraph was n't serious , because none of those are even remotely decent reasons to release something. + 4 insightful ?
seriously ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them.
I'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well.
So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel?Speak for yourself.
I have a very hard time appreciating originals after seeing their remakes etc.
For one, the pacing of older films is often insanely slow for todays standards.
There's the video and audio quality which is usually fairly bad, not to mention decayed since apparently it's not worth preserving.
The audio quality seems to be especially harsh in this regard.I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site.
Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?I can't believe this is a serious suggestion.
A professional artist isn't going to want his film on youtube unless he has no choice.
It isn't exactly known for being the haven of known artists, more like the myspace of videos.I also can't imagine that he needs his ego stroked, but who knows.I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?I don't understand how you can be so certain that you \_deserve\_ access to someone's artwork.
I sure hope that last paragraph wasn't serious, because none of those are even remotely decent reasons to release something.+4 insightful?
seriously?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430982</id>
	<title>Executive Producer's Cut re-release</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Adding Jar-Jar to the Executive Producer's Cut re-release was a huge mistake and totally ruined the film for me.  Everything Lucas touches turns to crap!  Stop raping my childhood!<br>
&nbsp; <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Never actually saw the film.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Adding Jar-Jar to the Executive Producer 's Cut re-release was a huge mistake and totally ruined the film for me .
Everything Lucas touches turns to crap !
Stop raping my childhood !
  /Never actually saw the film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adding Jar-Jar to the Executive Producer's Cut re-release was a huge mistake and totally ruined the film for me.
Everything Lucas touches turns to crap!
Stop raping my childhood!
   /Never actually saw the film.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120</id>
	<title>Really? What was the distribution on this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268216340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5). I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film. Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.</p><p>So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters ( I think it was like day 5 ) .
I distinctly remember the theater , the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour , and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater , but I do not remember this film .
Perhaps it was just too weird for me , but somehow I 'd think that it would 've been talked about amongst my friends and such.So was this included with all prints , or just selected theaters in selected cities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5).
I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film.
Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1268215500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds. Posting a question like:<p><div class="quote"><p>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.
<br> <br>
Secondly, with regards to:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...please see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonraker\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Moonraker</a> [wikipedia.org].
<br> <br>
Finally, you can turn in your geek card at the door on your way out. Thanks for playing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , this is slashdot , a website for nerds .
Posting a question like : What 's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway ?
...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung .
Secondly , with regards to : It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting ...please see Moonraker [ wikipedia.org ] .
Finally , you can turn in your geek card at the door on your way out .
Thanks for playing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds.
Posting a question like:What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?
...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.
Secondly, with regards to:It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting ...please see Moonraker [wikipedia.org].
Finally, you can turn in your geek card at the door on your way out.
Thanks for playing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430962</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1268215620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We don't really live like that, do we?</p></div><p>Welcome to the genre known as SciFi/Fantasy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... where you can escape from your gravity bound simple life and dream<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <br> <br>

Take your coat off and stay awhile, it's amazingly liberating when your imagination puts you in a rebel starfighter going up against insane odds trying to take down the big bad evil empire with the ability to wield a sabre of light while controlling the very concepts of physics<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or at least it did for me when I was a youth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't really live like that , do we ? Welcome to the genre known as SciFi/Fantasy ... where you can escape from your gravity bound simple life and dream .. . Take your coat off and stay awhile , it 's amazingly liberating when your imagination puts you in a rebel starfighter going up against insane odds trying to take down the big bad evil empire with the ability to wield a sabre of light while controlling the very concepts of physics ... or at least it did for me when I was a youth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't really live like that, do we?Welcome to the genre known as SciFi/Fantasy ... where you can escape from your gravity bound simple life and dream ...  

Take your coat off and stay awhile, it's amazingly liberating when your imagination puts you in a rebel starfighter going up against insane odds trying to take down the big bad evil empire with the ability to wield a sabre of light while controlling the very concepts of physics ... or at least it did for me when I was a youth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431966</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Internal Modem</author>
	<datestamp>1268220180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm dying to know....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm dying to know... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm dying to know....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31437156</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1268321460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wikipedia Brown, is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia Brown , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia Brown, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432282</id>
	<title>Ditto</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1268222160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw TESB first night (at midnight, thank you) in Southern Maine, and I don't recall anything about this 'short'.</p><p>And I was checking the room, and had to stay to the first reel.</p><p>So where indeed was 'Black Angel' shown? Not out in the woods, I can tell ya.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw TESB first night ( at midnight , thank you ) in Southern Maine , and I do n't recall anything about this 'short'.And I was checking the room , and had to stay to the first reel.So where indeed was 'Black Angel ' shown ?
