<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_1711254</id>
	<title>Man Threatened Spam Attack In $200,000 Extortion Plot</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1268248620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>52-year-old Anthony Digati was arrested for trying to extort $200,000 from an insurance firm by threatening to <a href="http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpps/news/dpgonc-man-threatened-spam-attack-in-200K-extortion-of-ny-firm-fc-20100309\_6468337">spam them with six million emails unless they paid up</a>. Digati said he would use a spam service and his amazing talents as a "huge social networker" to drag the company "through the muddiest waters imaginable" and presumably unfriend everyone. He added that the price would increase to $3 million if they failed to pay up by Monday, according to federal authorities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>52-year-old Anthony Digati was arrested for trying to extort $ 200,000 from an insurance firm by threatening to spam them with six million emails unless they paid up .
Digati said he would use a spam service and his amazing talents as a " huge social networker " to drag the company " through the muddiest waters imaginable " and presumably unfriend everyone .
He added that the price would increase to $ 3 million if they failed to pay up by Monday , according to federal authorities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>52-year-old Anthony Digati was arrested for trying to extort $200,000 from an insurance firm by threatening to spam them with six million emails unless they paid up.
Digati said he would use a spam service and his amazing talents as a "huge social networker" to drag the company "through the muddiest waters imaginable" and presumably unfriend everyone.
He added that the price would increase to $3 million if they failed to pay up by Monday, according to federal authorities.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429720</id>
	<title>SF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268253060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The day I sent you 6 million spam mails was the most important day in your life. <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ButForMeItWasTuesday" title="tvtropes.org">But for me... it was Tuesday</a> [tvtropes.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The day I sent you 6 million spam mails was the most important day in your life .
But for me... it was Tuesday [ tvtropes.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day I sent you 6 million spam mails was the most important day in your life.
But for me... it was Tuesday [tvtropes.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31432300</id>
	<title>After reading . .</title>
	<author>G00F</author>
	<datestamp>1268222220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. He wasn't going to spam their email servers, he was going to spam the world to smear their name "drag your company name and reputation, through the muddiest waters imaginable".</p><p>2. Looks like he wanted a resolution to the problems he was having because he felt they where doing him wrong.  A little different than pure extortion. Basically a "You do me right, or I will tell the whole world of how your wrong me"</p><p>He started it would cost them millions to undo what he would do to the companies reputation and that he was very mad at them.  This may not be as clear cut a case as the summary makes it.</p><p>Now to be honest, I also read it here: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/" title="theregister.co.uk">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/</a> [theregister.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
He was n't going to spam their email servers , he was going to spam the world to smear their name " drag your company name and reputation , through the muddiest waters imaginable " .2 .
Looks like he wanted a resolution to the problems he was having because he felt they where doing him wrong .
A little different than pure extortion .
Basically a " You do me right , or I will tell the whole world of how your wrong me " He started it would cost them millions to undo what he would do to the companies reputation and that he was very mad at them .
This may not be as clear cut a case as the summary makes it.Now to be honest , I also read it here : http : //www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber \ _extortion \ _charges/ [ theregister.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
He wasn't going to spam their email servers, he was going to spam the world to smear their name "drag your company name and reputation, through the muddiest waters imaginable".2.
Looks like he wanted a resolution to the problems he was having because he felt they where doing him wrong.
A little different than pure extortion.
Basically a "You do me right, or I will tell the whole world of how your wrong me"He started it would cost them millions to undo what he would do to the companies reputation and that he was very mad at them.
This may not be as clear cut a case as the summary makes it.Now to be honest, I also read it here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/ [theregister.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429542</id>
	<title>amazing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268252280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>cops are actually taking action. i had a similar incident take place and the cops could not be bothered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>cops are actually taking action .
i had a similar incident take place and the cops could not be bothered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cops are actually taking action.
i had a similar incident take place and the cops could not be bothered.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430526</id>
	<title>Re:amazing.</title>
	<author>tronkel</author>
	<datestamp>1268213520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They misspelled his name. With his level of computer knowledge his name should be spelled Anthony Digitali.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They misspelled his name .
With his level of computer knowledge his name should be spelled Anthony Digitali .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They misspelled his name.
With his level of computer knowledge his name should be spelled Anthony Digitali.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31435996</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1268307600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just you wait as this news reaches 4chan...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just you wait as this news reaches 4chan.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just you wait as this news reaches 4chan...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430372</id>
	<title>Re:6 million spam messages?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1268212860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tuesday afternoon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tuesday afternoon .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tuesday afternoon.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430028</id>
	<title>Re:Target selection FAIL</title>
	<author>ookabooka</author>
