<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_1532203</id>
	<title>Farewell To the South Pole Dome</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268239740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Julie188 writes <i>"After more than three decades of service to researchers and staff stationed at the bottom of the world, the <a href="http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/dome-away-home.html">dome at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station was deconstructed</a> this austral summer. Designed and constructed by the Seabees &mdash; the construction battalions of the US Navy &mdash; in the early 1970s, the dome's geodesic design provided a unique solution to the challenges posed to engineers trying to build structures at the South Pole. The dome is being returned to southern California where it will be held in storage. It could possibly be trotted out as an exhibit in a new US Navy Seabees museum."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Julie188 writes " After more than three decades of service to researchers and staff stationed at the bottom of the world , the dome at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station was deconstructed this austral summer .
Designed and constructed by the Seabees    the construction battalions of the US Navy    in the early 1970s , the dome 's geodesic design provided a unique solution to the challenges posed to engineers trying to build structures at the South Pole .
The dome is being returned to southern California where it will be held in storage .
It could possibly be trotted out as an exhibit in a new US Navy Seabees museum .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Julie188 writes "After more than three decades of service to researchers and staff stationed at the bottom of the world, the dome at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station was deconstructed this austral summer.
Designed and constructed by the Seabees — the construction battalions of the US Navy — in the early 1970s, the dome's geodesic design provided a unique solution to the challenges posed to engineers trying to build structures at the South Pole.
The dome is being returned to southern California where it will be held in storage.
It could possibly be trotted out as an exhibit in a new US Navy Seabees museum.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428142</id>
	<title>Re:Ice Worms!</title>
	<author>Syberz</author>
	<datestamp>1268245560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong pole chief, that episode was in Alaska which is closer to the North Pole than the South pole mentioned in the story.</p><p>Nice try to fit in a pop culture reference though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong pole chief , that episode was in Alaska which is closer to the North Pole than the South pole mentioned in the story.Nice try to fit in a pop culture reference though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong pole chief, that episode was in Alaska which is closer to the North Pole than the South pole mentioned in the story.Nice try to fit in a pop culture reference though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428992</id>
	<title>There's No Place Like Dome</title>
	<author>wa2flq</author>
	<datestamp>1268249640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and soon no Dome either.</p><p>No Ruby (or Silver) Slippers required.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and soon no Dome either.No Ruby ( or Silver ) Slippers required .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and soon no Dome either.No Ruby (or Silver) Slippers required.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431200</id>
	<title>South Pole Crew</title>
	<author>ArtificialPulse</author>
	<datestamp>1268216760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm one of the 47 down here for the 2010 Winter season, the crew is missing the Dome. It was an icon in Antarctica, and this place feels like it's missing something without it. Someone pointed earlier to Spindler's website <a href="http://www.southpolestation.com/" title="southpolestation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.southpolesation.com/</a> [southpolestation.com] where there is much more on the deconstruction from the unofficial South Pole historian.
--
<a href="http://www.artificialpulse.com/" title="artificialpulse.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.artificialpulse.com/</a> [artificialpulse.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm one of the 47 down here for the 2010 Winter season , the crew is missing the Dome .
It was an icon in Antarctica , and this place feels like it 's missing something without it .
Someone pointed earlier to Spindler 's website http : //www.southpolesation.com/ [ southpolestation.com ] where there is much more on the deconstruction from the unofficial South Pole historian .
-- http : //www.artificialpulse.com/ [ artificialpulse.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm one of the 47 down here for the 2010 Winter season, the crew is missing the Dome.
It was an icon in Antarctica, and this place feels like it's missing something without it.
Someone pointed earlier to Spindler's website http://www.southpolesation.com/ [southpolestation.com] where there is much more on the deconstruction from the unofficial South Pole historian.
--
http://www.artificialpulse.com/ [artificialpulse.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427822</id>
	<title>Ice Worms!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Got to watch out for ice worms too. They crawl in your ear and make your CRAZY! (X-Files S01E08)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got to watch out for ice worms too .