Not out in the woods , I can tell ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw TESB first night (at midnight, thank you) in Southern Maine, and I don't recall anything about this 'short'.And I was checking the room, and had to stay to the first reel.So where indeed was 'Black Angel' shown?
Not out in the woods, I can tell ya.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431114</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1268216340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then</p></div></blockquote><p>
"at least then"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what?<br> <br>
Come on, why did you choke?  It was about half naked, sultry space women who need to be rescued and / or turned as a double agent.<br> <br>
Right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting , because at least then " at least then " ... what ? Come on , why did you choke ?
It was about half naked , sultry space women who need to be rescued and / or turned as a double agent .
Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then
"at least then" ... what? 
Come on, why did you choke?
It was about half naked, sultry space women who need to be rescued and / or turned as a double agent.
Right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431592</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>insufflate10mg</author>
	<datestamp>1268218440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sad that the editors of Slashdot had to claim it was a film that accompanied Empire Strikes Back when it was nothing even close to that. Crazy what they'll do for a few extra bucks in advertising views huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sad that the editors of Slashdot had to claim it was a film that accompanied Empire Strikes Back when it was nothing even close to that .
Crazy what they 'll do for a few extra bucks in advertising views huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sad that the editors of Slashdot had to claim it was a film that accompanied Empire Strikes Back when it was nothing even close to that.
Crazy what they'll do for a few extra bucks in advertising views huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434714</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268245080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would someone please just post a link to the torrent file already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would someone please just post a link to the torrent file already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would someone please just post a link to the torrent file already?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430960</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>wjousts</author>
	<datestamp>1268215620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>James Bond like movie in space setting</p></div><p>You mean Moonraker?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>James Bond like movie in space settingYou mean Moonraker ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>James Bond like movie in space settingYou mean Moonraker?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</id>
	<title>Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <strong>But do your other plans for the <em>Black Angel</em> story make you think twice about releasing it?</strong> </p><p>Do you know something? I'm wrestling with this. I was talking about it yesterday. I still get letters, still get emails, there are threads on the IMDB going on and on about it - people guessing the story and how much it affected their mindsbut I just wonder if I brought it out now, thirty years later</p><p> <strong>I haven't seen it in thirty years myself, but I wonder if its imitators have devalued it a little, the way seven years of <em>The X-Files</em> made <em>Silence Of The Lambs</em> look dated</strong> </p><p>Exactly.</p><p> <strong>It might look like a copy of the films and TV that it inspired, which have been in circulation ever since.</strong> </p></div><p>I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's <i>Yojimbo</i> and <i>Sanjuro</i> despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's <i>Dollars</i> Trilogy which <b>massively</b> borrows from them.  I'm certain you were able to appreciate <i>The Hidden Fortress</i> after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well.  So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate <i>Black Angel</i>?  <br> <br>

I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site.  Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?  <br> <br>

I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But do your other plans for the Black Angel story make you think twice about releasing it ?
Do you know something ?
I 'm wrestling with this .
I was talking about it yesterday .
I still get letters , still get emails , there are threads on the IMDB going on and on about it - people guessing the story and how much it affected their mindsbut I just wonder if I brought it out now , thirty years later I have n't seen it in thirty years myself , but I wonder if its imitators have devalued it a little , the way seven years of The X-Files made Silence Of The Lambs look dated Exactly .
It might look like a copy of the films and TV that it inspired , which have been in circulation ever since .
I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa 's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone 's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them .
I 'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well .
So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel ?
I mean , if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site .
Would n't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over ?
I mean , even if it 's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it 's just a reason for people to brag that they 've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it 's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why would n't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> But do your other plans for the Black Angel story make you think twice about releasing it?
Do you know something?
I'm wrestling with this.
I was talking about it yesterday.
I still get letters, still get emails, there are threads on the IMDB going on and on about it - people guessing the story and how much it affected their mindsbut I just wonder if I brought it out now, thirty years later I haven't seen it in thirty years myself, but I wonder if its imitators have devalued it a little, the way seven years of The X-Files made Silence Of The Lambs look dated Exactly.
It might look like a copy of the films and TV that it inspired, which have been in circulation ever since.
I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them.
I'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well.
So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel?
I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site.
Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?
I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431104</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>wjousts</author>
	<datestamp>1268216280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.</p></div><p>Rubbish. That's confirmation bias. I bet there are lots of people who had near death experiences that just shrugged it off and didn't change a thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.Rubbish .
