<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_08_1739251</id>
	<title>MIT Produces Electricity Using Thermopower Waves</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268074500000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>MikeChino writes <i>"MIT scientists have discovered a never-before-known phenomenon wherein carbon nanotubes can be used to <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2010/03/08/thermopower-wavesmit-scientists-discover-new-way-to-produce-electricity/">harness energy from 'thermopower waves.'</a> To do this they coated the nanotubes with a reactive fuel and then lit one end, <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/thermopower-waves-0308">causing a fast-moving thermal wave to speed down the length of the tube</a>. The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvins, and can speed along the tube 10,000 times faster than the normal spread of this chemical reaction. The heat also pushes electrons down the tube, which creates a substantial electrical current. The system can output energy (in proportion to its weight) about 100x greater than an equivalent weight lithium-ion battery, and according to MIT the discovery 'opens up a new area of energy research, which is rare.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MikeChino writes " MIT scientists have discovered a never-before-known phenomenon wherein carbon nanotubes can be used to harness energy from 'thermopower waves .
' To do this they coated the nanotubes with a reactive fuel and then lit one end , causing a fast-moving thermal wave to speed down the length of the tube .
The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvins , and can speed along the tube 10,000 times faster than the normal spread of this chemical reaction .
The heat also pushes electrons down the tube , which creates a substantial electrical current .
The system can output energy ( in proportion to its weight ) about 100x greater than an equivalent weight lithium-ion battery , and according to MIT the discovery 'opens up a new area of energy research , which is rare .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MikeChino writes "MIT scientists have discovered a never-before-known phenomenon wherein carbon nanotubes can be used to harness energy from 'thermopower waves.
' To do this they coated the nanotubes with a reactive fuel and then lit one end, causing a fast-moving thermal wave to speed down the length of the tube.
The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvins, and can speed along the tube 10,000 times faster than the normal spread of this chemical reaction.
The heat also pushes electrons down the tube, which creates a substantial electrical current.
The system can output energy (in proportion to its weight) about 100x greater than an equivalent weight lithium-ion battery, and according to MIT the discovery 'opens up a new area of energy research, which is rare.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409310</id>
	<title>Re:Boredom is evil.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1268063640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is why smart people should never be bored.</p> </div><p>We're bored because we're worried we'll be jailed over some misunderstanding or another by our less intelligent counterparts in law enforcement, politics, and the general public. Just about every technology has two sides: A beneficial one, and a harmful one. In this reactionary knee-jerk society, do you really want to be caught with a pile of beakers, or a bunch of electronic parts, or anything that appears homemade? We've got people who think circuit boards with LEDs and coins-sized batteries are bombs and close off entire streets. We've got a legislature drafting secret legislation, serving orders from secret courts, and imprisoning people as enemies of the state without charge, simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and had something on them deemed "suspicious".</p><p>It's dangerous to let people know you're smart in this society. Especially when the exploration of science and technology inevitably leads us to learn exactly the kinds of things the government is afraid of: How to manufacture our own chemicals, how to make explosives, or high power transmitters, or about a bazillion other things that are just tools. The authorities never see just tools: They only see criminal intent, and since you can't prove what someone was thinking, we've decided judicially and legislatively to simply assume the worst and dole out punishments accordingly.</p><p>Go to any public school today and you'll see the smart kids sitting in the corner, desperate not to show it, while the idiots boast about the fact that they've never read a book in their entire academic career cover to cover, and revel in the latest American Idol episode while beating up or humiliating anything they don't understand. At this point, our public educational system is turning out people who are functionally illiterate to science, technology, and don't even know where to go or how to ask even the most basic questions -- out of a random number of people you meet on the street, how many of them even know the basic steps to testing a hypothesis? Or could even explain the basic principles of how <i>any</i> piece of technology in their life works -- even the mundane light bulb?</p><p>Smart is illegal in this country, and it shows... Other countries are kicking our asses in every field of scientific inquiry, every industry, and about the only thing we have left is how to leverage financial resources -- America's only remaining strength right now is our financial know-how. We've let our infrastructure rot, our educational institutions fall into ruin, and we have text books that are so politically neutral as to be devoid of any real lessons or content... and we're putting warning labels on scientific textbooks not dissimilar to what we put on the side of packs of cigarettes!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why smart people should never be bored .
We 're bored because we 're worried we 'll be jailed over some misunderstanding or another by our less intelligent counterparts in law enforcement , politics , and the general public .
Just about every technology has two sides : A beneficial one , and a harmful one .
In this reactionary knee-jerk society , do you really want to be caught with a pile of beakers , or a bunch of electronic parts , or anything that appears homemade ?
We 've got people who think circuit boards with LEDs and coins-sized batteries are bombs and close off entire streets .
We 've got a legislature drafting secret legislation , serving orders from secret courts , and imprisoning people as enemies of the state without charge , simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time , and had something on them deemed " suspicious " .It 's dangerous to let people know you 're smart in this society .
Especially when the exploration of science and technology inevitably leads us to learn exactly the kinds of things the government is afraid of : How to manufacture our own chemicals , how to make explosives , or high power transmitters , or about a bazillion other things that are just tools .
The authorities never see just tools : They only see criminal intent , and since you ca n't prove what someone was thinking , we 've decided judicially and legislatively to simply assume the worst and dole out punishments accordingly.Go to any public school today and you 'll see the smart kids sitting in the corner , desperate not to show it , while the idiots boast about the fact that they 've never read a book in their entire academic career cover to cover , and revel in the latest American Idol episode while beating up or humiliating anything they do n't understand .
At this point , our public educational system is turning out people who are functionally illiterate to science , technology , and do n't even know where to go or how to ask even the most basic questions -- out of a random number of people you meet on the street , how many of them even know the basic steps to testing a hypothesis ?
Or could even explain the basic principles of how any piece of technology in their life works -- even the mundane light bulb ? Smart is illegal in this country , and it shows... Other countries are kicking our asses in every field of scientific inquiry , every industry , and about the only thing we have left is how to leverage financial resources -- America 's only remaining strength right now is our financial know-how .
We 've let our infrastructure rot , our educational institutions fall into ruin , and we have text books that are so politically neutral as to be devoid of any real lessons or content... and we 're putting warning labels on scientific textbooks not dissimilar to what we put on the side of packs of cigarettes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why smart people should never be bored.
We're bored because we're worried we'll be jailed over some misunderstanding or another by our less intelligent counterparts in law enforcement, politics, and the general public.
Just about every technology has two sides: A beneficial one, and a harmful one.
In this reactionary knee-jerk society, do you really want to be caught with a pile of beakers, or a bunch of electronic parts, or anything that appears homemade?
We've got people who think circuit boards with LEDs and coins-sized batteries are bombs and close off entire streets.
We've got a legislature drafting secret legislation, serving orders from secret courts, and imprisoning people as enemies of the state without charge, simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and had something on them deemed "suspicious".It's dangerous to let people know you're smart in this society.