They crawl in your ear and make your CRAZY !
( X-Files S01E08 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Got to watch out for ice worms too.
They crawl in your ear and make your CRAZY!
(X-Files S01E08)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427784</id>
	<title>Dogs?</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268243760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just watch for any large dogs coming along with the building.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just watch for any large dogs coming along with the building .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just watch for any large dogs coming along with the building.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428810</id>
	<title>And Here is Why</title>
	<author>Lifyre</author>
	<datestamp>1268248800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because TFS couldn't be bothered to give a hint as to why I will...</p><p>"The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there, however, and each year the structure sunk deeper into the ice it was built on. Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away, burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer. The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible, necessitating the dome's deconstruction and removal."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because TFS could n't be bothered to give a hint as to why I will... " The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there , however , and each year the structure sunk deeper into the ice it was built on .
Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away , burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer .
The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible , necessitating the dome 's deconstruction and removal .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because TFS couldn't be bothered to give a hint as to why I will..."The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there, however, and each year the structure sunk deeper into the ice it was built on.
Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away, burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer.
The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible, necessitating the dome's deconstruction and removal.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428198</id>
	<title>nopics with noscript</title>
	<author>anagama</author>
	<datestamp>1268245860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be awfully nice if submitters would include links to sites with pictures where you don't have enable 50 scripts just to see a jpeg.  For example, linking to wikipedia is a no brainer that would save a million keystrokes:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott\_South\_Pole\_Station" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott\_South\_Pole\_Station</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be awfully nice if submitters would include links to sites with pictures where you do n't have enable 50 scripts just to see a jpeg .
For example , linking to wikipedia is a no brainer that would save a million keystrokes : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott \ _South \ _Pole \ _Station [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be awfully nice if submitters would include links to sites with pictures where you don't have enable 50 scripts just to see a jpeg.
For example, linking to wikipedia is a no brainer that would save a million keystrokes:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott\_South\_Pole\_Station [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428558</id>
	<title>Re:Pictures and more info</title>
	<author>jittles</author>
	<datestamp>1268247540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For anyone interested <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/special\_reports/livingsouthpole/intro.jsp" title="nsf.gov">here</a> [nsf.gov] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility.</p></div><p>I don't know about you but I really think they should change their URL to nsfw.gov</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For anyone interested here [ nsf.gov ] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility.I do n't know about you but I really think they should change their URL to nsfw.gov</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For anyone interested here [nsf.gov] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility.I don't know about you but I really think they should change their URL to nsfw.gov
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431222</id>
	<title>They finally ended the embarassment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268216880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geodesic dome design died out around the same time hippie communes did. They were looking for a new building that didn't scream "Hey man, check out my groovy new bell-bottoms!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geodesic dome design died out around the same time hippie communes did .
They were looking for a new building that did n't scream " Hey man , check out my groovy new bell-bottoms !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geodesic dome design died out around the same time hippie communes did.
They were looking for a new building that didn't scream "Hey man, check out my groovy new bell-bottoms!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430354</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268212800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont bring up facts when dealing with right-wingers - it only confuses them and they start lashing out in frustration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont bring up facts when dealing with right-wingers - it only confuses them and they start lashing out in frustration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont bring up facts when dealing with right-wingers - it only confuses them and they start lashing out in frustration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428048</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>quantumplacet</author>
	<datestamp>1268245080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, you may be wrong.</p><p>Deconstruct:<br>tr.v.   deconstructed, deconstructing, deconstructs</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1.  To break down into components; dismantle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , you may be wrong.Deconstruct : tr.v .
deconstructed , deconstructing , deconstructs       1 .
To break down into components ; dismantle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, you may be wrong.Deconstruct:tr.v.
deconstructed, deconstructing, deconstructs
      1.