	<datestamp>1268254380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the article <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/" title="theregister.co.uk">at the register</a> [theregister.co.uk]. He included his email addres and phone while talking about how evil and vindictive he is. He either didn't have the capacity to make rational decisions or never intended to succeed. Since he was also already in debt 1.2 mil and made his demand precisely 4x his life insurance premium that he was unhappy with I'm thinking it was a little of both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the article at the register [ theregister.co.uk ] .
He included his email addres and phone while talking about how evil and vindictive he is .
He either did n't have the capacity to make rational decisions or never intended to succeed .
Since he was also already in debt 1.2 mil and made his demand precisely 4x his life insurance premium that he was unhappy with I 'm thinking it was a little of both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the article at the register [theregister.co.uk].
He included his email addres and phone while talking about how evil and vindictive he is.
He either didn't have the capacity to make rational decisions or never intended to succeed.
Since he was also already in debt 1.2 mil and made his demand precisely 4x his life insurance premium that he was unhappy with I'm thinking it was a little of both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429926</id>
	<title>So I RTFA</title>
	<author>ookabooka</author>
	<datestamp>1268253900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, So I got a funny mod above, then I read the article. This guy is $1.2 mil in debt and was provoked by 'becoming "dissatisfied" with the performance of his own universal life insurance policy.' That's sad. But wait, theres more:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>""By the way," he added. "Yes, I am crazy. Yes, I am vindictive. Yes, I am extremely upset."</p><p>And to prove he wasn't joking, he allegedly included his personal phone number and email address. "</p></div><p>
&nbsp; <br>This man is obviously stressed out and possibly mentally ill. Still think he should go to jail though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , So I got a funny mod above , then I read the article .
This guy is $ 1.2 mil in debt and was provoked by 'becoming " dissatisfied " with the performance of his own universal life insurance policy .
' That 's sad .
But wait , theres more : " " By the way , " he added .
" Yes , I am crazy .
Yes , I am vindictive .
Yes , I am extremely upset .
" And to prove he was n't joking , he allegedly included his personal phone number and email address .
"   This man is obviously stressed out and possibly mentally ill. Still think he should go to jail though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, So I got a funny mod above, then I read the article.
This guy is $1.2 mil in debt and was provoked by 'becoming "dissatisfied" with the performance of his own universal life insurance policy.
' That's sad.
But wait, theres more:""By the way," he added.
"Yes, I am crazy.
Yes, I am vindictive.
Yes, I am extremely upset.
"And to prove he wasn't joking, he allegedly included his personal phone number and email address.
"
  This man is obviously stressed out and possibly mentally ill. Still think he should go to jail though.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086</id>
	<title>OMG!</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1268254620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The dude did manage to drag the company through slashdot - there is no water muddier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dude did manage to drag the company through slashdot - there is no water muddier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dude did manage to drag the company through slashdot - there is no water muddier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430534</id>
	<title>Extortion or Blackmail?</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268213520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA as opposed to TFS says <i>"threatening to smear it with a spam attack of six million emails"</i>. <p>If the "smear" consists of truthful but disparaging statements, it would fall within the bounds of free speech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA as opposed to TFS says " threatening to smear it with a spam attack of six million emails " .
If the " smear " consists of truthful but disparaging statements , it would fall within the bounds of free speech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA as opposed to TFS says "threatening to smear it with a spam attack of six million emails".
If the "smear" consists of truthful but disparaging statements, it would fall within the bounds of free speech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430876</id>
	<title>Re:we need a fancy new name for the digital mafia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RIAA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RIAA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RIAA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429556</id>
	<title>Hire him.</title>
	<author>ookabooka</author>
	<datestamp>1268252340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I were the company, I would have hired him for PR and marketing department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I were the company , I would have hired him for PR and marketing department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I were the company, I would have hired him for PR and marketing department.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430654</id>
	<title>Go to jail.</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1268214120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not pass Go.</p><p>Do not collect $200,000 dollars.</p><p>Asshat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not pass Go.Do not collect $ 200,000 dollars.Asshat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not pass Go.Do not collect $200,000 dollars.Asshat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431498</id>
	<title>Also approached by Mr. Digati...</title>
	<author>loren</author>
	<datestamp>1268218140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An unnamed representative from another firm contacted by Mr. Digati said later, "We would have turned him in ourselves, but his threat got caught in our spam filter."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An unnamed representative from another firm contacted by Mr. Digati said later , " We would have turned him in ourselves , but his threat got caught in our spam filter .
" ; - ) lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An unnamed representative from another firm contacted by Mr. Digati said later, "We would have turned him in ourselves, but his threat got caught in our spam filter.
" ;-) lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429546</id>
	<title>Mafia?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268252280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That's an awfully nice looking email server you've got there.  It'd be a shame if something happened to it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's an awfully nice looking email server you 've got there .
It 'd be a shame if something happened to it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's an awfully nice looking email server you've got there.
It'd be a shame if something happened to it.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430336</id>
	<title>Sorry Anthony....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268212740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry Anthony, but your scheme where a company pays you to not spam them advocates a