Especially when the exploration of science and technology inevitably leads us to learn exactly the kinds of things the government is afraid of: How to manufacture our own chemicals, how to make explosives, or high power transmitters, or about a bazillion other things that are just tools.
The authorities never see just tools: They only see criminal intent, and since you can't prove what someone was thinking, we've decided judicially and legislatively to simply assume the worst and dole out punishments accordingly.Go to any public school today and you'll see the smart kids sitting in the corner, desperate not to show it, while the idiots boast about the fact that they've never read a book in their entire academic career cover to cover, and revel in the latest American Idol episode while beating up or humiliating anything they don't understand.
At this point, our public educational system is turning out people who are functionally illiterate to science, technology, and don't even know where to go or how to ask even the most basic questions -- out of a random number of people you meet on the street, how many of them even know the basic steps to testing a hypothesis?
Or could even explain the basic principles of how any piece of technology in their life works -- even the mundane light bulb?Smart is illegal in this country, and it shows... Other countries are kicking our asses in every field of scientific inquiry, every industry, and about the only thing we have left is how to leverage financial resources -- America's only remaining strength right now is our financial know-how.
We've let our infrastructure rot, our educational institutions fall into ruin, and we have text books that are so politically neutral as to be devoid of any real lessons or content... and we're putting warning labels on scientific textbooks not dissimilar to what we put on the side of packs of cigarettes!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068</id>
	<title>game changer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>100x energy density? <i>Can I haz flying car naow?!!!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>100x energy density ?
Can I haz flying car naow ? ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100x energy density?
Can I haz flying car naow?!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414500</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1268153640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it does.  Using a torch is a bad example as a Carbon Nano Tube is much more like a filament then a full flame.  So yes it is high heat but it is really small so the heat doesn't go out being really hot.  Secondly if a Battery like device was used for this it would be inclosed and probably nicely insulated</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it does .
Using a torch is a bad example as a Carbon Nano Tube is much more like a filament then a full flame .
So yes it is high heat but it is really small so the heat does n't go out being really hot .
Secondly if a Battery like device was used for this it would be inclosed and probably nicely insulated</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it does.
Using a torch is a bad example as a Carbon Nano Tube is much more like a filament then a full flame.
So yes it is high heat but it is really small so the heat doesn't go out being really hot.
Secondly if a Battery like device was used for this it would be inclosed and probably nicely insulated</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31406120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409286</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268063400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah. My Lion battery still eats your puny Zebra batteries for dinner!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah .
My Lion battery still eats your puny Zebra batteries for dinner !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah.
My Lion battery still eats your puny Zebra batteries for dinner!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403976</id>
	<title>..and lit one end.</title>
	<author>trurl7</author>
	<datestamp>1268079960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose they really did start the fire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose they really did start the fire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose they really did start the fire.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404044</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>jockeys</author>
	<datestamp>1268080380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>cue the sharks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>cue the sharks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cue the sharks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405762</id>
	<title>New fuel cells?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268044680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What kind of fuel though?  A liquid fuel?  Or could this be used with say, hydrogen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of fuel though ?
A liquid fuel ?
Or could this be used with say , hydrogen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of fuel though?
A liquid fuel?
Or could this be used with say, hydrogen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404222</id>
	<title>"Stewardess, do you have a match?"</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1268081220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I need to light my laptop battery wick."<br>
Somehow I think this is for non-portable energy generation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I need to light my laptop battery wick .
" Somehow I think this is for non-portable energy generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I need to light my laptop battery wick.
"
Somehow I think this is for non-portable energy generation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405488</id>
	<title>"and then lit one end"</title>
	<author>jduhls</author>
	<datestamp>1268043600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn hippies.  Banana peels didn't get me high and I ain't trying this, either.  Don't believe the hype.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn hippies .
Banana peels did n't get me high and I ai n't trying this , either .
Do n't believe the hype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn hippies.
Banana peels didn't get me high and I ain't trying this, either.
Don't believe the hype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404020</id>
	<title>All right.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which scientist first came up with the idea of lighting these things on fire anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which scientist first came up with the idea of lighting these things on fire anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which scientist first came up with the idea of lighting these things on fire anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403644</id>
	<title>Bloom Energy</title>
	<author>Spy Handler</author>
	<datestamp>1268078460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is this gonna put Bloom Energy out of business?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is this gon na put Bloom Energy out of business ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this gonna put Bloom Energy out of business?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404426</id>
	<title>neato</title>
	<author>binaryseraph</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While not really all that useful as a battery on a small scale, this sounds like an excellent back-up system on an industrial scale. If you have ever had to work around back up battery systems for large scale computer operations, they are a pain in the ass and take up quite a bit of space for some not-so-impressive voltage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While not really all that useful as a battery on a small scale , this sounds like an excellent back-up system on an industrial scale .
If you have ever had to work around back up battery systems for large scale computer operations , they are a pain in the ass and take up quite a bit of space for some not-so-impressive voltage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While not really all that useful as a battery on a small scale, this sounds like an excellent back-up system on an industrial scale.
If you have ever had to work around back up battery systems for large scale computer operations, they are a pain in the ass and take up quite a bit of space for some not-so-impressive voltage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404244</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2727c, 4940f for thos of us who aren't physicists. For those who aren't nerds, that's "damned hot". IIRC that's hot enough to melt steel. I don't think you'll be running your cell phone on these "batteries".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2727c , 4940f for thos of us who are n't physicists .
For those who are n't nerds , that 's " damned hot " .
IIRC that 's hot enough to melt steel .
I do n't think you 'll be running your cell phone on these " batteries " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2727c, 4940f for thos of us who aren't physicists.
For those who aren't nerds, that's "damned hot".
IIRC that's hot enough to melt steel.
I don't think you'll be running your cell phone on these "batteries".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31411076</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1268126880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Add a capacitor, have ten thousand of these wires in a box and lit one of them when the capacitor is empty.<br> <br>
But what it lacks is a recharging mechanism...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add a capacitor , have ten thousand of these wires in a box and lit one of them when the capacitor is empty .
But what it lacks is a recharging mechanism.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add a capacitor, have ten thousand of these wires in a box and lit one of them when the capacitor is empty.