To break down into components; dismantle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431958</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>DesScorp</author>
	<datestamp>1268220180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then both the Bush and Obama administrations are guilty of stupidity on this one. Loran was relatively cheap, and what do you do if ASAT's from a hostile power start taking out GPS satellites? You're basically back to pre-1940's navigation methods. Hope your pilots are up on their starlight navigation skills. Hope your mariners haven't tossed their sextants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then both the Bush and Obama administrations are guilty of stupidity on this one .
Loran was relatively cheap , and what do you do if ASAT 's from a hostile power start taking out GPS satellites ?
You 're basically back to pre-1940 's navigation methods .
Hope your pilots are up on their starlight navigation skills .
Hope your mariners have n't tossed their sextants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then both the Bush and Obama administrations are guilty of stupidity on this one.
Loran was relatively cheap, and what do you do if ASAT's from a hostile power start taking out GPS satellites?
You're basically back to pre-1940's navigation methods.
Hope your pilots are up on their starlight navigation skills.
Hope your mariners haven't tossed their sextants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268248380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hey, this administration dismantled LORAN-C, the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....</p></div><p>President Obama is influential, but he isn't capable of time travel. President Bush scheduled the dismantling, President Obama continued that recommendation. Both the Coast Guard and the DHS said they didn't need LORAN-C, so why maintain it? It smells like pork.</p><p>This dismantling was already scheduled by the previous administration, according to the <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military\_law/4343983.html" title="popularmechanics.com">FA</a> [popularmechanics.com].</p><p><i><br>The Department of Homeland Security last year started a painful upgrade to LORAN-C, adding modern electronics and solid-state transmitters, despite the fact that in 2008 President George W. Bush signed a law that scheduled the system's dissolution.<br></i></p><p><a href="http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm" title="uscg.gov">http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm</a> [uscg.gov]</p><p>The DHS and Coast Guard both said they didn't need LORAN-C. From <a href="http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm" title="uscg.gov">http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm</a> [uscg.gov] :</p><p><i>The Homeland Security Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 allowed for termination of the LORAN-C signal on January 4, 2010, after certification from the Commandant of the Coast Guard that it was not needed for maritime navigation and from the Secretary of DHS that it is not needed as a backup for GPS.</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , this administration dismantled LORAN-C , the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....President Obama is influential , but he is n't capable of time travel .
President Bush scheduled the dismantling , President Obama continued that recommendation .
Both the Coast Guard and the DHS said they did n't need LORAN-C , so why maintain it ?
It smells like pork.This dismantling was already scheduled by the previous administration , according to the FA [ popularmechanics.com ] .The Department of Homeland Security last year started a painful upgrade to LORAN-C , adding modern electronics and solid-state transmitters , despite the fact that in 2008 President George W. Bush signed a law that scheduled the system 's dissolution.http : //www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm [ uscg.gov ] The DHS and Coast Guard both said they did n't need LORAN-C. From http : //www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm [ uscg.gov ] : The Homeland Security Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 allowed for termination of the LORAN-C signal on January 4 , 2010 , after certification from the Commandant of the Coast Guard that it was not needed for maritime navigation and from the Secretary of DHS that it is not needed as a backup for GPS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, this administration dismantled LORAN-C, the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....President Obama is influential, but he isn't capable of time travel.
President Bush scheduled the dismantling, President Obama continued that recommendation.
Both the Coast Guard and the DHS said they didn't need LORAN-C, so why maintain it?
