<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_08_1846259</id>
	<title>US Eases Internet Export Rules To Iran, Sudan, Cuba</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268036580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>coondoggie writes <i>"Looking to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/world/08export.html">facilitate what it calls free speech rights</a> in countries that don't look favorably at such liberties, the US government today said it would <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/58290">ease the regulations around exporting Internet-based applications</a> to Iran, Sudan and Cuba. Specifically, the Treasury Department <a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2010-05023\_PI.pdf">said it would add general licenses</a> (PDF) authorizing the exportation of free, personal, Internet-based communications services &ndash; such as instant messaging, chat and email, and social networking &ndash; to those three countries.  The amendments also allow the exportation of related software to Iran and Sudan, the department said in a release (the US Commerce Department controls software exports with Cuba). Until now all such exports would have broken federal laws."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>coondoggie writes " Looking to facilitate what it calls free speech rights in countries that do n't look favorably at such liberties , the US government today said it would ease the regulations around exporting Internet-based applications to Iran , Sudan and Cuba .
Specifically , the Treasury Department said it would add general licenses ( PDF ) authorizing the exportation of free , personal , Internet-based communications services    such as instant messaging , chat and email , and social networking    to those three countries .
The amendments also allow the exportation of related software to Iran and Sudan , the department said in a release ( the US Commerce Department controls software exports with Cuba ) .
Until now all such exports would have broken federal laws .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coondoggie writes "Looking to facilitate what it calls free speech rights in countries that don't look favorably at such liberties, the US government today said it would ease the regulations around exporting Internet-based applications to Iran, Sudan and Cuba.
Specifically, the Treasury Department said it would add general licenses (PDF) authorizing the exportation of free, personal, Internet-based communications services – such as instant messaging, chat and email, and social networking – to those three countries.
The amendments also allow the exportation of related software to Iran and Sudan, the department said in a release (the US Commerce Department controls software exports with Cuba).
Until now all such exports would have broken federal laws.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407156</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1268049480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... you say the US should copy China?</p><p>Would only be fair, if you ask me. They copied everything else from us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... you say the US should copy China ? Would only be fair , if you ask me .
They copied everything else from us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... you say the US should copy China?Would only be fair, if you ask me.
They copied everything else from us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407762</id>
	<title>Are Wiki's "exports"?</title>
	<author>sheetsda</author>
	<datestamp>1268052660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back around '04 I wrote some programming tutorials for a Wiki (gpwiki.org).  These included example source files.  About once a year I get an email from someone in Iran seeking clarifications or help.  Am(Was?) I (or the Wiki) running afoul of US export laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back around '04 I wrote some programming tutorials for a Wiki ( gpwiki.org ) .
These included example source files .
About once a year I get an email from someone in Iran seeking clarifications or help .
Am ( Was ? ) I ( or the Wiki ) running afoul of US export laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back around '04 I wrote some programming tutorials for a Wiki (gpwiki.org).
These included example source files.
About once a year I get an email from someone in Iran seeking clarifications or help.
Am(Was?) I (or the Wiki) running afoul of US export laws?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404788</id>
	<title>privacy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a good way to gather intel on the people using this technology in these "friendly" countries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a good way to gather intel on the people using this technology in these " friendly " countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a good way to gather intel on the people using this technology in these "friendly" countries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404840</id>
	<title>Re:Eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We have a strict policy of saying unkind things about any dictators who we didn't install personally(and a few who haven't been passing their performance reviews since we did)...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have a strict policy of saying unkind things about any dictators who we did n't install personally ( and a few who have n't been passing their performance reviews since we did ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have a strict policy of saying unkind things about any dictators who we didn't install personally(and a few who haven't been passing their performance reviews since we did)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408410</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1268056440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Send it/an ISO to me (in the UK) and I'll forward them for you. There will definitely be no problem with Cuba. North Korea is fine too, although their government might stop the import of the CD.<br>(It's &pound;1.38 to send an 80g packet to any of these countries.)</p><p>(The UK/EU does restrict what can be sent to Iran, but the only forbidden items are weapons or their components, or nuclear material. I see no problem whatsoever sending a music CD.)</p><p>I don't know about the USA, but here you can send anything anywhere without talking to anyone, so long as it fits in a post box on the street. You can either buy stamps ("&pound;1 stamp and a 38p stamp, please") or pay for and print a special label online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Send it/an ISO to me ( in the UK ) and I 'll forward them for you .
There will definitely be no problem with Cuba .
North Korea is fine too , although their government might stop the import of the CD .
( It 's   1.38 to send an 80g packet to any of these countries .
) ( The UK/EU does restrict what can be sent to Iran , but the only forbidden items are weapons or their components , or nuclear material .
I see no problem whatsoever sending a music CD .