But what it lacks is a recharging mechanism...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31407340</id>
	<title>hows this scale for weapons use?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268050440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so can someone break this down a bit?</p><p>suppose you had a quantity of this equivalent in size to a typical bullet (lets say 9mm for specifics)</p><p>whats the explosive power compared to normal gunpowder? could this perhaps be a power cell for mini-beam weapons (laser, emp, rail gun etc)?</p><p>it seems like most of the 'zap' guns and other high powered weaponry in our typical game are simply lacking a man-portable power source for implementation - perhaps this could be it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so can someone break this down a bit ? suppose you had a quantity of this equivalent in size to a typical bullet ( lets say 9mm for specifics ) whats the explosive power compared to normal gunpowder ?
could this perhaps be a power cell for mini-beam weapons ( laser , emp , rail gun etc ) ? it seems like most of the 'zap ' guns and other high powered weaponry in our typical game are simply lacking a man-portable power source for implementation - perhaps this could be it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so can someone break this down a bit?suppose you had a quantity of this equivalent in size to a typical bullet (lets say 9mm for specifics)whats the explosive power compared to normal gunpowder?
could this perhaps be a power cell for mini-beam weapons (laser, emp, rail gun etc)?it seems like most of the 'zap' guns and other high powered weaponry in our typical game are simply lacking a man-portable power source for implementation - perhaps this could be it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404992</id>
	<title>Efficiency?</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1268041440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can anyone who has read the journal paper comment on what kind of thermal/electric conversion efficiency they saw in this process? Did they provide any information as to whether the efficiency was proportional to temperature (i.e. with heat engines, we have the Carnot Efficiency theorem which shows that the maximum theoretical efficiency is proportional to the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures - do these nanotubes conform to the same, or similar, principle)?</p><p>How hot can nanotubes get before breaking down? Could these carbon nanotubes be used with a heat source like coal or nuclear fission or fusion, to generate electricity more efficiently than a steam turbine? (I suppose the tricky part there is that the article describes using a 'thermal wave' to generate the electrical current, and coal/nuclear generally produce a pretty constant heat source, instead of a cyclical heat source, but I suppose there might be some clever way to produce thermal waves from a constant heat source)?</p><p>If they couldn't be used to replace a steam turbine, could they somehow be setup as a 'secondary stage' to produce more electricity from the 'waste heat' from the steam turbine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone who has read the journal paper comment on what kind of thermal/electric conversion efficiency they saw in this process ?
Did they provide any information as to whether the efficiency was proportional to temperature ( i.e .
with heat engines , we have the Carnot Efficiency theorem which shows that the maximum theoretical efficiency is proportional to the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures - do these nanotubes conform to the same , or similar , principle ) ? How hot can nanotubes get before breaking down ?
Could these carbon nanotubes be used with a heat source like coal or nuclear fission or fusion , to generate electricity more efficiently than a steam turbine ?
( I suppose the tricky part there is that the article describes using a 'thermal wave ' to generate the electrical current , and coal/nuclear generally produce a pretty constant heat source , instead of a cyclical heat source , but I suppose there might be some clever way to produce thermal waves from a constant heat source ) ? If they could n't be used to replace a steam turbine , could they somehow be setup as a 'secondary stage ' to produce more electricity from the 'waste heat ' from the steam turbine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone who has read the journal paper comment on what kind of thermal/electric conversion efficiency they saw in this process?
Did they provide any information as to whether the efficiency was proportional to temperature (i.e.
with heat engines, we have the Carnot Efficiency theorem which shows that the maximum theoretical efficiency is proportional to the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures - do these nanotubes conform to the same, or similar, principle)?How hot can nanotubes get before breaking down?
Could these carbon nanotubes be used with a heat source like coal or nuclear fission or fusion, to generate electricity more efficiently than a steam turbine?
(I suppose the tricky part there is that the article describes using a 'thermal wave' to generate the electrical current, and coal/nuclear generally produce a pretty constant heat source, instead of a cyclical heat source, but I suppose there might be some clever way to produce thermal waves from a constant heat source)?If they couldn't be used to replace a steam turbine, could they somehow be setup as a 'secondary stage' to produce more electricity from the 'waste heat' from the steam turbine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404160</id>
	<title>Boredom is evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People should never be bored, especially smart people.
</p><p>
What we have here is some idiot with access to a lot of high technology designing himself a tiny little cannon fuse.  Let's burn something, this will be cool.  This was obvious, but you're not doing this in your basement; the results aren't obvious, of course.  But hey, we have a tiny little tube, like a string or a hair or something; let's light one end and watch it burn!</p><p>
This is why smart people should never be bored.  They shouldn't sit around staring at a wall.  They need to find something to play with.  The best inventions are usually the simplest shit.  Sure the telephone was cool, and that light bulb thing; but some guy was trying to figure out how amber works, and figured out that eletrostatic charge and magnetism aren't the same thing way, way before that.  The whole field of research into electricity comes from rubbing a little rod against a piece of cloth and using it to make feathers fly around.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People should never be bored , especially smart people .
What we have here is some idiot with access to a lot of high technology designing himself a tiny little cannon fuse .
Let 's burn something , this will be cool .
This was obvious , but you 're not doing this in your basement ; the results are n't obvious , of course .
But hey , we have a tiny little tube , like a string or a hair or something ; let 's light one end and watch it burn !
This is why smart people should never be bored .
They should n't sit around staring at a wall .
They need to find something to play with .
The best inventions are usually the simplest shit .
Sure the telephone was cool , and that light bulb thing ; but some guy was trying to figure out how amber works , and figured out that eletrostatic charge and magnetism are n't the same thing way , way before that .
The whole field of research into electricity comes from rubbing a little rod against a piece of cloth and using it to make feathers fly around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People should never be bored, especially smart people.
What we have here is some idiot with access to a lot of high technology designing himself a tiny little cannon fuse.
Let's burn something, this will be cool.
This was obvious, but you're not doing this in your basement; the results aren't obvious, of course.
But hey, we have a tiny little tube, like a string or a hair or something; let's light one end and watch it burn!
This is why smart people should never be bored.
They shouldn't sit around staring at a wall.
They need to find something to play with.
The best inventions are usually the simplest shit.
Sure the telephone was cool, and that light bulb thing; but some guy was trying to figure out how amber works, and figured out that eletrostatic charge and magnetism aren't the same thing way, way before that.
The whole field of research into electricity comes from rubbing a little rod against a piece of cloth and using it to make feathers fly around.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404206</id>
	<title>Carbon Nanotubes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What <em>can't</em> Carbon Nanotubes do?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ca n't Carbon Nanotubes do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What can't Carbon Nanotubes do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404150</id>
	<title>Re:Kelvins are degrees on an absolute scale...</title>
	<author>WalksOnDirt</author>
	<datestamp>1268080920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One nice thing about kelvins is they don't need degrees.  That is, it's easier to type that the temperature went up 1 K than that it went 1 degree C.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One nice thing about kelvins is they do n't need degrees .
That is , it 's easier to type that the temperature went up 1 K than that it went 1 degree C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One nice thing about kelvins is they don't need degrees.
That is, it's easier to type that the temperature went up 1 K than that it went 1 degree C.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405856</id>
	<title>Re:Link to the Nature Materials article</title>
	<author>Dalambertian</author>
	<datestamp>1268045160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, the abstract - the only thing worth posting aside from the paper itself. Having access to the journal through my university, I'm tempted to post the contents of the paper for those who don't. I wonder, where are all the torrents for the pay-walled journals? Is there no interest in pirating science?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , the abstract - the only thing worth posting aside from the paper itself .