It smells like pork.This dismantling was already scheduled by the previous administration, according to the FA [popularmechanics.com].The Department of Homeland Security last year started a painful upgrade to LORAN-C, adding modern electronics and solid-state transmitters, despite the fact that in 2008 President George W. Bush signed a law that scheduled the system's dissolution.http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm [uscg.gov]The DHS and Coast Guard both said they didn't need LORAN-C. From http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/Loran/default.htm [uscg.gov] :The Homeland Security Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 allowed for termination of the LORAN-C signal on January 4, 2010, after certification from the Commandant of the Coast Guard that it was not needed for maritime navigation and from the Secretary of DHS that it is not needed as a backup for GPS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427774</id>
	<title>Re:Bad idea.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the thing, it's John Wayne:</p><p><i>John Wayne's not dead - he's frozen! And when we find a cure for cancer, we're gonna thaw out the Duke and he's gonna be pretty pissed off. You know why? You ever taken a cold shower? Well, multiply that by 15 million times. That's how pissed off the Duke's gonna be.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the thing , it 's John Wayne : John Wayne 's not dead - he 's frozen !
And when we find a cure for cancer , we 're gon na thaw out the Duke and he 's gon na be pretty pissed off .
You know why ?
You ever taken a cold shower ?
Well , multiply that by 15 million times .
That 's how pissed off the Duke 's gon na be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the thing, it's John Wayne:John Wayne's not dead - he's frozen!
And when we find a cure for cancer, we're gonna thaw out the Duke and he's gonna be pretty pissed off.
You know why?
You ever taken a cold shower?
Well, multiply that by 15 million times.
That's how pissed off the Duke's gonna be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427782</id>
	<title>So the chair is no longer there.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the chair is no longer there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the chair is no longer there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the chair is no longer there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427750</id>
	<title>Perhaps they could make some money off it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lease it to Steve Ballmer to be used as a hat to cover that giant head of his.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lease it to Steve Ballmer to be used as a hat to cover that giant head of his .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lease it to Steve Ballmer to be used as a hat to cover that giant head of his.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, this administration dismantled LORAN-C, the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....I expect no better from them.  http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military\_law/4343983.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , this administration dismantled LORAN-C , the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....I expect no better from them .
http : //www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military \ _law/4343983.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, this administration dismantled LORAN-C, the backup system in case of GPS satellite spoofing or jamming.....I expect no better from them.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military\_law/4343983.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</id>
	<title>Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>wcrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1268244540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think that word means what you think it means.</p><p>"Dismantled" would be a better choice.</p><p>Of course I may be wrong.  Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that word means what you think it means .
" Dismantled " would be a better choice.Of course I may be wrong .
Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome 's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that word means what you think it means.
"Dismantled" would be a better choice.Of course I may be wrong.
Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428512</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1268247420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why are they removing it? It seems odd that they would remove one of the few structures on the continent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are they removing it ?
It seems odd that they would remove one of the few structures on the continent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are they removing it?
It seems odd that they would remove one of the few structures on the continent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428110</id>
	<title>Re:Pictures and more info</title>
	<author>polar red</author>
	<datestamp>1268245320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>here's another station:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess\_Elisabeth\_Base" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess\_Elisabeth\_Base</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://www.antarcticstation.org/" title="antarcticstation.org">http://www.antarcticstation.org/</a> [antarcticstation.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>here 's another station : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess \ _Elisabeth \ _Base [ wikipedia.org ] http : //www.antarcticstation.org/ [ antarcticstation.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here's another station:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess\_Elisabeth\_Base [wikipedia.org]http://www.antarcticstation.org/ [antarcticstation.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428184</id>
	<title>Re:Better?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1268245800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Dismantled" would be a better choice.</p></div><p>I think "Superior" would be a superior choice.</p><p>It's not hard to suggest Synonyms and sound pompous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Dismantled " would be a better choice.I think " Superior " would be a superior choice.It 's not hard to suggest Synonyms and sound pompous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Dismantled" would be a better choice.I think "Superior" would be a superior choice.It's not hard to suggest Synonyms and sound pompous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427852</id>
	<title>no great justice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268244060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how will we ever find the second stargate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how will we ever find the second stargate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how will we ever find the second stargate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428554</id>
	<title>Re:Pictures and more info</title>
	<author>atomic-penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1268247540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://southpolestation.com/0910/10photos2.html" title="southpolestation.com">Here</a> [southpolestation.com] are deconstruction photos of the former dome station.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ southpolestation.com ] are deconstruction photos of the former dome station .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [southpolestation.com] are deconstruction photos of the former dome station.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428096</id>
	<title>Re:Bad idea.</title>
	<author>Count Fenring</author>
	<datestamp>1268245260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or The Blob?  I mean, we don't have Steve McQueen and his pal, officer Dave this time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or The Blob ?