That 's confirmation bias .
I bet there are lots of people who had near death experiences that just shrugged it off and did n't change a thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.Rubbish.
That's confirmation bias.
I bet there are lots of people who had near death experiences that just shrugged it off and didn't change a thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31435866</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1268304960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Had this guy died yesterday, this work would likely be gone forever.<br>
<a href="http://www.piratpartiet.se/international/english" title="piratpartiet.se">End the copyrigth madness NOW</a> [piratpartiet.se] !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had this guy died yesterday , this work would likely be gone forever .
End the copyrigth madness NOW [ piratpartiet.se ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had this guy died yesterday, this work would likely be gone forever.
End the copyrigth madness NOW [piratpartiet.se] !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</id>
	<title>Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>That is oddly similar to the car crash that Lucas experienced shortly before graduating high school in his Autobianchi Bianchina on June 12, 1962.  It was a bad wreck that I guess was highly improbable for him to survive.  He was going to be a mechanic and race cars until that accident.  He is also said to have conceived the idea for "the Force" as it would grow (by assimilation of aspects of some Eastern spiritual philosophies) into the "hokey religions and ancient weapons" of Star Wars.  Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.  <br> <br>

I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian 's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico ... That is oddly similar to the car crash that Lucas experienced shortly before graduating high school in his Autobianchi Bianchina on June 12 , 1962 .
It was a bad wreck that I guess was highly improbable for him to survive .
He was going to be a mechanic and race cars until that accident .
He is also said to have conceived the idea for " the Force " as it would grow ( by assimilation of aspects of some Eastern spiritual philosophies ) into the " hokey religions and ancient weapons " of Star Wars .
Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people .
I 'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico ... That is oddly similar to the car crash that Lucas experienced shortly before graduating high school in his Autobianchi Bianchina on June 12, 1962.
It was a bad wreck that I guess was highly improbable for him to survive.
He was going to be a mechanic and race cars until that accident.
He is also said to have conceived the idea for "the Force" as it would grow (by assimilation of aspects of some Eastern spiritual philosophies) into the "hokey religions and ancient weapons" of Star Wars.
Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.
I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432674</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1268224800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.</i></p><p>Moonraker had probably 4-5 times the budget of Barbarella, actually.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>But I know what you meant. Just wanted to snark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that does n't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.Moonraker had probably 4-5 times the budget of Barbarella , actually .
: ) But I know what you meant .
Just wanted to snark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.Moonraker had probably 4-5 times the budget of Barbarella, actually.
:)But I know what you meant.
Just wanted to snark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431356</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>codegen</author>
	<datestamp>1268217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...please see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonraker\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">Moonraker</a> [wikipedia.org]</p> </div><p>This lapse is actually probably understandable since most of us have tried to forget that
we ever watched that particular movie.

It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't
devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...please see Moonraker [ wikipedia.org ] This lapse is actually probably understandable since most of us have tried to forget that we ever watched that particular movie .
It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that does n't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...please see Moonraker [wikipedia.org] This lapse is actually probably understandable since most of us have tried to forget that
we ever watched that particular movie.
It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't
devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431860</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Internal Modem</author>
	<datestamp>1268219700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432640</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268224560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...please see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonraker\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Moonraker</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div></blockquote><p>...please don't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...please see Moonraker [ wikipedia.org ] ....please do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...please see Moonraker [wikipedia.org]....please don't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431140</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1268216460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tangential" title="reference.com">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tangential</a> [reference.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //dictionary.reference.com/browse/tangential [ reference.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tangential [reference.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080</id>
	<title>Digital Dark Age</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268216100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>In those days history was lost because of issues with physically duplicating things.  Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks.  Perhaps in twenty years we'll come to our senses and retroactively permit the breaking of today's encryption then - for what survived.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In those days history was lost because of issues with physically duplicating things .
Nowadays , it is being lost because we do n't own the keys to the digital locks .
Perhaps in twenty years we 'll come to our senses and retroactively permit the breaking of today 's encryption then - for what survived .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In those days history was lost because of issues with physically duplicating things.
Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks.
Perhaps in twenty years we'll come to our senses and retroactively permit the breaking of today's encryption then - for what survived.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431862</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>skam240</author>
	<datestamp>1268219760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway? Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space. </i></p><p>You seem to be mixing the Holy Roman Empire up with the Roman Empire as the Holy Roman Empire was most certainly not known for arenas and racing. As for the "and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.", I believe you're referring to the Jedi's being roughly equivalent to medieval knights in space. A more apt comparison would be with Arthurian legend as real knights, like those who were active in the Holy Roman Empire, don't have much in common with Star Wars Jedi aside from the sword play.</p><p><i>We don't really live like that, do we?</i></p><p>That's the whole point of fiction...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway ?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas , races and idea behind jedi 's with future living in space .