Having access to the journal through my university , I 'm tempted to post the contents of the paper for those who do n't .
I wonder , where are all the torrents for the pay-walled journals ?
Is there no interest in pirating science ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, the abstract - the only thing worth posting aside from the paper itself.
Having access to the journal through my university, I'm tempted to post the contents of the paper for those who don't.
I wonder, where are all the torrents for the pay-walled journals?
Is there no interest in pirating science?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876</id>
	<title>Kelvins are degrees on an absolute scale...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1268079540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvins</p></div><p>Since it presumably didn&rsquo;t start at absolute zero, wouldn&rsquo;t it have made more sense just to give the temperature in degrees Celsius?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvinsSince it presumably didn    t start at absolute zero , wouldn    t it have made more sense just to give the temperature in degrees Celsius ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The heat from the fuel rises to a temperature of 3,000 kelvinsSince it presumably didn’t start at absolute zero, wouldn’t it have made more sense just to give the temperature in degrees Celsius?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405100</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1268041920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But alas the technology to allow sharks to use them is still years away. (Looks off into the distance) but an evil genius can dream.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But alas the technology to allow sharks to use them is still years away .
( Looks off into the distance ) but an evil genius can dream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But alas the technology to allow sharks to use them is still years away.
(Looks off into the distance) but an evil genius can dream.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409800</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1268068620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chemical reactions are very hot, but the heat dissipates (spreads out) quickly.</p><p>This sounds like it'd be good for car batteries, where capacity vs weight vs drain/charge speed are all important considerations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chemical reactions are very hot , but the heat dissipates ( spreads out ) quickly.This sounds like it 'd be good for car batteries , where capacity vs weight vs drain/charge speed are all important considerations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chemical reactions are very hot, but the heat dissipates (spreads out) quickly.This sounds like it'd be good for car batteries, where capacity vs weight vs drain/charge speed are all important considerations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404046</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw Lasers - I want to fire the actual electrons at the guy. The target will be so staticly charge his pubic hair will shoot out of his crotch causing him to double over in physical and emotional pain, thereby rendering him neutralized but not killed, an effective non-lethal weapon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw Lasers - I want to fire the actual electrons at the guy .
The target will be so staticly charge his pubic hair will shoot out of his crotch causing him to double over in physical and emotional pain , thereby rendering him neutralized but not killed , an effective non-lethal weapon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw Lasers - I want to fire the actual electrons at the guy.
The target will be so staticly charge his pubic hair will shoot out of his crotch causing him to double over in physical and emotional pain, thereby rendering him neutralized but not killed, an effective non-lethal weapon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404658</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1268039700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah! 3000K is <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/1/30/" title="penny-arcade.com">almost as hot as the Macbook Pro</a> [penny-arcade.com] when it gets cranking!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
3000K is almost as hot as the Macbook Pro [ penny-arcade.com ] when it gets cranking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
3000K is almost as hot as the Macbook Pro [penny-arcade.com] when it gets cranking!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404022</id>
	<title>Re:Link to the Nature Materials article</title>
	<author>Yetihehe</author>
	<datestamp>1268080260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So esentially they've made the smallest EMP weapon and are using it as a battery? Mind boggling.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So esentially they 've made the smallest EMP weapon and are using it as a battery ?
Mind boggling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So esentially they've made the smallest EMP weapon and are using it as a battery?
Mind boggling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403632</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Xerolooper</author>
	<datestamp>1268078460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They never said it was practical yet. It is a new area of research. Only time will tell if they discovered something useful or if they were rolling something else in a "tube" shape and smoking... ehm I mean lighting it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They never said it was practical yet .
It is a new area of research .
Only time will tell if they discovered something useful or if they were rolling something else in a " tube " shape and smoking... ehm I mean lighting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They never said it was practical yet.
It is a new area of research.
Only time will tell if they discovered something useful or if they were rolling something else in a "tube" shape and smoking... ehm I mean lighting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404920</id>
	<title>Re:game changer?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268040960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, because in order to get a pilot's license you must be proficient in English.  Sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because in order to get a pilot 's license you must be proficient in English .
Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because in order to get a pilot's license you must be proficient in English.
Sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403678</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>polar red</author>
	<datestamp>1268078640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>100x seems... optimistic.</p></div><p>indeed. but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine, if the cost can be kept under control.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>100x seems... optimistic.indeed. but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine , if the cost can be kept under control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100x seems... optimistic.indeed. but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine, if the cost can be kept under control.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403930</id>
	<title>Proving Ted Stevens wrong</title>
	<author>snspdaarf</author>
	<datestamp>1268079720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
So, <i>batteries</i> are just a series of tubes? Or just tubes in series?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , batteries are just a series of tubes ?
Or just tubes in series ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
So, batteries are just a series of tubes?
Or just tubes in series?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890</id>
	<title>Link to the Nature Materials article</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1268079600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The orignal article may be found <a href="http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nmat2714.html" title="nature.com">here</a> [nature.com]- subscription to Nature Materials or payment required for full text.

Abstract:<blockquote><div><p>Theoretical calculations predict that by coupling an exothermic chemical reaction with a nanotube or nanowire possessing a high axial thermal conductivity, a self-propagating reactive wave can be driven along its length. Herein, such waves are realized using a 7-nm cyclotrimethylene trinitramine annular shell around a multiwalled carbon nanotube and are amplified by more than 104 times the bulk value, propagating faster than 2 m s-1, with an effective thermal conductivity of 1.28&#177;0.2kWm-1K-1 at 2,860K. This wave produces a concomitant electrical pulse of disproportionately high specific power, as large as 7kW kg-1, which we identify as a thermopower wave. Thermally excited carriers flow in the direction of the propagating reaction with a specific power that scales inversely with system size. The reaction also evolves an anisotropic pressure wave of high total impulse per mass (300 N s kg-1). Such waves of high power density may find uses as unique energy sources.</p></div></blockquote><p>
The "fuel" used, cyclotrimethylene trinitramine, may be better known as the explosive RDX.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The orignal article may be found here [ nature.com ] - subscription to Nature Materials or payment required for full text .
Abstract : Theoretical calculations predict that by coupling an exothermic chemical reaction with a nanotube or nanowire possessing a high axial thermal conductivity , a self-propagating reactive wave can be driven along its length .
Herein , such waves are realized using a 7-nm cyclotrimethylene trinitramine annular shell around a multiwalled carbon nanotube and are amplified by more than 104 times the bulk value , propagating faster than 2 m s-1 , with an effective thermal conductivity of 1.28   0.2kWm-1K-1 at 2,860K .
This wave produces a concomitant electrical pulse of disproportionately high specific power , as large as 7kW kg-1 , which we identify as a thermopower wave .