I mean , we do n't have Steve McQueen and his pal , officer Dave this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or The Blob?
I mean, we don't have Steve McQueen and his pal, officer Dave this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428524</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let the engineers handle this one, fancy lad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let the engineers handle this one , fancy lad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let the engineers handle this one, fancy lad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432734</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1268225280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The DHS and Coast Guard both said they didn't need LORAN-C</p></div><p>They still haven't identified the backup for GPS, though. The best reason to do away with it that I can think of, though, is that it was designed for civilian use and yet practically no civilians use it. Consequently almost nobody has a receiver.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The DHS and Coast Guard both said they did n't need LORAN-CThey still have n't identified the backup for GPS , though .
The best reason to do away with it that I can think of , though , is that it was designed for civilian use and yet practically no civilians use it .
Consequently almost nobody has a receiver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The DHS and Coast Guard both said they didn't need LORAN-CThey still haven't identified the backup for GPS, though.
The best reason to do away with it that I can think of, though, is that it was designed for civilian use and yet practically no civilians use it.
Consequently almost nobody has a receiver.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428898</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed? Reason from TFA</title>
	<author>thms</author>
	<datestamp>1268249220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the fine article:<p><div class="quote"><p>The dome could <b>no longer accommodate the demands</b> of research activities taking place there, however, and <b>each year</b>  the structure <b>sunk deeper</b>  into the ice it was built on. Blowing <b>snow</b> that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away, <b>burning up precious fuel</b> and crew time during the short austral summer. The <b>international treaty</b> that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be <b>removed</b> and the site remediated whenever possible, necessitating the dome's deconstruction and removal.</p></div><p>I can understand the last two points (snow covering it, and no littering in Antarctica), but did the structure stay there for 30 years and only <i>now</i> the sinking into the snow becomes a problem? Given the panels are so light, they could have dis- and reassembled them when needed. Maybe made up to soften the accountants sharp pencil of "too expensive!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the fine article : The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there , however , and each year the structure sunk deeper into the ice it was built on .
Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away , burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer .
The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible , necessitating the dome 's deconstruction and removal.I can understand the last two points ( snow covering it , and no littering in Antarctica ) , but did the structure stay there for 30 years and only now the sinking into the snow becomes a problem ?
Given the panels are so light , they could have dis- and reassembled them when needed .
Maybe made up to soften the accountants sharp pencil of " too expensive !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the fine article:The dome could no longer accommodate the demands of research activities taking place there, however, and each year  the structure sunk deeper  into the ice it was built on.
Blowing snow that collected on top of it had to be removed and hauled away, burning up precious fuel and crew time during the short austral summer.
The international treaty that governs human activities in Antarctica requires that buildings and equipment no longer in use be removed and the site remediated whenever possible, necessitating the dome's deconstruction and removal.I can understand the last two points (snow covering it, and no littering in Antarctica), but did the structure stay there for 30 years and only now the sinking into the snow becomes a problem?
Given the panels are so light, they could have dis- and reassembled them when needed.
Maybe made up to soften the accountants sharp pencil of "too expensive!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31435372</id>
	<title>You Insensitive Clods</title>
	<author>mdm42</author>
	<datestamp>1268341020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's with calling it "the bottom of the world"? In space there is no "up".