( ) technical ( ) legislative (X) market-based (X) vigilante

approach to preventing spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work.

(One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may
have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal
law was passed.)

( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
(X) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
(X) Users of email will not put up with it
( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
(X) The police will not put up with it
(X) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential
    employers
( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
(X) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

Specifically, your plan fails to account for

(X) Laws expressly prohibiting it
( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
( ) Open relays in foreign countries
( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
(X) Asshats
(X) Jurisdictional problems
( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
( ) Extreme profitability of spam
( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
( ) Technically illiterate politicians
(X) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
(X) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
( ) Outlook

and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
    been shown practical
(X) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
( ) Blacklists suck
( ) Whitelists suck
( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
(X) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
(X) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
( ) Sending email should be free
(X) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
(X) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
( ) I don't want the government reading my email
( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
(X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
(X) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your
    house down!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Anthony , but your scheme where a company pays you to not spam them advocates a ( ) technical ( ) legislative ( X ) market-based ( X ) vigilante approach to preventing spam .
Your idea will not work .
Here is why it wo n't work .
( One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea , and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed .
) ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks ( X ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we 'll be stuck with it ( X ) Users of email will not put up with it ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it ( X ) The police will not put up with it ( X ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once ( ) Many email users can not afford to lose business or alienate potential employers ( ) Spammers do n't care about invalid addresses in their lists ( X ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else 's career or business Specifically , your plan fails to account for ( X ) Laws expressly prohibiting it ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email ( ) Open relays in foreign countries ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses ( X ) Asshats ( X ) Jurisdictional problems ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches ( ) Extreme profitability of spam ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft ( ) Technically illiterate politicians ( X ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers ( X ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering ( ) Outlook and the following philosophical objections may also apply : ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with , yet none have ever been shown practical ( X ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation ( ) Blacklists suck ( ) Whitelists suck ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored ( X ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud ( X ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually ( ) Sending email should be free ( X ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers ?
( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses ( X ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome ( ) I do n't want the government reading my email ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough Furthermore , this is what I think about you : ( ) Sorry dude , but I do n't think it would work .
( X ) This is a stupid idea , and you 're a stupid person for suggesting it .
( X ) Nice try , assh0le !
I 'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Anthony, but your scheme where a company pays you to not spam them advocates a

( ) technical ( ) legislative (X) market-based (X) vigilante

approach to preventing spam.
Your idea will not work.
Here is why it won't work.
(One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may
have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal
law was passed.
)

( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
(X) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
(X) Users of email will not put up with it
( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
(X) The police will not put up with it
(X) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential
    employers
( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
(X) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

Specifically, your plan fails to account for

(X) Laws expressly prohibiting it
( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
( ) Open relays in foreign countries
( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
(X) Asshats
(X) Jurisdictional problems
( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
( ) Extreme profitability of spam
( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
( ) Technically illiterate politicians
(X) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
(X) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
( ) Outlook