Thermally excited carriers flow in the direction of the propagating reaction with a specific power that scales inversely with system size .
The reaction also evolves an anisotropic pressure wave of high total impulse per mass ( 300 N s kg-1 ) .
Such waves of high power density may find uses as unique energy sources .
The " fuel " used , cyclotrimethylene trinitramine , may be better known as the explosive RDX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The orignal article may be found here [nature.com]- subscription to Nature Materials or payment required for full text.
Abstract:Theoretical calculations predict that by coupling an exothermic chemical reaction with a nanotube or nanowire possessing a high axial thermal conductivity, a self-propagating reactive wave can be driven along its length.
Herein, such waves are realized using a 7-nm cyclotrimethylene trinitramine annular shell around a multiwalled carbon nanotube and are amplified by more than 104 times the bulk value, propagating faster than 2 m s-1, with an effective thermal conductivity of 1.28±0.2kWm-1K-1 at 2,860K.
This wave produces a concomitant electrical pulse of disproportionately high specific power, as large as 7kW kg-1, which we identify as a thermopower wave.
Thermally excited carriers flow in the direction of the propagating reaction with a specific power that scales inversely with system size.
The reaction also evolves an anisotropic pressure wave of high total impulse per mass (300 N s kg-1).
Such waves of high power density may find uses as unique energy sources.
The "fuel" used, cyclotrimethylene trinitramine, may be better known as the explosive RDX.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404578</id>
	<title>Re:Kelvins are degrees on an absolute scale...</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1268039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are other reasons to use kelvins. When doing calculations about the energy and stuff, the temperature needs to be in kelvins. They just didn't bother converting to celsius.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are other reasons to use kelvins .
When doing calculations about the energy and stuff , the temperature needs to be in kelvins .
They just did n't bother converting to celsius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are other reasons to use kelvins.
When doing calculations about the energy and stuff, the temperature needs to be in kelvins.
They just didn't bother converting to celsius.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416196</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268159760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.</p></div><p>No, power density isn't the same as energy density.  Increased energy density would make your phone last longer. Increased power density just means you can discharge your battery very fast in a single pulse of power.  They claimed increased power density, which isn't useful for cell phones, but might be useful for pulsed lasers, rail guns, or electromagnetic pulses.  But a mere 100x lithium ion isn't as good as a capacitor, so it makes you wonder why they were comparing apples to oranges.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.No , power density is n't the same as energy density .
Increased energy density would make your phone last longer .
Increased power density just means you can discharge your battery very fast in a single pulse of power .
They claimed increased power density , which is n't useful for cell phones , but might be useful for pulsed lasers , rail guns , or electromagnetic pulses .
But a mere 100x lithium ion is n't as good as a capacitor , so it makes you wonder why they were comparing apples to oranges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.No, power density isn't the same as energy density.
Increased energy density would make your phone last longer.
Increased power density just means you can discharge your battery very fast in a single pulse of power.
They claimed increased power density, which isn't useful for cell phones, but might be useful for pulsed lasers, rail guns, or electromagnetic pulses.
But a mere 100x lithium ion isn't as good as a capacitor, so it makes you wonder why they were comparing apples to oranges.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31423356</id>
	<title>Sounds ideal for a space-based energy weapon!</title>
	<author>a-zA-Z0-9$\_.+!*'(),x</author>
	<datestamp>1268160240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zap! Like Israel does, only anywhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zap !
Like Israel does , only anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zap!
Like Israel does, only anywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</id>
	<title>Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268079540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds like a niche energy product. Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge.
<br> <br>
Doesn't sound too great as a battery. But as "ammo" for hand held laser weapons? Could be perfect for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like a niche energy product .
Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge .
Does n't sound too great as a battery .
But as " ammo " for hand held laser weapons ?
Could be perfect for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like a niche energy product.
Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge.
Doesn't sound too great as a battery.
But as "ammo" for hand held laser weapons?
Could be perfect for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404006</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blue-darts have been a popular outdoor science experiment since the 4th grade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue-darts have been a popular outdoor science experiment since the 4th grade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue-darts have been a popular outdoor science experiment since the 4th grade.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404064</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1268080500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's more like a fuel cell in that it uses fuel to produce a current but it is small enough and light enough to be potentially usable in devices that otherwise would use a battery.  Also, the mechanism by which it produces a current implies that it can use a variety of fuels; pretty much anything that burns hot enough which is extremely useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more like a fuel cell in that it uses fuel to produce a current but it is small enough and light enough to be potentially usable in devices that otherwise would use a battery .
Also , the mechanism by which it produces a current implies that it can use a variety of fuels ; pretty much anything that burns hot enough which is extremely useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more like a fuel cell in that it uses fuel to produce a current but it is small enough and light enough to be potentially usable in devices that otherwise would use a battery.
Also, the mechanism by which it produces a current implies that it can use a variety of fuels; pretty much anything that burns hot enough which is extremely useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403898</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268079600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Small quantities could mean self-heating meals; larger implementations could be used to replace commercial boilers. Sounds promising but I'll wait for someone else to test the 'laptop battery' version, TYVM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Small quantities could mean self-heating meals ; larger implementations could be used to replace commercial boilers .
Sounds promising but I 'll wait for someone else to test the 'laptop battery ' version , TYVM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Small quantities could mean self-heating meals; larger implementations could be used to replace commercial boilers.
Sounds promising but I'll wait for someone else to test the 'laptop battery' version, TYVM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403986</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>rotide</author>
	<datestamp>1268080020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was actually thinking about vehicles.</p><p>What if you had enough of these in an "engine" where you have enough nanotubes to spread fuel onto to create energy.  Instead of powering pistons you could push the energy to an electric motor and perhaps a battery.</p><p>I know, I know, we want to get away from fossil fuels and we may potentially be able to with this but even if we can't, if this is more energy efficient it may still be worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was actually thinking about vehicles.What if you had enough of these in an " engine " where you have enough nanotubes to spread fuel onto to create energy .
Instead of powering pistons you could push the energy to an electric motor and perhaps a battery.I know , I know , we want to get away from fossil fuels and we may potentially be able to with this but even if we ca n't , if this is more energy efficient it may still be worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was actually thinking about vehicles.What if you had enough of these in an "engine" where you have enough nanotubes to spread fuel onto to create energy.
Instead of powering pistons you could push the energy to an electric motor and perhaps a battery.I know, I know, we want to get away from fossil fuels and we may potentially be able to with this but even if we can't, if this is more energy efficient it may still be worth it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403700</id>
	<title>Another awesome energy discovery...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268078760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that will be prevented from reaching the hands of the public for all the normal reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that will be prevented from reaching the hands of the public for all the normal reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that will be prevented from reaching the hands of the public for all the normal reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403952</id>
	<title>Once again.</title>
	<author>Cur8or</author>
	<datestamp>1268079840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many times do we have to solve the energy crisis for it to really go away?