<p>
<i>Arrogant Southist assholes</i>. Allow me to refer you to a more correct <a href="http://flourish.org/upsidedownmap/upsidedownmap.jpg" title="flourish.org">map of the planet</a> [flourish.org] (though I'd still prefer to see an equal-area projection used instead of Mercator's abomination.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with calling it " the bottom of the world " ?
In space there is no " up " .
Arrogant Southist assholes .
Allow me to refer you to a more correct map of the planet [ flourish.org ] ( though I 'd still prefer to see an equal-area projection used instead of Mercator 's abomination .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with calling it "the bottom of the world"?
In space there is no "up".
Arrogant Southist assholes.
Allow me to refer you to a more correct map of the planet [flourish.org] (though I'd still prefer to see an equal-area projection used instead of Mercator's abomination.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430432</id>
	<title>one more SF southpole station</title>
	<author>spectrokid</author>
	<datestamp>1268213100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not as big, but quite good looking: <a href="http://www.antarcticstation.org/?lg=en" title="antarcticstation.org">Belgian - Princess <em>Elisabeth</em> station</a> [antarcticstation.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not as big , but quite good looking : Belgian - Princess Elisabeth station [ antarcticstation.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not as big, but quite good looking: Belgian - Princess Elisabeth station [antarcticstation.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840</id>
	<title>Pictures and more info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268244000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For anyone interested <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/special\_reports/livingsouthpole/intro.jsp" title="nsf.gov">here</a> [nsf.gov] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility.  Pretty cool (pardon the pun).</htmltext>
<tokenext>For anyone interested here [ nsf.gov ] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility .
Pretty cool ( pardon the pun ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For anyone interested here [nsf.gov] is the link on the NSF page showing the old site and the new facility.
Pretty cool (pardon the pun).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427976</id>
	<title>Re:Bad idea.</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268244720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They might also be Krynoids.  Very dangerous, and they always travel in pairs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They might also be Krynoids .
Very dangerous , and they always travel in pairs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They might also be Krynoids.
Very dangerous, and they always travel in pairs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428654</id>
	<title>Global Warming Sparks South Pole Evacuation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268248080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets see if we can sensationalize this one a bit, shall we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets see if we can sensationalize this one a bit , shall we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets see if we can sensationalize this one a bit, shall we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766</id>
	<title>Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>GiveBenADollar</author>
	<datestamp>1268243700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Guess they are also getting rid of the F-302s at McMurdo. Homeworld security must not be important to the current administration.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess they are also getting rid of the F-302s at McMurdo .
Homeworld security must not be important to the current administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess they are also getting rid of the F-302s at McMurdo.
Homeworld security must not be important to the current administration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31434488</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>sonicmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1268241840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you spend your entire life afraid you'll be attacked by a "hostile power"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you spend your entire life afraid you 'll be attacked by a " hostile power " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you spend your entire life afraid you'll be attacked by a "hostile power"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428070</id>
	<title>Sea bees? Is there a toolkit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268245140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, the Sea-bees? You don't suppose there's an old set of mechanic's tools left behind in there, do yah? I really to catch this boat tomorrow, and all I have is this weird book about the "means of production" which won't tell me squat about producin' some tools!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , the Sea-bees ?
You do n't suppose there 's an old set of mechanic 's tools left behind in there , do yah ?
I really to catch this boat tomorrow , and all I have is this weird book about the " means of production " which wo n't tell me squat about producin ' some tools !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, the Sea-bees?
You don't suppose there's an old set of mechanic's tools left behind in there, do yah?
I really to catch this boat tomorrow, and all I have is this weird book about the "means of production" which won't tell me squat about producin' some tools!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432904</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1268226660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A good replacement term for "deconstructed" would be "destroyed", as in "suffered destruction".<p>Muahahaha!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good replacement term for " deconstructed " would be " destroyed " , as in " suffered destruction " .Muahahaha !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good replacement term for "deconstructed" would be "destroyed", as in "suffered destruction".Muahahaha!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428800</id>
	<title>The new building is really nice</title>
	<author>frog\_strat</author>
	<datestamp>1268248740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live down the street, and the new building is much nicer. Parking is a pain, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live down the street , and the new building is much nicer .