) I do n't know about the USA , but here you can send anything anywhere without talking to anyone , so long as it fits in a post box on the street .
You can either buy stamps ( "   1 stamp and a 38p stamp , please " ) or pay for and print a special label online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Send it/an ISO to me (in the UK) and I'll forward them for you.
There will definitely be no problem with Cuba.
North Korea is fine too, although their government might stop the import of the CD.
(It's £1.38 to send an 80g packet to any of these countries.
)(The UK/EU does restrict what can be sent to Iran, but the only forbidden items are weapons or their components, or nuclear material.
I see no problem whatsoever sending a music CD.
)I don't know about the USA, but here you can send anything anywhere without talking to anyone, so long as it fits in a post box on the street.
You can either buy stamps ("£1 stamp and a 38p stamp, please") or pay for and print a special label online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405154</id>
	<title>free = gift (?)</title>
	<author>Comboman</author>
	<datestamp>1268042220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would think that if your CDs are free, it's a gift and not really an export.  I know many Cuban-Americans have been sending gifts to family in Cuba for years with no problems (at least, no problems on the US end).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think that if your CDs are free , it 's a gift and not really an export .
I know many Cuban-Americans have been sending gifts to family in Cuba for years with no problems ( at least , no problems on the US end ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think that if your CDs are free, it's a gift and not really an export.
I know many Cuban-Americans have been sending gifts to family in Cuba for years with no problems (at least, no problems on the US end).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</id>
	<title>Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>drumcat</author>
	<datestamp>1268041320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.  It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so.

Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech.  It's better than a war.  Their people are magnificent, intelligent, and just like us in many cases.  Hell, they even get all ideological, like Joel O'Steen and such.

Let's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans, and call off the war, k?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks , nothing could be better than trading with your enemies .
It has worked for millennia , and will continue to do so .
Trade Iran 's government into a needy , third-world leech .
It 's better than a war .
Their people are magnificent , intelligent , and just like us in many cases .
Hell , they even get all ideological , like Joel O'Steen and such .
Let 's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans , and call off the war , k ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.
It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so.
Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech.
It's better than a war.
Their people are magnificent, intelligent, and just like us in many cases.
Hell, they even get all ideological, like Joel O'Steen and such.
Let's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans, and call off the war, k?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407980</id>
	<title>Trade with Iran</title>
	<author>OrwellianLurker</author>
	<datestamp>1268053800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trading anything that can be helpful in making IEDs and WMDs to our enemies (the government of Iran for example) is foolish. Admittedly, they can get parts with other methods-- but that doesn't mean we can't make things more difficult for them or slow them down. Having a software embargo, on the other hand, is fucking ridiculous. What will that accomplish? Absolutely nothing. Politicians needs to study this series of intricate tubes before writings laws regulating them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trading anything that can be helpful in making IEDs and WMDs to our enemies ( the government of Iran for example ) is foolish .
Admittedly , they can get parts with other methods-- but that does n't mean we ca n't make things more difficult for them or slow them down .
Having a software embargo , on the other hand , is fucking ridiculous .
What will that accomplish ?
Absolutely nothing .
Politicians needs to study this series of intricate tubes before writings laws regulating them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trading anything that can be helpful in making IEDs and WMDs to our enemies (the government of Iran for example) is foolish.
Admittedly, they can get parts with other methods-- but that doesn't mean we can't make things more difficult for them or slow them down.
Having a software embargo, on the other hand, is fucking ridiculous.
What will that accomplish?
Absolutely nothing.
Politicians needs to study this series of intricate tubes before writings laws regulating them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405416</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech."</i></p><p>Looking at the direction of the flow of wealth, third-world nations are not the leeches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Trade Iran 's government into a needy , third-world leech .
" Looking at the direction of the flow of wealth , third-world nations are not the leeches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech.
"Looking at the direction of the flow of wealth, third-world nations are not the leeches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409946</id>
	<title>Just use a loophole</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1268070360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That brain-dead restriction was not a problem for RSA and others, they just opened an office in the Cayman Islands and it became encryption imports instead of exports.  Something like that had to be done or you could forget about secure international bank transactions.<br>The restrictions are stupid anyway.  We all have to pay a bit more for SuperMicro motherboards because they got find when someone sold servers with their boards to Iran and meanwhile Honeywell are building an oil refinery there which messes up some silly game that is trying to restrict Iran's access to fuel.  That sort of resource restricting diplomatic game didn't work a thousand years ago and it isn't going to work now, it just makes enemies among your own citizens that want to make an honest living.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That brain-dead restriction was not a problem for RSA and others , they just opened an office in the Cayman Islands and it became encryption imports instead of exports .
Something like that had to be done or you could forget about secure international bank transactions.The restrictions are stupid anyway .