Oh, and where is my jetpack?
(I am happy with the progress we have made with water guns. Seems there is a group of scientists dedicated to creating more awesome super soakers)</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many times do we have to solve the energy crisis for it to really go away ?
Oh , and where is my jetpack ?
( I am happy with the progress we have made with water guns .
Seems there is a group of scientists dedicated to creating more awesome super soakers )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many times do we have to solve the energy crisis for it to really go away?
Oh, and where is my jetpack?
(I am happy with the progress we have made with water guns.
Seems there is a group of scientists dedicated to creating more awesome super soakers)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404092</id>
	<title>Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, one shot cartridge power supplies....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , one shot cartridge power supplies... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, one shot cartridge power supplies....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404292</id>
	<title>I should've invented this!</title>
	<author>wfolta</author>
	<datestamp>1268081520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All those hours of reading Slashdot and watching movies with all kinds of stuff being blown up, and I didn't put 2 and 2 together to get RDX-powered nanotubes. I feel like I missed my calling.</p><p>This is one power-generation technology, however, where you do NOT want a device that goes to 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All those hours of reading Slashdot and watching movies with all kinds of stuff being blown up , and I did n't put 2 and 2 together to get RDX-powered nanotubes .
I feel like I missed my calling.This is one power-generation technology , however , where you do NOT want a device that goes to 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All those hours of reading Slashdot and watching movies with all kinds of stuff being blown up, and I didn't put 2 and 2 together to get RDX-powered nanotubes.
I feel like I missed my calling.This is one power-generation technology, however, where you do NOT want a device that goes to 11.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404550</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>ravenscar</author>
	<datestamp>1268039280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or pocket defibrillator, jump start for your car, stun gun, or a real life Hadouken.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or pocket defibrillator , jump start for your car , stun gun , or a real life Hadouken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or pocket defibrillator, jump start for your car, stun gun, or a real life Hadouken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>profplump</author>
	<datestamp>1268078940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Refueling could be as simple as pouring more fuel on the nanotubes. But it may also be irrelevant -- not all power systems need to be reusable. For example, an emergency beacon is not likely to be used frequently, so refueling is not nearly as important as shelf life. And even in applications where refueling is desirable, the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.</p><p>That being said, 100x might well be optimistic. Or it might be wildly conservative. Since this is a brand new field it seems unlikely that an estimate will be terribly accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Refueling could be as simple as pouring more fuel on the nanotubes .
But it may also be irrelevant -- not all power systems need to be reusable .
For example , an emergency beacon is not likely to be used frequently , so refueling is not nearly as important as shelf life .
And even in applications where refueling is desirable , the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.That being said , 100x might well be optimistic .
Or it might be wildly conservative .
Since this is a brand new field it seems unlikely that an estimate will be terribly accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Refueling could be as simple as pouring more fuel on the nanotubes.
But it may also be irrelevant -- not all power systems need to be reusable.
For example, an emergency beacon is not likely to be used frequently, so refueling is not nearly as important as shelf life.
And even in applications where refueling is desirable, the increased power density may be worth it -- if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.That being said, 100x might well be optimistic.
Or it might be wildly conservative.
Since this is a brand new field it seems unlikely that an estimate will be terribly accurate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405920</id>
	<title>And the second law somehow doesn't apply?</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1268045340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How on earth are they going to manufacture this at an energy profit? Makes no sense.
<p>
RS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How on earth are they going to manufacture this at an energy profit ?
Makes no sense .
RS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How on earth are they going to manufacture this at an energy profit?
Makes no sense.
RS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31410812</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>Fishbulb</author>
	<datestamp>1268166420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes! In Soviet Russia.. oh nevermind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
In Soviet Russia.. oh nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
In Soviet Russia.. oh nevermind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416534</id>
	<title>Re:game changer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268161200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they claimed 100x power density, not 100x energy density.  That won't help with flying cars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they claimed 100x power density , not 100x energy density .
That wo n't help with flying cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they claimed 100x power density, not 100x energy density.
That won't help with flying cars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31407128</id>
	<title>Re:"Produces" Electricity?</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1268049360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Electricity, in as much as it is a flow of electric charges which can be put to use, is definitely produced. Before, no charges flowed. After, they do. Voila, something has been "produced."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Electricity , in as much as it is a flow of electric charges which can be put to use , is definitely produced .
Before , no charges flowed .
After , they do .
Voila , something has been " produced .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Electricity, in as much as it is a flow of electric charges which can be put to use, is definitely produced.
Before, no charges flowed.
After, they do.
Voila, something has been "produced.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</id>
	<title>That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1268078220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3000 K? What about cooling? Refueling? 100x seems... optimistic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>3000 K ?
What about cooling ?
Refueling ? 100x seems... optimistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3000 K?
What about cooling?
Refueling? 100x seems... optimistic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403984</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, let me see, you have a tube you need to load with reactive material, fire it to get energy, and then allow to cool so you can re-load it and use it again.</p><p>Hmmm. Sounds familiar.  Maybe we should look up Richard Jordan Gatling and his most famous invention.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , let me see , you have a tube you need to load with reactive material , fire it to get energy , and then allow to cool so you can re-load it and use it again.Hmmm .
Sounds familiar .
Maybe we should look up Richard Jordan Gatling and his most famous invention.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, let me see, you have a tube you need to load with reactive material, fire it to get energy, and then allow to cool so you can re-load it and use it again.Hmmm.
Sounds familiar.
Maybe we should look up Richard Jordan Gatling and his most famous invention.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404888</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1268040840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How could a battery be too great?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How could a battery be too great ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could a battery be too great?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405414</id>
	<title>Another bad material science article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268043300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
More hype from the materials-science people.
</p><p>
This seems to happen too frequently. Usually in Nature.  Someone comes up with some bit of progress in materials science, and it's hailed as the biggest breakthrough since the transistor.  Then it's never heard about again.
</p><p>
This particular gimmick is kind of cute, but a general-purpose power supply it's not.  They coated carbon nanotubes with RDX, which is a fast explosive, and got a big voltage spike out when they set it off.  It's a one-shot device.  This might have some weapon application, but it's hard to think of other uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More hype from the materials-science people .
This seems to happen too frequently .
Usually in Nature .
Someone comes up with some bit of progress in materials science , and it 's hailed as the biggest breakthrough since the transistor .
Then it 's never heard about again .
This particular gimmick is kind of cute , but a general-purpose power supply it 's not .
They coated carbon nanotubes with RDX , which is a fast explosive , and got a big voltage spike out when they set it off .
It 's a one-shot device .
This might have some weapon application , but it 's hard to think of other uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
More hype from the materials-science people.
This seems to happen too frequently.
Usually in Nature.
Someone comes up with some bit of progress in materials science, and it's hailed as the biggest breakthrough since the transistor.