and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
    been shown practical
(X) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
( ) Blacklists suck
( ) Whitelists suck
( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
(X) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
(X) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
( ) Sending email should be free
(X) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
(X) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
( ) I don't want the government reading my email
( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
(X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
(X) Nice try, assh0le!
I'm going to find out where you live and burn your
    house down!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429584</id>
	<title>How the worm has turned!!!</title>
	<author>retardpicnic</author>
	<datestamp>1268252520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a similar thing happen with CD of the month club. I dunno whats worse, paying them the money to quit hounding me about our "contract"... or owning a Nickleback CD.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a similar thing happen with CD of the month club .
I dunno whats worse , paying them the money to quit hounding me about our " contract " ... or owning a Nickleback CD.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a similar thing happen with CD of the month club.
I dunno whats worse, paying them the money to quit hounding me about our "contract"... or owning a Nickleback CD.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430258</id>
	<title>we need a fancy new name for the digital mafia</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1268212320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>something with italian roots, but connoting the digital</p><p>hmmm</p><p>how about the digati?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>something with italian roots , but connoting the digitalhmmmhow about the digati ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something with italian roots, but connoting the digitalhmmmhow about the digati?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430818</id>
	<title>Re:Sir Spam Alot</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1268214960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to push the pramalot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to push the pramalot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to push the pramalot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429560</id>
	<title>Sir Spam Alot</title>
	<author>c0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1268252340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We dine well here in Camelot, we eat ham and jam and spamalot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We dine well here in Camelot , we eat ham and jam and spamalot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We dine well here in Camelot, we eat ham and jam and spamalot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430192</id>
	<title>Cue Dr. Evil Pinky...</title>
	<author>hal2814</author>
	<datestamp>1268211900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dr. Evil: If you don't pay up we're going to send out...<br>[pinky to corner of mouth]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...6 MILLION emails.</p><p>Number Two: Don't you think we send out *more* than six million emails? Six million emails isn't exactly a lot of spam these days. Virtucon alone gets over 9 billion spam messages per day!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Evil : If you do n't pay up we 're going to send out... [ pinky to corner of mouth ] ...6 MILLION emails.Number Two : Do n't you think we send out * more * than six million emails ?
Six million emails is n't exactly a lot of spam these days .
Virtucon alone gets over 9 billion spam messages per day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Evil: If you don't pay up we're going to send out...[pinky to corner of mouth] ...6 MILLION emails.Number Two: Don't you think we send out *more* than six million emails?
Six million emails isn't exactly a lot of spam these days.
Virtucon alone gets over 9 billion spam messages per day!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624</id>
	<title>Target selection FAIL</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1268252700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Might want to avoid extortion targets who are very well experienced, staffed, and funded in risk analysis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might want to avoid extortion targets who are very well experienced , staffed , and funded in risk analysis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might want to avoid extortion targets who are very well experienced, staffed, and funded in risk analysis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430802</id>
	<title>Oh yeah, buster?</title>
	<author>peacefinder</author>
	<datestamp>1268214900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now the price has gone up to TEN million!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now the price has gone up to TEN million !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now the price has gone up to TEN million!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429686</id>
	<title>Better article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268252940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a Register link to avoid the slimy popups on the linked Fox news site:</p><p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/" title="theregister.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/</a> [theregister.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a Register link to avoid the slimy popups on the linked Fox news site : http : //www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber \ _extortion \ _charges/ [ theregister.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a Register link to avoid the slimy popups on the linked Fox news site:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/08/cyber\_extortion\_charges/ [theregister.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31437544</id>
	<title>Re:What nobody says about this article...</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1268323620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did the insurance company screw him out of his life insurance policy? He hasn't died yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did the insurance company screw him out of his life insurance policy ?
He has n't died yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did the insurance company screw him out of his life insurance policy?
He hasn't died yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429908</id>
	<title>Re:Target selection FAIL</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1268253780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some plans are so foolish that it makes you wonder if there's actual brain damage involved.  For one thing, even if his original plan worked, he'd still be a million in the hole and two, there's no way to hide something like that from the authorities for any amount of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some plans are so foolish that it makes you wonder if there 's actual brain damage involved .
For one thing , even if his original plan worked , he 'd still be a million in the hole and two , there 's no way to hide something like that from the authorities for any amount of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some plans are so foolish that it makes you wonder if there's actual brain damage involved.
For one thing, even if his original plan worked, he'd still be a million in the hole and two, there's no way to hide something like that from the authorities for any amount of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431404</id>