We all have to pay a bit more for SuperMicro motherboards because they got find when someone sold servers with their boards to Iran and meanwhile Honeywell are building an oil refinery there which messes up some silly game that is trying to restrict Iran 's access to fuel .
That sort of resource restricting diplomatic game did n't work a thousand years ago and it is n't going to work now , it just makes enemies among your own citizens that want to make an honest living .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That brain-dead restriction was not a problem for RSA and others, they just opened an office in the Cayman Islands and it became encryption imports instead of exports.
Something like that had to be done or you could forget about secure international bank transactions.The restrictions are stupid anyway.
We all have to pay a bit more for SuperMicro motherboards because they got find when someone sold servers with their boards to Iran and meanwhile Honeywell are building an oil refinery there which messes up some silly game that is trying to restrict Iran's access to fuel.
That sort of resource restricting diplomatic game didn't work a thousand years ago and it isn't going to work now, it just makes enemies among your own citizens that want to make an honest living.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405892</id>
	<title>So I can give stuff to Cuba...</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1268045280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... But I still can't go there.  Well, at least not from the US.  But I might happen to know someone from the US who drove to Canada and then flew to Cuba from Canada (flying over the US to get there of course).  Clearly, this is what freedom is all about, right?  We have freedom to <b>not</b> travel freely!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... But I still ca n't go there .
Well , at least not from the US .
But I might happen to know someone from the US who drove to Canada and then flew to Cuba from Canada ( flying over the US to get there of course ) .
Clearly , this is what freedom is all about , right ?
We have freedom to not travel freely !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... But I still can't go there.
Well, at least not from the US.
But I might happen to know someone from the US who drove to Canada and then flew to Cuba from Canada (flying over the US to get there of course).
Clearly, this is what freedom is all about, right?
We have freedom to not travel freely!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407574</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>techno-vampire</author>
	<datestamp>1268051580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.</i> <p>
But it is a weapon: a weapon of Cultural Mass Destruction.  As long as young Iranians want to have it and the mullahs don't want them to, your music is a weapon pointed straight at the heart of the current regime.  If people in Iran want it, send it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like my music is some kind of weapon .
But it is a weapon : a weapon of Cultural Mass Destruction .
As long as young Iranians want to have it and the mullahs do n't want them to , your music is a weapon pointed straight at the heart of the current regime .
If people in Iran want it , send it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.
But it is a weapon: a weapon of Cultural Mass Destruction.
As long as young Iranians want to have it and the mullahs don't want them to, your music is a weapon pointed straight at the heart of the current regime.
If people in Iran want it, send it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405696</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1268044440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh, this way we get all their Engineers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh , this way we get all their Engineers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh, this way we get all their Engineers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408386</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268056320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies. It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so. Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech. It's better than a war</p></div><p> We are still doing that with the Germans and the French here in Europe. The free trade thing, it seems to be working, as we don't kill each other in millions. The only people who became leeches are the ones who have no possibility of enjoying the benefits of the free trade zone, however.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks , nothing could be better than trading with your enemies .
It has worked for millennia , and will continue to do so .
Trade Iran 's government into a needy , third-world leech .
It 's better than a war We are still doing that with the Germans and the French here in Europe .
The free trade thing , it seems to be working , as we do n't kill each other in millions .
The only people who became leeches are the ones who have no possibility of enjoying the benefits of the free trade zone , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.
It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so.
Trade Iran's government into a needy, third-world leech.
It's better than a war We are still doing that with the Germans and the French here in Europe.
The free trade thing, it seems to be working, as we don't kill each other in millions.
The only people who became leeches are the ones who have no possibility of enjoying the benefits of the free trade zone, however.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405830</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268045040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.<br></i><br>Woodie Guthrie had a guitar that had written on it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody\_Guthrie" title="wikipedia.org">This machine kills facists</a> [wikipedia.org] (larger photo <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/Woody\_Guthrie\_2.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">here</a> [wikimedia.org])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like my music is some kind of weapon.Woodie Guthrie had a guitar that had written on it This machine kills facists [ wikipedia.org ] ( larger photo here [ wikimedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.Woodie Guthrie had a guitar that had written on it This machine kills facists [wikipedia.org] (larger photo here [wikimedia.org])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405686</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>BZ</author>
	<datestamp>1268044440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so.</p><p>Worked in what sense?  Preventing wars?  Didn't really work that well for WWI or any of a whole bunch of other wars....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; It has worked for millennia , and will continue to do so.Worked in what sense ?
Preventing wars ?
Did n't really work that well for WWI or any of a whole bunch of other wars... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; It has worked for millennia, and will continue to do so.Worked in what sense?
Preventing wars?