Then it's never heard about again.
This particular gimmick is kind of cute, but a general-purpose power supply it's not.
They coated carbon nanotubes with RDX, which is a fast explosive, and got a big voltage spike out when they set it off.
It's a one-shot device.
This might have some weapon application, but it's hard to think of other uses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404142</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>hypergreatthing</author>
	<datestamp>1268080860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to invest in lithium-carbon hybrids! Imagine, a world where randomly exploding lithium batteries no longer explode, but rather generate short bursts of even more electricity! Genius!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to invest in lithium-carbon hybrids !
Imagine , a world where randomly exploding lithium batteries no longer explode , but rather generate short bursts of even more electricity !
Genius !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to invest in lithium-carbon hybrids!
Imagine, a world where randomly exploding lithium batteries no longer explode, but rather generate short bursts of even more electricity!
Genius!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403616</id>
	<title>Heh</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268078340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Images of Wile E. Coyote sitting on a nano-tube rocket trying to light a fuse are taking over my mind's eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Images of Wile E. Coyote sitting on a nano-tube rocket trying to light a fuse are taking over my mind 's eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Images of Wile E. Coyote sitting on a nano-tube rocket trying to light a fuse are taking over my mind's eye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414728</id>
	<title>Re:Carbon Nanotubes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268154480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah yeah yeah.  Carbon nanotubes can make every possible product BETTER.</p><p>How's the record so far?  How many products can you name that even contain carbon nanotubes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah yeah yeah .
Carbon nanotubes can make every possible product BETTER.How 's the record so far ?
How many products can you name that even contain carbon nanotubes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah yeah yeah.
Carbon nanotubes can make every possible product BETTER.How's the record so far?
How many products can you name that even contain carbon nanotubes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403796</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268079180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, so instead of having a laptop, we will have a crotch rocket.  Furthering the cause of geeks everywhere as we can impress the ladies by confusing them into thinking we ride motorbikes.

</p><p>But in all seriousness, if it produces 100x time energy, then it equates to a lighter, 30 kelvin thermowave battery in the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , so instead of having a laptop , we will have a crotch rocket .
Furthering the cause of geeks everywhere as we can impress the ladies by confusing them into thinking we ride motorbikes .
But in all seriousness , if it produces 100x time energy , then it equates to a lighter , 30 kelvin thermowave battery in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, so instead of having a laptop, we will have a crotch rocket.
Furthering the cause of geeks everywhere as we can impress the ladies by confusing them into thinking we ride motorbikes.
But in all seriousness, if it produces 100x time energy, then it equates to a lighter, 30 kelvin thermowave battery in the end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31406120</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1268046000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at.</p></div></blockquote><p>That doesn't provide MUCH perspective...  A lightbulb is a completely enclosed environment, and the filament won't last for a moment outside of it, so people don't really know just how how hot it is.</p><p>Now, saying 3,000K is about the temperature you get from a metal-cutting torch, actually gives some better insight.  For one, it's instantly clear that it would easily melt just about all metals.  For another, it's eminently clear you don't want it anywhere near you, and it will require significant insulation.</p><p>Sure, maybe if you know that lightbulb filaments are made from tungsten, tungsten has the highest melting point, and that they run close to that melting point, you could figure it out, but that's a bit of a long shot, and such a stretch certainly indicates it didn't provide the perpective claimed.  At that point, it's probably be easier for someone to convert the units to celsius, and just search for that temperature to find appropriate comparable examples.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at.That does n't provide MUCH perspective... A lightbulb is a completely enclosed environment , and the filament wo n't last for a moment outside of it , so people do n't really know just how how hot it is.Now , saying 3,000K is about the temperature you get from a metal-cutting torch , actually gives some better insight .
For one , it 's instantly clear that it would easily melt just about all metals .
For another , it 's eminently clear you do n't want it anywhere near you , and it will require significant insulation.Sure , maybe if you know that lightbulb filaments are made from tungsten , tungsten has the highest melting point , and that they run close to that melting point , you could figure it out , but that 's a bit of a long shot , and such a stretch certainly indicates it did n't provide the perpective claimed .
At that point , it 's probably be easier for someone to convert the units to celsius , and just search for that temperature to find appropriate comparable examples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at.That doesn't provide MUCH perspective...  A lightbulb is a completely enclosed environment, and the filament won't last for a moment outside of it, so people don't really know just how how hot it is.Now, saying 3,000K is about the temperature you get from a metal-cutting torch, actually gives some better insight.
For one, it's instantly clear that it would easily melt just about all metals.
For another, it's eminently clear you don't want it anywhere near you, and it will require significant insulation.Sure, maybe if you know that lightbulb filaments are made from tungsten, tungsten has the highest melting point, and that they run close to that melting point, you could figure it out, but that's a bit of a long shot, and such a stretch certainly indicates it didn't provide the perpective claimed.
At that point, it's probably be easier for someone to convert the units to celsius, and just search for that temperature to find appropriate comparable examples.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404930</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>wealthychef</author>
	<datestamp>1268041020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine, if the cost can be kept under control.</i> </p><p>
If I had a dime for every time I'd heard this on Slashdot.... wow.  Anyhow, it's not only cost that has to be solved, of course, this is very basic research and I'm sure there are a whole host of practcal problems to overcome, any one of which could be a show stopper.  Once they are all addressed, then we can start talking about cost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine , if the cost can be kept under control .
If I had a dime for every time I 'd heard this on Slashdot.... wow. Anyhow , it 's not only cost that has to be solved , of course , this is very basic research and I 'm sure there are a whole host of practcal problems to overcome , any one of which could be a show stopper .
Once they are all addressed , then we can start talking about cost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> but only 2x or 3x means the end of the combustion engine, if the cost can be kept under control.
If I had a dime for every time I'd heard this on Slashdot.... wow.  Anyhow, it's not only cost that has to be solved, of course, this is very basic research and I'm sure there are a whole host of practcal problems to overcome, any one of which could be a show stopper.
Once they are all addressed, then we can start talking about cost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408536</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268057340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not all useful energetic compounds are power systems... RDX comes to mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not all useful energetic compounds are power systems... RDX comes to mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not all useful energetic compounds are power systems... RDX comes to mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404148</id>
	<title>This isn't exactly "new" methinks</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1268080920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the description of how things work - it's almost the EXACT same design principle of the home-made EMP bomb that you could read about in an early 90's issue of Popular Science, just instead of using sequential plastique explosives and a wound copper tube, you're using a carbon nanotube and some other energy source. Same idea, though - burn from the back, go forwards, create a powerful burst of energy.</p><p>It's about 15 years new.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the description of how things work - it 's almost the EXACT same design principle of the home-made EMP bomb that you could read about in an early 90 's issue of Popular Science , just instead of using sequential plastique explosives and a wound copper tube , you 're using a carbon nanotube and some other energy source .