	<title>Spambot had a dead man's trigger</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268217720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FUUUUUUCK!</htmltext>
<tokenext>FUUUUUUCK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FUUUUUUCK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429554</id>
	<title>Fucking Nerds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268252280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>when will you fucking nerds ever learn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>when will you fucking nerds ever learn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when will you fucking nerds ever learn?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31432334</id>
	<title>Camelot vs. Python</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268222340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was meant to be posted humorously. Here comes the Karma crusade, or that was another movie.  I need to brush up on my python skills, an thus leave camelot (perl that is).</p><p>Is python more powerful than Perl?  Why learn Python?  Is it much more powerful?  Where is it weaker?  Where is it stronger?  I liked the twisted python library, but thats pretty much it. Seems like a simple tcl with lisp like dynamic features and lambdas all over the place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was meant to be posted humorously .
Here comes the Karma crusade , or that was another movie .
I need to brush up on my python skills , an thus leave camelot ( perl that is ) .Is python more powerful than Perl ?
Why learn Python ?
Is it much more powerful ?
Where is it weaker ?
Where is it stronger ?
I liked the twisted python library , but thats pretty much it .
Seems like a simple tcl with lisp like dynamic features and lambdas all over the place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was meant to be posted humorously.
Here comes the Karma crusade, or that was another movie.
I need to brush up on my python skills, an thus leave camelot (perl that is).Is python more powerful than Perl?
Why learn Python?
Is it much more powerful?
Where is it weaker?
Where is it stronger?
I liked the twisted python library, but thats pretty much it.
Seems like a simple tcl with lisp like dynamic features and lambdas all over the place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431758</id>
	<title>Re:What nobody says about this article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268219160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That the insurance company is taking advantage of the guy's anger and weak extortion attempt to screw him over goes without saying.  Pretty much all insurance companies are screwing all of us over every chance they get.  It's common knowledge.  It's also common knowledge that insurance companies buy laws, and that that's why various kinds of insurance are mandatory in some places.  If McDonalds had the kind of money to spend on laws that insurance companies do, every man, woman and child in the U.S. would be required by law to buy two quarter-pounders with cheese a week.  Very few of us are dumb enough to ask for $200K to not go ahead and buy a domain name and post a few facts about a slimeball insurance company though - we'd just go ahead and do it and not bother with the stupid extortion thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That the insurance company is taking advantage of the guy 's anger and weak extortion attempt to screw him over goes without saying .
Pretty much all insurance companies are screwing all of us over every chance they get .
It 's common knowledge .
It 's also common knowledge that insurance companies buy laws , and that that 's why various kinds of insurance are mandatory in some places .
If McDonalds had the kind of money to spend on laws that insurance companies do , every man , woman and child in the U.S. would be required by law to buy two quarter-pounders with cheese a week .
Very few of us are dumb enough to ask for $ 200K to not go ahead and buy a domain name and post a few facts about a slimeball insurance company though - we 'd just go ahead and do it and not bother with the stupid extortion thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the insurance company is taking advantage of the guy's anger and weak extortion attempt to screw him over goes without saying.
Pretty much all insurance companies are screwing all of us over every chance they get.
It's common knowledge.
It's also common knowledge that insurance companies buy laws, and that that's why various kinds of insurance are mandatory in some places.
If McDonalds had the kind of money to spend on laws that insurance companies do, every man, woman and child in the U.S. would be required by law to buy two quarter-pounders with cheese a week.
Very few of us are dumb enough to ask for $200K to not go ahead and buy a domain name and post a few facts about a slimeball insurance company though - we'd just go ahead and do it and not bother with the stupid extortion thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31433246</id>
	<title>link to actual rant</title>
	<author>cowtamer</author>
	<datestamp>1268229240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As crazy as it sounds, this seems like more of an angry rant than an extortion request:</p><p><a href="http://pastebin.com/DiBd9kAL" title="pastebin.com">http://pastebin.com/DiBd9kAL</a> [pastebin.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As crazy as it sounds , this seems like more of an angry rant than an extortion request : http : //pastebin.com/DiBd9kAL [ pastebin.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As crazy as it sounds, this seems like more of an angry rant than an extortion request:http://pastebin.com/DiBd9kAL [pastebin.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31434086</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1268237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait until my friends at Hello Kitty Online hear about this, you insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until my friends at Hello Kitty Online hear about this , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until my friends at Hello Kitty Online hear about this, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552</id>
	<title>6 million spam messages?</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1268252280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also known as Tuesday.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also known as Tuesday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also known as Tuesday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412</id>
	<title>What nobody says about this article...</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1268217780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that the insurance company really did owe him, and we're trying to screw him over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that the insurance company really did owe him , and we 're trying to screw him over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that the insurance company really did owe him, and we're trying to screw him over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31435996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31434086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1711254_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31437544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31437544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31431758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31432300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31434086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31435996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1711254.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31429560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1711254.31430818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