Didn't really work that well for WWI or any of a whole bunch of other wars....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405068</id>
	<title>Huh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268041740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this is a result over the attention the issue got when SourceForge had to temporarily disable access to those countries earlier this year?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this is a result over the attention the issue got when SourceForge had to temporarily disable access to those countries earlier this year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this is a result over the attention the issue got when SourceForge had to temporarily disable access to those countries earlier this year?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405522</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering how hot every single Persian chick I've ever met is, I fully support the idea of peaceful, loving relations with Iran, as often as possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering how hot every single Persian chick I 've ever met is , I fully support the idea of peaceful , loving relations with Iran , as often as possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering how hot every single Persian chick I've ever met is, I fully support the idea of peaceful, loving relations with Iran, as often as possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405180</id>
	<title>what about windows millenium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268042280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US should also allow the export of Windows ME (and perhaps even VISTA) to these 'trade-embargoed' countries.<br>In fact they should be distributed on discs just like AOL used to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US should also allow the export of Windows ME ( and perhaps even VISTA ) to these 'trade-embargoed ' countries.In fact they should be distributed on discs just like AOL used to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US should also allow the export of Windows ME (and perhaps even VISTA) to these 'trade-embargoed' countries.In fact they should be distributed on discs just like AOL used to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406356</id>
	<title>Re:There's no one easier to invade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268046720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We could've sent Stinger-missiles, like that other country, but hey, what harm can a bunch of internet-enabled communication-devices do in guerilla-warfare?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We could 've sent Stinger-missiles , like that other country , but hey , what harm can a bunch of internet-enabled communication-devices do in guerilla-warfare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could've sent Stinger-missiles, like that other country, but hey, what harm can a bunch of internet-enabled communication-devices do in guerilla-warfare?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404990</id>
	<title>Re:The very definition of irony</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1268041440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You need a license to export ?</p></div><p>Do you think that's strange, or that every other country doesn't have similar laws?  If you have a company who manufactures things like weapons, aeronautics, or communications equipment do you want them selling that to national enemies?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You need a license to export ? Do you think that 's strange , or that every other country does n't have similar laws ?
If you have a company who manufactures things like weapons , aeronautics , or communications equipment do you want them selling that to national enemies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need a license to export ?Do you think that's strange, or that every other country doesn't have similar laws?
If you have a company who manufactures things like weapons, aeronautics, or communications equipment do you want them selling that to national enemies?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405148</id>
	<title>Export? Import?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268042160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always figured that the nature of making software available for download on a website based in the US means that if somebody from Cuba downloads it, they are essentially coming to the US and getting the software, then importing it back to Cuba themselves. It may be a subtle difference with software, but with physical objects, the difference between export and import is pretty obvious.

Yes, you can always look it as one person is exporting and the other is importing in any given transaction and pretend there is no difference, but take an example of selling a weapon to somebody. If I sell a weapon to somebody in the US and that is a legal transaction, but that person then takes the weapon back to a country that it is illegal to do so under US law, then that person is guilty of trying to import the weapon to a restricted country. Assume I had no knowledge they were going to do as such after the sale of course. If a person in Cuba orders a weapon from me and I ship it to them, I would be guilty of breaking an export law then, as I was the one pushing the weapon to them.

So I guess what I'm saying is that the nature of the internet and software downloads equates pretty much all downloads from webservers to the case of a person coming to the US, buying the software, then taking it back with them to Cuba. It never in the past equated to me shipping software to Cuba, so I don't think it was ever illegal (for me) in the past for Cubans to download my software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always figured that the nature of making software available for download on a website based in the US means that if somebody from Cuba downloads it , they are essentially coming to the US and getting the software , then importing it back to Cuba themselves .
It may be a subtle difference with software , but with physical objects , the difference between export and import is pretty obvious .
Yes , you can always look it as one person is exporting and the other is importing in any given transaction and pretend there is no difference , but take an example of selling a weapon to somebody .
If I sell a weapon to somebody in the US and that is a legal transaction , but that person then takes the weapon back to a country that it is illegal to do so under US law , then that person is guilty of trying to import the weapon to a restricted country .
Assume I had no knowledge they were going to do as such after the sale of course .
If a person in Cuba orders a weapon from me and I ship it to them , I would be guilty of breaking an export law then , as I was the one pushing the weapon to them .
So I guess what I 'm saying is that the nature of the internet and software downloads equates pretty much all downloads from webservers to the case of a person coming to the US , buying the software , then taking it back with them to Cuba .
It never in the past equated to me shipping software to Cuba , so I do n't think it was ever illegal ( for me ) in the past for Cubans to download my software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always figured that the nature of making software available for download on a website based in the US means that if somebody from Cuba downloads it, they are essentially coming to the US and getting the software, then importing it back to Cuba themselves.
It may be a subtle difference with software, but with physical objects, the difference between export and import is pretty obvious.