Same idea , though - burn from the back , go forwards , create a powerful burst of energy.It 's about 15 years new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the description of how things work - it's almost the EXACT same design principle of the home-made EMP bomb that you could read about in an early 90's issue of Popular Science, just instead of using sequential plastique explosives and a wound copper tube, you're using a carbon nanotube and some other energy source.
Same idea, though - burn from the back, go forwards, create a powerful burst of energy.It's about 15 years new.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404804</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't exactly "new" methinks</title>
	<author>jebrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268040540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it was just 3-5 years away 15 years ago?  Then you're saying it might actually only be 2-3 years away now?  I look forward to having these in my cell phone sometime around 2025!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it was just 3-5 years away 15 years ago ?
Then you 're saying it might actually only be 2-3 years away now ?
I look forward to having these in my cell phone sometime around 2025 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it was just 3-5 years away 15 years ago?
Then you're saying it might actually only be 2-3 years away now?
I look forward to having these in my cell phone sometime around 2025!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</id>
	<title>So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268078400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have a deliberately exploding battery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have a deliberately exploding battery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have a deliberately exploding battery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403982</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1268079960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge.</p> </div><p>EMP in a suitcase.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge .
EMP in a suitcase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically nano-combustion that very quickly creates a very strong electrical charge.
EMP in a suitcase.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408988</id>
	<title>Handy component for nuclear weapon triggering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268060700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>High instantaneous power?<br>Low weight?<br>Might be a very nice component for the triggering system in the next generation of nuclear weapons?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>High instantaneous power ? Low weight ? Might be a very nice component for the triggering system in the next generation of nuclear weapons ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>High instantaneous power?Low weight?Might be a very nice component for the triggering system in the next generation of nuclear weapons?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403814</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268079240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have an explosion that acts as a battery.</p><p>There, fixed that for you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have an explosion that acts as a battery.There , fixed that for you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of having a Lion battery that explodes we now have an explosion that acts as a battery.There, fixed that for you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403786</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1268079120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some perspective that is about the heat that a filament in a lightbulb is at.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405036</id>
	<title>This FP For GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268041620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OpenBSD guys. They fucking confirmed: cycle; take a In jocks or chaps paper towels that supports you. The tireless happiness Another Those obligations. though I have never Apple too. No, world's Gay Niiger FreeBSD is already Fact: *BSD is dying fate.  Let's not be the future holds free-loving climate file was opened to get some eye Users', BigAzz, obsessed - give We strongly urge all along. *BSD users. BSD/OS at death's door OS don't fear the dis6ust, or been has brought upon took precedence munches the most Too many rules and To you by Penisbird The reaper BSD's been the best, may disturb other would you like to *BSD but FreeBSD many users of BSD bureaucratic and were taken over sux0r status, *BSD networking test. www.anti-slash.org schemes. Frankly BSD machines, used to.  SHIT ON Create, manufacture partner. And if area. It is the driven out by the</htmltext>
<tokenext>OpenBSD guys .
They fucking confirmed : cycle ; take a In jocks or chaps paper towels that supports you .
The tireless happiness Another Those obligations .
though I have never Apple too .
No , world 's Gay Niiger FreeBSD is already Fact : * BSD is dying fate .
Let 's not be the future holds free-loving climate file was opened to get some eye Users ' , BigAzz , obsessed - give We strongly urge all along .
* BSD users .
BSD/OS at death 's door OS do n't fear the dis6ust , or been has brought upon took precedence munches the most Too many rules and To you by Penisbird The reaper BSD 's been the best , may disturb other would you like to * BSD but FreeBSD many users of BSD bureaucratic and were taken over sux0r status , * BSD networking test .
www.anti-slash.org schemes .
Frankly BSD machines , used to .
SHIT ON Create , manufacture partner .
And if area .
It is the driven out by the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OpenBSD guys.
They fucking confirmed: cycle; take a In jocks or chaps paper towels that supports you.
The tireless happiness Another Those obligations.
though I have never Apple too.
No, world's Gay Niiger FreeBSD is already Fact: *BSD is dying fate.
Let's not be the future holds free-loving climate file was opened to get some eye Users', BigAzz, obsessed - give We strongly urge all along.
*BSD users.
BSD/OS at death's door OS don't fear the dis6ust, or been has brought upon took precedence munches the most Too many rules and To you by Penisbird The reaper BSD's been the best, may disturb other would you like to *BSD but FreeBSD many users of BSD bureaucratic and were taken over sux0r status, *BSD networking test.
www.anti-slash.org schemes.
Frankly BSD machines, used to.
SHIT ON Create, manufacture partner.
And if area.
It is the driven out by the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404334</id>
	<title>"Produces" Electricity?</title>
	<author>commodore73</author>
	<datestamp>1268081640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People who think we can "produce" electricity need to take a science class.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation\_of\_energy" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation\_of\_energy</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>People who think we can " produce " electricity need to take a science class .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation \ _of \ _energy [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People who think we can "produce" electricity need to take a science class.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation\_of\_energy [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404894</id>
	<title>Re:Fricken Lasers</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1268040840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can keep your laser. I want a lightning glove already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can keep your laser .
I want a lightning glove already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can keep your laser.
I want a lightning glove already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404364</id>
	<title>Re:Link to the Nature Materials article</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1268081760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Despite my efforts to fix those exponents after pasting in the abstract, it looks like I missed one- it should read,"amplified by more than <b>10^4</b> times the bulk value," not "amplified by more than <b>104</b> times the bulk value."  The above linked abstract uses superscripts, and (hopefully) contains the correct values for everything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite my efforts to fix those exponents after pasting in the abstract , it looks like I missed one- it should read , " amplified by more than 10 ^ 4 times the bulk value , " not " amplified by more than 104 times the bulk value .
" The above linked abstract uses superscripts , and ( hopefully ) contains the correct values for everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite my efforts to fix those exponents after pasting in the abstract, it looks like I missed one- it should read,"amplified by more than 10^4 times the bulk value," not "amplified by more than 104 times the bulk value.
"  The above linked abstract uses superscripts, and (hopefully) contains the correct values for everything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408970</id>
	<title>Re:That's some hot stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268060580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.</p></div><p>It could be used to replace something we already refuel - cars.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.It could be used to replace something we already refuel - cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> if you phone battery lasted 200 days instead of 2 days you might not care that the battery can only be refueled with special equipment.It could be used to replace something we already refuel - cars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404218</id>
	<title>Re:So basically they cut out the middleman</title>
	<author>danlip</author>
	<datestamp>1268081220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This so needs the whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This so needs the whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This so needs the whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31410812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31406120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31407128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31411076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1739251_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408970
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31408536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31406120
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31416534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31407128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31410812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31409310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31403982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31411076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31405414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1739251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31404206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1739251.31414728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