Parking is a pain , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live down the street, and the new building is much nicer.
Parking is a pain, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430314</id>
	<title>Re:Deconstructed?</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1268212560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design.</p><p>No, no. Its not the design, man, its like the "idea" that "man" can "own" property and "things" in the south pole.</p><p>*hits bong*</p><p>Yeah.... its like the penguins are the indians and we are General Custer.</p><p>*hits bong*</p><p>Err...what were we talking about? Custard? Yeah, I'd like some custard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome 's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design.No , no .
Its not the design , man , its like the " idea " that " man " can " own " property and " things " in the south pole .
* hits bong * Yeah.... its like the penguins are the indians and we are General Custer .
* hits bong * Err...what were we talking about ?
Custard ? Yeah , I 'd like some custard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Perhaps the Seabees really have been standing around considering the the dome's true meaning and searching for inconsistencies in its design.No, no.
Its not the design, man, its like the "idea" that "man" can "own" property and "things" in the south pole.
*hits bong*Yeah.... its like the penguins are the indians and we are General Custer.
*hits bong*Err...what were we talking about?
Custard? Yeah, I'd like some custard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430040</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268254440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I spent a year there, and I never went if the freakin' thing.  Closest I got to it was on the official decommissioning photo, when Dog pulled the American flag down and we all posed in front of the sign.</p><p>Watching The Penguin try to get off the side of the Dome without falling was the funniest part.</p><p>Old Pole is cooler (pun intended) than Old Dome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I spent a year there , and I never went if the freakin ' thing .
Closest I got to it was on the official decommissioning photo , when Dog pulled the American flag down and we all posed in front of the sign.Watching The Penguin try to get off the side of the Dome without falling was the funniest part.Old Pole is cooler ( pun intended ) than Old Dome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I spent a year there, and I never went if the freakin' thing.
Closest I got to it was on the official decommissioning photo, when Dog pulled the American flag down and we all posed in front of the sign.Watching The Penguin try to get off the side of the Dome without falling was the funniest part.Old Pole is cooler (pun intended) than Old Dome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432106</id>
	<title>Re:nopics with noscript</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1268221020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some people prefer to go to the original source when one is available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people prefer to go to the original source when one is available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people prefer to go to the original source when one is available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428574</id>
	<title>Re:Dang Air Force cutbacks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard they were selling off the original stargate too...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard they were selling off the original stargate too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard they were selling off the original stargate too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427764</id>
	<title>But what about the Others? And Jacob? And Smokie?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh wait, wrong 1970s scientific research group.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait , wrong 1970s scientific research group .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait, wrong 1970s scientific research group.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688</id>
	<title>Bad idea.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>Great, how do they know that in the past 28 years The Thing hasn't
managed to figure out how to assimilate non-living matter and is now the
dome?  Just sitting there, waiting in the cold.<br>I say we take off and nuke
the entire site from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.<br> <br> <i>How's that
for tying two classics together?</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , how do they know that in the past 28 years The Thing has n't managed to figure out how to assimilate non-living matter and is now the dome ?
Just sitting there , waiting in the cold.I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure .
How 's that for tying two classics together ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, how do they know that in the past 28 years The Thing hasn't
managed to figure out how to assimilate non-living matter and is now the
dome?
Just sitting there, waiting in the cold.I say we take off and nuke
the entire site from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
How's that
for tying two classics together?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31437130</id>
	<title>offtopic?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1268321280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what happens when you let just anyone moderate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what happens when you let just anyone moderate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what happens when you let just anyone moderate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432734</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31434488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31437130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_1532203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428702
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430354
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432734
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31437130
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431958
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31434488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31430314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31432106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31431222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_1532203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31428096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_1532203.31427976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