Yes, you can always look it as one person is exporting and the other is importing in any given transaction and pretend there is no difference, but take an example of selling a weapon to somebody.
If I sell a weapon to somebody in the US and that is a legal transaction, but that person then takes the weapon back to a country that it is illegal to do so under US law, then that person is guilty of trying to import the weapon to a restricted country.
Assume I had no knowledge they were going to do as such after the sale of course.
If a person in Cuba orders a weapon from me and I ship it to them, I would be guilty of breaking an export law then, as I was the one pushing the weapon to them.
So I guess what I'm saying is that the nature of the internet and software downloads equates pretty much all downloads from webservers to the case of a person coming to the US, buying the software, then taking it back with them to Cuba.
It never in the past equated to me shipping software to Cuba, so I don't think it was ever illegal (for me) in the past for Cubans to download my software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405338</id>
	<title>What about encryption?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is nice, guys, but when are we going to get rid of the brain-dead(*) restrictions on encryption software, already?  As governments and ISPs all over the world have been demonstrating over the past few years, increasing computer power means it is steadily becoming easier to spy on and censor Internet users.  To enable truly free communication in the face of a repressive government requires people to defend themselves, through anonymity software such as Tor, Freenet, and I2P, not to mention strong web and email encryption.  If the US wants to encourage freedom of speech, it should be promoting the distribution of these technologies, not outlawing their export.</p><p>Well, we can hope.  This seems to be a small step in the right direction.</p><p>(*) Yes, brain-dead; you'd have to be an idiot to think these restrictions do anything to keep encryption software out of terrorists' hands.  All they accomplish is to make it more difficult for ordinary citizens of, say, Iran, to protect themselves from their government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nice , guys , but when are we going to get rid of the brain-dead ( * ) restrictions on encryption software , already ?
As governments and ISPs all over the world have been demonstrating over the past few years , increasing computer power means it is steadily becoming easier to spy on and censor Internet users .
To enable truly free communication in the face of a repressive government requires people to defend themselves , through anonymity software such as Tor , Freenet , and I2P , not to mention strong web and email encryption .
If the US wants to encourage freedom of speech , it should be promoting the distribution of these technologies , not outlawing their export.Well , we can hope .
This seems to be a small step in the right direction .
( * ) Yes , brain-dead ; you 'd have to be an idiot to think these restrictions do anything to keep encryption software out of terrorists ' hands .
All they accomplish is to make it more difficult for ordinary citizens of , say , Iran , to protect themselves from their government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nice, guys, but when are we going to get rid of the brain-dead(*) restrictions on encryption software, already?
As governments and ISPs all over the world have been demonstrating over the past few years, increasing computer power means it is steadily becoming easier to spy on and censor Internet users.
To enable truly free communication in the face of a repressive government requires people to defend themselves, through anonymity software such as Tor, Freenet, and I2P, not to mention strong web and email encryption.
If the US wants to encourage freedom of speech, it should be promoting the distribution of these technologies, not outlawing their export.Well, we can hope.
This seems to be a small step in the right direction.
(*) Yes, brain-dead; you'd have to be an idiot to think these restrictions do anything to keep encryption software out of terrorists' hands.
All they accomplish is to make it more difficult for ordinary citizens of, say, Iran, to protect themselves from their government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405104</id>
	<title>took you long enough fools ...</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1268041980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>had you realized to do that sooner, like maybe 10 years ago, a lot might have changed in those countries by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>had you realized to do that sooner , like maybe 10 years ago , a lot might have changed in those countries by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>had you realized to do that sooner, like maybe 10 years ago, a lot might have changed in those countries by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405428</id>
	<title>Re:There's no one easier to invade</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1268043360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell you what, I wish I had cable news at home. I can't wait to see Cheney's head explode on Faux News over this deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell you what , I wish I had cable news at home .
I ca n't wait to see Cheney 's head explode on Faux News over this deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell you what, I wish I had cable news at home.
I can't wait to see Cheney's head explode on Faux News over this deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405272</id>
	<title>One word:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268042700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All thanks to the government spies at</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Google</a> [google.com].</p><p>Yours In Perm,<br>Kilgore T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All thanks to the government spies atGoogle [ google.com ] .Yours In Perm,Kilgore T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All thanks to the government spies atGoogle [google.com].Yours In Perm,Kilgore T.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405880</id>
	<title>Re:Eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268045220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US isn't a perfect country. But when <b>our</b> presidential election results were disputed (Bush vs Gore) no one got beaten, killed, arrested, or severely harassed by the authorities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US is n't a perfect country .
But when our presidential election results were disputed ( Bush vs Gore ) no one got beaten , killed , arrested , or severely harassed by the authorities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US isn't a perfect country.