You seem to be mixing the Holy Roman Empire up with the Roman Empire as the Holy Roman Empire was most certainly not known for arenas and racing .
As for the " and idea behind jedi 's with future living in space .
" , I believe you 're referring to the Jedi 's being roughly equivalent to medieval knights in space .
A more apt comparison would be with Arthurian legend as real knights , like those who were active in the Holy Roman Empire , do n't have much in common with Star Wars Jedi aside from the sword play.We do n't really live like that , do we ? That 's the whole point of fiction.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.
You seem to be mixing the Holy Roman Empire up with the Roman Empire as the Holy Roman Empire was most certainly not known for arenas and racing.
As for the "and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.
", I believe you're referring to the Jedi's being roughly equivalent to medieval knights in space.
A more apt comparison would be with Arthurian legend as real knights, like those who were active in the Holy Roman Empire, don't have much in common with Star Wars Jedi aside from the sword play.We don't really live like that, do we?That's the whole point of fiction...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</id>
	<title>Star Wars</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1268215200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway? Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space. We don't really live like that, do we? I don't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either, it's more like soap opera in space. It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway ?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas , races and idea behind jedi 's with future living in space .
We do n't really live like that , do we ?
I do n't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either , it 's more like soap opera in space .
It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting , because at least then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.
We don't really live like that, do we?
I don't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either, it's more like soap opera in space.
It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431238</id>
	<title>Re:Really? What was the distribution on this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268217000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5). I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film. Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.<br>
<br>
So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?
</i> <br>
<br>
It sounds like you saw TESB at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uptown\_Theater\_(Washington,\_D.C.)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Uptown,</a> [wikipedia.org] which is a theater where a fair number of films have their DC premiere. Even if the Black Angel was shown on only a handful of screens, that's precisely the kind of theater where it would have been shown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters ( I think it was like day 5 ) .
I distinctly remember the theater , the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour , and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater , but I do not remember this film .
Perhaps it was just too weird for me , but somehow I 'd think that it would 've been talked about amongst my friends and such .
So was this included with all prints , or just selected theaters in selected cities ?
It sounds like you saw TESB at the Uptown , [ wikipedia.org ] which is a theater where a fair number of films have their DC premiere .
Even if the Black Angel was shown on only a handful of screens , that 's precisely the kind of theater where it would have been shown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5).
I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film.
Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.
So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?
It sounds like you saw TESB at the Uptown, [wikipedia.org] which is a theater where a fair number of films have their DC premiere.
Even if the Black Angel was shown on only a handful of screens, that's precisely the kind of theater where it would have been shown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431014</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268215800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway? Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space. We don't really live like that, do we? I don't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either, it's more like soap opera in space. It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then</p></div><p>At this point?  Nostalgia, mostly.  Keep in mind that when it came out, there was literally nothing else like it.</p><p>As for myself, I was born in '84, but the Star Wars trilogy was still the first time I ever saw a movie like that (5 years old...young enough to appreciate it, old enough to remember it).  Going back and watching it now, for myself, it's mostly nostalgia...they're really campy, and the special effects aren't aging well at this point (although watching the THX version (NOT the version with the CGI) helps alleviate some of the aging issues.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway ?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas , races and idea behind jedi 's with future living in space .
We do n't really live like that , do we ?
I do n't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either , it 's more like soap opera in space .
It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting , because at least thenAt this point ?
Nostalgia , mostly .
Keep in mind that when it came out , there was literally nothing else like it.As for myself , I was born in '84 , but the Star Wars trilogy was still the first time I ever saw a movie like that ( 5 years old...young enough to appreciate it , old enough to remember it ) .
Going back and watching it now , for myself , it 's mostly nostalgia...they 're really campy , and the special effects are n't aging well at this point ( although watching the THX version ( NOT the version with the CGI ) helps alleviate some of the aging issues .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?
Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.
We don't really live like that, do we?
I don't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either, it's more like soap opera in space.
It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least thenAt this point?
Nostalgia, mostly.
Keep in mind that when it came out, there was literally nothing else like it.As for myself, I was born in '84, but the Star Wars trilogy was still the first time I ever saw a movie like that (5 years old...young enough to appreciate it, old enough to remember it).
Going back and watching it now, for myself, it's mostly nostalgia...they're really campy, and the special effects aren't aging well at this point (although watching the THX version (NOT the version with the CGI) helps alleviate some of the aging issues.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432144</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>CowboyRobot</author>
	<datestamp>1268221260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.</p> </div><p>You will surely get hanged.
Alas, none of us here are, or ever will be, hung.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung .
You will surely get hanged .
Alas , none of us here are , or ever will be , hung .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.
You will surely get hanged.
Alas, none of us here are, or ever will be, hung.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431050</id>
	<title>Priming The Proletariat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> for another Star Wars film.</p><p>One word: marketing.</p><p>Yours In Astrakhan,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for another Star Wars film.One word : marketing.Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext> for another Star Wars film.One word: marketing.Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431802</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1268219400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a bunch of those cards from back then. I should dig them out of storage. I also have some Battlestar Galactica, Buck Rogers, Space 1999 and a lot of baseball and football cards from the 70's. Would be cool to show to my daughter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a bunch of those cards from back then .
I should dig them out of storage .
I also have some Battlestar Galactica , Buck Rogers , Space 1999 and a lot of baseball and football cards from the 70 's .
Would be cool to show to my daughter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a bunch of those cards from back then.
I should dig them out of storage.
I also have some Battlestar Galactica, Buck Rogers, Space 1999 and a lot of baseball and football cards from the 70's.
Would be cool to show to my daughter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430958</id>
	<title>Re:Star Wars</title>
	<author>DIplomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1268215620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting</p></div><p>My guess is you're pretty young because the 11th James Bond film was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonraker\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Moonraker</a> [wikipedia.org], which sent Bond into space.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space settingMy guess is you 're pretty young because the 11th James Bond film was Moonraker [ wikipedia.org ] , which sent Bond into space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space settingMy guess is you're pretty young because the 11th James Bond film was Moonraker [wikipedia.org], which sent Bond into space.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432274</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268222160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this modded funny??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this modded funny ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this modded funny?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432554</id>
	<title>Re:Digital Dark Age</title>
	<author>currently\_awake</author>
	<datestamp>1268223960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest that to obtain a copyright, you must submit a (non DRM encumbered) copy to a central government department.
And that department would be legally required to keep it forever.  And when the copyright ends you could legally download it, for free.
We've lost far too much already, and not just obscure stuff.  The entire Parry Mason book series is crumbling to dust as we speak, to be lost forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest that to obtain a copyright , you must submit a ( non DRM encumbered ) copy to a central government department .
And that department would be legally required to keep it forever .
And when the copyright ends you could legally download it , for free .
We 've lost far too much already , and not just obscure stuff .
The entire Parry Mason book series is crumbling to dust as we speak , to be lost forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest that to obtain a copyright, you must submit a (non DRM encumbered) copy to a central government department.
And that department would be legally required to keep it forever.
And when the copyright ends you could legally download it, for free.
We've lost far too much already, and not just obscure stuff.
The entire Parry Mason book series is crumbling to dust as we speak, to be lost forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434904</id>
	<title>Re:Digital Dark Age</title>
	<author>sixsixtysix</author>
	<datestamp>1268247600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks.</p></div><p>also, the stuff that wasn't deemed profitable enough or had too much ownership dispute to even put on dvd. stuff that will never see the [legal] light of day again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays , it is being lost because we do n't own the keys to the digital locks.also , the stuff that was n't deemed profitable enough or had too much ownership dispute to even put on dvd .
stuff that will never see the [ legal ] light of day again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks.also, the stuff that wasn't deemed profitable enough or had too much ownership dispute to even put on dvd.
stuff that will never see the [legal] light of day again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431046</id>
	<title>Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people</p></div></blockquote><p>Wouldn't that rather be proof that you cannot really expect the future and extrapolate linearly, rather anticipate change and dynamically cope with it in an opportunistic and action-based way? eg: doing things and seeing opportunity or following intuition and drive to get to a result you yourself never could've envisioned.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on peopleWould n't that rather be proof that you can not really expect the future and extrapolate linearly , rather anticipate change and dynamically cope with it in an opportunistic and action-based way ?
eg : doing things and seeing opportunity or following intuition and drive to get to a result you yourself never could 've envisioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on peopleWouldn't that rather be proof that you cannot really expect the future and extrapolate linearly, rather anticipate change and dynamically cope with it in an opportunistic and action-based way?
eg: doing things and seeing opportunity or following intuition and drive to get to a result you yourself never could've envisioned.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31437156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31438350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31435866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1923209_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31435866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31434904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31438350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431860
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431356
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31430954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433378
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31437156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31433352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31432282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1923209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1923209.31431088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