But when our presidential election results were disputed (Bush vs Gore) no one got beaten, killed, arrested, or severely harassed by the authorities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405462</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cd's can be hurled in a frisbee-like manner towards adversaries, and decapitate them.</p><p>So, you're in big trouble.</p><p>Whats wrong with you anyway? Do you not like America?</p><p>cheers,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cd 's can be hurled in a frisbee-like manner towards adversaries , and decapitate them.So , you 're in big trouble.Whats wrong with you anyway ?
Do you not like America ? cheers,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cd's can be hurled in a frisbee-like manner towards adversaries, and decapitate them.So, you're in big trouble.Whats wrong with you anyway?
Do you not like America?cheers,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31410356</id>
	<title>Re:privacy?</title>
	<author>ndogg</author>
	<datestamp>1268074380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, yes, privacy for people that don't have any within the borders of their own government.  While I don't trust our government that much, I trust it more than Iran, Sudan, or Cuba, and I think that if we know more about what it happening within their borders we might possibly be able to help them out in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , yes , privacy for people that do n't have any within the borders of their own government .
While I do n't trust our government that much , I trust it more than Iran , Sudan , or Cuba , and I think that if we know more about what it happening within their borders we might possibly be able to help them out in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, yes, privacy for people that don't have any within the borders of their own government.
While I don't trust our government that much, I trust it more than Iran, Sudan, or Cuba, and I think that if we know more about what it happening within their borders we might possibly be able to help them out in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406466</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1268047080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans</p></div><p>
If I am giving up my Levi's I want some exotic Persian women in return. They can keep their damned hookahs. =P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans If I am giving up my Levi 's I want some exotic Persian women in return .
They can keep their damned hookahs .
= P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's trade some curry and hookahs for blue jeans
If I am giving up my Levi's I want some exotic Persian women in return.
They can keep their damned hookahs.
=P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407286</id>
	<title>Re:Eh?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1268050140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, yeah, but still, when the dust settles, the result is the same: Its the guy that "was wanted to win".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yeah , but still , when the dust settles , the result is the same : Its the guy that " was wanted to win " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yeah, but still, when the dust settles, the result is the same: Its the guy that "was wanted to win".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409334</id>
	<title>Re:Its not like my music is some kind of weapon..</title>
	<author>Corxeaus</author>
	<datestamp>1268063940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if it puts everyone to sleep..That could be a kind of weapon, couldn't it? LOL at myself again..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if it puts everyone to sleep..That could be a kind of weapon , could n't it ?
LOL at myself again. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if it puts everyone to sleep..That could be a kind of weapon, couldn't it?
LOL at myself again..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405494</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing better than trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.</p></div><p>Enemies? What are you talking about comrade? Aren't we in the US moving towards a global government-run commune filled with happy rainbows where people don't hate or kill each other anymore? Free electronic trade with communist and countries with repressive governments are just the first step in that process. Right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks , nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.Enemies ?
What are you talking about comrade ?
Are n't we in the US moving towards a global government-run commune filled with happy rainbows where people do n't hate or kill each other anymore ?
Free electronic trade with communist and countries with repressive governments are just the first step in that process .
Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks, nothing could be better than trading with your enemies.Enemies?
What are you talking about comrade?
Aren't we in the US moving towards a global government-run commune filled with happy rainbows where people don't hate or kill each other anymore?
Free electronic trade with communist and countries with repressive governments are just the first step in that process.
Right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</id>
	<title>What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For several years now I've been giving away <a href="http://www.geometricvisions.com/music/free-compact-disc/" title="geometricvisions.com">free copies of my piano CD</a> [geometricvisions.com].  I have received several requests from residents of Iran, and I would like very much to send them, but I haven't wanted to even try to figure out how to get approval from the Bureau of Export Administration.<p>

It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.</p><p>

You'd think that following the rules would just be a matter of looking up which countries are embargoed, but it's not that simple.  In many cases it's not the country that's embargoed, it's specific individuals or organizations - in the case of Iran, it's the Revolutionary Guard, among others.</p><p>

I'm pretty sure there's a procedure by which I could get a license, and I would be happy to go to all the trouble and expense that would be required.  What I'm not looking forward to though is if and when I do get the required licenses, having to explain to the clerk at my post office that I have the permission of the Feral Gummint to mail my music to Persia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For several years now I 've been giving away free copies of my piano CD [ geometricvisions.com ] .
I have received several requests from residents of Iran , and I would like very much to send them , but I have n't wanted to even try to figure out how to get approval from the Bureau of Export Administration .
It 's not like my music is some kind of weapon .
You 'd think that following the rules would just be a matter of looking up which countries are embargoed , but it 's not that simple .
In many cases it 's not the country that 's embargoed , it 's specific individuals or organizations - in the case of Iran , it 's the Revolutionary Guard , among others .
I 'm pretty sure there 's a procedure by which I could get a license , and I would be happy to go to all the trouble and expense that would be required .
What I 'm not looking forward to though is if and when I do get the required licenses , having to explain to the clerk at my post office that I have the permission of the Feral Gummint to mail my music to Persia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For several years now I've been giving away free copies of my piano CD [geometricvisions.com].
I have received several requests from residents of Iran, and I would like very much to send them, but I haven't wanted to even try to figure out how to get approval from the Bureau of Export Administration.
It's not like my music is some kind of weapon.
You'd think that following the rules would just be a matter of looking up which countries are embargoed, but it's not that simple.
In many cases it's not the country that's embargoed, it's specific individuals or organizations - in the case of Iran, it's the Revolutionary Guard, among others.
I'm pretty sure there's a procedure by which I could get a license, and I would be happy to go to all the trouble and expense that would be required.
What I'm not looking forward to though is if and when I do get the required licenses, having to explain to the clerk at my post office that I have the permission of the Feral Gummint to mail my music to Persia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405284</id>
	<title>Well that settles it</title>
	<author>s122604</author>
	<datestamp>1268042820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The terrorists have won.

Way to send us down the path of dhimmitude O'bama!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The terrorists have won .
Way to send us down the path of dhimmitude O'bama !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terrorists have won.
Way to send us down the path of dhimmitude O'bama!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404802</id>
	<title>The very definition of irony</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268040540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You need a license to <i> export </i>?
<br> <br>
Better add "free-speech zones" to that list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You need a license to export ?
Better add " free-speech zones " to that list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need a license to  export ?
Better add "free-speech zones" to that list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406960</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia</title>
	<author>spaceyhackerlady</author>
	<datestamp>1268048760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia applications export <em>you</em>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia applications export you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia applications export you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406886</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268048400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two easy and proven solutions:</p><p>1. Use a proxy country. send it to a country that has no export limitations to Iran.<br>2. There are companies, that offer you, to open a PO box in the US, and ship anything sent there to you. At least in UAE people do that, and so can buy anything you can get as a US company. The company itself does not care for any export limitations or anything, I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two easy and proven solutions : 1 .
Use a proxy country .
send it to a country that has no export limitations to Iran.2 .
There are companies , that offer you , to open a PO box in the US , and ship anything sent there to you .
At least in UAE people do that , and so can buy anything you can get as a US company .
The company itself does not care for any export limitations or anything , I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two easy and proven solutions:1.
Use a proxy country.
send it to a country that has no export limitations to Iran.2.
There are companies, that offer you, to open a PO box in the US, and ship anything sent there to you.
At least in UAE people do that, and so can buy anything you can get as a US company.
The company itself does not care for any export limitations or anything, I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405532</id>
	<title>Dont forget Free Speech Zones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... so useful allowing people to express their Free Speech under GWB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... so useful allowing people to express their Free Speech under GWB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... so useful allowing people to express their Free Speech under GWB.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790</id>
	<title>Eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>US now cares about freedom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>US now cares about freedom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>US now cares about freedom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406188</id>
	<title>Re:The very definition of irony</title>
	<author>TheCarp</author>
	<datestamp>1268046180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually don't care about the nation states so called "national enemies".</p><p>Send them hydrogen bombs for all I care. Seriously. The whole security and fear meme is so overrated. We spent years preparing for a war that was plainly just never going to happen with the USSR, because the fucking idiots in charge on both sides were so afraid that the other one was planning to come after them.</p><p>The last thing we need is more excuses for these people to have pissing contests. Its ridiculous for them to think that any countries regulations on "exports" of this type matter one bit.</p><p>Every single one of these technologies has been in those countries for YEARS now. I would be shocked if people weren't using IM, as simply one example, in all three of those countries since the mid 90s.</p><p>The ridiculous thing is that these "nation state" jokers are taken seriously at all.</p><p>-Steve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually do n't care about the nation states so called " national enemies " .Send them hydrogen bombs for all I care .
Seriously. The whole security and fear meme is so overrated .
We spent years preparing for a war that was plainly just never going to happen with the USSR , because the fucking idiots in charge on both sides were so afraid that the other one was planning to come after them.The last thing we need is more excuses for these people to have pissing contests .
Its ridiculous for them to think that any countries regulations on " exports " of this type matter one bit.Every single one of these technologies has been in those countries for YEARS now .
I would be shocked if people were n't using IM , as simply one example , in all three of those countries since the mid 90s.The ridiculous thing is that these " nation state " jokers are taken seriously at all.-Steve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually don't care about the nation states so called "national enemies".Send them hydrogen bombs for all I care.
Seriously. The whole security and fear meme is so overrated.
We spent years preparing for a war that was plainly just never going to happen with the USSR, because the fucking idiots in charge on both sides were so afraid that the other one was planning to come after them.The last thing we need is more excuses for these people to have pissing contests.
Its ridiculous for them to think that any countries regulations on "exports" of this type matter one bit.Every single one of these technologies has been in those countries for YEARS now.
I would be shocked if people weren't using IM, as simply one example, in all three of those countries since the mid 90s.The ridiculous thing is that these "nation state" jokers are taken seriously at all.-Steve</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404974</id>
	<title>When will they learn?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268041320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>When will the government learn that about the only way people continue to be oppressed through governments is poverty, lack of information, and brainwashing. By allowing citizens of countries with oppressive governments to be opened to art, music, literature, communication and visitors from the "free" world, it will inspire citizens to rebel. Selfishness is a virtue, it helps keep a sane government if there is at least some communication with the outside world. If we would flood Cuba with American tourists, artists, musicians, and brought them computers, cell phones, etc. chances are the dictatorship would fall (mostly because Cuba is well within travel distance from the US, and while some other "free" countries allow travel/etc to Cuba like Canada, they lack the -very- close distance).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will the government learn that about the only way people continue to be oppressed through governments is poverty , lack of information , and brainwashing .
By allowing citizens of countries with oppressive governments to be opened to art , music , literature , communication and visitors from the " free " world , it will inspire citizens to rebel .
Selfishness is a virtue , it helps keep a sane government if there is at least some communication with the outside world .
If we would flood Cuba with American tourists , artists , musicians , and brought them computers , cell phones , etc .
chances are the dictatorship would fall ( mostly because Cuba is well within travel distance from the US , and while some other " free " countries allow travel/etc to Cuba like Canada , they lack the -very- close distance ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will the government learn that about the only way people continue to be oppressed through governments is poverty, lack of information, and brainwashing.
By allowing citizens of countries with oppressive governments to be opened to art, music, literature, communication and visitors from the "free" world, it will inspire citizens to rebel.
Selfishness is a virtue, it helps keep a sane government if there is at least some communication with the outside world.
If we would flood Cuba with American tourists, artists, musicians, and brought them computers, cell phones, etc.
chances are the dictatorship would fall (mostly because Cuba is well within travel distance from the US, and while some other "free" countries allow travel/etc to Cuba like Canada, they lack the -very- close distance).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405504</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1268043600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not make an ISO of your CD available on your website and then provide any country-specific filtering? If someone wants it, they can just download it and burn a copy for themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not make an ISO of your CD available on your website and then provide any country-specific filtering ?
If someone wants it , they can just download it and burn a copy for themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not make an ISO of your CD available on your website and then provide any country-specific filtering?
If someone wants it, they can just download it and burn a copy for themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31416430</id>
	<title>Google Code, SourceForge, Oracle/Sun/MySQL, IBM...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268160660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will Google Code, SourceForge, Oracle/Sun/MySQL, IBM and many other allow direct access to their content and downloads now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will Google Code , SourceForge , Oracle/Sun/MySQL , IBM and many other allow direct access to their content and downloads now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will Google Code, SourceForge, Oracle/Sun/MySQL, IBM and many other allow direct access to their content and downloads now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406042</id>
	<title>New markets for Microsoft...</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1268045700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's about time that Iran, Sudan and Cuba learned the joys of Internet Explorer 6.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time that Iran , Sudan and Cuba learned the joys of Internet Explorer 6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time that Iran, Sudan and Cuba learned the joys of Internet Explorer 6.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31419292</id>
	<title>Re:What about instrumental piano CDs?</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1268129880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Completely off topic, I'd like to point out to other<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers that I've requested and received the Geometric Visions disc that the parent sends. It's solo piano and although it is not my type of music, I do play it every so often to change pace. I definitely recommend picking up a copy.</p><p>Thanks, Michael!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Completely off topic , I 'd like to point out to other /.ers that I 've requested and received the Geometric Visions disc that the parent sends .
It 's solo piano and although it is not my type of music , I do play it every so often to change pace .
I definitely recommend picking up a copy.Thanks , Michael !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Completely off topic, I'd like to point out to other /.ers that I've requested and received the Geometric Visions disc that the parent sends.
It's solo piano and although it is not my type of music, I do play it every so often to change pace.
I definitely recommend picking up a copy.Thanks, Michael!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842</id>
	<title>There's no one easier to invade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Than a country full of sedentary layabouts twittering to each other like chickadees<br>about the price of spice<br>and admiring their own portraits on facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Than a country full of sedentary layabouts twittering to each other like chickadeesabout the price of spiceand admiring their own portraits on facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Than a country full of sedentary layabouts twittering to each other like chickadeesabout the price of spiceand admiring their own portraits on facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31419292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31410356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1846259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31407574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31419292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31408410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31410356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31409946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31406356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31405428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1846259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1846259.31404974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
